WEBVTT - The Second Year Coach Re-Draft

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal hell that for me. I'm

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm forty.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 2>I've heard so many players say, well, I want to

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 2>be happy. You want to be happy for a day?

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Edo Steak is that woo woof?

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>And them and Tye welcome back to the soliburbo boys

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and girls when we are driven by Geiko. My name

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 1>is ty Hilda Brandt. That fine gentleman over there in

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>snowy and blustery and wintry but steer kind of cheerful. Yeah, Chicago, Illinois.

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Is Dan Rubinstein, sir? How are you?

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:38.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty good. I can't complain. Got a good night's

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 2>sleep last night. Hit that wordle hard first thing around

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 2>six am Central, nailed it in three tries. I know

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 2>everybody cares. But the thing is, I'm trying to feed

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 2>my brain, as are you. You're working out early. I

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 2>try to do some crosswords early on. I want to

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 2>be the best me because I'm about to evaluate with

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 2>you a bunch of gentlemen trying to be the best

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 2>versions of them elves for their teams and for their program.

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 2>So I'm trying to do my part. Also, I'm quite

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 2>hungry right now, and so if my blood sugar waxes

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 2>and wanes during the show.

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>That's why did we want to tell the story about

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:11.960
<v Speaker 1>me doing the fake wordle.

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 2>You were doing fake wordles. Yeah, you downloaded a copycat

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 2>app that was not at all wordle.

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I did not know that it wasn't an app. I

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't know it was a web app and not a

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>phone thing, and so we had a bit of confusion

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>this morning trying to figure out where we stood in

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.319
<v Speaker 1>the world universe, until you made it apparent to me

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that they needed to go to the weblink.

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a fun it's a fun, fun little exercise,

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 2>and I like that you can only do one a

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 2>day and everybody's doing the same word and comparing notes,

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 2>and you can compare like the green boxes or whatever.

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 2>If you don't know what wordle is or you don't

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 2>like wordle, I'm sorry, look it up or just move

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 2>on fast forward. But it's not an original game. I

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 2>was on the game show Lingo, which Wordle is a

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 2>direct ripoff of, And that's okay because I enjoyed Lingo

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 2>and I enjoy wordles, so I'm okay with it.

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, we will at some point have a wordle themed

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>episode if we can figure out exactly how to shoehorn

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that reference into the college football world. But in the meantime,

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>for the next forty five to sixty minutes or so,

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:15.519
<v Speaker 1>you'll be here with us talking all things second year coaches.

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into that momentarily, tell you exactly what we've

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>got in store before we go any further. If you

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>like the show, subscribe, slash, follow anywhere you can find

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. If you can give us a rating or review.

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>All that stuff really does help, especially now in the

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>doldrums of the offseason where people who are out there

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>they're college football fans. They don't know about us. Believe

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it or not, we've been around for a decade plus.

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>People still don't know about podcasting or the solid verbal

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>or they've got this college football itch that they need

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to scratch, and maybe we can help them do that.

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>So let your friends know, rate, review, all that stuff.

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:53.519
<v Speaker 1>Follow along on social media. We're on all the platforms.

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 1>We'd appreciate you following along if you haven't already. Reballers

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>dot Com is also something that we will continue to

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>water and feed throughout the course of this offseason. It's cold,

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>there's not as much sunlight in the college football ether,

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>but we're going to do our best to make that

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:13.919
<v Speaker 1>world grow. Just keep feeding the community with more content.

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 1>We've got the Weekly Brew and a episodes. I read

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the first hand account the testimonial that we received on

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the website after we did our last episode. We have

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun with those. We do them every Friday.

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>We've got a bunch of other bonus stuff that is planned,

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 1>So going out to verballers dot com and check out

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>our updated, certified and premium Verballer tiers if you are

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>ever so inclined to support the show. And last, but

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>not least, we have a new solid giveaway. It is

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a signed Reggie Bush mini helmet. If you are like

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Dan and I, if you worship at the altar of

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Reggie Bush. Even if you're not an SC fan, it

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>gives a damn. It's still Reggie Bush. He's a big

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>part of why we're all college football fans. You can

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>win a sign mini helmet. You just need to go

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>through a few quick and easy and free steps to

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>get your name in the hat and subsequently the hat

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>in the ring. We will draw that victor on February

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the fourteenth, fittingly on Valentine's Day.

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 2>At Valentine's You got plans yet, Ty, Come on, you're

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 2>a romantic.

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I am.

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 2>It's a different kind of year. I get that, I am, But.

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>No, not not yet. Okay, we're about a month out.

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:27.280
<v Speaker 1>That's a level of planning that I don't know.

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Never too soon.

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 1>If either you or I inherited from our parents.

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 2>We'll do a Valentine's Day show. We will at some point.

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Will That is not the Valentine's Day I have in store? O?

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you should just record the show and play it

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 2>for the solid wife Kate and sit silently on the couch,

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 2>listening to yourself and pristine digital audio.

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>You would look at that. Oh, I'm sure I love that.

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 1>What is today's show?

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 2>So today we are drafting humans who don't get drafted.

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 2>That's not we're doing a redraft. But it's not really

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 2>a redraft. It's sort of a new draft because we

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 2>are drafting second year head coaches. Now we've already seen

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 2>a couple fall by the wayside, at least a couple,

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 2>and then we've seen one leave for a new job.

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Kaitlin de Borr, Right, So that's Fresno State to Washington

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:23.799
<v Speaker 2>and of course, Jimmy Lake and Nick Rolovich no longer

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 2>employed by their the schools that hired them two years ago.

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 2>So these are coaches that were put into extraordinary circumstances

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 2>in that they took over in a very strange twenty

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty COVID year and had to make the best of

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 2>things with some unforeseen obstacles as a head coach than

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:45.919
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty one. Obviously much more normal. And we're going

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 2>to go back and forth. We have a bunch of

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 2>I think, bigger names to choose from. Oh yeah, and

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 2>we're going to select the coaches, but I think we

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 2>have to lay out some parameters of I mean, it's personal, right,

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 2>it's why you're selecting this coaches, these coaches. We're gonna

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 2>go back and forth. Of course, we are not forming

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 2>squadrons of coaches. We're not forming a team, but just

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.919
<v Speaker 2>who we value and why because of the job they've

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 2>done or the job that they appear to be doing

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 2>and can do at their current place. How I'm choosing

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 2>to look at this, and you can tell me if

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm wrong or whatever, but like I am looking at Okay,

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to find the most average school. By the way,

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm watching you take a water break because you can

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 2>feel me talking as much as I am. I don't know,

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 2>And maybe this is a point of contention, a point

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 2>of debate too, but like who is the most average

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 2>school in that the upside is pretty high, Like if

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.599
<v Speaker 2>everything breaks correctly, they could win double digit games, but

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 2>they've got a clunker of a year in them if

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 2>things break exceedingly poorly across the board, with coaches, with injuries,

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 2>with players not working out, with transfers, whatever. Like I

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 2>looked about at twenty twenty one, and I looked for, like, okay,

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 2>who are like the net like zero teams that forever

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:01.799
<v Speaker 2>point they put on the board they took off points

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 2>per drive, is how I looked at it. And so

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:06.359
<v Speaker 2>there were teams like cal and Virginia and Louisville. So

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 2>that's the kind of that's the gauge I'm going with, Like, Okay,

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 2>who would I want to hire at a place like

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 2>this to maximize not an elite place, but a place

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 2>with potential to succeed on an interesting level.

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>So this is all going to a place where you

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>take Jeff Hathley number one overall, I don't know.

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 2>This is where it's going you game this out.

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're all about the half, but who.

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Is that team? Who? What is that program? To you?

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 2>We're just like, look, they're gonna go six and six

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 2>or seven and five sometimes, but they get the right

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 2>QB in there, they get a hot shot, young coordinator,

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 2>they get their load up on transfers, and it all

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:46.559
<v Speaker 2>works out. They go nine to three, ten and two. Yeah,

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 2>because like Louisville has been to a New Year six game,

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Virginia has been to a New Year six game, cal

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 2>has not. But those were just some of the teams.

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 2>And like Florida State had an offense and defense ranked

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 2>in the sixties this year. But they themselves already have

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 2>one of our second year coaches that's draft eligible, so

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm not gonna consider them in that conversation. They've also

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 2>won a national championship. They're a step above in terms

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 2>of stealing in terms of ceiling. So that's what I'm

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 2>going with. Who can transform that kind of place into

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 2>a maximizing place? More often than not.

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I am approaching it from the standpoint of, uh,

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. I'm not too far removed from what you're describing, right,

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>You're you're taking a relative measure. You're looking at a coach,

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and you are saying, who is the right guy at

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the right time to get the most bang for the buck?

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm.

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm in a similar spot. I am

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more enticed by the wind totals though,

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of course, and we have a couple instances like that.

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they're gonna be like David Randa's gonna be

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>on your list, Sam Pittman's gonna be on your list.

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Mel Tucker is going to be on your draftable list.

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>These are guys who had pretty noticeable increases in win

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>totals going from twenty twenty to twenty twenty.

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 2>This is a very interesting crop of coaches.

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, and so I think that suys me a little

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>bit more. To be honest with you, I don't know

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>how I feel about Jeff Trailer. I know that Jeff

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Trailer did an awesome job with UTSA. I know he

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>won five more games in twenty twenty one than he

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>did in twenty twenty point yep. Is he the right

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>guy that i'd want to pick for my team? Well,

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>who's your team? I don't know.

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Well that that's why I'm asking an imaginary team.

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm working through it as we go here.

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I can tell you some of the like the

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 2>net like zero point zero ish teams that are like

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 2>either had amazing offenses and terrible defense or we're just

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 2>sort of average at everything, Like Miami was at point one.

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 2>They had the number forty seven offense and seventy five defense.

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 2>So if we're looking at Power five programs like Memphis

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 2>is right there negative point one, three Texas Tech with

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 2>a not so good defense, but the offense, even with

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 2>injuries at quarterback, was pretty decent most of the year.

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 2>West Virginia was right around there, Mississippi State at point two,

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Texas at point one, certainly Texas with more advantages, Oregon

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 2>State at point one, Auburn right there at sixty two

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 2>net rating net points per drive, So like, there are

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 2>interesting programs in there that you're like, Okay, like, how

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 2>do I fancy Jeff Trailer at Auburn for Miami? That

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 2>kind of thing I think is worth thinking about.

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, We've got a list here in front of us

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of all the coaches who were hired going into twenty twenty,

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty notably called year zero by a great number

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of folks in college football media for obvious reasons, twenty

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 1>twenty was the weird COVID year, not to say twenty

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>one wasn't, but twenty twenty was far more uncertain and

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>we had no idea what to expect. There were some

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>teams I'm looking at, like Michigan State played seven games,

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it went two and five. Rady Hope went four and

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 1>four for San Diego State. So it's not exactly comparing

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>apples to apples when you look from twenty to twenty one.

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>But we still have a pretty good idea based on

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>what we saw this past season. Who truly improved versus

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>who stayed stagged in in some cases, which schools took

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a step back. Yeah, why don't you make the first

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>pick and justify my god, this entire crop coaches? Yeah,

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>if you have your druthers, who are you taking first? Overall?

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Who's your guy for your team? It's a great question.

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a great question.

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 2>My parameters are what have we seen, How do I

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 2>feel in the moment, what do I believe they're ceiling

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 2>to be? And do I see them being able to

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 2>adapt and go with changes in college football and not

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 2>be stubborn and just like try to stay a step

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 2>ahead of the competition. Somebody that is That's what I

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 2>look for in a coach, right, Okay, guys are transferring.

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:57.079
<v Speaker 2>I'm getting in on the transfer action. This is where

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 2>offenses are going.

0:11:58.120 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I see.

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm right there. I'm not afraid to flip things around.

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 2>That's what I value. Yeah, my first overall pick I'm

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 2>looking at. I'm loading up my draft board right now

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 2>because of age, because of performance, because of sealing to me,

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 2>because of what I believe where recruiting will go. You

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 2>read me like a book. I'm going Dave Randa. Yeah,

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 2>well number one Dave Randa, because I think he's going

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 2>to continue to hire smart. I think he has been

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 2>around the sport enough that his connections are pretty deep.

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:34.839
<v Speaker 2>Having coached what Utah State, Wisconsin, LSU. Now Baylor has

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 2>the West Coast ties, made the change in offensive coordinator quickly,

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 2>has the defensive background within the state of Texas. I

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 2>think he is going to continue to do well. Now,

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 2>he might not compete with Texas, Oklahoma, Texas A, and

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 2>M on that level for recruits, but if we're dealing

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 2>with this like Central Anonymous School, I think he has

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 2>enough connections and he has enough of a vision that

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to go with a guy who went from

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 2>taking a team that was kind of bad to a

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 2>conference champion, a Power five conference champion in just a season.

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.319
<v Speaker 2>So I think there's there's proven stuff there. I think

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 2>there is upside with recruiting. I'm going Dave Randa to

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 2>spearhead my program. Of this list of coaches, we can

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:17.599
<v Speaker 2>go through the bank of available coaches as well. I

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 2>don't know if people know these off the top of

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 2>their head.

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 1>We could, we could, but quickly on the Randa point,

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 1>random went.

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 2>And feel free to pick on it, like you know,

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 2>nitpick my selection. No.

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, Randa went two to seven, yeah, in

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty last season. This past season twelve and two

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 1>won the Big twelve. That's a pretty good turnaround. That's

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 1>ten more games. You're not going to find a lot

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of coaches that can pull that one off. And I

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>think what you alluded to is really the important point

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>about Dave Randa. There are a lot of coaches that

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>are stuck in their ways that they come to a

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>place and they've got a system or an idea of

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a system, and they stick to it. That's not always

0:13:57.520 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a bad thing if it works. But what I think

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>we saw that of Dave Randa in year one is

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that he was always willing to crumple it up and

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:09.079
<v Speaker 1>throw it at the waste basket. Yeah right, Larry Fedora,

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>big name hired run the offense wasn't working when a

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>drastically different direction. Fedora tried to do a little bit

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of everything. Grimes said, Jeff Grimes, who came over from BYU,

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>he was much more simplistic in his philosophy, and he said,

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>let's do a couple things really well. And that's what

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>they did and it worked. David Randa caught hell for

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>being too conservative on offense in twenty twenty, especially as

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it relates to things like fourth downs. He went for

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it a lot, a lot more this season. He read

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the internet in the off season. I don't know, but

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>he took it to heart. He was a lot more concerned,

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot more aggressive, excuse me, when it came to

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>moments like that, And I think it paid dividends. So clearly,

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>if flexibility, if the willingness to kind of go a

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>different to look at the landscape, figure out what's working,

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>figure out what's not working, not have so much of

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>an ego about you that you're stuck in your ways.

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Aranda is the guy, man, He's got to be the guy.

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna be a name. And I hate to say

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>this for Baylor people, but it's true. They know it.

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>He's going to be a name that every big job

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that comes open, either in college, if he continues on

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>this trajectory, maybe even the NFL. You're gonna have to

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>get used to hearing Randa's name in the same manner

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that you heard Matt Ruhle's name, because in such a

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>short period of time, this turnaround story has been remarkable.

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>So I'm jealous you got Randa here and pick one.

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>There are other really good names that we can go through, but.

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 2>It was not easy for me. You said you like

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 2>had to be Randa. I don't think it has to

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 2>be Rando like I think. I mean, the other two

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 2>considerations I had for a picking number one overall would

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 2>have been Mel Tucker and Sam pitt Pittman, right, Yeah,

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 2>those are my other considerations. I think when you look

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 2>at turnarounds, when you look at vision for programs, when

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 2>you look at hiring, especially in the case of Sam Pittman,

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 2>and the Barry otom higher Like, I just, yeah, the

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 2>early returns on Arkansas and how competitive they are and

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 2>what that program is looking like moving forward, and sam

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 2>can be said from Mel Tucker for sure, especially on

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 2>the recruiting front. It was not an easy decision. It

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 2>came down to I suppose personal preference, and that's sort

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 2>of what I went with. But yeah, like Arkansas got

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 2>blown out a couple of times, I believe. Obviously Michigan

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 2>State did against Ohio State. I don't think that's a

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 2>defining characteristic of these guys. But when I went with

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 2>what Baylor looked like this year, I thought to myself,

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 2>you know what, I think that the uptick and recruiting

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 2>is going to keep happening and they're just going to

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 2>get better and better. We saw how we hit the

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 2>portal daved Randa in year one. It was Apuika who

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 2>came over from LSU to help anchor that defense up front.

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I just what with my gut there.

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So that brings it to my pick, right, Yes,

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I will go Mel Tucker. Okay, surprise, surprise, Yeah, you

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>have to eleven and two. It's well documented how well

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>this season went for Michigan State. That is an increase

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of nine wins from what he did in year zero,

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>which was two to five. Mel Tucker, I think also

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>showed that willingness to adapt. And we all know that

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the past defense was not what it should have been.

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 1>This year it was awful, really bad. They got to

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>get better. Still won eleven games. How did he do that?

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>First off, he went out and he hit the transfer

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:39.400
<v Speaker 1>portal really hard. I mean really hard. Keep in mind,

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy who took over very late in

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the cycle after they had the retirement, right, so he

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>comes in. He did the best he could in year one,

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>but we always knew it was going to be slow going.

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>With the benefit of a full offseason, he hit the

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 1>portal hard. He brought in fifteen guys. He also was

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>able to cobble together what I think is a pretty

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 1>good offense. Right the Kenneth Walker the third transfer, paid

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>huge dividends for him, and over the course of time

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Peyton Thornton came or Peyton Thornton excuse me came around.

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>They were able to find ways to make this offense

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:19.199
<v Speaker 1>really potent in clutch situations. I think back to that

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Michigan game, right, They needed to get an incredible effort

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>late in order to pull off that dub. They were

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>able to do it. What I like about this team

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is how they were able to play hard week in

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a week out. They really played hard week in a

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>week out. And you never expected a Michigan State team

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to take weeks off. They didn't. They didn't know. So

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I like that about him. I think it's meaningful that

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>mel Tucker was one of the names that came up

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>for some of the big openings came up, of course

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 1>for the LSU jobs. You know, you can go around

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>college football. Everybody was talking about Meltucker. So I also

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 1>credit Michigan State for locking him up. They read the

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 1>tea leaves. They knew that this could pretend actually be

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a very wild coaching carousel. They locked him up, gave

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>him a ton of money, made headlines nine and that

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>was it. Nine and a half million yep for mel Tucker.

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Big old booster came in, yep, nine and a half million.

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>What are we what are we talking about here? But

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 1>they had the foresight to do that, to lock him up. Yeah,

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 1>And I just feel like there's nowhere but for me.

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to improve on eleven wins. But I do

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>feel like there really truly is nowhere but up in

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>terms of stability for this program. It was in a

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 1>good place before, had maybe petered off a little bit

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>under the previous regime, but now with this boost, I

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to continue to get the most out

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of their talent. Peyton Thorne, I think in your in

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>year two for him as a starter coming up will

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>be much improved. I like the direction of this program,

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>So for me, mel Tucker's the answer here. He's a

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>good recruiter as well, Like there's just so much to

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>like about what this guy brings to the table. The

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>fact that he would move on as quickly as he

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>did frankly from Colorado a bummer for the Buffs, but

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>another credit to the administration at Michigan State that they

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>were able to see what he or what they thought

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 1>he brought to the table and snag him real quick.

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 1>So I like Meltucker a Lot's.

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So mel Tucker clearly a strong pick. Clearly has

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 2>done a very strong job at Michigan State. The nitpick

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 2>to me with mel Tucker, in my considerations, is leaves

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Colorado after a year, can recruit against him be like, look, guy,

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 2>when he sees a better situation, he will leave. That's

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 2>the problem. That's something right now, and that's not unique

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 2>to mel Tucker. There's a lot of guys on this

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 2>list who would do the same thing right if they

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 2>found themselves in a situation they didn't love for whatever reason,

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 2>and something new appeared, as the Michigan State job did.

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.640
<v Speaker 2>And all credit to Meltucker because of where that Michigan

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 2>State team was at the end of the marked into

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 2>by the way, because by the way, not Big Dave,

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 2>not yet. Anyway, Big Dave will get his name in

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 2>the hat for some of those other I don't know

0:20:58.400 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 2>why I'm calling him Big Dave.

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 1>But David Randa, David Randa, well, I know those conversations.

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 2>But he had an opportunity, has been he had.

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.439
<v Speaker 1>An opportunity here, and he chose to stay at Baylor.

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Correct, he had opportunities. Meltucker had opportunities this past year. Obviously,

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 2>the status of Michigan State football is in a higher

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 2>place than the status of Colorado football. I look a

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 2>little bit at Michigan State's scheduled this past year and

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:25.400
<v Speaker 2>the results when you look at the Nebraska game, when

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 2>you look at, obviously the loss to purdueing Ohio State,

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 2>when you look at the Indiana game that this wasn't

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 2>necessarily it's not smoking mirrors. And I think good coaches

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 2>win a lot of clunkers. I think you'd rather win

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 2>your clunkers than lose your clunkers. I just didn't see

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.679
<v Speaker 2>Michigan State in control. I think the record is a

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 2>little bit inflated, and that number that's associated with Meltucker

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:49.679
<v Speaker 2>and the Spartans right now is not necessarily representative of

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 2>how strong that program is. On I look, the past

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 2>defense was terrible. That said, this was the I looked

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:59.719
<v Speaker 2>it up. This is the number two most improved offensive

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 2>unit in the country, and it's the number one Power

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:04.880
<v Speaker 2>five one in terms of points per drive going from

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty to twenty twenty one. Kenneth Walker the explosive

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 2>plays downfield in the passing game. It was a joy

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 2>to watch. Yeah, I'm just not sold on Michigan State

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 2>as a whole. As a this is a new era.

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 2>We're back to being ten plus win Michigan State more

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 2>often than not just because of the results, just because

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 2>the lack of consistent strong wins. But I mean win

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 2>is a win. Is a win, is a win is

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.920
<v Speaker 2>a win in Michigan State won for sure, and I

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 2>think I am hopeful that further stability will be on

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 2>the way. This is still very much a work in

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 2>progress if we want to consider this truly year one

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 2>from El Tucker. Yeah, it took a while to work

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 2>some stuff out. We thought Anthony Russo was going to

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 2>be the quarterback, remember that. Yep. No, I mean the

0:22:55.920 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 2>cupboard was difficult with you know, the rocky lumbar already,

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.959
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Russo, Peyton Thorne like it. It was not a

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 2>team where you looked at them and said, this is

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 2>a team that's going to make big plays happen. And

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 2>this is like they have explosion within them. Maybe in

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 2>year three or something like that with a couple of

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:15.959
<v Speaker 2>recruiting cycles, but they have a quarterback of the future

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 2>coming in I think from southern California. Brandon Huffman talked

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 2>about him. Yeah, I think to look at Michigan State

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 2>right now is to look at a program that is

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 2>going to recruit potentially better than they ever have under

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Mel Tucker. I'm curious to see what those hires look

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 2>like here and in year out and I'm curious to see

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 2>now with an up Michigan, with Ohio State obviously going

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 2>to stay where they are, Penn State, I think will

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:42.359
<v Speaker 2>be in a really good place. It's the sort of

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 2>re establishing themselves as a team that can beat any

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 2>of these teams any given week, like where they were

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 2>in whatever it was twenty thirteen, fourteen, somewhere in there.

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I think effort is not to be undersold here. You're

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>right that the record of eleven wins is built a

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit on sand because the second order wins says

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that this is an eight and a half nine win team. Sure,

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, you called out a couple of

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the games. There's a Penn State game, there's a Nebraska game.

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>There's like three or four in.

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 2>There that Penn State was in snow. You know, I'm

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 2>willing to write off a little bit of that.

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, for sure. But point taken, and I think

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 1>it's valid. My hope for Meltucker is that he continues

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to build upon the success because it was a success

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>at eleven and two. Let me pivot. Then I will

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>go back to you if you can make the next

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>pick whatever.

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:34.959
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was just going to say if you're one

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 2>of those teams that I mentioned, right, Cal Virginia, Louisville, Miami.

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 2>You're thrilled with Meltucker as your head coach. You will

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 2>look at the moon with what mel Tucker would bring

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:46.160
<v Speaker 2>to your program.

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, So I'm looking. I see in the upper

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 1>left hand corner of the video, which you can watch

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>it for ballers dot Com, you've got snake. So is

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>this a Snake draft?

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 2>Am I up agains up to you? I don't know.

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 1>I think you should go again. I'll take Sam Pittman,

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>do it. Sam Pittman's the obvious one. Now Here's what's

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 1>not lost on me. Could you not make the same

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>points against Sam Pittman that you could melt Tucker, Because

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly if you more difficult schedule, I think on the

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Arkansas side playing in the SEC, but I think if

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>you look at their second order wins total in the

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:24.360
<v Speaker 1>same boat eight and a half nine win team, there

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>were games throughout the course of the year, the Mississippi

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:30.439
<v Speaker 1>State one comes to mind, wins in the box score,

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>but games where the team did not play particularly well.

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>What I like about Arkansas and what I like about

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.959
<v Speaker 1>Sam Pittman. Recall back to what he did in your

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:43.360
<v Speaker 1>money at Felipe Franks. Felipe Franks was very good for

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Sam Pittman and Arkansas did a good job before he

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>got hurt. This year, what he did with kJ Jefferson

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>is what I think I'm most excited about because as

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>we saw in the bowl game against Penn State, when

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>in the first there was a lot that was not

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 1>working for Arkansas and they were down a couple guys,

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I get it, but they relied on kJ Jefferson. They

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>were able to rely on kJ Jefferson, and that to

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:14.640
<v Speaker 1>me is a big deal moving forward if you've got

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:18.479
<v Speaker 1>that guy right. We talked about it coming into this season,

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>actually with Eli Drinkwitz, who I will not be drafting,

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 1>and we could talk about, but it is such a

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>different mindset when you feel like you've identified that quarterback

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that you can build around, versus still being in a

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>state of flux. Right. We thought that Connor Beasilak was

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be that guy for Eli Drinkwitz that you

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>know he's transferring now to Indiana. That culdarly did not

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>work out.

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:41.679
<v Speaker 2>To be clear, Sam Pittman didn't recruit kJ Jeffers.

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>He didn't recruit him but he he had the foresight

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to put him into a situation where he could succeed. Sure, yeah,

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 1>and succeed he did. It was an incredible season for

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 1>kJ Jefferson. He balled out big time. Yeah, big time.

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>This is a program that I just felt has taken

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>on to bleeps in pretty much every direction. They weren't

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>always the team that was going to go out there

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and beat your brains in, but they were able to utilize,

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>at least offensively, their talent at quarterback, their talent at

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 1>running back, the talent at wide receiver in the best

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>possible ways, and they were damn competitive in the SEC.

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>They won nine games. They went from three to seven

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:23.400
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty to nine and four this past year.

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can nitpick it if you want, but

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 1>to do that in the SEC, especially for where Arkansas was,

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 1>like even compared to Baylor, which you know, Baylor had

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>its moments, but even compared to Michigan State, Arkansas was

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>down and out. Man, he was down out taking that

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>job and to do what he's done in such a

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 1>short period of time is frankly maybe the best turnaround

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 1>story in all of college football.

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 2>I think the case for Sam Pittman as the best

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 2>of this class is wronger than mel Tucker's because the

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 2>degree of difficulty with which Arkansas operates playing in the

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 2>SEC West, the degree of difficulty with transfers and being

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 2>making Arkansas a destination. Not that Arkansas is a bad place,

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 2>but just because of recent Arkansas results, you have to question,

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 2>you like, what's going on here? As Bill c Likes mentioned,

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:25.959
<v Speaker 2>it's not always the coach, sometimes it's the school. So

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 2>you're like, Okay, what is going on in Fayetteville for

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Sam Pittman to come into a situation recognize what needed help.

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 2>I love when an offensive line coach gets a chance,

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 2>because at the very least, you know, okay, there's an

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 2>identification of talent up front, there's development of talent. You

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 2>know that there's going to be focused there. When a

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 2>team has two offensive line coaches, a head coach and

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 2>a position coach, and obviously you have Gas Nalys whatever,

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 2>But when they have those two offensive line coaches, you're

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 2>pretty sure that that's going to be a good looking

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 2>team up front. And I love the floor raising that

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 2>that gives you. Specifically to Arkansas. I mentioned the coordinator Hires.

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned how aggressively. They've hit the portal on both

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 2>sides of the ball. This past offseason we hat Drew

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Sanders from Alabama and then Jaden Hazelwood on the other

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 2>side of the ball, the receiver from Oklahoma. They've hit

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 2>the portal impressively hard. And there's something about the Sam

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Pittman experience right recruiting offensive line portal assistant hires that

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 2>I think, to me could translate more efficiently anywhere that

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 2>his force of personality, and the same thing be said

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 2>of Meltucker right when you have two defensive backs coaches,

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 2>whatever depends, but the force of personality with Sam Pittman,

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 2>the ability to look they gave Alabama kind of everything

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 2>they could handle for what over three quarters, three and

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 2>a half quarters. This is year two versus year whatever

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 2>it is thirteen for Nick Saban. So there is something

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 2>about Sam Pittman that wherever he would go, I think

0:29:56.840 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 2>that he would be fueling eight plus win teams. The

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 2>difference to me with mel Tucker, which I think is

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 2>more of a case for Sam Pittman as well, is

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 2>you look at how many ten plus win seasons Michigan

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 2>State has had in the past decade versus what Arkansas

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 2>has done in the last decade. Yeah, it's just more difficult.

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 2>They're starting for becoming, they're starting from a different point. Yeah,

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 2>he I mean, look, Michigan State was horrendous when mel

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Tucker got there, don't get me wrong, But in terms

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 2>of reputation, what Arkansas was dealing with with their low points,

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 2>which I guess was losing to Western Kentucky, I just, man,

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 2>it was so down in the dumps. So I don't know,

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 2>I give I give a lot of out of the

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 2>box credit to Arkansas for making the move that they

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 2>did and empowering Sam Pittman like they have. So that

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 2>was it was a tough back and forth with me

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 2>for Sam Pittman. I think I might have gone a

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Randa because of age that Sam Pittman, I think is

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:51.959
<v Speaker 2>considerably older than Dave Randa, so maybe that's a factor.

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 2>I just I love it. I love the pick hit

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 2>job well.

0:30:55.560 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>And another thing quickly on Pittman. We like to look

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 1>at improvements beyond the win total. Win total can sometimes

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>be deceiving. This is a program in Arkansas that took

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a thirty five spot jump in the overall SP plus rankings.

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>They finished the year twenty second. Overall, a pretty sizable

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>jump in both offense and defense. Now there's nuance to

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>those numbers. If you dig in, you can find spots.

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure where there were steps back, but by and large,

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it's tough to argue with nine wins in the SEC.

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>It's tough to argue with nine wins with a first

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>time starting quarterback in kJ Jefferson, just everything he's done

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 1>across the board and his force personality too. You know,

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 1>this is the kind of thing that I think for

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>sure both Sam Pittman and Meltucker have in common. You

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 1>hear a lot about mel Tucker, especially walks in a room.

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 1>He's got that gravitas, and there's a lot of that

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 1>going on with Sam Pittman as well. So I'm it's

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>hard to argue with any of the three guys that

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>we've thrown out there. Maybe the argument gets a little

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 1>bit more interesting now as we dive into your pick,

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>your fourth pick, because it seems to me like those

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>are the three obvious ones. The more we dig in,

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>now now we're getting into like Lane Kiffin territory. Right now,

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>we're getting into.

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Hafiege, Norvelle half Lates. Yeah, Solar Shiano.

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Shiano, Yeah, Mike Leach, I don't know where do you

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 1>want to go next? What's your next pick?

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Should also mention Arkansas, by the way, just because I

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 2>mentioned it with Michigan State top twenty and both most

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 2>improved offense and defense, so they were the number sixteen

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 2>most improved defense, number nineteen, most improved offense in terms

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 2>of points per drive taking away garbage time. I'm I'm

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 2>all aboard time. I'm on the lane train.

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>You're on the lane track?

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Is lane Kivin? Yeah? Yeah, Yeah, I'm on the lane

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 2>train because I'm a believer in the current version of

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Lane Kiffen, with recruiting, with offensive vision, with assistant hires,

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:59.959
<v Speaker 2>with on field ability with those assistant hires, with quarterback developed,

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 2>with system with identification of systems developing, Like he's run

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 2>a different stuff at different places, and you know, bringing

0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 2>in Levy, you know having I think it was FAU

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 2>That's where he was with Charlie Weist junior. Like he

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 2>has taken components of a bunch of different offenses spread

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 2>in West Coast and RPO. I think he's going any

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 2>school he goes to, we'll have a productive at the

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 2>very least quarterback. We'll have speed, We'll hit the portal hard.

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 2>He'll recruit well, and he's connected enough in the college

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 2>football world to make savvy hires. I mean, how many

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 2>games that all Miss win this year? They win ten games?

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 1>They went ten and three. That's up from five to five.

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 2>That's pretty good. Like, we can look at him cartoonishly,

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 2>but that cartoon wins a ton of games, right Like

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 2>we you can look back at his time at Tennessee

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 2>and the Raiders and USC and say, yeah, he's inconsistent.

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why he gets as much love as

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 2>he does. But as of late, he sort of went

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 2>back to square one with going to Alabama and going

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 2>to FAU and working his way back up and sort

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 2>of rediscovering what makes his name attractive in the coaching world.

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:17.439
<v Speaker 2>I look at the defensive improvement this year from Ole Miss.

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:22.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, I'm just like, there's a case that Lane

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Kiffin is actually the best proven coach on this list

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:28.880
<v Speaker 2>because of the amount of time that he has spent

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 2>as a head coach and major coordinator. That if you

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:34.360
<v Speaker 2>were to give a coach a year to build a

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 2>winning team, that Lane Kiffin might do the best job

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 2>of it. There's the wildcard element that I think goes

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:46.320
<v Speaker 2>against taking him first overall. But if you're just judging

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:53.759
<v Speaker 2>somebody based on proven best coach, like it might be Lane.

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 1>Lane Kiffin is only forty six years of age. Yeah,

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 1>he's been a head coach now five times MS if

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you count this gig with Old Miss. He's been in

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, he's been at Tennessee, he's been at USC. Like,

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy who's gotten around. This is a

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:13.759
<v Speaker 1>guy who clearly has a lot of coaching experience, and

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 1>he's still a pretty young dude. I believe in redemption arcs.

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe that a lot of the baggage that has

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:25.800
<v Speaker 1>been with Lane Kiffin throughout the years, hopefully he's the

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing that he's grown out of or can

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:30.240
<v Speaker 1>grow out of. I guess that would be the argument

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:32.359
<v Speaker 1>against him, right, that'd be the argument against him that, Yeah,

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 1>is this guy reliable? Because there have been moments where

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you know you got him and he wants to jump

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:41.359
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere Tennessee, Right, guy ends up going to USC. Can

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you trust him? Is he the kind of guy that

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to build your program around? Feels like a risk,

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Like these are real things that I think follow Lane

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Kiffin wherever he goes. That being said, you're right to

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 1>improve Old Missus defense, Like everyone's going to focus on

0:35:56.080 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Matt Carrall and he's probably gonna be a first round pick.

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>And the offense was very good. The defense was quietly

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:04.879
<v Speaker 1>the story for Old miss this year, quietly the story because.

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Couldn't stop the Ronaton. But they improved.

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 1>There's nuance. Right again, there's nuance. But the fact that

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:14.320
<v Speaker 1>they improved to the extent that they did and defensively

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 1>was much more of a force than they had been

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 1>in years past. That to me is kind of the

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 1>hallmark of a guy who's starting to figure it out.

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:24.719
<v Speaker 1>He's starting to figure it out. And now to the

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>recruiting point, and especially now with the transfer portal bringing

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 1>over Zach Evans right sure to be the starting running back.

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:37.799
<v Speaker 1>Who knows if they end up getting a guy like

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a Jackson Dart who could potentially be in play at

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Old Miss arch.

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Manning, they've hit They've hit the portal hard yep.

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Arch Manning another big name right like all world everything

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 1>quarterback recruit couldn't up in Oxford. His legacy, So like

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 1>there's just a lot going on there that if you're

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:58.440
<v Speaker 1>an old mis fan, you have to feel very optimistic

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 1>about what this programs under Lane baggage. Aside, the proof

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 1>is there. This is a team that got a lot better.

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Matt Carrall elevated his game, I think to a different dimension.

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:13.319
<v Speaker 1>He's probably gonna get picked in the first round. So

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 1>these are all recruiting bits that Lane's gonna use. He's

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 1>also fabulous on social media and like, Yeah, not to

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 1>say that either you or I enjoy living in that world,

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 1>but I think we both respect its value in the

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>modern age of college football, right, and the fact that

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>he's that good and that kind of with it. He's

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 1>got his finger on the pulse of Twitter or whatnot.

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 2>It he's with it, he is. It stands for something

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 2>in today's cool missus digitally forward in no small part

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 2>because of Lane Kiffin's presence. Yeah, so again, I'll turn

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 2>it to this. You now have Lane Kiffin, Dave Randa,

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Sam Pittman, or Mel Tucker, and you are Virginia or Louisville. Yeah,

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:01.399
<v Speaker 2>and you are you are tasked with let's say they'll

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:03.399
<v Speaker 2>all accept the you know, six million dollars or whatever

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:05.799
<v Speaker 2>you're offering six seven million dollars to be the new

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 2>head coach, and your big stipulation is you only get

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 2>paid if you win nine games, and you have a

0:38:11.760 --> 0:38:14.799
<v Speaker 2>year to you know, figure things out, and then the

0:38:14.800 --> 0:38:16.840
<v Speaker 2>next season you have to win nine games in the

0:38:16.880 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 2>ACC right now, an average conference coaching an average team

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 2>in Louisville, Scott Sanderfield is like, whatever, are you still

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:28.799
<v Speaker 2>going Sam Pittman or excuse me, are you still going

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Mel Tucker as your first choice? With Dave Verranda off

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 2>the border? Would you go Randa or would you go

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Lane Kiffin or would.

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:36.279
<v Speaker 1>You go to Sam?

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 2>You know which of these first four? If that changes

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:42.279
<v Speaker 2>your mind at all with the benefit of hindsight, the

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 2>way I'm presenting this exercise.

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 1>There is a very strong case to be made that

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>if you are looking for the quickest lift possible, yep,

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Lane Kiffin's your guy. Because despite the fact that Dave

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Randa has done a bang job at Baylor and Mel

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:04.319
<v Speaker 1>Tucker has been rebuilding this thing and he's lancing, and

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Sam Pittman has done you know, I mean, he's like

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:09.280
<v Speaker 1>walking on water in Fayeville at this point.

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:09.279
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm.

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Lane is probably the strongest recruiter of all three of

0:39:13.040 --> 0:39:16.759
<v Speaker 1>those guys, Lane is Lane brings a star power with

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:18.719
<v Speaker 1>him that the others don't have. They could get there,

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>but Lane's been around this game for so long and

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I just think he's He's a different kind of cat

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the recruiting game. So I guess

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it depends what you're after.

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 2>He does not come well, I said, I said, I said,

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.279
<v Speaker 2>basically a year. So I'm not asking for a long

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 2>term solution here.

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Long term, Yeah, you could make a really strong case

0:39:41.040 --> 0:39:41.359
<v Speaker 1>for him.

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:44.360
<v Speaker 2>I think it might be. Yeah, I think in that

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:47.879
<v Speaker 2>very specific ask, I think it's Lane, which is why

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm going with him. I think I have a value

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 2>pick and now Lane and Oranda as my grouping.

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:55.720
<v Speaker 1>What's your next pick?

0:39:57.960 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 2>I have it down here, I'm I have Jeff haff.

0:40:00.320 --> 0:40:03.240
<v Speaker 1>There, it is there, it is back together again.

0:40:04.200 --> 0:40:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So he definitely has an incomplete at BC because

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 2>he hasn't recruited a high school quarterback that has played

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot of time. He hit the portal relatively impressively

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 2>with philder Kovic, though hurt for the majority of twenty

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:22.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty one. So I can sort of give BC and

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 2>incomplete in terms of how it reflects on Jeff Haffley,

0:40:25.920 --> 0:40:27.680
<v Speaker 2>but I like his staff a lot. I like the

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 2>youth and energy from his staff, the recruiting, and I

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:34.280
<v Speaker 2>like his background both within the NFL and at Ohio

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 2>State his short time at Ohio State. I like the youth.

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 2>It's an incomplete though. This is much more of a

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 2>a hope. This is much more of a ceiling thing

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:49.239
<v Speaker 2>and a potential thing. Like I could have gone Greg

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Schiano or Mike Leach right like Greg Ciano is definitely

0:40:51.880 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 2>raising your floor one hundred percent, Mike Leach largely is.

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 2>And you have the vision thing, and you have the

0:40:56.520 --> 0:40:58.840
<v Speaker 2>track record thing that he's been there, done that, and

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 2>so those are clear case to take either Leech or

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Chiano over Jeff Halfley. So I'm sort of banking on

0:41:07.320 --> 0:41:10.760
<v Speaker 2>the unknown at this point that I think his teams

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:13.360
<v Speaker 2>play hard. I think he is going to be smart.

0:41:13.360 --> 0:41:15.879
<v Speaker 2>I think he's going to be cutting edge. I think

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:18.799
<v Speaker 2>he's going to raise floor pretty quickly no matter where

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:20.840
<v Speaker 2>he goes, because I don't think he's necessarily long for

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:23.239
<v Speaker 2>Boston College. If he does win eight or nine games there,

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:27.319
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a difficult place to win. So for that,

0:41:27.560 --> 0:41:31.359
<v Speaker 2>for those reasons, I'm going to roll the dice with

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Halfley, and I know BC fans aren't like fully

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 2>enamored with him by and large just because of the

0:41:37.960 --> 0:41:44.319
<v Speaker 2>inconsistent results his first two years. All that into consideration,

0:41:45.840 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 2>I still am a believer in his reputation, in how

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 2>the industry seems to view him, and say, I'm going

0:41:54.239 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 2>I want him on my make believe squad. Okay, would

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 2>you have taken somebody else over Halfley? Here? Would you

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:08.800
<v Speaker 2>have taken Jeff Trailer? Would you have taken and say, like, Okay,

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:10.879
<v Speaker 2>I know he has this. You know it's a he's

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:14.360
<v Speaker 2>a one state guy in Texas, right, I mean, I

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 2>think he's been at Arkansas, but his the majority of

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 2>his career has been in the lone star state that

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 2>you know Shiano, you know, NFL coach for US of

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Nature hit the portal hard from major schools.

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I you know I will grade Jeff Hafley

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:39.680
<v Speaker 1>against himself. Okay, because year one in twenty twenty I

0:42:39.680 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 1>thought was very promising. Now, Jeff Hafley, keep in mind

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:44.879
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about coaches took a big jump when

0:42:44.880 --> 0:42:48.399
<v Speaker 1>it comes to win totals. Jeff Hafley was six and

0:42:48.440 --> 0:42:52.040
<v Speaker 1>five in twenty twenty. He was six and six in

0:42:52.080 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one. Now there again, we have to color

0:42:55.600 --> 0:42:58.839
<v Speaker 1>in different shades here because there are reasons for that.

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Phil Jerkovic went down. It changed the trajectory of this

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:05.600
<v Speaker 1>season in a pretty drastic way. They were really counting

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:08.879
<v Speaker 1>on him to be the guy. He came back later

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 1>in the year. We could talk about what that meant

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to the team, what it didn't, but I think that's

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the reason for the incomplete I was gung ho on

0:43:17.480 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 1>BC coming into this year, and a lot of people

0:43:19.239 --> 0:43:23.319
<v Speaker 1>were You could squint and find a way to get

0:43:23.320 --> 0:43:26.080
<v Speaker 1>them to ten and two. The over under in Vegas

0:43:26.120 --> 0:43:28.880
<v Speaker 1>was seven, and I remember at the time when I

0:43:28.920 --> 0:43:31.920
<v Speaker 1>did the preview for BC, I was all in on

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:36.040
<v Speaker 1>over seven. All in again, I could take the optimistic view.

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd give them ten wins. You could also look at

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the schedule and say this is maybe a five win team.

0:43:43.040 --> 0:43:45.080
<v Speaker 1>In reality, because of the injury, they ended up being

0:43:45.120 --> 0:43:48.400
<v Speaker 1>closer to the lower end of that. Right. He is

0:43:48.440 --> 0:43:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a guy who What I liked about Jeff Halfley is

0:43:52.719 --> 0:43:57.440
<v Speaker 1>in year one he did something very wise, had a

0:43:57.440 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 1>transfer quarterback coming in, didn't know what we get out

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of field your COVID. But whereas a lot of coaches

0:44:03.040 --> 0:44:06.279
<v Speaker 1>out there tried to run like the full playbook in

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty, Jeff Hafley just stripped the thing down. He

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:13.000
<v Speaker 1>went techmo super Bowl style. Let's just do a few

0:44:13.040 --> 0:44:15.480
<v Speaker 1>things that we know we can master given the limitations

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of the season, and they did a great job with it. BC,

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:20.920
<v Speaker 1>even though they only had six wins, was a breakout

0:44:20.960 --> 0:44:23.879
<v Speaker 1>success in twenty twenty because of the job that they

0:44:23.880 --> 0:44:28.840
<v Speaker 1>did under Halfley had the injuries this season. He just

0:44:28.880 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 1>feels like a guy who knows how to maximize talent

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and he's at a place like BC where they're never

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:38.120
<v Speaker 1>going to get five star recruits, not in droves, right,

0:44:38.880 --> 0:44:40.919
<v Speaker 1>that's not the game that they're going to play in BC.

0:44:41.160 --> 0:44:44.400
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that they've been competitive now in a

0:44:44.440 --> 0:44:48.239
<v Speaker 1>manner that they have for two years running to varying degrees, Like,

0:44:49.080 --> 0:44:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I just think that's a great job that he's done.

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:53.640
<v Speaker 1>So as I'm looking up and down the list here,

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you could probably convince me on Kaylin de Borr, who's

0:44:57.880 --> 0:44:58.279
<v Speaker 1>my boy?

0:44:58.320 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 2>You know, I love Kaylen to Borr, but I don't

0:45:00.800 --> 0:45:06.120
<v Speaker 2>is he eligible for this exercise? I mean he's not

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:09.239
<v Speaker 2>at Presdent. He's not a second year he's not a

0:45:09.239 --> 0:45:10.879
<v Speaker 2>second year coach. He's a first year coach.

0:45:11.200 --> 0:45:16.200
<v Speaker 1>You could if we relax the rules, let's say zero zeroth, Yeah,

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:20.399
<v Speaker 1>you could. You could talk me into Kaitlin to bor Oh.

0:45:20.560 --> 0:45:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:45:21.080 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 1>But Jeff Trailer, I you know, I mean, Jeff Trailer

0:45:24.560 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 1>did a good job. Jeff Trailer won five more games

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:32.040
<v Speaker 1>this season and last. I am not as high on

0:45:32.120 --> 0:45:37.399
<v Speaker 1>Mike Leach. I'm not as high on Greg Chiano. I'm

0:45:37.400 --> 0:45:38.920
<v Speaker 1>not as high on Mike Norvel. I don't know if

0:45:38.920 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you're high on Mike Norvel. But Brady Hoak, like somewhat,

0:45:43.080 --> 0:45:44.799
<v Speaker 1>could we throw Brady Hoak in there? I still have

0:45:45.000 --> 0:45:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I still a scar tissue from the Michigan experience.

0:45:48.040 --> 0:45:52.080
<v Speaker 1>So yep, and Ricky Ronnie it was a great story,

0:45:52.120 --> 0:45:54.040
<v Speaker 1>but he's a huge incomplete because they didn't even play

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:58.120
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty. I think the only answer here is

0:45:58.160 --> 0:45:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Hafley.

0:46:01.239 --> 0:46:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean, the good news for Jeff Hafley is

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:06.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Boston College lost any games they really

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:10.880
<v Speaker 2>should have won, which can be somewhat attributed to coaching,

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:13.879
<v Speaker 2>and they didn't. I don't did they win any games

0:46:13.880 --> 0:46:15.799
<v Speaker 2>they should have lost, Like they just sort of were

0:46:15.880 --> 0:46:19.440
<v Speaker 2>who they were, so in terms of identity, like Boston

0:46:19.520 --> 0:46:23.560
<v Speaker 2>College was fine. I don't know, it's it's definitely incomplete

0:46:23.560 --> 0:46:26.120
<v Speaker 2>to me, but yeah, I'm banking on upside here.

0:46:27.840 --> 0:46:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Do we want to quickly talk through some of the

0:46:30.200 --> 0:46:33.640
<v Speaker 1>other names. We've each got three coaches now right that

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:37.160
<v Speaker 1>we've broken down and as we kind of turn the

0:46:37.160 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 1>corner here in the final ten minutes of the show, Yeah,

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:41.920
<v Speaker 1>there are some names that we haven't mentioned. So we've

0:46:41.920 --> 0:46:43.719
<v Speaker 1>thrown at Jeff Trail or we can go into a

0:46:43.760 --> 0:46:46.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit more detail about him. But I want to

0:46:46.440 --> 0:46:49.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about Mike Leach because Mike Leach a well known

0:46:49.160 --> 0:46:52.040
<v Speaker 1>figure in college football. You are very high in Mississippi

0:46:52.040 --> 0:46:55.399
<v Speaker 1>State coming into this season. I was the Mississippi State

0:46:55.480 --> 0:46:58.600
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty was four and seven. They went seven

0:46:58.640 --> 0:47:02.239
<v Speaker 1>and six into twenty twenty one. I feel like seven

0:47:02.320 --> 0:47:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and six is a bit of a disappointment cause you

0:47:06.080 --> 0:47:10.239
<v Speaker 1>had much higher expectations for this team. I'm curious why

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Leech is still in the conversation for you win total

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:17.279
<v Speaker 1>went up right out about it jump by three, but

0:47:17.360 --> 0:47:19.319
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, seven to six still feels like

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a disappointment relative to preseason expectations.

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they were just kind of all over the place

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:30.600
<v Speaker 2>when you look at the wins that obviously the textas

0:47:30.600 --> 0:47:34.360
<v Speaker 2>A and m one stands out beat in Kentucky the

0:47:34.400 --> 0:47:36.960
<v Speaker 2>way that they'd like. There were impressive wins, but just

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:39.720
<v Speaker 2>that they would fall behind twenty eight to three, twenty

0:47:39.719 --> 0:47:42.360
<v Speaker 2>eight seven and claw back in right they lose to

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:44.960
<v Speaker 2>LSU in that manner. You know, the Memphis game was

0:47:45.080 --> 0:47:48.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of a nightmare. The Arkansas game was obviously winnable.

0:47:49.320 --> 0:47:52.880
<v Speaker 2>I I don't know. The Bowl performance wasn't great, especially

0:47:52.920 --> 0:47:55.600
<v Speaker 2>in an emotional spot for him. They improved over the

0:47:55.600 --> 0:47:58.480
<v Speaker 2>course of you know, Mike Leach's tenure thus far, and

0:47:58.480 --> 0:48:00.279
<v Speaker 2>they have a quarterback who seems to be more and

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:03.480
<v Speaker 2>more comfortable in this offense. They've got playmakers at receiver obviously,

0:48:03.480 --> 0:48:08.600
<v Speaker 2>playmakers on defense. I just think that the inconsistency points

0:48:08.640 --> 0:48:11.719
<v Speaker 2>to some sort of I don't know, messaging problem, an

0:48:11.840 --> 0:48:15.200
<v Speaker 2>inspiration problem, a motivation problem. I don't know what it is,

0:48:15.360 --> 0:48:18.759
<v Speaker 2>but I can't fully get on board knowing that there

0:48:18.880 --> 0:48:22.720
<v Speaker 2>is that while that the team reflects the head coach

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:25.040
<v Speaker 2>and Mike Leach is nothing if not a wild card,

0:48:25.080 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 2>and that's what Mississippi State seems to have been this

0:48:27.560 --> 0:48:31.919
<v Speaker 2>past year. So the best of KLANGA is really fun

0:48:31.960 --> 0:48:35.000
<v Speaker 2>and impressive and can hang with or beat most teams,

0:48:35.840 --> 0:48:39.640
<v Speaker 2>but man, the depths, especially like last year when what

0:48:39.719 --> 0:48:41.680
<v Speaker 2>they beat LSU they throw for all those yards the

0:48:41.800 --> 0:48:45.200
<v Speaker 2>kJ costello and I mean obviously an awful and decimated

0:48:45.320 --> 0:48:48.400
<v Speaker 2>LSU team, and then to completely fold the way that

0:48:48.440 --> 0:48:52.000
<v Speaker 2>they did for the stretch through the middle of the season.

0:48:52.040 --> 0:48:54.919
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I'm just I don't think I would

0:48:54.960 --> 0:48:58.279
<v Speaker 2>feel super comfortable at this point saying this is who

0:48:58.320 --> 0:49:02.279
<v Speaker 2>I can count on if I'm Louisville, Virginia cal Like,

0:49:02.320 --> 0:49:05.080
<v Speaker 2>I just I need more dependability and a little bit

0:49:05.120 --> 0:49:06.160
<v Speaker 2>more recruiting for me.

0:49:07.680 --> 0:49:09.640
<v Speaker 1>You know how many times Mike Leach has won double

0:49:09.680 --> 0:49:12.120
<v Speaker 1>digits in his coaching career. He's been a head coach by.

0:49:12.040 --> 0:49:14.759
<v Speaker 2>The way, right, he's gonna bring you to be an

0:49:14.800 --> 0:49:18.520
<v Speaker 2>annoyingly competent team. He's good, too, great.

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Right. He's been a head coach at two notable stops,

0:49:23.640 --> 0:49:26.279
<v Speaker 1>Texas Tech in Washington State. There's a bit of a

0:49:26.360 --> 0:49:30.920
<v Speaker 1>layover between job one and job two, but only twice

0:49:31.840 --> 0:49:34.040
<v Speaker 1>in his tenure as a head football coach has he

0:49:34.120 --> 0:49:37.640
<v Speaker 1>won double digits, and each was in the second to

0:49:37.719 --> 0:49:42.120
<v Speaker 1>last year of his tenure. The win total did go

0:49:42.239 --> 0:49:49.080
<v Speaker 1>up for Mississippi State. But I guess my question is

0:49:49.080 --> 0:49:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is that good enough? Is it good enough to be

0:49:52.440 --> 0:49:56.960
<v Speaker 1>annoyingly competent? Is that a selling point for a coach

0:49:57.960 --> 0:50:00.919
<v Speaker 1>to establish that base levels to ability where you're gonna

0:50:00.920 --> 0:50:03.719
<v Speaker 1>win seven eight games a year? Is that good enough

0:50:03.719 --> 0:50:06.920
<v Speaker 1>for Mississippi State at this juncture in college football?

0:50:09.760 --> 0:50:14.120
<v Speaker 2>It's a good question. It's a good question. I can't

0:50:14.120 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 2>wait to see year three. I can't wait to see

0:50:16.200 --> 0:50:19.759
<v Speaker 2>a jump in year three. And the other two I

0:50:19.760 --> 0:50:23.759
<v Speaker 2>think major names are Eli Drinkwitz and Mike Norvell. Those

0:50:23.800 --> 0:50:27.200
<v Speaker 2>are good picks in theory. Those are two teams that

0:50:27.840 --> 0:50:30.319
<v Speaker 2>were really down and out, and there's a lot to

0:50:30.360 --> 0:50:34.160
<v Speaker 2>be encouraged about based on administrative moves within the team.

0:50:34.200 --> 0:50:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Who has been added to the roster in the portal

0:50:36.640 --> 0:50:39.440
<v Speaker 2>or what recruiting classes have looked like short of a

0:50:39.520 --> 0:50:41.960
<v Speaker 2>major cornerback who opted for Jackson State, I hear you,

0:50:42.480 --> 0:50:48.680
<v Speaker 2>But those are in theory, interesting names. So I just

0:50:49.000 --> 0:50:52.160
<v Speaker 2>haven't seen enough on the field, Like if the best

0:50:52.200 --> 0:50:55.720
<v Speaker 2>of Florida State is what the way they finished out

0:50:56.040 --> 0:50:59.120
<v Speaker 2>the Miami game, the way that they finished out almost

0:50:59.239 --> 0:51:02.839
<v Speaker 2>beating Notre Dame, Like, what what are we buying here

0:51:02.840 --> 0:51:06.480
<v Speaker 2>with Florida State? And so yeah, Miszoo is much more

0:51:06.520 --> 0:51:10.600
<v Speaker 2>hypothetical just because it's a more difficult job based on conference,

0:51:10.640 --> 0:51:13.799
<v Speaker 2>based on recent track record. But yeah, you look at

0:51:13.800 --> 0:51:17.440
<v Speaker 2>Florida State this past year. It's I yeah, it's pulling

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:21.560
<v Speaker 2>out Miami and almost pulling out Notre Dame, which is

0:51:22.960 --> 0:51:23.600
<v Speaker 2>not amazing.

0:51:24.800 --> 0:51:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the Norvel thing to me, I it was a

0:51:29.520 --> 0:51:32.520
<v Speaker 1>rocky start to his tenure. It was a very rocky

0:51:32.520 --> 0:51:38.120
<v Speaker 1>start to his tenure. And certainly the way that year

0:51:38.200 --> 0:51:41.719
<v Speaker 1>two started off, there were questions like is this guy

0:51:41.800 --> 0:51:43.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna make it through the year? Start off owing four

0:51:44.000 --> 0:51:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Boston Jacksonville State. Jacksonville State wasn't even a good FCS team,

0:51:47.800 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 1>like it.

0:51:48.400 --> 0:51:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, hard to draft that.

0:51:50.400 --> 0:51:53.759
<v Speaker 1>It's tough to pick that. And I think he did

0:51:53.800 --> 0:51:57.560
<v Speaker 1>an admirable job pulling it together after that, right, I mean,

0:51:57.600 --> 0:52:00.760
<v Speaker 1>there's no two ways about it. Didn't make a bowl,

0:52:00.800 --> 0:52:02.239
<v Speaker 1>but they at least had a chance to make a

0:52:02.239 --> 0:52:04.920
<v Speaker 1>bowl game going into that Florida matchup. That was a

0:52:04.920 --> 0:52:08.319
<v Speaker 1>close game that was a coin flip. Yeah, that Florida game,

0:52:08.360 --> 0:52:11.439
<v Speaker 1>and they could have won that, so they pulled together late.

0:52:12.040 --> 0:52:14.960
<v Speaker 1>It still feels to me like, given what we saw

0:52:15.000 --> 0:52:19.120
<v Speaker 1>from him at Memphis, to be Trott and Jordan Travis

0:52:19.120 --> 0:52:22.480
<v Speaker 1>out there is not what he wants to do. That's

0:52:22.520 --> 0:52:26.279
<v Speaker 1>not his mo. So it remains to be seen to

0:52:26.320 --> 0:52:28.080
<v Speaker 1>me if he can get more of his kind of

0:52:28.120 --> 0:52:31.239
<v Speaker 1>quarterback in there, if that's going to reverse fortunes a

0:52:31.239 --> 0:52:36.160
<v Speaker 1>bit on offense and and make this team just feel

0:52:36.160 --> 0:52:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot different and get to different heights. The recruiting

0:52:40.000 --> 0:52:43.319
<v Speaker 1>thing with Travis Hunter, Norvell was the victim of that

0:52:43.400 --> 0:52:45.560
<v Speaker 1>this year. People were calling for his head because of it.

0:52:45.760 --> 0:52:48.160
<v Speaker 1>There are gonna be other coaches that fall victim to

0:52:48.200 --> 0:52:50.600
<v Speaker 1>this too. It's not Norvell just happened to be the first.

0:52:51.040 --> 0:52:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Victim to a kid going to an HBC.

0:52:54.560 --> 0:52:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm being dramatic. I'm being dramatic.

0:52:55.960 --> 0:52:56.480
<v Speaker 2>I know you are.

0:52:56.600 --> 0:52:58.359
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm being dramatic. You know where I'm where

0:52:58.400 --> 0:53:00.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm at with this. But it will happen. Other kid's

0:53:00.719 --> 0:53:03.160
<v Speaker 1>going to happen, Nick Saban. At some point, sure there'll

0:53:03.160 --> 0:53:04.839
<v Speaker 1>be a kid who gets lured away, Maybe not by

0:53:04.920 --> 0:53:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Jackson state, but by a different program because of nil money,

0:53:09.560 --> 0:53:12.280
<v Speaker 1>like it's just going to happen. I'm just not sure

0:53:13.040 --> 0:53:16.319
<v Speaker 1>if I have the level of confidence that this thing

0:53:16.440 --> 0:53:18.399
<v Speaker 1>is going to turn around at all.

0:53:18.640 --> 0:53:20.839
<v Speaker 2>Okay for him, fair enough.

0:53:21.600 --> 0:53:24.880
<v Speaker 1>It The way they closed out the season was admirable

0:53:24.880 --> 0:53:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to an extent, But that being said, there's still a

0:53:29.160 --> 0:53:29.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of.

0:53:29.360 --> 0:53:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Holes to fill for sure, and some they improved. I'm

0:53:33.640 --> 0:53:36.600
<v Speaker 2>not sure the improvements there. It just it's a you know,

0:53:36.680 --> 0:53:39.040
<v Speaker 2>the NBA is what a make and mis league? Yeah,

0:53:39.280 --> 0:53:41.960
<v Speaker 2>everything's a win and lost league, and that's what that's

0:53:41.960 --> 0:53:43.200
<v Speaker 2>what we need. That's all.

0:53:43.880 --> 0:53:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Let me close it out very quickly by talking about

0:53:45.760 --> 0:53:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Greg Ciano.

0:53:46.719 --> 0:53:49.400
<v Speaker 2>I'd love to, as long as that the hypothetical school

0:53:49.440 --> 0:53:53.520
<v Speaker 2>we're dealing with is in New Jersey. He's an interesting pick. Otherwise,

0:53:53.560 --> 0:53:54.080
<v Speaker 2>who knows.

0:53:55.760 --> 0:53:59.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, man, I I like Rutgers going out

0:53:59.760 --> 0:54:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and get him. I don't typically like the retread, right,

0:54:04.080 --> 0:54:08.120
<v Speaker 1>especially if it's a retread that's been there before. I don't.

0:54:08.200 --> 0:54:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't like going for the sequel. But Rutgers is

0:54:13.800 --> 0:54:18.280
<v Speaker 1>at a unique disadvantage in the fact that it's supposed

0:54:18.280 --> 0:54:21.719
<v Speaker 1>to be kind of like the easternmost anchor of one

0:54:21.760 --> 0:54:25.719
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest conferences in college football. Fordham still may

0:54:25.760 --> 0:54:28.000
<v Speaker 1>literally be the team of New York. Okay, we make

0:54:28.040 --> 0:54:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that joke, but true. I don't know if anyone truly

0:54:30.880 --> 0:54:33.480
<v Speaker 1>gives a damn about Rutgers football in the numbers of

0:54:33.520 --> 0:54:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the big power. Yeah, it's just it's just not a thing.

0:54:37.280 --> 0:54:39.120
<v Speaker 1>And so it's hard to kind of rebuild that. It's

0:54:39.160 --> 0:54:43.600
<v Speaker 1>hard to recapture that magic, the pandemonium in Piscataway that

0:54:43.680 --> 0:54:45.839
<v Speaker 1>he was part of way back when, over a decade ago.

0:54:47.040 --> 0:54:50.400
<v Speaker 1>To kind of have that local knowledge and the experience

0:54:50.440 --> 0:54:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of having done that once I think is very valuable

0:54:54.680 --> 0:54:59.000
<v Speaker 1>at a place like Rutgers. And so he's already elevated

0:54:59.480 --> 0:55:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and raised the floor. In year two they went from

0:55:03.520 --> 0:55:08.320
<v Speaker 1>three wins to five and eight. With the Wonky Bowl situation, yep,

0:55:09.400 --> 0:55:11.359
<v Speaker 1>I think they're getting better. They are at least far

0:55:11.400 --> 0:55:13.880
<v Speaker 1>more competent than they were under the previous regime. So

0:55:14.400 --> 0:55:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I like him there in terms of somebody that I

0:55:17.440 --> 0:55:21.239
<v Speaker 1>would draft, He's a lot older than pretty much every

0:55:21.280 --> 0:55:24.239
<v Speaker 1>name on this list. That works against him, for better

0:55:24.320 --> 0:55:28.440
<v Speaker 1>or worse. If we're drafting, if we've got our two

0:55:28.520 --> 0:55:30.560
<v Speaker 1>cents about who we're gonna who we're gonna take and

0:55:30.560 --> 0:55:35.160
<v Speaker 1>when in what order? I like you said, outside of Jersey.

0:55:35.200 --> 0:55:37.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it plays, but at least in

0:55:37.239 --> 0:55:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that very specific instance, he's done.

0:55:39.080 --> 0:55:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Yeah, he'll raise your floor. And it's hard to

0:55:42.480 --> 0:55:48.160
<v Speaker 2>gauge because the depths of Rutgers football are tremendous, uh,

0:55:48.360 --> 0:55:52.320
<v Speaker 2>these past you know, basically ten years. So yeah, I

0:55:52.360 --> 0:55:54.400
<v Speaker 2>think he'd raise your floor anywhere. I think he would

0:55:54.560 --> 0:55:56.600
<v Speaker 2>field a good defense. He would hit the portal hard.

0:55:56.640 --> 0:55:58.560
<v Speaker 2>He still has the you know, he coached in the

0:55:58.640 --> 0:56:02.480
<v Speaker 2>NFL for a considerab amount of time or sometime. He's

0:56:02.520 --> 0:56:05.160
<v Speaker 2>a name, he's a big name. It's just what has

0:56:05.200 --> 0:56:07.520
<v Speaker 2>he proven in the modern era on any level in

0:56:07.600 --> 0:56:09.759
<v Speaker 2>terms of success yet to be seen?

0:56:10.920 --> 0:56:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Yet to be seen? All right, yep, right in, Soliverbalo

0:56:14.280 --> 0:56:15.080
<v Speaker 1>atgmail dot com.

0:56:15.160 --> 0:56:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, rank them.

0:56:16.520 --> 0:56:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Let us know what we got right, what we got wrong.

0:56:18.680 --> 0:56:21.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll be posting clips of this out across all of

0:56:21.120 --> 0:56:25.320
<v Speaker 1>our social media platforms. Respond wherever, let us know your thoughts.

0:56:25.400 --> 0:56:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Because very much a subjective exercise. But I thought a

0:56:30.480 --> 0:56:34.520
<v Speaker 1>fitting thing to do now that we're through what amounts

0:56:34.520 --> 0:56:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to year two or year one for many of these guys,

0:56:38.200 --> 0:56:40.560
<v Speaker 1>especially since it was such a big talking point coming

0:56:40.560 --> 0:56:43.480
<v Speaker 1>into the season. Right, there were so many unknowns, especially

0:56:43.560 --> 0:56:46.000
<v Speaker 1>with these guys in their programs and the jobs that

0:56:46.040 --> 0:56:48.160
<v Speaker 1>they did. So write and let us know what your

0:56:48.160 --> 0:56:51.799
<v Speaker 1>thoughts are. Don't forget to subscribe and follow, rate and

0:56:51.880 --> 0:56:54.879
<v Speaker 1>review the show. Going out to verballers dot com. That's

0:56:54.880 --> 0:56:57.200
<v Speaker 1>our Patreon, Going out to solid Giveaway dot com. That's

0:56:57.200 --> 0:57:02.320
<v Speaker 1>where you can compete, compete on don't know, enter the contest.

0:57:02.920 --> 0:57:05.919
<v Speaker 1>You don't really have to compete to win. That signed

0:57:05.920 --> 0:57:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Reggie Bush.

0:57:06.440 --> 0:57:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Mini helmet in a way.

0:57:07.880 --> 0:57:11.960
<v Speaker 1>In a way, alrighty Dan, fun show, as I'd like

0:57:12.040 --> 0:57:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to say, that is good. I enjoyeda same for that

0:57:16.160 --> 0:57:18.560
<v Speaker 1>guy there, my good friend Dan Rubinstein, for myself, Tie

0:57:18.600 --> 0:57:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Hilton Brand, thank you so much for downloading, for listening,

0:57:21.200 --> 0:57:24.600
<v Speaker 1>for playing along at home. We will be back next Tuesday.

0:57:25.120 --> 0:57:27.360
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, today saw peace