WEBVTT - AI Chipmaker Cerebras Seeks $4.8 Billion in Upsized IPO

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is a

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:16.440
<v Speaker 1>live from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>York and v Lovelow in San Francisco.

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech Coming up. Cerebris is now seeking

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>to raise as much as four point eight billion dollars

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 2>in its IPO upsizing, a listing that could be the

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:31.639
<v Speaker 2>biggest so far this year.

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Plus.

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 4>We speak with the Circle CEO, Jeremy Elaire about the

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 4>company posts in fours quarter revenue beat and shares this

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 4>vision of an agent.

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Led feature and Google researchers say they have uncovered the

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 2>first ever zero day attack built by artificial intelligence.

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 4>Will have the details we will, but first we check

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 4>in on these markets that just relentlessly push higher. We're

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 4>currently seeing the NASDAK one hundred up a tenth per percent.

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 4>We are on track for another record on the NASACK

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 4>one hundred. We're seing some tentative moves in the broader benchmarks. Look,

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 4>we are worried about what's happening the straight toward moves.

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:08.320
<v Speaker 4>We're worrying about where the conflict continues between Iran and

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 4>the United States. We're worrying about peace talks, but more broadly,

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 4>tech wants to go higher, and it is fueled to

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 4>with potential seven weeks of gains ED, that'll be the

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 4>longest winning street in the last that one hundred since

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 4>October twenty twenty four ED.

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay. The exuberance FAI is also hitting the eight IPO market.

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 2>AI chip maker and data center operator Cerebrius is boosting

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 2>the number of shares it plans to sell and their price.

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Now it's not going to raise as much as four

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 2>point eight billion dollars, one third more than it previously

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 2>aimed for. Bloomberg Air reporter Rebecca Torrance joins US, we've

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 2>got confirmation now at what Bloomberg had already been reporting.

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 2>So it's funny thing to say the biggest IPO potentially

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 2>so far this year, just like with SpaceX waiting in

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 2>the wings later in the year. But there's a lot

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 2>of interest here. Big over subscription.

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 5>Massive subscription ED.

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 3>We reported on Friday that the IPO was more than

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 3>twenty times subscribed and expected this price range bump coming.

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 3>The previous price range was one hundred and fifteen to

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and twenty five dollars per share, and now

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 3>it's up to one hundred and fifty to one hundred

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 3>and sixty dollars per share at the top end, that

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 3>will value Cerebrace at over thirty four billion dollars. That

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.079
<v Speaker 3>is making it the biggest IPOs so far this year

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 3>by a long shot, and a clear demonstration of the

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 3>insatiable demand for AI compute and AI infrastructure.

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 4>And insatiuable demand for stocks. They're related to them in

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 4>some way. I mean, it's got to be music to

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 4>the bankers, is the CEOs is when we have record

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 4>high after record high and a lot of it being

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 4>galvanized by the AI trade. More broadly, are there any

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 4>nerves coming through from retail investors institutional investors as to

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 4>the issues that Cerebras has to make sure that market

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 4>share can be a win and that supply chains on

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 4>an issue.

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 3>I would say less nerves than just pure unfeedtered excitement.

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there has been so much build up in

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 3>the IPO market, so much demand for new listings over

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 3>the past few years. You know, we really haven't seen

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 3>that many, and so far this year Cerebris has clinched

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 3>partnerships with Amazon and open Ai sort of prove out that,

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, the demand is real and it's going to

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 3>translate into real capital and that is being reflected in

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 3>the demand that we're seeing for its IPO.

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Rebecca just quickly run us through the mechanics of the week.

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 2>We think this is expected to price May thirteenth, right.

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.239
<v Speaker 3>That's correct on Wednesday afternoon, and we would expect shares

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 3>to begin training on Thursday.

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 2>We be invoked Rebecca Torrance, Top Top Reporting. Thank you

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 2>very much. Let's discuss what this means for broader tech

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 2>markets with Carosh Life Cheap market strategist at Demo Wealth Management.

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 2>So we're in this really interesting moment, right Caroline said

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 2>it at the top six straight weeks of gains on

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 2>the Nasdaq one hundred. I feel like the next phase

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:46.119
<v Speaker 2>is like this pre IPO anticipation you know, Cerebris, yes,

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX June. How does that impact a market at the

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 2>index level, that anticipation, Well, I.

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 6>Think the anticipation does keep a lot of ours obviously

0:03:56.440 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 6>focused not just on AI but on the broader And

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 6>it's interesting because on the one hand, yes, markets have

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 6>gone up, but so two have earnings. We've just come

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 6>through an earning season, We're almost towards.

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 5>The end of it.

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 6>When you've got top and bottom line growing double digits,

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 6>not just among tech, but that anticipation is there. We'll

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 6>see if we get several trillion dollars sized deals later

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 6>this year, what the investment appetite is in how much

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 6>can be absorbed because, unlike your former commentator, we do

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 6>have some nervous clients because on the one hand, they

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 6>don't want to get off the bus. On the other hand,

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 6>they're scratching their heads about how can markets be at

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 6>all time highs when you've got all these concerning short

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 6>term headlines which you just.

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 4>Mentioned, Carol, Can we not have two things being correct

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 4>at the same time. Yes, there are short term issues. Yes,

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 4>all is an issue, and in some ways for chips,

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 4>helium and other things that pass me the straight upwall

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 4>moves are an issue. But longer term, the drive towards

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 4>AI infrastructure is only a supply side issue rather than demand.

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 6>Yep, exactly, and that's exactly what we've been writing to

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 6>our clients. I wrote a piece last Friday talking about

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 6>a brave new world and just laying out the case

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.799
<v Speaker 6>or this next phase that we're in because the orders

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 6>of magnitude that we're talking about investing in capital infrastructure

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 6>that tends to tee you up for very good performance

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 6>from productivity standpoint from GDP, and we're seeing it start

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 6>to creep in the numbers because it's not like the

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 6>markets are just floating up without earnings and revenue and

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 6>margin support. And you're seeing very well managed tech companies

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 6>that are paying a lot of attention to their margin

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 6>management and the way they're managing their people and their

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 6>costs and their inputs. And you're exactly right that it's

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 6>capacity constraint. It's not like we're going to have dark

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 6>data centers other than the fact that if you can't

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 6>get energy to turn them on.

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 4>Well said, that is the bottleneck that many are focusing

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 4>it on. So why everyone's turning towards nuclear, It's why

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 4>we look at Constellation Energies earnings and we'll be diving

0:05:58.520 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 4>into them in.

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 5>But a moment. But there's this great report out of

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 5>Blue meg Intelligence.

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 4>At the moment, AI is swallowing the world, everything else

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 4>is just holding on. Is that the sense you get

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 4>from clients at the moment, Carol, Because this isn't just

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 4>a US trade And boy have we seen qualcom Micron

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 4>other of the chip sectors up today and the socks

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 4>has been extraordinary. But think of the moves skh INEX

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 4>of Samsung, but still earnings potential for those companies means

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 4>that even though we've seen hundreds of percentage points added

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 4>in terms of their share price, the pe ratios are

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 4>actually coming down because people think earnings are going to

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 4>rise even faster.

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 6>That's exactly it. And the markets are telling you underneath

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 6>the surface too that even with all of the issues

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 6>going on in the Strait of hormones and the fact

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 6>that the bulk of that oil goes to South Southeast Asia,

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 6>those stocks are railing anyway because they're telling you this

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 6>is a lot bigger. And one of the phrases we

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 6>had used in last week's piece was.

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 2>How about yeah.

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 6>I mean, it's like we're all grabbing the tiger by

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 6>the tail and just hanging on for the ride. But

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 6>it's got fundamental underpinnings to it, and it touches so

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:03.479
<v Speaker 6>many other places and take you know, I spent the

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 6>weekend talking to grandkids about how exciting space is and

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 6>lots of things going there. There's so many things we

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 6>haven't even started to explore.

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm changing my mind. I just asked Marguerite in the

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 2>control rooms bring back that research, but you brought up space,

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 2>so I'm going to pivot right. The point of that

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 2>research is that the entire market in terms of profit

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 2>group has held up by a very small number of companies. Yes,

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 2>they're around the world AI infrastructure related. SpaceX is trying

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.239
<v Speaker 2>to sell that story as well. Right with its IPO.

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 2>The vision the bankers are putting out on the road

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 2>show is orbital Data center. How easy is that for

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 2>you to translate to clients, Carol? Is that believable for

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 2>the biggest IPO of all time?

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 6>Well, the IPO side the whole when you take the

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 6>Artemis mission on what was going on there, and the

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 6>fact that actually when you look at earnings, it's not

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 6>just a handful of companies because Reverent we had double

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 6>digit revenue growth. I pulled the numbers from Bloomberg this morning,

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 6>and you have double digit revenue and bottom and earnings

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 6>growth in eight out of eleven sectors. So this is

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 6>pretty broad spread and there's a lot of companies playing

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 6>into it. But space, I mean, clients love to talk

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 6>about space. The Artemis Mischig kind of shoved aside because

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 6>it coincided with increased hostility in the Middle East, so

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 6>it got pulled short term. But this is definitely a

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 6>market that wants to lean into that long term story

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 6>and investors are all about it.

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Carol. Earlier you talked about riding the bus, and if

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 2>we stick with that analogy, if you are an investor

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 2>and you know that the biggest IPO of all times

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 2>happening in a month's time, do you put yourself into

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 2>cash or do some kind of rejiggering in order to

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 2>be able to participate in that IPO.

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 6>Well, we don't necessarily go chasing down IPOs anymore than

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:01.599
<v Speaker 6>I did managing money for clients in the nineties IPOs

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 6>per se. But strategic rebalancing is something we do all along,

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 6>and trimming some of your lousers or some of the winners,

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 6>if you will, trimming some of the gains that you've

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 6>made there to make sure that the portfolio stays balanced. Intermediate,

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 6>longer term is where you want to be. We've been

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 6>growth biased all along this, you know, starting before last year,

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 6>we never bought into the recession fears in twenty two.

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 6>We didn't think that tariffs were going to throw things

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 6>substantially off last year, although our companies are learning to

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 6>adapt and this year too, we think it makes sense

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 6>to trim some of the winners. Look at other industries,

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 6>look at those second third tier knock on industries. We

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 6>touched on energy, we touched on space. There'll be substantial

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 6>rebuilding or reconstruction. If you think once we settle some

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 6>of these the conflicts Russia, Ukraine, Middle East, you're talking

0:09:56.040 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 6>about substantial rebuilding. You're also talking about companies rethinking supply

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 6>chains and where they get done and solidifying. So you're

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:08.599
<v Speaker 6>talking about a massive infrastructure build or teeing up for

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 6>that has many years to run.

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 4>Carol, I want to go to the rethinking of supply

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 4>chains because for many years people have been rethinking their

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 4>dependence on China. Maybe that starts to get more clarity.

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 4>This week, we understand that President Trump, of course is

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 4>going for that meeting with President she over in China,

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 4>and it's taking a whole host of CEOs with him.

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 4>Tim Cook of Apple a musk of course talking of SpaceX,

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 4>but a moment ago mic on the chip sector, Qualcom,

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 4>but also there are some sprinkling of banks and other areas. Carol,

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 4>does this meeting mean something to your clients.

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 6>Briefly, we definitely think we've been watching this geopolitical pivot

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 6>in the geoeconomic pivot for the last year and a

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 6>half or so, and it's been clear from the beginning

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 6>that you've got two major players in terms of the

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:56.559
<v Speaker 6>US and China. China was the only primary country able

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 6>to push back on the US against the tariffs and

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 6>engage in even briefly in the trade war. But they've

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 6>got critical supply chain issues with rare earth. The US

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 6>has critical supply chain issues with energy and materials and

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 6>so and clearly they want to have a collaborative relationship

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.439
<v Speaker 6>where there's certain things that we want to manufacture here

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 6>and things China wants control over. But business deals are

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 6>what the administration is all about and hence bringing a

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 6>lot of those companies with But you've got a lot

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 6>of interesting interplay to watch here and how this thing

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 6>plays out.

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 4>Parash Life of female wealth Management.

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 5>Thank you, very cut and Dean for joining us today.

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:41.839
<v Speaker 4>No, we did just talk about how earnings are the

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.719
<v Speaker 4>name of the game. Constellation Energy is actually down by

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 4>four and a half percent. This is what a first

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 4>call to operating revenue that beat But they're facing pressure

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 4>from nuclear refueling outages. In particular, this is about execution.

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 4>A boy has admitted dependence on companies like this d

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 4>when we think about the future of data centers and

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 4>potentially with some sort of cleaner energy like nuclear.

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, coming up on the program, we're actually going to

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 2>go back to earnings. We speak with Circle CEO Jeremy

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Alaire after the stable corn platform posted a first quarter

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 2>revenue b and announces an agent led future. This is

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Tech.

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 4>Circle seeing shares up once again nine percent thereabouts on

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 4>the days. It's a twenty percent revenue surge in its

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 4>first quarter, but.

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 5>Net income that decline. The company is.

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 4>Saying that focus is moving to a future with autonomous

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 4>AI agents that transact in stable coins. Jenning us now

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 4>a Circle CEO, Jeremy Lair. There's a lot to get

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 4>to in your numbers. And what's so interesting is the

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 4>way in which you make an awful lot of your

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 4>profits is largely based.

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 5>On government and yields. Of course, with the.

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 4>Money that you sit upon, Jeremy, how you thinking about

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 4>that amount that you currently earned back and how you're

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:56.439
<v Speaker 4>diversifying the business.

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean, look when we went public last we

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.839
<v Speaker 7>talked a lot about we're building the world's largest stable

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 7>cooin network. We want that network to provide the highest

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.319
<v Speaker 7>utility form of digital dollar money in the world. Since then,

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 7>USDC has become the leading dollar digital currency in the world.

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 7>We reported in our earnings call according to third party data,

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 7>in Q one, we saw almost thirty trillion dollars of

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 7>transactions on chain, with USDC accounting for eighty percent of

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 7>the stablecoin transaction volume market.

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 2>And so we're seeing that happen.

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.719
<v Speaker 7>At the same time, we've been investing in building out

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 7>these platform pillars. Alongside our stablecoin business, our payments network

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 7>with CPN and ARC, our new economic OS, which is

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 7>really designed for the future of how transactions, how financial services,

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 7>and broader economic activity is going to be digitally and

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 7>software mediated.

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 2>That's obviously a place where.

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:54.199
<v Speaker 7>The emerging world of AI operating systems and agentic systems

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 7>are coming into play as well.

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 4>You invest today for fruits tomorrow. When are those fruits.

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:03.199
<v Speaker 7>Come, Jeremy, Well, you know we're seeing this. I mean,

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 7>we talked a little bit about this in our earnings call.

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 7>We've been investing for a couple of years to build ARC.

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 7>We announced this morning that we had pre sold two

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 7>hundred and twenty million dollars of ARC tokens, with a

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 7>sixteen Z crypto as a leader, but also major financial

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 7>companies Apollo, Black Rocks, Standard Chartered, Intercontinental Exchange, and many others.

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 7>And so we're building an infrastructure and we will begin

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 7>to monetize that infrastructure, and as we shared in our

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 7>earnings call, we'll have a lot more to say about

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 7>that on our next earnings call. But ARC is getting

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 7>ready for liftoff, and we're getting close to the main

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 7>net launch, and between the stake that Circle has in

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 7>the ARC network, the various types of programs that we're

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 7>going to be building with partners all around the world

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 7>on that, and then participating in validation, transaction fees, and

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 7>other services that we build on top of it, we

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 7>think that our represents a tremendous opportunity. So that's a

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 7>place there, and then our Payments Network CPN.

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Continues to grow.

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 7>Since we last reported, we saw the anualized volume go

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 7>up about seventy five percent.

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Jeremy, let's go back to reserve return rate. I don't

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 2>think we've got to an answer there. So essentially USDC

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:25.239
<v Speaker 2>circulation is growing strongly, and that boosts your overall revenue,

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 2>but your profit is pressured essentially when you have declining

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 2>reserve return rate essentially interests that you urge assets. Let

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 2>me just finish this one. That back the stable coin.

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 2>If that's the business model, you're at risk here when

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 2>we have a lower rate environment. So what's your plan.

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 2>We've seen the opposite.

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 7>So when the yields curve started coming in in December

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 7>twenty three and we saw almost all of the rate

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 7>cutting cycle get undertaken, we saw rates come down over

0:15:56.600 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 7>forty percent. During that same period, We've seen USDC and

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 7>circulation grow multiple hundreds of percent. We've seen transaction volumes

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 7>grow massively, and so a lower interest rates actually, at

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 7>the end of the day, create higher velocity money, create

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 7>more demand for money in the economy, and we believe

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 7>actually support that growth. And historically we've seen that. When

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 7>we think about that long term growth, when the Treasury

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 7>Secretary talks about trillions of dollars of stable coins in circulation,

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 7>or when you know new regulation like the Clarity Act

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 7>defines models for incentivizing stable cooin adoction based on utility,

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 7>those are emblematic of the fact that utility is what

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 7>is going to drive this growth, and so interest rates

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 7>are a factor, but fundamentally, it's utility, its network effects,

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 7>it's the number of apps, developers and others that drive it.

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 2>And on that front, we're.

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 7>Clearly winning, and we're showing that in the incredible traction

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 7>that we're seeing in terms of the adoption of this

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 7>as a transactional technology on the Internet.

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 2>That did get us the Answer Circle CEO Jeremy Alaire, great,

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 2>heavy back on the program, Thank you very much.

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 5>Care Yeah, it's time now for talking tech air.

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 4>First up, SoftBank is stepping up its push into AI infrastructure.

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 5>Fana Massiochi Sun is in.

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 4>Talks to unveil a major data center project in France

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 4>for President Emmanuel Macron in the coming weeks and now,

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:20.440
<v Speaker 4>according to sources, Son is considering a multi billion dollar

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 4>investment and at one point floated a figure as house

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 4>one hundred billion dollars. Meanwhile, SoftBank's mobile unit is expanding

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 4>into AI computing services and large scale battery production and

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:33.399
<v Speaker 4>mean to meet growing demand for the hardware powering artificial intelligence.

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 4>Plus Ripple's prime brokerage Union has secured two hundred million

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:39.679
<v Speaker 4>dollars in new financing from Newburger Berman to expand the

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 4>margin it offers clients training across traditional and digital markets.

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 4>The funds will boost its capacity to finance client trades.

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 5>The margin loans backed by Collateral.

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 4>And Alphabet is planning to issue Yen denominated bonds for

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:54.199
<v Speaker 4>the first time, a move that could help fund its

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 4>growing investment in new guest at Ai that the company

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 4>has already raised its capital spending outlook to as much

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:00.959
<v Speaker 4>as one hundred and nineteen billion dollars this year has

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 4>phapped other currencies beside the US dollar as it looks

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 4>to secure low cost funding.

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Open Ai will acquire a consulting company tomorrow to contribute

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 2>to a new private equity back joint venture. The goal

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 2>help drive adoption of its AI software across more businesses.

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 2>The new entity will be staffed with roughly one hundred

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 2>and fifty employees focused on deploying AI software Carrot Now.

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:29.159
<v Speaker 4>Companies like open ai are investing heavily in AI to

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 4>boost productivity, but a new consensus perhaps suggests that the

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 4>global workforce staring down some sort of displacement crisis. Joining

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 4>us now for really, how we are going to see

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 4>AI boost productivity or not. It's Stacy Fanox Smith has

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 4>got a great story out in BusinessWeek and it starts

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 4>with a bet between two key economists as to whether

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 4>productivity is actually going to go up and to the right,

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 4>are we seeing signs that AI is boosting productivity not

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 4>at the expense of me and labor.

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 8>We are seeing signs that AIS bosting productivity, but it

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 8>does seem to be coming potentially at the expense of jobs.

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 8>So it is a really good news bad news situation.

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 8>I think we just got productivity numbers out for the

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 8>first quarter of twenty twenty six. They came in quite

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 8>high two point nine percent year over year, which was

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:19.479
<v Speaker 8>higher than people expected. So that is evidence that that

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 8>robots are produced. Are you boosting our productivity? At the

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 8>same time, I think we've all been covering the job

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:30.639
<v Speaker 8>market and it's not great. So I think there's just

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 8>a lot of concern, and rightly so, that the AI

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 8>is displacing jobs.

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 2>It's so difficult to see clearly through the metric of productivity,

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:44.199
<v Speaker 2>like we've been growing two percent since twenty twenty Do

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 2>we know for certain that there's like a tangible AI

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:51.679
<v Speaker 2>contribution in each of those numbers. This is a great question.

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 8>It is so hard to know where the productivity is

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 8>coming from. So the bet that you referred to was

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 8>between two economists here in the US, Eric Brynolfson at

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 8>Stanford and Robert Gordon at Northwestern, and they bet on

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 8>productivity growing by an average of one point eight percent

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:12.640
<v Speaker 8>between twenty twenty and twenty thirty. It seems like it's

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:14.639
<v Speaker 8>going to beat that, but there are a lot of

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 8>questions as to why. When I was talking to Robert

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 8>Gordon about why productivity had grown so much, he thought

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 8>it was potentially layoffs. A lot of the layoffs that

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 8>we've been seeing has have boost to productivity because it's

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 8>a very simple equation. It's just the amount our economy

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 8>produces divided by ours worked. So the second you take

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 8>a bunch of workers out of the workforce, then that

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:39.679
<v Speaker 8>number can go up, even if it doesn't even if

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 8>it you know, our productivity isn't necessary, even if the

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 8>productivity isn't growing as fast as we.

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Hope Top Top Analysis, Thank you very much. In the

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 2>next thirty minutes or so, we are going to be

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 2>keeping our eyes on the court in Oakland where Microsoft

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 2>CEO Sacha Nadella is to take the stand in Elon

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Musk's lawsuit over the non profit status of open Ai.

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:08.439
<v Speaker 2>Remember that Musk is suing open ai and its two founders,

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Sam Altman, Greg Rockman and Sati and Adela Caro. It's

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:13.880
<v Speaker 2>a kind of a wow moment too.

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 4>It is whether at least a couple of hours that

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 4>he'll take to the stand understanding the intricacies of which

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 4>Microsoft first.

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 5>Came into open ai too. Back it.

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 4>Remember this is really the moment that Elon Musk takes

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.959
<v Speaker 4>issue with when because open a I would argue computer

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 4>capacity mentioned that they had to take outside financing. Was

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 4>that moment that maybe the idea of it being a

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 4>not for profit started to fall away?

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.360
<v Speaker 2>I would read the California brief from our Bloomberg law

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:41.119
<v Speaker 2>team where they basically point out so far there's no

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 2>smoking gun, email communication. It's just been about egos and

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 2>personalities Musk versus the others. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's take a look at today's big number, and that

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 2>is alphabet or Google's current market cap point seventy five trillion.

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:04.399
<v Speaker 2>Here's the thing. It had become a dominant player in

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 2>the AI space and was on the brink of overtaking

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 2>AI chip giant and Vidia potentially as the world's largest company.

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 2>I say, here's the problem. Actually, in this Monday session,

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Alphabet's down almost two percent in Nvidia is up three percent.

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 2>But the gap had been closing from Vidia, the world's

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 2>most valuable company around five point four trillion dollars market cap,

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Alphabet was heading toward the five trillion dollar club. Why

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 2>that's going to Bloombo's Ryan Blaseelica, who has more? That

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 2>was the story, and like, I'm not blaming you at all, Ryan,

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Timing is a funny thing, but the point is is

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 2>that Alphabet had had a lot of momentum recently and

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 2>that gap had been closing on Nvidia. Absolutely.

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 9>I think there is a growing appreciation that when you

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 9>look at any part of artificial intelligence, Alphabet is extremely

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 9>dominant in that area, if not the most dominant company.

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:59.120
<v Speaker 9>So we can talk about how strong Gemini is their

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 9>EI model, and talk about how growth at Google Cloud

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 9>is accelerating. We can talk about how AI seems to

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 9>be improving growth trends at Google Search, at YouTube. We

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 9>can talk about physical AI with their Waimo self driving

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 9>car company. We can talk about their TPU business, which

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 9>is their semiconductors, which they said they might start selling

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 9>around to other cloud companies. So that's a huge potential

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 9>revenue boost for them, and that is an area that

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:28.120
<v Speaker 9>is really getting into Nvidia's own territory. We wrote about

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 9>this about a week ago about how Nvidia might be

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 9>seeing increase competition in AI chips, and Alphabet is a

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 9>huge part of that, and so when you add all

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 9>of that together, it just seems like they are really

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 9>the company of the AI era.

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 4>The vertical integration has been something that the flywheel effects

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 4>come into play in earnings recently. What's amazing is even

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 4>with this rocket chip of a share price move and

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 4>this is still really positive on the stock and it's

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:55.919
<v Speaker 4>got zero cleratings eighteen buys.

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 5>I mean, could we see.

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 4>It start to move towards that price target of four thirty,

0:23:59.240 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 4>what would be the castle.

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 9>Well, we've just seen a real grind higher in the

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 9>share price for a while now. I think the latest

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:09.440
<v Speaker 9>result really just reinforced how strong they are on all

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 9>these different issues. And when I talk to portfolio managers

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.640
<v Speaker 9>and investors, they will say that even if we saw

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 9>something like open Ai come out with their latest model.

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 9>Let's say it's better than Jemini on you know, whatever

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 9>metrics you want to use. That really just speaks to

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 9>increased AI adoption overall, which is probably going to end

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 9>up being a tailwind for Google Cloud for the chips business.

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 9>It really seems like even if one leg of this

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 9>story starts to falter, the other ones are able to

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 9>kind of pick up the slack here. So it's a

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 9>very diverse sources of revenue. It's much less dependent on

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 9>one major business, like you might say of Nvidia.

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 2>We're just showing on the screen Ryan that you know,

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 2>alphabet shares over the past twelve months roun one hundred

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:52.919
<v Speaker 2>and sixty percent year to date twenty twenty six percent,

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 2>but beating the major indexes. You make the point through

0:24:56.640 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 2>the voice of the investor that it's completely logical Alphabets

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 2>take that tie to eventually, and lots of people for

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:06.719
<v Speaker 2>that reason see it as a good stock to own. Yeah, exactly.

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 9>And I will say about a year ago, there was

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 9>a lot of skepticism about what is AI competition going

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 9>to mean for Alphabet Is it going to reduce their

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 9>search market share? A lot of those fears. Not only

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:18.880
<v Speaker 9>have they not really come to pass, but they've really

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 9>shown you know, acceleration in growth, They've shown strength across

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 9>all these different markets and really just has set up them,

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 9>you know, just to be an incredibly strong stock. And

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:30.360
<v Speaker 9>even the multiple right now it's a little bit elevated

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:32.199
<v Speaker 9>for their own history. But it's not a sort of

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 9>dot Com price for perfection. Everything must go right, authorize

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 9>this thing is just going to collapse sort of thing.

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 9>It doesn't feel like that at all. People feel very

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.360
<v Speaker 9>optimistic that they can keep a lot of these momentum

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 9>going round.

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 4>For Selka, it's great to get you on the stock

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 4>that we're watching at the moment. And look, it's actually

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 4>Alphabet that we turn to next in a different capacity

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 4>because the worst case AI scenario the White House has

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 4>actually warned about it seems to already be in reality

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.439
<v Speaker 4>because Google researchers say they have uncovered the have a

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 4>zero day attack built by artificial intelligence joining us now

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 4>and the details is new most Margie Murphy, why is

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 4>this so concerning?

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so we have been on the show to talk

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 10>about the kind of mythos effect, and we know that

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:19.640
<v Speaker 10>the White House has been calling emergency meetings with tech

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 10>and industry leaders about concerns that AI tools that we

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:28.919
<v Speaker 10>have currently may be used to build these really you know,

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 10>explosive attacks against a lot of the software we use

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 10>and could have serious impacts on national security. And now

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 10>Google is saying, actually, we think that this is already

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 10>a reality. The threat that we thought we saw coming

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 10>along is actually here, and we have identified a prominent

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 10>criminal group who was working with an LM and was

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 10>able to find and exploit in a popular software tool.

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 10>Luckily Google kind of foiled it ahead of time and

0:26:57.440 --> 0:27:00.160
<v Speaker 10>let the software developer know, so they've issued a pat

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 10>But it just shows that the things we've been talking

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.120
<v Speaker 10>about and we've been concerned about in terms of AI

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 10>and security are a reality.

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Now zero day, I think, just help us out. I'm

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 2>learning so much through the reporting, but the basics of

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 2>what that is zero day vulnerability and the fact that

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 2>this is an artificial intelligence linked or discovered one please yeah.

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 10>So as zero day means that it's a flaw in

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 10>a piece of software that the developer didn't know about,

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 10>what nobody else knew about. So once it becomes apparent,

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:38.159
<v Speaker 10>once a hacker has you know, identified it they have

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 10>exactly zero days to fix that. So it's a big

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 10>concern because then you're always you're a step behind anyone

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 10>trying to get in and exploit it, to potentially get

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 10>into your customers systems. And in terms of AI being

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 10>able to generate that, it's all about the speed and

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 10>this race between the defenders and the attackers. So if

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 10>an AI like LLLM is able to scan and find

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:06.160
<v Speaker 10>these zero days, these previously unknown flaws in a lot

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.639
<v Speaker 10>of the software we use, it means that we're going

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 10>to quickly see a lot of exploits and potentially these

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 10>could be further down the line, potentially a load of

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 10>hacks that otherwise, you know, would have been more trickier

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 10>for these kind of criminal actors or espionage actors to

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:25.919
<v Speaker 10>have conducted.

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 4>Now, remind us what the spokespeople you've been talking to

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 4>have said about who's to blame, which LLLM was behind it,

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 4>and more broadly, sort of whether or not there was Mythos,

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 4>because there's an argument against that, right, so Google's.

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 10>Been very clear that it isn't. They don't believe it's Mythos,

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 10>they don't believe it's Gemini, which is its own LLM. However,

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 10>they're keeping the name of the LLM they believe was

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 10>used under wraps. They're saying to protect their sources because

0:28:56.840 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 10>they have kind of intelligence which suggests who's you using what,

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 10>And frustratingly, we're not also going to hear about the

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 10>software that was developed or the criminal group that they've

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 10>been tracking either. So that kind of makes a little

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 10>bit more of a challenging for figuring out. But I

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 10>think the broader story here is it doesn't matter which

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 10>l element was. It's the fact that there's lms that

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 10>are available right now for people to use that are

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 10>being abused in this way.

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Margie Murphy, thank you very much. Now coming up,

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 2>we're going to be joined by Dan Wagner from Resolve

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 2>ai is. The company's making a bid for Commerce dot Com.

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Details next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 4>Resolve ai in designs tools for digital shopping customer engagement,

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 4>a lot of AI within it. It's also making a

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 4>hostile bid for Commerce dot Com. Now. The board rejected

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 4>an earlier offer and called the new proposal of one

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 4>Resolve share for every two shares a commers dot Com.

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 5>Even less favorable.

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 4>Resolveoiceo Dan Magnet is here to talk about the Igenticai opportunity,

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 4>along with I hope a discussion about why m Anda

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 4>would make sense for your business at this moment.

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 5>So let's start with the m and a why want

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 5>to become bigger?

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:19.479
<v Speaker 4>What are the opportunities to lean in as a resolve

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 4>plus commers dot com business?

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 11>Well, so I think first of all, you've got to

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 11>frame it within the context of our growth. So we're

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 11>seeing fantastic growth in our business, you know, extraordinary momentum.

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 11>We went from nothing to two hundred and thirty two

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 11>million of contracted annual revenue in one year. We did

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:40.719
<v Speaker 11>sixty million in the first quarter and revenue versus the

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 11>whole year last year forty six million. So we're growing

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 11>at an incredible rate. And in this space when you

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 11>have the best product in the vertical that we're operating in,

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 11>which is commerce and retail, it's very important. Having been

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 11>building tech businesses over many decades, although you couldn't possibly

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 11>tell you called arena that the most important thing is

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 11>kind of land grab right, we have to move quickly

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 11>to consolidate our position as a leader. Now we're doing

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 11>that anyway organically, but if we were to acquire commerce

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 11>dot com, which is a stock that's really a business

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 11>that's really kind of stuck and needs us to unlock it,

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 11>unlock the value. You know, we uh, you know, we

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 11>immediately give ourselves a greater presence and we will continue

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 11>to do deals like that when they're available at good

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 11>value to increase our market position.

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:37.239
<v Speaker 4>So what would be unlocked with a commerce dot com

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 4>is like the companies, they already work with the client

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 4>base that they have, and you unlock it with this

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 4>future of agenda. Ki, Look, let's just talk about the

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 4>agentic commerce offering because you're even a little bit in

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 4>the world of crypto, and we've just had Jeremy Alair

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 4>of Circle on and he thinks his business and stable

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:55.719
<v Speaker 4>coins are the future of agentic commerce, is right?

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 10>Do you?

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 5>How are you the rails rather than a circle for example?

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 11>So circle is a is a is a coin is

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 11>a token, but you need that token to be sitting

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 11>on some sort of infrastructure to allow it to be

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 11>used in everyday commerce. So, for example, if you went

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 11>to Starbucks today, you're not going to use stable coins

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 11>to buy your coffee. We're going to facilitate that change

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 11>with Resolve pay so that the retailers and the brands

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 11>can take stable coins in the same efficient way for

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 11>a consumer as credit cards and other forms of payment,

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 11>because crypto as we know it today is a frustrating

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 11>and clunky experience, and we're changing that with a resolve

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 11>pay so that it's as good, if not better, an

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 11>experience as what you're used to.

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Often sometimes M and A is strategic, right, and so

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 2>commerce dot com is sixty thousand merchants. Would you say, Dan,

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 2>that's the strategic value of it, and if so, you

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 2>boost your offer. You'd be willing to pay more of

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 2>a premium to realize that strategic asset.

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 11>So, yes, a sixty thousand merchant base that's frustrated with

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 11>them because there's been lack of innovation. I mean, they're

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 11>forecasting growth of one and a half percent in the

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 11>next twelve months. I mean, you can't even imagine such

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 11>a sort of embarrassing growth rate for a business in commerce.

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 11>One and a half percent is just it was ridiculous.

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 11>You know, we're growing conversely seven hundred and fifty percent

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 11>year on year, seven hundred and fifty percent. So you've

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 11>got a company where it is at the moment which

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 11>is not really innovating. It has a large footprint that's

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 11>historically been gained over you know, over a decade of

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 11>providing services, but it's kind of lost and it needs

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 11>us to come and inject value and enthusiasm and innovation

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 11>into that customer base to energize them. Now, do we

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 11>need them, No, we don't, because, as I've just told you,

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 11>we're growing seven to fifty percent year on year, and

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 11>we've got all this momentum and everything else. But if

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 11>we were to buy them, we could unlock that value

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 11>and grow that element of the business much faster than

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 11>it is today. In answer to your question, yes, I

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:11.839
<v Speaker 11>think we're open to being more more generous with a deal,

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 11>but you know, the board rejected us, and then they

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:15.800
<v Speaker 11>put in a poison pill. And I really can't be

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:18.399
<v Speaker 11>bothered with a board that is so locked in its

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 11>own protection that they can't see the benefit of a

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 11>combination with us. We should have, you know, any sensible

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 11>board should be having a proper conversation with us to

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:31.320
<v Speaker 11>try to extract the best value for their shareholders. And

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 11>you know fully embrace this opportunity.

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 2>What about the competition and risks?

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 1>To you?

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 2>I've enjoyed reading about Resolve and trying to understand the

0:34:41.040 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 2>story right, and it's whoever controls the agent layer wins

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:47.760
<v Speaker 2>in commerce. And a very reasonable question that the Bloomberg

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 2>Tech audience ouppose is why doesn't an Amazon or an

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:54.279
<v Speaker 2>alphabet or Google or even open ai just do what

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 2>you do and then come come you.

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 11>I mean they've tried, some of them have tried. So

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 11>open a I did a deal with Walmart. You was

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:04.879
<v Speaker 11>very highly publicized about five and a half months ago.

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 11>That was disbanded about two or three weeks ago. And

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 11>the reason it was disbanded was it started making these

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 11>terrible mistakes, which is what we call hallucinations. Jerity of

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 11>AI is uses probabilistic algorithms, you know, mathematical algorithms that

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 11>algorithms that guess words and the next word and the

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 11>next word in a sentence to create a paragraph and

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:28.799
<v Speaker 11>to create an answer. And when you're guessing things, there

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 11>is an element of error. And we knew this from

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:33.320
<v Speaker 11>the very outset because of my background in search and

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 11>you know, for decades and being involved in some of

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 11>the major innovations in search technology in the nineties and

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:42.279
<v Speaker 11>the early noughties. So We knew that this would happen,

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 11>so we spent the last ten years preventing hallucinations. That's

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:49.759
<v Speaker 11>really our primary position, and of course we did it

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 11>with the very clear vision of providing that technology to

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 11>represent digital platforms as the best salesman on the planet,

0:35:56.719 --> 0:35:58.800
<v Speaker 11>you know, interacting with customers. But you can't have the

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 11>best salesman on the planet who's hallucinating, you know, who's

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 11>saying the wrong things, making mistakes. Then you end up

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 11>with returns, you know, the misled customers buying the wrong

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 11>products and so on. So we believe, and Microsoft and

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 11>Google have endorsed that that belief that we have the

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:19.240
<v Speaker 11>only technology that in this vertical that is reliable for merchants.

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 11>They don't have to worry in deploying our technology that

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:25.959
<v Speaker 11>their representative generative AI representative is going to be selling

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 11>the wrong things, making mistakes, misleading customers, and worse, insulting people.

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:34.799
<v Speaker 2>Dan Wagner, CEO of Resolve AI, thank you very much

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 2>for your time on Bloomberg Tech. Now coming up, Apple

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 2>looks to refine its Mac Os designer and a few

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 2>new features. We have more on the reporting next. This

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg Tech Breaking news on the Bloomberg terminal. President

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump says the US Iran ceasefire is in a

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:00.880
<v Speaker 2>weak state and on life support. It was in response

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:03.919
<v Speaker 2>to a question post by journalists. He's speaking the Oval

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:06.359
<v Speaker 2>Office in the White House. It was an event about

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 2>maternal healthcare. But then taking reporter questions, he'd earlier said

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:11.919
<v Speaker 2>that he was going to meet with a large group

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 2>of generals for an update about Iran. But that's the

0:37:14.719 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 2>headline US around ceasefire is in a weak state, says

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 2>President Trump, on life support. And what we saw is

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 2>oil nudge Hire Brent. The global benchmark back above one

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:26.239
<v Speaker 2>hundred and four dollars a barrel. Keep with it, Carra.

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 4>We will now let's turn around attention to Apple. It's

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:32.839
<v Speaker 4>planning a slight redesign to its upcoming mac OS twenty seven.

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:35.239
<v Speaker 4>That's according to sources, it aims to smooth out some

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 4>of the visual quirks introduced by mac OS twenty six Tahoe,

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:42.800
<v Speaker 4>particularly around shadows and transparency tied to its liquid glass interface.

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 4>Man behind that story, of course, is Blueberg's Apple and

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 4>consumer tech reporter Mark German, an editor and team leader.

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:52.479
<v Speaker 4>I'm interested Mark on the liquid glass issue in many ways.

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 4>It's what because the deployment is meant for slightly more

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:57.919
<v Speaker 4>cutting edge technology versus the Mac.

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:01.880
<v Speaker 12>Yes, so that's rolled out their new liquid glass interface.

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 12>I quite like it on the iPhone and the iPad.

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:06.920
<v Speaker 12>It looks good with the OLED displays of the newer devices,

0:38:07.000 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 12>but it doesn't look so hot on the Mac. Part

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:12.360
<v Speaker 12>of the reason is that it uses older LCD technology.

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 12>Apple's not moving to OLED until the new Mac pros hit,

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 12>probably at the tail end of this year or early

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 12>next year. So they're making some tweaks to Mac Os

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:24.839
<v Speaker 12>with the twenty seven release being announced on June eighth

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 12>at WWDC, cleaning up some of the transparency, some of

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 12>the icons and the shadows that have made Tahoe a

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 12>bit controversial.

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:35.279
<v Speaker 2>Controversial, So I find that interesting. We've spent so much

0:38:35.360 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 2>time talking with you about Apple Intelligence, Siri and iOS

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 2>and the cadence of update and how it's getting better,

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 2>less about mac Os. You know, I'm a Mac user.

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:47.080
<v Speaker 2>I believe you are too. Why are you saying it's

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:50.799
<v Speaker 2>controversial that the rollout in development and macOS generations?

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 12>Oh yeah, macOS Taco has been a huge, hugely controversial

0:38:55.760 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 12>on Reddit among developers, among some consumers among technofiles and

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:02.759
<v Speaker 12>what have you. People just don't like the way the

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 12>lookquid glass interface and the new icons look.

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:07.279
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's a catastrophe.

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 12>I don't think it's that big of a deal, but

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:12.040
<v Speaker 12>certainly it's a step below the implementation on the iPhone

0:39:12.080 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 12>and the iPad.

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 2>The most Mark German, who leads our coverage consumer tech

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:18.200
<v Speaker 2>and the author of power on Thank you. At the

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 2>same time, Apple's Macmini has emerged as a go to

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 2>machine for running standalone AI agents. Its ability to operate

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 2>around the clock at low electricity costs fueled a surge

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 2>in demand for more. Bloomberg's Austin car has the BusinessWeek

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 2>story this is in the culture, like this is everywhere.

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 2>People put together clusters of Mac mini's, and that is

0:39:41.040 --> 0:39:43.880
<v Speaker 2>their compute to do all things in AI and inference.

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Just give us the top line of the BusinessWeek article

0:39:46.480 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 2>that you wrote.

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:49.880
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I mean this is a big trend right now,

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 13>starting your own AI agents at home. Instead of flinging

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 13>off every request to some far flung data center or

0:39:57.000 --> 0:39:59.919
<v Speaker 13>cloud server, you could have your own personal AI super

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.719
<v Speaker 13>computer essentially in your living room. You're seeing a lot

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 13>of people by mac Minie's their higher end cousin, the

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:10.520
<v Speaker 13>Max Studio install agents frameworks like Openclaw to sort of

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 13>have this twenty four to seven personal AI concierge that

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 13>you can interact with on any messaging app. It's pretty

0:40:17.200 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 13>wild to see this trend take off and be a

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:21.800
<v Speaker 13>rare bright spot for AI. When it comes to Apple,

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 13>which didn't really foresee this trend, it just sort of

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 13>took off that this hardware was really really good for

0:40:26.360 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 13>local AI.

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 4>Computing, open claw life, and it's a global phenomenon. And

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 4>I think we even sort of heard about the supply

0:40:33.760 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 4>chain surprise coming Apple's way, but i've I mean we

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:39.960
<v Speaker 4>saw a stock of say a Raspberry Pie go up

0:40:40.040 --> 0:40:41.799
<v Speaker 4>into the right over in the UK as people thought

0:40:41.840 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 4>the other types of hardware would be useful for this Austin.

0:40:44.680 --> 0:40:47.160
<v Speaker 5>Has Apple really been ended up the only game in town?

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Not?

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:50.359
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it remains to be seen.

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 13>I think a lot of the hardware makers are chasing

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 13>this future right now where the hardware is being tailored

0:40:56.560 --> 0:41:00.560
<v Speaker 13>to merge some of the graphics processing and TPUs that

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:04.480
<v Speaker 13>were historically doing that processing separate. They're now merged into

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:07.719
<v Speaker 13>a unified architecture on Apple devices, which is really good

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:11.320
<v Speaker 13>for AI processing and has a lot of memory bandwidth,

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 13>and it can do a lot of things that just

0:41:13.520 --> 0:41:16.239
<v Speaker 13>a few years ago weren't really that efficient to do.

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:20.359
<v Speaker 13>So you're seeing the hardware get remarkably better tailored to AI,

0:41:20.480 --> 0:41:21.759
<v Speaker 13>and at the same time, you're seeing a lot of

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 13>AI models becoming radically more efficient. If you remember last

0:41:25.719 --> 0:41:27.839
<v Speaker 13>year with deep Seek, one of the really amazing things

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 13>about that model was how efficient it was in terms

0:41:30.160 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 13>of doing a lot of the processing that it would

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 13>take a lot more to do for an open AI

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 13>or anthropic to do. So you're going to see a

0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:39.320
<v Speaker 13>lot of these models getting smaller and more efficient to

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 13>run locally. But what you're seeing the MAX do is

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:44.560
<v Speaker 13>just a lot of the stuff on device, like opening

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:48.760
<v Speaker 13>a browser, checking your files, you know, interacting with business systems,

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:51.920
<v Speaker 13>interacting with your apps in ways that are just autonomous,

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 13>and essentially making what's called a headless Mac, meaning it's

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:57.399
<v Speaker 13>just plugged into the wall. It's your AI agent, your

0:41:57.440 --> 0:42:00.279
<v Speaker 13>local server, and you can interact with it however you want,

0:42:01.000 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 13>just like having sort of a personal chatch you putee

0:42:03.360 --> 0:42:04.120
<v Speaker 13>in your living room.

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:07.759
<v Speaker 2>Alsome, we just have fifteen seconds in the piece. You're

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 2>talking about developers, you're talking about everyone vibe coding everyday people.

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 2>It's a mix.

0:42:13.160 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 13>I mean I talk to a lot of people who

0:42:14.680 --> 0:42:17.480
<v Speaker 13>are using it for their sort of an AI developer

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 13>to have to interact with, but then consumers who are

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:22.920
<v Speaker 13>just building these things very simply, you know, setting them

0:42:23.000 --> 0:42:24.720
<v Speaker 13>up to sort of be a household chief of staff,

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:26.920
<v Speaker 13>their butler, to monitor their grocery lists and things of

0:42:27.000 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 13>that nature. They can give you can give them a

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:31.759
<v Speaker 13>lot more access to your local files, customize them in

0:42:31.800 --> 0:42:34.239
<v Speaker 13>a lot of really fun ways, and you're going to

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:36.560
<v Speaker 13>see this trend and take a lot off a lot

0:42:36.640 --> 0:42:39.359
<v Speaker 13>more when Apple sort of makes its own open claw

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:41.800
<v Speaker 13>like system. Eventually, I would assume that's where all this

0:42:41.920 --> 0:42:42.239
<v Speaker 13>is heading.

0:42:42.640 --> 0:42:45.440
<v Speaker 4>Austin Carr is a great read and BusinessWeek we appreciate it.

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:47.799
<v Speaker 5>Now. That's it from this edition of Bloomberg Tech. Great

0:42:47.800 --> 0:42:48.400
<v Speaker 5>to have you back ed.

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:50.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's good to be back. Check out the pod

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:52.880
<v Speaker 2>lots to recap to start the week, and find it

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:56.560
<v Speaker 2>on all the Bloomberg platforms and online. This is Bloomberg Tech.