WEBVTT - 2022 NFL Schedule Release Breakdown, Team Predictions & NFL Win Totals (Ep. 171)

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Hello everyone, and welcome on into the Betting Pros Podcast.

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm Thomas Yola and joining me today to talk about

0:00:07.440 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the NFL schedule release. We're gonna be discussing some win

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>totals here now that we have the full picture.

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Parls, Jeff, how are you doing good?

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 3>Tom.

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:18.440
<v Speaker 4>It's a pleasure is always to be with you, buddy.

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 2>It's a pleasure to have you back on.

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>And like I said, in the NFL schedule it is out.

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>We know every game now. We know the Lions will

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>not be on primetime, we know that the Jets will

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>have an amazing Thursday night showdown with the Jaguars, and

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>we know there are a couple other games nobody cares about,

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>like the Buccaneers versus the Bills and the Chiefs playing

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you know the game's no one's gonna want to watch

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 1>the low action games.

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 4>Hey man.

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 3>We've known the opponents since the season ended. But it's

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 3>good to know the sequence now, Tom, And I know

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:55.279
<v Speaker 3>we'll get into this, but I know people scoff at

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 3>the schedule Liso. It's yeah, so it's ridiculous, but you

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 3>know what perspective, you kind of actually need to know

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 3>the sequence of events here because it does impact the

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 3>way at least I bet season win totals if I'm

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:12.759
<v Speaker 3>gonna bet them, and quite frankly bending some playoff bets

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 3>as well for some teams.

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree you can know the opponents. But the

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>thing that most betters need to understand when you're gonna

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>bet season win totals is it's not just looking at

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the team's number and going that's an eleven win team.

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>That's a twelve win team. They can clear nine and

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a half wins easy. It is going through the schedule,

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>breaking it down, saying okay, well this is where their

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>bye week is. This is a really rough road stretch

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>right here, this is a London game. Things like that

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 1>come into play. You have to go through the schedule.

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>In the way that we'd like to properly break it

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>down is literally going game by game and saying this

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>is a win, this is a loss. I think they

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>win this game, and picking it out and finding out

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>how you arrive at your number through that. The way

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I like to set it up is literally going through

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the schedule. Before I even look at a team's number,

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to know what my number for that team is,

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and then compare it to the book. Yeah.

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:12.639
<v Speaker 3>Look, I usually go through everything, and usually if I

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 3>end up with a team, usually the number that I

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 3>look for Tom is.

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 4>One and a half win difference.

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 3>If there is a one and a half win difference

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 3>either way, then I look to bet it. If it's

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 3>more than one and a half from what the market

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 3>says to what I go through this.

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 4>I'll probably do this three.

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 3>Times before the season starts and go off my final

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 3>one because the final one is the closest one to

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 3>the season, and I know those win totals change, but

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 3>injuries happen, and the last thing I want is to

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 3>have a horrible.

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 4>Position on a team.

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Or let's say, like again, I'm not betting this, but

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 3>let's say hypothetically, you want the Chiefs over this year,

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 3>and we'll get to them in a second.

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 4>Patrick Mahomes gets hurt.

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 3>But the way that schedule is the Chiefs may win

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 3>five games, but if Mahomes is there, Homes is probably

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 3>worth four or five wins.

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 4>And I know the chief.

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Schedules is horrendous in the way of the difficulty there, Tom,

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 3>So I would.

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 4>Be looking up.

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 3>I would just be going through the whole thing trying

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 3>to find at least a win and a half difference

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 3>from what you think to the book.

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 4>If you get two to two and a half, great

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:21.799
<v Speaker 4>go ahead.

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 3>I usually the biggest advantage I can remember was the

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Lions back in twenty nineteen.

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 4>They were six and a half plus money under. I

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 4>had them winning.

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Three, and that was like a quadruple bet for me

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 3>and the Detroit Lions. In twenty nineteen, Tom.

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 4>We're not good. No, we're not good.

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 3>They were three twelve and one. So again I didn't

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 3>have them with a tie, but.

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:46.119
<v Speaker 4>It was an easy under.

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 3>It was as easy of an under as you're gonna

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 3>have all the year. So I think that's just what

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 3>you do. You go through the whole thing, you go

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 3>through all the games. If you're a first instinct guy,

0:03:56.680 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 3>and go with that, fine whatever. I usually i'll do one.

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 3>I'll do one in about a week. I'm gonna let

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 3>the dust settle here and go from there. Like a week.

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 4>From when we're recording this, I'll have my first version of.

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 3>This and then by I want to say, the end

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 3>of the second week in the preseason, because a lot

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 3>of the teams won't play their guys in that third

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 3>preseason game.

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 4>Now I'll be looking to do the the second.

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 3>And final one, and then if I inevitably get bored

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 3>in the summer when it's only baseball, I'll probably throw

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 3>one of those other ones and see how it changes

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 3>through the off season.

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 4>But I very rarely change more than like a win

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 4>or two across the board.

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 3>If by accidentally have like a team going like, oh

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 3>in seventeen, like no team's going oh in seventeen in

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 3>this age in the NFL, Like it's not gonna happen.

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:43.239
<v Speaker 3>No one's probably going seventeen to no either for that regard.

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 3>So like let's say hypothetically ahead and I don't have

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 3>them with this just on the early look at it,

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Like hypothetically, let's say I had the Lions going oh

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 3>in seventeen, like I would go back and change two

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 3>games to make sure you get them two wins like

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 3>no teams if the Texans last year were able to

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 3>win multiple games, and teams are not, teams are not

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 3>going in this new age with the extra game and

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 3>teams like not officially taking weeks off.

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 4>But we saw it last year. We saw as soon

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 4>as Mike.

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 3>White beat the Bengals on Halloween, everything went nuts, like

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 3>we're none of upset. So you're gonna say, I think

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 3>that's your more common on common day NFL. At this point,

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 3>you're gonna have teams that with the extra game, like out,

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 3>this team sucks, we don't either a game.

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 4>Why don't we just take it a little bit easier.

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 4>We'll still win.

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 3>And then all of a sudden, the Texans are beating

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 3>the Chargers and the Titans on the road that Mike

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 3>White's thrown for four hundred yards against a team that

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 3>inevitably makes the Super Bowl.

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:41.919
<v Speaker 4>Like, uh, like you think gets some wild stuff this year, Tom.

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 3>So it's a little bit harder day in the past,

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 3>But look, it's the NFL.

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 4>Man.

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 3>If you have a win and a half to win

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 3>advantage based off of what you think, and again it's

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 3>hard to find that you probably go you still go

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 3>with it, even with the day and age of a

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 3>little bit more a little more wonky results once you

0:05:59.440 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 3>hit mid seas.

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the NFL today is it is just the parody

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>is so strong. Even with Yes, there's obviously a huge

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>gap between the Jaguars and the Chiefs. Of course, any

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>team can still go out on any week and beat

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 1>any other team. It truly is the any given Sunday sport.

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>These are all professionals. The variance is so great that

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>being said, win totals can be a good way to

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:29.840
<v Speaker 1>make a nice little future investment off that. And we've

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>already talked about how you're gonna go about breaking the

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>schedule down. We'll get into a couple specific teams here.

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>This is just some preliminary looks. Obviously, in your case,

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking the best time to bet these is going

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to be right before the season starts, when you have

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:48.159
<v Speaker 1>a good picture of what the market is looking like

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and what these teams are going to look like. You

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>know what the preseason injuries are gonna be Like.

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, Tom, that's the way I do it. Everyone

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 3>has their own rhyme or reason. I like, if someone

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 3>thinks they have in a vanda, let's take the let's

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 3>just start.

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 4>I know we're gonna bring up the Jets. Why don't

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 4>we we stay there top.

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:07.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's get into them.

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 3>Because the Jet win totals five and a half at

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 3>most places with heavy juice on the over, and inevitably

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 3>I think they will.

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 4>Hit a six.

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 3>So, like, there are some teams where if you want

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 3>the over or if you want to basically beat the

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 3>market to the punch and then come back on a

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 3>plus number or a better number or hell of it

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 3>gets six and a half fine an all six and

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 3>a half all seven betting under try to get the

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Jets to land six or seven wins. I don't have

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 3>a problem with that, And there are some other teams,

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 3>like if you didn't bet the Eagles to go over

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 3>to win totally, you're already betting into a market that's

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 3>not as good if you like that over right now,

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 3>that was eight and a half the whole time, nine

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 3>and a half this morning on DraftKings and the Jews

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 3>is on the over, which I actually think is correct.

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 3>I think the Eagles are probably a ten win team

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 3>this year if they were able to get close to

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 3>that last year with with a team that I didn't

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 3>think was any good. But there are plenty of ways

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 3>to bet this time, and I just go my way

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 3>and find your style, find your correct style, and also

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 3>get chop around. That's the biggest thing is everything to

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 3>to shop around, make sure get the best number on things.

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>And the best way that you can shop around and

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>get that best number, head on over to bettingpros dot com.

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 4>The I see what I did there.

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, you've got you have to have the plug in there.

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Seriously, while prepping this show, the first place I went

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>was right to our own website because they have not

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>just odds to win Division, super Bowl, all of that

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>forever NFL team. They've got the win totals and they've

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.319
<v Speaker 1>got them all broken out. You can see at every shop.

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>That's how I know, like you said, the Jets are

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>going to get to six. They're already at six at

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 1>bet Rivers right now. I think the market is going

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to go in that direction. You're right, there's still five

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half juiced at DraftKings. I see them going

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>into the six. But let's get into the Jets. They're

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the first team I have up on my notes. I'll

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>tell you looking at the schedule, those first nine games

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>are brutal. You start off playing the entire AFC North.

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>That's the first four games, and then you have a

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 1>week ten by I think that they're only going to

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>have about three wins heading into that buy. I think

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers are beatable, I think the Browns are beatable,

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:16.959
<v Speaker 1>and I think the Dolphins are beatable. But you look

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>at the rest of that schedule, and it is ugly, Jeff,

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't get a whole lot better. On the

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>other side, you have Week twelve versus the Bears. That's

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>got potential depending on how the Bears start the season

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>out a lot of unknowns, their new coaching staff, obviously

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>second year quarterback.

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 2>In Justin Fields.

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Then you've got Week fifteen in Detroit versus Detroit, Week

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 1>sixteen versus Jacksonville. That's a big back to back right there,

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and Week seventeen at Seattle. They've got a long week

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>there after the Jags game Thursday night. But I don't

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 1>think that they can string three wins together in that

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>stretch like that, which tells me that they're probably gonna

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>go under that six. I'm kind of like fit hitting

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>our own team here.

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 3>I will probably if I can get a five and

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 3>a half that's a little better than minus one forty juice,

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 3>that probably still go over. They're vastly improved from what

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 3>they were a year ago.

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 4>And look they're starting Tom.

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 3>It's been the interminable rebuild at this point, it just

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 3>has been. But they are much better, like they are

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:22.719
<v Speaker 3>much better than they were a year ago, and they

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 3>look Tom an absurd blown lead at the end against Tampa,

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 3>where if Wilson doesn't do the ridiculous hold the ball

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 3>for no reason do to QB sneak on four to

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 3>two and a half, the Jets probably win that game.

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:39.559
<v Speaker 3>The opportunities to be Carolina and they had opportunities to

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 3>be to Atlanta. Like, again, I'm mentioning two crappy teams

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 3>in there, but look, I expect.

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 4>Them to be better.

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.079
<v Speaker 3>And five and a half is a very low total,

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 3>Like you're expecting them to be a bottom five team.

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 3>Basically if they go under that, I don't think they're

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 3>a bottom five team. I think they're probably closer to

0:10:56.760 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 3>being team the bottom ten, bottom twelve. But look tom

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:03.079
<v Speaker 3>the schedule, and this was the sequencing we knew going

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 3>in the Jets schedule was going to look pretty brutal.

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:06.959
<v Speaker 4>The sequencing socks for them.

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 3>They played all the AFC North, which may be the

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 3>most competitive division in the NFL. I know the AFC

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 3>West still exists, but the AFC North could be very

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 3>competitive because those teams are all to me closely bunched together,

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 3>where you can have everyone.

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 4>Ending up nine and eight, ten and seven.

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Not as sparkly of records as I think the teams

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:28.199
<v Speaker 3>out west will be but it will be a very

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 3>competitive division and Jets play all four of those teams

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 3>right away.

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 4>They have to go to Lambeau.

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that's as intimidating as it would be

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 3>in the past.

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.079
<v Speaker 4>But you're not going to pick the Jets to win

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 4>a game in green Bay.

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, even with green Bay coming off the London game.

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:44.719
<v Speaker 3>But Tom, I think you those first nine because the

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 3>week ten by week Yeah, they can beat Baltimore. I'm

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 3>not saying they will be I would not bet that

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 3>at all, but they can beat Baltimore. They can beat

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 3>any of those AFC North teams. They can beat Miami.

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 3>They're not winning at green Bay. Theer not winning at Denver.

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 3>They always play horrible Denver, regardless of what the Broncos are.

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, hell, even Brett Rippon beat them a few

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 3>years ago. But to me, if the Jets are gonna

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:12.959
<v Speaker 3>go over, you gotta get the divisional home games.

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 4>The Jets have been brutal in the division for years now.

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 4>And if you beat Miami and New England at home,

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 4>with the way.

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 3>That the rest of your schedule goes out, and the

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 3>Jets do catch a break that Jacksonville is a home game,

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 3>a game that if it was on the road, they

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.079
<v Speaker 3>might lose. If at home on a cold December night,

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 3>maybe in front of a thirty five thousand people met life,

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 3>I actually like the jets chances there.

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 4>Getting Detroit at home is a big deal, and they.

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 3>If you go to ford Field this year, I actually

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:42.679
<v Speaker 3>think the Jets probably would lose that game on the

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.679
<v Speaker 3>road this year, but at home, I actually like them

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 3>at home in Chicago, I think the Bears are gonna

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 3>be terrible.

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 4>I think the Bear would be one of.

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 3>The three worst teams in the league, so you got

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 3>to get all those games where the Jets are either

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 3>comparable or better than those teams. I still like this

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 3>over time. I think they're going to find a way

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:00.679
<v Speaker 3>to scratch out seven. I think they'll be competitive. I

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 3>think we'll actually look the part of a seven and

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 3>ten team, which is good enough to get us over

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 3>five and a half six. So I'll have to go

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.839
<v Speaker 3>through it in full, but I think they're gonna be

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:11.719
<v Speaker 3>good enough. Due Leies get to that bye week at

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 3>three and six, and if you get to that bye

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 3>week at three and six, you're probably going over because

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 3>three and five on the three and five on the

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:23.719
<v Speaker 3>back end with that week's schedule actually to me seem like.

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:24.959
<v Speaker 4>A little bit of a disappointment.

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I agree, And you know, the last four weeks of

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the season are always the Jets super Bowl. It's meaninglessly

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>this playoff time to start trying. Look, I've got you

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>all over my shoulder here. You know that I want

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 1>to see this. If this team wins seven or eight games,

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I as a fan will be thrilled because it will

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>mean that we're trending in the right direction. And Zach

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Wilson might actually look the part. But we could do

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>an entire hour talking just about the Jets.

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:49.319
<v Speaker 4>Here.

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's move on and shift from one of the worst

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>teams in the league to a team that everybody always

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.199
<v Speaker 1>has is one of the best, and that is Kansas City.

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Their total is at ten and a half right now.

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Part of me likes the over, but I am honestly

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>with you, this schedule is pretty brutal. I think the

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>forty nine ers are bad. I think that it's pretty

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 1>nice that they get Arizona without Hopkins to start the

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 1>season and you get to play the Rams and Bills

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>at home, which is big. But oh, there are a

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of good teams on this schedule, and I think

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a Chiefs team that is going to take

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a step back. I'd be inclined to take them under

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that win total. I think that they're going to have

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>a very hard.

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Time without Tyreek Hill.

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 4>I disagree with you on the Niners.

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 3>I actually think the Niners will be fine even with

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 3>that confusing quarterback situation, unless of Lance, Unless of Lance

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 3>is the guy in Lance just totally sucks, which could happen.

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk about the Niners in a moment here a

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 2>little bit.

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 3>But Tom, the Chiefs are the first team in the

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 3>league history to have the first eight games of the

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 3>season against teams that finished over five hundred the following year. Yeah,

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 3>our previous year, I should say, first team in the

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 3>history of the league to do that. And look top

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 3>this is even even with like you look at this schedule.

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 3>They'll beat Jacksonville, they'll beat Houston, they'll beat Seattle. Other

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 3>than that, this schedule, you could make an argument that

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 3>they could win or lose every game. Now, it's odd

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 3>to say that again about a Patrick Mahomes team, And

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 3>of course, the Chiefs are not gonna go three and fourteen, Like,

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 3>that's not gonna happen. Could you imagine even too good

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 3>Andy Reid is too good of a coach to allow

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 3>that to happen. And they will be favored, Tom realistically,

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 3>even with that insane stretch to begin the season. My

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 3>guess is that they will be favored in more than

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 3>half of those eight games against the teams that finished.

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 4>Over five hundred. They'll be favored probably in five or

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 4>six of those games. They'll be a dog.

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 3>At Tampa, and depending on what the Buffalo Bills and

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 3>forty nine ers look like at the times they play

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 3>those teams, they will probably either be a slight home

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 3>dog to Buffalo or a slight home favorite against Buffalo.

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Same deal in San Francisco. Of the nine are good,

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 3>so Tom, it's just hard to go over ten and

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 3>a half. You're asking a team to win eleven games

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 3>in the most competitive division in the league, in a

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 3>division that I think all four teams have a realistic

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 3>shot to make the playoffs, and you're gonna be fighting

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 3>at the beginning of the year like we saw last

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 3>year looked ugly at the beginning of the year for

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 3>them with Tyreek Hill there.

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 4>Now you haven't you don't have your deep threat anymore.

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Teams are going to try to take Travis Kelcey out

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 3>of the game as much as humanly possible, And for me,

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 3>I thought they got lucky getting Arizona week one. I

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 3>don't think the Cardinals are particularly good even if they

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 3>had Hoppins and the road game in Week three, Indianapolis

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 3>like it's a winnable game, even though it's a tough

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 3>road game, it's a winnable road game. And I think there.

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 3>I think ten and a half's probably about right. I

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 3>would only lean to the under because it's hard to

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 3>go over ten and a half with that type of schedule,

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 3>but it will be no bet for me. I like

0:16:56.640 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 3>the Chargers to win that division. I really do. And

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 3>if the Chargers win Week two in that first Amazon game,

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 3>then I think it's a whole different mix. But again,

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.640
<v Speaker 3>Chargers had the freaking division on the rocket last year.

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 3>Your managed to blow that game and somehow missed the playoffs.

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 3>So I again, it's still Kansas City's.

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 4>Division to lose.

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 3>And look, when you have all these teams that are

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 3>really good and they beat the crap out of each other,

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 3>who knows, maybe we get something weird into the AGC

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 3>West the whole division ends at ten and seven or

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 3>something like that.

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 2>I entirely possible.

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that this is going to be an absolutely

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>wild ride in the division, which everybody thinks, but I

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>just I have a hard time.

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 2>I have a hard time taking the over. I'm with you.

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 1>The good news is, I think the public is going

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to take the over. I think if we wait long enough,

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>we can see this to get up to eleven, maybe

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>eleven and a half if we really believe, and then

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you could take an under because let's face it, Travis

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey's not getting any younger. Juju Smith Schuster is there now,

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>but that's still not He and Marquez the Scantling are

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>not replacements for Tyreek Hill. This offense is going to

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>have a harder time than it's used to. I think

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>things could be very surprising for us on the Chiefs front.

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you.

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 1>If I can get them a little higher, I'd like

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to take me under there. Guys, I want to talk

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to you for a minute about Sleeper. It's the fastest

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>growing fantasy platform today with millions of players, and it's

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a game changing product unlike anything else.

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 2>In the industry.

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 1>And now you could win on Sleeper by playing their

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 1>new over undergame. It's super simple. First, in any sport,

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>choose two or more players that you like and pick

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the over under, for example, number of points in a

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>basketball game or hits in a baseball game. Then choose

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the amount of money you want to enter into the contest.

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>If you pick correctly, you could win anywhere from two

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to over twenty times the amount of money you put in.

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>The main reason I'm excited about over under on Sleeper

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:51.880
<v Speaker 1>is that it's the only app where I can join

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>my buddies contests and play together. It's got a built

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in group chat where I can talk trash and copy

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:59.880
<v Speaker 1>my friend's picks with the tap of a button. Since

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>it's sanely easy and fun to ride it out together,

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>So stop what you're doing and download Sleeper now to

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 1>play their new over undergame. Have fun with your friends

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>and make some money on your mobile phone. Join our

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>listener group on Sleeper at sleeper dot com, slash betting

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Pros and Sleeper will automatically match your first deposit up

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to one hundred dollars. Again, just go to sleeper dot com,

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.439
<v Speaker 1>slash Betting Pros and you'll get a one hundred dollars

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>match on your first deposit. Might I suggest using that

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>deposit on my pick of the weekend, Devin Booker over

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven and a half points. Terms and conditions apply.

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>See Sleeper's Terms of use for details. Now let's shift

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>over to the forty nine ers, because their total is

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:42.120
<v Speaker 1>at ten games on DraftKings minus one ten each way.

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Right now, I'm going under all the way. I see

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>this team ceiling at eight waves. I think they got

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:50.400
<v Speaker 1>very lucky last year to get as far as they did.

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>They have no answer at QB. Jimmy g is not good.

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 1>He is trash. They don't want him. Problem is nobody

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>else wants him and they want to turn to Trey

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Land at some point, except for the fact that Kyle

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Shanahan probably doesn't want to. They have an easy early

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 1>road schedule. Yeah, the Bears, the Panthers, and the Falcons

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 1>are all very winnable road games. But the home schedule

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Miami and Washington winnable. But Chiefs, Bucks and Chargers are

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:18.239
<v Speaker 1>tough home opponents, throwing a QB controversy, and hey, a

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>tough New Year's Day road game in Vegas again. I

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>don't see this team getting more than eight wins on

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the schedule.

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 4>It's funny.

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 3>I go through it quickly, and I think I see ten.

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 3>I think the numbers right. I think the numbers spot on,

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 3>and it really the Niners are going to be the

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 3>hardest team the handicap the going into the season for sure,

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 3>because even though I know you don't like Jimmy Garoppolo.

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:44.640
<v Speaker 3>I know people don't like Jimmy Garoppolo, But Jimmy, you're

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 3>going to win games with him in the regular season though,

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 3>if he's healthy. That's always been what he's been with

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:55.160
<v Speaker 3>Shanahan in San Francisco. When Garoppolo has been healthy, they've won. Now,

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:58.360
<v Speaker 3>has it looked pretty No? Not sometimes it has. Most

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 3>of the time it has it, But he wins games

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 3>when Kyle Shannan is his head coach. Now, the big

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 3>question is there's a reason that Garoppolo is still on

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 3>his roster, and I think it's more than oh, they

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 3>haven't gotten the proper offer that they wanted for him.

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they buy Trey Lance still. I don't

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 3>think they think he's ready. And if it ends up

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 3>being Trey Lance before this team, I can't bet this

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 3>at all period. I lean under if it's Lance because

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 3>he again, we saw him twice last year they ran

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 3>the freaking air force wing tee against Arizona the first

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 3>go around and then the game against Houston. He was

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:34.479
<v Speaker 3>horrible in the first half, played well in the second,

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 3>and I don't know, I just I don't see again.

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Could he be end up being really good. Of course

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 3>you take a guy like that at number three because

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 3>of the high ceiling. The problem is the floor is

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 3>low with him, as we kind of saw on those

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 3>two starts. So I'm not betting San Francisco. I think

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 3>that the hardest team to handicap because their ceiling is

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.679
<v Speaker 3>very high, kind of high Lance. Their ceiling is very high.

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 3>If Trey Lance starts and ends up being really good

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:05.400
<v Speaker 3>and their ceiling is really low, if he ends up stinking,

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 3>and we're gonna kind of know right away because those

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 3>first two games this year.

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:13.239
<v Speaker 4>At Chicago, they are almost a touchdown road favorite in

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 4>that game.

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 3>In the opening numbers in week one, you don't see

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 3>that very often. Yeah, we have two of those games

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.640
<v Speaker 3>this year, and in Week two they play Seattle at

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 3>home in Seattle. Is not any going on bad If

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Trey Lance looks bad at those two games, that is

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 3>a very bad sign for what San Francisco is.

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 4>Gonna be this year.

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 3>If he looks good, then the Niners are gonna be

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 3>a playoff team again. I think Ten's right, Tom. I

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 3>think it's unbettable right now because of the unknown factor

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 3>in last.

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>I think that's fair. I'm just not high on this

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>team either way. That being said, obviously, wait and see

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 1>what's gonna happen to start this season. Well, as we

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>get closer and start the preseason, see where they're venturing

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback. I think Trey Lance is probably gonna get

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the starting gig week one, simply because of how easy

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the opening schedule is. They're gonna want to get him

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>out there for the easy games rather than having Jimmy

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>g soak up some of those and then maybe make

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>it even harder to go to Lance. I see that

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>as how the game theory is going to play out

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>here with this team. But we'll see as the preseason

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>rolls closer. The next team I want to talk to

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you about here the Green Bay Packers. Sure this is

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a tough one this year for them. Eleven

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half at Fox bet ten and a half

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>at Fandal. Again, you can find all of these numbers

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>quick to compare bettingpros dot com odds. They opened at Minnesota,

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's an l to start off the season.

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 1>They don't play everyone in the preseason. We know that

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>they don't like to do that, and we saw what

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that Russ did to them last year versus the Saints

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>when they got walloped in Week one. But I think

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>with no Adams, this team takes a step back on offense.

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Playing the Giants in London is definitely helped by a

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>second bye week versus the Jets, but I think they

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>drop at least one in that stretch of New York,

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 1>New York and Washington, and while the schedule is favorable,

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see them getting to twelve.

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 4>They should have been Washington last year.

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you remember that game, freaking Heineke kept

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 3>they Washington kept getting in the red zone and not

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:13.159
<v Speaker 3>score and that was probably the worst beat of the

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 3>entire NFL season, getting getting over a touchdown in that

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 3>game and still not getting there on Washington.

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 4>Look, I think Green Bay is hard for me.

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't I don't know what to do with them

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 3>because we know Aaron Rodgers is great, but now their

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 3>number one receivers animals are like at some point not

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 3>having Devonte Adams, and I know they have played well

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 3>with Adams out in the past. At some point him

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:39.120
<v Speaker 3>not being there has to hurt. And I don't know,

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 3>well Christian Watson turned into a legitimate number one wide

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 3>receiver right away.

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 4>Who knows.

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 3>I will say this is the best defense on paper.

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Green Bay is a on aut in a while, so

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 3>that does help it.

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 4>I like them week one.

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 3>I think Minnesota's gonna be a big bust again, even

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:57.880
<v Speaker 3>though the one thing I will say, having O'Connell there

0:24:57.880 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 3>as the head coach instead of Zimmer, We're gonna see

0:24:59.920 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 3>how bad Mike Zimmer really was, or if it just

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 3>was that it had just run his course with Zimmer

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 3>and he's actually still a good coach, but it just

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 3>he just ran his course for being there as long

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 3>as he was.

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 4>But look, they get they get Tampa week three. They've

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:18.959
<v Speaker 4>been horrible in this era since Brady's gotten there. Against

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:20.959
<v Speaker 4>the Bucks, they lost both of those games.

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 3>But I will say this schedule kind of is conducive

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 3>to win a lot of games, like they'll lose at Buffalo,

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 3>probably on a Sunday night the.

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:28.920
<v Speaker 4>Week in Halloween.

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 3>I think they'll go three and oh in that stretch

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 3>that includes the one London game. Like they usually beat

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 3>up on bad teams in the Rogers era, they usually

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 3>don't lose the teams they shouldn't lose too. They'll lose

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 3>the good teams, but they won't blow the games, like

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 3>they're not gonna lose the Chicago Week two but you're

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 3>not gonna happen.

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 4>So I think that number is right.

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm not gonna bet it though, just because and again

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 3>I hate giving you.

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm not betting this.

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 3>But green Bay and San Francisco are probably the two

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 3>most complex NFC teams going into the year because like Dallas,

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 3>like all right, their schedule, they play six games against

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 3>teams we know they're better then, even though I know

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 3>people like Philly this year, Dallas is still more talented

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 3>than philm and they played the first place schedule, so

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:17.360
<v Speaker 3>they they have to play green Bay.

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 4>They have to play well, they get.

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Green Bay because of the NFCS, but they have to

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 3>play the Buccaneers. They have to play the Rams. They

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:28.919
<v Speaker 3>get the the they get they get the Bengals on

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 3>the flip for the extra AFC game.

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 4>Now, like, all right, you get a sense like Dallas

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 4>may be talented, but that schedule is pretty difficult outside

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 4>of the division, and you know what they are.

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 3>You know what the Cowboys are with Mike McCarthy. They're

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 3>very talented and very horribly coached. But with Green Bay,

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 3>like with Green Bay in San Francisco, San Francisco, again,

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 3>when you don't know the quarterback situation, it's tough. And

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 3>with Green Bay we are talking about a very different

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 3>situation than what we are accustomed to with that team.

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 3>So again, again I hate saying like, oh I don't

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 3>like this all like that. But here's the other thing though,

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 3>Tom and I gotta bring this up because of the

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 3>reason of having two bets, the two teams that don't

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 3>like a bet on. There are ways to bet this

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 3>through the season, but there are there are adjusted win totals,

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:17.120
<v Speaker 3>and San Francisco maybe a good one to possibly hop

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:19.640
<v Speaker 3>on what happens if they win the first two games

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 3>and looked royally unimpressive and that win total hopped to

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 3>eleven and a half twelve probably, And we saw this with.

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 4>Denver last year.

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Denver because they won against the Giants on the road

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 3>is a favoritem went up two whole wins at one

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 3>and oh after week one, and they had the next

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:46.920
<v Speaker 3>two weeks the Great Jaguars and Jets back to back

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 3>to two teams they're supposed to beat, and that win

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 3>total went up to ten and a half based off

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 3>of beating three bad teams. And what happened with Denver,

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 3>they went way the hell under the ten and a half.

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 3>So there are opportunities. Just pay attention, Like if San

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Francisco looks unimpressive and two wins against two teams they're

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 3>supposed to to beat, maybe you come back with it

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 3>with adjusted under with Green Bay, you know what, there

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 3>there might even be a case.

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 4>To go over for them in the season, Like.

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 3>If Aaron Rodgers, like, oh, you know what, DeVante as

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 3>great as Devanta Adams was, Aaron Rodgers is still the

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 3>best talented quarterback we've ever seen, and the Packers offense

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 3>looks really good, So like there are ways to bet

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:32.119
<v Speaker 3>this end. Same with our Jets, Like at some point,

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 3>like if the Jets start one to nine and an

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 3>adjusted win total goes down to two and a half,

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:37.640
<v Speaker 3>guess well, We're.

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 4>Gonna bet that over.

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Ye'd have been it over because the Jets will win,

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 3>probably because Tom there's no franchise that's done a better

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 3>job of ruining the draft pick better than the New

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 3>York Jets.

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 4>Oh you like, Yeah, of course they'll win.

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Three of their last five games to fall from pick

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 3>number two to pick number six. Like I mean, there

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 3>are plenty of ways to bet this, and that's Look,

0:28:57.560 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 3>that's the good thing with being in this post paths

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 3>of War world where you can you can bet these

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 3>continuously and the books that put these up credit them.

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 4>We have more opportunities.

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Now, guys, real quick, remember when you're looking for free

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>picks and sports betting advice, bettingpros dot com has you

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>covered with tips from over one hundred and fifty experts

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>to make it easy for you to cash out. Download

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the app to get sports betting alerts. You'll get notified

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a favorable bets based online movements, consensus picks from the

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 1>most accurate experts and vetted systems in play. Betting Pros

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 1>monitors all of the major sports books, most accurate experts,

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and top systems to identify the best betting opportunities.

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 2>So download today. In the Apple or Google play stores.

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Jeff, I want to ask you about one more team

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>before I let you go here, and that is the

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl runner ups, the Bengals. The number around ten

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half right now, And I know you have

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on this team. I thought that they overachieved a

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit getting to the super Bowl in what I

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>thought was going to be a decent year for them.

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought they were a playoff possibility, and of course

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:06.959
<v Speaker 1>they blew out all expectations many in as far as

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 1>they did this year, I expected them to take more

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>of that step to being a legit contender. What do

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you think is gonna happen? Are they going to regress

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>with that Super Bowl loss hangover? Or do you think

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that they should be right there in the conversation again.

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 3>Again, I'll go back to what we said earlier about

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 3>the AFC North. That's gonna be an extraordinarily competitive division.

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 4>Because all those teams. I know, Look, I know Pittsburgh

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 4>has as low of win total as they've ever had.

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it doesn't matter.

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 3>They've they've sucked two of the last three years, and

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 3>they were in the play in the playoffs last year

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 3>with a bad team, and they went five hundred with

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Duck Hodges and Mason Rudolph playing quarterback in twenty nineteen.

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't matter, it doesn't matter what they aren't growing

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 3>the win games.

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 4>And for the Bengals this, I'm actually going to go

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 4>back to what I said before. What I just said.

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 3>They're a great team to monitor through the year to

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 3>figure out an in season win total bet.

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 4>Because they're schedule.

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 3>They own the Steelers last year, they destroyed them twice.

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 3>They get them week one. Now, we saw last year

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Pittsburgh somehow won in Buffalo Week one. Maybe Pittsburgh has

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 3>another trick up their sleeve early in the season with Trubisky.

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that would be the case. They played

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 3>Dallas League two, tough game, but winnable, and Cincinnati after

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 3>that gets the Jets of the Dolphins on a short

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 3>week at home, they get Atlanta, they get Carolina like

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 3>they get a bunch of winnable games. But the back

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 3>end of that schedule is very difficult. After the bye,

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Top got Tennessee, Kansas City, Cleveland at Tampa, at New England, Buffalo, Baltimore.

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 3>That schedule is brutal. Though after the bye week, which

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 3>is Week number ten. That is a team that if

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 3>the cracks start to show a little bit, maybe you say,

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 3>oh wow, all right, Cincinnati got out seven and two

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 3>or something like that. Pre boy, that would be a

0:31:56.720 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 3>very high wind total to get over in just a

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 3>in season.

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 4>They're a team with.

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 3>That back end schedule being much tougher than the beginning.

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Like if Cincinnati gets through seven and two to beginning

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 3>of the year, it probably look to come back under

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 3>because they probably go five hundred on the back end,

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 3>go eleven and six.

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 4>That feels about right that.

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 3>In season win justin winter, it will probably be eleven

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 3>and a half twelve at that point if they're not,

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 3>if they are well above water at.

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 4>The bye week at week ten toimes.

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 3>So that's the one I've been pinpointing the most actually

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 3>for in season wagering Bengals get out to a big start,

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 3>come back with an under in season. If Joe Burrow's

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 3>every bit as good as everyone thinks, though maybe I'm

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 3>out of luck.

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 4>But if Joe Burrow beats me and goes thirteen and four,

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 4>so be it.

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 1>There you go, Jeff, thank you so much for joining

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>me today. Really appreciate the time. Where can people find

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you and the work you're doing.

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah at Jeff Parls on the tweets, v SIN place

0:32:55.360 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 3>to watch me, Numbers Game with Gil Alexander, and other

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 3>programs on the weekend schedule changing on the time.

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Tom, Jeff again, thank you so much for your time today.

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Best of luck with the entire season. I'm sure I'll

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>be talking to you again real soon. As a matter

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 1>of fact, I'm sure we'll be sharing a beer or two.

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 4>Without worried about that, Tom, I would say so.

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Tom, all right, have a good one and guys, best

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of luck this week. You can find me on Twitter,

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>at TV, at work, and don't forget hand on over

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to bettingpros dot com. We've got everything you need to

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 1>get ready for the NFL season. It's a long summer

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of prep and we're excited for it. Have a good one, everybody,