WEBVTT - Satya Nadella

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Hi everyone, I'm Emily Chang and this is Bloomberg Studio

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>one point Out. A year ago, the coronavirus pandemic started

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>creeping into the United States after taking a devastating toll

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>across the globe. The early US outbreak was centered in

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Washington State, just miles away from Microsoft's headquarters. There, CEO

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>sachan Adela made the call that a significant number of

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the company's one hundred sixty eight thousand employees could work

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>from home. Now, his focus is shifting to not just

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>keeping those employees safe, but keeping them engaged, with the

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>rise of Microsoft's chat product teams and a new offering

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>called Viva. All of this as Microsoft stock has continued

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to rise up more than five percent during his seven

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>years at the helm after languishing for more than a

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 1>decade under his predecessors Bill Gates and Steve Balmer. He

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>shared this key guidance with us three years ago on

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Studio one Point Oh. It's not about changing everything. It's

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>about changing what needs to be changed, and then in

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>lies the tricks to speed. Since then, Microsoft's market cap

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>has crossed one trillion dollars, now closing in on two

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars. But with big tech scrutiny ramping up in

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Washington and rising tech competition in China, Nadella's next seven

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>years at Microsoft will be just as critical. On this

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Studio one point oh, an exclusive interview

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>with Microsoft CEO Sacha Adela. Sacha, thank you so much

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:30.960
<v Speaker 1>for doing this. It's so great to have you. Thank

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you so much, Emily for having me. It's great to

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>be with you. The pandemic has underscored the power of

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>technology in helping companies and governments and families get through this,

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and Microsoft Teams has been a huge part of that

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and has been an incredible growth story. Give us a

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>snapshot of just how much Teams has grown through the pandemic.

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>As we talk a lot about remote work, but the

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>reality is more than fifty of the workforce, whether it

0:01:55.800 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>is in healthcare or in retail or critical manufacturing, to

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>be uh in the at the site. And so one

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of the things that really got upended across industries was

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>how do you connect people? So if you have someone

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>on the front lines and then an engineer perhaps working

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 1>from home, how do you connect So the team's growth

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>was not just about knowledge workers collaborating but it was

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>in fact really helping frontline workers and knowledge workers come

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>together to keep business continuity in our society and our

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>economy going. In fact, I shuddered to think even what

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the economic activity would have been, or what the state

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of services that we all you know, you know have

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>today would have been but for the state of today's

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:45.919
<v Speaker 1>technologies and that cloud architecture and teams clearly has been

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a massive growth story for us, But it's mostly because

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>of the context of the constraints and how to overcome them.

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Now you're onto what you believe will be your next

0:02:55.760 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>massive line of business employee experience. Tell us about your

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>newest product, Microsoft Fever. The thing that the pandemic has

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>put really shine the light on is how important the

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>experience for the employees is, right, I mean, when you're

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>remote in particular, you want to be staying engaged with

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 1>your business and your company and its sense of purpose

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and mission. You want to be able to collaborate, like

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>as I said, between the folks on the front lines,

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>when the knowledge workers, you want to be able to

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>actually start learning, saying, as a new employee, I joined,

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>how do I build that knowledge capital by learning from others?

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.119
<v Speaker 1>When I don't have some of the same social structures

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of the workplace. I need to be able to find

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>them online learn from them as well as the learning

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>content needs to be delivered more in the you know,

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the workflow tools I use every day. We've had to

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>introduce even things like virtual commutes and so on in

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>order to help people with transitions. So putting these things

0:03:56.160 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 1>all together, the employee engagement, learning, collaboration and well being

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>UH into one experience platform is what Viva is all about. UH.

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think that this represents a new category creation moment.

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>If you look at what we have, the journey we've

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 1>been on with Microsoft three six five. We started with

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>individual tools, it became a collaboration suite UH, and now

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>we think it's going to can really get into a

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>new space around employee experience more holistically thinking about productivity

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>not just narrowly as output, but all of learning and

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>well being and collaboration. So if you spend your whole

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>day in teams or word or outlook, are you putting

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 1>all of those in one place? Is that what that

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>would mean for the user? In fact, it's not that.

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>It's the exact opposite, which is to say, use the

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>tool that you're using for, for example, any of your

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:53.679
<v Speaker 1>communication needs or deep work needs. And then in the

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>context of that, let us bring in the other people

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to work with, the learning content that's going

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.919
<v Speaker 1>to make you more productive, the well being nudges you

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 1>need in order to make sure that you have the transition.

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's the main purpose of an employee experience is

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to not introduce one more new experience that you need

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to go to, but to bring an experience that you

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>need in the tools that you're using every day as

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>part of your work. Could this be your next ten

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar business? What's the total addressable market? I believe

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 1>with the XP is you know HR software is there,

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>or HCM or human capital management software is there. But

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>it's more about really tying what happens in the HR

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>or people operations to the entirety of the business right

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 1>whether it's in finance, whether it's in marketing, whether it's

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>in engineering. And so we think that this can be

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>like in the years to come, in the decades to come,

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about it like a CRM or an e

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>RP class category. You have been very outspoken about how

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>employee experience is suffering in the work from home environment,

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft teams data showing we're all take more meetings, more chats,

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>more ad hoc calls, more chats on the weekends as well.

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>What concerns you so much about working from home and

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 1>this remote work period as it drags on. I would

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 1>say my main thing is to not just have some

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>new dogma about any one type of work, right the

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>reality is everything in fact, coming out of this crisis

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:28.359
<v Speaker 1>perhaps or this pandemic, we're all going to recognize the

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>importance of flexibility. There is real reasons why people may

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>want to work from home, but it might be in

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.599
<v Speaker 1>different times and different you know, for different people. It

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>will be different by geography, it will be different by

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>business function, and so we need, at least from a

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>workplace policy perspective as well as the infrastructure and the

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 1>tooling perspective, build for that flexibility. So we cannot assume

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>remote everything for all time to come, or all things

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>have to happen only in the workplace. So I'm more

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 1>fall into the camp of let's make sure that we

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>have built in to both the policies and the infrastructure

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and the tools maximum flexibility, because none of us, I

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>think we'll want to be constrained anymore, whether it's by

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the place or the time or the location. Even what's

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>been the hardest part of work from home for you

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>personally as a leader trying to run this company. I

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>think for me it's been you know, the social capital

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that gets built, uh, you know in so many different

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>ways when you're able to see the body language, you're

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>able to learn from the accused people by watching people, uh,

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and some of that social capital is hard to create.

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes meetings can become very transactional. So to me that's

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>probably been the hardest. I'm not saying but that that

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>therefore we should sort of think that somehow remote work

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>is inferior. As I said, there are times when you

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>remote work can be very productive. But at the same time,

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to bring in more innovation, like

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>together more than others to start even bridging the social

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>capital creation capabilities. Do you think work from home could

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>be stifling innovation? Is its stifling innovation? In fact, we're studying,

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>We're collecting a lot of data, and the reality is,

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>let's take our game studios right. The one place where

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>we've seen some challenges is that the game studios do

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>have a tough time in work from home, to be

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>able to bring people together, to in fact collaborate, in

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>fact watch other gamers to get the inspiration to create

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>new content. So clearly there are some places where the

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>innovation does take a hit. But at the same time,

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>when I look at what's happening with some of the

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>data around GitHub, it's fascinating to see how the world

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>has come together, even more so in the open source side,

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to create critical software for very and innovate together. So

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say there's just one answer. So if anything

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking away is every there needs to be some

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 1>structural change. Perhaps wherever there has been an impediment to

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>creativity or innovation, one has to go back and ask

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>what is that structural change that will allow us, Quite frankly,

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the next time there's another tail event and we have

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to work remotely or with other constraints, how can we

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>continue to innovate. So I think that all the solution

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>for every function and every industry is not there today,

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 1>but I think there will be. This is my conversation

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>with Microsoft CEO such An Adela. Up next with big

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>tech facing new scrutiny from the US government, is it

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>deja vu for Microsoft, having been through it before, during

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>what some call It's Lost decade and deep platforming. The

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>president should companies like Facebook and Twitter have the power

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to say whose voices we can and cannot here. I'm

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Emily Chang, this is Bloomberg Studio. At one point out

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>it's been seven years almost to the day as we

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>take this that you took over as CEO, and since

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>then the stock has soared over after languishing for more

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>than a decade across a one trillion dollar market cap.

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>If you could pick one thing, what do you think

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.839
<v Speaker 1>is the single most important thing that you did, right,

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>It's actually stunning to me that seven years have passed. Um,

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>if I had to sort of you know, having grown

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>up at Microsoft, perhaps even on day one when I started,

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>of course there is a completely new job right now,

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.559
<v Speaker 1>recognize that, you know, the responsibility of being a CEO

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>is different, even that from one step removed. But I

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>came at it, I think, Emily, from that sense of

0:10:55.960 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>pride in what this company represented for you know, in

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the world. I always felt that I joined Microsoft because

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of its mission, so reinforcing perhaps that mission sense of

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>purpose and then having this culture of being the learn

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it alls has probably been the most important thing because

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>they're they're very talented people. The opportunity, whether it was

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>cloud or other technologies, was clear. And I think in

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>any company, you know, you have to go back to

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the very basics of why do you exist? And if

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't exist, would anybody miss you? Being able to

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>ask those questions and answer those questions and having a

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>culture that even allows you to really honestly answer those

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>questions is the most important thing. And uh and as

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>an insider at Microsoft, I always felt that and so

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that is hot I started with. And that's how do

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I started even my seventh year. What advice would this

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>such an adela give that such an adela seven years ago?

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the thing that perhaps was the steepest learning

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>curve for me um as CEO was understanding what does

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:13.439
<v Speaker 1>it mean to have multiple constituents? Right? I mean people

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about it's about customers, it's about employees, it's about investors,

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>it's about other stakeholders. And today, of course multi stakeholder

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>capitalism is the topic that everybody is talking about. But

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>understanding what as a CEO, what does that mean? How

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 1>do you really grapple with it? And it can't be

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>something that I will divide my week into multiple stakeholders

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 1>right in equal quantities. It's about harmonizing that into the

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>core of your business model as well as your operations

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of as a business. That's probably been the thing that

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I would say, having a framework for it. I feel

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 1>fantastic about the work the entire team at Microsoft is

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>done around it right, because you need to have a

0:12:56.920 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>business model fundamentally where when you do well, the world

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 1>around you is doing well. If that is broken, it's

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 1>very hard to fix even if you have business performance.

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>But if the world around you, because of your business

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>performance is not doing well, that's a social contract that

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you cannot be put back together. So I would say

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that's the advice I would give any CEO is to ask,

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it's something that it's also got to

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>be managed every day. It's not something you take for granted.

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 1>Now you're now on your third administration US presidential administration

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>as CEO of Microsoft. If there was one thing you

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:35.079
<v Speaker 1>want this administration to do that would make a difference

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>for Microsoft, what would it be? I think, for quite frankly,

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>for this administration and the last administration. Right now, the

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>most important thing is how do we get past this

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 1>pandemic because even as we speak, if you think about

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the big challenges we have around even the

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>core logistics of delivering the vaccines, the vaccine supply chain.

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>So I feel the price of its sector needs to

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>do its job and do its super well. We have

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>many capabilities, but even the government needs to do its job.

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's really I think, if anything, we've all come

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>to recognize the strength in our institutions in the private

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>sector and in the public sector, and how they all

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>both need to be coordinated and stitched together. And quite frankly,

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>governments are the most capable coordinating agencies we have. Uh,

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>And we just need that and more of that going forward.

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>The power of big tech is being scrutinized by regulators

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>around the world, lawmakers around the world, and regular people

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>around the world. What do you think it is that

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the tech industry is doing wrong that makes so many

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>people wonder? Are they too big, too powerful and abusing

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that power? I'll say a couple of things. Big by

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>itself is not bad, but competition is good. Uh. And

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>more importantly, it's not just competition, but it's that point

0:14:57.200 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I made earlier, which is you need to have a

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>big in this model um that really is aligned with

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the world doing well. I think that's what's being litigated right,

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>which is there are certain categories of products where the

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>unintended consequences of the growth on that category or lack

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of competition in it creates issues. And so that's what

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I think people are all looking at and saying, hey,

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>what's the fixed for that? But I don't think big

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>by itself is bad or but competition is good. And

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>every business, in particular the businesses that are large and

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>have high scale, the unintended consequences of your scale cannot

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>be dealt after the fact. They need to be dealt

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>while you're scaling. So when it comes to the d

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 1>platforming of President Trump, for example, should a Facebook or

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a Twitter or Google or YouTube or Twitch have the

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>power to say who we can and cannot hear from

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and if not, who should? Yeah, I mean this is

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>another one of those places where I think unilateral action

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>by individual companies in democracy is like ours is just

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>not I think long term stable, we do need to

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to have framework of laws and norms which

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>are societal norms around even internet safety. Uh, and what

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>is the public square that really is in alignment with

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a thriving democracy. So we just need to get to

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>a stable state, uh in that because otherwise, depending on

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>any one individual CEO in any one of these companies

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to make calls that are going to really help us

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>maintain something as sacred and as important as our democracy

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>in the long run is just no way at least I,

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>as a citizen would advocate for now. Slack has alleged

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that Microsoft combining teams into offices anti competitive. Um, what's

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>your response to that? How does the landscape change now

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that slack has been bought by Salesforce and as part

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of this bigger entity. I think both Slack and Salesforce

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>have been successful. For example, I always point out that

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>when we think about what they were able to do,

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I always ask the question would slack away even existed

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:07.880
<v Speaker 1>if it was not for the free access they had

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>on top of say, the Windows platform. They didn't have

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to call Microsoft, they didn't have to go through any

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:15.719
<v Speaker 1>of our app stores, they didn't have need any uh

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, off our permission. Compared to any of the

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>other platforms that they're available on, we perhaps provide the

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>most open platform and Windows and even on Office five.

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>You can, in fact use all of the APIs that

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 1>we expose, integrate with any application, and people use it.

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 1>If you look at even the usage reports, this slack

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 1>usage and Microsoft three five years, it's so and same

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>thing with Salesforce. So the fact that they're combining will

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 1>compete with them, and they will also cooperate with them

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and provide them access to our platforms. And I think

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>they should measure it by what type of success they've

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:53.360
<v Speaker 1>had on top of our platform. You worked at Microsoft

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>through its own antitrust battles, You remember what that was like.

0:17:56.359 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>It's been called the Lost Decade if you will. What

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>cultural risks do you believe these companies face, even if

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>they're not broken up. What's happening on the inside as

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>these investigations play out. I don't know if there are

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 1>real parallels between what happened with Microsoft and any of them,

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>but I would say I think the core, as I

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>always go back, is you know, if you have a

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>business and a business model where when you are doing

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>well around you, people are doing well, uh, and that

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>is something that your own employees feel, then I think

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>things will work out culturally. When that is not true,

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 1>I think It's very, very hard because one of the

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>things I feel is, as somebody said, you've got to

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>keep it simple. What do you say, what you do,

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 1>and what you think all needs to be consistent. You

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>can't sort of have a real distance between those three things.

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's what at least would be my advice and

0:18:51.960 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to anybody in starting with ourselves. You're listening my conversation

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>with such An Adela, CEO of Microsoft, Remember Microsoft trying

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to buy TikTok. Nidela tells us why, and we talk

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 1>about Microsoft's future in self driving cars and what the

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>CEO's next seven years will hold. I'm Emily Chang, this

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Studio. At one point out stay with us.

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>What are your biggest concerns about a rising tech industry

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in China. I think that first of all, there is

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>no God given right for the say US tech companies

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to take for granted that they cannot be other tech

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 1>powers and text fears. So, if anything, rising competition in

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>the world, whether it's from Europe, whether it's from China

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 1>or the rest of Asia, is some thing that I

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>think all of us, even quote and quote in the

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>West Coast of the United States, need to be more

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>grounded in because sometimes I think we celebrate our own

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:12.479
<v Speaker 1>advances far too much, and we should be more looking

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 1>to saying what's happening in the world and how relevant

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>is our technology in the world. So from that perspective,

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm a more big believer that the world does better

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>when there is real competition across the globe and there

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>is more technology that then is diffused throughout that said,

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 1>national security concerns are real concerns, uh, and that's for

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>nation states to really, you know, legislate on. But I

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>think for private companies like ours, we should be thinking

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>about how how good is our technology, how useful is

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>our technology around the world, and welcome competition wherever it's

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 1>coming from. Microsoft tried to buy TikTok and it didn't happen.

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Why did you want to buy TikTok? You know, it's

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's I think TikTok has achieved a lot

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of success in being able to take take a new

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>media format like short form video and create a very

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting property. Here. We had a very crisp vision or

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>for what we would want to do with it, uh,

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and including for example, addressing some of the very real

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>concerns around national security, But that was the last summer

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and we moved on. Would you be interested in other

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:23.919
<v Speaker 1>social media properties today have emily, whether it's Minecraft or

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Xbox Live or LinkedIn or even get up because it

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>is you know, one of the things perhaps that's not

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>as well understood in the world is we do have

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>some very high scale, proper communities and properties like that

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>that we are engaged in making sure. For example, what

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:42.439
<v Speaker 1>does internet safety look like, how does the quality of

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the dialogue on the LinkedIn platform, what's moderation on Xbox

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Live look like? How can we even think about GitHub

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and making sure that that community is thriving. So to me,

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm very very focused on the properties we have, scaling

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>them and scaling them with these unintended consequences, in particular

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 1>around internet safety. Microsoft is now teaming up with GM

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and Cruise to commercialize self driving cars. You know, talk

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to us a little bit more about what we'll see

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>here in terms of Microsoft's mobility play. It's actually an

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting combination or GM that is an incumbent and Cruise

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that is a new entrant, both relying and depending on

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft cloud computing technology to build their own computing platforms,

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we want to replicate quite frankly broadly

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>in the auto industry as well as in other industries,

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 1>because we think that the model that at least I

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>have is that this is not about one wordically integrated

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>company called Microsoft. It's about digital technology being much more

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>evenly spread across every tech industry. I mean, every industry

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 1>becoming more like a digital tech industry. And that's what

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>we are intend to do. Even with these partners, we're

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing a huge pushback against the establishment and centralized power.

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 1>Was it whether it is the capital riot or individual

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 1>investors driving up the price of game stoff, or the

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:14.439
<v Speaker 1>unionization of tech employees. Do you see it as a

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>fundamental shift in power from institutions to individuals? And how

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>will these trends inform your next seven years as the

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Microsoft. It's a great it's a great question, Emily,

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you know, sort of in some sense,

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm still learning what this shift looks like. But I

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>would say the core principle of institutions and institutional strength

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that fundamentally distributes power is a good thing. It's that's

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of what democracies were all about. I mean, Fundamentally,

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>democracies were about institutions that actually distributed power. So any

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>institution that centralizes power will have more challenges in the

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>long run because they won't be as resilient as distributed powers.

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>So from that principal perspective, I think that we can

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>take perhaps a lot of hope from what's happening, but

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll also have to watch how this plays out so

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that we really make sure that now we don't swing

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>from one to the other only to sort of recognize

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that there needs to be more thought given to how

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 1>we transform such an Adella, CEO of Microsoft, thank you

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:27.400
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us on this edition of Bloomberg Studio.

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>At one point, now, thank you so much, Emily, Bloomberg

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:36.919
<v Speaker 1>Studio at one point. I was produced and edited by

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Hines. Our executive producers Alison Weiss Are. Managing editor

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 1>is Daniel Culperson, with production assistance from Mallory Abelhouse and

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>editing assistance from Brian Carter gainor I'm Emily changing your

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>host and executive producer. This is Bloomberg