WEBVTT - Byepocalypse 2023

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from iHeartRadio, your weekly

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 2>source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and advice. Now

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:19.959
<v Speaker 2>along with the guys from Guillotine Leagues dot com. Here's

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 2>your host, Paul Jargian.

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>It is Bipocalypse twenty twenty three.

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Sounds dominous?

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Does sound ominous, doesn't it? Well it is for many

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:32.599
<v Speaker 1>of us.

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 3>You know what you know it's gonna be by apocalypse?

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 3>Look ahead to week thirteen.

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's good. That's that's gonna be the worst two

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three.

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, yeah, that's volume two. This is volume one. Yes,

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 4>like yeah, to kill Bill.

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, I like it. Well, And if your name's Bill,

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you could get killed this week. It's a tricky, tricky

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>week with bye weeks. Bill Belichick, they should fire him

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>this week. They won't, but they should. Paul Charchie and

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Matt Harrison, Bryant Johnson with you Fantasy Football Weekly. In

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a very very tricky week. We've got a bunch of

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>bye week teams. That means we don't have quite as

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>many matchups to get through, which means we get to

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>spend a little more time on each one of them,

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>which is great. We get to do three tough questions

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:14.759
<v Speaker 1>we give to get get to give you nine players

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>upon whom you can take a chance. Premature speculation. And

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>although Scott Fish could not be here because.

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 4>Oh I'm not saying, because I'm not saying it, why

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 4>not because.

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying does he have chlamydia? No?

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Of course not, of course.

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 5>True. You don't sure he's shopping for an item. I

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 5>don't know. That's all I'm gonna say.

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 3>A personal item, but not not to replace a broken one.

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 5>It's not Yes, it's not a medication of any types

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 5>of any sorts. Though we don't want to spad.

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>If Scott were here, what would he be telling us

0:01:59.240 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>right now?

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, Scott's birthday the other day, and Fantasy Cares is

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:09.959
<v Speaker 3>giving away a signed autographed Justin Jefferson Jersey and Funko Pop.

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 3>All you have to do to get registered to win

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 3>the autograph Jersey and Funko Pop is go to fantasycars

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 3>dot org slash donate and every donation made between the

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 3>nineteenth and twenty sixth of October will be entered into

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:28.679
<v Speaker 3>the sweepstakes to win it. So kind of fun.

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that is fun. So nice opportunity to do something

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>great for the fantasy football community.

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 4>For so just a dollar gets you in the entry

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 4>and a dollar goes a long way if everyone just

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 4>donates a dollar.

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, great calls great prize.

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely awesome.

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Not too shabby. Let's jump into the matchups. Atlanta Falcons

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>taking on the Tampa Bay Buccaneers Matt And for the Falcons,

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a I think a little bit of a trickier

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>matchup than it looks like on face value. Tampa Bay

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>defense not too shabby. What do you think of this one?

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean we'll start with Bijon Robinson. He's kind

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 3>of the headliner there. He's now the field for around

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 3>seventy two percent of the snaps, which means Tyler Algier

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 3>more of a handcuffed a little bit of an afterthought

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.079
<v Speaker 3>at this point. Bijeon's matchup this week is tough. Though

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 3>the Bucks have yet to allow a running back rushing touchdown,

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 3>they've only given up one through the air to running

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 3>backs this year. They're also along the fifth fewest running

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 3>back combo yards per game at just one hundred and nine.

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 3>If you factor in about a quarter of that going

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 3>to Algier. You're looking at Bijon at about eighty total

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 3>yards and a very low chance of a score. That's

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 3>kind of borderline B C grade for me. I'm giving

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 3>him a bee, but it's not a great matchup. Drake

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 3>London he also gets a B. Over the last three weeks,

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 3>he's been fairly reliable targets, increasing from seven to nine

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 3>to twelve last week, air yards of ninety nine more

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 3>in each of those weeks, and he's put up double

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 3>digit PPR points in four of the last five. He

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 3>runs from the left side most often, which means he'll

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 3>match up with Tampa's right corner Jamel Dean, who's allowed

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 3>a one thirty two passer rating in his coverage this year.

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 3>The Falcons tight ends, Oh boy, let's talk about those guys.

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, well, there's only one, well, an actual tight end

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to fantasy football.

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 5>I guess there's two.

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes in fantasy football. So two rare occurrences took place

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 3>last week, a solar eclipse in the United States and

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Kyle Pitts scored a touchdown.

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh I like it.

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.679
<v Speaker 3>Pitts has strung together two straight weeks with double digit

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 3>PPR points. The problem for Pitts is so is John U.

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 5>Smith.

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 3>And if you smashed the two together into one player,

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 3>now we've got what we expected Kyle.

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Pitts to be.

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 3>But then again, John U. Smith is still there. The

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Bucks haven't allowed a tight end touchdown on the season.

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 3>They're only allowing five catches for forty yards per game

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 3>to the position, and we're splitting that two ways. That

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 3>doesn't look good at all. And Tampas played some good

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 3>tight ends this year and held them in check. Howkinson, Goddard, Laporta,

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:47.919
<v Speaker 3>and Comet were all held to forty one yards or less.

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm leaving both of these guys on the bench, but

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 3>I understand if you have to start one in a

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 3>six team. By week, Desmond Ritter putting up some decent stats,

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 3>but the eye test still doesn't look good. Did have

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 3>three hundred and seven passing yards and two passing scores

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 3>last week, but through three picks in a loss to Washington,

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 3>and I'm a little nervous that we're like one or

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 3>two interceptions away in the first half from Taylor Heineke

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 3>getting snaps. Tampa is a better than average pass defense

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:13.559
<v Speaker 3>as well. I don't have any druthers, but if I did,

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 3>I'd leave Desmond Ritter on the bench. This week, Baker

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 3>Mayfield faces an Atlanta defense that is break but don't bend.

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 3>The Falcons are allowing the third fewest passing yards at

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 3>only one hundred and ninety one per game, but allowing

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 3>the sixth most passing scores at almost two per game.

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 3>Problem is Atlanta is great against wide receivers and that's

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 3>where most of Mayfield's targets have been going. So I'm

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 3>leaving Baker on the bench. I don't really like Mike

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Evans and Chris Godwin in this one either, but I'll

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 3>give them both C grades. The best overall matchup for

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 3>any player is going against slot corner d Alford, who

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 3>has already allowed three touchdowns in his coverage this year.

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Problem is Godwin is only in the slot thirty one

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 3>percent of the time, Evans twenty six percent of the time.

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 3>The rest of the time, they're outside against Jeff Okuda,

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 3>who's had a career resurgence in Atlanta, allowing only fifty

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 3>one total yards in his coverage this year, or they

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 3>face aj Terrell, who's always tough. So just C grades

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 3>for those guys, and Rashad White better off on your

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 3>bench too. He's only topped ten PPR points once this season,

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 3>only touched the ball ten times and last week's lost

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 3>to Detroit. Plus Atlanta has only allowed three point seven

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 3>yards per carry and about three receptions per game to

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 3>opposing backs, only two total running back scores on the season.

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 3>They're a top five run defense right now. So you

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 3>can't start Rashad White here, and we'll talk more about

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 3>him later in the show.

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Or Rashad White breakdowns, yeah later, which is very very exciting.

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>Back to Desmond Ritter for a second. I believe it's

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>one career touchdown in road games.

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 3>His home road splits are absolutely weird.

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>They are very very and you know, I don't love

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>playing the home road differential very often unless it's something

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that's really hyper lopsided. Desmond Ritters, that's it is hyper

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>ltid in that way. So yeah, I think that's fair

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to mention it. Yeah, now, and they are in Tampa,

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>by the way, he confirmed one touchdown pass on the road,

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>yep for Desmond Ritter.

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 5>And back to Kyle.

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 4>Pitts really quick sixty of his snaps taking them slot

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 4>out wide thirteen percent in line.

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 5>He is a wide receiver.

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Does that that who is eligible at tight end he's

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>even less valuable?

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 5>Then no, absolutely not.

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 3>He's he's still tight end in your league, and he's not.

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 3>He's performing as well as you want to get tight

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 3>end to two points.

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Ray lines up, I'm not getting any more fantasy points.

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't matter if he's lining up his running back, quarterback, kicker.

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't care. He's not getting the points.

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo taking on the New England Patriots. Brian, let's start

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>on the Buffalo Bill's side.

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 5>I'm not ready to move on, but I will.

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Brian's ears are smoking right now.

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to start the running game. Many people, including me,

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to start Latavius Murray in a disturbing

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>number of week. Damian Harris is not gonna play in

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>this game. Murray's gonna have a chance. I want to

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>know what you think about him and James Cook part

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>of the rushing tandem for the Bills.

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I've got to see on both Murray and Cook.

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 4>I like Cook a little more. Still, he continues to

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 4>lead the Bills backs in carries. Last week he had fourteen,

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 4>but Latavius Murray had twelve. But Cook did far more

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 4>with his chances, he averaged more than five yards per carry.

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 4>Murray was good for just three point seven five yards

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:33.079
<v Speaker 4>per carry. New England only allowing three point five yards

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 4>per carry to opposing backs, but they have yielded the

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 4>seventh most rushing attempts and have allowed the fourth most

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 4>rushing touchdowns to running backs. And it's really about the

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 4>Patriots offense is just so bad, yeah, that they're never

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 4>on the field, meaning the other teams their opponents are

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 4>running the ball mercilessly against them. New England has allowed

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 4>the fourth most rushing touchdowns to running back. So I

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 4>see again on both Cook and Murray. If I had

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 4>to pick one, I would still Cook. But they're both

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 4>gonna be viable in this game. Stefan Diggs will certainly

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 4>be viable. Not the best matchup for Buffalo's passing game,

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 4>but that's because teams don't throw much on the Patriots,

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 4>who on the fourth lowest opponent passing play percentage, and

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 4>as a result, opposing wide receivers are averaging less than

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 4>thirteen catches one hundred and forty five yards in a

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 4>touchdown per game. That's not great, but the Patriots have

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 4>surrendered a wide receiver touchdown in every game but one.

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 5>And if I'm going to bet on.

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 4>A Bill's wide receiver to score, it's Stefan Diggs, who

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 4>had seven catches one hundred and four yards in a

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 4>touchdown and then seven catches ninety two yards in a

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 4>touchdown in his two games against the Patriots last season.

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 5>So at a for Diggs.

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:43.679
<v Speaker 4>Just a see though for Gabe Davis, who has scored

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 4>in three of his last four games against New England,

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 4>but he has failed to top three catches or fifty

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 4>yards in any of those games. He's touchdown dependent. In

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 4>this matchup, he'll need he'll need a touchdown to payoff.

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 4>You gotta like Digs more than Davis, but that's no

0:09:57.240 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 4>shock to anybody.

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 5>It's been a sh so far.

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 4>As Dalton Kincaid, why isn't he getting the hate that

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 4>Kyle Pitts has been getting the last two.

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 3>Years because he's six games into his career.

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 4>He was also well, it didn't take long for you

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 4>guys to hate on Kyle Pits un to only take

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 4>about six minutes in.

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>The preseason before he'd even hit the field. Thought that

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Pitts was overrated that offense.

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 4>But who's been overrated so far as Dalton Kincaid and no,

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 4>shut that peacock, op.

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 5>He doesn't even get that pea cocks.

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought I was right, No, you were not. We're

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 1>two years into this experiment, two and a half years,

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>two and a third years into this experiment.

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 4>So you're just gonna discount the one thousand plus yards

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 4>as a rookie that Kyle Pitts had allow me to answer,

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:43.319
<v Speaker 4>which only Mike did.

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 6>Did.

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that that peacock is then this he's I'm gonna

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 4>be eating that thing for Thanksgiving dinner sooner than that. Anyway,

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 4>back to Dalton Kincaid and Dawson Knox, they are both

0:10:56.880 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 4>on the bench. Kincaid was out last week with the concussion.

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 4>He should make his way back into the lineup this week.

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 4>In fact, he's expected to be mean.

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Dalton can cuss.

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 5>There you go out of that.

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 4>Oh, Knox did play last week, but of course it

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 4>was Quintin Morris, h quin tin Tin I like to

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 4>call him, who caught the touchdown. You can't be excited

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 4>about any of these guys though. In this game, Kincaid,

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 4>Knox or Morris. The Patriots are allowing less than four

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 4>catches and forty yards per game to tight ends and

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 4>have allowed just one total touchdown to the position this season. Lastly,

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 4>for the Bills, Josh Allen gets a b. New England

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 4>has only surrendered six passing touchdowns all year, but again

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 4>that's because no one really throws against them. But Allen

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 4>did throw for multiple scores in both meetings with the

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 4>Patriots last year, and as total thirteen passing touchdowns across

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 4>his last four games against New England. And you're not

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 4>sitting Josh Allen, so we're not going to go into

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 4>that any further. You are going to sit basically everyone

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 4>on the Patriots outside of Ramandre Stevenson and Ezekiel Elliot.

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 5>Buffalo has allowed the.

0:11:56.840 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 4>Fifth most rushing yards and the fifth most receiving running backs,

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 4>which equates to one hundred and forty eight combo yards

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 4>per game. So it's a nice matchup on paper. Stevenson

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 4>out touched Zeke fifteen to eight last week. Both scored

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 4>on the ground. Stevenson had five catches to the one

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 4>from Zeke. Zeke had like an eighty plus yard touchdown

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 4>reception called back on a holding penalty.

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 5>He looked pretty good.

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 4>But those are the only two starting grades I have

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 4>on any Patriots, and you're gonna sit Kendrick Bourne, Juju Smith.

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Schuster, anybody.

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 4>Jones, the Bonte Parker on hundred, sick a Hunter, Henry

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 4>Mica Sicki yes, and Mac Jones the whole passing game

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 4>on the bench for New England.

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>When Tacon back Detroit Lions, Baltimore Ravens, we'll tell you

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>what to do with this thorny Detroit backfield. Jamir Gibbs,

0:12:43.720 --> 0:13:15.959
<v Speaker 1>Craig Reynolds. When we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly,

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>nine players not normally in starting lineups. Many of these

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>guys available on the waiver wire. It's take a chance

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>on me. We begin at the quarterback position and Matt Harrison.

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.439
<v Speaker 3>I've got Josh Dobbs this week. He's put up average

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 3>two above average numbers in every week but Week one,

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 3>and he's faced some pretty tough defenses along the way Dallas,

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco, Cincinnati and the Rams. In the last four weeks,

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 3>he's been buoyed by over forty rushing yards per game

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 3>and four of his last five, and has had two

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 3>passing touchdowns and two of his last three. This week,

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 3>he faces a Seattle defense that's allowed multiple passing scores

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 3>to three of the last four quarterbacks they've faced, and

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 3>over three hundred yards passing in three of their five

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 3>games so far the season. Plus they've only really faced

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 3>one mobile quarterback. That was Daniel Jones. He finished the

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 3>game with ten carries and sixty six yards on the ground.

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 3>So kind of like Dobbs this week, in a weird

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:12.079
<v Speaker 3>week of quarterbacks, he's probably like a top twelve quarterback

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 3>in this week.

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's that's about where I've got him right.

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>By the way, all my player rankings available for free

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>at Caietinen Leagues.

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:18.439
<v Speaker 6>Doc.

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I've heard of that site.

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I've heard good things. Brian. You take a chance at

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>me quarterback.

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, you probably have Brian Hoyer and Aiden O'Connell ranked

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 4>in the same spot because as.

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 5>Of right now, we're not sure who's going to be

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 5>starting for the Raiders.

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>A lot of mystery in Oh.

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 4>It seems like it's going to be Brian Hoyer to

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 4>prepare for we don't know who it's going to be.

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 4>But whoever it is, I'm starting said Raiders quarterback at

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 4>the Bears. I think it's going to be Brian Hoyer.

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 4>But if it's not, then it's eight o' O'Connell. You

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 4>shouldn't have a problem picking up either. But a great

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 4>matchup for both quarterbacks. The Bears have allowed the third

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 4>most passing yards and the second most passing touchdowns so

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 4>far this season. The Raiders have a very frustrated DeVante Adams.

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 5>Yea insert squeak key wheel.

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>You know we don't have the squeaky wheels.

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, horrible squeaky wheel.

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 4>Vegas has Jakobe Myers, who was bawling out right now.

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 4>Rookie tight end Michael Mayer has found his footing and

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 4>this is also a very plus matchup for Josh Jacobs

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 4>through the air. So Raiders quarterback tight d team quarterback

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 4>LV Does.

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Anybody play team quarterback anymore?

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 3>No, there's a part of me that kind of misses it.

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Not me, No, okay, not at all. I'm going Packers quarterback.

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Eddie Jackson ruled out for that Bear secondary.

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>That's a big loss.

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 5>Even let's go Bears.

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>We're going Packers quarterback. Jordan Love taking on Denver. Anybody

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>against Denver's viable anybody. Now we know the play is

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>ugly for Jordan Love. Sometimes the super slow processing the

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>horrible accuracies. He's just spraying balls around the field. But

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you know what, fantasy players don't care that much about

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that stuff because that stuff doesn't always cost us fantasy points.

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>The reality is Love's got a big arm and mobility,

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and those things generate fantasy points. He's got those traits

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that we like, and this is a perfect spot for

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a big hit for Jordan Love. Denver allowing the second

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>most fantasy points to quarterbacks, the most passing yards, the

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>most passing touchdowns, and coming out of the by the

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Packers are much much healthier team than they used to be.

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Love, we'll talk more about him later in this

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>show as well, but particularly like him this week. Let's

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>go to the running back position.

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 3>As Charchs just said, anybody is viable against the Denver Broncos.

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 3>That's why aj Dillon is might take a chance on

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 3>me runner. The Broncos are the worst run defense in

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 3>the league, and it's not particularly close. They're bottom three.

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 3>They're at bottom three rank in every category, including five

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 3>point eight yards per carry, the worst one hundred and

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 3>forty eight rush yards per game, the worst two hundred

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 3>and one combo yards to running backs, the worst thirty

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 3>two running back touchdown touches per game, the worst. Twelve

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 3>running back touchdowns allowed second worst. They've given up fifteen

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 3>more PPR points to an opposing running backs six times

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.199
<v Speaker 3>in six games, and five of those six have been

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 3>over twenty two PPR points. Aaron Jones still limited in

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 3>practice with a hamstring injury. There's no need to rush

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 3>him back for this game. AJ Dillon can handle it.

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 3>He had twenty carries in the Vegas game in Week five,

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.199
<v Speaker 3>and I expect a similar workload for AJ Dillon this

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 3>week now.

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Jones re injured his hamstring. They haven't said that,

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's clear that, just based on how

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>much his time away from the game, that he must

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>have had a set back on the hamstring. Cato at

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>some point. AJ Dillons really has rarely put together big

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>games when Aaron Jones has missed. But the opportunity is absurd,

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>as you outline, absolutely, Brian, you taking a chance on

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>mer running back.

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm sticking with this Bears Raiders game, but I'm on

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 4>the other side for running back here with Travis Homer

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 4>of Chicago at home against the said Raiders. The Raiders

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 4>have surrendered three rushing scores to running backs over the

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 4>last two weeks, and on the season, they are allowing

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 4>nearly one hundred and thirty combo yards per game to

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 4>the position. Danta Foreman will start for Chicago, but Roshan

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 4>Johnson has.

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 5>Been ruled out.

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 4>Khalil Herbert is on IR so it's going to be

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 4>Foreman and Travis Homer carrying the load for the Bears

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 4>against the Raiders. And the Bears offensive line has been

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 4>great when it comes to the run game. Chicago owns

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 4>the second best run block win rate among every offensive

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 4>line in the league. And again, the one hundred and

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 4>thirty combo yards per game allowed by the Raiders will

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:29.919
<v Speaker 4>play into the favor of Homer, who should dominate the

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 4>third down work at running back for Chicago.

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Matt outlined how bad the Broncos are against running backs.

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I told you, by the way, and I mentioned they've

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>given up the most passing yards, they've given up the

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:40.360
<v Speaker 1>most rushing yards.

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 3>Which is like the anti Cleveland.

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>They are anti Cleveland.

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 5>I like that.

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 1>They'd probably like to hear that too. After the Broncos

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 1>as the Panthers there and by after the Panthers allowing

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the third most rushing yards per game the New York Giants.

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Who can we go to for the New York Giants.

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:01.399
<v Speaker 1>How about Antonio Gibson averaging just refewer snaps than the

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>starter Brian Robinson. Just the Giants defense so bad? Even

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 1>backup running games are posting solid games against the Giants.

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Latavius Murray came in with forty five yards. Both of

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the Miami running backs got fed big time. Zach Charbonay

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.239
<v Speaker 1>posted a career game against the Giants. Elijah Mitchell went

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 1>for forty two yards against the Giants. Look in this

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>bye week, if we can get to forty fifty total

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>yards for Antonio Gibson, that's a win in a tricky

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 1>bye week with all the injuries. Antonio Gibson, he posted

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 1>one good game one bad game against the Giants last year.

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:36.959
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this is the good one this year. Let's go

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to the wide receiver position.

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 3>Matt I've got Jackson Smith and Jigba dk metcalf is

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 3>not practiced all week with both rib and hip injuries.

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 3>He's questionable, but you have to think he's unlikely to

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 3>go if he hasn't practiced yet. Tyler Lockett nursing a

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 3>hamstring injury. He was limited all week, but he's off

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 3>the injury report as of now. But wide receivers and

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 3>hamstring injuries just don't mix very well, and one wrong

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 3>step he could be watching from the sidelines. So I

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 3>think it's JSN time. Last week here was the Seahawks

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 3>route counts. Metcalf ran thirty nine, Lockett ran thirty nine,

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 3>JSN ran thirty nine. While Lockett and Metcalf each had

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 3>eight targets, JSN only had five. But he's now learning

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 3>the offense and he's on the field about the same

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 3>amount as the other guys. He has the opportunity here,

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 3>and the Cardinals are terrible against wide receivers. They're allowing

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 3>the fourth most receptions and the second most yards to

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 3>opposing wide receivers at one hundred and ninety nine yards

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 3>per game. I like a lot of that to go

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 3>to Smith Injigba in his coming out party.

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Not moving what by rankings. I think you've convinced me.

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 6>Thank you.

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Brian. You take a chance on your receiver.

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:39.679
<v Speaker 5>It's not a wide receiver.

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 4>We're going tight end tight out with Las Vegas is

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 4>Michael Mayer at Chicago.

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 5>So I'm all in on this game.

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 4>The rookie tight end Mayor broke out last week, and

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.719
<v Speaker 4>the Raiders continue to increase his usage as the season

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:56.239
<v Speaker 4>goes on. Mayor's snapshare over the last four weeks has

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:59.479
<v Speaker 4>gone from forty percent to fifty one percent, to sixty

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 4>six percent, and then to eighty one percent last week.

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 4>Chicago has only surrendered two tight end touchdowns so far,

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 4>but they are allowing six and a half catches and

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 4>fifty five yards per game to the position.

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 5>Those are very healthy numbers. So Michael Mayer, who I

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 5>believe it's Mayor, it's Mayor. It's not Meyer.

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:18.719
<v Speaker 4>But I know at an Order Dame when you'd make

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.120
<v Speaker 4>a catch, they would play the Michael Meyers Halloween music

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 4>every time, which was pretty dope.

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 5>They need to transfer that over to the NFL, but

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 5>I like that. We'll hear that dun dun dun dun

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 5>dun dun dum dund lots of times on Sunday.

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. When my uh, when my daughter was very young

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and we were doing animal sounds, you know, like cow

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>goes move very good.

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:41.119
<v Speaker 5>That was like I got that.

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I got that.

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Puzzy on Brian was like over there not things I.

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 5>Had no idea.

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I taught her shark goes done, done, done, done, done,

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>dune dune, dune, dune, dune, dune done. And you know

0:21:57.680 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 1>she really believed. She buys it right me down. You

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 1>know when your kids two, you know they buy all

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 1>that stuff, So you can teach him anything.

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 3>The more I get to know you charge, the more

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 3>I know how much you lied to your daughter. That

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 3>is like as a toddler.

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>That is a fact and good parenting right There absolutely

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of half truths. Washington wide receiver for Curtis

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Samuels scored in three straight games, and I don't think

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>we're chasing box scores, and we highlight an opportunity against

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. Giants, he had good games against the Giants

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>last year when he was very lightly used. He was

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 1>averaging six targets per game in fifty four yards against

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the Giants in the two games last year. The Giants

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>are a very leaky secondary, but what they don't give

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 1>up a lot of his air yards, and that underneath

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff is where Curtis Samuel makes his money. So I

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be a lot of underneath looks

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>for him. Something called Cordell flat is your new starting

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>slot safety with the Dory Jackson questionable for the Giants.

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Both of them, no matter who it is, they both

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>allow passer ratings over one hundred eight team on the season.

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Clot in the slot lot allowed a touchdown last week

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>in his first game as a starter this year. Curtis Samuel,

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>your final take a chance at me player. As we

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>go to the Lions taking on the Ravens, I want

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to start with the running game here. We know David

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery's out and Jamiir Gibbs has been proclaimed the starter

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>by Dan Campbell and he says he's going to get

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the majority of the looks because Craig Reynolds is hurt.

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>And we'll talk more about Craig in a second. Detroit

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>leads the league in rushing attempts and his third in

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>both rushing yards and score, so opportunities should be here

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>for Jamiir Gibbs. Gibbs will get most to get most

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of that work. Montgomery was averaging three carries from inside

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the ten before going down. This team runs the ball

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot inside the ten. A lot of that could

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>go to Gibbs, depending on whether or not Reynolds is

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 1>healthy enough to get that kind of work. Baltimore's run

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 1>defense has been elite in recent years, not as much

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>this year. They ranked tenth in run defense by Pro

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Football Focus. They we ain't twentieth and run stuff win

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 1>rate by Espienzo. I think Gibbs can get a little

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 1>something done here. B grade on Jamiir Gibbs, and just

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 1>a C grade on Craig Reynolds. You know, you know

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>he's got the hamstring, he's got the toe injury. If

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>he plays at all, we assume it's going to be

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>in a diminished role here, but hopefully a touchdown opportunity

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>as they run the ball inside the ten as I

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>just talked about. We'll keep a C grade on Craig

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Reynolds if he happens to play. As for the passing game,

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a brutal matchup for everybody, including I'm on

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 1>rass Saint Brown, possibly the toughest matchup of his year.

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore ranks number two in pass coverage by Pro Football Focus,

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>sixth an overall DVOA. I'm on ross Saint Brown is

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a tricky matchup in the slot against Arthur Mallett, who

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>has yet to allow a touchdown this year, and is

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>giving up just twenty two yards per game in his coverage.

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>The good news Baltimore's cornerbacks play more man than zone,

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and AARSB has been good against man coverage. So there's that.

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I got a passer rating of one hundred and one

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>when targeted in man coverage, So that might be your

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.360
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for a'm on Ross Saint Brown. Who clocks in

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:07.120
<v Speaker 1>with a beeg? Right?

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 4>Do you want to play the game? Did the Ravens

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 4>pick a wide receiver over I'm on Ross Bronn.

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Bateman might have been over. I'm on Ross Saint Brown,

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Ding Ding Ding Correct? There we go well before I'm

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 1>on Ross Saint Brown. By the way, yeah, there's that

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 1>much more. We love it. We love I'm on Ross

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Saint Brown.

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 2>So good.

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Josh Reynolds comes in with a sea grade. He's turning

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:30.880
<v Speaker 1>into a weekly fantasy play, but again, tough spot here.

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 1>For many of the reasons I just described, Baltimore's outside

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 1>cornerbacks have been outstanding over the last four weeks. Brandon

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Stevens and Ronald Darby are both allowing passer ratings below

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>seventy one in catch rates below sixty five percent. Stevenson

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:48.880
<v Speaker 1>has been targeted a lot man Maybe that helps Reynolds,

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>but mostly it's not turning into actual production. I can

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>only get you to a C grade on Josh Reynolds.

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Sam Laporte has been a fantastic fine and like one

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>of the only overachievers at the tight end position in

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the entire life. But this also brutal matchup for him too.

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore allowing the fewest points to tight ends, They're one

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of five teams not to allow a touchdown to the position,

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and they allow the second fewest yards per game to

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. Now, in fairness, Laporte is the best tight

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>end they faced all year, So maybe a lot of

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:18.959
<v Speaker 1>perform the other guys that they face, but to this point,

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it's been a very tough matchup and I can only

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>give you a C grade on Sam Laporta. Jamison Williams

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>is on the bench until he's on the field much

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>more often, I believe, just twelve snaps last week, So

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>we need him on the field more before we can

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>throw darts at Jamison Williams. And all of that leaves

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>us with Jared Goff clocking in with a B grade.

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 1>He's been great. This is again a very tough matchup, though,

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore ranks number two in coverage by Pro Football Focus

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and the return of cornerback Marlin Humphrey for the Ravens

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>has been a big boost. He's allowing just thirty two

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>yards per game in his coverage. Some extra volume may

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 1>be coming because of the injuries to the running backs.

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Nobody's healthy here, and if either Gibbs or Craig Reynolds

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>has a setback on their existing injuries, that would mean

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>even more passing. And I factored that in too, gave

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 1>him a B grade here. For Jared Goff it might

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>have otherwise been a C grade. Let's go to the

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Ravens side. I want to start with the running game here.

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>We're going to leave both Gus Edwards and Justice Hill

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. They're splitting work, which stinks. The Lions

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>run defense has been shockingly good. They're ranking number one

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and run defense by Pro Football Focus. No back his

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 1>top forty three yards against the Lions. That is a

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>heck of a turnaround for them.

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 4>I feel like I've seen Gus Edwards take like five

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:34.919
<v Speaker 4>carries at least from inside the five yard line and

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:35.880
<v Speaker 4>just nothing.

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:38.159
<v Speaker 5>Squad doosh, Yeah, I'm with you.

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:40.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's left a lot of yards on

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>the field, but it's there's still not much production to

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>be had. There only one runners scored against the Lions

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>all season long, so they're both on the bench. Let's

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 1>go to the passing game. Zay Flowers finally scored last week,

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>which I think helps fantasy managers realize just how good

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>he's been now. Originally we'd worried that Flowers was going

0:27:58.080 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to run mostly from the slot and have some of

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the imitations that come from most slot receivers. But he's

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>running in all parts of the field evenly, and if

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Detroit's rookie's safety Brian Branch can't go, that puts Will

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Harris on the field, and he's been getting killed by

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>slot receivers. Detroit allows at least seventy yards to a

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>receiver in four of their last five games, and Zay

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Flowers is the most likely guy to get that. So

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 1>he comes in with a B grade on Zay Flowers

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and is really turning into an every week starter for

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:27.439
<v Speaker 1>your fantasy team. Mark Andrews is the only other receiver

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:30.239
<v Speaker 1>you care about from Baltimore. He's managed four or more

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:33.119
<v Speaker 1>receptions in every game He's top sixty five receiving yards

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>in three straight games. Detroit's allowed the fourth most points

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and the second most receptions and the second most yards

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the tight ends this season. So it's a smash spot

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>for Mark Andrews, who comes in with an A grade. Now,

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>how about just not dropping any touchdowns? Mark Andrews, how

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 1>about it? It's not too much trouble. And that leaves

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 1>us with Lamar Jackson. For all the talk of Todd

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Munkin ushering in this pass heavy game script to the

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Ravens that is not materialized at all. There ranked thirtieth

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and pass attempts thirtieth.

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 5>We need to start calling him Art Monkin. Now that's right.

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 5>Well we said don't call him that, but now we're

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 5>gonna call him this now.

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of the same old, same old. I mean,

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>low Volume's got Jackson ranking seventeenth in completions nineteenth and

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>passing yards twenty third in passing touchdowns. It's a bummer, honestly.

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore's league average and pass blocking and contain and containing

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna have to contain. They're gonna have to contain.

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Defensive Player of the Year candidate Agent Aiden Hutchinson, who's

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>been really, really good, and I don't know if they're

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be up for that. But the rest of the

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Lions don't rush particularly well. That's a team Detroit ranks

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventh in pass rush win rate. So Jackson's legs

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>will be the wild card here as it usually is.

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>The Lions haven't faced a mobile quarterback this year, but

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 1>last year, justin Fields, Jalen Hurts and Josh Allen absolutely

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>hammered Detroit's defense. Get this, those three guys Fields, Jalen Hurts,

0:29:56.800 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen against the Lions last year average how many

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards average?

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Let's say eighty because I want to be in the neighborhood.

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 5>Sounds about right.

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>One hundred and twelve.

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Wow. Wow, Yeah, So that's exciting.

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>That is exciting, Labar Jackson be great. Let's take a break.

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, we got a big block of

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>matchups for you, including Cleveland Browns in Indianapolis Colts. The

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Brown's defense on a historic run right now, Can you

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>start any Cults against the Cleveland Browns this week? Any week?

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Find out when we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>New leagues forming virtually every day guianteen leagues dot com.

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>It's the freshest, funnest way to play fantasy football. You

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 1>know how it works because you've heard the show a

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>million times. Every week, the low scoring team gets chopped

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>from the league, their roster goes, so the waiver wire

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of us build superstar lineups to go

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>head to head the rest of the way. All you

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 1>have to do is not finish last with this. At

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>this stage of the season, twelve te weeks left in

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>this season, so twelve team leagues being formed now gilletine

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 1>league dot com.

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 4>And we should clarify for those who are listening and

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 4>they're like, well, there was already a game played on Thursday.

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 5>You can still draft those players.

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 4>Insert them in your starting lineup and gets the points

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 4>Scout accumulated. And you know Travis etn was a fringe

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 4>first round pick. Maybe just take them first overall and

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 4>he take his two.

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Touchdowns, let's and survive a week. Survive a week, so

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>by himself he will probably get you to next week.

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 4>And so many studs like Jamar Chase Adam Fiehlen top

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 4>ten wide receiver on by.

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 5>How much of a discount do you get on those guys, it's.

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Jamar Chase on By.

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, exactly.

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Fascinating, absolute fascinating time to draft. You know what else

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>is fascinating? If you got any Colts in your lineup?

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>What are you going to do here against the best

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>on a defense that is historically good? Right now? Opposing

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>teams getting just fifty two plays per game against the Browns,

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>it's been an incredible run for their defense. I don't

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>think there's any Colts to play here other than maybe

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Michael Pittman. What do you think?

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 3>It's pretty grim. The Browns are number one in the

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 3>league in the following categories, passing completions allowed, passing yards allowed,

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 3>passing touchdowns allowed, running back touches per game, receptions yards

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 3>and touchdowns allowed to wide receivers, receptions and yards allowed

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 3>to tight ends. Yeah, let's leave all the colts on

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 3>the bench. Zach Taylor or Zach Taylor and Jonathan Moss

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 3>how about Oh yeah, it doesn't matter. They're both on

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 3>the bench. It was an almost even split last week

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 3>and snaps thirty seven to thirty two in favor of Moss,

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 3>completely tied in opportunities fourteen rushing attempts plus targets, A piece.

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 3>If anything, it's trending the right way for Taylor in

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 3>his third week back. But if you're splitting ninety four

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 3>total yards and less than half of a score between

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Moss and Taylor, both of them have to be on

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 3>the bench. Gardner Minshew has played a portion of every

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 3>game this year for the Colts, and last week he

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 3>did put up three hundred and twenty nine yards in

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 3>a score plus three picks against his old team. Again.

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Problem is, the Browns are allowing one hundred and forty

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 3>three passing yards and just under a touchdown per game.

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 3>If you need to start a Colts wide receiver because

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 3>you're in a weird league that has a requirement that

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 3>you would start a Colts wide receiver, Michael Pittman's the

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 3>only one you could consider. If the Colts do it right,

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 3>they'll flex Pittman out to the left most often, where

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 3>he'd face right cornerback Martin Emerson. That's the only soft

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 3>spot in the Browns secondary. He's allowing only twenty He's

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 3>allowing twenty three yards per reception in his coverage, but

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 3>he's only allowed six receptions on the season, so I

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't start him. But if you have to in a pinch.

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Michael Pittman's somebody, I guess that you could get a

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 3>low c on on the other side.

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, not a lot to love here.

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 3>A lot to love here either. Will it be PJ. Walker?

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 3>Will it be QB. Brown's? It sounds like it's going

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 3>to be QB. Brown's. He was a full participant, still

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 3>recovering from a rotator cuff strand on his throwing arm.

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 3>That's not a great thing to have when you have

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 3>to pass the ball. And it's a pretty good matchup too.

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 3>The Colts are bottom ten and completions, pass yards and

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 3>rushing yards allowed to the opposing quarterback, but with an

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 3>unhealthy shoulder, it's just a C grade for the Browns.

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 3>Qb Amari Cooper is the only Browns wide receiver you

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:24.320
<v Speaker 3>could consider starting, although it's worth noting that he missed

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:28.960
<v Speaker 3>Wednesday and Thursday practice for non injury related items. Cooper

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 3>and Elijah Moore are getting similar target shares, but the

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.280
<v Speaker 3>average depth of target for Cooper is fifteen point six.

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 3>That's good, and it's eight for Elijah Moore. More tends

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:40.879
<v Speaker 3>to run from the slot, where he'll face Kenny Moore

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 3>most often. He has been the best of the Colts

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:44.359
<v Speaker 3>corners this year.

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Who gets more.

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 3>In the midnight hour? We cried more and more and more.

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah nice, I'll give Cooper a c here in an

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:55.799
<v Speaker 3>above average matchup. The Colts are allowing the eleventh most

0:34:55.800 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 3>receptions and yards to opposing wide receivers. But still it's

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 3>the shoulder of QB. Browns that's the difference. David and

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Joku A spots c start as well. Three different tight

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:07.879
<v Speaker 3>ends in the last three weeks have hit the ten

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:11.399
<v Speaker 3>PPR points mark. It's mostly been on volume. The Colts

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:13.879
<v Speaker 3>have allowed the fourth most receptions and the sixth most

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:16.440
<v Speaker 3>yards to the position this year, but only have given

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 3>up one score to a tight end this year. And finally,

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 3>the running backs Jerome Ford and Kareem Hunt worth noting

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:24.840
<v Speaker 3>the slight shift in Cleveland.

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure.

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:29.320
<v Speaker 3>In the last three weeks, Kareem Hunt snaps went fourteen fourteen,

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 3>twenty six. Jerome Ford snap stayed pretty close to the

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 3>same at around thirty seven per game, but the rushing

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:37.879
<v Speaker 3>attempts and targets were pretty close to a split. Last week,

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:41.919
<v Speaker 3>Hunt had fifteen opportunities, Ford had nineteen. It's clear both

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:44.879
<v Speaker 3>will be utilized and This could grow into almost an

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:47.919
<v Speaker 3>even split before long. Maybe it's already there. This week

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 3>against the Colts, they face a team that's allowed seven

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 3>rushing touchdowns to opposing backs already. That's the fourth most

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:55.760
<v Speaker 3>in the league. They've also allowed the ninth most receiving

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 3>yards and are seeing about twenty eight total running back

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 3>touches per game. That lines up for some good numbers

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 3>for both of the runners. Even if it's a split.

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 3>I'll give a pair of sees to both of them.

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 3>But four it is closer to the b than Hunt.

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas taking on the Bears. Now, Brian, you already

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 1>told us about some elements of the Las Vegas passing

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>game that you like, and take a chance on me.

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>But let's go to Josh Jacobs with what feels like

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good opportunity. Vikings could not cash in against

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:22.919
<v Speaker 1>the Bears last week. I like Josh Jacobs to do better.

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, as do I I'm giving Jacobs an a.

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:27.880
<v Speaker 4>It's not the best matchup on the ground, as the

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 4>Bears allowed the tenth fewest rushing yards per game to

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 4>opposing running backs.

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 5>The real angle here is through the air. For Jacobs.

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:37.799
<v Speaker 4>The Bears allowed the most receiving yards per game to

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:41.799
<v Speaker 4>opposing backs sixty one per game, and Jacobs leads all

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 4>running backs with nearly in targets with nearly six per game.

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 5>So I like Jacobs a lot and his usual bell

0:36:48.080 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 5>cow role here.

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 4>Speaking of liking a player a lot, you can't like

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:55.880
<v Speaker 4>Devonte Adams a whole lot over the last two weeks.

0:36:56.000 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 4>Just six catches for seventy four scoreless yards across his

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:03.359
<v Speaker 4>last two still giving him a bee here, though, this

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 4>feels like the squeaky wheel gets the grease.

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I think kind of game if you were a good

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 1>enough player. Squeaky wheel almost always works if you're a

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:15.160
<v Speaker 1>good enough player, and Adams is, and.

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 4>Adams certainly has played his fair share of games against

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 4>the Bears in his time with the Packers. The Bears

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:23.319
<v Speaker 4>are allowing one hundred and sixty yards at more than

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 4>a touchdown per game to opposing wideout. So a B

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 4>for Adams and a B for Jakobe Myers, who was

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 4>just red hot right now. Meyers with twelve catches, one

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:34.360
<v Speaker 4>hundred and thirty six yards and two touchdowns across his

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:37.839
<v Speaker 4>last two games. Myers is now just one of nine

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:41.720
<v Speaker 4>wide receivers with at least four touchdowns this year. Only

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 4>he and Keenan Allen have played five games. Among those

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 4>nine wide receivers on that list, the other seven have

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:50.279
<v Speaker 4>played six. So Myers red hot safe b for him

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 4>and Michael Mayer. Might take a chance on me pass catcher,

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 4>and it's confirmed Brian Hoyer is Raiders quarterback this week

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:00.840
<v Speaker 4>against the Bears. He might take a chance on me quarterback.

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 4>Over to the Bear side, Dante Foreman gets a see

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 4>he will be starting will be the starting running back

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:08.799
<v Speaker 4>for Chicago and this one. The Raiders have surrendered three

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 4>rushing touchdowns to running backs over the last two weeks,

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 4>and on the season, the Raiders are allowing nearly one

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:17.359
<v Speaker 4>hundred and thirty compo yards per game to running back.

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 4>So a safe sea for Foreman. And that's why I

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 4>had Travis Homer. Its might take a chance on me

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:25.479
<v Speaker 4>running back and by Coop, excuse me by apocalypse part

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 4>one by Pocalytpa, take a D three, take a shot

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:31.840
<v Speaker 4>on Travis Homer. If you're imedy at running back like

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 4>most of us are, DJ Moore, just to see for

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 4>him in this game. You have to downgrade more based

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:41.760
<v Speaker 4>on the Bears quarterback situation. Which we'll discuss in a minute,

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 4>very briefly, we'll discuss it. But regardless of who is

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 4>under cender, this is not a great matchup on paper

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 4>for posing wide receivers. The Raiders have allowed the fifth

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:55.600
<v Speaker 4>fewest catches per game to opposing wide receivers, and no

0:38:55.680 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 4>opposing wide out has topped one hundred yards against Las Vegas.

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 4>For those reasons, Darnell Mooney is on the bench, but

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 4>I will give cole kmet a c in the tight

0:39:05.680 --> 0:39:08.800
<v Speaker 4>end waste land, the Raiders are allowing nearly six catches

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 4>and fifty yards per game to tight ends.

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 5>We will take that all day, every day if we.

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 4>Can get eleven PPR points from our tight end in

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 4>the waste land.

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:17.280
<v Speaker 5>And I alluded to.

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 4>The the quarterback situation in Chicago, it's Tyler. I'm sorry,

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 4>Tyson Bajant secret Bagient man, it's on the bench.

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:29.239
<v Speaker 5>I don't know that's the best.

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:32.399
<v Speaker 1>No, yeah, obviously he's on the bench.

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:32.760
<v Speaker 5>Secret.

0:39:32.800 --> 0:39:34.360
<v Speaker 4>I don't know what else can we do with Bajient

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 4>double O seven. He'll score zero zero point seven.

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Points something like that. Commander's taking on the Giants. We'll

0:39:44.560 --> 0:39:48.759
<v Speaker 1>just move along here. I like a lot of Commanders

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:56.280
<v Speaker 1>in this game A grade four, Matty McLaurin.

0:39:56.480 --> 0:40:00.239
<v Speaker 4>Oh the other way, Oh yeah, absolutely.

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:01.840
<v Speaker 5>That's all the sound effects from really Commanders.

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 1>He's got a bunch. Terry mclaur in awesome history against

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:08.799
<v Speaker 1>the Giants, averaging seven receptions for ninety three yards and

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:12.360
<v Speaker 1>half a touchdown against his divisional rival. He's top seventy

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:16.600
<v Speaker 1>yards in every lifetime matchup against the Giants. Cornerback of

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Dory Jackson questionable with a neck injury. Jackson has allowed

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the fifth most yards of any cornerback to season, So

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 1>even if he goes, it's a great matchup for McLaurin.

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 1>And if he doesn't, replacement cornerback Trey Hawkins is even

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 1>worse and he's giving up the deepest a out of

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:35.840
<v Speaker 1>any cornerback in the league. So game on, Terry McLaurin,

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:39.320
<v Speaker 1>love it a grade for him. Let's go to further receivers.

0:40:39.400 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Samuels might take a chance on my receiver, and

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:47.920
<v Speaker 1>even the much maligned and non producing Johan Dotson. We're

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna give him one last crack in this bipocalypse twenty three.

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:54.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, they vowed to get the ball in his hands

0:40:54.760 --> 0:40:56.840
<v Speaker 4>more yea awesome, that is. But that's because now he

0:40:56.920 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 4>is now the placeholder.

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:02.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. Just I'd say it's the holder of point per

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:03.960
<v Speaker 5>place holder.

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah for laces out point per laces out. Dotson by

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 1>week dart throw here, he leads all Commanders receivers and snaps.

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:14.319
<v Speaker 1>He's second in targets. He just never there's just no

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:17.760
<v Speaker 1>production to go with it. But the Giants secondary so bad,

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>this could be Dotson's breakout game of the year. I

0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:24.480
<v Speaker 1>already told you that the cornerback problems they're having. The

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 1>probable starting cornerbacks for the Giants are going to roll

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 1>into this game with these Pro Football Focus rankings ninety third,

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:35.799
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and thirteenth, and one hundred and twenty three.

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>There's an opportunity for Johan Dotson for a breakout game

0:41:39.800 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 1>right here, Logan Thomas, you'd expect the Giants are yielding

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:46.480
<v Speaker 1>against tight ends. Since the opener. The Giants are allowing

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:49.439
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight tight end receiving yards per game, which would

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 1>be fourth worst across the full season. Thomas is very

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 1>involved in the offense, averaging five targets and four catches

0:41:54.560 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 1>per game, including a red zone target per game. Be

0:41:57.480 --> 0:42:00.359
<v Speaker 1>great on Logan Thomas. If I didn't say a grade

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 1>on Johan Dotson, it's a C grade for him, and

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 1>so all of those receivers together. Obviously, I like the

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:10.800
<v Speaker 1>passing game here, and I like my guy Sam Howell

0:42:11.719 --> 0:42:16.640
<v Speaker 1>on pace to shatter the single season sack record along

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:21.880
<v Speaker 1>with several Vertebrae's on pace for ninety six sacks. Ninety

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:29.840
<v Speaker 1>six Somewhere, David Carr is involuntarily wincing at Sam Howell

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Howell seeing pressure. I'm thirty four percent of his dropbacks.

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:36.759
<v Speaker 1>That's the league's worst number. Now, Worryingly, the Giants pass

0:42:36.840 --> 0:42:38.880
<v Speaker 1>rush win rate is tenth best, and that's like the

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 1>one thing the Giants are still good at. Dexter Lawrence

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:45.759
<v Speaker 1>getting at opposing quarterbacks. But still, Sam Howe has been good, impressively,

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:49.920
<v Speaker 1>sitting in the top ten among all quarterbacks in completions,

0:42:50.000 --> 0:42:54.960
<v Speaker 1>completion percentage, and touchdown passes. For Sam Howell clocking in

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 1>with a B grade, Let's go over to Brian Robinson.

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 1>By the way, this sounds like a bunch of guys

0:43:00.680 --> 0:43:04.319
<v Speaker 1>doing a wolf folel. It doesn't even sound like real wolves.

0:43:03.600 --> 0:43:08.600
<v Speaker 1>It's it's me dot real wolves, not guys sounding like wolves.

0:43:09.200 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

0:43:10.280 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 3>Anything for you charge.

0:43:11.960 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Brian Robinson matchup starter and this is the right matchup.

0:43:15.200 --> 0:43:17.920
<v Speaker 1>In six career games against the Giants, he's averaging seventy

0:43:17.920 --> 0:43:20.600
<v Speaker 1>combined yards and nearly a score per game. Giants are

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:23.279
<v Speaker 1>bottom ten and run stuff win rate. The Giants have

0:43:23.320 --> 0:43:25.680
<v Speaker 1>allowed six opposing running backs to rush for at least

0:43:25.719 --> 0:43:28.880
<v Speaker 1>sixty five yards and a score. So a great opportunity

0:43:28.880 --> 0:43:31.240
<v Speaker 1>for Brian Robinson, who comes in with a B grade

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and Antonio Gibson was my take a chance on me runner.

0:43:34.480 --> 0:43:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's go over to the Giants side, where there's a

0:43:36.440 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 1>lot less to like. Sakwon Barkley comes in with a

0:43:39.600 --> 0:43:43.439
<v Speaker 1>B grade. Giants offensive line ranks dead last and run

0:43:43.480 --> 0:43:45.400
<v Speaker 1>block win rate, and we know they're going to be

0:43:45.400 --> 0:43:49.120
<v Speaker 1>missing three offensive linemen in this game, including Andrew Thomas

0:43:49.160 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and Senator John Michael Schmidts. Fortunately, Washington a middling run defense,

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 1>so there's still opportunity for Barkley. Barkley's closest comparable, running

0:43:58.040 --> 0:44:01.799
<v Speaker 1>back Jon Robinson, last week got steming on the ground

0:44:01.800 --> 0:44:04.279
<v Speaker 1>but caught five passes. I like that here and then

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Tyrod Taylor's a consideration you could have. He runs around

0:44:07.560 --> 0:44:09.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot, very mobile commanders have allowed the second most

0:44:09.880 --> 0:44:13.239
<v Speaker 1>quarterback rushing yards last year, Daniel Daniel Jones ran for

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:15.880
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and six and in the two matchups with Washington,

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:17.959
<v Speaker 1>if it is Taylor, if it's not, you could also

0:44:18.000 --> 0:44:20.400
<v Speaker 1>consider a dart throw at Daniel Jones, mostly for what

0:44:20.440 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 1>he could do on the ground. And then, lastly, Darren

0:44:24.200 --> 0:44:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Waller startble in this matchup. Some signs of life lately

0:44:27.520 --> 0:44:30.520
<v Speaker 1>with nineteen targets the past two weeks and he's caught

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:33.320
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent of his targets over the past three games.

0:44:33.640 --> 0:44:36.160
<v Speaker 1>A healthy eight yard a dot here in Washington, a

0:44:36.160 --> 0:44:38.920
<v Speaker 1>middle of the pack tight end defense in the bipocalypse,

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you probably have to start Darren Waller with a C grade,

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:45.279
<v Speaker 1>B grade on Barkley, C grade on Tyrod Taylor, and

0:44:45.520 --> 0:44:48.719
<v Speaker 1>or Daniel Jones. When we come back, A game we

0:44:48.880 --> 0:45:14.440
<v Speaker 1>like to call three tough questions, Stay tuned our number

0:45:14.440 --> 0:45:16.959
<v Speaker 1>two Fantasy Football Weekly A game we like to call

0:45:17.080 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 1>three tough questions. Play along, see if you can go

0:45:20.560 --> 0:45:22.280
<v Speaker 1>three and oh with our panel of experts.

0:45:22.480 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 6>Tough question number one.

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:27.040
<v Speaker 1>They tell me that they don't think you got it. Well,

0:45:27.520 --> 0:45:29.399
<v Speaker 1>you guys are saying on the break, you don't think

0:45:29.480 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that our listeners can go three and oh.

0:45:31.160 --> 0:45:33.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, I was saying that.

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:36.880
<v Speaker 5>Oh, I always like their chances more than mine, the listeners.

0:45:37.040 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 1>That's true. But none of these are Abu Kyle Pitts.

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 1>So you're not automatically going to lose.

0:45:40.640 --> 0:45:41.399
<v Speaker 5>Oh, that's good.

0:45:43.160 --> 0:45:45.080
<v Speaker 6>Tough. Question number one.

0:45:45.000 --> 0:45:47.600
<v Speaker 1>For teams that are six and oh or five and one,

0:45:48.120 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is it too early to start molding your roster for

0:45:51.080 --> 0:45:52.919
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs? We begin with Matt.

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 3>If you go to week fourteen, you have eight weeks

0:45:56.040 --> 0:45:57.399
<v Speaker 3>left and all you got to do is go five

0:45:57.480 --> 0:45:59.400
<v Speaker 3>hundred to be ten and four, nine and five, and

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 3>most of those leagues, that's good enough to make the playoffs.

0:46:01.640 --> 0:46:04.280
<v Speaker 3>So not too early to start looking ahead at the playoffs.

0:46:04.280 --> 0:46:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Maybe start targeting some of the league's worst defenses, making

0:46:07.400 --> 0:46:10.319
<v Speaker 3>some even trades, like, for instance, look at Denver, who

0:46:10.320 --> 0:46:13.040
<v Speaker 3>has the Lions, Patriots, and Chargers in the playoffs, Or

0:46:13.040 --> 0:46:15.520
<v Speaker 3>look at Arizona who has the forty nine Ers, Bears,

0:46:15.520 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 3>and Eagles in the playoffs. That's what you should kind

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:22.480
<v Speaker 3>of be looking at right now. So yes, yeah, go ahead, Okay,

0:46:22.520 --> 0:46:24.800
<v Speaker 3>start molding. Not too early, yeah, you say, Brian.

0:46:25.480 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 1>For teams that are six and zero or five and one,

0:46:27.680 --> 0:46:29.799
<v Speaker 1>Is it too early to start molding your roster for

0:46:29.840 --> 0:46:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs?

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:33.600
<v Speaker 4>No, definitely not too early. It's the perfect time and

0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:35.879
<v Speaker 4>things you can be doing this week with so many

0:46:35.920 --> 0:46:39.240
<v Speaker 4>teams on by look at the teams in your league

0:46:39.400 --> 0:46:43.319
<v Speaker 4>that maybe have the ceed Lamb or Garrett Wilson, one

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:46.320
<v Speaker 4>of these studs on by your Higgens, Jammy mar Chaks

0:46:46.360 --> 0:46:49.040
<v Speaker 4>who've been underperforming by low on those guys, and just

0:46:49.760 --> 0:46:52.280
<v Speaker 4>you can afford to look ahead. As Matt Matt mentioned,

0:46:52.320 --> 0:46:56.600
<v Speaker 4>you're essentially guaranteed to make the playoffs. You're not one

0:46:56.640 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 4>hundred percent guaranteed, but very good chance you do. But yeah,

0:46:59.520 --> 0:47:01.799
<v Speaker 4>start playing the matchups in the later weeks. Make sure

0:47:01.840 --> 0:47:04.799
<v Speaker 4>you have sound backups. But yeah, this is the time

0:47:04.840 --> 0:47:07.680
<v Speaker 4>to look at players who had a rough schedule. Damian

0:47:07.719 --> 0:47:10.200
<v Speaker 4>Peters is definitely won on buy this week, had a

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 4>brutal stretch to start at.

0:47:12.000 --> 0:47:14.080
<v Speaker 1>All time low on. David, You're sorry that all.

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:16.040
<v Speaker 4>The time, Low, But the answer is no, it is

0:47:16.120 --> 0:47:18.520
<v Speaker 4>definitely not too early to start molding your lineups.

0:47:18.800 --> 0:47:22.799
<v Speaker 1>You are both correct. Really, we're trading October wins for

0:47:22.880 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 1>December wins, and that's fine. And as Matt I did,

0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:27.719
<v Speaker 1>the exact same math that Matt did. If I played

0:47:27.760 --> 0:47:29.600
<v Speaker 1>just five hundred balls, apparently I've got a very good

0:47:29.600 --> 0:47:31.600
<v Speaker 1>team if I'm six and OHM five and one. If

0:47:31.600 --> 0:47:33.759
<v Speaker 1>I just if that drops down to five hundred, I'm

0:47:33.760 --> 0:47:36.200
<v Speaker 1>still making the playoffs one hundred percent if I play

0:47:36.200 --> 0:47:38.319
<v Speaker 1>five hundred ball the rest of the way. So now

0:47:38.320 --> 0:47:41.760
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at acquiring players who can help us later

0:47:41.920 --> 0:47:46.759
<v Speaker 1>that you can get now. How about injured players David Montgomery,

0:47:47.040 --> 0:47:51.799
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones, Justin Jefferson. Go get these guys that are

0:47:52.000 --> 0:47:55.040
<v Speaker 1>likely to be healthy by then and aren't healthy right

0:47:55.080 --> 0:47:58.319
<v Speaker 1>now because you can take those losses. How About backups

0:47:58.760 --> 0:48:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that could be in lead spots by December for whatever reason.

0:48:03.120 --> 0:48:05.440
<v Speaker 1>What if Alexander Madison doesn't get any better and they

0:48:05.480 --> 0:48:09.120
<v Speaker 1>go to cam Akers. What if Derrick Henry gets hurt

0:48:09.400 --> 0:48:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and they go to Taja Spears or they trade them.

0:48:11.680 --> 0:48:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about trading Derrick Henry. What if Jeff What

0:48:15.040 --> 0:48:17.640
<v Speaker 1>if Marhem Moster gets hurt, which he always does. What

0:48:17.640 --> 0:48:20.080
<v Speaker 1>if it's Jeff Wilson's job by then? These are the

0:48:20.200 --> 0:48:23.799
<v Speaker 1>kinds of moves that you could take speculatively now to

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:25.760
<v Speaker 1>help your team in December.

0:48:27.320 --> 0:48:30.800
<v Speaker 6>Tough question number two for Dynasty.

0:48:30.400 --> 0:48:35.400
<v Speaker 1>And Empire leagues. Specifically, are you buying low on Jordan Love?

0:48:35.840 --> 0:48:38.760
<v Speaker 1>M We discussed Love a little bit earlier, easy matchup

0:48:38.880 --> 0:48:42.520
<v Speaker 1>this week, but obviously our vision here on this question

0:48:42.840 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 1>is years down the road, not just week seven. Brian,

0:48:46.600 --> 0:48:47.440
<v Speaker 1>what do you think.

0:48:47.800 --> 0:48:51.880
<v Speaker 4>I was going to initially compartmentalize this into one quarterback

0:48:51.880 --> 0:48:55.600
<v Speaker 4>and then super flex leagues when I answered, but I'm

0:48:55.600 --> 0:48:57.239
<v Speaker 4>going to love them together and say yes, I am

0:48:57.320 --> 0:48:58.839
<v Speaker 4>going to buy low on Jordan Love.

0:48:58.880 --> 0:49:01.560
<v Speaker 5>He's had is ups and downs so far. This year.

0:49:01.840 --> 0:49:04.560
<v Speaker 4>Was a Gangbusters to start look great, but he's had

0:49:04.600 --> 0:49:08.480
<v Speaker 4>his down games. But in all reality, the Packers haven't

0:49:08.480 --> 0:49:10.919
<v Speaker 4>had their full offense on the field altogether at once.

0:49:11.000 --> 0:49:14.160
<v Speaker 4>Christian Watson was injured to start the season. Then Aaron

0:49:14.239 --> 0:49:16.040
<v Speaker 4>Jones went down, so they just haven't.

0:49:15.840 --> 0:49:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Had Dobbs was injured.

0:49:16.920 --> 0:49:20.120
<v Speaker 4>Dubbs was injured, so they haven't had their full arsenal.

0:49:20.200 --> 0:49:23.360
<v Speaker 4>And Love does lead the league right now in average

0:49:23.400 --> 0:49:26.200
<v Speaker 4>depth of target at nine point eight yards, So let's

0:49:26.239 --> 0:49:29.399
<v Speaker 4>see what he can do with Watson healthy, which will

0:49:29.400 --> 0:49:29.879
<v Speaker 4>be this week.

0:49:30.680 --> 0:49:31.919
<v Speaker 5>You broke the matchup down early.

0:49:31.960 --> 0:49:34.040
<v Speaker 4>We don't know if Aaron Jones will be back, but

0:49:34.080 --> 0:49:36.160
<v Speaker 4>I want to see this whole Packers offense with everyone

0:49:36.200 --> 0:49:40.440
<v Speaker 4>healthy before I give a final verdict on Jordan Love's.

0:49:40.200 --> 0:49:42.160
<v Speaker 5>Outlook, But as of right now, I will buy low.

0:49:42.000 --> 0:49:44.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, So you're a yes on that, Matt. For

0:49:44.120 --> 0:49:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Dynasty and Empire League specifically, are you buying low on

0:49:47.200 --> 0:49:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Love Well?

0:49:48.200 --> 0:49:50.680
<v Speaker 3>First off? In a Dynasty League, I'm not really sure

0:49:50.680 --> 0:49:53.440
<v Speaker 3>that it's a by low moment on Jordan Love because

0:49:53.760 --> 0:49:56.040
<v Speaker 3>chances are whoever has him either has had him on

0:49:56.160 --> 0:49:59.239
<v Speaker 3>roster for three years or they traded to go get

0:49:59.320 --> 0:50:01.680
<v Speaker 3>him before this, and they really like him. So I

0:50:02.040 --> 0:50:04.680
<v Speaker 3>don't think that there's too much of a by low opportunity.

0:50:04.880 --> 0:50:06.879
<v Speaker 3>But if the question is do I believe better days

0:50:06.880 --> 0:50:08.640
<v Speaker 3>are ahead for him than the last three weeks, yes,

0:50:08.719 --> 0:50:11.640
<v Speaker 3>I do. His passing still needs more seasoning, but that

0:50:11.680 --> 0:50:15.080
<v Speaker 3>grows with reps. And he does add a very decent

0:50:15.160 --> 0:50:17.920
<v Speaker 3>rushing element that's going underrated. He's put up twenty rushing

0:50:18.000 --> 0:50:20.560
<v Speaker 3>yards or more in three of four games and scored

0:50:20.600 --> 0:50:22.600
<v Speaker 3>twice on the ground in the last three weeks. I

0:50:22.600 --> 0:50:25.040
<v Speaker 3>think that he's a very solid contributor there too.

0:50:26.160 --> 0:50:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Agree with many of the points you already said, and

0:50:27.880 --> 0:50:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm on yes and this I disagree with your assertion

0:50:30.320 --> 0:50:33.680
<v Speaker 1>that whoever Scott Jordan Love is not worried right now.

0:50:33.719 --> 0:50:36.040
<v Speaker 1>The play has not been great, super inconsistent. If you

0:50:36.160 --> 0:50:38.640
<v Speaker 1>have held him for years, you're not getting the payoff

0:50:38.680 --> 0:50:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you expect.

0:50:39.160 --> 0:50:41.120
<v Speaker 3>I just don't think that in a dynasty league people

0:50:41.160 --> 0:50:43.960
<v Speaker 3>are like, oh, five weeks in, I'm ditching him after

0:50:44.000 --> 0:50:45.279
<v Speaker 3>holding them for two and a half years.

0:50:45.320 --> 0:50:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you know anything about fantasy players. You

0:50:47.480 --> 0:50:49.520
<v Speaker 1>think they don't get nervous through six weeks.

0:50:49.760 --> 0:50:51.719
<v Speaker 3>Dynasty players are a little bit of a different breed

0:50:51.760 --> 0:50:52.360
<v Speaker 3>in my opinion.

0:50:52.400 --> 0:50:55.000
<v Speaker 1>But uh huh, okay, all right, So we're seven games

0:50:55.040 --> 0:50:57.680
<v Speaker 1>into his NFL career and there are troubling traits like

0:50:57.719 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the processing speed and the accuracy, but we love the

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:03.279
<v Speaker 1>big arm, we love the mobility, and Brian, I think

0:51:03.320 --> 0:51:06.759
<v Speaker 1>hit on the biggest thing we haven't seen this offense.

0:51:06.960 --> 0:51:09.800
<v Speaker 1>The offensive line decimated by injuries, the running back position

0:51:09.880 --> 0:51:14.600
<v Speaker 1>decimated by injury, and then the wide receivers all all

0:51:14.600 --> 0:51:17.640
<v Speaker 1>been injured at various times. So I'm still I'm not

0:51:17.760 --> 0:51:20.880
<v Speaker 1>ready to say that Jordan Love's not going to end

0:51:21.000 --> 0:51:23.520
<v Speaker 1>up being a pretty significant fantasy factor. And I'm trying

0:51:23.520 --> 0:51:25.319
<v Speaker 1>to find out what I can get Jordan love for

0:51:25.480 --> 0:51:25.960
<v Speaker 1>right now.

0:51:26.719 --> 0:51:29.399
<v Speaker 6>Tough question number three.

0:51:28.960 --> 0:51:32.800
<v Speaker 1>What is the appropriate level of concern for Reshad White?

0:51:33.520 --> 0:51:36.279
<v Speaker 1>Is it none? Is it some? Or is it a

0:51:36.400 --> 0:51:39.880
<v Speaker 1>bowel loosening level of existential dread?

0:51:41.320 --> 0:51:43.560
<v Speaker 3>We begin with Matt So I looked this up and

0:51:43.600 --> 0:51:45.400
<v Speaker 3>it was on the internet, so it has to be true.

0:51:45.960 --> 0:51:49.040
<v Speaker 3>On May sixteenth of this year, in Burnsville, Minnesota, mother

0:51:49.160 --> 0:51:51.719
<v Speaker 3>was in a Caribou coffee drive through when mysteriously it

0:51:51.840 --> 0:51:55.640
<v Speaker 3>started raining poop on their car. The incident was unsolved

0:51:55.760 --> 0:51:58.640
<v Speaker 3>until right now. It was due to Rashad White fantasy

0:51:58.640 --> 0:52:02.640
<v Speaker 3>owners in nearby apartment complexes. He's on the field for

0:52:02.719 --> 0:52:04.799
<v Speaker 3>eighty percent of the Bucks snaps this year, and he's

0:52:04.840 --> 0:52:07.879
<v Speaker 3>done almost nothing. I mentioned in the matchup that he's

0:52:07.880 --> 0:52:11.360
<v Speaker 3>top ten PPR points only once this season. He's seventy

0:52:11.400 --> 0:52:13.960
<v Speaker 3>fourth in the league in rushing yards per attempt at

0:52:14.000 --> 0:52:16.640
<v Speaker 3>three point three. He has one rushing score in his

0:52:16.719 --> 0:52:20.400
<v Speaker 3>last nineteen games, and he's topped sixty rushing yards twice

0:52:20.480 --> 0:52:24.400
<v Speaker 3>in his twenty two career games. He's not good. He's blowed.

0:52:24.880 --> 0:52:28.360
<v Speaker 1>He's blowed, and you're blowed thinking about Yeah, he blew

0:52:28.480 --> 0:52:33.239
<v Speaker 1>on a Caribou drive Throo. Yeah, in midsomb not specifically him,

0:52:33.320 --> 0:52:37.279
<v Speaker 1>but oh his fantasy owners are nearby bowa loosening levels

0:52:37.320 --> 0:52:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of existential dread obviously, Yeah, absolutely, Brian. Appropriate level of

0:52:42.080 --> 0:52:45.480
<v Speaker 1>concern for Rashad White none, some or blowed.

0:52:47.000 --> 0:52:49.680
<v Speaker 4>I was close to blow, but I'm at some right now,

0:52:49.719 --> 0:52:53.120
<v Speaker 4>even though I'm a Sean Tucker bobo. But he's taken

0:52:53.520 --> 0:52:56.120
<v Speaker 4>the back seat to Keishaan Vaughan as the what is

0:52:56.160 --> 0:52:59.160
<v Speaker 4>that backup running back? So that says there's not a

0:52:59.200 --> 0:53:02.280
<v Speaker 4>ton of talents in that backfield and that includes White.

0:53:02.280 --> 0:53:05.279
<v Speaker 4>But it's been a tough start for White in terms

0:53:05.280 --> 0:53:07.120
<v Speaker 4>of matchups. I have to attribute a lot of these

0:53:07.120 --> 0:53:11.279
<v Speaker 4>stats to Graham Barfield. I read this on Twitter. So

0:53:12.000 --> 0:53:15.080
<v Speaker 4>the Bucks have generated zero point six y' eight adjusted

0:53:15.200 --> 0:53:18.279
<v Speaker 4>yards before contact for their running backs. That is the

0:53:18.400 --> 0:53:21.680
<v Speaker 4>third fewest. Now you couple that with their gauntlet of

0:53:21.800 --> 0:53:24.960
<v Speaker 4>a start. When it comes to matchups four opposing running backs,

0:53:25.120 --> 0:53:27.720
<v Speaker 4>They've had the Vikings, who have allowed the eleventh fewest

0:53:27.840 --> 0:53:32.120
<v Speaker 4>yards per carry, then Chicago third fewest, Philadelphia fourth fewest,

0:53:32.560 --> 0:53:36.319
<v Speaker 4>New Orleans ninth fewest, Detroit. Last week for Tampa Bay

0:53:36.440 --> 0:53:39.440
<v Speaker 4>second fewest, and this week they get the Falcons allowing

0:53:39.560 --> 0:53:42.920
<v Speaker 4>just three point three yards per carry, So it's not

0:53:43.040 --> 0:53:46.279
<v Speaker 4>all his fault. So that's why I'm at some. But

0:53:46.600 --> 0:53:49.200
<v Speaker 4>hopefully the schedule softens up a little bit for White.

0:53:49.239 --> 0:53:50.839
<v Speaker 4>But you're not gonna get any reprieve.

0:53:50.560 --> 0:53:52.920
<v Speaker 5>This week, it sounds like, but I'm at some, not blowed.

0:53:53.040 --> 0:53:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you guys are. You've hit on a lot of

0:53:55.080 --> 0:53:58.000
<v Speaker 1>my talking points already, and you've backed it up with

0:53:58.040 --> 0:54:00.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of salient data. Let me add this one.

0:54:00.239 --> 0:54:05.040
<v Speaker 1>In third worst rushing yards over expectation, where shot White

0:54:05.320 --> 0:54:09.799
<v Speaker 1>at negative one yards over expectation, So that's technically under expectation.

0:54:11.040 --> 0:54:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Over expectation.

0:54:12.200 --> 0:54:18.239
<v Speaker 1>He's negatively negative over Yes, So now I thought he

0:54:18.320 --> 0:54:20.560
<v Speaker 1>was going to be a more capable receiver than he

0:54:20.640 --> 0:54:23.920
<v Speaker 1>has been. Just seventeen catches to this point of the season,

0:54:23.960 --> 0:54:27.840
<v Speaker 1>he's averaging three catches for twenty yards. I went into

0:54:27.840 --> 0:54:30.600
<v Speaker 1>this question assuming the answer was going to be blowed.

0:54:31.200 --> 0:54:35.399
<v Speaker 1>But in fantasy football, opportunity means more than ability does.

0:54:35.440 --> 0:54:38.839
<v Speaker 1>The ability isn't there, the offensive line's not there, but

0:54:38.880 --> 0:54:42.200
<v Speaker 1>there's nobody pushing him for touches, and in with all

0:54:42.239 --> 0:54:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of the injuries and everything else at the running back position,

0:54:45.120 --> 0:54:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I got bigger problems. Honestly, then we're Shot White clocking

0:54:48.120 --> 0:54:50.759
<v Speaker 1>in for nine to ten Fantasy points a game. I

0:54:50.800 --> 0:54:54.319
<v Speaker 1>got bigger fish to fry. The answer is some Let's

0:54:54.320 --> 0:54:57.600
<v Speaker 1>go back to the matchups. Matt Arizona Cardinals taking the

0:54:57.600 --> 0:55:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Seahawks. He already talked a little bit about Josh

0:55:00.160 --> 0:55:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Dobbs is a take a chance for me quarterback. How

0:55:02.719 --> 0:55:08.000
<v Speaker 1>about his primary receiver in this game, Marquise Hollywood Brown.

0:55:08.160 --> 0:55:09.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's the only one I'd start out of the

0:55:09.960 --> 0:55:13.440
<v Speaker 3>wide receivers. He'll line up most open with Tarik Woolan,

0:55:13.880 --> 0:55:17.799
<v Speaker 3>who has a one twenty passer rating in coverage this year,

0:55:17.920 --> 0:55:21.560
<v Speaker 3>and he's already allowed two scores. Brown has double digit

0:55:21.600 --> 0:55:24.560
<v Speaker 3>targets in four of the last five weeks, so he

0:55:24.920 --> 0:55:28.440
<v Speaker 3>is a solid B grade here. Michael Wilson's two to

0:55:28.480 --> 0:55:30.719
<v Speaker 3>four targets in the last two weeks aren't enough to

0:55:30.760 --> 0:55:34.240
<v Speaker 3>warrant consideration, and Ronde al Moore's average depth of target

0:55:34.280 --> 0:55:37.200
<v Speaker 3>is two point four. That's a complete disaster. So those

0:55:37.239 --> 0:55:39.319
<v Speaker 3>two are on the bench. Zach Ertz is on the

0:55:39.320 --> 0:55:42.200
<v Speaker 3>bench too. Seattle's been very good against tight ends this year.

0:55:42.440 --> 0:55:44.800
<v Speaker 3>They haven't allowed a tight end score since week fifteen

0:55:44.880 --> 0:55:47.880
<v Speaker 3>of last season, and Ertz has only seen four targets

0:55:47.920 --> 0:55:50.280
<v Speaker 3>per game in each of the last two weeks. Seattle's

0:55:50.280 --> 0:55:52.719
<v Speaker 3>only seen one tight end top the fifty yard mark

0:55:52.960 --> 0:55:56.200
<v Speaker 3>in their last six games. The running back situation is

0:55:56.239 --> 0:55:59.000
<v Speaker 3>absolutely gross and you should stay away from it. Imari

0:55:59.120 --> 0:56:01.960
<v Speaker 3>de Marcado at the most snaps last week at thirty three,

0:56:02.000 --> 0:56:05.680
<v Speaker 3>but only had three touches. Keyante Ingram had twenty six

0:56:05.719 --> 0:56:08.640
<v Speaker 3>snaps and twelve touches but did almost nothing with them.

0:56:08.880 --> 0:56:11.880
<v Speaker 3>And then they activated Damian Williams from the practice squad.

0:56:12.120 --> 0:56:14.799
<v Speaker 3>He got nine touches on twelve snaps, and then they

0:56:14.840 --> 0:56:17.279
<v Speaker 3>sent him back to the practice squad this week, which

0:56:17.320 --> 0:56:18.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't understand.

0:56:18.520 --> 0:56:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Just eye test. He ran the hardest of the three

0:56:21.080 --> 0:56:23.600
<v Speaker 1>by a mile. I'm like, well, he looks like the best.

0:56:23.880 --> 0:56:26.399
<v Speaker 3>I mean, nine touches on twelve snaps says something. They

0:56:26.400 --> 0:56:28.520
<v Speaker 3>trusted him more than anybody else.

0:56:28.440 --> 0:56:30.120
<v Speaker 1>And then they sent him back to practice squad.

0:56:30.200 --> 0:56:33.120
<v Speaker 3>Exactly. No, I mean they could elevate him again, I suppose,

0:56:33.160 --> 0:56:35.920
<v Speaker 3>but Seattle's only allowing two point six yards per carry.

0:56:35.960 --> 0:56:38.360
<v Speaker 3>That's the best mark in the league, so everybody's on

0:56:38.400 --> 0:56:42.600
<v Speaker 3>the bench. Kenneth Walker on the other side, he gets

0:56:42.600 --> 0:56:46.000
<v Speaker 3>my fantasy Ardvark. This week, you get the fantasy yard

0:56:46.120 --> 0:56:49.600
<v Speaker 3>var He's a double A grade For those keeping count

0:56:49.680 --> 0:56:53.240
<v Speaker 3>at home, the cards are allowing one hundred and forty

0:56:53.280 --> 0:56:56.279
<v Speaker 3>four combo yards and a score and a half per

0:56:56.320 --> 0:56:59.520
<v Speaker 3>game to the running back position. Walker's still getting almost

0:56:59.600 --> 0:57:02.320
<v Speaker 3>all the war He's averaging nineteen touches per game and

0:57:02.360 --> 0:57:05.239
<v Speaker 3>a scored six times in the last four weeks. He's

0:57:05.280 --> 0:57:08.960
<v Speaker 3>a solid double A start this week. Gino Smith, He's

0:57:08.960 --> 0:57:11.240
<v Speaker 3>a B grade here. He's hit at least two hundred

0:57:11.280 --> 0:57:13.320
<v Speaker 3>ninety six yards and three of his last four and

0:57:13.360 --> 0:57:16.560
<v Speaker 3>he faces a Cardinals defense that's allowing the fourth most

0:57:16.560 --> 0:57:18.800
<v Speaker 3>passing yards in the league at two hundred sixty six

0:57:18.840 --> 0:57:22.480
<v Speaker 3>per game. But the issue is, and I mentioned it

0:57:22.480 --> 0:57:24.960
<v Speaker 3>on take a chance on me. Dk Metcalf and Tyler

0:57:25.000 --> 0:57:29.120
<v Speaker 3>Lockett both kind of working with some nagging injuries. Lockett's

0:57:29.120 --> 0:57:32.520
<v Speaker 3>trending the right way, Metcalf the wrong way. Jackson Smith

0:57:32.560 --> 0:57:34.520
<v Speaker 3>and Jigbo was might take a chance on me wide

0:57:34.520 --> 0:57:37.680
<v Speaker 3>receiver with a B grade, and I like him. There's

0:57:37.720 --> 0:57:39.960
<v Speaker 3>definitely no tight ends that I want to start for

0:57:40.200 --> 0:57:41.840
<v Speaker 3>the Seattle Seahawks.

0:57:41.880 --> 0:57:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Hey, speaking of tight ends. Let's keep an eye on

0:57:44.320 --> 0:57:48.959
<v Speaker 1>this emerging Trey McBride Zach zach Ertz thing, because sure

0:57:49.000 --> 0:57:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Bride's usage is going up.

0:57:51.320 --> 0:57:54.240
<v Speaker 3>Zachson. Mc bride's a sneaky good play and if he's

0:57:54.280 --> 0:57:56.960
<v Speaker 3>available in a dynasty league that you're in, he's a

0:57:57.000 --> 0:57:57.600
<v Speaker 3>good stash.

0:57:57.680 --> 0:58:00.680
<v Speaker 4>Right now, let me throw out real quick, if Metcalf

0:58:00.680 --> 0:58:04.240
<v Speaker 4>were to sit for those daily players out there, Jake

0:58:04.440 --> 0:58:08.320
<v Speaker 4>Bobo baby probably bare minimum just sitting out there waiting

0:58:08.360 --> 0:58:08.920
<v Speaker 4>for your.

0:58:11.040 --> 0:58:11.720
<v Speaker 5>I can't think of it.

0:58:13.000 --> 0:58:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Wait for the.

0:58:13.480 --> 0:58:14.720
<v Speaker 5>Bobo Bobo sla.

0:58:14.760 --> 0:58:15.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm a Bobo Bobo.

0:58:15.960 --> 0:58:17.960
<v Speaker 5>I've said it a long time. I just loved the name.

0:58:18.160 --> 0:58:18.760
<v Speaker 5>Jake Bobo.

0:58:19.400 --> 0:58:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Steelers taking on the Los Angeles Rams Brian and

0:58:22.840 --> 0:58:26.000
<v Speaker 1>for Pittsburgh, Uh, it's been a very rough go. But

0:58:26.440 --> 0:58:29.920
<v Speaker 1>they may get back Deontay Johnson in this game. Off

0:58:30.000 --> 0:58:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I are has the opportunity to get elevated for this one.

0:58:33.120 --> 0:58:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Could come back. Maybe that's a spark this offense needs.

0:58:35.640 --> 0:58:36.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Deontay A.

0:58:36.600 --> 0:58:39.320
<v Speaker 4>Johnson not listed on the injury report, so he sounds

0:58:39.360 --> 0:58:41.440
<v Speaker 4>like he will return from that hamsterring injury. So we'll

0:58:41.440 --> 0:58:44.240
<v Speaker 4>start with him and George Pickens, but just to see

0:58:44.280 --> 0:58:47.440
<v Speaker 4>for both Pickens and Johnson. The Rams are allowing a

0:58:47.520 --> 0:58:50.520
<v Speaker 4>meager eleven catches and one hundred and thirty one yards

0:58:50.520 --> 0:58:53.720
<v Speaker 4>per game to opposing wide receivers and just one total

0:58:53.760 --> 0:58:58.200
<v Speaker 4>touchdown to the position all year. LA's outside corners are

0:58:58.280 --> 0:59:01.160
<v Speaker 4>Legit Darien Kendrick and a with the It's been both

0:59:01.200 --> 0:59:05.640
<v Speaker 4>on a forty five percent catch rate and their coverage combined,

0:59:05.680 --> 0:59:08.680
<v Speaker 4>they've only allowed eleven receptions on the season. That's one

0:59:09.120 --> 0:59:10.840
<v Speaker 4>every twenty coverage snaps.

0:59:11.400 --> 0:59:11.800
<v Speaker 5>Yikes.

0:59:11.800 --> 0:59:16.120
<v Speaker 4>So softest of seeds for Pickens and Deontay Johnson and

0:59:16.160 --> 0:59:19.440
<v Speaker 4>Pat Firemouth No C, no D. He's on the bench,

0:59:19.560 --> 0:59:22.720
<v Speaker 4>not expected to play with the hamstring injury, and it's

0:59:22.800 --> 0:59:25.360
<v Speaker 4>unfortunate because this is a good matchup for tight ends.

0:59:25.720 --> 0:59:28.320
<v Speaker 4>The Rams are allowing five catches, sixty nine yards and

0:59:28.360 --> 0:59:31.200
<v Speaker 4>half a touchdown per game to tight ends. But you're

0:59:31.240 --> 0:59:35.160
<v Speaker 4>flipping a coin now between Connor Hayward and Darnell Washington,

0:59:35.200 --> 0:59:39.720
<v Speaker 4>Who's an exciting rookie, but Hayward's been seeing more targets

0:59:39.760 --> 0:59:42.720
<v Speaker 4>than Washington when they both see snaps. If I had

0:59:42.760 --> 0:59:44.760
<v Speaker 4>to pick one would be Hayward. But they're both on

0:59:44.800 --> 0:59:47.800
<v Speaker 4>the bench in this game, as is Kenny Pickett. He'll

0:59:47.800 --> 0:59:51.960
<v Speaker 4>be sitting on the bench next to Hayward and Darnell Washington.

0:59:52.000 --> 0:59:55.200
<v Speaker 4>The Ram sep surrendered four passing touchdowns and six games

0:59:55.280 --> 0:59:55.640
<v Speaker 4>this year.

0:59:55.680 --> 0:59:58.160
<v Speaker 5>That is not a lot. And also on the bench.

0:59:58.680 --> 1:00:02.400
<v Speaker 4>For the Steelers are running backs Jalen Warren and Najie Harris.

1:00:02.680 --> 1:00:05.280
<v Speaker 4>I list Warren first because he is the better running

1:00:05.280 --> 1:00:09.000
<v Speaker 4>back between the two. Warren has outscored Najie Harris and

1:00:09.080 --> 1:00:11.360
<v Speaker 4>Fantasy points in every game this season, all five that

1:00:11.680 --> 1:00:13.880
<v Speaker 4>Brig has played. I didn't realize it was that lopside.

1:00:13.920 --> 1:00:16.800
<v Speaker 4>It is, and he has only seen fifty five touches,

1:00:17.040 --> 1:00:20.960
<v Speaker 4>twenty one being catches. Harris has sixty eight touches, just

1:00:21.040 --> 1:00:23.680
<v Speaker 4>five being catches. But more touches for Harris, but he's

1:00:23.720 --> 1:00:26.760
<v Speaker 4>getting outscored by Warren. But a bad matchup for both.

1:00:26.800 --> 1:00:30.120
<v Speaker 4>The Rams are yielding less than twenty four touches per

1:00:30.200 --> 1:00:32.520
<v Speaker 4>game to running backs for just one hundred and four

1:00:32.560 --> 1:00:35.800
<v Speaker 4>combo yards, So Warren and Harris on the bench in

1:00:35.840 --> 1:00:40.160
<v Speaker 4>this one. Now over to the running backs for the Rams.

1:00:40.320 --> 1:00:42.440
<v Speaker 4>This is about as ugly as it gets with my

1:00:42.520 --> 1:00:46.600
<v Speaker 4>boy Kyra and Williams already ruled out his backup Ronnie

1:00:46.680 --> 1:00:49.600
<v Speaker 4>Rivers ruled out, So now we're looking at Zach Evans,

1:00:50.440 --> 1:00:52.479
<v Speaker 4>Royce Freeman mile.

1:00:53.200 --> 1:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, go ahead, Royce Royce, drop the piano, Freeman, let's go,

1:00:58.400 --> 1:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>let's kill. Let's go with the official signed FFW name.

1:01:01.440 --> 1:01:06.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, how many pianos does Darryl Henderson carry on?

1:01:06.200 --> 1:01:06.960
<v Speaker 5>He's back on the.

1:01:08.720 --> 1:01:10.800
<v Speaker 3>Baby grand I think it is about how many pianos

1:01:10.800 --> 1:01:11.840
<v Speaker 3>does Royce Freeman have?

1:01:12.200 --> 1:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Three?

1:01:12.760 --> 1:01:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Okay?

1:01:13.440 --> 1:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>It does the Steinways full on Steinways that he's dragging

1:01:17.760 --> 1:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>behind him.

1:01:18.240 --> 1:01:19.080
<v Speaker 3>That's a nice piano.

1:01:19.240 --> 1:01:22.040
<v Speaker 4>I can't give a starting grade to anyone in this backfield.

1:01:22.760 --> 1:01:26.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm still in shock over Kyen Williams and his ankle sprain.

1:01:26.320 --> 1:01:28.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm very sad over this. But not a great matchup.

1:01:28.840 --> 1:01:30.720
<v Speaker 4>Can't start any of these running backs for the Rams.

1:01:30.720 --> 1:01:33.440
<v Speaker 4>The Steelers allowing less than a touchdown per game to

1:01:33.480 --> 1:01:35.240
<v Speaker 4>opposing running backs, and this is going to be the

1:01:35.280 --> 1:01:37.160
<v Speaker 4>platoon of all platoons, and that's.

1:01:36.960 --> 1:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>What worries me. So it's going to be stupid Darryl

1:01:39.160 --> 1:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Henderson getting the most garried.

1:01:40.720 --> 1:01:43.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's a four headed coin flip.

1:01:43.600 --> 1:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>And was I wanted to be Zach Evans, who had

1:01:46.200 --> 1:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>some really good traits at ole Miss and I feel

1:01:49.600 --> 1:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>like he has he could be special, and all these

1:01:51.960 --> 1:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>other running backs stink, but just the NFL doesn't work

1:01:55.560 --> 1:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>that way. And the fact that Zach Evans hadn't gotten

1:01:58.400 --> 1:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>himself into position to get really any work before now

1:02:01.800 --> 1:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>tells me that John McVay didn't trust him and didn't

1:02:04.080 --> 1:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>want him on the field.

1:02:05.240 --> 1:02:05.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, a lot of.

1:02:05.840 --> 1:02:08.160
<v Speaker 4>Nervous, A lot of mystery in that backfield. We don't

1:02:08.160 --> 1:02:09.760
<v Speaker 4>want to mess with that. Not a lot of mystery

1:02:09.800 --> 1:02:12.240
<v Speaker 4>at wide receiver for the Ramso Cooper Cup easy a

1:02:12.400 --> 1:02:15.120
<v Speaker 4>Pittsburgh has allowed some big name receivers to pop off

1:02:15.160 --> 1:02:18.160
<v Speaker 4>against them. Brandon Ayuk eight for one twenty nine and

1:02:18.160 --> 1:02:22.480
<v Speaker 4>two touchdowns, DeVante Adams thirteen catches, one hundred and seventy

1:02:22.480 --> 1:02:26.479
<v Speaker 4>two yards two touchdowns against the Rams, Nico Collins seven

1:02:26.560 --> 1:02:29.720
<v Speaker 4>catch I'm sorry against the Steelers. Nico Collins seven catches

1:02:29.800 --> 1:02:32.840
<v Speaker 4>one sixty eight and two against the Steelers. Cooper Cup

1:02:32.880 --> 1:02:36.920
<v Speaker 4>can certainly reproduce those numbers, as could Pooka Nakua. He's

1:02:36.960 --> 1:02:40.240
<v Speaker 4>become the robin to Cooper Cup, who is clearly batman.

1:02:40.280 --> 1:02:43.080
<v Speaker 4>Nowady is healthy, but again a great matchup. The Steelers

1:02:43.120 --> 1:02:46.520
<v Speaker 4>are top ten and the most catches and touchdowns allowed

1:02:46.520 --> 1:02:49.520
<v Speaker 4>to opposing wide receivers in a starting grade for tight

1:02:49.640 --> 1:02:53.000
<v Speaker 4>end Tyler Higbee. The Steelers don't give up a lot

1:02:53.000 --> 1:02:56.040
<v Speaker 4>of production to tight ends on paper, but those numbers

1:02:56.080 --> 1:02:58.560
<v Speaker 4>are suppressed by the zero catches the Raiders tight ends

1:02:58.760 --> 1:03:00.919
<v Speaker 4>head against him in Week three. Outside of that game,

1:03:01.240 --> 1:03:04.920
<v Speaker 4>tight ends at faredwell against Pittsburgh, Mark Andrews, Dalton Schultz

1:03:05.200 --> 1:03:07.440
<v Speaker 4>and the Browns tight ends all combined for good games

1:03:07.840 --> 1:03:11.880
<v Speaker 4>against Pittsburgh and so A. See on Higbee, B on Nakua,

1:03:12.040 --> 1:03:14.120
<v Speaker 4>A on cup Easy, b on Matt.

1:03:13.960 --> 1:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Stafford when we come back justin air pair coming off

1:03:19.360 --> 1:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a bad game. Whatever his prospects for a rebound in

1:03:23.840 --> 1:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City, find out when we come back to Fantasy

1:03:26.720 --> 1:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Charchian, Matt Harrison, Brian

1:03:57.360 --> 1:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Johnson with you if you want to follow us on

1:03:59.720 --> 1:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the side formerly known as Twitter. I'm at Paul Charchie

1:04:02.080 --> 1:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and Matt is at Explosive Output and Brian is at

1:04:04.920 --> 1:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>bt X j.

1:04:06.480 --> 1:04:08.880
<v Speaker 3>Ooh, charg Can I give a shout out really quick?

1:04:09.040 --> 1:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Sure?

1:04:09.800 --> 1:04:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Hey? My soccer team that I'm the assistant coach on

1:04:12.760 --> 1:04:15.600
<v Speaker 3>we made the state tournament last night. We won in

1:04:15.640 --> 1:04:18.280
<v Speaker 3>Super Section eight Double A. Congrats to the Saint Michael

1:04:18.280 --> 1:04:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Albertville Knights boys soccer team. Let's go win a few

1:04:21.400 --> 1:04:23.720
<v Speaker 3>games and take down State. Now that's awesome.

1:04:23.840 --> 1:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Congratulations, that's super cool. Chargers take on the Kansas City Chiefs.

1:04:28.440 --> 1:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Austin Eckler came back and immediately went right back to

1:04:31.440 --> 1:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>being the workhorse role that we were hoping he would

1:04:34.360 --> 1:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>get and came up one yard short twice. Otherwise would

1:04:38.600 --> 1:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>have had really a pretty monstrous game last week. Tricky

1:04:42.120 --> 1:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>matchup here against Kansas City worse.

1:04:44.840 --> 1:04:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, well I like it.

1:04:46.120 --> 1:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>That's why this season we forget the horses even on here.

1:04:49.360 --> 1:04:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely, so many so many animal noises on here.

1:04:52.720 --> 1:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Odd animal noises. So obviously for Austin Eckler, let's go

1:04:55.760 --> 1:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to the passing game here. I want to start with

1:04:57.600 --> 1:05:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen. Now this temptation is just autumn adally plug

1:05:00.680 --> 1:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>him in as an A grade, but not this week

1:05:03.160 --> 1:05:05.720
<v Speaker 1>into Wait, I got some individual matchups that worry me.

1:05:05.800 --> 1:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Here on Allen, he runs from the slot on two

1:05:08.880 --> 1:05:12.160
<v Speaker 1>thirds of his routes. The Chiefs have slot cornerback Trent

1:05:12.200 --> 1:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>mcduffey was last year's first round pick. Right now ranking

1:05:15.640 --> 1:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>his Pro Football Focus is thirteenth best cornerback overall. He's

1:05:19.640 --> 1:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>allowing a mere three receptions per game under thirty yards

1:05:23.160 --> 1:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>per game, and when Allen goes outside, the Chiefs outside

1:05:26.560 --> 1:05:29.720
<v Speaker 1>cornerback Lajerius Snead is also only allowing three receptions and

1:05:29.800 --> 1:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty yards. So there's nowhere to go for an easy

1:05:32.080 --> 1:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>matchups for Keenan Allen. So I'm just putting the B

1:05:34.920 --> 1:05:37.840
<v Speaker 1>grade on Keenan Allen this week. Josh Palmer comes in

1:05:37.840 --> 1:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>with a C grade. He's averaged six sketches seventy two

1:05:41.720 --> 1:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>yards with two touchdowns in the games that Mike Williams

1:05:44.480 --> 1:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>has missed since last season. He led the teams in

1:05:47.200 --> 1:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>routes last week he had even more than Keenan Allen

1:05:50.000 --> 1:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and the second most targets, had the second most receptions

1:05:53.280 --> 1:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in yards. Tricky matchup again for him too. Gets all

1:05:56.160 --> 1:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>three cornerbacks, including the aforementioned Snead and mcduffy who I mentioned.

1:06:00.440 --> 1:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Chargers allowing the fifth fewest yards sorry, Chiefs allowing the

1:06:04.080 --> 1:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>fifth fewest yards to wide outs and over the last month,

1:06:07.280 --> 1:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>no opposing receiver has top sixty four yards against the

1:06:10.600 --> 1:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs and that includes Justin Jefferson, Garrett Wilson, DJ Moore,

1:06:15.280 --> 1:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>some good receivers, so Josh Palmer, just to see grade here.

1:06:19.840 --> 1:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Gerald Everett's on the bench. I'm not chasing. Last week's

1:06:23.280 --> 1:06:26.840
<v Speaker 1>touchdown tight ends are having some success against Kansas City.

1:06:27.080 --> 1:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Three tight ends of top fifty yards, only one is scored.

1:06:29.640 --> 1:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>And the worry is that even with Mike Williams out,

1:06:31.880 --> 1:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>everage is still mostly an afterthought in this offense. In

1:06:34.760 --> 1:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>two games without Mike Williams, Everett averaging two catches for

1:06:38.640 --> 1:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>thirteen yards. Bench grade for Gerald Everett.

1:06:43.000 --> 1:06:43.640
<v Speaker 3>So where does that.

1:06:43.640 --> 1:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Leave Justin air Bear? Coming off the lousy game, he

1:06:49.680 --> 1:06:52.480
<v Speaker 1>faces this good secondary that I've already talked about. I've

1:06:52.520 --> 1:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>got BC's and bench grades on everybody else. Chiefs allowing

1:06:56.320 --> 1:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>less than two hundred passing yards and a very modest

1:06:59.200 --> 1:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>one point two asking touchdowns per game, now working in

1:07:02.960 --> 1:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Herbert's favor, a terrific history against Kansas City. Last year's

1:07:08.000 --> 1:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>two games against the Chiefs combined for six hundred and

1:07:12.400 --> 1:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>fourteen yards and five touchdowns.

1:07:15.120 --> 1:07:15.760
<v Speaker 3>That's pretty good.

1:07:15.760 --> 1:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty good. Maybe a bounce back game coming for

1:07:18.880 --> 1:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Justin air Bear. B grade for Justin Airbear, which I

1:07:22.840 --> 1:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>almost went C grade, but just too much upside to

1:07:25.480 --> 1:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>be had here. All, let's go to the Kansas City side.

1:07:27.920 --> 1:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I get the easy assignment every week of telling you

1:07:29.800 --> 1:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelcey, your obvious a's. Mahomes

1:07:33.000 --> 1:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>has obliterated the Chargers, averaging three touchdowns per game in

1:07:39.040 --> 1:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>his career against the division rival. Only two other Chiefs

1:07:43.800 --> 1:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that I want to talk about. Rashid Rice coming off

1:07:46.800 --> 1:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>his biggest game career highs and routes run and receiving yards.

1:07:51.040 --> 1:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>The rookie could be emerging out of the quagmire of

1:07:54.720 --> 1:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs wide receivers.

1:07:56.760 --> 1:07:58.520
<v Speaker 3>That got even murkier this week.

1:07:58.640 --> 1:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>It did the me cole Hartman thing to me, says

1:08:01.600 --> 1:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>plenty about sky more, I mean sky less, more is less.

1:08:09.360 --> 1:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>That is absolutely sky more is less.

1:08:11.600 --> 1:08:14.959
<v Speaker 4>There's no reason not to just play Rice like I'm

1:08:15.120 --> 1:08:17.080
<v Speaker 4>ninety percent of the snaps at this point for them.

1:08:17.160 --> 1:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you're the Chiefs, why not just yeah, let

1:08:19.200 --> 1:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that kid run and see what happens. He runs two

1:08:21.760 --> 1:08:23.439
<v Speaker 1>thirds of his routes from the slot where he's going

1:08:23.479 --> 1:08:25.919
<v Speaker 1>to face cornerback Josh, Sir.

1:08:26.080 --> 1:08:28.599
<v Speaker 3>Taylor, you're making that name up.

1:08:28.720 --> 1:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I pause just for you, Yeah, he ranks his Pro

1:08:30.880 --> 1:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Football Focus is coverage corner one hundred and sixty six.

1:08:35.360 --> 1:08:37.240
<v Speaker 3>You're making that number up it and yeah, if you're.

1:08:37.200 --> 1:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Thinking what I'm thinking, like, is there one hundred and

1:08:39.880 --> 1:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>sixty six cornerbacks in the NFL? Apparently, yes there are.

1:08:43.360 --> 1:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I think he was like fourth from the bottom. So

1:08:46.760 --> 1:08:48.559
<v Speaker 1>are Shea Rice comes in with the Sea Grade. We'll

1:08:48.560 --> 1:08:51.599
<v Speaker 1>give him the opportunity here. And then lastly, Isaiah Pacheco.

1:08:52.040 --> 1:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>He's looked terrific, running hard in every game. Kansas City

1:08:55.040 --> 1:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>a middle of the pack run blocking offensive line, but

1:08:57.880 --> 1:09:00.519
<v Speaker 1>fortunately the Chargers aren't great in run defense. It's ranking

1:09:00.600 --> 1:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixth in run stuff win rate, twenty fourth in

1:09:05.360 --> 1:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>run defense by Pro Football Focus. Los Angeles allows the

1:09:08.760 --> 1:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>second most receiving yards and the third most receptions to

1:09:11.760 --> 1:09:15.439
<v Speaker 1>opposing backs, and Pacheco quietly averaging over three targets per game,

1:09:15.439 --> 1:09:19.559
<v Speaker 1>and he's seen more targets than Jeric McKinnon has this year.

1:09:21.240 --> 1:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>B Grade, Isaiah Pacheco, let's go back to the matchups,

1:09:25.200 --> 1:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay taking on the Denver Broncos. Matt We've already

1:09:28.160 --> 1:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>talked about a number of different players we like in

1:09:30.320 --> 1:09:32.559
<v Speaker 1>this one. I gave Jordan Loves. May take a chance

1:09:32.600 --> 1:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>on me quarterback. You gave aj Dillons, You take a

1:09:36.280 --> 1:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>chance on me running back? Who else do you like

1:09:38.840 --> 1:09:39.599
<v Speaker 1>from the Packers?

1:09:40.040 --> 1:09:44.040
<v Speaker 3>If Aaron Jones actually does play coming off the bye

1:09:44.040 --> 1:09:47.280
<v Speaker 3>week in the hamstring injury, I don't think the Packers

1:09:47.320 --> 1:09:49.880
<v Speaker 3>would need to play him a lot, but I'd give

1:09:49.920 --> 1:09:52.240
<v Speaker 3>him a C because the matchup is just so good.

1:09:52.280 --> 1:09:54.719
<v Speaker 3>He could be a change of pace guy gets six

1:09:54.800 --> 1:09:58.040
<v Speaker 3>touches and it might be fantasy relevant this week. I'm

1:09:58.080 --> 1:10:01.160
<v Speaker 3>not sure quite what to think of the combo of

1:10:01.280 --> 1:10:04.559
<v Speaker 3>Romeo Dobbs, Jayden Reid and Christian Watson. Since Watson returned

1:10:04.560 --> 1:10:07.599
<v Speaker 3>from injury in week four, the waters have been muddy

1:10:07.640 --> 1:10:11.080
<v Speaker 3>at best. Reid's routes dropped from thirty six in week

1:10:11.160 --> 1:10:14.840
<v Speaker 3>three to only twenty in week two. You're in week five,

1:10:15.240 --> 1:10:18.160
<v Speaker 3>and then targets went from seven to two. Dobbs saw

1:10:18.200 --> 1:10:21.599
<v Speaker 3>a similar downturn from forty three routes run and eleven

1:10:21.640 --> 1:10:24.200
<v Speaker 3>targets in week three to thirty three routes run and

1:10:24.280 --> 1:10:27.719
<v Speaker 3>three targets in week five, while Watson's numbers are climbing

1:10:28.960 --> 1:10:31.000
<v Speaker 3>from his first week back to the second. I'm going

1:10:31.080 --> 1:10:33.719
<v Speaker 3>to give all three starting grades, though, with Watson getting

1:10:33.720 --> 1:10:37.040
<v Speaker 3>a B and Dubs and Reid getting a C, simply

1:10:37.040 --> 1:10:40.719
<v Speaker 3>because Damari Mathis and Jakwan McMillan have been so bad

1:10:40.760 --> 1:10:43.960
<v Speaker 3>in Denver secondary Mathis has allowed four scores and a

1:10:44.040 --> 1:10:47.600
<v Speaker 3>one forty three passer rating, McMillan two touchdowns and a

1:10:47.600 --> 1:10:50.800
<v Speaker 3>one thirty eight passer rating, and Mathis is the worst one.

1:10:50.840 --> 1:10:52.799
<v Speaker 3>He plays the right side of the field most often.

1:10:53.120 --> 1:10:56.120
<v Speaker 3>That's where Christian Watson runs from the most, so that's

1:10:56.160 --> 1:11:01.040
<v Speaker 3>why Watson gets the B. Loose Mutton or Luke Musgraves

1:11:01.080 --> 1:11:04.200
<v Speaker 3>as the squares call him. He gets a C grade

1:11:04.240 --> 1:11:04.639
<v Speaker 3>as well.

1:11:04.920 --> 1:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a cheap we still have a sep sound.

1:11:07.240 --> 1:11:07.519
<v Speaker 6>Man.

1:11:07.600 --> 1:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>If we're gonna run with this, I need cheap sound

1:11:09.880 --> 1:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>on this sport.

1:11:11.000 --> 1:11:13.120
<v Speaker 3>He hasn't done a ton this year, but this is

1:11:13.160 --> 1:11:17.240
<v Speaker 3>a purely great matchup for him. The Broncos are the

1:11:17.320 --> 1:11:22.040
<v Speaker 3>league's worst tight end defenses, allowing six catches in seventy

1:11:22.080 --> 1:11:24.479
<v Speaker 3>six yards per game to the position and half a

1:11:24.520 --> 1:11:28.320
<v Speaker 3>score per game. Considering amongst all the tight end targets

1:11:28.320 --> 1:11:31.000
<v Speaker 3>in Green Bay, they're all going toward Loose Mutton, So

1:11:31.439 --> 1:11:35.160
<v Speaker 3>I definitely take those numbers. Russell Wilson has to be

1:11:35.200 --> 1:11:38.000
<v Speaker 3>on the hot seat in Denver considering the losses he's taken,

1:11:38.040 --> 1:11:41.280
<v Speaker 3>but outside of last week's disaster against Kansas City, his

1:11:41.360 --> 1:11:44.120
<v Speaker 3>fantasy numbers have actually been pretty good. He's a top

1:11:44.160 --> 1:11:48.519
<v Speaker 3>twelve quarterback in most scoring systems, multiple scores in four

1:11:48.520 --> 1:11:51.760
<v Speaker 3>of six, three hundred passing yards twice, thirty or more

1:11:51.840 --> 1:11:54.320
<v Speaker 3>rushing yards in half of his games. The problem is

1:11:54.320 --> 1:11:56.960
<v Speaker 3>they're not winning, and the franchise is in total upheaval

1:11:57.040 --> 1:12:00.000
<v Speaker 3>right now, and they're facing a pretty good Packers pass defense.

1:12:00.439 --> 1:12:03.280
<v Speaker 3>Green Bay has allowed the second fewest completions and yards

1:12:03.280 --> 1:12:06.040
<v Speaker 3>to opposing quarterbacks, with an average stat line of two

1:12:06.080 --> 1:12:09.200
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifteen yards and just one passing score per game.

1:12:09.760 --> 1:12:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Plus he could get the hook at any moment. For

1:12:11.800 --> 1:12:14.360
<v Speaker 3>Jared Stidham, I think that there's a real possibility there.

1:12:14.479 --> 1:12:14.559
<v Speaker 6>Ye.

1:12:15.200 --> 1:12:17.000
<v Speaker 3>I'll still give him a C grade, but it's much

1:12:17.000 --> 1:12:20.240
<v Speaker 3>closer to a bench grade. Courtland Sutton and Jerry Judy

1:12:20.240 --> 1:12:22.519
<v Speaker 3>are both on the bench for me. The Packers have

1:12:22.560 --> 1:12:26.400
<v Speaker 3>allowed one opposing wide receiver to top seventy five yards this season.

1:12:26.600 --> 1:12:29.439
<v Speaker 3>They're along the third fewest receptions and the second fewest

1:12:29.479 --> 1:12:32.880
<v Speaker 3>yards to wide receivers overall. If you have to pick one,

1:12:32.920 --> 1:12:35.519
<v Speaker 3>Sutton has three wide receiver scorers on the year. I'd

1:12:35.600 --> 1:12:37.920
<v Speaker 3>lean his direction over Judy, but both are on the bench,

1:12:38.600 --> 1:12:42.639
<v Speaker 3>and the Denver running back situation it's very tricky. First off,

1:12:42.680 --> 1:12:45.200
<v Speaker 3>it's a good matchup. Green Bay is bottom twelve in

1:12:45.280 --> 1:12:49.800
<v Speaker 3>rushing yards, rushing touchdowns, receptions, receiving yards, and combo touchdowns

1:12:49.840 --> 1:12:52.599
<v Speaker 3>allowed to opposing running backs, So if they had one

1:12:52.640 --> 1:12:55.240
<v Speaker 3>guy getting most of the work, he'd be very startable

1:12:55.240 --> 1:12:58.000
<v Speaker 3>in this game. But problem is that's not the case.

1:12:58.560 --> 1:13:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Jalil McLoughlin had the most snaps last week with twenty

1:13:02.040 --> 1:13:06.040
<v Speaker 3>and got nine touches. Javonte Williams had seventeen snaps and

1:13:06.120 --> 1:13:09.200
<v Speaker 3>ten touches, and then samaj p Erin got two touches

1:13:09.240 --> 1:13:12.479
<v Speaker 3>on eight snaps. So McLoughlin is the guy I'd start

1:13:12.520 --> 1:13:14.839
<v Speaker 3>out of these three for a couple of reasons.

1:13:14.920 --> 1:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>First, Oh, he's averaging like six and a half yards

1:13:17.920 --> 1:13:18.479
<v Speaker 1>per carry.

1:13:18.640 --> 1:13:21.680
<v Speaker 3>That's pretty good. Yeah, but he's also getting quality work

1:13:21.720 --> 1:13:24.400
<v Speaker 3>in the passing game, including two receiving touchdowns in the

1:13:24.520 --> 1:13:28.320
<v Speaker 3>last three weeks. Second, he's had more inside the five

1:13:28.439 --> 1:13:31.160
<v Speaker 3>carries than the other two backs. Granted that surprises me.

1:13:31.240 --> 1:13:35.920
<v Speaker 3>It's only two to one, okay, but it's more a third.

1:13:36.040 --> 1:13:38.960
<v Speaker 3>Even with Williams returning for Week six, McLoughlin was on

1:13:39.000 --> 1:13:41.719
<v Speaker 3>the field more. So I'll give McLoughlin a C grade.

1:13:42.400 --> 1:13:45.599
<v Speaker 3>It could be like, could be closer to be output

1:13:45.640 --> 1:13:47.840
<v Speaker 3>if they just leave him on the field more. But

1:13:47.920 --> 1:13:49.280
<v Speaker 3>the other two I think are on the bench.

1:13:49.320 --> 1:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>For me, I thought Javonte Williams looked downright plotting in

1:13:54.400 --> 1:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>every game until last week, and then it looked like

1:13:57.439 --> 1:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>he just it finally looked like we got some the

1:14:00.280 --> 1:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>old Javante Williams back.

1:14:02.160 --> 1:14:03.639
<v Speaker 3>Maybe he's finally getting healthy.

1:14:03.720 --> 1:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I hope so. But that doesn't take anything away from

1:14:06.320 --> 1:14:09.479
<v Speaker 1>Julian McLoughlin, who's got a spark to him that none

1:14:09.520 --> 1:14:10.479
<v Speaker 1>of the other runners have.

1:14:10.640 --> 1:14:12.960
<v Speaker 3>He's been the one bright spot on that team this year.

1:14:13.080 --> 1:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure, for sure. When we come back, we've

1:14:17.080 --> 1:14:20.759
<v Speaker 1>got more matchups and a trip in the Fantasy Football

1:14:20.800 --> 1:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Weekly Time Machine. We're gonna give you some players to

1:14:24.080 --> 1:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>pick up this week that everybody else is going to

1:14:26.800 --> 1:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>try to pick up next week. But already on your.

1:14:29.160 --> 1:14:32.040
<v Speaker 5>Roster, I used Julia McLaughlin.

1:14:32.680 --> 1:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>You're four weeks ago. Yeah, what do you are you

1:14:36.280 --> 1:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to say this?

1:14:40.240 --> 1:14:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Now he likes the peacock.

1:14:42.640 --> 1:14:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Suddenly you're not eating our peacock.

1:14:47.360 --> 1:14:49.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad you you slowed down on saying that.

1:14:51.560 --> 1:15:16.759
<v Speaker 1>We come back. Premature speculation, final segment Fantasy Football Weekly,

1:15:17.040 --> 1:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>not like forever, just for this week. We'll be back

1:15:19.760 --> 1:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>next week, week number eight. Get you ready. This is

1:15:23.360 --> 1:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a segment we like to call premature speculation. We give

1:15:26.080 --> 1:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you a player that you'll want to pick up now

1:15:27.479 --> 1:15:29.599
<v Speaker 1>that I'll just be trying to pick up after they've

1:15:29.600 --> 1:15:32.599
<v Speaker 1>already seen what happens this week. These guys will hopefully

1:15:32.600 --> 1:15:34.799
<v Speaker 1>already be on your roster. We begin with Matt Harrison.

1:15:35.479 --> 1:15:38.120
<v Speaker 3>Kyler Murray returned to practice this week for the Cardinals,

1:15:38.160 --> 1:15:40.840
<v Speaker 3>which means his twenty one day window to return to

1:15:40.880 --> 1:15:43.400
<v Speaker 3>the active roster has opened. By the way, he's only

1:15:43.600 --> 1:15:46.920
<v Speaker 3>rostered in about forty seven percent of sleeper leagues right now.

1:15:47.320 --> 1:15:49.240
<v Speaker 3>They're going to give him every start as soon as

1:15:49.240 --> 1:15:50.960
<v Speaker 3>he's able to get back on the field from a

1:15:51.000 --> 1:15:52.559
<v Speaker 3>torn acl last December.

1:15:53.120 --> 1:15:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Do you think they showcase Kyler Murray so they can

1:15:55.479 --> 1:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>try to trade him. I think absolutely, And they hope

1:15:58.840 --> 1:16:03.439
<v Speaker 1>he plays well enough that he Garners trade interests. They

1:16:03.439 --> 1:16:07.519
<v Speaker 1>can unload that awful contract without him actually winning games

1:16:07.560 --> 1:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>because they want to be at the top of the

1:16:08.880 --> 1:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>draft so they can replace Kyler Murray with somebody this

1:16:11.840 --> 1:16:12.599
<v Speaker 1>year's draft.

1:16:12.520 --> 1:16:14.680
<v Speaker 5>And you don't have to open the window all the

1:16:14.680 --> 1:16:16.360
<v Speaker 5>way for him to fit through, which.

1:16:16.160 --> 1:16:20.120
<v Speaker 3>Is he's tiny. Yeah, well, Church, you stole all my

1:16:20.200 --> 1:16:23.400
<v Speaker 3>thunder there. But he does have a Week sixteen matchup

1:16:23.439 --> 1:16:26.840
<v Speaker 3>with the Bears, by the way, which he could be

1:16:26.880 --> 1:16:29.639
<v Speaker 3>playing for his job in your fantasy playoffs. And oh,

1:16:29.640 --> 1:16:32.439
<v Speaker 3>by the way, that's against Justin Fields, who could also

1:16:32.520 --> 1:16:34.920
<v Speaker 3>be playing for his job. That's going to be a

1:16:35.000 --> 1:16:39.000
<v Speaker 3>super intriguing game in Week sixteen between these two quarterbacks

1:16:39.000 --> 1:16:42.960
<v Speaker 3>who have a rookie looking over their shoulder in the draft.

1:16:43.800 --> 1:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, Brian, you'll take a chance with me player.

1:16:46.560 --> 1:16:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Not a lot of thunder to steal here. I'm going

1:16:48.800 --> 1:16:52.439
<v Speaker 4>I'm going very deep here with Miami wide receiver Cedric Wilson.

1:16:52.479 --> 1:16:56.400
<v Speaker 4>And this is more like the rare wide receiver handcuff

1:16:56.439 --> 1:17:00.559
<v Speaker 4>play if you roster either Tyreek hill End or jayl Waddle.

1:17:00.600 --> 1:17:02.439
<v Speaker 4>But really, if something were to happen to those guys,

1:17:02.479 --> 1:17:06.040
<v Speaker 4>Cedric Wilson would step in. Granted he's not Tyreek Hill

1:17:06.120 --> 1:17:08.719
<v Speaker 4>or Jalen Waddle, but he'll be a starting wide receiver

1:17:09.280 --> 1:17:12.559
<v Speaker 4>in one of the most high flying offensive offenses in

1:17:12.600 --> 1:17:15.679
<v Speaker 4>the NFL. Just five catches so far for Cedric Wilson,

1:17:15.680 --> 1:17:18.519
<v Speaker 4>but averaging thirteen point six yards per catch, and again,

1:17:18.720 --> 1:17:20.640
<v Speaker 4>if you were to get starter snaps, he would be

1:17:20.680 --> 1:17:23.439
<v Speaker 4>fantasy viable. So if you got a roster spot to

1:17:23.439 --> 1:17:25.080
<v Speaker 4>burn Cedric Wilson, why not?

1:17:25.280 --> 1:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>All right? I had originally said I was going to

1:17:27.160 --> 1:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>do Latavius Murray here, but that feels too obvious. Now

1:17:30.920 --> 1:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>set that up middle earlier in the week. So I'm

1:17:33.120 --> 1:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna pivot Latavius Murray. Assuming he's gone, let's go back

1:17:36.040 --> 1:17:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to Roshawn Johnson, who I think a lot of fantasy

1:17:38.240 --> 1:17:40.120
<v Speaker 1>nors have gotten tired of at this point and aren't

1:17:40.120 --> 1:17:42.519
<v Speaker 1>going to wait him out. Khalil Herbert went on IR

1:17:42.800 --> 1:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>he's going to miss another four games. Roshawan Johnson comes

1:17:46.320 --> 1:17:49.519
<v Speaker 1>back off injured reserve. Not in Drear Surrey. It comes

1:17:49.560 --> 1:17:51.479
<v Speaker 1>out of the concussion protocol. He could walk into the

1:17:51.520 --> 1:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>starting job because thatther foreman's.

1:17:54.000 --> 1:17:54.679
<v Speaker 5>Not that good.

1:17:55.280 --> 1:17:59.479
<v Speaker 1>Travis Homer is a lifelong backup in Darrington Evans has

1:17:59.560 --> 1:18:03.519
<v Speaker 1>never been a meaningful contributor, so opportunities. There is a

1:18:03.560 --> 1:18:08.360
<v Speaker 1>big big thor Nystrom guy Roachan Johnson. You get a

1:18:08.400 --> 1:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>big power back who could get the ball to goal

1:18:10.880 --> 1:18:15.360
<v Speaker 1>line in Roshan Johnson. Let's go to our final two matchups.

1:18:16.040 --> 1:18:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins have the toughest matchup of their year. It's

1:18:19.400 --> 1:18:21.880
<v Speaker 1>been up I think the toughest matchup of the year

1:18:22.120 --> 1:18:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the Philadelphia Eagles. Brian, what do you think of the

1:18:25.200 --> 1:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>high flying Miami offense in a trickier spot in Philadelphia.

1:18:28.800 --> 1:18:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we got a fun game on TAPS Sunday night,

1:18:32.040 --> 1:18:34.120
<v Speaker 4>but like you said, the toughest matchup of the season

1:18:34.160 --> 1:18:36.000
<v Speaker 4>so far for the Dolphins. But a lot of starting

1:18:36.040 --> 1:18:39.080
<v Speaker 4>grades nonetheless, starting with Raheem Moster, It's gonna give him

1:18:39.080 --> 1:18:41.479
<v Speaker 4>a bee. Despite the fact the Eagles have the second

1:18:41.680 --> 1:18:44.880
<v Speaker 4>best run defense grade per Pro Football Focus, and they're

1:18:44.880 --> 1:18:47.320
<v Speaker 4>allowing a meager forty nine rushing yards per game to

1:18:47.400 --> 1:18:50.360
<v Speaker 4>running backs on just three point one yards per carry,

1:18:50.400 --> 1:18:53.360
<v Speaker 4>that's the third lowest. Philly has also just surrendered two

1:18:53.439 --> 1:18:56.000
<v Speaker 4>total scores for running backs, so this will surely be

1:18:56.040 --> 1:18:59.360
<v Speaker 4>a tough test for Mostert. Jeff Wilson has been practicing

1:18:59.360 --> 1:19:03.479
<v Speaker 4>in fullest, he will likely steal some touches. Wilson is

1:19:03.479 --> 1:19:05.640
<v Speaker 4>on the bench, but I'm still gonna roll with mostert

1:19:05.680 --> 1:19:08.400
<v Speaker 4>with the b This is the toughest matchup for the

1:19:08.439 --> 1:19:10.960
<v Speaker 4>Dolphins when it comes to the Eagles in defense, but

1:19:11.479 --> 1:19:13.600
<v Speaker 4>arguably be the toughest matchup for the Eagles on the

1:19:13.680 --> 1:19:17.240
<v Speaker 4>other side against the offense are facing specifically Tyreek Hill,

1:19:17.280 --> 1:19:19.719
<v Speaker 4>who is out of this world right now on pace

1:19:19.720 --> 1:19:22.759
<v Speaker 4>for one hundred and twenty catches, twenty three hundred plus

1:19:22.840 --> 1:19:26.479
<v Speaker 4>yards and seventeen touchdowns. Hill is one hundred and eighty

1:19:26.479 --> 1:19:29.240
<v Speaker 4>six yards shy of a thousand, and he could hit

1:19:29.240 --> 1:19:32.679
<v Speaker 4>that mark by week seven. It's He's insane, Yes, absolutely insane.

1:19:32.680 --> 1:19:35.800
<v Speaker 4>He is a matchup proof. He gets the A.

1:19:35.920 --> 1:19:38.080
<v Speaker 5>Jalen Wattle not matchup hitch.

1:19:37.880 --> 1:19:40.160
<v Speaker 1>A because you're on your last matchup and we haven't

1:19:40.200 --> 1:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>heard from Fantasy FONSI.

1:19:42.680 --> 1:19:44.559
<v Speaker 4>Yet, not yet, but I'm gonna I might save that

1:19:44.600 --> 1:19:47.960
<v Speaker 4>for the other side. Wattle, Jalen Wattle does not get

1:19:48.000 --> 1:19:50.080
<v Speaker 4>the FANSI just to see for him. That's because the

1:19:50.120 --> 1:19:53.040
<v Speaker 4>Eagles play a lot of man coverage, which isn't great

1:19:53.040 --> 1:19:56.200
<v Speaker 4>for Waddle, who only has a thirteen percent target share

1:19:56.280 --> 1:19:57.519
<v Speaker 4>when facing man coverage, so.

1:19:57.640 --> 1:19:58.559
<v Speaker 5>Just the sea for Wattle.

1:19:58.920 --> 1:20:01.639
<v Speaker 4>It does bode well for both Waddle and Tyreek Kill

1:20:01.720 --> 1:20:05.320
<v Speaker 4>though that starting cornerback Bradley Roby and starting safety Read

1:20:05.400 --> 1:20:08.080
<v Speaker 4>Blank and Ship have been ruled out for the Dolph

1:20:08.240 --> 1:20:11.479
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry for the Eagles, and last and sadly, we're

1:20:11.479 --> 1:20:14.080
<v Speaker 4>not going to talk about Durnham smythe my boy Smith Tyston.

1:20:14.439 --> 1:20:17.160
<v Speaker 4>He's on the bench, but Tua Tungo Viola is not.

1:20:17.280 --> 1:20:20.800
<v Speaker 4>He gets an A. Tua's currently ranked first and passing touchdowns,

1:20:20.840 --> 1:20:24.840
<v Speaker 4>passing yards yards per pass attempt, and quarterback raiding. The

1:20:24.920 --> 1:20:27.280
<v Speaker 4>Eagles did just blank Zach Wilson, but that is not

1:20:27.320 --> 1:20:30.759
<v Speaker 4>a big deal. Before that, they had surrendered multiple touchdown

1:20:30.800 --> 1:20:34.160
<v Speaker 4>passes in three of their first five games. Philly also

1:20:34.240 --> 1:20:37.960
<v Speaker 4>yielding the fourth most pass attempts per game at thirty nine,

1:20:37.960 --> 1:20:40.280
<v Speaker 4>So I'm going to stick with an A grade for Tua.

1:20:40.360 --> 1:20:41.800
<v Speaker 5>He's on an MVP.

1:20:41.640 --> 1:20:45.040
<v Speaker 4>Pace right now over to the Eagle side, starting with

1:20:45.080 --> 1:20:48.920
<v Speaker 4>DeAndre Swift, he gets a B. Philly is ESPN's top

1:20:49.000 --> 1:20:53.559
<v Speaker 4>offensive line per their run block win rate metric, and

1:20:53.600 --> 1:20:56.920
<v Speaker 4>they are also Pro Football Focus's top run blocking unit,

1:20:57.120 --> 1:20:59.960
<v Speaker 4>and Miami is twenty seventh in run stuff win race.

1:21:00.200 --> 1:21:02.000
<v Speaker 5>So Lake Swift here with the B.

1:21:02.400 --> 1:21:05.880
<v Speaker 4>The Dolphins have also yielded the second fewest running back

1:21:05.920 --> 1:21:08.519
<v Speaker 4>targets this season. Not great, but they have allowed the

1:21:08.560 --> 1:21:11.960
<v Speaker 4>second highest yards per reception to the position, so that

1:21:12.000 --> 1:21:14.559
<v Speaker 4>those numbers are a little skewed. Like Swift a lot

1:21:14.560 --> 1:21:16.680
<v Speaker 4>in the bellcow role. He gets a B and you

1:21:16.760 --> 1:21:22.040
<v Speaker 4>gotta love AJ Brown. He gets this week's fantasy fonsie.

1:21:23.479 --> 1:21:24.400
<v Speaker 3>That's so exciting.

1:21:24.600 --> 1:21:28.200
<v Speaker 4>Brown's last four games nine for one thirty one, nine

1:21:28.240 --> 1:21:30.240
<v Speaker 4>for one seventy five and two six for one to

1:21:30.280 --> 1:21:32.879
<v Speaker 4>twenty seven seven for one hundred and thirty one yards.

1:21:33.200 --> 1:21:36.840
<v Speaker 4>He is searing hot right now. Miami's quarterbacks xaviing Howard

1:21:36.880 --> 1:21:40.240
<v Speaker 4>and Ela Apple major liabilities for their secondary. They rank

1:21:40.240 --> 1:21:44.200
<v Speaker 4>as Pro Football focuses cornerbacks one for nine and one

1:21:44.320 --> 1:21:48.200
<v Speaker 4>fifty five, respectively. That is not good. The Dolphins have

1:21:48.240 --> 1:21:51.280
<v Speaker 4>allowed the fourth most catches and touchdowns to opposing wide receivers.

1:21:51.600 --> 1:21:54.240
<v Speaker 4>So easy a the fonsie for AJ Brown, But just

1:21:54.280 --> 1:21:56.599
<v Speaker 4>to see for Devonte Smith, who has taken a clear

1:21:56.600 --> 1:21:59.719
<v Speaker 4>back seat to Brown this season. His first read target

1:21:59.760 --> 1:22:04.120
<v Speaker 4>share has dropped from twenty eight percent in twenty twenty

1:22:04.120 --> 1:22:07.720
<v Speaker 4>two for Davante Smith to nineteen percent in twenty twenty three.

1:22:07.760 --> 1:22:10.639
<v Speaker 4>This year, AJ Browns has gone up. AJ's a alpha

1:22:10.960 --> 1:22:13.679
<v Speaker 4>Smith is just he's the second option now at wide receiver.

1:22:13.760 --> 1:22:16.840
<v Speaker 4>He gets the C but B for Dallas Goddard in

1:22:16.880 --> 1:22:20.599
<v Speaker 4>a spike game, because in twenty eighteen, the Miami Dolphins

1:22:20.600 --> 1:22:25.280
<v Speaker 4>selected Mikeasicki seven picks before Dallas Goddard in that draft,

1:22:25.400 --> 1:22:27.200
<v Speaker 4>and the Dolphins also allowing more than five and a

1:22:27.200 --> 1:22:29.840
<v Speaker 4>half catches and fifty yards per game. Two tight ends

1:22:29.960 --> 1:22:32.400
<v Speaker 4>safe bey on Goddard and an A for Jalen Hurts.

1:22:32.400 --> 1:22:34.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you're you're not sitting Jalen Hurts ever, so for.

1:22:34.840 --> 1:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Him, yeah, it'll coming off a bad game.

1:22:38.240 --> 1:22:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Do you think spike games work a lot better for

1:22:40.439 --> 1:22:43.960
<v Speaker 3>wide receivers? White wide receivers seem to really really dig

1:22:44.000 --> 1:22:46.759
<v Speaker 3>the spike games and Harry tight ends are like whatever.

1:22:46.880 --> 1:22:49.800
<v Speaker 4>And speaking of spike games, really quick, the Dolphins did

1:22:49.840 --> 1:22:52.759
<v Speaker 4>take two over Jalen Hurts in the twenty twenty draft.

1:22:52.800 --> 1:22:54.880
<v Speaker 5>I'm just saying, well, they were like neck and.

1:22:54.880 --> 1:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Neck, but it's separated by round or two.

1:22:57.920 --> 1:23:00.400
<v Speaker 5>Hurts We'll remember, Yeah, Hurts was the second round, all right, the.

1:23:00.360 --> 1:23:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Monday nighter is really muddy here. We have unknowns going

1:23:02.800 --> 1:23:06.120
<v Speaker 1>into it with Christian McCaffrey and Deebo Samuel, you both

1:23:06.160 --> 1:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>feel like coin flips. I think Deebo doesn't go, is

1:23:09.400 --> 1:23:13.120
<v Speaker 1>my guess. But obviously, if Christian mccafrey goes, you're gonna

1:23:13.120 --> 1:23:15.400
<v Speaker 1>play him. And so if that goes, without saying, I'm

1:23:15.400 --> 1:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>not going to spend a lot of time elaborating on that,

1:23:17.360 --> 1:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>but let's talk about what happens if he doesn't go,

1:23:20.240 --> 1:23:23.400
<v Speaker 1>because then Jordan Mason becomes a viable player, and I'd

1:23:23.400 --> 1:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>put him in as a B grade. If he does

1:23:26.080 --> 1:23:29.879
<v Speaker 1>not go, he's the expected starter even if Elijah Mitchell's available.

1:23:30.000 --> 1:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell's got a knee injury, and we've seen Mason get

1:23:32.120 --> 1:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>more work in recent games. San Francisco has Pro Football Focus'

1:23:36.439 --> 1:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>third highest run block grade and Minnesota ranks fifth and

1:23:40.200 --> 1:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>ESPN's run stuff win rates, so Viken's actually been quite

1:23:43.280 --> 1:23:47.799
<v Speaker 1>good against the run. The fifteen non DeAndre Swift runners

1:23:48.000 --> 1:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>who have faced Minnesota have averaged just three yards per carry.

1:23:52.400 --> 1:23:54.360
<v Speaker 1>So I can get you to a B grade on

1:23:54.439 --> 1:23:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Mason. If Christian McCaffrey goes and he's probably out entirely.

1:23:57.840 --> 1:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>If Christian McCaffrey does go'd be great. If he doesn't go,

1:24:01.880 --> 1:24:03.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, so then let's go into the passing game.

1:24:03.760 --> 1:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>So let's start with the Deebo Samuel Juwan Jennings thing.

1:24:06.439 --> 1:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I would only start Debo if he's basically completely off

1:24:10.280 --> 1:24:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the injury port you hear that he's absolutely in great

1:24:12.920 --> 1:24:15.519
<v Speaker 1>shape for this. And then if he does not go,

1:24:16.040 --> 1:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the pivot guy that you want, and I think a

1:24:18.040 --> 1:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>really sneaky bye week starter Juwan Jennings. J Jennings is

1:24:24.360 --> 1:24:26.479
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to me. He gets a ton of run when

1:24:26.479 --> 1:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Deebo misses. He's a big body guy who can stylistically

1:24:30.640 --> 1:24:32.880
<v Speaker 1>match a lot of what Deebo does. And all the

1:24:32.960 --> 1:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Vikings cornerbacks are really struggling, especially coveted offseason free agent

1:24:37.280 --> 1:24:41.360
<v Speaker 1>acquisition Byron Murphy, who's already allowed three touchdowns in his coverage,

1:24:41.479 --> 1:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>tied for fifth most Minnesota cornerbacks own Pro Football Focus

1:24:46.439 --> 1:24:49.920
<v Speaker 1>covered ranks of thirty, ninth, eighty third, and ninety ninth.

1:24:50.280 --> 1:24:53.519
<v Speaker 1>Juwan Jennings C grade and a possible pickup. And if

1:24:53.560 --> 1:24:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you've got Deebo Samuel and you don't know what's gonna

1:24:55.880 --> 1:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>happen till Monday night. Go roster Juwan Jennings, so you

1:24:58.840 --> 1:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>can make that switch if you need to, and Brevard

1:25:01.280 --> 1:25:03.519
<v Speaker 1>put Samuel in your flex so you'd have even more

1:25:03.560 --> 1:25:07.840
<v Speaker 1>opportunities to make changes later. Sticking with the receivers, Brandon

1:25:07.880 --> 1:25:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Ayuk A grade, Minnesota allows the second most receptions per

1:25:12.160 --> 1:25:15.920
<v Speaker 1>game to wide receivers and Minnesota leans zone heavy. Ayuk

1:25:16.000 --> 1:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>leads San Francisco receivers in receiving yards against zone coverage

1:25:19.880 --> 1:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and as I mentioned, primo matchups against all the Vikings cornerbacks.

1:25:23.439 --> 1:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>He's been playing great this year. Brandon Ayuk A grade.

1:25:28.600 --> 1:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>George Kittle comes into the C grade. He's had two

1:25:31.120 --> 1:25:36.519
<v Speaker 1>huge games this year and four absolute duds with three

1:25:36.720 --> 1:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>or fewer catches and less than thirty receiving yards.

1:25:40.520 --> 1:25:40.720
<v Speaker 5>Now.

1:25:40.720 --> 1:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>In theory he would get more looks if Deebo misses,

1:25:43.400 --> 1:25:45.679
<v Speaker 1>but that did not manifest itself last week and Deebo

1:25:45.760 --> 1:25:48.759
<v Speaker 1>only played eight snaps last week. Minnesota and above average

1:25:48.800 --> 1:25:51.759
<v Speaker 1>tight end defense so far, allowing the fifth fewest yards

1:25:51.760 --> 1:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to tight ends despite facing Travis Kelce Dallas Goddard, so

1:25:55.760 --> 1:25:59.160
<v Speaker 1>they're right defense C grade on George Kittle. We need him,

1:25:59.200 --> 1:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>we need a boom game. Those down games have really

1:26:02.160 --> 1:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>hurt his owners, and Brock Purty comes into the B

1:26:04.880 --> 1:26:07.599
<v Speaker 1>grade i've given out as i've given out c's and c's,

1:26:08.040 --> 1:26:10.559
<v Speaker 1>I think pretty fits in grade fits right in the

1:26:10.600 --> 1:26:15.479
<v Speaker 1>middle here, But let's upgrade party. If CMC and deebo play,

1:26:15.479 --> 1:26:17.679
<v Speaker 1>I'd bump them up to an A grade. In this game,

1:26:17.960 --> 1:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>good passers generally emerging with solid box scores against the Vikings,

1:26:21.920 --> 1:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and only bottom tier passers getting stymied. Brock's a good passer.

1:26:25.080 --> 1:26:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be okay here. Let's go to

1:26:27.160 --> 1:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the Viking side. We'll start with the running game. Alexander

1:26:30.040 --> 1:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Madison clocks in with a C grade, a really dispiriting

1:26:34.120 --> 1:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>performance last week against a pretty bad Bears defense, and

1:26:37.800 --> 1:26:41.400
<v Speaker 1>now he faces obviously a vastly superior Niners run defense.

1:26:41.720 --> 1:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco's only allowed one running back to top fifty

1:26:44.280 --> 1:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>two rushing yards all season, only one is top seventy

1:26:47.240 --> 1:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>in their last twenty nine regular season games, which is amazing. Wow,

1:26:52.000 --> 1:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Niers are a top ten run stuff win rate. It's

1:26:55.040 --> 1:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>tough now the Vikings have a top five run blocking unit,

1:26:58.320 --> 1:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>but still this is a tricky spot and Alexander Madison's

1:27:02.120 --> 1:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>dropped five passes this year to lead the NFL and

1:27:05.439 --> 1:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>drops which is also very disappointing.

1:27:08.439 --> 1:27:11.840
<v Speaker 4>A couple for touchdowns. Two they would have gone for touchdowns, and.

1:27:11.920 --> 1:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's also I can't so I can't talk to

1:27:13.840 --> 1:27:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you about Alexander Madison maybe winning that way. So just

1:27:16.920 --> 1:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a C grade there. Jordan Addison comes into the sea grade.

1:27:20.040 --> 1:27:24.479
<v Speaker 1>Outside cornerbacks Chavarius Ward Diamador Lenore both allows sub zero

1:27:24.640 --> 1:27:27.880
<v Speaker 1>seventy passer ratings and they've combined for three interceptions, five

1:27:27.960 --> 1:27:32.519
<v Speaker 1>pass blocks and zero touchdowns allowed. So is a tricky

1:27:32.560 --> 1:27:34.479
<v Speaker 1>spot for Addison. I can only get him to a

1:27:34.520 --> 1:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>C grade in this one. kJ Osbourne's on the bench

1:27:38.200 --> 1:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>despite taking over for Justin Jefferson last week. He only

1:27:41.000 --> 1:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>got a slight upticking snaps and targets and routes and

1:27:44.040 --> 1:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>not the big spike that we wanted from a guy

1:27:46.000 --> 1:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>who inherited all of Justin Jefferson's coveted route tree. And yeah,

1:27:50.280 --> 1:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be sitting on the outside. And as I mentioned,

1:27:52.240 --> 1:27:54.519
<v Speaker 1>these are really good corners on the outside. So I

1:27:54.560 --> 1:27:57.120
<v Speaker 1>can't put a bench starting grade on kJ Osbourne or

1:27:57.160 --> 1:28:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Powell either. And that leaves us with TJ. Hockinson

1:28:01.200 --> 1:28:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to discuss. He has seen eight or more targets in

1:28:04.200 --> 1:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>five of six games this season, and with Justin Jefferson out,

1:28:07.000 --> 1:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you know the volume is going to stay high for Hockinson.

1:28:09.760 --> 1:28:10.080
<v Speaker 5>Be nice.

1:28:10.160 --> 1:28:12.759
<v Speaker 1>We caught a few more contested catches. He's only scored

1:28:12.800 --> 1:28:14.599
<v Speaker 1>in one game. He needs to come up with more

1:28:14.600 --> 1:28:17.719
<v Speaker 1>of those catches that are more meaningful. Now they could

1:28:17.720 --> 1:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>be missing. I just can be missing a coverage linebacker

1:28:21.280 --> 1:28:23.639
<v Speaker 1>Dray Greenlaw and that could be a big help for him.

1:28:23.880 --> 1:28:26.559
<v Speaker 1>B grade and Hockinson and if you're all that together,

1:28:26.600 --> 1:28:28.519
<v Speaker 1>I can only get to a C grade on Kirk

1:28:28.560 --> 1:28:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Cousins in a very tough matchup against the defense at

1:28:31.120 --> 1:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>ranks number one in coverage, number one in pass rush.

1:28:35.040 --> 1:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Viking's pass blocking is improved, but still this is a

1:28:38.960 --> 1:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>really tricky spot for any quarterback. Only Matthew Stafford has

1:28:42.680 --> 1:28:45.439
<v Speaker 1>managed a solid game against the Niners three hundred and

1:28:45.479 --> 1:28:47.599
<v Speaker 1>seven yards in a score for him. That is your

1:28:47.640 --> 1:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>upside for Kirk Cousins in this matchup. Thank you for listening, everybody.

1:28:52.280 --> 1:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate it. Of course, getting to the end of

1:28:54.240 --> 1:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a long Fantasy Football weekly lots of Guillotine Leagues still

1:28:58.200 --> 1:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>forming a Guillotine leagues dot Com almost every day of

1:29:00.840 --> 1:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the week, you can go draft a new Guillotine league,

1:29:03.600 --> 1:29:06.639
<v Speaker 1>get into a fresh, brand new guillotine league. Super fun,

1:29:06.880 --> 1:29:08.519
<v Speaker 1>the freshest way to play, And if you miss any

1:29:08.560 --> 1:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>part of the player rankings in this show, you can

1:29:10.080 --> 1:29:13.320
<v Speaker 1>get all my player rankings for free Guillotine Leagues dot com.

1:29:13.360 --> 1:29:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Talk to you next week, everybody, Best of luck this weekend.

1:29:15.760 --> 1:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>By about It. Fantasy Football Weekly is a production of iHeartRadio.

1:29:22.520 --> 1:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

1:29:26.880 --> 1:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.