WEBVTT - #410 Wrongful Conviction: Junk Science - Shaken Baby Syndrome

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Hey, folks, Kate Judson here. I'm a lawyer and the

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:09.040
<v Speaker 1>executive director of the Center for Integrity and Forensic Sciences.

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>We're back with another episode of Junk Science, a series

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>we first released in twenty twenty, but these stories are

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>just as relevant as ever. This is the last episode

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of our series and one that's especially close to my heart.

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Shake and baby syndrome is one of the main focuses

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of my work, and I am interviewed in the episode

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.519
<v Speaker 1>you're about to hear. Shake and baby syndrome is a

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>determination doctors make when a certain constellation of medical findings

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>show up together in a child, and as we'll hear later,

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>there are many reasons for these findings to show up together,

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>not just child abuse. Shake and baby syndrome, also sometimes

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>called abusive head trauma, isn't the only reliable science used

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to take kids away from their parents and lock up caregivers.

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Others similarly vague or poorly understood diagnoses have led to

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the separation and victimization of families. In these cases, the

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>errors of medical and legal systems intertwine, creating a tangled

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 1>mess that can be difficult to solve and heartbreaking for

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>everyone involved.

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 2>At six pm, and the usual controlled cast of the

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 2>day is finally wound down. Most of your daylight hours

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 2>are filled with the sounds of giggling kids and, yes,

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 2>the occasional whining and tantrums. You've been a licensed childcare

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 2>provider for the past fifteen years and you run a

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 2>daycare center out of your house. You wave goodbye to

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 2>the last toddler to get picked up by his dad

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 2>from your doorway, then you head back inside. Your two

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 2>middle schoolers are sitting at the kitchen table doing their homework,

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 2>so you take advantage of the brief moment of quiet

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 2>to start getting dinner ready. But the quiet doesn't last

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 2>more than a few minutes. There's a knock on the door.

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 2>You're sure it's one of the kid's parents picking up

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 2>a missing toy, but your heart sinks to your stomach

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 2>when you see that it's the police. You quickly open

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 2>the door, worry that something might have happened to your husband,

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 2>who hasn't gotten home from work yet. Hi, there is

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 2>everything okay? You ask They ask you your name, and

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 2>they say, ma'am, do you run a daycare out of

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 2>this house? Yes? I do. What seems to be the

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 2>problem you'll need to come with us. What do you

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 2>mean I can right now. I'm getting dinner ready for

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 2>my kids. Ma'am. You don't understand. You need to turn

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 2>around and put your hands behind your back. You're under arrest.

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 2>You'll feel the cold handcuffs tighten around your wrists. What

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 2>is this all about. There's a child in your care name.

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 2>You know who Maria is, ma'am. She died from brain

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.799
<v Speaker 2>injuries after spending the day in your care. So I'm

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 2>gonna read you your rights. You're speechless, Maria, that little

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 2>girl who spent one session at your daycare months ago.

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 2>You can't compute, but you're a mom, and so you

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 2>leap into action for your kids. You don't want to

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 2>scare them, so you try to prevent your voice from

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 2>cracking as you call them over. You tell your fourteen

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 2>year old look after your little brother. Call your dad,

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 2>he'll be here soon. Tell him not to worry, and

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.119
<v Speaker 2>you don't worry. This is all going to work out.

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 2>You put on a brave face for them, and you

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 2>try not to panic as one of the officers pushes

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 2>your head down in that classic move that leads a

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 2>suspect into the back of a police car. Your world

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 2>has turned upside down in an instant. As the police

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 2>car pulls away from your house and down the street

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 2>toward the County gi you sit in jail before your

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 2>trial and replay the events of the day. You watch

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Maria over and over again in your head. You were

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 2>sitting on the carpet helping one of the little boys

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 2>get a train rolling on its tracks when there was

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 2>a knock at the door. You answered it and you

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 2>saw a smiling baby in the arms of her mother.

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 2>This must be Maria, you said, smiling at the toddler.

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 2>You took Maria from her mother's arms and helped the

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 2>little girl wave goodbye with her tiny hand while her

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 2>mom pulled out of the driveway. Maria was happy and

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 2>playful all day until about noon. She started crying, and

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 2>you recognize that as the telltale sign of a tired baby.

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 2>You put her down for a nap, and a few

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 2>hours later Maria's mom came back. Maria was still sleeping.

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 2>You watched her pick Maria up from the crib, trying

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 2>not to wake her. Maria slept on her mom's shoulder

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 2>the whole way to the car. You watched as they

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 2>pulled out of the driveway. That's everything you can remember

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 2>from that day, but that's not what happened. What you

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 2>didn't know is that when Maria and her mother pulled

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 2>up to their home, Maria was slumped over in her

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 2>car seat, her head almost in her lap, and she'd

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 2>thrown up all over herself. Maria wouldn't wake up, so

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 2>her mom called nine to one one and she was

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 2>rushed to the hospital. The doctor said that the baby's

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 2>brain was bleeding and swollen, and her blood sugar was high.

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 2>The doctors frantically worked on her, trying to revive her,

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 2>but eventually Maria was put on life support. She died

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 2>about a week later. Approximately two months after that, the

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 2>police showed up at your house and arrested you. Sitting

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 2>in your jail cell, you're paralyzed by the horror of

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 2>all this. One family lost their baby, and your kids

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 2>are at home wondering if their mother will be around

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 2>to watch them grow up. Now it's the day of

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 2>your trial. Your lawyer doesn't dispute that bleeding and swelling

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 2>of Maria's brain caused her death, but there was no

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 2>evidence that it was caused by anything you did. There

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:38.039
<v Speaker 2>was no evidence whatsoever that you abused Maria in any way.

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 2>She didn't have any broken bones, no injuries to her

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 2>neck or spinal column or anything like that. And there was,

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 2>in fact another explanation for Maria's injuries. When she had

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 2>been admitted to the hospital, her blood sugar level was

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 2>four times higher than what was considered to be normal,

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 2>and so it was possible that Maria's brain injuries may

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 2>have been caused by an undiagnosed metabolic disorder like diabetes.

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 2>But when the prosecution makes its case, the pain and

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 2>mystery around Maria's death is sharpened to a fine point.

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 2>A child abuse specialist takes the stand and tells the

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 2>jury that Maria had bleeding and swelling in her brain

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:23.239
<v Speaker 2>and bleeding behind her eyes. Let me make it clear,

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 2>the expert witness said, these injuries mean that Maria incurred

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 2>physical abuse associated with trauma to the head. There is

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 2>no other way these injuries could have occurred. You sit

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 2>there next to your defense attorney and your heart starts

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 2>beating fast, your sweating. You know what she's saying can't

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 2>be true. You've been watching kids for your entire adult life.

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 2>You would never, you have never hurt a child. And

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 2>yet you know that if you were a member of

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 2>that jury and you heard this testimony from this doctor,

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.559
<v Speaker 2>that you would probably believe it too. You would also

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 2>want to be able to hold someone accountable for the

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 2>death of this innocent child. When the jury goes into

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 2>their deliberations, you're not just worried about the outcome of

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 2>your trial. Your heart is also broken for Maria's family.

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 2>You know you'll never be able to wrap your head

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 2>around their grief, but you also know that putting an

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 2>innocent person in prison won't bring their baby back. After

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 2>just two days of deliberating, the jury comes back with

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 2>a guilty verdict. You bury your face in your hands

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 2>as the verdict has read. At your sentencing, the prosecution

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:45.719
<v Speaker 2>reads letters from Maria's family. Her mother had addressed one

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 2>of them to you. It said, you killed my baby. Why?

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Why did you do this? I beg this chord to

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 2>give you the maximum sentence possible. You are sentenced to

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 2>fifteen years in prison for manslaughter. The story you just

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 2>heard is loosely based on Stephanie Spurgeon's wrongful conviction in

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and eight. Innocent people have been convicted based

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 2>on medical testimony, which claims that three symptoms bleeding of

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 2>the brain, swelling of the brain, and bleeding behind the eyes,

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 2>indicates a form of child abuse referred to as shaken

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 2>baby syndrome, but this medical testimony has proven to be problematic.

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 2>With the help of the Innocence Project and the Exoneration

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Project from the University of Chicago Law School, the evidence

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 2>in Stephanie's case was re examined and she was released

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 2>from prison in August twenty twenty. But many others are

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 2>not as lucky and continue to serve sentences for crimes

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 2>they did not commit. There's nothing more devastating than the

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 2>death of a child. When a tragedy like that occurs,

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.839
<v Speaker 2>it's natural to want answers, how did this happen, who

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 2>should we hold accountable for this, and what could have

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 2>been done to prevent it. What might be most difficult

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:17.359
<v Speaker 2>for jurors to accept is that the death was completely accidental,

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 2>that there was nothing anyone did to cause it, and

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 2>nothing could have been done to stop it. I'm Josh Dubin,

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 2>civil rights and criminal defense attorney, an Innocent ambassador to

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 2>the Innocence Project in New York. Today on wrongful conviction,

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 2>junk science we'll explore how what's known as shaken baby

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 2>syndrome has been used to falsely implicate people in crimes

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 2>that they did not commit. It turns out that shaken

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 2>baby syndrome isn't a full proof diagnosis. There are many

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 2>other causes for the symptoms of shaken baby syndrome that

0:10:54.559 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 2>do not arise from intentionally shaking a baby. In nineteen

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 2>sixty nine, two scientists put a live reciss monkey under

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 2>anesthesia and strapped it to a chair made of fiberglass.

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 2>The fiberglass chair was then attached to roller skate wheels.

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 2>When the tiny car accelerated and then decelerated quickly, the

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 2>passenger's head that is, the monkey's head, was flung backwards

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 2>then quickly snapped forward. Scientists wanted to study the effect

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 2>of whiplash during a car crash, so the tiny car

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 2>with the little monkey passenger was designed to mimic the

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 2>movement of a car during a rear end collision. Of

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 2>the fifty monkeys that took a ride in the whiplash car,

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 2>nineteen of them sustained a concussion. The study proved that

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 2>direct impact from a hard surface to the head isn't

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 2>necessary to cause traumatic brain injuries. The human brain can

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 2>be injured just from a head being violently jerked back

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 2>and forth, causing the brain to rattle around inside the skull.

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 2>This study had important repercussions for car safety. It's part

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.439
<v Speaker 2>of the reason why cars are supposed to have headrests

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 2>to prevent brain injuries due to whiplash during an accident.

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 2>But this study also interested a British pediatric neurosurgeon named

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Norman Guthkelch. Now, Doctor Guthkelch had been noticing infants coming

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 2>into his office with no outward signs of abuse, no bruising,

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 2>no broken bones, but they had bleeding around their brain.

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 2>He wondered if these children had been getting whiplash not

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 2>from a car crash, but from their parents and caregivers. Now,

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 2>at the time in Northern England, shaking babies was a

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 2>socially acceptable way of calming, quieting, and even disciplining a

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 2>fussy baby. In fact, when doctor Guthkelch saw children with

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:09.439
<v Speaker 2>bleeding around their brain, he asked parents if they sometimes

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 2>shook their child. Many parents readily confess they would say yes.

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Johnny wouldn't stop crying, so I gave him a good

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 2>shaking doctor guth Kelch suspected that shaking an infant mimicked

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 2>the motion of whiplash, and so he wrote a short

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 2>two page paper. It said that trauma to a baby's brain,

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 2>even when no other signs of physical abuse were present,

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 2>may in fact be caused by violent shaking. Doctor guth

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Kelch never claimed that there might not be other causes

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 2>of bleeding around the brain. He simply hypothesized that shaking

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 2>might be the cause of it. His hope was that

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 2>doctors who read his study would help teach parents to

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 2>handle their infants more gently to avoid accidental harm. After

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 2>doctor guth Kelch's article was published, other doctors continue to

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 2>research this issue. They found that three symptoms in particular

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 2>were associated with shaking a baby. These symptoms were subdural hematoma,

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 2>retinal hemorrhage, and cerebral edema that is bleeding around the brain,

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 2>bleeding behind the eyes, and brain swelling. These three symptoms

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 2>became known as the quote classic triad, the signs that

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 2>are said to be an indicator of shaken baby syndrome.

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 2>The problem is that these three symptoms became synonymous with

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 2>shaken baby syndrome. If these three symptoms were present, it

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 2>was thought that a parent or caretaker must have intentionally

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 2>shaken their infant, and so when parents showed up to

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 2>the hospital with a sick child who exhibited some or

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 2>all of the symptoms of the triad, their children were

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 2>taken away from them. The parents were put on trial,

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 2>and they were sometimes convicted of abusing or even killing

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 2>their own child. As parents started to be accused of

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 2>child abuse based solely on the hypothesis of shaking baby syndrome,

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 2>doctor Gothkelch knew he had to do something he never

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 2>meant for his short paper to be used as a

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 2>tool for prosecution. The whole point of his paper was

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 2>to help parents, not criminalize them. Doctor Guthkelch continued to

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 2>fight for wrongfully convicted parents and caregivers up until he

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 2>died in twenty sixteen at the ripe age of one

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 2>hundred and one years old.

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 3>No one was really suggesting that this should be a

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 3>mechanism for prosecuting anyone. They acknowledged, and you know, pretty

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 3>clearly articulated that what they were talking about was a

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 3>hypothesis about why children might have these findings. But it

0:15:57.080 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 3>then started to be used as a paradigm for prosecution,

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 3>and that's really where it runs into trouble because instead

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 3>of continuing to research and look for answers, physicians and

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 3>prosecutors started to accept it without looking further into the

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 3>kinds of claims that experts were making about it.

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Today on our show, we're speaking with Kate Judson. Kate

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 2>is the executive director for the Center for Integrity and

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Forensic Sciences, and she was one of the lawyers who

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 2>represented Stephanie Spurgeon, whose story we discussed at the beginning

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 2>of our show. So to start tell us about what

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 2>we should understand about the difference between shaking baby syndrome

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 2>as a hypothesis rather than as a diagnosis.

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 3>I think there are a lot of ways in which

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 3>it differs significantly from other medical diagnoses. So child abuse

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 3>and particularly shaken baby syndrome is much more a determination

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 3>of etiology of how somebody got the medical findings then

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 3>the medical findings themselves. So the kinds of findings that

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 3>are often attributed to child abuse in shaken baby syndrome

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 3>and abusive head trauma cases can be due to trauma,

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 3>but it isn't always, so there are medical conditions that

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.199
<v Speaker 3>can cause these kinds of medical findings as well, and

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 3>so sometimes the evidence of actual innocence is new medical

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 3>opinions that support the idea that the child had a

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 3>disease or another kind of condition that led to their

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 3>medical findings, rather than any kind of trauma or abuse.

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 2>So let's back off for a second to when this

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 2>first started to be used at trial. How did this

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:44.959
<v Speaker 2>diagnosis become something that prosecutors were able to weaponize against defendants.

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 3>Part of what makes it seductive if you're trying to

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 3>protect children and punish wrongdoing is that it seemed at

0:17:57.000 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 3>the time very definitive. Pyusicians were saying, if a child

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:05.959
<v Speaker 3>has this set of injuries, they have been abused, and

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 3>that abuse consisted of shaking, and we know that, and

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 3>there are no exceptions, or very very few exceptions. I mean,

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.160
<v Speaker 3>in fact, at the time, there are plenty of transcripts

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 3>available where physicians said nothing else causes this, right, and

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 3>so it gives a very clear and definitive answer. No

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 3>one has to wonder in the face of such an answer,

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 3>what happened to a child who died, who previously would

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 3>have no explanation for their death. It's definitive, it's clear

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 3>and frankly, really effective in court, often resulting in a

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 3>conviction almost all the time. So I think that it

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 3>gave people who were involved in the criminal legal system

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 3>the impression that they were successfully locking up people who

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 3>were dangerous who had murdered a child. And it turns

0:18:53.280 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 3>out it's not that straightforward.

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 2>So tell us more about other ways a child can

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 2>come to have the same kind of symptoms or the

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 2>same sort of trauma that are usually associated with shaking

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 2>baby syndrome.

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 3>There are things like infection, serious infection, genetic disorders, problems

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:28.679
<v Speaker 3>with blood clotting, certain kinds of tumors, certain kinds of

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 3>blood cloths, you know, like a pediatric stroke. There are

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 3>cases where the medical findings are thought to have arisen

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 3>after events like choking. But what really started to come

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 3>to light in twenty sixteen there was a report done

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 3>by the Swedish government that looked at medical literature that

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 3>discussed you know what is colloquially called the triad that

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 3>the combination of subdralhematoma, rental hemorrhage, and cerebral edema, and

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 3>looked at children who were diagnosed as and studies of

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 3>children who were diagnosed as being abused based on those findings.

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 3>What they found was that the data was not there,

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 3>that it was very incomplete, and they recommended that the

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Swedish government no longer prosecute people under that paradigm. And

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 3>the reaction that that got from, you know, child advocates

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 3>and child abust pediatricians was simply to attack the people

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 3>who did the report. You know, there's been a real

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 3>lack of serious engagement around the failings in the literature

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 3>that everybody knows are there, and so that is really

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:36.160
<v Speaker 3>a shame and that's not how science progresses, and that's

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 3>not how people get fair trials. People who who are

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 3>admirably concerned about protecting children have unfortunately written things like

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 3>editorials in journals engaging in personal attacks instead of trying

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 3>to figure out how to best approach these kinds of cases.

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 2>And that's part of what makes studies and being critical

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 2>of the shaken baby hypothesis really difficult. People often assume

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 2>that critics of shaken baby syndrome are trying to side

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 2>with child abusers, and of course that's not the case. Researchers, doctors,

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 2>lawyers who are critical of shaking baby syndrome are just

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 2>trying to make sure that people don't get accused of

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 2>crimes they didn't commit based on misleading evidence. And on

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 2>the other side of this battle, there are well meaning

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 2>people who are trying to protect children from abuse. I

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 2>know that expert witnesses and cases involving child abuse are

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 2>often doctors, So tell us more about that. Who are

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 2>the doctors who testify during these cases for the prosecution

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 2>as experts?

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:53.400
<v Speaker 3>So there are different kinds of physicians. They're not always

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 3>child abuse pediatricians, but they frequently are child abuse pediatricians.

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 3>There are about three hundred child abuse pediatricians in the

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 3>United States. It's a new subspecialty. I believe the first

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 3>child abuse pediatricians were board certified in twenty eleven, so

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 3>it's quite new. So their job is to evaluate children

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 3>in hospitals or clinics for child abuse and yes, to

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:20.360
<v Speaker 3>testify in cases or to create reports for law enforcement

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 3>agencies for the courts.

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 2>So that's interesting. I guess talking about biases, I could

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 2>imagine that someone who's trained to look for child abuse

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:32.719
<v Speaker 2>could just start seeing abuse everywhere. It's what they know,

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 2>it's what they study, it's what they look for. They think,

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, this is a symptom that comes up with

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 2>people who are victims of abuse, so it must be abused.

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:44.479
<v Speaker 2>It's you know, becomes difficult to see outside of your

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:48.679
<v Speaker 2>own tunnel vision. And so when a medical specialty is

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 2>geared directly towards one conclusion or looking out for one thing,

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 2>of course, even with the best of intentions, it could

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 2>be easy for these doctors to get tunnel vision right.

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 3>That's a real concern when analysts are, for example, embedded

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 3>with law enforcement. When the crime lab is part of

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 3>the police department, for example, we see this role affects bias.

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Analysts start to see themselves as part of the law

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 3>enforcement team rather than as an objective, independent scientist. But

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 3>the same issue was present when child abuse pediatricians are

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 3>part of a child abuse team, especially when those teams

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 3>involve police and investigators and prosecutors and don't involve people,

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:39.479
<v Speaker 3>for example, from the defense bar. And since they're all

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:42.400
<v Speaker 3>human beings, it's not unreasonable to say that the same

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 3>concerns we have about analysts housed within a police station

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 3>or who work very closely with police and prosecutors, that

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 3>other kinds of experts might be subject to those same biases.

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 2>I think another reason that there are so many wrongful

0:23:55.480 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 2>convictions when people are accused of abuse, is that everybody involved, jurors, lawyers,

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 2>the doctors, they don't want to get it wrong because,

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:10.199
<v Speaker 2>let's just face it, setting a potential child abuse are

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 2>free is a scary proposition. The stakes are very high

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 2>in these cases.

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 3>So really often I hear people respond to these concerns,

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 3>particularly people who are who are working in kind of

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.199
<v Speaker 3>the child abuse field, respond to these concerns about wrongful

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:30.679
<v Speaker 3>convictions by saying, well, we just want to air on

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 3>the side of the child, right, But in these kinds

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 3>of cases there's really no way to do that. Any

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 3>error is harmful. This idea that you can air safely

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 3>on the side of the child is a false one.

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 3>And that's because if you get this wrong. If a

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 3>child is being diagnosed as or being determined to have

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 3>been abused and they haven't been, a couple of things

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 3>can happen. One is that a child can be deprived

0:24:56.720 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 3>of a loving home and separated from loving parents and caregivers.

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 3>And studies have shown over and over and over again

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:09.199
<v Speaker 3>that separating children from their family is traumatic. It is

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 3>sometimes a necessary harm, but it is always harmful.

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Even for people who are just accused of child abuse

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 2>and they don't get convicted, but just have to go

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 2>through the trial. That in itself can be so damaging

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 2>to children and their families.

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:34.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's anecdotal, but I pretty frequently hear from

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 3>families who say, like, we're really grateful that nobody in

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:39.640
<v Speaker 3>our family was convicted, but our kids are still suffering

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.199
<v Speaker 3>all kinds of harm and problems from the trauma that

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 3>was inflicted upon them just from even a brief separation.

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 3>So there may very well be good reason reasons to

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 3>separate families, But what we can't do is go to

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 3>court and say that the abuse is more definitive than

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 3>the science actually supp if that makes sense. The other

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 3>problem is that when these cases are not medically investigated carefully,

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 3>there is the chance that a child will be classified

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 3>as having been abused when they actually have a serious illness,

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 3>and that is also really problematic can potentially lead to

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 3>more harm or even death because of that misdiagnosis.

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 2>It seems almost unlikely that evidence in child abuse cases

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 2>can be similar to other forensic disciplines that we've talked

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 2>about on our show, But it turns out that the

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 2>same tactics used to convict people based on faulty pattern

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 2>matching evidence, for example, is really the same thing we're

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 2>dealing with here. In instances of you know, alleged.

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Child abuse, the kind of biases that we see in

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 3>other kinds of forensic sciences are certainly present here. And

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 3>because there is no gold standard criteria, no simple or

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:01.159
<v Speaker 3>single test that allows any to make a diagnosis of

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 3>child abuse, you end up having to fall back on

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 3>so much subjectivity of the person examining the child and

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.719
<v Speaker 3>looking at the facts, and what we know from pattern

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 3>matching disciplines in particular, but also things like ours and investigation,

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:18.879
<v Speaker 3>is that the more subjectivity that is introduced into the system,

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 3>the less reliable your result can be. Sometimes when you

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 3>look at the breakdown of cases where people get wrongfully

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 3>convicted based on faulty forensic science, and a majority of them,

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 3>part of the faulty forensic science is that the expert

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 3>spoke to the jury with more certainty than the science warranted.

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 3>The same is true in cases with medical testimony. So

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 3>when a doctor says that a fracture or a subdural

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 3>hematoma or a retinal hemorrhage can only be caused by

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 3>child abuse, and there's no other explanation that is definitive,

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:56.919
<v Speaker 3>it is convincing that is stated with more certainty than

0:27:56.960 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 3>the science can support, and that can certainly lead to

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 3>an unfair trial and a wrongful conviction.

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 2>So, in your opinion, when something as tragic as a

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 2>baby dying happens, what can we do to make sure

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 2>that the cause of death is determined correctly so that

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 2>parents and caretakers stop being wrongfully accused based on this

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 2>shaken baby hypothesis.

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 3>There really should be really rigorous testing in all of

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:32.439
<v Speaker 3>these cases, and not every case out there gets the

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 3>benefit of really careful, comprehensive testing. There's actually kind of

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 3>a famous case that a district attorney from Queen's has

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 3>used in a bunch of presentations where there was a

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 3>videotaped fall. A child fell at a mall and off

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 3>of just a really short fall off of a piece

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 3>of playground equipment and later died, and investigators embarked upon

0:28:55.640 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 3>an extremely complex and comprehensive medical evaluation, and when they

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 3>did that, they found that there were potentially some blood

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 3>disorders lurking within the family. And while the child who

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 3>died never definitively tested positive for a bleeding disorder. Her

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 3>parents were carrying genes that suggested that she may have

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 3>had one that may have contributed to her death. But

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 3>I have to tell you that it's uncommon that that

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 3>kind of testing is done. I have seen it become

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 3>more common, and hopefully it will continue to become more common.

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 3>But that's just a great example of really thorough evaluation,

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 3>clarifying that a deceased child died because of a tragic accident,

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 3>not because anybody hurt her.

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 2>When I think about people convicted based on this type

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 2>of evidence, it's usually a parent that we're talking about.

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Someone who has just lost their child, is going through

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 2>this unimaginable tragedy, and then to be accused of being

0:29:56.680 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 2>the one that actually inflicted this harm a lot to

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 2>wrap your head around. It's like too much to.

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:06.959
<v Speaker 3>Bear for parents who go through this. They have a

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 3>double tragedy, right They have the loss of the life

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 3>or health of their child, which is incredibly tragic, and

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 3>then they have this prosecution, which threatens their freedom, often

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 3>threatens their relationship with their other children. In some of

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 3>these cases, parents might lose custody of other children in

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 3>the family, it's horrifying. It's horrifying as.

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 2>A lawyer to it. It must be difficult to be

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 2>watching this unfold.

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's an incredibly emotional situation. And in fact, there

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 3>are some lawyers who find these cases so disturbing and

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 3>disruptive that they do one and they never want to

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 3>do another one. You do care about that happening. I mean,

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 3>it's not easy. It's always difficult. They are very emotional,

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 3>they are very upsetting. It is it's difficult to be

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 3>there for someone who has gone through, like, like I said,

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 3>this double tragedy, right where a child that you know

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 3>that they loved and cared about is gone or very

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 3>or were very different, and then they've they've been accused

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 3>of this crime they didn't commit. It's it's it's terrible.

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 3>I think the only reason why I feel compelled to

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 3>keep doing it is that what has happened to these

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 3>folks is wrong and someone has to help them and

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 3>stand up for them. It's not an easy thing, but

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a necessary one.

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 2>When I agreed to host this podcast, I set out

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 2>to expose some of the many flaws that exist in

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 2>our criminal justice system. Specifically, what I wanted to do

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 2>was address what goes wrong when jurors are presented with

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 2>what they are told this science but actually turns out

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 2>to be well junk. The harms of junk science go

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 2>beyond innocent people having to endure the unthinkable nightmare of

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 2>being accused and convicted of crimes they did not commit.

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 2>The consequences extend even further than those people having to

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 2>endure the rawest and most cutting of human suffering, being

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 2>torn from their life and locked in a cage. In

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 2>addition to that human tragedy, junk science causes the moral

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 2>fabric of our judicial system to wear and tear at

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 2>the seams. It causes an entire institution of law and

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 2>order and justice to be completely undermined. In examining the

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 2>various disciplines of forensic science we've discussed this season, whether

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 2>it was our sin or blood spatter, eyewitness identification, or,

0:32:56.720 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 2>as in this episode, shaking baby syndrome. I knew it

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 2>would be interesting and enlightening, but I never expected it

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 2>to affect me in the profound manner that it has.

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 2>I have been in turns dumbfounded, angry, saddened, and even outraged.

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 2>A trial is supposed to be a search for the truth.

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 2>The word science itself is defined as the study of

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 2>the physical and natural world through observation and experiment. Our

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 2>system of justice has been regarded as not perfect, but

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 2>the best way to ensure that people who are accused

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 2>of crimes get the fairest shake possible. So how is

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 2>our system of justice veered so far off the tracks?

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 2>How have we managed to bastardize and bludgeon What science means?

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if we can ever arrive at a

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 2>clear answer. There are probably many explanations. One thing I

0:33:57.120 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 2>do know is that when human beings get involved in

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 2>it any endeavor, we bring our own biases or thirst

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 2>for financial gain, our hunches and quirks into the equation,

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 2>and in the process we sometimes create such a mess

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:16.280
<v Speaker 2>that it becomes difficult to untangle the hows and whys

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:20.720
<v Speaker 2>of it all. But I still manage to find hope

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:25.479
<v Speaker 2>and a way forward. And here's why. If you've ever

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:28.279
<v Speaker 2>been fortunate enough to meet someone that has spent time

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 2>in prison for a crime they didn't commit, one thing

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:37.879
<v Speaker 2>becomes apparent very quickly. They are the embodiment of all

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 2>that is soaring and remarkable about the human condition. They

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 2>are a special combination of resilience, hope, forgiveness and strength.

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 2>They are quite simply a force of nature. So I

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 2>will continue to pour my energy, every cell in my

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 2>body into helping those who are still behind bars for

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 2>crimes they did not commit. I will fight to restore

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:11.759
<v Speaker 2>signs to its proper definition in our courtrooms. I am

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 2>propelled by these men and women that represent the triumph

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:19.800
<v Speaker 2>of the human soul. To restore one's life and freedom

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 2>is perhaps the highest service to your fellow human being.

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 2>I can't even find the words to describe what it's

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 2>like to walk someone out of a nightmare of a

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 2>prison cell and into the bright light of freedom to

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:41.240
<v Speaker 2>restore a life. The only way I can articulate it

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 2>is that, aside from marrying my wife and the birth

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:49.880
<v Speaker 2>of my children, it is and always will be my

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 2>most important contribution to my fellow human beings. There is

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:57.399
<v Speaker 2>nothing I have done in this life, or could ever

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:03.840
<v Speaker 2>fathom doing, that can ever close. No material gain, no drug,

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:08.920
<v Speaker 2>no drink, nothing at all that can approach the state

0:36:08.960 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 2>of nirvana that consumes your soul when you have helped

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:16.880
<v Speaker 2>save a life, and I think that says a lot

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 2>about who we are at our essence, we are meant

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 2>to be of service to one another, to heal each other,

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 2>to restore each other. Not a bad message, if I

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:31.320
<v Speaker 2>do say so myself, at a time when it seems

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:35.319
<v Speaker 2>like we could really use it, I encourage all of

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:39.919
<v Speaker 2>you to continue to keep your voices up, write those

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 2>letters to your local prosecutors and judges, be a more

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 2>conscientious juror pitching in any way that you can. Together

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 2>we can ensure that one day there will be no

0:36:53.760 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 2>more wrongful convictions Based on Junk Science. Wrongful Conviction Junk

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Science is a production of Lava for Good Podcasts and

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 2>association with Signal Company Number One. Thanks to our executive

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 2>producer Jason Flam and the team at Signal Company Number

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 2>one executive producer Kevin Wardis and senior producers Kara Kornhaber

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 2>and Brit Spangler. Our music was composed by Jay Ralph.

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 2>You can follow me on Instagram at dubin Josh. Follow

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 2>the Wrongful Conviction podcast on Facebook and on Instagram at

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Wrongful Conviction and on Twitter at wrong Conviction