WEBVTT - Reviving Immigration Is Key To U.S. Turnaround: Kotok

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. All right, we've got some

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>big round numbers out there. Of course, DAL thirty thousand,

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>NASDAC twelve thousand, that's just extraordinary. They're big numbers. What

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>do they mean? Let's try to put some of that

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>into context. Nobody better to do that with. Then, David

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Ko Talk, Chairman and chief investment officer of Cumberland Advisors.

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>They have over three billion dollars in assets under management,

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>located in beautiful Sarasota, Florida. David, thanks much for joining

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>us again. Okay, some big round numbers. A lot of

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 1>people say, I don't worry about it, They're just numbers,

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>but boy, what do you make of them? Well, it's extraordinary, Paul,

0:00:55.400 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for having me on. Um. You know,

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I thought that to the book DAL thirty thousand when

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.919
<v Speaker 1>it was written and we were all a few weeks

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>younger then, and and people thought it was a statement

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of madness at the time. Look where we are, so

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a streny. The markets, as we see it, are

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>looking beyond next spring. Um, it's the classics six or

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>nine months uhum forward looking post vaccine recovery. And you

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 1>see some forecasts of the rory twenties. I read a

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>piece I hadyard Any about that he's using that mantra.

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>So maybe we have the explosion of spending of what

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>has been a year of accumulated savings um in this

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:59.639
<v Speaker 1>release of cabin fever. After we inoculate people and after

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>we overcome what is a terrible shock. Right now, markets

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>are looking beyond the shock. Those of us who are

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:11.359
<v Speaker 1>living day to day lives are still living with the shock.

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>And unfortunately a lot of folks are letting their guard

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>down and they're getting sick, and when they do so,

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a tragedy. With healthcare workers, nurses. I saw a

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 1>note Cleveland clinic as a thousand staff furloughed, not furload,

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:33.239
<v Speaker 1>but on medical leave because they're sick. So we're we're

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:36.799
<v Speaker 1>in the midst of the forest fire right now. And

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a sad tragedy for America and the world. Yeah, exactly, David.

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to see something catlest some catalysts arrive

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that sort of brings this market back to reality or

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 1>is it just assuming that Joe Biden takes office and

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:54.799
<v Speaker 1>that you know, there's stimulus, that all those millions of

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>people don't get a picked in January, that the unemployment

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it starts coming down quickly next year, and that you know,

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 1>by the end of next year all as well in

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the world again. Well, I don't know they'll all be

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>well in the world again, Vanny, but we certainly see

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>markets looking to Biden calm, less disruption, more season professional

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>government governance, and finally we are going to have a

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>transition and all of this disruption of our electoral process

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>looks like it's going to come to an end. And

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I think markets are celebrating the lack of disruption and

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>chaos that we have seen. So it's a relief on

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>top of what would be a v shape recovery outlook

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>for next year and the year after. That's how it

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>looks to me and David. It also is it relates

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to your outlook, or it appears that we have a

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>very clear rotation trade. You know, out of some of

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>those growthy names that have been really the stalwarts for

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>this equity market really since financial crisis, whether it's an

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple or an Amazon, into more cyclical type of groups,

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 1>whether it's banks or even even energy has had a

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:20.919
<v Speaker 1>great month. Um. Do you believe that's the play right here?

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>And how long you think it could last? Well are

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>two questions. So we use a little joke in the company.

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>We say, Fang went to the dentist, and now we're

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>going to have a broadening market. And I guess there's

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>something to that. We see it in the small caps

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and we see it in the Russell two thousand um

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>in our shop. We have uh good positions in the

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Russell two thousand in through the et F structure and

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>in mid caps and small caps. So we've been enjoying

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the rally and we continue to do so. We we

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 1>took advantage j of the sell off a few weeks ago,

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and we have been nearly fully invested to this surge.

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I admit that this is very fast, very robust, and

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 1>every day we get up and look at it and

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>we're terrified, and we don't sell anything in the next day.

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>We say we're glad we waited. That's uh, that's where

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>we are today in Thanksgiving week. Will you continue to

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>stay in this market as that out help David Well,

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I I will for at least the next seven minutes, Vanny.

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>But but after that, I'm not sure. Yeah, I think so,

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>because when you put the robust recovery and the productivity

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>games on top of this v shaped powerful uh fiscal stimulus,

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 1>monetary stimulus you projected into two, you get an upward

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 1>trajectory in earnings and it can be supplies in surprisingly robust.

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's a second kicker here, and that

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>is the Biden administration lifts the lid on DOCTA. That's

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>nine thou people who begin to flourish instead of hide

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>behind the front door because they make it decordered. We

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>change the immigration structure, and so we include, we increase

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the workforce, the labor force by allowing it to flourish.

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>We bring back into the United States people. We need nurses.

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a there's a demand for million nursing care people.

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>They would like to come to American work. I think

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 1>they would like to still come to America. They used

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 1>to want to do that. So If you add productivity games,

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:57.239
<v Speaker 1>which we're getting in huge amounts, to increase in working population,

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you accelerate the growth rate. I think we could hit

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 1>growth rates above three percent, maybe even to four percent

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of years in g d P. If

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>we get population and productivity, and we release the economy

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>from chaos and from COVID, it could be an extraordinary

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. And the markets are saying that. Markets

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>are saying those companies are going to reflect that in

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>their earnings. And I believe that's not only possible, but

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's becoming more and more likely as efficacious

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>vaccines get into distribution. That's remarkable science being applied. Remarkable. David,

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>how many milestones have we seen together in this market?

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>There's not the reely rhetorical question because there's no time

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to answer it. But I can tell a listener is

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that me and David and Paul have seen very, very

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>many milestones. That's David Kotalk, their chairman and chief investment

0:07:54.240 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>officer at Cumberland Advisors, joining us from Sarazota, Florida. Well,

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>we're certainly on a doll thirty thousand. Watch your three

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>or seventy points here nine thousand, nine sixty two. Clearly

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>equity investors are certainly willing to look past the dire

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>pandemic numbers were experiencing right now, look to the other

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>side of this in a world with a multiple vaccine.

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>To get a sense of kind of where we should

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>be looking in the market, we welcome Nicholas Co, founder

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of Data Trek Research based in New York City. Nick,

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us again here. What do

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you make of this equity market and are you surprised

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>at all about the ability of this market to really

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 1>look well towards the other side of this pandemic. You're right,

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>it is absolutely impressive. I'm not all that surprised, only

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>because you know, as a cyclicals oriented analysts, this very

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>much fits the playbook of every recovery back to when

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I started looking at cycles in the early nineties covering

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the auto industry. So it's certainly a compressed version of

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>thout cyclical recoveries, but it does fit the basic paradigm

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>as much as any other one does. Small cap rallying industrials, rallying, financial's,

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>rallying tech under performing, you know, against the backdrop of recovery.

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>It makes all makes sense, What, then, Nick, should we

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:14.719
<v Speaker 1>expect next Well, I mean, obviously we've got a real

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>head of steam on this market, and so you know,

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of particularly days is going to be

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>a further continuation of the rally, particularly into light volume.

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>But I do think there's going to have to be

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>some kinds of reset back to some you know, more

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 1>real form of reality, if you will, as we get

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>into December and into the first part of next year.

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Because cyclical rallies always kind of blast off on hope,

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we're seeing right now. Then there's a

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 1>real reality check when you start to see the numbers

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>come through. And while earnings are definitely going to show

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>leverage next year, you know, you don't never want to

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>be around for when a company just meets expectations after

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a recession, they've got to keep beating them by a

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>wide margin. So the new term setup is fine further

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>out first half of next year much offer. So Nick,

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>we see some more positive data points, I guess just

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>on the geopolitical front, we're having president like Biden begin

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>his transition, starting to fill out his cabinet, janet, yelling

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>treasury pick, what are your thoughts very helpful for markets

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>for I think probably all the obvious reasons, mostly, you know,

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>having somebody who can coordinate treasury policy federal reserve policy

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 1>and not necessarily emerge those two functions, but make them

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>work as smoothly as possible, and we definitely need to

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>help in they have fiscal and monetary policy work hand

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>in glove. Also obviously an experienced set of hands for

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.079
<v Speaker 1>the economy. Somebody who is well known on Capitol Hill,

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>somebody who can easily be be confirmed by the Senate.

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, just a huge thumbs up. It was a

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>great choice. Who else would you like to see on board, Nick,

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of regulation, in terms of everything else from

0:10:55.600 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the SEC too, you know, anybody lee thing with the banks.

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a wonderful question. Um, you know, without naming any

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>specific names, I think what the market wants to see.

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, what Biden seems very much in the channel

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:15.239
<v Speaker 1>to do is just picked non controversial, easy to confirm,

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>widely acceptable choices and really get the you know, get

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Washington back into the mainstream of governing the way it did,

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, for the last fifty years instead of the

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 1>last four. So Nick, how about as it relates to

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve chairman. Do you expect Pal to stay

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.959
<v Speaker 1>or do you think the market would prefer perhaps someone

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>new Well, I mean, you know, Governor Brainers is obviously

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.839
<v Speaker 1>the one that people call out is the most likely

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>potential next FED chare in two. I think the market

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>would like that only in terms of her usually dovish

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>bias Um and I think between you know, yelling and

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>whoever comes in the next at the FED, the market

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:01.479
<v Speaker 1>is beginning to feel that incremental, really large bank regulation

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>isn't coming down the road, and so you're seeing you know,

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>names like well as Fargo really work today, the financials

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>work today. That's really been a beaten up group, not

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>just for rates being so low, because of the threat

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of more regulation. And as long as that doesn't that

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't come down the road, whoever is the next bed share,

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, should the market should welcome. So we just

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>had you know, retail sales reports that were pretty much okay, Nick,

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, we're seeing a little bit of a dent

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and consumer conferdence this month, but nothing you know massive.

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:35.599
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing housing, at least in suburban areas across the

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>country holding up even more than that. It's on fire.

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>How is this economy doing? Yes, okay, So on retail sales,

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>very interesting point. I mean, we think we're going to

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>see very strong November retail sales versus last year. NRF

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 1>was out yesterday with a pretty positive forecast on retail sales.

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>And just think about how much money is not being

0:12:56.960 --> 0:13:00.040
<v Speaker 1>spent on holiday travel for example, that money is and

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I spent get spent on holiday and recamplers have been

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>super aggressive on getting their specials out the door early,

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>whether it be online or in store, and so we

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 1>think November is going to be a very good month

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of retail sales, and that will fit with the data

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing on home sales and home prices. We're

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>a little more circumspect about December, however, because we think

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be a lot of holiday demand pulled forward

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:23.559
<v Speaker 1>to November and won't be there in December. So I

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>think the near term news is fine. We'll have to

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 1>wait and see how December plays out and then refasts. Nick,

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>just what is your forecast for when the Dow actually

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 1>tops thirty? Oh, I don't know. I'm checking my watch.

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>It's more along those lines um than anything else. I mean,

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a You know, it's that those people at discount

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>these big round numbers as something that really doesn't matter

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to markets. I do think it matters to markets. If

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you look to see how many retail investors google Dow

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Jones versus S and P it's Dow Jones by like one,

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>they'll know when the deal gets to thirty and it

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>is a confidence lift, right, there is something to be

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>said for it, right, Yeah, yeah, I think so. I mean,

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a nice it's certainly nice for financial journalists to

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about. But I think Nick, you're right. I mean,

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>people do view it as a plateau to be to

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>be achieved, so it can be important from that. Yeah,

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think when you hit a round number,

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>at least what at least what becomes very obvious is

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the direction, and if it's higher, well that's usually just

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the green light end of its lower world. Probably didn't

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>see that one coming, Nick, Thank you so much. Nick

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Cholos is co founder of Data Track Research, always full

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of fascinating market insights daily, so we thank him for that. Well,

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>if you want to travel internationally, you better get used

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to a new concept called a COVID passport. That's a

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>new word I think is entering our minacular right now.

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's get some more details. We bring on Charlotte Ryan,

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>aviation reporter for bloombergsh is based in London. Charlotte, what

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>is a COVID passport? And do I need one? If

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to travel internationally? At some point? Good afternoon.

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>So the COVID pass for it is an idea that

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a few organizations starting to explore, the most

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>recent of those being AYATA, the International Air Transport Association.

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>And basically what it is is UM, an online effective

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>health status that would show your most recent COVID test

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>results and whether you've had a vaccine when indeed a

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>vaccine is available. And the idea is to link this

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>UM with your travel documents so that when passengers travel,

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the airline or government that is accepting the passenger can

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>immediately see their health status. Who would be the regulator

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>for this? So that's a really good question, and it's still,

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in a sense a bit of an open question. We've

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>got a few a few initiatives that are underway at

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the moment, and such a health path for its actually

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>being trialed on routes in Asia, but it's not clear

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to what extend. Governments would have to be involved in this. Obviously,

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>as we known from the travel disruption we've seen so

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>far with the virus is up to the individual governments

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to decide under what conditions they want to let people in. UM.

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>So that is very much something that still has to

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>be resolved with these health path worts. So Charlotte, what's

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>what's the position of airlines? Generally speaking, I would think

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>they would be in favor of anything that would get

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>people back in their seats. Yeah, exactly. So I mean

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>we with this latest effor if I have, they're going

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to trial this with i D, one of the bigger

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>airlines UM and they say that they're hoping to launch

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>with other airlines as well. We've also had Quantis saying

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>this week that once a vaccine is in place, they

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>would not allow international passengers to travel unless they have

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>been vaccinated. So there certainly is a willingness I think

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to get people back in the air and also to

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 1>be as sure of passengers. But it is safe to fly,

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>so I don't fully understand because many of them are

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 1>not enforcing rules like mask wearing or you know, six

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 1>ft apart separation in the planes. But suddenly they'd want

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you to prove that you've had a vaccine at some point. Yeah.

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>So on the six ft rule, we did have a

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of US airlines that were putting not quite six feet,

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>but putting a gap in between each cassenger. So I

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 1>guess my point is that, you know, this doesn't seem

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>to be right now. They don't seem to be worried

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>about but too worried about, you know, enforcing certain rules

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that might help people not get COVID. But when there

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 1>is a vaccine, suddenly they will be just explained that

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to me sure, So I think in terms of mass

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>wearing at least, Um, you know, what we know from

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the airlines is they all they all say that they

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 1>do enforced this currently. I know there have been cases

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of individual flights where people's say that that's not what's happened. Um,

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think, yeah. With the vaccine, I mean, I

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>guess the advantage from the airline point of view is

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.679
<v Speaker 1>that it's this very clear indication if you get on

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a flight where everybody has been vaccinated, you know that

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you're you're pretty much safe. Whereas I think from the

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>airline side of things, they have suggested that things like

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:42.719
<v Speaker 1>putting a seat in between passengers aren't necessarily that effective

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>as something was spread anyway, Yeah, exactly, just real quickly,

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>don't there any data that shows that people do get

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:53.719
<v Speaker 1>the virus from air traffic? I haven't seen many stories

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>about that. Yeah, so this is still again a bit

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 1>of an open question since what extent this virus in

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>particular can spreads on aircraft. But we have had cases.

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I asked to think they've been around four fifty cases,

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>which sounds like a lot, but it's worth highly in.

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>A good chunk of those were on a couple of

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>flights before the requirements where masks was brought in, and

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 1>but certainly there have been cases where where the virus

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 1>has spreads on the aircraft. It does seem that this

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:30.880
<v Speaker 1>has something to do with the fact that just today

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I had as predicting carriers will lose a combined one

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven billion dollars this year and next year, which

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>is more than a forecast in June. So it also

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>was getting things wrong. Charlotte. Wonderful story, Charlotte, Ryan, they're

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>joining us well. I think for most people it appears

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that this work from home situation is working out fairly well.

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Now some companies are certainly think about what their staffing

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>plans will be post pandemic. UH. Deutsche back coming out

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>today and saying maybe they're considering on a permanent basis

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 1>having their workers work two days a week at home

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>on a permanent basis. Steve Aaron's is a German banks

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>reporter for Bloomberg News. He joins us from Frankfurt. Steve,

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. So talk to

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:16.159
<v Speaker 1>us about the news today about Deutsche Bank. What are

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:21.159
<v Speaker 1>there their plans here post pandemic so UM, as with

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>many other banks, Glergi Bank obviously has been thinking about

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>its future once the pandemic is over. And it's been

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 1>in the kind of work from home mode since the

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>pandemic broke out in in earlier this year and and

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>in February March, people have been working from the home. UH.

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>They've been surprised as how well it's been working. And

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>now they're coming to the conclusion that this can help

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>UH lower costs and of course adapt to new circumstances,

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and therefore there now approaching a new policy where they

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 1>will probably allow people are work from home to day

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the week. So is it though, that you can work

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>home any two days you choose, because we know from

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:01.880
<v Speaker 1>chat with hedge fund managers and various people who talk

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to us about how their offices are staff that right

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>now Friday is not a very popular day for people

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to come in, and neither is Monday. So are we

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>going to have of deute buying stuff in on Tuesday, Wednesday,

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Thursday and the rest, you know, not in Monday Friday. Yeah,

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not entirely sure how Dodge Bank will handle it,

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 1>but you're right, obviously that would be probably a very

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>heavy focus on Friday and Monday to work from home.

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure they will have policies in place that

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 1>won't permit that, though I don't have really insight knowledge

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and that, but yeah, I think a lot of companies

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 1>are trying to figure out. I mean, most likely scenario,

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, is to have you know, binding agreement

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:40.959
<v Speaker 1>in place for certain days of the week and then

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 1>they will ensure it's sort of even it evens out,

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and then if you don't get Friday on Monday, and

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 1>I guess you're locked out. So, Steve, do you have

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>any sense or do Stuorte Bank have any sense at

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>this point as to what types of people would be

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.719
<v Speaker 1>given this work from home opportunity. I would think they

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>would want their traders in, maybe their investment bankers in

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>every day. So it's just more of a back office

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>type thing. Yeah, I guess that's another important consideration, right, Traitors,

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>for compliance reasons and many other reasons, need to be

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>at their death in the office a lot of the time,

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 1>so it's likely that they may have only one day

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>or no days. Um, that's certainly something that is still

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 1>working on UM and uh in the same goes for

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>UM client facing people who travel a lot UM. So yeah,

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we're mostly talking about the back office you're

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:35.640
<v Speaker 1>aware of. Working from home is much less of an issue.

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>And then for the other stuff, so you know, not

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that money companies have put out formal blueprints because nobody

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:44.239
<v Speaker 1>knows who, nobody knows how long the pandemic is going

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to last one, vaccines are going to be available, at

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>what point their workers are going to be able to

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 1>access vaccines and so on. Why do dot de bank

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>decide to do this now? Well, it's not it's not

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a formal announcement, right, we booked the news. It's people

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>familiar U However, there are banks European banks who have

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>made sort of preliminary announcements. What they're planning is um

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and they're ranging from twenty to fifty on Dutch banks

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and said they will allow fifty percent of staff to

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 1>work from home. So I just think it's you know,

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>we've had a trial line of working from home since

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of this year. They realize it's working well,

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and now you know, you have to consider if you

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 1>want this to impact your policies. You have nieces in place,

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>if you want to reduce office space, you have to

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:30.880
<v Speaker 1>start doing this now because it will play out over

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>a very long period of time. Also, you need to

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>talk to regulators about install on. If you don't make

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a decision at some point, um, it's gonna just you're

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna delay the whole implementation for a long time. So, Steve,

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how much of this is really a cost

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>cutting move here. I mean, you know better than anybody

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the difficulty that German banks have been dealing with four years,

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>especially now with this low and negative interest rate environment.

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>How much do you think that's playing into a cost

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>cutting costs on a long term basis. Yeah, you're absolutely right.

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>European banks and specifically German banks and Deutsche Bank have

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a huge cost problem and I'm we want to prevent

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>sure that this is a very big consideration. But if

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:13.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, they sort of for them, it's a win

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:17.439
<v Speaker 1>win situation if it really does make staff happy. You know,

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:20.439
<v Speaker 1>if you'll give your staff the opportunity to work from

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>home and they're happier about it and you can cut

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>costs at the same time, why not, right, I mean,

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it works, it works. Well. What when there's a vaccine

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 1>that everybody can get access to and everybody is vaccinated

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that wants to be vaccinated, and we've decided that this

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 1>pandemic is not a yearly thing that mutates, will we really?

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, does anybody really think we'll see any capitalist

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>country continuing with this idea for you know, the next

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>five and fifteen years and permanently. M that's yeah, I mean,

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:53.919
<v Speaker 1>that's a crystal ball question. But I do think so.

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, all the banks are saying this has been

0:24:56.600 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a sea chain for them. They now think work from

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>home is the new normal. They also say officers will

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:07.679
<v Speaker 1>always be a place in important place for them. They

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 1>will never abandon their officers entirely. But I do think

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>there will be a mixed model. Uh. And now that

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>people have been working at home and their managers a

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>line managers real life people don't flack off at home

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and productivity stays at the same level, then why not? Yeah?

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it will stay? So, Steve? Is this

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>when do you think we're gonna see some more news

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>out of maybe Deutsche Bank or some other banks. As

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to announcements, I think I think there will be every

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>now and then there will be banks making announcement announcements

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:38.719
<v Speaker 1>on this as they come to a conclusion what they

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.400
<v Speaker 1>really want to have for set up. I'm not sure.

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>We don't know when Dutche Bank will make a formally

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>adopt out plan. It may still be a few months.

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean, you're some European bankers Upstad have

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 1>made that formal announcement, and I'm pretty sure others will

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>follow suit. Stephen Aaron's joining us there with a wonderful

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>story on Deutsche banks moving to a reduced workforce from

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:03.880
<v Speaker 1>in house areas at least, and Stephen, of course covering

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 1>all of the woes of European banks over the last

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 1>several years. It doesn't seem to be getting all that

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 1>much better, but at least they've got something else to

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>think about for the moment. Stephen Aaron's they're joining us

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>from Frankfurt, Germany. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn. I'm

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Bonnie Quinn. And Paul Sweeney I'm on

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio