WEBVTT - How Dynamic Ads Work in Podcasts

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from my Heart Radio.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Be there and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with iHeart Radio and

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 1>how the tech are you. I recently got a note

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>from my editor that my rushed intro is starting to

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>slurn together to the point where it's completely incomprehensible, so

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm working to reverse that. You can thank TORII. She's

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the reason why uh I I have I have been

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>curbed of my chaotic behavior. Anyway, Twitter user Ryan Barrier

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>sent me a message that read quote, Hey, Jonathan, I'd

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 1>love to hear about how podcast advertising works. Early on

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>in your show, I remember hearing the same ad for years.

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Toyota Camera not currently a sponsor of this episode. That's

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>just metorializing. Then it seems they became more dynamic. Now

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>even old episodes have current ads. Thanks end quote. Well,

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Ryan Barrier. And yes, our podcasts have ads

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that stay current. Even if you were to go back

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and download a very old episode of tech Stuff, you

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>would hear current ads in the ad breaks. And as

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you say, the ads are dynamic, we call them dynamic

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 1>ads are really dynamic ad insertions. But let's start off

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>with the different kinds of ads that you can encounter

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>with podcasts, because it's good to know how advertisers think,

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>how content creators think, and the frankly difficult path of

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>balancing commerce and art, or in the case of tech stuff,

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>commerce and the technology podcast made by a twit. Now,

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>this stuff is not going to relate to ads initially.

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give a little bit more background, but

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it is important to understand to kind of get a

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>grasp on the evolution of podcasting and then the subsequent

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>incorporation of ads. Now, in the old old days, most

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>podcasts were not really monetized, at least not through advertising.

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 1>It was a brand new medium, and so typically a

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>podcast came out of either someone's hobby, so it was

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>being done just for fun zies, with no expectation that

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.839
<v Speaker 1>it was going to generate revenue. In fact, more than

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>likely it was costing the person who was making the

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>podcast money, or it was going to be used as

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 1>an extension of some other media companies output. There were

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:47.839
<v Speaker 1>a few exceptions. A couple of podcasts set up subscription

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>models pretty early on, so they were kind of like

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>an audio magazine. Listeners could pay to download episodes month

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:58.839
<v Speaker 1>to month. So there were some early versions of podcasts

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that were supported directly by listeners, and obviously that model

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>still exists today. There are subscription based podcasts out there

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that are behind a paywall in other words, but ads

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>really would come a bit later for podcasts. So even

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>though there were some early paywall podcasting, there weren't a

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of podcasts that contain ads early early on.

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Let me give you an example of a podcast that

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:30.679
<v Speaker 1>was used for brand extension. Uh, there was a podcast

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I used to listen to. It no longer exists. I

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>mean you can find old episodes, I imagine, but it's

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>no longer produced. And this was way back in like

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the mid two thousand's, before I was ever a podcaster myself.

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>It was called buzz out Loud and it came from

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>c Net. Tom Merritt and Molly Wood were the the

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>anchors of that show, with other hosts and producers also contributing.

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>The Buzz out Loud show covered tech news and was

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>part of a c net brand, but it wasn't necessarily

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>a revenue generating show on its own, at least not

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>most of the time. Rather, it was helping you know,

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>introduced the brand of c net to new audiences, and

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the hope was that these audiences would then find their

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>way to c net dot com, where traffic was monetized

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>through various means like web page ads and whatnot, you know,

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>all the regular web advertising strategies. Maybe that visitor would

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>then become a regular at c net, which means they

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 1>would also be a regular source of revenue, or rather,

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>their traffic would be a regular source of revenue. It

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>all gets a bit wibbly wobbly when we talk about

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:49.559
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. Really, whenever you talk about advertising, there's there's

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a level of kind of vague uncertainty in the mix.

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 1>When I started podcasting, which was back in the summer

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand eight, it was much the same for

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>us over at what was then how stuff Works dot Com.

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>To be clear, how stuff Works dot Com still exists,

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>but my part in How Stuff Works split off several

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 1>years ago and we haven't had any real contact since then.

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 1>But back in two thousand and eight, I was a

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 1>writer for how stuff Works dot com and I focused

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>primarily on tech articles. Big surprise there, and our buss

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Conal Burne who has actually been our

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>boss on and off a few times over the years.

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>It kind of feels like we would go our separate

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>ways and then come back and then do it again. Um.

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>He decided in two thousand and eight that podcasting would

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>be a good way to extend brand awareness of how

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff Works dot com. Uh. The first of those podcasts,

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 1>technically the first, I believe was brain Stuff, which was

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Marshall brains podcast. He was the founder of how stuff

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com, and then later on that podcast would

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>pass to other hands. But the first big one to

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>come out that really was the flagship was Stuff You

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Should Know Now. It was important to try and extend

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the brand of how stuff Works dot com because most

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 1>of the traffic coming into the website was from web searches,

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>primarily Google. So, in other words, most people who are

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 1>going to how stuff Works dot com, we're not going

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 1>there just to browse articles. Most visitors were not fans

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of the site who just wanted to learn about all

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 1>sorts of stuff, from tech to history to culture to food.

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>By the way, how stupp works dot Com still a

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>fantastic website with amazing, well written, researched articles, and I

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>highly recommend checking it out if you're of a curious

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>nature and you want to just learn stuff. But now

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>most of the people coming to the website had a

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 1>specific question that they wanted to answer, like how does

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a steam engine work, for example, and they used a

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.039
<v Speaker 1>search engine, our site would pop up and they would

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>come into the site to get their answer from one

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of these well written, well researched articles, and then once

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>they got their answer, they would bounce. Well, while we

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>loved all the traffic coming into the site through search,

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>there was no denying that it sure would be nice

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to have folks stick around a bit more and brows

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and become regular visitors. Also, this is a good time

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to mention that search engines change over time. Right. The

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Google search algorithm has changed many times over the years,

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and whenever there's a change in the algorithm, there's a

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>change in page rankings, which means you might at one

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>point have been the dominant player in search results for

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>various topics, and then once there's a change in the algorithm,

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe your results appeared lower down on the page or

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>or worst case scenario, off of page one. Because hardly

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>anyone goes beyond page one of search results. Hardly anyone

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>goes below the fold. So not being highly ranked in

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>SIR could be a death sentence if you were depending

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>heavily upon traffic coming from search engines. So again a

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>strong incentive to find a way to bring people over

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to the website beyond just searching for a specific answer. Right. So,

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the podcasts, while not initially monetize herble directly themselves, we're

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing almost like an advertising tool for the website. In fact,

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:34.319
<v Speaker 1>when we first launched the podcasts, we had a rule

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>every episode needed to relate to a specific article on

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the website, and we would refer listeners to go and

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>read those articles in the hopes that they actually would

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>go check those articles out and then maybe branch out

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>from there and explore the site. We were trying to

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>make How Stuff Works a destination site. UH that had

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>limited success as far as I'm aware. I mean I

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>wasn't and analytics, so I couldn't really see what, if

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>any effect this had. However, we did not too long

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 1>after that mandate dropped the requirements so that different podcasts

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>could actually do UH topics that were not directly related

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to an article on the site, And we dropped it

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>immediately over at tech Stuff because a lot of the

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>articles that were on the site that we're relating to technology,

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Obviously they would get out of date very quickly because

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>technology evolved so fast, and so we would have an

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>article of and the examples in an article might be

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>really kind of embarrassing in in retrospect, Like if you're

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>doing an article or a podcast about CPUs and the

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>article is talking about pentium processors, that's kind of embarrassing

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>because those are dinosaurs. Right. So anyway, we switched over,

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it also turned out that it's it's

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a difficult cell to convince someone who's listening to a

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>podcast to then go to a specific U r L right,

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>because it all depends on how they're listening. If they're

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.319
<v Speaker 1>jogging and they're listening on headphones, they're not going to

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>stop and pull out their phone and navigate to the website.

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>If they're driving, I sure as heck hope they aren't

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>going to stop, uh paying attention to the road and

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>then try and navigate to this website to read an

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>article while they're driving. So yeah, it was tough to

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>use podcasts in this way. And honestly, there could have

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>been the chance for podcasts at how Stuff works to

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>just go away because the limited return on investment, But

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>we stuck with it and we grew, and that would

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>end up paying off because eventually, not immediately, but over time,

0:10:55.679 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>podcasting would become a relevant way of generating revenue all

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>on its own thanks to advertising. Okay, now, before we

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>get into that, it's time to have an example. We're

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.079
<v Speaker 1>going to actually take an ad break right now. We'll

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>be right back. Okay. So podcasts when they start off

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 1>aren't really monetized beyond being behind a paywall in some

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>rare instances, but let's skip ahead. Gradually, some brands, particularly

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of smaller companies, started seeing the possibility of reaching customers

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 1>through podcasts, and that opened up some opportunities on all sides.

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>One opportunity was to have an ad baked into a podcast.

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Another opportunity was to pay for a fully sponsored and

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>possibly themed episode. That second option is more expensive, and

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>it also means that a single advertiser pretty much has

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>domain over the whole episode, so in other words, you

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>won't hear ads from other brands appear in that episode.

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>But let's talk about baked in ads or burned in ads,

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>depending upon whom you're talking to. Now, back in the

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 1>old days, there really wasn't any sophisticated content management system

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>for podcasts. So the way it worked was you would

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>record your audio, maybe you edit it, you might add

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.439
<v Speaker 1>in some music and some other stuff, maybe other effects.

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Then you would publish this finished audio file on a

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>publication platform. That platform would then push the podcasts RSS

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>feed to the various podcatching services out there, most notably iTunes.

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 1>Back in the day, iTunes was the dominant source for podcasts.

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>In fact that we call them podcasts because of the iPod.

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>So Apple, while it had not invented either the MP

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>three player or the podcast, was kind of the the

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 1>nexus of all things podcast in the early days. Now

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to this day, iTunes is still a really important piece

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>of the puzzle. Interestingly, a lot of the tech stuff

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>listeners out there are getting this show through other podcatching

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>services because I can see that a ton of y'all

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>are listening on Android devices, which is, you know, awesome,

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and I also listen on an Android device. So yeah,

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of an outlier because a lot of podcasts

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>still get the majority of their traffic through iTunes. All right,

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>So originally most of the companies that would actually purchase

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>advertising on podcasts were these smaller companies that could not

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>necessarily afford a big national campaign on you know, traditional

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>media like TV and radio, but podcasts also have national

0:13:56.120 --> 0:14:01.079
<v Speaker 1>or global reach, and podcasts were not nearly as expensive

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to use for advertising. Heck, there were podcasts out there

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that had no idea what ad rates to charge or

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>what metrics to use in order to guide negotiations. It

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>was really messy and chaotic. Now it would all more

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>or less get worked out over time, but in those

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>early days it was It was just confusing because no

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>one really had any way of of quantifying what add

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>time on a podcast was worth. Anyway, a baked in

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>AD is one that's recorded right inside of a show itself.

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>It is part of the audio file. So you might

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>be talking about like a transponder one moment. Then you

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>might say in the podcast, before we go any further,

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about our sponsor blah blah blah, and then

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you might transition right into an AD, and it's all

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>part of the same recording session. It's all part of

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the same file. And most of the ads back in

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>those days were what we would call direct response advertising. Now,

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>this is a kind of ad that asks the listener

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to take some sort of immediate action, such as purchasing

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a product or service, and there's typically a code associated

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>with whichever podcast has the ad in it. And when

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you hear me in an ad say something like use

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>promo code stuff or something like that, that is a

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>direct response ad. The ads efficacy is largely measured by

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>how many folks actually went to the trouble of going

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to the site and using that promo code. Now, in

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the old days, you'd hear a lot of the same

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>companies advertising across different shows, like Casper Mattresses and Meanis

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and Dollar Shave Club and stitch Fix. These are all

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>great companies. By the way, I actually really liked working

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>with all of these brands. They were great, and it

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>was it was kind of a rising tide lifts all

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>ships because I really believed in the products. So listeners,

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>if they were using the the code, we're getting products

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that I believed in. They were getting a discount, so

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that was the benefit to the listeners, and the brands

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>were getting broader reach across and more customers, so everybody

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>was winning. So it was kind of like a a

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>bootstrap approach to business, you know. These were companies that

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>again probably would have had trouble accessing traditional media on

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a national level, and here they were being able to

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>tap into something that was having an incredible impact. Like

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the podcasting experience is a very intimate one. It has

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>this relationship between host and listener, and especially a host

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>red ad can have a huge impact on listeners, particularly

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the host is being sincere about it. So yeah, it

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>was this kind of magical com nation right now. Podcasting

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>was growing in popularity in general. I mean you kept

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>on seeing news about podcasting his back or the podcasting renaissance,

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and you would have people who have been podcasting that

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>whole time saying, don't call to come back, I've been

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>here for years. Shout out the Scott Johnson um and

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>some podcasts were doing really, really well, right Some would

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 1>go on to be like the superstars of the medium. Like,

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not a fan of his his beliefs

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>or his delivery, but there's no denying Joe Rogan hit

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the stratosphere as far as podcasting is concerned, and he

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>launched that show I think in two thousand nine. So

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>this was that's an example of a show the win

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>to the stratosphere. Here at at I Heart and actually

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>previously at How Stuff Works. Our big flagship show was

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know. I'll mention them again in a

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit. So this opened up the opportunity to do

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 1>sponsored and themed episodes because the shows were getting to

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a point where if you were an advertiser, and you

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.160
<v Speaker 1>are an advertising client maybe who had the money, then

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>getting a sponsored show could be really attractive because of

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the reach of these podcasts. But this is where things

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>get really tricky, um because this is where you've got

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>increased overlap between advertising and editorial content, and that can

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>produce like advertorial content is one of the phrases for it.

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>It's one I hate, but it is what it's often

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:44.880
<v Speaker 1>used to describe a show that is supposed to combine

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the promotion of a sponsor with the content itself. Now, ideally,

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:57.199
<v Speaker 1>a themed podcast, a themed sponsored podcast should appeal to

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>regular listeners, even if it was themed to promote whatever

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:05.640
<v Speaker 1>sponsor was sponsoring the episode. If it is done poorly,

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>then the episode is going to come across as a

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>very long advertisement for the respective sponsor. And ain't no

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 1>one out there who loves that. Apart from advertising executives,

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>who seem to think it's a win, even though that

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:22.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of content almost never performs well once it's released. Now,

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>there are ways to do a themed sponsored episode well,

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.120
<v Speaker 1>but that approach is delicate and needs a really good

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>level of understanding between the content creators, the advertising reps,

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and the sponsor itself in order to make it happen.

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 1>And frankly, it always surprises me when I encounter folks

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 1>pushing to make a show more explicitly an ad for

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a company or its products and services or whatever, because

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 1>I maintain audiences are really smart. I mean, we all

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>know how to spot and add. We've been encountering ads

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:01.120
<v Speaker 1>our entire lives, so of course we know an ad

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>right away. And if we suspect someone is trying to

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:08.919
<v Speaker 1>pass off and add as quote unquote real content, we

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>get irritated about it because we feel like the content

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>creator doesn't respect our intelligence. Right It's like the content

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 1>creator is trying to pass off this advertisement as if

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>it is otherwise content and they would have created anyway,

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>And the disingenuous nature of that offends a lot of people,

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>including me. I mean, I I'm likely to bounce off

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a video or a podcast if I sense that it's

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>not a genuine piece of work and is instead an

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>add masquerading as an episode. Now, all that being said,

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the best episodes of some podcasts have come

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>from sponsored and themed episodes. It can be done. It

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>just takes a real collaborative effort of all the parties

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>involved and an understanding on the part of the sponsor

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 1>and the ad reps that pushing their narrative too hard

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to have the opposite effect that they want. Now,

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>let's move on to dynamic ad insertion, which actually I

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:15.439
<v Speaker 1>guess I'll get to after we take this break for

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple more ads. Okay, dynamic ad insertion. As podcasting

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>grew in popularity, you had companies that were creating more

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated tools for publishing and hosting podcasts, Like there was

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>an industry there, so there was an incentive to innovate

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>in the space. And one tool, one that was already

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>in use on the Worldwide Web, was dynamic ad insertion,

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and it does exactly what it says on the ten.

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Dynamic ad insertion is the practice of inserting ads at

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the time someone encounters the content. So when someone downloads

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a podcast or when they stream an episode, that's when

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>the AD gets inserted. So instead of having a baked

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.919
<v Speaker 1>in AD that was recorded at the time that the

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>podcast itself was recorded, the dynamic ad insertion tool plops

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 1>a current AD into the ad breaks. That means, if

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you download an episode today and someone you know downloads

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.919
<v Speaker 1>the same episode a year later, the two of you

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>are going to encounter different ads at the time that

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you listen to the show when you hit those AD breaks.

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:37.679
<v Speaker 1>And the way this works from our side is pretty simple.

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>We create AD breaks in our show now some folks

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>like yours. Truly, We do that as we record, so

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you've heard it in this episode. I just keep an

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 1>eye on the time, and when I hit certain time lines,

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I will pause to throw in an AD break. We

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>have UH standards in our our company about how many

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>AD breaks go into a show based upon how long

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 1>the episode is. So if my episode is going to

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>be longer than say twenty minutes, I know that I

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>need to put an AD break in every ten minutes

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>or so. If it's gonna be like five minutes, I

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>can go to like fifteen minutes or so. It again

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>depends upon the length of the episode, and I'm not

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>going to give all the details about it, because one

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>those change over time, so I can't guarantee that by

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the time you listen to this it will be the same.

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:32.360
<v Speaker 1>And too, it really doesn't matter. So I pause my episode,

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll throw in an ad break, and then my super

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 1>editor Torii can, while editing, chop the episode there and

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>insert a little digital marker, and that digital marker essentially

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 1>tells our publication platform here is where you can put

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>a mid role ad. Mid role is just a type

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>of ad that appears in the middle of a show.

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>You also have pre role obviously that happens before a

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>show starts, and post roll those are ads that play

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>after a show ends. Then I just picked back up

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and carry on until I hit the next benchmark, and

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 1>then I insert a new ad break throw and Torii

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>chops the show there when she's editing and puts in

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>another digital marker. Now that little digital marker that TRY

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 1>adds in is really the secret sauce, and we typically

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 1>have parameters set for what our ads can be in

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>our various positions, So mid role ads tend to be

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>sixty seconds long each. Now once in a while we

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:37.879
<v Speaker 1>might have a longer ad depending upon the specific AD deal.

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Like you could have a two minute AD instead of

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:43.719
<v Speaker 1>a sixty second AD, but then that would essentially take

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>up two slots in your AD break, Right, So each

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>AD break allows a certain number of ads per break,

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>or really a certain amount of AD time per break. Now,

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 1>why would you want to use dynamic ads in the

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:00.719
<v Speaker 1>first place. Well, to understand that, it's helpful understand a

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit about AD deals themselves. Typically, an AD deal

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>is made to either last a specific amount of time

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>or more frequently, in order to reach a specific number

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of impressions. Now, impressions means the number of times that

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 1>particular AD was downloaded or streamed. So let's say we

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 1>strike a deal with I don't know, the ACME corporation

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>from the old Warner Brothers cartoons, and we're trying to

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>sell anvils. So our deal is to hit one thousand

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>impressions with this hypothetical AD deal. So ACNE pays us

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 1>whatever our AD rate is to reach that impression limit,

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and we get to work on delivering those impressions by

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 1>getting people to download a hundred thousand episodes or stream

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.239
<v Speaker 1>a hundred thousand episodes that have or or you know,

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>instances that have that AD in them. Now, if you

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>have a baked in AD where you've actually recorded it

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:04.879
<v Speaker 1>within the body of the podcast and it's not something

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that can be easily chopped out, that podcast ad is limited, right.

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's true that episodes typically see the highest

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 1>number of downloads on the first week of publication. After that,

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>things trail off really really fast. It is rare for

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you to see a spike in an old episode unless

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 1>something really relevant to that episode happened in the news.

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>But there is a long tail there. People do go

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>back and search back catalogs, and they do download and

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>stream old, old episodes of podcasts. And if an ad

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>has been baked into a podcast, well, technically that podcast

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>is still delivering impressions even after the ad deal has concluded.

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>And advertisers love that because you know, they paid for

0:26:56.320 --> 0:27:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a hundred thousand impressions. But if it's a baked an ad,

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>they're going to keep getting impressions on that ad beyond

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 1>that one thousand deal because the ad was baked in.

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>So anyone downloading that episode years later is going to

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.159
<v Speaker 1>hear that old ad and maybe you know, the promo

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 1>code is not gonna matter anymore, but the ad might

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>still drive people to go to that that particular company.

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's like everything you've got above the one impressions

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you got for free, or if you want, you can

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>think of it as the price per impression continues to

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>decrease over time. But dynamic ad insertion means that number one,

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>podcasts can more nimbly switch from serving one ad to

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a different ad as various ad deals conclude, and two

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 1>they can rely on the back catalog to contribute to

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the number of impressions agreed upon with the current advertiser.

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>So in other words, by swapping out the ads, you

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>can meet the obligations faster, and then you can sell

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that da da da brand new ads. It's a more

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>lucrative way to do business. Right, So if if only

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>my newest episodes were able to hold the latest ads,

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it would take longer for me to meet my obligation

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 1>to the advertiser. But because it goes through the entire

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>back catalog and people are always downloading old episodes, then

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:27.199
<v Speaker 1>those ads are getting served more frequently because of the

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>long tail, So I meet that obligation faster, and then

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I can conclude one ad deal and go to a

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 1>new one. When I say I, I really mean my

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>sales team. I don't do any of that work, thank goodness,

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>because I would be terrible at it anyway. This also

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>means that folks listening are going to hear relevant ads,

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>even if they're diving into the back catalog. They're not

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>going to hear an ad for some company that stopped

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 1>existing like seven years ago. Now, there are some different

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>ways of doing this. One way would be to a

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>mass prerecorded ads that can run across an entire network.

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>We call these run off network ads. So these would

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>be ads where the company I Heart in this case,

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 1>would have agreed that it would deliver a certain number

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of impressions per ad, but it doesn't really matter which

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>shows that ad appears on. So theoretically my Heart could

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 1>put that ad on every show on the network and

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>push it out there to meet that impression requirement immediately.

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:32.959
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot like the ads that you would encounter

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>on radio or on television that they aren't made specifically

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 1>for one podcast like one show, and they may or

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>may not be read by a podcast host at all.

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>It might be produced by some ad company, and no

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 1>one that you know of was related to the production

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 1>of that ad. That's one way to do it here

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 1>at I Heart. Yeah, we do have run of network ads.

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>We have some of those, and those might run on

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>certain shows, but not all of them. But we still

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>largely depend upon host red advertising, so we still have

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 1>hosts reading our ads. Like you know, the ads you

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>encounter on tech Stuff more often than not, those are

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 1>ads that I'm doing. It's just that now those ads

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that were recording are going effectively into a database of ads,

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and the dynamic Ad Insertion tool can pull from and

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>PLoP those ads into our respective shows, all the episodes

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>of our respective shows. In fact, so if I do

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a read for a specific company, that spot can now

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>appear on every episode of tech Stuff I have ever published. Now,

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't physically insert the ad into every episode at

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that time, It just happens whenever anyone downloads or streams

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the episode, that's when the ad gets inserted. Otherwise, you

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 1>can think of the ad breaks in these undownloaded episodes

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 1>as kind of being ready to go to pop in

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>whatever relevant ads should go in that space at that time.

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>This is great for me because it means that I

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 1>am delivering the most relevant ads at any given moment,

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and that those then cycle off the show once the

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 1>ad deal has concluded and new relevant ads can appear,

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and I don't have to worry about people listening to

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff that doesn't exist anymore or that has a promo

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>code that has long since stopped working. And host red

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 1>ads tend to be more valuable than generic prerecorded spots.

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>When I say generic, I mean an ad that's been

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>recorded for any show, not for a specific show, right Like,

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>you could hear that same ad on whatever podcast you downloaded.

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't relate to the show you just listened to.

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Now it feels weird for me to talk about this

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>because you know it's it's how the sausage is made.

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>But this is info that's readily available if you want

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to look for it. It's not like I'm giving away

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>trade secrets. There are articles dedicated to this kind of stuff,

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>including articles that quote my boss Conal Burne, the guy

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I talked about earlier talking about the value of host

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 1>read advertising, because you know that has a real connection

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to it to listeners. Also, Connal refers to baked in

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 1>ads as burned in ads, so he's one of the

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>people who says burned in rather than baked in, and

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>he talks about how those have really big limitations. I

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 1>think one reason that our host read ads are seen

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to have a lot more value than you know, preprogrammed

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>ads is here at iHeart, hosts have a ton of

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>authority when it comes to choosing what ads can run

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>on their respective shows and which ones can't. So hosts

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>have the chance to review and accept or reject ads

0:32:56.000 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and sponsors. Times out of a hundred, it all works

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 1>really well. Right the host says, yeah, I'm fine with that,

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>or I would rather not do that, and that's it.

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Once in a blue moon, you might get a little pushback.

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Happened to me recently. If a particular ad deal is

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 1>seen as really crucial for the company, then it might

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>prompt a deeper discussion rather than just a thumbs up

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>or thumbs down, so that we can get to the

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>bottom of where is their resistance and is there a

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>good reason for it or is there a way to

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>present this that doesn't have that resistance. So there's a

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of room for negotiation, and ultimately someone can still

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 1>say no. Uh, maybe they compromise, or maybe they just

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 1>said listen, this is a hard no for me. I

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 1>just can't do it and we move on. So here's

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the thing we all understand. Podcasting cannot continue without generating revenue.

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Everyone working on the shows has to eat and pay

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:57.239
<v Speaker 1>rent and you know all that kind of stuff, and

0:33:57.280 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you can't do that just for free. So there is

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a business. That is why you have to balance the

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>commerce part. It has to happen or else podcasts don't happen.

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>So this is really just figuring out the right fit

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 1>per show, and the right fit for one show is

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>not the same as the fit for the next show.

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:16.959
<v Speaker 1>It's again why I'm glad that my Heart does things

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the way they do because they cater to the individual

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 1>show as opposed to having a cookie cutter approach that

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>all shows have to follow. So as an example, most

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of the time, you are not going to hear me

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:34.759
<v Speaker 1>advertise for any kind of alcohol on this show. I

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>once did and add for mixers. I want to say

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>it was one of the rare occasions where I allowed

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 1>an alcohol related ad to play on this show. Now,

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:48.839
<v Speaker 1>it's not that I'm strictly anti alcohol. I mean I

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 1>do not drink, that's true, but it's that I know

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of younger folks listening to the podcast,

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and I just don't want to advertise alcohol to younger listeners.

0:34:57.880 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>That's not who I am. I don't want to do that.

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>It's the same with tobacco based products or tobacco substitutes.

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to do that either. There have been

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:07.879
<v Speaker 1>a few times where I have allowed an add through

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that later on I regretted, but those cases were almost

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:16.360
<v Speaker 1>always my own fault for not looking into a company

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 1>or product thoroughly enough before I gave the thumbs up,

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and then later on it was brought to my attention, Hey,

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that thing you advertised, it's not on the up and up.

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of shady, and I felt awful about it.

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 1>And again that was my fault because it didn't do enough.

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't I didn't do the due diligence, and uh,

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I try very hard now to do it. Occasionally, you know,

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I might slip up, but I try anyway. My point

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 1>is that this level of review and approval means that

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the ads that do appear on our shows have typically

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 1>passed at least some level of scrutiny from the hosts themselves.

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:55.720
<v Speaker 1>If it's not a run of network ad, that's definitely

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:58.319
<v Speaker 1>the case. Even with run of network ads, we're given

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the chance to say what out ofgories we absolutely do

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:04.399
<v Speaker 1>not want running on our show and which ones we're

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:07.360
<v Speaker 1>okay with, So we even have a little bit of

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 1>control when it comes to that, and this scrutiny is

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a reflection of our respect for our listeners. I like

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 1>to think that that's what makes the ads on our

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:20.720
<v Speaker 1>shows more valuable. It's because we hosts care about y'all,

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and y'all know that we You know, we care about you,

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 1>And hopefully the ads you listen when you do listen

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and you don't just skip the ad break, are ones

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that are potentially helpful for you. You You maybe you find

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a new product or service that you didn't even know

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:40.719
<v Speaker 1>you needed. That's when it all works perfectly. And I

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:43.479
<v Speaker 1>keep saying, it doesn't do anyone any good to serve

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:46.760
<v Speaker 1>up bad junkie ads to folks who only get angry

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>about them. That just hurts everyone down the line. It

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do anyone any good. So I always want to

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 1>make sure that ads I do are adding value both

0:36:56.920 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to the advertiser and the sponsor and to the listener

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and to the show. Like that's that's my goal. It's

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:06.919
<v Speaker 1>hard to do and it doesn't always work, but that's

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:12.719
<v Speaker 1>the goal anyway. That's the secret sauce behind dynamic ad insertion.

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a strategy that tons of podcasts are using these days.

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 1>For the ones that still use host red ads, it

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:22.880
<v Speaker 1>can be a really useful tool. Now, if you go

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:25.879
<v Speaker 1>strictly programmatic with this approach, where you're just using these

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:29.440
<v Speaker 1>prerecorded ads that have nothing to do with the shows themselves,

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:32.440
<v Speaker 1>you really risk losing some of the special touch that

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:36.320
<v Speaker 1>podcasts have with their audiences. So there is a line

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:38.239
<v Speaker 1>to walk. If you can do what I Heeart does

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and use dynamic ad insertion that largely depends upon host

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 1>red ads for those specific shows, that's that's the golden touch,

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 1>but it requires a scale that's difficult to achieve. My

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Heart has been around for ages and has an enormous

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast network, so it's a little easier for us to

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:03.440
<v Speaker 1>do it then for a smaller network. Also, there are

0:38:03.480 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>still a lot of podcasts out there that use some

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:09.560
<v Speaker 1>form of baked in ads. For example, My Brother, My

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Brother and Me, which is an incredibly popular comedy podcast,

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:16.280
<v Speaker 1>has an ad break that they call the Money Zone,

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and those ads are all baked in. I think, like

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they used dynamic ad insertion in the

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Money Zone at all. Um. I definitely know that the

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>old Money Zone ad breaks are baked in because I

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 1>did a deep dive into the back catalog when I

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:34.160
<v Speaker 1>was trying to catch up on the show, and some

0:38:34.239 --> 0:38:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of their classic comedy bits are actually contained in the

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:41.479
<v Speaker 1>ad break itself. So if you skip the ad break,

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you miss some of their best stuff that just happens

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 1>organically as they're riffing on their ads, which means if

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 1>they had gone with dynamic ad insertion, those comedy bits

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:56.320
<v Speaker 1>would eventually get swapped out over time and you would

0:38:56.360 --> 0:39:00.759
<v Speaker 1>lose some pretty amazing material in the process. Now, I

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:03.839
<v Speaker 1>wish I could provide you with my favorite example of

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a Money Zone bit, but it contains language that's inappropriate

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 1>for tech stuff, so uh, it's uh, it's it's a

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:16.360
<v Speaker 1>little a little more raunchy than what tech stuff typically is.

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>It is a very funny bit. It's the ballad of

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a fictional character who has a uh, somewhat juvenile name.

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 1>That's all I'll say. But it was a very very

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:28.399
<v Speaker 1>funny bit, and again it was in the Money Zone.

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 1>So if they had done dynamic ad insertion, then eventually

0:39:32.840 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 1>that whole section would get pulled and swapped out for

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:39.800
<v Speaker 1>something else and you would lose a classic bit of content.

0:39:39.960 --> 0:39:43.879
<v Speaker 1>So there are tradeoffs here. Um. It all depends on

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the style of ad presentation. And in the case of

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 1>my brother, my brother and me, it's actually part of

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the comedy show. So you know, your mileage may vary. Alright.

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:57.840
<v Speaker 1>That is the wrap up on how the sausage is

0:39:57.880 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>made as far as dynamic ad insertion. Hope you learned something.

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 1>I hope you have a deeper appreciation for the way

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that podcasts generate revenue. Um, if they're not like direct support,

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:13.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, like a Patreon style or paywall style, then

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>this is this is something that we have to deal

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:20.280
<v Speaker 1>with in order to bring you content and do also

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>fulfill our obligations on behalf of the sponsors who support us. Uh.

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 1>It's again a delicate ecosystem, but when treated properly, it works.

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 1>If you have suggestions for future topics on tech Stuff,

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 1>please reach out to me. One way to do that

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 1>is to download the I Heart Radio app, which is

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 1>free to download, free to use. You can navigate over

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:44.319
<v Speaker 1>to tech Stuff. There's a little microphone icon that you

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:46.719
<v Speaker 1>can click on and leave a voice message up to

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:49.799
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds in length, Or you can pop on over

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to Twitter and send me a message. There the handle

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that we use as text Stuff hs W and I'll

0:40:56.680 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again, Release soon. Y text Stuff is

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:09.279
<v Speaker 1>an I heart Radio production. For more podcasts from I

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.