WEBVTT - Micron's Earnings and Reddit's IPO

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 2>From Mahard where Innovation, Money and power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:18.440
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm Caroline Hyde and Bloomberg's weld head quarters in New York.

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm Ed Lodlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 4>Coming up, we have an exclusive interview with the CEO

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 4>of Micron, Sanjay Mahotra, is going to be joining us

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 4>as shares surge to a record high. That's after the

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 4>company boosted its outlook on AI growth.

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 5>Plus, we push ahead to Reddit's long awaited IPO and

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 5>sit down with reddits COO Jen Wong later this hour.

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 4>And of course we go live to the Department of

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 4>Justice as they announ an antitrust lawsuit against Apple.

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 5>We're also thinking a lot about Micron. Shares of Micron

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 5>at a record high, biggest jump since twenty eleven. The

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 5>outlook for the fiscal third quarter a recovery and commoditized

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 5>d RAM prices, but also a ramp in the next

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 5>generation HBM three E that is the memory that supports

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 5>the GPUs in training AI that is the conversation that

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 5>we'll have. Let's dive right into microns earnings with CEO

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 5>Sanjay Morotra as Sanja, good morning to you, and that's

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 5>how i'd frame it. Let's get right to the outlook

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 5>for the fiscal third way up the factors for us.

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 5>Was this all about the recovery in d RAM traditionally

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 5>commoditized or is this more about the ramp up in

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 5>HBM THREEE that is going in support of things like

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 5>the h two hundred from Nvidia.

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>First of all, thank you Caroline and ED for having

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>me on the show here. Our recovery is really driven

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>by a demand related to AI with tight supply and

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>actually demand that is strong across most of our end markets,

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>particularly data centered driven demand. And Micron has a strong

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>portfolio of products. Very excited about our latest offering of

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>HV and three E that you refer to earlier. We

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>have just begun shipments of this and we see strong

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:23.799
<v Speaker 1>growth in the several quarters that are ahead of us.

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>And supply is tight, leading edge nodes in particular, and

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 1>and tight supply that's leading to price increases as well.

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:36.239
<v Speaker 1>So as we look ahead at twenty twenty four, our

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>year of recovery. We see increasing prices driven by the

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>demand supply fundamentals, and we look at twenty twenty five

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to be a record year for Micron's revenue with significantly

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>improved profitability as well.

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 4>Twenty twenty five supply also mostly already allocated. You sold

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 4>out on twenty twenty four. Say let's dig in on

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 4>the high bandwidth memory because was it Jason Wyang over

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 4>at in video calling this a technology miracle? Will it

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 4>not get commoditized? Will prices remain elevated?

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>First of all, our sr HBM product that is sold

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:20.279
<v Speaker 1>out for calendar year twenty four, and a vast majority

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:24.799
<v Speaker 1>of the supply for our twenty twenty five is allocated

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>as well. This is a critical product. HBM three E

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>is in very very early stages here and it's key

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>enabler of what AI platforms, generative AI platforms are able

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to do. Just think about it. I mean the latest

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Blackwell platform that has been announced. It has sixty four

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>die of memory in it, so tremendous amount of silicon.

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>HBM is growing fast, expected to be about fifteen percent

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>high teens, mid to high teens of the industry revenue

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>over the course of next years compared to being just

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>half of that last year. And as you look ahead

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>at the new platforms being announced Nvidia earlier this week,

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Broadcom yesterday, they're all placing tremendous emphasis on the performance

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and the power of HPM memory. As AI becomes bigger,

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>data becomes bigger, data lives in the products that Micron

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>makes for AI applications, lives in the kind of products

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>such as HPM three E, but high density DIM modules

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>as well as other products that Micron makes DDD ARE

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>five memory and data center SSDs. So AI is really

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>driving tremendous growth trajectory. HBM THREEE is absolutely going to

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>be critical. This is in very early innings and you know,

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>even if there are any perturbations in supply, they will

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>get absorbed over time. And what's important to understand is

0:04:54.200 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>because HPM THREEE product is extremely silicon intensive across the industr,

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>it is really leaving not enough supply for non HBM

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>products and those are in tight supply, and that's what

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>is driving tremendous strength in terms of demand supply fundamentals

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>in pricing trajectory for memory.

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 5>And the question is, Sanjay, how do you keep up

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 5>right HBM THREEE running at five point two gigabits per second.

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 5>You've already mentioned blackwell, you're going to have to bring

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 5>that next generation HBM nine gigabits per second faster. Just

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 5>walk us through the real term ramp of your products,

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 5>getting them into the real world and when they show

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 5>up in your financials in the near and medium term.

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, we talked about yesterday in our earnings call that

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>we have begun shipments of HBM three E product. It's

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>an industry leading product. It has the best performance in

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.479
<v Speaker 1>the lowest power in the industry, which you know for

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>data center applications, power is critical. Thirty percent better power

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>for our HBM three E product. So we have really

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>long legs in this HP and three E product for

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>foreseeable future here and HPM three E has begun shipments,

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and we mentioned in the call yesterday that it will

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>be a creative to our gross margins and we'll have

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>several hundred million dollars of revenue of this HPM three

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>E product in our fiscal year which will end in

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>August timeframe. And of course we look at significant growth

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>ahead for HPM three E as well. Our production has begun.

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 1>We are extremely focused on continuing to ramp this product.

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Our target is to get our share in HBM three

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>E equivalent to our DRAM industry share, and we're going

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 1>to remain extremely disciplined key will be absolutely managing the

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>supply and demand fundamentals overall for the DRAM industry. So

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>we look at strong growth ahead for our HPM three E.

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Keep in mind that HBM is expected to have a

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:02.039
<v Speaker 1>KAGHER greater than fifty percent over the course of next

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a few years in terms of bit growth that HPM

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>will be driving. Of course, it will be all the

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>GENAI applications that we'll be driving this And I just

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>want to add here that of course data center is

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a big driver of our growth. We are shifting our

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>business more toward data center given the demand and the

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>profitability profile of that part of the market. We are

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>doing that with our DTA and products as well as

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>with our SSDs. But just want to point out that

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>other markets such as smartphones and PCs, they too are

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>implementing AI enabled devices and you'll start seeing them coming

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>out from later this year, and of course twenty twenty

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>five will be the first full year of all these

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>devices on the edge, such as smart AI enabled smartphones

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and PCs. They take much higher memory content than their

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>prior generation devices. You're really, we're exciting about the opportunities

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>for that AI enables for US enables for memory, which

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>is at the heart of AI revolution in terms of

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>from data center all the way to the edge.

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 4>Going back though, to this high bandwidth memory and going

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 4>back to that market share that you say you want

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 4>to own, can you articulate exactly what that share is

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 4>going to be for our audience right now when we

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 4>have Heinex Samsung likely to.

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 6>Be unveiling their products at the first half of this year.

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Our share in DAM today in the industry is approximately

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty three percent, and we are targeting that our HBM

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>share would be in line with that DRAM industry share.

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Of course, it will be ramping gradually over time. Sometime

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty five if we expect to be getting

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:48.079
<v Speaker 1>to our shared in HBM equal in to DM share.

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a product that has greater profitability and as we said,

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>it really will be a driver of our revenue and

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>profit growth along with the rest of the market that

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>has strengthening fundamentals well for a bloom bag television right

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and let me just point out the most important thing

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>is that our product has leadership specs, and that's why

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it's getting a strong customer pull. Leadership products. Again in

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of performance, bandwidth being about ten percent better than

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:23.559
<v Speaker 1>other competitive products, power being thirty percent lower. Data centers

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>today take up about three percent of the world's energy

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>over the course of next several years, expected to continue

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to increase, getting to closer to high single digit percentage.

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>That's where memory becomes extremely important in making sure that

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>these accelerators for Jenai are running lower power, low power memory.

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:49.319
<v Speaker 1>Our thirty percent lower power solution is extremely attractive to

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:50.079
<v Speaker 1>our customers.

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 5>Sanjay, for our Bloomberg television and radio audience worldwide, you

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 5>can point out a lot of things. We have a

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 5>lot of questions for you to bear with us. Let's

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.599
<v Speaker 5>go back to on device because you clearly want to

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 5>talk about that. We talk about on device a lot

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 5>on this program, the smartphone and PC context. You are

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 5>saying that there is a tangible benefit that you're seeing

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:12.839
<v Speaker 5>in orders for that, but.

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 7>Is that happening right now?

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 5>There is a lot of skepticism that on device processing

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 5>of llms and generative AI tools is somewhere away. Are

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 5>you telling us that this is material now or you're

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 5>predicting that it's coming soon.

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, earlier this year you saw Samsung S twenty four

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>getting announced at Mobile World Congress, on it announced its

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Magic six Pro. And these are great examples where AI

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:45.319
<v Speaker 1>is being implemented, great examples of influencing on the edge.

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 1>AI is being implemented, that's intent based, and that's really

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>going to drive tremendous opportunity. Of course, these kind of

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>high end next gen AI capabilities and PCs and smartphones

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>will start getting to the marketplace later this year, twenty

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty five will become the first full year. Over the

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>course of next few years, next few short years, we

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>would see that AI enabled devices will be representing let's

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>say about a third of smartphones and PC markets, and

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:22.560
<v Speaker 1>they take much more content anywhere from forty percent two

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent more content in flagship AI enabled PCs and

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>smartphones versus flagship AI in PC devices today, Sanjai, we've

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>got flagship smartphone and PC devices.

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 4>Today, We've got a couple more key questions. We're going

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 4>to keep it tight, fee, Sanjay, because we have been

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.439
<v Speaker 4>thinking about the CHIPSAC, We've been thinking about Intel getting

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 4>that money. We've been thinking about you still building out

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 4>in China and in India. Will you still be committed

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 4>to putting money into Boise, into New York as well?

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 4>Are you going to get the money from the government.

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, we'll respeak to the chips ACKed and are previously

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>announced plans for leading edge memory manufacturing in Boise and

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in the Syracuse area. Our application for chips ACT is

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>underprocessing with the chips Program Office making good progress there.

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we will make the announcements when that process

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>is completed. Important thing is that chips ACT enables us

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to bring with CHIPSACKED grants sufficient level of CHIPSACK grants,

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>investment tax credits, and local state government support. It helps

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.959
<v Speaker 1>bridge the cost gap with Asia operations. So it helps

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>us bring leading edge memory manufacturing into semiconductors and of

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.839
<v Speaker 1>course that creates many jobs. It supports economic as well

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:52.079
<v Speaker 1>as national security, and memory is pivotal. We just talked

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>about how pivotal memory is to AI applications. So think

0:12:56.000 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 1>about it. Today, only two percent of world's memory total,

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>world's memory production is here in the US. Of course,

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>it's all by micron at our facility in Manassas Virginia.

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 7>With chipsec support.

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>As we expand our leading edge memory manufacturing in Boise

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and Syracuse next decade, Sometime in next decade, we'll be

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>able to get to ten percent over ten percent of

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>world's leading edge memory production here in the US. And

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that's really Sunji significantly moving the needle, and Micron of

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>course is committed to.

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 5>That, Sanjay, We're running out of time here. Bloomberg's reported

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 5>that the US is considering restricting one of your Chinese rivals, CEXMT.

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 5>My understanding is that Micron has been in support of that.

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 5>Could you just outline Micron's position on the US restricting CXMT.

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:56.199
<v Speaker 1>Look, the governments make their own decision and we are

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>not going to speculate or speak on behalf of any

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of the actions. What we can tell you is that,

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of course China is an important market for US, just

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:10.199
<v Speaker 1>like China is an important market for the entire semiconductor industry,

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and we are veil engaged with the customer ecosystem there

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of bringing value of our leading edge products

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>in memory and storage, helping them drive their innovation road maps.

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 4>We want to thank you so much for your time

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 4>today walking us through your numbers through the industry with

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 4>which is growing at such pace. Micron CEO Sanjay Erroltra,

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 4>thank you. Now turning our attention to the Department of

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 4>Justice holding a key press conference as they announce their

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 4>antitrust suit against Apple, which has been five years in

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 4>the making. We just want to be dipping in and.

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 6>Bringing you some of those headlines. Of course, Merrit Garland.

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 4>The Attorney General, saying that Apple has monopoly power in

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 4>the smartphone market. He's also been articulating that Apple has

0:14:54.400 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 4>maintained power via exclusionary behavior at the moment, so to

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 4>be turning our attention listening in to that press conference

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 4>for a moment today.

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 8>The Department alleges that Apple, one of the world's largest

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 8>tech companies, cross the line from rigorous competition to anti

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 8>competitive exclusion, unlawfully maintaining a monopoly in violation of the

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 8>Sherman Act. The complaint makes clear that for years Apple

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 8>has tightened its grip on the smartphone market.

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 6>It has done so not through.

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 8>Product improvements, but by maintaining a chokehold on competition, locking

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 8>its customers in to the iPhone while locking its competitors

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 8>out of the market. As a result, and, as the

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 8>complaint details, Apple has gone from revolutionizing the smartphone market

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 8>to stalling its advancement. This shift has smothered an entire industry,

0:15:55.720 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 8>from users to app developers to the next generation of innovator.

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 8>Apple's anti competitive conduct must stop. Sixteen other Attorneys General

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 8>agree and have joined us in bringing this lawsuit against Apple.

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 6>I want to thank the women and the.

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 8>Men of the Anti Trust Division for their commitment to

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 8>promoting competition and protecting consumers and workers in all of

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 8>their work, and I want to thank Assistant Attorney General

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 8>Canter for his leadership. Their work makes clear that no manual.

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 4>Has how fast the Deputy Attorney General LA speaking Lisa Monaco.

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 4>But meanwhile, there's more breaking news, all focused in on Apple.

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 4>I just want to bring you the headlines that Apple

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 4>and Google are likely to be hit by the first investigations,

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 4>the first probes under the EU Digital Law. So of

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 4>course there's the DMA which came into force just earlier

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 4>this month, And of course there has been a keen

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 4>eye on some of these labeled key gatekeepers as the

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 4>EU singles out big tech, Apple and Google among them.

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 4>The Digital Markets Act investigation could pay the way for fines,

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 4>some big fines. Meta is also expected to be facing

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 4>some scrutiny in the EU's big tech clampdown. So much

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 4>to discuss from EU, and indeed, what's happening right here

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 4>with of course, the Department of Justice and sixteen attorneys general.

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:19.919
<v Speaker 4>Let's bring in bloombergs Ana Edjuton and anaag Rana for

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 4>more on this. Anna, I want to begin with you,

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:24.679
<v Speaker 4>and let's start with what has been the culmination of

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 4>a five year investigation. The key takeaways is to where

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 4>exactly Apple has been monopolistic and shutting out others in

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 4>the market.

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so we have been expecting this complaint for a

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 9>long time. It started in twenty nineteen under the trub administration.

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 9>And we see how Jonathan Cancer, the Assistan Attorney General

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:47.120
<v Speaker 9>for Anti trust, has really tried to tell a narrative

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 9>with this complaint. He's really tried to not just lay

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 9>out the facts of what he alleges as anti competitive

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.120
<v Speaker 9>behavior by Apple, but tell it in a compelling way

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 9>so that it's not just being decided in a court

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 9>of law, but it's also compelling to normal consumers who

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:04.239
<v Speaker 9>you know, love their iPhones, love their Apple products. They

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 9>can look at this complaint and see that this is

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 9>behavior that's in some cases causing them higher prices that

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 9>could give them less choice. So that's really the goal

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 9>of this complaint that you know, could also help its

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 9>chases in the court of law.

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 5>Let me bring in Bloomberg Intelligence senior analysts and rag

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 5>Rana an Arag. I'm looking at the shares with down

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 5>three point four percent the low of the session. That

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 5>decline is three point eight percent, put Apple on track

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.120
<v Speaker 5>for its biggest decline since August of last year.

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 7>You and I have talked about this for years.

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 5>Is the markets finally starting to price in the antitrust

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 5>threat that Apple is facing?

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 2>I think, as you know, products slow down antitrust risks.

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Apple doesn't have much going on right now,

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 2>so it's going to be interesting to see what they

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 2>pull out in June in terms of anything, JENNYI because

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 2>other than that, I mean, it's going to be a

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 2>very gloomy year for them in terms of sales growth.

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 4>And I go want to follow up on that because

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 4>this isn't just the US with its anti trust concerns.

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 4>It's the EU as well with that and Google being

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 4>hit potentially by the Digital Markets Act which come into force. Ultimately,

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 4>Apple has at the edge has already been trying to

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 4>change some of its business model, trying to appease with

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:12.479
<v Speaker 4>whether or not it's reducing certain payments that you're making

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 4>for the app store, but it seems to be begging

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 4>from Peter to pay Paul. How much do you think

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 4>Apple can change its business model without impacting its margins

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 4>too much?

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think the services business or the app store

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:33.880
<v Speaker 2>business will see some depression at least in the near dum.

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 5>And let's get back to this DOJ situation. I think

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:38.120
<v Speaker 5>it's worth for you re explaining to audience the basics here.

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 5>The DOJ has been looking at Apple for like five years.

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 5>It's the third time in a decade that they filed

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 5>a suit. What are the specific allegations here?

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 9>This really focuses on the iPhone and the way the

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 9>iPhone business runs and acts as a kind of moat

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 9>around around the business. As a long suffering Android user

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 9>who's always the green bubble in the family group chat,

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 9>you know, you can see how there are certain things

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 9>that you benefit iPhone users and being interoperable with other

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 9>Apple devices. So that's really the behavior that this complaint

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 9>lays out, and it's interesting that Biden's anti trust enforcers

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 9>came in kind of pushing the balance of anti trust

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 9>law and wanting to really look at the behavior of

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 9>these big American especially tech companies. But when it comes

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 9>down to this complaint, the harm that is really being

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:29.479
<v Speaker 9>laid out is consumer prices, which of course is classic

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 9>anti trust. So there's an interesting balance between pushing anti

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:35.439
<v Speaker 9>trust law as far as it will go and really

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 9>sticking to the arguments that they think will be successful

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 9>in court.

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 4>Anna, As you mentioned, this has been long anticipated and

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 4>has been going on for a long time five years.

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 4>It is under President Trump that this first investigation began.

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 4>It's the third time, in fact, in fourteen years that

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:54.400
<v Speaker 4>Apple has been focused on in this anti trust way

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 4>from the DOJ. How quickly are we likely to see

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:01.199
<v Speaker 4>any real actions taken, any real implication in response to Apples.

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:04.439
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's interesting that they file the case in federal

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 9>court in New Jersey, so we'll learn more about why

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 9>that was the case, but we know they do want

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 9>to move quickly on this. If the Department of Justice

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 9>has been a little frustrated with how slow their case

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:17.439
<v Speaker 9>against Google has gone. So the Justice Department also has

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 9>more targets to finish.

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 6>Up the rest of this year.

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 9>They're working on another case against Google, so they have

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 9>high ambitions. They want to take big swings, and Biden's

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 9>first term is coming to an end, so there's definitely

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 9>a big ambitions and limited resources and time to check

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 9>all of those off.

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 5>Anna Rag, you really see a threat of this getting

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 5>to consume as a window to jump to Android from iOS?

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh No, I don't think that's going to be the case, frankly,

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 2>because those things are extremely sticky from that point. I mean,

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't think one bubble is going to make a

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 2>difference for people to jump from the other. Apple's really

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 2>loyal customer base. What I'm concerned about is, you know,

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 2>whether they can charge for the app store in the

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:02.120
<v Speaker 2>same frame book as they were before. I think that's

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 2>going to be the bigger outcome in our view, rather

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 2>than anything else.

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 4>And so a just interesting from the perspective that we

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 4>are seeing this share price reaction down some three percent.

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 4>That's not nothing for the second most valuable company out there.

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 4>So do you think more weakness has to be factored in?

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 4>Even though they have a very loyal base that perhaps

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 4>might not be shifting to an Android or competitor on

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:28.439
<v Speaker 4>any changes to business models.

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, as I said, services business is extremely

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 2>important for them, both in terms of margin and diversification.

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 2>If you compress those c it is going to have

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 2>an impact on their boath, their top line as well

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 2>as the bottom line. So this is a new overhang

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 2>on the stock that you know, tops.

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 7>Up what's happening in Europe.

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 2>So there isn't much going on for Apple this year.

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, sales are growing, sales are not growing in

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:54.719
<v Speaker 2>terms of the products, and now the service is under pressure.

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 2>So you know, that's really what's happening.

0:22:56.920 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 5>Here in our view and behind every doc move and

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:03.239
<v Speaker 5>appleys down three point three percent, as I said at

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 5>the session, low three point eight percent. There are some people,

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 5>some human beings. Tell me about this DOJ team that

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.199
<v Speaker 5>was up on the stage one moment ago that are

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 5>leading this anti trust initiative against Apple.

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that's a great question.

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 9>I mean, Jonathan Cancer came into the anti trust division

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 9>being labeled you know, Google's foe.

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 6>We knew that. You know, he had his.

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 9>Site set on big tech and that's part of this

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 9>kind of neo Brandisian school of anti trust that we

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 9>see also at the FTC with Lena Khan, the commissioner there,

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:37.439
<v Speaker 9>So you know, they've in some cases really worked together

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 9>to reshape the understanding of anti trust law and really

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 9>try to show how corporate behavior, even corporations that are

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 9>well loved that produce products that people really enjoy, their

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 9>behavior results in higher prices for consumers. So you know,

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 9>we see this also from the app developers like Spotify,

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 9>Match Sonos who have complained for years that Apple's behavior

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 9>puts them at a disadvantage competing with products like Apple Music.

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 9>So that's all a part of this equation and is

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 9>all going to be tried now in a court of

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 9>law and we'll we'll see how it comes out.

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 4>I want to just return to you, Ana Rag for

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 4>a moment and just think about ultimately where Apple has

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 4>to stay from now in terms of its oval prioritizations.

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:25.120
<v Speaker 4>As you said, there's a worry about general to AI

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 4>and being behind the curve there, will that stymey any

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.880
<v Speaker 4>relationship that it's trying to be brokering with Google. Will

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 4>we still see sort of the ongoing build up of

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 4>Apple and its presence in general to AI and still

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 4>trying to refocus the business when it is having to

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 4>be distracted in this way.

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's going to be the biggest thing

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 2>that we find out over the next few months. If

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 2>they are able to pull off this, you know, you

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.119
<v Speaker 2>could say deal with Google. It's going to be symbiotic

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 2>and beneficial for both the companies and that has the

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 2>potential to improve iPhone sales in the second half of

0:24:57.280 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 2>this year. You know, botting that there isn't much going

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 2>on Apple at this point, both in terms of current

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 2>status as well as you know the outlook for second half.

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 4>Anna Agrana, fantastic analysis. Thank you for being there at

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 4>the moment. Rerumkexana Egerton as well with a breakdown of

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 4>this anti trust move and the years that it's taken

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 4>to get here.

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 3>Apple actively encourages banks, merchants, and other parties to participate

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:32.439
<v Speaker 3>in Apple Wallet, but it simultaneously exerts its monopoly power

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:37.360
<v Speaker 3>to block these same partners from developing alternative payment products

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 3>and services for iPhone users.

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 4>Eric Garland, Attorney General, that is, as the DOJ in

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 4>sixteen attorneys general weigh in bringing enforcement to Apple at

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 4>the moment, announcing an antitrust lawsuit against Apple, and of

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 4>course ed this is as we see the share price

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 4>really being not by this off by more than three percent.

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 4>It is the second most valuable company out there, So

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 4>that knocks some twenty ninety two billion off of its

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 4>market capitalization overall on the day training at the lowest

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 4>that we've seen since the start of the year. And

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 4>all of this ultimately should have been expected.

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:11.880
<v Speaker 6>It's a five year investigation, That's.

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 7>The observation I've made.

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 5>Though, So at the session low, the stock was down

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 5>three point eight percent, putting Apple on track for its

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 5>biggest decline since August last year. Bloomberg reported all these

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 5>details last night, and yet when the press conference came

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 5>and the official confirmation came, the stock continued to slide.

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:28.679
<v Speaker 5>And if you go on your Bloomberg terminal look at

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 5>the street wrap.

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:31.160
<v Speaker 7>There is an acknowledgment of.

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.880
<v Speaker 5>A regulatory overhang, which every time you and I talk

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 5>about anti trust over the last few years, it never

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 5>shows up in the stock.

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and then you have to add in on that

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 4>the other bloomberg scoop that came within this time of

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 4>the fact that the EU is now weighing a full

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 4>blown investigation on its part as well into Apple and

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 4>Google when it comes to the digital markets app. So

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 4>this is an antitrust global fixation on Apple right now.

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 5>The one point on that EU reporting is that I

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 5>think the EU is looking at a lot of people

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 5>alphabet and all, so we're reporting meta and that eventually

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 5>that could lead to fine. So that is a story

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 5>out of Europe that will continue to watch. There is

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:09.880
<v Speaker 5>another big story happening we may have forgotten. Let's turn

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 5>to Reddit listing day. Here's some video of them ringing

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 5>the bell at the NYC earlier. Have a great listener,

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:28.400
<v Speaker 5>I would say that, I say them, I don't think

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 5>that's Steve Huffman in a mascot.

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 7>Suit, but I'm sure he was there.

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 5>That was Reddit ringing the ny Stock Exchange bell earlier

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 5>this morning. Let's get some of the key numbers with

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 5>Bloombo's Katie Ruth, and we have an indication of where

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 5>Reddit might open.

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so we don't know exactly where it's going to

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 10>open just yet, but last night it priced at thirty

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 10>four dollars a share at the top of the range,

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 10>which was, you know, a positive indication based on the

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 10>road show and showing where you know, the street thinks

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 10>it's going to open at you know, right now. What

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:04.880
<v Speaker 10>they're doing is they're sorting out the book. They're figuring

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 10>out precisely, you know, for the very very first trade

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 10>to the public where it should trade at, because the

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 10>IPO is actually just for insiders, and so a lot

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 10>of ours are watching Reddit. There's been a dearth of

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:22.439
<v Speaker 10>tech IPOs in recent years. I mean, twenty twenty one

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 10>is a very active year with over one hundred, and

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:26.639
<v Speaker 10>then in twenty twenty two there were nine, and then

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 10>last year we only saw instacart, klaviow an arm, you

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:34.159
<v Speaker 10>know for the big ones. And this week with Reddit

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 10>in Astera, people are hoping might finally open that tech

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 10>ipo window.

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 5>Just looking at this headline crossing the Bloomberg terminal that

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 5>Reddit shares indicated to open between forty two and forty

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 5>six dollars a share, clearly a premium on that thirty

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 5>four dollar IPO pricing.

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 7>There is interest in this one, right.

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 5>It's been a long road because we thought they might

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 5>go twenty twenty one, as you said, was an excellent

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 5>year for US IPOs, and they didn't.

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, they announced in twenty twenty one they had filed

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 10>for IPO in twenty twenty two. I broke that they

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 10>had hired bankers, and they did. It just took a

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 10>little while for them to actually do it. But you know,

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 10>I think it's it's a matter of are people interested

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 10>at what price? You know, they priced at something that

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 10>valued them above six billion, but they were last valued

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 10>at ten billion in twenty twenty one, and so yes,

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 10>there is interest in Reddit at this price, it looks like,

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 10>especially if it's popping, But it's a matter of, you know,

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 10>will it will it be able to sustain that price?

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 10>Will it be able to achieve the price it had

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 10>in twenty twenty one at market highs at.

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 4>My named seeing a blue bug intelligence saying, yes, a

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 4>ten billion valuation is really where Reddit should be, Katie.

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 4>But I'm interested in the allocation and where it went

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 4>when it was priced. To course, money flowing into institutional hands,

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 4>but also into the retail investor and into the redditors themselves.

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 4>How much volatility might this add well, I.

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 10>Think it depends on whether these longtime Reddit users that

0:29:55.840 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 10>got access at the IPO price are are willing to

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 10>stay Reddit stockholders. Part of the idea behind some of

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 10>these consumer facing companies giving access to their top users

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 10>at the IPO price. Is the idea that these would

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 10>be long term stockholders. The IPO is only given to insiders,

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 10>so people that are close to the banks normally and

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 10>they get there's expected to be a pop on day one,

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 10>and so it's seen as a gift that they get

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 10>access to those games on day one. And so this

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 10>is meant to be a good thing for Reddit shareholders,

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 10>Reddit users, and also for Reddit.

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Katie Roof has been across this IPO, We thank

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 4>you so much for bringing it to us and ed,

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean there's a question of course future drive growth

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 4>drivers not just being advertising but AI too.

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's the idea sell the very unique user data

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:57.239
<v Speaker 5>to the companies building large language models. And BI has

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 5>this very wide range saying thirty to eight of Reddit

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 5>users only use Reddit, they don't use other social media platforms.

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 4>And really it's that focus on the desire to be

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 4>engaging there and what it means for some of these

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 4>large language models as well for a future direction of

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 4>travel when it comes to a diversification of revenue. Now,

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 4>we want to welcome to our Bloomberg TV and radio

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 4>audience worldwide. Reddits listing day, it's arrived.

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 6>Let's bring in.

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 4>Reddit's chief operating officer, Jen Wong for more on the

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 4>big day, live from the New York Sock Exchange. Jen,

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 4>it's a day to remember, and I'm interested as to

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 4>really for you how much you are excited about redditors

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 4>having part of the process here or worried a bit

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 4>about the volatility to come.

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 6>Thanks for having me today.

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 11>It's been our dream, our dream to have our users

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 11>and our communities to be able to be shareholders in Reddit.

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 6>Everything on Reddit is built.

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 11>By our users and communities, so having them be owners

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 11>makes a lot of sense.

0:31:57.600 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 6>We're so excited about that.

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 5>Jane, good morning, it's ed in San Francisco. What's the

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:06.719
<v Speaker 5>main benefit of the IPO. You know, we always talk

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 5>about the money raise, the doll evaluation, but I always

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 5>reflect an IPO gets your name out there. Not everyone

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 5>is on Reddit, not everyone is a redditor. How do

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 5>you weigh up the pros and cons of listing?

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 11>Well, it's certainly a lot of press on a day

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 11>like today. It is a special day, but becoming a

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 11>public company has just made us a better company. We've

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 11>actually been in this process longer than most almost two

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 11>years actually, and that process has made us more disciplined,

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:41.719
<v Speaker 11>more operationally rigorous, and actually allowed us to get to

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 11>know investors better and tell our story. And so this

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 11>whole process has made us a better company, and we're

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 11>prepared to be a public company. I think it's actually

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 11>been really good for us, and I think companies that

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 11>you can go public it's sort of a duty. It's

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 11>part of the process of maturing as a company.

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 6>And then the benefit of having.

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 11>Our sharehold our employee employees have liquidity which we promise

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 11>in them, and in addition, have our communities and users

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 11>be able to be shareholders makes a lot of sense

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 11>for Reddit.

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 7>Jen.

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 5>The evolution of the story is for you moving away

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 5>from a solely advertising based business model to one way

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 5>you license your user data to the companies that are

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 5>building large language models. I just asked if you could

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 5>explain to our audience how that works in practice, how

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 5>you're going to grow that business.

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, well, just ahead of addressing that, I just wanted

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 11>to provide context. One of the things that's so special

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 11>about Reddit is that we play in three big addressable markets.

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 6>We have this core advertising business. Adds is a great business.

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 11>It's still early we have great traction and momentum. That's

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 11>our core business. We have an emerging data licensing business

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 11>that we built the foundations for last year because reddits

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 11>corpus of information is incredibly important to the training of

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 11>large language models and also for insights for different kinds

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 11>of businesses.

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:10.839
<v Speaker 6>And the third is a.

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 11>User economy where our communities go beyond conversation into being able.

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:16.319
<v Speaker 6>To transact with each other.

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 11>Now you asked about the data licensing business, which we've

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 11>built the foundations for last year. That has two pieces

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 11>to it. It is a piece that's sort of well established,

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 11>where there's social listening for marketing for companies who want

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 11>to understand what's happening on reddits and for marketing campaigns.

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:35.839
<v Speaker 11>There's also financial services companies who are interested in that.

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 11>Those are well established markets. And then there's the new

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 11>emerging market of AI where large language models need data

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 11>to train on. And when you look at Reddit's corpus

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 11>nineteen years of human experience organized by topic with well

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:57.880
<v Speaker 11>moderation and relevance, that's incredibly important to building both a

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 11>chat capability and the freshness of information. So that's an

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:04.839
<v Speaker 11>area where you know we see opportunity. I think what

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:06.920
<v Speaker 11>that signals, you know, whether it shows up honestly in

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:08.839
<v Speaker 11>our revenue or what it shows up in the value

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 11>of Reddit is how valuable.

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:13.400
<v Speaker 6>Reddit is, you know, the more that we move.

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 11>Toward this AI world, that corpus and that knowledge and

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 11>refreshment of human experience becomes more valuable.

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 4>To our TV and radio audience. We are speaking with

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 4>Reddit Chief operating Officer Gen Wong and to that ongoing

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:28.799
<v Speaker 4>value of your data to AI and to the large

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 4>language models being developed. I mean those llms, the models

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:33.240
<v Speaker 4>are being.

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 6>Built in new and different ways.

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:39.919
<v Speaker 4>This actual technology also develops. I'm interested as to really

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 4>whether this goes on in perpetuity. Do you see this

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 4>sort of licensing being steady and secure for ten years

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 4>from now?

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 11>What I'd say is this is so early in this

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:56.760
<v Speaker 11>emergence of this technology, it's hard to see far out.

0:35:57.280 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 11>The way I think about it, the way we think

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 11>about it, is this the read its corpus of data

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:05.359
<v Speaker 11>is incredibly valuable, and it gets more valuable because as

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:10.840
<v Speaker 11>there's more more content that's generated maybe by AI or computers,

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 11>original human thoughts and ideas increase in value. Right if

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:18.360
<v Speaker 11>you think about it, a new car comes out who's

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 11>going to review it.

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 6>A real life family of six.

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:24.280
<v Speaker 11>Can actually tell you what it's like to drive that car.

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 11>That's always going to be valuable, and so you know,

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 11>whether that shows up in data licensing or in the

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 11>products that Reddit builds, it is valuable.

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:36.800
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk about a community that has been very valuable

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:38.800
<v Speaker 4>at times and extraordinary at others.

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:40.760
<v Speaker 6>To wool Street more broadly.

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:43.720
<v Speaker 4>Has been the reditors who are very active on wool Street.

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:45.399
<v Speaker 4>We go back to woll Street bets. We just think

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 4>about what happened to GameStop for example. There is a

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:50.760
<v Speaker 4>double edged sword here for you involving your.

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 6>Editors as investors.

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 4>How secure are you that you won't become a meme

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 4>frenzy yourself to the up and to the dam.

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:01.359
<v Speaker 11>Look, I love the ethos of that community in all

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:04.839
<v Speaker 11>of our investing communities, and who knows, I mean, it's

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 11>it's Reddit, right, I mean, who knows what's going to happen,

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:09.760
<v Speaker 11>So we'll see.

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 6>I mean it's hard to say, but in the end, I.

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 11>Think having our users and communities be shareholders is a

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 11>good thing and I think ultimately will be judged on

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 11>our performance, and that'll take time for people to know

0:37:21.239 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 11>but ultimately I think that's what investors Judge Judge.

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:24.160
<v Speaker 9>Us on.

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:30.400
<v Speaker 5>Jen we're awaiting the opening trade Bloomberg reporting. The indication

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:32.960
<v Speaker 5>is the stock will open somewhere between forty two or

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 5>forty six dollars a share. It's quite a premium on

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 5>the IPO price. You're one of the biggest shareholders as well.

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:42.800
<v Speaker 5>Just give me your personal feeling in this moment.

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 6>You know, it's kind of like a wedding day.

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:54.799
<v Speaker 11>I guess lots of different emotions, joy, relief, jitters, all

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 11>of it in one I haven't even processed it, frankly,

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:03.000
<v Speaker 11>but it is a special moment. It is one milestone

0:38:03.040 --> 0:38:06.239
<v Speaker 11>in a history of a nineteen year company that I

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 11>think has a lot of runway. You know, we're nineteen

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 11>years old, but we're really young as a company, and

0:38:14.800 --> 0:38:16.320
<v Speaker 11>this is sort of the start of the next chapter.

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 7>Read it.

0:38:18.080 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 5>Chief operating Officer Gem Wong, live from the NYC. We're

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:23.399
<v Speaker 5>grateful for your time on listing Day.

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:23.799
<v Speaker 6>Thank you.

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 7>Okay, time for VC Spotlight and.

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 5>Sequoia has just wrapped up its AI Ascent event right

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 5>here in San Francisco, which brought together some of the

0:38:42.080 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 5>best and biggest minds in artificial intelligence. Let's bring it

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 5>SCOA Capital partner Constantine Butler to explain who was there?

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 5>There were big names in the building. Why did you

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 5>do that?

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 12>Well, first, ad Caroline, thank you so much for having

0:38:55.800 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 12>me again.

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:56.959
<v Speaker 7>You're right.

0:38:57.040 --> 0:39:00.840
<v Speaker 12>Yesterday we had one hundred of the leading minds in AI.

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 12>We brought them together because we want to discuss the

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 12>state of.

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:07.640
<v Speaker 5>The AI industry, just portfolio companies or the community, the

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:09.960
<v Speaker 5>whole community, right, not just portfolio companies.

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:12.880
<v Speaker 12>We're talking the leading minds in AI. We wanted to

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 12>talk about the state of the industry today, but also

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 12>where we're going, what's next, and.

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 7>What was the conclusion.

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 12>Well, one thing I think will surprise your audience is

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 12>that everybody knew that we had to be patient in

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:26.880
<v Speaker 12>this process. It feels like we started the AI process

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:29.360
<v Speaker 12>as a sprint, but everyone knows this is a marathon.

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:32.319
<v Speaker 12>So what's ahead of us is the long haul, and

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:34.439
<v Speaker 12>every everyone's getting ready for that long haul.

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 4>Custinton, I'm sure a topic of conversation must have been inflection,

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:43.360
<v Speaker 4>basically going in house to Microsoft and yes, licensing some

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:46.239
<v Speaker 4>of its technology. At the same time you're speaking with

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 4>the likes of the co CEO of Anthropic, which has

0:39:49.600 --> 0:39:52.239
<v Speaker 4>a deal with Amazon. You're also talking with Mistrale, which

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 4>is of course got a deal with Microsoft. How is

0:39:55.120 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 4>that whole ecosystem ultimately building itself? There seems to be

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 4>it'll be some very interesting partnerships that end up looking

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:05.400
<v Speaker 4>like MNA. How do you feel as someone who's putting

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 4>money into these businesses.

0:40:07.560 --> 0:40:09.719
<v Speaker 7>Caroline, You're exactly right. There was a lot of talk

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 7>about that.

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 12>And one of the major trends that I think will

0:40:13.160 --> 0:40:15.959
<v Speaker 12>surprise your audience is that the leaders we're talking about

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:20.359
<v Speaker 12>how ais are gonna actually work together. So we're talking

0:40:20.360 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 12>about this concept of networks of ais, not just so

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:26.360
<v Speaker 12>you're gonna have one AI, but you're gonna have multiple

0:40:26.360 --> 0:40:29.439
<v Speaker 12>ais that are good at different tasks, and they're gonna

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:32.080
<v Speaker 12>work together, cooperate and compete. I'll give you a very

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:35.320
<v Speaker 12>tangible example. I use a product called dust. It also

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:38.840
<v Speaker 12>happens to be a wonderful Sequoia portfolio company. It allows

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 12>me to call both GPT four and mistraw large, and

0:40:42.800 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 12>also Claude three from Anthropic in parallel. I can have

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:50.200
<v Speaker 12>the models compete against each other, I can have them collaborate,

0:40:50.480 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 12>and this yields an even better outcome.

0:40:53.200 --> 0:40:54.280
<v Speaker 7>That's the future of AI.

0:40:54.480 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 12>It's gonna be many models working together in a network.

0:40:57.200 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 4>Another portfolio company being hugging face, which are cool. So

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 4>allays bring together the entire ecosystem in that manner. And

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 4>there must be an awful lot of debate ultimately about

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 4>well open versus closed. You've got open AI, and many

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 4>would argue that open AI ain't that open anymore, and

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:15.800
<v Speaker 4>some would say for good reason, how are you seeing

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:20.399
<v Speaker 4>the overall AI community divide itself on how open large

0:41:20.480 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 4>language models should be.

0:41:22.600 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 7>I'll tell you what we heard yesterday.

0:41:24.400 --> 0:41:28.440
<v Speaker 12>We heard a lot of enthusiasm about open source. And frankly,

0:41:28.480 --> 0:41:30.400
<v Speaker 12>it wasn't just from the builders. So a lot of

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:32.279
<v Speaker 12>the builders, of course want open source so that they

0:41:32.280 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 12>can run these models in their own clouds, but it

0:41:36.040 --> 0:41:36.879
<v Speaker 12>was also.

0:41:36.640 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 7>From the application layer.

0:41:38.320 --> 0:41:40.919
<v Speaker 12>We had CJ the COO and president of service Now,

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 12>and he talked about how service now is using AI

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 12>internally to deflect twenty percent of tickets that's for it

0:41:47.840 --> 0:41:50.960
<v Speaker 12>stuff like ordering a laptop, that's for HR, stuff like

0:41:51.080 --> 0:41:54.200
<v Speaker 12>leave and he made it very clear, we need the

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:57.080
<v Speaker 12>open source because that's going to help us drive costs down.

0:41:57.280 --> 0:42:00.600
<v Speaker 12>That's going to help us preserve margin. So customers want this.

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:02.839
<v Speaker 12>We've heard it from customers. We've also heard it from

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:03.880
<v Speaker 12>the founders and the builders.

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:06.840
<v Speaker 5>Just a headline on the Bloomberg to make our audience

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:09.760
<v Speaker 5>where reddit share is now indicated to open at forty

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 5>four to forty eight dollars to share a premium on

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 5>the thirty four dollars that they price the IPO at.

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 5>We were just talking to gen want at redit the

0:42:16.760 --> 0:42:19.520
<v Speaker 5>idea that they are in an available data set for

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 5>training large language models.

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:22.399
<v Speaker 7>The difference in the.

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 5>Data is the focus of reddits. They only use Reddit, right,

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 5>was that something you've discussed about the availability of data

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 5>and Reddit?

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:33.080
<v Speaker 7>I mean, what are people saying about that? Absolutely? First

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 7>of all, we're so happy for Reddit.

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 12>This is an amazing milestone and Junge just seve it

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:40.000
<v Speaker 12>and IPO is an important milestone in the journey.

0:42:40.640 --> 0:42:41.359
<v Speaker 6>And this is an.

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:44.360
<v Speaker 12>Example of how the fact that they created an online community,

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 12>a true community where they were actually working together, is

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:49.120
<v Speaker 12>going to pay off, not just for advertising that's the

0:42:49.160 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 12>obvious business, but for data.

0:42:51.200 --> 0:42:51.920
<v Speaker 7>We know they have a.

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:54.120
<v Speaker 12>Big partnership with Google and we're going to see a

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:56.799
<v Speaker 12>lot more businesses like this that have accumulated that data

0:42:56.800 --> 0:42:59.160
<v Speaker 12>advantage being partners for.

0:42:59.239 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 7>Great AI products that need to train on that data.

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:05.040
<v Speaker 5>It's core capital partner Constemula. Great to have you back

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:08.480
<v Speaker 5>in the studio, San Francisco. What a day it's been carried.

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:12.920
<v Speaker 5>This for now is been big technology. Thanks ed, Thanks Jian.

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 3>We oglage that Apple has employed a strategy that relies

0:43:28.239 --> 0:43:34.200
<v Speaker 3>on exclusionary anti competitive conduct that hurts both consumers and developers.

0:43:34.960 --> 0:43:39.360
<v Speaker 3>For consumers, that has meant fewer choices, higher prices and fees,

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:44.799
<v Speaker 3>lower quality smartphones, apps and accessories, and less innovation from

0:43:44.840 --> 0:43:46.279
<v Speaker 3>Apple and its competitors.

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:51.320
<v Speaker 4>Attorney General Garland there of the Department of Justice, speaking

0:43:51.360 --> 0:43:54.919
<v Speaker 4>earlier today, Apple facing global anti trust allegations, of course

0:43:55.000 --> 0:43:57.640
<v Speaker 4>not known from the US, but also the EU. We

0:43:57.760 --> 0:44:00.920
<v Speaker 4>understand they're going to do a full probe Google and Apple.

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:04.759
<v Speaker 4>You commissioned a EVP, Margravestdaya told us this earlier in

0:44:04.800 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 4>the month.

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:09.399
<v Speaker 13>We see an illegal abuse that has been ongoing for

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 13>a number of years, which has made it, you know,

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 13>virtually impossible for customers to choose if they want the

0:44:17.160 --> 0:44:21.719
<v Speaker 13>payment service in app by Apple paying the fee, or

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:23.840
<v Speaker 13>they would want to go, for instance, to a website

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:26.600
<v Speaker 13>and have a cheaper subscription price.

0:44:28.840 --> 0:44:31.640
<v Speaker 4>Bags margam and for more What's apples take.

0:44:33.600 --> 0:44:37.960
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, Apple certainly disagrees across the board on this lawsuit,

0:44:39.160 --> 0:44:43.000
<v Speaker 14>implying that the lawsuit is not legal, saying the iPhone

0:44:43.040 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 14>is not a monopoly, and pushing back heavily on the

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:50.000
<v Speaker 14>bevy of claims The Department of Justice is going after

0:44:50.080 --> 0:44:53.719
<v Speaker 14>Apple from everything from green Bubbles to car play to

0:44:53.800 --> 0:44:59.920
<v Speaker 14>how iCloud storage integrated, blaming Apple for hurting consumers, hurting choice,

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:05.480
<v Speaker 14>hurting developers. Certainly, Apple has squashed developers and made it

0:45:05.520 --> 0:45:07.640
<v Speaker 14>difficult for developers to.

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:09.480
<v Speaker 7>Compete in some instances.

0:45:10.360 --> 0:45:12.200
<v Speaker 14>On the other hand, a lot of this comes down

0:45:12.239 --> 0:45:17.359
<v Speaker 14>to user interface and philosophical decisions Apple made many years

0:45:17.400 --> 0:45:20.760
<v Speaker 14>ago about its integrated experience. So we'll have to see

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:23.840
<v Speaker 14>where Apple is willing to meet the DOJ how they

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:27.040
<v Speaker 14>can work together to create some solutions here to keep

0:45:27.040 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 14>the iPhone still a secure, integrated platform, but certainly it

0:45:30.480 --> 0:45:32.759
<v Speaker 14>needs to get a bit more open and a bit

0:45:32.800 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 14>more competitive for third party developers and accessory makers.

0:45:36.480 --> 0:45:39.520
<v Speaker 4>The man who can explain the Apple philosophy, Mark German.

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:41.839
<v Speaker 4>We thank you so much for jumping in on the.

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:44.600
<v Speaker 6>News and boy that does it for

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:47.480
<v Speaker 4>This extremely busy edition of Blue meg Technology