1 00:00:00,760 --> 00:00:03,640 Speaker 1: Hey, guys, ready or not, twenty twenty four is here 2 00:00:03,840 --> 00:00:06,320 Speaker 1: and we here at breaking points, are already thinking of 3 00:00:06,360 --> 00:00:08,600 Speaker 1: ways we can up our game for this critical election. 4 00:00:08,800 --> 00:00:11,719 Speaker 2: We rely on our premium subs to expand coverage, upgrade 5 00:00:11,720 --> 00:00:15,720 Speaker 2: the studio ad staff give you, guys, the best independent. 6 00:00:15,120 --> 00:00:16,239 Speaker 3: Coverage that is possible. 7 00:00:16,280 --> 00:00:18,239 Speaker 2: If you like what we're all about, it just means 8 00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:20,799 Speaker 2: the absolute world to have your support. But enough with that, 9 00:00:21,000 --> 00:00:27,200 Speaker 2: let's get to the show. Good morning, everybody, Happy Tuesday. 10 00:00:27,240 --> 00:00:29,040 Speaker 2: We have an amazing show for everybody today. What do 11 00:00:29,080 --> 00:00:29,600 Speaker 2: we have, Crystal? 12 00:00:30,080 --> 00:00:33,160 Speaker 1: Indeed, we do. Many interesting things developing this morning. We've 13 00:00:33,159 --> 00:00:36,479 Speaker 1: got new details in that second Trump assassination attempt, a 14 00:00:36,560 --> 00:00:38,200 Speaker 1: new questions for the Secret Service. 15 00:00:38,720 --> 00:00:40,159 Speaker 4: Kamala Harris actually did. 16 00:00:40,040 --> 00:00:42,760 Speaker 1: Another solo sit down interview, so we want to dig 17 00:00:42,840 --> 00:00:46,440 Speaker 1: into those less than satisfying answers that she gave. Joe 18 00:00:46,520 --> 00:00:49,120 Speaker 1: Rogan with some interesting commentary on the debate. Bill Maher 19 00:00:49,200 --> 00:00:51,800 Speaker 1: was some interesting commentary on the election. Dave Portnoy was 20 00:00:51,840 --> 00:00:54,480 Speaker 1: some interesting commentary on weed. Of course, we couldn't miss 21 00:00:54,520 --> 00:00:58,560 Speaker 1: that one given Soccer's interest in the subject. Some very 22 00:00:58,560 --> 00:01:01,760 Speaker 1: serious things developing with regard to foreign policy, both in Ukraine, 23 00:01:01,840 --> 00:01:04,280 Speaker 1: and Israel, both of which point in the direction of 24 00:01:04,400 --> 00:01:08,080 Speaker 1: further terrifying escalation. So we did not want to miss that. 25 00:01:08,560 --> 00:01:10,880 Speaker 1: And we've got a new guest on the show today. 26 00:01:11,560 --> 00:01:15,000 Speaker 1: He runs an election model, taking a look at all 27 00:01:15,040 --> 00:01:17,399 Speaker 1: the polls and feeding them in and seeing what he 28 00:01:17,480 --> 00:01:19,240 Speaker 1: thinks is going to happen this November. 29 00:01:19,280 --> 00:01:20,959 Speaker 4: So we're excited to talk to him as well. 30 00:01:21,280 --> 00:01:21,880 Speaker 3: Yes we are. 31 00:01:22,400 --> 00:01:23,800 Speaker 2: And before we get to any of that, thank you 32 00:01:23,800 --> 00:01:25,840 Speaker 2: to all of our premium subscribers. We're going to be 33 00:01:25,880 --> 00:01:28,640 Speaker 2: doing our Ask Me Anything later today. We do it 34 00:01:28,760 --> 00:01:33,320 Speaker 2: live from our studio here and we broadcasted exclusively on locals, 35 00:01:33,600 --> 00:01:35,360 Speaker 2: so if you want to go ahead and subscribe and 36 00:01:35,400 --> 00:01:38,280 Speaker 2: be a part of that Breakingpoints dot com. Before we 37 00:01:38,360 --> 00:01:40,520 Speaker 2: get to all the stories that Crystal just laid out, 38 00:01:40,520 --> 00:01:42,680 Speaker 2: we actually had a major breaking story that just happened 39 00:01:43,080 --> 00:01:43,800 Speaker 2: this morning. 40 00:01:43,880 --> 00:01:45,959 Speaker 3: Let's go ahead and put this up there on the screen. 41 00:01:46,000 --> 00:01:47,960 Speaker 2: We wanted to make sure we gave people some of 42 00:01:48,000 --> 00:01:50,600 Speaker 2: the details because this story know many are interested in. 43 00:01:51,040 --> 00:01:51,640 Speaker 3: Sean P. 44 00:01:51,800 --> 00:01:56,000 Speaker 2: Diddy Combs has been arrested in Manhattan after a grand 45 00:01:56,200 --> 00:02:00,000 Speaker 2: jury indictment. So it was literally just happened late last night. 46 00:02:00,080 --> 00:02:03,200 Speaker 3: Sehn P. Didy Combs was taken into. 47 00:02:03,000 --> 00:02:06,160 Speaker 2: Custody by the US Southern District of New York and 48 00:02:06,200 --> 00:02:10,120 Speaker 2: by the US Marshall Service at about eight thirty pm 49 00:02:10,240 --> 00:02:12,320 Speaker 2: at the hotel where he was staying, the Park Hyatt 50 00:02:12,360 --> 00:02:16,120 Speaker 2: on fifty seventh Street. The indictment and the charges against 51 00:02:16,240 --> 00:02:19,680 Speaker 2: him remain sealed by the federal government, but we do 52 00:02:19,840 --> 00:02:22,200 Speaker 2: know that this was an investigation that was led by 53 00:02:22,200 --> 00:02:27,440 Speaker 2: the Homeland Security Department, specifically HSI, which often investigates sex 54 00:02:27,520 --> 00:02:28,639 Speaker 2: trafficking cases. 55 00:02:28,960 --> 00:02:29,280 Speaker 3: Quote. 56 00:02:29,280 --> 00:02:31,960 Speaker 2: The March raids that we all brought everybody live coverage 57 00:02:32,000 --> 00:02:36,120 Speaker 2: of at the time, demonstrated that they were converging on 58 00:02:36,200 --> 00:02:39,560 Speaker 2: his mansion in Los Angeles. He was then later, you know, 59 00:02:39,880 --> 00:02:41,800 Speaker 2: there's a lot of speculation as to exactly where he 60 00:02:41,960 --> 00:02:42,679 Speaker 2: was and whether. 61 00:02:42,800 --> 00:02:43,400 Speaker 3: He was fleeing. 62 00:02:43,440 --> 00:02:46,240 Speaker 2: They could be seen carrying out electronics and all of 63 00:02:46,240 --> 00:02:47,840 Speaker 2: this is in the context of a lot of the 64 00:02:47,960 --> 00:02:51,799 Speaker 2: lawsuits and videos that have come out about Combs since 65 00:02:52,200 --> 00:02:55,520 Speaker 2: I guess the last couple of years, past relationships, violence, 66 00:02:55,560 --> 00:02:58,040 Speaker 2: and many of the other stories that have been alleged 67 00:02:58,040 --> 00:03:01,280 Speaker 2: against him. But obviously him as a titanic development, not 68 00:03:01,320 --> 00:03:03,440 Speaker 2: only in the case against him, but kind of looking 69 00:03:03,440 --> 00:03:06,679 Speaker 2: at the entire music industry, something that's been trailing in 70 00:03:06,720 --> 00:03:10,400 Speaker 2: for almost thirty years, and very very interested to see 71 00:03:10,400 --> 00:03:12,600 Speaker 2: what is in that unsealed or in that currently sealed 72 00:03:12,639 --> 00:03:15,320 Speaker 2: indictment against him. Southern District of New York again a 73 00:03:15,480 --> 00:03:21,000 Speaker 2: very i guess, probably one of the most important jurisdictions 74 00:03:21,040 --> 00:03:22,919 Speaker 2: in all of law enforcement in the United. 75 00:03:22,720 --> 00:03:25,639 Speaker 1: States, no doubt. It's one of the most high profile 76 00:03:25,800 --> 00:03:29,960 Speaker 1: federal courts. Probably excuse me. Between that and the Alexandria 77 00:03:30,000 --> 00:03:32,480 Speaker 1: Federal District Court, which handles a lot of terrorism cases, 78 00:03:32,480 --> 00:03:35,440 Speaker 1: those are probably the two most significant and powerful jurisdictions 79 00:03:35,480 --> 00:03:37,560 Speaker 1: in the country. Just to remind people of some of 80 00:03:37,720 --> 00:03:42,600 Speaker 1: the horrifying details here, This whole saga and learning about 81 00:03:42,600 --> 00:03:44,840 Speaker 1: some of the horrible things that have been alleged and 82 00:03:44,880 --> 00:03:48,360 Speaker 1: in fact were caught and revealed on video started when 83 00:03:48,800 --> 00:03:51,400 Speaker 1: R and B singer Cassie came forward with a series 84 00:03:51,440 --> 00:03:54,920 Speaker 1: of horrifying allegations, including things that would be tantamount to 85 00:03:55,200 --> 00:03:58,680 Speaker 1: sex trafficking. In addition, you know, are being drugged and 86 00:03:58,720 --> 00:04:03,280 Speaker 1: forced into horrible things. Her being beaten video was eventually 87 00:04:03,320 --> 00:04:07,800 Speaker 1: revealed from a hotel security camera that fit perfectly to 88 00:04:07,920 --> 00:04:10,520 Speaker 1: a t Some of the horrors that she described. Now 89 00:04:10,560 --> 00:04:14,200 Speaker 1: he immediately settled, but that really opened the floodgates. And 90 00:04:14,280 --> 00:04:17,520 Speaker 1: so this individual, who you know, as a millennial, he 91 00:04:17,600 --> 00:04:20,839 Speaker 1: was sort of the pinnacle of pop and hip hop culture. 92 00:04:21,880 --> 00:04:24,560 Speaker 1: You know, what we have learned about him and the 93 00:04:24,720 --> 00:04:28,280 Speaker 1: criminal behavior that is now alleged to have occurred across 94 00:04:28,360 --> 00:04:31,839 Speaker 1: multiple women across multiple states over years and years and 95 00:04:31,920 --> 00:04:35,640 Speaker 1: years has been shocking and horrifying. So, you know, everybody 96 00:04:35,680 --> 00:04:37,520 Speaker 1: deserves their day and core, but what's already in the 97 00:04:37,520 --> 00:04:39,600 Speaker 1: public sphere is pretty damning. 98 00:04:40,279 --> 00:04:43,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, the videos alone, not to mention the testimony and 99 00:04:43,120 --> 00:04:45,719 Speaker 2: some of the things he's only already either not admitted 100 00:04:45,720 --> 00:04:48,000 Speaker 2: to or settled in cases have been outrageous. 101 00:04:49,160 --> 00:04:50,240 Speaker 4: Yeah, that's exactly right. 102 00:04:50,279 --> 00:04:54,240 Speaker 1: And then these always raise the questions too of Okay, well, 103 00:04:54,520 --> 00:04:56,800 Speaker 1: he had a lot of handlers around him, He had 104 00:04:56,839 --> 00:05:00,200 Speaker 1: a lot of you know, other stars who were around him, 105 00:05:00,240 --> 00:05:02,920 Speaker 1: and allegedly, you know, at some of these parties where 106 00:05:02,960 --> 00:05:06,520 Speaker 1: these rapes and sexual assaults and druggings, et cetera occurred. 107 00:05:06,640 --> 00:05:10,000 Speaker 4: So who knew what when? How big was the circle? 108 00:05:10,880 --> 00:05:11,120 Speaker 3: You know? 109 00:05:11,440 --> 00:05:15,440 Speaker 1: Was this one of those apparently open secrets in Hollywood 110 00:05:15,440 --> 00:05:18,440 Speaker 1: and pop culture that everyone just turned a blind eye 111 00:05:18,480 --> 00:05:22,200 Speaker 1: to or perhaps participated in, or perhaps enabled, et cetera. 112 00:05:22,800 --> 00:05:26,200 Speaker 1: Those are some of the questions that go beyond Sean Diddycombs. 113 00:05:26,240 --> 00:05:28,960 Speaker 1: Not that this wouldn't be a gigantic and horrifying story 114 00:05:29,080 --> 00:05:32,240 Speaker 1: just on its own with him being the only perpetrator involved. 115 00:05:32,520 --> 00:05:34,960 Speaker 2: Yeah, great point, And what it does mean is that 116 00:05:35,000 --> 00:05:38,320 Speaker 2: it will face a lot of inquiries into his businesses 117 00:05:38,720 --> 00:05:40,920 Speaker 2: in the past, going all the way back to the 118 00:05:40,960 --> 00:05:44,720 Speaker 2: early nineteen nineties, including some of the allegations that are 119 00:05:44,760 --> 00:05:49,120 Speaker 2: against him. The HSI involvement is what really put you know, 120 00:05:49,160 --> 00:05:51,000 Speaker 2: put a lot of flags on the case because it 121 00:05:51,040 --> 00:05:56,119 Speaker 2: demonstrated this specifically a sex trafficking investigation, and of course 122 00:05:56,160 --> 00:05:59,080 Speaker 2: you know, the charges and the years that those hold 123 00:05:59,640 --> 00:06:03,240 Speaker 2: could be really stunning when we eventually see what the 124 00:06:03,320 --> 00:06:05,960 Speaker 2: end result of this. Like we said, Crystal, you know, 125 00:06:06,040 --> 00:06:09,039 Speaker 2: Sean Combs maintains his innocence. He say, quote, he's an 126 00:06:09,080 --> 00:06:11,400 Speaker 2: imperfect man, but that does not mean that he is 127 00:06:11,440 --> 00:06:13,880 Speaker 2: a criminal. And they say that he remains innocent of 128 00:06:14,200 --> 00:06:16,200 Speaker 2: the charges. We don't yet know what those charges are, 129 00:06:16,200 --> 00:06:17,880 Speaker 2: and when we get full details, we'll bring it to 130 00:06:17,880 --> 00:06:20,359 Speaker 2: Everybody wanted to make sure they got that arrest in 131 00:06:20,440 --> 00:06:25,039 Speaker 2: the show. Let's go ahead and move on then to 132 00:06:25,160 --> 00:06:28,720 Speaker 2: Donald Trump and to some of the new revelations that 133 00:06:28,760 --> 00:06:32,840 Speaker 2: we have about this attempted assassination of Donald Trump at 134 00:06:32,839 --> 00:06:36,320 Speaker 2: his golf course in West Palm Beach, Florida. We now 135 00:06:36,360 --> 00:06:40,440 Speaker 2: have body camera footage that has been released showing Ryan 136 00:06:40,560 --> 00:06:45,360 Speaker 2: Rout's arrest by the authorities. Remember, Ryan Routh was on 137 00:06:45,400 --> 00:06:48,239 Speaker 2: the golf course, he was spotted by Secret Service agents. 138 00:06:48,400 --> 00:06:51,599 Speaker 2: Secret agents actually took a shot at him. He was 139 00:06:51,680 --> 00:06:55,640 Speaker 2: able to drop his rifle fleet get into his vehicle, 140 00:06:55,680 --> 00:06:59,160 Speaker 2: which was parked nearby, drive away to a different county. 141 00:06:59,400 --> 00:07:02,440 Speaker 2: It was only because a bystander nearby took a picture 142 00:07:02,480 --> 00:07:04,560 Speaker 2: of his license plate and the make of the car 143 00:07:04,680 --> 00:07:07,040 Speaker 2: that they were able to apprehend him so quickly. They 144 00:07:07,040 --> 00:07:09,600 Speaker 2: eventually corner him on a road. And here's how that 145 00:07:09,640 --> 00:07:11,640 Speaker 2: all went down. Let's go ahead and take a listen. 146 00:07:11,680 --> 00:07:13,160 Speaker 2: We're gonna play some of this. So what we can 147 00:07:13,200 --> 00:07:16,160 Speaker 2: see here is Ryan Routh. He's here, He's got a 148 00:07:16,200 --> 00:07:18,560 Speaker 2: shirt up over his head, likely so that they could 149 00:07:18,600 --> 00:07:20,440 Speaker 2: make sure that he didn't have anything that was on 150 00:07:20,600 --> 00:07:23,120 Speaker 2: his person, and then he's getting arrested. There he could 151 00:07:23,160 --> 00:07:25,640 Speaker 2: see that they basically cornered him on a road and 152 00:07:26,280 --> 00:07:29,000 Speaker 2: made sure that they were able to arrest him without incident. 153 00:07:29,200 --> 00:07:34,160 Speaker 2: So he did appear in court yesterday, and some of 154 00:07:34,200 --> 00:07:37,920 Speaker 2: the details that are now alleged in the criminal complaint 155 00:07:37,960 --> 00:07:42,200 Speaker 2: are absolutely crazy. This really does tell the story of 156 00:07:42,240 --> 00:07:45,000 Speaker 2: the secret Service failure. So in the criminal complaint that 157 00:07:45,080 --> 00:07:48,480 Speaker 2: was filed by federal prosecutors, the affidavit says from T 158 00:07:48,640 --> 00:07:52,480 Speaker 2: mobile phone records indicate that Ryan Round's mobile phone was 159 00:07:52,560 --> 00:07:56,840 Speaker 2: quote located in the vicinity of the area along the 160 00:07:56,880 --> 00:08:01,360 Speaker 2: tree line from one fifty nine am until approximately one 161 00:08:01,640 --> 00:08:05,120 Speaker 2: thirty one pm, so he was in and around the 162 00:08:05,120 --> 00:08:08,920 Speaker 2: Trump golf course for a stunning twelve hours quote. The 163 00:08:08,960 --> 00:08:13,000 Speaker 2: affidavit also says local law enforcement told them Ralph was 164 00:08:13,120 --> 00:08:17,120 Speaker 2: driving a Nissan with the license plate belonging to a 165 00:08:17,240 --> 00:08:20,960 Speaker 2: FOD truck that had been reported stolen. So there are 166 00:08:21,040 --> 00:08:23,200 Speaker 2: so many sketchy things that are going on right now 167 00:08:23,760 --> 00:08:26,360 Speaker 2: with respect to mister Ralph Christl because not only in 168 00:08:26,360 --> 00:08:28,960 Speaker 2: the criminal complaint, I was just reading some more details 169 00:08:29,200 --> 00:08:33,199 Speaker 2: this morning. He was under investigation multiple times by the 170 00:08:33,280 --> 00:08:37,679 Speaker 2: FBI as a convicted felon known in possession of a firearm. 171 00:08:37,800 --> 00:08:42,000 Speaker 2: In fact, federal authorities were flagged to him about him 172 00:08:42,120 --> 00:08:46,160 Speaker 2: multiple years ago, including from a nurse who was returning 173 00:08:46,200 --> 00:08:50,439 Speaker 2: from Ukraine and she told customs officers returning to the 174 00:08:50,559 --> 00:08:52,680 Speaker 2: United States, she said, you need to watch out for 175 00:08:52,720 --> 00:08:56,679 Speaker 2: this guy. He is crazy, he's violent, he's a problem. 176 00:08:56,920 --> 00:09:00,079 Speaker 2: So this was not just on the radar, but now 177 00:09:00,200 --> 00:09:04,000 Speaker 2: to federal authorities at multiple different levels, from his Ukraine 178 00:09:04,040 --> 00:09:07,360 Speaker 2: work to his gun possession. We know a little bit 179 00:09:07,440 --> 00:09:10,000 Speaker 2: from the gun charges. You know, the serial number on 180 00:09:10,080 --> 00:09:12,640 Speaker 2: the rifle that was found that he allegedly was trying 181 00:09:12,640 --> 00:09:16,040 Speaker 2: to use, that was filed off perhaps, you know, showing 182 00:09:16,040 --> 00:09:18,800 Speaker 2: that it is an illegal weapon that was purchased. But 183 00:09:18,800 --> 00:09:21,480 Speaker 2: there's a lot of sketchy questions that remain around Ralph. 184 00:09:21,520 --> 00:09:24,120 Speaker 2: How was he funding his lifestyle? Was funding his multiple 185 00:09:24,120 --> 00:09:27,120 Speaker 2: trips back and forth from Ukraine? So lots of weird 186 00:09:27,160 --> 00:09:28,760 Speaker 2: stuff that's currently happening. 187 00:09:29,320 --> 00:09:31,800 Speaker 1: Yeah, and that's so noteworthy that there were multiple people 188 00:09:31,840 --> 00:09:33,760 Speaker 1: who interacted with this guy, and some of this was 189 00:09:33,760 --> 00:09:36,479 Speaker 1: in the public domain. We were talking about it yesterday 190 00:09:36,920 --> 00:09:39,240 Speaker 1: where they were warning they're saying, this guy does not 191 00:09:39,320 --> 00:09:43,120 Speaker 1: represent Ukraine, he is not recruiting foreign fighters like he's 192 00:09:43,160 --> 00:09:45,880 Speaker 1: basically a fraud and a con. Don't take him seriously. 193 00:09:46,320 --> 00:09:48,560 Speaker 1: And then the new information that we learned is that 194 00:09:48,640 --> 00:09:51,320 Speaker 1: going beyond that, it wasn't just hey, this guy is, 195 00:09:51,440 --> 00:09:54,520 Speaker 1: you know, a huckster. It was this man is dangerous. 196 00:09:54,840 --> 00:09:57,400 Speaker 1: The things he's saying are crazy, and you need to be, 197 00:09:57,720 --> 00:10:00,400 Speaker 1: like federal authorities, you need to be watching out for him. 198 00:10:00,600 --> 00:10:03,000 Speaker 1: So the more we learn about that, uh, the more 199 00:10:03,040 --> 00:10:05,120 Speaker 1: interesting that tale is going to be. You know, with 200 00:10:05,160 --> 00:10:08,040 Speaker 1: regard to the Secret Service response here, I feel a 201 00:10:08,080 --> 00:10:11,280 Speaker 1: little differently about the Secret Service response in this instance 202 00:10:11,360 --> 00:10:15,120 Speaker 1: versus Butler. It's very clear Secret Service just fell down 203 00:10:15,160 --> 00:10:17,640 Speaker 1: on the job in Butler and came within an inch, 204 00:10:17,800 --> 00:10:20,880 Speaker 1: you know, within half an inch of former President Trump 205 00:10:20,920 --> 00:10:23,760 Speaker 1: being murdered in front of a giant rally crowd on 206 00:10:23,880 --> 00:10:27,960 Speaker 1: national television. It was just by luck, fortune, fate, or 207 00:10:27,960 --> 00:10:30,200 Speaker 1: whatever that he happened to turn his head at that moment. 208 00:10:30,640 --> 00:10:33,080 Speaker 1: In this instance, you had a you know, a very 209 00:10:33,320 --> 00:10:36,760 Speaker 1: sharp eyed Secret Service agent who was scouting ahead and 210 00:10:37,000 --> 00:10:40,360 Speaker 1: was able to spot him, and you know, they were 211 00:10:40,400 --> 00:10:43,040 Speaker 1: able to fire off shots and then ultimately, you know, 212 00:10:43,080 --> 00:10:44,679 Speaker 1: down the road they got kind of lucky with their 213 00:10:44,720 --> 00:10:48,680 Speaker 1: ability to apprehend him before he could get any shots off. 214 00:10:48,760 --> 00:10:49,439 Speaker 4: Whatsoever. 215 00:10:49,840 --> 00:10:54,320 Speaker 1: I'm open to two explanations for how they came within, 216 00:10:54,559 --> 00:10:57,880 Speaker 1: you know, another such a close call on the president's 217 00:10:57,920 --> 00:11:00,320 Speaker 1: former president's life this time. One is that there was 218 00:11:00,400 --> 00:11:02,800 Speaker 1: another Secret Service failure, you know, when he's in the 219 00:11:02,800 --> 00:11:05,600 Speaker 1: woods for twelve hours, that there wasn't a sufficient job 220 00:11:05,640 --> 00:11:08,319 Speaker 1: done scouting the golf course ahead of Trump going out 221 00:11:08,360 --> 00:11:08,840 Speaker 1: and playing. 222 00:11:09,240 --> 00:11:10,640 Speaker 4: That's one possible explanation. 223 00:11:10,720 --> 00:11:14,360 Speaker 1: Another possible explanation kind of falls on Congress or perhaps 224 00:11:14,440 --> 00:11:17,680 Speaker 1: on the agency heads, that there have been insufficient resources 225 00:11:17,880 --> 00:11:20,160 Speaker 1: allocated to the Secret Service such that they're doing the 226 00:11:20,160 --> 00:11:22,400 Speaker 1: best job they can and did the best job they 227 00:11:22,400 --> 00:11:25,840 Speaker 1: could in the circumstances, but simply didn't have the tools 228 00:11:25,880 --> 00:11:28,760 Speaker 1: and the resources to be able to avoid such a 229 00:11:28,760 --> 00:11:30,640 Speaker 1: close call. But I'll tell you, you know, it's very 230 00:11:30,640 --> 00:11:32,679 Speaker 1: noteworthy to me. I'm not an expert. I'd love to 231 00:11:32,679 --> 00:11:34,280 Speaker 1: hear people who are an expert kind of way in 232 00:11:34,360 --> 00:11:38,320 Speaker 1: on this. But they really got lucky in that bystander 233 00:11:38,760 --> 00:11:42,040 Speaker 1: taking a picture of his license plate and their ability 234 00:11:42,080 --> 00:11:44,440 Speaker 1: to then you know, work with local law enforcement to 235 00:11:44,520 --> 00:11:47,440 Speaker 1: apprehend this guy down the road, because imagine a situation 236 00:11:47,520 --> 00:11:50,640 Speaker 1: where there's an ongoing man cunt for this individual or 237 00:11:50,679 --> 00:11:54,240 Speaker 1: where you know, potentially theoretically he is never found. I 238 00:11:54,280 --> 00:11:57,640 Speaker 1: think we were very close to that scenario unfolding if 239 00:11:57,679 --> 00:12:00,520 Speaker 1: not for the quick thinking of a near dot nearby, 240 00:12:00,800 --> 00:12:01,640 Speaker 1: you know, passerby. 241 00:12:01,840 --> 00:12:04,319 Speaker 2: You're right, I mean, look, would they have eventually found him, 242 00:12:04,360 --> 00:12:06,840 Speaker 2: most likely fingerprints on the weapon, you know, some of 243 00:12:06,880 --> 00:12:09,880 Speaker 2: the personal details and other things, maybe his phone rerecords 244 00:12:09,920 --> 00:12:11,880 Speaker 2: they could have used, but it might have taken a 245 00:12:11,920 --> 00:12:12,360 Speaker 2: long time. 246 00:12:12,400 --> 00:12:14,760 Speaker 3: And who knows. He's an unstable individual. 247 00:12:14,800 --> 00:12:17,760 Speaker 2: He literally wanted to kill the presidents and got close 248 00:12:17,800 --> 00:12:20,400 Speaker 2: to him, so possibly had I mean, they didn't charge 249 00:12:20,440 --> 00:12:23,200 Speaker 2: him with guns inside of the car, but again, you know, 250 00:12:23,200 --> 00:12:25,080 Speaker 2: when you have an unstable person like that who is 251 00:12:25,120 --> 00:12:27,080 Speaker 2: literally on the run, they could do anything. So we 252 00:12:27,240 --> 00:12:29,240 Speaker 2: certainly did get lucky. I agree with you on the 253 00:12:29,240 --> 00:12:32,480 Speaker 2: institutional level, you know, not faulting the individual agents who 254 00:12:32,520 --> 00:12:35,600 Speaker 2: were there on the ground, but it is clear resources wise, 255 00:12:35,640 --> 00:12:38,040 Speaker 2: it's just different. So again I can give my own 256 00:12:38,080 --> 00:12:41,160 Speaker 2: personal experience having had to cover some of these golf 257 00:12:41,200 --> 00:12:44,080 Speaker 2: things when Trump was president. I know for a fact 258 00:12:44,320 --> 00:12:47,320 Speaker 2: that the golf course was entirely shut down and patrolled 259 00:12:47,520 --> 00:12:50,000 Speaker 2: when they were president. In fact, from what I understand, 260 00:12:50,200 --> 00:12:53,320 Speaker 2: if he had had the same level of presidential detail 261 00:12:53,400 --> 00:12:55,760 Speaker 2: that was normal. Then the golf course would have been 262 00:12:55,800 --> 00:12:58,400 Speaker 2: secured in a different way and nobody would have been 263 00:12:58,400 --> 00:13:01,200 Speaker 2: allowed to camp out there for twelve hours. And the 264 00:13:01,240 --> 00:13:04,360 Speaker 2: only reason again that they even were able to were 265 00:13:04,360 --> 00:13:06,520 Speaker 2: able to see him was because they were scouting one 266 00:13:06,640 --> 00:13:09,880 Speaker 2: hole ahead whenever he was there, as opposed to shutting 267 00:13:09,920 --> 00:13:13,559 Speaker 2: the entire thing down. This gets to resources right now. 268 00:13:13,600 --> 00:13:16,160 Speaker 2: The Secret Service is telling us Trump now has the 269 00:13:16,240 --> 00:13:20,080 Speaker 2: highest level of possible protection. That includes he had a 270 00:13:20,120 --> 00:13:23,880 Speaker 2: phone call, I believe with President Biden yesterday where Biden 271 00:13:23,920 --> 00:13:25,679 Speaker 2: basically talked to him about. 272 00:13:25,360 --> 00:13:25,920 Speaker 3: The same thing. 273 00:13:25,960 --> 00:13:28,320 Speaker 2: But now a Secret Service, you know, seeing two attempted 274 00:13:28,320 --> 00:13:32,240 Speaker 2: assassinations in the span of just sixty days is terrible 275 00:13:32,679 --> 00:13:35,800 Speaker 2: look for them, and it is very scary too whenever 276 00:13:35,800 --> 00:13:40,320 Speaker 2: we have an active candidate for president of the United States. Also, though, 277 00:13:40,600 --> 00:13:43,680 Speaker 2: now we're getting back into the rhetoric wars, let's put 278 00:13:43,679 --> 00:13:46,640 Speaker 2: this up there on the screen. Trump returning to Twitter 279 00:13:46,720 --> 00:13:49,040 Speaker 2: at least for this one. He says the rhetoric lies, 280 00:13:49,080 --> 00:13:51,920 Speaker 2: as exemplified by the false statements made by Comrade Kamala 281 00:13:52,040 --> 00:13:54,440 Speaker 2: during the rigged and highly parts and ABC debate and 282 00:13:54,520 --> 00:13:57,520 Speaker 2: ridiculous lawsuits designed. I can't even read this, there's so 283 00:13:57,600 --> 00:13:59,719 Speaker 2: many comments, but I'll just get to this. It is 284 00:13:59,720 --> 00:14:02,520 Speaker 2: because because of the communist left rhetoric, the bullets are 285 00:14:02,520 --> 00:14:04,719 Speaker 2: flying and it will only get worse, allowing millions of 286 00:14:04,720 --> 00:14:07,720 Speaker 2: pieces from places unknown to invade and take over our countries. 287 00:14:07,720 --> 00:14:09,360 Speaker 2: And on part of wals stay blah blah blah, we 288 00:14:09,400 --> 00:14:12,120 Speaker 2: must love our nation. Come in legally, he turns it 289 00:14:12,160 --> 00:14:16,440 Speaker 2: into a migrant thing. But I have I said this 290 00:14:16,679 --> 00:14:19,920 Speaker 2: after last time, and I continue to maintain it. I'm 291 00:14:19,960 --> 00:14:23,560 Speaker 2: just going to stay in defense of we think reasonable 292 00:14:23,600 --> 00:14:27,720 Speaker 2: position that just because people have quote unquote heated rhetoric 293 00:14:27,840 --> 00:14:30,440 Speaker 2: does not mean that they are responsible. I think that 294 00:14:30,760 --> 00:14:34,000 Speaker 2: for what a deranged person like Ryan Routh does. I 295 00:14:34,040 --> 00:14:37,600 Speaker 2: don't think that applies in the case of people being 296 00:14:37,600 --> 00:14:40,040 Speaker 2: like we need to end and stop Donald Trump, or 297 00:14:40,080 --> 00:14:43,480 Speaker 2: even calling him a dictator or fascist. It's a free country, 298 00:14:43,520 --> 00:14:46,120 Speaker 2: we have free speech. I don't think that that's necessarily 299 00:14:46,160 --> 00:14:48,640 Speaker 2: inciting violence, and I don't think it's the same whenever 300 00:14:48,680 --> 00:14:53,160 Speaker 2: those same charges are leveled against you know, right wing politicians. 301 00:14:53,160 --> 00:14:55,720 Speaker 2: So this always annoys me, you know, this whole like 302 00:14:55,760 --> 00:14:57,720 Speaker 2: we need to tone down the rhetoric while they're literally 303 00:14:57,840 --> 00:14:59,960 Speaker 2: ramping up the rhetoric on their own side. 304 00:15:00,200 --> 00:15:01,120 Speaker 3: And I just think. 305 00:15:00,920 --> 00:15:04,880 Speaker 2: It's very foolish because guys like we like, we have 306 00:15:04,920 --> 00:15:09,160 Speaker 2: a general social contract. Most normal people understand whenever you say, 307 00:15:09,360 --> 00:15:12,080 Speaker 2: quote unquote we need to stop him, it doesn't entail 308 00:15:12,400 --> 00:15:17,120 Speaker 2: a literal assassination that applies to quote unquote comrade Kamala, 309 00:15:17,120 --> 00:15:21,360 Speaker 2: communist Kamala. The Democrats are having an invasion of our country. 310 00:15:21,400 --> 00:15:22,320 Speaker 3: That's the same thing. 311 00:15:22,440 --> 00:15:25,360 Speaker 2: So anyways, this has always annoyed me, I said after 312 00:15:25,360 --> 00:15:28,240 Speaker 2: the last attempt assassination, and I will continue to say 313 00:15:28,240 --> 00:15:28,560 Speaker 2: it here. 314 00:15:29,360 --> 00:15:31,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, and yeah, I don't think Republicans really want this 315 00:15:32,040 --> 00:15:35,120 Speaker 1: election to be contested on who has the more heated 316 00:15:35,320 --> 00:15:37,840 Speaker 1: or reasonable rhetoric, right, I mean, the last time around, 317 00:15:37,840 --> 00:15:40,400 Speaker 1: there was at least like five minutes where Trump was like, oh, 318 00:15:40,440 --> 00:15:42,520 Speaker 1: I'm going to be the unity candidate and we're it's 319 00:15:42,520 --> 00:15:44,960 Speaker 1: going to be a totally different Trump. And maybe about 320 00:15:44,960 --> 00:15:48,360 Speaker 1: twenty minutes into his RNC convention speech, that was out 321 00:15:48,400 --> 00:15:49,960 Speaker 1: the window and it was back to the same old, 322 00:15:49,960 --> 00:15:53,720 Speaker 1: same old. Like you know, Donald Trump did come up 323 00:15:53,760 --> 00:15:57,120 Speaker 1: with a fake electors scheme. He did give that speech 324 00:15:57,240 --> 00:15:59,560 Speaker 1: and tell people to come to DC, and that it 325 00:15:59,600 --> 00:16:02,160 Speaker 1: was going to be wild. He did watch as those 326 00:16:02,960 --> 00:16:07,040 Speaker 1: rioters breached the capitol and you know, assaulted police officers 327 00:16:07,080 --> 00:16:09,080 Speaker 1: and all of those things, and he just watched and 328 00:16:09,360 --> 00:16:14,120 Speaker 1: wouldn't say anything for hours and hours. So it's entirely reasonable, appropriate, 329 00:16:14,120 --> 00:16:18,080 Speaker 1: et cetera, to say, based on his past behavior, he 330 00:16:18,240 --> 00:16:21,080 Speaker 1: is a threat to democracy, and so to then you know, 331 00:16:21,160 --> 00:16:23,560 Speaker 1: turn around, you can't say that about him because it's inciting. 332 00:16:23,600 --> 00:16:26,360 Speaker 1: It's like, well, we're just you know, it's a very 333 00:16:26,440 --> 00:16:29,479 Speaker 1: reasonable even if you disagree, it's a very reasonable conclusion 334 00:16:29,560 --> 00:16:32,200 Speaker 1: and charge to levy at Donald Trump. And of course, 335 00:16:32,280 --> 00:16:35,760 Speaker 1: I mean his rhetoric, even within this one tweet where 336 00:16:35,800 --> 00:16:39,360 Speaker 1: he's saying that it's, you know, the democratic rhetoric is 337 00:16:39,360 --> 00:16:43,240 Speaker 1: too hot. He's then going on and painting an existential threat. 338 00:16:43,360 --> 00:16:46,160 Speaker 1: So yeah, it's you know, it's it's sort of ridiculous, 339 00:16:46,160 --> 00:16:50,400 Speaker 1: and especially when you dig into the specifics of these cases, 340 00:16:51,080 --> 00:16:53,920 Speaker 1: the first assassination attempt in particular, which you know, we 341 00:16:54,000 --> 00:16:55,720 Speaker 1: know more about at this point than we do the 342 00:16:55,760 --> 00:16:58,800 Speaker 1: second assassination attempt, and what the potential motivations are. Although 343 00:16:58,920 --> 00:17:00,720 Speaker 1: you know, I think it's fairly reason to assume it 344 00:17:00,760 --> 00:17:02,760 Speaker 1: had something to do with Ukraine, since this guy was 345 00:17:02,800 --> 00:17:07,480 Speaker 1: like obsessively into Ukraine. But the first one, this guy 346 00:17:07,520 --> 00:17:10,520 Speaker 1: didn't seem he was looking at, you know, where various 347 00:17:10,520 --> 00:17:15,159 Speaker 1: political figures of both parties were gonna be. He seemed 348 00:17:15,200 --> 00:17:18,520 Speaker 1: like he just wanted his moment of notoriety, that it 349 00:17:18,600 --> 00:17:21,800 Speaker 1: was all about just getting his name into the history 350 00:17:21,840 --> 00:17:24,840 Speaker 1: books and really had nothing to do with political ideology 351 00:17:24,880 --> 00:17:27,119 Speaker 1: as best as we can tell. I mean, still, even 352 00:17:27,200 --> 00:17:29,639 Speaker 1: after the reports that they've done and the information that 353 00:17:29,680 --> 00:17:33,880 Speaker 1: they've learned, they still haven't really they haven't asserted any 354 00:17:33,920 --> 00:17:36,879 Speaker 1: motive outside of what we could all glean from, you know, 355 00:17:37,000 --> 00:17:39,119 Speaker 1: just the fact that he's searching all kinds of different 356 00:17:39,440 --> 00:17:42,000 Speaker 1: high level political and cultural figures that he could go 357 00:17:42,040 --> 00:17:45,560 Speaker 1: out and potentially take a shot at. So in any case, yeah, 358 00:17:45,680 --> 00:17:49,040 Speaker 1: this discourse, obviously, I found it as ridiculous and sort 359 00:17:49,080 --> 00:17:50,040 Speaker 1: of silly as you do. 360 00:17:50,480 --> 00:17:53,960 Speaker 2: Right because, like, look on the Thomas Crooks thing, we 361 00:17:54,000 --> 00:17:56,720 Speaker 2: don't know a lot, but yeah, I mean, current evidence 362 00:17:57,200 --> 00:18:01,160 Speaker 2: points in that direction. And there's an important point there. 363 00:18:01,200 --> 00:18:04,480 Speaker 2: It's about the individual. It's not about quote unquote the 364 00:18:04,560 --> 00:18:08,160 Speaker 2: rhetoric of Democrats or Republicans. You know, there is individual 365 00:18:08,240 --> 00:18:11,400 Speaker 2: responsibility here. These people have agency, even if they may 366 00:18:11,760 --> 00:18:14,800 Speaker 2: be drained. It doesn't necessarily fall on what you know 367 00:18:14,840 --> 00:18:16,520 Speaker 2: somebody said earlier. 368 00:18:16,560 --> 00:18:18,440 Speaker 3: Now, should we have better rhetoric. 369 00:18:18,119 --> 00:18:20,840 Speaker 2: Maybe, although you know, I'm not really gonna I hate 370 00:18:20,840 --> 00:18:24,639 Speaker 2: tone policing just in general, especially whenever we try and 371 00:18:24,680 --> 00:18:26,960 Speaker 2: gate it around an election. No, elections are actually very 372 00:18:27,040 --> 00:18:29,520 Speaker 2: high stakes. We should argue sometimes they are existential and 373 00:18:29,560 --> 00:18:31,680 Speaker 2: the eye of the beholder. I think he's totally fine 374 00:18:31,680 --> 00:18:33,840 Speaker 2: to say so, no matter where you fall. Let's go 375 00:18:33,880 --> 00:18:37,960 Speaker 2: to the next part here, continuing with Ryan Routh. Ryan, 376 00:18:38,200 --> 00:18:41,960 Speaker 2: interesting guy appearing here in court on these federal gun charges. 377 00:18:42,200 --> 00:18:44,520 Speaker 2: Let's put this up there on the screen. He claims 378 00:18:44,520 --> 00:18:47,000 Speaker 2: he is indigent and he is now currently being represented 379 00:18:47,000 --> 00:18:49,639 Speaker 2: by a public defender, meaning he has no funds. I 380 00:18:49,680 --> 00:18:51,800 Speaker 2: again just find a lot of the funding behind him. 381 00:18:51,960 --> 00:18:56,639 Speaker 2: Very just mystifying. Because he is a current resident of Hawaii. 382 00:18:56,720 --> 00:18:59,919 Speaker 2: He clearly has enough money to like jet set across 383 00:19:00,480 --> 00:19:03,520 Speaker 2: the ocean back and forth from Ukraine to come here 384 00:19:03,560 --> 00:19:07,760 Speaker 2: to Washington. He was previously in North Carolina, allegedly was 385 00:19:07,800 --> 00:19:10,800 Speaker 2: running a business with his son. And you know, I 386 00:19:10,800 --> 00:19:14,119 Speaker 2: don't have any experience buying illegal weapons, but from what 387 00:19:14,200 --> 00:19:17,520 Speaker 2: I understand from reading, they generally cost like five times 388 00:19:17,920 --> 00:19:22,320 Speaker 2: retail costs, So several thousand dollars invested in the rifle 389 00:19:22,760 --> 00:19:25,760 Speaker 2: that he purchased. Where is all this stuff coming from? 390 00:19:25,760 --> 00:19:27,119 Speaker 2: Like maybe it was a credit card. I don't know, 391 00:19:27,160 --> 00:19:29,840 Speaker 2: but I'd be very interested to see that. Right now, 392 00:19:30,480 --> 00:19:32,600 Speaker 2: those gun charges are the only ones that have been 393 00:19:32,600 --> 00:19:36,320 Speaker 2: filed against Ralph. From what I understand, it would be 394 00:19:36,440 --> 00:19:41,760 Speaker 2: quite difficult to charge him with attempted murder or attempted assassination, 395 00:19:42,720 --> 00:19:46,760 Speaker 2: but it is possible, though the federal prosecutors will move 396 00:19:46,840 --> 00:19:50,800 Speaker 2: to do so. Staying with like who Ryan was, As 397 00:19:50,800 --> 00:19:54,600 Speaker 2: you just said, he was a fanatic. He genuinely was 398 00:19:54,800 --> 00:19:59,119 Speaker 2: a Ukraine like just a pro nuclear war in favor 399 00:19:59,119 --> 00:20:02,640 Speaker 2: of Ukraine. Wanted to make sure that America did everything possible, 400 00:20:02,720 --> 00:20:06,560 Speaker 2: sending patriot missol defense systems. There's multiple photos of him 401 00:20:06,840 --> 00:20:10,120 Speaker 2: at protests and others begging F sixteens, no fly zone, 402 00:20:10,359 --> 00:20:13,080 Speaker 2: all of these things over the last couple of years. 403 00:20:13,080 --> 00:20:15,240 Speaker 3: In fact, somebody recently flagged this. 404 00:20:15,440 --> 00:20:20,800 Speaker 2: He appears to have been in an Azov battalion propaganda 405 00:20:20,920 --> 00:20:24,040 Speaker 2: video from twenty twenty two. We can play some of 406 00:20:24,080 --> 00:20:26,879 Speaker 2: this so that people can see, let's just roll a 407 00:20:26,920 --> 00:20:29,480 Speaker 2: little bit. This Azov Battalion, of course, is the far 408 00:20:29,600 --> 00:20:33,000 Speaker 2: right literal neo Nazis who are attached to the Ukrainian military. 409 00:20:33,040 --> 00:20:33,960 Speaker 3: But there he was. 410 00:20:34,200 --> 00:20:37,160 Speaker 2: That's a picture of him. 411 00:20:37,280 --> 00:20:37,480 Speaker 3: Yeah. 412 00:20:40,440 --> 00:20:41,960 Speaker 2: I mean, there's a you know, probably a lot to 413 00:20:42,000 --> 00:20:45,119 Speaker 2: say there in terms of what it means for Ukraine. 414 00:20:45,240 --> 00:20:47,800 Speaker 2: But like I said, and I'll cut the Ukrainian slack 415 00:20:48,119 --> 00:20:52,560 Speaker 2: in this, Uh, the International Legion has completely denounced him. 416 00:20:52,600 --> 00:20:55,359 Speaker 2: All these foreign fighters who were there, they're like, we 417 00:20:55,400 --> 00:20:57,480 Speaker 2: have nothing connected to this guy. In fact, there are 418 00:20:57,520 --> 00:21:01,359 Speaker 2: multiple instances of us calling him a grifter and a liar. 419 00:21:02,600 --> 00:21:03,880 Speaker 3: We saw this morning. 420 00:21:03,960 --> 00:21:06,440 Speaker 2: Like I said, there were people who were in Ukraine 421 00:21:06,800 --> 00:21:09,560 Speaker 2: coming back to the United States telling federal authorities you 422 00:21:09,600 --> 00:21:10,359 Speaker 2: got to watch out. 423 00:21:10,240 --> 00:21:10,680 Speaker 3: For this guy. 424 00:21:10,720 --> 00:21:14,240 Speaker 2: He is crazy and flagging and trying to get US 425 00:21:14,280 --> 00:21:17,480 Speaker 2: authorities to do something about it. It does appear that 426 00:21:17,560 --> 00:21:20,360 Speaker 2: while he was in Kiev, he did have some contacts 427 00:21:20,600 --> 00:21:24,159 Speaker 2: and was able to funnel some foreign fighters into the 428 00:21:24,280 --> 00:21:27,879 Speaker 2: Ukrainian military. At least one person has said that, so 429 00:21:27,960 --> 00:21:30,560 Speaker 2: his ties, you know, to the Ukrainian state, to the 430 00:21:30,560 --> 00:21:33,680 Speaker 2: International Legion, foreign fighters. It's not as cut and dry 431 00:21:34,040 --> 00:21:35,800 Speaker 2: as some people may want to say, I think the 432 00:21:36,000 --> 00:21:39,760 Speaker 2: obvious explanation is just crazy, but that doesn't mean that 433 00:21:39,800 --> 00:21:43,280 Speaker 2: he also didn't have some contact with them. But he 434 00:21:43,400 --> 00:21:46,679 Speaker 2: certainly was not part and parcel a foreign fighter or 435 00:21:46,680 --> 00:21:48,480 Speaker 2: something like that in Ukraine. 436 00:21:48,240 --> 00:21:51,119 Speaker 1: As best we can tell, and his social media posts 437 00:21:51,119 --> 00:21:53,720 Speaker 1: before his Twitter account was taken down, there were a 438 00:21:53,760 --> 00:21:56,240 Speaker 1: bunch of them that were like, I will fight and 439 00:21:56,280 --> 00:21:58,800 Speaker 1: die for Ukraine. I want to go to Ukraine to 440 00:21:58,840 --> 00:22:01,200 Speaker 1: fight and die. And the best syndications are that he 441 00:22:01,280 --> 00:22:03,120 Speaker 1: tried to do that and they rejected him. 442 00:22:03,640 --> 00:22:05,239 Speaker 4: They were like, no, we don't want to. 443 00:22:05,400 --> 00:22:08,119 Speaker 1: And then you had a bunch of people who interacted 444 00:22:08,119 --> 00:22:12,000 Speaker 1: with him throwing up these warning signals. So yeah, he 445 00:22:12,200 --> 00:22:15,199 Speaker 1: was whatever vibes he was given off, whatever things he 446 00:22:15,359 --> 00:22:17,639 Speaker 1: was saying. In the context of the Ukrainian conflict, there 447 00:22:17,640 --> 00:22:20,520 Speaker 1: were plenty of people involved who are extraordinarily pro Ukraine 448 00:22:20,520 --> 00:22:23,080 Speaker 1: who were like, absolutely not. And by the way, let 449 00:22:23,119 --> 00:22:26,119 Speaker 1: me alert the federal authorities because this dude is an 450 00:22:26,200 --> 00:22:29,560 Speaker 1: absolute maniac. I'm not sure if you mentioned this or not, 451 00:22:29,600 --> 00:22:30,800 Speaker 1: but I just wanted to make sure to get in 452 00:22:30,800 --> 00:22:34,600 Speaker 1: the detail with regards to the gun charges and the 453 00:22:34,680 --> 00:22:37,080 Speaker 1: legal angle of this is interesting because I was thinking 454 00:22:37,080 --> 00:22:40,719 Speaker 1: about that. He didn't get any shots off. It was 455 00:22:40,760 --> 00:22:44,159 Speaker 1: the Secret Service firing at him, So that's probably what 456 00:22:44,240 --> 00:22:47,520 Speaker 1: makes it more difficult to charge him with attempted assassination. 457 00:22:48,000 --> 00:22:51,080 Speaker 1: Now we can all read the tea leaves of when 458 00:22:51,080 --> 00:22:54,760 Speaker 1: you're hiding in the woods at the former president's golf 459 00:22:54,800 --> 00:22:59,760 Speaker 1: course for twelve hours with a sniper rifle and scope 460 00:22:59,840 --> 00:23:03,760 Speaker 1: and a O pro camera to record it all, we 461 00:23:03,840 --> 00:23:07,239 Speaker 1: can probably all guess what intentions you ultimately had. But 462 00:23:07,359 --> 00:23:09,880 Speaker 1: I would assume that that's the reason why it would 463 00:23:09,880 --> 00:23:14,720 Speaker 1: be difficult to prove those more egregious charges versus the 464 00:23:14,760 --> 00:23:18,000 Speaker 1: gun charges. And part of what we learned yesterday as 465 00:23:18,000 --> 00:23:21,639 Speaker 1: well is that the serial number on his rifle was 466 00:23:21,680 --> 00:23:26,320 Speaker 1: at least partially scratched out. So that is why we 467 00:23:26,359 --> 00:23:28,560 Speaker 1: don't have details. You know, usually we get pretty quickly 468 00:23:28,600 --> 00:23:30,440 Speaker 1: the details of like, oh, this is where the gun 469 00:23:30,480 --> 00:23:32,840 Speaker 1: came from. He bought it legally, he bought it illegally, 470 00:23:32,880 --> 00:23:35,600 Speaker 1: It was somebody else's. It's still over stolen, as in 471 00:23:35,640 --> 00:23:38,080 Speaker 1: the case of the Georgia school shooting. His dad bought 472 00:23:38,080 --> 00:23:40,720 Speaker 1: it for him for Christmas or whatever. We don't have 473 00:23:40,760 --> 00:23:43,440 Speaker 1: those details yet because of the serial number being scratched 474 00:23:43,440 --> 00:23:45,600 Speaker 1: out and making it much more difficult to track the 475 00:23:45,640 --> 00:23:47,200 Speaker 1: origin of this particular weapon. 476 00:23:47,680 --> 00:23:48,320 Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right. 477 00:23:48,600 --> 00:23:50,800 Speaker 2: Like I said, though he was a convicted felon by 478 00:23:50,960 --> 00:23:53,760 Speaker 2: many you know, reasonable standards, should not have had a 479 00:23:53,760 --> 00:23:57,879 Speaker 2: fire arm. I'm talking about legally, and FBI literally investigated it. 480 00:23:57,920 --> 00:24:00,600 Speaker 2: That's part of what I find missedifying. And it just 481 00:24:00,640 --> 00:24:03,080 Speaker 2: always comes back. It's like known to FBI. It's almost 482 00:24:03,080 --> 00:24:06,240 Speaker 2: a meme at this point, known to federal authorities. Twenty nineteen, 483 00:24:06,280 --> 00:24:09,040 Speaker 2: Tipster calls the FBI says, hey, this guy's a convicted felon. 484 00:24:09,080 --> 00:24:12,360 Speaker 2: Remember in his past two thousand and two, barricaded himself 485 00:24:12,400 --> 00:24:15,600 Speaker 2: inside of an office with a fully automatic weapon. So 486 00:24:15,800 --> 00:24:19,920 Speaker 2: that's it, You're done. FBI is called by Tipster Honolulu. 487 00:24:20,080 --> 00:24:24,360 Speaker 2: FBI office investigates and drops the case, closes it. I mean, 488 00:24:24,560 --> 00:24:28,480 Speaker 2: that's pretty egregious in my opinion, on top of all 489 00:24:28,560 --> 00:24:33,119 Speaker 2: of the investigations, that all of the flags done specifically 490 00:24:33,480 --> 00:24:37,639 Speaker 2: by people returning from Ukraine begging the FBI and federal 491 00:24:37,640 --> 00:24:39,280 Speaker 2: authorities are like, you need to keep an eye on 492 00:24:39,320 --> 00:24:42,680 Speaker 2: this guy. There is something wrong with him. Let's go 493 00:24:42,720 --> 00:24:44,919 Speaker 2: ahead and put the last one up there. And that's 494 00:24:44,960 --> 00:24:47,840 Speaker 2: just what we referenced earlier, Secret Service under scrutiny here 495 00:24:48,040 --> 00:24:51,639 Speaker 2: after this potential a second attempt on Donald Trump's life, 496 00:24:51,760 --> 00:24:56,000 Speaker 2: Congress and others are now calling for investigations. But Congress, 497 00:24:56,040 --> 00:24:58,960 Speaker 2: by all accounts, is also getting very fed up. I 498 00:24:59,080 --> 00:25:02,639 Speaker 2: just saw a statement from or a senator yesterday that 499 00:25:02,720 --> 00:25:05,119 Speaker 2: said that I think it was Richard Blumenthal, so Democrat 500 00:25:05,200 --> 00:25:08,600 Speaker 2: from Connecticut, saying that the Homeland Security Department has been 501 00:25:08,640 --> 00:25:12,560 Speaker 2: derelict in its duty in sharing information with Congress. And 502 00:25:12,640 --> 00:25:15,320 Speaker 2: I mean all of the current indications, not only in 503 00:25:15,400 --> 00:25:19,840 Speaker 2: terms of these attempted assassinations from resources, but also at 504 00:25:19,840 --> 00:25:24,480 Speaker 2: the institutional level, point to an absolute cluster inside of 505 00:25:24,520 --> 00:25:25,719 Speaker 2: this organization. 506 00:25:25,880 --> 00:25:26,320 Speaker 3: Right now. 507 00:25:26,480 --> 00:25:29,560 Speaker 2: We had those leaked you know, text messages and others 508 00:25:29,560 --> 00:25:32,640 Speaker 2: that we had flagged earlier. But you know, there's clearly 509 00:25:32,720 --> 00:25:35,440 Speaker 2: there is something deeply rotten inside of the Secret Service, 510 00:25:35,440 --> 00:25:39,040 Speaker 2: and that's that is existentially dangerous to our country because 511 00:25:39,359 --> 00:25:41,320 Speaker 2: it's not just Donald Trump. It could be Kamala Harris, 512 00:25:41,400 --> 00:25:44,000 Speaker 2: could be Joe Biden, it could be any of these 513 00:25:44,119 --> 00:25:48,439 Speaker 2: figs or the members of the family, people in the 514 00:25:48,480 --> 00:25:51,760 Speaker 2: executive branch, people like Jake Sullivan or others. There are 515 00:25:51,760 --> 00:25:54,320 Speaker 2: all kinds of sketchy and weird people. As we learn 516 00:25:54,600 --> 00:25:58,480 Speaker 2: from Ryan Ralph and mister Crooks who tried to assassinate 517 00:25:58,560 --> 00:26:02,399 Speaker 2: Donald Trump earlier. These people are swarming Washington and just 518 00:26:02,600 --> 00:26:06,760 Speaker 2: orbiting the political system, waiting for an opportunity. So they 519 00:26:06,800 --> 00:26:08,800 Speaker 2: need to be vigilant at all times. And it genuinely 520 00:26:08,840 --> 00:26:10,200 Speaker 2: is dangerous to see stuff like this. 521 00:26:10,960 --> 00:26:15,240 Speaker 1: I mean, it's a horrible landscape to acknowledge, But we've 522 00:26:15,280 --> 00:26:17,760 Speaker 1: got a country that is kind of a tinder box 523 00:26:17,800 --> 00:26:21,480 Speaker 1: where the politics, do you know, tend towards the sense 524 00:26:21,520 --> 00:26:26,720 Speaker 1: of existential stakes, where there's just the numbers, a massive 525 00:26:26,840 --> 00:26:30,679 Speaker 1: amount of guns. So you know, whatever they're doing in 526 00:26:30,760 --> 00:26:34,040 Speaker 1: terms of Secret Service protection for all of their protectees, 527 00:26:34,119 --> 00:26:37,080 Speaker 1: they need to up the ante. And I said this yesterday, 528 00:26:37,200 --> 00:26:41,600 Speaker 1: I fear that this is kind of a terrifying new 529 00:26:41,880 --> 00:26:46,679 Speaker 1: normal because once one person demonstrates what's possible, then a 530 00:26:46,720 --> 00:26:49,440 Speaker 1: lot of other lunatics start to get ideas in their 531 00:26:49,480 --> 00:26:54,359 Speaker 1: head as well. And with regard to the specifics of 532 00:26:54,440 --> 00:26:58,520 Speaker 1: this instance and the fact that you know, still even 533 00:26:58,640 --> 00:27:02,760 Speaker 1: after the first assassination attempt, president, former President Trump was 534 00:27:02,800 --> 00:27:06,840 Speaker 1: not getting the level of protection that the current president gets. 535 00:27:07,160 --> 00:27:08,440 Speaker 4: It almost seems. 536 00:27:08,119 --> 00:27:13,480 Speaker 1: To me like a bureaucratic box checking issue where it's like, well, 537 00:27:13,520 --> 00:27:17,560 Speaker 1: here's our standard for you know, if you're this person, 538 00:27:17,600 --> 00:27:18,879 Speaker 1: you get that level of protection. 539 00:27:18,960 --> 00:27:20,680 Speaker 4: If you're that person, you get this level. 540 00:27:20,720 --> 00:27:25,160 Speaker 1: Here's our protocols, here's what we do, rather than flexibly 541 00:27:25,560 --> 00:27:30,080 Speaker 1: thinking about, wow, the risk landscape has just dramatically increased 542 00:27:30,240 --> 00:27:35,720 Speaker 1: for this particular individual protect perhaps for all protectees overall. 543 00:27:36,240 --> 00:27:40,439 Speaker 1: So we need to go beyond what would be what 544 00:27:40,480 --> 00:27:43,480 Speaker 1: we've typically done in the past for a former president 545 00:27:43,560 --> 00:27:46,640 Speaker 1: or for a you know, current candidate. We actually need 546 00:27:46,680 --> 00:27:49,399 Speaker 1: to do as much as we possibly can now. Again, 547 00:27:49,960 --> 00:27:53,679 Speaker 1: Secret Service doesn't have unlimited funds. One of the issues 548 00:27:53,680 --> 00:27:56,600 Speaker 1: that Ken Klippenstein, who has done fantastic reporting on this, 549 00:27:56,720 --> 00:27:59,800 Speaker 1: talks about a lot, is that they've been stretched in 550 00:28:00,119 --> 00:28:03,080 Speaker 1: so many different directions and pulled in so many different 551 00:28:03,119 --> 00:28:06,119 Speaker 1: directions into areas that you would never think that the 552 00:28:06,119 --> 00:28:10,199 Speaker 1: Secret Service was involved with whatsoever and so. 553 00:28:10,480 --> 00:28:11,840 Speaker 4: And that's not all their fault. 554 00:28:11,920 --> 00:28:14,440 Speaker 1: That also could be you know, the agency had certainly, 555 00:28:14,520 --> 00:28:17,960 Speaker 1: but also could be things that Congress has mandated. There 556 00:28:18,000 --> 00:28:21,359 Speaker 1: needs to be an executive branch and a legislative branch 557 00:28:21,480 --> 00:28:25,200 Speaker 1: effort to refocus this agency on the most critical core 558 00:28:25,280 --> 00:28:29,040 Speaker 1: part of their mission, and to acknowledge that the risk 559 00:28:29,320 --> 00:28:33,280 Speaker 1: is dramatically elevated, certainly for former President Trump, but I 560 00:28:33,280 --> 00:28:36,600 Speaker 1: would say probably for all of the protectees that you 561 00:28:36,640 --> 00:28:40,840 Speaker 1: know are under their care. So we wanted to make 562 00:28:40,840 --> 00:28:42,680 Speaker 1: sure to get to this. Kamala Harrison did sit for 563 00:28:42,880 --> 00:28:47,440 Speaker 1: another solo interview with results that I would say are 564 00:28:47,440 --> 00:28:50,320 Speaker 1: indicative of perhaps why she doesn't say for that many 565 00:28:50,360 --> 00:28:52,720 Speaker 1: of these interviews. So let me just give you a 566 00:28:52,760 --> 00:28:56,240 Speaker 1: little bit of what went down here. So this video 567 00:28:56,280 --> 00:28:58,760 Speaker 1: is going to start off with her response to an 568 00:28:58,800 --> 00:29:03,320 Speaker 1: answer about how specifically she would go about lowering prices. 569 00:29:03,400 --> 00:29:04,160 Speaker 4: Let's take a lisson. 570 00:29:04,640 --> 00:29:07,840 Speaker 5: I grew up a middle class kid. My mother raised 571 00:29:07,840 --> 00:29:11,440 Speaker 5: my sister and me. She worked very hard. She was 572 00:29:11,520 --> 00:29:14,040 Speaker 5: able to finally save up enough money to buy our 573 00:29:14,080 --> 00:29:16,440 Speaker 5: first house when I was a teenager. 574 00:29:17,800 --> 00:29:18,600 Speaker 2: I grew up in a. 575 00:29:18,560 --> 00:29:22,760 Speaker 5: Community of hardworking people, you know, construction workers and nurses 576 00:29:22,800 --> 00:29:26,120 Speaker 5: and teachers. And I try to explain to some people 577 00:29:26,280 --> 00:29:28,160 Speaker 5: who may not have had the same experience. You know, 578 00:29:28,360 --> 00:29:32,080 Speaker 5: if a lot of people will relate to this, you know, 579 00:29:32,120 --> 00:29:33,960 Speaker 5: I grew up in a neighborhood of folks who were 580 00:29:34,160 --> 00:29:40,120 Speaker 5: very proud of their lawn, you know. And I was 581 00:29:40,240 --> 00:29:45,360 Speaker 5: raised to believe and to know that all people deserve 582 00:29:45,440 --> 00:29:52,560 Speaker 5: dignity and that we as Americans have a beautiful character 583 00:29:52,840 --> 00:29:56,080 Speaker 5: to build in. My goal is three million new homes 584 00:29:56,120 --> 00:29:59,480 Speaker 5: by the end of my first term. In addition to 585 00:29:59,600 --> 00:30:02,040 Speaker 5: help people who just want to get their foot in 586 00:30:02,120 --> 00:30:06,880 Speaker 5: the door literally and so giving first time home buyers 587 00:30:06,920 --> 00:30:10,800 Speaker 5: a twenty five thousand dollars down payment assistance. A new 588 00:30:10,960 --> 00:30:14,080 Speaker 5: approach is to expand the child tax credit to six 589 00:30:14,160 --> 00:30:18,120 Speaker 5: thousand dollars for young families for the first year of 590 00:30:18,160 --> 00:30:22,280 Speaker 5: their child's life. And people want a leader who has 591 00:30:22,440 --> 00:30:25,800 Speaker 5: common sense and tries to find common ground. I'm supported 592 00:30:25,800 --> 00:30:30,920 Speaker 5: by over two hundred Republicans who worked for both Presidents Bush, 593 00:30:31,400 --> 00:30:32,920 Speaker 5: John McCain, met Romney. 594 00:30:33,120 --> 00:30:36,680 Speaker 1: So she gets around to talking about some of her 595 00:30:36,720 --> 00:30:40,200 Speaker 1: policy plans, but sacer, I don't know why this is 596 00:30:40,360 --> 00:30:43,120 Speaker 1: hard like, so she gets asked, Okay, what are you 597 00:30:43,160 --> 00:30:43,520 Speaker 1: gonna do? 598 00:30:43,800 --> 00:30:44,000 Speaker 3: Right? 599 00:30:45,040 --> 00:30:48,480 Speaker 1: I come from a middle class background, and people loved 600 00:30:48,520 --> 00:30:51,000 Speaker 1: their lawns, and don't we have great values. It's like 601 00:30:51,320 --> 00:30:54,640 Speaker 1: you have good policy proposals that you put out that. 602 00:30:54,640 --> 00:30:55,880 Speaker 4: Are really really popular. 603 00:30:56,480 --> 00:31:00,120 Speaker 1: I don't know why there isn't in her playbook, in 604 00:31:00,160 --> 00:31:03,040 Speaker 1: her list of talking points right out of the gate, 605 00:31:03,600 --> 00:31:05,800 Speaker 1: I'm going to crack down on price gouging. I'm going 606 00:31:05,840 --> 00:31:08,600 Speaker 1: to crack down on you know, the prescription drug prices. 607 00:31:08,600 --> 00:31:10,360 Speaker 1: I'm going to bring them down. And then you know, 608 00:31:10,400 --> 00:31:13,240 Speaker 1: the housing stuff is really good, the child tax credit, 609 00:31:13,280 --> 00:31:14,080 Speaker 1: it's really good. 610 00:31:14,760 --> 00:31:16,840 Speaker 4: I don't know why there isn't. Just like a dut 611 00:31:16,960 --> 00:31:17,520 Speaker 4: dout dut. 612 00:31:17,600 --> 00:31:19,320 Speaker 1: And then if you want to zoom out and do 613 00:31:19,400 --> 00:31:21,560 Speaker 1: your let me tell you about my values and where 614 00:31:21,560 --> 00:31:23,120 Speaker 1: I come from and why these are the things that 615 00:31:23,160 --> 00:31:26,480 Speaker 1: I believe in and committed to. That's fine, But you know, 616 00:31:26,760 --> 00:31:29,320 Speaker 1: I'm not trying to nitpick here. But I do think 617 00:31:29,480 --> 00:31:32,440 Speaker 1: this is the one piece that is really missing for 618 00:31:32,480 --> 00:31:34,320 Speaker 1: a lot of voters, even a lot of voters who 619 00:31:34,360 --> 00:31:36,560 Speaker 1: watched the debate and were like, she did way better 620 00:31:36,600 --> 00:31:39,320 Speaker 1: than Trump, and I cannot stand Trump, and she made 621 00:31:39,360 --> 00:31:41,120 Speaker 1: him look like a fool, and he made himself look 622 00:31:41,200 --> 00:31:41,720 Speaker 1: like a fool. 623 00:31:42,160 --> 00:31:43,400 Speaker 4: But I really still want to. 624 00:31:43,360 --> 00:31:46,000 Speaker 1: Get that core of like who are you and what 625 00:31:46,240 --> 00:31:48,800 Speaker 1: specifically are you committed to doing on day one. 626 00:31:49,320 --> 00:31:51,600 Speaker 4: For some reason, this is the most difficult question for her. 627 00:31:51,720 --> 00:31:53,440 Speaker 2: Yeah, it is, well, I mean I think there's a 628 00:31:53,560 --> 00:31:55,360 Speaker 2: when you say why, I think the answer is is 629 00:31:55,400 --> 00:31:57,640 Speaker 2: that she doesn't believe it. These are things or she 630 00:31:57,640 --> 00:32:00,880 Speaker 2: doesn't believe anything, And that's actually the number one knock 631 00:32:00,920 --> 00:32:03,440 Speaker 2: against her. She's so used to having to lean into 632 00:32:03,440 --> 00:32:06,360 Speaker 2: her identity and others that it appears to be the 633 00:32:06,400 --> 00:32:08,760 Speaker 2: default answer. Keep in mind, this is only a ten 634 00:32:09,000 --> 00:32:12,240 Speaker 2: minute interview and we gave you, literally, I guess, to 635 00:32:12,280 --> 00:32:14,720 Speaker 2: the highlights. But the point that you're making is that 636 00:32:14,800 --> 00:32:16,880 Speaker 2: if you calibrate to what And this is where I 637 00:32:16,920 --> 00:32:19,120 Speaker 2: always say with Americans, like, look, you could say a 638 00:32:19,160 --> 00:32:21,640 Speaker 2: lot about our country, but people genuinely into it and 639 00:32:21,680 --> 00:32:24,040 Speaker 2: cut to the truth very quickly in a way that 640 00:32:24,080 --> 00:32:27,280 Speaker 2: a lot of pundits are not able to. They are like, listen, 641 00:32:27,600 --> 00:32:30,840 Speaker 2: I think you are better than Trump character wise. I 642 00:32:30,960 --> 00:32:32,960 Speaker 2: probably trust you a little bit more on a few 643 00:32:32,960 --> 00:32:35,479 Speaker 2: different things. But what are you actually going to do? 644 00:32:35,560 --> 00:32:37,320 Speaker 2: That was the number one question amongst all of those 645 00:32:37,320 --> 00:32:40,400 Speaker 2: swing voters. I do not know what she stands for? 646 00:32:40,440 --> 00:32:43,479 Speaker 2: And this is a Hillary esque mistake. Hillary made her 647 00:32:43,480 --> 00:32:46,880 Speaker 2: campaign all about her and also being about not Donald Trump. 648 00:32:47,080 --> 00:32:50,959 Speaker 2: Where here with Kamala she's personalizing her story. Again, Fine, 649 00:32:51,280 --> 00:32:53,479 Speaker 2: if you're maybe giving a campaign speech or something. 650 00:32:53,640 --> 00:32:56,480 Speaker 3: But this is a direct question about prices. 651 00:32:56,760 --> 00:32:59,920 Speaker 2: I do think again that the major problem is like 652 00:33:00,560 --> 00:33:04,400 Speaker 2: she doesn't believe things, or she has a the copy 653 00:33:04,440 --> 00:33:07,400 Speaker 2: and paste from her campaign website from the Joe Biden 654 00:33:07,880 --> 00:33:11,160 Speaker 2: campaign promises it does tell you something. She's got the 655 00:33:11,240 --> 00:33:14,400 Speaker 2: Biden people on her staff. Maybe she does believe it, 656 00:33:14,440 --> 00:33:19,000 Speaker 2: if you were to say generally, but the deep specifics, 657 00:33:19,040 --> 00:33:22,160 Speaker 2: the preparation, this is exactly why she doesn't do a 658 00:33:22,200 --> 00:33:25,440 Speaker 2: lot of these So, I mean not I don't find 659 00:33:25,480 --> 00:33:28,840 Speaker 2: it mystifying in that this is kind of how she's 660 00:33:28,920 --> 00:33:32,160 Speaker 2: always been. It also is concerning just from a general 661 00:33:32,200 --> 00:33:35,200 Speaker 2: like candidate level, where we know that you can deliver 662 00:33:35,240 --> 00:33:37,880 Speaker 2: a decent performance if you want, like at the debate. 663 00:33:38,280 --> 00:33:42,840 Speaker 2: So do you just not think or prepare for these things? 664 00:33:42,880 --> 00:33:45,200 Speaker 2: And if you do, is this really the best that 665 00:33:45,240 --> 00:33:47,280 Speaker 2: you can come up with? This was very old school 666 00:33:47,360 --> 00:33:50,920 Speaker 2: behavior from her. I thought for her it really is 667 00:33:50,960 --> 00:33:53,960 Speaker 2: all about preparation. When she really takes something serious locks in, 668 00:33:54,040 --> 00:33:56,320 Speaker 2: she can be fantastic. I mean, she was fantastic in 669 00:33:56,360 --> 00:34:01,560 Speaker 2: that debate. She I have watched it now two times 670 00:34:01,800 --> 00:34:05,760 Speaker 2: and it is amazing. She does exactly what she wants 671 00:34:05,800 --> 00:34:08,960 Speaker 2: to do in that debate, in every single answer, it 672 00:34:09,000 --> 00:34:12,359 Speaker 2: was masterful in a way. But when she doesn't lock 673 00:34:12,440 --> 00:34:14,719 Speaker 2: in and preparees much, then you get, you know, a 674 00:34:14,840 --> 00:34:18,480 Speaker 2: very sort of middling and stumbling performance like this. And 675 00:34:18,760 --> 00:34:20,359 Speaker 2: you know, to go back to this piece because I've 676 00:34:20,360 --> 00:34:22,640 Speaker 2: been thinking about this, because you look at Trump, like 677 00:34:22,719 --> 00:34:24,960 Speaker 2: his answer on healthcare in the debate was I have 678 00:34:25,040 --> 00:34:25,960 Speaker 2: concepts of a plan. 679 00:34:26,480 --> 00:34:27,480 Speaker 4: His answer when he. 680 00:34:27,480 --> 00:34:31,800 Speaker 1: Got asked about childcare was utterly incomprehensible and somehow involved 681 00:34:31,840 --> 00:34:35,000 Speaker 1: like Avantee and Marco Rubio and tariffs, and was like 682 00:34:35,400 --> 00:34:40,040 Speaker 1: what are you talking about? But people have a sense 683 00:34:40,719 --> 00:34:43,960 Speaker 1: of what makes Trump tick, like the things that he 684 00:34:44,080 --> 00:34:50,160 Speaker 1: actually has a consistent passion for, like immigration is one 685 00:34:50,160 --> 00:34:53,560 Speaker 1: of them. Like you may not know the specifics of 686 00:34:53,640 --> 00:34:56,680 Speaker 1: what he actually will do on immigration, you know, is 687 00:34:56,680 --> 00:34:58,879 Speaker 1: he actually going to do the mass deportation He didn't 688 00:34:58,920 --> 00:35:00,759 Speaker 1: last time around, but he did some other stuff that 689 00:35:00,760 --> 00:35:04,000 Speaker 1: I found pretty terrible, But you know that is core 690 00:35:04,040 --> 00:35:06,919 Speaker 1: to him, without even getting the white paper and really 691 00:35:06,960 --> 00:35:09,200 Speaker 1: knowing all the details of how it's gonna work. And 692 00:35:09,239 --> 00:35:11,200 Speaker 1: I think Tariff's yeah, you could also put into that 693 00:35:11,200 --> 00:35:12,920 Speaker 1: bucket as well. You know, you look at like a 694 00:35:12,960 --> 00:35:17,160 Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders, like you know what that man is all about. 695 00:35:17,320 --> 00:35:18,920 Speaker 1: You know what he's thinking about when he gets up, 696 00:35:18,960 --> 00:35:21,480 Speaker 1: you know what he's thinking about when he goes to bed. So, 697 00:35:22,840 --> 00:35:26,200 Speaker 1: even to go back to your Hillary Clinton comparison, like 698 00:35:26,560 --> 00:35:31,480 Speaker 1: Hillary had all kinds of white papers, and she wouldn't 699 00:35:31,480 --> 00:35:33,239 Speaker 1: have flubbed that answer like Okay, what are you going 700 00:35:33,320 --> 00:35:35,400 Speaker 1: to do to bring down costs? She would have wrapped 701 00:35:35,520 --> 00:35:38,120 Speaker 1: off or like here's my plan and here's my white paper, 702 00:35:38,160 --> 00:35:41,600 Speaker 1: blah blah blah. But again on that like you know, 703 00:35:41,719 --> 00:35:45,080 Speaker 1: examination of the soul, people would be like, yeah, but 704 00:35:45,480 --> 00:35:48,560 Speaker 1: I don't know what really drives her outside of her 705 00:35:48,600 --> 00:35:52,760 Speaker 1: own ambition. And so Kamala Harris has a similar issue, 706 00:35:53,040 --> 00:35:56,160 Speaker 1: not just because she's changed her position. Okay, Drums changed 707 00:35:56,200 --> 00:35:58,960 Speaker 1: his positions a lot. You're allowed to change your position, 708 00:35:59,040 --> 00:36:01,160 Speaker 1: by the way, if you've got new information, et cetera. 709 00:36:01,680 --> 00:36:04,960 Speaker 1: But when you could when you add that together with 710 00:36:05,160 --> 00:36:07,880 Speaker 1: this sense of like I don't know what the thing 711 00:36:08,280 --> 00:36:11,319 Speaker 1: is for you, like I don't know what is what 712 00:36:11,440 --> 00:36:13,880 Speaker 1: is driving you in the political realm outside of your 713 00:36:13,880 --> 00:36:16,680 Speaker 1: own desire to be in this office. I think that's 714 00:36:16,719 --> 00:36:20,600 Speaker 1: where where it continues to be the biggest question mark 715 00:36:20,640 --> 00:36:23,840 Speaker 1: for her honestly at this point, and you know, I 716 00:36:23,840 --> 00:36:26,759 Speaker 1: don't know that it's really fixable. The only advice I 717 00:36:26,760 --> 00:36:29,000 Speaker 1: could give to them is just like pick something with 718 00:36:29,320 --> 00:36:33,040 Speaker 1: childcare housing, Like just pick something and just relentlessly talk 719 00:36:33,040 --> 00:36:35,200 Speaker 1: about it. Just fake it like that's your passion, you know, 720 00:36:35,520 --> 00:36:37,880 Speaker 1: and no one's buying this. Small business is my passion. 721 00:36:37,960 --> 00:36:40,680 Speaker 4: By the way, it's not small business. It's clearly not 722 00:36:40,719 --> 00:36:41,240 Speaker 4: your passion. 723 00:36:41,239 --> 00:36:44,400 Speaker 1: But yeah, pick something, lean into it, talk about it 724 00:36:44,440 --> 00:36:47,200 Speaker 1: a lot, feign some passion. That's probably the best she 725 00:36:47,239 --> 00:36:50,799 Speaker 1: could do, because that's the piece that's really missing. And 726 00:36:50,840 --> 00:36:53,520 Speaker 1: then it becomes blatantly obvious in a question like this 727 00:36:53,640 --> 00:36:55,279 Speaker 1: or the ones she got from Dana Bash what's your 728 00:36:55,360 --> 00:36:59,240 Speaker 1: day one agenda that she similarly kind of fumbled around 729 00:36:59,320 --> 00:37:03,200 Speaker 1: with or eventually yes landing on her policy proposals, but 730 00:37:03,760 --> 00:37:07,279 Speaker 1: didn't have that burning like this is the number one 731 00:37:07,360 --> 00:37:09,839 Speaker 1: goal of the next administration, at least not that came 732 00:37:09,840 --> 00:37:10,840 Speaker 1: across in that interview. 733 00:37:10,880 --> 00:37:13,200 Speaker 2: I think that's a very as dude answer. People in 734 00:37:13,280 --> 00:37:15,879 Speaker 2: general are pretty good at intuiting what makes people tick. 735 00:37:16,520 --> 00:37:18,520 Speaker 2: I guarantee people who watch the show knows what the 736 00:37:18,520 --> 00:37:20,880 Speaker 2: two of us makes us tick. And what there's a 737 00:37:20,960 --> 00:37:24,680 Speaker 2: lot of passion in But that's important. People can intuit 738 00:37:24,760 --> 00:37:27,160 Speaker 2: something in the way that you can with anybody, your boss, 739 00:37:27,239 --> 00:37:30,239 Speaker 2: or anybody who you're looking at or you're watching. So 740 00:37:30,280 --> 00:37:33,200 Speaker 2: what we see here with Kamala is that tick answer. 741 00:37:33,239 --> 00:37:37,680 Speaker 2: When you're not immediately burning to do something, then it 742 00:37:37,719 --> 00:37:40,200 Speaker 2: does tell us that it's almost kicks in, like oh, 743 00:37:40,280 --> 00:37:43,440 Speaker 2: I should probably now mention my three million new homes. 744 00:37:43,480 --> 00:37:45,799 Speaker 2: But she didn't actually answer that question about prices. She 745 00:37:45,800 --> 00:37:49,160 Speaker 2: didn't really say the word inflation. She didn't acknowledge necessarily 746 00:37:49,320 --> 00:37:51,640 Speaker 2: pain that people are in or try to paint a 747 00:37:51,680 --> 00:37:52,320 Speaker 2: bigger picture. 748 00:37:52,360 --> 00:37:53,520 Speaker 3: It started with herself. 749 00:37:53,800 --> 00:37:56,320 Speaker 2: You got basically you're trying to dance around the issue, 750 00:37:56,320 --> 00:37:58,359 Speaker 2: but you're not actually zeroing in. 751 00:37:58,480 --> 00:37:59,920 Speaker 3: And voters understand that. 752 00:38:00,080 --> 00:38:02,799 Speaker 2: So if she loses, a big part of this will 753 00:38:02,800 --> 00:38:05,719 Speaker 2: be why because people felt, at the end of the day, 754 00:38:05,760 --> 00:38:08,839 Speaker 2: I didn't truly understand what she was going to do 755 00:38:09,200 --> 00:38:12,799 Speaker 2: for me. Trump also really does benefit from the fact 756 00:38:12,840 --> 00:38:14,920 Speaker 2: that he was president and people have a lot of 757 00:38:15,000 --> 00:38:18,000 Speaker 2: rose colored glasses about what those four years were, Like 758 00:38:18,080 --> 00:38:20,759 Speaker 2: I mean rose colored. It almost implies that they're incorrect. 759 00:38:21,000 --> 00:38:25,160 Speaker 2: They remember fondly what prices, gas and all other stuff 760 00:38:25,200 --> 00:38:27,839 Speaker 2: looked like under the Trump administration, and they feel there's 761 00:38:27,880 --> 00:38:31,120 Speaker 2: been a lot of chaos and price inflation since then. 762 00:38:31,360 --> 00:38:33,920 Speaker 3: That is just empirical, it's reality. 763 00:38:34,280 --> 00:38:36,759 Speaker 2: Kamalin needs actually do a good job to try and 764 00:38:37,000 --> 00:38:40,160 Speaker 2: actually diminish those colored glasses and say no, remember the chaos, 765 00:38:40,280 --> 00:38:42,840 Speaker 2: and he's actually bringing that. He only cares about himself, 766 00:38:42,880 --> 00:38:45,040 Speaker 2: often the best hit that she had on him during 767 00:38:45,080 --> 00:38:48,080 Speaker 2: the debate. So in general, this is why she won't 768 00:38:48,080 --> 00:38:50,560 Speaker 2: do the interviews. But I mean, well, actually, you know, 769 00:38:50,600 --> 00:38:52,680 Speaker 2: I apologize. She will do one more interview. Whether it's 770 00:38:52,680 --> 00:38:54,320 Speaker 2: an actual interview, we'll see. 771 00:38:54,840 --> 00:38:57,240 Speaker 4: Yeah. So this is and this is kind of funny. 772 00:38:57,280 --> 00:39:01,520 Speaker 1: So she's doing this live event with Oprah Winfrey. We 773 00:39:01,520 --> 00:39:03,080 Speaker 1: can put this up on the screen. I mean, it's 774 00:39:03,120 --> 00:39:05,640 Speaker 1: a campaign function, it's not it's not a real interview. 775 00:39:06,880 --> 00:39:09,800 Speaker 1: But she's doing what's described as a live stream rally 776 00:39:10,239 --> 00:39:13,480 Speaker 1: with Oprah Winfrey, who of course endorsed Kamala and spoke 777 00:39:13,560 --> 00:39:14,640 Speaker 1: at the DNC. 778 00:39:15,480 --> 00:39:16,760 Speaker 4: She gets her speech. 779 00:39:16,840 --> 00:39:19,040 Speaker 1: In my opinion, it was like very cliched, but because 780 00:39:19,080 --> 00:39:21,080 Speaker 1: she's Oprah, she like made it work. You know, she 781 00:39:21,160 --> 00:39:23,160 Speaker 1: just has so much charisma that you're like, I want 782 00:39:23,200 --> 00:39:25,040 Speaker 1: to hear what you are saying, even when it's just 783 00:39:25,080 --> 00:39:26,680 Speaker 1: a bunch of problem political cliches. 784 00:39:26,719 --> 00:39:28,799 Speaker 4: But anyway, you know. 785 00:39:29,000 --> 00:39:34,120 Speaker 1: I think the strategy basically makes sense, and she's done 786 00:39:34,440 --> 00:39:37,799 Speaker 1: enough now to lower the temperature on the like when 787 00:39:37,840 --> 00:39:39,040 Speaker 1: are you going to sit for an interview? When are 788 00:39:39,080 --> 00:39:40,520 Speaker 1: you going to sit for an interview when you know 789 00:39:40,640 --> 00:39:42,040 Speaker 1: you need to sit for an interview. She's done a 790 00:39:42,040 --> 00:39:44,080 Speaker 1: couple like local news, like the one we just showed 791 00:39:44,080 --> 00:39:47,399 Speaker 1: you that was a Philadelphia local news journalist. I think 792 00:39:47,440 --> 00:39:49,560 Speaker 1: she did a radio interview like. She's done a few 793 00:39:49,600 --> 00:39:51,239 Speaker 1: things enough for them to be able to point to 794 00:39:51,239 --> 00:39:55,200 Speaker 1: to be like, see, she's accessible and it's not her wheelhouse. 795 00:39:55,400 --> 00:39:58,719 Speaker 1: She does much better in a rally situation with the 796 00:39:59,120 --> 00:40:02,040 Speaker 1: prompt red to go. Trump is giving her a tremendous 797 00:40:02,080 --> 00:40:04,360 Speaker 1: gift if he sticks by his I don't want a 798 00:40:04,360 --> 00:40:07,760 Speaker 1: debate again, although you know, given how well she performed 799 00:40:07,760 --> 00:40:09,719 Speaker 1: in the first one, I don't think she should necessarily 800 00:40:09,760 --> 00:40:13,319 Speaker 1: be afraid of a second debate either, although I think 801 00:40:13,320 --> 00:40:15,480 Speaker 1: it would be difficult for her to match her performance 802 00:40:15,480 --> 00:40:17,640 Speaker 1: there and for Trump to match the low of his 803 00:40:17,760 --> 00:40:19,040 Speaker 1: performance there as well. 804 00:40:19,560 --> 00:40:21,440 Speaker 4: But you know, I think. 805 00:40:21,320 --> 00:40:25,359 Speaker 1: They basically are correct that this is probably the right 806 00:40:25,400 --> 00:40:28,279 Speaker 1: strategy given the candidate that they have. 807 00:40:29,400 --> 00:40:30,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, I think that's correct. 808 00:40:31,000 --> 00:40:32,600 Speaker 2: I think at the end of the day, we now 809 00:40:32,680 --> 00:40:35,960 Speaker 2: know who she is and Americans at this point are 810 00:40:35,960 --> 00:40:37,480 Speaker 2: they're going to have to make their peace with it 811 00:40:37,920 --> 00:40:38,160 Speaker 2: or not. 812 00:40:38,360 --> 00:40:39,840 Speaker 3: And that's risky. That's really what it is. 813 00:40:39,920 --> 00:40:39,960 Speaker 6: Is. 814 00:40:40,239 --> 00:40:42,840 Speaker 2: Poll after Pole tells us that this is a risky strategy, 815 00:40:43,120 --> 00:40:45,120 Speaker 2: that this is difficult. A lot of the ball is 816 00:40:45,120 --> 00:40:47,839 Speaker 2: actually in Trump's court to see how he is going 817 00:40:47,840 --> 00:40:49,880 Speaker 2: to do this. Is he going to seize the narrative 818 00:40:50,040 --> 00:40:52,239 Speaker 2: and is he going going to try and put it 819 00:40:52,320 --> 00:40:55,440 Speaker 2: in more advantageous directions for him? In that contrast and 820 00:40:55,520 --> 00:40:58,000 Speaker 2: the way that he takes press questions or even in 821 00:40:58,080 --> 00:41:00,640 Speaker 2: terms of the issues that are highlight here or not. 822 00:41:00,840 --> 00:41:03,120 Speaker 2: The less that it is about him personally, and the 823 00:41:03,160 --> 00:41:05,480 Speaker 2: more that it's going to be about issues than that 824 00:41:05,640 --> 00:41:08,680 Speaker 2: contrast on Kamala will be difficult because it will remind 825 00:41:08,719 --> 00:41:12,400 Speaker 2: people that she doesn't necessarily stand for anything. But you know, 826 00:41:12,480 --> 00:41:15,719 Speaker 2: it really comes back to how Kamala too, is going 827 00:41:15,760 --> 00:41:18,719 Speaker 2: to is she just going to continue this Oprah Winfrey 828 00:41:19,160 --> 00:41:22,120 Speaker 2: kind of vibes strategy. Look, some of the polls are 829 00:41:22,160 --> 00:41:23,839 Speaker 2: in her favor. There's been a lot of decent ones 830 00:41:23,840 --> 00:41:25,520 Speaker 2: that have come out for her in the last couple 831 00:41:25,560 --> 00:41:28,760 Speaker 2: of days, Pennsylvania actually showing her up by a couple 832 00:41:28,760 --> 00:41:31,040 Speaker 2: of points. So it is highly possible that this is 833 00:41:31,080 --> 00:41:34,600 Speaker 2: exactly what is that this is exactly the way that 834 00:41:34,640 --> 00:41:37,919 Speaker 2: she does win the election, and that also demonstrates both 835 00:41:37,920 --> 00:41:41,399 Speaker 2: her strengths and weaknesses as a candidate, and very very 836 00:41:41,440 --> 00:41:44,240 Speaker 2: much so. What I think at previous more than anything, 837 00:41:44,280 --> 00:41:46,759 Speaker 2: is she is going to struggle in the presidency. You 838 00:41:47,000 --> 00:41:50,000 Speaker 2: can not get away with this when you are president. 839 00:41:50,080 --> 00:41:52,560 Speaker 2: Just at a baseline, even if you try to keep 840 00:41:52,560 --> 00:41:55,120 Speaker 2: the press away, look at Biden, they did their best. 841 00:41:55,400 --> 00:41:59,680 Speaker 2: You will be revealed. The job genuinely requires it. Even 842 00:41:59,719 --> 00:42:01,759 Speaker 2: if you're trying not to do a press conference. One day, 843 00:42:01,800 --> 00:42:04,040 Speaker 2: you're going to be sitting with five European leaders and 844 00:42:04,040 --> 00:42:06,080 Speaker 2: you're going to have a dementia incident. 845 00:42:05,719 --> 00:42:08,239 Speaker 3: And wander off to go look at a parachute, and. 846 00:42:08,200 --> 00:42:10,440 Speaker 2: America is gonna be like, what the hell is going 847 00:42:10,480 --> 00:42:13,799 Speaker 2: off over here? So buckle up because that is not 848 00:42:13,880 --> 00:42:15,359 Speaker 2: going to be good for you if you win the job. 849 00:42:18,840 --> 00:42:20,440 Speaker 4: So Trump obviously did himself. 850 00:42:20,640 --> 00:42:24,640 Speaker 1: He meant the big opportunity in the debate to make 851 00:42:24,760 --> 00:42:27,560 Speaker 1: this race a you know, a contract or even a 852 00:42:27,600 --> 00:42:31,879 Speaker 1: referendum on Kamala Harris and Joe Biden versus a referendum 853 00:42:32,000 --> 00:42:34,760 Speaker 1: on the most negative parts of himself. Kamala Harris wants 854 00:42:34,800 --> 00:42:37,000 Speaker 1: to use the debate to shift the focus to him 855 00:42:37,040 --> 00:42:39,520 Speaker 1: into the parts of his personality that people find to 856 00:42:39,560 --> 00:42:43,759 Speaker 1: be the most odious, and she succeeded overwhelmingly. You know, 857 00:42:43,840 --> 00:42:45,759 Speaker 1: at this point, it's undeniable when you look at the 858 00:42:45,760 --> 00:42:48,080 Speaker 1: polling ship post debate, when you look at the number 859 00:42:48,120 --> 00:42:50,560 Speaker 1: of people who said they thought she won the debate, 860 00:42:50,640 --> 00:42:53,239 Speaker 1: including a significant chunk of Republicans, when you look at 861 00:42:53,239 --> 00:42:56,560 Speaker 1: her favorability ratings going up and Trump's going down post debate, 862 00:42:56,840 --> 00:42:58,560 Speaker 1: when you look at, you know, how people felt they 863 00:42:58,680 --> 00:43:01,719 Speaker 1: answered questions on the very issues. So it's you know, 864 00:43:01,760 --> 00:43:05,080 Speaker 1: the verdict is fairly clear in terms of how that 865 00:43:05,160 --> 00:43:08,360 Speaker 1: debate went for Donald Trump. And one of the people 866 00:43:08,360 --> 00:43:12,640 Speaker 1: who noted this was Joe Rogan who made some interesting 867 00:43:12,640 --> 00:43:14,759 Speaker 1: comments about how he thought this debate went. 868 00:43:14,840 --> 00:43:15,600 Speaker 4: Let's take a listen. 869 00:43:16,000 --> 00:43:16,840 Speaker 7: Did you watch the debate? 870 00:43:19,280 --> 00:43:20,040 Speaker 6: Brod forgot? 871 00:43:20,200 --> 00:43:22,319 Speaker 7: Let me tell you before I say anything, I just 872 00:43:22,320 --> 00:43:27,080 Speaker 7: want to say, whoever's helping her, whoever's coaching her, whoever's 873 00:43:27,160 --> 00:43:30,560 Speaker 7: the puppet master run the strings. Yeah, you had a 874 00:43:30,600 --> 00:43:34,960 Speaker 7: fucking amazing job. Say job, they did an amazing job. 875 00:43:35,000 --> 00:43:38,240 Speaker 7: From the moment Biden drops out, forcing Biden to drop 876 00:43:38,280 --> 00:43:42,080 Speaker 7: out right, whatever they're doing, whoever's writing those speeches, getting 877 00:43:42,120 --> 00:43:46,239 Speaker 7: her deliverum, coaching her, she's nailing it. She nailed that 878 00:43:46,320 --> 00:43:46,920 Speaker 7: one speech. 879 00:43:46,960 --> 00:43:51,040 Speaker 4: She's like, say it to my family, Yeah, she nailed it. 880 00:43:51,840 --> 00:43:54,759 Speaker 7: And then last night to me when I was like, 881 00:43:54,800 --> 00:43:57,200 Speaker 7: oh my god, this is jiu jitsu, where she was like, 882 00:43:57,360 --> 00:43:59,640 Speaker 7: if you go to his rallies, his crowds are boring, 883 00:44:00,080 --> 00:44:04,080 Speaker 7: attired crowds are the best crowds. I have the number 884 00:44:04,120 --> 00:44:04,600 Speaker 7: one crowd. 885 00:44:04,640 --> 00:44:06,920 Speaker 6: He couldn't help himself. 886 00:44:06,680 --> 00:44:07,640 Speaker 8: And she got him. 887 00:44:08,160 --> 00:44:11,720 Speaker 1: So, I mean, it's so obvious what happened. 888 00:44:11,800 --> 00:44:15,000 Speaker 4: And they really like even more than. 889 00:44:15,080 --> 00:44:19,400 Speaker 1: The content preparation, it was as somebody else said this 890 00:44:19,560 --> 00:44:22,440 Speaker 1: that I'm borrowing from, but it was like a psychological 891 00:44:22,480 --> 00:44:26,439 Speaker 1: preparation for exactly what was going to get him where 892 00:44:26,440 --> 00:44:27,560 Speaker 1: he couldn't resist. 893 00:44:27,960 --> 00:44:29,520 Speaker 4: And it truly is an amazing moment. 894 00:44:30,000 --> 00:44:32,960 Speaker 1: When she gets asked this difficult question about immigration, she 895 00:44:33,040 --> 00:44:35,960 Speaker 1: does a little you know, blah, blah blah. I prosecuted 896 00:44:36,000 --> 00:44:39,240 Speaker 1: transnational gangs, et cetera, et cetera. But let's talk about 897 00:44:39,280 --> 00:44:43,000 Speaker 1: his rallies. The moderator, David Muir comes back to him 898 00:44:43,000 --> 00:44:45,800 Speaker 1: and actually asked him a follow up question on immigration, 899 00:44:45,920 --> 00:44:46,640 Speaker 1: and he says. 900 00:44:46,840 --> 00:44:48,479 Speaker 4: I'll get to that, but I got to talk about 901 00:44:48,480 --> 00:44:49,040 Speaker 4: the rallies. 902 00:44:49,280 --> 00:44:53,920 Speaker 1: And from there on out, she had him dancing to 903 00:44:54,080 --> 00:44:59,000 Speaker 1: whatever beat she wanted him to dance to. And I've 904 00:44:59,040 --> 00:45:01,680 Speaker 1: never seen anything like it, to be honest with you, 905 00:45:01,719 --> 00:45:05,200 Speaker 1: where it was so clear what her strategy was and 906 00:45:05,280 --> 00:45:09,160 Speaker 1: it was executed well, but where he just could not 907 00:45:10,040 --> 00:45:13,920 Speaker 1: resist taking the bait and doing exactly what she wanted 908 00:45:14,000 --> 00:45:17,160 Speaker 1: him to do. In every instance, it was unbelievable to 909 00:45:17,200 --> 00:45:17,880 Speaker 1: watch it unfold. 910 00:45:18,280 --> 00:45:21,359 Speaker 2: The Rogan check in is an important one because you know, look, 911 00:45:21,440 --> 00:45:25,200 Speaker 2: Joe is no lover of Kamala. He also is generally 912 00:45:25,400 --> 00:45:28,640 Speaker 2: like more apolitical and is just an observer. Tom Segura 913 00:45:28,719 --> 00:45:31,680 Speaker 2: as well, who these people are comedians. So you know, 914 00:45:31,719 --> 00:45:34,640 Speaker 2: in a sense, I like to hear the same thing 915 00:45:34,760 --> 00:45:36,600 Speaker 2: where you and I are political nerds. 916 00:45:36,640 --> 00:45:37,800 Speaker 3: Like you said you watched it twice. 917 00:45:37,840 --> 00:45:41,080 Speaker 2: I mean we're looking at every detail and trying to 918 00:45:41,120 --> 00:45:44,400 Speaker 2: parse or trying to find something, but it is validating 919 00:45:44,440 --> 00:45:46,879 Speaker 2: in the sense that the casual observer is like, man, 920 00:45:47,000 --> 00:45:49,640 Speaker 2: she really got him on that. And the rally size, 921 00:45:49,680 --> 00:45:52,560 Speaker 2: I mean, we shouldn't forget that became a meme in 922 00:45:52,600 --> 00:45:55,279 Speaker 2: this country. If we remember the whole Sean Spicer thing, 923 00:45:55,719 --> 00:45:59,000 Speaker 2: Melissa McCarthy, it was the first time SNL was relevant 924 00:45:59,080 --> 00:46:03,200 Speaker 2: in like twenty years. People were actually sharing the skit, 925 00:46:03,600 --> 00:46:07,520 Speaker 2: the podium stuff. I mean, it was a national story 926 00:46:07,560 --> 00:46:10,440 Speaker 2: and people were laughing. I remember too, traveling around in 927 00:46:10,520 --> 00:46:14,680 Speaker 2: November twenty seventeen and everyone was joking about the rally 928 00:46:14,680 --> 00:46:17,239 Speaker 2: stuff and with Sean Spice or who's a household name, 929 00:46:17,600 --> 00:46:20,040 Speaker 2: And I started to think about that and I was like, wow, 930 00:46:20,280 --> 00:46:23,640 Speaker 2: you know, you forget too that these memetic incidents become 931 00:46:23,880 --> 00:46:27,080 Speaker 2: imprinted in a way that the normal person can laugh. 932 00:46:27,120 --> 00:46:28,400 Speaker 3: Because what does it illustrate. 933 00:46:28,440 --> 00:46:32,560 Speaker 2: It illustrates Trump's weakest link, which is his own narcissism 934 00:46:32,560 --> 00:46:36,239 Speaker 2: in the center of self. And worse is it amplifies 935 00:46:36,520 --> 00:46:39,520 Speaker 2: the consistent democratic message of he doesn't care about you, 936 00:46:39,719 --> 00:46:42,480 Speaker 2: he only cares about himself. So he really is at 937 00:46:42,480 --> 00:46:45,360 Speaker 2: his best when he's fired up about immigration or tariffs, 938 00:46:45,360 --> 00:46:48,080 Speaker 2: because at least there it's about something that has to 939 00:46:48,120 --> 00:46:52,040 Speaker 2: do with US policy, or about opposition to US elites 940 00:46:52,080 --> 00:46:52,880 Speaker 2: with rally size. 941 00:46:52,920 --> 00:46:56,520 Speaker 3: There's no pretending it's literally just about you. I mean, 942 00:46:56,680 --> 00:46:57,680 Speaker 3: that's the problem. 943 00:46:58,160 --> 00:47:00,799 Speaker 1: Well, he's both at his best and worse apparently when 944 00:47:00,840 --> 00:47:03,440 Speaker 1: it comes to immigration because the pets thing. 945 00:47:03,480 --> 00:47:05,800 Speaker 4: We won't get back into the big debate we had yesterday, 946 00:47:05,920 --> 00:47:06,600 Speaker 4: but I mean. 947 00:47:06,480 --> 00:47:09,600 Speaker 1: I think you more or less agree that it didn't 948 00:47:09,640 --> 00:47:11,759 Speaker 1: work out. It's not going to work out for them politically. 949 00:47:11,920 --> 00:47:14,719 Speaker 1: And I saw more polling yesterday that even a like 950 00:47:14,800 --> 00:47:18,400 Speaker 1: overwhelming majority of Republican and said that the pets dogs 951 00:47:18,480 --> 00:47:21,840 Speaker 1: cats saying comments were quote unquote weird, which again is 952 00:47:21,840 --> 00:47:26,400 Speaker 1: what Democrats want the public to be thinking about Donald 953 00:47:26,400 --> 00:47:29,680 Speaker 1: Trump and JD. Van So even when he was on 954 00:47:29,840 --> 00:47:33,480 Speaker 1: his topic of choice, he didn't use the time to 955 00:47:33,520 --> 00:47:36,040 Speaker 1: talk about it in a way that is appealing to 956 00:47:36,120 --> 00:47:38,839 Speaker 1: the people that might be won over. He used it, 957 00:47:38,920 --> 00:47:41,160 Speaker 1: you know, in a way that fed into a democratic 958 00:47:41,239 --> 00:47:44,120 Speaker 1: narrative about the ticket and sparked an entire you know, 959 00:47:44,200 --> 00:47:46,880 Speaker 1: we won't go back over it, but I think I 960 00:47:46,960 --> 00:47:49,040 Speaker 1: made my views on this pretty clear yesterday. 961 00:47:49,200 --> 00:47:51,080 Speaker 2: The debate has been there in terms of the polling 962 00:47:51,360 --> 00:47:53,799 Speaker 2: My thing is, I think you're probably right. 963 00:47:53,960 --> 00:47:54,919 Speaker 3: I just have no idea. 964 00:47:54,880 --> 00:47:59,480 Speaker 2: I just because of Kasir Khan, because of access Hollywood, 965 00:47:59,520 --> 00:48:02,239 Speaker 2: because of living through these moments where they're like this there, 966 00:48:02,440 --> 00:48:03,359 Speaker 2: this is going to get him. 967 00:48:03,520 --> 00:48:06,000 Speaker 3: Charlottesville is never going to happen. All of this. 968 00:48:06,120 --> 00:48:08,799 Speaker 4: I'm just you know, Charlottesville was bad for him, though. 969 00:48:08,960 --> 00:48:11,279 Speaker 1: I mean, I think Charlottesville was a big part of 970 00:48:11,400 --> 00:48:14,640 Speaker 1: why he ends up losing in twenty twenty. His approval 971 00:48:14,719 --> 00:48:18,560 Speaker 1: rating took a giant hit, and I think Charlottesville January sixth, 972 00:48:18,640 --> 00:48:22,399 Speaker 1: like those moments where he was truly unhinged. I think 973 00:48:22,400 --> 00:48:24,439 Speaker 1: it's pretty clear at this point are part of why 974 00:48:24,480 --> 00:48:27,080 Speaker 1: not only he lost in twenty twenty as a sitting 975 00:48:27,080 --> 00:48:30,319 Speaker 1: income at president, which yet he overperformed his polls but 976 00:48:30,400 --> 00:48:34,000 Speaker 1: he still lost, and why they dramatically underperformed in twenty 977 00:48:34,040 --> 00:48:38,120 Speaker 1: twenty two, the more that it was his candidates who 978 00:48:38,160 --> 00:48:41,600 Speaker 1: embraced some of these more you know, fringe, extreme outrageous 979 00:48:41,640 --> 00:48:45,319 Speaker 1: moments the worst they performed. So, you know, I do 980 00:48:45,400 --> 00:48:48,320 Speaker 1: think that some of the moments, it's not like nothing mattered, 981 00:48:48,440 --> 00:48:50,560 Speaker 1: somethings didn't matter, because he did end up losing. 982 00:48:50,920 --> 00:48:53,680 Speaker 3: Absolutely things matter. He barely lost. 983 00:48:53,920 --> 00:48:56,960 Speaker 2: I just I've been burned too many times to take 984 00:48:57,000 --> 00:49:00,520 Speaker 2: any of these conventional wisdom. And I genuinely A'm just 985 00:49:00,600 --> 00:49:02,640 Speaker 2: a we'll see. Why don't we get to Bill Maher because. 986 00:49:02,560 --> 00:49:05,200 Speaker 1: Yeah, well this is yeah exactly though this segues well 987 00:49:05,280 --> 00:49:08,440 Speaker 1: to Bill Maher, who made a pretty bold prediction in 988 00:49:08,560 --> 00:49:09,719 Speaker 1: his show last week. 989 00:49:09,800 --> 00:49:10,480 Speaker 4: Let's take a listen. 990 00:49:10,800 --> 00:49:12,840 Speaker 9: I'm gonna make this a very momentous night with a 991 00:49:12,880 --> 00:49:14,040 Speaker 9: prediction because. 992 00:49:16,239 --> 00:49:17,840 Speaker 6: And I think I have the credibility for this. 993 00:49:17,880 --> 00:49:20,719 Speaker 9: Prediction because I have been called a Trump alarmist for 994 00:49:20,800 --> 00:49:21,520 Speaker 9: a very long time. 995 00:49:21,560 --> 00:49:22,120 Speaker 6: They were wrong. 996 00:49:22,400 --> 00:49:22,920 Speaker 8: I was right. 997 00:49:23,200 --> 00:49:24,399 Speaker 6: He wasn't going to leave power. 998 00:49:24,440 --> 00:49:29,920 Speaker 9: We okay, But ever since then, and since the Hollywood 999 00:49:29,920 --> 00:49:31,880 Speaker 9: Access taper, he said I'm going to grab him by 1000 00:49:31,880 --> 00:49:35,480 Speaker 9: the pussy, and he survived that. Every time he's been 1001 00:49:35,520 --> 00:49:38,840 Speaker 9: done crazy shit and gotten his stelf in trouble. I said, no, no, 1002 00:49:39,080 --> 00:49:41,960 Speaker 9: it's not over. I've said that. I've argued with people. 1003 00:49:42,120 --> 00:49:44,399 Speaker 9: Brett Stevens, my good friend. He's on the show next week. 1004 00:49:44,440 --> 00:49:46,120 Speaker 9: He said at one point a few years ago, the 1005 00:49:46,200 --> 00:49:48,680 Speaker 9: Trump thing. I said no, no, no, tonight, I'm saying 1006 00:49:49,600 --> 00:49:50,279 Speaker 9: I think it's over. 1007 00:49:52,040 --> 00:49:55,399 Speaker 6: I just want to bring up I mean, now, let's 1008 00:49:55,400 --> 00:49:56,240 Speaker 6: see that one person. 1009 00:49:57,680 --> 00:49:59,640 Speaker 9: Even before we were around, there was a guy named 1010 00:49:59,680 --> 00:50:01,800 Speaker 9: Joe McCarthy in the early fifties and he had a 1011 00:50:01,880 --> 00:50:06,200 Speaker 9: hold on America and it blew out in about two years, right, 1012 00:50:06,320 --> 00:50:08,640 Speaker 9: two three years. He was the biggest thing, and then 1013 00:50:08,719 --> 00:50:11,720 Speaker 9: it was just and I feel like eating the dogs 1014 00:50:11,800 --> 00:50:14,560 Speaker 9: were at this point. I think, I feel like we're 1015 00:50:14,600 --> 00:50:18,200 Speaker 9: at the Captain Quig with the strawberries. We're at Denzel 1016 00:50:18,280 --> 00:50:21,000 Speaker 9: at the end of training day. I'm a king ring 1017 00:50:21,080 --> 00:50:21,520 Speaker 9: up last. 1018 00:50:21,760 --> 00:50:25,640 Speaker 4: I just think he's gonna raise What do you think 1019 00:50:25,680 --> 00:50:26,360 Speaker 4: sagara about that? 1020 00:50:27,719 --> 00:50:28,160 Speaker 3: I don't know. 1021 00:50:28,400 --> 00:50:31,000 Speaker 2: I mean, listen, Bill's history is a little off in 1022 00:50:31,120 --> 00:50:33,799 Speaker 2: terms of McCarthy. McCarthy lasted a lot longer than I mean, 1023 00:50:33,920 --> 00:50:36,640 Speaker 2: it's not wrong. The peak was definitely there for two 1024 00:50:36,760 --> 00:50:38,680 Speaker 2: or three years. What Bill is alluding to is this 1025 00:50:38,800 --> 00:50:41,960 Speaker 2: idea of like a have you No decency Sir? Movement, 1026 00:50:42,160 --> 00:50:45,880 Speaker 2: which you know has been cast as the general end 1027 00:50:46,000 --> 00:50:49,520 Speaker 2: of McCarthyism. But the idea that he's trying to get 1028 00:50:49,560 --> 00:50:52,440 Speaker 2: at is that this is the official breaking point get 1029 00:50:52,480 --> 00:50:55,279 Speaker 2: it for the American electorate with Trump, and. 1030 00:50:55,440 --> 00:50:57,840 Speaker 3: I just don't see evidence of that. 1031 00:50:58,280 --> 00:51:03,400 Speaker 2: Also that coincide with a genuine like down spiral for McCarthy, 1032 00:51:03,640 --> 00:51:05,600 Speaker 2: not in the way that like, oh Trump is spiraling. 1033 00:51:05,760 --> 00:51:07,920 Speaker 2: He's still like, you know, it's with it. McCarthy was 1034 00:51:07,960 --> 00:51:10,839 Speaker 2: a literal alcoholic and came to death. Maybe I'm taking 1035 00:51:10,880 --> 00:51:13,440 Speaker 2: it a little bit too literally, but it is important 1036 00:51:13,680 --> 00:51:15,960 Speaker 2: to just think about, Like what he's trying to say 1037 00:51:16,040 --> 00:51:17,120 Speaker 2: is this, There was this phenomenon. 1038 00:51:17,200 --> 00:51:18,080 Speaker 3: It took over the whole country. 1039 00:51:18,120 --> 00:51:21,240 Speaker 2: It was massively popular, it had its hold on American politics, 1040 00:51:21,280 --> 00:51:24,239 Speaker 2: and then this was the breaking moment. People at the 1041 00:51:24,320 --> 00:51:27,640 Speaker 2: time intuited actually that that probably was the end. And 1042 00:51:27,920 --> 00:51:31,080 Speaker 2: I don't intuit that yet, just because I can't when 1043 00:51:31,120 --> 00:51:33,200 Speaker 2: the man still has a toss up fifty to fifty 1044 00:51:33,280 --> 00:51:36,440 Speaker 2: chance of being elected president of the United States again, 1045 00:51:36,920 --> 00:51:40,200 Speaker 2: and if we look and we at the polling and 1046 00:51:40,280 --> 00:51:43,640 Speaker 2: how much closer he is today, the possibility of his 1047 00:51:43,920 --> 00:51:47,000 Speaker 2: victory looms larger than it did in twenty twenty and 1048 00:51:47,239 --> 00:51:48,400 Speaker 2: in twenty sixteen. 1049 00:51:48,440 --> 00:51:50,360 Speaker 3: So I just don't think it's really as accurate. 1050 00:51:50,400 --> 00:51:52,880 Speaker 2: But look, maybe Bill is right. If Trump loses by 1051 00:51:52,960 --> 00:51:55,799 Speaker 2: five by five points like nationally, which I don't think 1052 00:51:55,840 --> 00:51:58,839 Speaker 2: will happen but as possible, then yeah, absolutely, But I'm 1053 00:51:58,880 --> 00:51:59,839 Speaker 2: not really sure we're there yet. 1054 00:52:01,520 --> 00:52:05,160 Speaker 1: Here's what I find compelling. I don't you know, I 1055 00:52:05,160 --> 00:52:06,919 Speaker 1: don't look to Bill Maher to like have his finger 1056 00:52:06,960 --> 00:52:09,320 Speaker 1: on the pulse of the country at this point in 1057 00:52:09,440 --> 00:52:10,279 Speaker 1: his trajectory. 1058 00:52:10,320 --> 00:52:11,320 Speaker 4: I don't think anyone should. 1059 00:52:12,760 --> 00:52:14,840 Speaker 1: You know, what actually stuck with me from our debate 1060 00:52:14,960 --> 00:52:17,440 Speaker 1: night coverage Soccer was the point that you made about 1061 00:52:17,640 --> 00:52:21,759 Speaker 1: how now we know how he's going to spiral, right, 1062 00:52:21,880 --> 00:52:25,560 Speaker 1: He's gonna double down on the Laura Loomers and Corey Lewandowski, 1063 00:52:26,200 --> 00:52:28,880 Speaker 1: the people that the Chris Lasovita and the Susie Wilds 1064 00:52:28,920 --> 00:52:30,719 Speaker 1: are going to be on the ounce. Whether they, you know, 1065 00:52:30,840 --> 00:52:33,680 Speaker 1: get actually fired or he just doesn't listen to them anymore, 1066 00:52:33,800 --> 00:52:38,799 Speaker 1: doesn't really matter in terms of the outcome. And he's 1067 00:52:39,000 --> 00:52:43,080 Speaker 1: losing time to reset this race, and I think he 1068 00:52:43,200 --> 00:52:45,520 Speaker 1: does need to reset this race. There's another pull out 1069 00:52:45,560 --> 00:52:48,359 Speaker 1: this morning Morning Consult that has Coma with a six 1070 00:52:48,440 --> 00:52:51,200 Speaker 1: point national lead. That's a that's a doubling in her 1071 00:52:51,719 --> 00:52:56,320 Speaker 1: national lead with that particular Polster post debate, and with 1072 00:52:56,440 --> 00:53:00,600 Speaker 1: the exception of one pole, that's been a pretty consistent 1073 00:53:00,840 --> 00:53:04,520 Speaker 1: post debate trend. Now you could say, okay, well, that 1074 00:53:05,000 --> 00:53:08,080 Speaker 1: you know, might be a temporary bump. Sure, but you 1075 00:53:08,200 --> 00:53:11,600 Speaker 1: have to see some sort of evidence that your opponent 1076 00:53:11,719 --> 00:53:14,960 Speaker 1: is going to be able to adjust and shift. And 1077 00:53:15,160 --> 00:53:18,840 Speaker 1: all we've seen is the contrary is him, you know, 1078 00:53:19,239 --> 00:53:22,120 Speaker 1: going in on his worst instincts, surrounding himself with the 1079 00:53:22,200 --> 00:53:25,640 Speaker 1: worst possible people he could surround himself with. And again, 1080 00:53:25,840 --> 00:53:29,319 Speaker 1: like some people in some states are literally voting now, 1081 00:53:29,600 --> 00:53:33,800 Speaker 1: it is September seventeenth, you know, it is very short 1082 00:53:34,000 --> 00:53:35,799 Speaker 1: period of time before election day. 1083 00:53:36,040 --> 00:53:37,640 Speaker 4: Trump himself has closed the door. 1084 00:53:37,760 --> 00:53:41,080 Speaker 1: And again this shows the foolishness of his tactics to 1085 00:53:41,200 --> 00:53:44,120 Speaker 1: another debate. He's out, you know, tweeting how much he 1086 00:53:44,160 --> 00:53:48,160 Speaker 1: hates Taylor Swift, et cetera, et cetera. So it's more, 1087 00:53:48,880 --> 00:53:52,200 Speaker 1: I it's hard for me to see how he adjusts 1088 00:53:52,719 --> 00:53:55,640 Speaker 1: and is able to make a more compelling case. Then 1089 00:53:55,960 --> 00:53:58,120 Speaker 1: you know that this one moment or this one instant 1090 00:53:58,239 --> 00:54:00,480 Speaker 1: incident is going to be the thing. And then I 1091 00:54:00,560 --> 00:54:03,960 Speaker 1: also just look like, you know, he won in twenty 1092 00:54:04,000 --> 00:54:06,520 Speaker 1: sixteen and it was shocking, right, and the poles were 1093 00:54:06,520 --> 00:54:09,480 Speaker 1: wrong and it was crazy, et cetera, et cetera. And 1094 00:54:09,640 --> 00:54:12,560 Speaker 1: ever since then, like you know, there's this sense that 1095 00:54:12,680 --> 00:54:15,400 Speaker 1: he's just got some sort of political magic that nobody 1096 00:54:15,440 --> 00:54:19,120 Speaker 1: else understands. But if you just look flat at the record, 1097 00:54:19,880 --> 00:54:22,839 Speaker 1: they did poorly in twenty eighteen, he lost in twenty twenty, 1098 00:54:22,920 --> 00:54:25,120 Speaker 1: they did poorly in twenty twenty two, and now here 1099 00:54:25,200 --> 00:54:27,600 Speaker 1: you are in twenty twenty four, and it's hard to 1100 00:54:27,640 --> 00:54:29,920 Speaker 1: see what's different. And it's easy to see that he 1101 00:54:30,480 --> 00:54:33,440 Speaker 1: is not the same candidate he was in twenty sixteen. 1102 00:54:33,680 --> 00:54:37,759 Speaker 1: He's lost a step in terms of his co personal coherence, 1103 00:54:37,800 --> 00:54:40,720 Speaker 1: and he is aging, although not as like noticeably as Biden. 1104 00:54:41,160 --> 00:54:43,960 Speaker 1: And he's lost a step in terms of his sense 1105 00:54:44,200 --> 00:54:47,600 Speaker 1: of the electorate and having his finger on the pulse. 1106 00:54:48,200 --> 00:54:50,359 Speaker 1: So that's why you know, I don't think Bill Maher 1107 00:54:50,480 --> 00:54:53,239 Speaker 1: is entirely off face to sense this as a pivot point, 1108 00:54:53,280 --> 00:54:55,640 Speaker 1: because it was one of the best opportunities for Trump 1109 00:54:55,719 --> 00:54:58,239 Speaker 1: to really seize the narrative in this race in a 1110 00:54:58,320 --> 00:55:00,960 Speaker 1: way that benefits him, and he utterly failed to do it. 1111 00:55:01,840 --> 00:55:05,120 Speaker 2: Very possible, Crystal, he also did that. To return to 1112 00:55:05,160 --> 00:55:08,400 Speaker 2: twenty sixteen, he surrounded himself with loyalists. All the Republicans 1113 00:55:08,440 --> 00:55:11,120 Speaker 2: denounced him. Everybody said he was going to lose what 1114 00:55:11,280 --> 00:55:14,239 Speaker 2: was Kelly Aott and others were like nope, I'm unindorsing him. 1115 00:55:14,280 --> 00:55:16,719 Speaker 3: I'm gonna write in Mitt Romney and he won. 1116 00:55:16,880 --> 00:55:19,839 Speaker 2: So the problem too that Trump learned actually from that time, 1117 00:55:19,880 --> 00:55:21,719 Speaker 2: and part of the reason I said that is he 1118 00:55:21,920 --> 00:55:24,400 Speaker 2: has learned to actually trust his instincts. He has learned 1119 00:55:25,080 --> 00:55:28,719 Speaker 2: that his base instincts, on top of surrounding himself by loyalists, 1120 00:55:29,040 --> 00:55:32,440 Speaker 2: can and often does pay off for him. Now, obviously 1121 00:55:32,640 --> 00:55:34,440 Speaker 2: that did not work in twenty twenty, and that's part 1122 00:55:34,440 --> 00:55:37,279 Speaker 2: of the reason the January sixth insanity was as bad 1123 00:55:37,360 --> 00:55:39,280 Speaker 2: as it was. And I'm not talking about the actual 1124 00:55:40,320 --> 00:55:43,279 Speaker 2: riot at the Capitol. I'm talking about Mike Lindell and 1125 00:55:43,360 --> 00:55:47,120 Speaker 2: the Overstock CEO in the Oval office with Sidney Powell 1126 00:55:47,440 --> 00:55:49,080 Speaker 2: doing the whole fake elect or stuff. 1127 00:55:49,120 --> 00:55:49,400 Speaker 5: That was. 1128 00:55:49,560 --> 00:55:53,200 Speaker 2: Honestly, that's way worse in my opinion, just not only 1129 00:55:53,239 --> 00:55:54,840 Speaker 2: in terms of what the overall effect would have been. 1130 00:55:54,920 --> 00:55:57,320 Speaker 2: That's actually if you look, is what he's being charged 1131 00:55:57,360 --> 00:56:01,520 Speaker 2: with federally. And so this it's been a downside, it's 1132 00:56:01,520 --> 00:56:03,840 Speaker 2: been an upside, but it's one where how old is 1133 00:56:03,880 --> 00:56:06,759 Speaker 2: he seventy nine maybe seventy eight. He's not going to change. 1134 00:56:06,800 --> 00:56:09,319 Speaker 2: That's why I made that prediction. So you know, either 1135 00:56:09,360 --> 00:56:11,719 Speaker 2: things will go like they did in twenty sixteen. But 1136 00:56:12,000 --> 00:56:14,759 Speaker 2: it is very possible that Bill is right, and right 1137 00:56:14,920 --> 00:56:17,560 Speaker 2: mostly in the sense of if he spirals that or 1138 00:56:17,560 --> 00:56:20,120 Speaker 2: if he continues to surround himself, if he continues to 1139 00:56:20,560 --> 00:56:25,800 Speaker 2: keep this strategy going in he reminds people that he 1140 00:56:26,320 --> 00:56:29,040 Speaker 2: reminds and shows people in the highest flagship moment of 1141 00:56:29,080 --> 00:56:32,759 Speaker 2: politics of his modern career, that he made it more 1142 00:56:32,800 --> 00:56:37,120 Speaker 2: about himself his rallies and was easily baited as opposed 1143 00:56:37,200 --> 00:56:41,520 Speaker 2: to talking about issues that matter. Most Americans actually are 1144 00:56:41,680 --> 00:56:45,280 Speaker 2: voting on issues, or at least how they feel about issues, 1145 00:56:45,560 --> 00:56:47,080 Speaker 2: and that will be the biggest disconnect. 1146 00:56:47,160 --> 00:56:48,359 Speaker 3: So both of these canons have big. 1147 00:56:48,280 --> 00:56:51,120 Speaker 1: Problems, and he's losing ground to her right now on 1148 00:56:51,160 --> 00:56:53,759 Speaker 1: who would handle the economy better, and that should be 1149 00:56:54,040 --> 00:56:57,120 Speaker 1: you know, he should own that space every day, all 1150 00:56:57,239 --> 00:57:01,360 Speaker 1: day long. There is another difference that I mentioned yesterday 1151 00:57:01,400 --> 00:57:03,920 Speaker 1: but I think is very significant, which is with twenty sixteen, 1152 00:57:04,000 --> 00:57:08,720 Speaker 1: which is, however you feel about Kamala Harris, or however 1153 00:57:08,920 --> 00:57:11,560 Speaker 1: I feel about Kamala Harris, her favorability is pretty good. 1154 00:57:11,719 --> 00:57:15,200 Speaker 1: It's basically even, which you know, doesn't sound amazing, but 1155 00:57:15,440 --> 00:57:18,800 Speaker 1: in modern politics actually is kind of amazing, and back 1156 00:57:18,840 --> 00:57:22,680 Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen, he was running against a deeply unpopular 1157 00:57:22,760 --> 00:57:26,040 Speaker 1: candidate in Hillary Clinton, who had negative favorability rating of 1158 00:57:26,240 --> 00:57:31,080 Speaker 1: like minus sixteen, certainly in the double digits. And you know, 1159 00:57:31,280 --> 00:57:34,480 Speaker 1: I think that that matters and is quite significant as well. 1160 00:57:34,920 --> 00:57:37,520 Speaker 1: I also am starting to think, you know, in twenty twenty, 1161 00:57:37,880 --> 00:57:39,800 Speaker 1: and I mean we said this at the time, so 1162 00:57:39,920 --> 00:57:41,560 Speaker 1: it's not like this is really a change of tune 1163 00:57:41,600 --> 00:57:43,760 Speaker 1: for us, but there's this narrative that's taken hold that, 1164 00:57:43,920 --> 00:57:46,040 Speaker 1: like Joe Biden was such an amazing, perfect candidate in 1165 00:57:46,080 --> 00:57:50,880 Speaker 1: twenty twenty, the guy barely campaigned like he was. You know, 1166 00:57:51,000 --> 00:57:53,280 Speaker 1: he had the excuse of COVID, but we talked all 1167 00:57:53,320 --> 00:57:56,560 Speaker 1: the time about the basement strategy was like invisible for 1168 00:57:57,320 --> 00:58:00,240 Speaker 1: obvious reasons because his decline, while he was in a 1169 00:58:00,360 --> 00:58:02,920 Speaker 1: much better condition than he is today, it was already 1170 00:58:03,280 --> 00:58:06,640 Speaker 1: market it was already noticeable. And he did not run 1171 00:58:06,880 --> 00:58:09,760 Speaker 1: on any affirmative economic agenda. The good stuff that they 1172 00:58:09,840 --> 00:58:12,040 Speaker 1: ended up doing, he did not talk about at all 1173 00:58:12,120 --> 00:58:16,280 Speaker 1: in the campaign. It was purely referendum on Trump paid 1174 00:58:16,320 --> 00:58:18,840 Speaker 1: communications and I'm going to hide myself. And there was 1175 00:58:18,960 --> 00:58:22,640 Speaker 1: very little enthusiasm in favor of the Democratic ticket. All 1176 00:58:22,760 --> 00:58:25,680 Speaker 1: of the enthusiasm on the Democratic side was an anti 1177 00:58:25,800 --> 00:58:30,439 Speaker 1: Trump vote, so you know, and even that was enough 1178 00:58:30,680 --> 00:58:34,040 Speaker 1: to defeat Donald Trump at that point. So you know. 1179 00:58:34,120 --> 00:58:37,040 Speaker 1: I just I've been readjusting some of my priors about 1180 00:58:37,280 --> 00:58:41,480 Speaker 1: how extraordinary or powerful a political figure Donald Trump actually is, 1181 00:58:41,520 --> 00:58:44,000 Speaker 1: because outside of winning in twenty sixteen, the record has 1182 00:58:44,080 --> 00:58:45,600 Speaker 1: not been a winning one. 1183 00:58:46,040 --> 00:58:52,800 Speaker 2: Certainly possible, Crystal. Let's move on to mari Wana. I 1184 00:58:52,920 --> 00:58:55,800 Speaker 2: had to put this one in the show. Dave Portnoy 1185 00:58:55,960 --> 00:58:59,520 Speaker 2: kicked the hornets nest I guess on Twitter. He recently 1186 00:58:59,560 --> 00:59:04,320 Speaker 2: put out video endorsing the Florida Amendment three, which would 1187 00:59:04,560 --> 00:59:06,680 Speaker 2: legalize marijuana in the state. 1188 00:59:07,000 --> 00:59:07,760 Speaker 3: Let's take a listen. 1189 00:59:08,280 --> 00:59:16,040 Speaker 8: Listen, It's Sunday afternoon, football on TV. Pizza on the 1190 00:59:16,120 --> 00:59:24,320 Speaker 8: way in Massachusetts, smoking a little weed, just enjoying my day. Florida. 1191 00:59:24,400 --> 00:59:27,040 Speaker 8: You can't do this in my Miami house. You can't 1192 00:59:27,080 --> 00:59:31,280 Speaker 8: do this. Why freedom? It's about freedom. Half the states 1193 00:59:31,320 --> 00:59:35,800 Speaker 8: allow this legal marijuana. Florida. I want to be able 1194 00:59:35,840 --> 00:59:40,240 Speaker 8: to watch football, eat pizza, and smoke. We're all adults here. 1195 00:59:40,360 --> 00:59:44,360 Speaker 8: Twenty one plus. Make your own decisions. It's on the ballot. 1196 00:59:44,520 --> 00:59:49,240 Speaker 8: Vote yes on three. Legalize recreational weed. Come on, where 1197 00:59:49,320 --> 00:59:55,000 Speaker 8: are we Florida? Wake up? Wake up. Don't tell what 1198 00:59:55,280 --> 00:59:57,480 Speaker 8: other people want to do in their own house. We're 1199 00:59:57,520 --> 01:00:01,080 Speaker 8: grown adults. It's safe, it's legal. Over half the states 1200 01:00:01,120 --> 01:00:03,800 Speaker 8: in the country have it. Why don't we in Florida. 1201 01:00:03,800 --> 01:00:05,920 Speaker 8: I'm a Florida resident. I want to be able to 1202 01:00:05,960 --> 01:00:08,919 Speaker 8: smoke in my house, watching football, eating pizza like a human. 1203 01:00:09,200 --> 01:00:12,240 Speaker 8: I can do it in Massachusetts. Make it legal on 1204 01:00:12,520 --> 01:00:15,160 Speaker 8: ballot A vote yes on three in Florida. 1205 01:00:15,320 --> 01:00:15,680 Speaker 6: Thank you? 1206 01:00:16,640 --> 01:00:16,960 Speaker 2: All right? 1207 01:00:17,000 --> 01:00:18,000 Speaker 4: Amen? Amen? 1208 01:00:18,120 --> 01:00:22,280 Speaker 2: Brother, Okay, this is bullshit because nobody in the state 1209 01:00:22,320 --> 01:00:24,919 Speaker 2: of Florida is getting arrested for smoking weed in their house. 1210 01:00:25,080 --> 01:00:26,800 Speaker 2: In fact, weed addicts. By the way, I put this 1211 01:00:26,840 --> 01:00:29,440 Speaker 2: out yesterday. If you all just stay home and eat pizza, 1212 01:00:29,720 --> 01:00:31,920 Speaker 2: be my guest. Nobody cares about what you do at home. 1213 01:00:32,200 --> 01:00:35,240 Speaker 2: When you smoke outside, whenever you smoke behind the wheel 1214 01:00:35,240 --> 01:00:37,680 Speaker 2: of a car because it's chill. When you smoke around 1215 01:00:37,720 --> 01:00:40,960 Speaker 2: children in public pararks, yeah, I think that's a problem. 1216 01:00:41,920 --> 01:00:44,720 Speaker 2: And that's the issue is they think that it's fine 1217 01:00:44,760 --> 01:00:48,760 Speaker 2: to pollute public spaces. Just light up outside. I just landed, 1218 01:00:48,800 --> 01:00:51,400 Speaker 2: by the way, recently, Denver airport. People next to me 1219 01:00:51,480 --> 01:00:53,440 Speaker 2: are smoking weed while waiting for a rental car. We 1220 01:00:53,520 --> 01:00:55,360 Speaker 2: need smoke weed while waiting for a rental car while 1221 01:00:55,360 --> 01:00:57,240 Speaker 2: we're about to break the law. Everybody just thinks it's 1222 01:00:57,280 --> 01:01:01,160 Speaker 2: totally fine. We get behind the wheel and they're totally intoxid. So, frankly, 1223 01:01:01,240 --> 01:01:03,720 Speaker 2: this is a bullshite understanding of what legal weed would 1224 01:01:03,800 --> 01:01:06,160 Speaker 2: mean for the state of Florida, because it's really more 1225 01:01:06,200 --> 01:01:08,720 Speaker 2: about public consumption and being some of us. 1226 01:01:09,240 --> 01:01:12,000 Speaker 3: Nobody's get at home, nobody zero. 1227 01:01:12,280 --> 01:01:16,000 Speaker 1: Dave Portnoy happened to believe in a little concept called freedom. 1228 01:01:16,800 --> 01:01:17,160 Speaker 8: There's no. 1229 01:01:19,560 --> 01:01:20,720 Speaker 3: One's violating your freedom at home. 1230 01:01:21,000 --> 01:01:23,160 Speaker 4: Zero that you don't believe in freedom, That's what's sad 1231 01:01:23,200 --> 01:01:23,360 Speaker 4: to me. 1232 01:01:23,520 --> 01:01:25,240 Speaker 2: Yeah, this is what I'm talking about, Like it's it's 1233 01:01:25,320 --> 01:01:29,240 Speaker 2: just total propaganda by these weedheads and uh like, who 1234 01:01:29,400 --> 01:01:32,200 Speaker 2: is coming to Dave Portnoy's Miami house and arresting them 1235 01:01:32,560 --> 01:01:36,560 Speaker 2: for marijuana they will for blowing up cocaine. I mean, 1236 01:01:36,600 --> 01:01:39,880 Speaker 2: it's not ridiculous because that the point is that that's 1237 01:01:40,000 --> 01:01:42,520 Speaker 2: not actually what is happening. What's happening is it would 1238 01:01:42,600 --> 01:01:45,960 Speaker 2: legalize high potency THC, which would be violely a bit 1239 01:01:46,040 --> 01:01:48,080 Speaker 2: widely available commercially in the state. 1240 01:01:48,440 --> 01:01:50,000 Speaker 3: It would be a boon for big banks. 1241 01:01:50,040 --> 01:01:53,160 Speaker 4: It would be regulated. 1242 01:01:53,280 --> 01:01:55,760 Speaker 2: It would be so regulated like it is in Colorado. 1243 01:01:56,120 --> 01:01:59,520 Speaker 4: Teenagers regulated well more dangerous. 1244 01:02:00,320 --> 01:02:04,040 Speaker 2: In the state of Colorado, high potency THC is poisoning children. 1245 01:02:04,400 --> 01:02:05,160 Speaker 3: Er visits are up. 1246 01:02:05,240 --> 01:02:07,440 Speaker 2: They have massive amounts of traffic debts, and the amount 1247 01:02:07,480 --> 01:02:10,360 Speaker 2: of tax revenue does not even compare to what they 1248 01:02:10,440 --> 01:02:14,800 Speaker 2: initially promised. It is almost certainly being overwhelmed in emergency 1249 01:02:14,880 --> 01:02:18,280 Speaker 2: services and higher police or public safety needs. 1250 01:02:18,480 --> 01:02:20,480 Speaker 3: And the entire city smells like shit. 1251 01:02:20,720 --> 01:02:22,960 Speaker 2: So if that's the trade that you would like in Miami, 1252 01:02:23,400 --> 01:02:26,360 Speaker 2: in Miami Beach, in Tampa, in Jacksonville. 1253 01:02:26,520 --> 01:02:28,040 Speaker 3: Be by the way, I don't live in Florida. You 1254 01:02:28,120 --> 01:02:29,000 Speaker 3: people do whatever you want. 1255 01:02:29,080 --> 01:02:31,320 Speaker 2: I visit probably once a year, and I'm like, why 1256 01:02:31,400 --> 01:02:33,960 Speaker 2: did I come to this place exactly, So let's put 1257 01:02:33,960 --> 01:02:36,320 Speaker 2: this up there on the screen. In terms of the polls, 1258 01:02:36,400 --> 01:02:40,400 Speaker 2: the polls currently disagree on the fate of Florida marijuana 1259 01:02:40,600 --> 01:02:44,800 Speaker 2: legalization initiative. Among those who have been surveyed, sixty six 1260 01:02:44,840 --> 01:02:47,320 Speaker 2: percent said that they would vote yes. Only thirty three 1261 01:02:47,360 --> 01:02:49,640 Speaker 2: percent say say no. I will just put it on 1262 01:02:49,680 --> 01:02:51,880 Speaker 2: the table I don't generally make predictions. I think it 1263 01:02:51,960 --> 01:02:55,080 Speaker 2: is going to pass just because I think marijuana legalization 1264 01:02:55,200 --> 01:02:57,200 Speaker 2: is unfortunately incredibly popular, So it's. 1265 01:02:57,160 --> 01:02:58,320 Speaker 3: Very popular people. 1266 01:02:58,320 --> 01:03:00,959 Speaker 4: Most Americans agree with me and Dave Portnoy and believe 1267 01:03:01,040 --> 01:03:01,400 Speaker 4: in freedom. 1268 01:03:01,480 --> 01:03:03,640 Speaker 3: Be my guest, you want to ruin public you. 1269 01:03:03,640 --> 01:03:06,760 Speaker 1: Know, just a technical thing that it has to get 1270 01:03:06,760 --> 01:03:09,800 Speaker 1: sixty percent to pass. I believe it is the margin. 1271 01:03:09,920 --> 01:03:12,680 Speaker 1: And so there was one poll from Florida Atlantic University 1272 01:03:12,720 --> 01:03:15,120 Speaker 1: that had it at fifty six percent, but you still 1273 01:03:15,280 --> 01:03:18,240 Speaker 1: had some fifteen percent who said that they didn't know 1274 01:03:18,320 --> 01:03:19,600 Speaker 1: how they would vote on the measures. 1275 01:03:19,640 --> 01:03:21,280 Speaker 4: I agree with you. I think it's pretty likely little 1276 01:03:21,360 --> 01:03:21,840 Speaker 4: past you had. 1277 01:03:21,800 --> 01:03:25,040 Speaker 1: Trump come out and endorse it amount in fact it 1278 01:03:25,440 --> 01:03:28,960 Speaker 1: so the more interesting thing to me not that I 1279 01:03:29,000 --> 01:03:30,840 Speaker 1: don't always find your views on the topic. 1280 01:03:30,720 --> 01:03:32,120 Speaker 4: Very interesting saga, but. 1281 01:03:33,600 --> 01:03:38,320 Speaker 1: There is an interesting divide in the GOP coalition between 1282 01:03:38,480 --> 01:03:41,600 Speaker 1: the what something the phenomena you've talked about, the barstool 1283 01:03:41,640 --> 01:03:46,000 Speaker 1: conservatives of course being chief among them, and the JD. 1284 01:03:46,200 --> 01:03:50,960 Speaker 1: Vance style conservatives, who are you know, social conservatives who 1285 01:03:50,960 --> 01:03:54,160 Speaker 1: are deeply concerned about like degeneracy and the decline of 1286 01:03:54,240 --> 01:03:55,280 Speaker 1: the culture, et cetera. 1287 01:03:55,080 --> 01:03:55,520 Speaker 4: Et cetera. 1288 01:03:56,240 --> 01:04:00,480 Speaker 1: And there was a unifying and there's still to some 1289 01:04:00,640 --> 01:04:03,760 Speaker 1: extent is but part of what brought them together was 1290 01:04:03,880 --> 01:04:07,600 Speaker 1: this like backlash against democratic wokeness right and the like 1291 01:04:08,120 --> 01:04:11,240 Speaker 1: you know, the the PC police and the policing of 1292 01:04:11,320 --> 01:04:14,880 Speaker 1: word language and all that stuff, and it sort of 1293 01:04:15,040 --> 01:04:17,920 Speaker 1: united them because the portnoid types are like, leave me 1294 01:04:17,960 --> 01:04:19,720 Speaker 1: the fuck alone, like I'm gonna say what I want 1295 01:04:19,760 --> 01:04:22,720 Speaker 1: to say, and the JD. Vans types are like, you know, 1296 01:04:23,160 --> 01:04:25,360 Speaker 1: they're I don't want to use him specifically, but that 1297 01:04:25,600 --> 01:04:29,000 Speaker 1: genre of conservative it's not that there's so much opposed 1298 01:04:29,520 --> 01:04:32,800 Speaker 1: to some censorship or restrictions in their direction, but they 1299 01:04:32,840 --> 01:04:40,440 Speaker 1: didn't like that particular like liberal institutional wokeness being codified 1300 01:04:40,480 --> 01:04:43,360 Speaker 1: in corporations and those sorts of things, because it's obviously 1301 01:04:43,440 --> 01:04:45,000 Speaker 1: on the other side of the culture war for them. 1302 01:04:45,080 --> 01:04:48,560 Speaker 1: So there was like a unifying theme there. The salience 1303 01:04:48,600 --> 01:04:51,280 Speaker 1: of that issue, I think anyone would say, has declined. 1304 01:04:51,400 --> 01:04:54,840 Speaker 1: It's not a major battleground in terms of this presidential election. 1305 01:04:54,920 --> 01:04:57,240 Speaker 1: It's not something Trump really ever talked about. Ron Santis 1306 01:04:57,320 --> 01:04:59,160 Speaker 1: really leaned into it. We saw how well that worked 1307 01:04:59,200 --> 01:05:02,280 Speaker 1: out for him, et ceter uh. And so you're getting 1308 01:05:02,400 --> 01:05:06,480 Speaker 1: more instances where this divide is on display. The other 1309 01:05:06,520 --> 01:05:09,000 Speaker 1: one that I can think of is the abortion argument, 1310 01:05:09,040 --> 01:05:12,360 Speaker 1: where Pornoy came out and you know, was relatively pro 1311 01:05:12,480 --> 01:05:15,200 Speaker 1: choice in his commentary, and there was again a backlash 1312 01:05:15,240 --> 01:05:17,240 Speaker 1: against him from more of the like you know, social 1313 01:05:17,280 --> 01:05:20,760 Speaker 1: conservative Jandie Vance wing of the party. And so that's 1314 01:05:20,960 --> 01:05:23,920 Speaker 1: that's actually what's interesting to me here about some of 1315 01:05:23,960 --> 01:05:27,240 Speaker 1: the backlash of poor Noy's comments is exposive a fissure 1316 01:05:27,800 --> 01:05:31,520 Speaker 1: between the social conservatives and the barstool conservatives within the 1317 01:05:31,600 --> 01:05:36,160 Speaker 1: GOP coalition that hadn't been on huge display until you know, recently. 1318 01:05:36,640 --> 01:05:38,680 Speaker 2: Let me take off my own hat and be descriptive. 1319 01:05:39,200 --> 01:05:42,800 Speaker 2: They're obviously more popular, like ten times more. And in fact, 1320 01:05:42,960 --> 01:05:45,000 Speaker 2: this is the issue is that by you mean the 1321 01:05:45,840 --> 01:05:48,800 Speaker 2: barcal people I said this, I look, I think barstool 1322 01:05:48,800 --> 01:05:50,920 Speaker 2: conservatism will be the future. I think that is exactly 1323 01:05:51,000 --> 01:05:53,360 Speaker 2: what the GOP will eventually look like. There will have 1324 01:05:53,480 --> 01:05:57,440 Speaker 2: to be some sis to Soljia moment on abortion or 1325 01:05:57,560 --> 01:06:00,960 Speaker 2: the abortion abortion question will be just resolved Democrats whenever 1326 01:06:01,000 --> 01:06:03,560 Speaker 2: they nationalize it, and the pro life people can shut 1327 01:06:03,640 --> 01:06:06,440 Speaker 2: up forever after that period. It's very likely that this 1328 01:06:06,600 --> 01:06:09,040 Speaker 2: is the direction that things will trend just because it's 1329 01:06:09,080 --> 01:06:09,800 Speaker 2: way more popular. 1330 01:06:09,880 --> 01:06:12,000 Speaker 3: People are a lot more secular. They don't like telling 1331 01:06:12,080 --> 01:06:13,160 Speaker 3: people what to do. 1332 01:06:13,800 --> 01:06:16,040 Speaker 2: And if you notice, like, for example, let's put the 1333 01:06:16,200 --> 01:06:19,200 Speaker 2: other side of who these people might have in terms 1334 01:06:19,240 --> 01:06:22,120 Speaker 2: of their political talent, like Ron DeSantis. Yeah, Ron de 1335 01:06:22,200 --> 01:06:24,840 Speaker 2: Santas is popular in Florida, but he lost massively in 1336 01:06:24,880 --> 01:06:27,520 Speaker 2: the GOP primary. And listen to the way that he 1337 01:06:27,600 --> 01:06:29,000 Speaker 2: talks about the issue. Let's take a listen. 1338 01:06:29,080 --> 01:06:29,880 Speaker 3: This is just yesterday. 1339 01:06:30,240 --> 01:06:33,440 Speaker 10: And what I tell people is your default on amending 1340 01:06:33,560 --> 01:06:36,560 Speaker 10: the Constitution should be no right. They should have to 1341 01:06:36,680 --> 01:06:39,960 Speaker 10: prove to you a really high bar why you would 1342 01:06:40,000 --> 01:06:43,240 Speaker 10: put something in the constitution which effectively can't be changed. 1343 01:06:43,600 --> 01:06:46,640 Speaker 10: Same thing with this Amendment three. You know the Amendment three. 1344 01:06:47,080 --> 01:06:51,080 Speaker 10: The media will refer to it as marijuana recreational legalization. 1345 01:06:51,280 --> 01:06:55,320 Speaker 10: That's not entirely true. It's a partial legalization because this 1346 01:06:55,440 --> 01:06:58,240 Speaker 10: has been put in by basically one big weed company 1347 01:06:58,600 --> 01:07:01,800 Speaker 10: that spents seventy five eighty million dollars. And yes, they 1348 01:07:01,920 --> 01:07:03,920 Speaker 10: write in there that you have a right to possess 1349 01:07:04,080 --> 01:07:06,720 Speaker 10: and use up to three ounces of marion, which the 1350 01:07:06,840 --> 01:07:09,400 Speaker 10: law enforcement tells me maybe fifty to one hundred joints, 1351 01:07:09,400 --> 01:07:11,200 Speaker 10: so that's more than any other state in the country. 1352 01:07:11,480 --> 01:07:14,400 Speaker 10: So they're putting that in the constitution. So yes, you 1353 01:07:14,520 --> 01:07:16,320 Speaker 10: do have that right, but only if you buy it 1354 01:07:16,400 --> 01:07:19,600 Speaker 10: from them. You can't grow it in your backyard. You 1355 01:07:19,680 --> 01:07:21,840 Speaker 10: got to buy it from them. So they're creating in 1356 01:07:21,920 --> 01:07:26,320 Speaker 10: our constitution a big weed cartel. And not only that, 1357 01:07:26,480 --> 01:07:31,600 Speaker 10: they're giving themselves protection from any civil liability at all 1358 01:07:31,920 --> 01:07:35,800 Speaker 10: at any point in the distribution or cultivation process. That's 1359 01:07:35,960 --> 01:07:37,240 Speaker 10: not in the ballot summary. 1360 01:07:38,000 --> 01:07:40,480 Speaker 2: I mean, look, empirically, he's right, but that's like the 1361 01:07:40,600 --> 01:07:43,760 Speaker 2: most boring way that you could possibly address this. 1362 01:07:44,840 --> 01:07:48,520 Speaker 1: Well, It's also what I took note of is like 1363 01:07:49,360 --> 01:07:51,320 Speaker 1: when you just argued against it, you went at it 1364 01:07:51,400 --> 01:07:55,600 Speaker 1: directly basically like this is bad, and here's why you 1365 01:07:55,720 --> 01:07:58,520 Speaker 1: can fell. He knows he's on losing grounds because he 1366 01:07:58,640 --> 01:08:01,880 Speaker 1: makes all these like proced vidural arguments about like well 1367 01:08:01,960 --> 01:08:05,080 Speaker 1: maybe we should mess with the constitution, you know, which 1368 01:08:05,120 --> 01:08:07,920 Speaker 1: again isn't a weed specific argument. It's just like a 1369 01:08:08,160 --> 01:08:10,920 Speaker 1: you know, appeal to sort of tradition and sense of 1370 01:08:11,040 --> 01:08:14,280 Speaker 1: people's fear of change. Then he does this kind of 1371 01:08:14,360 --> 01:08:16,519 Speaker 1: jiu jitsu and like, oh, well, this is really a 1372 01:08:16,600 --> 01:08:20,320 Speaker 1: giveaway to corporations. None of it is a direct argument 1373 01:08:20,439 --> 01:08:23,600 Speaker 1: against the thing that people are actually voting on. And 1374 01:08:23,840 --> 01:08:27,559 Speaker 1: so to me, it's very telling that he knows he's 1375 01:08:27,600 --> 01:08:29,800 Speaker 1: looking at these full numbers. He knows he's on not 1376 01:08:30,000 --> 01:08:32,519 Speaker 1: on you know, solid grounds here in terms of public opinion, 1377 01:08:32,560 --> 01:08:34,040 Speaker 1: which is why he has to do all of these 1378 01:08:34,040 --> 01:08:36,880 Speaker 1: sort of ancillary arguments rather than making a direct appeal 1379 01:08:36,920 --> 01:08:37,320 Speaker 1: as you did. 1380 01:08:37,840 --> 01:08:40,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, I agree, I mean this is part of the problem. 1381 01:08:40,320 --> 01:08:42,280 Speaker 2: Let's continue in this vein. Let's put the next one 1382 01:08:42,320 --> 01:08:45,120 Speaker 2: up on the screen. Matt Walsh put out a tweet says, 1383 01:08:45,120 --> 01:08:46,880 Speaker 2: can you point to any state or city where life 1384 01:08:46,920 --> 01:08:50,320 Speaker 2: has been in anywhere measurably improved after legalizing marijuana? Where 1385 01:08:50,320 --> 01:08:52,400 Speaker 2: are the success st is? Just give me one please. 1386 01:08:52,680 --> 01:08:55,800 Speaker 2: But Jason Whitlock, you know, kind of also crystallizing what 1387 01:08:55,920 --> 01:08:58,280 Speaker 2: you're talking about here. This is why single people and 1388 01:08:58,320 --> 01:09:00,879 Speaker 2: people with hout kids shouldn't vote. We to think selfishly, 1389 01:09:00,960 --> 01:09:03,320 Speaker 2: with no concern to what we're leaving the next generation. 1390 01:09:03,479 --> 01:09:05,320 Speaker 2: Married people with kids should be the only voters. We 1391 01:09:05,360 --> 01:09:08,479 Speaker 2: should prioritize families. We want to fix our broken culture. 1392 01:09:08,560 --> 01:09:10,800 Speaker 2: Maybe you can agree or you can disagree, but that's 1393 01:09:10,840 --> 01:09:13,360 Speaker 2: not popular. I'll just put it that way, and that's 1394 01:09:13,400 --> 01:09:15,000 Speaker 2: the issue. We have to live in the realm of 1395 01:09:15,080 --> 01:09:18,439 Speaker 2: representative democracy. So look, you're correct. I made a very 1396 01:09:19,000 --> 01:09:21,559 Speaker 2: fourth right argument about it. But a lot of people 1397 01:09:21,640 --> 01:09:23,800 Speaker 2: don't even want to talk about the issue or get 1398 01:09:23,840 --> 01:09:27,120 Speaker 2: into this whole like, oh, people, kids shouldn't vote. The 1399 01:09:27,200 --> 01:09:30,960 Speaker 2: truth is that Portnoy is like a hedonist individualist. I 1400 01:09:31,320 --> 01:09:34,200 Speaker 2: would hope he does not take exception to that, because 1401 01:09:34,640 --> 01:09:38,120 Speaker 2: I would say, that's descriptive, that's not necessarily a bad thing, 1402 01:09:38,479 --> 01:09:41,639 Speaker 2: that's a very popular thing. It's a very American character. 1403 01:09:41,960 --> 01:09:45,360 Speaker 2: Actually I don't necessarily agree with it whenever it comes 1404 01:09:45,400 --> 01:09:49,160 Speaker 2: to marijuana, but descriptively, it is so obvious to me 1405 01:09:49,240 --> 01:09:51,680 Speaker 2: that things are going in that direction. It also is why, 1406 01:09:52,080 --> 01:09:55,599 Speaker 2: for example, Portnoy you know, went after JD. Vance about 1407 01:09:56,160 --> 01:09:59,000 Speaker 2: this idea of like having higher taxes or whatever for 1408 01:09:59,120 --> 01:10:02,599 Speaker 2: people who are seeing goal why he also but also 1409 01:10:02,720 --> 01:10:05,679 Speaker 2: why it's very important remember that he was pro Trump 1410 01:10:05,800 --> 01:10:10,240 Speaker 2: in twenty and fifteen, not for policy positions, for quote 1411 01:10:10,320 --> 01:10:12,840 Speaker 2: telling it like it is. And so I always pointed 1412 01:10:12,920 --> 01:10:15,400 Speaker 2: that I think is a very important precursor of where 1413 01:10:15,520 --> 01:10:17,880 Speaker 2: politics and all of that will trend how someone can 1414 01:10:18,000 --> 01:10:21,760 Speaker 2: be simultaneously pro choice and also like pro Trump. 1415 01:10:21,840 --> 01:10:23,560 Speaker 3: Anti woke left and all that. 1416 01:10:24,000 --> 01:10:26,439 Speaker 2: It seems incoherent if you think about politics in a 1417 01:10:26,520 --> 01:10:29,519 Speaker 2: nineteen ninety sense, but in a twenty twenty four cents, 1418 01:10:29,600 --> 01:10:31,439 Speaker 2: I actually think it's starting to make perfect sense. 1419 01:10:32,479 --> 01:10:35,600 Speaker 1: Fortnite really is sort of the living embodiment of the 1420 01:10:35,720 --> 01:10:37,879 Speaker 1: antithesis of JD. Vance's politics. 1421 01:10:38,040 --> 01:10:38,680 Speaker 3: Yes, that's right. 1422 01:10:39,680 --> 01:10:43,200 Speaker 1: Putting aside, you know, whatever policy proposals he puts out there, 1423 01:10:43,439 --> 01:10:48,680 Speaker 1: which you know I am. For example, on child tax credit, right, 1424 01:10:48,800 --> 01:10:51,160 Speaker 1: they had a child tax credit vote in the Senate 1425 01:10:51,280 --> 01:10:53,200 Speaker 1: and he didn't bother his show up for it. He 1426 01:10:53,280 --> 01:10:55,519 Speaker 1: certainly didn't like lead the charge to reinstate the child 1427 01:10:55,600 --> 01:10:59,559 Speaker 1: tax credit after the after it expired, you know, from 1428 01:10:59,640 --> 01:11:03,479 Speaker 1: the the COVID era provisions, et cetera. And I think, 1429 01:11:03,600 --> 01:11:05,360 Speaker 1: and you can tell me Zaga, because you know him 1430 01:11:05,400 --> 01:11:08,400 Speaker 1: and his ideology better than I do, that it's because 1431 01:11:08,920 --> 01:11:12,880 Speaker 1: he doesn't actually believe that policy is really central to 1432 01:11:13,120 --> 01:11:15,120 Speaker 1: the goals that he wants to accomplish. 1433 01:11:15,720 --> 01:11:17,480 Speaker 4: It's more about. 1434 01:11:19,120 --> 01:11:24,440 Speaker 1: Using culture to kind of enforce a certain cultural lifestyle 1435 01:11:24,600 --> 01:11:28,599 Speaker 1: that he thinks is the ideal based on his experience, 1436 01:11:28,680 --> 01:11:33,120 Speaker 1: his childhood, his religion, et cetera. And so you know, 1437 01:11:33,200 --> 01:11:35,200 Speaker 1: when Jadie Vance is out there talking about like we 1438 01:11:35,280 --> 01:11:39,200 Speaker 1: need to punish the childless or we need to you know, 1439 01:11:39,439 --> 01:11:42,160 Speaker 1: or flirting with this idea that Woodlock puts down there 1440 01:11:42,200 --> 01:11:44,639 Speaker 1: that hey, you know, your vote should count more if 1441 01:11:44,680 --> 01:11:50,240 Speaker 1: you have kids than if you don't, it's exactly because 1442 01:11:50,880 --> 01:11:55,760 Speaker 1: he thinks very negatively about the lifestyle of that Dave 1443 01:11:55,840 --> 01:11:58,760 Speaker 1: Portnoy has chosen, and he thinks that that should be 1444 01:12:00,000 --> 01:12:02,560 Speaker 1: effectively shamed. And I don't not try to use that 1445 01:12:02,720 --> 01:12:05,479 Speaker 1: like in an overly pejorative way, but effectively shamed out 1446 01:12:05,520 --> 01:12:09,559 Speaker 1: of existence or minimized. And yes, policy is one lever 1447 01:12:09,720 --> 01:12:12,960 Speaker 1: for that, but it's not just about rewarding people with families. 1448 01:12:13,040 --> 01:12:17,479 Speaker 1: It's about actively, like trying to disincentivize the lifestyle of 1449 01:12:17,800 --> 01:12:18,479 Speaker 1: Dave Portnoy. 1450 01:12:18,920 --> 01:12:21,320 Speaker 4: And so that's, you know, part of what I was 1451 01:12:21,360 --> 01:12:21,840 Speaker 4: thinking about. 1452 01:12:21,880 --> 01:12:24,040 Speaker 1: When you're hearing him talk about this and the way 1453 01:12:24,040 --> 01:12:25,960 Speaker 1: he's approaching to smoke of the blunt on the camera 1454 01:12:26,080 --> 01:12:30,240 Speaker 1: or whatever. It's like very weird that that person and 1455 01:12:30,560 --> 01:12:33,800 Speaker 1: Jade Vance exist in the same party, because they are 1456 01:12:34,720 --> 01:12:36,600 Speaker 1: diametrically opposed. 1457 01:12:36,560 --> 01:12:39,520 Speaker 4: In their view of the world and their approach to politics. 1458 01:12:39,800 --> 01:12:42,280 Speaker 2: I would the only thing I would really quibble is 1459 01:12:42,320 --> 01:12:44,719 Speaker 2: that it's not about culture to culture, it's actually about 1460 01:12:44,760 --> 01:12:47,600 Speaker 2: policy to culture. Like so for example, this whole like 1461 01:12:47,720 --> 01:12:50,840 Speaker 2: child tax credit debate, it's not about the child tax 1462 01:12:50,920 --> 01:12:54,080 Speaker 2: credit on its face, it's about increasing well First of all, 1463 01:12:54,200 --> 01:12:57,080 Speaker 2: it's actually about winning an intra party fight as opposed 1464 01:12:57,120 --> 01:12:59,600 Speaker 2: to working with the left, as in it needs to 1465 01:12:59,680 --> 01:13:01,960 Speaker 2: be a victory within the Republican Party to try and 1466 01:13:02,000 --> 01:13:04,160 Speaker 2: get them to vote for it, as opposed to working 1467 01:13:04,200 --> 01:13:06,719 Speaker 2: with the left to get something done. Second, is really, 1468 01:13:07,000 --> 01:13:10,320 Speaker 2: I mean really is about It's it's difficult to call 1469 01:13:10,360 --> 01:13:13,760 Speaker 2: it social engineering because also like leftist policy is also 1470 01:13:13,800 --> 01:13:15,840 Speaker 2: a form of social engineering. Like if you have a 1471 01:13:15,920 --> 01:13:19,360 Speaker 2: child tax the major disagreement at least between ProChile tax 1472 01:13:19,439 --> 01:13:21,360 Speaker 2: credit people on the right and left, is whether you 1473 01:13:21,400 --> 01:13:23,960 Speaker 2: should have means tests or single mothers like that is, 1474 01:13:24,120 --> 01:13:26,360 Speaker 2: if you do, that's a form of social engineering. If 1475 01:13:26,360 --> 01:13:28,880 Speaker 2: you don't, that's also a form of engineering. The point 1476 01:13:29,040 --> 01:13:31,559 Speaker 2: is is that it's about using tax policy to create 1477 01:13:31,600 --> 01:13:34,560 Speaker 2: a society that you have an objective view is the 1478 01:13:34,680 --> 01:13:38,120 Speaker 2: ideal way that you should live, and that if anything 1479 01:13:38,240 --> 01:13:42,960 Speaker 2: really describes like the major difference with Portnoyism or type 1480 01:13:42,960 --> 01:13:45,160 Speaker 2: of people who might be like him and JD is 1481 01:13:45,240 --> 01:13:48,559 Speaker 2: that like Portanoiism is really, like I said, it's about 1482 01:13:48,640 --> 01:13:54,280 Speaker 2: individuality libertarian. It is deeply socially and economically libertarian. Right, 1483 01:13:54,360 --> 01:13:57,360 Speaker 2: So it's just it's about small business, it's about individuality, 1484 01:13:57,400 --> 01:14:00,840 Speaker 2: it's about maximizing the ability of this self to achieve 1485 01:14:00,960 --> 01:14:05,640 Speaker 2: whatever it desires, as opposed to more of like a 1486 01:14:05,720 --> 01:14:09,160 Speaker 2: Judeo Christian way that JD would look at it, or 1487 01:14:09,240 --> 01:14:11,400 Speaker 2: even there's non religious ways to look at it too, 1488 01:14:11,680 --> 01:14:14,400 Speaker 2: which is like, no, the family is the individual. Unit 1489 01:14:14,520 --> 01:14:17,640 Speaker 2: is the unit which should be maximized, not the individual. 1490 01:14:17,920 --> 01:14:21,240 Speaker 2: That's a long time debate in America. Actually, it's a 1491 01:14:21,360 --> 01:14:26,240 Speaker 2: big divide not just between social libertarian and Republican or 1492 01:14:26,360 --> 01:14:31,679 Speaker 2: even conservatives, but Christians and non Christians or secular there's 1493 01:14:31,800 --> 01:14:35,120 Speaker 2: various secular debates like within this. So that's kind of 1494 01:14:35,120 --> 01:14:37,320 Speaker 2: the way that I've been looking at this. But I 1495 01:14:37,439 --> 01:14:41,280 Speaker 2: have no doubt that Portnoy and his vision or not 1496 01:14:41,360 --> 01:14:45,519 Speaker 2: even vision, his lifestyle like what he perpetuates and all 1497 01:14:45,600 --> 01:14:48,599 Speaker 2: that that is more popular amongst men today. I don't 1498 01:14:48,600 --> 01:14:50,920 Speaker 2: think that's necessarily a good thing, but I'm not stupid. 1499 01:14:50,960 --> 01:14:52,240 Speaker 2: I know where things are trending. 1500 01:14:53,000 --> 01:14:56,200 Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I just I guess with JD. And I 1501 01:14:56,439 --> 01:14:59,320 Speaker 1: am interested your thought if this is accurate. You know, 1502 01:14:59,439 --> 01:15:02,519 Speaker 1: he talks a lot about, you know, the goals of 1503 01:15:03,240 --> 01:15:06,400 Speaker 1: family creation and centering the family, and you know, making 1504 01:15:06,400 --> 01:15:09,479 Speaker 1: it more difficult to get out of marriages, and you know. 1505 01:15:09,560 --> 01:15:11,479 Speaker 4: That that might be important bed rock. 1506 01:15:11,520 --> 01:15:13,880 Speaker 3: And I don't know religion it I know people around 1507 01:15:13,920 --> 01:15:14,400 Speaker 3: him have said it. 1508 01:15:14,920 --> 01:15:18,559 Speaker 1: He didn't, but anyway, yeah, I mean, he he has 1509 01:15:18,680 --> 01:15:22,000 Speaker 1: floated that it perhaps would be better if people had 1510 01:15:22,040 --> 01:15:25,840 Speaker 1: a more difficult time getting out of divorces. But in 1511 01:15:25,920 --> 01:15:29,400 Speaker 1: any case, but he doesn't talk a lot about He 1512 01:15:29,600 --> 01:15:31,920 Speaker 1: leans into the goals, but he doesn't talk a lot 1513 01:15:31,960 --> 01:15:37,000 Speaker 1: about the specific policies. And perhaps that's because, you know, 1514 01:15:37,160 --> 01:15:39,439 Speaker 1: it would be difficult to sign on to some of 1515 01:15:39,479 --> 01:15:42,000 Speaker 1: those policies in a Republican context, because some of them 1516 01:15:42,200 --> 01:15:46,200 Speaker 1: just sound like, you know, lefty progressive policies. But I 1517 01:15:46,760 --> 01:15:50,800 Speaker 1: suspect it's more about he is not afraid of using 1518 01:15:51,080 --> 01:15:55,160 Speaker 1: government to push in the direction that he wants to see, 1519 01:15:55,200 --> 01:16:00,000 Speaker 1: in the anti Portnoy direction, we'll say, but he believe 1520 01:16:00,000 --> 01:16:04,439 Speaker 1: he's more in the power of culture to change the 1521 01:16:04,520 --> 01:16:07,120 Speaker 1: things that he wants to change. And by the way, 1522 01:16:07,280 --> 01:16:10,120 Speaker 1: he's not necessarily wrong about that we were talking before. 1523 01:16:10,520 --> 01:16:13,240 Speaker 1: You know, if your goal is to increase the birth rate, 1524 01:16:13,320 --> 01:16:15,120 Speaker 1: which is one of his goals, if you have this 1525 01:16:15,240 --> 01:16:18,240 Speaker 1: like pro natalist approach and you look around the world, 1526 01:16:18,640 --> 01:16:23,080 Speaker 1: there's literally nowhere that any policy has actually worked to 1527 01:16:23,120 --> 01:16:26,000 Speaker 1: achieve that goal, and so then you have to look 1528 01:16:26,040 --> 01:16:28,759 Speaker 1: at Okay, well, then we need a more religious society 1529 01:16:28,840 --> 01:16:31,559 Speaker 1: where it's like, you know, a religious goal like part 1530 01:16:31,600 --> 01:16:35,679 Speaker 1: of your whole ethos, and culture is centered around kids 1531 01:16:35,760 --> 01:16:40,400 Speaker 1: and family versus a government prescription. And so that's that's 1532 01:16:40,479 --> 01:16:44,040 Speaker 1: my sense, that's my evolving sense of why he actually 1533 01:16:44,200 --> 01:16:48,440 Speaker 1: isn't all that interested in policies because he thinks cultural 1534 01:16:48,720 --> 01:16:52,160 Speaker 1: impetus and you know, pushing in an anti portnite direction 1535 01:16:52,320 --> 01:16:53,679 Speaker 1: is probably a more. 1536 01:16:53,560 --> 01:16:56,519 Speaker 4: Effective way to go. And why so interested in like 1537 01:16:56,600 --> 01:16:59,000 Speaker 4: the culture war over the sort of economic pieces that 1538 01:16:59,040 --> 01:16:59,960 Speaker 4: he sometimes talks about. 1539 01:17:00,240 --> 01:17:02,240 Speaker 2: That's not my sense, just because a lot of his 1540 01:17:02,360 --> 01:17:06,040 Speaker 2: staff are look Matt Iglesias today said, my sense amongst 1541 01:17:06,080 --> 01:17:08,439 Speaker 2: Democrats is that he has the most serious policy staff 1542 01:17:08,439 --> 01:17:09,599 Speaker 2: amongst Republicans on the Hill. 1543 01:17:09,640 --> 01:17:11,400 Speaker 3: So I don't think that's true. In fact, I think 1544 01:17:11,439 --> 01:17:13,160 Speaker 3: he's very well versed in policy. 1545 01:17:13,200 --> 01:17:14,640 Speaker 2: I think part of the reason you don't necessarily want 1546 01:17:14,640 --> 01:17:16,240 Speaker 2: to take a policy position is because it can be 1547 01:17:16,320 --> 01:17:19,280 Speaker 2: unpopular within your own party, and maybe you learn a 1548 01:17:19,360 --> 01:17:21,760 Speaker 2: thing or two from Donald Trump and Kamala Is. Hey, 1549 01:17:21,880 --> 01:17:25,080 Speaker 2: you know, the more breathing space you give yourself, the better. 1550 01:17:25,160 --> 01:17:27,519 Speaker 2: I would also say this, he's not the principle you 1551 01:17:27,600 --> 01:17:29,000 Speaker 2: know what I mean, He's learned the hard way on 1552 01:17:29,120 --> 01:17:31,560 Speaker 2: abortionne Like if you were running his own campaign, I 1553 01:17:31,600 --> 01:17:34,479 Speaker 2: think it would actually be quite different, at least in 1554 01:17:34,560 --> 01:17:36,880 Speaker 2: terms of what you're talking about. But with Trump, the 1555 01:17:37,080 --> 01:17:40,120 Speaker 2: vague being vague is probably a net benefit. 1556 01:17:40,240 --> 01:17:42,080 Speaker 3: You don't necessarily want to talk specifics. 1557 01:17:42,439 --> 01:17:44,519 Speaker 2: You don't want to give the opposition something they can 1558 01:17:44,600 --> 01:17:46,800 Speaker 2: hit you on in terms of a difference between him 1559 01:17:46,800 --> 01:17:48,880 Speaker 2: and Trump. So I don't think that that's correct on 1560 01:17:49,240 --> 01:17:50,960 Speaker 2: the policy front. I think it has much more to 1561 01:17:51,040 --> 01:17:53,040 Speaker 2: do with it a dynamics of being a vice president 1562 01:17:53,240 --> 01:17:55,439 Speaker 2: and also being within the Republican Party where there are 1563 01:17:55,560 --> 01:17:58,920 Speaker 2: huge civil wars like going on, like if they do win, 1564 01:17:59,080 --> 01:18:02,240 Speaker 2: there will be a assive fight on this come Tax 1565 01:18:02,320 --> 01:18:04,920 Speaker 2: Cuts and Jobs Act season on where and how to 1566 01:18:04,960 --> 01:18:07,000 Speaker 2: pay for it. And actually that'll be a little bit 1567 01:18:07,040 --> 01:18:09,760 Speaker 2: more interesting, honestly, about how it will really manifest when 1568 01:18:09,760 --> 01:18:12,280 Speaker 2: the two sides of them actually have power Senate Republicans 1569 01:18:12,479 --> 01:18:14,479 Speaker 2: and somebody like Vance in the White House, and then 1570 01:18:14,560 --> 01:18:15,880 Speaker 2: which way Donald Trump is going to go? 1571 01:18:16,720 --> 01:18:17,599 Speaker 4: Yeah for sure. 1572 01:18:17,800 --> 01:18:20,759 Speaker 1: Well, anyway, that's my intrigue with regard to to Portnoy 1573 01:18:20,840 --> 01:18:23,640 Speaker 1: and Vance is how they are truly like antithesis of 1574 01:18:23,680 --> 01:18:26,439 Speaker 1: each other in terms of politics, and yet today somehow 1575 01:18:26,520 --> 01:18:27,639 Speaker 1: exist in the same coalition. 1576 01:18:28,200 --> 01:18:30,800 Speaker 2: Well, Dick Cheney and AOC are in the same coalition too, 1577 01:18:30,840 --> 01:18:32,040 Speaker 2: which is part of the fun parts. 1578 01:18:31,840 --> 01:18:33,120 Speaker 4: Of the strange bedfellows. 1579 01:18:33,200 --> 01:18:36,000 Speaker 2: Yeah, let's go to the next one. Ukraine definitely wanted 1580 01:18:36,040 --> 01:18:38,880 Speaker 2: to make sure that we highlighted this. Let's go ahead 1581 01:18:38,880 --> 01:18:41,920 Speaker 2: and play some of Vladimir Putin's comments on the news 1582 01:18:42,000 --> 01:18:45,960 Speaker 2: that the US may allow NATO provided missiles to strike 1583 01:18:46,120 --> 01:18:48,960 Speaker 2: even deeper inside of Russia. So let's play the video 1584 01:18:49,040 --> 01:18:50,840 Speaker 2: and I'm going to read it. Putin says, this is 1585 01:18:50,880 --> 01:18:54,080 Speaker 2: their directive. Molment, of course, fundamentally changes the essence, the 1586 01:18:54,240 --> 01:18:58,080 Speaker 2: very nature of the conflict. He continues, this will mean 1587 01:18:58,240 --> 01:19:01,800 Speaker 2: that NATO countries, the United States, and European countries are 1588 01:19:02,040 --> 01:19:05,040 Speaker 2: at war with Russia. If this is the case, considering 1589 01:19:05,120 --> 01:19:07,400 Speaker 2: the change in the very nature of this conflict, we 1590 01:19:07,479 --> 01:19:10,760 Speaker 2: will make corresponding decisions based on the threats that will 1591 01:19:10,800 --> 01:19:14,599 Speaker 2: be created for US. So that was direct quotes here 1592 01:19:14,680 --> 01:19:17,679 Speaker 2: from Vladimir Putin in reaction to some of the news 1593 01:19:17,760 --> 01:19:20,320 Speaker 2: and the debates that are coming out about US policy 1594 01:19:20,800 --> 01:19:23,439 Speaker 2: versus Ukraine. Let's put the next one up there on 1595 01:19:23,520 --> 01:19:26,879 Speaker 2: the screen, because this is the most important decision probably 1596 01:19:26,960 --> 01:19:30,320 Speaker 2: that we'll be made in this war so far. Anthony 1597 01:19:30,400 --> 01:19:33,639 Speaker 2: blinkoln Our Secretary of State, hints that the United States 1598 01:19:33,760 --> 01:19:38,000 Speaker 2: will lift arms restrictions on Ukraine using long range arms 1599 01:19:38,200 --> 01:19:39,439 Speaker 2: inside of Russia. 1600 01:19:39,840 --> 01:19:40,120 Speaker 3: Quote. 1601 01:19:40,160 --> 01:19:42,840 Speaker 2: The decision is understood to have already been made in private, 1602 01:19:42,920 --> 01:19:45,000 Speaker 2: as the Secretary of State says in Kiev. 1603 01:19:45,400 --> 01:19:48,040 Speaker 3: The US will continue to adapt its policy. 1604 01:19:48,479 --> 01:19:51,960 Speaker 2: Allegedly they're keeping this on the back burner and there 1605 01:19:52,080 --> 01:19:55,600 Speaker 2: is no official decision, but right now there will be 1606 01:19:55,720 --> 01:19:58,639 Speaker 2: a change in restriction on Ukraine's use of missiles which 1607 01:19:58,720 --> 01:20:02,040 Speaker 2: have a range of approximate one hundred and ninety miles 1608 01:20:02,360 --> 01:20:06,360 Speaker 2: to quote avoid reckless or unnecessary attacks, which is kind 1609 01:20:06,360 --> 01:20:09,200 Speaker 2: of a ridiculous way of framing it. Considering that Ukraine 1610 01:20:09,280 --> 01:20:12,519 Speaker 2: literally invaded Russia and continues to actually hold some of 1611 01:20:12,520 --> 01:20:15,679 Speaker 2: the territory that has not been disputed prior. 1612 01:20:15,560 --> 01:20:16,160 Speaker 3: To this war. 1613 01:20:16,520 --> 01:20:20,160 Speaker 2: The point is just that the slow bubbling things that 1614 01:20:20,240 --> 01:20:24,560 Speaker 2: are happening inside of Ukraine continue to be massively unstable 1615 01:20:24,640 --> 01:20:28,200 Speaker 2: and detrimental to the overall international order and have the 1616 01:20:28,400 --> 01:20:31,559 Speaker 2: risk of spiraling totally out of control in a highly 1617 01:20:31,920 --> 01:20:34,640 Speaker 2: predictable manner. And if you put it on the backdrop 1618 01:20:34,760 --> 01:20:37,439 Speaker 2: of everything that is happening, if you look at Kursk, 1619 01:20:37,560 --> 01:20:42,320 Speaker 2: for example, Russian advances putin and Russian resolve to continue 1620 01:20:42,360 --> 01:20:45,400 Speaker 2: the war, there has been basically zero change to the 1621 01:20:45,520 --> 01:20:49,080 Speaker 2: overall strategic status quo as a result of Ukraine being 1622 01:20:49,120 --> 01:20:52,280 Speaker 2: allowed to use these weapons. And yet the Ukraine lobby 1623 01:20:52,439 --> 01:20:55,240 Speaker 2: and Kamala and all of their the advisors in the 1624 01:20:55,280 --> 01:20:58,960 Speaker 2: White House, Biden and others, they just continue to direct 1625 01:20:59,240 --> 01:21:01,920 Speaker 2: in this post. Three years ago, it was totally off 1626 01:21:01,960 --> 01:21:04,960 Speaker 2: the table, this idea of giving Ukraine long range missiles 1627 01:21:04,960 --> 01:21:06,960 Speaker 2: to strike inside of Russia. Now we're just keep on 1628 01:21:07,080 --> 01:21:10,080 Speaker 2: upping the ante from tanks to F sixteen's to now 1629 01:21:10,160 --> 01:21:12,920 Speaker 2: to these missiles. It's just totally ridiculous. You know, the 1630 01:21:13,000 --> 01:21:17,200 Speaker 2: way that we whitewashed past policy and concerns of the past, 1631 01:21:17,479 --> 01:21:19,599 Speaker 2: and arguably give it to them at a time where 1632 01:21:19,640 --> 01:21:21,719 Speaker 2: it's not going to make even that much of a difference. 1633 01:21:21,800 --> 01:21:24,920 Speaker 2: The overall end to the war will not change all 1634 01:21:25,000 --> 01:21:27,919 Speaker 2: that much. So how many more square miles of territory 1635 01:21:28,240 --> 01:21:30,000 Speaker 2: is it worth it? Wall Street Journal has a story 1636 01:21:30,080 --> 01:21:33,400 Speaker 2: up this morning say that the unofficial death toll is 1637 01:21:33,479 --> 01:21:35,720 Speaker 2: somewhere in the nature of one million. 1638 01:21:35,560 --> 01:21:37,080 Speaker 3: As a result of this war. 1639 01:21:37,520 --> 01:21:41,599 Speaker 2: Yeah, and those are with the fake CIA numbers about 1640 01:21:41,640 --> 01:21:42,280 Speaker 2: Ukrainian dead. 1641 01:21:42,439 --> 01:21:44,080 Speaker 3: So what's the real number? A million? 1642 01:21:44,200 --> 01:21:48,240 Speaker 2: Five, you know, something like that. That's a disaster for them, 1643 01:21:48,439 --> 01:21:50,200 Speaker 2: for Russia, for the world. 1644 01:21:50,600 --> 01:21:51,799 Speaker 4: Just absolutely horrible. 1645 01:21:52,160 --> 01:21:54,680 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, listen, I guess what people say in 1646 01:21:54,800 --> 01:21:57,679 Speaker 1: response is, Okay, Putin's made a lot of threats before 1647 01:21:57,920 --> 01:22:00,880 Speaker 1: and hasn't necessarily followed through on them. So yeah, he's 1648 01:22:00,920 --> 01:22:03,640 Speaker 1: full of bluster about how this will be a declaration, 1649 01:22:03,800 --> 01:22:06,840 Speaker 1: NATO declaration of war against Russia, et cetera, et cetera. 1650 01:22:07,080 --> 01:22:10,720 Speaker 1: But these probably just bluffing and it's like, okay, well, 1651 01:22:10,920 --> 01:22:13,720 Speaker 1: can we at least talk about it, like, can we 1652 01:22:13,800 --> 01:22:17,120 Speaker 1: at least really focus the American people's attention on what 1653 01:22:17,240 --> 01:22:21,080 Speaker 1: would be obviously an extraordinary escalation on you know, these 1654 01:22:21,160 --> 01:22:23,519 Speaker 1: threats from Putin and what we should make of them, 1655 01:22:23,800 --> 01:22:26,880 Speaker 1: and you know, at least have a fulsome debate about 1656 01:22:26,920 --> 01:22:29,680 Speaker 1: where this is going, because you know, we've used this 1657 01:22:29,840 --> 01:22:33,600 Speaker 1: term sleepwalking from the beginning of this war, and it 1658 01:22:33,840 --> 01:22:37,839 Speaker 1: just feels more and more accurate of now the initial 1659 01:22:38,840 --> 01:22:42,400 Speaker 1: horror and attention is gone. There's very little coverage of 1660 01:22:42,600 --> 01:22:45,920 Speaker 1: what's going on and what each of these individual decisions mean, 1661 01:22:46,160 --> 01:22:49,439 Speaker 1: and yet they're so incredibly consequential. That's what's really disturbing. 1662 01:22:49,920 --> 01:22:52,280 Speaker 1: And the other thing I'm thinking is, you know, we 1663 01:22:52,439 --> 01:22:56,400 Speaker 1: know how difficult it is for American presidents to bring 1664 01:22:56,640 --> 01:22:59,479 Speaker 1: conflicts to a close, because as long as it's ongoing, 1665 01:22:59,520 --> 01:23:02,400 Speaker 1: you can you live in the like, you know, perfect 1666 01:23:02,479 --> 01:23:06,120 Speaker 1: fantasy land whereas Lenski regains all control and Putin is vanquished, 1667 01:23:06,160 --> 01:23:08,679 Speaker 1: et cetera, et cetera, even though that's obviously not going 1668 01:23:08,800 --> 01:23:12,080 Speaker 1: to be reality. The moment you have a conclusion, then 1669 01:23:12,120 --> 01:23:14,680 Speaker 1: there is a hard and fast outcome which we can 1670 01:23:15,320 --> 01:23:18,519 Speaker 1: then use to debate whether, I don't know, we should 1671 01:23:18,520 --> 01:23:22,479 Speaker 1: have spent years fighting this war rather than engaged in 1672 01:23:22,640 --> 01:23:25,240 Speaker 1: the peace negotiations, which were available to us at the 1673 01:23:25,280 --> 01:23:28,519 Speaker 1: beginning of this conflict before a million people were killed. 1674 01:23:29,040 --> 01:23:32,880 Speaker 1: So that's the logic of ongoing conflicts and endless wars. 1675 01:23:32,960 --> 01:23:35,800 Speaker 1: And of course the other logic of it is that 1676 01:23:35,880 --> 01:23:38,040 Speaker 1: you have many people who profit directly off of it, 1677 01:23:38,160 --> 01:23:40,759 Speaker 1: and no one really profiting directly off of peace except 1678 01:23:40,800 --> 01:23:43,960 Speaker 1: for the people who benefit from not being having their 1679 01:23:44,000 --> 01:23:47,479 Speaker 1: home land destroyed and fighting and dying. So, you know, 1680 01:23:47,600 --> 01:23:51,320 Speaker 1: Biden right now, he's a lame duck president. His political 1681 01:23:51,360 --> 01:23:54,800 Speaker 1: standing outside of whatever blowback it has on Kamala, Harris, 1682 01:23:54,840 --> 01:23:58,479 Speaker 1: et cetera, et cetera, his political standing really doesn't matter anymore. 1683 01:23:58,920 --> 01:24:02,120 Speaker 4: So like, take the hit, bring this thing to a. 1684 01:24:02,160 --> 01:24:05,560 Speaker 1: Close, end it, because if it goes into the next administration, 1685 01:24:05,880 --> 01:24:08,439 Speaker 1: whether it's Kamala or Trump, they're both gonna look at 1686 01:24:08,479 --> 01:24:10,800 Speaker 1: the same calculus and say, listen, what behooves us is 1687 01:24:10,880 --> 01:24:12,559 Speaker 1: to just kind of keep this thing on a slow 1688 01:24:12,600 --> 01:24:15,960 Speaker 1: burn and maintain the status quote indefinitely and kick the 1689 01:24:16,040 --> 01:24:16,800 Speaker 1: can down the road. 1690 01:24:17,160 --> 01:24:19,120 Speaker 2: Yes, and let's put this next one up there on 1691 01:24:19,240 --> 01:24:22,720 Speaker 2: the screen. It now appears that if you look at 1692 01:24:22,880 --> 01:24:26,040 Speaker 2: poll everyone says, oh, nothing without Ukraine or nothing for 1693 01:24:26,240 --> 01:24:29,920 Speaker 2: Ukraine without Ukraine. I mean, look at this, guys. Look 1694 01:24:30,120 --> 01:24:33,559 Speaker 2: more Ukrainians today want a negotiated peace to the end 1695 01:24:33,560 --> 01:24:36,800 Speaker 2: of the war than at any time before. It's actually 1696 01:24:36,920 --> 01:24:39,840 Speaker 2: the men who have been drafted and forced into the 1697 01:24:39,920 --> 01:24:42,640 Speaker 2: Ukrainian military who are the only ones who say that 1698 01:24:42,720 --> 01:24:45,760 Speaker 2: we should quote fight until it liberates all territory to 1699 01:24:45,840 --> 01:24:49,760 Speaker 2: the nineteen ninety one borders. But the highest number than 1700 01:24:49,920 --> 01:24:53,600 Speaker 2: ever before say that they should negotiate with Russia to 1701 01:24:53,800 --> 01:24:57,560 Speaker 2: achieve peace to quote, seek a compromise to end the 1702 01:24:57,680 --> 01:25:01,439 Speaker 2: war through negotiations. Now it's only forty three percent. You 1703 01:25:01,520 --> 01:25:04,679 Speaker 2: still got fifty four percent, but that is much higher 1704 01:25:05,000 --> 01:25:09,600 Speaker 2: than previous polls of the war have found. And what 1705 01:25:09,800 --> 01:25:13,559 Speaker 2: they say is that it's clear when you take into 1706 01:25:13,640 --> 01:25:19,640 Speaker 2: consideration the death and the population projections, this is if 1707 01:25:19,720 --> 01:25:21,960 Speaker 2: the longer it goes, the more in benefit of Russia. 1708 01:25:22,200 --> 01:25:25,519 Speaker 2: So for example, you know, population projections of Russia and 1709 01:25:25,720 --> 01:25:28,840 Speaker 2: Ukraine up until twenty one hundred are both dismal. But 1710 01:25:29,320 --> 01:25:32,599 Speaker 2: for Russia they'll still have well over one hundred million people. 1711 01:25:32,880 --> 01:25:36,400 Speaker 2: For the Ukrainians, it starts trending down from a height 1712 01:25:36,560 --> 01:25:40,280 Speaker 2: of fifty million around the Soviet Union collapse to like 1713 01:25:40,560 --> 01:25:43,920 Speaker 2: five million. You were talking about a tenfold reduction of 1714 01:25:44,160 --> 01:25:47,320 Speaker 2: the overall population of the country, because not only if 1715 01:25:47,320 --> 01:25:49,800 Speaker 2: so many people have been killed, so many people have fled, 1716 01:25:50,400 --> 01:25:54,680 Speaker 2: that's a disaster. No civilization can survive that, or at 1717 01:25:54,760 --> 01:25:56,479 Speaker 2: least in the way that they want to, because its 1718 01:25:56,640 --> 01:26:00,720 Speaker 2: entire war is supposedly all about protecting their identity and 1719 01:26:00,800 --> 01:26:04,679 Speaker 2: their sovereignty, etc. So it's clear, like if you want, 1720 01:26:05,120 --> 01:26:08,000 Speaker 2: if you want the outcome that you allegedly want, then 1721 01:26:08,040 --> 01:26:10,439 Speaker 2: it's pretty clear what you should do. Biden could easily 1722 01:26:10,479 --> 01:26:12,519 Speaker 2: help you get there. Biden will not do it because 1723 01:26:12,600 --> 01:26:16,120 Speaker 2: for Ukraine, or I mean for Biden, NATO and Ukraine 1724 01:26:16,280 --> 01:26:18,240 Speaker 2: is like a religion. It's like the only thing that 1725 01:26:18,320 --> 01:26:22,320 Speaker 2: still fires his synapses. So we're locked in, locked that. 1726 01:26:22,439 --> 01:26:23,920 Speaker 4: In Zionism, which we're about to get to. 1727 01:26:24,000 --> 01:26:26,000 Speaker 3: Yeah right, yeah, good point, Yeah, good point. All right, 1728 01:26:26,080 --> 01:26:26,560 Speaker 3: let's get to it. 1729 01:26:29,400 --> 01:26:32,639 Speaker 1: So a lot of very significant developments coming out of Israel. 1730 01:26:32,720 --> 01:26:34,840 Speaker 1: Let's go ahead and put this first image up on 1731 01:26:34,920 --> 01:26:38,599 Speaker 1: the screen. This is some video that was released by 1732 01:26:38,720 --> 01:26:42,719 Speaker 1: the Hoofis of a hypersonic missile that they are calling 1733 01:26:42,840 --> 01:26:46,960 Speaker 1: Palestine two. They are claiming that this is the missile 1734 01:26:47,000 --> 01:26:51,080 Speaker 1: that hit the outskirts of Tel Aviv on Saturday, so 1735 01:26:51,200 --> 01:26:53,320 Speaker 1: you can see it there and indication you know, they're 1736 01:26:53,360 --> 01:26:56,120 Speaker 1: trying to flex their muscle and proved to be a 1737 01:26:56,240 --> 01:26:59,840 Speaker 1: significant threat to the population of Israel's going and put 1738 01:26:59,840 --> 01:27:01,680 Speaker 1: the next piece up on the screen. This is from 1739 01:27:01,720 --> 01:27:05,040 Speaker 1: the Washington Post talking about this attack. The headline here 1740 01:27:05,040 --> 01:27:07,400 Speaker 1: who They's fire missile from yam and into central Israel, 1741 01:27:07,479 --> 01:27:10,479 Speaker 1: warn of more strikes. In the report, they say they 1742 01:27:10,520 --> 01:27:14,639 Speaker 1: claimed responsibility for a surface to surface missile attacking central 1743 01:27:14,800 --> 01:27:18,320 Speaker 1: Israel on Sunday morning, marking a continued escalation between the 1744 01:27:18,360 --> 01:27:22,679 Speaker 1: Iranian backed group and Israel. Caused no direct injuries, though 1745 01:27:22,960 --> 01:27:26,080 Speaker 1: they did respond with emergency services and treated nine people 1746 01:27:26,120 --> 01:27:29,759 Speaker 1: who were injured on their way to shelters after sirens sounded. 1747 01:27:30,160 --> 01:27:33,519 Speaker 1: The Houfi military spokesman described it as a hypersonic ballistic 1748 01:27:33,760 --> 01:27:37,240 Speaker 1: missile targeting military operations. The IDF said in a statement 1749 01:27:37,280 --> 01:27:39,799 Speaker 1: the missile was hit by an interceptor as a result 1750 01:27:39,880 --> 01:27:44,439 Speaker 1: of which the target fragmented but was not destroyed. In 1751 01:27:44,840 --> 01:27:47,679 Speaker 1: that same article from the Washington Post, they also had 1752 01:27:47,840 --> 01:27:51,439 Speaker 1: another piece of significant news, which is that the IDF 1753 01:27:51,720 --> 01:27:55,760 Speaker 1: is now actually admitting that it was their ice airstrikes 1754 01:27:55,920 --> 01:28:00,240 Speaker 1: that killed three different Hostriges back in November. This is 1755 01:28:00,320 --> 01:28:03,400 Speaker 1: something that had been long suspected, but now long after 1756 01:28:03,479 --> 01:28:06,719 Speaker 1: the fact, they're finally acknowledging that this is actually the case. 1757 01:28:06,840 --> 01:28:10,120 Speaker 1: But Soccer with regard to the you know, the Hoothi's 1758 01:28:10,200 --> 01:28:13,439 Speaker 1: really trying to up the ante here and demonstrating some 1759 01:28:13,600 --> 01:28:18,680 Speaker 1: more sophisticated weaponry. Obviously, this raises the stakes or for 1760 01:28:18,920 --> 01:28:21,920 Speaker 1: Israel in terms of their prosecution of this continued war. 1761 01:28:22,320 --> 01:28:23,200 Speaker 3: Yeah, this is scary. 1762 01:28:23,200 --> 01:28:25,439 Speaker 2: I mean, look, I don't know whether it was actually 1763 01:28:25,600 --> 01:28:29,000 Speaker 2: hypersonic or any of that. I don't know the actual 1764 01:28:29,080 --> 01:28:33,400 Speaker 2: technical details, but you should not dismiss this as deeply 1765 01:28:33,600 --> 01:28:36,320 Speaker 2: unstable in the system, because what it means is that 1766 01:28:36,400 --> 01:28:39,600 Speaker 2: they have a much more important capability that may not 1767 01:28:39,720 --> 01:28:42,680 Speaker 2: be as easily defeated by even the United States or 1768 01:28:42,720 --> 01:28:45,560 Speaker 2: all the other countries that intervened last time around, and 1769 01:28:45,720 --> 01:28:48,240 Speaker 2: that if they wanted, they could quite easily use it 1770 01:28:48,600 --> 01:28:51,240 Speaker 2: to inflict a lot more damage than we've seen previously. 1771 01:28:51,280 --> 01:28:53,280 Speaker 2: I attracked a lot of this stuff during North Korea 1772 01:28:53,680 --> 01:28:57,360 Speaker 2: and the development of their own nuclear missiles and their 1773 01:28:57,640 --> 01:29:00,760 Speaker 2: ICBMs capable of hitting the United States and everyone. You know, 1774 01:29:00,880 --> 01:29:02,960 Speaker 2: there's constantly just a want to just be like, oh, 1775 01:29:03,040 --> 01:29:04,320 Speaker 2: it's not that big of a deal, and it's like, 1776 01:29:04,360 --> 01:29:07,640 Speaker 2: you don't understand how what this really means for the 1777 01:29:07,680 --> 01:29:11,080 Speaker 2: overall strategic picture. Part of why you know, accepting and 1778 01:29:11,280 --> 01:29:14,679 Speaker 2: trying to create a piece negotiation with them was so important. 1779 01:29:14,760 --> 01:29:17,240 Speaker 2: And that's what I see as a vital here is 1780 01:29:17,360 --> 01:29:20,360 Speaker 2: that this really does actually change the game, not only 1781 01:29:20,360 --> 01:29:23,120 Speaker 2: in terms of US assets in the region and our 1782 01:29:23,200 --> 01:29:25,360 Speaker 2: own even ability to you know, fight something like this 1783 01:29:25,479 --> 01:29:28,160 Speaker 2: where we've bonded them several times, we've had spend billions 1784 01:29:28,240 --> 01:29:29,320 Speaker 2: of dollars trying to stop this. 1785 01:29:29,479 --> 01:29:31,559 Speaker 3: It hasn't actually worked all that well. 1786 01:29:31,680 --> 01:29:33,360 Speaker 2: And then for Israel itself, you know, look at a 1787 01:29:33,400 --> 01:29:37,840 Speaker 2: certain hopefully eventually they will become responsible entirely for their 1788 01:29:37,880 --> 01:29:41,400 Speaker 2: own security, and if they do, this is exactly what 1789 01:29:41,520 --> 01:29:44,120 Speaker 2: would pose like real existential threats to them. 1790 01:29:44,880 --> 01:29:47,080 Speaker 1: Yeah, and the Houthis went on their way to say, hey, 1791 01:29:47,120 --> 01:29:49,680 Speaker 1: we have the technology to be able to evade your 1792 01:29:49,840 --> 01:29:53,800 Speaker 1: iron dome interceptors. So this, you know, sense that you're 1793 01:29:53,960 --> 01:29:57,479 Speaker 1: only able to inflict damage in one direction, we are 1794 01:29:57,560 --> 01:30:00,639 Speaker 1: going to put that at jeopardy and attempt to impose 1795 01:30:00,720 --> 01:30:04,960 Speaker 1: a greater cost on you and on your country. At 1796 01:30:04,960 --> 01:30:09,200 Speaker 1: the same time this has gone, you know, relatively unnoticed 1797 01:30:09,520 --> 01:30:12,240 Speaker 1: in the US press. But this is there are extraordinary 1798 01:30:12,280 --> 01:30:15,360 Speaker 1: developments in terms of the Israeli war cabinet and their 1799 01:30:16,040 --> 01:30:19,840 Speaker 1: stated clear desire to escalate the war in Lebanon. We 1800 01:30:19,880 --> 01:30:22,720 Speaker 1: could put this up on the screen. So Netanna, who 1801 01:30:22,760 --> 01:30:27,800 Speaker 1: is apparently considering strongly and reports indicate very likely to 1802 01:30:28,040 --> 01:30:33,360 Speaker 1: fire his defense chief Yoav Galant now and replace him 1803 01:30:33,439 --> 01:30:37,560 Speaker 1: with a more far right figure who has been vehemently 1804 01:30:37,800 --> 01:30:42,360 Speaker 1: opposed to any sort of a hostage deal. So you know, 1805 01:30:42,760 --> 01:30:48,520 Speaker 1: Yoev Glant is also facing likely international criminal court indictments. 1806 01:30:48,760 --> 01:30:51,240 Speaker 1: You know, he is also obviously a war criminal. He 1807 01:30:51,280 --> 01:30:54,719 Speaker 1: has said some absolutely heinous things about Palestinians, some criminal 1808 01:30:54,760 --> 01:30:57,040 Speaker 1: things about Palestinians, including you know, he's the one who 1809 01:30:57,160 --> 01:31:00,400 Speaker 1: announced we're gonna treat them like animals, We're going to 1810 01:31:00,479 --> 01:31:02,880 Speaker 1: cut off all the food, water, et cetera. But he 1811 01:31:03,080 --> 01:31:05,280 Speaker 1: has been a voice inside the cabinet that has been 1812 01:31:05,360 --> 01:31:07,920 Speaker 1: receptive to the idea of at least having a ceasefire 1813 01:31:08,040 --> 01:31:12,839 Speaker 1: and a hostage deal. So you have Gallant, reportedly, according 1814 01:31:12,880 --> 01:31:17,360 Speaker 1: to Harats, is at least somewhat opposed to a massive 1815 01:31:18,240 --> 01:31:21,960 Speaker 1: widening of the war into Lebanon and a huge escalation 1816 01:31:22,160 --> 01:31:25,760 Speaker 1: there vis a vi Hezbola, and that appears to be 1817 01:31:25,920 --> 01:31:30,320 Speaker 1: the triggering descent that is leading net Yahoo to consider 1818 01:31:30,600 --> 01:31:34,760 Speaker 1: firing him and just wholly embracing and publicly embracing this 1819 01:31:35,200 --> 01:31:38,800 Speaker 1: further right figure who again called a hostage deal quote surrender. 1820 01:31:40,439 --> 01:31:44,759 Speaker 1: There's a hostage pro hostage group that said that appointing 1821 01:31:44,800 --> 01:31:48,200 Speaker 1: this far right figure would represent a quote death sentence 1822 01:31:48,280 --> 01:31:52,720 Speaker 1: for the hostages and a complete abandonment of those in captivity. 1823 01:31:52,760 --> 01:31:54,600 Speaker 1: And let me put this one next piece up on 1824 01:31:54,640 --> 01:31:57,120 Speaker 1: the screen before I get your reaction, saga. This is 1825 01:31:57,160 --> 01:31:59,920 Speaker 1: from the New York Times. Well, sorry, this is harat, 1826 01:32:01,040 --> 01:32:04,200 Speaker 1: but the New York Times also had this reporting that, 1827 01:32:04,680 --> 01:32:06,840 Speaker 1: you know, the US is meeting with Gallant, meeting with 1828 01:32:07,479 --> 01:32:09,439 Speaker 1: net Yahoo, and they're saying, hey, we don't want this 1829 01:32:09,520 --> 01:32:11,559 Speaker 1: wider war in Lebanon. Guys, don't do it, we don't 1830 01:32:11,600 --> 01:32:13,519 Speaker 1: want you to do it, et cetera, et cetera. And 1831 01:32:13,640 --> 01:32:15,960 Speaker 1: net Yahu was just like, no, we're going to do it. 1832 01:32:16,040 --> 01:32:18,120 Speaker 1: We're going to do whatever it takes. He wants to 1833 01:32:18,240 --> 01:32:23,360 Speaker 1: officially expand the war goals to include this, you know, 1834 01:32:23,600 --> 01:32:26,720 Speaker 1: escalation viz a vi Lebanon. So once again, you know, 1835 01:32:26,840 --> 01:32:29,360 Speaker 1: similar to the Ukraine situation, we see a conflict we're 1836 01:32:29,400 --> 01:32:32,120 Speaker 1: directly engaged in that we're funding, that we're arming, et cetera, 1837 01:32:32,600 --> 01:32:36,719 Speaker 1: that is spiraling in escalatory directions that the US President 1838 01:32:36,800 --> 01:32:40,559 Speaker 1: is supposedly opposed to but utterly unwilling to do anything 1839 01:32:40,760 --> 01:32:42,960 Speaker 1: to forestall this very dangerous direction. 1840 01:32:43,479 --> 01:32:45,920 Speaker 2: It is a problem, and it is exactly I mean, 1841 01:32:45,960 --> 01:32:47,840 Speaker 2: this is what we take our eye off the ball, 1842 01:32:47,920 --> 01:32:50,280 Speaker 2: and there's still crazy developments that are happening. You know, 1843 01:32:50,520 --> 01:32:53,000 Speaker 2: there were not that far away from the anniversary of 1844 01:32:53,040 --> 01:32:56,520 Speaker 2: October seventh, and everything that's happened there and the instability 1845 01:32:56,560 --> 01:32:59,559 Speaker 2: inside the Israeli cabinet have major effects for all of us. 1846 01:32:59,720 --> 01:33:01,720 Speaker 2: All so none of the political leaders that we have 1847 01:33:02,080 --> 01:33:06,120 Speaker 2: are really all of that like concerned about constraining any 1848 01:33:06,160 --> 01:33:08,360 Speaker 2: of this. And so in both cases, you know, we 1849 01:33:08,439 --> 01:33:12,360 Speaker 2: either have one party or the other who is default 1850 01:33:12,880 --> 01:33:17,080 Speaker 2: allowing things like this that cannot go. You can't put 1851 01:33:17,120 --> 01:33:19,080 Speaker 2: it all back in the box. And we're seeing one 1852 01:33:19,120 --> 01:33:21,160 Speaker 2: of our producers just send us a story this morning. 1853 01:33:21,479 --> 01:33:26,400 Speaker 2: It appears there was some major Israeli operation against a 1854 01:33:26,400 --> 01:33:30,120 Speaker 2: bunch of Hezbola terrorists inside of Lesbanon or appears. I 1855 01:33:30,160 --> 01:33:32,559 Speaker 2: think it looks like they're pagers exploded. I mean it's 1856 01:33:32,600 --> 01:33:35,360 Speaker 2: literally like something out of science fiction. That's what I'm 1857 01:33:35,360 --> 01:33:36,720 Speaker 2: just taking a look at. So don't have all of 1858 01:33:36,760 --> 01:33:40,439 Speaker 2: the details. The point though, is that stuff like this 1859 01:33:40,560 --> 01:33:44,920 Speaker 2: inside of Lebanon just continues the spiral and the only 1860 01:33:45,040 --> 01:33:47,240 Speaker 2: question is is like how much of the cost of 1861 01:33:47,360 --> 01:33:48,840 Speaker 2: this are we going to bear? And we generally know 1862 01:33:48,920 --> 01:33:51,240 Speaker 2: the answer to that almost one hundred percent, almost one 1863 01:33:51,320 --> 01:33:52,000 Speaker 2: hundred percent. 1864 01:33:52,160 --> 01:33:52,920 Speaker 4: That we will pring for. 1865 01:33:53,520 --> 01:33:55,760 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, we're coming up on almost a year here, 1866 01:33:56,120 --> 01:34:01,400 Speaker 1: and no one's even really talking about US fire deal anymore. 1867 01:34:01,880 --> 01:34:06,080 Speaker 1: It's just collapses off the table. And there was maybe 1868 01:34:06,240 --> 01:34:08,400 Speaker 1: a week or so ago there were these reports about 1869 01:34:08,439 --> 01:34:11,400 Speaker 1: there was some debate within the Biden administration like should 1870 01:34:11,400 --> 01:34:13,639 Speaker 1: we still keep trying with the ceasefire deal or should 1871 01:34:13,640 --> 01:34:17,040 Speaker 1: we just basically like give up because bb very clearly 1872 01:34:17,200 --> 01:34:22,120 Speaker 1: does not want a ceasefire deal and the whole thing 1873 01:34:22,240 --> 01:34:26,479 Speaker 1: is so utterly absurd and pathetic, Like if you are 1874 01:34:26,560 --> 01:34:29,400 Speaker 1: the United States of America, you are the American president, 1875 01:34:29,520 --> 01:34:32,080 Speaker 1: if you want a ceasefire deal, like all you have 1876 01:34:32,240 --> 01:34:34,640 Speaker 1: to do is stop shipping the bombs that enable this 1877 01:34:34,760 --> 01:34:39,640 Speaker 1: continued direction. So instead of that, they're just putting it 1878 01:34:39,800 --> 01:34:43,519 Speaker 1: again on autopilot, where we're just continue to ship bombs 1879 01:34:43,560 --> 01:34:47,439 Speaker 1: that are used to slaughter, annihilate, and destroy with ever 1880 01:34:47,880 --> 01:34:51,360 Speaker 1: broadening horizons. You know, there have been multiple threats that 1881 01:34:51,439 --> 01:34:54,200 Speaker 1: Bay Root's going to be turned into Gaza throughout the 1882 01:34:54,240 --> 01:34:58,320 Speaker 1: course of this war, and we're unwilling to change course 1883 01:34:58,439 --> 01:35:01,560 Speaker 1: or do anything stop this slide in this direction. And 1884 01:35:01,960 --> 01:35:04,080 Speaker 1: you know, it is horrifying on a moral dimension, it's 1885 01:35:04,200 --> 01:35:06,559 Speaker 1: terrifying on a just national security dimension. 1886 01:35:06,840 --> 01:35:08,920 Speaker 3: Yeah, very true. All right, we got a good guest 1887 01:35:08,960 --> 01:35:10,240 Speaker 3: standing by let's get to it. 1888 01:35:10,439 --> 01:35:12,799 Speaker 1: We're excited to be joined this morning by Logan Phillips. 1889 01:35:13,000 --> 01:35:15,559 Speaker 1: He is the founder of Race to the White House, 1890 01:35:15,560 --> 01:35:18,679 Speaker 1: which is an electoral prediction model. Great to see you, Logan, 1891 01:35:19,000 --> 01:35:19,720 Speaker 1: Good to see you, man. 1892 01:35:20,200 --> 01:35:21,880 Speaker 6: Hey, great to see you guys too. Thanks for having 1893 01:35:21,920 --> 01:35:22,080 Speaker 6: me on. 1894 01:35:22,680 --> 01:35:24,280 Speaker 4: Yeah, of course, so first time on the show. 1895 01:35:24,360 --> 01:35:25,800 Speaker 1: Just give people a little bit of a sense of 1896 01:35:26,040 --> 01:35:28,640 Speaker 1: who you are and how this model is designed and 1897 01:35:28,680 --> 01:35:29,360 Speaker 1: how it functions. 1898 01:35:30,560 --> 01:35:33,280 Speaker 11: Yeah, So I forecast elections for Race to the White 1899 01:35:33,320 --> 01:35:37,040 Speaker 11: House and track pulling for every major federal race in 1900 01:35:37,080 --> 01:35:39,799 Speaker 11: the country, and the goal of my site in addition 1901 01:35:39,880 --> 01:35:43,000 Speaker 11: to ideally getting these predictions right, is to help make 1902 01:35:43,040 --> 01:35:44,800 Speaker 11: sense of the chaos and make it as easy for 1903 01:35:44,840 --> 01:35:47,200 Speaker 11: people to understand which races are the most competitive and 1904 01:35:47,240 --> 01:35:50,400 Speaker 11: in the presidential race, which states are most likely to 1905 01:35:50,479 --> 01:35:53,680 Speaker 11: determine the outcome. And so my goal is to make 1906 01:35:53,760 --> 01:35:55,519 Speaker 11: it so anyone who comes to the site for the 1907 01:35:55,560 --> 01:35:58,320 Speaker 11: first time within thirty or seconds or so, have a 1908 01:35:58,439 --> 01:35:59,559 Speaker 11: much better sense of. 1909 01:36:01,240 --> 01:36:05,479 Speaker 6: This central factors are going to determine the race. 1910 01:36:06,040 --> 01:36:07,880 Speaker 1: So let's go ahead and put up on the screen 1911 01:36:08,120 --> 01:36:10,880 Speaker 1: the graphic of where things stand right now in terms 1912 01:36:11,080 --> 01:36:14,080 Speaker 1: of the electoral college. Your prediction is that there is 1913 01:36:14,120 --> 01:36:16,519 Speaker 1: a fifty six point nine percent chance the Kamala wins 1914 01:36:16,560 --> 01:36:19,360 Speaker 1: the forty two point eight percent chance that Trump wins. 1915 01:36:19,720 --> 01:36:21,880 Speaker 1: Those are still pretty good odds for Trump, even with 1916 01:36:22,240 --> 01:36:25,639 Speaker 1: Kamala somewhat favored there. And you've got projected electoral votes 1917 01:36:25,680 --> 01:36:28,519 Speaker 1: Kamala at two point eighty four point four and Trump 1918 01:36:28,640 --> 01:36:32,200 Speaker 1: at two fifty three point six. How should we think 1919 01:36:32,320 --> 01:36:36,200 Speaker 1: about those odds and what are some of the factors 1920 01:36:36,560 --> 01:36:39,280 Speaker 1: that are leading your model to give Kamala a bit 1921 01:36:39,360 --> 01:36:39,960 Speaker 1: of an edge here? 1922 01:36:41,280 --> 01:36:43,200 Speaker 11: Yeah, I would say that basically means it's a toss 1923 01:36:43,240 --> 01:36:46,160 Speaker 11: of the problem here is that we have two different factors. 1924 01:36:46,240 --> 01:36:46,360 Speaker 6: Right. 1925 01:36:46,600 --> 01:36:48,840 Speaker 11: We have the national polling, which is pretty competitive, and 1926 01:36:48,880 --> 01:36:51,720 Speaker 11: would say maybe up until about a few days ago 1927 01:36:51,760 --> 01:36:53,800 Speaker 11: when Kamala got a little bit of post debate bounced 1928 01:36:53,840 --> 01:36:55,840 Speaker 11: that Donald Trump would be favored if we look at 1929 01:36:55,920 --> 01:36:58,200 Speaker 11: what happened in the twenty twenty electoral map, which was 1930 01:36:58,560 --> 01:37:01,360 Speaker 11: heavily biased to Republicans in terms of the electoral college. 1931 01:37:02,080 --> 01:37:04,360 Speaker 11: But then the state poles for Kamala Harris have been 1932 01:37:04,920 --> 01:37:08,919 Speaker 11: really really strong. You know, in some states like Michigan, Wisconsin, 1933 01:37:09,040 --> 01:37:10,880 Speaker 11: she's usually been doing better in the state poles than 1934 01:37:10,880 --> 01:37:11,920 Speaker 11: even the national polls. 1935 01:37:12,400 --> 01:37:14,120 Speaker 6: And so the question here is which is real. 1936 01:37:14,280 --> 01:37:17,280 Speaker 11: Has Kamala really is doing that much better than Joe 1937 01:37:17,320 --> 01:37:19,640 Speaker 11: Biden to the point that the electoral college disadvantage is 1938 01:37:19,680 --> 01:37:21,960 Speaker 11: significantly smaller, And if that's the case, then she is 1939 01:37:22,000 --> 01:37:22,880 Speaker 11: outright favorite to win. 1940 01:37:23,600 --> 01:37:24,840 Speaker 6: And I think because you have. 1941 01:37:26,320 --> 01:37:28,600 Speaker 11: That disparity, it's probably part of the reason why some 1942 01:37:28,760 --> 01:37:32,080 Speaker 11: models like Nate Silver's show Donald Trump favored, because they're 1943 01:37:32,120 --> 01:37:34,880 Speaker 11: probably assuming a lot more about the twenty twenty electoral 1944 01:37:34,960 --> 01:37:38,000 Speaker 11: map still being in place. But this is definitely a 1945 01:37:38,000 --> 01:37:40,960 Speaker 11: really close election. Now Harris will at least in my model, 1946 01:37:41,240 --> 01:37:43,519 Speaker 11: start to edge ahead if she has the same type 1947 01:37:43,520 --> 01:37:46,040 Speaker 11: of bounce in the state poles that we're seeing in 1948 01:37:46,040 --> 01:37:48,120 Speaker 11: the national polls. There's just been a real dirf of 1949 01:37:48,200 --> 01:37:52,200 Speaker 11: pulling outside of some GOP aligned pollsters since the debate. 1950 01:37:52,439 --> 01:37:54,639 Speaker 2: So logan, give us a sense of you were talking 1951 01:37:54,680 --> 01:37:57,160 Speaker 2: there about the difference between you and Nate Silver. A 1952 01:37:57,200 --> 01:38:00,200 Speaker 2: lot of people obviously wonder about the individual mechanics. As 1953 01:38:00,240 --> 01:38:03,400 Speaker 2: close as you can to relatable speak. Just give us 1954 01:38:03,439 --> 01:38:07,840 Speaker 2: a sense of what the differences and the factors that 1955 01:38:07,960 --> 01:38:11,240 Speaker 2: you look at that can help people assess whenever the 1956 01:38:11,360 --> 01:38:13,680 Speaker 2: looking let's say your model at a different model, what 1957 01:38:13,760 --> 01:38:16,800 Speaker 2: are the types of things that you wait, how much 1958 01:38:16,880 --> 01:38:17,519 Speaker 2: weight to give them? 1959 01:38:17,600 --> 01:38:19,320 Speaker 3: And give us your overall thought process. 1960 01:38:20,320 --> 01:38:22,040 Speaker 11: Yeah, so I think across the board from was all 1961 01:38:22,080 --> 01:38:25,000 Speaker 11: of our models, there's a few different things it does. 1962 01:38:25,120 --> 01:38:25,240 Speaker 6: Right. 1963 01:38:25,320 --> 01:38:27,680 Speaker 11: First, you try to assess what the national environment is, 1964 01:38:28,360 --> 01:38:30,839 Speaker 11: and for me, I use polling, I use the economy. 1965 01:38:30,920 --> 01:38:33,080 Speaker 11: Those are by far the two most important. I also 1966 01:38:33,160 --> 01:38:35,519 Speaker 11: look at how special elections have been going lately, on 1967 01:38:35,640 --> 01:38:38,760 Speaker 11: which party has been overperforming expectations, and a tiny like 1968 01:38:38,840 --> 01:38:41,640 Speaker 11: one percent of it is fundraising. And after we have 1969 01:38:41,720 --> 01:38:43,519 Speaker 11: a sense of what the national environment is. We try 1970 01:38:43,520 --> 01:38:45,360 Speaker 11: to turn that into state numbers, right, So we look 1971 01:38:45,400 --> 01:38:48,600 Speaker 11: at how states have voted in recent elections relative to 1972 01:38:48,680 --> 01:38:51,320 Speaker 11: the popular vote. So if it's been a little bit 1973 01:38:51,360 --> 01:38:52,960 Speaker 11: to the left, a little bit to the right, you'd assume, 1974 01:38:53,040 --> 01:38:55,400 Speaker 11: like if it's a state that's two points to the left, 1975 01:38:55,680 --> 01:38:58,519 Speaker 11: Democrats are up by four Nationally they vote for Harris 1976 01:38:58,600 --> 01:39:01,560 Speaker 11: by six points. Bind that with the state poles to 1977 01:39:01,600 --> 01:39:04,080 Speaker 11: give an overall projection for each state. And then the 1978 01:39:04,160 --> 01:39:06,000 Speaker 11: final component, which I think is honestly one of the 1979 01:39:06,080 --> 01:39:08,240 Speaker 11: most important, is you try to figure out how likely 1980 01:39:08,280 --> 01:39:10,200 Speaker 11: are you to be wrong in every state? Right, So 1981 01:39:10,560 --> 01:39:13,479 Speaker 11: that's based off of like the information we have and 1982 01:39:13,560 --> 01:39:16,240 Speaker 11: how far away we are from election day, how often 1983 01:39:16,280 --> 01:39:17,360 Speaker 11: average would the model be. 1984 01:39:17,640 --> 01:39:19,800 Speaker 6: And to do that you got to look at electoral history. 1985 01:39:19,880 --> 01:39:21,920 Speaker 11: For me, I look at like every election since the 1986 01:39:22,040 --> 01:39:25,680 Speaker 11: nineteen sixties, and that helps us get a sense of 1987 01:39:25,760 --> 01:39:29,240 Speaker 11: the chance of an upset. And then the final additional 1988 01:39:29,280 --> 01:39:31,600 Speaker 11: part after you project the lead for each state, is 1989 01:39:31,720 --> 01:39:36,360 Speaker 11: you then simulate all the states together to figure out 1990 01:39:36,360 --> 01:39:41,080 Speaker 11: what the chance Kamala and Trump have nationwide. And so 1991 01:39:41,200 --> 01:39:43,120 Speaker 11: you have to see, like some you know, if you 1992 01:39:43,200 --> 01:39:45,160 Speaker 11: over perform in Michigan, You're probably going to overperform in 1993 01:39:45,200 --> 01:39:48,479 Speaker 11: Pennsylvania and Wisconsin too, So you try to calculate how 1994 01:39:48,520 --> 01:39:50,040 Speaker 11: correlated each state is as well. 1995 01:39:50,960 --> 01:39:54,519 Speaker 1: How are you thinking about a potential polling miss so 1996 01:39:54,960 --> 01:40:01,640 Speaker 1: you know, twenty sixteen, Trump support is understated, support is understated. 1997 01:40:01,800 --> 01:40:06,720 Speaker 1: Twenty twenty two, Republican support is overstated. You have a 1998 01:40:06,760 --> 01:40:11,160 Speaker 1: special elections. It seemed like Democratic support was understated. So 1999 01:40:11,880 --> 01:40:13,439 Speaker 1: you know, just looking at the track record as a 2000 01:40:13,479 --> 01:40:14,840 Speaker 1: lay person, it seems like you got a lot of 2001 01:40:14,880 --> 01:40:18,360 Speaker 1: contradictory indications. How are you thinking about that in terms 2002 01:40:18,400 --> 01:40:19,599 Speaker 1: of your statistical modeling. 2003 01:40:20,600 --> 01:40:21,880 Speaker 6: Yeah, it's such a great question. 2004 01:40:22,080 --> 01:40:24,040 Speaker 11: It's very easy to fall into the trap after twenty 2005 01:40:24,120 --> 01:40:26,160 Speaker 11: twenty and twenty sixteen to just assume it's going to 2006 01:40:26,960 --> 01:40:29,680 Speaker 11: go against Donald Trump. I think that's what RCP did 2007 01:40:29,720 --> 01:40:31,439 Speaker 11: to a degree in twenty twenty two, and it really 2008 01:40:31,520 --> 01:40:34,559 Speaker 11: backfired for them because the reality is that past polling 2009 01:40:34,600 --> 01:40:38,760 Speaker 11: misses aren't usually predictive directionally of future polling misses. But 2010 01:40:38,840 --> 01:40:40,720 Speaker 11: I do think it's fair to say after twenty twenty 2011 01:40:40,800 --> 01:40:43,880 Speaker 11: and twenty sixteen, which you know, we're both really bad 2012 01:40:43,920 --> 01:40:46,960 Speaker 11: misses for presidential polls, especially twenty twenty, that we can 2013 01:40:47,040 --> 01:40:49,960 Speaker 11: have a little more inserting than we would normally. Polling 2014 01:40:50,040 --> 01:40:52,240 Speaker 11: is way harder than it used to be. The response 2015 01:40:52,320 --> 01:40:55,719 Speaker 11: rate for polls that are calling people is drastically lower, 2016 01:40:56,080 --> 01:40:58,160 Speaker 11: and it makes basic sense for all of us, right 2017 01:40:58,200 --> 01:41:00,639 Speaker 11: because if you're getting a phone call from and to number, 2018 01:41:01,040 --> 01:41:02,560 Speaker 11: more often than not it's going to be someone not 2019 01:41:02,600 --> 01:41:04,599 Speaker 11: even trying to sell you something, but trying to scam 2020 01:41:04,720 --> 01:41:08,920 Speaker 11: you into something. And so as a result, pollsters have 2021 01:41:09,040 --> 01:41:11,519 Speaker 11: to find new and creative ways to reach vhoters. Sometimes 2022 01:41:11,560 --> 01:41:13,479 Speaker 11: they're doing online polls, that's a huge part of how 2023 01:41:13,560 --> 01:41:16,760 Speaker 11: polls work now. Sometimes they're text poles, but overall they're 2024 01:41:16,800 --> 01:41:19,280 Speaker 11: still kind of figuring out how to adjust to the 2025 01:41:19,360 --> 01:41:23,120 Speaker 11: new world. So for my models, I increase the uncertainty 2026 01:41:23,200 --> 01:41:25,320 Speaker 11: quite a bit. I think that the odds of a 2027 01:41:25,400 --> 01:41:27,880 Speaker 11: miss are higher right now, but I'm not going to 2028 01:41:27,920 --> 01:41:30,040 Speaker 11: say that it's necessarily going to go four against Trump. 2029 01:41:30,120 --> 01:41:33,000 Speaker 11: I mean there's also capitalist incentives here, right. Pollster's goal 2030 01:41:33,840 --> 01:41:36,240 Speaker 11: is to make money, is to get as accurate as 2031 01:41:36,320 --> 01:41:39,000 Speaker 11: possible by make more money. If they do well on 2032 01:41:39,040 --> 01:41:41,600 Speaker 11: that front, the whole industry will be badly off and 2033 01:41:41,680 --> 01:41:43,160 Speaker 11: have a lot less trust in them if they underrate 2034 01:41:43,200 --> 01:41:46,200 Speaker 11: Trump specifically. So on one hand, they couldn't miss them 2035 01:41:46,200 --> 01:41:47,600 Speaker 11: because they've done it before. On the other hand, they 2036 01:41:47,600 --> 01:41:48,559 Speaker 11: could overcorrect too. 2037 01:41:48,840 --> 01:41:51,760 Speaker 2: Right, So factoring in twenty twenty two, like you were 2038 01:41:51,840 --> 01:41:54,679 Speaker 2: just talking about, what were the what was the mistake 2039 01:41:54,840 --> 01:41:57,040 Speaker 2: that pollsters made because a lot of people forget you know, 2040 01:41:57,520 --> 01:41:59,920 Speaker 2: after twenty sixteen, there was a lot of discussion about 2041 01:42:00,200 --> 01:42:02,840 Speaker 2: not pulling up white collar workers, white working class workers 2042 01:42:02,840 --> 01:42:07,000 Speaker 2: specifically after twenty twenty. I believe the excuse was that 2043 01:42:07,120 --> 01:42:10,480 Speaker 2: there were too many older Democrats at home. They were responding. 2044 01:42:10,560 --> 01:42:13,840 Speaker 2: It was like a polling response bias. Twenty twenty two. 2045 01:42:13,920 --> 01:42:17,600 Speaker 2: I haven't heard a particularly good actual analysis of what 2046 01:42:17,720 --> 01:42:19,519 Speaker 2: went wrong. So what in your opinion, what is what 2047 01:42:19,720 --> 01:42:20,960 Speaker 2: wrong with the polls for there? 2048 01:42:21,479 --> 01:42:23,400 Speaker 11: Well, I would just say, you know, in fantis to polsters, 2049 01:42:23,400 --> 01:42:25,000 Speaker 11: twenty twenty two is a pretty good year for them. 2050 01:42:25,400 --> 01:42:27,559 Speaker 11: There's usually going to be a bias against one party 2051 01:42:27,680 --> 01:42:29,800 Speaker 11: or the other, and that year was against Democrats. 2052 01:42:30,040 --> 01:42:31,320 Speaker 6: But overall they were pretty good. 2053 01:42:31,960 --> 01:42:36,120 Speaker 11: They lightly underrated youth turnout, and honestly, my gut feeling 2054 01:42:36,200 --> 01:42:38,120 Speaker 11: is that overall they all had to make corrections. After 2055 01:42:38,160 --> 01:42:40,439 Speaker 11: the last two presidential cycles, and they may have overdone 2056 01:42:40,479 --> 01:42:42,200 Speaker 11: it a little bit just because it was in their 2057 01:42:42,240 --> 01:42:46,200 Speaker 11: incentives to not under great Republicans again, but it was 2058 01:42:46,200 --> 01:42:47,240 Speaker 11: still pretty good year for them. 2059 01:42:47,439 --> 01:42:49,800 Speaker 1: Okay, what do you make of this is something I 2060 01:42:49,920 --> 01:42:53,040 Speaker 1: hear from like the resistance Libs, right, which you know, 2061 01:42:53,200 --> 01:42:55,160 Speaker 1: sometimes they have a point, so we like to take 2062 01:42:55,160 --> 01:42:57,880 Speaker 1: them seriously. They're making a good argument that there's been 2063 01:42:57,920 --> 01:43:02,280 Speaker 1: an influx of these Republicans aligned polsters who are more 2064 01:43:02,479 --> 01:43:07,519 Speaker 1: interested in their capitalist incentive. We may say is more 2065 01:43:07,680 --> 01:43:11,880 Speaker 1: about setting a pro Republican narrative than it is about 2066 01:43:12,040 --> 01:43:15,840 Speaker 1: being wholly accurate. And you know, so for people who 2067 01:43:15,880 --> 01:43:18,800 Speaker 1: want to discount and eat Silver's model, looking at you know, 2068 01:43:18,880 --> 01:43:21,120 Speaker 1: which has Donald Trump still favors, kind of like the 2069 01:43:21,160 --> 01:43:23,600 Speaker 1: inverse of where your model sits. That's one of the 2070 01:43:23,680 --> 01:43:26,679 Speaker 1: things that they'll point to is that he takes those 2071 01:43:27,040 --> 01:43:30,599 Speaker 1: that flood of GOP aligned polls sort of too seriously 2072 01:43:30,720 --> 01:43:31,799 Speaker 1: in terms of his modeling. 2073 01:43:33,560 --> 01:43:35,240 Speaker 6: Yeah, it's it's a huge concern. 2074 01:43:35,320 --> 01:43:36,760 Speaker 11: In twenty twenty two, I had to call a bit 2075 01:43:36,800 --> 01:43:39,799 Speaker 11: of an audible and start increasing the penalty to partisan 2076 01:43:39,840 --> 01:43:42,479 Speaker 11: posters once they really started to flood the average. There's 2077 01:43:42,479 --> 01:43:44,360 Speaker 11: a lot more polls for the presidential SOULCI if it 2078 01:43:44,400 --> 01:43:46,519 Speaker 11: gets at that point. That's certainly been the case lately 2079 01:43:46,880 --> 01:43:48,760 Speaker 11: in the post debate state poles because they say be 2080 01:43:48,800 --> 01:43:51,280 Speaker 11: the only ones releasing pols. I would say for all 2081 01:43:51,320 --> 01:43:56,040 Speaker 11: these polsters, as with anyone has power influence, right, you 2082 01:43:56,160 --> 01:43:58,160 Speaker 11: got to think about what their incentives are, and just 2083 01:43:58,240 --> 01:43:59,920 Speaker 11: like you said, right, their goal is to try to 2084 01:44:00,080 --> 01:44:02,439 Speaker 11: change the narrat If that's true for any internal poll. 2085 01:44:03,080 --> 01:44:05,600 Speaker 11: No campaign is going to release a poll just for 2086 01:44:05,680 --> 01:44:07,040 Speaker 11: the heck of it. If they have a poll that 2087 01:44:07,320 --> 01:44:09,599 Speaker 11: it's a Democratic line polster that's showing them way worse 2088 01:44:09,640 --> 01:44:12,000 Speaker 11: than everyone else, maybe the race closer than everyone else, 2089 01:44:12,200 --> 01:44:14,240 Speaker 11: it might be using it for fundraising purposes, and then 2090 01:44:14,240 --> 01:44:15,760 Speaker 11: they just put it out there publicly so they can 2091 01:44:15,800 --> 01:44:18,040 Speaker 11: cite it in ads. Right, there's usually going to be 2092 01:44:18,080 --> 01:44:18,920 Speaker 11: some type of agenda. 2093 01:44:20,120 --> 01:44:22,479 Speaker 2: Yeah, well, I really enjoy talking to you, Logan. Thanks 2094 01:44:22,520 --> 01:44:24,439 Speaker 2: for coming on man, and we'll continue to check out 2095 01:44:24,439 --> 01:44:24,960 Speaker 2: your website. 2096 01:44:25,360 --> 01:44:28,080 Speaker 4: Yeah, great to meet you, Legan, our pleasure. 2097 01:44:28,120 --> 01:44:28,400 Speaker 6: Thanks me. 2098 01:44:29,040 --> 01:44:30,880 Speaker 2: All right, guys, we'll see you later about to film 2099 01:44:30,920 --> 01:44:33,360 Speaker 2: our AMA and broadcast it live. So if you want 2100 01:44:33,400 --> 01:44:35,519 Speaker 2: to be able to join things like that, Breakingpoints Dot 2101 01:44:35,560 --> 01:44:38,360 Speaker 2: com from premium subscribers, Otherwise, we'll see you all later.