1
00:00:04,400 --> 00:00:07,800
Speaker 1: Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

2
00:00:12,119 --> 00:00:14,920
Speaker 1: Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

3
00:00:15,080 --> 00:00:18,560
Speaker 1: Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

4
00:00:18,720 --> 00:00:20,840
Speaker 1: and I love all things tech, and it's time for

5
00:00:20,880 --> 00:00:25,680
Speaker 1: the tech News for Thursday, October twenty one, twenty one.

6
00:00:26,079 --> 00:00:29,760
Speaker 1: Recording late today because it was a pretty hectic day.

7
00:00:30,040 --> 00:00:33,240
Speaker 1: I actually can see Tari from where I'm sitting right

8
00:00:33,280 --> 00:00:37,519
Speaker 1: now because once again I'm actually in the office in

9
00:00:37,560 --> 00:00:41,400
Speaker 1: the studio using my own mic. But I'm in the studio,

10
00:00:41,880 --> 00:00:44,000
Speaker 1: and so if it sounds a little different, that's why.

11
00:00:44,159 --> 00:00:47,680
Speaker 1: But let's get to the news. Yesterday's episode was about

12
00:00:47,760 --> 00:00:52,120
Speaker 1: the metaverse and what that means. The idea for that

13
00:00:52,159 --> 00:00:55,920
Speaker 1: episode actually came from the first news item I want

14
00:00:55,960 --> 00:00:59,960
Speaker 1: to cover today, which is that Facebook, the company, plans

15
00:01:00,040 --> 00:01:03,880
Speaker 1: to announce a rebrand for the company itself. Now, this

16
00:01:03,920 --> 00:01:08,039
Speaker 1: doesn't mean that Facebook, the social networking site is going

17
00:01:08,120 --> 00:01:13,200
Speaker 1: to change names. The company that owns Facebook the social

18
00:01:13,360 --> 00:01:19,480
Speaker 1: network site, as well as Instagram, WhatsApp, Messenger, and Oculus,

19
00:01:20,080 --> 00:01:22,920
Speaker 1: is going to get a new brand name. The Verge

20
00:01:22,920 --> 00:01:25,840
Speaker 1: reports that we should expect an announcement about the new

21
00:01:25,920 --> 00:01:29,679
Speaker 1: name no later than next week and possibly sooner than that,

22
00:01:30,400 --> 00:01:34,280
Speaker 1: but that the brand name itself remains a secret kept

23
00:01:34,360 --> 00:01:37,200
Speaker 1: only by a few top level executives, which is probably,

24
00:01:38,120 --> 00:01:40,720
Speaker 1: you know, a good idea on Facebook's behalf, considering how

25
00:01:40,720 --> 00:01:45,280
Speaker 1: many leaks that company has sprung. Now, this hasn't stopped

26
00:01:45,319 --> 00:01:49,040
Speaker 1: speculation about what that name might be, something that perhaps

27
00:01:49,080 --> 00:01:53,520
Speaker 1: because Facebook is gearing up to create a metaverse platform,

28
00:01:53,560 --> 00:01:57,120
Speaker 1: that the new name might relate to that. For example,

29
00:01:57,200 --> 00:02:01,560
Speaker 1: Facebook might adopt the company name Horizon, which references a

30
00:02:01,680 --> 00:02:06,480
Speaker 1: sort of proto metaverse that Facebook has in development. But

31
00:02:07,120 --> 00:02:09,760
Speaker 1: you might ask, why is Facebook even making this change

32
00:02:09,760 --> 00:02:12,040
Speaker 1: in the first place. Well, in part it might be

33
00:02:12,120 --> 00:02:16,240
Speaker 1: to indicate that the company is about more than just Facebook,

34
00:02:16,400 --> 00:02:19,200
Speaker 1: the social network. But I think another big part of

35
00:02:19,200 --> 00:02:22,840
Speaker 1: it is that the Facebook brand has more than a

36
00:02:22,880 --> 00:02:26,520
Speaker 1: little tarnish on it right now, with various investigations into

37
00:02:26,520 --> 00:02:31,079
Speaker 1: the company proceeding around the world and employees speaking out

38
00:02:31,120 --> 00:02:34,079
Speaker 1: against the company. I'm sure that by this time next

39
00:02:34,160 --> 00:02:37,120
Speaker 1: week I'll be reporting on whatever the new name is,

40
00:02:37,600 --> 00:02:40,160
Speaker 1: along with you know, whatever else the company has to

41
00:02:40,160 --> 00:02:44,880
Speaker 1: announce around that time. Speaking of tarnish on Facebook, yesterday,

42
00:02:45,000 --> 00:02:49,920
Speaker 1: the Attorney General for Washington, D C. Carl Racing announced

43
00:02:49,919 --> 00:02:53,799
Speaker 1: that he was adding Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to a

44
00:02:53,880 --> 00:02:58,480
Speaker 1: lawsuit that centers on the Cambridge Analytica scandal. Now, in

45
00:02:58,560 --> 00:03:02,200
Speaker 1: case you aren't familiar with what that is, that scandal

46
00:03:02,280 --> 00:03:07,360
Speaker 1: relates to this analytics marketing company called Cambridge Analytica that

47
00:03:07,560 --> 00:03:12,360
Speaker 1: focused on providing support for political campaigns, particularly for for

48
00:03:12,520 --> 00:03:18,400
Speaker 1: right wing political campaigns. Investigative journalists discovered that Cambridge Analytica

49
00:03:18,680 --> 00:03:22,640
Speaker 1: was apparently depending upon a loophole that was in Facebook's

50
00:03:22,639 --> 00:03:27,040
Speaker 1: application programming interface. Once upon a time, UH, the company

51
00:03:27,080 --> 00:03:30,880
Speaker 1: developed a survey tool. Actually, they adapted a survey tool

52
00:03:31,480 --> 00:03:34,640
Speaker 1: that encouraged people to engage in the survey in return

53
00:03:34,760 --> 00:03:39,240
Speaker 1: for you know, like a monetary reward. But this loophole

54
00:03:39,280 --> 00:03:42,680
Speaker 1: in the development part of the a p I allowed

55
00:03:42,680 --> 00:03:45,560
Speaker 1: the app developer to see not only the personal information

56
00:03:45,680 --> 00:03:48,600
Speaker 1: of whomever it was who took the survey, but also

57
00:03:48,760 --> 00:03:52,400
Speaker 1: access the information of all of that person's contacts on Facebook,

58
00:03:52,440 --> 00:03:56,440
Speaker 1: at least so far as those users had shared with

59
00:03:56,480 --> 00:03:59,280
Speaker 1: the survey taker. So let me explain what that means.

60
00:03:59,680 --> 00:04:02,720
Speaker 1: Let's say that I decided to take this survey, so

61
00:04:02,960 --> 00:04:08,080
Speaker 1: I go and I granted the permissions that it was requesting,

62
00:04:08,440 --> 00:04:10,880
Speaker 1: and I go take the survey, and you and I

63
00:04:11,000 --> 00:04:15,840
Speaker 1: happened to be friends. Well, normally Cambridge Analytica wouldn't be

64
00:04:15,880 --> 00:04:19,400
Speaker 1: able to see your information just by default, especially if

65
00:04:19,400 --> 00:04:23,160
Speaker 1: you had anything set to friends only. But because you're

66
00:04:23,200 --> 00:04:27,599
Speaker 1: friends with me, and because the app had these wide,

67
00:04:27,720 --> 00:04:32,599
Speaker 1: widespread permissions that allowed it to access various pieces of information,

68
00:04:32,960 --> 00:04:34,880
Speaker 1: it would mean that Cambridge Analytica would be able to

69
00:04:34,880 --> 00:04:37,760
Speaker 1: see just as much of your information as you allowed

70
00:04:37,960 --> 00:04:41,960
Speaker 1: me to see. Facebook subsequently patched that loophole, but the

71
00:04:42,040 --> 00:04:45,880
Speaker 1: damage was already done. Meanwhile, Cambridge Analytica was also implicated

72
00:04:45,880 --> 00:04:51,160
Speaker 1: in various schemes to spread misinformation and to manipulate voters. Uh,

73
00:04:51,279 --> 00:04:54,840
Speaker 1: there was this whole story about Cambridge Analytica targeting people

74
00:04:55,080 --> 00:04:59,840
Speaker 1: who didn't support Cambridge analyticas clients, in other words, people

75
00:04:59,839 --> 00:05:03,560
Speaker 1: who would have voted against the political candidates that Cambridge

76
00:05:03,560 --> 00:05:07,120
Speaker 1: Analytica was trying to help, and then Cambridge Analytica was

77
00:05:07,400 --> 00:05:10,800
Speaker 1: using methods to try and discourage those people from voting

78
00:05:10,800 --> 00:05:13,719
Speaker 1: at all. Now, all of this happened several years ago,

79
00:05:14,040 --> 00:05:17,480
Speaker 1: actually leading up to the election in the United States.

80
00:05:17,839 --> 00:05:22,400
Speaker 1: The lawsuit itself has its origins in the government charges

81
00:05:22,440 --> 00:05:26,200
Speaker 1: that Facebook violated the terms of the Consumer Protection Procedures

82
00:05:26,240 --> 00:05:29,040
Speaker 1: Act and it should be held accountable with the goal

83
00:05:29,160 --> 00:05:32,640
Speaker 1: of finding Facebook for damages. This, by the way, is

84
00:05:32,680 --> 00:05:36,520
Speaker 1: a civil case, not a criminal case. Facebook tried to

85
00:05:36,520 --> 00:05:39,920
Speaker 1: get this lawsuit dismissed in twenty nineteen, but that effort failed.

86
00:05:40,040 --> 00:05:43,520
Speaker 1: The judge denied the request, and now Zuckerberg has been

87
00:05:43,600 --> 00:05:47,000
Speaker 1: named as a defendant in the case. The company continues

88
00:05:47,040 --> 00:05:49,440
Speaker 1: to deny the charges, so we'll have to wait and

89
00:05:49,480 --> 00:05:53,640
Speaker 1: see where this goes next. Now. I promised that we

90
00:05:53,680 --> 00:05:57,840
Speaker 1: are going to talk about stuff that isn't just Facebook

91
00:05:58,080 --> 00:06:02,599
Speaker 1: in today's episode. However, news about Facebook keeps breaking even

92
00:06:02,680 --> 00:06:05,640
Speaker 1: as I was trying to put this episode together. Today,

93
00:06:05,960 --> 00:06:09,400
Speaker 1: Facebook's oversight panel announced that it is looking into an

94
00:06:09,440 --> 00:06:13,320
Speaker 1: alleged system in which Facebook gives a free pass to

95
00:06:13,480 --> 00:06:18,880
Speaker 1: certain v I p UH Facebook accounts. So the implication

96
00:06:19,000 --> 00:06:23,200
Speaker 1: is that Facebook ignores incidents in which these accounts violate

97
00:06:23,320 --> 00:06:27,520
Speaker 1: various policies. This investigation follows the series of Wall Street

98
00:06:27,560 --> 00:06:30,400
Speaker 1: Journal reports that revealed the contents of some of the

99
00:06:30,520 --> 00:06:35,000
Speaker 1: thousands of documents that the newspaper received from whistleblower Francis Hogan.

100
00:06:35,440 --> 00:06:38,400
Speaker 1: The You Know Facebook has a system that they call

101
00:06:38,560 --> 00:06:41,880
Speaker 1: cross check or sometimes x check. It's sometimes written as

102
00:06:42,000 --> 00:06:44,359
Speaker 1: x x check, but I think they refer to it

103
00:06:44,400 --> 00:06:47,440
Speaker 1: as cross check. And according to the Wall Street Journal,

104
00:06:47,600 --> 00:06:54,080
Speaker 1: this system essentially covers for high profile accounts and and

105
00:06:54,400 --> 00:06:59,160
Speaker 1: doesn't count violations of Facebook policy against those accounts. So

106
00:06:59,200 --> 00:07:01,360
Speaker 1: the Oversight bore It has stated that, you know, it

107
00:07:01,400 --> 00:07:05,839
Speaker 1: has the responsibility to review Facebook's moderation policies. Like the

108
00:07:05,880 --> 00:07:09,039
Speaker 1: whole purpose that the Oversight Board was put together was

109
00:07:09,120 --> 00:07:12,720
Speaker 1: to hold Facebook accountable and to say, all right, what

110
00:07:12,840 --> 00:07:16,280
Speaker 1: are your policies, Are they fair and are you actually

111
00:07:16,920 --> 00:07:22,000
Speaker 1: carrying them out equitably across the platform? And they're saying

112
00:07:22,040 --> 00:07:27,520
Speaker 1: Facebook has failed to share all the information needed for

113
00:07:27,600 --> 00:07:30,760
Speaker 1: the Oversight Board to make that assessment, which you know,

114
00:07:31,160 --> 00:07:35,520
Speaker 1: that's a problem. So this seems fairly straight forward. We

115
00:07:35,560 --> 00:07:39,360
Speaker 1: will have to wait and see what Facebook's response is

116
00:07:39,480 --> 00:07:44,840
Speaker 1: to it. However, security company Sofoss reports that scammers using

117
00:07:44,920 --> 00:07:49,960
Speaker 1: social engineering have stolen more than a million dollars from victims,

118
00:07:50,080 --> 00:07:54,320
Speaker 1: using a combination of dating apps and bogus cryptocurrency apps

119
00:07:54,440 --> 00:07:58,600
Speaker 1: to do it, Apple apps, I should add, so first

120
00:07:58,640 --> 00:08:03,040
Speaker 1: let's define what social engineering is. Essentially, this is when

121
00:08:03,040 --> 00:08:05,400
Speaker 1: you try and pull a fast one on someone, you're

122
00:08:05,440 --> 00:08:08,560
Speaker 1: tricking someone into trusting you and then you know, giving

123
00:08:08,600 --> 00:08:12,360
Speaker 1: you access to a system or information. So the classic

124
00:08:12,440 --> 00:08:16,640
Speaker 1: example is someone contacts a person who works for a

125
00:08:16,640 --> 00:08:20,360
Speaker 1: specific company and they pose as I T personnel and

126
00:08:20,400 --> 00:08:22,720
Speaker 1: they say, I need to have access to your computer.

127
00:08:23,000 --> 00:08:25,720
Speaker 1: I need to install, you know, a new program or something.

128
00:08:25,760 --> 00:08:29,280
Speaker 1: But the whole point is just to gain access to

129
00:08:29,440 --> 00:08:32,240
Speaker 1: the system. Well, in this case, the scammers were using

130
00:08:32,280 --> 00:08:35,560
Speaker 1: popular dating apps like Tender and Bumble to set up

131
00:08:35,600 --> 00:08:41,439
Speaker 1: profiles that looked legit and then fish for victims. Once

132
00:08:41,600 --> 00:08:44,880
Speaker 1: someone expressed interest, the scammers would kind of string the

133
00:08:44,920 --> 00:08:47,760
Speaker 1: mark along for a little bit, trying to convince them

134
00:08:47,760 --> 00:08:52,320
Speaker 1: to download a cryptocurrency app that looked legit but was

135
00:08:52,360 --> 00:08:55,240
Speaker 1: actually a scam. Uh. In fact, these were apps that

136
00:08:55,280 --> 00:09:01,120
Speaker 1: made it through Apple's famous restrictive ecosyste for apps. By

137
00:09:01,200 --> 00:09:05,120
Speaker 1: using a loophole, the scammers would convince their marks to

138
00:09:05,200 --> 00:09:08,559
Speaker 1: invest money, even just small amounts of money into the app,

139
00:09:08,679 --> 00:09:12,440
Speaker 1: supposedly buying into cryptocurrency, and as long as the target

140
00:09:12,880 --> 00:09:16,640
Speaker 1: was investing money, everything was cool. But the moment someone

141
00:09:16,720 --> 00:09:20,000
Speaker 1: tried to retrieve their money or otherwise shut down their account.

142
00:09:20,320 --> 00:09:23,440
Speaker 1: The scammers would close off access to the money that

143
00:09:23,520 --> 00:09:26,320
Speaker 1: had been quote unquote invested in the app and just

144
00:09:26,400 --> 00:09:30,200
Speaker 1: steal the money for themselves. Worse, the scammers use something

145
00:09:30,240 --> 00:09:35,440
Speaker 1: called Apple's Enterprise or Corporate Signature designation that's intended to

146
00:09:35,520 --> 00:09:39,160
Speaker 1: let app developers test out apps with a small group

147
00:09:39,200 --> 00:09:43,320
Speaker 1: of test users in the development process. The whole idea

148
00:09:43,320 --> 00:09:46,480
Speaker 1: is it gives developers a way of doing quality assurance

149
00:09:46,480 --> 00:09:50,280
Speaker 1: testing of their apps before they submit the app to

150
00:09:50,360 --> 00:09:53,960
Speaker 1: the Apple App Store for consideration. So these apps never

151
00:09:54,000 --> 00:09:56,160
Speaker 1: went into the Apple App Store, they never had to

152
00:09:56,160 --> 00:09:59,280
Speaker 1: face that scrutiny. They were taking advantage of the fact

153
00:09:59,360 --> 00:10:04,679
Speaker 1: that Apple allows developers to test their work before submitting it. So,

154
00:10:04,720 --> 00:10:07,559
Speaker 1: in other words, you know, they were just using a

155
00:10:07,640 --> 00:10:11,520
Speaker 1: work around and convincing people to download apps not by

156
00:10:11,559 --> 00:10:14,200
Speaker 1: going through the App Store, but downing them directly through

157
00:10:14,240 --> 00:10:19,520
Speaker 1: this enterprise or corporate program, then tricking them into investing

158
00:10:19,559 --> 00:10:24,560
Speaker 1: money into these you know, cryptocurrency schemes um so very

159
00:10:24,559 --> 00:10:29,199
Speaker 1: clever work around one that's not necessarily easy to counteract.

160
00:10:29,559 --> 00:10:32,920
Speaker 1: This particular scheme originated out of Asia, but so FOS

161
00:10:32,960 --> 00:10:35,760
Speaker 1: says that it has detected victims in places like Europe

162
00:10:35,760 --> 00:10:39,240
Speaker 1: and the United States. So if you use dating apps,

163
00:10:39,679 --> 00:10:42,120
Speaker 1: be on the look for any matches who are urging

164
00:10:42,160 --> 00:10:46,720
Speaker 1: you to download cryptocurrency apps and make investments. So FoST

165
00:10:47,200 --> 00:10:50,520
Speaker 1: has also called an Apple to alert users about this

166
00:10:50,760 --> 00:10:54,920
Speaker 1: enterprise program and how a bad actor could potentially use

167
00:10:54,960 --> 00:10:57,800
Speaker 1: that to convince folks to install apps that haven't actually

168
00:10:57,800 --> 00:11:02,719
Speaker 1: gone through Apple's review process. Like the fact that loophole exists,

169
00:11:02,840 --> 00:11:05,520
Speaker 1: I mean it's needed, Like you need to have a

170
00:11:05,520 --> 00:11:08,360
Speaker 1: way to test your your app before you submit it

171
00:11:08,400 --> 00:11:10,000
Speaker 1: so that you can make sure you work out any

172
00:11:10,040 --> 00:11:13,520
Speaker 1: bugs before Apple gets hold of it. But you need

173
00:11:13,559 --> 00:11:15,640
Speaker 1: to also have a way to keep a lid on

174
00:11:15,679 --> 00:11:19,720
Speaker 1: that so that people don't just create bogus apples apps

175
00:11:20,240 --> 00:11:22,680
Speaker 1: and make it look like it's a legit thing and

176
00:11:22,720 --> 00:11:24,920
Speaker 1: then convince people to download it without going through the

177
00:11:24,960 --> 00:11:28,120
Speaker 1: Apple Store. That that is the real issue. We have

178
00:11:28,160 --> 00:11:30,360
Speaker 1: some more stories to cover, but before we get to that,

179
00:11:30,480 --> 00:11:41,760
Speaker 1: let's take a quick break. Bloomberg reports that PayPal is

180
00:11:41,800 --> 00:11:45,439
Speaker 1: looking into making a possible acquisition that of the social

181
00:11:45,480 --> 00:11:49,280
Speaker 1: media company Pinterest. Bloomberg reports that PayPal reached out to

182
00:11:49,360 --> 00:11:52,440
Speaker 1: Pinterest to see if the platform would consider a buyout

183
00:11:52,760 --> 00:11:55,880
Speaker 1: with a reported offer of around seventy dollars per share

184
00:11:55,960 --> 00:11:59,560
Speaker 1: of pinterest stock. Now, some quick math tells us that

185
00:11:59,640 --> 00:12:03,400
Speaker 1: this value pinterest at just under forty billion dollars, which

186
00:12:03,520 --> 00:12:07,600
Speaker 1: is a princely sum, And currently pinterest stock is trading

187
00:12:07,600 --> 00:12:11,120
Speaker 1: at just under sixty two dollars a share, so it's

188
00:12:11,120 --> 00:12:14,040
Speaker 1: an offer that is above the market value of a

189
00:12:14,080 --> 00:12:17,959
Speaker 1: share of pinterest. But however, you know, pinterest stock had

190
00:12:18,040 --> 00:12:22,840
Speaker 1: reached as high as almost ninety dollars a share over

191
00:12:22,880 --> 00:12:25,920
Speaker 1: the past year, but more recently it has been trading

192
00:12:25,920 --> 00:12:29,560
Speaker 1: around the sixty dollar range. And you might wonder why PayPal,

193
00:12:29,640 --> 00:12:32,960
Speaker 1: which is most known as being a financial services company,

194
00:12:33,240 --> 00:12:36,480
Speaker 1: would be interested in Pinterest known as a social media

195
00:12:36,520 --> 00:12:40,679
Speaker 1: platform with a bulletin board like interface. But pinterest has

196
00:12:40,679 --> 00:12:44,280
Speaker 1: been incorporating e commerce elements into its platform over the

197
00:12:44,320 --> 00:12:47,280
Speaker 1: last couple of years, creating ways for users to shop

198
00:12:47,320 --> 00:12:51,680
Speaker 1: for items through pinterest itself. And since pinterest is all about,

199
00:12:51,720 --> 00:12:56,040
Speaker 1: you know, creating boards with aesthetically pleasing and thematically relevant images,

200
00:12:56,120 --> 00:12:59,880
Speaker 1: I mean a lot of Like interior design companies can

201
00:13:00,080 --> 00:13:04,520
Speaker 1: use Pinterest to to highlight how various components can go

202
00:13:04,600 --> 00:13:08,080
Speaker 1: together to make a particular aesthetic. Well, you can see

203
00:13:08,080 --> 00:13:12,880
Speaker 1: how a shopping system integrated with a financial company like

204
00:13:12,920 --> 00:13:15,520
Speaker 1: PayPal would be a really powerful tool in order to

205
00:13:15,640 --> 00:13:19,439
Speaker 1: market stuff to folks. Now, so far, neither pinterest nor

206
00:13:19,520 --> 00:13:23,120
Speaker 1: PayPal has responded to journalist requests for common about this

207
00:13:23,520 --> 00:13:27,400
Speaker 1: potential acquisition, So there's no way of knowing if pinterest

208
00:13:27,480 --> 00:13:30,000
Speaker 1: is actually considering the offer. I mean, if you want

209
00:13:30,040 --> 00:13:33,280
Speaker 1: to be really clear about it, there's no confirmation that

210
00:13:33,320 --> 00:13:36,280
Speaker 1: an actual offer even happened. But I have no reason

211
00:13:36,320 --> 00:13:40,320
Speaker 1: to doubt Bloomberg's reporting on this. The Boring Company, as in,

212
00:13:40,760 --> 00:13:44,880
Speaker 1: you know, the company that makes tunnels most often associated

213
00:13:44,920 --> 00:13:50,280
Speaker 1: with hyper loop like projects UH and also associated with

214
00:13:50,320 --> 00:13:54,320
Speaker 1: Elon Musk, has cleared one hurdle between it and the

215
00:13:54,360 --> 00:13:59,040
Speaker 1: goal of building out an underground transportation system in Las Vegas, Nevada.

216
00:13:59,600 --> 00:14:02,800
Speaker 1: The altimate goal is to establish a system that includes

217
00:14:02,960 --> 00:14:06,680
Speaker 1: fifty one separate stations, many of which would connect to

218
00:14:06,840 --> 00:14:09,679
Speaker 1: casinos along the Las Vegas Strip, as well as other

219
00:14:09,720 --> 00:14:13,680
Speaker 1: notable stops like Allegiance Stadium, the Las Vegas Convention Center,

220
00:14:14,200 --> 00:14:18,720
Speaker 1: the Fremont Street Experience, the airport, and more. Now, the

221
00:14:18,800 --> 00:14:22,920
Speaker 1: hurdle was the approval of the Clark County Commissioner's office

222
00:14:23,080 --> 00:14:26,080
Speaker 1: to go ahead with this. The proposed system would span

223
00:14:26,240 --> 00:14:29,040
Speaker 1: the border between Clark County and the city of Las

224
00:14:29,160 --> 00:14:32,840
Speaker 1: Vegas itself. Fun fact, the Las Vegas Strip is mostly

225
00:14:32,880 --> 00:14:36,200
Speaker 1: in Clark County, it's not within the actual city limits

226
00:14:36,280 --> 00:14:39,840
Speaker 1: of Las Vegas proper. The company will need to apply

227
00:14:39,960 --> 00:14:43,080
Speaker 1: for permits before actually beginning construction on the system, and

228
00:14:43,120 --> 00:14:47,480
Speaker 1: according to the boring company, the schedule would be really

229
00:14:48,120 --> 00:14:52,120
Speaker 1: super aggressive. Representatives say that the plan is to have

230
00:14:52,800 --> 00:14:56,560
Speaker 1: up to ten stations completed and connected within the first

231
00:14:56,960 --> 00:15:01,000
Speaker 1: six six months of the project breaking ground, which is

232
00:15:01,640 --> 00:15:05,240
Speaker 1: really aggressive, and that the whole thing should be completed

233
00:15:05,320 --> 00:15:09,400
Speaker 1: within three years. And that seems unbelievably optimistic to me.

234
00:15:09,480 --> 00:15:12,080
Speaker 1: But then what do I know. Well, one thing I

235
00:15:12,120 --> 00:15:15,520
Speaker 1: do know is that the existing tunnel system in Las

236
00:15:15,600 --> 00:15:18,920
Speaker 1: Vegas that was created by the boring company, the Las

237
00:15:19,040 --> 00:15:23,520
Speaker 1: Vegas Convention Center Loop, has fallen well below the projected

238
00:15:23,520 --> 00:15:26,400
Speaker 1: performance the company had claimed at the start of the project.

239
00:15:26,720 --> 00:15:29,920
Speaker 1: So the loop connects the South Hall, the West Hall,

240
00:15:30,240 --> 00:15:33,240
Speaker 1: and the Central Hall of the Las Vegas Convention Center.

241
00:15:33,400 --> 00:15:38,160
Speaker 1: These are three huge buildings that have exhibition spaces inside

242
00:15:38,200 --> 00:15:40,600
Speaker 1: of them. I know it best from my visits to

243
00:15:40,720 --> 00:15:43,560
Speaker 1: c e s over the years, and getting from one

244
00:15:43,600 --> 00:15:46,560
Speaker 1: to another can take a while. Like, if it's empty,

245
00:15:46,720 --> 00:15:48,800
Speaker 1: it might take you fifteen minutes to walk from one

246
00:15:48,840 --> 00:15:51,520
Speaker 1: to the next. If it's full, it might take you

247
00:15:51,600 --> 00:15:53,720
Speaker 1: forty five minutes to walk from one to the next

248
00:15:53,760 --> 00:15:57,080
Speaker 1: because of the crowds. So if things are really busy

249
00:15:57,280 --> 00:16:00,760
Speaker 1: and it's a congested event, an other way of getting

250
00:16:00,760 --> 00:16:04,520
Speaker 1: between the different buildings is useful, especially if you've got

251
00:16:04,560 --> 00:16:08,320
Speaker 1: like meetings back to back that are across the convention

252
00:16:08,360 --> 00:16:11,560
Speaker 1: center from each other. So the idea was to build

253
00:16:11,600 --> 00:16:17,160
Speaker 1: this underground tunnel loop system with two one way paths,

254
00:16:17,200 --> 00:16:19,920
Speaker 1: you know, one going from one side of the convention

255
00:16:19,920 --> 00:16:24,479
Speaker 1: center together and the other one coming back. And the

256
00:16:24,520 --> 00:16:28,600
Speaker 1: boring company originally predicted that this particular system would be

257
00:16:28,640 --> 00:16:30,920
Speaker 1: able to move up to four thousand, four hundred people

258
00:16:30,960 --> 00:16:35,480
Speaker 1: per hour. However, as it's in its current incarnation, it

259
00:16:35,480 --> 00:16:38,800
Speaker 1: can move fewer than six hundred people per hour. That's

260
00:16:38,920 --> 00:16:42,720
Speaker 1: if it's going at full capacity. Uh. And the experience

261
00:16:42,760 --> 00:16:45,880
Speaker 1: that you know, Las Vegas got was much less futuristic

262
00:16:45,960 --> 00:16:48,240
Speaker 1: than what was originally proposed. The idea was that was

263
00:16:48,240 --> 00:16:52,080
Speaker 1: going to be autonomous vehicles taking people from point A

264
00:16:52,240 --> 00:16:57,080
Speaker 1: to point B. Instead, it's people driving Tesla vehicles through

265
00:16:57,120 --> 00:17:00,400
Speaker 1: a tunnel and ferrying you from point A point be

266
00:17:00,880 --> 00:17:05,240
Speaker 1: kind of like a very limited taxicab. Although the convention

267
00:17:05,320 --> 00:17:09,080
Speaker 1: center version of this is operated free of charge for

268
00:17:09,080 --> 00:17:13,399
Speaker 1: for actual writers. The full Las Vegas system, well, if

269
00:17:13,440 --> 00:17:15,359
Speaker 1: it ends up being just a larger version of what

270
00:17:15,480 --> 00:17:19,400
Speaker 1: you're already seeing at the convention Center, it's not necessarily

271
00:17:19,520 --> 00:17:23,400
Speaker 1: going to be a huge boon to Las Vegas. It's

272
00:17:23,440 --> 00:17:29,600
Speaker 1: not really built in such a way to significantly reduced

273
00:17:29,720 --> 00:17:33,800
Speaker 1: traffic in the Las Vegas area. There's actually a really

274
00:17:33,880 --> 00:17:38,639
Speaker 1: good video about this by Daniel Cooper from Engadget called

275
00:17:38,840 --> 00:17:43,119
Speaker 1: Elon Musk's Las Vegas Loop could have been Great. Highly

276
00:17:43,119 --> 00:17:46,200
Speaker 1: recommend you check it out. It's really informative on this subject.

277
00:17:46,240 --> 00:17:49,080
Speaker 1: And I might have to do a full episode about

278
00:17:49,119 --> 00:17:52,760
Speaker 1: this to talk about what was promised, what was delivered,

279
00:17:53,200 --> 00:17:57,680
Speaker 1: how might that evolve into something more useful, and why

280
00:17:57,760 --> 00:18:01,040
Speaker 1: it doesn't really resemble anything when we you know, we're

281
00:18:01,040 --> 00:18:03,840
Speaker 1: talking about the hyper loop years ago, because this is

282
00:18:03,880 --> 00:18:07,840
Speaker 1: not a hyper loop style system. A group of companies

283
00:18:07,880 --> 00:18:12,320
Speaker 1: including Lockeed Martin, Voyager Space, and nano Rax have announced

284
00:18:12,359 --> 00:18:16,040
Speaker 1: their intent to design, build, and deploy a privately run

285
00:18:16,160 --> 00:18:19,880
Speaker 1: space station by the year twenty seven. If you listen

286
00:18:19,920 --> 00:18:22,679
Speaker 1: to my episodes about space stations, you know that the

287
00:18:22,720 --> 00:18:26,639
Speaker 1: International Space Station is getting up there in years. Components

288
00:18:26,640 --> 00:18:28,960
Speaker 1: that were meant to last just ten to fifteen years

289
00:18:29,320 --> 00:18:32,959
Speaker 1: are well past that now. The earliest modules that were

290
00:18:33,040 --> 00:18:36,320
Speaker 1: launched we'll be closing in on thirty years old in

291
00:18:36,400 --> 00:18:39,280
Speaker 1: just a couple of years. So NASA has encouraged the

292
00:18:39,320 --> 00:18:43,600
Speaker 1: private sector to get involved in this space pun intended.

293
00:18:43,640 --> 00:18:47,480
Speaker 1: I guess the proposed station that these companies are are

294
00:18:47,520 --> 00:18:50,760
Speaker 1: going to build has the name star Lab, and it

295
00:18:50,760 --> 00:18:53,080
Speaker 1: would be much much smaller than the I S S.

296
00:18:53,160 --> 00:18:56,200
Speaker 1: It would accommodate only up to four astronauts at a time,

297
00:18:56,640 --> 00:19:00,800
Speaker 1: and like the earliest space stations, this would be a

298
00:19:00,880 --> 00:19:05,280
Speaker 1: monolithic design. Now that means it would be a single

299
00:19:05,400 --> 00:19:08,119
Speaker 1: launch that would carry the full space station up to orbit.

300
00:19:08,240 --> 00:19:12,199
Speaker 1: It would not be modular like the International Space Station is.

301
00:19:12,240 --> 00:19:14,240
Speaker 1: Like the I S S has grown over the years

302
00:19:14,600 --> 00:19:17,520
Speaker 1: because we've added more modules to it over time, kind

303
00:19:17,520 --> 00:19:21,040
Speaker 1: of like a giant tinker toy in space. This version

304
00:19:21,119 --> 00:19:24,800
Speaker 1: star Lab would be a single thing that we launch

305
00:19:24,960 --> 00:19:29,239
Speaker 1: once up into low Earth orbit. Uh, and kind of

306
00:19:29,240 --> 00:19:32,239
Speaker 1: like the BIGELO module that's connected to the I S S.

307
00:19:32,480 --> 00:19:35,879
Speaker 1: The idea is that this space station that the habitable

308
00:19:36,040 --> 00:19:40,240
Speaker 1: part anyway, will be an inflatable structure, which is part

309
00:19:40,280 --> 00:19:42,840
Speaker 1: of the reason why you can launch it in one go.

310
00:19:43,040 --> 00:19:46,000
Speaker 1: If it's inflatable, then you can have it deflated when

311
00:19:46,040 --> 00:19:48,199
Speaker 1: you're on the ground and then wait till you're in

312
00:19:48,280 --> 00:19:51,720
Speaker 1: space to inflate and expand it to its full size.

313
00:19:52,359 --> 00:19:54,760
Speaker 1: As for what the station will be used for, that

314
00:19:54,800 --> 00:19:58,960
Speaker 1: could include everything from scientific research to industrial research, to

315
00:19:59,680 --> 00:20:03,600
Speaker 1: space tourism, so you know, the typical stuff that we

316
00:20:03,640 --> 00:20:08,200
Speaker 1: tend to hear about when we talk about private space exploration.

317
00:20:08,560 --> 00:20:11,000
Speaker 1: The f d A has approved a particular use of

318
00:20:11,080 --> 00:20:15,120
Speaker 1: virtual reality to treat people who have amblyopia. I hope

319
00:20:15,160 --> 00:20:17,800
Speaker 1: I said that correctly. Uh. This refers to the condition

320
00:20:17,800 --> 00:20:21,480
Speaker 1: that most of us know as lazy eye. So with ambliopia,

321
00:20:21,840 --> 00:20:24,920
Speaker 1: the brain begins to rely more on one eye than

322
00:20:25,000 --> 00:20:28,400
Speaker 1: the other, and communication between the brain and the other

323
00:20:28,480 --> 00:20:31,960
Speaker 1: eye breaks down a bit. The traditional way that we've

324
00:20:31,960 --> 00:20:34,679
Speaker 1: treated ambleiopia is to use stuff like an eye patch

325
00:20:34,840 --> 00:20:37,919
Speaker 1: over the good eye, the stronger eye, and this forces

326
00:20:37,960 --> 00:20:40,600
Speaker 1: the brain to re establish connections with the other eye.

327
00:20:40,720 --> 00:20:43,800
Speaker 1: Kind of it's kind of like strength training for your eye,

328
00:20:44,240 --> 00:20:47,240
Speaker 1: and it helps counteract the effects of amblopia. Well, the

329
00:20:47,359 --> 00:20:51,560
Speaker 1: VR approach presents two similar images while you know, you

330
00:20:51,600 --> 00:20:55,920
Speaker 1: watch video, so each eye is getting a slightly different image.

331
00:20:56,119 --> 00:21:00,400
Speaker 1: The stronger eye gets a lower contrast version, so details

332
00:21:00,400 --> 00:21:03,080
Speaker 1: are harder to make out for the stronger eye, and

333
00:21:03,160 --> 00:21:06,080
Speaker 1: so the weaker eye needs to get a little more

334
00:21:06,280 --> 00:21:09,439
Speaker 1: love from the brain for the images to make sense. Also,

335
00:21:09,720 --> 00:21:14,879
Speaker 1: the VR uses some overlays on each image, and the

336
00:21:14,960 --> 00:21:18,560
Speaker 1: overlays block a little bit of the user's view. It's

337
00:21:18,600 --> 00:21:22,919
Speaker 1: only by combining the view from each eye that you

338
00:21:22,960 --> 00:21:25,080
Speaker 1: get a full image in the brain. So the brain

339
00:21:25,160 --> 00:21:27,080
Speaker 1: can do this. We're not even conscious of it when

340
00:21:27,080 --> 00:21:30,320
Speaker 1: it happens. The brain just handles it. But these are

341
00:21:30,359 --> 00:21:35,000
Speaker 1: little elements that can be introduced virtually that ultimately make

342
00:21:35,040 --> 00:21:38,480
Speaker 1: our brains work with a specific eye to have it,

343
00:21:38,640 --> 00:21:41,240
Speaker 1: you know, get up to speed. So it's kind of

344
00:21:41,280 --> 00:21:44,200
Speaker 1: like the eye patch approach in a way. It forces

345
00:21:44,240 --> 00:21:47,960
Speaker 1: the brain to rely more on the affected eye, the

346
00:21:48,000 --> 00:21:51,280
Speaker 1: one with amblopia, but it does so while the user

347
00:21:51,359 --> 00:21:54,199
Speaker 1: also is watching something that they would like to see,

348
00:21:54,280 --> 00:21:56,920
Speaker 1: you know, instead of wearing an eyepatch. They're watching movies,

349
00:21:57,280 --> 00:21:59,479
Speaker 1: and wearing an eyepatch can bring with it a bit

350
00:21:59,520 --> 00:22:01,879
Speaker 1: of a social stigma. However, you know that is actually

351
00:22:01,920 --> 00:22:05,040
Speaker 1: something that we should really address as a society. Anyway,

352
00:22:05,080 --> 00:22:07,399
Speaker 1: this whole issue with able is um but you know,

353
00:22:07,480 --> 00:22:09,440
Speaker 1: you get my meaning. Like it's it's one of those

354
00:22:09,440 --> 00:22:14,679
Speaker 1: ways where you can do this therapy that doesn't require

355
00:22:14,760 --> 00:22:17,600
Speaker 1: you to wear an eye patch or use eye drops,

356
00:22:17,760 --> 00:22:20,080
Speaker 1: or maybe you use it in conjunction with that, but

357
00:22:20,119 --> 00:22:22,800
Speaker 1: it's one way to train up your your strength. I

358
00:22:22,800 --> 00:22:24,920
Speaker 1: think it's cool that the FDA has approved this type

359
00:22:24,920 --> 00:22:27,080
Speaker 1: of therapy and hopefully we'll see it rolled out to

360
00:22:27,119 --> 00:22:30,040
Speaker 1: a broader scale in the near future. Sony has received

361
00:22:30,080 --> 00:22:32,280
Speaker 1: approval from the U S Patent Office for a patent

362
00:22:32,320 --> 00:22:35,760
Speaker 1: that allows for a system in which participants and spectators

363
00:22:35,760 --> 00:22:40,560
Speaker 1: of multiplayer video games could vote to ban players from

364
00:22:40,600 --> 00:22:43,640
Speaker 1: the game. The patent calls for a few different implementations

365
00:22:43,640 --> 00:22:47,320
Speaker 1: of this idea. So, for example, imagine that you're watching

366
00:22:47,520 --> 00:22:51,240
Speaker 1: a competitive multiplayer game and there's one player who is

367
00:22:51,280 --> 00:22:54,879
Speaker 1: consistently performing below the skill level of everybody else in

368
00:22:54,920 --> 00:22:59,200
Speaker 1: the game, and the participants or maybe the spectators might

369
00:22:59,280 --> 00:23:02,879
Speaker 1: vote to inch that person, just removing them from play.

370
00:23:03,320 --> 00:23:06,240
Speaker 1: But there's another implementation that suggests a scenario in which

371
00:23:06,320 --> 00:23:11,000
Speaker 1: spectators could pay to vote someone out of a competitive

372
00:23:11,080 --> 00:23:14,760
Speaker 1: multiplayer game. Sony calls for a system that would require

373
00:23:14,760 --> 00:23:18,639
Speaker 1: at least a sixty percent majority to actually vote to

374
00:23:18,680 --> 00:23:21,200
Speaker 1: remove someone from a game. However, I think you could

375
00:23:21,240 --> 00:23:24,880
Speaker 1: easily imagine a scenario where this would become inherently unfair.

376
00:23:25,240 --> 00:23:29,320
Speaker 1: For example, let's say you've got a favorite streamer who

377
00:23:29,359 --> 00:23:34,640
Speaker 1: plays online in competitive multiplayer games. So maybe you're watching

378
00:23:34,640 --> 00:23:39,879
Speaker 1: them actively play live online and they're doing great, But

379
00:23:39,960 --> 00:23:43,280
Speaker 1: then you also find out that some other really good

380
00:23:43,320 --> 00:23:46,000
Speaker 1: player has joined the game. They're on the opposite team,

381
00:23:46,560 --> 00:23:51,120
Speaker 1: and so you and your fellow fans all banded together

382
00:23:51,240 --> 00:23:54,720
Speaker 1: to pitch in some money and vote the other player off,

383
00:23:55,160 --> 00:23:58,800
Speaker 1: because that way, your favorite has a better chance of

384
00:23:58,840 --> 00:24:04,480
Speaker 1: winning because you've removed their most uh most difficult competition

385
00:24:04,480 --> 00:24:07,919
Speaker 1: in the game. That doesn't sound fair, right, Well, you

386
00:24:07,920 --> 00:24:10,239
Speaker 1: can probably imagine a lot of different ways that this

387
00:24:10,280 --> 00:24:14,640
Speaker 1: particular system could potentially be abused. Now, this is just

388
00:24:14,720 --> 00:24:17,959
Speaker 1: a patent, it is not an actual implementation. Sony has

389
00:24:18,000 --> 00:24:22,000
Speaker 1: not said it's actually going to make this become a reality.

390
00:24:22,040 --> 00:24:25,000
Speaker 1: They might not do anything with the idea. They might

391
00:24:25,080 --> 00:24:27,760
Speaker 1: have patented it just so that way, if anyone else

392
00:24:27,800 --> 00:24:30,000
Speaker 1: tries to make something similar, Sony can say, hey, you

393
00:24:30,040 --> 00:24:32,280
Speaker 1: can't do that unless you pay us first, because we

394
00:24:32,440 --> 00:24:35,080
Speaker 1: patented it, so you have to license that idea from us.

395
00:24:35,880 --> 00:24:37,439
Speaker 1: Or who knows, maybe in a year or so we'll

396
00:24:37,480 --> 00:24:40,200
Speaker 1: see video games like a gladiator sport where the crowd

397
00:24:40,280 --> 00:24:43,400
Speaker 1: votes to get rid of unfavored players. That doesn't sound

398
00:24:43,400 --> 00:24:47,240
Speaker 1: particularly fun to me, and I hope it doesn't happen. Finally,

399
00:24:47,359 --> 00:24:50,240
Speaker 1: a group of museums in Vienna encountered a bit of

400
00:24:50,280 --> 00:24:53,080
Speaker 1: a problem. They were uploading images of works of art

401
00:24:53,359 --> 00:24:56,280
Speaker 1: to social media platforms, but some of these works of

402
00:24:56,520 --> 00:25:01,040
Speaker 1: art had naked people in them. So ancient works, classical works,

403
00:25:01,080 --> 00:25:04,399
Speaker 1: modern works sometimes you know, they depict nude figures and

404
00:25:04,440 --> 00:25:07,159
Speaker 1: it's art, And I'm sure that doesn't come as a

405
00:25:07,200 --> 00:25:09,719
Speaker 1: shock to you. I'm certain you've encountered some of it

406
00:25:09,760 --> 00:25:12,840
Speaker 1: in the past, and yet you live to tell the tale.

407
00:25:13,320 --> 00:25:17,760
Speaker 1: But apparently this shocked various social media platforms, or at

408
00:25:17,800 --> 00:25:21,680
Speaker 1: least it triggered their content moderation systems, and several museums

409
00:25:21,720 --> 00:25:26,600
Speaker 1: found their social accounts banned or temporarily restricted or muted.

410
00:25:27,040 --> 00:25:29,960
Speaker 1: So they did the only sensible thing. They got together

411
00:25:30,000 --> 00:25:34,560
Speaker 1: and they created an only fans account. Yep, only fans,

412
00:25:34,680 --> 00:25:38,480
Speaker 1: the platform perhaps best known as a site that hosts

413
00:25:38,640 --> 00:25:45,359
Speaker 1: creators who make adult content, you know, the sexy kind. Well,

414
00:25:45,400 --> 00:25:50,399
Speaker 1: the Museums formed an account called Vienna laid Bear, saying

415
00:25:50,400 --> 00:25:54,200
Speaker 1: it was an effort to counteract the quote unquote prudishness

416
00:25:54,200 --> 00:25:58,000
Speaker 1: of the modern social network platforms, which frequently clamped down

417
00:25:58,080 --> 00:26:02,359
Speaker 1: on socially risky material in an effort to appease stakeholders

418
00:26:02,680 --> 00:26:07,240
Speaker 1: and the various financial institutions that facilitate payments to these networks.

419
00:26:07,800 --> 00:26:10,840
Speaker 1: And I think this is kind of brilliant. It's a

420
00:26:10,880 --> 00:26:14,720
Speaker 1: great pr move for the Museums. It elevates only fans,

421
00:26:15,119 --> 00:26:18,080
Speaker 1: and it highlights how these social network policies are often

422
00:26:18,160 --> 00:26:22,639
Speaker 1: poorly constructed and executed. And now if someone sees that

423
00:26:22,720 --> 00:26:25,760
Speaker 1: you visit only fans, you can say I only go

424
00:26:25,800 --> 00:26:29,000
Speaker 1: there for the art. While that wraps up this episode

425
00:26:29,119 --> 00:26:32,240
Speaker 1: of tech Stuff. If you have, you know, ideas for

426
00:26:32,359 --> 00:26:34,800
Speaker 1: things I should talk about in future episodes of tech Stuff,

427
00:26:35,119 --> 00:26:37,520
Speaker 1: reach out to me on Twitter. The handle for the

428
00:26:37,520 --> 00:26:41,240
Speaker 1: show is Text Stuff H s W and I'll talk

429
00:26:41,280 --> 00:26:50,240
Speaker 1: to you again really soon. Text Stuff is an I

430
00:26:50,359 --> 00:26:53,840
Speaker 1: heart Radio production. For more podcasts from my heart Radio,

431
00:26:54,160 --> 00:26:57,359
Speaker 1: visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

432
00:26:57,440 --> 00:27:01,160
Speaker 1: you listen to your favorite shows. Eight