WEBVTT - Oracle’s Huge Bond Sale, Musk Eyes SpaceX and xAI Combo

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and ever though in Sent Francisco.

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:23.440
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 3>Disney shares sinking after giving a tepid growth outlook that

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:28.479
<v Speaker 3>says the market of waits news on who will be

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 3>it's new leader. Plus Oracle raising more debt as a

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 3>software giant looks to raise forty five to fifty billion

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 3>dollars in bonds, an equity for additional cloud in the

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 3>structure capacity and sources, say Elon musk Is in advanced

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 3>talks to combined SpaceX with XAI. Will have all the details,

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:46.599
<v Speaker 3>but first we check in on these markets. Then in

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 3>certain areas breathe some size of relief after selloff on

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 3>the NASZAC on the s and P five hundred, we're

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 3>actually seeing a bit more of the buying of the

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:56.319
<v Speaker 3>dip when it comes to stocks, not so much when

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 3>you're looking at commodities rob percent when you're looking at

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 3>the NASAK. Now Bitcoin bounces, but boy did it feel

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 3>the pain. Over the course of the weekend. We're only

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 3>training at seventy eight thousand, so still the pressure on

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 3>on so called digital gold as we actually see that

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 3>continued strain on gold and silver that really catalyzed on

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 3>Friday and the decision of who will be the next

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 3>FED chair. Move on to the individual stocks in video

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 3>is one of the biggest points drags to the downside

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 3>to day off by one point four percent. We're going

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 3>to dig into what really its relationship with Opening Eye

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 3>and how much it's committing to funding. It is going

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 3>to look like we're looking at Oracle now up two

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 3>percentage points. It's selling a whole wealth of debt and equity.

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 3>But does this steady the nerves that it would in

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 3>some way temp junk status on its debt. We're getting

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:39.479
<v Speaker 3>into that a little bit later. Move on there, because

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 3>then the here and now we're looking at earnings and it

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 3>was tepid growth more broadly that we saw for Disney,

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 3>and that particular seems to be being pointed forward to

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 3>this fiscal quarter that we look at what is the

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 3>worry about people not traveling towards many of the parks

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 3>in the year to come. We're currently off by four

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 3>percent to say, on the interry day basis, but interesting

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 3>news over the course of a weekend as well. About management.

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Felix Chillette joins us. Now, just going to the fundamentals

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 3>of the business. The quarter they just reported was strong,

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:10.799
<v Speaker 3>particularly in streaming, but it seems to be where we're

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 3>going in parks, which is a slight nervousness.

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, they just reported record sales and parks

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 4>for the previous quarter. They hit ten billion dollars of

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 4>sales in the quarter for the first time. But they

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 4>offer this outlook today that said, you know, in the

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 4>current quarter, there are some concerns. There's all this you know,

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 4>volatility in terms of the international market. Are they going

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 4>to have as many international visitors to the parks. They're

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.079
<v Speaker 4>going to shift some of their marketing to try and

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 4>attract more domestic visitors to the domestic parks. There's also

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 4>increased costs. They're launching a new cruise ship. They have

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 4>a new Frozen exhibit opening in the parks in France.

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, the park's outlook for this quarter is not

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 4>as good coming off a very strong quarter.

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 3>Interesting time for parks though, and it's leadership because we

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 3>understand there's a key vote going on at the boarderlane

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 3>this week.

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so the ward is meeting they're expected to vote

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 4>on Bob Isereiger's successor. We've been watching this for three

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 4>years now. They are leaning towards Josh Tomorrow, who's the

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 4>head of Parks, and we're expecting to see that vote

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 4>this week. Disney previously said they're going to announce a

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 4>successor for Bob Biger sometime before the end of March.

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 4>So things are moving forward and it makes sense that

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 4>Josh Tomorrow would be in the lead at this point.

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 4>The Parks and Cruise division is providing the vast amounts

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 4>of profit at this company, and it sort of reflects

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 4>where things are at. The experience is really working well

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 4>for consumers right now, and we've talked about the home

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 4>entertainment is still somewhat tumultuous as we make this transition

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 4>from cable to streaming.

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Felix Junette with the best run up. We so appreciate it.

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Thank you. Meanwhile, Disney CEO Bob Byga.

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Didn't talk about their IP, saying there's no rush to

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 3>acquire any more of it.

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Here he is in Today's Enny's Cool.

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 5>I think we have a great hand. I don't really

0:03:54.000 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 5>feel that we have a need to buy more iping

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 5>to continue to create our.

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 6>Own and we've got an unbelievable bedrock of stories already

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 6>told to grow.

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 3>From sticking to Disney, streaming landscape and more with Daniel

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 3>Payne his slate Stone Wealth CIO. Just for a moment,

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 3>we're just talking about how important the parks are. But

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:18.239
<v Speaker 3>from the streaming side, it had a really good innings

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 3>in terms of profitability. Finally, in terms of the previous

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 3>court are just reported on that push us forward.

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, really good from the entertainment standpoint, and that's where

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 6>they see a lot of their operating leverage leverage.

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 5>In the company.

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 6>But we do believe moving forward there are a few

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 6>catalysts out there on the experiences, which is their parks

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 6>and cruises over the course of the year that really

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 6>could be beneficial to shareholders.

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:46.919
<v Speaker 6>The near term concerns which they mentioned for the first

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 6>quarter because of international travel, you know, might be pressuring

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 6>the stock today along with the management changing. So there's

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.919
<v Speaker 6>a lot going there, you know, under the hood. But

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 6>bottom line is we got massive stimulus and down to

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 6>pipe in this country with the tax cuts, with the

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 6>one big beautiful bill, We're going to have about one

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 6>hundred and fifty billion dollars of tax refunds for consumers,

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 6>and the US consumer they've proven over and over again

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 6>that if they're halfway confident with their job and they

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 6>have excess money in their pocket, they're going to spend it.

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 6>So that could be a catalyst moving forward once we

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 6>get into summer. And another thing that nobody's really talking

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 6>about is that this summer we have a few events

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 6>that are kind of unique for this country. We have

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 6>the World Cup here this summer, and we have the

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 6>two hundred and fiftieth anniversary of our country, which.

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 5>Is going to be a lot of steamless in and

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:39.239
<v Speaker 5>of itself.

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 6>I've seen some projections that the World Cup is going

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 6>to generate about six point five people coming for the event,

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:51.159
<v Speaker 6>it's going to generate roughly seventeen billion in GDP for

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 6>this country. And you know, with those kind of visitors,

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 6>who's not to say they might stay a little bit

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 6>longer and bolt on a trip to one of the

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 6>Disney parks moving forward, So I think longer term, there

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 6>could be some catalyst to get this stock out of

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 6>the fund that has been in over the past four

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 6>years under the current management.

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 3>We'll talk about management and current management, how do you

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 3>feel about maybe the person who's helped drive the park's

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:16.599
<v Speaker 3>business becoming the CEO of the whole business again.

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 6>Well, that could be the reason why we've seen some

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 6>weakness today because it could be like, you know, here

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 6>we go again, because if you remember back in twenty twenty,

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 6>we had the same thing happen when I Eiger, you know,

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 6>placed his hand picked successor, Bob Chappick, in control, and

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 6>you know, unfortunately for Chapick, he was put in control

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 6>of the entire operations in February of twenty twenty, so

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.479
<v Speaker 6>we know exactly what happened a month or two later.

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 6>It's kind of hard to run a company when the

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 6>whole economy shuts down and discretionary spending comes to a halt.

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 6>So you know, that might be kind of unfair to

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 6>judge Chappick on that, but there could be some nervousness

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 6>with investors by doing the same thing once again, putting

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 6>the head of the experiences, which again is parts and

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 6>cruise line and gaming ahead at the charge of the company.

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 5>So there might be some hesitancy there.

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 6>But I will say Disney over the past four years

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 6>has nearly doubled their EPs, but yet the stock has

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 6>been essentially flats. We've had massive valuation contraction. And if

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 6>they get the right person in charge that can pull

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 6>the various levers of this company, you know, we can

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 6>have a premium brand once again trading at a premium valuation.

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 6>So right now the stock trades at roughly seventeen times

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 6>to twenty twenty six earn exestimus about six sixty. You know,

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 6>if a market multiple is placed upon this premium brand,

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 6>you know the stock could get into the mid one

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:47.119
<v Speaker 6>fifties with pretty much ease.

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 5>And so that is significant.

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 6>Upside potential if the right person can make the right

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 6>decisions moving forward.

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 3>If we hear it's Josh, and we know the board

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 3>is voting this week and then they've promised us that

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 3>we would hear by the end of March. If that's

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 3>the case, then where do you think they can drive

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 3>the realization that their IP is worth so much more

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 3>that the spending isn't having to just go up into

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 3>the right when they're trying to market the latest Avatar movie,

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 3>or when they're having to really pay top dollar for

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 3>sporting events. I mean, you just went at length and

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 3>what the soccer means for the US more broadly, but

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 3>when you're trying to stream it or show it, it

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 3>gets very expensive.

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 5>And that's the problem with that side of the business.

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 6>There's significant operating leverage with the variable cost and you know,

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 6>you spend all that variable cost money up front and

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 6>it's almost.

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 5>Like you build it and you hope they show up.

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 6>And so you know, if you get the formula right,

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 6>you spend the money on the content and it's success,

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 6>then that significant leverage for the earnings growth of the company.

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 6>And that's kind of the factor that investors are weighing

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 6>right now with especially with this change in leadership. Could

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 6>it just adds uncertainty to the stock but you know,

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 6>once again, you know, and uncertainty lead to opportunity, and

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 6>their opportunities how you make money in the stock over

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 6>market cycle.

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Daniel Payne a Slate Stone Wealth.

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate it coming on today and coming up the US.

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:13.199
<v Speaker 2>It aims to slash.

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Its reliance on Chinese rare earths and other metals. We'll

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 3>tell you all about the plans for the first of

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 3>its kind stockpile for the US private sector.

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 2>That's next as a blomleg tech.

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 3>President Trump, Well, it's set to launch a twelve billion

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 3>dollar stockpile of strategic critical minerals. The move set to

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 3>count US lance on Chinese rare earth but send prices

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 3>for related companies higher. But it's all according to sources

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 3>thus far. Let's bring in Bloomberg's tech editor in DC,

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Mike Shephard, tell us about this first of its kind

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 3>store for US private sector. What do we know is

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 3>set to potentially be announced here, Mike.

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 7>Well, what we're looking for is the US Export Import

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 7>Bank to take a vote later today on approving this package.

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:02.839
<v Speaker 7>The private sector will kick in about one point six

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 7>to seven billion dollars as part of this seed money,

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 7>and the US Export Import Bank will kick in another

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 7>ten billion dollars, and this would be the biggest such

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 7>deal in the Bank's history by far. And it really

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 7>is a sign of just how much the administration is

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 7>pushing in this area of rare roots and critical minerals

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 7>and trying to wean the US from its dependence on

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 7>China as a key source for these inputs. They're so

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 7>essential to the private sector, to autos, to iPhones, to

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 7>gas turbines even and without access to them, we risk

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 7>seeing a manufacturing supply chain disruption akin to what we

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 7>risk experiencing earlier last year when the Chinese government started

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 7>to impose some of those export controls on rare earth.

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 7>So the US is trying to diversify around it and

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 7>ensure both pricing stability and supply stability.

0:10:57.960 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 8>Here.

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:04.359
<v Speaker 3>Caro administration officials have been detailing what could be announced.

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:07.839
<v Speaker 3>But what's interesting, Mike is through which countries are we

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 3>going to be sourcing from and what sort of backstops

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 3>do these The export import back need to know that

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 3>they can sell this on correctly and not be landed

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 3>with an awful lot of minerals.

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 7>Well, the idea is to ensure that US manufacturers have

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 7>this access, and it would create this stockpile akin to

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 7>the Strategic Petroleum Reserve here that manufacturers here in the

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 7>US could access is needed, they would have to pay

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 7>into it to be able to eventually make purchases and

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 7>then promise to replenish it down the road. But this

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 7>is just one of several steps in the area of

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:45.559
<v Speaker 7>rare earth that the US government is taking right now.

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.439
<v Speaker 7>Later this week there will be meetings with dozens of

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 7>foreign ministers here in Washington to agree on trying to

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 7>find some way to create a mechanism to stabilize prices

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 7>and supply around the world, not just here in the US,

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 7>but with allies, so that collectively they can reduce some

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 7>of their dependence on China and increase extraction, mining and

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 7>refining in a number of other countries. While we call

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 7>them rare earths, they are actually fairly common. It is

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:14.319
<v Speaker 7>just that they are not extracted or exploited in as

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 7>many places as they are, and to the extent that

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 7>China has come to dominate the market and cara. The

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 7>clock is ticking. Remember that the trade truths that the

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 7>President signed with Shijinping late last year, it's only good

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 7>for one year, so they have to start making these

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 7>moves to ensure that supply won't be as disrupted as

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 7>a risk being facing earlier last year before the trade agreement.

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 3>I'll see how project vaulted it is known continues being

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 3>by to Smack Shepherd. Thanks for detailing all of this.

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 3>Let's get the broader economic picture now to well what's

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 3>moving tech stocks in particular Natal Gallagher's with US principal

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 3>economists and director at Board.

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 2>Just going back to that rarer suggestion, is.

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 3>That positive do we need is supply chain, real headache

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 3>for the this is out there right now.

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely, you know what we're seeing as a fundamental shift

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 10>in how the US has really been addressing supply chain

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 10>resilience over the past few years and absolutely top of

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 10>mind following the export control measures by China back in

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 10>twenty twenty five. You know what, in essence we're doing

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 10>is we're creating a strategic preserve of rare earth menerals

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 10>for the digital economy, which means that we're less at

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 10>the behest of foreign entities as we try to continue

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 10>to move forward right in AI innovation and all the

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 10>potential for the economy that that really houses.

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 3>A lot of the focus has been not so much

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 3>on supply chain of rare US as well as that,

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 3>but also really just the bottlenecks that we see in

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 3>delivering the AI hope and euphoria that is built into

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 3>the market, whether that's power, that's energy, whether it's land. Natalie,

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 3>where do you stand in terms of the reality of

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 3>AI and what has been thus far driving a lot

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 3>a lot of stock share and shares high this year?

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 11>Yeah?

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely, I mean twenty twenty five we saw a really

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 10>intense increase in valuations there's a lot of hope in

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 10>what AI can deliver. We heard that at the DeVos

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 10>Economic Forum, also allowed and clear by many key tech

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 10>and political leaders as well. Now, in order for these

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 10>valuations to hold in twenty twenty six, and what we're

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 10>really going to have to see and it's going to

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 10>sort of earmark the year, is a close right in

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 10>the gap between how much is being spent on AI

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 10>and the ROI that we're actually going to achieve. If

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 10>we get those productivity gains, then this is absolutely a

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 10>great story of foresight. If we don't see those productivity gains,

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 10>then we're going to have a conversation much more housed

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 10>around capital misallocation.

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 3>But now, Sie, how's that going to show up? As

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 3>an economist? You looking at job's data? I mean, because

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 3>at the moment, all we're seeing is jobs cuts upon

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 3>jobs cut, which in some way seems to be going

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 3>back to AI.

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean, it's fascinating right what we're seeing in

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 10>the overall jobs data. I'll first sort of approach that

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 10>and then tell you as an economist what I'm looking at.

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 10>We look at the jobs data, there's not a whole

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 10>lot of evidence that the jobs that are currently being

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 10>cut is.

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 11>Due to AI.

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 10>Right, we know that that's what companies are saying. At

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 10>the same time, it's not really showing up in a

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 10>clear way in the data.

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 11>On the other hand, what.

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 10>We do really need to see is almost a discontinuous

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 10>jump in the productivity data. Right, So if we're sort

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 10>of on this level increase, what we really want to

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 10>see with AI is we're jumping up and then we're

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 10>on a totally new level playing field when we see that,

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:29.479
<v Speaker 10>and there should be early adopters in some key industries.

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 10>I'm thinking, you know, healthcare, consulting, finance, we should see

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 10>those early signals and they should be showing up in the.

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Data as soon as twenty twenty six. You think.

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 10>That, I firmly believe that's going to need to happen

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 10>in twenty twenty six in order for these valuations to

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 10>be deemed worthwhile.

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 3>We're going to be getting into these big stories that

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 3>are in the market today of how.

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 2>At the moment we continue to fuel.

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 3>The ever needing expansion of AI infrastructure, whether it's oracles

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 3>selling debt and equity, whether it's well whether or not

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 3>in video is going to be giving up to one

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 3>hundred billion dollars or not to open AI. How are

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 3>you seeing that narrative continue in twenty twenty six, and

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 3>we're going to have to see a pullback in the

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 3>amount that the companies are committing.

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 10>You know, I think it's more so we're really going

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 10>to have to see the ROI in a meaningful way

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 10>that we can go back to. And again that gets

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 10>back to productivity, and the risk really is as we

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 10>sort of pull all of these levers and they get

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 10>more and more complex, it becomes a much more opaic environment,

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 10>right for investors to really operate in, and so the

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 10>risk of those valuations maybe being artificially bolstered goes up.

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Just from your perspective, the narrative of circular deals is

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 3>that actually, in many ways we often put it in

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 3>a negative context, but that's exactly what in VIDEOS should

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 3>be doing, investing in its own clients to be able

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 3>to foster the potential ROI that we might see in

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 3>this locks that jump.

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean absolutely right.

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 10>So if we see this truly meaningful transformation in the

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 10>economy that's sort of promised with AI, then.

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 11>We're in a great spot, right.

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 10>These circular investing schemes that is excellent foresight by these companies.

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 10>If we don't see that, right, that's the real risk

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 10>of pretty significant market correction, right because that investing scheme,

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 10>it is bolstering the overall revenue numbers that we're seeing.

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 2>What therefore are some more of the headwinds.

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 3>Other than waiting for ROAI, we're also still tackling tariffs,

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 3>We're still worried about South Korea's relationship with the United States,

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 3>for example in the here and now, let alone China.

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 3>What could be the headwind that you're looking out for?

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.120
<v Speaker 10>You know, one head wind I'm particularly interested in tracking

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 10>is actually jobs. Right, So we're in a labor market overall.

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 10>When we talk about the macroeconomy that's quite soft. But

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 10>when we speak specifically to AI, machine learning, sort of

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 10>these high powered tech jobs, we have a little bit

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 10>of a bottleneck there. And so something really interesting that

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 10>came out of the US Taiwan trade deal just a

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 10>few weeks ago was this goal, right of onshoring significant

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 10>supply chain efforts from Taiwan to the US.

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 11>In order to do that, we're also.

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 10>Going to need significant changes in our workforce development. And

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 10>there's a risk there, right, because We've had meaningful policy

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:10.640
<v Speaker 10>changes over the last year alone.

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Fascinating Take Massady Gaga come back soon, we hope. Principal

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 3>economist over at Board coming up, elamsk will is in

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 3>advanced talks to combine SpaceX with Xai. Will have all

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 3>the details. Next, this is Broombed Tech checking on on

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 3>Tesla shares well. We're seeing the impact of European sluggishness again.

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 3>You saw it throughout twenty twenty five, but down two.

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 2>And a half percent.

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 3>As we understand, European car sales of Tesla's in particular

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 3>slumped into twenty twenty six, in particular absolutely plummeting French

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 3>shells down forty two percent. They only sold six hundred

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 3>and sixty one cars. Norway registrations plunging eighty eight percent.

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 2>But that says we.

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 3>Hear specific changes in policy over in Noise in particular,

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:01.919
<v Speaker 3>but look generally Evy registrations going higher in Europe, but

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 3>just not the Tesla, whether it's a political read across

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 3>or whether indeed it continues to be something around the

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 3>brand and a slower adoption of older models versus the

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 3>Chinese one. But let's move on to other areas of

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musk's empire right now, because we understand that he

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 3>is in advanced talks to combine SpaceX with Xai, according

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 3>to sources, a deal that would combine, of course, two

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 3>of the largest closely held companies in the world. I

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 3>just think XAAA is valued two hundred billion dollars. SpaceX

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:30.640
<v Speaker 3>is currently worth eight hundred billion dollars at the last

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Camp and their Deals Team Managing editor Ianna Baker joins

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 3>us some more, there's been a lot of conversation about

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 3>somehow his empire combining forces, whether it's Tesla and SpaceX

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 3>or Xai and SpaceX. It looks like the latter is

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 3>the more likely at the moment.

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 12>That's the idea that's gained traction in you know, late

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 12>last week and over the weekend, that it looks like

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:52.400
<v Speaker 12>these two private companies SpaceX and Xai, which also on X,

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 12>would come together. It's possible, and the future Tesla could

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 12>be involved. There's a lot of theories that one day

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 12>there's just going to be one huge Elon must conglomerate.

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 12>But for now, at least it looks like this is

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 12>the plan and that SpaceX would still go public later

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 12>this year.

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 2>I can see that.

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 3>The benefit for xais that it needs a ton of money.

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:13.640
<v Speaker 3>What is in theory the benefit to investors of both

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 3>these companies buy culbination.

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 12>A lot of this is futuristic. If investors in SpaceX

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 12>want to see these data centers in space one day,

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 12>which there's been some filings that could indicate maybe that's

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 12>something they're working on. This is a way to bring

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 12>that together. But definitely, you know, is it a bailout

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 12>of XAI, you know, compared to SpaceX hard to say.

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 12>We don't know any details on what is the structure

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 12>right now, what shares will be transferred or exchange or

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 12>swaps for each other, so those details still need to

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 12>come out to see, you know, how shareholders make out.

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 3>And what sort of approvals do they need because we

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 3>understand a lot of this has got investors support, but

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 3>do they need to Can it just be done because

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 3>it must thinks it's the right thing to do.

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 12>It's hard to say, but last year when x and

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 12>Xai merge, it kind of just happened in an ex

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 12>post and that's fat A lot of this, especially when

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 12>there's private companies, the M and A is very much

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 12>behind the scenes. Maybe an investment bank gets brought on

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 12>for a fairness opinion, or there's certainly law firms, but

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 12>it's hard to say. It's not like a public shareholder

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 12>deal or you know, there might be committees, but a lot.

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 11>Of it's done behind the scenes.

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 12>And if Tesla had been part of this merger, then

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:32.959
<v Speaker 12>you might see more public information or independent board shareholder

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 12>votes and whatnot. But this is all going to be

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 12>happening kind of under the radar.

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Briefly, who would run it?

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 11>That's a great question.

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 12>You know, Xai has brought on Anthony Armstrong, a former

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 12>investment banker and who worked in the government. You know,

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 12>SpaceX has leadership, and our reporting you know, doesn't have

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 12>the answers. But there's certainly a few people in Elon

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 12>Musk's sphere that could you know, potentially run this. Apparently

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 12>all his executives do everything at all the company, so

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 12>maybe it's just everyone.

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 3>Certainly there's cross pollination already. Leanna Baker is a great

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:07.959
<v Speaker 3>scoop that came out earlier today. We so appreciate it. Meanwhile,

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:10.639
<v Speaker 3>coming up Oracle, it's raising to build out to day

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 3>our infrastructure, with plans to raise up to fifty billion

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 3>dollars on that.

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 2>Next, this is blue Beg Tech. Welcome back to Blue

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Beg Tech. We check in on these market.

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 3>It's a bit of a reprieve if you're in stocks

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 3>and the dollar today, not so much if you're in

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 3>gold and silver or up nineteen percent on the Nasdaq

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 3>one hundred is we get a bit of a bounce

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 3>back after a couple of days selling on big tech stocks.

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 3>We're looking at Bitcoin, It's seventy nine thousand. Look it's

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 3>up on the day, but boy was it sold off

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 3>hard throughout the weekend. Once again, we're questioning people's desire

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 3>full risk assets. More broadly, at these sorts of valuations.

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Digital gold has not been particularly loved. Meanwhile, gold got

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 3>absolutely hammered on Friday and continuing into Monday. But let's

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 3>look at some of the other areas of focus when

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 3>it comes to individual stocks. The mood because underneath the

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 3>hood and Video has been one of the ways down

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 3>in terms of points. We're going to dig into why

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 3>in Video is perhaps reassessing how much is going to

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 3>be committing to Open AI's infrastructure build out, how it

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 3>commits to that as well. So we also see how

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Oracle is up to and a half percent, having brought

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more transparency as to what they need

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 3>to raise for its own AI infrastructure, largely to open

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 3>AI bonds stock. The sales are upon us already. Bloomberg's

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Brodie Ford joins us, who was working hard all weekend

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 3>because it was on a Sunday that we learn that

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:32.199
<v Speaker 3>here's a company that's looking to raise what up to

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 3>fifty billion and a make sure of equity and.

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 13>Debt Sunday night, it's time to raise more money. Yeah,

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 13>it was kind of a unique situation to have this

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 13>kind of large announcement from a company as mature as

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 13>Oracle on a Sunday. But what that really underscores is

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 13>how Oracle has become this poster child of all the

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 13>AI financing fears. It's expected to be negative free cash

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 13>flow for the next couple of years as it builds

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 13>massive data centers, and the big question has been and

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 13>how much money will they have to borrow to do that?

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 13>Will they be able to maintain their investment grade? And

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 13>they essentially were trying to respond to these concerns and

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 13>say that no, we have a solid plan.

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 3>And it's interesting maybe they've been learned from past haste

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 3>with a previous bond sell at the end of last

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 3>year where Bonholder was an own suing because.

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 2>They felt that they didn't get enough.

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Well clear transparency that this was a company that will

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 3>be tapping the debt market a lot.

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 2>When we're looking at what they're getting.

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 3>Today, though there's three year floating rate notes, there's three

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 3>a fixed, five year fixed, seven year fixed, what's a

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 3>long seventy.

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:33.239
<v Speaker 2>Ar, ten year, thirty or forty year.

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 3>How much they're having to pay for the debt side

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:36.880
<v Speaker 3>of the equation, which they actually say is the only

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 3>time they're going to be tapping the bond markets.

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 13>This year, Well they're gonna be. They're expected to get

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 13>a ton of free cash flow once you look a

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 13>couple of years out, once those OAI contracts and others

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 13>start flowing. And what's particularly interesting today is to see

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:55.120
<v Speaker 13>them issue equity and often when that happens, investors don't

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 13>like dilution and the stock goes down. So it's funny

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 13>to see the stock go up on an equity insurance.

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 13>And what that means is that the company is willing

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:06.239
<v Speaker 13>to do what it takes to keep investment grade. It

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 13>does not want to get saddled with some incredible interest rates.

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 13>We've heard a lot of concerns on these loans, and

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 13>so they're trying to show that they're going to do

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 13>what it takes to maintain a good rating.

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 3>And actually that was really what we heard from the

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 3>analyst space coming out here, saying this should be positive

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 3>sign that they are really committed to avoiding junk.

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 13>Absolutely, and I think what it is too is just clarity.

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 13>I mean, there's been so much uncertainty about Hey, is

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 13>Oracle going to be able to get all of the

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 13>loans it needs? Is it going to be able to

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 13>complete this build out seamlessly? Is Open AI going to

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 13>pay its bills? That's a lot of the questions that

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:45.199
<v Speaker 13>have been weighing on the stock and so kind of

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:48.879
<v Speaker 13>any new information that shows a specific plan, almost whatever

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 13>that plan is, as long as it seems reasonable, is

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:52.919
<v Speaker 13>going to be read as good news.

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 3>We'll see how the up to twenty five billion dollars

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 3>on sale goes today and and need some of those

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 3>convertible notes as well. Broddie Ford all over the Oracle story,

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 3>and let's stay with the AI related debt story now,

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 3>because the cost of data center build out, it is

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 3>expected to.

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Top three trillion dollars.

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 3>An Oracle isn't the only tech company borrowing to finance

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 3>their plans, but he works senior private credit reporter policylks.

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:16.439
<v Speaker 2>And joins us.

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:19.679
<v Speaker 3>Now, who you've been looking across the board at the

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 3>panacee all ways in which companies are trying to finance

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 3>an extraordinary amount of build out right now? How much

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 3>are they leaning on public bond markets or indeed the

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 3>rest of the debt system.

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 14>So the best way to think about this is they

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 14>are tapping all debt markets. So we have obviously the

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 14>typical unbalanced sheet corporate borrowing, which you see like with

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 14>the Oracle deal today. That can be an investment grade bond,

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 14>a hiled bond, or a leverage loan, or even a

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 14>private credit direct loan. But there's a lot of off

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:47.880
<v Speaker 14>balance sheet borrowing happening as well. I know that sounds

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 14>a little bit scary when you first hear the words

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 14>off balance sheet, but what it simply means is that

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 14>instead of an investor lending to the company, they're lending

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 14>to the actual data center project itself. So they create

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:00.159
<v Speaker 14>a special purpose vehicle that is the actual building, or

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 14>an owner and borrower to create the data center. When

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 14>you tap that, that opens up a whole other realm

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 14>of markets. So, for example, the bank project finance construction

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 14>loan market has been heavily involved in this space. You're

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 14>seeing private placements, which are typically insurance companies. You're seeing

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 14>structured finance investors in the form of commercial mortgage.

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 11>Backed securities and asset backed securities.

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 14>You're seeing private credit, You're seeing GPU finance for the chips.

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 11>It is touching all parts of the debt markets, and.

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 3>We think about cole Weaves very much thinking about financing

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 3>of the chips to begin with, we saw that deal

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 3>between blue Out a meta is a real pin up.

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:33.919
<v Speaker 2>And the private slubpot of the business. What are they

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 2>having to pay for all of this?

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 14>It really depends, and it can range from just a

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 14>little bit over investment grade all the way to double

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 14>digit teams mid teens yields.

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 11>It just kind of depends on the structure.

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 14>There's also a big difference between something that is a

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 14>hyperscaler borrowing or ultimately backed by a hyperscaler versus some

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 14>of the more risky things where maybe it's a small

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:57.880
<v Speaker 14>early stage company that needs to borrow money.

0:27:57.880 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 11>That's all in on AI.

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 2>We've had a lot of new neo clouds.

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 3>It ca'll hang out you for example, just tell us

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 3>about the need for transparency. Though, what so interesting is

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 3>the equity markets response to Oracle today? It's just few

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:12.919
<v Speaker 3>you're telling us a little bit more. When we have

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.919
<v Speaker 3>so much private credit getting involved, do investors feel they

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 3>have enough information about just how broadly the borrowing is

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:20.640
<v Speaker 3>going from certain issues?

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:22.479
<v Speaker 11>I think it depends on the issuer.

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 14>So Oracle, for example, well, it is doing this off

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 14>balance sheet borrowing, it is still tied to those data

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 14>centers through lease commitments, and that does show up publicly

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 14>in their financial statements.

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 11>But I think for a lot.

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 14>Of these deals it's actually pretty much all private. It's

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 14>also a lot of times private company is doing it,

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 14>so then the investor base is just a very different

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 14>investor base. And I hope we're getting disclosures, but it's unclear.

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 14>And I think what makes it nerve wracking for the

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 14>markets is even if those private company investors are learning

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 14>about it, maybe the rest of the market doesn't know,

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 14>and that can just cause unease and uncertainty around the

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 14>absolute scale of the debt being borrowed right now.

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, said Bloommegg's polastics and got to go and read

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 3>her offers throughout all about the debt markets. Really interesting stuff. Meanwhile,

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 3>let's go to other Ai build out. In video, CEO

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Jensen Huang says the company has proposed one hundred billion

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 3>dollar investment in open Ai was quote never a commitment.

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Speaking to reporters in time, Hay over the weekend reiterated

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 3>his support for the chat chip tea maker, but did

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 3>not disclose the total investment.

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 6>Just to listen, Sam is closing the realm, and we

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 6>will absolutely be.

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 5>Interupted in their home mode, their home mode.

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 7>We will invest a great deal of money, probably the

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 7>largest investment we've ever made a.

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Large So is that going to be your overall one

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 3>hundred peal?

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 7>No, no, no, no, no, no, nothing like that.

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Fair Figeman joins us now for what was a busy weekend,

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 3>as always from mister Huango for in Taipei. Look are

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 3>we meant to be surprised that when you've inked some

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 3>sort of deal and said look we're good for up

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 3>to one hundred billion dollars that actually that hasn't been

0:29:57.560 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 3>fully ironed out and agreed and it's up to sch

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Mega walk coming online a little bit.

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I think it's important to step back. I

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 8>remember when this deal was announced in a few months back.

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 8>It was a monumental moment for both companies. One that

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 8>attested to the scope of the buildout that opening I

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 8>had in mind and Nvidia's role in that, and also

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 8>a lot of the circular deals concerns. To your point,

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 8>there are a lot of daylight there. They've ever set

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 8>a firm timetable or a fixed amount, and so there

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 8>was room to imagine and maybe it wouldn't be one

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 8>hundred billion dollars, But now I think it's a question

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 8>of just how far away is it from that, and

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 8>again over what timetable.

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Some of the reporting from other networks and outlets has

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 3>been that actually in video is getting uncomfortable with a

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 3>competitive landscape, uncomfortable with a so called discipline of open AI.

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Is that something that we're hearing in our reporting or

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 3>is this more this is a company that's maybe he

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 3>is aware of the criticism around circular financing and it's

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:46.239
<v Speaker 3>just been questioning a little bit more.

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, it's unclear, and it's a delicate balance

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 8>here between these two companies. Even if Nvidia is maybe

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 8>having those concerns that you lay out, Opening Eye is

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 8>still very central both to a larger landscape and to

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 8>Nvidia's own deployment of chips. It's clear that the relationship

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 8>between these two firms has not broken down. As Jensen said,

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 8>we'll probably be the largest investment they've ever made, and

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 8>will probably be the largest funding round we've ever seen.

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 8>But it's possible there is some daylight there.

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 3>Let's just go to that funding round because that's what's

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:14.959
<v Speaker 3>currently under negotiation. We know that Middle Eastern investors has

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 3>been eyed up, we know the Amazon's interested in the round.

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 3>So what sort of scale are we talking and how

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 3>will it be related to using certain companies equipment or

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 3>giga what's coming online?

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so, I mean we've reported that up to one

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 8>hundred billion dollars in this funding round, which again would

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 8>be the largest that we've ever seen, trumping Opening Eyes

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 8>prior forty billion dollar funding rounds. We've seen that Amazon,

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 8>SoftBank and Vidia each willing to potentially commit billions or

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 8>tens of billions of dollars to this round. Does not

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 8>currently feel like Opening Eye is hurting for money in

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 8>that one respect remains to be seen. And then to

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 8>your question, not just in Vidia, but certainly Amazon, Microsoft,

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 8>like these are all, if not circular relationships. Then continued

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 8>examples of the companies using the suppliers to fund their ambitions.

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, we'll keep a track of it, figure and breaking

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 3>it all down on that relationship between the video and

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 3>open Ai. Meanwhile, coming up, let's talk about crypto exchanges.

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 2>They're under pressure.

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 3>Plunging trading volumes is really the issue. At the moment,

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 3>we're off by just a couple of percent. We've cooped

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 3>some of our losses on the day, but we'll dig

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 3>into it next.

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 2>This has been their tech bearish sentiment in crypto.

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 3>It is weighing on the exchanges as investors pull back

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 3>on trading platforms like coinbase and Gemini, Well, they're seeing

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 3>stock prices and training volumes drop more on the entire ecosystem.

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Let's bring in Boombog cross asset reporter Isabel Lee and

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 3>no Wonder. Companies exposed to trading and volume are going

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 3>to be feeling the pain when everyone probably takes.

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 2>A bit of a step back at this moment, definitely

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:46.959
<v Speaker 2>a step back.

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 15>I was sitting in my SOFA nicely over the weekend,

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 15>and then bitcoin fell. It fell to as slower since April,

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:53.719
<v Speaker 15>the tarify of in volatility. So it's made a lot

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 15>of investors panic. Granted, thin liquidity over the weekend and

0:32:56.840 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 15>fewer traders, fewer online, and we know they've been Bitcoin falls.

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 15>It triggers a wave of liquidations. We saw billions and

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 15>billions of long and short positions liquidated. But still investors

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 15>have been increasingly becoming a little unhappy with bitcoin because

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 15>macro factors that used to help it before haven't been

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 15>really helping. Like a weeker dollar that's supposed to be

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 15>good for bitcoin, but it's not really helping right now.

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 15>So now we're seeing January decline and it's really one

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 15>of the longest streaks. I think it's a fourth straight

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 15>monthly decline, the longest streak since twenty eighteen.

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:26.719
<v Speaker 3>I mean, bitcoin shed nearly eleven percent in January. At

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 3>one point it was trading the lowest since President Trump's

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 3>returned to the White House. Much had been hoped for

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 3>regulatory changes, in particular what white get through Congress that

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 3>seems to be put on ice.

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Is that also an issue? Definitely, it's put on.

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 15>Ice because if this president, which is supposed to be

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 15>the most crypto friendly president, can't help it, what can

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 15>And you also see it and flows flows are drying up.

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 15>I mean, sure it's just a bucket and this we

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 15>still have more than a billion dollars in assets, but

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 15>you see flows drying up. I think investors have been

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 15>spoiled because it used to be always green on disc

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 15>green inflos after inflows. When bitcoin ETF's launch in twenty

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 15>twenty four, which is crazy, two years ago, it made

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 15>records after records, and now I mean some would say

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 15>it's consolidation. Some would say, oh great, now I can

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:08.839
<v Speaker 15>buy it's an attractive entry point because for a while

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 15>Bitcoin has been too high, and if it's too high,

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:13.439
<v Speaker 15>I mean, how will that be an attractive entry point.

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:15.799
<v Speaker 15>So it's a mixed sentiment out there, but for now,

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 15>you can't deny that there's some gloom in crypto.

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 3>World, some blue for Michael Sailor in particular. I mean,

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 3>just talk to us about these digital asset treasury companies

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:27.800
<v Speaker 3>and how much this pain must be hurting.

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:28.840
<v Speaker 11>Them, just like bitcoin.

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 15>I think digital asset treasuries are whether you love them

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 15>or you hate them. But today headlines are making for

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 15>Michael Sailor because for the first time, the plunge token's

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 15>price fell below the purchase cost of Michael Sailor's leverage

0:34:41.040 --> 0:34:43.880
<v Speaker 15>bitcoin proxy and strategy. So that's really something. There are

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:45.799
<v Speaker 15>no margin calls yet. I want to make sure there's

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 15>no immediate financial stress, no expectation to sell bitcoin. But

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:51.800
<v Speaker 15>it's just something worth noting. Could this be the beginning

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 15>of something? Maybe, but maybe it's also just like a

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:56.879
<v Speaker 15>bad day, a bad week, a bad month. But it's

0:34:56.880 --> 0:34:59.919
<v Speaker 15>definitely worth noting because he is the biggest, biggest bull

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 15>of bigcoin and lots Street.

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the company's cost basis is about seventy six thousand,

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 3>and we went below that for a moment. I mean,

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 3>we see the shot stock price just get off of

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 3>its lows, but still under pressure. Once again, isabell lee

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 3>across the sasset class for us, we appreciate it. Now

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:17.319
<v Speaker 3>coming up Palenteer earnings, they come up after the bell.

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:33.240
<v Speaker 3>We're going to discuss what to expect. That's in Bloomberg Tech.

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Earning.

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 3>Still coming all lies on pal Andeer reporting after the

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 3>closing bell today and actually, for the first time in

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 3>two years, Palentiner's shares are not rallying into a.

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Quarterly earnings report.

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.359
<v Speaker 3>Let's break it all down Bloomberg's Tech Equity Reporter com

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:43.239
<v Speaker 3>and rhaning key on the day, they're up just a

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 3>little bit, but yet to date it's been brutal.

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 11>Right, it has.

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 9>And if you look even further back to November when

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 9>they hit the record high ahead of their last earnings report,

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:54.240
<v Speaker 9>the drawdown is about twenty five percent, which is pretty

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 9>significant for Palenti, for any stock, and a very different

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:01.800
<v Speaker 9>setup that we've seen going into our earnings from previous reports.

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:05.439
<v Speaker 9>So it's definitely looking like, you know, the stock could

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:07.359
<v Speaker 9>get a little bit of help. Its valuation is still

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:09.359
<v Speaker 9>very high, even though it's come in a little bit.

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 9>With this, you know, the stocks decline, so investors are

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 9>looking for some very key things. I mean, pounds expected

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 9>to put up another great quarter. The guidance will really

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 9>be paramount, and there's a lot of volatility in this name,

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 9>so we could really see big swings in either direction.

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:25.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, revenue is still meant to be sixty one

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 3>percent growth fifty more than fifty percent for the fiscal

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 3>full year. But doctor CoP's got to be aware of

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 3>how many ways has deemed a bit of a mean stock,

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 3>and as we've just been discussing with crypto and bitcoin,

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 3>we've seen a lot of changes where people have been

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 3>wanting to allocate.

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Is that anything to do.

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 3>With it, It's more about just a terrible time for software

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 3>in general.

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 9>I think it's a little bit more tied to the

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 9>software you know sell off. We've seen a couple analysts

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 9>commenting on that it's just gotten weighed down with the

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 9>rest of the sector. I think there also could be

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:58.799
<v Speaker 9>you know, there's been some of a rotation away from

0:36:58.800 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 9>you know, the most expensive tech names. This definitely is

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:04.920
<v Speaker 9>in that camp. And you know, a source said to me,

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:07.720
<v Speaker 9>if you're looking to rotate in something's over one hundred

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:11.360
<v Speaker 9>times you know forward earnings, that's not really maybe the

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 9>place that you're going to be looking to buy. So yeah,

0:37:14.680 --> 0:37:17.279
<v Speaker 9>we'll just really see I think doctor Karp as well,

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 9>you know, he's such a passionate CEO. People will definitely

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:23.279
<v Speaker 9>be listening for his comments on the call, and that could,

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:24.600
<v Speaker 9>you know, really go either way as well.

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 3>We always get some pretty choice words from doctor Carp,

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:30.240
<v Speaker 3>pretty most common Rhyanikey, great to have you on today.

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Look Palente isn't the only big tech name

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:35.840
<v Speaker 3>reporting earningxist week. Look how many we've got coming and

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 3>please to say Fiona Sincotter's senior analysta City Index Financial can.

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 15>Talk us to.

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:42.800
<v Speaker 3>We've got a MD on Tuesday, Qualcom, Alphabet Wednesday, Thursday

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 3>got the big one that is an Amazon far out.

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:48.479
<v Speaker 3>How do you embrace for some of these numbers, because look,

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft last week wasn't a bad set of numbers, absolutely

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:55.279
<v Speaker 3>beaten up when people were worried about the capital expenditure.

0:37:56.840 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's right.

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:01.400
<v Speaker 16>I mean, we're definitely seeing this sort of division between

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:04.880
<v Speaker 16>those techs that are in favor and those that are not.

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:07.719
<v Speaker 16>And I think that's going to be even more under

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 16>the microscope as these earnings come through, the market is

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 16>very much more selective about where they're looking to direct capital.

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:19.239
<v Speaker 16>You know, before, as we said, it was just very

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 16>much more jump on that tech trade and ride it higher.

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:24.719
<v Speaker 16>There really wasn't too much in it. But that's just

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 16>not the case anymore. And we're seeing, you know, even

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:30.239
<v Speaker 16>numbers that come out relatively good, like we said with Microsoft,

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:32.360
<v Speaker 16>end up with you know, a ten percent drop in

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 16>the stock. And at the same time we saw Meta

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:37.800
<v Speaker 16>driving ten percent higher. So it does feel a little

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 16>bit more unpredictable in that respect, and it also means

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 16>that the bar I would say is even higher on

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:49.319
<v Speaker 16>these companies to impress than it has been before, even

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:52.799
<v Speaker 16>though valuations in some cases have come down a bit

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:54.920
<v Speaker 16>given that sort of setout of tech that we had

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:57.440
<v Speaker 16>seen since the November highs.

0:38:57.719 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 3>So let's just start with Palenteer for example, what would

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 3>a software company that is going to deliver more than

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:05.919
<v Speaker 3>sixty percent earnings for share growth more than sixty percent

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 3>revenue growth have to articulate, you think to change the

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 3>sentiment on the name.

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 16>I mean, I think Ford Guidance is going to be

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:17.279
<v Speaker 16>absolutely key, and I feel that's where sort of, you know,

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 16>Microsoft might have just sort of let the side down

0:39:20.760 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 16>a little bit compared to Matter for example. So I

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 16>think for Guidance is going to be massively impressive in

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:31.439
<v Speaker 16>order to support this valuation. I mean, as we spoke about,

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:33.759
<v Speaker 16>you know, the evaluation here is what one hundred and

0:39:33.840 --> 0:39:36.360
<v Speaker 16>forty times expected earnings.

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:38.359
<v Speaker 2>So you know, it really has a lot to live

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:40.280
<v Speaker 2>up to. And given that we've.

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:44.240
<v Speaker 16>Seen all these questions about the AI spend capital expenditure,

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:49.360
<v Speaker 16>what's the monetization. This does mean that investors do actually

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:52.440
<v Speaker 16>want to see that something's coming through now, And for

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 16>that reason, I think Ford guidance is going to be

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 16>key here.

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, if anyone can show productivity and articulate what AI

0:39:58.160 --> 0:40:01.719
<v Speaker 3>is doing, palentteer like you do that. Meanwhile, Alphabet's that

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 3>one stop shop, vertically integrated, showing what it can do

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 3>with its own chips, doing what it can do with

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 3>its own tech and hardware and the whole shebang. What

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:12.960
<v Speaker 3>do you anticipate? Alphabet has had a lot of mood

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:15.279
<v Speaker 3>music to the positive of late. Will that hold?

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:16.799
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 16>So, I mean I think this is definitely one of

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 16>the stocks that seems to be in the favored few.

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:24.240
<v Speaker 16>I mean, if we look at up eight percent across January,

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 16>which is you know, pretty good returns for a tex

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 16>stook in January sixty eight percent year on year. But

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:34.800
<v Speaker 16>I think, you know, Amazon and again with sorry Alphabet,

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 16>again with Amazon, are going to be very much a

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:39.320
<v Speaker 16>litmus test as far as that whole sort of you

0:40:39.400 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 16>know AI theme is concerned. Obviously, with Alphabet, you're looking

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 16>at a four trillion dollar valuation, so you know, investors

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 16>are really going to want to see whether there's momentum

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:54.280
<v Speaker 16>in that Google Cloud and advertising to support that valuation.

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 16>So you know, focus, as I said, will be on

0:40:57.280 --> 0:41:01.320
<v Speaker 16>that cloud, growth, will be on AI initiatives, monetization of that,

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:03.840
<v Speaker 16>and also spending. I mean, this is what you know

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 16>the market has been getting very nervous about.

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 2>Is you know, what is that AI spending? What are

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:10.880
<v Speaker 2>we looking at? How much is it expected to go up?

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 2>And what are the returns on the back of that.

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting is both Alphabet and Amazon will be a

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:20.320
<v Speaker 3>bit of a tell fro an in video maybe AMD

0:41:20.480 --> 0:41:22.920
<v Speaker 3>as well, which is coming out beforehand, of how well

0:41:23.000 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 3>are they producing their own chips? How much does that

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 3>matter to InVideo in the future. I mean, we don't

0:41:27.640 --> 0:41:29.759
<v Speaker 3>get their earnings until later in February is always fearing.

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:35.800
<v Speaker 3>But do you think semiconductor concerns should be start to

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:38.359
<v Speaker 3>build in in terms of companies being able to build

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:40.440
<v Speaker 3>their own and just turning to a broad com for example.

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, I mean it's definitely a question that's on the

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 16>table and a focus that will be there. And I

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 16>mean if we do see that happening, then obviously that

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:53.480
<v Speaker 16>will move attention away from Nvidia and that sort of

0:41:53.520 --> 0:42:00.239
<v Speaker 16>you know first to market momentum that that stock had.

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:03.239
<v Speaker 16>I don't think we're necessarily there yet, but I think

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 16>it is right to expect that to slowly start creeping in.

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:09.839
<v Speaker 16>So attention will be on that as well, as you said,

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:11.640
<v Speaker 16>you know, and video not for a little while yet,

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:14.720
<v Speaker 16>but it's always a massive focus as we get past

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 16>these earnings this week.

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:19.800
<v Speaker 3>How many calls are you taking also about the private side,

0:42:19.960 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 3>the question marks around Opening Eyes fundraising and what that

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:26.239
<v Speaker 3>really means the rest of the ecosystem to your public investors.

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 16>For a moment, it's definitely a question, and it's that

0:42:31.200 --> 0:42:33.080
<v Speaker 16>question that we had, and it was very much a

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:36.759
<v Speaker 16>concern I think, you know, around October November time, where

0:42:36.840 --> 0:42:38.840
<v Speaker 16>there seemed to be a lot of deals going on

0:42:39.120 --> 0:42:41.840
<v Speaker 16>and there was that sense of all that question is

0:42:41.920 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 16>this sort of an ecosystem that's growing or is it

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 16>just circular investment?

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:49.720
<v Speaker 2>And I don't think that was ever really resolved.

0:42:49.760 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 16>The market does seem to be a little bit calmer

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:54.560
<v Speaker 16>about those questions for the time being, but I wonder

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 16>if we as we move towards and videos, whether those

0:42:57.719 --> 0:43:00.359
<v Speaker 16>questions will start to appear again, and especially after we've

0:43:00.400 --> 0:43:01.120
<v Speaker 16>had the earnings this.

0:43:01.160 --> 0:43:04.719
<v Speaker 3>Week Piana Sincotter bracing us for a big week at

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:07.160
<v Speaker 3>City Index Financial Markets. Thanks so much for your time

0:43:07.200 --> 0:43:09.320
<v Speaker 3>as always. Meanwhile, that does it for this edition in

0:43:09.360 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Tech. Do not forget to check out our podcast

0:43:11.719 --> 0:43:14.280
<v Speaker 3>if I'd on the terminal, as well as online on Apple, Spotify,

0:43:14.400 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 3>and iHeart.

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:17.799
<v Speaker 2>From New York. This is Bloomberg Tech.