WEBVTT - The Cycle: Too Early 2026 Mock Draft (Ep. 1093)

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello, everybody, Welcome into the Cycle. I am Ryan Warmley,

0:00:08.160 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>joined as always by Mike Mayor.

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Mayor.

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>It is the third straight week of us kind of

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>approaching the show a little differently than our usual format.

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.079
<v Speaker 1>A couple weeks ago it was the holiday with fourth

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of July. Last week we had, you know, kind of

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:23.639
<v Speaker 1>going into the All Star break. It was a little weird,

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, not having the upcoming week. This week, we

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:28.479
<v Speaker 1>don't have the previous week of games right because it

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>was the All Star break. So we will be back

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to our kind of our normal format of three different

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>parts spread out on both audio and video starting next week.

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 1>For this week, we're doing one final one episode of

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the whole week edition of the cycle.

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna talks to news and.

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Notes, kind of react to Homer and Derby, All Star Game,

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>MLB Draft at the top of the show, and then

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>what we're gonna do is a way too early twenty

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty six baseball mock draft. Probably didn't need to say baseball.

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Everybody knows that for the show they're listening to, But yeah,

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do a twenty twenty six early mock. We're

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna do two rounds to that and just kind of

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>take an early look at who the guys are that

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 1>we think are going to be at the top next

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 1>year and see where we go. I actually very specifically

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>did not prep for that. I mean, obviously I have

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>all the names in mind, but I didn't like sit

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>down and lay out a big board because I wanted

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>to kind of feel in the moment, like I wanted

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>this to kind of be like a gut check, like

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>how are we feeling less so than like, well, the

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>numbers say it'll probably be this guy.

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Does that make sense? Like I wanted to be kind

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 2>of shooting from the hip.

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 3>I personally was up all night crafting my strategy, and

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 3>I have a very clear path going in. No, I

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 3>don't have any strategy either, but uh yeah, similar I

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:39.479
<v Speaker 3>wanted to. I have a bunch of different like resources

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 3>open that I want to look at, and it's kind

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 3>of like, what do dynasty rankings look like? What do

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 3>the stats look like at the halfway point here, what

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 3>do the rest of season rankings look like? And what

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 3>did draft rankings look like coming into last season? Because

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 3>it'll be interesting to see how different those you know,

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 3>those looks. So I have all those open to kind

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 3>of review, but kind of the same thing. I wanted

0:01:57.760 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 3>to see it, do it in real time and kind

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 3>of see how things are gonna land.

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so that'll be fun.

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll see how it goes, and everybody can let us

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>know in the comments who they think, you know, went

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:09.959
<v Speaker 1>too high, too low, who who had the better version

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of our way too early draft. But that will be

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the second part of the show. We'll start off with

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.919
<v Speaker 1>the news and notes can kind of go a bunch

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of different directions with this. I say, let's kind of

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>go in order of how the events took place over

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the weekend, So that would be starting with the MLB Draft.

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>And I you know, I'm very into dynasty leagues. You

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and I play in the kind of like a dynasty

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>slash deep keeper format together. It's my favorite form of baseball.

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I just like prospect stuff. So those are the leagues

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 1>that I enjoy the most. So I really enjoyed the

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>bet the draft. Also, the Orioles were bad for so

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>many years in a row that you get kind of

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:48.239
<v Speaker 1>used to caring about the draft. This year a little

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>different with I'm not picking till nineteen.

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 4>You'll be there next year.

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, probably, What's interesting though, is unlike football and unlike basketball,

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>these guys are not contributing for your fantasy teams anytime soon.

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>By and large, now you have the you know, these

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>fast moving pictures lately like Chase Burns, Paul skeens Lee,

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:07.959
<v Speaker 1>or Pryor.

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Who are moving very quickly.

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>But by and large, these players that are getting drafted

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>are years away from even being in the big leagues,

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>let alone being impact fantasy players.

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 2>So when you watch the MLB draft.

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Is there a type of player you're looking for when

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking about long term dynasty stuff? Are you thinking like, oh,

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Mikad Anderson, for example, went to the Mariners. Are you thinking, well,

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the Mariners have a great track record of, you know,

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>developing pictures, so I'm really happy with that landing spot

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and I'm more interested in Anderson now, or a guy

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>like Ethan Holliday, big power going to Colorado, like, oh,

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure he's going to hit well in course field.

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Are you thinking down the line that far when you

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>are thinking about dynasty stuff? Are you just looking at

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>pure talent? Like who did I think the best prospect was?

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>How do you approach thinking about the draft with your

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>dynasty formats?

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 3>So I'm kind of an impatient team manager. I don't

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't like to wait that long. So ideally I

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 3>want the you know, you know, everyone's going to want

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 3>the Chase Spurns who comes up, you know, quickly and

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 3>contributes right away. But I also, you know, like the

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 3>first pick in this draft is probably not going to

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 3>be someone I'm I'm going to take, you know, this

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 3>kind of young high schooler who's a long term project.

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 3>That's not really going to be the fantasy target for me,

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:25.600
<v Speaker 3>unless you know, we're talking you know, uh, generational prospects

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 3>like Bryce Harper and Mike Trout who came up and

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 3>we're like in the big leagues at eighteen nineteen years old.

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 3>But a lot of times I look at the path

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 3>to the big leagues like how close are these guys

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 3>to being ready? And so for that reason, I would

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 3>probably look at a Kate Anderson because he's probably one

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 3>of the more you know, not MLB ready, But like,

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, looking at this class, we can talk about

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 3>the class as a whole next, because it was I

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 3>thought it was an interesting, like kind of a down

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:53.719
<v Speaker 3>year for the class, unless you know, people who are

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 3>smarter than me really disagree it didn't feel like last

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 3>year we had, you know, a bunch of high end

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:01.359
<v Speaker 3>talent that kind of went this year. You saw just

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.479
<v Speaker 3>how the draft played out, even the way people predicted

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 3>the draft. There were a bunch of surprising picks in

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.039
<v Speaker 3>the top ten, and so it was kind of a

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:11.840
<v Speaker 3>down year for that. And I don't know, maybe this

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 3>is the year I trade my first round pick and

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't worry about these prospects.

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 2>But there are a couple that I like, Yeah, there

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 2>are definitely prospects I like.

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't feel like, you know, like there was a

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago where like the top five, I think,

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:27.840
<v Speaker 1>like you were like Walker Jenkins, Max Clark, those guys

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>aren't in the big leagues yet. But just look at

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot of really high end talented guys, and again

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>we've seen some players move very quickly. Guys like Nick

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:38.039
<v Speaker 1>Kurtz were drafted very recently and are already making an

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 1>impact in the big leagues. This doesn't necessarily feel like

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that kind of class. I mean, Kate Anderson is a

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>good example of a guy that I think could move quickly.

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>But the number one pick, Eli Willits is a high

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>school guy. I don't anticipate him moving super fast. Ethan

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Holliday a high school guy, so it's an interesting draft.

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I would encourage everybody to check out Welsh, who is

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>an expert on all things draft prospects, did an episode

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>with Joe kind of on their on their end of

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the feed upbout these prospects and first year player drafts

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and that sort of thing. So I would encourage everybody

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to to go listen in too and watch that and

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:17.720
<v Speaker 1>get kind of a deeper dive. Our thoughts just from

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of the macro level, are maybe not the class

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>where you're trying to acquire these high end picks in

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 1>your dynasty format or like in the league you and

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I are in. They'll be available in our salary cap

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>draft in the spring. You know, I probably won't be

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>spending a lot, you know, to give you to give

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 1>you a reference point, because it was before you had

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 1>joined the league. Paul Skeens went for like twenty eight

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:41.919
<v Speaker 1>bucks the year he was available, you know. Jackson Holiday

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 1>went for twelve I think the year he was the

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>number one overall pick. I'm not the type to really

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 1>spend like that in these on rookies, not rookies on

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>prospects in those drafts because I feel like I can

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>get guys for cheaper. So I just feel like, if

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Ethan Holiday is going for ten plus, I'm probably not

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be in on that bidding.

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I I don't have it up, but I'm

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 3>pretty sure in that league I got Chase Burns for

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 3>pretty cheap, like three bucks or something, and you know

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.559
<v Speaker 3>that is that is paid off. I will also say,

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, you mentioned the episode that Joe and Welsh did.

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Welsh also has an article up on fantasypros dot com

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 3>on his first year player draft rankings or he kind

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 3>of breaks down the class and how he would rank them.

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 4>I agree with a lot of what he wrote.

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, I won't spoil all of it, but he

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of had a similar take to what I said

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 3>at the top, that the way it broke down was

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 3>kind of interesting, especially for fantasy, and that maybe this

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 3>is you know, I don't know that you know you

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 3>would go for like an Eli Willets at the top

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 3>of your fantasy draft, but you know, maybe you take

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 3>a big swing on an Ethan Holiday because you know,

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 3>the power profile is there, even if it's not like

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 3>a sure thing like we've seen in the past, whether

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 3>a Jack Keg Leonner, Nick Kurtz, you know, he has

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 3>the highest upside, you know. For me, it's like Ethan

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 3>Holliday and Kate Anderstond the top of the class would

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 3>be my top targets for fantasy.

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was gonna say, I feel like it's Ethan

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Holiday unless you are in a position where you really

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>want a fast moving, quality pitcher.

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 2>In that case, you just go Kate Anderson.

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>But I think unless you specifically are eyeing that profile,

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Holiday's probably the right pick.

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 2>But he is not a perfect prospect.

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>He's a very different prospect than Jackson too, just in

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of his strengths and weaknesses. So don't don't think

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you're getting Jackson Holiday if you take Ethan Holiday. But

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously still a high ceiling, like, no doubt about it.

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, So those are quick MLB draft thoughts. Again,

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>check us out, you know, on fanspros dot com and

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere on the feed for more of a deep dive there.

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>The next event from the All Star break the home

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>run Derby, which you didn't think you had won. We

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>said we were doing total you know, home runs hit

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and cal Raley was the difference for you, so congratulations

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>on winning that he arguably shouldn't have even advanced.

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:49.559
<v Speaker 2>There should have been a swing off in round one.

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 2>I hate that there wasn't.

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand why it strictly who hit the ball

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the furthest I actually didn't even realize that was the

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>tiebreaker in round one, and I despise that, not just

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>because it made lose, Like I hated it even in

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the moment that I was like, why is there not

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>a swing off? That would be so much more fun

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>alas that's the way it went, And even though the

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>thing that was really frustrating me and I was ready

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to come on and argue about your victory is junior

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Cameron Aro like left time on the clock in round

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>two when he was just on a heater because he

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:24.719
<v Speaker 1>went second. I actually didn't remember any of these I

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't remember that they switched to a bracket in the

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>second round, like this whole thing, Like, I don't like

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that they keep changing the rules of this, and I

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>don't really like this current setup. I don't mind having

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a limited number of pitches to make sure people aren't

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>just taking every other pitch, but I don't like the

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:45.959
<v Speaker 1>time limit because I want to sit back and enjoy

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the majesty of these home runs. I don't like, go, go, go,

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you gotta get as many pitches in as possible.

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 2>So you know, that was all kind of a bummer.

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>At any rate, I was ready to argue, like Junior

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Camerenarow missed out on home runs that he should have

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>had because he, you know, had to go second, and

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>then he went second again in the finals. So even

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>if he had won and I had picked the winner,

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>he yet again was going to be able to stop

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and not keep hitting homer as out of the total.

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>So I was like, that's just him getting punished for

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>hitting more in the first round.

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 2>But then he didn't hit enough.

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Cal Rally won, so it was a clear victory for you,

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>which I, you know what will happily see.

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'll take it.

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 3>And you know, as we talk about cal Raley potentially

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 3>winning the MVP, now he's also the home run Derby

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:33.839
<v Speaker 3>champion and even more importantly, I just saw today that

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.959
<v Speaker 3>he won the Mariners Golden Locker Award for having the

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 3>cleanest and most organized locker. So just an all time

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 3>season for cal Raley, just racking up the awards and

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 3>if he's not the MVP. I don't you know we're

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:47.319
<v Speaker 3>talking about an all time season here.

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I have never heard of that for any team at

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>any level. But great job for him winning that award.

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you like the current iteration of the home run derby?

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 3>No, I want to go back to I don't like

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 3>the current I'm like an old grump. I don't like

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 3>the current iteration of anything. I want to go back

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 3>to the outs version. I'm very alone in this take,

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 3>but I want to go back to the All Star

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Game meaning something and determining home run or not home field.

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 4>Advantage in the World Series. I love that.

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 3>I love that the game meant something. I hate the

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 3>way it is now. You know, I have it on

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 3>in the background, but it's like not must watch for me.

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 3>I just like to watch, like, you know, having all

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 3>the obviously all the All Stars in one place. So

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 3>though I could go on to rant about how bad

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 3>the rosters were this year, I know you and I

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 3>were slacking about that a little bit, and I was just,

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, ranting privately to you about how bad the

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 3>American League roster was this year in terms of All Stars.

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I'm an old grump. I don't like the

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 3>format of anything. I want the All Star Game to

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.959
<v Speaker 3>determine homefield advantage in the World Series. But I think

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 3>I might be the only person on Earth who thinks that.

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 2>I kind of agree.

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Like, honestly, the All Star Game, the only thing that

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>was cool was the swing off, Like I do like that,

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>but like the All Star Game swing I have on

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>in the background while doing other stuff, like I'm not

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I had friends over to watch the Home Run Derby

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>even though I don't love the current format, I just

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I just love the idea of the Home Run Derby

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 1>and I enjoy watching it with people like that is

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>an event that I will care about and hope that

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it gets kind of back to.

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 2>Its glory days.

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>But the All Star Game is like, yeah, when an

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Orioles hitter is up, I'm looking up at my TV,

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>which isn't on right now, but like I'd be like, oh,

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>okay cool, Like Ryan O'Hearn's up when you know, besides that,

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>it's like okay cool. But the swing off I did,

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I did, Like, did you enjoy that as a as?

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I certainly would hate it if that was

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>like in a real game. But for the All Star Game,

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>I loved it.

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I thought it was fine. I don't know that

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 3>I hate it. For a real game, I might be

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 3>okay with that. You know, it's kind of like the

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 3>hell Hockey. Instead of having ties, they do the shootout

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 3>at the end. I don't know that I'm against it.

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 3>I might like that more than like the ghost run

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 3>around second rule, but I don't know, maybe not.

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I actually could not more vehemently be opposed to it

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in a regular season game.

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 2>It's so it's so fun.

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>In the All Star Game and an exhibition it's so

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>it would be so like baseball is afraid of extra innings,

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and I don't understand why. All my thing I was

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>tweeting about this on Tuesday night, all my best memories

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of baseball are extra innings stuff like oh that game

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that went eighteen innings or oh remember like it got

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>all the way to twelve. And I'm like, I don't

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>like that they're trying to limit extra innings with the

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.079
<v Speaker 1>ghost runner, and well, let's just do a swing off instead,

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Like I want all the extra baseball. And I don't

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>understand anybody who doesn't like I get it that, like

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't want every game to go six hours, but

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>like as a as a random like Tuesday night in

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 1>May and you're like, wow, I'm staying up for that,

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm inning fifteen, Like those are fun.

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 2>I did that once.

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>The Orioles were in Seattle and I was in college,

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>so in Maryland on the East Coast, and I had

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>an eight am class that I could not skip the

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>next day. It was the only semester I ever had

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>an eight am class, and it was one It was

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>like twice a weekend.

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 2>It was like totally unskippable.

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>And I stayed up for an eighteen inning game with

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the Orioles in Seattle.

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Go.

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>So I went to bed at you know, my time

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in the East Coast was like I don't know, five

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>or six am, but I didn't care. It was a

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>great memory and a fun like this is what makes

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>baseball great in my opinion. So I would hate it

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>in the regular season, but super cool. And shouts to

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Schwarber for being a beast in the All Star

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Game version.

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Speaking of and going back to the rosters, how was

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Jonathan Rondo one of the American League picks for that

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 3>swing off?

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 4>Like how did he make the top three?

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I know a lot of people left, and

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 2>that was part of it.

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I also think Boone also weird, was probably just like

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>just picked the first three people who saw he saw

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>or something like, I don't know genuinely, like it seems

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>really odd. I don't know who was still like there

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and who he might have asked people and they said, nah,

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm good, like I'm you know, I've taken off my

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>cleats for the day, like you know, yeah, I'm done.

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know. I agree, it was a weird pick.

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 2>We didn't even get to.

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 4>See, all right.

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Schwerber goes three for three and as The Cure's Jonathan

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Arondez saved the day, and it's like, shocker.

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 2>He didn't acted all right.

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>A couple other dudes and notes here you got some

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>injury stuff on here for a couple of pictures.

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Run us through those.

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, so a big one. Max Free dealing with

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 3>a blister not always a huge deal, but when you

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 3>when you talk about blisters, that's the kind of thing

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 3>that can linger. And so he doubled in his last start.

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 3>He's unsure if he's going to pitch this weekend, but

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 3>it seems like such a minor injury. We've seen blisters

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 3>really like derail pitchers for like several weeks at a

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 3>time in the past, and it's the kind of thing

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 3>where you keep thinking that they're back from it, and

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 3>you know it keeps popping up again. I think in

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 3>years past there were a lot of issues with the

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 3>balls being changed, and we saw a ton of pictures

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 3>dealing with blisters and it just almost derailed seasons. I

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 3>don't want to be an alarmist and say that's going

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 3>on with Max Freed. I think it's more of a

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 3>minor blister, but still something you want to keep an

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 3>eye on, because you know that's always scared. Shane McClanahan

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 3>completed a short rehab start recently and you know, his

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 3>arm did not fall off. It seems like he's working

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 3>his way back from that nerve issue. He only threw

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 3>thirty six pitches. But the fact that he's on the

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 3>mound throwing after what we saw in you know, before

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 3>the season started, when it looked like really really, really

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 3>bad while you were actively drafting him in AR league.

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's good to see him and he's he's

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 3>the potential someone we've talked to talked about.

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 4>We didn't talk to him.

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 3>That would be great someone we talked about recently as

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 3>someone you could pick up in the second half. It

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 3>could be a difference maker. And yeah, that was it

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 3>for me. The last note here is about it on

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 3>a trade that you're thinking about making in our league.

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I wanted to ask you kind of your opinion

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>since you are not you're not in kind of that

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>tier one of contenders, so you're not going after this player.

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>So I felt comfortable kind of talking strategy with you. Basically,

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and this is a dynasty discussion, well deep keeper dynasty.

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a little bit of both, but hybrid

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you can keep up to fourteen players, so it very

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>much feels like a dynasty, even though there's technically not

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 1>like a first year player draft and you don't keep

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the entire roster, but it's a very very different.

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 4>You must keep minor league you must keep.

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>At least four minor leaguers, so that's part of this. Basically,

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Acunya is seventy dollars is his cost in this league.

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I have I'm actually not sure to pronounce.

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 4>Which is a lot. For comparison, it's a lot.

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think I think Mookie Betts was once like

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>seventy four in this league. But that's basically like the

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>highest i've we've ever had in this league.

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 2>It's a three hundred dollars budget.

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:35.919
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I know most people don't, you know,

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>can really care about the specifics. The main important question

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>here that I want to talk through on the show is,

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is Ronald o'cunya at seventy dollars based on what we've

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>seen so far somebody that you think is worth giving

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>up an elite prospect for Because I have Leo DeVry

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Devree is how you're pronounced, the Padres shortstop who's eighteen

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 1>years old, crushing it in Hia. Still a couple of

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>years away, but I mean, he's going to be the

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>number one prospect in baseball. I think after this year,

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:06.199
<v Speaker 1>at the very least, he will be top five for

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of years, it feels like, and I

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>have him for just one dollar, and eventually that cost

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>will go up a few years into his career. But

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 1>he's basically going to be very cheap for the next

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>five or six years, and then even after that's still

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty cheap assuming he's a good player. Would you trade

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a prospect like that for Ronald Kunya, who we have

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>seen be the best player in Fantasy at times. Obviously,

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>coming back for the injury, he hasn't been running as much.

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he only has four steels since coming back.

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Obviously he's been home runs. I'm kind of torn. I

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>am the type of manager who typically does not like

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to move elite young, cheap talent. I'm like, this is

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the core of my team going forward, like I want

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>guys like Leo de vrye toe again, I'm not sure

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to pronounce it, you know, for a dollar in my roster,

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and the Padreas are aggressive with these guys, so maybe

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 1>he moves a little faster than I expect. But fly forever.

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>I am a Tier one team. I am not the

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:04.919
<v Speaker 1>best team in this league, but I'm clearly in the

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>contending top tier. And the other factor here is if

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 1>I do not make this trade, I know for a

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that the number one team, who is already clearly

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the best team in this league, will be getting Acunya.

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 2>So what I want to ask you is A what

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:21.160
<v Speaker 2>do you think about that this.

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Trade offer of Devree for for Acunya, given costs and everything,

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:30.639
<v Speaker 1>and b how much when you're making trades in keeper

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>in Dynasty formats, are you thinking about the fact that, oh,

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>this other player, this other manager who is who I'm

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:39.919
<v Speaker 1>directly contending with, is going to get this guy if

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't, you know, overspend.

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 3>So that makes it tricky because that obviously context matters

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 3>you when you talk about a trade like this. If

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 3>you're just talking about Acunya for DeVries, which is I

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 3>say his name, it's in Dynasty, You're like, wow, I'd

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 3>love to have Acunya. But then you consider that it's

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 3>seventy dollars, which in the grands gay things is prohibitive

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 3>to keeping him like that is just too Like.

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Mookie Betts has been caught kept for seventy dollars before,

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 1>but it is like, okay, I'm now missing out on

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity for other talent elsewhere in the draft. It's capable,

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>but it is like a lot and he is I

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>believe was just per I believe he was sent back

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 1>like this year, So he is his price isn't going

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>up for a couple of years. Let me double check

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>on that, or was he kept this year? He actually

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>he actually might have been kept. Oh no, it is

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 1>going up every year. Okay, so he will be seventy

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>five dollars next year, which which is like borderline getting

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>into not capable and like this is a rental.

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:49.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so that's where it gets interesting. And then in

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 3>the context of this league, the best team is like

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 3>by far the best team, he's clearing a head and

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 3>so if he gets a Kunya, it's almost like he's unbeatable.

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 4>And so I don't know.

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 3>I feel like in this instance I would I would

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:04.199
<v Speaker 3>go for it and just try to take my swing

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 3>and hope that you know, knowing your team, you already

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 3>have a good stockpile of young talent, and so it's

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 3>not like Devrees is your only good prospect, And so

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 3>it's the kind of thing where context really matters. In

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 3>this context, I think you're close enough to go for it,

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 3>and that Acunya could put you over the top. And

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 3>I believe you've already beaten him head to head once,

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 3>Is that right?

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 2>I did earlier this season?

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So the team ahead of us in the standings,

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 1>who's really really good?

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't.

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Actually he doesn't have good prospects and doesn't really have

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>good depth either. It's just his starting his starting lineup

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 1>is very loaded. I think he's beatable, and getting Akunya

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>for him obviously makes that more challenging. I guess what

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious about from your perspective too, And that's part

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of why I wanted to bring this up on the show,

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is because you know, people don't really care about like

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:59.400
<v Speaker 1>my fantasy team, but I think they care about Acunya.

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you see Yakunya as the type.

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Of player going forward, because like in past seasons, this

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 1>is a guy who's been you know, however many points

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>per game, likes like six point two points per game

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty three. If the steals aren't there anymore

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to the degree we need them to be, that changes things.

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know, last season, in forty nine games, he

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>had sixteen steals. This season in forty five games, he

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>has four and obviously two knee injuries. You know, the

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:31.880
<v Speaker 1>ops is over a thousand, right, he has twelve home

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>runs in forty five games, like a lot of it's

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 1>very good. He's not been a bad player, clearly, But

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>if he's not, if he's a four point per game

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>player instead of a six point two point per game

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>player and is also a clear rental, you know, does

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 1>that sound worth it? Even setting aside the prospect that

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving up it, you know, setting aside cost is

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a Kunya somebody like that that you think is the

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>type of player right now as he is playing this

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>seas in the guy that can you know, put somebody

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>over the top to win the league. Or do you

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>just see him as a good player but not an

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 1>elite one right now?

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 4>I think he's still elite. I think you're you're seeing it.

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 3>I just think the stolen bases are going to be

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 3>a little bit lower, which he which he has already said,

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, he's probably not going to run as much.

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 3>It's also possible he's the only stolen four bases in

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 3>forty five games. It could just be as he's working

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 3>his way back. He's also four for four on stolle bases.

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.880
<v Speaker 3>It could just be the more he gets comfortable with

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 3>this knee, you know, being surgically repaired and not being

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 3>nervous to run anymore, he might run a little bit more.

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 3>And he in last year in forty nine games, you

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 3>said he stole sixteen bases. This year he's only stolen four.

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 3>But also last year in those forty nine games, he

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:42.679
<v Speaker 3>only had four home runs. This year, he's got twelve

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 3>and he's patting three twenty three, and we've seen him

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 3>just come back and it wasn't like before when the

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 3>power was kind of apped. The powers there. He looks

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 3>like the elite hitter again. And so yeah, I you

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 3>kind of stole the line I was going to say

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 3>about Flags five forever, which you know, it's hard when

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 3>you're you know, especially in like a dynasty or keeper league,

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 3>when it can it can be so fluid from year

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 3>to year and you never know when you're going to

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 3>really like be a contender, Like if you're in the

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 3>contending window and you have an opportunity to go for it,

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 3>it's hard to not pull the trigger, especially when when

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:14.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, we don't know if Davrez is a sure thing,

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 3>like he's a top prospect, but Akunya is basically a

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 3>sure thing, even though it's a one it's a one

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 3>year rental.

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:25.679
<v Speaker 1>I really like Devrees, which makes it tough, right, Like

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>if it was a guy who was ranked highly as

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 1>a prospect but I wasn't like super invested in, I

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>might feel a little differently.

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Devrez is a guy that I do like.

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Really believe in, So you know, that makes it like

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>if it was just like, oh, you're not willing to

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 1>give up in a vacuum. It's like, Okay, you're going

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to pass on a Kunya as a win now team

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>for a guy that's not going to be in the

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>big leagues for three years.

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Sounds silly, but.

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>If you really believe, I mean, this is how I

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>have a very cheap Bobby wit Junior in this league

0:24:57.000 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>because I held on to him and now I'm reaping

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>those bens benefits right like same with Jackson Curio I

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 1>got for cheap.

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Gunnar Henderson has been a little down this year. Same thing.

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I have him for cheap because you know, I held

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 1>on to them when they when they kind of took

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 1>off as prospects. So because that's been so successful for

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>me in the past in building this foundation, it's hard

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to give up on that. And I don't know, there's

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot to think about. I would love to hear

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>what the commenters think on a trade like that. Given

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:25.360
<v Speaker 1>what they've heard, I won't waste their time.

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 2>With that anyway. I vote Aunya, You vote Acunya.

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, speaking of Acunya, let's transition into our twenty twenty

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>six way too early mock draft. We're going to go

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>through two rounds here. Acunya will certainly be one of

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the players taken in the first two rounds here, let's say,

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:46.199
<v Speaker 1>because actually before we dive in, I want to let

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>everybody know that we are giving away a Wan Gonzalez

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>signed Rangers jersey courtesy of our friends at Pristine Auction

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>dot com. All you have to do to enter is

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the Fantasy Pros MLB YouTube channel right now,

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 1>comment below on any video, and that is we will

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>be announcing one lucky winner right here on the channel,

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>So make sure to turn on those notifications so you

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:06.919
<v Speaker 1>can know when new videos are up and to claim

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 1>your prize. I think we should let you go first

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>as sort of a reward for winning the home run

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 1>derby draft. But basically we'll just alternate here, so you'll

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 1>you'll get picks one, three, five, seven, I'll get two, four, six, eight,

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, et cetera, and we'll go through twenty four

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 1>picks here, two different rounds. Does that sound good to you?

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:30.199
<v Speaker 3>It sounds good to me, except that I didn't want

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 3>to go first. I was hoping to not have to pick.

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 3>But I will just go with the tried and true

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 3>Tony and I'll just take Otani first and just lock

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 3>that in and just make sure I can't ever use

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 3>my utility spot for an entire season.

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I actually like I would be more inclined to take

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Otani if they just said, like, he's not never pitching again,

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Like I almost just like don't want him. It's cool

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>that he does it, it makes it more valuable in

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 1>real life, but I'm like, that is kind of.

0:26:58.119 --> 0:26:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Hanging over your head a little bit.

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>And there are other elite players, so yeah, I yeah.

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 4>I should have also checked, like, is this a daily

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 4>line up league? Can I use him as well?

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 4>I mean he will never pitch for me.

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's let's let's call this weekly lineup And you know,

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 1>do you want to call this roto versus categories?

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't really care.

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we'll just do standard roto weekly league. Okay, but

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 3>that is interesting. I do have Otani in both kinds

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 3>of leagues. In a daily league, I will let not

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 3>right now because he's only going like two three innings,

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 3>but if he's like back to being a traditional starter

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 3>in a daily league, I will start him. When he's

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 3>a starter in a weekly league, he never leaves my

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 3>hitter spot. He's never pitching for me.

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I don't know how you view this. So

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>if Otani is the clear number one, how big of

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a kind of a next tier do you view? Like, like,

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that he is a clear number Well, well

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>let me rephrase, because I actually agree that I don't

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 1>think he's a clear number one. How many names would

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you consider for this for the pick?

0:27:57.600 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 3>I think that's hard to answer in mid July because

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 3>I think will depend on how the second half goes.

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 4>Because you can see.

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:04.680
<v Speaker 2>That's why this is way too early.

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I think you have Otani and you have Judge.

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 3>But then it starts getting interesting because then obviously, like

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Bobby Wit comes into the equation. I don't think Jose.

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 3>I think Jose Rimire is going to be locked in.

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if he's going to push for the

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 3>top spot of it, but I think he's going to

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 3>be locked in.

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:23.160
<v Speaker 4>Like the top five.

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 3>But then based on how the second half goes, is

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 3>Peek or Armstrong in that conversation, is cal Rawley in

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 3>that conversation. So it's very interesting to see how the

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 3>top very like tippy top of the draft goes next year.

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I am going to go with the guy that I

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>am most confident is going to help me in the

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 1>most categories, and that's Bobby Witch Junior with pick number two.

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>And I view this as almost the safest pick here

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 1>just given age and the categories he will help you in.

0:28:57.560 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that that's the right pick.

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Actually, I could very is you see myself a year

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>from now saying I'd rather have taken you know, Judge

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>or one of these other guys. But right now, I

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>feel like Bobby with Junior is just the best at

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the most things. Even if like Judge is going to

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>hit more homers than him, and you know, cal Roley

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>has the catcher eligibility and all that sort of thing.

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Witt has both floor and ceiling and I'm just gonna

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>be really happy with every league that I start with

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>him in it.

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:27.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's fair. So at the third pick, I'm going

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 3>to go with the player. I don't usually draft based

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 3>on where I'm picking, but it just what almost feels

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 3>silly to pass time at this point based on the

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 3>season he's having Aaron Judge with the power and the

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 3>average and ever all the other counting stats.

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 4>You're going to get from him.

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 3>I always worry about him and injuries and his you know,

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 3>his size, but he's stayed healthy recently, so.

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 2>He's he's also thirty three.

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel like he's the type of player who

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>once it goes it's it's going to go fast. I'm

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>not like, obviously he's been so good this year, you're

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>not anticipating a falloff next year. But like you get

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>into your mid thirties, I know he's kind of like

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a freak of nature just physically, but at a certain

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 1>point it does go like, like he's not as young

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>as you might think for how little he's been in

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the big leagues.

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he and that's some of that is because he

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 3>wasn't like this like one oh one draft pick who

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 3>came up like he was kind of an un heralded,

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 3>unheralded draft pick kind of coming up who just you know,

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 3>outperformed his his draft slot and turned into the superstar.

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 3>And so he didn't have the same kind of like

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 3>really really quick path to the big leagues. I've said

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 3>for a long time, I worry about how he's going

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 3>to age. I was worried about that, you know, if

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 3>I was Yankees I'd be worried about that contract, but

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 3>I you know, I understand they had to do what

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 3>they had to do.

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 4>They couldn't just like let him walk, especially.

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 3>With what he meant to that lineup and what he

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 3>means to you know, how popular he is in that city.

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, they just were not in a position that

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 3>they could let him go somewhere else. But I do

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:54.959
<v Speaker 3>think the back half of this contract could could get

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 3>pretty ugly. It could be like a mcgul cabera kind

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 3>of back half of the contract.

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't disagree with that fourth pick.

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 1>A couple of names of considering, I think, you know,

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>this is maybe a little ironic, given that I'm not

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 1>even sure if I want to if I'm going to

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>be trading for him, But I think Ronald Acunya should

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 1>be a top five pick as of right now from

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>what we expect him to be, you know, even further

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 1>removed from the injury, so maybe you know, more willingness

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>to run, not seventy stolen bases again, but more willingness

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to run. The home runs haven't gone anywhere right in

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>his prime. I think he'll be what twenty eight next season?

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I think so, assuming that the second half looks really

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 1>good and he looks even healthier and healthier. I think

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the lineup will be better next year in Atlanta too.

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 1>So I got where do you think Acunya should have gone?

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Because I do feel like top five or six is

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 1>like the right place, and maybe even low like me,

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>if he looks like the Acunya of old, maybe he'll

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 1>even be like in the conversation for number one.

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it'll be interesting.

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that he's going to go number one

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 3>based on what we just talked about about with the speed,

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Like if if he only steals six stolen you know,

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 3>six six bases the rest of the year and ends

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 3>with ten in half a season, it might be pushing

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 3>it to to.

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 4>Draft him at one.

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Overall, I think at that point you'll see people lean

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 3>more into like the Otani, the Bobby with the Aaron Judge.

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I think he's gonna go top five. I

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 3>think you're gonna he might be the player next year

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 3>who has the biggest like difference in like average ADP

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 3>where you know, an average ranking, just kind of the

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 3>difference there, because you're going to see people are gonna

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 3>be nervous, like there's two injuries here, Like some people

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 3>just don't want to draft that at the top of

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 3>the draft, and that's fair.

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 2>I yeah, I think that's very fair.

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>This is me kind of wanting to be aggressive and

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>feel like I'm getting a superstar at the top, but

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I I will not as of right now. Obviously let's

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>see what the second half looks like. But as of

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>right now, I would not fault anybody.

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 2>For thinking this is too high for Acunya.

0:32:56.600 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:32:57.840 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 3>I was debating which direction I want to go with

0:32:59.600 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 3>this pick.

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 4>It's it's possible.

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 3>And I also will want to say, like part of

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 3>this is like strategy of like going head to head

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 3>in a draft, whereas like maybe I shouldn't be doing

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 3>it thinking about this way, but like in the fifth

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 3>for the fifth pick in the draft, if this was

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 3>like my first pick, like one zero five is my

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 3>first pick, I don't know that I'm taking this chance

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 3>at least at this point of the season. We'll see

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 3>how the second half goes. But this person is second

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 3>in VBR already and is on pace for a forty

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 3>forty season, and so I'm going to go Pik Armstrong,

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 3>And some of that is like strategy thinking about what

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 3>you're going to do next and how I'm building my roster.

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 3>But Piker Armstrong second most valuable player so far and

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 3>pushing for number one.

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 4>But also, look, it's gonna be tough five. I'm getting

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 4>in at fifth.

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I hope this isn't going to throw off picks you've made.

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 1>But I don't say this is building a roster. This

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 1>is like, these are twelve different managers I think that

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 1>are drafting here.

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 3>So like it's not like, yeah, that's why I said

0:33:58.320 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 3>it's maybe the wrong way to think about it, but

0:33:59.880 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 3>just also looking at value.

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't view it as like my team has

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>went and a Kunya. It's like just kind of where

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 1>they would go.

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:08.320
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I mean, I'm drafting for the YouTube commenter.

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 3>I want them to say that I have the best.

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:13.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what PCA has done so far, it's hard

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:15.879
<v Speaker 1>to argue. It's just a matter of, you know, how

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 1>replicable you think it is for him compared to some

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of these other guys who have done it longer.

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 3>I maybe it's an apology pick because we've we've kind

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:26.319
<v Speaker 3>of like downplayed his his season so far.

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you know, I'm reverting.

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:32.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of torn between two players, So I'm just

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:35.479
<v Speaker 1>going to go with the younger one. I think Ellie

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Dala Cruz should not fall to this pick in a

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 1>in a.

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:44.360
<v Speaker 2>In a Roto draft, sorry my computers, not any.

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Type in a you know, Roto format. The steals he

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>is giving you. He is twenty five already this season,

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and eighteen homers and the best batting average of his

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>career at two eighty four. I like he's a stud.

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it should be a top five pick. And

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 1>there's there's another player that I really like that I

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 1>could have taken here, but I will happily take the

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:11.879
<v Speaker 1>value of the following daily Cruz and get the power

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>speed combo. Who's who's now hitting for average too?

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:17.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so that was the player I was thinking about

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 3>when talking. When talking just about like you know, if

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 3>you if we're assuming this, this is us going to

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:24.760
<v Speaker 3>head to head and kind of like building a building

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 3>a roster. Was like, I want to get PCA stolen

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 3>bases and potentially the other counting stats there, assuming you

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 3>might take Ellie next. I didn't want to miss out

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 3>on like both of them kind of a thing. But

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 3>now this gets really interesting because there's a player I

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 3>really want to take. But a we're also at pick

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:41.359
<v Speaker 3>seven here, and there's a player that should not fall

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:43.839
<v Speaker 3>out a pick seven take who you really are?

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 4>All right, well, I'm going to go calt Rally. Nice,

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 4>that's I'm going to take count Rally.

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought that's who you really wanted, which, by the way,

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>it might not be a terrible decision. It's not who

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I would have taken there, because there's a player that

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 1>should not be available anymore, Jse Ramirez, and I'm.

0:35:57.960 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Just going to take him to exactly that's who I

0:35:59.440 --> 0:35:59.919
<v Speaker 2>was talking about.

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad I go toed you into taking the other guy,

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>because Ramire is at eight is the best value on

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 1>this whole board. But yeah, I mean Raley is like

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:11.239
<v Speaker 1>Pete crow Armstrong, where you're very much leaning into what's

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:14.360
<v Speaker 1>happening this season with these last two picks and clearly

0:36:14.400 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 1>buying into you're gonna be drafting these guys like you're

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna get something close to a repeat next year.

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:22.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and you can make the argument Jose Aramir should

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 3>have gone where I took p kromstro total.

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 2>You can make the argument Ramirez could have gone.

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 4>As high as four. I think, yeah, yeah.

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 2>I think you could have gone instead of Acuna four.

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 3>So I'm drafting on vibes, baby, I'm trying to clear

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:36.479
<v Speaker 3>how to build the best, the most fun team.

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 4>Here clearly a right who's left? Anybody left?

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:40.279
<v Speaker 2>Well, you're on the clock.

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 1>So I took hose air Ameres again great value at eight,

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:46.880
<v Speaker 1>just like consistently the best third basement and contributes everywhere,

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's just like an absolute stud eighteen homers, twenty

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>nine stolen bases, two ninety two average like arguably could have,

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>like I said, could have easily gone five.

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:58.879
<v Speaker 2>Spots Hires or four spots Hires. So at pic nine

0:36:58.920 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 2>you're on the clock.

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 3>So here's an interesting one because I think there's an

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 3>obvious pick here, But he's also someone who is going

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 3>to be three hundred million dollars richer by the time

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 3>you're making this pick next year, and he might not

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 3>be on the same team, he might be on a

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 3>different team, And those two things can sometimes scare me.

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:18.840
<v Speaker 3>In the first round, you know that you're drafting someone

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:21.839
<v Speaker 3>in potentially a new city with new expectations. We're seeing

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 3>it with mon Soda right now, and who just got paid,

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:28.279
<v Speaker 3>and you know, sometimes you know you get paid, maybe

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:29.759
<v Speaker 3>you don't have the best steer it next year. You

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:32.879
<v Speaker 3>already got your money. But I think the obvious pick

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 3>here is Kyle Tucker, and so I'm going to have

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:36.839
<v Speaker 3>to lock in Kyle Tucker at the ninth pick.

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree. If you didn't take him, I was

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 1>going to just having a great year in Chicago. Where

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:43.240
<v Speaker 1>do you think he ends up? Do you think because

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 1>will keep him or I think they should.

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 4>I assume they will.

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 3>But you know, it's the kind of thing where when

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 3>you get to free agency, the kind of money it's

0:37:55.080 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 3>going to get thrown around.

0:37:57.520 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 3>My fear is that he goes to the Yankees as

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:01.880
<v Speaker 3>a baseball on Red Sox fanas that he.

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 2>But not not your fear as a fantasy manager.

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 4>Nos a fantasy manager, he's not.

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 1>This is a fantasy show, not a baseball show.

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:11.439
<v Speaker 4>Baseball show.

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, if he goes to the Yankees, he's not making

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:15.600
<v Speaker 3>it to die. And I can tell you that right now.

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, I'm going to be the guy to

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:20.280
<v Speaker 1>take the picture.

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Schooble is just too good. We take him at ten here.

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that's the right spot for the first picture?

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:27.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that's fine.

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 3>I uh just because of like overall strategy and like

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 3>what we've been talking about recently and like how you

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 3>value pittures. I was almost not even considering pictures, but

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 3>uh yeah, I think it's we've we It also feels

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 3>like just looking at the like at the hitters we've

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:45.719
<v Speaker 3>taken and like kind of the tier where we're at

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 3>it kind of it feels like the right spot and

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 3>that I think Tucker is probably the end of this

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:54.720
<v Speaker 3>hitter tier, and you know, you're you're kind of picking

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 3>between a lower tier hitter or the clear one of

0:38:58.280 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 3>the top best pictures.

0:38:59.239 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I don't know if this is who

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna take next, But in terms of just thinking

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 1>about the hitters like Juan Soto, I think you can

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 1>make a compelling case belongs in that tier.

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 4>James Wood slower start.

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 1>To the season for him, obviously, but like this this

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:19.920
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote disappointing start for Mets fans, twenty three homers,

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 1>eleven stone bases two sixty two average. If that's his

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:26.439
<v Speaker 1>floor in New York, like, I'm not I'm expecting big

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:29.280
<v Speaker 1>things next year when again he's still like entering his prime,

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, realistically, or the very least in it. So

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you can make a case for him, especially

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:39.320
<v Speaker 1>with the eleven steels this year, that he does belong

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in that upper tier.

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:41.759
<v Speaker 2>But maybe maybe are you gonna go with him? Are

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:42.720
<v Speaker 2>you going to go in a different direction.

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 3>I was thinking about him. I was thinking about James Wood.

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 3>Not to spoil my picks here, but I was I

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 3>think he's in the tier.

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:52.799
<v Speaker 4>I think you're right.

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:54.719
<v Speaker 3>I think the eleven steels do matter because I think

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 3>if we're looking at twenty three home runs two sixty

0:39:56.520 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 3>two average on like two steals, I think there's a

0:39:58.640 --> 0:40:01.000
<v Speaker 3>big difference in the value we're talking about here. But

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:06.400
<v Speaker 3>the elevens deals does help Jackson Churio. But again, like

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:08.920
<v Speaker 3>we're we're drafting now in July based on how the

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 3>season is gone, and I don't know. I feel like

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:14.359
<v Speaker 3>I feel like I would want all these players over

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 3>Juan Soto. Okay, well you're on the clock, so okay,

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:22.880
<v Speaker 3>so I'm not taking one. So now the question is

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 3>do I take one of the pictures or do I

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 3>keep going down the hit or rabbit hole? And I

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 3>guess I will go with everyone's favorite breakout and.

0:40:36.400 --> 0:40:38.720
<v Speaker 4>I'll go James Wood. I'll take James Wood here.

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't sure if Wood had become a first round player.

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a great pick. I have nothing against it.

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:45.439
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't sure if he'd become a first round player,

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:46.799
<v Speaker 1>if he would still be more like kind of top

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:49.799
<v Speaker 1>of the second. I think I think there will, as

0:40:49.800 --> 0:40:51.439
<v Speaker 1>of right now, there will be leagues where he would

0:40:51.440 --> 0:40:53.880
<v Speaker 1>get to the second because I don't think you can

0:40:53.960 --> 0:40:55.399
<v Speaker 1>really make a case for him in the top ten.

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:58.319
<v Speaker 1>So it really just kind of becomes personal preference in

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 1>those last two spots, because I feel like, personally the

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:03.799
<v Speaker 1>top ten is pretty set with those nine hitters and

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Scooble For me personally, like I just can't like, I

0:41:08.360 --> 0:41:12.280
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine taking would sixth be you know, more power

0:41:12.320 --> 0:41:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to you if you did. And also I guess I

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:19.319
<v Speaker 1>should limit backtrack and say, if somebody is buying into

0:41:19.360 --> 0:41:22.400
<v Speaker 1>significant regression for like cal Raley, then maybe he doesn't

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 1>belong inside that top ten, and you you make the

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 1>case for Wood ahead of him or something like that,

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:28.480
<v Speaker 1>like if you believe in his breakout season more, then

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:30.239
<v Speaker 1>I could see that case being made. So I don't

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:31.960
<v Speaker 1>want to say that Wood doesn't belong in the top ten,

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 1>but I was curious if he was going to go

0:41:33.480 --> 0:41:36.360
<v Speaker 1>there or not, you know, inside the first round. But

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a great pick just everything he's done,

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, I love James would, so I'm not

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:40.840
<v Speaker 1>going to argue with this one. I am going to

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take one Sido by the way.

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, yeah, just for for James Wood. You know, just

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 3>everyone was kind of predicting the breakout this year.

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 4>We saw it.

0:41:48.680 --> 0:41:52.959
<v Speaker 3>You know, I talked preseason about drafting meta ceiling shame

0:41:53.040 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 3>on me because he's currently you talked about him going

0:41:56.000 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 3>in the top ten. He's currently tenth in VBR in

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:02.040
<v Speaker 3>terms of fantasy value on Fantasy Pros, and that's thanks

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 3>to twenty four home runs. And we just talked about

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:07.400
<v Speaker 3>Juan Soto's eleven steals. James Wood has twelve, and he's

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 3>batting two seventy eight. And so the other thing that

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 3>you and I have talked about is his power. It's

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:15.239
<v Speaker 3>to all fields, it's not just the pull power, and

0:42:15.280 --> 0:42:18.439
<v Speaker 3>so you know that I think gives him a higher

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:19.960
<v Speaker 3>floor going forward.

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:21.320
<v Speaker 4>So someone I'm.

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Potentially excited about, assuming he has a strong second half

0:42:24.480 --> 0:42:26.200
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:29.200
<v Speaker 1>So I mean the stolen bases matter to me that

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:31.759
<v Speaker 1>he's getting more of them. I have no doubt about

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the power and batting average long term.

0:42:33.440 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 4>So you think he's gonna keep running.

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but enough, I think he'll keep running

0:42:38.840 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 1>it more than you know, previous seasons of like you said,

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, really not doing anything. He's already what won

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:48.359
<v Speaker 1>off his career high in steals. Like, I think he'll

0:42:48.440 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 1>run enough to be in the double digits. May maybe

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:54.319
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, wishful thinking, but I think he'll always

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:56.600
<v Speaker 1>be in the double digits with what we've seen so far.

0:42:57.200 --> 0:42:59.960
<v Speaker 1>And if that, you know, if you give me that

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and thirty five to forty homers and a high batting

0:43:03.880 --> 0:43:07.000
<v Speaker 1>average or you know, high enough batting average, I'm happy.

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:10.719
<v Speaker 3>Maybe he just really cares about fantasy managers and he

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:12.719
<v Speaker 3>knows he's not producing enough as a hitter, so he's

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:15.960
<v Speaker 3>running more, and that next year, if the batting stats

0:43:15.960 --> 0:43:16.839
<v Speaker 3>come back, he won't run as.

0:43:16.880 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the bating stats aren't bad.

0:43:18.200 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 1>He has twenty three homers at the All Star break,

0:43:20.600 --> 0:43:22.359
<v Speaker 1>and his batting average is a little down.

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:24.880
<v Speaker 2>It's still too sixty two, And like I.

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 4>Three fifteen expected batting average by the way.

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like I don't feel like the bat's letting us down.

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 1>It's maybe not like mega insane, you know, all time

0:43:35.200 --> 0:43:37.000
<v Speaker 1>batting season, but it's not bad.

0:43:38.360 --> 0:43:39.640
<v Speaker 4>By the way, how many picks are we doing?

0:43:40.320 --> 0:43:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Two rounds?

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:42.400
<v Speaker 4>Okay?

0:43:42.400 --> 0:43:43.239
<v Speaker 2>We said that already, was.

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:44.759
<v Speaker 3>Looking at the sheet we had. We had a break,

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:47.760
<v Speaker 3>and are we doing ten teams or twelve twelve?

0:43:48.200 --> 0:43:48.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:43:48.520 --> 0:43:50.279
<v Speaker 1>She she got messed up in the formatting we're doing.

0:43:50.320 --> 0:43:52.720
<v Speaker 1>We're doing twenty four picks to two rounds of twelve.

0:43:52.760 --> 0:43:56.760
<v Speaker 1>So okay, So we are through round one and.

0:43:58.400 --> 0:43:59.759
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, why don't you recap us real quick?

0:43:59.800 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Round one went in this order. Twelve picks, Shoho Tani,

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Wit, Junior, Aaron Judge, Ronald o'cunya Junior, Pete rah Armstrong,

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Ellie d La Cruz, cal Raley, Jose Ramirez, Steel, the Draft,

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Tucker, Tarique's Google, James Wood and Juan Soto. Pretty

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:17.520
<v Speaker 1>good first.

0:44:17.320 --> 0:44:22.480
<v Speaker 3>Round, not too shabby. So I'm on the clock at thirteen.

0:44:23.200 --> 0:44:25.040
<v Speaker 3>Are we doing just or are we snaking?

0:44:28.880 --> 0:44:29.720
<v Speaker 2>That's a good question.

0:44:29.760 --> 0:44:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I actually was thinking of just still alternating, but you're right,

0:44:32.520 --> 0:44:34.759
<v Speaker 1>we should snake and keep the kind of the same

0:44:34.800 --> 0:44:38.399
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote managers let's do that for fun. So I'll

0:44:38.400 --> 0:44:40.080
<v Speaker 1>be on the clock then to start round two. I

0:44:40.200 --> 0:44:46.080
<v Speaker 1>was not thinking about that pairing with Sodo. I think

0:44:46.120 --> 0:44:52.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of names you could pick between. I

0:44:52.520 --> 0:44:58.919
<v Speaker 1>am inclined. In a real draft, I think I would

0:44:58.920 --> 0:45:00.200
<v Speaker 1>make a different pick than the one of my out

0:45:00.200 --> 0:45:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to me, because I don't think you're going to take

0:45:01.520 --> 0:45:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the player that I would really take in a real draft.

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 4>So pretend like you know what I'm going to do.

0:45:08.120 --> 0:45:09.880
<v Speaker 2>I just I said, think. I didn't say I know,

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:14.560
<v Speaker 2>So I think what I will do.

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:17.439
<v Speaker 4>Now real quick before you pick.

0:45:18.760 --> 0:45:20.920
<v Speaker 3>So you are sorry, You're sorry, you already said this.

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:22.880
<v Speaker 3>So you are considering this like the twelve team and

0:45:22.920 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 3>you're pairing with Juan Sota.

0:45:24.360 --> 0:45:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I am approaching it that way, yes, like I said, Yes,

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that is the way I'm approaching it.

0:45:29.360 --> 0:45:30.719
<v Speaker 2>Do you want to not approach it that way?

0:45:31.160 --> 0:45:32.120
<v Speaker 4>No, that's fine. I just.

0:45:33.960 --> 0:45:36.960
<v Speaker 3>I just wanted to, you know, clarify for our wonderful listeners.

0:45:37.239 --> 0:45:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm going to go with the if Wan

0:45:41.080 --> 0:45:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Soto is the floor, I'm going to go with this

0:45:43.239 --> 0:45:48.040
<v Speaker 1>ceiling upside of his former teammate Fernando Tatis Junior. And

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:49.839
<v Speaker 1>like I said, this is probably not what I would

0:45:49.880 --> 0:45:52.799
<v Speaker 1>pick if I was not going up against you, but

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm picking here, So pairing up Soto intentions,

0:45:58.400 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 1>But what do.

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:02.080
<v Speaker 4>You think about that against me? No, that's good.

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:04.640
<v Speaker 3>He I've been kind of like like I mentioned at

0:46:04.640 --> 0:46:06.520
<v Speaker 3>the top of the show, bouncing around between like you know,

0:46:06.600 --> 0:46:09.040
<v Speaker 3>current stats and the VBR and like previous rankings.

0:46:09.560 --> 0:46:11.440
<v Speaker 4>And so if you just.

0:46:11.520 --> 0:46:14.759
<v Speaker 3>Go by VBR in the first half, he's seventeen, but

0:46:14.800 --> 0:46:17.640
<v Speaker 3>he's also behind players like Juanniel Suarez who are not

0:46:17.719 --> 0:46:18.719
<v Speaker 3>going to go this high.

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:22.720
<v Speaker 1>He's in our rest of season consensus rankings on Fantasy

0:46:22.719 --> 0:46:23.800
<v Speaker 1>pros TATIS.

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:29.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's unsurprising, even you know, despite the VBR. So,

0:46:30.160 --> 0:46:32.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean that's not a bad pairing either, especially you know,

0:46:33.360 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 3>high ceiling, high floor for both those players, assuming Tuty

0:46:36.200 --> 0:46:36.719
<v Speaker 3>stays healthy.

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:36.880
<v Speaker 4>Ye.

0:46:38.520 --> 0:46:43.960
<v Speaker 3>And so so you went twelve thirteen paired Soda with tatists,

0:46:44.000 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 3>that means I'm pairing James Wood with this pick. So

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:53.160
<v Speaker 3>to pair with James Wood, I think I'll go back

0:46:53.200 --> 0:46:57.280
<v Speaker 3>into the pitchers bucket and I'll go Garrett Crochet. Okay,

0:46:57.600 --> 0:47:02.400
<v Speaker 3>much the chagrin of Chris Rolls, we caret.

0:47:01.840 --> 0:47:07.479
<v Speaker 1>Crochet all right, Yeah, that that's I think a totally

0:47:07.560 --> 0:47:09.200
<v Speaker 1>valid pick. Do you think Crochet is is the right

0:47:09.239 --> 0:47:11.800
<v Speaker 1>guy for SP two? Did you consider Skiens or Wheeler?

0:47:12.800 --> 0:47:13.200
<v Speaker 4>I did?

0:47:13.520 --> 0:47:17.640
<v Speaker 3>I maybe, Yeah, I considered Skeens and Wheeler, and then

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:22.160
<v Speaker 3>it's too early too at this point to make this pick.

0:47:22.200 --> 0:47:23.759
<v Speaker 3>But I do think Hunter Browns can be in that

0:47:23.760 --> 0:47:27.720
<v Speaker 3>conversation too. But just given what Crochet, Wheeler and Skins

0:47:27.719 --> 0:47:29.920
<v Speaker 3>are doing. As much as I like Hunter brown and

0:47:29.960 --> 0:47:31.919
<v Speaker 3>believe in what he's doing, it's going to be hard

0:47:31.960 --> 0:47:36.399
<v Speaker 3>to to overtake them. Barring injury. They look really really

0:47:36.400 --> 0:47:38.719
<v Speaker 3>good right now. But yeah, I'm a big Paul Skins guy.

0:47:38.719 --> 0:47:41.799
<v Speaker 3>I had him this year as coming into the year

0:47:41.800 --> 0:47:45.680
<v Speaker 3>as SP one, but three schoobl is U making a

0:47:45.719 --> 0:47:46.359
<v Speaker 3>mockery event.

0:47:48.880 --> 0:47:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I think this is an interesting spot with Schooble because

0:47:51.120 --> 0:47:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I think, like I would probably be inclined to take Skiings.

0:47:54.880 --> 0:47:57.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm not somebody who really goes pocket aces though, so

0:47:58.360 --> 0:48:01.560
<v Speaker 1>since we are can considering this as pairing them, I

0:48:01.600 --> 0:48:03.919
<v Speaker 1>probably will go away from like I think, I think

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:06.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a spot where schemes should be off the board.

0:48:07.760 --> 0:48:09.120
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know if it makes sense to pair

0:48:09.200 --> 0:48:11.920
<v Speaker 1>with Google unless unless that is just your strategy of pocketases,

0:48:11.920 --> 0:48:14.160
<v Speaker 1>which is totally valid if that's kind of the way

0:48:14.200 --> 0:48:19.879
<v Speaker 1>you like to do things. There are I think as

0:48:19.920 --> 0:48:27.400
<v Speaker 1>many as one, two, three, four. I think you can

0:48:27.440 --> 0:48:31.359
<v Speaker 1>make a case for seven hitters here. Honestly, I mean,

0:48:31.520 --> 0:48:34.320
<v Speaker 1>do you see a clear standout hitter or it feels

0:48:34.400 --> 0:48:37.560
<v Speaker 1>like a real group of Are you buying a bounce

0:48:37.640 --> 0:48:40.920
<v Speaker 1>back for Gunner? Lindor is great but another year older,

0:48:41.320 --> 0:48:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, Churio taking another step forward? Maybe Mookie Betts.

0:48:45.280 --> 0:48:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Is this just a down season? Vla Gerrero best first

0:48:49.120 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 1>baseman available? Like, I feel like there's a lot of

0:48:52.600 --> 0:48:54.440
<v Speaker 1>different cases you could that you can make here. Do

0:48:54.480 --> 0:48:56.239
<v Speaker 1>you do you see that too? Or do you have

0:48:56.280 --> 0:48:56.879
<v Speaker 1>a clear guy?

0:48:59.040 --> 0:48:59.080
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:48:59.280 --> 0:48:59.960
<v Speaker 4>I see that too.

0:49:00.000 --> 0:49:02.680
<v Speaker 3>So there is one guy that came to mind first,

0:49:03.400 --> 0:49:08.680
<v Speaker 3>just as not like I don't want to say highest ceiling,

0:49:08.680 --> 0:49:09.960
<v Speaker 3>but like that I'm most excited about.

0:49:10.040 --> 0:49:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, these guys all have high ceilings, right, Like you

0:49:12.880 --> 0:49:15.640
<v Speaker 1>can paint a picture for any of them as really

0:49:15.719 --> 0:49:16.480
<v Speaker 1>smart picks here.

0:49:16.960 --> 0:49:20.920
<v Speaker 2>I think what I'm gonna do. I'm actually really torn this.

0:49:20.920 --> 0:49:23.200
<v Speaker 1>This is a really fun exercise because it is teaching

0:49:23.239 --> 0:49:26.000
<v Speaker 1>me that I see a really big group here. And

0:49:26.280 --> 0:49:28.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I would have assumed that going

0:49:28.800 --> 0:49:30.239
<v Speaker 1>in that's the end. This is kind of why I

0:49:30.320 --> 0:49:32.080
<v Speaker 1>like doing it. Shooting from the hip.

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:34.120
<v Speaker 4>Do you consider Camanaro in this group?

0:49:35.080 --> 0:49:37.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably not taking him yet, but I wouldn't like

0:49:37.840 --> 0:49:40.919
<v Speaker 1>say you're wrong for considering him, es like giving out

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:45.560
<v Speaker 1>how difficult third base is. Right, I'm not considering him

0:49:45.560 --> 0:49:48.080
<v Speaker 1>with this pick, but I think it's reasonable. I think

0:49:48.080 --> 0:49:52.160
<v Speaker 1>what I'm gonna do is I'm gonna say, you know,

0:49:52.239 --> 0:49:57.600
<v Speaker 1>this is just a fluke down season for Mookie Bets

0:49:58.000 --> 0:50:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and and take him. I know he didn't play full

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:02.400
<v Speaker 1>season last year, so this is now two years in

0:50:02.400 --> 0:50:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a row where the coounting stats maybe aren't as good,

0:50:04.320 --> 0:50:06.200
<v Speaker 1>but we know what this guy is at his best,

0:50:06.840 --> 0:50:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know the Dodgers, there's always gonna be opportunities

0:50:09.560 --> 0:50:12.239
<v Speaker 1>for runs and RBI. And I'm gonna say that he

0:50:12.320 --> 0:50:13.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of goes in the next season fully healthy and

0:50:13.880 --> 0:50:15.839
<v Speaker 1>we get one last kind of elite season out of him.

0:50:15.840 --> 0:50:17.839
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not one last, but I'm gonna go with Nuoki

0:50:17.880 --> 0:50:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Bets here. Does that Does that feel too early for him?

0:50:20.000 --> 0:50:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Given what we've seen this year?

0:50:23.000 --> 0:50:23.600
<v Speaker 4>It makes it?

0:50:23.680 --> 0:50:26.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean yes and no, It feels a little early

0:50:26.560 --> 0:50:28.120
<v Speaker 3>based on the down season we're seeing. We're like, I

0:50:28.440 --> 0:50:30.440
<v Speaker 3>need to see a stronger second half from him in

0:50:30.560 --> 0:50:32.960
<v Speaker 3>order to take him this early. But also like if

0:50:32.960 --> 0:50:34.359
<v Speaker 3>he had a great season to be a first round pick,

0:50:34.360 --> 0:50:37.200
<v Speaker 3>and we're already at pick fifteen, so it does feel fair, but.

0:50:37.440 --> 0:50:40.279
<v Speaker 1>We're we're we're imagining going in the next season, Like again,

0:50:40.320 --> 0:50:42.920
<v Speaker 1>he started off this season weird with the sickness, Like

0:50:43.000 --> 0:50:45.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just like, it just feels like he has earned

0:50:45.440 --> 0:50:47.719
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of the doubt of I'm willing to look

0:50:47.760 --> 0:50:50.960
<v Speaker 1>past this kind of fluke bad year and hope that

0:50:51.000 --> 0:50:53.919
<v Speaker 1>it is just a fluke and he's a lot lower

0:50:53.960 --> 0:50:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of the season ranking, so this this

0:50:55.560 --> 0:50:57.600
<v Speaker 1>might actually be a reach. I'm not saying that it's not,

0:50:57.760 --> 0:51:01.960
<v Speaker 1>but I think all these guys are again justifiable, So

0:51:02.000 --> 0:51:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to go with the guy that's been the

0:51:03.400 --> 0:51:05.799
<v Speaker 1>best for the longest and count of this being a

0:51:05.840 --> 0:51:06.400
<v Speaker 1>down season.

0:51:07.480 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's a lot of worry there. He going into

0:51:10.200 --> 0:51:12.160
<v Speaker 3>next season, he will be thirty three, as you mentioned,

0:51:12.160 --> 0:51:15.520
<v Speaker 3>wou judge, and there's also the possibility that we're seeing

0:51:15.600 --> 0:51:18.480
<v Speaker 3>the downturn. So in twenty twenty three, he played one

0:51:18.520 --> 0:51:20.359
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifty two games, it hit thirty nine home runs.

0:51:20.440 --> 0:51:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Last year he only played one hundred sixteen, but he

0:51:22.200 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 3>only hit nineteen home runs, so not the same kind

0:51:24.160 --> 0:51:27.239
<v Speaker 3>of pace and so and this year eleven home runs

0:51:27.280 --> 0:51:30.680
<v Speaker 3>in eighty nine games. So it's possible we've seen that power.

0:51:31.200 --> 0:51:32.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, we're not going to see that thirty plus

0:51:32.600 --> 0:51:35.080
<v Speaker 3>home run power anymore, which we only saw it like

0:51:35.120 --> 0:51:37.640
<v Speaker 3>a few times before. Anyway, he kind of has floated

0:51:37.680 --> 0:51:41.160
<v Speaker 3>between that, like, you know, twenties and thirties home runs power.

0:51:41.400 --> 0:51:43.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't think we're seeing thirty nine anymore.

0:51:43.680 --> 0:51:46.360
<v Speaker 1>What I'm more worried about is the risk of he's

0:51:46.440 --> 0:51:49.480
<v Speaker 1>not going to run any He's only six stolen bases

0:51:49.480 --> 0:51:52.400
<v Speaker 1>this year, so like, if he gets me like twenty

0:51:52.440 --> 0:51:56.800
<v Speaker 1>six homers and fifteen stolen bases and his batting average

0:51:56.840 --> 0:51:59.359
<v Speaker 1>is back to three hundred, like I'm okay with that.

0:52:00.120 --> 0:52:01.520
<v Speaker 2>But if he's in the single.

0:52:01.239 --> 0:52:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Digit steals total and low twenties homers and the average

0:52:05.200 --> 0:52:06.839
<v Speaker 1>bet like that's where it starts to be. Like, Okay,

0:52:06.840 --> 0:52:09.759
<v Speaker 1>this is like a significant reach, but maybe it's buying

0:52:09.800 --> 0:52:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a little too much into name value. But I have

0:52:11.960 --> 0:52:14.080
<v Speaker 1>made the pick, so it's locked in Yeah.

0:52:14.719 --> 0:52:16.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we don't have to spend much more time on him,

0:52:16.760 --> 0:52:19.000
<v Speaker 3>but there is when you just look at like, granted

0:52:19.000 --> 0:52:20.480
<v Speaker 3>it's only half a season, but if you look at

0:52:20.480 --> 0:52:22.440
<v Speaker 3>the numbers, there are some concerns he' about in two

0:52:22.480 --> 0:52:22.879
<v Speaker 3>forty four.

0:52:23.080 --> 0:52:23.279
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:52:23.320 --> 0:52:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm not focused on this season's counting stats in

0:52:26.520 --> 0:52:29.520
<v Speaker 1>making this pick. This is a This is me saying

0:52:29.520 --> 0:52:31.279
<v Speaker 1>it is a weird start to the year, weird year

0:52:31.280 --> 0:52:33.719
<v Speaker 1>in general for him, Like we're counting this as a

0:52:33.760 --> 0:52:35.640
<v Speaker 1>fluke to me, the if you want to paint the

0:52:36.400 --> 0:52:38.919
<v Speaker 1>case of this being a concern it's last year.

0:52:40.280 --> 0:52:43.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because the county sides are down and his expected

0:52:43.760 --> 0:52:45.560
<v Speaker 3>stats or a lot of them will all be career

0:52:45.560 --> 0:52:48.200
<v Speaker 3>worst as well, and so he's earning it all right,

0:52:48.239 --> 0:52:50.000
<v Speaker 3>But we can move on. I could tell you want

0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:54.000
<v Speaker 3>to move on. You don't want to, you know, just well.

0:52:53.840 --> 0:52:55.960
<v Speaker 2>No, you don't want to. We don't spend ten minutes

0:52:56.000 --> 0:52:56.760
<v Speaker 2>on every pick.

0:52:58.120 --> 0:53:01.120
<v Speaker 3>I know you're regretting the Mookie Bets pick already. So

0:53:01.200 --> 0:53:03.319
<v Speaker 3>you paired Mookie Betts with Scooble, is that right?

0:53:03.360 --> 0:53:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:53:04.520 --> 0:53:06.920
<v Speaker 3>So now I'm up with the team who picked at

0:53:06.920 --> 0:53:10.200
<v Speaker 3>one on nine and picked Kyle Tucker and so for me,

0:53:10.480 --> 0:53:12.600
<v Speaker 3>I'll make it quick and I just think he shouldn't

0:53:12.600 --> 0:53:15.280
<v Speaker 3>have fallen this this far. And I'll pair a really

0:53:16.239 --> 0:53:17.800
<v Speaker 3>one of the top hitters with one of the top pitchers,

0:53:17.800 --> 0:53:19.439
<v Speaker 3>and I'll take Paul Skins off the board.

0:53:19.680 --> 0:53:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Skens would have been my next pick for sure.

0:53:22.200 --> 0:53:25.360
<v Speaker 1>If I didn't take Scooble with the tenth pick, I

0:53:25.360 --> 0:53:27.600
<v Speaker 1>would have taken Skins. I like gu said, I just

0:53:27.640 --> 0:53:29.359
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to go pocket aces, but like I would

0:53:29.400 --> 0:53:30.759
<v Speaker 1>have taken him a pick before if we were just

0:53:30.840 --> 0:53:38.000
<v Speaker 1>drafting in a vacuum correct pick. I think, I don't

0:53:38.040 --> 0:53:41.600
<v Speaker 1>know that I want to take another picture here in Wheeler,

0:53:42.080 --> 0:53:43.239
<v Speaker 1>like I don't know that I want to take another

0:53:43.239 --> 0:53:47.600
<v Speaker 1>picture this whole mock draft is, is my point, even

0:53:47.640 --> 0:53:49.399
<v Speaker 1>though I do really like Wheeler obviously, just like another

0:53:49.480 --> 0:53:51.400
<v Speaker 1>year older. That's hard, and there's so many good hitters

0:53:51.400 --> 0:53:55.759
<v Speaker 1>that I like. I'm gonna say, I'm going I'm gonna

0:53:55.800 --> 0:53:57.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of a bounce back from Gunner Henderson. Other than

0:53:57.520 --> 0:53:59.279
<v Speaker 1>this too far, he was a first rounder like very

0:53:59.320 --> 0:54:02.080
<v Speaker 1>easily a year ago. He's still very young, he's still

0:54:02.160 --> 0:54:04.200
<v Speaker 1>very good. A lot of the bad of ball data

0:54:04.239 --> 0:54:06.759
<v Speaker 1>is very promising. He's sitting the ball hard, he's just

0:54:06.760 --> 0:54:08.839
<v Speaker 1>not lifting it a lot. I think it gets back

0:54:08.880 --> 0:54:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to you remember he also started this season weirdly, getting

0:54:12.560 --> 0:54:15.160
<v Speaker 1>injured in in spring training and then kind of working

0:54:15.160 --> 0:54:18.560
<v Speaker 1>his way back. It gets major league pitching. This is

0:54:18.600 --> 0:54:20.719
<v Speaker 1>just buying into the talent what we saw last year.

0:54:21.160 --> 0:54:24.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'll just take a Gunner Henderson and again, I

0:54:24.080 --> 0:54:26.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of have the floor of Jose Ramirez that I'm

0:54:26.040 --> 0:54:28.200
<v Speaker 1>pairing him with, and now I'm kind of getting I

0:54:28.200 --> 0:54:30.880
<v Speaker 1>think I think the ceiling again with Gunner Henderson.

0:54:33.200 --> 0:54:36.120
<v Speaker 3>All right, so you paired Jose Ramirez and Gunner Henderson.

0:54:36.280 --> 0:54:40.400
<v Speaker 3>I am now up at eighteen with the team that

0:54:40.560 --> 0:54:43.319
<v Speaker 3>one oh seven. I took cal Raley and so I

0:54:43.320 --> 0:54:44.960
<v Speaker 3>could go in a couple different directions here. But I

0:54:44.960 --> 0:54:47.359
<v Speaker 3>also think this player should not still be on board,

0:54:47.360 --> 0:54:49.560
<v Speaker 3>and that's Jacksonio. And so I like the idea of

0:54:50.440 --> 0:54:53.920
<v Speaker 3>pairing the power of cal Rally with the speed and

0:54:54.000 --> 0:54:55.520
<v Speaker 3>power of Jacksonterio.

0:54:56.480 --> 0:55:00.239
<v Speaker 1>I could have easily taken Cheerio instead of Gunner. You know, again,

0:55:00.280 --> 0:55:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I think this is kind of a big group of hitters,

0:55:02.040 --> 0:55:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's a totally good pick.

0:55:03.840 --> 0:55:04.439
<v Speaker 2>I want to let.

0:55:04.320 --> 0:55:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Everybody know before we finish up the draft. If you're

0:55:06.160 --> 0:55:09.760
<v Speaker 1>struggling with lineup decisions, our lineup assistant recommends optimal lineup

0:55:09.760 --> 0:55:12.200
<v Speaker 1>suggestions to maximize your team's performance.

0:55:12.239 --> 0:55:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Each day or a week.

0:55:13.480 --> 0:55:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Just sink your league for tailored guidance based on your

0:55:15.719 --> 0:55:18.600
<v Speaker 1>roster in league settings. Download the Fantasy Baseball My Playbook

0:55:18.640 --> 0:55:22.240
<v Speaker 1>app or visit fantasypros dot com slash MLB my Playbook

0:55:22.360 --> 0:55:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to set your winning lineup today.

0:55:25.880 --> 0:55:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm back.

0:55:29.880 --> 0:55:33.360
<v Speaker 1>On the clock and I will take a guy that

0:55:33.400 --> 0:55:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I considered a couple of picks ago. Really, a lot

0:55:35.640 --> 0:55:37.919
<v Speaker 1>of these guys I've at least considered for a couple

0:55:37.960 --> 0:55:41.319
<v Speaker 1>of picks. I know the batting averages hasn't been very good.

0:55:41.640 --> 0:55:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Corbyn Carroll is only twenty four years old. I know

0:55:44.719 --> 0:55:47.239
<v Speaker 1>he's got a bit of the wrist injury stuff right now.

0:55:47.280 --> 0:55:49.600
<v Speaker 1>But this is guy that in general, going into next season,

0:55:49.640 --> 0:55:52.799
<v Speaker 1>barring anything unforeseen this year, I'm going to be expecting

0:55:53.320 --> 0:55:57.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty five homers and thirty five stolen bases and hoping

0:55:57.760 --> 0:55:59.560
<v Speaker 1>for a batting average bounce back. Even though this is

0:55:59.560 --> 0:56:02.560
<v Speaker 1>two years in a row of a low batting average.

0:56:02.840 --> 0:56:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I just think the town's too good. And again in

0:56:04.239 --> 0:56:08.200
<v Speaker 1>this in a Rodo format with the Steels. I just

0:56:08.239 --> 0:56:10.640
<v Speaker 1>think back half of Route two is a perfectly great

0:56:10.640 --> 0:56:11.759
<v Speaker 1>place to take him.

0:56:12.800 --> 0:56:13.839
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think it's fair.

0:56:13.880 --> 0:56:18.480
<v Speaker 3>I think it's he's probably he's been on the on

0:56:18.719 --> 0:56:21.359
<v Speaker 3>the uh missing the word here.

0:56:21.480 --> 0:56:23.200
<v Speaker 4>He's been available for too long in this draft.

0:56:23.480 --> 0:56:25.239
<v Speaker 3>As someone who coming into last year he was like

0:56:25.400 --> 0:56:29.000
<v Speaker 3>contensus top five, top three pick. There are some injury

0:56:29.000 --> 0:56:32.319
<v Speaker 3>concerns there. You know, I share those coming into last season.

0:56:32.360 --> 0:56:35.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't have any shares of Corbyn Carrol. But yeah,

0:56:35.080 --> 0:56:38.279
<v Speaker 3>I think nineteenth pick, second round, like mid to late

0:56:38.280 --> 0:56:40.759
<v Speaker 3>second round, is just way too long for him to

0:56:40.760 --> 0:56:41.160
<v Speaker 3>be on the board.

0:56:41.160 --> 0:56:42.040
<v Speaker 4>That's the word I was looking for it.

0:56:42.239 --> 0:56:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean he's he's on his one hundred and

0:56:45.960 --> 0:56:49.560
<v Speaker 1>sixty two game pace this year is forty two homers

0:56:49.560 --> 0:56:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and twenty two steals, and I think the steels is

0:56:51.480 --> 0:56:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the one that we're more confident would bounce back in

0:56:53.960 --> 0:56:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the future. So, like again, a twenty five to thirty

0:56:58.200 --> 0:57:01.880
<v Speaker 1>five season is selling him, sure from what the ceiling

0:57:02.000 --> 0:57:05.920
<v Speaker 1>could be. So I think if the floor is you're

0:57:05.920 --> 0:57:09.000
<v Speaker 1>at least getting power speed combo, and the ceiling is

0:57:09.040 --> 0:57:11.120
<v Speaker 1>like a top five player, which is what it is.

0:57:11.480 --> 0:57:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a good value, and I'm pairing

0:57:14.320 --> 0:57:15.960
<v Speaker 1>him with Eli Da La Cruz.

0:57:16.000 --> 0:57:17.400
<v Speaker 2>So that's a lot of power speed.

0:57:18.360 --> 0:57:19.880
<v Speaker 3>Yep, yeah, I was going to say that you're you're

0:57:19.920 --> 0:57:22.400
<v Speaker 3>pairing with Eli Data Cruz, so I'm no up. And

0:57:22.520 --> 0:57:24.760
<v Speaker 3>this is pairing with Pik or Armstrong who went at

0:57:24.800 --> 0:57:26.680
<v Speaker 3>one oh five. Maybe a little early, but you know,

0:57:26.760 --> 0:57:31.640
<v Speaker 3>projecting the superstardom. So I did take a little bit

0:57:31.640 --> 0:57:34.480
<v Speaker 3>of a risk with that first pick with Piak or Armstrong.

0:57:34.560 --> 0:57:36.360
<v Speaker 3>And so now do I want to pair it with

0:57:36.400 --> 0:57:38.440
<v Speaker 3>an elite pitcher and kind of build the floor in

0:57:38.480 --> 0:57:41.000
<v Speaker 3>the pitching side, or do I want to further cement

0:57:41.120 --> 0:57:45.760
<v Speaker 3>my offensive floor. I think I'll go offense and I

0:57:45.840 --> 0:57:46.880
<v Speaker 3>will go with.

0:57:49.800 --> 0:57:53.840
<v Speaker 4>I already have some of that speed. Do I want

0:57:53.880 --> 0:57:56.280
<v Speaker 4>to I'll go Lindoor, Francisco, Lindor.

0:57:56.640 --> 0:58:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Good Claire and a good a good floor picked to

0:58:01.800 --> 0:58:03.280
<v Speaker 1>pair of somebody like pe K Armstrong.

0:58:03.440 --> 0:58:06.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm a little nervous about batting average because there's a

0:58:06.200 --> 0:58:08.800
<v Speaker 3>chance that like I just drafted like two two fifty

0:58:08.840 --> 0:58:12.440
<v Speaker 3>two sixty hitters, which was which was my one hesitation there.

0:58:13.000 --> 0:58:15.040
<v Speaker 3>But I do think you're locking in a lot of

0:58:15.080 --> 0:58:18.080
<v Speaker 3>power speed and like a good enough batting average really

0:58:18.120 --> 0:58:18.520
<v Speaker 3>early on.

0:58:18.880 --> 0:58:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I think it's a good pick.

0:58:20.840 --> 0:58:24.440
<v Speaker 1>We're starting to get into the territory of feeling like

0:58:24.480 --> 0:58:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you're taking a step down.

0:58:27.320 --> 0:58:31.320
<v Speaker 2>With who's available. Yeah, I'm looking around.

0:58:31.400 --> 0:58:34.440
<v Speaker 1>It's like like we're in the territory of there. There's

0:58:34.600 --> 0:58:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a red flag somewhere. Was Zach Wheeler. It's age, you

0:58:39.000 --> 0:58:41.520
<v Speaker 1>know with I mean, I don't know how far down

0:58:41.640 --> 0:58:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you're looking. But you know, a guy like you know,

0:58:45.360 --> 0:58:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Ca tel Marte, you're not getting any steals. You know,

0:58:47.440 --> 0:58:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a guy like Trey Turner, you know, the power hasn't

0:58:49.880 --> 0:58:52.560
<v Speaker 1>been there this year, you know, and he's also into

0:58:52.560 --> 0:58:54.560
<v Speaker 1>his thirties now, so how long is the speed going

0:58:54.600 --> 0:58:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to be there? You know, Julio Rodriguez has been like

0:58:57.840 --> 0:59:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a slow starter, you know, for so much of the time.

0:59:00.600 --> 0:59:03.360
<v Speaker 1>But he's you know, fourteen homers, seventeen steals at the

0:59:03.360 --> 0:59:06.120
<v Speaker 1>All Star break, you know, low batting average. I'm like

0:59:06.200 --> 0:59:08.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of talking it through because again, there's kind of

0:59:08.840 --> 0:59:11.880
<v Speaker 1>like downsides for a lot of these guys. Somebody who's

0:59:11.920 --> 0:59:16.040
<v Speaker 1>having a very you know, a good season is Manny

0:59:16.040 --> 0:59:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Machado and third base is so difficult, you know, seventeen homers,

0:59:19.360 --> 0:59:22.680
<v Speaker 1>eight steals two ninety two average. But he is another

0:59:22.720 --> 0:59:25.800
<v Speaker 1>guy into his you know, early to mid thirties. Now

0:59:25.800 --> 0:59:28.680
<v Speaker 1>he's thirty three years old right now. Like I said,

0:59:28.680 --> 0:59:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of talking it through because I think there's

0:59:30.040 --> 0:59:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different options. I think what I will

0:59:32.000 --> 0:59:36.120
<v Speaker 1>do in this is pairing with Ronald Acunya is and

0:59:36.160 --> 0:59:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't expect to this. I'm gonna take Zach Wheeler.

0:59:38.200 --> 0:59:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I I'm at the point with Zach Wheeler where it's

0:59:42.440 --> 0:59:46.320
<v Speaker 1>almost like Derrek Henry and fantasy football. I'm not I'm

0:59:46.360 --> 0:59:49.680
<v Speaker 1>just gonna ride this thing until it burns me, right Like,

0:59:49.800 --> 0:59:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to be the one. I'm not gonna

0:59:51.120 --> 0:59:53.640
<v Speaker 1>keep predicting when he's gonna fall off. He's been so

0:59:53.800 --> 0:59:57.040
<v Speaker 1>good for so long it does concern me his age,

0:59:57.360 --> 0:59:59.960
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, this is several years in a row

1:00:00.080 --> 1:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of being a real fantasy ace, one of the five

1:00:02.800 --> 1:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>best pitchers in fantasy baseball. I'm just gonna let I'm

1:00:08.280 --> 1:00:10.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna let him burn me one year, and I'm gonna

1:00:10.520 --> 1:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>keep taking him until he does so. Pairing him with

1:00:12.640 --> 1:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>ron On Acunya Cook, that's that's a low ceiling. If

1:00:15.320 --> 1:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>he does at the age Cliff and Acunya, you know,

1:00:18.280 --> 1:00:19.240
<v Speaker 1>has injury issues.

1:00:19.280 --> 1:00:22.160
<v Speaker 2>But that's a high ceiling. It's it's a low floor.

1:00:22.160 --> 1:00:24.960
<v Speaker 3>I feel like I feel like you tricked me saying

1:00:24.960 --> 1:00:26.480
<v Speaker 3>you weren't going to take any more pictures. I just

1:00:26.520 --> 1:00:28.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, filled up my strategy.

1:00:30.000 --> 1:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Later I planned to not and then in the moment

1:00:32.640 --> 1:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>talk again, this is where we're figuring this out. In

1:00:35.240 --> 1:00:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the moment, I kind of realized, actually I do.

1:00:38.880 --> 1:00:40.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, No, I think it's the right move.

1:00:40.240 --> 1:00:42.440
<v Speaker 3>I do think, especially when you start looking at like

1:00:42.440 --> 1:00:45.600
<v Speaker 3>pitching tears, you need to not need to, but you know,

1:00:46.680 --> 1:00:49.080
<v Speaker 3>locking like he said, like that ceiling floor of a

1:00:49.160 --> 1:00:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Zach Wheeler, especially pairing up with someone like Acunya, I

1:00:51.920 --> 1:00:53.880
<v Speaker 3>think it makes a lot of sense. So you paired

1:00:54.480 --> 1:00:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Acunya and Wheeler, and now I am up with the

1:00:58.600 --> 1:01:00.840
<v Speaker 3>team that was one O three, that Aaron Judge, and

1:01:00.880 --> 1:01:04.000
<v Speaker 3>so I have a pretty high floor, high ceiling there,

1:01:04.960 --> 1:01:06.840
<v Speaker 3>and who do I want to pair him with? So

1:01:06.960 --> 1:01:09.120
<v Speaker 3>if I want to go the pitching route, there's Hunter

1:01:09.200 --> 1:01:11.439
<v Speaker 3>Brown and there's Max Freed, and I feel like those

1:01:11.480 --> 1:01:13.480
<v Speaker 3>are probably the only two.

1:01:14.720 --> 1:01:16.320
<v Speaker 4>In that tier. And you could argue that the Hunter

1:01:16.360 --> 1:01:21.480
<v Speaker 4>Brown is not in that tier yet. I Vlad is.

1:01:21.480 --> 1:01:23.560
<v Speaker 3>Someone I consider, but he's not having the stats I

1:01:23.560 --> 1:01:25.919
<v Speaker 3>would want to take. Take this early, like we're not

1:01:25.920 --> 1:01:26.760
<v Speaker 3>not seeing the powers.

1:01:26.880 --> 1:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I thought about Vlad the last couple of picks,

1:01:29.480 --> 1:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>but I'm like, it's just not happening, and I don't know. Yeah,

1:01:35.120 --> 1:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I Lad was a tricky one for me to decide on.

1:01:40.960 --> 1:01:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I want to go Junior Camenaro.

1:01:45.280 --> 1:01:48.840
<v Speaker 4>That's you know, I don't know that. I don't know.

1:01:48.840 --> 1:01:50.680
<v Speaker 3>It makes me a little bit nervous, but you know,

1:01:50.760 --> 1:01:52.880
<v Speaker 3>there is a lot of power out of her weak

1:01:52.920 --> 1:01:56.440
<v Speaker 3>position there. I'm taking too long to make the pick here.

1:01:58.720 --> 1:02:04.920
<v Speaker 3>Uh you know what, Just give me Junior kerin Air.

1:02:05.120 --> 1:02:10.520
<v Speaker 3>I'll take him, Okay, I'll take the Plunge.

1:02:11.400 --> 1:02:12.520
<v Speaker 4>Was not in on them this season.

1:02:12.760 --> 1:02:15.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm I'm correcting the mistake like I did with Pek Armstrong.

1:02:15.720 --> 1:02:18.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm I'm going back.

1:02:20.360 --> 1:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>My last pick. I have Bobby Wood. Junior is the

1:02:23.280 --> 1:02:24.240
<v Speaker 1>guy I'm pairing this with.

1:02:25.840 --> 1:02:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Ma'am.

1:02:26.240 --> 1:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I I am torn as it happened for a couple

1:02:30.520 --> 1:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of picks in Rowe because there's a lot of guys

1:02:32.040 --> 1:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that I think are pretty close to each other.

1:02:33.560 --> 1:02:35.160
<v Speaker 2>There's guys like Trade Kyle Schwarber.

1:02:35.320 --> 1:02:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Is he someone you would take. I can't take him

1:02:37.000 --> 1:02:39.200
<v Speaker 3>with the next pick because that's the team.

1:02:39.600 --> 1:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I am just somebody who typically does not like that strategy.

1:02:42.960 --> 1:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>As good of a hitter as he is, I mean, dude,

1:02:44.640 --> 1:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>his thirty home runs this year, and like, I'm not

1:02:46.160 --> 1:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>even saying that I'm correct in that stance. I just

1:02:49.120 --> 1:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>don't typically go for guys like Schworber, you know, at

1:02:52.280 --> 1:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>their cost. But that's just a personal preference.

1:02:56.680 --> 1:02:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just wanted to bring it up because I

1:02:58.240 --> 1:03:00.280
<v Speaker 3>actually I cannot take him with the next pick unless

1:03:00.280 --> 1:03:01.080
<v Speaker 3>there's two utilities.

1:03:01.320 --> 1:03:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, no, no, it's valid. I mean I think you

1:03:05.960 --> 1:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>could even scroll down and look at like like I'm

1:03:10.600 --> 1:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>not taking him. But I wouldn't fight too strongly against

1:03:13.800 --> 1:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>somebody making the case for like Jackson Merrill and just saying, like, listen,

1:03:16.880 --> 1:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>he said, injury issues this year and that's why everything's

1:03:19.800 --> 1:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>looking really bad. But as a rookie, as a young

1:03:23.120 --> 1:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>rookie twenty one years old, he went he had twenty

1:03:25.600 --> 1:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>four homers, sixteen soul bases in a two ninety two average,

1:03:28.680 --> 1:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and just kind of thinking a step forward from that

1:03:31.320 --> 1:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>is the most likely outcome for next year. I I mean,

1:03:35.480 --> 1:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I'm a take it, but I wouldn't

1:03:37.640 --> 1:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>fight against it.

1:03:39.320 --> 1:03:40.520
<v Speaker 4>Do you I'll be real quick.

1:03:40.560 --> 1:03:42.520
<v Speaker 3>But do you want to see I have like last

1:03:42.600 --> 1:03:44.520
<v Speaker 3>year's draft rankings up. Do you want to hear some

1:03:44.560 --> 1:03:46.920
<v Speaker 3>of the top names setting into last draft season that

1:03:46.920 --> 1:03:49.800
<v Speaker 3>are still available. Sure, there's a few of them, So

1:03:49.960 --> 1:03:55.240
<v Speaker 3>scrolling through the list, Julio Rodriguez, consider God Alvarez, Bryce Harper, I.

1:03:55.200 --> 1:03:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Will not be taking Jared on Alvarez.

1:03:57.680 --> 1:04:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Jared Duran, Drey Turner, and then you're Jackson Merril, Freddie Freeman,

1:04:01.480 --> 1:04:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Jazz Chishom could tell Marte Austin, Riley, Logan Gilbert.

1:04:05.120 --> 1:04:08.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean there's good players there, yeah, for sure. I

1:04:08.920 --> 1:04:12.840
<v Speaker 2>mean the highest in our rest of season rankings available

1:04:12.840 --> 1:04:13.600
<v Speaker 2>is vlad.

1:04:14.880 --> 1:04:16.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. I think I think he's too high there.

1:04:17.040 --> 1:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's just so hard to take him with

1:04:18.840 --> 1:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>what the season has looked like.

1:04:20.000 --> 1:04:21.760
<v Speaker 4>I think I agree.

1:04:21.800 --> 1:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Trey Turner, you're getting steals, but another year. Yeah,

1:04:25.640 --> 1:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I also have Bobby wit Junior on the team, so

1:04:27.560 --> 1:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>pairing shortstops, I could do it, right, There'll be there'll

1:04:30.200 --> 1:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>be an infielder spot, but I probably won't, you know, Julio,

1:04:36.120 --> 1:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>just betting on the talent Pete Alonzo. If I wanted

1:04:38.640 --> 1:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to go a different first baseman.

1:04:44.600 --> 1:04:44.800
<v Speaker 2>I do.

1:04:45.040 --> 1:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, I can't. I feel like I can't

1:04:46.640 --> 1:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>take him base on what we've seen. But I do

1:04:47.960 --> 1:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>really like Jackson Merrill a lot. Tell Marte just like

1:04:50.760 --> 1:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>getting the best second baseman is appealing.

1:04:53.520 --> 1:04:55.040
<v Speaker 4>Would you consider Max Freed here?

1:04:55.800 --> 1:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>No? If if I was going to take a picture,

1:04:57.200 --> 1:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I would take Connor Brown like unequivally. I I like

1:05:00.520 --> 1:05:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Brown better than Freed for sure. Okay, so I don't

1:05:04.280 --> 1:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>think I want to take a picture, but if I

1:05:06.240 --> 1:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>was to take one, it would be one hundred percent.

1:05:12.160 --> 1:05:13.280
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm going to.

1:05:13.400 --> 1:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Say he's too talented and young enough that there could

1:05:18.840 --> 1:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>still be a step forward, and he was a high pick.

1:05:21.640 --> 1:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>He's had a thirty thirty season on his resume. I'm

1:05:24.040 --> 1:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>going to take Julio Rider. You guys, I think he

1:05:26.120 --> 1:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>can't get out of the second round just with the

1:05:28.440 --> 1:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>talent and age alone.

1:05:30.840 --> 1:05:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Wow, do you think that's the wrong pick?

1:05:34.360 --> 1:05:34.440
<v Speaker 4>No?

1:05:34.560 --> 1:05:36.360
<v Speaker 3>I just think you were already talked about it. There's

1:05:36.360 --> 1:05:39.960
<v Speaker 3>a lot of uncertainty there. He's also a he's been

1:05:40.600 --> 1:05:42.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's kind of fluky, but he's been a

1:05:42.280 --> 1:05:45.520
<v Speaker 3>second half player. So there's a world where we're heading

1:05:45.520 --> 1:05:47.720
<v Speaker 3>into next draft season and his numbers look really good

1:05:47.720 --> 1:05:49.440
<v Speaker 3>and you're like, wow, he had a great season forgetting that,

1:05:49.480 --> 1:05:51.520
<v Speaker 3>Like the beginning of season was I mean, I mean.

1:05:51.400 --> 1:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>His poor first half is still fourteen homer seventeen steals,

1:05:56.280 --> 1:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and like the average is twenty points lower. But his

1:05:58.880 --> 1:06:01.480
<v Speaker 1>average the first three was two eighty four, two seventy five,

1:06:01.520 --> 1:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>two seventy three. This year's two fifty two. So that

1:06:03.480 --> 1:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>looks like the outlier. You know, he's he's been a

1:06:06.680 --> 1:06:08.479
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty guy every year of his career.

1:06:08.480 --> 1:06:09.440
<v Speaker 2>He's going to be that again.

1:06:09.840 --> 1:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>He's been a thirty thirty guy once, twenty five to

1:06:12.560 --> 1:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty five guy twice. So I feel like the floor

1:06:15.520 --> 1:06:20.439
<v Speaker 1>is actually higher overall maybe then you would think with him,

1:06:20.600 --> 1:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and the ceiling is very clear and apparent too, So

1:06:23.960 --> 1:06:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I think like him getting out of the second would

1:06:26.000 --> 1:06:27.720
<v Speaker 1>be crazy, and like pairing him with Bobby Woo Junior,

1:06:27.720 --> 1:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel really good about.

1:06:30.080 --> 1:06:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:06:31.440 --> 1:06:33.960
<v Speaker 3>So I'll be really quick again, but I'll just hit

1:06:34.040 --> 1:06:38.320
<v Speaker 3>some of the before I hit the top draft rankings

1:06:38.440 --> 1:06:40.360
<v Speaker 3>of a players heading into last year's draft that are

1:06:40.400 --> 1:06:43.439
<v Speaker 3>still available. Now, I'll hit some of the players through

1:06:43.480 --> 1:06:45.040
<v Speaker 3>the first half of the season have been the best

1:06:45.080 --> 1:06:48.680
<v Speaker 3>statistically that are still available. Number nine Byron Buxton, not

1:06:48.720 --> 1:06:52.320
<v Speaker 3>taking him here. Number eleven Kylesh forber he already said,

1:06:52.400 --> 1:06:53.200
<v Speaker 3>can't take him.

1:06:53.080 --> 1:06:54.200
<v Speaker 4>With the on the Otani team.

1:06:54.240 --> 1:06:56.160
<v Speaker 3>This is the one oh one team that is now,

1:06:57.960 --> 1:07:00.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, pairing whoever this player is without Treya Turner.

1:07:01.640 --> 1:07:03.120
<v Speaker 4>Riley Green is an interesting one.

1:07:03.160 --> 1:07:04.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that I would take him this high,

1:07:04.480 --> 1:07:06.439
<v Speaker 3>but he's having a very good year. Twenty four home runs,

1:07:06.440 --> 1:07:09.080
<v Speaker 3>twenty four batting average. You Haino Suarez not taking him here?

1:07:09.440 --> 1:07:12.240
<v Speaker 3>Say Suzuki is an interesting name. Peelansa many him Chatto,

1:07:12.240 --> 1:07:15.160
<v Speaker 3>you already mentioned Kristin Yelli's not doing that. And then

1:07:15.280 --> 1:07:17.919
<v Speaker 3>I think you kind of get further down into two

1:07:17.920 --> 1:07:18.960
<v Speaker 3>different kind of tears.

1:07:19.760 --> 1:07:20.240
<v Speaker 4>And so.

1:07:22.720 --> 1:07:24.920
<v Speaker 3>Assuming this you know this team, I'm making two picks,

1:07:24.920 --> 1:07:26.760
<v Speaker 3>but we're not going to you know, go past this pick.

1:07:26.840 --> 1:07:29.920
<v Speaker 3>But this, you know, in this, you know turn I

1:07:29.920 --> 1:07:31.560
<v Speaker 3>would be making two picks, so I think one of

1:07:31.600 --> 1:07:35.200
<v Speaker 3>them would be a pitcher, and so I'll take Hunter Brown.

1:07:35.400 --> 1:07:37.240
<v Speaker 3>I'll take Hunter Brown as the final pick.

1:07:37.440 --> 1:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>And that tell us who who would the hitter have been?

1:07:39.720 --> 1:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>If you said, okay, Hunter Brown will be the first

1:07:41.240 --> 1:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>pick of the third round, just so we'd know who

1:07:43.160 --> 1:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>would who would the hitter have been.

1:07:45.680 --> 1:07:52.160
<v Speaker 4>That's where I kind of was struggling. I think I

1:07:52.200 --> 1:07:53.480
<v Speaker 4>think just based on.

1:07:55.360 --> 1:07:58.640
<v Speaker 3>The you know, what we've seen so far, and he's

1:07:58.640 --> 1:08:00.640
<v Speaker 3>having a really good year, though I don't know that

1:08:00.680 --> 1:08:04.280
<v Speaker 3>I could really trust trust it based on the injury stuff.

1:08:04.280 --> 1:08:05.040
<v Speaker 4>I was gonna say, say.

1:08:04.920 --> 1:08:07.640
<v Speaker 3>It's Azuki would would have been would have been the pick,

1:08:08.000 --> 1:08:10.480
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know. I'm not a big tell Marte

1:08:10.520 --> 1:08:12.880
<v Speaker 3>guy is gonna be a year older Price Harper, I'm

1:08:12.880 --> 1:08:13.440
<v Speaker 3>not going to do.

1:08:14.880 --> 1:08:14.920
<v Speaker 2>So.

1:08:15.000 --> 1:08:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I feel like it's kind of a weird area. Yeah,

1:08:20.040 --> 1:08:21.679
<v Speaker 3>I think it probably would have been saying Azuki.

1:08:23.640 --> 1:08:27.200
<v Speaker 2>That would not I was not my guess. I I

1:08:27.479 --> 1:08:28.559
<v Speaker 2>what was your guys gonna make?

1:08:28.920 --> 1:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I really had one, But it

1:08:30.720 --> 1:08:35.519
<v Speaker 1>was not that I was thinking more like a guy

1:08:35.600 --> 1:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that we had ranked in this way coming into the year,

1:08:41.280 --> 1:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>like like like the previous list you read like guys

1:08:43.880 --> 1:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that were here a year ago, and we're thinking, oh,

1:08:46.720 --> 1:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>they just had a little bit of a down year

1:08:48.040 --> 1:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>or somebody like not not saying Laddie, but like you

1:08:51.280 --> 1:08:54.519
<v Speaker 1>know of Laddie or somebody like that that was that

1:08:54.600 --> 1:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>we expected to be here would have been my guess, yeah, Duran.

1:08:58.920 --> 1:09:01.479
<v Speaker 4>But I think the rants haven't down year. He's not good.

1:09:01.520 --> 1:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean all these guys that were in this

1:09:03.439 --> 1:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>range of year ago, like in the spring, that we're

1:09:05.960 --> 1:09:09.479
<v Speaker 1>not taking are having down years to varying degrees, or

1:09:09.880 --> 1:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>are older and we don't expect to maybe like like

1:09:13.160 --> 1:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Mana Machada was having a good year, but like, is

1:09:15.040 --> 1:09:16.680
<v Speaker 1>he having this kind of year that you expect him

1:09:16.680 --> 1:09:18.559
<v Speaker 1>to do this as a thirty three year old next year?

1:09:18.680 --> 1:09:19.200
<v Speaker 4>Like, I don't know.

1:09:19.720 --> 1:09:21.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean the answer could have been or would

1:09:21.960 --> 1:09:25.639
<v Speaker 3>have been Jackson Merril. But we're not seeing the kind

1:09:25.680 --> 1:09:28.160
<v Speaker 3>of second year we were hoping for after that breakout

1:09:28.439 --> 1:09:31.640
<v Speaker 3>rookie season, so it was hard hard to trust him

1:09:31.640 --> 1:09:32.439
<v Speaker 3>in the second round either.

1:09:32.479 --> 1:09:34.000
<v Speaker 2>But that's also injury based too.

1:09:34.040 --> 1:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Like I feel like next year, I'm going to be

1:09:36.800 --> 1:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>really happy in any draft where I get Merrill in

1:09:38.840 --> 1:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the third round if that happens, And maybe maybe that

1:09:42.160 --> 1:09:44.559
<v Speaker 1>won't happen based on how the second half goes. But

1:09:44.640 --> 1:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>as of right now, he obviously didn't make our top

1:09:46.400 --> 1:09:48.639
<v Speaker 1>two rounds here, but I'm going to be I'm gonna

1:09:48.640 --> 1:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>be stoked to buy low next year, I think.

1:09:51.160 --> 1:09:54.200
<v Speaker 3>And he was twenty three consensus going into last year,

1:09:54.200 --> 1:09:55.679
<v Speaker 3>so he would have gone right around.

1:09:55.520 --> 1:09:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Here and is going to be twenty three years old

1:09:58.320 --> 1:09:58.880
<v Speaker 2>next season.

1:09:59.720 --> 1:10:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but also seven home runs in sixty four games,

1:10:02.880 --> 1:10:04.519
<v Speaker 3>but that's after hitting twenty four.

1:10:04.680 --> 1:10:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean again, you're buying on it being it down.

1:10:07.240 --> 1:10:08.080
<v Speaker 2>I think my one.

1:10:07.920 --> 1:10:09.719
<v Speaker 4>Regret one one stolen base.

1:10:09.880 --> 1:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I think my only regret from this is I actually

1:10:12.120 --> 1:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I do think I reached on Mooki bets as I

1:10:14.040 --> 1:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>talked through it. But the rest, I actually I'm really

1:10:16.160 --> 1:10:18.439
<v Speaker 1>happy with with the values I got. Like I think

1:10:18.720 --> 1:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Jazeramirez eighth, Soto twelfth, you know, you getting Skiens sixteenth,

1:10:23.760 --> 1:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I think was great. I would have taken skiin to

1:10:25.840 --> 1:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>heead of Crochet, honestly, although I think it's a coin flip,

1:10:27.960 --> 1:10:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm not saying you're wrong for that, just the

1:10:30.200 --> 1:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>direction I would have gone, like Gunner, like from pick

1:10:33.520 --> 1:10:38.599
<v Speaker 1>sixteen to nineteen being Skeens, Gunner, Churio and Corbyn Carroll

1:10:38.800 --> 1:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is like, that's really enticing. And then even even after that,

1:10:43.439 --> 1:10:48.519
<v Speaker 1>Lindor Wheeler, like that range of the mid teens to

1:10:48.560 --> 1:10:49.519
<v Speaker 1>the early twenties.

1:10:49.640 --> 1:10:51.719
<v Speaker 2>I think is really strong.

1:10:52.960 --> 1:10:56.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I took Pca early knowingly, but he's going

1:10:56.560 --> 1:10:59.240
<v Speaker 3>to be a fascinating one going into next season seeing

1:10:59.280 --> 1:11:00.840
<v Speaker 3>on the second half go because he could go as

1:11:00.920 --> 1:11:04.160
<v Speaker 3>high as like top four, top three, or if he

1:11:04.520 --> 1:11:06.320
<v Speaker 3>falls off in the second half, he could fall to

1:11:06.320 --> 1:11:07.560
<v Speaker 3>the back end of the first round, maybe out of

1:11:07.560 --> 1:11:08.000
<v Speaker 3>the first round.

1:11:08.000 --> 1:11:09.479
<v Speaker 1>I think a few of these guys, you could say

1:11:09.680 --> 1:11:11.519
<v Speaker 1>there's a chance they could go Like Acunia I think

1:11:11.560 --> 1:11:13.839
<v Speaker 1>could go higher than four if he has a vintage

1:11:13.880 --> 1:11:17.439
<v Speaker 1>second half. I think Julio could go a lot higher

1:11:17.439 --> 1:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>if he has his what he usually does in the

1:11:19.240 --> 1:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>second half. Gunner and Schurio I think could go higher.

1:11:24.520 --> 1:11:26.599
<v Speaker 1>I think I think Camvanaro could fall off. I mean

1:11:26.640 --> 1:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>one of my bull predictions last week was that he

1:11:28.200 --> 1:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>has forty homer So I don't think he will, but

1:11:29.640 --> 1:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I think he could. James would I could see falling

1:11:32.120 --> 1:11:33.559
<v Speaker 1>out of the first. He's not falling out of the second,

1:11:33.560 --> 1:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>but I could see him falling out of the first.

1:11:36.200 --> 1:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Cal Raley if he slows down, I think people he

1:11:38.800 --> 1:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>won't be a top seven pick. But but yeah, some

1:11:42.880 --> 1:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of these guys could could move around a bit.

1:11:44.360 --> 1:11:47.000
<v Speaker 2>I think the top three. Is even if he is

1:11:47.000 --> 1:11:48.280
<v Speaker 2>the easiest part of this whole draft.

1:11:48.640 --> 1:11:51.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, even if cal Raley falls off, think about going

1:11:51.720 --> 1:11:53.519
<v Speaker 3>into second going into next year, he's going to be

1:11:53.560 --> 1:11:55.880
<v Speaker 3>a catcher with a good average, forty home rounds and

1:11:55.920 --> 1:11:57.840
<v Speaker 3>some stolen bases. Like someone's going to take that in

1:11:57.920 --> 1:11:59.800
<v Speaker 3>the first round just because they want to be done

1:11:59.840 --> 1:12:01.320
<v Speaker 3>with and don't have to worry about it anymore.

1:12:01.720 --> 1:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>And they're you know, maybe not wrong about that. You know,

1:12:04.560 --> 1:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it's that's a totally viable thing. Is he's twenty eight

1:12:08.200 --> 1:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>this year, so it's not like he's like young young,

1:12:10.240 --> 1:12:11.519
<v Speaker 1>but he's not old either. He's not one of these

1:12:11.560 --> 1:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>guys in his thirties that you would expect to see

1:12:13.880 --> 1:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>fall off. But I think we'll just be expecting general

1:12:16.040 --> 1:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>statistical regression, right, Like it's just gonna be hard to

1:12:18.280 --> 1:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>repeat it. All.

1:12:20.320 --> 1:12:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Right, let's get into our two start pitcher competition quickly,

1:12:22.280 --> 1:12:25.679
<v Speaker 2>because we went pretty long on this. It's currently tied.

1:12:25.800 --> 1:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>That includes the home run derby win for you, so

1:12:29.240 --> 1:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>it's six six and then we had one week that

1:12:31.479 --> 1:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>was a tie, so we've each won six and then

1:12:33.640 --> 1:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>there is the tie in there and that, by the way,

1:12:37.439 --> 1:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I very easily gave myself the win. For the last

1:12:39.960 --> 1:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>full week, we had Christopher Sanchez thirty three Fantasy points,

1:12:43.120 --> 1:12:46.519
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Brown just two for you against Cleveland and Texas.

1:12:47.080 --> 1:12:49.120
<v Speaker 2>This week's really true second round pick Hunter Brown.

1:12:49.240 --> 1:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So what we decided to do for this week

1:12:51.080 --> 1:12:54.680
<v Speaker 1>because obviously, like rotations aren't totally set yet as of

1:12:54.720 --> 1:12:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Thursday morning when we're recording this, and it's a weird

1:12:58.680 --> 1:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>week where it's we have this weekend subpcoming weeks. So

1:13:00.680 --> 1:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>what we're doing is Mayor and I have each picked

1:13:03.280 --> 1:13:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a each picked a pitcher that is has been announced

1:13:07.120 --> 1:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to be pitching this weekend, so we can be reasonably

1:13:10.439 --> 1:13:14.479
<v Speaker 1>confident they are getting two starts, including this weekend and

1:13:14.520 --> 1:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>then all of next week. So rather than try to

1:13:16.760 --> 1:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>play this game where we try to guess because like

1:13:19.000 --> 1:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>some teams want to give their best pictures like a

1:13:20.960 --> 1:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit of extra rest, it's just sorry to tell

1:13:22.760 --> 1:13:25.519
<v Speaker 1>what direction it's going. So pictures that are announced to

1:13:25.520 --> 1:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>pitch this weekend, we are assuming we'll get this weekend

1:13:27.920 --> 1:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and then at least one more start in this upcoming week,

1:13:30.000 --> 1:13:32.839
<v Speaker 1>and therefore we will be two starts between now next Sunday.

1:13:33.000 --> 1:13:34.680
<v Speaker 2>That will be our approach with it. There was not.

1:13:34.680 --> 1:13:37.519
<v Speaker 1>A super long list as of the time we're recording this,

1:13:37.520 --> 1:13:39.639
<v Speaker 1>some guys that have even been confirmed to pitch this weekend,

1:13:40.080 --> 1:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>so it might sound like worse pictures than you know,

1:13:42.280 --> 1:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>we usually trying. We usually have some aces in here,

1:13:44.920 --> 1:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>but the guys that were announced we either had already

1:13:47.200 --> 1:13:48.679
<v Speaker 1>used or we're not very good.

1:13:49.120 --> 1:13:51.320
<v Speaker 2>So my pick is Nick Pavetta.

1:13:51.439 --> 1:13:54.639
<v Speaker 1>He gets Washington and then we think the Mets next week,

1:13:54.960 --> 1:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>so one really good matchup in there. Mets have been

1:13:57.720 --> 1:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>up and down that has been good this year. I

1:14:00.080 --> 1:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>remember we had the guy predict he was going to

1:14:01.800 --> 1:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>lead the league in strikeouts before the season. That was

1:14:04.240 --> 1:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>one of our commenters bold predictions. So so yeah, I'll

1:14:07.320 --> 1:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>go with Paveta.

1:14:09.840 --> 1:14:11.840
<v Speaker 3>And I'm going to go and just to you know,

1:14:11.920 --> 1:14:15.519
<v Speaker 3>further cement your point. Looking at the announced schedule for

1:14:15.560 --> 1:14:18.040
<v Speaker 3>this weekend, less than fifty percent of pitchers have been announced,

1:14:18.080 --> 1:14:21.200
<v Speaker 3>so there's a lot of TVD and undecided on the schedule.

1:14:21.760 --> 1:14:25.920
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going with Nathan Valdi, who is lining up

1:14:25.960 --> 1:14:28.320
<v Speaker 3>this weekend to pitch against the Tigers, and then he

1:14:28.400 --> 1:14:31.040
<v Speaker 3>should line up to face the Braves in his next start.

1:14:31.120 --> 1:14:34.280
<v Speaker 3>So not the easiest of matchups. But the Braves are

1:14:34.360 --> 1:14:36.920
<v Speaker 3>down and they will be without Austin Riley, So I'm

1:14:36.920 --> 1:14:37.880
<v Speaker 3>going with Nathan Ivaldi.

1:14:38.040 --> 1:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, Paveta versus Evaldi. I'm on a real winning

1:14:41.880 --> 1:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>streak here. By the way, you have not won a

1:14:44.320 --> 1:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>outside the home run derby version of it. You have

1:14:46.080 --> 1:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>not run a two start pitcher week since Week eight.

1:14:49.080 --> 1:14:51.639
<v Speaker 1>I won in nine. We didn't have Week ten because

1:14:51.840 --> 1:14:55.759
<v Speaker 1>both pitchers always started one game. Week eleven was our tie.

1:14:56.000 --> 1:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I won a week twelve. I won a week thirteen.

1:14:58.160 --> 1:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>So we were on a little worm run here, but

1:15:02.520 --> 1:15:03.639
<v Speaker 1>broken up by the Homer derby.

1:15:03.640 --> 1:15:06.080
<v Speaker 4>Some we'll see I had one four out of five

1:15:06.320 --> 1:15:07.000
<v Speaker 4>heading into that.

1:15:07.560 --> 1:15:09.960
<v Speaker 2>It's a game of runs, like like basketball.

1:15:10.080 --> 1:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>So all right, we'll go ahead and wrap up there.

1:15:12.479 --> 1:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate everybody tuning in for the episode. Let us

1:15:15.160 --> 1:15:17.519
<v Speaker 1>know what picks you would have made in different spots

1:15:17.560 --> 1:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in that two round mock draft. If you would have

1:15:19.160 --> 1:15:20.519
<v Speaker 1>taken a guy earlier or lower.

1:15:20.720 --> 1:15:22.599
<v Speaker 2>Let us know who didn't get drafted that should have been.

1:15:22.680 --> 1:15:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Who we you know, we might have just forgotten. It's

1:15:25.040 --> 1:15:25.759
<v Speaker 2>totally possible.

1:15:25.960 --> 1:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, I wanted to do this shooting from

1:15:28.120 --> 1:15:31.599
<v Speaker 1>the hip rather than strictly, like you know, laying out

1:15:31.640 --> 1:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a big board, so maybe I overlook somebody let us know.

1:15:33.640 --> 1:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>If we did be able go ahead and wrap up there.

1:15:35.880 --> 1:15:38.519
<v Speaker 1>We'll get back to our usual three part episode next week.

1:15:38.960 --> 1:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>It would be myself and Mayor through the end of July,

1:15:41.520 --> 1:15:45.519
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll be having I believe Kelly stepping in

1:15:45.560 --> 1:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>for me in August, so a couple more weeks left

1:15:47.920 --> 1:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of the dynamic duo. Here for Mayor, I'm Ryan Warmlan.

1:15:51.000 --> 1:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for tuning in. We'll see you next time. Thanks

1:15:53.120 --> 1:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast.

1:15:56.280 --> 1:15:58.679
<v Speaker 2>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

1:15:58.720 --> 1:15:59.080
<v Speaker 2>us is by

1:15:59.160 --> 1:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify, Follow

1:16:03.000 --> 1:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at Fantasy Pros, and

1:16:06.439 --> 1:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com slash

1:16:09.360 --> 1:16:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros MLB