WEBVTT - Mike Cocking

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I miss the green.

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:03.480
<v Speaker 2>For example, I'm already upset. When I find my ball

0:00:03.520 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 2>in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And when I find my ball in a brid egg

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:11.479
<v Speaker 1>Friday Egg, the dreaded Frida Egg Friday Frida Egg Bride

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Egg Lie, I'm about ready to run.

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Off of the course.

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Ladies and gentlemen, Welcome back to another edition of the

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Friday Egg Podcast. Today I'm joined by Mike Cocking, a

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 2>golf course architect based in Australia and part of the Ogilvie, Clayton,

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Cocking and Mead Design firm. Mike, Welcome on.

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Andy, thanks for having me.

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, excited to talk golf course architecture, some sand belt

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Australia and little learn a little bit more about your

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 2>firm and what you guys are doing down under.

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, yep, look forward to it.

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 2>So I'd love to hear. I think, knowing you a

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:26.119
<v Speaker 2>little bit, I think you've got a really interesting background.

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 2>How you got into golf course architecture. Why don't you

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 2>tell us how you got into golf and architecture.

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>Sure, well, I guess I got into golf. My first

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of experience with golf was my parents decided to

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 1>take the game up when I was about I don't know,

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight, and they dragged my sister and I

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>out to the golf course and you know, I wander

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>around with.

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Him and we hated it.

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>It was it was not interesting at all. I probably

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe I would have been hooked if I had been

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>allowed to swing a club or try and have a hit,

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>but they were just new to the game and probably

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>nervous that I'd hit a shank and smash a car

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>or something. So that was sort of my first taste

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>of it. And then years later, well, I used to

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>My parents were teachers, and they started They would start

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>school at bit earlier than I would, so that they

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>would drop me at my grandparents' house and I'd just

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>watched TV for an hour before they would take me

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to school. And one morning the golf was on and

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>it was I reckon. It was the eighty eight US Open,

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>so it was Curtis Strange and Faldo, and I was

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of I found it quite captivating, really because it

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>was a tight finish. I thought Valdo was cool because

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>he looked like Harrison Ford and Indiana Jones was speaking

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>at the time, so I kind of I was rooting

0:02:56.880 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>for him, and I went to school and Lullberhold. They

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>tired and so it was a playoff. So the next

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>day I got to see it again and that probably

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>was what really grabbed me. And then I kind of

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>found my parents' clubs in the cupboard at home and

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>started kind of chipping around the backyard, and so my

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:20.799
<v Speaker 1>dad decided to take me to a driving range, and

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it kind of went from there really and he was

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>keen to take up the game with me, so we

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of started together, and I was probably eleven, then

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>eleven or twelve, and I went from the driving range

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to a local kind of communi or public golf course,

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and then I sort of joined a proper golf course

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>if you like, when I was perhaps fourteen thirteen fourteen.

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Then I joined Peninsula where we're working now, when I

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>was seventeen. I was there for about twenty years, and

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:52.839
<v Speaker 1>then six six years ago I joined Kingston Heath because

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I lived literally next door to Kingston Age, which is

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of nice.

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 2>That's yeah.

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>So that was sort of my introduction to golf. To

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>golf course design was a little bit a little bit later.

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think, like most kids are kind of

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Drew Gold once I was kind of once I was

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>into golf, I was really into golf. You know, I

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>would read all the magazines and you know, see photos

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of Cyprus Point and Augusta, and you know, that was

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>just like Disneyland to me. And I guess the thought

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>of ever seeing those was certainly, you know, really held

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>my attention. And then I I was my boss at

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the time, I was working in a golf shop when

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I was about fifteen or sixteen, and my boss got

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a copy of one of the limited edition copies of

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:47.479
<v Speaker 1>Tom Doak's Confidential Guide, and I borrowed that and sort

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of reading through that started to understand that there was

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>this whole other element to golf courses that I'd never

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>really thought about. You know, I guess, like most kids,

0:04:56.640 --> 0:05:00.159
<v Speaker 1>just sort of the condition of the course is probably

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>what how you measure whether it's good or bad. And

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>suddenly he was talking about routings and talking about all

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 1>these things that I didn't really know what they were.

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And then as my golf improved, I was in what's

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>known as the Victorian Institute of Sport, which was it

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 1>was kind of Australia's answer to the college program in America.

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>So it was started in the nineties. Robert Allen, b

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Stuart appleby Jeff Ogilvie, Aaron Badley, they all came through

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that program, and through that I got to travel. I

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>was a good amateur, so I played seat of internationally

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a fair bit, and I used Tom's book really to

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 1>find all the courses near where I was playing that

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.280
<v Speaker 1>are worth seeing, so that it kind of extended from there.

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>And then I was never really comfortable with the idea

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 1>of playing professionally. I did briefly, but I don't know.

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe having options isn't a good thing if you're trying

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to be a professional golfer. But I'd finished a degree

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.799
<v Speaker 1>in engineering and I didn't want to be a struggling

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 1>pro by any stretch. And I was always I was

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>interested in golf course design obviously, but figured it would

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:19.239
<v Speaker 1>be really hard to get into. But then Mike Clayton

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>then a couple of other guys who had started a

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>company together, got the job at Peninsula to do some work,

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>which was where I was playing. And I knew Mike

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 1>through golf and sort of approached them whether they needed

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of some help or part time work, or whether

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether I could how I could kind of

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:41.799
<v Speaker 1>get involved in golf course design, and that was in

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and Ashley met actually joined that firm at

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the same time to help out with construction. So Mike,

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Ashley and I have worked together for eighteen years and

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>it kind of went from there really and then over

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:58.239
<v Speaker 1>time I got more interested in golf course design, less

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>interested in playing, and it just of, you know, I

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>played less golf and worked more in design. So it

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of was a pretty that's how it progressed.

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 2>I guess have you found that since you stopped caring

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 2>as much about golf that your your golf has gotten

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 2>better the more you think about design.

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>When you play, I enjoy it more, certainly I having

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a bad round and not worrying about not having to

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>stress over all these parts you've missed or this shot

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you've missed and having to go to the range work

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>on it. You know, I do like I enjoy my

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>golf again where you just you know, you just have

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>around and once you part out in eighteen that's the

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>end of it. I always find it hard to look

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>at kind of look at the architecture and play it

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, because you get you do get

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>involved with your game, and I find I see a

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>lot more just walking a golf course rather than playing it.

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>So I'm never that fast. If I go overseas somewhere

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and see a golf course that I've always wanted to see,

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not that far if I don't play it. You know,

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>in an ideal world you perhaps walk it in the

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>morning and then play it in the afternoon, But really

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>do you have that amount of time free? So, yeah,

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I see a lot more kind of walking the golf course.

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 2>I find, Yeah, I would agree. You can just it

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 2>removes one like personal element from it and like you're

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 2>not looking for balls, and especially if you're walking it alone,

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 2>you can just walk and observe it. You know, you're

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 2>not talking to somebody. But it's rare that you get

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:33.319
<v Speaker 2>to do both.

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>That's right. And you probably don't concentrate on the you

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 1>don't notice the peripheral things, you know, because you do

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of just focus on the playing area.

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Isn't down the middle and wherever you hit your ball too?

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 2>What would you say is one thing that like the

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 2>average golfer beginning to get into architecture do to understand

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 2>more about architecture while they're playing.

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>That's a good question. It. I guess, like on the

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>sand belt here, the strategies are fairly straightforward and quite

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>it's almost strategic design one O one. You know, the

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>greens are very clearly angled one way or the other.

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>So if you work, if you study the green complex

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and work your way back the strategy, the whole makes sense.

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think once they understand, like we talk about

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it a lot when we have like a committee meeting

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.719
<v Speaker 1>or something, it's amazing how few people understand the very

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>basics of strategy, you know, and once and it's not

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>really a complicated topic. But I think once they understand that, okay, well,

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the greens designed to favor play from a

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>particular part of the fair way, and usually around that

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>spot there's a hazard, you know, so if you play

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>close to the hazard, you get a better angle. If

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you play further away from it, it's a worse angle.

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>And it's you know, there's shades of gray, it's not

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>black or white. You can aim a meter a little

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>bit to the ride or forty meters to the right,

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and the shot just incrementally gets harder. And I think

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>once they you can see the light bulb go off

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>when you do explain that, and then suddenly they start

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:22.839
<v Speaker 1>thinking about all the holes on the golf course and

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>how they're range. So I think it's in terms of

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.559
<v Speaker 1>playing it. I think they need to understand that basic

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 1>logic and then they can kind of apply it to

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>their own game and their own golf course. I tell

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you one thing that I find. I've got a set

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of hickory clubs, which I've got a couple of sets,

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>but it's a lot of fun using hickories and on

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>an interesting on a strategic golf course because you really

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>understand the strategy of the holes. They make more sense

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>because you can't hit you know, with the hickories. Everything

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>comes out a bit lower and it runs. You can't

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>hit that high spinning nine nine that stops on the

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>green if you're out of position. So the strategy of

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the golf course really shines through with hickorys. If that

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>makes sense, you have to be It's such a reward

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>for being in the right position and such a penalty

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 1>for being out of position with hickorys, just because you

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>can't hit that recovery shot. So I think people would

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>understand strategy very quickly, perhaps if they had around with hickrees.

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Maybe that's what people need to start learning golf on hecrees.

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe I don't think that happened a nineteen year

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>old to put away M two and pick up a

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:47.199
<v Speaker 1>wooden shafted club.

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it might actually slow down the growth of the game.

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 2>So in terms of you guys, have you got to

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 2>have one of the best player firms in the country

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 2>between but working with Mike Clayton, Jeff Ogilvie and Ashley Mead,

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 2>how do you guys work and split up work?

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so where there's a couple of other staff members

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>as well that have worked with us for a long time.

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>So we we like that kind of turnkey approach, I guess,

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>or I guess I've always liked the idea that we

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:30.559
<v Speaker 1>can do everything from the first kind of little concept

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>sketch basically right through. So like a lot of the

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 1>modern firms like Bill and Ben and Tom and have you,

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>we build. We build our own work. We don't really

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:46.839
<v Speaker 1>like to give it to a contractor. So I guess

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>in the early phases of a new project or a design,

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>we all kind of get involved with that and sort

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of chat through some of the big picture ideas. Jeff's

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>still playing of course in America, so he's probably not

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>as involved as you know as long term he hopes

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to be. And then you know, I guess as it

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>moves into more of a construction probably actually and I

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>have more of a lead role in terms of being

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>on site and working with the guys out in the field.

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know that can limit how many projects you

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 1>take on. Usually two sort of big projects in construction

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>is about as much as we want to do because

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>invariably you've got You've also then got jobs that you're

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>pitching on, or there might be two or throw out

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the jobs that are in design, and you know it's

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously more than just those two that are in construction.

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, that's typically how it works in terms.

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Of got the collaborative approach, and obviously with Jeff and

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 2>make you've got a couple of big names from in

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Australia and obviously Jeff across the world. What are the

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 2>benefits of working in that and versus say being out

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 2>on your own.

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I think collaborative approaches that I do find

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>it minimizes your missus. You know, sometimes if you're on

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>your own, you go down a certain path and perhaps

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you're you're pushing hard to build a green or build

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a hole on the edge. It's helpful to have someone

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>with fresh eyes come out and say, oh, you know,

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there might be a bit of a stretch.

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a little bit too hard or a bit too slopy,

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>or you know, because you do get you get so

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>engrossed in that project that sometimes you forget to step

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>back and look a look at the big picture. So

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that's where it's very helpful having any of the guys

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>come in and really with fresh eyes have a look

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>at it. I mean, Jeff and Mike certainly from a

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>playing point of view, is really helpful as well. I

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>know there's been a I mean, you don't build too

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>many tournament golf courses. There's on many tournaments in Australia,

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>but we do consult to a lot of courses that

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>host tournaments, and it is sometimes interesting you sort of

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>forget how good those guys are, how far they hit it,

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>what they see as being a reasonable shot to take

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>on under certain conditions. So it sometimes just kind of

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>puts a different perspective on a whole So that's always

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting versus on your own I mean, perhaps maybe the

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>negative of a collaborative approach is that you may not

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>get those way out ideas because they might always be

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>tempered by in a collaboration. But I think if you

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>come up with an idea and put a case forward

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to why it's a good idea, typically we'll go ahead

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and build it and then you just see how it evolves.

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>You can always I mean by building your own work.

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>It's the advantage. You can build something. If it doesn't

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>look great, you can just change it.

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's I think. Sometimes I would benefit from somebody

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 2>reading over some stuff that I write, because sometimes I

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 2>might go a little far, you know.

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah. It's like it's like the email. You know,

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you never I never send an email at night, you know,

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>because you yeah, you can get Yeah, it's amazing in

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the morning when you wake up and have a read

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of that same email, you're like, oh, yeah, I'm not

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>sure I can say that.

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 2>I send all my emails out late at night, so

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 2>that one of my problems.

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Wait for the morning.

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 2>So you're finishing up a project Landhai International in China,

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious how golf design and the golf culture is

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 2>different there compared to Australia or the States.

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's someone once described it to me is that,

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, golfing in China and perhaps some other not

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>just China, but in the countries where golf is new,

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 1>that it's sort of an unsophisticated market. And that's not

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a criticism. It's just that because golf is so new,

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:18.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't necessarily know what's good and bad. You know

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:22.360
<v Speaker 1>what's good design, what's bad design. You know, in America

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you've had one hundred years for it to evolve and

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to educate people, and likewise well longer in the UK,

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 1>about one hundred years in Australia. So it is tricky

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>trying to you know, so things like I guess most

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>clients in China would expect a past seventy two, for instance,

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>because that's kind of what they understand as being the norm,

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and you know, four past threes and four par fives

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and sort of all those things just when you're getting

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 1>just when you're new to golf design, that the thing

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>is that you kind of understand as being the norm,

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that that's sort of I guess where a lot of

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the golf is at. So that can be a challenge

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:05.880
<v Speaker 1>for sure, I know when Bill and Ben were building

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Shanquin Bay, supposedly that it was so different. I think

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>people were wondering just how the Chinese would react to it,

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 1>because it was a course that you would expect to see,

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, in America, but perhaps not in a country

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>where most of the golf courses were your typical resort

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 1>style golf, you know, lots of water, sort of resort

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>style bunkers.

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, they were wondering.

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 1>How they would react to it. But I believe the

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>client there was very worldly. It traveled extensively around the world,

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 1>so he kind of was confident that that was the

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>right approach.

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, in China they unlike it. Like the UK, they

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 2>started with Saint Andrews. America we had like Chicago Golf

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 2>and Newport Country Club. Australia you had Alistair mackenzie pay

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 2>an early visit and kind of sat Melbourne on the path.

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 2>But in China they got like Jack Nicholas and Arnold

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Palmer designing courses and like the era of signature design

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:12.200
<v Speaker 2>gave birth the golf there.

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, Yeah, that's right, and now it's an interesting because

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of the moratorium on new golf courses that there's I

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>believe there's four hundred and ninety six legal golf courses

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>now in China, you know, because they've closed so many

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that were built illegally and that hasn't really been opened

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 1>up yet. So depending on how long that that goes.

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Because the course we're working on there wasn't existing golf

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>course and we're just it's a redesign. So it may

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>be that the next wave in China is more redesign.

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>It could be that where a lot of those golf

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>courses they're legal, but perhaps they're not as good as

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 1>they could be, or they were part of, like you said,

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that sort of wave of signature designs that it might

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 1>spread it now the idea of redesign work might kind

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:07.679
<v Speaker 1>of start spreading into China.

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 2>So high profile club that you guys consult at as

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Kingston Heath, which is one of the best golf courses

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 2>in the world regularly kind of comparison as the Australian Marion,

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 2>and then you also consult at Shady Oaks, a high

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 2>profile course in Dallas. What are the similarities and differences

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 2>between clubs in Australia and the America.

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>So I guess Shady Oak. So it's a it's a

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>really pretty parkland style golf course. Robert Trent Jones Senior

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 1>built it for Marvin Leonard in the fifties on the

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>back of Colonial, So they built Colonial and they wanted

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a smaller private member's course, went to Shady Oaks, and

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of course Ben Hogan came across as part of that

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>as well, so that became his home. One of the

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>things that I always find fascinating and hopefully to answers

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>your question in a roundabout way, whenever we've looked at

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>courses in America, it's not all courses, but a lot

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of the classic American parkland style course. We're always intrigued

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:32.439
<v Speaker 1>by the the way they're set up with typically you know,

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 1>lots of rough around the greens, quite often rough between

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the fairway bunkers and the fairways, which we find curious

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>because in Australia that the norm is to cut fairways

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>right to the edge of hazards and we typically have

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of short grass around greens and so it's

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>more of a I think it's more of a British

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:59.360
<v Speaker 1>maintenance style in Australia, so we're really wedged firmly between,

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, a little bit from Britain and a little

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>bit from America. I think with our golf they certainly

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 1>play firm and fast like they do in Britain, but

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>there's other elements that are kind of similar to America.

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>And what I guess is always interesting and part of

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the pitch to Shady Oaks or one of the things

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>we sort of talked about was that it's kind of

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting that Augusta, you know, has been, has been. If

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 1>you ask most tool players what their favorite course is

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:27.919
<v Speaker 1>of the year, most of them would probably say Augusta.

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Most golfers in America, if you ask it, you know,

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 1>their dream around or where would they love to go,

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>they probably say Augusta and Augusta it's essentially maintained like

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 1>a Samdbell golf course. You know, it's short, heaps of

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>short grass, heaps of short grass around the green, short

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>grass to the edge of the bunkers. It's it's kind

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of like Royal Melbourne. Really, it's very similar. And yet

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:53.400
<v Speaker 1>golf courses went in a totally different direction. They went

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>in another direction, and yet every year everyone goes back

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to Augusta and loves it, and for whatever reason, it

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of down this other part. So you know one

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of the things that not that we're trying to turn

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Shady Oaks into a SAMD Belt golf course, but certainly

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we talked a lot about that, trying to create more

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>short grass and perhaps a line a little closer to

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the way we like golf to be played. And they've

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>really embraced that. I mean in the first brand and

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I flagged some new fairly lines there and I think

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>they added ten acres in a month of short grass,

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 1>and the members have really liked it. So that is

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:35.640
<v Speaker 1>always a curiosity to me though, that just the position

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that Augusta holds in American golf, and yet people struggle

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to join the dots. You know, they look at their

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>golf course and see the rough and you talk about

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>short grass and they look at you perhaps like you're

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:49.679
<v Speaker 1>mad or what are you talking about? And yet you know,

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>come April every year it's there for everyone to see.

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, that is a curiosity.

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 2>Most people seem to focus on, like the flowers and

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 2>the green nature of Augustine. Take the two worse things

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 2>to their golf course and make it soft and slow

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 2>and plant some flowers, but curious with extending fairway lanes.

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 2>It seems that one of the common you know, pushbacks

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 2>from a club would be you're making this golf course easier.

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:23.640
<v Speaker 2>What is your response to that?

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, and that's true. I mean you need to look

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>at the whole package. And because if the green complexes

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and the bunkering isn't great, then yeah, widening of course

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>will make it easier. So they kind of fit together.

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean ideally there's lots of space for people to

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 1>hit to, but in actual fact that the desired area

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of the fairway is quite small, you know. And I

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:58.199
<v Speaker 1>think part of that which is often forgotten about is

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 1>the is the maintenance. I mean when people talk about

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 1>tool courses and the like, I mean, one of the

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>reasons that many of the sand Belt courses are still

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:12.119
<v Speaker 1>so relevant from a tournament perspective is how firm and

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 1>fast the greens are, you know, because you can't I mean,

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Kingston Head's not particularly long in sort of US tour standards.

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>It's probably seven thousand one hundred yards, maybe seven thousand

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:31.199
<v Speaker 1>two hundred yards, but you know, it's not just a

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>driver of every tee because the greens are so well

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:38.679
<v Speaker 1>designed and firm that if you are out of position,

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you can't easily hit. Sometimes you can't even hit the

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>green if you're in the wrong spot, So suddenly you're

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>prepared to sacrifice some distance to hit a three iron

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 1>or hit a two iron into the right position of

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the fairway. So but if the greens were if the

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>greens were really soft, then suddenly it wouldn't be quite

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>as strategic, because you could you could play to the

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>greens from anywhere. And if and if you waded it

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>down even further and just built some fairly flat greens

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and bought the bunkers further away from the putting surface,

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>then it would be even less strategic. Again, so it's

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>not just that you can't just look at the widening

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of the fairways. It has to be looked at with

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the position of the bunkers and the green design too sore.

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:23.640
<v Speaker 1>At Shady there were some spots where you could easily

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>add short grass, particularly around the greens, because there was

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of greens that were perched up and there

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>were some nice sort of hollows and slopes away from

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>them where you could add short grass and not make

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it easier in some ways. You know, short grass around

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the greens. If there's a slope, adding short grass actually

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:45.199
<v Speaker 1>makes it harder because a missshot just the ball just

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>finishes further away from the putting surface instead of getting

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>caught up in that little bit rough, you know, between

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:51.119
<v Speaker 1>the green and the bunker.

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would agree with that. I think when the

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 2>ball rolls it's very scary for good players especially.

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it puts it puts doubt in a good

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>player's mind because you don't know what to hit. You know,

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>if it's done well, suddenly you've got five clubs in

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>your head thinking, well, do you know do I hit

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 1>the kind of that three would bump and run that

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Tiger kind of did a fair bit

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:23.879
<v Speaker 1>of Or do you try and hit a lobodge or

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.879
<v Speaker 1>do you bounce it into the slope with like are

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:28.919
<v Speaker 1>a wedge? Or do you a part of it? But

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the great thing is for a hacker, for a bad player,

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 1>they can just pull apart up and they can at

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>least kind of knock it up there and knock it

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:37.160
<v Speaker 1>on the green. They probably won't get up and down,

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's a it's a really that's where it's a

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>clever hazard because it's hard for the good player and

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 1>or confusing for the good player and kind of easy

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>for the average player.

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm in agreement there. A big, high profile project

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 2>you're working is Peninsula, which is, of course you grew

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:02.439
<v Speaker 2>up playing in Melbourne. Yea, you know, is there some

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 2>pressure with all the great courses around Melbourne designing a

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 2>new course with all the historic courses.

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 1>There is? I mean it was. It's a great bit

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of land, the equal almost the equal to real Melbourne really,

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>but it was a course that it never quite had

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>reached its potential. So they've been redesigned work done there previously,

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and we've done quite a lot of that, but it

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:32.679
<v Speaker 1>was usually it was done on a shoe string and

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>it was never a.

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 3>Comprehensive sort of redevelopment.

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>And I guess that they merged with a golf club

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>called Kingswood, so now it's sort of Peninsula. Kingswood is

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the new club and that allowed them financially the opportunity

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to look at a much bigger redevelopment, which is what

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of web two thirds of the way through. And

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the challenge for them absolutely is so when people come

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to Melbourne and want a taste of samd Belt golf,

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>they typically go to Royal Melbourne and Kingston Heave if

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>they have time, they might go to Metropolitan Victoria and

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>usually that's it. Then they go they might go down

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to Tasmayania to play Bamboo Junes or king Owen and

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 1>then they're gone. And as a result of that or

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>this has actually influenced that that mindset that there is

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a big gap between those four elite sand Belt clubs

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and kind of everyone else on the sand Belt. So

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>their challenge and our challenge is to kind of turn

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>four into five. You know, when people come to Melbourne,

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>they want to go to Poeninsula Kingswood, so that, yeah,

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:45.719
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot of pressure attached to that. I mean,

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>we've assembled a really good team down there, and so

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>far the results are showing that, you know, it's looking

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 1>really promising. But it's a hard nut to crack that

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>elite sam Belt club, if you like, because they've had

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, they had one hundred years and copious tournaments

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that have kind of created their reputation. So it's hard

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to We're trying to do fifty years work in three,

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, and that's so it's even if we get

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the product there, it's still going to take a little

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>time for I think for that to influence rankings and

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>how people view the golf course both here and overseas. Yeah.

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you look at the American top ten

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 2>golf courses, there's only one modern golf course in there,

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 2>sand Hills, and you know at this point it's it's

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 2>now twenty five years old almost.

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right.

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 2>So it's it's tricky because the history and the tradition

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 2>always get lumped into judging the golf course. Are you

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 2>guys pulling a lot of influence from those area courses

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 2>and or are you trying to build something new and unique.

0:30:54.840 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>No, we're one thing. It's a bit of a cross

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>between or a bit of a hybrid of some of

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the other Sandbelt courses. There's two courses there, so there's

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a north course in a south course, and we built

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>many years ago a creek on the south course through

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of some a low section of the course. And

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>looking at old photos of the site, there were actually

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>quite a lot of creeks that ran through the property,

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 1>so there was quite a few wet areas, and so

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>we had an idea to maybe make a better looking creek.

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>We used some we used the local stonemason to kind

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of create the impression that was like an old ruin,

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess, so sort of it was interesting because he

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>was clients typically judged how well he did a job

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>by how perfect the rock work was the draysten wall,

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and we were like, no, no, no, we don't want

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>it perfectly, want it rugged and old and sort of,

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, almost falling apart. So he really enjoyed it

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 1>because it was totally different from what he was used

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and so we did that on one hole and it

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>worked out so well. We ended up creating that crete

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>network through a number of holes. So in a way

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:14.719
<v Speaker 1>that became a bit of a signature of the of

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the South course, whereas the North is a bit more elevated,

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a bit more undulating, sandier, and so it's probably

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>more and the vegetation is better, a lot more heath

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>than kind of almost a monas stand of the Manicum,

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>which is the kind of the the tree which most

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 1>would identify with a lot of the sand belt courses.

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's probably more of a typical sand belt experience.

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>And whilst the South is a sand belt course, it's

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 1>just that the creek kind of creates a little bit

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 1>of a point of difference between the North in terms

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of the greens and the bunkers though they probably they

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 1>probably weren't. One of the big drivers of the project

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 1>was conditioning. They've never really had firm fast greens, which

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 1>are kind of you know, synonymous, I guess with SAMD

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>belt golf, so a lot of work. We basically created

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a new sort of a different style of construction with

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the green. So a lot of there's been a lot

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 1>of USGA greens on the sand belt built over the

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>last thirty years, but people have struggled, They really struggled

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to get in the firm So we went with a

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>different construction technique, a different grass, and one of the

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>things we've noticed on the old greens was that the

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>bunkers weren't They were very much out of scale with

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the greens. If you look at sand belt holes from

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the air, the bunkering around the green is bigger than

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the green. So really that's what helps create the scale

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of the green sites on the sand belt. People look

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 1>at Royal Melbourne's greens and think they're enormous, and they

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 1>are big, but they're not that big. The reason they

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 1>feel big is because it's so expansive around the green.

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>The bunkering is really expansive and a lot of short grass.

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 1>So they're these big, they feel like, these huge, elegant

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 1>green sites. So we very much borrowed from that concept

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>with the green sites of Peninsula. We cleared out a

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of space around them, and the bunkering now is

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 1>much bigger, much more, more of the sort of capes

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and bays that people you know, people talk about Mackenzie bunkering,

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's probably a different topic. But yeah, so more

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of that kind of classic bunkering style that you would

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>see at rom Melbourne and Kingston. A more short grass. Yeah,

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and we've cleared out a fair bit of vegetation to

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:33.319
<v Speaker 1>try and return it to what we hope is what

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the property would have looked like, you know, one hundred

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 1>years ago before there was a golf course there.

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 2>That's that's cool, natural, much more natural.

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, then you.

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Got the other side that's got the rustic creek.

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 1>So absolutely, and it's sort of I mean, they've given us,

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:52.319
<v Speaker 1>they've afforded us a lot of license, which has been

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they've been just a fantastic club to work

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:59.400
<v Speaker 1>with and so much you just wouldn't get that license

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:02.360
<v Speaker 1>at many of the the sand Belt clubs you wouldn't

0:35:02.360 --> 0:35:04.720
<v Speaker 1>be afforded that amount of license. But as a result,

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>what will happen is that, you know, the North is

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:10.239
<v Speaker 1>the Sandburg golf course that so many of the other

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Sandburg clubs want to be, you know, so they really

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 1>do have the potential to leap frog a whole bunch

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of clubs, and you put themselves as a thirty six

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:21.880
<v Speaker 1>hole venue. You know, they should be. It should be

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the place to join in Melbourne.

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you get variety between the two courses. So

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:34.720
<v Speaker 2>it's so with you be down in Australia. I'm curious.

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:38.320
<v Speaker 2>I asked this question every once in a while. Who's

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 2>on your Mount Rushmore? So for architects, that's a Mount Rushmore.

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:47.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you know is a famous.

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, you know, I don't know. Well, it's hard.

0:35:54.280 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>We're so heavily influenced by Alistair McKenzie here, rightly or wrongly,

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, but I think probably rightly. But you know,

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 1>he only spent ten weeks here McKenzie. You know, it's

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:13.280
<v Speaker 1>an interesting story and so as you know, he came here,

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Royal Melbourne engaged him to come out, I guess through

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:22.399
<v Speaker 1>the RNA connection to come out and design their course.

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 1>I think he got paid two hundred pounds and to

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 1>help pay for that fee, they sort of farmed him

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 1>out to a lot of other golf courses and they

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 1>did a deal with him to split the fee so

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>for any other work that they could find for him,

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:39.279
<v Speaker 1>he would go halves on his consulting fee. And he

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:42.800
<v Speaker 1>was seriously active. I mean he came here to Melbourne.

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 1>He did the design for Roal Melbourne. He consulted to

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 1>Kingston Heath and the Explorer and did a bunker plan.

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:52.880
<v Speaker 1>So you know, at that time it was quite common

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 1>for courses to get built and then they would do

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 1>the bunkering scheme after they opened, so they would kind

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of see how people played the gold of course and

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 1>then figure out for where to put the bunkers. So

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't uncommon at the time. So he did an

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:09.839
<v Speaker 1>scheme for Kingston Heath, He did a plan for Metropolitan,

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 1>He did a bunkering plan for Victoria. He went to

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Adelaide and did a plan for a design plan for

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Royal Adelaide. He went to new stath Whale and went

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 1>to New Sos Golf Club. Royal Adelaide. He consulted by Doon.

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:27.279
<v Speaker 1>He consulted at two or three others. He went to

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Queensland and consulted I think Brisbane Golf Club in Dropilli

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Golf Club, all in ten weeks and he saw really

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:37.520
<v Speaker 1>nothing built. He saw the fifth Wester at Royal Melbourne

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:40.360
<v Speaker 1>either built or partly built, which is that kind of

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:43.919
<v Speaker 1>famous iconic path three from the elevated tea elevated green

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and hit across the valley. And he supposedly saw a

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 1>little bit of fifteen at the uphill path three which

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:55.479
<v Speaker 1>was previously what could only have been an odd hole.

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:58.880
<v Speaker 1>It was a blind path four over the hill. So

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 1>he brought the green back to the top of the hill.

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think he saw some bunkers built on the

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:06.719
<v Speaker 1>thirteenth ro Royal Adelaide and then he was gone. So

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 1>but he influenced. He struck up a relationship with Alex Russell,

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 1>who became a designer in his own right and designed

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a pretty cool set of four golf courses. He did

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the Royal Melbourne East, he did Lake carrn Up in Perth,

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:26.280
<v Speaker 1>he did Yariara and he did Parapari in New Zealand

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 1>which is a great links course. And he also taught

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a father and son team of construction guy. So Mick

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Morecambe who was the Royal Melbourne superintendent, he built all

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:42.919
<v Speaker 1>his work there and then he built the work where

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 1>they did a couple of greens at Metropolitan and did

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 1>work at Victoria and basically what you know is the

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 1>sand belt look with bunkers is very heavily influenced by

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Mick Morcomb or his son Vern, and Vern became the

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:01.880
<v Speaker 1>superintendent at king Sneve where he was for forty six years,

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and he changed that golf course a lot, he changed

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the bunkering a lot. He readed greens, he readed teas.

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's always interesting with Mackenzie just how much people

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:16.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about the credit, the big unknown factor, like the primary.

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:22.279
<v Speaker 1>His primary influence was ten weeks long, maybe not that much.

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Did a couple of plans but never saw them built.

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 1>So he never really wrote about in his books how

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 1>great the work was in Australia because he never saw it.

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:35.319
<v Speaker 1>But his secondary influence I think was huge. That's the thing.

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 1>You know. He was clever that he found guys that

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:41.879
<v Speaker 1>were talented I guess, educated them and then they then

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:44.400
<v Speaker 1>went on and that then influenced the next generation and

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the next generation. So it was a it was a

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:49.279
<v Speaker 1>defining moment. Those ten weeks really changed the course of

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 1>golf course design in Australia. So as an Australian, to

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:58.760
<v Speaker 1>get back to your question, he's clearly front and center

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:00.760
<v Speaker 1>in the Mount rush more of golf.

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:08.399
<v Speaker 2>I think it will be crazy if somebody did a

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:12.560
<v Speaker 2>golf course the way they used to bunker it. If

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 2>they waited till some people play it and then bunkerd it,

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:19.919
<v Speaker 2>how much more effective and how fewer bunkers a golf

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 2>course would have.

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. The only tricky thing with it, I guess would

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:29.320
<v Speaker 1>be the green complexes, because it's kind of hard to

0:40:29.360 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 1>build bunkers and grains independently from one another. You know,

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 1>they really they need to be built as one kind

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of shape when you know you're sculpting the land and

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you're building the green at the same time as you're

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 1>building the shapes around the bunkers.

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Maybe a little bit more costly.

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but fairly bunkers. Yeah, you know, I guess it's

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:51.879
<v Speaker 1>sort of I mean, you would like to think now

0:40:51.920 --> 0:40:55.239
<v Speaker 1>that I think you should know good enough to think

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>through it.

0:40:57.680 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 2>So you got Alistair McKenzie and your ones.

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Well he's in there. I mean, I don't know. I've

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:09.760
<v Speaker 1>traveled quite a bit. I really like cold In obviously

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:12.799
<v Speaker 1>in the UK and the influence he had over there.

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I really like gold courses. I've got a bit of

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a sucker for I haven't played a lot of his courses,

0:41:19.080 --> 0:41:23.799
<v Speaker 1>but I'm always fascinated by Rainer and McDonald and I

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:29.399
<v Speaker 1>would love to see surely the time's right. Actually, in fact,

0:41:29.400 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I saw a photo of someone who was doing a

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:34.239
<v Speaker 1>bit of a too. You kind of wonder with golf

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 1>course design, whether the just have whether like art movements,

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:40.319
<v Speaker 1>whether we'll go through a different you know. I mean

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:42.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the new courses built now I sort

0:41:42.400 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of look and feel similar. It'd be kind of nice,

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think it'd be cool to for someone to

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:52.759
<v Speaker 1>build a super geometric Rainer style, still strategic, but just

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:55.880
<v Speaker 1>visually quite different golf course. I would love to see that.

0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:59.399
<v Speaker 2>I think they're doing it at Arcadia Bluffs is one

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:03.239
<v Speaker 2>that looks similar. You know, it's got the squared off

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 2>greens and oh okay in the trench. It would be

0:42:07.280 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 2>cool to see. Yeah, it'd be cool to see one

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:10.839
<v Speaker 2>of those in Australia.

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 1>I would I mean unfortunately. I think because he's so

0:42:18.040 --> 0:42:21.160
<v Speaker 1>unknown here that if you started down that track, they

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 1>would put the client probably wouldn't let you unless they

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 1>were really well traveled. They would look at it and go,

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, what do you what are you doing? That

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 1>would be the challenge, with the challenge to convince them

0:42:31.160 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that yeah it's a worthy cause. So yeah, probably I

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:43.400
<v Speaker 1>would probably have mackenzie cult.

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:46.520
<v Speaker 2>We'll put amal mcarainer, you know, will make.

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:49.799
<v Speaker 1>Him one yeah, yeah, yeah, and maybe just hanging off

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the edge. I think the Malcombs I always feel good

0:42:52.200 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 1>sorry for. I don't think they get the credit that

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:57.279
<v Speaker 1>is here in Australia anyway. Everyone talks, you know, talks

0:42:57.280 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 1>about McKenzie. But yeah, when you look at Kingston Heath,

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:06.839
<v Speaker 1>it's a result of four or five different people over

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:09.480
<v Speaker 1>one hundred years. It's not you know, to call it

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a McKenzie course is way overstating it.

0:43:13.680 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 2>How do you mean As an architect and knowing that

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:21.959
<v Speaker 2>a lot of work in this era will be redesigned

0:43:22.760 --> 0:43:26.879
<v Speaker 2>and usually there's only one architect on the scorecard, what's

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:31.440
<v Speaker 2>your thoughts on approaching you know, should every architect be

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 2>listed on a scorecard?

0:43:33.640 --> 0:43:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Well? I I they very rarely the magazines, and they

0:43:37.719 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 1>very rarely get it right. They either don't research it

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:45.880
<v Speaker 1>properly or they credit the kind of the known person.

0:43:47.000 --> 0:43:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't really see why. I would prefer that they

0:43:49.480 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't credit any architect, to be honest. I mean, it's

0:43:52.880 --> 0:43:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the champions the golf course and not the architects, you know,

0:43:57.360 --> 0:44:02.400
<v Speaker 1>or trying to label one particular architects so difficult. I

0:44:02.440 --> 0:44:05.480
<v Speaker 1>mean Kingston Heath, for instance, is you know it was

0:44:05.520 --> 0:44:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a Dan Suitor course. Mackenzie did this plan, Vern Morecombe was,

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Mick morcamb built some work there. Vern Morcambe was a superintendent.

0:44:16.400 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're the consulting accent now, but it would

0:44:18.640 --> 0:44:23.200
<v Speaker 1>be totally wrong to credit us to it. And then

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you've had all different captains and presidents over the years

0:44:26.680 --> 0:44:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that have influenced it. Yeah, the golf course today is

0:44:29.920 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the best it's ever been in a hundred years, and

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:34.839
<v Speaker 1>to try if you tried to restore it to any

0:44:34.840 --> 0:44:38.080
<v Speaker 1>particular era, even the so called Mackenzie era, it would

0:44:38.080 --> 0:44:40.360
<v Speaker 1>be a worse golf course. No way would it be

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 1>as good as it is now. So it's kind of like,

0:44:42.680 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why. I mean, magazines are just obsessed

0:44:45.640 --> 0:44:49.160
<v Speaker 1>by labeling each course with an archeced I would rather

0:44:49.200 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 1>they didn't just call it, you know, Kingston Heath.

0:44:54.520 --> 0:44:59.280
<v Speaker 2>My uncle gave me this old Jeff Cornish Ron Wittens book.

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:02.719
<v Speaker 2>It's called The Golf Course or he found it in

0:45:02.760 --> 0:45:06.520
<v Speaker 2>his basement and gave it to me. And it's so funny.

0:45:07.080 --> 0:45:09.360
<v Speaker 2>It's got like all the golf course in America and

0:45:09.400 --> 0:45:12.759
<v Speaker 2>the architect and like there are still many that are off.

0:45:12.840 --> 0:45:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Like they've got Short Acres in Chicago, which is a

0:45:15.440 --> 0:45:19.919
<v Speaker 2>seth Rayner listed as an Alison. It's like, you know,

0:45:19.400 --> 0:45:22.560
<v Speaker 2>how do they How does somebody think that Rainer's work

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:24.760
<v Speaker 2>was Allison's? They're like completely different.

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so at least and unfortunately, I mean in reality,

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 1>some court not all courses. I mean some new courses

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 1>you could you could pretty confidently say who did it.

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:40.880
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, some courses kind of read like the credits

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:44.239
<v Speaker 1>to a film, you know, I mean, you don't list

0:45:44.840 --> 0:45:49.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty people and which clearly no one's going to do.

0:45:49.680 --> 0:45:51.719
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I don't know. I kind of get a

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:55.560
<v Speaker 1>bit over the whole trying to label every every course

0:45:55.600 --> 0:45:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to a particular person or people. I just I wouldn't

0:45:58.520 --> 0:45:59.880
<v Speaker 1>bother myself believe it.

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of my listeners are in America. And

0:46:06.719 --> 0:46:09.920
<v Speaker 2>if if you were going down, if you're an American

0:46:10.080 --> 0:46:14.520
<v Speaker 2>going to Australia and you got seven days and it's

0:46:14.600 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Speaker 2>ye probably the only day, the only time in your

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:19.799
<v Speaker 2>life you're going to go. What what golf courses are

0:46:19.800 --> 0:46:20.240
<v Speaker 2>you playing?

0:46:25.600 --> 0:46:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's you really have to come to Melbourne and

0:46:30.320 --> 0:46:33.239
<v Speaker 1>I would those four that I mentioned before, you would

0:46:33.239 --> 0:46:36.719
<v Speaker 1>play the two courses at real Melbourne. Absolutely it's like

0:46:36.840 --> 0:46:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Kingston eight and.

0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:40.879
<v Speaker 2>We'll say a couple of thirty six holidays, not all

0:46:40.880 --> 0:46:43.640
<v Speaker 2>thirty six holidays, okay.

0:46:43.200 --> 0:46:45.040
<v Speaker 1>So well we're all Melbourne. You can do in a day.

0:46:45.120 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Let's call that a sety six whole day. So it's

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:56.279
<v Speaker 1>one day Victoria and another Metropolitan, another Kingston Heath another, so

0:46:56.280 --> 0:47:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that's four days. I would then fly to Bamboo Dunes.

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:05.840
<v Speaker 1>You've got to play barmber woodeons and Lost Farm down there.

0:47:08.840 --> 0:47:11.279
<v Speaker 1>Then on the day or two left, you could go

0:47:11.320 --> 0:47:14.239
<v Speaker 1>to king Ireland. Selfishly, I would say you've got to

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:17.560
<v Speaker 1>come and play penincially Kingswood because it'll be finished by then.

0:47:19.800 --> 0:47:21.960
<v Speaker 1>But it's always a tricky one because people ask us

0:47:22.000 --> 0:47:24.319
<v Speaker 1>that question, would you go? But it's so it's such

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a big country and not that i'm you know, there's

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:35.200
<v Speaker 1>not the depth of golf in the other major cities

0:47:35.239 --> 0:47:37.920
<v Speaker 1>as there is in Melbourne. I mean you could extend

0:47:38.000 --> 0:47:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that if you wanted and play ten courses on the

0:47:39.920 --> 0:47:42.759
<v Speaker 1>sand belt, whereas if you went to New So if

0:47:42.760 --> 0:47:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you went to Sydney, you know you might play New

0:47:46.120 --> 0:47:49.600
<v Speaker 1>South Wales and perhaps the Lakes. That's two. You know,

0:47:49.640 --> 0:47:52.239
<v Speaker 1>if you went to Queensland, you're probably playing Royal Queensland

0:47:52.360 --> 0:47:56.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe one other. And Perth there's really like Karen

0:47:56.840 --> 0:47:59.960
<v Speaker 1>up Adelaide, there's Royal Adelaide and maybe one or two other.

0:48:00.080 --> 0:48:02.719
<v Speaker 1>So there's just not the depth. So to really get

0:48:02.719 --> 0:48:05.680
<v Speaker 1>bang for your back, I think you're better off staying

0:48:05.680 --> 0:48:08.959
<v Speaker 1>in one place and doing it properly rather than trying

0:48:09.000 --> 0:48:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to fly all around the country. So I think it's

0:48:11.600 --> 0:48:14.319
<v Speaker 1>been knowing up guys pretty much. Did that trip. I

0:48:14.320 --> 0:48:18.080
<v Speaker 1>think it was Melbourne, predominantly Melbourne and then go down

0:48:18.120 --> 0:48:18.919
<v Speaker 1>to Tasmania.

0:48:19.040 --> 0:48:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it looked like an awesome trip.

0:48:21.960 --> 0:48:25.560
<v Speaker 1>We're constantly here, you know, it's on my bucket least.

0:48:25.640 --> 0:48:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure whether I'll ever get You've just got

0:48:27.520 --> 0:48:29.319
<v Speaker 1>to suck it. Up and get on a plane. I mean,

0:48:29.320 --> 0:48:31.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not that far. A couple of movies, a bit

0:48:31.640 --> 0:48:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of a sleep in your hear.

0:48:34.560 --> 0:48:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, one of my buddies is trying to get me

0:48:36.520 --> 0:48:41.239
<v Speaker 2>to go next year or like this next holidays, so

0:48:41.440 --> 0:48:44.400
<v Speaker 2>maybe we'll see. I got a lot of places to

0:48:44.480 --> 0:48:48.440
<v Speaker 2>go every podcast, so add another place to where I

0:48:48.480 --> 0:48:52.919
<v Speaker 2>want to go. But what's like the is there any

0:48:53.040 --> 0:48:57.399
<v Speaker 2>like hidden gems that are worth seeing that nobody ever

0:48:57.480 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 2>goes and sees.

0:49:01.160 --> 0:49:05.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a couple in New Zealand. Definitely, not many people

0:49:05.800 --> 0:49:09.880
<v Speaker 1>see Paraparau. It's a really good links course. It's a

0:49:09.920 --> 0:49:13.080
<v Speaker 1>fantastic golf course. And there's another course way on the

0:49:13.120 --> 0:49:15.239
<v Speaker 1>southern tip of New Zealand, which is a Lynx course.

0:49:19.880 --> 0:49:23.480
<v Speaker 1>It's probably me think, I mean, there are some courses

0:49:23.520 --> 0:49:26.040
<v Speaker 1>around it, certainly to an American they would never have

0:49:26.120 --> 0:49:29.840
<v Speaker 1>heard of that are worth seeing, but you just probably

0:49:29.840 --> 0:49:32.160
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't do them in your seven days because there's too

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:33.120
<v Speaker 1>much other good golf.

0:49:33.800 --> 0:49:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Gotcha, it's is Tigarragi any good? The Mackenzie down there

0:49:39.920 --> 0:49:44.960
<v Speaker 2>in New Zealand.

0:49:42.880 --> 0:49:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Tittering, Yeah, yeah, apparently so they restored they did a

0:49:49.600 --> 0:49:51.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of work there ten years ago. Apparently I haven't

0:49:51.960 --> 0:49:55.160
<v Speaker 1>seen it since, but apparently very good. Yeah, you know,

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:57.239
<v Speaker 1>and then of course you've got the new courses there

0:49:57.280 --> 0:50:01.400
<v Speaker 1>as well, which are you know, really good. So you

0:50:01.400 --> 0:50:03.400
<v Speaker 1>could easily do a trip, a separate trip to New

0:50:03.520 --> 0:50:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Zealand in seven days.

0:50:04.840 --> 0:50:06.480
<v Speaker 2>It's not that far, too, right.

0:50:07.520 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 1>No, it's it's a it's like flying to Perth from here.

0:50:10.680 --> 0:50:14.320
<v Speaker 1>It's like a three hour flight from the New Zealand.

0:50:14.320 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 3>It's not at all.

0:50:15.360 --> 0:50:17.960
<v Speaker 2>You just need a month, really, you need a month.

0:50:19.880 --> 0:50:21.719
<v Speaker 1>You need it would be better. I mean it's a

0:50:21.760 --> 0:50:24.480
<v Speaker 1>long way to come for seven days, I will say that, Yeah,

0:50:24.520 --> 0:50:26.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're just getting over jet lag and then

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you're going home again. If you could stretch it to

0:50:30.080 --> 0:50:32.360
<v Speaker 1>two or three weeks, that would be better.

0:50:32.800 --> 0:50:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So we'd be we'd be messing out if we

0:50:36.560 --> 0:50:39.760
<v Speaker 2>didn't talk about your sketches. And I mean, oh, okay,

0:50:39.920 --> 0:50:45.360
<v Speaker 2>you're one of the the world's four front golf sketchers.

0:50:45.360 --> 0:50:49.680
<v Speaker 2>How did were you just always good at at drawing?

0:50:51.080 --> 0:50:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I was always interested in it. My dad was

0:50:53.600 --> 0:50:59.640
<v Speaker 1>an artist, so he taught art at school, so he

0:50:59.760 --> 0:51:04.600
<v Speaker 1>was teacher. So when I was young, I mean I

0:51:04.640 --> 0:51:07.680
<v Speaker 1>had a teacher right there at home. So, and I

0:51:07.760 --> 0:51:11.799
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed sketching, so he would sort of show me basics

0:51:12.239 --> 0:51:14.600
<v Speaker 1>perspective and if I got you know, if I was

0:51:14.680 --> 0:51:16.800
<v Speaker 1>drawing something for a school project, he would sort of

0:51:16.800 --> 0:51:19.600
<v Speaker 1>show me perhaps a better way of doing it. So

0:51:19.880 --> 0:51:21.759
<v Speaker 1>I kind of picked it up and put it down

0:51:21.800 --> 0:51:24.480
<v Speaker 1>over the years, but never really seriously did it. And

0:51:24.520 --> 0:51:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, it was only when I got into

0:51:26.080 --> 0:51:29.120
<v Speaker 1>golf course design there was a reason suddenly to draw,

0:51:29.920 --> 0:51:33.040
<v Speaker 1>because it was very helpful I think when I first

0:51:33.040 --> 0:51:37.080
<v Speaker 1>started working in it, because no one else really could draw.

0:51:37.920 --> 0:51:40.560
<v Speaker 1>It was an advantage to if I had an idea

0:51:40.600 --> 0:51:42.600
<v Speaker 1>for a whole to be able to get a bit

0:51:42.640 --> 0:51:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of paper and draw it on it in the field

0:51:44.719 --> 0:51:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and say what do you think of this? Suddenly it

0:51:48.960 --> 0:51:51.360
<v Speaker 1>was something that everyone could see and everyone could understand,

0:51:51.440 --> 0:51:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and it was a really good way of getting your

0:51:54.360 --> 0:52:00.000
<v Speaker 1>point across, whereas otherwise, you know, everyone's just pointing. It

0:52:00.360 --> 0:52:03.120
<v Speaker 1>put me at various things and as it was confusing,

0:52:03.960 --> 0:52:07.480
<v Speaker 1>so there was a reason to draw. And then you know,

0:52:07.520 --> 0:52:11.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're in a committee room or sometimes I would

0:52:11.560 --> 0:52:13.560
<v Speaker 1>draw for a plan, you know, to like do a

0:52:13.600 --> 0:52:16.040
<v Speaker 1>worked up sort of drawing to do as part of

0:52:16.040 --> 0:52:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a presentation, so I think that certainly got me interested

0:52:19.920 --> 0:52:25.080
<v Speaker 1>in it again. And then it's then when Barbougle Dunes

0:52:25.440 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 1>was built, Richard, the owner wanted a course guide. He

0:52:29.040 --> 0:52:32.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted a yardage book. And I'd done ones before when

0:52:32.920 --> 0:52:35.319
<v Speaker 1>I was playing just sort of all little ones and this,

0:52:35.600 --> 0:52:38.880
<v Speaker 1>but suddenly this needed to be like a commercially produced one.

0:52:39.200 --> 0:52:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I was pretty comfortable I could do it, and that

0:52:41.239 --> 0:52:44.680
<v Speaker 1>was really the first one I did. And then out

0:52:44.680 --> 0:52:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of that just not really I didn't really ever advertise,

0:52:48.760 --> 0:52:51.640
<v Speaker 1>but just word of mouth, people asked me to do

0:52:51.880 --> 0:52:55.640
<v Speaker 1>other course guides, and then I was quite keen to

0:52:56.160 --> 0:53:00.200
<v Speaker 1>get to improve my proper painting, so not just horse

0:53:00.239 --> 0:53:03.880
<v Speaker 1>guide drawings, but actual landscapes and things, and so I

0:53:04.080 --> 0:53:06.879
<v Speaker 1>just over particularly the last ten years, I've probably spent

0:53:06.920 --> 0:53:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a bit more time doing it. And yeah, I mean

0:53:10.160 --> 0:53:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't have as much time to do it as

0:53:11.600 --> 0:53:15.359
<v Speaker 1>I would like. I tend it's only when people ask

0:53:15.440 --> 0:53:17.760
<v Speaker 1>me to do a painting or commission me to do something,

0:53:17.880 --> 0:53:22.760
<v Speaker 1>it tends to sort of maybe a panic and think, okay,

0:53:22.760 --> 0:53:24.560
<v Speaker 1>now now I've really got a knuckle down. So that

0:53:24.640 --> 0:53:29.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of forces me to really spend my spare time

0:53:29.320 --> 0:53:32.200
<v Speaker 1>painting for a month until I can produce something that's

0:53:32.280 --> 0:53:36.080
<v Speaker 1>really good and then yeah, but then it's not like

0:53:36.160 --> 0:53:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm sitting at home each night just yeah with the

0:53:39.400 --> 0:53:44.040
<v Speaker 1>paints out, sketching and the like. But yeah, well to

0:53:44.280 --> 0:53:44.600
<v Speaker 1>enjoy it.

0:53:45.719 --> 0:53:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you've got to have a life too. You can't get.

0:53:52.800 --> 0:53:54.759
<v Speaker 1>And because we've been so busy, it's just yeah, I

0:53:54.880 --> 0:53:56.880
<v Speaker 1>probably haven't spent as much time doing it. But just

0:53:56.960 --> 0:54:00.440
<v Speaker 1>recently I did a friend wanted some gifts for he

0:54:00.480 --> 0:54:02.520
<v Speaker 1>took a group over to America, and so I did.

0:54:02.800 --> 0:54:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I did six kind of proper watercolors for him and

0:54:05.239 --> 0:54:08.480
<v Speaker 1>they turned out really well. So that was good because

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I basically painted for two months doing those. It must

0:54:11.960 --> 0:54:14.680
<v Speaker 1>spare time, and it kind of I definitely got improved

0:54:14.960 --> 0:54:16.719
<v Speaker 1>at the end of it. I felt pretty good.

0:54:17.280 --> 0:54:24.279
<v Speaker 2>So I'm a I'm a horrendous draw sketcher, painter. What

0:54:24.320 --> 0:54:27.879
<v Speaker 2>would be the most basic, easy piece of advice for

0:54:27.920 --> 0:54:29.239
<v Speaker 2>somebody to get a little bit better?

0:54:31.760 --> 0:54:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh, I think you've got to understand perspective, I think really,

0:54:38.320 --> 0:54:40.000
<v Speaker 1>So you mean, like to draw a picture of a

0:54:40.000 --> 0:54:42.080
<v Speaker 1>hole as it looks like if you're standing out on

0:54:42.080 --> 0:54:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the golf course.

0:54:42.960 --> 0:54:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, Like if I wanted a draw hole. I'm horrible.

0:54:47.760 --> 0:54:51.080
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I'm a thirty handicap asking for a

0:54:51.120 --> 0:54:53.400
<v Speaker 2>tip on the range before a round right now.

0:54:55.840 --> 0:55:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it's it's really getting a photo if

0:55:04.040 --> 0:55:07.759
<v Speaker 1>you just got a photo of a golf hole of

0:55:08.080 --> 0:55:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the green and the bunkers and just kind of just

0:55:09.960 --> 0:55:13.040
<v Speaker 1>forget all the detail, but just look at very simply

0:55:13.040 --> 0:55:16.600
<v Speaker 1>where the flag sits the green, and just the rough

0:55:16.640 --> 0:55:19.440
<v Speaker 1>shape of the bunker and how the how perspective works.

0:55:19.480 --> 0:55:22.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's things that are closer or bigger, and

0:55:23.000 --> 0:55:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you know further away are smaller. Just having an understanding

0:55:26.520 --> 0:55:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of that would be very helpful.

0:55:29.040 --> 0:55:31.920
<v Speaker 2>That actually makes sense because if I drew on I

0:55:31.960 --> 0:55:34.080
<v Speaker 2>would make them all the same size.

0:55:34.640 --> 0:55:38.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, and that sort of Yeah, you see people

0:55:39.400 --> 0:55:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and they don't kind of fill the page like you

0:55:41.000 --> 0:55:42.879
<v Speaker 1>see guys do a little sketch and it's this kind

0:55:42.880 --> 0:55:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of little bird scrawl in the middle or whatever over

0:55:45.480 --> 0:55:48.480
<v Speaker 1>on the edge. It's like, no, no, no, let's fill the page.

0:55:48.560 --> 0:55:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's see, you know, make the green. Just sort of

0:55:50.880 --> 0:55:52.920
<v Speaker 1>understanding the size of things, you know, how big a

0:55:52.920 --> 0:55:55.360
<v Speaker 1>flag is, how big a green is, how big a

0:55:55.400 --> 0:55:57.319
<v Speaker 1>person would be if it's standing on the green. Just

0:55:57.400 --> 0:56:01.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of understanding the sizes and the sky and just

0:56:01.040 --> 0:56:03.480
<v Speaker 1>how perspective works. That would you would go a long

0:56:03.520 --> 0:56:05.359
<v Speaker 1>way to improving your drawing. You don't have to worry

0:56:05.360 --> 0:56:09.120
<v Speaker 1>about I mean, even if you can't. You don't have

0:56:09.160 --> 0:56:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to be able to draw a lifelike people or life

0:56:11.960 --> 0:56:14.799
<v Speaker 1>like trees, but just a simple line drawing just to

0:56:14.880 --> 0:56:18.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of green and bunkers. It's so helpful. I mean,

0:56:19.080 --> 0:56:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that's where it's helpful I think in design is just

0:56:21.840 --> 0:56:23.879
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to be brilliant at it, but it's

0:56:24.000 --> 0:56:25.960
<v Speaker 1>very helpful to Like, if you're with someone on a

0:56:26.000 --> 0:56:30.360
<v Speaker 1>machine and you want them to build something that no

0:56:30.440 --> 0:56:32.960
<v Speaker 1>one looks in plan view, no one sort of really

0:56:33.040 --> 0:56:36.120
<v Speaker 1>understands if you draw something as though. It's because most

0:56:36.120 --> 0:56:38.400
<v Speaker 1>plans are all from the air, it's very hard for

0:56:38.440 --> 0:56:41.480
<v Speaker 1>people to understand how that translates to what's on the ground.

0:56:41.920 --> 0:56:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Whereas if you can just do a really simple drawing

0:56:44.840 --> 0:56:47.200
<v Speaker 1>in either in the dirt or on a bit of paper,

0:56:48.200 --> 0:56:50.200
<v Speaker 1>suddenly it all makes sense. You know, how high a

0:56:50.200 --> 0:56:52.240
<v Speaker 1>bunker lip's going to be, or the fact that, okay,

0:56:52.320 --> 0:56:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you can see the left half of the green but

0:56:54.040 --> 0:56:55.600
<v Speaker 1>not the right half of the ring because it's covered

0:56:55.600 --> 0:56:58.600
<v Speaker 1>by a bunker, or the bunker comes a third of

0:56:58.640 --> 0:57:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the way across the green, or you know those things

0:57:02.920 --> 0:57:05.919
<v Speaker 1>in a very simple sketch. Suddenly it's you can give

0:57:05.960 --> 0:57:09.920
<v Speaker 1>someone enough detail to spend the day building something that

0:57:10.000 --> 0:57:12.920
<v Speaker 1>means you can go off and do something else. That's

0:57:12.960 --> 0:57:13.880
<v Speaker 1>where it's really helpful.

0:57:14.719 --> 0:57:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that makes sense. It's uh, if you're just telling somebody,

0:57:18.680 --> 0:57:22.760
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna take your words and interpret them and their

0:57:22.840 --> 0:57:24.720
<v Speaker 2>head how they think that you want it.

0:57:25.960 --> 0:57:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, that's right. You know, we like to give

0:57:29.160 --> 0:57:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the guys a little license to be creative. But yeah,

0:57:32.080 --> 0:57:34.000
<v Speaker 1>if there's something that you really want, you know, we

0:57:34.040 --> 0:57:35.800
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure it's this or that. You know,

0:57:36.440 --> 0:57:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll do a little sketch and just sort of talk

0:57:38.560 --> 0:57:42.120
<v Speaker 1>through it and leave it with them.

0:57:42.160 --> 0:57:44.760
<v Speaker 2>So you ready for underrated? Overrated?

0:57:46.560 --> 0:57:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Sure, yep, go for it.

0:57:48.120 --> 0:57:56.600
<v Speaker 2>What everybody is waiting for, all right? Sand belt bunkering.

0:57:59.320 --> 0:58:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I would say it's underrated in the world of golf,

0:58:01.800 --> 0:58:07.280
<v Speaker 1>it's underrated, all right. I think that's I mean, here,

0:58:07.760 --> 0:58:15.440
<v Speaker 1>we see it all the time, but the shaping and

0:58:15.720 --> 0:58:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the way that the short grass works into the mets. Still,

0:58:19.080 --> 0:58:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I think there's still so many clubs could learn from

0:58:22.560 --> 0:58:23.400
<v Speaker 1>sand belt bunkering.

0:58:23.760 --> 0:58:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, just the mowing lines. Like even if you had

0:58:27.840 --> 0:58:30.480
<v Speaker 2>a little bit closer to that, it would.

0:58:30.280 --> 0:58:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Be yeah, yeah, yeah, you don't have to copy the

0:58:33.400 --> 0:58:36.840
<v Speaker 1>sand belt bunkers, but understand why they work. Well, I think, yeah,

0:58:36.920 --> 0:58:38.320
<v Speaker 1>totally underrated.

0:58:40.000 --> 0:58:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Kangaroos as an animal.

0:58:42.280 --> 0:58:51.800
<v Speaker 1>You underrated or overrated? Oh well, I don't know. Again, well,

0:58:53.040 --> 0:58:56.520
<v Speaker 1>probably overrated for us we see them, well they're not. Yeah,

0:58:56.520 --> 0:59:00.440
<v Speaker 1>we seem all the time, I guess. But think I

0:59:00.440 --> 0:59:02.600
<v Speaker 1>think the rest of the world probably wants to see

0:59:02.640 --> 0:59:05.800
<v Speaker 1>more kangaroos.

0:59:06.160 --> 0:59:08.640
<v Speaker 2>That is the easiest thing to spot, like a tourist,

0:59:09.320 --> 0:59:12.720
<v Speaker 2>seeing the way they react when they see a kangaroo right,

0:59:13.520 --> 0:59:15.120
<v Speaker 2>because they are point.

0:59:15.280 --> 0:59:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, if you think about it, they're a

0:59:17.680 --> 0:59:20.840
<v Speaker 1>really odd creature, like very strange, you know. I mean,

0:59:21.360 --> 0:59:24.439
<v Speaker 1>there's not really anything like them anywhere else in the world.

0:59:24.520 --> 0:59:25.240
<v Speaker 1>That guess.

0:59:26.280 --> 0:59:27.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean.

0:59:29.880 --> 0:59:34.640
<v Speaker 1>What I mean, they can be Yeah, they be too,

0:59:34.760 --> 0:59:36.600
<v Speaker 1>some of them. So there's a there's a there's a

0:59:36.640 --> 0:59:40.400
<v Speaker 1>gray kangaroo and a red kangaroo. The red kangaroos. You

0:59:40.440 --> 0:59:43.080
<v Speaker 1>see the grays down here in Sydney and Melbourne. The

0:59:43.080 --> 0:59:46.040
<v Speaker 1>red ones are in the outback and they are really

0:59:46.280 --> 0:59:48.440
<v Speaker 1>when they stand up on their back feet, they are tall,

0:59:48.800 --> 0:59:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and their their tail is so strong. You know, they

0:59:51.840 --> 0:59:55.680
<v Speaker 1>can kill like a dog, like whipping the dog and

0:59:55.720 --> 0:59:58.600
<v Speaker 1>then they'll claw at them, so they can be mean.

0:59:58.680 --> 1:00:02.120
<v Speaker 1>They're quite intimidating when you see when standing up on

1:00:02.200 --> 1:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it behind lakes. I've played golf tournaments before where you know,

1:00:07.040 --> 1:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you hit your ball need the kangaroos and you kind

1:00:09.000 --> 1:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of you don't really want to go in there and

1:00:10.280 --> 1:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>get it. So they're pretty intimidating.

1:00:13.440 --> 1:00:16.160
<v Speaker 2>They're kind of like the Australian swan.

1:00:18.200 --> 1:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I guess yes, one's a pretty Uh they

1:00:21.000 --> 1:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>can be I.

1:00:22.320 --> 1:00:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Think they can break your arm with their neck. Yeah,

1:00:25.440 --> 1:00:28.680
<v Speaker 2>oh really yeah, if they snapped their neck, they can

1:00:28.800 --> 1:00:32.840
<v Speaker 2>break a human arm. Wow. Yeah, of course. I grew

1:00:32.920 --> 1:00:35.800
<v Speaker 2>up Caddy and at had like the meanest swan in

1:00:35.840 --> 1:00:38.680
<v Speaker 2>the world in one of their pints, and like the

1:00:38.760 --> 1:00:41.960
<v Speaker 2>thing like you'd be walking like twenty yards away from

1:00:42.000 --> 1:00:44.600
<v Speaker 2>the water edge and the thing would be hissing at you.

1:00:44.800 --> 1:00:47.120
<v Speaker 2>It was you know, and then one kid broke his

1:00:47.280 --> 1:00:50.480
<v Speaker 2>arm from the swan and that swan was gone. So

1:00:53.160 --> 1:01:00.000
<v Speaker 2>let's get back on here. Overrated Underrated golf in Japan.

1:01:01.840 --> 1:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I've never played there. I would say overrated. I reckon

1:01:05.440 --> 1:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it's that Let me think about that, because there's a

1:01:13.560 --> 1:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>couple of great courses there I've always wanted to see,

1:01:16.640 --> 1:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>but that I think they're a long way from where

1:01:18.520 --> 1:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>they were from by all accounts, I'm going to say overrated.

1:01:23.160 --> 1:01:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Maybe a place that's right for restoration of the another

1:01:27.880 --> 1:01:28.920
<v Speaker 2>like Alison.

1:01:28.600 --> 1:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Did it good. So it's like, yeah, there's there's certainly

1:01:34.320 --> 1:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>three or four that you know, by all accounts, worth seeing,

1:01:37.720 --> 1:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>but they're just you can a bit like you know,

1:01:40.720 --> 1:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>perhaps like La Country Club was before the restoration. Yeah,

1:01:43.920 --> 1:01:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you can kind of tell the bones of a great

1:01:45.400 --> 1:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>course are there, but it's just needs a bit of

1:01:47.640 --> 1:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>work to get back.

1:01:48.560 --> 1:01:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Is there anywhere like in Asia, like or Southeast Asia

1:01:52.960 --> 1:01:56.880
<v Speaker 2>that's like got sandy soil that the world hasn't found

1:01:57.000 --> 1:01:57.800
<v Speaker 2>yet for golf.

1:02:00.200 --> 1:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure about Southeast I mean, well, actually East

1:02:04.520 --> 1:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the world's founded, but the east coast of Vietnam where

1:02:07.880 --> 1:02:10.920
<v Speaker 1>there's quite a few courses being built. There's some really

1:02:10.960 --> 1:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>good sand dunes there all the way out. Greg Norman's

1:02:13.720 --> 1:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>group did a course there, unbelievable sand dunes, huge ho tram.

1:02:21.040 --> 1:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>It's called home trend links, unbelievable site, beautiful site. So

1:02:25.840 --> 1:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>there are pockets. I mean we used to think twenty

1:02:28.000 --> 1:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>or thirty years ago, you know, you didn't necessarily think

1:02:31.600 --> 1:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of Asia as having all these great sites, but they do.

1:02:34.680 --> 1:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's some really good land through through Vietnam, China,

1:02:39.520 --> 1:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>there's some really good sites. So they're around absolutely, and

1:02:43.120 --> 1:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>there's some really good sites in Australia. It's just that

1:02:45.160 --> 1:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>we don't have the population too, you know, the build

1:02:50.280 --> 1:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>it and they will come kind of concept. Is it's

1:02:52.760 --> 1:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>hard here, you know, we just don't have the population

1:02:55.760 --> 1:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>base of America really to make it work. Yeah, but

1:03:01.240 --> 1:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>there's some Perths very This is some brilliant land in

1:03:04.480 --> 1:03:07.920
<v Speaker 1>perse up and down the coast where you can drive

1:03:08.080 --> 1:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>an hour up north of Perth and it is incredible

1:03:11.320 --> 1:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>land on the water, sandy ground, undulating, beautiful vegetation. But

1:03:16.960 --> 1:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>they built a number of years ago, they built a

1:03:18.600 --> 1:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>really good golf course over there, only forty minutes from person.

1:03:21.360 --> 1:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>No one goes there to play, so you can't convince

1:03:23.760 --> 1:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>them to go. Great so you could, you could build

1:03:26.880 --> 1:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a sand valley, but just trying to get the people

1:03:30.800 --> 1:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>there to be the challenge.

1:03:32.240 --> 1:03:34.840
<v Speaker 2>As a Chicago. I live in the City of Chicago.

1:03:34.880 --> 1:03:37.200
<v Speaker 2>It's like a minimum of forty minutes for me to

1:03:37.200 --> 1:03:40.160
<v Speaker 2>golf anywhere. And if I could put golf on as

1:03:40.680 --> 1:03:43.880
<v Speaker 2>a coast on Sandy on Sandy Ground, I'd be like

1:03:44.480 --> 1:03:46.040
<v Speaker 2>forty minutes done.

1:03:47.000 --> 1:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>So well. Yeah, and that's that's the challenge for those

1:03:50.360 --> 1:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>courses on King Island, you know, the two that were built.

1:03:52.880 --> 1:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>They're spectacular, but you've either got to get on a

1:03:56.400 --> 1:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>little plane to get there, which is not everyone's kind

1:03:59.160 --> 1:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of cup of tea. But yeah, and they time, the

1:04:06.560 --> 1:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>island's got fifteen hundred people on it, so there's not

1:04:09.760 --> 1:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>enough people on the island to play there to just

1:04:12.240 --> 1:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>keep it, you know, ticking along. So it's just hard,

1:04:17.960 --> 1:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, really hard for those isolated courses to get

1:04:20.240 --> 1:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the traffic.

1:04:21.640 --> 1:04:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean that's that's almost everywhere. But you know,

1:04:25.920 --> 1:04:29.840
<v Speaker 2>they also don't have like the big American budgets that

1:04:30.320 --> 1:04:33.080
<v Speaker 2>tell everybody that this is the greatest course ever before

1:04:33.120 --> 1:04:33.600
<v Speaker 2>it's open.

1:04:34.880 --> 1:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, that's true.

1:04:37.240 --> 1:04:41.959
<v Speaker 2>It's but Mike, thanks for coming on, and we'll look

1:04:42.040 --> 1:04:45.480
<v Speaker 2>forward to seeing more of your work in the future.

1:04:46.120 --> 1:04:50.360
<v Speaker 2>You're on Twitter and what is it at, Mike Cocking.

1:04:51.840 --> 1:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh my Twitter, Yeah, yeah, yeah, and.

1:04:54.280 --> 1:04:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Then you're are you on INSTAGRAMM golf one as well, Yeah,

1:04:58.560 --> 1:05:02.640
<v Speaker 2>o CCM Golf at OCCM golf, and then they're on Twitter.

1:05:03.520 --> 1:05:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Lots of great pictures of golf courses that make you

1:05:07.720 --> 1:05:08.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of drool.

1:05:09.440 --> 1:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, fantastic.

1:05:10.920 --> 1:05:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Look forward to seeing some of your work in the

1:05:12.560 --> 1:05:13.200
<v Speaker 2>near future.

1:05:14.120 --> 1:05:15.959
<v Speaker 1>Terrific. Thanks so much, Andy, Thanks Mike.

1:05:16.400 --> 1:05:19.640
<v Speaker 2>You've been listening to the fried Egg podcast. We do

1:05:19.760 --> 1:05:20.920
<v Speaker 2>the digging for you.