1 00:00:07,960 --> 00:00:10,720 Speaker 1: The average number of children each woman gives birth to 2 00:00:10,880 --> 00:00:15,480 Speaker 1: globally has been steadily declining. To some, this is a disaster. 3 00:00:16,120 --> 00:00:19,599 Speaker 1: Elon Musk, for example, says that collapsing birth rate is 4 00:00:19,640 --> 00:00:24,360 Speaker 1: the biggest danger civilization faces by far, with fourteen children 5 00:00:24,440 --> 00:00:27,200 Speaker 1: at last count, he seems to be attempting to avert 6 00:00:27,240 --> 00:00:31,560 Speaker 1: this crisis single handedly. Folks concerned with the decline in 7 00:00:31,640 --> 00:00:35,440 Speaker 1: birth rates advocate for policies that incentivize having more children. 8 00:00:35,840 --> 00:00:38,200 Speaker 1: But on the other hand, a decline in birth rate 9 00:00:38,320 --> 00:00:41,720 Speaker 1: is music to the ears of others. As someone who 10 00:00:41,760 --> 00:00:45,640 Speaker 1: adores both human beings and nature, I would love to 11 00:00:45,640 --> 00:00:50,040 Speaker 1: see living standards rise as population size falls. It seems 12 00:00:50,159 --> 00:00:53,440 Speaker 1: reasonable to assume that more humans translates into a greater 13 00:00:53,560 --> 00:00:57,600 Speaker 1: environmental impact. So if humans are choosing to have fewer babies, 14 00:00:58,080 --> 00:01:01,720 Speaker 1: that sounds like a win win for humans and for nature. Plus, 15 00:01:01,760 --> 00:01:03,680 Speaker 1: I've heard humans are going to level out at eight 16 00:01:03,680 --> 00:01:07,200 Speaker 1: billion people anyway, so any decline in population size would 17 00:01:07,200 --> 00:01:10,240 Speaker 1: be short lived, and anyway, this seems like a problem 18 00:01:10,280 --> 00:01:13,479 Speaker 1: for future generations. Right, Why should we start worrying about 19 00:01:13,520 --> 00:01:17,760 Speaker 1: population size now? Well, today we're going to talk to 20 00:01:17,880 --> 00:01:21,600 Speaker 1: Dean Spears and Michael Jeruso about their recent book After 21 00:01:21,640 --> 00:01:25,840 Speaker 1: the Spike, Population Progress and the Case for People. They 22 00:01:25,959 --> 00:01:28,880 Speaker 1: are concerned that the future will see a precipitous decline 23 00:01:28,920 --> 00:01:31,600 Speaker 1: in human population size, and they want to see us 24 00:01:31,600 --> 00:01:34,840 Speaker 1: start taking this problem seriously now so that we have 25 00:01:34,920 --> 00:01:37,800 Speaker 1: plenty of time to find compassionate solutions to the problem 26 00:01:38,040 --> 00:01:41,840 Speaker 1: before society start to feel the pinch. Welcome to Daniel 27 00:01:41,840 --> 00:01:43,560 Speaker 1: and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe. 28 00:01:56,440 --> 00:01:59,680 Speaker 2: Hi. I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and a professor 29 00:01:59,760 --> 00:02:02,200 Speaker 2: a you see Irvine, and I have two children and 30 00:02:02,240 --> 00:02:02,640 Speaker 2: a dog. 31 00:02:02,920 --> 00:02:06,200 Speaker 1: Hello. I'm Kelly Weener Smith. I study parasites and space 32 00:02:06,240 --> 00:02:10,959 Speaker 1: and I have two children, two dogs, seven goats, two cats, 33 00:02:11,040 --> 00:02:14,120 Speaker 1: and as of next week, I will have five ducks 34 00:02:14,120 --> 00:02:14,840 Speaker 1: and two geese. 35 00:02:16,440 --> 00:02:18,440 Speaker 2: Is that it really how many rats are living on 36 00:02:18,440 --> 00:02:18,960 Speaker 2: the property? 37 00:02:19,840 --> 00:02:21,919 Speaker 1: Well, you know, there used to be a lot of them, 38 00:02:22,120 --> 00:02:25,320 Speaker 1: but we took care of them. And I know, I 39 00:02:25,400 --> 00:02:27,960 Speaker 1: know you and I really like rats, but not when 40 00:02:28,000 --> 00:02:31,560 Speaker 1: they're eating the chickens food. And it was just complicated 41 00:02:31,680 --> 00:02:32,679 Speaker 1: and it was us or them. 42 00:02:33,240 --> 00:02:35,560 Speaker 2: So my question for you, Kelly is why did you 43 00:02:35,639 --> 00:02:39,160 Speaker 2: decide to have two children and not three or seventeen? 44 00:02:39,680 --> 00:02:42,520 Speaker 2: And you considered goats part of the Wiener Smith clan. 45 00:02:44,919 --> 00:02:46,359 Speaker 1: I love the goats, but not as much as I 46 00:02:46,400 --> 00:02:49,560 Speaker 1: love my kids, and so there's a hierarchy there for sure. 47 00:02:50,120 --> 00:02:53,480 Speaker 2: Wow, species is much Yep, Yes, it's true. 48 00:02:53,800 --> 00:02:56,440 Speaker 1: I like humans. I do like humans a lot. We 49 00:02:56,520 --> 00:02:58,760 Speaker 1: decided to have two because after we had the second 50 00:02:58,800 --> 00:03:02,360 Speaker 1: one and he was old enough to be like sleeping 51 00:03:02,360 --> 00:03:05,320 Speaker 1: a little bit better, I thought to myself, I do 52 00:03:05,360 --> 00:03:08,919 Speaker 1: not have the energy to go through those long nights again. 53 00:03:09,360 --> 00:03:12,400 Speaker 1: And my second pregnancy was a high risk. I ended 54 00:03:12,480 --> 00:03:15,360 Speaker 1: up in the ICU with hypertension after my son was born, 55 00:03:15,840 --> 00:03:17,560 Speaker 1: and so I was like, I think my body is 56 00:03:17,600 --> 00:03:21,200 Speaker 1: telling me two is good, and yeah, what about you? 57 00:03:21,240 --> 00:03:22,000 Speaker 1: Why'd you pick two? 58 00:03:22,360 --> 00:03:24,400 Speaker 2: I feel like two is a special number because it's 59 00:03:24,400 --> 00:03:27,400 Speaker 2: the same number as parents in the family, And so 60 00:03:27,440 --> 00:03:30,280 Speaker 2: I think people really underestimate, like how much more work 61 00:03:30,320 --> 00:03:32,920 Speaker 2: a third child is. And you know, when we talk 62 00:03:32,960 --> 00:03:34,880 Speaker 2: to the economists today on the program, they're talking about 63 00:03:34,880 --> 00:03:37,240 Speaker 2: these numbers one, two, three, But I really feel like 64 00:03:37,240 --> 00:03:39,960 Speaker 2: there's a barrier there past two where it just really 65 00:03:40,000 --> 00:03:42,680 Speaker 2: becomes much much harder. And also if you have like 66 00:03:42,720 --> 00:03:45,960 Speaker 2: two academics and young careers, and it just didn't seem 67 00:03:46,000 --> 00:03:49,080 Speaker 2: plausible for us. Plus every pregnancy for us is high 68 00:03:49,160 --> 00:03:51,760 Speaker 2: risk because Katrina is Type one diabetic. Yeah, so it 69 00:03:51,880 --> 00:03:53,240 Speaker 2: just felt like more than we could handle. 70 00:03:53,640 --> 00:03:55,240 Speaker 1: So you and I both read the book, and they 71 00:03:55,240 --> 00:03:58,280 Speaker 1: do address how difficult and time consuming it is to 72 00:03:58,280 --> 00:04:01,080 Speaker 1: have children, also like how beauty full and amazing it is. 73 00:04:01,760 --> 00:04:04,280 Speaker 1: And one of their suggestions is that, you know, society 74 00:04:04,360 --> 00:04:08,440 Speaker 1: needs to modify in ways that make it easier, you know, 75 00:04:08,560 --> 00:04:11,320 Speaker 1: easier to get child cares, or less work for the 76 00:04:11,360 --> 00:04:13,520 Speaker 1: moms and for the dads, and just trying to make 77 00:04:13,520 --> 00:04:16,680 Speaker 1: the whole thing easier. But I agree, two was a 78 00:04:16,720 --> 00:04:19,680 Speaker 1: lot more work than one. And I thought, I thought, well, 79 00:04:19,720 --> 00:04:21,640 Speaker 1: I'm already doing this parenting thing. It won't be that 80 00:04:21,720 --> 00:04:24,279 Speaker 1: much more. It's a lot more, And I'm still glad 81 00:04:24,279 --> 00:04:27,000 Speaker 1: I did it, for sure, But yes, three is to 82 00:04:27,120 --> 00:04:29,040 Speaker 1: me conceivable. 83 00:04:29,800 --> 00:04:32,200 Speaker 2: So thank you to all the parents out there having 84 00:04:32,240 --> 00:04:35,880 Speaker 2: more than two children and helping us maintain the human population. 85 00:04:36,279 --> 00:04:39,120 Speaker 1: That's right, Yes, it's an important job and needs to 86 00:04:39,120 --> 00:04:42,640 Speaker 1: be done well. And so speaking of the human population, 87 00:04:42,960 --> 00:04:45,080 Speaker 1: the book that we're talking about today sort of projects 88 00:04:45,120 --> 00:04:47,599 Speaker 1: forward what the human population might look like as we 89 00:04:47,680 --> 00:04:51,120 Speaker 1: go through multiple generations, and so we wanted to know 90 00:04:51,360 --> 00:04:54,279 Speaker 1: what our audience thinks about how many people will be 91 00:04:54,320 --> 00:04:57,160 Speaker 1: on the planet in three hundred years, and here are 92 00:04:57,200 --> 00:04:57,839 Speaker 1: their answers. 93 00:04:58,400 --> 00:05:01,560 Speaker 3: That's a good question, but realistic unanswable, and my humble opinion, 94 00:05:01,760 --> 00:05:03,760 Speaker 3: because there are too many unknown variables that can occur 95 00:05:03,800 --> 00:05:05,880 Speaker 3: in three hundred years that could wipe out a portion 96 00:05:05,960 --> 00:05:08,320 Speaker 3: of all of humanity, from our own deeds to an 97 00:05:08,360 --> 00:05:10,800 Speaker 3: asteroid impact like the size that took out the dinosaurs, 98 00:05:11,000 --> 00:05:14,159 Speaker 3: or a combination of things like successive volcanic eruptions, wildly 99 00:05:14,240 --> 00:05:17,600 Speaker 3: ballenced anomious tornadoes, and plant earthquakes. So I don't think 100 00:05:17,640 --> 00:05:19,240 Speaker 3: the question is realistically answerable. 101 00:05:19,560 --> 00:05:25,480 Speaker 4: So the optimist in me would say that overall population 102 00:05:25,839 --> 00:05:31,080 Speaker 4: would be in a slow decline by then, since as 103 00:05:31,360 --> 00:05:34,200 Speaker 4: education levels increase around the world and the standard of 104 00:05:34,200 --> 00:05:37,640 Speaker 4: living increases around the world, people tend to have fewer 105 00:05:37,839 --> 00:05:41,200 Speaker 4: children on average. In fact, they tend to have a 106 00:05:41,200 --> 00:05:43,360 Speaker 4: negative birth rate, So I would say. 107 00:05:44,400 --> 00:05:45,680 Speaker 2: One billion individuals. 108 00:05:45,720 --> 00:05:47,640 Speaker 4: I kind of feel like we'd go back down to 109 00:05:47,680 --> 00:05:52,400 Speaker 4: something like that. The pessimist in me says that we 110 00:05:52,480 --> 00:05:55,080 Speaker 4: blow ourselves up with a nuclear disaster. 111 00:05:55,880 --> 00:06:00,040 Speaker 5: Birth rates in all countries have dropped. I expect in 112 00:06:00,120 --> 00:06:04,160 Speaker 5: three hundred years, we will have less population than today. 113 00:06:04,760 --> 00:06:07,760 Speaker 6: It's easy to naively imagine living like the Jetsons three 114 00:06:07,839 --> 00:06:11,480 Speaker 6: hundred years from now, but considering the unsustainably outrageous rate 115 00:06:11,520 --> 00:06:15,200 Speaker 6: of our populace over consuming all natural resources except sunlight, 116 00:06:15,680 --> 00:06:18,880 Speaker 6: I anticipate a bleak existence. For However, many humans can 117 00:06:18,880 --> 00:06:22,400 Speaker 6: subsist on what remains. Choosing a number, I doubt even 118 00:06:22,440 --> 00:06:24,720 Speaker 6: first order billions. 119 00:06:24,080 --> 00:06:28,000 Speaker 7: Well, I think that in three hundred years there will 120 00:06:28,000 --> 00:06:33,400 Speaker 7: be social pressure to just replace yourself. I think with longevity, 121 00:06:33,839 --> 00:06:36,560 Speaker 7: people will be living for a very long time and 122 00:06:37,080 --> 00:06:39,119 Speaker 7: we will avoid overpopulation. 123 00:06:40,080 --> 00:06:43,599 Speaker 8: I personally think we have a horrible future as a species. 124 00:06:44,560 --> 00:06:50,000 Speaker 8: We are terribly overpopulated right now without enough resources. My 125 00:06:50,160 --> 00:06:52,839 Speaker 8: guess is in three hundred years they'll probably be less 126 00:06:52,880 --> 00:06:57,720 Speaker 8: than ten percent of the population left. Sadly, I don't 127 00:06:57,720 --> 00:07:00,440 Speaker 8: think there will be any people lift on planet in 128 00:07:00,520 --> 00:07:01,400 Speaker 8: three hundred years. 129 00:07:02,279 --> 00:07:05,280 Speaker 6: We are our own worst enemy, and considering the trajectory 130 00:07:05,320 --> 00:07:08,040 Speaker 6: we're going in right now, I would say. 131 00:07:08,680 --> 00:07:12,880 Speaker 2: Less of five percent of the current population, precisely zero. 132 00:07:13,480 --> 00:07:14,920 Speaker 5: There's no way we'll make it that far. 133 00:07:15,680 --> 00:07:18,320 Speaker 2: So, Kelly, why did you pick three hundred years? It's 134 00:07:18,360 --> 00:07:20,240 Speaker 2: a really specific timeline. 135 00:07:20,400 --> 00:07:23,760 Speaker 1: Oh. I went to one of the figures in their book, 136 00:07:24,320 --> 00:07:27,280 Speaker 1: and I looked at a point where the projected population 137 00:07:27,360 --> 00:07:29,280 Speaker 1: size was quite a bit lower, and so I thought, 138 00:07:29,360 --> 00:07:31,640 Speaker 1: you know, at this point, people can say up or down, 139 00:07:31,720 --> 00:07:35,280 Speaker 1: and according to their projections, the answer should be definitely down. 140 00:07:35,960 --> 00:07:38,520 Speaker 1: But I gotta be honest, I did not expect answers 141 00:07:38,560 --> 00:07:42,680 Speaker 1: to be so dark dark from our audience. Usually there's 142 00:07:42,720 --> 00:07:44,520 Speaker 1: like a bunch of jokes thrown in there, like I 143 00:07:44,560 --> 00:07:46,720 Speaker 1: don't know, but here's a poop joke, and I'm like, oh, 144 00:07:46,760 --> 00:07:49,119 Speaker 1: I love you guys. But this was like we're probably 145 00:07:49,120 --> 00:07:51,360 Speaker 1: gonna blow ourselves up. Yeah, And they're like, oh man, 146 00:07:51,400 --> 00:07:54,560 Speaker 1: a couple answers like that, and so wow. 147 00:07:54,640 --> 00:07:56,960 Speaker 2: Well, I don't know. Maybe digging this deep into science, 148 00:07:57,000 --> 00:08:00,160 Speaker 2: into physics and biologies made people existential. You know, they 149 00:08:00,200 --> 00:08:03,920 Speaker 2: realize how fragile our meat bags are on this tiny 150 00:08:04,000 --> 00:08:07,040 Speaker 2: speck of dust we're floating on in this vast universe. 151 00:08:07,560 --> 00:08:09,640 Speaker 2: So it's sort of hard in that context to imagine 152 00:08:09,640 --> 00:08:11,760 Speaker 2: we're going to be around in three hundred years, three 153 00:08:11,800 --> 00:08:14,840 Speaker 2: thousand years, three million years. It seems like incredible we 154 00:08:14,880 --> 00:08:15,520 Speaker 2: are here at all. 155 00:08:15,800 --> 00:08:16,040 Speaker 5: Yeah. 156 00:08:16,040 --> 00:08:19,960 Speaker 1: No, I absolutely agree, and I share concerns about what 157 00:08:20,120 --> 00:08:23,000 Speaker 1: our species is going to do because we have nuclear 158 00:08:23,000 --> 00:08:25,680 Speaker 1: weapons and are we going to like just totally accidentally 159 00:08:25,720 --> 00:08:29,000 Speaker 1: blow ourselves up? I hope not, but from a like 160 00:08:29,160 --> 00:08:33,240 Speaker 1: resources and population standpoint for anyone who's feeling negative but 161 00:08:33,320 --> 00:08:36,600 Speaker 1: would like to have their spirits slightly lifted, I really 162 00:08:36,720 --> 00:08:39,280 Speaker 1: liked Not the End of the World by Hanna Richie. 163 00:08:39,320 --> 00:08:43,360 Speaker 1: She runs our world in data and so she really 164 00:08:43,360 --> 00:08:46,160 Speaker 1: digs into the numbers for a bunch of these resource problems, 165 00:08:46,240 --> 00:08:48,520 Speaker 1: and it's like one of my favorite books because I 166 00:08:48,559 --> 00:08:51,600 Speaker 1: love the way she addresses these problems with data, and 167 00:08:51,640 --> 00:08:54,120 Speaker 1: in the end she decides, look, we can handle this 168 00:08:54,240 --> 00:08:57,720 Speaker 1: and it doesn't need to be too catastrophic in terms 169 00:08:57,720 --> 00:09:00,360 Speaker 1: of all of us changing our lives, but we do 170 00:09:00,400 --> 00:09:02,600 Speaker 1: need to make some changes and here are some suggestions. 171 00:09:02,600 --> 00:09:04,600 Speaker 1: And anyway, I really enjoyed her book. 172 00:09:04,720 --> 00:09:05,960 Speaker 2: Awesome. I'll check that out. 173 00:09:06,080 --> 00:09:06,200 Speaker 7: Well. 174 00:09:06,240 --> 00:09:08,400 Speaker 2: Today we're talking about the book After the Spike, Population 175 00:09:08,520 --> 00:09:11,480 Speaker 2: Progress and the Case for People by Dean Spears and 176 00:09:11,520 --> 00:09:14,400 Speaker 2: Michael GURUSO out today. Go check it out. Kelly and 177 00:09:14,440 --> 00:09:16,680 Speaker 2: I both read this book. I really enjoyed it because 178 00:09:17,160 --> 00:09:21,200 Speaker 2: I love books that take apart sort of popular misconceptions like, 179 00:09:21,240 --> 00:09:24,880 Speaker 2: here's the standard lore everybody believes. Why did you believe that? 180 00:09:25,280 --> 00:09:28,520 Speaker 2: Why is that not true? And what's more likely to happen? 181 00:09:28,880 --> 00:09:31,000 Speaker 2: And this book does a great job of that. It's 182 00:09:31,040 --> 00:09:34,320 Speaker 2: a little bit nerdy and economical and data heavy, but 183 00:09:34,360 --> 00:09:37,160 Speaker 2: only as much as you need to convince yourself that 184 00:09:37,160 --> 00:09:39,160 Speaker 2: these guys know what they're talking about and the issues 185 00:09:39,200 --> 00:09:42,040 Speaker 2: they raise are real issues. It's also fun and their 186 00:09:42,160 --> 00:09:44,680 Speaker 2: jokes and as you'll hear in our conversation today, these 187 00:09:44,679 --> 00:09:46,000 Speaker 2: guys are good at explaining stuff. 188 00:09:46,160 --> 00:09:48,559 Speaker 1: Yeah, and I also felt like they were sort of 189 00:09:48,640 --> 00:09:52,600 Speaker 1: kindred spirits with us because for a lot of the answers, it's, look, 190 00:09:52,640 --> 00:09:54,480 Speaker 1: we just we don't know, we don't have the data, 191 00:09:54,559 --> 00:09:57,440 Speaker 1: and they're very honest about what we do know what 192 00:09:57,480 --> 00:09:59,880 Speaker 1: we don't know. Yeah, and I really appreciate that they're 193 00:09:59,880 --> 00:10:01,960 Speaker 1: t taking on this problem because it has sort of 194 00:10:01,960 --> 00:10:05,400 Speaker 1: become politicized, as I mentioned in the intro, and I 195 00:10:05,440 --> 00:10:07,760 Speaker 1: feel like they might be sort of making themselves targets, 196 00:10:07,760 --> 00:10:11,320 Speaker 1: which is maybe why they are so so tied to 197 00:10:11,360 --> 00:10:14,440 Speaker 1: their data, the data and their arguments. And anyway, they 198 00:10:14,440 --> 00:10:17,560 Speaker 1: make some pretty interesting arguments. And let me go ahead 199 00:10:17,559 --> 00:10:20,640 Speaker 1: and give their bio real Quick. Spears and Jeruso are 200 00:10:20,640 --> 00:10:24,320 Speaker 1: professors of economics and demography at U t Austin. Jeruso 201 00:10:24,520 --> 00:10:27,520 Speaker 1: served as a senior economist in the Biden White House. 202 00:10:27,880 --> 00:10:32,840 Speaker 1: Spears runs the nonprofit research Institute for Compassionate Economics, which 203 00:10:32,840 --> 00:10:37,400 Speaker 1: helped establish a give well backed newborn health program in India. 204 00:10:37,480 --> 00:10:40,120 Speaker 9: Welcome to the show, guys, Thanks so much for having us. 205 00:10:40,360 --> 00:10:41,160 Speaker 5: Glad to be here. 206 00:10:41,280 --> 00:10:44,080 Speaker 1: My husband Zach has been absolutely raving about your book. 207 00:10:44,120 --> 00:10:45,640 Speaker 1: He loved it, so I was excited to have a 208 00:10:45,720 --> 00:10:48,400 Speaker 1: chance to read it. So let's jump right in. One 209 00:10:48,440 --> 00:10:49,960 Speaker 1: of the things that I like about this book is 210 00:10:49,960 --> 00:10:53,960 Speaker 1: that it gets me to think about population size way 211 00:10:54,000 --> 00:10:56,480 Speaker 1: differently than I thought about for like, literally all of 212 00:10:56,480 --> 00:10:58,480 Speaker 1: my life. So I was born in nineteen eighty two. 213 00:10:58,880 --> 00:11:01,560 Speaker 1: When I was born, popular size was about four point 214 00:11:01,640 --> 00:11:05,360 Speaker 1: six billion, and it's currently over eight billion. And I'm 215 00:11:05,440 --> 00:11:09,040 Speaker 1: an ecologist, so I usually think about population size as 216 00:11:09,040 --> 00:11:13,040 Speaker 1: being the thing that kills animals and destroys ecosystems and 217 00:11:13,040 --> 00:11:16,280 Speaker 1: stuff like that. So when I started hearing that, you know, oh, 218 00:11:16,320 --> 00:11:19,760 Speaker 1: eventually population size is going to go down, that sounded 219 00:11:19,800 --> 00:11:22,600 Speaker 1: like good news to me. And so your book was 220 00:11:22,640 --> 00:11:25,440 Speaker 1: sort of like mental whiplash for me. So explain to 221 00:11:25,520 --> 00:11:29,000 Speaker 1: us why population is going to go down and why 222 00:11:29,080 --> 00:11:31,400 Speaker 1: instead of feeling like, oh, this is maybe good news, 223 00:11:31,440 --> 00:11:33,760 Speaker 1: why this is something that we should be concerned about. 224 00:11:34,120 --> 00:11:37,480 Speaker 9: So we were also born in the eighties and we 225 00:11:37,640 --> 00:11:41,680 Speaker 9: also grew up hearing about overpopulation. But right now, global 226 00:11:41,800 --> 00:11:45,720 Speaker 9: depopulation is the most likely future. And what global depopulation 227 00:11:45,880 --> 00:11:49,840 Speaker 9: means is that every decade, every generation, the world's population 228 00:11:49,960 --> 00:11:52,559 Speaker 9: is going to shrink. That's the path that we're on. 229 00:11:52,720 --> 00:11:55,800 Speaker 9: Within a few decades, the world's population will begin to decline. 230 00:11:56,280 --> 00:11:59,120 Speaker 9: And there's no reason to think that once that happens, 231 00:11:59,160 --> 00:12:00,480 Speaker 9: it'll automatically reverse. 232 00:12:00,960 --> 00:12:01,840 Speaker 5: So a big. 233 00:12:01,720 --> 00:12:05,280 Speaker 9: Question before us is should we welcome that or should 234 00:12:05,280 --> 00:12:08,280 Speaker 9: we want something else to happen. But even before that 235 00:12:08,679 --> 00:12:12,880 Speaker 9: is why it's happening. And the fundamental explanation is that 236 00:12:12,960 --> 00:12:16,120 Speaker 9: birth rates are low and falling. So that's a way 237 00:12:16,160 --> 00:12:18,840 Speaker 9: that humans are different from other animals. If you're thinking 238 00:12:18,880 --> 00:12:23,319 Speaker 9: about ecology, that humans have cultures in society and decision 239 00:12:23,320 --> 00:12:26,560 Speaker 9: making and decide how many children to have. And over 240 00:12:26,600 --> 00:12:30,200 Speaker 9: time we've been deciding to have fewer children. And you know, 241 00:12:30,240 --> 00:12:32,800 Speaker 9: when I say low birth rates, you might think something 242 00:12:33,000 --> 00:12:35,760 Speaker 9: like South Korea where there is zero point seven of 243 00:12:35,760 --> 00:12:37,960 Speaker 9: a kid on average for two adults right now. But 244 00:12:38,120 --> 00:12:42,280 Speaker 9: actually it would be enough for global depopulation to have 245 00:12:42,400 --> 00:12:45,360 Speaker 9: low birth rates like in the US where it's one 246 00:12:45,400 --> 00:12:48,880 Speaker 9: point six kids per two adults, or like Texas or 247 00:12:48,920 --> 00:12:52,880 Speaker 9: Latin America where it's one point eight, because depopulation will 248 00:12:52,920 --> 00:12:56,480 Speaker 9: be the unavoidable consequence of there being fewer than two 249 00:12:56,640 --> 00:13:00,120 Speaker 9: children in the next generation to replace two adults in 250 00:13:00,160 --> 00:13:03,240 Speaker 9: the last generation. In two thirds of people now live 251 00:13:03,280 --> 00:13:05,880 Speaker 9: in a country where the birth rate is below that 252 00:13:06,040 --> 00:13:09,920 Speaker 9: two births per two adults average, that would stabilize the population. 253 00:13:10,400 --> 00:13:14,080 Speaker 2: And what exactly is new about that piece of knowledge, Like, 254 00:13:14,360 --> 00:13:17,160 Speaker 2: is this something that demographers and economists have known for 255 00:13:17,160 --> 00:13:20,079 Speaker 2: a long long time but the general population isn't aware of, 256 00:13:20,520 --> 00:13:23,760 Speaker 2: Or have we recently learned something about birth rates? Why 257 00:13:23,800 --> 00:13:26,120 Speaker 2: this conflict between our knowledge that birth rates are following 258 00:13:26,280 --> 00:13:28,520 Speaker 2: and the general sense among the whole population that the 259 00:13:28,520 --> 00:13:30,080 Speaker 2: population is growing out of control. 260 00:13:30,400 --> 00:13:33,000 Speaker 5: Yeah, I think that's a really good question. The fact 261 00:13:33,000 --> 00:13:35,560 Speaker 5: of the matter is that falling birth rates are not 262 00:13:35,880 --> 00:13:38,800 Speaker 5: some entirely new phenomenon that just popped up on the 263 00:13:38,800 --> 00:13:41,280 Speaker 5: scene in the last five or ten years. During this 264 00:13:41,440 --> 00:13:45,599 Speaker 5: period of rapid global population growth, you know, over the 265 00:13:45,679 --> 00:13:48,960 Speaker 5: last fifty sixty years, that was a period during which 266 00:13:49,080 --> 00:13:52,319 Speaker 5: birth rates were already falling. It's just really hard to 267 00:13:52,400 --> 00:13:55,040 Speaker 5: see and appreciate that birth rates are falling in a 268 00:13:55,080 --> 00:13:58,480 Speaker 5: time when the goal population is spiking up so quickly. Right, 269 00:13:58,559 --> 00:14:01,640 Speaker 5: So you mentioned you were born in nineteen eighty, Kelly, 270 00:14:01,840 --> 00:14:04,000 Speaker 5: or sorry, nineteen eighty two. I was born in nineteen eighty. 271 00:14:04,280 --> 00:14:07,080 Speaker 5: But the birth rate has been falling for a very 272 00:14:07,120 --> 00:14:07,559 Speaker 5: long time. 273 00:14:07,679 --> 00:14:07,880 Speaker 1: Ian. 274 00:14:07,880 --> 00:14:11,200 Speaker 5: It's been falling for as long back as we have 275 00:14:11,400 --> 00:14:15,080 Speaker 5: good statistics to document it. So birth rates were falling 276 00:14:15,160 --> 00:14:17,720 Speaker 5: in France and the seventeen hundreds, birth rates were falling 277 00:14:17,800 --> 00:14:20,600 Speaker 5: in other places in Europe in the eighteen hundreds. Birth 278 00:14:20,680 --> 00:14:24,240 Speaker 5: rates have been falling for the globe overall for as 279 00:14:24,280 --> 00:14:27,160 Speaker 5: long back as we have any good statistics now, like 280 00:14:27,240 --> 00:14:30,080 Speaker 5: there have been temporary blips, like the post World War 281 00:14:30,120 --> 00:14:33,880 Speaker 5: two baby boom, but on average, over the whole world, 282 00:14:34,200 --> 00:14:38,560 Speaker 5: over time frames that span decades rather than individual years 283 00:14:38,560 --> 00:14:40,880 Speaker 5: where things might bounce up or down, birth rates have 284 00:14:40,920 --> 00:14:43,120 Speaker 5: been falling. And so I just think it's really hard 285 00:14:43,160 --> 00:14:45,920 Speaker 5: to come to grips with the idea that even as 286 00:14:45,960 --> 00:14:49,200 Speaker 5: the population is rising birth rates have been falling. 287 00:14:49,360 --> 00:14:50,960 Speaker 2: Can you break that down a little bit for those 288 00:14:50,960 --> 00:14:53,760 Speaker 2: of us who don't always think in terms of differential equations, 289 00:14:53,880 --> 00:14:56,120 Speaker 2: How is it possible for the population to be rising 290 00:14:56,160 --> 00:14:57,400 Speaker 2: and the birth rate to be falling? 291 00:14:57,640 --> 00:15:01,520 Speaker 5: Okay, good question. Population changed At the basic level is 292 00:15:01,520 --> 00:15:04,640 Speaker 5: the difference between birth rates and death rates. So there's 293 00:15:04,640 --> 00:15:07,920 Speaker 5: two ways that population can increase. Births can go up 294 00:15:08,160 --> 00:15:11,840 Speaker 5: or deaths can go down. And the revolution that's happened 295 00:15:11,920 --> 00:15:15,040 Speaker 5: around the world in the past two centuries has not 296 00:15:15,080 --> 00:15:18,000 Speaker 5: been birth rates climbing. It's been death rates falling, and 297 00:15:18,000 --> 00:15:21,040 Speaker 5: in particular, the death rates of children falling. 298 00:15:21,600 --> 00:15:23,120 Speaker 2: So that sounds like good news. 299 00:15:23,240 --> 00:15:25,560 Speaker 5: Yay, Yes, that's very good news. 300 00:15:25,680 --> 00:15:25,840 Speaker 3: Yay. 301 00:15:26,360 --> 00:15:28,440 Speaker 5: I mean it's really good news. It's sort of hard 302 00:15:28,440 --> 00:15:32,800 Speaker 5: to appreciate from a modern perspective just how awful the 303 00:15:32,840 --> 00:15:35,960 Speaker 5: mortality rates of children and babies were not all that 304 00:15:36,000 --> 00:15:39,360 Speaker 5: long ago. So a couple hundred years ago, the sort 305 00:15:39,400 --> 00:15:43,800 Speaker 5: of the global average for mortality for a kid would 306 00:15:43,840 --> 00:15:49,600 Speaker 5: be something like one in three kids dying before age five, right, 307 00:15:49,640 --> 00:15:53,160 Speaker 5: And so as we've learned to keep ourselves and our 308 00:15:53,240 --> 00:15:58,000 Speaker 5: children alive through better sanitation, through an understanding of the 309 00:15:58,080 --> 00:16:00,960 Speaker 5: drum theear of disease, through better water, through better nutrition, 310 00:16:01,120 --> 00:16:05,440 Speaker 5: eventually through vaccines later at our history, what that's meant 311 00:16:05,520 --> 00:16:07,760 Speaker 5: is that more people have grown up to become adults 312 00:16:07,800 --> 00:16:10,160 Speaker 5: and to have children of their own. So the part 313 00:16:10,160 --> 00:16:12,960 Speaker 5: of the equation that's been changing this time is that 314 00:16:13,000 --> 00:16:15,280 Speaker 5: death rates have been falling and birth rates have been 315 00:16:15,280 --> 00:16:19,400 Speaker 5: falling too. It's just that they've been chasing death rates downward. 316 00:16:19,800 --> 00:16:21,760 Speaker 5: And the net effect of all of that over the 317 00:16:21,800 --> 00:16:25,400 Speaker 5: past one hundred years two hundred years has been just 318 00:16:25,680 --> 00:16:28,480 Speaker 5: a skyrocketing of the global population. So, just to put 319 00:16:28,480 --> 00:16:31,800 Speaker 5: that in some perspective, in eighteen hundred, there were about 320 00:16:31,800 --> 00:16:34,560 Speaker 5: a billion of us worldwide. About a century later, in 321 00:16:34,600 --> 00:16:37,640 Speaker 5: nineteen twenty five we passed two billion, and then since then, 322 00:16:37,920 --> 00:16:41,000 Speaker 5: in the last hundred years, we've quadrupled to the present 323 00:16:41,160 --> 00:16:43,760 Speaker 5: eight point two billion. And all of that action has 324 00:16:43,800 --> 00:16:46,720 Speaker 5: been about declining death rates that have been declining faster 325 00:16:46,840 --> 00:16:48,240 Speaker 5: than birth rates have been declining. 326 00:16:48,520 --> 00:16:50,720 Speaker 1: And so is the idea that at some point we're 327 00:16:50,760 --> 00:16:53,640 Speaker 1: going to max out on what we can do in 328 00:16:53,720 --> 00:16:56,600 Speaker 1: terms of reducing death rates, and now the birth rates 329 00:16:56,600 --> 00:16:58,000 Speaker 1: are going to start being more important. 330 00:16:58,240 --> 00:17:01,680 Speaker 5: Yes, yes, we're going to in out on what we 331 00:17:01,720 --> 00:17:05,119 Speaker 5: can do for minimizing death rates. Thankfully, mortality rates for 332 00:17:05,240 --> 00:17:07,760 Speaker 5: children are so low that they're pressing up against a 333 00:17:07,840 --> 00:17:10,960 Speaker 5: zero lower bound, so there's just not much more room 334 00:17:11,040 --> 00:17:14,200 Speaker 5: for them to fall. Meanwhile, fertility rates continue to fall. 335 00:17:14,400 --> 00:17:17,040 Speaker 2: Can't we all just transform into immortal cyborgs and solve 336 00:17:17,040 --> 00:17:17,520 Speaker 2: this problem? 337 00:17:17,960 --> 00:17:21,360 Speaker 5: That would be? That would be that would be. 338 00:17:21,280 --> 00:17:26,280 Speaker 2: Something I love seeing you search or an adjective there? 339 00:17:26,720 --> 00:17:28,960 Speaker 9: Well, I mean, okay, so there is actually there's something 340 00:17:29,000 --> 00:17:31,440 Speaker 9: interesting there. I want to jump in on that because 341 00:17:31,480 --> 00:17:34,159 Speaker 9: that is a question that we get, which is, could 342 00:17:34,440 --> 00:17:38,480 Speaker 9: lower mortality rates solve this problem? We don't mean lower 343 00:17:38,520 --> 00:17:40,320 Speaker 9: info mortality rates? What sort of brought us up to 344 00:17:40,320 --> 00:17:42,600 Speaker 9: spite people's like what if people just stop dying in 345 00:17:42,720 --> 00:17:44,680 Speaker 9: older age and live longer than so, like, what if 346 00:17:44,680 --> 00:17:47,200 Speaker 9: instead of dying on average at seventy five or something, 347 00:17:47,480 --> 00:17:50,760 Speaker 9: we live twice as long and died at one hundred 348 00:17:50,800 --> 00:17:51,280 Speaker 9: and fifty? 349 00:17:51,440 --> 00:17:51,680 Speaker 4: Right? 350 00:17:51,840 --> 00:17:54,640 Speaker 9: Would that be enough to knock us off the path 351 00:17:54,640 --> 00:17:56,840 Speaker 9: and make it so it's no longer the case that 352 00:17:56,960 --> 00:18:00,240 Speaker 9: depopulation is the most likely future. And they answered that 353 00:18:00,320 --> 00:18:05,200 Speaker 9: question is surprisingly no. Now you asked out differential equations 354 00:18:05,200 --> 00:18:06,879 Speaker 9: and I won't get into it. But just think of 355 00:18:06,920 --> 00:18:10,760 Speaker 9: it as like this. If everybody still has two kids 356 00:18:10,840 --> 00:18:13,240 Speaker 9: or one point six kids on average for two adults, 357 00:18:13,400 --> 00:18:16,159 Speaker 9: then we're going to have the same phenomenon where the 358 00:18:16,200 --> 00:18:19,920 Speaker 9: next generation is smaller than the generation before. A given 359 00:18:19,960 --> 00:18:22,800 Speaker 9: generation will live longer, so the number of people alive 360 00:18:22,840 --> 00:18:25,959 Speaker 9: and any one time will be greater, but depopulation will 361 00:18:26,000 --> 00:18:28,720 Speaker 9: still be what's happening. As generation after generation gets smaller 362 00:18:28,760 --> 00:18:29,600 Speaker 9: and smaller. 363 00:18:29,280 --> 00:18:30,680 Speaker 2: You're just stretching out the time scale. 364 00:18:30,800 --> 00:18:33,560 Speaker 9: Befasted exactly, stretching out the timescale. Now it could be 365 00:18:33,800 --> 00:18:35,920 Speaker 9: if we live to be one hundred and fifty instead 366 00:18:35,920 --> 00:18:39,919 Speaker 9: of living to be seventy five. And also the biology 367 00:18:39,960 --> 00:18:43,399 Speaker 9: of reproduction change that instead of having you know, kids 368 00:18:43,440 --> 00:18:45,840 Speaker 9: in our twenties and thirties and maybe forties, you had 369 00:18:45,840 --> 00:18:47,640 Speaker 9: a couple of kids in your thirties, a couple kids 370 00:18:47,680 --> 00:18:50,360 Speaker 9: in your fifties, a couple kids in your seventies. Right 371 00:18:50,840 --> 00:18:53,520 Speaker 9: then we would get off the path from depopulation. But 372 00:18:53,560 --> 00:18:56,000 Speaker 9: it wouldn't be because we were living longer. It would 373 00:18:56,040 --> 00:18:59,480 Speaker 9: still be because we were having more kids. I'll pass, 374 00:19:01,280 --> 00:19:02,639 Speaker 9: I don't know, I mean, what are you going to 375 00:19:02,720 --> 00:19:04,200 Speaker 9: do with all that time when you're one hundred and 376 00:19:04,280 --> 00:19:07,920 Speaker 9: forty and sleep read read we. 377 00:19:07,960 --> 00:19:09,879 Speaker 2: Might need to be cyborgs that to keep up with 378 00:19:09,880 --> 00:19:11,720 Speaker 2: our toddlers when we're one hundred and thirty. That does 379 00:19:11,720 --> 00:19:12,800 Speaker 2: not sound like a lot of fun. 380 00:19:13,080 --> 00:19:15,479 Speaker 1: That's hard. I've been telling a bunch of my friends 381 00:19:15,480 --> 00:19:17,960 Speaker 1: that I read this book and have wanted to like 382 00:19:18,000 --> 00:19:20,800 Speaker 1: start conversations with them about it, and a lot of 383 00:19:20,840 --> 00:19:23,280 Speaker 1: them will say to me, well, that doesn't match up 384 00:19:23,320 --> 00:19:25,520 Speaker 1: with what I've heard. What I've heard is that the 385 00:19:25,600 --> 00:19:28,439 Speaker 1: Earth's population is going to settle at eight billion and 386 00:19:28,480 --> 00:19:30,720 Speaker 1: we're going to stay there. And a couple people have 387 00:19:30,760 --> 00:19:33,000 Speaker 1: said this to me, do you know where that figure 388 00:19:33,080 --> 00:19:35,639 Speaker 1: came from? And could you explain why it's wrong? 389 00:19:36,240 --> 00:19:40,560 Speaker 9: Yeah. So I think it's just that people have known 390 00:19:41,000 --> 00:19:44,359 Speaker 9: that population growth was slowing, and there's just like a 391 00:19:44,560 --> 00:19:47,040 Speaker 9: trope or something that's come out of you know, population 392 00:19:47,119 --> 00:19:49,600 Speaker 9: growth is slowing and it's going to hit zero, and 393 00:19:49,640 --> 00:19:53,240 Speaker 9: there just isn't a lot of thought about what happens next. 394 00:19:53,359 --> 00:19:55,600 Speaker 9: So you might read a newspaper article it says, you know, 395 00:19:55,600 --> 00:19:58,119 Speaker 9: demographers that come out with new information that shows that 396 00:19:58,160 --> 00:20:01,320 Speaker 9: population growth is slowing in going to hit zero. Yes, 397 00:20:01,720 --> 00:20:04,040 Speaker 9: but then what happens next you throw a ball up 398 00:20:04,040 --> 00:20:08,120 Speaker 9: into the air, and at some point it's vertical velocity 399 00:20:08,160 --> 00:20:10,320 Speaker 9: is going to hit zero. But that's not the end 400 00:20:10,359 --> 00:20:13,680 Speaker 9: of the story, right The same force that slowed its 401 00:20:13,680 --> 00:20:16,240 Speaker 9: ascent is eventually going to bring it back down. And 402 00:20:16,280 --> 00:20:19,320 Speaker 9: I think people just aren't seeing that second side of 403 00:20:19,320 --> 00:20:22,880 Speaker 9: the story, that just as falling birth rates have slowed 404 00:20:22,880 --> 00:20:26,000 Speaker 9: the growth rate in the population, falling birth rates are 405 00:20:26,040 --> 00:20:28,760 Speaker 9: also going to bring the population size down. 406 00:20:29,200 --> 00:20:31,840 Speaker 2: So are you suggesting that we haven't had any sort 407 00:20:31,880 --> 00:20:35,760 Speaker 2: of realistic model in the sort of popular discussion of population, 408 00:20:36,200 --> 00:20:39,520 Speaker 2: that it's all just been assumptions about how things are 409 00:20:39,520 --> 00:20:40,520 Speaker 2: going to stabilize. 410 00:20:40,760 --> 00:20:43,959 Speaker 9: I think there has been a lot of thinking that 411 00:20:44,040 --> 00:20:48,680 Speaker 9: because the population size is growing, it's going to continue growing, 412 00:20:49,119 --> 00:20:51,960 Speaker 9: even though there have been signs all along that that 413 00:20:52,040 --> 00:20:54,840 Speaker 9: probably wasn't going to be the case. So all the 414 00:20:54,840 --> 00:20:58,000 Speaker 9: way back in nineteen eighty, a long time ago, as 415 00:20:58,040 --> 00:21:01,520 Speaker 9: we've already discussed on this one, and five people already 416 00:21:01,600 --> 00:21:05,359 Speaker 9: lived in a country where the birth rate was below two. 417 00:21:05,840 --> 00:21:08,919 Speaker 9: You know, in the nineteen seventies, Europe passed below to Japan, 418 00:21:09,040 --> 00:21:12,359 Speaker 9: passed below to Cuba, Australia, Canada passed below too. In 419 00:21:12,400 --> 00:21:15,280 Speaker 9: the nineteen seventies, and so not only have birth rates 420 00:21:15,320 --> 00:21:20,640 Speaker 9: been falling for not just decades, but centuries. It's long 421 00:21:20,720 --> 00:21:23,719 Speaker 9: been the case that we could have seen this coming. 422 00:21:24,000 --> 00:21:28,159 Speaker 9: But I think because rapid exponential population growth due to 423 00:21:28,160 --> 00:21:31,600 Speaker 9: low mortality was so new on the historical scene that 424 00:21:31,760 --> 00:21:35,240 Speaker 9: got everybody's attention, and so it just wasn't that many 425 00:21:35,280 --> 00:21:39,000 Speaker 9: that thought through that if then, if the world's average 426 00:21:39,000 --> 00:21:41,800 Speaker 9: birth rate falls below two, then what's going to happen next? 427 00:21:42,040 --> 00:21:44,600 Speaker 9: And the evidence pointing towards that being the likely future. 428 00:21:45,080 --> 00:21:47,440 Speaker 2: And you mentioned earlier that birth rates vary a lot 429 00:21:47,480 --> 00:21:50,399 Speaker 2: from country to countries, South Korea versus other places, And 430 00:21:50,760 --> 00:21:54,520 Speaker 2: you know, I've heard anecdotally about subpopulations that have very 431 00:21:54,560 --> 00:21:57,679 Speaker 2: high birth rates. I remember my wife in grad school 432 00:21:57,720 --> 00:22:01,120 Speaker 2: learning about some population where they have like seven eight 433 00:22:01,200 --> 00:22:04,360 Speaker 2: children on average. What do we know about the sort 434 00:22:04,359 --> 00:22:07,960 Speaker 2: of variation among subpopulations? Are we going to see the 435 00:22:08,000 --> 00:22:12,440 Speaker 2: global population decline but some populations grow very rapidly to compensate. 436 00:22:12,840 --> 00:22:16,240 Speaker 5: What's sort of interesting, and I think flying under the 437 00:22:16,359 --> 00:22:20,480 Speaker 5: radar in the popular discourse about this is that really 438 00:22:20,920 --> 00:22:25,399 Speaker 5: almost every region on Earth has either low fertility or 439 00:22:25,520 --> 00:22:28,480 Speaker 5: falling fertility. So it's really easy to think that this 440 00:22:28,600 --> 00:22:31,480 Speaker 5: is a phenomenon that's like special to Southeast the rich 441 00:22:31,520 --> 00:22:34,720 Speaker 5: economies of Southeast Asia, or maybe to Europe or the US. 442 00:22:35,119 --> 00:22:38,200 Speaker 5: But you know, we're here at Texas, and the birth 443 00:22:38,280 --> 00:22:40,400 Speaker 5: rate in Mexico, just south of the border is lower 444 00:22:40,440 --> 00:22:43,439 Speaker 5: than the birth rate in Texas. The fertility rate in 445 00:22:43,520 --> 00:22:47,080 Speaker 5: Latin America as a whole is something like one point eight, 446 00:22:47,560 --> 00:22:50,960 Speaker 5: which is below the replacement rate. Let's see. So the 447 00:22:51,119 --> 00:22:55,000 Speaker 5: three largest countries in the world are India, China, and 448 00:22:55,240 --> 00:22:58,720 Speaker 5: the United States, and all three countries have birth rates 449 00:22:58,800 --> 00:23:01,080 Speaker 5: below replacement and those are places that are very different. 450 00:23:01,080 --> 00:23:04,280 Speaker 5: They're different socially, they're different economically, they range. You know, 451 00:23:04,359 --> 00:23:07,600 Speaker 5: India's a developing country, China's middle income country. The United 452 00:23:07,600 --> 00:23:11,080 Speaker 5: States is an advanced economy. But basically everywhere in the 453 00:23:11,080 --> 00:23:14,199 Speaker 5: world we have low birth rates. And the exceptions to 454 00:23:14,240 --> 00:23:17,000 Speaker 5: that places like subs Haer in Africa. Birth rates are 455 00:23:17,040 --> 00:23:19,479 Speaker 5: still high. So it's still something like four kids per 456 00:23:19,520 --> 00:23:22,400 Speaker 5: two adults, but that number has also been falling over 457 00:23:22,400 --> 00:23:26,679 Speaker 5: the last fifty years, and demographers tend to project that 458 00:23:26,800 --> 00:23:29,560 Speaker 5: will continue to fall into the future as subs Haer 459 00:23:29,600 --> 00:23:33,440 Speaker 5: in Africa continues its development in terms of rising incomes, 460 00:23:33,520 --> 00:23:35,320 Speaker 5: rising opportunities, rising education. 461 00:23:35,760 --> 00:23:37,600 Speaker 1: So let's take a break and when we get back, 462 00:23:37,640 --> 00:23:40,240 Speaker 1: we'll talk about what we know about why birth rates 463 00:23:40,280 --> 00:23:54,800 Speaker 1: fall and how good we are at predicting this stuff. 464 00:24:03,240 --> 00:24:03,879 Speaker 1: And we're back. 465 00:24:04,200 --> 00:24:04,320 Speaker 7: Mike. 466 00:24:04,359 --> 00:24:06,440 Speaker 1: At the end of the last segment, you were talking 467 00:24:06,480 --> 00:24:10,040 Speaker 1: about how birth rates in the Sahara region have gone 468 00:24:10,080 --> 00:24:13,600 Speaker 1: from four to Are they dropping from four or did 469 00:24:13,640 --> 00:24:15,280 Speaker 1: they go from higher than four to four? 470 00:24:15,600 --> 00:24:19,159 Speaker 5: They've gone from something like six in the middle of 471 00:24:19,200 --> 00:24:21,720 Speaker 5: the twentieth century to something like four today. 472 00:24:21,920 --> 00:24:24,359 Speaker 1: So how good are we at predicting this kind of 473 00:24:24,359 --> 00:24:26,560 Speaker 1: stuff in like a ten year frame for example? 474 00:24:27,040 --> 00:24:30,000 Speaker 5: So in a ten year frame, professional demographers are good 475 00:24:30,040 --> 00:24:34,000 Speaker 5: at predicting population trajectories. The reason that demographers are pretty 476 00:24:34,000 --> 00:24:37,520 Speaker 5: good at predicting population sizes over a course like ten 477 00:24:37,600 --> 00:24:40,199 Speaker 5: years is that the population just has a lot of 478 00:24:40,200 --> 00:24:43,399 Speaker 5: inertia in it, so no matter what happens to they 479 00:24:43,560 --> 00:24:46,160 Speaker 5: were sticking too much on calculus here. But a fertility 480 00:24:46,240 --> 00:24:49,240 Speaker 5: rate is a flow and population is a stock, and 481 00:24:49,280 --> 00:24:51,560 Speaker 5: so you can change the flow as much as you 482 00:24:51,640 --> 00:24:55,280 Speaker 5: want instantaneously and it's going to have no immediate effect 483 00:24:55,400 --> 00:24:59,359 Speaker 5: on the stock. So in terms of predicting the population tomorrow. 484 00:24:59,480 --> 00:25:01,920 Speaker 5: I can pred debt very well, even though I don't 485 00:25:01,960 --> 00:25:04,800 Speaker 5: know how many babies will be born today, because most 486 00:25:04,800 --> 00:25:06,919 Speaker 5: of that prediction is built up in the stock of 487 00:25:07,280 --> 00:25:10,800 Speaker 5: people who are already alive. We know how people age 488 00:25:11,000 --> 00:25:13,600 Speaker 5: and die in their later years. We can predict that 489 00:25:13,600 --> 00:25:17,560 Speaker 5: with pretty good statistical accuracy. And so the uncertainty is 490 00:25:17,640 --> 00:25:21,399 Speaker 5: really about fertility and changes, and fertility actually take a 491 00:25:21,440 --> 00:25:25,920 Speaker 5: long time to play out into changes in population size. Now, 492 00:25:26,080 --> 00:25:29,879 Speaker 5: how good is anyone predicting whether fertility rates will stay low, 493 00:25:30,200 --> 00:25:32,160 Speaker 5: not just in the next decade, but in the next 494 00:25:32,320 --> 00:25:34,720 Speaker 5: half century, the next century. I think we should be 495 00:25:34,800 --> 00:25:37,680 Speaker 5: pretty clear that nobody knows for sure. But what we're 496 00:25:37,720 --> 00:25:41,880 Speaker 5: seeing around the world is a convergent pattern of low 497 00:25:41,920 --> 00:25:47,080 Speaker 5: fertility fertility below too. And history is not a guarantee 498 00:25:47,119 --> 00:25:49,800 Speaker 5: of future performance. Is That's what they say in stock 499 00:25:49,840 --> 00:25:53,480 Speaker 5: market predicting. But if we look around, we shouldn't ignore history. 500 00:25:53,520 --> 00:25:55,639 Speaker 5: And if we look around the world at all of 501 00:25:55,640 --> 00:25:59,560 Speaker 5: the countries where over a full childbearing lifetime fertility rates 502 00:25:59,560 --> 00:26:03,360 Speaker 5: have ever fall in below one point nine, there's twenty 503 00:26:03,440 --> 00:26:06,320 Speaker 5: six countries in that category. In none of those have 504 00:26:06,440 --> 00:26:09,440 Speaker 5: lifetime fertility rates meaning over the course of women's entire 505 00:26:09,480 --> 00:26:13,679 Speaker 5: life ever risen above two again, So that zero and 506 00:26:13,720 --> 00:26:16,159 Speaker 5: twenty six record isn't a guarantee of what will happen, 507 00:26:16,640 --> 00:26:18,640 Speaker 5: but it would be something that we would do well 508 00:26:18,680 --> 00:26:20,720 Speaker 5: to take seriously as a risk for the future. 509 00:26:21,119 --> 00:26:24,160 Speaker 2: So I want to understand what we know about why 510 00:26:24,200 --> 00:26:26,560 Speaker 2: this is happening, and then also talk in a minute 511 00:26:26,680 --> 00:26:29,520 Speaker 2: about things people have tried and why that might or 512 00:26:29,640 --> 00:26:32,000 Speaker 2: might not work. But what do we know about the 513 00:26:32,240 --> 00:26:34,439 Speaker 2: overall trends that are causing this. 514 00:26:35,000 --> 00:26:38,840 Speaker 9: So surprisingly less than you might think. You know, everybody 515 00:26:38,920 --> 00:26:42,840 Speaker 9: has a theory of why birth rates are low and falling, 516 00:26:43,359 --> 00:26:46,760 Speaker 9: but everybody's theories are different, and none of them really 517 00:26:46,800 --> 00:26:50,040 Speaker 9: captured the bigness of falling birth rates. And by bigness, 518 00:26:50,080 --> 00:26:52,120 Speaker 9: I mean we've talked about how it's something that's been 519 00:26:52,160 --> 00:26:55,119 Speaker 9: going on not just for years or decades, but for centuries. 520 00:26:55,600 --> 00:26:59,240 Speaker 9: And also that's happening in societies that are very different 521 00:26:59,280 --> 00:27:00,760 Speaker 9: from one another around the world. 522 00:27:00,800 --> 00:27:02,840 Speaker 2: And so we can't blame it all on Joe Biden, 523 00:27:02,880 --> 00:27:03,280 Speaker 2: for example. 524 00:27:03,280 --> 00:27:04,760 Speaker 9: You can't blame it all on Joe Biden. You can't 525 00:27:04,760 --> 00:27:07,359 Speaker 9: blame it all on any one thing. There's going to 526 00:27:07,359 --> 00:27:10,000 Speaker 9: be no silver bull exc So you hear people you know, 527 00:27:10,040 --> 00:27:13,760 Speaker 9: depending on as you say, there are sort of preconceptions 528 00:27:13,800 --> 00:27:18,119 Speaker 9: thinking about well, maybe it's about capitalism or the free 529 00:27:18,160 --> 00:27:21,000 Speaker 9: market or neoliberalism that's causing the problem. Or maybe somebody 530 00:27:21,080 --> 00:27:24,960 Speaker 9: might say it's about feminism or the retreat for marriage 531 00:27:25,040 --> 00:27:27,560 Speaker 9: or the decline of religion that's causing the problem. But whatever, 532 00:27:28,119 --> 00:27:32,040 Speaker 9: whatever your theory is, you can find an exception. So 533 00:27:32,440 --> 00:27:35,120 Speaker 9: for me, I learn a lot by thinking about India, 534 00:27:35,200 --> 00:27:37,320 Speaker 9: which is the country that I study in my research 535 00:27:37,359 --> 00:27:39,800 Speaker 9: and where I work. And so India is now not 536 00:27:39,840 --> 00:27:42,520 Speaker 9: only the world's most populous country, but the world's most 537 00:27:42,520 --> 00:27:46,720 Speaker 9: populous below replacement country. It's below too also, even though 538 00:27:46,920 --> 00:27:49,040 Speaker 9: India was the place in the middle of the twentieth 539 00:27:49,080 --> 00:27:53,439 Speaker 9: century that was the center of these overpopulation fears. And 540 00:27:53,480 --> 00:27:56,800 Speaker 9: what makes India so interesting is that it's a society 541 00:27:56,960 --> 00:28:02,040 Speaker 9: where religion continues to be important and in almost everybody's lives, 542 00:28:02,080 --> 00:28:04,719 Speaker 9: not just on a piece of paper, but actually something 543 00:28:04,760 --> 00:28:08,000 Speaker 9: that's part of their practices. Almost everybody gets married and 544 00:28:08,080 --> 00:28:11,440 Speaker 9: at young ages. Almost everybody gets married at young ages 545 00:28:11,480 --> 00:28:14,040 Speaker 9: and starts having kids at young ages. And here's what's 546 00:28:14,240 --> 00:28:18,000 Speaker 9: particularly striking is that female labor force participation in India 547 00:28:18,160 --> 00:28:21,439 Speaker 9: is still pretty low in international comparison, So in a 548 00:28:21,480 --> 00:28:25,960 Speaker 9: place like the US or Europe, there's an important story 549 00:28:26,000 --> 00:28:30,439 Speaker 9: about conflicts between career and family being part of why 550 00:28:30,640 --> 00:28:33,240 Speaker 9: people aren't having so many children. In fact, that's the 551 00:28:33,280 --> 00:28:36,400 Speaker 9: title of Claudia Golden's books. She's a Nobel Prize winny 552 00:28:36,359 --> 00:28:39,320 Speaker 9: economist's career and family, and this is very important in 553 00:28:39,320 --> 00:28:42,360 Speaker 9: many people's lives. But even that's not the explanation that 554 00:28:42,400 --> 00:28:44,880 Speaker 9: works everywhere, because it couldn't be what's going on in 555 00:28:44,880 --> 00:28:46,920 Speaker 9: India because so many of the women aren't working in 556 00:28:46,960 --> 00:28:50,320 Speaker 9: the paid labor force but still having below replacement birth rates, 557 00:28:50,360 --> 00:28:54,239 Speaker 9: and so no theory is right or applicable everywhere. And 558 00:28:54,280 --> 00:28:57,400 Speaker 9: so part of what's so striking is that, yes, there's 559 00:28:57,480 --> 00:29:01,520 Speaker 9: variability across countries, but that very really is shrinking. As 560 00:29:01,720 --> 00:29:04,760 Speaker 9: as birth rates fall everywhere, countries are becoming more similar 561 00:29:04,800 --> 00:29:07,560 Speaker 9: in this way, and so what we're seeing is a 562 00:29:07,640 --> 00:29:10,480 Speaker 9: convergent outcome, and that's part of what makes us think 563 00:29:10,480 --> 00:29:12,480 Speaker 9: that depopulation is so likely. 564 00:29:13,200 --> 00:29:15,640 Speaker 1: So Mike kind of already addressed this, but while I 565 00:29:15,680 --> 00:29:17,360 Speaker 1: was reading the book, this was a question that kind 566 00:29:17,360 --> 00:29:19,440 Speaker 1: of kept going through my mind. So I want to 567 00:29:19,520 --> 00:29:22,360 Speaker 1: sort of bottom line this. So we don't understand why 568 00:29:22,440 --> 00:29:25,920 Speaker 1: birth rates are falling, So we don't know for sure 569 00:29:26,160 --> 00:29:28,640 Speaker 1: that things won't change when we hit a population size 570 00:29:28,640 --> 00:29:31,480 Speaker 1: of six billion, for example, But we have really good 571 00:29:31,560 --> 00:29:35,240 Speaker 1: data on trends which suggests we should be concerned about this. 572 00:29:35,280 --> 00:29:37,480 Speaker 1: Would that be a fair way of sort of summarizing 573 00:29:37,640 --> 00:29:38,160 Speaker 1: the argument. 574 00:29:38,520 --> 00:29:40,880 Speaker 5: Yeah, And I think we could say more too. I 575 00:29:40,960 --> 00:29:42,920 Speaker 5: think we can sort of do a little bit of 576 00:29:42,920 --> 00:29:46,280 Speaker 5: introspection here. Sometimes we can too quickly jump to the 577 00:29:46,360 --> 00:29:49,360 Speaker 5: idea that, well, this is like an unsustainable trend. You know, 578 00:29:49,480 --> 00:29:52,000 Speaker 5: birth rates can't keep falling. I mean, the first thing 579 00:29:52,040 --> 00:29:54,120 Speaker 5: to say there is that birth rates wouldn't need to 580 00:29:54,200 --> 00:29:56,120 Speaker 5: keep falling, whether they're already low. They we just have 581 00:29:56,160 --> 00:29:59,360 Speaker 5: to stay low. And then the question is, couldn't it 582 00:29:59,360 --> 00:30:01,360 Speaker 5: be the case that people could continue to choose to 583 00:30:01,440 --> 00:30:03,840 Speaker 5: have the sort of families that they do now. I mean, 584 00:30:03,880 --> 00:30:06,320 Speaker 5: in a world that was shrinking, that fell to six 585 00:30:06,400 --> 00:30:10,720 Speaker 5: billion or four billion, I think it's quite plausible that 586 00:30:11,120 --> 00:30:14,040 Speaker 5: if nothing else in society changed, people could look around 587 00:30:14,320 --> 00:30:16,600 Speaker 5: and think. You know, lots of people thinking that two 588 00:30:16,680 --> 00:30:19,360 Speaker 5: kids as the right number for them. Some people thinking one, 589 00:30:19,440 --> 00:30:21,920 Speaker 5: some people thinking zero, some people thinking three or more. 590 00:30:22,120 --> 00:30:24,640 Speaker 5: I think people could continue to make those sort of 591 00:30:24,720 --> 00:30:28,840 Speaker 5: choices even as the population was falling. Sometimes people think 592 00:30:28,880 --> 00:30:30,840 Speaker 5: that there's going to be some natural rebound to two, 593 00:30:31,520 --> 00:30:34,680 Speaker 5: that two is some sort of special number when it 594 00:30:34,680 --> 00:30:37,320 Speaker 5: comes to fertility, and two might be the number that 595 00:30:37,320 --> 00:30:39,480 Speaker 5: a lot of people choose. But two is not a 596 00:30:39,480 --> 00:30:42,520 Speaker 5: special number in terms of a population average. We've never 597 00:30:42,560 --> 00:30:45,560 Speaker 5: had a population average in any population any time that 598 00:30:45,640 --> 00:30:48,239 Speaker 5: just held exactly at two. When birth rates fall, they 599 00:30:48,240 --> 00:30:50,720 Speaker 5: fall right across two, and they don't. There's no like 600 00:30:50,720 --> 00:30:53,240 Speaker 5: a magnetic force pulling them back up to two. So 601 00:30:53,760 --> 00:30:56,600 Speaker 5: I think there's lots of reasons to think that low 602 00:30:56,680 --> 00:30:59,600 Speaker 5: fertility could continue even in the face of a flawing 603 00:30:59,640 --> 00:31:00,600 Speaker 5: global population. 604 00:31:00,840 --> 00:31:03,040 Speaker 2: I think you're bumping up on something really interesting there, 605 00:31:03,160 --> 00:31:07,040 Speaker 2: which is implicitly doing differential equations. You know, you're telling 606 00:31:07,120 --> 00:31:10,200 Speaker 2: us that people don't respond to the density of people 607 00:31:10,240 --> 00:31:12,800 Speaker 2: around them. It's not like families get together and they're like, hmm, 608 00:31:12,880 --> 00:31:15,200 Speaker 2: there's lots of kids in the kindergarten, Let's have fewer kids. 609 00:31:15,320 --> 00:31:18,800 Speaker 2: Or while kindergartens seem empty, let's have more kids. That's 610 00:31:18,840 --> 00:31:21,440 Speaker 2: not sensitive to the population itself, right. 611 00:31:21,280 --> 00:31:23,160 Speaker 9: And it's more than that, it's that it might not 612 00:31:23,240 --> 00:31:26,600 Speaker 9: even seem that different. And so you know, in Texas 613 00:31:26,680 --> 00:31:29,280 Speaker 9: right now, the average is one point eight. What if 614 00:31:29,320 --> 00:31:33,640 Speaker 9: the average instead were two point one. You know, that 615 00:31:33,760 --> 00:31:36,560 Speaker 9: would make the difference for the world as a whole 616 00:31:36,840 --> 00:31:41,040 Speaker 9: between depopulating and growing. But I don't think life would 617 00:31:41,040 --> 00:31:43,600 Speaker 9: seem very different living in a society with an average 618 00:31:43,680 --> 00:31:45,480 Speaker 9: one point eight from living in a society with an 619 00:31:45,520 --> 00:31:48,200 Speaker 9: average of two point one. When you're you know, jogging 620 00:31:48,240 --> 00:31:50,760 Speaker 9: around the park or going to the store, it would 621 00:31:50,760 --> 00:31:52,960 Speaker 9: feel pretty similar. And I think, you know, back to 622 00:31:53,000 --> 00:31:55,880 Speaker 9: the question of how did this all slip under everybody's 623 00:31:55,960 --> 00:31:57,600 Speaker 9: radar and how did we get on the path of 624 00:31:57,680 --> 00:32:00,560 Speaker 9: depopulation with that everybody noticing? I think I think part 625 00:32:00,560 --> 00:32:02,520 Speaker 9: of it is because, at least in the United States, 626 00:32:02,600 --> 00:32:05,280 Speaker 9: where we were right around this two level for a 627 00:32:05,360 --> 00:32:08,480 Speaker 9: long time, one point it's just not going to feel 628 00:32:08,520 --> 00:32:10,480 Speaker 9: that different from two point two, but it's going to 629 00:32:10,520 --> 00:32:13,360 Speaker 9: have very different consequences for the long term future. 630 00:32:13,600 --> 00:32:16,160 Speaker 2: And the story we're sort of getting to is that 631 00:32:16,560 --> 00:32:20,920 Speaker 2: birth rates and rates of production of children somehow depends 632 00:32:21,040 --> 00:32:23,880 Speaker 2: on a lot of complicated factors that it's not always 633 00:32:23,960 --> 00:32:26,520 Speaker 2: obvious to dig out. And it reminds me this story 634 00:32:26,560 --> 00:32:29,040 Speaker 2: I remember from my wife being in graduate school shit 635 00:32:29,080 --> 00:32:31,680 Speaker 2: a friend who was working to study this population of 636 00:32:31,760 --> 00:32:35,640 Speaker 2: hutter Rights, a small religious community in the Midwest, and 637 00:32:35,680 --> 00:32:38,800 Speaker 2: they have like an enormous fertility rate, like huge numbers 638 00:32:38,800 --> 00:32:41,080 Speaker 2: of children. And I remember these researchers studying like why 639 00:32:41,200 --> 00:32:43,800 Speaker 2: is it, why are they so fertile? And eventually the 640 00:32:43,840 --> 00:32:47,520 Speaker 2: answer was they just have sex every day and why 641 00:32:47,640 --> 00:32:49,880 Speaker 2: they have so many kids. And so it's not like, 642 00:32:50,040 --> 00:32:52,840 Speaker 2: you know, we want to populate the earth, or kindergartens 643 00:32:52,880 --> 00:32:55,720 Speaker 2: are too empty. It's just like a product of lots 644 00:32:55,720 --> 00:32:57,800 Speaker 2: of choices people are making about. 645 00:32:57,600 --> 00:32:59,560 Speaker 1: Their days, but their numbers are going down too. 646 00:33:00,080 --> 00:33:02,000 Speaker 5: We talk a bit in the book, not about the 647 00:33:02,040 --> 00:33:05,120 Speaker 5: hutter rates, but about like the Pennsylvania Dutch, the Amish, 648 00:33:05,440 --> 00:33:07,560 Speaker 5: and we talk about it because I think a sort 649 00:33:07,600 --> 00:33:10,960 Speaker 5: of a certain kind of math inclined person would hear 650 00:33:11,040 --> 00:33:15,320 Speaker 5: these arguments and think, huh, well, it's one thing to 651 00:33:15,360 --> 00:33:18,000 Speaker 5: say that many populations have birth rates that would lead 652 00:33:18,040 --> 00:33:20,800 Speaker 5: to decline, but there are these subcultures like the Amish 653 00:33:20,880 --> 00:33:23,719 Speaker 5: that just have tons of kids. Right, So even if 654 00:33:23,720 --> 00:33:25,720 Speaker 5: we're not having a lot of kids in the rest 655 00:33:25,720 --> 00:33:28,000 Speaker 5: of America. The Amish are having a lot of kids, 656 00:33:28,240 --> 00:33:30,600 Speaker 5: and you could do a sort of extrapolation to think, well, 657 00:33:30,640 --> 00:33:33,160 Speaker 5: if the Amish keep having more and more kids, they're 658 00:33:33,160 --> 00:33:34,680 Speaker 5: going to build up to be a larger and larger 659 00:33:34,720 --> 00:33:38,240 Speaker 5: fraction of the population. And you know, so you know, 660 00:33:38,280 --> 00:33:41,920 Speaker 5: we look this up and the recent population growth rates 661 00:33:41,920 --> 00:33:43,920 Speaker 5: of the Amish or something like four percent a year, 662 00:33:44,400 --> 00:33:47,520 Speaker 5: and if you just extrapolate that naively, then you know, 663 00:33:47,520 --> 00:33:49,120 Speaker 5: in two hundred years there's going to be a billion 664 00:33:49,160 --> 00:33:51,680 Speaker 5: Amish in the world. But we don't think that argument 665 00:33:51,760 --> 00:33:54,600 Speaker 5: makes an awful lot of sense for a couple of reasons. 666 00:33:55,280 --> 00:33:59,160 Speaker 5: One is that sort of high fertility enclaves, whether it's 667 00:33:59,200 --> 00:34:02,920 Speaker 5: the Amish or any other, their fertility is also going down, 668 00:34:03,000 --> 00:34:07,520 Speaker 5: like Kelly alluded to. So, you know, maybe last century 669 00:34:07,960 --> 00:34:11,640 Speaker 5: the Amish we're having eight kids per two adults. Today 670 00:34:11,760 --> 00:34:14,000 Speaker 5: the estimates put it as something like five or five 671 00:34:14,040 --> 00:34:16,400 Speaker 5: and a half kids per two adults. It's hard to know. 672 00:34:16,440 --> 00:34:18,080 Speaker 5: There's not a census of the Amish the way that 673 00:34:18,120 --> 00:34:21,160 Speaker 5: there's like a census of Texas. So reason one is 674 00:34:21,160 --> 00:34:24,839 Speaker 5: that even among high fertility subcultures, what counts as high 675 00:34:24,880 --> 00:34:27,960 Speaker 5: fertility is changing over time, and you know, Sunday high 676 00:34:28,000 --> 00:34:30,480 Speaker 5: fertility might be in two kids instead of one, rather 677 00:34:30,520 --> 00:34:33,440 Speaker 5: than five kids instead of three. The other reason that 678 00:34:33,480 --> 00:34:37,319 Speaker 5: we shouldn't count on the Amish outnumbering grains of sand 679 00:34:37,400 --> 00:34:41,040 Speaker 5: on the beach is that people don't always adopt the 680 00:34:41,080 --> 00:34:45,759 Speaker 5: cultural practices of their parents. We see cultural change all 681 00:34:45,760 --> 00:34:49,600 Speaker 5: over the world. South America is changing from being more 682 00:34:49,640 --> 00:34:53,040 Speaker 5: Catholic to becoming more Protestant over time, just as one example. 683 00:34:53,040 --> 00:34:55,040 Speaker 5: But you know, in our own lives, I think we've 684 00:34:55,040 --> 00:34:57,680 Speaker 5: all had the experience of being teenagers and projecting one 685 00:34:57,680 --> 00:35:00,399 Speaker 5: cultural practice or another of our parents. These these links 686 00:35:00,400 --> 00:35:03,719 Speaker 5: that connect generations aren't perfect. And you really have to 687 00:35:04,360 --> 00:35:07,520 Speaker 5: push this idea of cultural heritability pretty far to think 688 00:35:07,560 --> 00:35:11,759 Speaker 5: that even as the Pennsylvania Dutch ran out of Pennsylvania farmland, 689 00:35:11,800 --> 00:35:14,920 Speaker 5: because you know, they're spilling across continents, because there's just 690 00:35:14,960 --> 00:35:18,239 Speaker 5: so many of them, that somehow these cultural practices and 691 00:35:18,360 --> 00:35:21,919 Speaker 5: preferences are going to be inherited one for one from 692 00:35:21,960 --> 00:35:22,760 Speaker 5: parent to child. 693 00:35:23,160 --> 00:35:25,240 Speaker 1: I think some of that cultural stuff is at play 694 00:35:25,440 --> 00:35:28,400 Speaker 1: with the Hutter rates. Hutter rates are communal. So my 695 00:35:28,480 --> 00:35:30,439 Speaker 1: husband and I spent a lot of time reading about 696 00:35:30,440 --> 00:35:32,439 Speaker 1: them when we were trying to decide if communes would 697 00:35:32,440 --> 00:35:36,080 Speaker 1: be a good model for early space settlements, and so 698 00:35:36,160 --> 00:35:38,520 Speaker 1: we became sort of experts in hutter rates, and they 699 00:35:38,560 --> 00:35:40,960 Speaker 1: were also lamenting their declining birth rates. 700 00:35:42,000 --> 00:35:43,960 Speaker 2: I keep waiting for somebody to make a weird al 701 00:35:44,040 --> 00:35:45,840 Speaker 2: joke here. Nobody's going to talk about how we're not 702 00:35:45,880 --> 00:35:47,920 Speaker 2: going to be living in the future Amish paradise. 703 00:35:48,560 --> 00:35:53,600 Speaker 1: Now we missed that cultural touchstone. Let's talk a little 704 00:35:53,600 --> 00:35:57,560 Speaker 1: bit about why depopulation could be bad. So, you know, 705 00:35:57,600 --> 00:35:59,960 Speaker 1: as an ecologist, the idea that we might have four 706 00:36:00,120 --> 00:36:02,200 Speaker 1: billion people, like, I don't want there to be zero people. 707 00:36:02,239 --> 00:36:04,640 Speaker 1: I like people, and I don't want any people to die. 708 00:36:05,000 --> 00:36:07,399 Speaker 1: But if people are choosing to not have as many 709 00:36:07,400 --> 00:36:09,520 Speaker 1: babies and we end up with something like four billion, 710 00:36:10,080 --> 00:36:12,160 Speaker 1: it doesn't sound so bad to me initially to have 711 00:36:12,320 --> 00:36:14,640 Speaker 1: fewer people that we invest more in. But you all 712 00:36:14,640 --> 00:36:17,600 Speaker 1: make a pretty good argument about more people being better 713 00:36:17,640 --> 00:36:19,839 Speaker 1: for a lot of reasons. So let's hear about why 714 00:36:19,920 --> 00:36:23,040 Speaker 1: we don't want billions of people fewer on this planet. 715 00:36:23,120 --> 00:36:25,680 Speaker 9: Well, first, I want to hold on that four billion 716 00:36:25,760 --> 00:36:28,359 Speaker 9: thing for a second, because I think it's important if 717 00:36:28,480 --> 00:36:32,920 Speaker 9: somebody's listening to this and they're thinking, yeah, let's have 718 00:36:33,120 --> 00:36:36,719 Speaker 9: some depopulation. And what I want is a future where 719 00:36:36,760 --> 00:36:40,680 Speaker 9: the world stabilizes at some number like four billion or 720 00:36:40,719 --> 00:36:45,320 Speaker 9: three billion or two billion. Then that sort of future 721 00:36:45,520 --> 00:36:49,520 Speaker 9: would fundamentally require the same thing we're talking about here, 722 00:36:49,719 --> 00:36:52,680 Speaker 9: which is an increase someday in birth rates. Right, the 723 00:36:52,760 --> 00:36:55,520 Speaker 9: population is not just going to suddenly hang and hold 724 00:36:55,560 --> 00:36:57,839 Speaker 9: still at eight billion or ten billion, and it's not 725 00:36:57,880 --> 00:36:59,960 Speaker 9: just going to suddenly hang and hold still at four 726 00:37:00,200 --> 00:37:03,520 Speaker 9: billion either unless birth rates go back up. So in 727 00:37:03,560 --> 00:37:07,160 Speaker 9: our book, after the spike, what we're considering is would 728 00:37:07,200 --> 00:37:10,640 Speaker 9: it be better to have a future of depopulation generation 729 00:37:10,680 --> 00:37:13,440 Speaker 9: after generation or would it be better instead to have 730 00:37:13,480 --> 00:37:16,760 Speaker 9: a future of stabilization. And not to hide the ball, 731 00:37:17,000 --> 00:37:19,239 Speaker 9: we make the case for a future of stabilization. Now 732 00:37:19,280 --> 00:37:22,239 Speaker 9: we don't say where. That's beyond what anyone could know 733 00:37:22,320 --> 00:37:25,080 Speaker 9: given the science we have. But let's take four billion. 734 00:37:25,560 --> 00:37:29,080 Speaker 9: For the world's population to ever stabilize someday at four billion, 735 00:37:29,440 --> 00:37:33,239 Speaker 9: that means after a period of depopulation, birth rates around 736 00:37:33,280 --> 00:37:35,560 Speaker 9: the world are going to have to go back up 737 00:37:35,600 --> 00:37:36,680 Speaker 9: to to and stay there. 738 00:37:36,800 --> 00:37:38,520 Speaker 2: And I just want to bottom line that to make 739 00:37:38,560 --> 00:37:40,839 Speaker 2: sure people caught that because you're arguing that if birth 740 00:37:40,880 --> 00:37:44,200 Speaker 2: rates stay below replacement, we won't just go from eight 741 00:37:44,239 --> 00:37:46,040 Speaker 2: billion to four billion, we'll go to two billion and 742 00:37:46,080 --> 00:37:47,560 Speaker 2: one billion and a half a billion, and you just 743 00:37:47,680 --> 00:37:48,680 Speaker 2: keep going. 744 00:37:48,360 --> 00:37:49,040 Speaker 5: Down, right. 745 00:37:49,040 --> 00:37:51,080 Speaker 9: It's you know, when your rocket ship gets to the 746 00:37:51,120 --> 00:37:52,840 Speaker 9: planet that you want to be on, how do you 747 00:37:52,960 --> 00:37:57,320 Speaker 9: slow down and stop right? When the global population gets 748 00:37:57,360 --> 00:38:00,239 Speaker 9: to the size that you want to stabilize that four 749 00:38:00,280 --> 00:38:02,759 Speaker 9: billion or three billion or whatever, if you want to 750 00:38:02,800 --> 00:38:05,400 Speaker 9: stay there, then just like at any other size, birth rate, 751 00:38:05,480 --> 00:38:07,279 Speaker 9: you have to be an average of two. So this 752 00:38:07,440 --> 00:38:11,160 Speaker 9: is my conciliatory message that we're on the same team here. 753 00:38:11,280 --> 00:38:14,320 Speaker 9: If you want the size of the population to stabilize somewhere, 754 00:38:14,600 --> 00:38:18,680 Speaker 9: and we face the same question of how would we 755 00:38:18,760 --> 00:38:20,840 Speaker 9: ever get back to a birth rate and an average 756 00:38:20,840 --> 00:38:24,200 Speaker 9: around two. Okay, Now, another question, and it's the one 757 00:38:24,200 --> 00:38:25,920 Speaker 9: that you asked, which is. 758 00:38:26,400 --> 00:38:27,319 Speaker 5: Why would we want that? 759 00:38:27,600 --> 00:38:31,480 Speaker 9: Why would we want the size of the population to 760 00:38:31,840 --> 00:38:37,520 Speaker 9: stabilize or to avoid depopulation generation after generation? And here's 761 00:38:37,600 --> 00:38:40,560 Speaker 9: one reason why we think that depopulation matters and that 762 00:38:40,640 --> 00:38:43,080 Speaker 9: we should want to avoid it, because we're all made 763 00:38:43,160 --> 00:38:45,720 Speaker 9: better off by sharing the world with more other people, 764 00:38:46,000 --> 00:38:49,399 Speaker 9: Other people alive alongside us, other people who were live 765 00:38:49,480 --> 00:38:52,080 Speaker 9: before us. Other people make the discoveries and have the 766 00:38:52,160 --> 00:38:55,600 Speaker 9: ideas that improve our lives. And other people are where 767 00:38:55,640 --> 00:38:57,040 Speaker 9: science and knowledge comes from. 768 00:38:57,239 --> 00:38:58,120 Speaker 1: I like people too. 769 00:39:00,040 --> 00:39:00,960 Speaker 2: People are awesome. 770 00:39:01,719 --> 00:39:03,839 Speaker 5: We can drill down on that too. I mean, why 771 00:39:03,880 --> 00:39:07,200 Speaker 5: are lives better now than a couple centuries ago? 772 00:39:07,840 --> 00:39:08,000 Speaker 7: You know? 773 00:39:08,040 --> 00:39:10,120 Speaker 5: Why do we all have shoes on our feet and 774 00:39:10,160 --> 00:39:14,200 Speaker 5: glasses to correct our vision, plenty to eat, climate controlled work, environment, 775 00:39:14,280 --> 00:39:18,480 Speaker 5: shorter workdays, a library of literature AI in our pocket? 776 00:39:18,920 --> 00:39:22,000 Speaker 5: You know, social safety net systems to protect the elderly 777 00:39:22,000 --> 00:39:25,280 Speaker 5: and disabled. Why our living standards so much higher today 778 00:39:25,520 --> 00:39:29,000 Speaker 5: than not all that long ago. It's the same sun overhead, 779 00:39:29,120 --> 00:39:31,680 Speaker 5: it's the same wind blowing, it's the same dirt underneath 780 00:39:31,680 --> 00:39:34,320 Speaker 5: our feet. But knowledge is the difference. We know better 781 00:39:34,440 --> 00:39:36,520 Speaker 5: what to do with these things. We know how to 782 00:39:36,560 --> 00:39:39,160 Speaker 5: extract the minerals from the rocks and make glass and 783 00:39:39,160 --> 00:39:42,120 Speaker 5: solar panels and computer chips. We know how to farm 784 00:39:42,200 --> 00:39:45,360 Speaker 5: more efficiently to grow more food, more calories per acre 785 00:39:45,480 --> 00:39:47,160 Speaker 5: of that dirt, and we know how to do that 786 00:39:47,200 --> 00:39:49,520 Speaker 5: with less human labor. We know how to make soap 787 00:39:49,719 --> 00:39:51,840 Speaker 5: to keep us from getting infections. We know how to 788 00:39:51,840 --> 00:39:54,759 Speaker 5: make antibiotic pills to treat infections, and we have a 789 00:39:54,840 --> 00:39:58,040 Speaker 5: germ theory of disease so that we know what an 790 00:39:58,040 --> 00:40:01,880 Speaker 5: infection is. And we know all of these things because 791 00:40:01,880 --> 00:40:05,120 Speaker 5: of people that came before us. We know better how 792 00:40:05,160 --> 00:40:07,719 Speaker 5: to organize a kindergarten or a cancer drug trial, or 793 00:40:07,800 --> 00:40:14,200 Speaker 5: a parliamentary democracy. These these things ideas, discoveries, process improvements, innovations. 794 00:40:14,960 --> 00:40:17,920 Speaker 5: They are why we all on this call of listening 795 00:40:17,960 --> 00:40:20,439 Speaker 5: to this podcast get to expect more out of life 796 00:40:20,520 --> 00:40:22,920 Speaker 5: and better things out of life than people did not 797 00:40:23,120 --> 00:40:27,200 Speaker 5: all that long ago. This notion is something that economist 798 00:40:27,200 --> 00:40:30,320 Speaker 5: Paul Romer won a Nobel Prize for in twenty eighteen, 799 00:40:30,800 --> 00:40:34,719 Speaker 5: and his realization that he sort of formalized in the 800 00:40:34,800 --> 00:40:38,960 Speaker 5: language of economic math was that an idea isn't scarce 801 00:40:39,040 --> 00:40:41,640 Speaker 5: in the same way a parcel of land or a 802 00:40:41,680 --> 00:40:45,440 Speaker 5: physical object like a hammer is scarce. Instead, an idea 803 00:40:45,560 --> 00:40:49,880 Speaker 5: can be reused and shared endlessly. You know, we've been 804 00:40:49,880 --> 00:40:52,920 Speaker 5: talking about differential equations. I took differential equations as an 805 00:40:53,000 --> 00:40:56,960 Speaker 5: undergraduate engineering major. Maybe Kelly or Daniel you had the 806 00:40:57,000 --> 00:40:59,400 Speaker 5: same textbook as I did, But what I read the 807 00:40:59,440 --> 00:41:02,240 Speaker 5: words out of that textbook. It didn't cause the words 808 00:41:02,280 --> 00:41:05,480 Speaker 5: to disappear from your copy of the textbook. Right, We 809 00:41:05,560 --> 00:41:08,840 Speaker 5: get to reuse these ideas over and over again. And 810 00:41:08,920 --> 00:41:13,279 Speaker 5: so once Newton or Leibniz invents calculus, or maybe if 811 00:41:13,320 --> 00:41:15,719 Speaker 5: they didn't live, somebody else would have, then we all 812 00:41:15,760 --> 00:41:18,360 Speaker 5: get to benefit from that over and over and over again. 813 00:41:18,440 --> 00:41:22,800 Speaker 5: So ideas and scientific knowledge are a sort of special 814 00:41:22,880 --> 00:41:26,200 Speaker 5: resource that never gets depleted no matter how much it's used. 815 00:41:26,520 --> 00:41:29,360 Speaker 5: And that's sort of one of the core reasons why 816 00:41:29,560 --> 00:41:31,920 Speaker 5: sharing the world with a lot of other people. We're 817 00:41:31,920 --> 00:41:34,640 Speaker 5: getting to live at a time after a large population 818 00:41:34,640 --> 00:41:37,759 Speaker 5: has already existed. It's just a huge benefit to us. 819 00:41:38,120 --> 00:41:41,280 Speaker 2: And it's more than just expanding the population and creating 820 00:41:41,320 --> 00:41:43,839 Speaker 2: new innovations, right, it's about maintaining our quality of life. 821 00:41:43,840 --> 00:41:46,680 Speaker 2: We need a certain number of people to keep making 822 00:41:46,800 --> 00:41:50,440 Speaker 2: t shirts and pencils and teaching our children like the world. 823 00:41:50,640 --> 00:41:53,640 Speaker 2: Our infrastructure can't survive on a tiny population. But it 824 00:41:53,680 --> 00:41:55,840 Speaker 2: makes me wonder if we're going to do a ridiculous 825 00:41:55,880 --> 00:41:59,319 Speaker 2: extrapolation tell us about sort of the numbers of people 826 00:41:59,400 --> 00:42:02,400 Speaker 2: we expect to have on Earth. If birth rates don't change, 827 00:42:02,680 --> 00:42:05,200 Speaker 2: how many people we have on Earth in ten years, 828 00:42:05,239 --> 00:42:08,960 Speaker 2: fifty years, one thousand years, extrapolate all the way out 829 00:42:08,960 --> 00:42:11,120 Speaker 2: to you know, twenty five thousand years. Are we going 830 00:42:11,160 --> 00:42:13,360 Speaker 2: to end up with like twenty people on the planet. 831 00:42:13,760 --> 00:42:17,479 Speaker 9: Okay, we don't know, right, we don't have a crystal ball, 832 00:42:17,520 --> 00:42:19,960 Speaker 9: but we can make if then assumptions, right, you know, 833 00:42:20,000 --> 00:42:22,600 Speaker 9: if the birth rates end up like this, then we 834 00:42:22,640 --> 00:42:24,680 Speaker 9: can say something about how the future would evolve. And 835 00:42:24,719 --> 00:42:28,120 Speaker 9: so one easy and plausible case is to imagine the 836 00:42:28,160 --> 00:42:31,480 Speaker 9: worldwide average birth rate of one point five, which is 837 00:42:31,560 --> 00:42:34,040 Speaker 9: what it is right now in Europe, you know, a 838 00:42:34,120 --> 00:42:36,839 Speaker 9: little bit less than in the US, and a little 839 00:42:36,880 --> 00:42:38,040 Speaker 9: bit more than in Canada. 840 00:42:38,320 --> 00:42:39,279 Speaker 5: So one point five. 841 00:42:39,440 --> 00:42:43,239 Speaker 9: That's the next generation being twenty five percent smaller, the 842 00:42:43,280 --> 00:42:46,000 Speaker 9: next generation after that being twenty five percent smaller. 843 00:42:46,040 --> 00:42:46,279 Speaker 5: Again. 844 00:42:46,440 --> 00:42:49,160 Speaker 9: So if the world were like that, then every decade 845 00:42:49,560 --> 00:42:52,160 Speaker 9: we would see the size of the world population fall 846 00:42:52,200 --> 00:42:55,120 Speaker 9: by ten percent, and every century the size of the 847 00:42:55,160 --> 00:42:59,680 Speaker 9: world population would fall by two thirds, and that cumulative 848 00:42:59,800 --> 00:43:03,960 Speaker 9: exponential decay would continue and we could get quite small 849 00:43:04,360 --> 00:43:06,520 Speaker 9: in just a few hundred years. If instead of it 850 00:43:06,600 --> 00:43:08,879 Speaker 9: being one point five, it were an average of one 851 00:43:09,600 --> 00:43:12,279 Speaker 9: like in China today, then you can see the next 852 00:43:12,320 --> 00:43:15,040 Speaker 9: generation is going to be half the size. The generation 853 00:43:15,120 --> 00:43:17,120 Speaker 9: after that, the grandchildren's generation is going to be a 854 00:43:17,200 --> 00:43:20,759 Speaker 9: quarter the size, and so the fall could be very fast. Now, 855 00:43:21,040 --> 00:43:23,160 Speaker 9: how does all of that play out? How does that, 856 00:43:23,280 --> 00:43:26,280 Speaker 9: you know, cash out in something big breaking or something 857 00:43:26,320 --> 00:43:29,279 Speaker 9: breaking down, or not having the discoveries we need, or 858 00:43:29,320 --> 00:43:32,719 Speaker 9: even the librarians to staff the libraries that we can 859 00:43:32,760 --> 00:43:35,880 Speaker 9: maintain the knowledge we have. That's hard to know, but 860 00:43:36,080 --> 00:43:39,000 Speaker 9: we can learn something about it by thinking about sort 861 00:43:39,040 --> 00:43:43,600 Speaker 9: of comparing more populated places like cities and less populated 862 00:43:43,680 --> 00:43:48,720 Speaker 9: rural places. You need enough other people around who want 863 00:43:48,760 --> 00:43:51,520 Speaker 9: and need the same sorts of things that you want 864 00:43:51,560 --> 00:43:54,520 Speaker 9: and need in order for those things to exist to 865 00:43:54,560 --> 00:43:58,239 Speaker 9: be feasible to be provided by a government or a 866 00:43:58,239 --> 00:44:01,000 Speaker 9: business or a nonprofit other people wanting and need. What 867 00:44:01,040 --> 00:44:03,359 Speaker 9: you want is how you get in. That's true if 868 00:44:03,440 --> 00:44:07,080 Speaker 9: what you want is well functioning public transportation, because a 869 00:44:07,120 --> 00:44:10,320 Speaker 9: network of trains and buses can't operate without enough riders. 870 00:44:10,360 --> 00:44:13,080 Speaker 9: It's true if what you want is a green energy 871 00:44:13,080 --> 00:44:17,799 Speaker 9: infrastructure built on the work of scientists and engineers and implementers. 872 00:44:18,239 --> 00:44:20,800 Speaker 9: And it's true for all of us as a whole. 873 00:44:21,080 --> 00:44:24,120 Speaker 9: If what you need is a vaccine for a novel virus, 874 00:44:24,239 --> 00:44:27,279 Speaker 9: or a cure for a rare disease. It's the sorts 875 00:44:27,280 --> 00:44:30,319 Speaker 9: of things that only the niche medical specialization of a 876 00:44:30,360 --> 00:44:32,800 Speaker 9: big world could produce. And so as there are fewer 877 00:44:32,880 --> 00:44:35,200 Speaker 9: and fewer of us, we're not going to be able 878 00:44:35,280 --> 00:44:40,920 Speaker 9: to provide those sorts of discoveries, products, innovation, creation that 879 00:44:41,080 --> 00:44:44,399 Speaker 9: are only possible with other people. So other people may 880 00:44:44,520 --> 00:44:49,920 Speaker 9: sometimes be another person may sometimes be your competition, but 881 00:44:50,080 --> 00:44:52,799 Speaker 9: other people there being other people over the long run, 882 00:44:52,840 --> 00:44:55,080 Speaker 9: or why things like this can exist and there resource 883 00:44:55,120 --> 00:44:55,759 Speaker 9: of abundance. 884 00:44:56,320 --> 00:44:58,040 Speaker 1: Let's take a break, and when we get back, we'll 885 00:44:58,040 --> 00:45:01,600 Speaker 1: talk about some let's say, less than compassionate methods that 886 00:45:01,640 --> 00:45:03,480 Speaker 1: have been used in the past to try to improve 887 00:45:03,520 --> 00:45:06,759 Speaker 1: birth rates, and what are some more ethical options we 888 00:45:06,800 --> 00:45:14,120 Speaker 1: could consider in the future for improving birth rates. And 889 00:45:28,880 --> 00:45:32,040 Speaker 1: we're back and we are talking about how the average 890 00:45:32,080 --> 00:45:35,799 Speaker 1: birth rate globally has fallen below too and the implications 891 00:45:35,840 --> 00:45:39,040 Speaker 1: of that. So when I think about ways for trying 892 00:45:39,040 --> 00:45:42,080 Speaker 1: to improve birth rates, the first thing that come to 893 00:45:42,160 --> 00:45:45,840 Speaker 1: mind are some authoritarian governments who have tried to control 894 00:45:45,880 --> 00:45:48,440 Speaker 1: birth rates in ways that I'm not super comfortable with. 895 00:45:48,880 --> 00:45:51,319 Speaker 1: To put it lightly, so let's review some methods that 896 00:45:51,400 --> 00:45:54,120 Speaker 1: have not worked when countries have tried to improve their 897 00:45:54,120 --> 00:45:55,879 Speaker 1: birth rates in the past. What do we know does 898 00:45:55,920 --> 00:45:57,040 Speaker 1: not work well? 899 00:45:57,080 --> 00:45:59,160 Speaker 5: All of them? All of them. 900 00:46:00,200 --> 00:46:05,320 Speaker 9: There isn't an example of, you know, government coercion, whether 901 00:46:05,400 --> 00:46:09,280 Speaker 9: trying to coerce higher birth rates or trying to coerse 902 00:46:09,640 --> 00:46:13,680 Speaker 9: lower birth rates, you know, resulting in the sort of lasting, 903 00:46:14,280 --> 00:46:19,320 Speaker 9: big picture, sustainable change to birth rates that could knock 904 00:46:19,440 --> 00:46:23,160 Speaker 9: the population off of a path of depopulation and onto 905 00:46:23,160 --> 00:46:25,480 Speaker 9: a path of stabilization. I mean, I want to take 906 00:46:25,520 --> 00:46:28,440 Speaker 9: a step backwards here. You know, we're making the case 907 00:46:28,680 --> 00:46:33,960 Speaker 9: that a stabilized future population would be better than global depopulation. 908 00:46:34,920 --> 00:46:38,759 Speaker 9: We also think that a stabilized population is compatible with 909 00:46:38,800 --> 00:46:44,200 Speaker 9: commitments to environmental stewardship, to reproductive freedom, and to progressive 910 00:46:44,200 --> 00:46:46,719 Speaker 9: priorities more broadly, and we want other people to think so, 911 00:46:47,120 --> 00:46:49,839 Speaker 9: to be a part of this conversation. So we don't 912 00:46:49,840 --> 00:46:53,239 Speaker 9: want anyone to misunderstand that if somebody chooses to have 913 00:46:53,320 --> 00:46:56,399 Speaker 9: no children or few children, that's not for anyone else 914 00:46:56,440 --> 00:46:58,840 Speaker 9: to say whether they're making a mistake. And that's a 915 00:46:58,960 --> 00:47:01,840 Speaker 9: question of an f starting point. But it might still 916 00:47:01,920 --> 00:47:05,200 Speaker 9: be that all of us together are making a mistake 917 00:47:05,440 --> 00:47:08,560 Speaker 9: when we make it hard for people to choose larger 918 00:47:08,600 --> 00:47:12,319 Speaker 9: families and choose to have children. So you can talk 919 00:47:12,360 --> 00:47:14,920 Speaker 9: about this and talk about whether stabilization is the future 920 00:47:14,960 --> 00:47:19,200 Speaker 9: we want without it, you know, necessarily invoking the idea 921 00:47:19,239 --> 00:47:22,760 Speaker 9: that anyone should be coercing anybody else. Now, that said, 922 00:47:23,080 --> 00:47:25,760 Speaker 9: it's an important and reasonable thing to worry about, because 923 00:47:25,760 --> 00:47:29,840 Speaker 9: there have been examples where governments have tried to compel 924 00:47:29,920 --> 00:47:32,759 Speaker 9: people to have kids they don't want to have, or 925 00:47:33,120 --> 00:47:35,759 Speaker 9: to compel people not to have kids. So, you know, 926 00:47:35,880 --> 00:47:39,719 Speaker 9: the classic example that people think about is China's one 927 00:47:39,800 --> 00:47:44,759 Speaker 9: child policy, where the government of China made it illegal 928 00:47:44,920 --> 00:47:48,879 Speaker 9: and with harsh and coursive implementation to have what they 929 00:47:48,920 --> 00:47:51,560 Speaker 9: consider to be too many children. And sure enough, if 930 00:47:51,680 --> 00:47:54,480 Speaker 9: you look at the birth rate in China over this 931 00:47:54,560 --> 00:47:58,360 Speaker 9: time period, it fell. However, that doesn't turn out to 932 00:47:58,440 --> 00:48:02,520 Speaker 9: be evidence that the one policy is why birth rates 933 00:48:02,520 --> 00:48:06,040 Speaker 9: in China fell. And the surprising fact is that if 934 00:48:06,040 --> 00:48:08,880 Speaker 9: you take the birth rate in China over time, so 935 00:48:09,160 --> 00:48:11,880 Speaker 9: make a plot where you know you're looking at the 936 00:48:11,920 --> 00:48:14,359 Speaker 9: birth rate in nineteen eighty the birth rate nineteen eighty five, 937 00:48:14,440 --> 00:48:16,600 Speaker 9: the birth rate in nineteen ninety. What you see is 938 00:48:16,600 --> 00:48:18,520 Speaker 9: the birth rate in China fell overtime while the one 939 00:48:18,600 --> 00:48:21,200 Speaker 9: child policy was in effect. But if you also look 940 00:48:21,239 --> 00:48:24,160 Speaker 9: at what happened to birth rates over time in any 941 00:48:24,200 --> 00:48:28,560 Speaker 9: other middle income developing country that was also undergoing the 942 00:48:28,600 --> 00:48:31,960 Speaker 9: same sort of increase in living standards, increase in education, 943 00:48:32,120 --> 00:48:35,960 Speaker 9: specifically increase in female education, you see birth rates falling 944 00:48:36,320 --> 00:48:39,760 Speaker 9: in basically the same parallel way that that was happening 945 00:48:39,960 --> 00:48:42,920 Speaker 9: all around the world in countries about that sort of 946 00:48:43,000 --> 00:48:46,239 Speaker 9: level of socioeconomic development. And so what that tells us 947 00:48:46,320 --> 00:48:49,200 Speaker 9: is that it probably wasn't the one child policy that 948 00:48:49,360 --> 00:48:51,839 Speaker 9: was responsible for the big picture decline in birth rates 949 00:48:51,840 --> 00:48:53,680 Speaker 9: in China. It's not to say that China would have 950 00:48:53,760 --> 00:48:55,880 Speaker 9: ended up in the exact same place without the one 951 00:48:55,960 --> 00:48:59,080 Speaker 9: child policy, but somewhere pretty similar. And it's certainly not 952 00:48:59,200 --> 00:49:02,160 Speaker 9: to say that one child policy didn't do a lot 953 00:49:02,200 --> 00:49:04,920 Speaker 9: of harm to people's lives in China. But the birth 954 00:49:04,960 --> 00:49:07,560 Speaker 9: rate is probably where it would have been otherwise. 955 00:49:07,600 --> 00:49:10,160 Speaker 1: And wasn't there. I can't believe that. I'm forgetting the 956 00:49:10,239 --> 00:49:12,240 Speaker 1: name of the country and the leader was it child Chescu. 957 00:49:12,360 --> 00:49:16,640 Speaker 1: Somebody tried to increase birth rates by making birth control 958 00:49:16,719 --> 00:49:20,720 Speaker 1: unavailable or something like that. Correct my historical inaccuracies, please 959 00:49:20,800 --> 00:49:21,800 Speaker 1: and tell us that story. 960 00:49:21,960 --> 00:49:25,680 Speaker 5: No, that's you are correct. So this was Romania, This 961 00:49:25,880 --> 00:49:32,480 Speaker 5: was nineteen sixty six or sixty seven, Chescu. He implemented 962 00:49:32,600 --> 00:49:36,239 Speaker 5: decrease seven seventy. And what decrease seven to seventy said 963 00:49:36,440 --> 00:49:38,040 Speaker 5: was that birth control was no longer going to be 964 00:49:38,120 --> 00:49:41,400 Speaker 5: available or legal, that abortion was going to be illegal. 965 00:49:41,760 --> 00:49:44,960 Speaker 5: And just to put this in context, in Romania, prior 966 00:49:45,000 --> 00:49:49,480 Speaker 5: to that time, abortion was more freely available than it's 967 00:49:49,520 --> 00:49:51,600 Speaker 5: ever been for like the whole of the United States. 968 00:49:51,719 --> 00:49:55,480 Speaker 5: So this was a big change in Romania, and that 969 00:49:55,560 --> 00:50:00,160 Speaker 5: big change overnight did cause birth rates to rise overnight. 970 00:50:00,520 --> 00:50:03,600 Speaker 5: So you know, you pulled the rugout from people, you 971 00:50:03,719 --> 00:50:07,560 Speaker 5: change what's available to them, and birth rates did climb 972 00:50:07,640 --> 00:50:09,839 Speaker 5: between nineteen sixty six and nineteen sixty seven. I think 973 00:50:09,880 --> 00:50:11,400 Speaker 5: they something like almost doubled. 974 00:50:11,560 --> 00:50:11,960 Speaker 7: Wow. 975 00:50:12,000 --> 00:50:15,280 Speaker 5: But in the years that followed, birth rates started tacking 976 00:50:15,480 --> 00:50:19,960 Speaker 5: back down, and you know, within something like a decade, 977 00:50:20,000 --> 00:50:22,359 Speaker 5: they've fallen two thirds the way back from where they 978 00:50:22,360 --> 00:50:26,920 Speaker 5: started prior to the policy, as people made other plans 979 00:50:27,160 --> 00:50:31,240 Speaker 5: and built their family planning around the new coercive regime, 980 00:50:31,520 --> 00:50:34,040 Speaker 5: so that policy did a lot of harm to people, 981 00:50:34,280 --> 00:50:37,000 Speaker 5: and you know, just a lot of harm. I mean, 982 00:50:37,200 --> 00:50:41,360 Speaker 5: women died, pregnancy became very unsafe. So it was awful, 983 00:50:42,000 --> 00:50:44,760 Speaker 5: but it was awful without achieving the goal of boosting 984 00:50:44,800 --> 00:50:49,360 Speaker 5: birth rates super high. And you know, Chescu was overthrown, 985 00:50:50,080 --> 00:50:52,960 Speaker 5: was lined up against the wall and shot. And so 986 00:50:53,880 --> 00:50:56,280 Speaker 5: if your formula, and I know this is not anyone 987 00:50:56,320 --> 00:50:58,840 Speaker 5: on this cause formula, but if it's anybody's formula to 988 00:50:58,880 --> 00:51:01,480 Speaker 5: try to bring birth rates up by you know, a 989 00:51:01,560 --> 00:51:04,960 Speaker 5: dictator coursing women to have children they don't want, that's 990 00:51:05,000 --> 00:51:08,480 Speaker 5: not a sustainable option for anybody, including that dictator. 991 00:51:09,360 --> 00:51:11,960 Speaker 2: So you want policymakers in the audience to hear that 992 00:51:12,000 --> 00:51:13,960 Speaker 2: as a cautionary tale. 993 00:51:14,520 --> 00:51:19,239 Speaker 1: It's a good message. So in either direction trying to 994 00:51:19,600 --> 00:51:21,840 Speaker 1: push numbers up or push numbers down. We don't have 995 00:51:21,880 --> 00:51:25,080 Speaker 1: good evidence that it works, and it's incredibly unethical the 996 00:51:25,080 --> 00:51:25,719 Speaker 1: way it's been done. 997 00:51:25,800 --> 00:51:27,839 Speaker 5: Yeah, it's I think we have I say, even something 998 00:51:27,880 --> 00:51:29,759 Speaker 5: a little bit stronger. We have good evidence that it 999 00:51:29,760 --> 00:51:30,279 Speaker 5: doesn't work. 1000 00:51:30,480 --> 00:51:33,960 Speaker 2: What about other things like trying to provide more childcare 1001 00:51:34,080 --> 00:51:38,279 Speaker 2: or making college cheaper, or more family planning. Aren't there 1002 00:51:38,280 --> 00:51:40,960 Speaker 2: ethical ways we can make it easier for people to 1003 00:51:41,000 --> 00:51:41,800 Speaker 2: have more kids. 1004 00:51:42,080 --> 00:51:45,000 Speaker 5: There are lots of ethical things that we can try 1005 00:51:45,040 --> 00:51:49,000 Speaker 5: and that countries have tried. Unfortunately, the track record there 1006 00:51:49,239 --> 00:51:51,400 Speaker 5: isn't as great as one would hope it would be. 1007 00:51:51,760 --> 00:51:53,759 Speaker 5: So I think we're still still a long way to 1008 00:51:53,800 --> 00:51:56,440 Speaker 5: go to figure out what might work, you know, on 1009 00:51:56,480 --> 00:52:00,319 Speaker 5: this question of making childcare more affordable, more available. You know, 1010 00:52:00,360 --> 00:52:03,880 Speaker 5: if you look to Scandinavian countries, for example, places where 1011 00:52:04,040 --> 00:52:08,600 Speaker 5: college tuition is free, where there's universal health care, where 1012 00:52:08,800 --> 00:52:12,239 Speaker 5: there's childcare that's not only heavily subsidized or free for 1013 00:52:12,320 --> 00:52:16,480 Speaker 5: you know, pre K childcare, but it's also provided like 1014 00:52:16,520 --> 00:52:19,440 Speaker 5: it's available. I don't know what your experiences are, but 1015 00:52:19,480 --> 00:52:21,880 Speaker 5: my experience as a parent is like it's just hard 1016 00:52:22,160 --> 00:52:25,480 Speaker 5: sometimes to organize childcare for when work is on but 1017 00:52:25,520 --> 00:52:28,960 Speaker 5: school is out or you know, summertime. It's a patchwork 1018 00:52:29,000 --> 00:52:32,560 Speaker 5: of things. But even in places where childcare is better organized, free, 1019 00:52:32,560 --> 00:52:36,520 Speaker 5: where tuition is free, where healthcare is more available or 1020 00:52:36,800 --> 00:52:39,839 Speaker 5: free provided socially by the government, these aren't places with 1021 00:52:40,000 --> 00:52:43,680 Speaker 5: high birth rates. And so yes, I think there are 1022 00:52:43,719 --> 00:52:47,080 Speaker 5: things that there's plenty left still to try in the 1023 00:52:47,120 --> 00:52:50,319 Speaker 5: toolkit of what like free liberal societies can do to 1024 00:52:50,360 --> 00:52:54,279 Speaker 5: make life better and easier for parents. But I don't 1025 00:52:54,280 --> 00:52:57,480 Speaker 5: think anybody, not governments, not social scientists, have figured out 1026 00:52:57,719 --> 00:52:59,239 Speaker 5: that what that special sauce is. 1027 00:52:59,320 --> 00:53:02,040 Speaker 9: Yet I want to sort of say that maybe that's 1028 00:53:02,080 --> 00:53:05,080 Speaker 9: not so surprising. I mean, think about, you know, the 1029 00:53:05,160 --> 00:53:07,680 Speaker 9: sort of policies that we hear of, you know, a 1030 00:53:07,719 --> 00:53:10,560 Speaker 9: few thousand dollars baby bonus or something like that. Right, 1031 00:53:10,920 --> 00:53:14,560 Speaker 9: you know, let's do a thought experiment. Would you have 1032 00:53:14,680 --> 00:53:18,040 Speaker 9: agreed to marry somebody other than the person who you 1033 00:53:18,120 --> 00:53:22,799 Speaker 9: married for about five thousand dollars? I don't think very 1034 00:53:22,880 --> 00:53:24,560 Speaker 9: many people are going to say yes to that, right. 1035 00:53:24,600 --> 00:53:27,839 Speaker 2: Our spouse is listening to the podcast, so that question, well. 1036 00:53:28,000 --> 00:53:31,040 Speaker 9: Okay, so it's not a fair task or anonymize. I 1037 00:53:31,080 --> 00:53:34,359 Speaker 9: didn't do my research procedures, right, But I think you know, 1038 00:53:34,840 --> 00:53:38,880 Speaker 9: these are people's biggest decisions forming their family. What's their 1039 00:53:38,920 --> 00:53:41,120 Speaker 9: life story about? What autobiography am I writing? 1040 00:53:41,200 --> 00:53:41,439 Speaker 5: Right? 1041 00:53:41,560 --> 00:53:44,359 Speaker 9: You know, a few thousand dollars will help a lot. 1042 00:53:44,640 --> 00:53:47,239 Speaker 9: And you know, if you ask me or yes, Mike 1043 00:53:47,360 --> 00:53:50,640 Speaker 9: will say that society should do more to help parents, 1044 00:53:50,680 --> 00:53:53,040 Speaker 9: must do more to help parents, right, But when we 1045 00:53:53,120 --> 00:53:56,319 Speaker 9: say do more, we're meaning something a lot bigger, and 1046 00:53:56,360 --> 00:53:58,359 Speaker 9: it just shouldn't be a surprise. If we don't think 1047 00:53:58,400 --> 00:54:01,319 Speaker 9: that a few thousand dollars is going to change who 1048 00:54:01,320 --> 00:54:03,560 Speaker 9: you're going to marry, it's probably not going to change 1049 00:54:03,680 --> 00:54:07,560 Speaker 9: your biggest picture decisions about how to form your family 1050 00:54:07,600 --> 00:54:10,479 Speaker 9: and form your own life story in other ways too, 1051 00:54:10,880 --> 00:54:14,440 Speaker 9: And so yes, by all means, let's support parents, support families. 1052 00:54:14,520 --> 00:54:17,880 Speaker 9: Let's do that, but let's not be surprised when that doesn't, 1053 00:54:18,000 --> 00:54:21,480 Speaker 9: you know, shift us from the path to depopulation the 1054 00:54:21,520 --> 00:54:22,480 Speaker 9: path is stabilization. 1055 00:54:23,080 --> 00:54:25,200 Speaker 1: I was listening to Left, Right and Center the other 1056 00:54:25,280 --> 00:54:28,640 Speaker 1: day and one of the hosts, Sarah Iger, was saying that, 1057 00:54:28,719 --> 00:54:31,200 Speaker 1: you know, one of the reasons population is going down 1058 00:54:31,239 --> 00:54:34,279 Speaker 1: globally is that when women have more reproductive choice and 1059 00:54:34,320 --> 00:54:37,120 Speaker 1: more options in life, they choose to have fewer kids. 1060 00:54:37,440 --> 00:54:38,960 Speaker 1: And one of the things that I love that you 1061 00:54:39,120 --> 00:54:42,960 Speaker 1: all addressed directly in your book was that increases in 1062 00:54:43,040 --> 00:54:47,080 Speaker 1: population size, would you know, in the absence of artificial wombs, 1063 00:54:47,120 --> 00:54:50,560 Speaker 1: have to come from women having more babies, which has 1064 00:54:50,680 --> 00:54:54,479 Speaker 1: a health impact, a career impact, et cetera. So one 1065 00:54:54,600 --> 00:54:57,160 Speaker 1: my question is is it true that when women have 1066 00:54:57,280 --> 00:55:00,200 Speaker 1: more choice, they have fewer children, and that's the mechanism. 1067 00:55:00,239 --> 00:55:02,640 Speaker 1: It sounds like maybe we don't understand that mechanism as well, 1068 00:55:02,640 --> 00:55:05,360 Speaker 1: based on our conversation we've had, and what do you 1069 00:55:05,440 --> 00:55:08,200 Speaker 1: propose as the method for having more babies in a 1070 00:55:08,239 --> 00:55:11,560 Speaker 1: way to do it that sort of distributes this responsibility 1071 00:55:11,640 --> 00:55:12,240 Speaker 1: more evenly. 1072 00:55:13,000 --> 00:55:17,279 Speaker 9: I think that we all have a shared interest in 1073 00:55:17,400 --> 00:55:21,120 Speaker 9: their being future generations, and so that we all need 1074 00:55:21,160 --> 00:55:25,839 Speaker 9: to be pitching in to making there be future generations 1075 00:55:25,840 --> 00:55:28,600 Speaker 9: and sharing and lifting those burdens off of one another. 1076 00:55:28,640 --> 00:55:32,080 Speaker 9: And I think it's no surprise that in a history 1077 00:55:32,520 --> 00:55:36,080 Speaker 9: where we have long put a lot of that burden 1078 00:55:36,160 --> 00:55:38,680 Speaker 9: on a subset of the population, I mean mothers in particular, 1079 00:55:39,160 --> 00:55:43,160 Speaker 9: that we have people saying no, thank you. But because 1080 00:55:43,160 --> 00:55:46,480 Speaker 9: that's been the past, that doesn't necessarily mean that that 1081 00:55:46,640 --> 00:55:49,120 Speaker 9: has to be the future. I mean, sometimes we hear 1082 00:55:49,200 --> 00:55:52,080 Speaker 9: people talking about these conversations about low birth rates, and 1083 00:55:52,120 --> 00:55:54,439 Speaker 9: they act like there's a choice we have to make. 1084 00:55:54,960 --> 00:55:59,040 Speaker 9: Either we can have regressive gender politics that ask more 1085 00:55:59,080 --> 00:56:03,040 Speaker 9: of women, or we can have global depopulation. I think 1086 00:56:03,160 --> 00:56:05,839 Speaker 9: people both on the left and the right start these 1087 00:56:05,880 --> 00:56:09,400 Speaker 9: conversations with the presumption that if we're going to stabilize 1088 00:56:09,440 --> 00:56:12,680 Speaker 9: the population, the extra burden has to fall on to women, 1089 00:56:13,120 --> 00:56:15,759 Speaker 9: and I don't think that's right. I don't think that 1090 00:56:16,000 --> 00:56:18,520 Speaker 9: we should start by asking more for mothers. I think 1091 00:56:18,600 --> 00:56:20,600 Speaker 9: the place to start, or a place to start, is 1092 00:56:20,600 --> 00:56:24,359 Speaker 9: by asking more from fathers. Males can't get pregnant, that's right, 1093 00:56:24,760 --> 00:56:27,000 Speaker 9: But it takes more than nine months to make a 1094 00:56:27,000 --> 00:56:30,120 Speaker 9: new person. It takes decades to raise a child into 1095 00:56:30,160 --> 00:56:32,239 Speaker 9: a new adult. And that means there's plenty of time 1096 00:56:32,280 --> 00:56:34,799 Speaker 9: and plenty to do for men to even things out. 1097 00:56:34,960 --> 00:56:37,000 Speaker 9: Dads can get up at three am to sue the 1098 00:56:37,040 --> 00:56:40,200 Speaker 9: crying baby. They can cook even though they're tired. They 1099 00:56:40,200 --> 00:56:43,240 Speaker 9: can process the laundry and pack the snacks and figure 1100 00:56:43,239 --> 00:56:45,719 Speaker 9: out about the childcare when school is out, and drive 1101 00:56:45,760 --> 00:56:49,320 Speaker 9: to swim lessons and do so much. They can accept 1102 00:56:49,360 --> 00:56:52,480 Speaker 9: the work and the responsibility and being the person who's 1103 00:56:52,520 --> 00:56:55,799 Speaker 9: on call on sick days and summer days, and they 1104 00:56:55,880 --> 00:56:57,880 Speaker 9: can do that for years and years and years and years. 1105 00:56:58,480 --> 00:57:01,080 Speaker 9: You know, I think this is it sounds nice. I 1106 00:57:01,120 --> 00:57:03,520 Speaker 9: mean it's more than just hopeful rhetoric. I think it's 1107 00:57:03,560 --> 00:57:06,359 Speaker 9: a challenge, and we shouldn't consider there to be any 1108 00:57:06,360 --> 00:57:08,960 Speaker 9: sort of guarantee that this is what's going to happen. 1109 00:57:09,360 --> 00:57:13,800 Speaker 9: But the future of birth rates is going to be chosen. 1110 00:57:14,640 --> 00:57:17,080 Speaker 9: Whether or not we depopulate and whether and where we 1111 00:57:17,120 --> 00:57:19,000 Speaker 9: stabilize is are going to come down to the choices 1112 00:57:19,040 --> 00:57:22,400 Speaker 9: that people and especially women make for their lives. That 1113 00:57:22,560 --> 00:57:26,200 Speaker 9: seems pretty clear. And so if we're going to expect 1114 00:57:26,280 --> 00:57:30,360 Speaker 9: people to choose parenting, then there's work that we all 1115 00:57:30,400 --> 00:57:33,680 Speaker 9: need to do to make parenting more attractive, and that 1116 00:57:33,960 --> 00:57:37,560 Speaker 9: starts with lifting and sharing the burdens that for so 1117 00:57:37,720 --> 00:57:39,400 Speaker 9: long have only fallen on. 1118 00:57:39,320 --> 00:57:39,840 Speaker 2: Some of us. 1119 00:57:40,200 --> 00:57:41,840 Speaker 1: I loved reading that part of your book. 1120 00:57:42,360 --> 00:57:44,960 Speaker 2: And is this why you've written a popular book instead 1121 00:57:44,960 --> 00:57:49,040 Speaker 2: of like making this argument to policymakers and within academia. 1122 00:57:49,320 --> 00:57:51,240 Speaker 2: Are you're writing this to the general public to make 1123 00:57:51,240 --> 00:57:53,480 Speaker 2: people aware of this coming issue. 1124 00:57:53,800 --> 00:57:58,560 Speaker 9: Well there's that and the differential equations, but no. 1125 00:57:58,880 --> 00:58:00,440 Speaker 2: That's really your goal in the end, right, This is 1126 00:58:00,480 --> 00:58:01,880 Speaker 2: really just a math lesson This. 1127 00:58:01,800 --> 00:58:03,760 Speaker 9: Is a topic that more people should be talking about, 1128 00:58:04,400 --> 00:58:07,520 Speaker 9: not just you know, more numbers, but a broader set 1129 00:58:07,520 --> 00:58:11,360 Speaker 9: of people. We're at the very beginning of facing up 1130 00:58:11,400 --> 00:58:14,360 Speaker 9: to this challenge. Most people haven't yet come to the 1131 00:58:14,440 --> 00:58:17,680 Speaker 9: terms of the magnitude of what we're facing. But you know, 1132 00:58:17,720 --> 00:58:20,680 Speaker 9: we wouldn't have written this book calling to avoid depopulation 1133 00:58:21,200 --> 00:58:25,040 Speaker 9: if we didn't think it were possible for humanity to 1134 00:58:25,120 --> 00:58:28,760 Speaker 9: change course. Depopulation is the path that we're on, but 1135 00:58:28,920 --> 00:58:33,160 Speaker 9: it's not the inevitable future. People ask us, so, what's 1136 00:58:33,200 --> 00:58:36,160 Speaker 9: your policy recommendation, what legislation would you write? And I 1137 00:58:36,200 --> 00:58:38,840 Speaker 9: think jumping to a policy solution at this point is 1138 00:58:38,920 --> 00:58:41,600 Speaker 9: probably the wrong move. This isn't something that's going to 1139 00:58:41,600 --> 00:58:44,600 Speaker 9: turn around in one presidential term or because of one 1140 00:58:44,640 --> 00:58:47,880 Speaker 9: set of legislative considerations for parents, or you know, a 1141 00:58:47,920 --> 00:58:51,080 Speaker 9: new bill about print to leave. I think we're facing 1142 00:58:51,080 --> 00:58:55,200 Speaker 9: something big, and the first step is many more people 1143 00:58:55,680 --> 00:58:58,600 Speaker 9: sharing a belief that we should want something to change. 1144 00:58:58,800 --> 00:59:03,480 Speaker 9: That's necess Harry precursor. If you're already convinced and you're 1145 00:59:03,520 --> 00:59:06,560 Speaker 9: asking what to do next, I don't think it's advocate 1146 00:59:06,600 --> 00:59:09,240 Speaker 9: for a particular piece of legislation. It's invite more people 1147 00:59:09,280 --> 00:59:12,680 Speaker 9: into the conversation and convince your friends and family and 1148 00:59:12,720 --> 00:59:16,520 Speaker 9: classmates and colleagues that people are fundamentally good for another 1149 00:59:16,640 --> 00:59:20,080 Speaker 9: and that depopulation is not going to get us off 1150 00:59:20,120 --> 00:59:24,480 Speaker 9: the hook for challenges like climate change and our environmental 1151 00:59:24,520 --> 00:59:29,280 Speaker 9: problems that we face. Start a conversation about what could 1152 00:59:29,320 --> 00:59:32,760 Speaker 9: be good about a future in which more people feel 1153 00:59:32,800 --> 00:59:35,120 Speaker 9: like they're able to and support it to choosee parenting. 1154 00:59:35,440 --> 00:59:38,600 Speaker 9: That sort of re orientation to thinking that stabilization might 1155 00:59:38,640 --> 00:59:41,040 Speaker 9: be a good future has got to be the first step. 1156 00:59:41,160 --> 00:59:43,320 Speaker 9: And in the meanwhile, there is a lot of social 1157 00:59:43,400 --> 00:59:46,000 Speaker 9: science to do that we should be building out to 1158 00:59:46,040 --> 00:59:49,720 Speaker 9: better understand what might work, so that once we're able 1159 00:59:49,760 --> 00:59:51,960 Speaker 9: to build the social and the political support for a 1160 00:59:52,000 --> 00:59:54,560 Speaker 9: stabilized future, will know what to do. But there are 1161 00:59:54,600 --> 00:59:56,480 Speaker 9: a lot of minds to change first. 1162 00:59:57,080 --> 00:59:58,560 Speaker 2: Can I end us on an alien's question? 1163 00:59:58,720 --> 01:00:01,000 Speaker 1: Of course, it wouldn't be a DECA episode about it. 1164 01:00:02,000 --> 01:00:04,320 Speaker 2: So the fact that we see this trend across so 1165 01:00:04,440 --> 01:00:07,680 Speaker 2: many different communities in so many different circumstances makes me wonder, 1166 01:00:07,760 --> 01:00:10,600 Speaker 2: naturally if this is something that exists in I don't know, 1167 01:00:10,760 --> 01:00:14,480 Speaker 2: all intelligent technological civilizations in the galaxy. And do you 1168 01:00:14,520 --> 01:00:16,720 Speaker 2: think maybe what you've done here is stumble on the 1169 01:00:16,760 --> 01:00:18,480 Speaker 2: solution to the Fermi paradox. 1170 01:00:18,880 --> 01:00:20,680 Speaker 5: I'm so glad you asked that. Wait, wait, wait, wait, 1171 01:00:20,880 --> 01:00:22,640 Speaker 5: we need to we need to stop just for a moment. 1172 01:00:22,960 --> 01:00:25,360 Speaker 5: You've really made Dean's day. He wants to put the 1173 01:00:25,360 --> 01:00:28,439 Speaker 5: Fermi paradox in the book. Don't we ended up putting 1174 01:00:28,440 --> 01:00:29,440 Speaker 5: the Fermi paradox in. 1175 01:00:29,400 --> 01:00:30,680 Speaker 2: The book, big mistake. 1176 01:00:31,680 --> 01:00:32,400 Speaker 7: We cut it. 1177 01:00:32,400 --> 01:00:34,360 Speaker 9: There was a cutting room for But I was interviewed 1178 01:00:34,360 --> 01:00:36,480 Speaker 9: on a podcast from someone at SETI and I brought 1179 01:00:36,480 --> 01:00:40,320 Speaker 9: this up and he was just it was almost like like, 1180 01:00:40,400 --> 01:00:44,320 Speaker 9: how how could I say something so silly and smirch 1181 01:00:44,400 --> 01:00:47,240 Speaker 9: the podcast? But yeah, I mean, I think it makes 1182 01:00:47,280 --> 01:00:50,560 Speaker 9: a lot of sense that, you know, individuals have to 1183 01:00:50,600 --> 01:00:54,960 Speaker 9: sacrifice to make the next generation. There are shared public 1184 01:00:55,040 --> 01:00:58,080 Speaker 9: benefits of there being a next generation. We're gonna you're 1185 01:00:58,120 --> 01:01:01,000 Speaker 9: gonna learn how to control your birth rates, and so 1186 01:01:01,320 --> 01:01:06,120 Speaker 9: I do think that this sort of dilemma is probably 1187 01:01:06,840 --> 01:01:11,640 Speaker 9: a common one. Now, I am just a humble demographer 1188 01:01:11,640 --> 01:01:13,120 Speaker 9: of utra British India. 1189 01:01:13,160 --> 01:01:13,880 Speaker 5: I don't you know. 1190 01:01:13,960 --> 01:01:16,360 Speaker 9: I can't speak to the larger questions. 1191 01:01:16,440 --> 01:01:21,000 Speaker 1: But Dean is glowing right now. Everyone, He's very excited 1192 01:01:21,040 --> 01:01:23,160 Speaker 1: to be talked about this. We love it all right, 1193 01:01:23,240 --> 01:01:25,080 Speaker 1: Dean and Mike, thank you so much for being on 1194 01:01:25,120 --> 01:01:27,880 Speaker 1: the show. This was fascinating and anybody who wants to 1195 01:01:27,920 --> 01:01:30,080 Speaker 1: learn more should go grab the book after the spike. 1196 01:01:30,240 --> 01:01:32,000 Speaker 5: Thanks very much, guys, Thank you so much. 1197 01:01:32,080 --> 01:01:32,440 Speaker 7: Thank you. 1198 01:01:40,000 --> 01:01:43,840 Speaker 1: Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe is produced by iHeartRadio. We 1199 01:01:43,880 --> 01:01:46,440 Speaker 1: would love to hear from you, We really would. 1200 01:01:46,600 --> 01:01:49,320 Speaker 2: We want to know what questions you have about this 1201 01:01:49,560 --> 01:01:51,200 Speaker 2: Extraordinary Universe. 1202 01:01:51,280 --> 01:01:54,240 Speaker 1: We want to know your thoughts on recent shows, suggestions 1203 01:01:54,240 --> 01:01:57,240 Speaker 1: for future shows. If you contact us, we will get 1204 01:01:57,280 --> 01:01:57,680 Speaker 1: back to you. 1205 01:01:57,960 --> 01:02:01,200 Speaker 2: We really mean it. We answer every free message. Email 1206 01:02:01,320 --> 01:02:04,720 Speaker 2: us at Questions at Danielandkelly. 1207 01:02:03,760 --> 01:02:05,880 Speaker 1: Dot org, or you can find us on social media. 1208 01:02:05,960 --> 01:02:09,760 Speaker 1: We have accounts on x, Instagram, Blue Sky and on 1209 01:02:09,840 --> 01:02:11,800 Speaker 1: all of those platforms. You can find us at D 1210 01:02:12,240 --> 01:02:13,760 Speaker 1: and K Universe. 1211 01:02:13,960 --> 01:02:15,520 Speaker 2: Don't be shy, write to us