WEBVTT - Militia Member Convicted in First Jan. 6 Trial

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Law with June Brusso from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Texas militia member was the first to go to trial

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>in the January six insurrection. Prosecutors said that guy Refit

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>quote lit the fire of the very first group of

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>rioters that breached the Capitol, and they not only had

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>photos of him storming the Capitol, they had video from

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>his own helmet camera. Refit had the sad distinction of

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>being turned in by his own teenage son, Jackson. Reffit

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>told CNN his father had threatened him and his sister

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.959
<v Speaker 1>as it became clear that law enforcement was hunting down rioters.

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>He said to choose a side or die, and if

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:06.119
<v Speaker 1>I chose a certain side, I would cross a line

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.119
<v Speaker 1>and he would do something he didn't want to do.

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>The jury took less than four hours to convict Refit

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>of all charges, including obstruction of Congress, a crucial victory

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>for the Johnstice Department. Joining me is Eric Larson, a

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg legal reporter who covered the trial. Eric tell us

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>what the charges against Refit were so. Mr ruff It

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>was accused of basically leading the first crowd of writers

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.839
<v Speaker 1>that went up the steps of the terrorism and eventually

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>broke into the capitol, so they claimed that he really

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>led them on, egged them on, encouraged them to more

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>forcefully confront the police, which they did. They also claimed

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that he was armed with a pistol a loaded gun

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>at the time, and that he had traveled to Washington

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>from Texas with an a R fifteen as well, which

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>he had left in his hotel room. So they claimed

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>that he went there prepared for battle and prepared to fight,

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and that that is what he did. Was there a

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>reason why he was tried? First of all the January

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>six rioters, not that I'm aware of. You know, more

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 1>than seven hundred and fifty people have been charged, only

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>around two hundred or so pleaded guilty, So there are

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of people who are supposedly going to go to

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.639
<v Speaker 1>trial here. Um, it just seems that this one sort

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of moves the fastest. We're going to see a lot

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of trials later this year. I think it was just

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the luck of the draw for him. Let's talk about

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution's case, and what was so unusual and telling

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>was that his son was the government's star witness against him. Yeah,

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that's correct. That was a real twist. His then eighteen

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>year old son contacted the FBI, informed him about his

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:47.839
<v Speaker 1>father's involvement in the riots, and even went so far

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 1>as to secretly record his father talking at the kitchen table,

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to put his iPhone down on the table and just

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>let his father speak as he was bragging about all

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of his activities on January six. So he really went

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty far and trying to help the government. And one

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of his reasons for doing so is that at one point,

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>as his father realized that so many writers were being

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>arrested and charged, he threatened his children to keep them quiets,

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>knowing that they had different political views than he did,

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and knowing that they had some pretty incriminating information. He

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>told them that speaking with law enforcement would be treason

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and that traders get shot, as they put it. And

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>some Capital police officers testified, did one breakdown on the stand.

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>There were several who testified, and one in particular, as

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>she was in the command center during the riot, and

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, they have several different commanders and officers in

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>this room with lots of screens watching different camera feeds

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>from all over the Capitol. They've got all the radios

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>with them, and she just described as the scene just deteriorated,

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and they saw writers running through the building and started

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to hear officers screaming for help on their radios, and

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>they just realized that there was only so much they

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>could do that they really felt unprepared, and she she

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>broke down crying describing it. So it was fairly emotional

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>for for some of them. Talk about how federal prosecutors

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>built their case against him. You know, what kinds of

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>evidence they used besides direct testimony, you know, it was

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>really a lot of evidence. I have to say. They

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 1>really built the case as if someone, you know, in

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>this case, the jurors didn't know anything about the riot.

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that they all did. But they really explained

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>how it occurred, what happened. They showed the video footage

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of people attacking that they had witnesses talk from the

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Senate floor explaining how they had to abandon the session

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>all to back up all of the various charges for

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>obstruction of Congress and being armed on Catholic grounds and

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>things like this. They showed photographs from Mr. Refit's house

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>when they rated it, showing the gun sitting on his

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>nightstand and then comparing it to pictures taken during the

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.359
<v Speaker 1>riot where they say he had the same gun on

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>his hip, so cell phone footage from other writers, Mr

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Ruffitt's own helmet mounted camera, his zoom calls with other

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 1>militia leaders, things like that, so they really they put

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it all out there, and the defense didn't call any

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>witnesses at all. What was the defense. Of course, defendants

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>aren't required to put on a case, and the judge,

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, instructed the jury that that shouldn't be interpreted

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>as any sort of admission of guilt or anything like that.

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 1>But based on the cross examination of the witnesses, the

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>defense was basically that Mr ruff It didn't hurt anyone,

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't damage any property, didn't steal anything, and didn't interfere

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>with any attempts by law enforcement to arrest anyone. And

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>also that he didn't enter the capital. Of course, he

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 1>isn't accused of any of those things, so it was

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a fairly limited defense. He was stopped by pepper spray

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 1>before he could go in the capitals that day, but

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.839
<v Speaker 1>by then, as the prosecution alleged, he had already encouraged

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and led everyone else up the stairs. So the defense

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 1>was really focused on saying that Raffit hadn't done things

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that he wasn't accused of. There was some attempt to

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>illustrate that there wasn't enough evidence that he was armed,

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>but the jury clearly did not buy that. There was

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>actually an audio recording of Mr. Reffitt in the mob

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that day bragging that he had a gun with it,

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>So it really didn't work out with the jury. The

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>jury didn't take very long to come back with guilty

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>on all charges. Was this trial at chest for prosecutors?

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>In some ways? I would say so. I think that

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>especially the obstruction of Congress charge, there has been some

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say controversy, but some dispute over whether or

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>not Congress was technically in session at the moment that

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 1>the Capitol was breached, and whether or not, you know,

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the counting of the certification of the votes qualifies as

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the kind of legal proceeding that can be obstructed. Sort

0:06:55.520 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of technical arguments around that, And clearly the judge denied

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 1>emotion to dismiss that charge earlier, and of course it

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>went to trial and and the jury agreed, based on

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the evidence that Congress wasn't session, that what was happening

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>was an official proceeding of the government and that it

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>was obstructed by the actions. So I did speak with

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a former federal prosecutor who said that that was an

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>important test to see if a jury would agree that

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Congress had been obstructed, since that is a charge that

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>will see in so many of these cases. Yeah, prosecutors

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to elevate some of the cases beyond misdemeanor and trespassing.

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Another judge dismissed that charge against a January six rioter

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>this week, saying the law was meant to apply more

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>specifically to destroying documents or records in connection with the proceedings.

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>So we may actually see that that question go up

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to the d C Circuit. Yeah, I think that we

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>probably will. And you know, the defense lawyer after the

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>jury verdict was handed down and the jury was dismissed,

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the defense lawyer did renew his request to have the

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>case thrown out, which is not uncommon after a trial,

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>but he specifically cited that ruling which had come in

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>another case in DC just the prior day, I believe,

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and the judge had already had her decision prepared on

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>that and said that regardless of that earlier decision, she's

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>standing by her finding that the Congress wasn't session and

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>was obstructed. Um, she said, well, basically what you just said.

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll have to wait and see. It's a question that

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>might might be decided by the d C Circuit. But

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>she seems to think that the words in the statutes

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>were being defined too narrowly in that decision the day before,

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and that she's standing by her more broad interpretation. So

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>will this be a bell weather for the trials to

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>come in perhaps the way the prosecution laid out the case,

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, I it's possible. It's hard to predict, but

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 1>I think one thing that the judge at some point

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>during the trial when the jury wasn't around, sort of

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>not admonished, but that to the prosecution, you know, you're

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>really doing too much here, almost like knowing too much evidence,

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>showing the same evidence too many times, getting too many

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>witnesses to say the same things. So in a way

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>she was kind of like, look, you've you've made your

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>case to move on, And just from having watched it

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>it was a six day trial, they really did put

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>on so much evidence to prove things that maybe in

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>our minds would feel like, yeah, we already know this,

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>right happened we know this happened. We know this happened.

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I think they really wanted to just sew everything up

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>from every angle and just make it sort of impossible

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to work around the charges. You know, they really have

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to get around that, that doubt, so we'll see you well.

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess that shows how much the first trial means

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to sort of set a standard. And also I think

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>this means that a lot of defendants whose trials are

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>coming up are going to end up pleading. You know,

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that would definitely make sense. That's what some have been

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>speculating here that once they saw how effective the prosecution

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 1>was that presenting the government and how quickly the jury

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>accepted the evidence to back the charges, that they really

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>wanted to take that chance and go to trial if

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>they can get some lesser time. And we have seen

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that some defendants who have pleaded guilty are getting some

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>seemingly short sentences. I mean, just a day or two ago,

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>one defendant of current f A, a employee who's been

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>suspended and he participated in the riot, pleaded guilty to

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>illegal parading in the capitol. He took a photo in

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>front of the Nancy Pelosi's office. He was one of

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the first people in the building. He pleaded guilty and

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>was sentenced to no time behind bars and three years

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of probation um. And the government actually had requested only

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>two weeks behind bars, so he ended up getting nune.

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:46.839
<v Speaker 1>So clearly, you know, say what you will about whether

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that was too lenient or not. Um. They're clearly, as

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>many defense floors, no benefit to pleading out at some point.

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting that outside the courthouse after the verdict, wrath

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>It's wife told other defendants not to take a plea deal,

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>don't take a police, do not take a police. They

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.719
<v Speaker 1>want us to take a police. The reason that we

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>have all guilty verdicts as they are making a point

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>out of guy and that is to intimidate the other

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>members of the one sixers and we will all fight together.

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll see what happens there. So what is he facing

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>when he's sentenced on June? Ay, I know that Jacob

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>chans Ley, the Q and On Shaman as he's known,

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>was sentenced to more than three years in prison on

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the obstruction charge. Yeah, well, I do know

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these maximum sentences, you know, they never

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>end up being the amount that is handed down and

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>when there are multiple accounts that they're not always placed

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>on top of each other, they're sort of put together.

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.839
<v Speaker 1>So I think the maximum sentence for the obstruction charge

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.839
<v Speaker 1>alone is twenty years. I think you could add them

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>all up and say, you know, maybe it's like sixty

0:11:58.200 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 1>years or something, but I don't think it would be

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. So we'll see this judge is that

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>sentencing for June eighth, so we'll see if that. That

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>will be another important test to see what judges give

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>these defendants that they're convicted at trial, right, because usually

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>there's an extra sort of added on if you make

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the government prove their case at trial instead of pleading

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>out like Chansley did. So the trials that are happening

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>later this year, they're the most serious charges against the

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 1>insurrectionists involved two group trials. That's right, Um, they're mostly

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:38.839
<v Speaker 1>from this group called the Oathkeepers. For the record, Mr

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Ruffort was with the militia group called the Three per Centers,

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>But these trials coming up later are mostly Oathkeepers. Here.

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 1>There's one in April or some of these militia members

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:52.839
<v Speaker 1>who are charged with conspiracy. So that's going to be

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a real interesting case to see whether these conspiracy charges

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>can stick at trial the same way we saw in

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 1>this trial just now, whether or not an obstruction of

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Congress charge being sick this will show a much more

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>serious conspiracy charge work. Then in July will see another

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>group of the oathkeepers who have been charged with the

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>most serious charge in from the right, which is sedition.

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think a lot of people will be watching

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that to see how far the government can take this

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>attempt to essentially overthrow Congress and forced Congress to allow

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump to essentially have another tournament office. So whether or

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 1>not that's edition still remains to be seen. And the

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>former chairman of the Proud Boys was arrested. Was that

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a big arrest? You know? I it's ah, he had already.

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 1>He was arrested yesterday in Miami, and he has been

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:51.680
<v Speaker 1>added to an earlier case against some other Proud Boys,

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's another conspiracy case. And I believe that one

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>goes to trial in May, or at least the schedule two.

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>At this point. UM, it's unclear of adding um Henry

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Tario is his name, whether that may slow things down,

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>But I would say it's not a surprise only because

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you know he was the leader of the group, and

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the group was clearly deeply involved in the planning of

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>UM that march on the Capitol UM and say, you

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>know you might remember during the UH during the presidential debate,

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>um Trump was asked to condemn white supremacy and and

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the militia groups UH and groups like the Proud Boys,

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and he said to the Proud Boys that stand back

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:38.359
<v Speaker 1>and stand by. Of course, Trump was pretty widely criticized

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>for that. UM. So the fact that the leader of

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the Proud Boys has been added to this isn't too

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>surprising to me. UM. But I spoke with his lawyer yesterday. UM.

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>He didn't want to comment, but he was wondering whether

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>or not UM the case would go to trial as

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>play in May. Thanks Eric, that's Bloomberg Legal reporter Eric Lawson.

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>As Russia's invasion of Ukraine heads towards the two week mark,

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the stakes are escalating. Russian President Vladimir Putin said again

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday the war will continue until Ukraine accepts his

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>demands and halts resistance. Are we in danger of a

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>new Cold War? Joining me is Michael Doyle, a professor

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>at Columbia Law School and Columbia School of International and

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Public Affairs start by telling us about the Cold War

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and when it ended. Well, whenever we say the word

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Cold War, everyone in my generation, the ones before and

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the one after, of course, thinks about the Cold War,

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>which is the conflict and the contest between the Soviet

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Union and the United States. The Soviet Union supported by

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the war saw packed the US by NATO that starts

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>up in and ends roughly with garbage off somewhere about

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety. So that's the Cold War, and it's a

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>contest between two superpowers, the US the U s s

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>are divided by two polar opposite ideologies of communism and capitalism,

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>also different political systems of dictatorship and democracy. That's sort

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Cold War. But what I think we should

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>realize is that there are many other conflicts in international

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>history that are special, even if they're not identical. And

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>what makes them special is that their contests that are

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>not just over a different interest at stake, you know,

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>who controls that province or this province, or who can

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>get the most out of a trade deal and become wealthier.

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Their conflicts about legitimacy, wherein one partner or one state

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>regards the other as in some form or another illegitimate.

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>That is, that it holds territory that it should not,

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>or that it's political system is violative of the principles

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of the rival. So I think we need to expand

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the meaning of Cold War to take into account those

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>conflicts over legitimacy, and there are a number of them.

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 1>And the danger is is that we may be entering

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a new one today in which the US and its

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>liberal capitalists democratic allies face off against China and Russia

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 1>as nationalist autocracies that are also corporatist in their economic orientation.

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 1>And there's a danger of that that's emerging today. What

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>would you say the situation between the US and Russia

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 1>has been for the last let's say two decades. I

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:46.439
<v Speaker 1>would go back sort of to three decades, that is,

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the Cold War ended in and then there was ten

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 1>years roughly when Russia was unfortunately in a bit of

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>crisis under President Elson economically and politically, but nonetheless was

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>verging in a direction of shared universal values as Gorba

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Jeff had announced, and movements towards elections and democracy and

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 1>more of a free market. And that era was one

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:17.120
<v Speaker 1>of very considerable cooperation, though not equality. In the nineteen nineties,

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>starting around the period of twenty years ago, we began

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to see some deterioration. Russia itself experienced failures in democracy,

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>very problematic movements moving towards a party that was more

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>hegemonic and less tolerant of dissent. At the same time,

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>as we saw the emergence of Mr. Putin, a strongman

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>who built a coterie of oligarchs and party officials around himself,

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>determined to reverse the losses that the Soviet Empire had

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:53.640
<v Speaker 1>experienced with its collapse in n and so, starting then

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 1>and then peaking about twelve, the full Putin regime was

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>put in place, a regime which the state controls media,

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>controls overall corporate activity, and is able to extract rents

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>for it, for its for its cronies, and manipulates the

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>elections that do occur, such as there's no real accountability,

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and adopts of quite aggressive foreign military policy in places

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 1>like Georgia, Syria and not of course most recently in Ukraine.

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a theory about why Putin now decided

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to invade Ukraine and start this war? I think it

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>was it was an opportunity. He saw the West, that is,

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the NATO allies being both weak and quite divided, increasing

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 1>dependence upon Russian gas that he thought would deter any

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 1>United Front. He just came off a very successful military

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 1>campaign in which he propped up assad in Syria and

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>routed those who were trying to over throw Aside. So

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a great deal of confidence on the military side,

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a sense of vulnerability looking into Western Europe, which appeared

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 1>divided to him. And he was also I think concerned

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that Mr Zelenski, you know, the then newly elected president,

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:22.919
<v Speaker 1>had the capacities for mobilizing Ukraine in a way that

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>made him very far from the kind of clients that

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:31.880
<v Speaker 1>he had previously experienced in Kiev. And so we saw

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine slipping away. He saw the West disunited, and he

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>had just come off a very successful military campaign that

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>made him quite confident in the capabilities of his army.

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>So it looked like an opportunity to him. Are we

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>entering another phase of a Cold War? Or might it

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>even be worse because he's threatening to use Russia's nuclear capabilities.

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 1>My own view is that we've, you know, for the

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>past ten years, we've been in towards the Cold War

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 1>in suspicions cyber war industrial warfare with both Russia and

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>China that have been boiling under the surface, UH for

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>quite a long time. UM. We had a little proxy

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:21.479
<v Speaker 1>war in Syria, which which so to speak, the West lost,

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 1>partly because we had no idea which side we were

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>fighting for. Frankly, we certainly weren't fighting for Isis, which

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 1>was the major opponent of ASAD. UH. So that you know,

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:36.959
<v Speaker 1>we're we're in a in that kind of a of

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>a of a different world where we've been edging towards

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the Cold War. I suspect that this will solidify it

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 1>in very significant ways, in the same way that the

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>coup in Czechoslovakia and UH the war in Korea solidified

0:21:56.800 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the first Cold War. This will solid if I not

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:06.199
<v Speaker 1>an iron curtain, but a very significant disarticulation, you know,

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>splitting up of the world along ideological lines between autocracy

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and democracy, as President Biden said, now there will be

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>strong pushback against that. The Chinese don't want to enter

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that kind of a split world. They want to be

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 1>on both sides. They want the economy of the West

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and the and the polity, the politics of Putin and

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>they've tried to play that middle course. It will be

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>very difficult now, but they don't want a full blown

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Cold war, and the Europeans, of course, would have immense

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>economic cost if there's something like an iron curtain that

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>goes down between Western Europe and Russia. The United Nations

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>estimates that more than one and a half million people

0:22:54.320 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>have fled Ukraine since Russia began bombing some countries Pole in, Romania,

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:04.120
<v Speaker 1>think Slovakian else who are taking them in. Well, what's

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>happening is that these deeply unfortunate people are fleeing for

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 1>their lives to the border. And as you say, it's

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>it's quite striking the welcome that they are receiving in

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:18.919
<v Speaker 1>the countries you just mentioned plan and including Hungary to

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a certain extent, and certainly Romania and others have stepped

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 1>forward to welcome the refugees. That's exactly the right thing

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to do, and they should all deserve commendation for that

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>over time, unless we expect, you know, some kind of

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a quick magical piece and everything gets returned to normal

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>right away, or normal that is the independence of Ukraine

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and peace, which I think is very unlikely. They're going

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to be in a protracted situation of having to live

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>outside their home country at the expense of so far

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>generous Poles and others. And I think it's gonna be

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>very important that at least the financial burdens of supporting

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 1>these refugees a million and a half now, who knows

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>how many more are coming, should be shared. It should

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>be shared in Europe, it should be shared globally. The

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 1>US has announced that will be providing ten billion dollars

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of support for Ukraine humanitarian and refugee assistance that will

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>probably go through the Congress, and a refugee cost roughly

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.880
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand euros or so per year, So you multiply

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the figures out and one is talking about a considerable

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>number of billions of dollars that will need to be

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>invested to support them in their asylum in the countries

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>what is now the West. So this will be a

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>humanitarian crisis that's not going to go away quickly, and

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>it's one that we need to share, at least financially.

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>So the EU has agreed to grant temporary residents to

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainian access to employment, social welfare and housing for up

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to three years. Is three years enough and also why

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 1>hasn't the UK done that. It's a good question, as

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Brexit uh anxieties in the Produced Breakfast

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 1>were predominantly driven by immigration concerns in the in the UK,

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and so they're deeply allergic to all of this. I

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 1>think it speaks well to the EU that they've offered

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the three years. Again, I stressed that the financial burden

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>needs to be shared beyond the EU budget. They can

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:39.959
<v Speaker 1>afford it, but there's no reason why they should have

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to pay for it alone. This is a global emergency.

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>The US and Britain have roles to play. The only

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 1>thing I would say is that, you know, the typical

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 1>refugee in the world today is outside of her country

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>for more than eighteen years, and so it's very optimistic

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>to think in three years this will be resolved. It

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>would be wonderful if that's the case, but it would

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:12.199
<v Speaker 1>require some extremely statesman like peacemaking in the very near future,

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 1>and I suspect some very considerable further peddling back of

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>ambitions by Mr Putin and some concessions by Ukraine in

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 1>order to imagine a three year window that would allow

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the refugees to be able to go back to Ukraine

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and then of course all the cost of rebuilding. Today,

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:34.439
<v Speaker 1>in the past week, the level of destruction of the

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 1>major cities radically escalated and is likely to continue to

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>do so in the next few days. The US has

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>given temporary protected status to Ukrainians who are here by

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:50.159
<v Speaker 1>March one. That doesn't seem like very much compared to

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>what other nations are doing. Do you think that the

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:56.880
<v Speaker 1>U s should be doing more, should be taking in Ukrainians? Yes,

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>we should. That is again, um, there will be many

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>people in asylum in Western Europe who might prefer to

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 1>be uh in the US because of family connections, job opportunities, etcetera.

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>So we two should step up and play of our

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:22.919
<v Speaker 1>our fair share in supporting these refugees. And again we

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 1>can do it both by resettlement, that is, by issuing

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>visas and permits to bring refugees here to the US,

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 1>as we did, you know, way back in n with

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Hungarians who were quickly moved from Western Europe to the

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 1>United States. And we can provide financial support to assist

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the Europeans in the you know, the temporary integration of

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>these persons into Western Europe. The governments the taxpayers. We

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>should all step up, the people who should really be

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>at the front of the line to pay for these

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:03.159
<v Speaker 1>damages that have been inflicted on the Ukrainian people or

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Mr Putin and the oligarch that support him, and measures

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>are afoot in various places to try to seize, not

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>just freeze, the wealth that Putin and his fellow orligarchs

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>have parked in western banks in Western Europe, Canada, the

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>United States and further afield. Thanks for being on the show.

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:28.400
<v Speaker 1>That's Professor Michael Doyle of Columbia Law School and Columbia

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 1>School of International and Public Affairs. And that's it for

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 1>this edition of The Bloomberg Law Show. Remember you can

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>always get the latest legal news on our Bloomberg Law Podcast.

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>You can find them on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and at

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>www dot Bloomberg dot com, slash podcast slash Law, And

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>remember to tune in to The Bloomberg Law Show every

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>week night. Attend B M. Wall Street Time. I'm June

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Grosso and you're listening to Bloomberg