WEBVTT - Brian Hamburger on Surging Merger Business in RIAs

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Master's in Business with Barry rid Holds on

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:12.319
<v Speaker 2>This week on the podcast, I have an extra special guest.

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Brian Hamburger has been one of the leading authorities in

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 2>the world of registered investment advisories, broker dealers, sec regulatory compliance.

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 2>He is the founder of Market Council, which is one

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 2>of the leading firms in that space, as well as

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 2>the Hamburger Law firm. I know Brian for a dozen years,

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 2>maybe longer, but I've really gotten to know him over

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 2>the past couple of years. Really, there are a few

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 2>people in the industry with a better perch on what's

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 2>going on, a better position to see the industry, which,

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 2>depending on which survey you read, is anywhere between thirty

0:00:55.000 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 2>eight trillion and ninety seven trillion dollars. He just knows

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 2>everything about how to stand up an ria, what's happening

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 2>in the world of mergers and acquisitions in the space

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 2>where the capital is flowing, how people change their employment

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:17.839
<v Speaker 2>in the industry, and how various groups get carved out

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 2>or stood up or established on both the broker dealer

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 2>side and the registered investment advisory side. He is highly

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 2>sought after as a council in this space, and I'm

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 2>glad we had the opportunity to finally sit down and

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 2>talk about the industry. It's a little inside baseball if

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 2>you're an RIA, if you're an attorney working in the space,

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 2>if you're a broker dealer, if you're anybody within the

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 2>financial services industry, or if you're somebody just curious as

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 2>to how all these things actually happen. I think you're

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 2>going to find this to be an absolutely fascinating conversation

0:01:55.880 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 2>with no further ADO Market Councils. Brian Hamburger, Thanks Barry,

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 2>it's so great to be here. It's great to have

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 2>you now. Full disclosure. Ridult's Wealth Management has been around

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 2>a decade. A couple of years before we launched, we

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 2>were exploring merging with somebody. We retained your firm. You

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 2>guys did a nice job and that was I don't know,

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 2>twelve years ago. I always feel more comp more disclosures

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 2>better than less As an attorney, I assume you wouldn't

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 2>disagree with that.

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Persusse I wouldn't aagree. We also co invested in an

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 1>investment recently where we should that's right, So I don't

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>know if that closed yet has that clised closed last week?

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 2>So there you go. So now I have to disclose

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 2>that also. So Brian is not a stranger to me,

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 2>and we have some shared financial interests. But the reason

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to bring him in here is there are

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 2>a few people in the industry who have a better

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 2>perch by which to look at the world of registered

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 2>investment advisors, broker dealers, all of the changes that are

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 2>taking place in the space. And before we delve into that,

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 2>let's jump into your background. You turned out to be

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 2>the first dual economics financial management major at Quinnipiac. What

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 2>what led to the interest in finance?

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Quite frankly, the interest in finance started when I was young.

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>My father was was an investment advisor, and he he

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>made his way to be an investment advisor from being

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>a manager with a textile factory to selling insurance to

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:30.359
<v Speaker 1>find his way out of that business. Went from insurance

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to financial planning, financial planning to the independent broker dealer

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>world independent broker dealer to hybrid IBD slash Ria.

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 2>And so really you're saying he couldn't keep a job,

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 2>constantly looking for a new game.

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>He made his way. He made his way into this space,

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and I was, I was captivated. You know. Keep in

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>mind also that when I when I was going through

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>school in the you know, mid to late nineties, you know,

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street was was pretty pretty appealing, bang and it

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>was on fire. Yeah, pretty sexy. And so so why

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>law school?

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 2>You go to university in Miami, why not go for

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 2>a business degree?

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>So I did. I mean, at first I got out

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of undergrad and a degree in finance, coming out of

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>coming out of a small college at the time, Quinnipiac College.

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:22.679
<v Speaker 1>The gigs I was offered were essentially customer service jobs

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>at mutual funds, you know call service, you know, manning

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the phones, which I was no stranger to, you know,

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>work my way through high school and college on the phones,

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>but was uninspired by that work. I didn't see the

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 1>real path ahead. I saw myself, if anything, maybe maybe

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>doing product wholesaling, getting involved in you know, in financial

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, product structuring. But I didn't really see a

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 1>clear path. And my grandmother sat me down and she said,

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 1>maximize the opportunity. She said, you're still in learning mode.

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 1>You're never going to go back to school if you're

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna if you're gonna do it go to law school.

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>And actually, I'm going to tell you she she did

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>something a little interesting. She she was an investor, she

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 1>loved stocks. She had her broker at Mary lynch Uh

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and and she put in front of me a stack

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 1>of annual reports. Remember these big gloss things used to

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>come out all.

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 2>The time with a little bit of information buried in

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 2>the back, but the front was was the narrative, story

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:30.720
<v Speaker 2>was compelling. Yeah, and how could you not put money

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 2>into this common right?

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 1>So she she she puts these annual reports, and she said,

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I want you to look at the management in the

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and the board of directors, and I want you to

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 1>tell me what they have in common. So we're at

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>We're at dinner that night, and she said, did you

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:46.600
<v Speaker 1>look through them? I said yeah. I said, I'm good

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>with my auntser, I'm ready. She goes, what are they

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>have in common? I said, they're all white bald men.

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 2>And one day I'll be a white bald man.

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>And she said, that's not that's not what I wanted

0:05:57.320 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you to get out of it. But was tough.

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 2>She she wasn't falling around.

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 1>With I thought she wasn't falling around.

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 2>She was looking for the answer they all went to

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 2>law school.

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>They all went to law school, and they and they

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 1>didn't necessarily pursue a career purely in law, but her

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.479
<v Speaker 1>her understanding of it is they must know the rules

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of the game better than others. And so that really

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that really stuck with me. And they know the rules of.

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 2>The road better than others. That's really insightful. What did

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 2>grandma do that she had such market savvy back in

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 2>the nineties.

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:34.720
<v Speaker 1>So my grandma Nan and Sophie, she lost She lost

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>her husband at a young age before I was born,

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and her husband ran an autobody shop. They were first

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>generation immigrants, and when faced with the typical widow dilemma,

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>she stepped in and said, I'm not going to sell.

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to run this business. And so to this

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>day I continue to meet some old school mechanics who

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 1>knew my grandmother when and they said, man, she was

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a tough son of a.

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Really yeah, and I've been having a hard time chasing

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 2>down an old nine to eleven turbo the charger. Can

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 2>she can Grandma hook me up?

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>So she's unfortunately passed away for many years now. But

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I had some really, some really good strong

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>women in my life. My other grandmother was another first

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>generation immigrant from Germany, and she she took to selling

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>beauty supplies on the side, and before you knew it,

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>she was the number one salesperson for the uh you know,

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>uh selling to professional salons in the whole country. So

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I learned a lot from from young ladies.

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 2>That's quite quite interesting. So one of your grandmothers steers

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 2>you towards law, when did you kind of realize, Hey,

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 2>I can make law and finance work well together, and

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 2>one plus one is three.

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So I don't think there was that necessarily eureka moment,

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>but I was definitely informed by my father's study groups.

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, I knew his network of friends and colleagues,

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and I would constantly hear them frustrated by the compliance department, right, right,

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>they were just playing compliance for everything they couldn't do.

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 2>The Bureau of Business Prevention is how the retail brokers

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 2>used to describe compliance.

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I think many still do, right. They know that the

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>answers know, but they don't know why, right, And they

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>don't really don't care to know why. And it just

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>struck me that it can't be all that complicated. And

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>so when I would look into why certain of their

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>marketing materials would get declined or certain of their business

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>requests or authorizations would get declined, and I would share

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it with them. We would sit down and figure out

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a way around it, right, a way to deal with

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 1>those issues, and they were really grateful. And I love

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>solving things that other people think are unsolvable.

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 2>I love the puzzle.

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Well more than the puzzle. I love coming up with

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a solution when they can't even formulate the question. Huh right,

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's like it's almost like pulling it out of

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>them and asking what the problem is. And I've always

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>been drawn to that, and so to me, you know,

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.959
<v Speaker 1>that really helped. And then early in my early in

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>law school at a professor and adjunct professor. I think

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the best professors in college are adjunct professors.

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 2>They're working actual career in the industry and teaching part time.

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, And I was fortunate that this professor, Chuck Senator,

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>was during the day the head of enforcement the in

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Miami's SEC Enforcement Division, and so I started to see,

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, what he's done with his with his law

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>school education. Chuck went on to be general counsel for

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>small firm like Fidelity Investments and Aim and I. Him

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and I are still in touch to this day. But

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>it's people like that who who take the education and

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>really make it their own that that really really inspired me.

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 2>So let me throw a compliance question at you, because

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:02.959
<v Speaker 2>you're making my.

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 1>You want free advice?

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, I want to talk about the industry.

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 2>So I always assumed the reason compliance departments always said

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:16.319
<v Speaker 2>no was simple game theory. There's zero upside for them

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 2>saying yes. The best that can happen is nothing goes

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 2>terribly wrong. The worst that can go happen is there's

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 2>a big problem, and why did you approve this? So internally,

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 2>there's no incentive for them to do business until they

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 2>stop so much business that some senior person has to

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 2>come in and say, hey, you got to loosen the

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 2>reins a little bit. You're killing us.

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.839
<v Speaker 1>You are very correct, and I'm not going to tell

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you that that often. But the root of that is

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>this big misnomer. It's this it's this word compliance that

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:53.319
<v Speaker 1>major firms have used because it's a good catch all. Right.

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Compliance at big firms is similar to saying wait till

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>your mother gets home, right, Because they know that people

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:05.439
<v Speaker 1>are fearful of the regulators far more than their colleagues

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>sitting at the cubicle right across the hall, and so

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>they call things compliance when really probably about eighty percent

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of the issues are risk mitigation issues. And so as

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 1>advisors look to leave these big enterprises and go independent,

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest things that we need to train

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>them on is the distinction between compliance, legal and.

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Risk, compliance, legal and risk. Those are three very very

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 2>distinct issues that sometimes get lumped together as a lazy

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 2>way to say no exactly really intriguing. So clearly you

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:47.319
<v Speaker 2>see the overlap between being an attorney understanding the intricacies

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 2>of securities law. I'm going to use a dirty word now,

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 2>how did you come across the synergy of combining a

0:11:56.720 --> 0:12:01.439
<v Speaker 2>law firm with a consultancy that specialized in compliance and

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 2>regulatory supervision?

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Has that become a dirty word?

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Now? Oh? In the M and A world, it's the

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 2>worst word you can use, really, because it means we

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 2>don't really know why we're slamming these two companies together

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 2>other than the fees, the banking fees. So let's say

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 2>there's synergies here, and we'll all go out for beer.

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's kind of how that word became a

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 2>dirty word. It was a substitute for actually thinking about

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 2>how do to disparare things? You know, how do you

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 2>get to that one plus one equals three?

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>So we'll just assume that that that's going to work

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>out instead of doing the analysis. Got it?

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I mean, I don't think that's that far

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 2>from the truth.

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>So what I realized is that people were intimidated by

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>law firms. My first job out of law school was

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>at a mid size law firm out of Prince in

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, and I would have clients who wouldn't call

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>when an issue arose.

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 2>They're afraid of getting built.

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 1>That was it, one hundred percent? That was it? Because

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I would ask them after the fact and they would say,

0:12:57.559 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, honestly, I didn't want to run the clock.

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I said, that would have cost fifty dollars. We would

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 1>have been done with this.

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 2>You know. I didn't want to tell you what you

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 2>guys hit me for. Every time I met a phone call.

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was no, you guys were pretty fair.

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 2>But that is a legitimate concern, especially for a small

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:16.679
<v Speaker 2>firm that has a modest budget.

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, yeah, So in my mind, we had to do

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>something democratize regulatory compliance without diminishing the quality of work.

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Because when I started Market Council and the Hamburger Law

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:33.079
<v Speaker 1>from back in two thousand, the only firms that were

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:37.719
<v Speaker 1>doing regulatory compliance work were registration services service bureaus. Right,

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it was a very much a next available operator. Former

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>regulators were the best you would get. And a lot

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of the answers were, well, this is what we do right,

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>this is our practice, this is what other firms do,

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>And they couldn't go back to the source, They couldn't

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>go back to the root, They couldn't rationalize why things

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 1>were being done that way. And so I wanted to

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>be able to bringing a higher degree of quality to

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:05.319
<v Speaker 1>regulatory compliance. At the same time, I didn't want to

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>walk away from the things that we need to be

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>lawyers to do right. And so there are certain things

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:16.079
<v Speaker 1>or drafting of contracts, negotiating deals, representing someone's interests right

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>actually you know, working on their behalf, dealing with some

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>complex issues where we're going beyond the law, beyond the

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>rules and regulations. All of those have to be done

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>by an attorney, and so I didn't want to skirt

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that or circumvent that, and so we set up two

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>distinct firms.

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 2>So how many companies, and I'm actually literally researching as

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 2>we speak, how many companies do what Market Council does

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 2>or some partial approximation.

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think there's anyone that has the breadth

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of services that we do. Other firms have launched in

0:14:54.000 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the past as affiliates or related companies to law firms,

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>but they really they've either sold off the compliance business

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>so they're no longer affiliated, or they really do they

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>do completely different different work. It's really just a referral relationship,

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:22.239
<v Speaker 1>you know. With us, the law firm is basically a

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>customer of Market Council for a lot of our startup work.

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 2>So when you say startup, it's a new firm that's

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 2>stepping out to launch a new company, and they need

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 2>to go through the whole SEC registration process unless they're

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 2>small enough, in which case it's whatever states they're operating in.

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 2>They need to set up their policies and procedures. It's

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 2>just all those initial painful, tedious, difficult things. I mean,

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 2>we're only not even a decade out from launching hours

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 2>and I remember it was a pretty painful set of

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 2>circumstances to get up and run.

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, yes and no, right, I mean so, so Market

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Council Mark Council Consulting will work with firms on really

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>understanding their scope of services, taking inventory over their conflicts

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of interest, drafting out fee schedules, investment strategy. A lot

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of it is disclosure based, right, so we'll work on

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>on creating all the disclosures, obviously handling all of the registrations,

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the regulatory reporting that needs to be done, drafting and

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>installing a drafting a compliance manual, and installing an initial

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>compliance program. All of that work is handled by Market

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Council for most of the clients that come to us

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>for startup work right in that program we call it

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the ra incubator, right, which is a really I think

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>describes you know what it does. But for almost all

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the clients that come to us, they're not coming from

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a very pure place where they can just engage in

0:16:57.200 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that activity, right, you know.

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 2>For meaning coming from a broker dealer or another RIA.

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 2>And that raises a question as to some of the

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 2>technical legal employment issues around their exits.

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, there's definitely issues with their employment and employment transition, right,

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>what canon they can't do while they are currently gainfully

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>employed elsewhere. Right, That captive employment restricts them often far

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:26.919
<v Speaker 1>more than they know. But they can engage in an

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>outside business activity, right, they can engage in selling away.

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>The big one that they get hung up on is

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>they can engage in a private securities transaction without getting

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the prior written consent of the firm. Now, you may say, Barry, well,

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 1>how is this a private securities transactions?

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 2>They're launching a new firm that's sec regulated.

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't even matter if it's sec regulated. The fact that

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>they are, let's say, in preparation for launching this new firm,

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>they are acquiring one hundred percent of the membership interests

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of an LLC or one hundred percent of the stock

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of corporation.

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Can't you disclose that at the last minute and.

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 1>No prior written consent of the firm you're working? Oh,

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>so you can.

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 2>That's technical, isn't it.

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, and it's enforce right, and so you can decide

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>that you want to sever your employment and then begin

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 1>the startup work. But that's not tenable for the most.

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Six months, then, so how do you never? That seems

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 2>kind of an absurd set of rules. That prevents people

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 2>from leaving a firm if or, I guess you could

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.679
<v Speaker 2>always use a straw up man. You could use a

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 2>third person to set this up and then hey, I

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 2>didn't decide to do leave until the day I resigned,

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:43.640
<v Speaker 2>and my wife did all the work. It's on hard.

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Does that work?

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately? No, But there are strategies that we do deploy

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>in order to make that work. And it doesn't work

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 1>for a whole variety of situations, depending upon how restrictive

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 1>their current employment situation is. But when you say you know,

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that seems awfully restrictive, keep in mind these are rules

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>written by a self regulatory organization comprised of broker dealers

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>or looking to create a moat.

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 2>So you launch both Hamburger Law Firm and Market Council

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 2>in two thousand, that that's some timing. Everything's going to hell.

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.679
<v Speaker 2>The dot com implosion is happening, the Nasdaq falls. I

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 2>think it was eighty one percent peak to troth. What

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:31.400
<v Speaker 2>was it like launching two firms into that mess?

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I was dumb and young, right, I mean.

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's the time to be dumb when you have

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, recovery period.

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, you know I had and.

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk exactly how dumb you sold your house to

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 2>fund this? Is that true?

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I did, I did, and I'm to this day, I'm

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>grateful to my former wife for supporting that decision and

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>actually coming up with the idea.

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 2>It was her idea. You were both all in, let's

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 2>let's sell the house and see what sticks against the wall.

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>So I came up with this consulting concept, and I

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>pitched it to the firm's partnership and I said, I said,

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>I really think that we would be able to do

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a great job for our ria clients, for our wealth

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>management clients by having this consulting firm. And they rejected

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:21.919
<v Speaker 1>the idea. And I would come home from work and

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>crack open a beer, sit on the back porch, and

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't do that every every day, but I did

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 1>it coming out of work there, and I would punch

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 1>the pillow in the morning.

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 2>I was just, why did they reject the idea? What

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 2>was the explanation?

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Law firms don't do that now. Okay, two years later,

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty two years later, we see that law firms now

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:44.959
<v Speaker 1>do that. They just didn't do that in big numbers

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:49.640
<v Speaker 1>back then. And so so she said to me, she said, well,

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>are you just going to keep doing this?

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 2>And I said, well meaning punching the pillow.

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, meaning punching the pillow. And I said, it's probably

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:00.160
<v Speaker 1>my best option right now. And you know, we looked

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>at our situation. She was pregnant with our first with

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 1>our first child.

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 2>And we were that's the time to quit your job

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 2>and sell your house.

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>That's the perfect So she said, well leave and I said,

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 1>how are we gonna do that? We just bought this

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>house and she said if not now, when?

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 2>So not even like a second mortgage, sell the house

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 2>and use that to fund the news.

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>We had to sell the house. We had to do

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 1>a for sale by owner because if we sold it

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>using a broker, we would have been way underwater. So

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>we literally printed up flyers, put them outside, put them

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>all over town. We sold our house we have. When

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I went to launch this firm, my daughter was six

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>months old and my wife was pregnant with our second.

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>We had two large dogs. Well and behold, no one

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>wanted to rent to us, so we ended up we

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>ended up renting a log cabin on a vineyard in

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>central New Jersey. I thought it was charming, My wife

0:21:58.160 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>not so much.

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Wait they're a vineyard in New Jersey. That's the news

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 2>New Jersey.

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:04.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I can't read that many.

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 2>I can't recall my last New Jersey bouchelet. When when

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 2>is that harvest?

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>It was it was a lovely place to live for

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:16.399
<v Speaker 1>a short period and yeah, we uh you know, we

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>were all in. We literally sold the house to finance

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the bill.

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that's a crazy story.

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Prior to twenty twenty two, when rates were cheap, when

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 2>rates were zero, when capital was plentiful, it seemed like

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 2>the entire industry went through this wild merger frenzy. I

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 2>thought twenty twenty two would cool it off. I mean,

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 2>it seems to have slowed a bit, but it's not

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 2>like anybody through a bucket of ice water. What's going

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 2>on in that space today?

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Listen. I think it has slowed, and I think interest

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>rates are going to be probably the you know, the biggest,

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>the biggest driver there because, as you know, right, the

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>capitol becomes more expensive. But you know, what shocked me

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 1>more more than the slowdown, the slowdown actually makes sense.

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>What shocked me more than the slowdown was the intoxication

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>of capital, right, and the fervor in which you know

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>these these firms, private capital has been chasing investment advisors.

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 2>So I have a theory as to why. I'm curious

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 2>as to why you think that that fervor was there.

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think that I think that there is

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:29.919
<v Speaker 1>a strong investment thesis as to why to acquire these firms. Right,

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>we joked around about synergies. Before they talk about synergies,

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>they talk about economies of scale. There's this foregone belief

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>where people just like to jump to the fact that

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 1>that there is some type of scalable client experience out

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>there that's really special. People don't necessarily describe how to

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 1>get there, but they just say, with more resources, we

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>can build a better client experience. Right. You could probably

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>build better digital tools, you could probably build build a

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:04.640
<v Speaker 1>better communications strategy, probably insert some AI that you could

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>do some sophisticated things. But I'm not quite sure it's

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>just quantitatively or qualitatively better, right, because how do you

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>how do you compete with the advisor who's got a

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:17.679
<v Speaker 1>couple hundred million dollars, who knows the names of all

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:20.880
<v Speaker 1>their clients and all their kids, knows all their needs,

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 1>goals and objectives. Is sitting down at the kitchen table

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 1>with them, you know, every quarter. I mean, this is

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 1>the career that we started in, right, I mean this

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>this was what it looked like. And and so I

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.479
<v Speaker 1>always ask, you know, better from what perspective? You know,

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>is it going to be better from the client perspective

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>or better in terms of just more profitable business? And

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't quite know the answer to that.

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:46.959
<v Speaker 2>So let's take that apart. So, so there's really two

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:50.719
<v Speaker 2>issues there. The first is all the private money flowing in.

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 2>I always looked at the private capital rushing into the

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 2>RIA space, especially with so there are a couple of

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 2>different types of firms. A small firm that you know,

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 2>is a very nice little lifestyle practice. Then there's the

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:09.439
<v Speaker 2>medium firm that's been a decent chunk of capital but

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 2>for forever. They've been around for twenty years. They're almost

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 2>a billion dollars in ass of pioneers. Right, they're not growing,

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 2>they're not losing clients, they're kind of holding steady. To

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 2>private equity, which is a big source of the money

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 2>that was flowing in here. Hey, this is a bond

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 2>with a seven or an eight percent coupon, and theoretically

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 2>a capital you know, an equity kicker if they're if

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 2>they're acquired down the road. So we're getting two percent

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 2>in the bond market, or at least they were before

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty two. Let's get seven eight percent and maybe

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 2>things work out and someone takes them out. That was

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 2>the at least some of the interest when things were zero.

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>It's better than that. Actually, oh really it's I think

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that private capital likens it to an equity indexed annuity

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>right where there's no downside because they put in a pick,

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:05.160
<v Speaker 1>they put in a preferred income clause that gives them

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the ability to get paid first, So there's no market

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:12.120
<v Speaker 1>downturn risk, or I should say very low market downturn risk.

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>When the when the minority investor or the you know,

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the capital partner paid first is getting paid first, there's

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a long way to go before before that investment is affected.

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think they look at it as having us

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>insured upside potential with that ongoing annuity stream.

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Now, now you let's talk a little bit about the

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 2>roll ups and the mergers and acquisitions that are going on.

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 2>So for there's no doubt in my mind as having

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 2>run affirm that was ninety million an assets, the one

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 2>that is coming. We're three and eventually four when the

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 2>last deal closes. Billion dollars is a lot of a

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 2>lot of assets graduation. There are well a lot of

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 2>work still to go, but there are clearly economies of

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 2>scale and ik, You'll give full credit to my partners

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 2>for seeing this before I did. And hey, we need

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 2>to hire a CFO or promote someone and say, you know,

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 2>you don't want Barry doing payroll and Josh doing the

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:15.640
<v Speaker 2>health care plan. But that's literally what was going on. Sure,

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 2>so we promoted the CFO. Hey, we need a head

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 2>of compliance, Like, really, we're not that big, you know what.

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 2>Think of it as insurance. Okay. My best bet is

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 2>my best trait is I let smarter people than me

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:32.120
<v Speaker 2>convince me of things that I'm hesitant about.

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a good call.

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Hey, hey, we need a head of HR because you know,

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:38.640
<v Speaker 2>we need to hire people. We're not hiring them fast enough.

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 2>We need to make sure that nobody is saying or

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 2>doing anything that doesn't comply with the rules. We're in

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven states. There's a different rule in every state.

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not even talking about the crazy this will

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 2>get your canceled stuff. I mean just staying on the

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 2>right side of regulator, and on and on and so, yes,

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 2>there's no doubt scale helps, but it doesn't help you

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:07.120
<v Speaker 2>with the client experience. It doesn't help you with client acquisition,

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:12.120
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't help you with your investment performance. All those

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:14.959
<v Speaker 2>things have to be right before you start scaling up,

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 2>or at least that's how I see the world.

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I see. I agree that scale helps, But what does

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 1>scale help with? Scale helps with reducing the complexity that's

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>largely come from growth, right, right, So it's it's a drug,

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>right you. I mean, if you want to grow quickly,

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you need to capture that scale in order to combat

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the complexity that comes with that growth. But for the

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>for the advisor with a few hundred million of assets

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>under management, they don't need the scale. They're running a

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>profitable business as it is, right, they're delivering outstanding service

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to you know, to their clients. If this is a

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 1>lifestyle business, and I know that's kind of a dirty

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>word because people want to say, oh, I'm not in

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a lifestyle business. Right, It's okay, Like you know, just

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 1>where we always encourage people to do is start with

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>their why. I know that sounds kind of corny, but.

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 2>No, But it's a fair question, right, But why do

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 2>you want to grow? If you're running a nice business,

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 2>you're happy, your clients are happy.

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>If you're happy, if your partner in life is happy

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 1>with you, and you've got time to spend with the

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>people you love, If your clients love what's going on,

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>if your employees are well cared for and they love

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>working there, you know is growth and imperative. And if

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you read the trades, you would think everyone has to grow. Right,

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna grow or you're gonna die.

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Right, And now there are literally roll up shops that

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 2>have I've sat in the I never sit in the audience.

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm usually in the green room. But if I'm sitting

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 2>in the audience and someone comes out and says, grow

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:44.479
<v Speaker 2>or die, we're a roll up. And if you're not

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 2>going to be part of the roll up strategy, you're

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 2>gonna get steamrolled. How much of that is just self

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 2>interest talking.

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>My opinion is all self interest? Right? If someone listen,

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you always start I always start at bottom of the article.

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I always look at the italicized print, right, just like

0:29:58.200 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>you started with the disclosures at the top of the

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 1>sh show right, start with the atala sized print. If

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm here from a roll up or an aggregator, and

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I tell you, now's the time for you to sell

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to me because prices are at all time record highs. Right,

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I gotta like, you know, raise my eyebrows say well,

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>why do you then want to buy my practice if

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you believe that this is an all time high? Right?

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>So to me, you know, the truth is in the action,

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>not the words. Right.

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 2>I can't hear what you're saying because what you're doing

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 2>is speaking so loudly.

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>You are so much more eloquent.

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 2>That's not me. I stole that. That's a Longfellow or

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Wadsworth or somebody.

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I know.

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 2>I know I'm stealing that. My dad used to say

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 2>that to me all the time. It's a great one,

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 2>but really it's true, which raises the question how big

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 2>is that? M and a market for ri as? Shoot,

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 2>nobody has. Here's the crazy thing. So you take the

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 2>five biggest rias you can think of, they're all two

0:30:56.760 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 2>hundred billion Creative Planning, Edelman, ken Fisher. They're all giants.

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure there's a couple more there. Two hundred billion

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 2>dollars is nothing in a thirty forty by some measures,

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 2>ninety seven trillion dollar space. Is anyone ever going to

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 2>have market share here?

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>So you have you have a few questions, Yeah, you

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>have two questions there. The first one is we're in

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the early innings, right, because even the giants of independent

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>wealth management are small in comparison to the entire securities industry. Right,

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not. It wouldn't take much for one of these

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 1>financial behemoths to become an aggregator themselves, and they've got

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>far more financial might than any of these private capital

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>providers out there.

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Note have gone public yet, right, they're all still mostly private,

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Is that right?

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean you had focus financial, right, so you know,

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>go public and.

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 2>They're clearly a roll up there. How big are they

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 2>They're like three four hundred five hundred billions?

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think, but they're they're actually going they're leaving

0:31:57.600 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the public markets, and you know, it looks like they're

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're heading back to private. So that's an

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting transaction, right. One of the few firms to make

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>their way into the public markets is actually you know,

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>some would say retreating, you know, others would say, you know,

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>recapitalizing within the you know, the private markets, but you know,

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>they're the ones that have made their way over. Arguably,

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>other firms like NFP have gone public, but that's not

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>really a pure national financial partners right, more in insurance focus.

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 1>But I think we're in the early innings. I really do.

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that there is a whole world that you

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and I can't even sit here in fathom knowing where

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>we've come from to imagine what this is going to

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 1>become in the next ten or twenty years. I really,

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I really think we're in the early innings.

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Really, so let's let's that's surprising because when we launched

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 2>our firm in twenty thirteen, I felt like we were

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 2>a decade past the real launch of registered investment advisories.

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 2>We were on the right side of pass if, we

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 2>were the right side of fiduciary. It felt like, all right,

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 2>this is the future. And that's why I was surprised

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 2>the big shops hadn't bought on yet. But you're saying,

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 2>and here it is almost a decade later, you're saying,

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 2>this is still early days. The transition from transactional non

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 2>fiduciary business is going to continue to ramp.

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I believe that's the case. Yeah, and then you said,

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, are there going to be dominant you know

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 1>players in the space, And I don't believe there ever

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>will be, really And the reason for that is because

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 1>there's such a low barrier to entry. Right. Anyone you

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 1>know who takes a nice, hot, long shower, you know,

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>has an idea, right, and most of those people have

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the wherewithal the pull off.

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 2>I told you that in confidence, most people.

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Have the where with all the pull it off. Within

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the independent wealth management space, right, there's not a high

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>barrier to entry. There's not significant licensing, you know that

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that takes place and with the help of an objective advisor.

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is not a very complex endeavor.

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 2>So you mentioned Focus Financial. Let's talk about the platforms

0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 2>like Focus, like Dynasty. Schopenny was a guest of the

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:16.720
<v Speaker 2>show a couple of years ago, has a fascinating personal story.

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:21.840
<v Speaker 2>I think they're down in Saint Petersburg or Tampa. These

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 2>platforms have developed. High Tower is another one that essentially

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:31.359
<v Speaker 2>exists to pull out these billion dollar teams from big

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 2>firms and have been doing so very successfully. What is

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 2>that sort of transaction like and how challenging is it

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 2>for you as the attorney to deal with. I mean,

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 2>nobody at a big firm is happy when a billion

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 2>and a half dollars walks out the door.

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, the billion and a half walking out is happy,

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 1>just to be clear.

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Nobody who's left behind is happy.

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think the three examples you gave are three

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>really different examples that probably satisfy a similar utility, a

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>similar need or demand in the marketplace. When you look

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:08.879
<v Speaker 1>at at firms like you know, like Dynasty, right, they're

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a single vendor platform provider, right. So for that entrepreneur

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 1>who doesn't want to make so many of the decisions

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 1>that go that naturally go with entrepreneurship, but they want

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>all the features and the independence and autonomy of running

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 1>their own business, right, those firms are a great option

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:32.319
<v Speaker 1>for them. Right. Suddenly within the independent space, you know,

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 1>going out and being independent doesn't mean that you have

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to go it alone, right, Whereas there are other firms

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:43.279
<v Speaker 1>are joint opportunities where you're not going to have the

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>autonomy of running your own firm. You're going to go

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and you're going to join these firms. You're going to

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>be a quote unquote partner in the firm, or you're

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:53.840
<v Speaker 1>going to you know, run one of these satellite affiliates

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:56.359
<v Speaker 1>within the firm. But make no mistake about it, right,

0:35:56.440 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>This is all about this concept of control, right, And

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I think entrepreneurs really want to hone in on this.

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's going to be a theme over the

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>next few years, is control because we have so many

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 1>minority investments happening within the space. But even with a

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 1>minority investment, these minority investors are demanding control provisions. Right.

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Control is like the big tug of war that's happening nowadays.

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:22.839
<v Speaker 1>And when you look at a and when you look

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 1>at a firm like Charles from at Dynasty, you see

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a firm that helps enable folks to run their own independent,

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 1>autonomous practice without having to give up that degree of control.

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask you about some of the deals

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:43.279
<v Speaker 2>you look at and review sometimes after the fact. One

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 2>of the risks of being an attorney is people will

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:50.319
<v Speaker 2>always come up to you and ask you about a problem,

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 2>and then two thirds of the way through the conversation

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:56.720
<v Speaker 2>you find they already signed that document. Oh I'm sorry,

0:36:56.800 --> 0:36:59.359
<v Speaker 2>but I can't help you. You have a contractor how

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 2>often do people will come to you and say, hey,

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 2>what can you tell me about this deal and your

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 2>answer is, oh, that's a terrible deal, don't sign that.

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 2>And they say, well, I already did a letter of intent.

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:14.320
<v Speaker 2>What do I do now? Is this a legitimate issue

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 2>that happens time and again.

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:19.880
<v Speaker 1>So you asked me before about the different practice areas

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 1>we have, and that happens all the time within our

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Business Transactions group. Really personally, like, where I spend my

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:31.320
<v Speaker 1>time is really in two primary areas, and in my practice,

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 1>one is having that ongoing relationship with CEOs within this

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>wealth management space and talking to them about their objectives

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and helping them navigate a path so it doesn't happen

0:37:44.120 --> 0:37:47.439
<v Speaker 1>in those circumstances. The other part of where I spend

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>my time is fixing problems. Right, you know this is.

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 2>A problem someone says, hey, I signed this, what do

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 2>I do?

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>This becomes a problem, right, And it's actually typically it's

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 1>like an LOI, right, So it's not a legally binding document,

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:02.319
<v Speaker 1>but it's a good will problem, right because we worked

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>with so many other of these firms within the space. Bye,

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:09.359
<v Speaker 1>by the advisor signing that l o I, it's it's

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 1>really the equivalent of a handshake, right, right, And if

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be in business with this firm for

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the next few decades at least. You don't want to

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 1>start off by your attorney calling saying, hey, I know

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 1>they signed this, but what there really meant was that? Right?

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:25.879
<v Speaker 1>So I could tell you it just it limits the

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:31.799
<v Speaker 1>ability for us to meaningfully affect the deal. We of

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 1>course can continue to negotiate around the fringes and help

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 1>mitigate risk and optimize the transaction to you know, to fit.

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:43.239
<v Speaker 1>They can. Yeah, no, it can. And I mean, that's

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:45.279
<v Speaker 1>that's the typical right, blame the attorneys right right.

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Right under the bus.

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 1>We get that all the time.

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:49.919
<v Speaker 2>And that's fine, Hamburger. It's his fault. We had a deal,

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 2>we had a handshake until Brian came along and saved

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:54.279
<v Speaker 2>me from myself.

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:57.839
<v Speaker 1>Perfectly, perfectly fine. But usually my job is to call

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:00.280
<v Speaker 1>up the CEO with the counter with the contra firm

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:02.399
<v Speaker 1>and to say, hey, I know, you guys slipped one,

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, by the goalie on this one by Yeah,

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:08.359
<v Speaker 1>I said, you know. And and it's almost always met Barry,

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>We laughed, they know, it's almost always met with Oh,

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:13.439
<v Speaker 1>we had no idea that you were working with them.

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Of course, it's not a problem.

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 2>So that's hilarious. Yeah, because I can't tell you how

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 2>often somebody will mention something and it's like, oh, I'm

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 2>a car guy, Hey what do you think of this?

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:29.879
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 2>You don't want I've learned not to say you don't

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:32.839
<v Speaker 2>want to buy that.

0:39:33.040 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to touch that.

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 2>That's a poss bought it last week, right, and that's

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:39.920
<v Speaker 2>always the answer. Oh it was just delivered. Well, you know,

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:43.440
<v Speaker 2>send your mechanic a Christmas card because you're going to

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 2>be spending a lot of time with him, you don't.

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:47.880
<v Speaker 2>I've learned not to stick my foot in my mouth

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:52.240
<v Speaker 2>after having done it a dozen times, so you can.

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 2>You can work with people to erase a bad LOOI

0:39:56.800 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 2>what happens if someone comes to you and said, hey,

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I got a phone call. All these people offered me

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 2>a ton of money. All I had to do is

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:05.839
<v Speaker 2>sign this assigning all my aum to them, and they

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:07.760
<v Speaker 2>gave me ten percent of the value of the firm

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 2>and I'll work out the rest. What do you do

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 2>with that? That?

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Listen? That doesn't always, That doesn't often happen. You know

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:15.359
<v Speaker 1>what what often happens is they come to us with

0:40:15.400 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 1>this deal, and my first call to them was I

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 1>didn't even know you were in the market to sell, right, right,

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 1>like we and and and by the way, the one

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 1>firm that you're talking to seems to have none of

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the qualities that were important to you when you left

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:33.880
<v Speaker 1>your firm five years ago. Right, So you know, I'm

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big fan of really understanding what the objectives

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 1>are before we set out to do anything.

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 2>It's more than just dollars. There's there's a lot of

0:40:41.120 --> 0:40:43.360
<v Speaker 2>other factors that make a big difference.

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Because most advisors don't think of the fact that they're

0:40:46.560 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 1>going to have to be employed by this firm right afterwards,

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:52.319
<v Speaker 1>like this is not a one time transaction. I think

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the other big misnomer that's out there is people are

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:58.880
<v Speaker 1>fueled by these headline numbers, right They're they're looking at

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 1>these headlines. This firm sold for you know, eighteen x.

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 1>This firm just sold for twenty x, and they don't

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>understand that deals are far more complicated than that. That

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:13.960
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a cash component, right, there are contingencies, there

0:41:14.000 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 1>are retention components to any deal. And so when we

0:41:18.960 --> 0:41:21.439
<v Speaker 1>look at those headline numbers, we're all we're often looking

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 1>at the total cost of ownership. Right you going back

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:26.799
<v Speaker 1>to your you know, your your car model, like what

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:30.360
<v Speaker 1>did the what did the firm pay to successfully acquire

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and integrate this this firm, It's not how much of

0:41:33.880 --> 0:41:36.799
<v Speaker 1>the original owner or founder put in their pocket, right, right,

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:39.359
<v Speaker 1>And then they don't look at the tax structure, right

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 1>And for many of these transactions, the tax structure is

0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the one thing that can dictate the success or failure

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of these deals right right, because it really makes it

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>can make a thin deal work really well if structured

0:41:55.160 --> 0:41:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in the right way.

0:41:55.719 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Right, If the LLC passed through, especially if you're in

0:41:58.080 --> 0:42:02.640
<v Speaker 2>New York, a California based is a big advantage versus

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, traditional C corps or whoever else people are

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 2>doing it in other states. I love hearing people say

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:15.440
<v Speaker 2>we are absolutely not for sale twenty x really, let

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:17.320
<v Speaker 2>me get back to you on that. It's It's funny

0:42:17.320 --> 0:42:21.400
<v Speaker 2>how money is an issue until suddenly it becomes becomes

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:21.880
<v Speaker 2>an issue.

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:23.920
<v Speaker 1>See old Robert Redford quote. Right, everything's for.

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Sale at a indecent proposal. Very good, Demi Moore, I

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 2>don't remember who her husband was, what Harrol's that's right,

0:42:31.160 --> 0:42:35.320
<v Speaker 2>that's right. So let's let's talk a little bit about

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 2>some of the fun terminology here. Teams, new launches carveouts

0:42:42.239 --> 0:42:44.239
<v Speaker 2>what's going on in those spaces.

0:42:44.600 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 1>So you know, the interesting thing with with teams these

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 1>are these are people who are typically employed by a

0:42:51.680 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 1>brokerage firm. They have worked together for many, many years.

0:42:55.520 --> 0:42:58.879
<v Speaker 1>They are under this false belief that they're partners, right,

0:43:00.400 --> 0:43:03.279
<v Speaker 1>they're co employees, they're coworker. Yeah, they're colleagues that are

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:05.800
<v Speaker 1>often seated with, you know, next to one another. Often

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:11.239
<v Speaker 1>they have like some type of fee sharing arrangement among them, right,

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:14.160
<v Speaker 1>But there's this misnomer among them. They think they're partners.

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:18.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not here to burst anyone's bubble, but it

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:20.799
<v Speaker 1>comes out, you know. I force it out when we

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:24.080
<v Speaker 1>have some of our initial consults on the business startup,

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 1>because I'll ask them, I'll say, you know, hey, Barry,

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:32.120
<v Speaker 1>do you know do you know John's you know, time

0:43:32.160 --> 0:43:34.960
<v Speaker 1>horizon until he wants to retire. No clue, no, no

0:43:34.960 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 1>no idea.

0:43:35.600 --> 0:43:38.960
<v Speaker 2>So, in other words, until there's a partnership agreement, nobody's

0:43:38.960 --> 0:43:39.440
<v Speaker 2>a partner.

0:43:39.520 --> 0:43:41.960
<v Speaker 1>No one's really a partner, right, right, And so what

0:43:41.960 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 1>we try to force them to do is really get

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:47.759
<v Speaker 1>to know one another because within this team are a

0:43:47.800 --> 0:43:50.399
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of different dynamics. Right. Someone needs to come

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:53.759
<v Speaker 1>clean that they're on the precipice of getting a divorce. Right.

0:43:53.840 --> 0:43:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Someone needs to come clean that their financial affairs are

0:43:56.440 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 1>just in complete disarray, right, Which when your colleagues in

0:43:59.600 --> 0:44:02.440
<v Speaker 1>an office doesn't really matter, right. But if that's your

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 1>business partners, damn well better know that they're going to

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:07.840
<v Speaker 1>be declaring bankruptcy within the next few you know, a

0:44:07.840 --> 0:44:11.000
<v Speaker 1>few months, right. And so these are the surprises that

0:44:11.120 --> 0:44:13.239
<v Speaker 1>legitimately there's legitimately launch.

0:44:13.000 --> 0:44:15.800
<v Speaker 2>A business and there's a oh, I got this back depending,

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:17.759
<v Speaker 2>but don't worry, it won't affect what we do.

0:44:17.920 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 1>What makes the hair go up on the in the

0:44:19.480 --> 0:44:21.839
<v Speaker 1>back of my neck is when we get off we're

0:44:21.840 --> 0:44:24.239
<v Speaker 1>about to close a call like that and one of

0:44:24.280 --> 0:44:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the people that are on the call will say, hey, Brian,

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:28.480
<v Speaker 1>can you hang on the line for a minute. Uh uh,

0:44:29.080 --> 0:44:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I know what's coming. Every single time it's a it's

0:44:33.600 --> 0:44:38.719
<v Speaker 1>a prior felony conviction that they haven't disclosed, or sometimes.

0:44:38.680 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Matter if it's out of the United States, like a

0:44:40.680 --> 0:44:43.879
<v Speaker 2>felony in South America asking for a friend, Yeah, yeah,

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:45.200
<v Speaker 2>just asking for a friend.

0:44:45.320 --> 0:44:48.320
<v Speaker 1>The Uh, you know they want to talk about marital

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:51.200
<v Speaker 1>issues and uh, is that any way one? But yeah, yeah,

0:44:51.239 --> 0:44:53.239
<v Speaker 1>is there any way to own this without you know,

0:44:53.280 --> 0:44:55.400
<v Speaker 1>while protecting it? Uh? They want to talk about the

0:44:55.440 --> 0:44:59.120
<v Speaker 1>state issues. So anytime that there's that type of divide

0:44:59.239 --> 0:45:01.520
<v Speaker 1>between would be partners, big red flag. We have a

0:45:01.520 --> 0:45:04.160
<v Speaker 1>whole service protocol to try and make sure that we

0:45:04.200 --> 0:45:07.040
<v Speaker 1>can diffuse that. And you know that's not our information

0:45:07.080 --> 0:45:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to share, but it needs to be shared.

0:45:09.160 --> 0:45:12.399
<v Speaker 2>How often did someone come to you with a proposal

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:15.239
<v Speaker 2>and you look at it and say, I just can't

0:45:15.280 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 2>let you sign this. This is not this is not

0:45:17.239 --> 0:45:17.759
<v Speaker 2>a good deal.

0:45:18.440 --> 0:45:21.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm from Jersey, right, so we we can't

0:45:21.320 --> 0:45:25.319
<v Speaker 1>not share our opinion. It's part of our it's part

0:45:25.360 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of who we are, It's how we're brought up. But

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I won't say that. What I'm going to say is

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll say, in a polite way, I'll say what are

0:45:32.160 --> 0:45:34.920
<v Speaker 1>you thinking? Right, because I'll say, like, what were your objectives?

0:45:34.960 --> 0:45:36.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, what do you think that this are?

0:45:36.640 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 2>You're going to finest your way around getting to this

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:39.879
<v Speaker 2>is a bad deal?

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, come on, you know our colleagues in this industry, right,

0:45:42.520 --> 0:45:44.919
<v Speaker 1>they're very prideful group. Right. Some may say that there's

0:45:44.960 --> 0:45:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a big ego about them, and they're you know, they're

0:45:48.040 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 1>used to being the smartest folks in the room. And

0:45:51.040 --> 0:45:54.239
<v Speaker 1>what shocks me more than anything else that we've talked

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:58.080
<v Speaker 1>about today, what shocks me is how great investment advisors

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:01.440
<v Speaker 1>lose their when it comes to the securities analysis of

0:46:01.480 --> 0:46:02.719
<v Speaker 1>their own security, right.

0:46:02.719 --> 0:46:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Because there's no objectivity, they can't separate themselves.

0:46:05.680 --> 0:46:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Right, So you know this, I mean, really, at the

0:46:08.239 --> 0:46:09.840
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, what do you own? You have

0:46:09.880 --> 0:46:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a concentrated securities position, right, right, You better than me

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 1>as the investment advisor, can analyze the value of that security, right.

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:19.879
<v Speaker 1>You have all sorts of methods for doing that, and

0:46:19.960 --> 0:46:23.560
<v Speaker 1>so my job is to is to redirect your skills

0:46:24.120 --> 0:46:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to be able to do that. And most of the

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:27.040
<v Speaker 1>time they see that.

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:30.120
<v Speaker 2>So so let me ask you this question because I'm

0:46:30.280 --> 0:46:34.759
<v Speaker 2>genuinely aghast. We talked earlier about people not making the

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:36.400
<v Speaker 2>phone call because they don't want to run up the

0:46:36.440 --> 0:46:39.640
<v Speaker 2>legal bill every now and then. I'm horrified to see

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:45.000
<v Speaker 2>people not have attorneys, not have accountants sign documents like

0:46:45.160 --> 0:46:48.560
<v Speaker 2>how much are you saving? You're talking about millions of

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:52.280
<v Speaker 2>dollars in revenue, tens of millions of dollars in revenue,

0:46:52.320 --> 0:46:55.560
<v Speaker 2>millions of dollars in salary. How can you sign a

0:46:55.640 --> 0:47:00.759
<v Speaker 2>document without having a lawyer review it? Oh, save ten

0:47:00.880 --> 0:47:04.279
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars. It's gonna cost you three million dollars over

0:47:04.320 --> 0:47:09.640
<v Speaker 2>the next decade. I'm apoplectic here. I see this all

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:11.960
<v Speaker 2>the time. I'm genuinely aghast.

0:47:12.880 --> 0:47:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I too share your sentiments. I mean, you know, of

0:47:16.120 --> 0:47:19.359
<v Speaker 1>course I'm biased. I think that I think you should

0:47:19.440 --> 0:47:24.520
<v Speaker 1>never go into a novel financial transaction, particularly one that

0:47:24.640 --> 0:47:27.680
<v Speaker 1>capitalizes the decades of goodwill and trust that you have

0:47:27.760 --> 0:47:31.920
<v Speaker 1>developed throughout the course of your career without number one,

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:36.040
<v Speaker 1>an objective party, right, even if that's a knowledgeable friend

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of yours to say, what the heck are you thinking?

0:47:38.920 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 1>And an experienced party, right, someone who's been there before

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and knows what's important. You know what needs to be

0:47:45.680 --> 0:47:48.640
<v Speaker 1>handled urgently, and what's everything else? Right? You know, what's

0:47:48.680 --> 0:47:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the noise that we can kind of set to the side.

0:47:50.840 --> 0:47:54.840
<v Speaker 1>But it amazes me the transactions that people enter into

0:47:55.360 --> 0:48:01.080
<v Speaker 1>without the benefit of objective, experienced counsel. It really does.

0:48:01.200 --> 0:48:05.920
<v Speaker 2>And you know, and this isn't just self interest speaking

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:09.000
<v Speaker 2>because the odds are they going to go to a

0:48:09.040 --> 0:48:12.839
<v Speaker 2>different attorney than you. Sure, just statistically, But if you're

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:16.120
<v Speaker 2>signing a contract that's worth millions and millions of dollars,

0:48:17.040 --> 0:48:19.200
<v Speaker 2>isn't it just common sense to have an attorney look

0:48:19.239 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 2>it over. I mean, I'm genuinely aghast when I see

0:48:24.719 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 2>and hear about these things, and it happens more often

0:48:28.000 --> 0:48:30.920
<v Speaker 2>than one would imagine. And it's not like you're a minor.

0:48:30.960 --> 0:48:32.520
<v Speaker 2>It's not like you're going to be able to get

0:48:32.520 --> 0:48:34.520
<v Speaker 2>that you know. Oh no, they didn't know what they

0:48:34.560 --> 0:48:36.040
<v Speaker 2>were doing. Let's just decay that.

0:48:36.440 --> 0:48:38.799
<v Speaker 1>So here, here's the distinction that I've been able to

0:48:38.840 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 1>call together over the years is that people that think

0:48:41.040 --> 0:48:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of this as an investment, people that think of this

0:48:43.960 --> 0:48:47.279
<v Speaker 1>as a business, are apt to spend that money. Sure right,

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:50.000
<v Speaker 1>they say, Hey, there's a transaction cost, and it's making

0:48:50.040 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 1>sure I have good counsel to help optimize the transaction,

0:48:53.360 --> 0:48:57.040
<v Speaker 1>mitigate risk, et cetera, et cetera. Think about brokers, even

0:48:57.040 --> 0:48:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the most successful among them, who have been sitting in

0:48:59.440 --> 0:49:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a wire house throughout, you know, for decades, throughout their

0:49:02.520 --> 0:49:07.319
<v Speaker 1>whole career, they've never written a check for any business endeavor. Right, right.

0:49:07.400 --> 0:49:10.759
<v Speaker 1>The only attorneys they've ever hired is, you know, is

0:49:10.800 --> 0:49:14.240
<v Speaker 1>probably to buy a house and maybe get divorced.

0:49:14.320 --> 0:49:17.279
<v Speaker 2>But but you would hire an attorney to buy a house, right,

0:49:17.280 --> 0:49:19.359
<v Speaker 2>You wouldn't just go in and do the closing. Yeah,

0:49:19.400 --> 0:49:20.520
<v Speaker 2>I could figure it out.

0:49:20.719 --> 0:49:23.040
<v Speaker 1>But that's only because your realtor sent you to someone

0:49:23.080 --> 0:49:26.080
<v Speaker 1>who's charging one thousand dollars to do the closing for you, right,

0:49:26.320 --> 0:49:28.359
<v Speaker 1>It's not really because you would have found them on

0:49:28.400 --> 0:49:31.920
<v Speaker 1>your own. Here right, when you're saying this is what

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:35.520
<v Speaker 1>objective counsel is going to cost, that's a tough check

0:49:35.600 --> 0:49:39.839
<v Speaker 1>to stroke, so less you're thinking about the brighter right right.

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:41.879
<v Speaker 2>I guess if you're sitting in a place where you're

0:49:41.880 --> 0:49:44.080
<v Speaker 2>not paying for legal, you're not paying for compliance, you're

0:49:44.120 --> 0:49:47.600
<v Speaker 2>not playing for marketing, you're not paying for trading, you're

0:49:47.600 --> 0:49:49.799
<v Speaker 2>not trade execution, you're not paying for any of that.

0:49:50.239 --> 0:49:54.120
<v Speaker 2>It comes out of out of your gross revenue on

0:49:54.160 --> 0:49:57.359
<v Speaker 2>a grid, So you don't really recognize that these are

0:49:57.400 --> 0:50:01.200
<v Speaker 2>actual costs. I mean, giving up half of your comp

0:50:01.320 --> 0:50:05.560
<v Speaker 2>or more to pay for that. I would think that's intuitive,

0:50:05.920 --> 0:50:09.480
<v Speaker 2>but I guess not so. The last question about M

0:50:09.520 --> 0:50:12.239
<v Speaker 2>and A that that I have to ask is I

0:50:13.000 --> 0:50:16.080
<v Speaker 2>keep seeing these headlines? Is this the end of the

0:50:16.120 --> 0:50:20.640
<v Speaker 2>small ria again? It seems a little you know, self interested,

0:50:20.800 --> 0:50:23.759
<v Speaker 2>But what do we think about whether you want to

0:50:23.800 --> 0:50:26.880
<v Speaker 2>call it a lifestyle practice or a small local practice.

0:50:28.320 --> 0:50:32.000
<v Speaker 2>These are people everybody in the town knows and when

0:50:32.040 --> 0:50:35.319
<v Speaker 2>they have a financial question go to Am I wrong

0:50:35.360 --> 0:50:37.440
<v Speaker 2>in thinking those aren't going away? They're going to be

0:50:37.440 --> 0:50:38.080
<v Speaker 2>here for a while.

0:50:39.680 --> 0:50:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Those small RaaS will be here throughout the duration of

0:50:42.760 --> 0:50:46.640
<v Speaker 1>our lives. And the reason for that is probably not

0:50:46.719 --> 0:50:50.200
<v Speaker 1>what you think. The reason for that is technology. Is technology, okay, yeah,

0:50:50.200 --> 0:50:52.640
<v Speaker 1>because what you could do as a as a solo

0:50:52.719 --> 0:50:55.680
<v Speaker 1>practitioner or two or three people working in an office

0:50:55.719 --> 0:50:59.319
<v Speaker 1>today is just so much more expansive than what you

0:50:59.360 --> 0:51:02.840
<v Speaker 1>could do to years ago. That but I think even

0:51:02.880 --> 0:51:06.520
<v Speaker 1>more compelling is the scalability of that technology, right, the

0:51:06.600 --> 0:51:09.640
<v Speaker 1>fact that everything is a cloud based application and you

0:51:09.680 --> 0:51:12.440
<v Speaker 1>can scale it down to a single user license. Think

0:51:12.480 --> 0:51:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of the CRMs, right, I mean everyone knows the CRM.

0:51:14.960 --> 0:51:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Salesforce is a big giant company. There's a dozen of

0:51:18.040 --> 0:51:19.640
<v Speaker 2>them for rias.

0:51:19.920 --> 0:51:22.920
<v Speaker 1>But to stand up a CRM twenty years ago, to

0:51:22.920 --> 0:51:26.000
<v Speaker 1>stand up a CRM like a salesforce, right, you would

0:51:26.080 --> 0:51:28.840
<v Speaker 1>have to buy a dedicated server, right posted in a

0:51:28.920 --> 0:51:30.960
<v Speaker 1>cooled office, right.

0:51:31.480 --> 0:51:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Have have replicate the data, manage it.

0:51:34.160 --> 0:51:36.279
<v Speaker 1>Right. Yeah, you have backups all over the place, right,

0:51:36.320 --> 0:51:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, backup tapes and all this, you know, crazy stuff.

0:51:39.080 --> 0:51:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Now you buy a license and that's it. You buy

0:51:41.480 --> 0:51:43.439
<v Speaker 1>a single license and you log in and you start

0:51:43.480 --> 0:51:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to configure it. And so the scalability of technology, the

0:51:46.960 --> 0:51:53.040
<v Speaker 1>scalability of telecommunications is the game changer, right. And I

0:51:53.040 --> 0:51:56.440
<v Speaker 1>don't think too many people plot out the acceleration of

0:51:56.520 --> 0:52:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the independent, fragmented wealth management business with the prominence of

0:52:02.840 --> 0:52:06.400
<v Speaker 1>scalable technology solutions in the place, in the space. But

0:52:06.440 --> 0:52:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I would say that they've developed in lockstep with one another.

0:52:08.840 --> 0:52:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Huh really quite fascinating. Tell us about your practice. What

0:52:14.239 --> 0:52:16.520
<v Speaker 2>is the thing that keeps you most busy? What are

0:52:16.560 --> 0:52:20.719
<v Speaker 2>what are the other areas of practice that someone who says, hey,

0:52:20.760 --> 0:52:24.080
<v Speaker 2>I want to set up a registered investment advisory, I

0:52:24.160 --> 0:52:27.840
<v Speaker 2>have half a billion dollars in assets. What what is

0:52:27.920 --> 0:52:30.240
<v Speaker 2>the thing that keeps you most active?

0:52:30.719 --> 0:52:33.080
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we talked earlier about the work we

0:52:33.160 --> 0:52:37.640
<v Speaker 1>do within Market Council Consulting, our consulting firm, But most

0:52:37.640 --> 0:52:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of the time I'm spending is personally is Within our

0:52:41.000 --> 0:52:44.120
<v Speaker 1>law firm we have we have three distinct practice areas.

0:52:44.120 --> 0:52:47.000
<v Speaker 1>One is regulatory, where not only do we uh do

0:52:47.080 --> 0:52:51.000
<v Speaker 1>we work a lot with with advisors on various legal matters,

0:52:51.000 --> 0:52:54.680
<v Speaker 1>but also regulatory interactions right working with state and federal

0:52:54.719 --> 0:53:01.080
<v Speaker 1>regulators on anything that rises beyond a simple examination. The

0:53:01.160 --> 0:53:04.560
<v Speaker 1>second is business transactions. Right in our business transactions practice

0:53:04.960 --> 0:53:11.640
<v Speaker 1>spans from startup all the way to interesting permutations of

0:53:11.719 --> 0:53:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the business, whether it's business compliance, it's succession planning or implementation,

0:53:18.520 --> 0:53:21.800
<v Speaker 1>it's selling off equity, M and A and everything in between.

0:53:22.080 --> 0:53:24.160
<v Speaker 1>And then the third area, and probably the area that

0:53:24.200 --> 0:53:28.359
<v Speaker 1>people know us most for, is employment transition work, where

0:53:28.400 --> 0:53:31.920
<v Speaker 1>we help folks go from wherever they are to wherever

0:53:31.960 --> 0:53:35.440
<v Speaker 1>they want to be and everywhere and help them navigate

0:53:35.920 --> 0:53:36.880
<v Speaker 1>everything in between.

0:53:37.000 --> 0:53:40.000
<v Speaker 2>So, if I'm in a right to work state, how

0:53:40.120 --> 0:53:44.200
<v Speaker 2>challenging is it for me in the finance industry, either

0:53:44.239 --> 0:53:47.440
<v Speaker 2>as a broker or a trader or a fund manager

0:53:47.600 --> 0:53:49.960
<v Speaker 2>or an RIA to say, Hey, I want to switch

0:53:50.000 --> 0:53:50.879
<v Speaker 2>and go somewhere else.

0:53:51.040 --> 0:53:55.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's funny when I describe the employment arrangements

0:53:55.400 --> 0:53:58.520
<v Speaker 1>or restrictions to people outside of this industry shocked. They

0:53:58.520 --> 0:54:01.880
<v Speaker 1>think I'm making it up. They think it's a story,

0:54:01.880 --> 0:54:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know. I think there's more interesting stories

0:54:04.880 --> 0:54:08.759
<v Speaker 1>to tell than that. But it is beyond comprehension for

0:54:08.840 --> 0:54:12.280
<v Speaker 1>those that don't spend time in this space. Right, everything

0:54:12.360 --> 0:54:16.799
<v Speaker 1>from restrictive covenants such as the inability to solicit uh,

0:54:16.960 --> 0:54:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, former customers, to no higher provisions, the inability

0:54:20.320 --> 0:54:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to you know, to hire former colleagues, to non competes

0:54:25.080 --> 0:54:28.280
<v Speaker 1>which everyone knows about, to garden leave provisions which require

0:54:28.280 --> 0:54:31.400
<v Speaker 1>people to maybe provide some type of extended notice or

0:54:31.440 --> 0:54:32.839
<v Speaker 1>to sit out for a period of time.

0:54:33.040 --> 0:54:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:54:33.520 --> 0:54:34.680
<v Speaker 1>These restrictions are.

0:54:34.600 --> 0:54:37.759
<v Speaker 2>Real, right, and they're being found to be legal.

0:54:37.600 --> 0:54:41.040
<v Speaker 1>And they're found in varying degrees found to be enforceable, right,

0:54:41.040 --> 0:54:45.200
<v Speaker 1>depending upon the reasonableness of the restrictions, the states that

0:54:45.239 --> 0:54:48.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be dealing with these restrictions in and

0:54:49.280 --> 0:54:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, and that's how enforceable they are. But we

0:54:51.680 --> 0:54:53.440
<v Speaker 1>also have to look at the firms that they're leaving.

0:54:53.480 --> 0:54:55.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, what's the reputation of the firm for actually

0:54:56.040 --> 0:54:58.360
<v Speaker 1>enforcing the terms of those of those contracts.

0:54:58.800 --> 0:55:02.719
<v Speaker 2>So we hired some ones from a major wirehouse and

0:55:02.760 --> 0:55:07.960
<v Speaker 2>I got this like sieving email from general counsel. I

0:55:07.960 --> 0:55:10.320
<v Speaker 2>picked the phone and go, dude, what's up. We're a

0:55:10.480 --> 0:55:12.600
<v Speaker 2>member of protocol. He's like, oh, sorry, I don't worry

0:55:12.640 --> 0:55:14.960
<v Speaker 2>about it, just deleted. Can you send me an email

0:55:15.000 --> 0:55:18.480
<v Speaker 2>confirming here? Yeah, yeah, no problem. I mean, it was

0:55:18.680 --> 0:55:22.440
<v Speaker 2>savage to h no worries mod It was just like

0:55:22.480 --> 0:55:26.279
<v Speaker 2>a crazy transition. Explain to people who are not in

0:55:26.320 --> 0:55:30.120
<v Speaker 2>the industry what protocol is and how that works and

0:55:30.480 --> 0:55:34.600
<v Speaker 2>why people are just so, you know, Jacqueline Hyde, if

0:55:34.640 --> 0:55:35.759
<v Speaker 2>you're not a member.

0:55:35.719 --> 0:55:40.800
<v Speaker 1>So the Broker Protocol, I mean we should first probably

0:55:40.800 --> 0:55:44.600
<v Speaker 1>say that before the Broker Protocol, the industry was a

0:55:44.600 --> 0:55:46.920
<v Speaker 1>bit of a Wild West, right, free for all. It

0:55:47.120 --> 0:55:49.080
<v Speaker 1>was a bit of the free for all, right. People

0:55:49.120 --> 0:55:52.680
<v Speaker 1>were leaving to go to firms. In fact, I was

0:55:52.719 --> 0:55:54.960
<v Speaker 1>in I was in court in the Southern District of

0:55:55.040 --> 0:55:56.920
<v Speaker 1>New York, federal court, right because all these are handled

0:55:56.960 --> 0:56:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in federal court. And I watched a firm go in

0:56:02.080 --> 0:56:04.480
<v Speaker 1>front of a judge and say this broker should not

0:56:04.520 --> 0:56:07.840
<v Speaker 1>be able to leave and solicit its clients, and here's

0:56:07.880 --> 0:56:11.040
<v Speaker 1>our trade secrets and all of these things. And the

0:56:11.080 --> 0:56:14.120
<v Speaker 1>next case that was called, this attorney was on the

0:56:14.160 --> 0:56:17.960
<v Speaker 1>other side explaining why they had a right to recruit

0:56:18.120 --> 0:56:21.920
<v Speaker 1>this broker. So the hypocrisy was not lost on federal judges,

0:56:21.920 --> 0:56:23.640
<v Speaker 1>who quite frankly, have better things to do.

0:56:23.840 --> 0:56:27.239
<v Speaker 2>Right. My partner Josh calls this a prisoner exchange, like

0:56:27.440 --> 0:56:30.240
<v Speaker 2>guys from UBS go to Morgan, from Morgan to Merrill,

0:56:30.320 --> 0:56:33.640
<v Speaker 2>from Meryll to JPM Chase and then and then back

0:56:33.680 --> 0:56:39.360
<v Speaker 2>to UBS. It's literally everybody is chasing a signing bonus, which,

0:56:39.560 --> 0:56:42.120
<v Speaker 2>if you have a decent amount of assets under management,

0:56:42.440 --> 0:56:43.880
<v Speaker 2>can be millions of dollars.

0:56:43.960 --> 0:56:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Right. And so from a distance, right, this looks like

0:56:46.719 --> 0:56:49.600
<v Speaker 1>indentured servitude, right, or this looks like that we're trading

0:56:49.680 --> 0:56:52.719
<v Speaker 1>human chattel. Right. Both things that are you know, completely

0:56:52.760 --> 0:56:55.680
<v Speaker 1>illegal and way outdated. You know, not only in this

0:56:55.760 --> 0:56:58.680
<v Speaker 1>country but in the world, but in the securities industry.

0:56:59.080 --> 0:57:01.120
<v Speaker 1>There were still shades of that up until the Broker

0:57:01.160 --> 0:57:04.399
<v Speaker 1>Protocol and maybe still in some pockets.

0:57:04.280 --> 0:57:05.839
<v Speaker 2>When did the protocol first come out?

0:57:06.040 --> 0:57:10.879
<v Speaker 1>So protocol has been existing since the mid two thousands, right,

0:57:10.960 --> 0:57:16.880
<v Speaker 1>And it's a limited forbearance agreement that that effectively says

0:57:17.120 --> 0:57:19.640
<v Speaker 1>if if a firm is a member of the protocol,

0:57:21.200 --> 0:57:26.160
<v Speaker 1>they agree not to enforce certain terms restrictive covenants that

0:57:26.240 --> 0:57:30.240
<v Speaker 1>might be contained in an employment agreement. If the broker

0:57:30.440 --> 0:57:34.280
<v Speaker 1>that's leaving goes to another protocol firm and agrees to

0:57:34.320 --> 0:57:37.920
<v Speaker 1>abide by the quote unquote protocol right taking of limited information,

0:57:38.600 --> 0:57:42.640
<v Speaker 1>furnishing certain notice, and you know, there's a few other provisions.

0:57:42.600 --> 0:57:46.640
<v Speaker 2>And somehow this escapes anty trust provisions somehow. I mean,

0:57:46.680 --> 0:57:48.960
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't it be like, hey, you guys are creating a

0:57:48.960 --> 0:57:50.360
<v Speaker 2>little oligopoly here.

0:57:50.680 --> 0:57:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Somehow this deal that was concocted, you know, on the

0:57:52.880 --> 0:57:57.400
<v Speaker 1>back of a cocktail napkin, you know, seemingly amongst four

0:57:58.120 --> 0:58:00.440
<v Speaker 1>global titans you know of there's.

0:58:00.240 --> 0:58:03.440
<v Speaker 2>No price fixing, So I guess it it escapes that way.

0:58:03.320 --> 0:58:06.640
<v Speaker 1>The so so it was actually our first argument. So

0:58:06.680 --> 0:58:10.200
<v Speaker 1>we were the first firm to add an r I

0:58:10.360 --> 0:58:13.800
<v Speaker 1>A to the broker protocol. Oh really, And the administrator

0:58:13.840 --> 0:58:16.120
<v Speaker 1>at the time said, uh, he called me up, sir Brian,

0:58:16.160 --> 0:58:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you can't do this. It is not is not for RA.

0:58:18.160 --> 0:58:22.840
<v Speaker 2>As which administrator it was of which the which government agency?

0:58:22.920 --> 0:58:26.280
<v Speaker 1>No, No, no government agency. They just appointed a voluntary

0:58:26.320 --> 0:58:34.400
<v Speaker 1>administrator within Yeah, there's no FINRA, there's no sec oversight this.

0:58:32.840 --> 0:58:35.200
<v Speaker 2>This well, let's see what the judge has to say

0:58:35.320 --> 0:58:36.400
<v Speaker 2>speaking of anti trust.

0:58:36.560 --> 0:58:39.440
<v Speaker 1>So these four founders, right that you know that concocted this,

0:58:39.640 --> 0:58:42.680
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, this this three page agreement. They say,

0:58:42.720 --> 0:58:44.640
<v Speaker 1>this is not this was not meant for arias. And

0:58:44.720 --> 0:58:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I say, well, you know, then it seems like we

0:58:47.440 --> 0:58:49.720
<v Speaker 1>have a legal problem because it seems like you guys

0:58:49.720 --> 0:58:53.080
<v Speaker 1>are creating a moat and this seems to be an agreement.

0:58:53.160 --> 0:58:57.560
<v Speaker 2>To restrict competition in the space of providing financially.

0:58:57.680 --> 0:59:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, and so I said, so, I guess we're gonna

0:59:00.080 --> 0:59:01.680
<v Speaker 1>have to you know, we're gonna have to then deal

0:59:01.840 --> 0:59:05.360
<v Speaker 1>deal with that. They thought again about it, and they said,

0:59:05.360 --> 0:59:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, on second thought, we're okay with the RAA joints.

0:59:08.680 --> 0:59:10.640
<v Speaker 2>As opposed to a judge thrown the whole.

0:59:10.480 --> 0:59:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Thing out right because they never they never defined the term, right, broker, right, like,

0:59:15.920 --> 0:59:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we know what a broker is, but they

0:59:17.440 --> 0:59:19.680
<v Speaker 1>never defined the term. I mean, arguably a car wash

0:59:19.720 --> 0:59:22.000
<v Speaker 1>can join the broker protocol, right because it is like

0:59:22.040 --> 0:59:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a prisoner exchange, right, It's it is, you know, it's

0:59:26.000 --> 0:59:29.280
<v Speaker 1>it's very much a protocol. And so coming off of that,

0:59:29.320 --> 0:59:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, thousands of RaaS have joined the broker protocol,

0:59:32.680 --> 0:59:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and they are beneficiaries. Since they're often the RaaS often

0:59:38.120 --> 0:59:41.760
<v Speaker 1>have a less restrictive environment. Their beneficiaries of this broker protocol,

0:59:41.800 --> 0:59:48.160
<v Speaker 1>they're able to freely extrapolate talent from these otherwise restrictive

0:59:48.200 --> 0:59:51.120
<v Speaker 1>scenarios and bring them to their firm.

0:59:51.320 --> 0:59:57.040
<v Speaker 2>And I suspect capitalism supports that that you want competition

0:59:57.080 --> 0:59:59.960
<v Speaker 2>in the marketplace for talent, you want the ability to

1:00:00.160 --> 1:00:03.720
<v Speaker 2>become more efficient, more productive, move around, go where there's

1:00:03.760 --> 1:00:08.800
<v Speaker 2>the best deal. It's almost you know, any other industry,

1:00:09.120 --> 1:00:10.320
<v Speaker 2>it wouldn't even be a question.

1:00:11.000 --> 1:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>It wouldn't be a question. And I'm smirking here. I

1:00:14.560 --> 1:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>can't see that on radio. But because there's a running

1:00:17.360 --> 1:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>joke within the space, there's a gathering each year that

1:00:22.120 --> 1:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>is assembled by a leading labor employment firm in the space,

1:00:26.360 --> 1:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and they bring together probably about one hundred practitioners who

1:00:29.680 --> 1:00:32.840
<v Speaker 1>focus on employment law within the securities industry. And for

1:00:32.880 --> 1:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>many years, I was the only independent representative that was

1:00:38.280 --> 1:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>coming that worked with RaaS that would come to these meetings.

1:00:42.040 --> 1:00:46.480
<v Speaker 1>And and it's a big Q and a session, right.

1:00:46.480 --> 1:00:50.200
<v Speaker 1>We work on case studies, and there wasn't a case

1:00:50.200 --> 1:00:53.160
<v Speaker 1>study that passed where I wasn't the butt of one

1:00:53.160 --> 1:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of the jokes, you know, and like unless Brian decides

1:00:55.320 --> 1:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to unravel this, you know. And so you know, for

1:00:58.120 --> 1:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>many years we were the troublemakers, and you know with

1:01:01.600 --> 1:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the Broker Protocol. When the Broker Protocol UH experienced what

1:01:07.160 --> 1:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>we alleged was was some gamesmanship when Morgan Stanley about

1:01:11.120 --> 1:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>out of the protocol. UH, we actually forced a change

1:01:15.320 --> 1:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>in the administrator because lo and behold, the law firm

1:01:19.320 --> 1:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>that was representing Morgan Stanley UH forgot to send a

1:01:23.320 --> 1:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>timely notification of Morgan Stanley's withdrawal, and.

1:01:27.800 --> 1:01:29.560
<v Speaker 2>So there was still members by accident.

1:01:29.760 --> 1:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, the the the they announced, oh, you know, our

1:01:34.120 --> 1:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>o mission. But they're suddenly, you know, withdrawing from the

1:01:37.160 --> 1:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>protocol without the requisite notice. And so yeah, you know,

1:01:41.320 --> 1:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>we've been we've been advocates of of not only having

1:01:45.440 --> 1:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the protocol UH, but making sure that the terms of

1:01:48.280 --> 1:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the protocol are enforced, that there's no gamesmanship within the protocol.

1:01:51.960 --> 1:01:56.080
<v Speaker 2>And what's the what's the game theory for one big

1:01:56.120 --> 1:02:02.080
<v Speaker 2>firm with drawing from protocol? They that confident that because

1:02:02.120 --> 1:02:04.640
<v Speaker 2>I know one of the provisions is no rating. You

1:02:04.680 --> 1:02:07.520
<v Speaker 2>could take a couple of people, But you can't decimate

1:02:07.560 --> 1:02:10.560
<v Speaker 2>an office. Sure, now that they're no longer involved, Hey,

1:02:10.560 --> 1:02:14.120
<v Speaker 2>you're back to the wild West, let's go, you know,

1:02:14.440 --> 1:02:15.640
<v Speaker 2>pillage Morgan Stanley.

1:02:15.720 --> 1:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, there's still no rating, right, So the limitation on

1:02:18.520 --> 1:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>rating doesn't em any from the protocol. The protocol just

1:02:21.280 --> 1:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't protect you from rating.

1:02:23.400 --> 1:02:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay.

1:02:24.240 --> 1:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>So I honestly think that some of the larger firms

1:02:28.360 --> 1:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that are in the protocol are there as a matter

1:02:30.640 --> 1:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of pride. I think that if they were to withdraw,

1:02:34.800 --> 1:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that their advisors would see that as a

1:02:38.520 --> 1:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>sign of defeat. Really, I do believe that. I think

1:02:42.640 --> 1:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that's one of you know, that's one of the theories.

1:02:44.920 --> 1:02:46.959
<v Speaker 1>And I've spoken to executives at some of these large

1:02:47.000 --> 1:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>firms and they said that the optics around withdrawing would

1:02:49.520 --> 1:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>be would be terrible. They also believe that there's a

1:02:52.120 --> 1:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>brighter future for them. They believe that they can innovate

1:02:54.960 --> 1:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>their way out of this and have have brokers stay

1:02:59.360 --> 1:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>at these firms for all the right reasons. History indicates otherwise,

1:03:04.640 --> 1:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>because by all measures, they're losing the game to independent

1:03:08.480 --> 1:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>wealth management. But there's still a lot of really smart,

1:03:12.000 --> 1:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>talented people there. As we talked about the sport.

1:03:14.160 --> 1:03:16.360
<v Speaker 2>So let's stay with this. I'll circle back to m

1:03:16.400 --> 1:03:20.000
<v Speaker 2>and A later. So first, full disclosure, I've been wrong

1:03:20.160 --> 1:03:23.760
<v Speaker 2>about the brokers industry for thirty years. I've been saying

1:03:23.800 --> 1:03:25.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't see how they don't collapse under the weight

1:03:26.000 --> 1:03:31.560
<v Speaker 2>of their own fees, churning underperformance, and the lack of

1:03:31.560 --> 1:03:34.760
<v Speaker 2>a fiduciary standard. To me, it just makes more sense

1:03:34.800 --> 1:03:38.400
<v Speaker 2>that your financial planner should be more like your attorney

1:03:38.480 --> 1:03:42.040
<v Speaker 2>than a used car salesman. But that's starting to change.

1:03:42.040 --> 1:03:45.040
<v Speaker 2>So I've been wrong for twenty five years and it's

1:03:45.080 --> 1:03:45.880
<v Speaker 2>beginning to change.

1:03:46.000 --> 1:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>What's changing, So what is changing.

1:03:48.840 --> 1:03:53.439
<v Speaker 2>Is the big broker dealers kind of figured out that

1:03:54.400 --> 1:04:00.520
<v Speaker 2>the compliance nightmare and the legal nightmare of transactional business

1:04:01.200 --> 1:04:05.360
<v Speaker 2>is so much harder than Wait, we could just charge

1:04:05.400 --> 1:04:09.760
<v Speaker 2>a fee for managing their money, not sell them bs

1:04:09.800 --> 1:04:13.280
<v Speaker 2>syndicate or not sell them IPOs that maybe they work,

1:04:13.400 --> 1:04:15.880
<v Speaker 2>maybe they don't. The good ones all get sucked up

1:04:15.920 --> 1:04:19.040
<v Speaker 2>by the institution, so the junk that's left will stick

1:04:19.040 --> 1:04:22.320
<v Speaker 2>in MoMA. Those are all ticking time bombs. Let's just

1:04:22.520 --> 1:04:26.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of go semi passive, keep it low key, and

1:04:27.080 --> 1:04:30.640
<v Speaker 2>eliminate ninety nine percent of our compliance headaches. Like some

1:04:30.720 --> 1:04:34.160
<v Speaker 2>of the bigger firms have gotten that message and either

1:04:34.160 --> 1:04:38.280
<v Speaker 2>their hybrid you know, half RIA half bds or really

1:04:38.320 --> 1:04:43.680
<v Speaker 2>have aggressively moved into VRIA space. So whereas I thought

1:04:44.160 --> 1:04:47.840
<v Speaker 2>they would collapse under their own weight, they kind of said, oh,

1:04:48.160 --> 1:04:50.640
<v Speaker 2>we want to eat from both sides of the table.

1:04:50.640 --> 1:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>So now that you're dealing with the reverse churn, right,

1:04:52.640 --> 1:04:54.919
<v Speaker 1>you're dealing with you're dealing with clients who are paying

1:04:54.920 --> 1:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a fee.

1:04:55.720 --> 1:04:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Went from churn and burn to net and forget it.

1:04:58.640 --> 1:05:00.400
<v Speaker 2>That's a good way to keep it, keep it running.

1:05:00.480 --> 1:05:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Although that really to be fair, That really isn't isn't

1:05:04.440 --> 1:05:06.480
<v Speaker 2>isn't fair because I know plenty of guys that are

1:05:07.200 --> 1:05:10.600
<v Speaker 2>and men and women that are arias at big So

1:05:10.720 --> 1:05:14.200
<v Speaker 2>I've been slagging everybody, so let me, you know, throw

1:05:14.240 --> 1:05:17.720
<v Speaker 2>a compliment. Plenty of people at big farms do really

1:05:17.840 --> 1:05:22.360
<v Speaker 2>nice work on behalf of their clients, mostly operating as arias.

1:05:22.480 --> 1:05:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Every now and then they take off their RIA hat,

1:05:25.200 --> 1:05:28.240
<v Speaker 2>they put on their broker dealer hat. Here's a secondary,

1:05:28.320 --> 1:05:32.200
<v Speaker 2>here's some insurance product, here's this. So it's not really

1:05:32.400 --> 1:05:35.880
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent true fiduciary, but it looks so much

1:05:35.920 --> 1:05:38.400
<v Speaker 2>more like it than it did in the nineteen nineties

1:05:38.720 --> 1:05:40.280
<v Speaker 2>when it really was the wild West.

1:05:40.400 --> 1:05:42.600
<v Speaker 1>So a couple of things on that. First of all,

1:05:43.480 --> 1:05:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the way these sophisticated organizations do is they win a

1:05:48.120 --> 1:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>multiple fronts, right, because along with what you're saying here right,

1:05:51.440 --> 1:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>as they've evolved their product, they've they've mitigated risk, they've

1:05:55.080 --> 1:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>also engaged in some sleight of hint. Right. So where

1:05:58.480 --> 1:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>advisors are subject to a foot utree obligation, would you know, right,

1:06:02.440 --> 1:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that means they have to act in the best interests

1:06:04.720 --> 1:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of their clients.

1:06:05.720 --> 1:06:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Which seems pretty instinctially how you want your financial advisors.

1:06:09.920 --> 1:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>You would think, right, But then then they get blessed

1:06:13.040 --> 1:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and they get they get blessed by the SEC on

1:06:16.280 --> 1:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>this notion of a best interest standard, right, which is

1:06:20.480 --> 1:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>not a fiduciary not a fiduciary standard.

1:06:22.480 --> 1:06:24.400
<v Speaker 2>You can call it what you want. It's it's black

1:06:24.480 --> 1:06:28.120
<v Speaker 2>or white, either you're a fiduciary or you're something else entirely.

1:06:27.880 --> 1:06:30.720
<v Speaker 1>But it just coincidentally has the two core words that

1:06:30.760 --> 1:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>define the fiduciarye standard. Right.

1:06:32.440 --> 1:06:34.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is where I go on a tirade

1:06:34.320 --> 1:06:36.840
<v Speaker 2>as to hey, liars are going to lie and there

1:06:36.840 --> 1:06:38.840
<v Speaker 2>ain't nothing you're going to do to change it. Like

1:06:38.920 --> 1:06:40.720
<v Speaker 2>I want to give them the benefit of the data.

1:06:40.840 --> 1:06:43.880
<v Speaker 2>I know you do, but I they just keep disappointing.

1:06:43.960 --> 1:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>But here's the distinction that I think will and it'll

1:06:45.880 --> 1:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>help you with your segue over to M and A

1:06:48.400 --> 1:06:52.720
<v Speaker 1>as well, is that I think I think financial advisors,

1:06:52.760 --> 1:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>whether they are brokers or advisors, are largely an amazing

1:06:56.280 --> 1:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>crop of people. I think almost all of them are

1:06:58.840 --> 1:07:03.160
<v Speaker 1>in it for the best of reasons. I think we

1:07:03.280 --> 1:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>have a high degree of success in the industry. People

1:07:06.640 --> 1:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>make a really fine living and they're doing good work.

1:07:11.320 --> 1:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>You can they're very well intentioned people. I think where

1:07:16.120 --> 1:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you face this dichotomy is with the firms, right, because

1:07:19.840 --> 1:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the firms, even if they push out a fee based.

1:07:23.400 --> 1:07:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Program, they won't have it both ways.

1:07:25.240 --> 1:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>The question is the legal standard of care. The question

1:07:27.480 --> 1:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>is are the products and they're pure? Is there a

1:07:30.200 --> 1:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>cash threshold in there where they're scraping money off the top? Right,

1:07:33.920 --> 1:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Because at the end of the day, this firm's management

1:07:37.560 --> 1:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and their board have a fiduciary obligation to who the

1:07:40.360 --> 1:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>shareholder that's right, right, And that's the biggest distinction that

1:07:43.840 --> 1:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>we have between traditional brokerage industry and the wealth management industry,

1:07:50.400 --> 1:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's changing.

1:07:52.760 --> 1:07:53.640
<v Speaker 2>How is that changing?

1:07:53.800 --> 1:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean M and A has come upon the

1:07:56.480 --> 1:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>wealth management space. You know, there's there's hysteria right when

1:08:01.640 --> 1:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to M and A, there's there's a

1:08:04.000 --> 1:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>real lack of logic that's out there in.

1:08:06.640 --> 1:08:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Terms in terms of who's getting put together or the

1:08:09.480 --> 1:08:11.880
<v Speaker 2>price is paid or what's the hysteria?

1:08:12.040 --> 1:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes, all of it. Yes, I think that I think

1:08:15.200 --> 1:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>there's been an influxing capital into the space. Investors see

1:08:19.040 --> 1:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>this as a as a safe investment, right, but one

1:08:24.080 --> 1:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>with with significant upside, right like any other self regulatory.

1:08:28.160 --> 1:08:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh so when you say these are these are finner rules,

1:08:30.960 --> 1:08:33.360
<v Speaker 2>these are my attitude has always been they could go

1:08:33.439 --> 1:08:36.600
<v Speaker 2>leap in a lake. They have no regulatory authority over me.

1:08:36.760 --> 1:08:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Who gave up my seven? And every now and then

1:08:39.520 --> 1:08:42.760
<v Speaker 2>I get a request from FINRA and I pick up

1:08:42.760 --> 1:08:46.760
<v Speaker 2>the phone and my compliance people aren't happy, but I

1:08:46.880 --> 1:08:48.800
<v Speaker 2>let them know what I really think. I've written what

1:08:48.920 --> 1:08:52.840
<v Speaker 2>I really think. A whole decide that they were probably

1:08:52.880 --> 1:08:57.040
<v Speaker 2>the single most corrupt organization in finance when it came

1:08:57.120 --> 1:09:00.320
<v Speaker 2>to their arbitrations. It was just theft out and I

1:09:00.400 --> 1:09:02.439
<v Speaker 2>will defend that in court if I have to. So,

1:09:02.640 --> 1:09:08.240
<v Speaker 2>I am, but this is a nineties era perspective. I'm biased,

1:09:08.600 --> 1:09:10.920
<v Speaker 2>And back then they weren't called Finnra. Back then they

1:09:10.920 --> 1:09:14.400
<v Speaker 2>were called any SDR, which had such a harbor reputation

1:09:14.439 --> 1:09:16.960
<v Speaker 2>they had to change their name. Tell me, am, I

1:09:17.360 --> 1:09:24.120
<v Speaker 2>overstating a nineties era distaste for that self regulatory organization?

1:09:24.520 --> 1:09:27.679
<v Speaker 2>Or is that you know how a lot of people felt.

1:09:28.439 --> 1:09:30.559
<v Speaker 1>You are not overstating it. It is how a lot

1:09:30.560 --> 1:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of people felt. The organization has evolved a little better,

1:09:35.200 --> 1:09:37.519
<v Speaker 1>haven't that? But it hasn't gotten better on the whole.

1:09:37.600 --> 1:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean there are areas where they have improved. The

1:09:39.960 --> 1:09:42.680
<v Speaker 1>arbitration process has gotten better.

1:09:42.600 --> 1:09:46.439
<v Speaker 2>By judicial decree because it was found to be third

1:09:46.479 --> 1:09:48.800
<v Speaker 2>world corrupt. Again, am I exaggerating?

1:09:48.960 --> 1:09:50.839
<v Speaker 1>You are not exaggerated, just like, oh.

1:09:50.720 --> 1:09:53.400
<v Speaker 2>This is legalized theft and we're not going to allow

1:09:53.439 --> 1:09:56.360
<v Speaker 2>this nonsense to go on. You can't do this anymore.

1:09:56.400 --> 1:10:00.799
<v Speaker 2>You can't own the arbitration companies and mandai an arbitration

1:10:00.920 --> 1:10:01.360
<v Speaker 2>go there.

1:10:01.439 --> 1:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>So you're absolutely correct with regards to the arbitration. But

1:10:04.120 --> 1:10:06.479
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind you said, well, if I if I

1:10:06.560 --> 1:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>leave FINRA, right, if I no longer am a broker,

1:10:09.000 --> 1:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and I decide to go fee only, they can go

1:10:11.080 --> 1:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>pound sand.

1:10:12.200 --> 1:10:14.240
<v Speaker 2>But they're trying desperately to get in there.

1:10:14.280 --> 1:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, but when you sign that U four, right, you

1:10:17.479 --> 1:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>gave them jurisdiction over you for two years.

1:10:20.240 --> 1:10:22.840
<v Speaker 2>After I never signed the U four, I just walked back.

1:10:23.439 --> 1:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>No, no, not to you five. When you sign your registration,

1:10:26.400 --> 1:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>oh the original use, they have jurisdiction over you. That's so. Yeah.

1:10:31.040 --> 1:10:33.439
<v Speaker 1>So so there's a two year period of time after

1:10:33.600 --> 1:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you resign where they continue to retain.

1:10:36.520 --> 1:10:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, I dropped the seven two years before I

1:10:39.040 --> 1:10:41.640
<v Speaker 2>resigned because I didn't I wasn't doing any brokers.

1:10:41.320 --> 1:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Work well and so and so a lot of these

1:10:43.479 --> 1:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>restrictions are tied to the fact that these folks are

1:10:46.080 --> 1:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>leaving broker dealers, right, and so, yeah, these are fin rules.

1:10:49.160 --> 1:10:51.719
<v Speaker 2>Now listen that that seems like that is a class

1:10:51.800 --> 1:10:55.800
<v Speaker 2>action lawsuit waiting to happen. Close. That whole setup is

1:10:56.240 --> 1:11:00.559
<v Speaker 2>borderline employment restriction. You would think like a state like

1:11:00.640 --> 1:11:03.519
<v Speaker 2>California would slam that stuff from going.

1:11:03.320 --> 1:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>On, except that states like California like the fact that

1:11:08.600 --> 1:11:12.639
<v Speaker 1>broker dealers have that level of supervision and control. Right

1:11:13.280 --> 1:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to protecting investors.

1:11:15.320 --> 1:11:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Because again, the nasd R did such a great job

1:11:19.920 --> 1:11:25.479
<v Speaker 2>protecting people from the worst brokers. Sarcasm alert. They you know,

1:11:25.880 --> 1:11:30.519
<v Speaker 2>the voiceover is narrator. They didn't, right, I mean, they

1:11:30.560 --> 1:11:33.880
<v Speaker 2>did a horrible job. What they did was protect And

1:11:33.880 --> 1:11:36.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to make this a I have a

1:11:36.280 --> 1:11:39.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of respect for shops like Morgan Stanley and Merrill

1:11:40.000 --> 1:11:44.439
<v Speaker 2>Lynch that have been around for forever and help democratize investing,

1:11:44.520 --> 1:11:47.959
<v Speaker 2>So I don't want to paint with too broad to brush. However,

1:11:48.240 --> 1:11:52.920
<v Speaker 2>it seemed like the bigger member firms had, like Michael Jordan,

1:11:53.000 --> 1:11:56.760
<v Speaker 2>a very different set of rules than what applied to

1:11:56.800 --> 1:12:00.720
<v Speaker 2>the smaller firms. And meanwhile, the tiniest buck shops got

1:12:00.720 --> 1:12:03.600
<v Speaker 2>away with murder for years and years and years. It

1:12:04.160 --> 1:12:05.640
<v Speaker 2>seemed like a no win situation.

1:12:05.840 --> 1:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, but that that's why, right, That's why they were

1:12:09.280 --> 1:12:12.439
<v Speaker 1>able to justify a lot of these restrictive rules over

1:12:12.479 --> 1:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the years, Right, because there were people out there doing

1:12:15.160 --> 1:12:16.439
<v Speaker 1>bad things and.

1:12:16.320 --> 1:12:18.240
<v Speaker 2>So that they failed to regulate.

1:12:18.439 --> 1:12:21.559
<v Speaker 1>Right, And so when larger firms would push would advocate

1:12:21.640 --> 1:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>for these rules, right, no one thought about the law

1:12:25.000 --> 1:12:28.559
<v Speaker 1>of unintended consequences. The big firms did right, there's really

1:12:28.600 --> 1:12:31.599
<v Speaker 1>smart people at More Stanley and Merrilnch and Goldman Sachs.

1:12:31.640 --> 1:12:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:12:31.800 --> 1:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these people are really smart and they have

1:12:34.040 --> 1:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>time to think about this stuff, right, whereas small firms,

1:12:36.920 --> 1:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>as you know, are just reacting to these rules on

1:12:39.840 --> 1:12:42.479
<v Speaker 1>the most part right there, they don't have as many

1:12:42.520 --> 1:12:46.960
<v Speaker 1>resources to participate in these meetings and the rulemaking and

1:12:46.960 --> 1:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>writing comment letters, and so as a result, large firms

1:12:50.439 --> 1:12:54.439
<v Speaker 1>have an outsized influence over the rule making process. That's

1:12:54.479 --> 1:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>just the way it is.

1:12:56.120 --> 1:13:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Really interesting. So let's talk about this space that I

1:13:01.000 --> 1:13:04.040
<v Speaker 2>think has really gained traction in the past couple of years,

1:13:04.400 --> 1:13:08.200
<v Speaker 2>the idea of the outsourced chief compliance officer. Tell us

1:13:08.240 --> 1:13:09.200
<v Speaker 2>a little bit about that.

1:13:09.800 --> 1:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, back in two thousand, we had two services

1:13:14.040 --> 1:13:17.559
<v Speaker 1>at Market Council. One was the RAA Incubator, which we

1:13:17.640 --> 1:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>still have to this day. The other was called your

1:13:19.880 --> 1:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Compliance Officer, and it was kind of a cheeky name.

1:13:23.360 --> 1:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>But keep in mind, this was like Windows two thousand era, right,

1:13:26.080 --> 1:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>where like everything was like my files and all that

1:13:28.400 --> 1:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. The SEC promulgated compliance program role in

1:13:33.840 --> 1:13:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the two thousands that, among other things, really clarified the

1:13:39.320 --> 1:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>role of a chief compliance officer, including what quality is

1:13:44.600 --> 1:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a chief compliance officer need to have their autonomy, the

1:13:49.120 --> 1:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>level of control and authority that they had to have,

1:13:52.280 --> 1:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and it made it clear to us that you cannot

1:13:55.600 --> 1:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>outsource the role of a C suite executive, specifically a

1:14:00.960 --> 1:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>chief compliance officer within an RAA. So for all the

1:14:06.120 --> 1:14:10.320
<v Speaker 1>firms that we work with, their chief compliance officer is

1:14:10.360 --> 1:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>an employee of the firm, because that employee needs to

1:14:15.200 --> 1:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>have authority to manage and control other employees and monitor them.

1:14:20.560 --> 1:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Tough to argue that that's possible when you have an

1:14:23.280 --> 1:14:25.519
<v Speaker 1>outsourced vendor, that you could just sever their contract at

1:14:25.560 --> 1:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>any time. And so we built our services to help

1:14:31.920 --> 1:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>lead and direct the activities of the CEO, right to

1:14:35.600 --> 1:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>give them kind of an editorial calendar and an agenda,

1:14:39.840 --> 1:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to give them information for which to do their job effectively,

1:14:44.160 --> 1:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and then to layer on underneath them and help administer

1:14:47.479 --> 1:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>their work and you know, and do and carry out

1:14:50.720 --> 1:14:54.479
<v Speaker 1>help carry out their responsibilities. So the chief compliance officer

1:14:54.720 --> 1:14:56.519
<v Speaker 1>always has their finger on the trigger.

1:14:57.000 --> 1:15:01.920
<v Speaker 2>So how many firms can out source chief compliance officer

1:15:02.479 --> 1:15:06.559
<v Speaker 2>be an employee of and still stay true to that mandate?

1:15:06.720 --> 1:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

1:15:07.320 --> 1:15:09.600
<v Speaker 2>You can't do ten thousand, but you could probably do

1:15:09.720 --> 1:15:10.639
<v Speaker 2>twenty or forty.

1:15:10.920 --> 1:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean, the SEC hasn't been clear

1:15:12.960 --> 1:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>on it. We don't think it's possible at all. Like

1:15:14.680 --> 1:15:17.439
<v Speaker 1>we don't really yeah, I mean, you know, our reading

1:15:17.479 --> 1:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of the rule indicates that, you know, someone who is

1:15:21.280 --> 1:15:24.479
<v Speaker 1>an outsourced service provider cannot serve in the role as

1:15:24.600 --> 1:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>chief compliance officer. But I know other firms do it right,

1:15:28.720 --> 1:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>They've made a business out of it. But before we

1:15:33.439 --> 1:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>hired a chief compliance officer, we were working with a

1:15:37.400 --> 1:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>regulatory compliance firm out in LA.

1:15:40.560 --> 1:15:43.960
<v Speaker 2>They were very helpful. It wasn't that they were a

1:15:44.080 --> 1:15:49.360
<v Speaker 2>chief compliance officer. But let's be honest, effectively when you're

1:15:49.439 --> 1:15:51.559
<v Speaker 2>hiring a third party, and I got to think this

1:15:51.640 --> 1:15:55.320
<v Speaker 2>is true for Market Council also, when you're saying to somebody, hey,

1:15:55.439 --> 1:15:57.680
<v Speaker 2>we don't know what the policies and procedures should be.

1:15:57.720 --> 1:15:59.400
<v Speaker 2>We don't know what we What do we need to

1:15:59.400 --> 1:16:01.759
<v Speaker 2>do to make sure? Will we pass our next audit?

1:16:01.800 --> 1:16:04.120
<v Speaker 2>What do we do to make sure? Like you want

1:16:04.120 --> 1:16:07.040
<v Speaker 2>to be on the right side of the compliance rules,

1:16:07.320 --> 1:16:09.280
<v Speaker 2>tell us what we can and can't do us give

1:16:09.360 --> 1:16:11.760
<v Speaker 2>us a black line and we'll stay on the right side.

1:16:11.800 --> 1:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Of it.

1:16:12.600 --> 1:16:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Whether that person is a full time employee or an

1:16:15.240 --> 1:16:19.519
<v Speaker 2>outside attorney that's giving you advice, how big a difference

1:16:19.560 --> 1:16:19.920
<v Speaker 2>is there?

1:16:20.800 --> 1:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>To me, the distinction here is that we're helping run

1:16:23.960 --> 1:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>an outsource compliance department. Right, we should be all of

1:16:26.920 --> 1:16:30.679
<v Speaker 1>the resources that a fully functional outsource compliance or compliance

1:16:30.680 --> 1:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>department should be on the other end of an email

1:16:33.200 --> 1:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and the other end of a phone call, any type

1:16:35.439 --> 1:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of communication. But to me, it's critical that that chief executive,

1:16:40.720 --> 1:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the chief compliance officer, the c suite individual sits as

1:16:44.280 --> 1:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>an employee of the firm so that they have the

1:16:46.040 --> 1:16:49.839
<v Speaker 1>proper authority. They're granted the proper authority within the corporate documents,

1:16:49.840 --> 1:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that they have the authority to carry out their responsibilities,

1:16:52.600 --> 1:16:56.799
<v Speaker 1>including the ability to hire and fire personnel. The SEC

1:16:56.840 --> 1:17:00.439
<v Speaker 1>says that person needs that authority, And I've never seen

1:17:02.040 --> 1:17:04.599
<v Speaker 1>in all my years of practicing law, I've never seen

1:17:05.200 --> 1:17:08.719
<v Speaker 1>a vendor relationship where you give the vendor the authority

1:17:08.800 --> 1:17:12.400
<v Speaker 1>to hire or fire an employee. It just doesn't happen. Right,

1:17:12.520 --> 1:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>So our reading of it doesn't allow a third party

1:17:16.960 --> 1:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a vendor to actually serve as a CCO. We think

1:17:20.000 --> 1:17:23.439
<v Speaker 1>we can as an outside provider, we can layer on

1:17:23.520 --> 1:17:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the top end underneath the CECO and we can provide

1:17:25.920 --> 1:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>them with all of the support and guidance that they need.

1:17:28.439 --> 1:17:32.360
<v Speaker 1>But it's really critical to me that someone within that

1:17:32.479 --> 1:17:36.640
<v Speaker 1>management with a management role takes on the role of it.

1:17:36.800 --> 1:17:39.559
<v Speaker 2>And it doesn't necessarily have to be a single, dedicated person.

1:17:39.600 --> 1:17:43.160
<v Speaker 2>It could be someone wearing multiple hats and when they say, okay,

1:17:43.160 --> 1:17:46.599
<v Speaker 2>now I'm chief compliance officer, you're working directly with them.

1:17:46.680 --> 1:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. A lot of people have noted recently. You know

1:17:49.600 --> 1:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>what I think has been a longtime trend, which is

1:17:51.360 --> 1:17:55.519
<v Speaker 1>that the chief operating officer often also serves as chief

1:17:55.520 --> 1:17:58.880
<v Speaker 1>compliance officer. I don't think that's the wrong call, right

1:17:58.880 --> 1:18:01.559
<v Speaker 1>when someone needs to wear more hats, because to me,

1:18:02.640 --> 1:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>regulatory compliance is simply an operational baseline standard. Right, that's

1:18:07.360 --> 1:18:10.360
<v Speaker 1>your non negotiable line, right. It's like, we never dip

1:18:10.439 --> 1:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>below that standard. Right. Maybe we're striving for excellence, you know,

1:18:14.120 --> 1:18:15.880
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to get you know, nine out of ten

1:18:15.960 --> 1:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>on these but regulatory compliance is that non negotiable line, right,

1:18:19.840 --> 1:18:22.120
<v Speaker 1>And so it makes sense that if someone's going to

1:18:22.160 --> 1:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>serve dual role, that the chief operating officer steps in.

1:18:25.520 --> 1:18:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Assuming you have a chief operator were especially you know,

1:18:28.360 --> 1:18:31.120
<v Speaker 2>smaller firm five ten people, they may not have an

1:18:31.160 --> 1:18:31.800
<v Speaker 2>operating offer.

1:18:31.840 --> 1:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Then it's you know, who's signed the operating agreement last right.

1:18:35.200 --> 1:18:40.519
<v Speaker 2>Right, or whoever's overseeing the advisors they're cfps, and it's

1:18:40.560 --> 1:18:44.400
<v Speaker 2>not you know, on a broker side, that person is

1:18:44.439 --> 1:18:50.040
<v Speaker 2>trying to encourage transactions with which generate revenue on the

1:18:50.120 --> 1:18:53.519
<v Speaker 2>fiduciary side. On the ra side, hey, the revenue takes

1:18:53.520 --> 1:18:56.000
<v Speaker 2>care of itself. Is a fee agreement. You just want

1:18:56.000 --> 1:18:58.599
<v Speaker 2>to make sure the advisor's doing with what they're supposed

1:18:58.640 --> 1:19:02.519
<v Speaker 2>to be doing and staying compliant. It shouldn't shouldn't be

1:19:02.640 --> 1:19:06.680
<v Speaker 2>an interference in the actual business. But I'm really down

1:19:07.000 --> 1:19:09.559
<v Speaker 2>down a rabbit hole and I'm projecting my own experience.

1:19:09.840 --> 1:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, but within that experience, don't you think that it's

1:19:13.240 --> 1:19:15.439
<v Speaker 1>as much a quality of service issue as anything else?

1:19:15.520 --> 1:19:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:19:15.680 --> 1:19:19.920
<v Speaker 1>We talked earlier about the distinction between compliance, legal and risk.

1:19:20.280 --> 1:19:23.719
<v Speaker 1>But much of what you know regulatory compliance is something

1:19:23.760 --> 1:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that we can handle, right. We know it's a finite

1:19:27.080 --> 1:19:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, set of rules, right, But what you're getting

1:19:30.240 --> 1:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>into is is moderating oversight, right, making sure that people

1:19:34.280 --> 1:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>are doing the right thing. And quite often when you

1:19:36.760 --> 1:19:38.639
<v Speaker 1>when you find a dispute with a client, it comes

1:19:38.680 --> 1:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>down to poor communications.

1:19:40.880 --> 1:19:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Almost almost always. So. So you mentioned earlier the SEC,

1:19:46.040 --> 1:19:50.479
<v Speaker 2>and I think I brought up audits pre pandemic. The

1:19:50.600 --> 1:19:53.679
<v Speaker 2>rule of thumb was, hey, expect an audit every three years,

1:19:53.680 --> 1:19:57.400
<v Speaker 2>and then the pandemic happened and for three years, you know,

1:19:57.439 --> 1:20:00.240
<v Speaker 2>everybody was sort of frozen. What do you I think

1:20:00.320 --> 1:20:04.240
<v Speaker 2>is going to happen going forward in terms of what

1:20:05.120 --> 1:20:08.080
<v Speaker 2>the audit procedures going to look like, what the frequency is,

1:20:08.520 --> 1:20:11.840
<v Speaker 2>because I have to imagine the SEC is getting to

1:20:11.880 --> 1:20:14.680
<v Speaker 2>the point where hey, let's go back to if not

1:20:15.040 --> 1:20:18.040
<v Speaker 2>the old regime, well something that looks like it, and

1:20:18.479 --> 1:20:20.040
<v Speaker 2>the world is normalizing again.

1:20:20.720 --> 1:20:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think it matters really.

1:20:23.000 --> 1:20:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I remember prepping for i know, first

1:20:26.800 --> 1:20:30.120
<v Speaker 2>audit and it was like, you know, it was like

1:20:30.240 --> 1:20:35.080
<v Speaker 2>the bar exam, going to the prom and the SATs

1:20:35.160 --> 1:20:36.160
<v Speaker 2>all rolled into one.

1:20:36.640 --> 1:20:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I think your perception is shaped by when you entered

1:20:39.920 --> 1:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>into this industry. Right, People used to market all the time,

1:20:43.439 --> 1:20:48.360
<v Speaker 1>death taxes, regulatory exams. Right. The thing I can share

1:20:48.520 --> 1:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>is that there's a zero mortality rate, you know, attached

1:20:51.240 --> 1:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to regulatory.

1:20:52.400 --> 1:20:55.439
<v Speaker 2>But there are fines there are like, hey, you guys suck,

1:20:55.479 --> 1:20:58.240
<v Speaker 2>You better get your act together. Just as a matter

1:20:58.280 --> 1:21:01.120
<v Speaker 2>of pride, you never want to have something like that happened.

1:21:01.520 --> 1:21:06.120
<v Speaker 1>There's there's no question that the SEC's regulatory exams have

1:21:06.200 --> 1:21:10.880
<v Speaker 1>gotten better, and they've gotten better primarily because the SEC

1:21:10.960 --> 1:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>has more data and they're using that data. Right, So

1:21:13.760 --> 1:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>before the SEC even walks into an advisor's office, they

1:21:17.120 --> 1:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>often have a short list of deficiencies and I can

1:21:20.280 --> 1:21:23.120
<v Speaker 1>find those that they're looking for or they already know about,

1:21:23.600 --> 1:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>really absolutely, because because it's as simple as this, they're

1:21:26.840 --> 1:21:30.880
<v Speaker 1>pulling your your form adv disclosure statement, right, They're pulling

1:21:30.920 --> 1:21:34.519
<v Speaker 1>your marketing collateral, they're pulling your client agreements right, and

1:21:34.560 --> 1:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>sometimes they're asking you for this in advance of the

1:21:36.680 --> 1:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>visitors just for this. Most of the time, for advisors

1:21:41.320 --> 1:21:44.479
<v Speaker 1>that existing advisors that are on board with US, there

1:21:44.520 --> 1:21:47.200
<v Speaker 1>are conflicts just within those agreements.

1:21:46.600 --> 1:21:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Meaning that they they're in opposite each other and you

1:21:49.280 --> 1:21:51.960
<v Speaker 2>can't actually fulfill all those.

1:21:51.800 --> 1:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Obligations either that or one is so vague that it

1:21:55.360 --> 1:21:58.559
<v Speaker 1>could be argued that it's misleading, right. I mean, when

1:21:58.600 --> 1:22:01.479
<v Speaker 1>advisors talk about their fees, this is a really big

1:22:01.520 --> 1:22:02.440
<v Speaker 1>area because.

1:22:02.200 --> 1:22:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that on a form adv disclosure? Isn't that all man?

1:22:05.160 --> 1:22:08.160
<v Speaker 2>We're really inside baseball today, I mean, isn't that all

1:22:08.200 --> 1:22:10.040
<v Speaker 2>out there? How do you mess that up?

1:22:10.720 --> 1:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>It's so easy to mess that up. Really absolutely, I'd

1:22:13.040 --> 1:22:15.360
<v Speaker 1>say more advisors mess up their fees and their conflicts

1:22:15.360 --> 1:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>of interest than anything else, right, because with their fees,

1:22:18.760 --> 1:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>advisors want to be aspirational in their disclosure. They want

1:22:22.040 --> 1:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to say, our fee is one percent right. They don't

1:22:24.280 --> 1:22:26.400
<v Speaker 1>want to get into all of the qualities they look

1:22:26.400 --> 1:22:29.400
<v Speaker 1>at when they discount that fee. They don't want to

1:22:30.120 --> 1:22:33.200
<v Speaker 1>disclose conflicts of interests that come along with the way

1:22:33.200 --> 1:22:35.599
<v Speaker 1>in which they structured that fee. And we are definitely

1:22:35.640 --> 1:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>getting into inside baseball. But conflicts of interest are by

1:22:39.320 --> 1:22:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and large the biggest area that the SEC can find

1:22:42.680 --> 1:22:45.440
<v Speaker 1>without even stepping into the office or talking to an individual.

1:22:45.600 --> 1:22:49.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's because they can see your business practices and

1:22:49.200 --> 1:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>they can see what you've disclosed. And most of the

1:22:51.280 --> 1:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>time when you talk to advisors, they say, well, that's

1:22:53.920 --> 1:22:56.559
<v Speaker 1>not a conflict because we would never do that right.

1:22:57.360 --> 1:23:01.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's just a real significant misunderstanding what a conflict is.

1:23:01.640 --> 1:23:06.439
<v Speaker 1>And you need an objective party to step in and say, hey,

1:23:06.800 --> 1:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I know you you know you guys are good people, right,

1:23:09.960 --> 1:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>but this is a conflict of interest. What we do

1:23:12.960 --> 1:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to mitigate that conflict or eliminate that conflict is another issue.

1:23:16.280 --> 1:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>But we have to call out the conflict and disclosure.

1:23:18.280 --> 1:23:22.519
<v Speaker 2>So I started out with a disclosure. Let's wrap up

1:23:22.840 --> 1:23:27.439
<v Speaker 2>the last segment with a disclosure. Which is my rule

1:23:27.439 --> 1:23:30.720
<v Speaker 2>of thumb is always even if there is a conflict,

1:23:30.840 --> 1:23:34.040
<v Speaker 2>and we really work hard on the fiduciary side of

1:23:34.080 --> 1:23:36.280
<v Speaker 2>the street. I don't mean just our WM, but the

1:23:36.320 --> 1:23:42.719
<v Speaker 2>whole Ria industry tries to not have a conflict. Isn't

1:23:42.880 --> 1:23:46.400
<v Speaker 2>all of this stuff satisfied by just disclosed? Disclosed? Disclose

1:23:46.760 --> 1:23:49.840
<v Speaker 2>if you let the clients know, Hey, we set up

1:23:50.080 --> 1:23:54.719
<v Speaker 2>a fintech venture fund because we feel we can push

1:23:54.800 --> 1:23:58.920
<v Speaker 2>those companies out there and do really a benefit for them,

1:23:59.000 --> 1:24:01.639
<v Speaker 2>and we want a PARTI in the upside. By the way,

1:24:01.640 --> 1:24:04.280
<v Speaker 2>if you're interested in it, we we have upside. And

1:24:04.320 --> 1:24:08.800
<v Speaker 2>here's the disclosure. If I disclose everything, how do you

1:24:08.960 --> 1:24:11.479
<v Speaker 2>how do you get into trouble? Does that resolve? Does

1:24:11.560 --> 1:24:14.920
<v Speaker 2>disclosure resolve all of And I'm not looking for free

1:24:15.000 --> 1:24:20.520
<v Speaker 2>legal advice here, it's a legit question. Does disclosure resolve

1:24:20.800 --> 1:24:22.000
<v Speaker 2>the conflict.

1:24:21.479 --> 1:24:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Issue mostly mostly? So going back to mostly but I

1:24:26.439 --> 1:24:27.759
<v Speaker 1>just want to I don't want to just have mostly

1:24:27.800 --> 1:24:32.599
<v Speaker 1>hanging out there mostly, but it doesn't resolve at all. Right,

1:24:32.640 --> 1:24:37.160
<v Speaker 1>And some conflicts are are simply improper, right, you simply

1:24:37.200 --> 1:24:39.120
<v Speaker 1>can't can't disclose them away.

1:24:39.120 --> 1:24:40.759
<v Speaker 2>Like like what sort of conflict?

1:24:40.840 --> 1:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, so so use that example right where you disclose

1:24:44.240 --> 1:24:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that you have this venture fund, right is your own fund.

1:24:47.240 --> 1:24:48.479
<v Speaker 1>And as by.

1:24:48.360 --> 1:24:50.920
<v Speaker 2>The way, one of the things we will not put

1:24:50.960 --> 1:24:55.320
<v Speaker 2>into the venture funds is an ETF or or anything

1:24:55.400 --> 1:24:57.920
<v Speaker 2>investing that then we're going to buy for the client

1:24:57.920 --> 1:25:00.960
<v Speaker 2>because clearly you're on both sides the trade. There, that's

1:25:00.960 --> 1:25:01.360
<v Speaker 2>a no no.

1:25:01.600 --> 1:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>So there you go, right, there's one of them. How

1:25:03.840 --> 1:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>about the other one being if these are if these

1:25:06.080 --> 1:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>are funds that you are recommending an allocation, you're not

1:25:09.960 --> 1:25:12.559
<v Speaker 1>going to recommend your own fund get paid for the

1:25:12.600 --> 1:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>investment advice and that get paid out of fund express, right,

1:25:15.360 --> 1:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>that's right. So there are some conflicts that are just

1:25:18.160 --> 1:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>just too far. Right, the SEC is going to say

1:25:19.960 --> 1:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you could disclose what you want. But in my second

1:25:22.000 --> 1:25:25.160
<v Speaker 1>week working at the at the SEC and the Enforcement Division,

1:25:25.840 --> 1:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>after I took Chuck Senator's class that we talked about earlier.

1:25:29.840 --> 1:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>He assigned me to work for this powerhouse of a litigator,

1:25:35.240 --> 1:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Sue Curtain. I don't know how I just remembered her name.

1:25:37.960 --> 1:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't tell you what I had for breakfast, right,

1:25:39.880 --> 1:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>But I said to Sue my friends, clearly, my sense

1:25:45.000 --> 1:25:48.679
<v Speaker 1>of like this raa thing is crazy. Like my sense

1:25:48.760 --> 1:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>is that so long as you disclose, that you are

1:25:52.160 --> 1:25:55.439
<v Speaker 1>stealing ten thousand dollars a day from the client, right,

1:25:55.520 --> 1:25:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that that so much of the recourse is precluded. Right.

1:26:00.400 --> 1:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>She just laughed at me and she said, you're a

1:26:03.040 --> 1:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>quick study. Right. And so clearly there are anti fraud provisions,

1:26:08.240 --> 1:26:14.160
<v Speaker 1>but disclosure is a key component to the advisor's act

1:26:14.200 --> 1:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and one that so many advisors have trouble with. They

1:26:16.880 --> 1:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>have a trouble really yeah, because I mean think of it, right,

1:26:19.760 --> 1:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the last time, the last time you went to your doctor,

1:26:22.240 --> 1:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>would he say how you feeling? Right? I feel great? Really?

1:26:25.840 --> 1:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Because I'm looking at your blood sugars, I'm looking at

1:26:27.800 --> 1:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>your weight, and the numbers are telling me a different story. Right.

1:26:32.120 --> 1:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>And so that's what happens with advisors. They are so

1:26:35.320 --> 1:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>blinded by their own good intentions and their purpose that

1:26:38.840 --> 1:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>they don't see the harm that they could do if

1:26:42.240 --> 1:26:44.360
<v Speaker 1>they set out to do it. Got and so as

1:26:44.400 --> 1:26:46.679
<v Speaker 1>an objective advisor, your job is to shine a mirror

1:26:46.680 --> 1:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and say, just imagine for a moment there was a

1:26:48.800 --> 1:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>bad actor, right, could we do this? Which is listen,

1:26:51.880 --> 1:26:53.519
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to get off on another tangent on

1:26:53.600 --> 1:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>your ear. But that's why cybersecurity and fraud. Cyber fraud

1:26:57.560 --> 1:27:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is such a problem for advisors because they're running a

1:27:00.680 --> 1:27:05.519
<v Speaker 1>business that's that has a foundation in familiarity. Right, they

1:27:05.600 --> 1:27:07.679
<v Speaker 1>can't have you call and just say, what's your social

1:27:07.680 --> 1:27:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Security number? Right? What's your what's your mother?

1:27:09.400 --> 1:27:12.200
<v Speaker 2>And we've heard we've heard people, we've heard horrible stories

1:27:12.240 --> 1:27:16.679
<v Speaker 2>about AI, especially somebody like you who's in the public

1:27:17.640 --> 1:27:20.160
<v Speaker 2>or me in the public domain. You could use AI,

1:27:20.400 --> 1:27:23.280
<v Speaker 2>pull a bunch of language out and create a phone

1:27:23.320 --> 1:27:28.720
<v Speaker 2>call that sounds like a person you were telling a

1:27:28.760 --> 1:27:34.120
<v Speaker 2>story about that. How dangerous is cybersecurity and this sort

1:27:34.160 --> 1:27:38.960
<v Speaker 2>of AI generated impersonation to fraud protection?

1:27:39.040 --> 1:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, let's let's just touch on cybersecurity. Cybersecurity

1:27:42.640 --> 1:27:45.120
<v Speaker 1>is a people problem, right, It's just that the root

1:27:45.160 --> 1:27:47.559
<v Speaker 1>of where they're getting the data is technology, and.

1:27:47.520 --> 1:27:51.519
<v Speaker 2>The social engineer acting is is is the data.

1:27:51.560 --> 1:27:54.200
<v Speaker 1>But it's almost all coming from people. Right. It's it's

1:27:54.240 --> 1:27:56.160
<v Speaker 1>your unroot to a conference or I'm unrout to a

1:27:56.200 --> 1:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>conference and someone is specifically targeting your colleagues, right, I

1:28:00.760 --> 1:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>got I got an email from from one of my

1:28:04.920 --> 1:28:08.479
<v Speaker 1>colleagues years ago. Uh, and he received an email before

1:28:08.520 --> 1:28:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that that said, Hey, as you know, I'm flying out

1:28:10.920 --> 1:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to this conference is a well known conference in our interspace.

1:28:14.080 --> 1:28:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to be available, but I need you

1:28:15.680 --> 1:28:18.439
<v Speaker 1>to send me the following financial reports, to which he

1:28:19.080 --> 1:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>replied to me and he said, I don't have access

1:28:22.200 --> 1:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to those financial reports. I replied to him, Well, that's

1:28:25.840 --> 1:28:28.679
<v Speaker 1>exactly why you don't have access to these financial reports.

1:28:29.720 --> 1:28:33.559
<v Speaker 1>They're you know, these cyber criminals are getting and I

1:28:33.600 --> 1:28:36.839
<v Speaker 1>hate to call them that because people they're getting clever. Fantasy,

1:28:37.080 --> 1:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>they're getting clever, they're getting a depth, they're getting more nimble.

1:28:40.280 --> 1:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're small advisors are not the primary subjects

1:28:45.040 --> 1:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of a denial of service attack, right, I mean that's

1:28:47.160 --> 1:28:51.599
<v Speaker 1>what big financial institutions are. After what they're they're going

1:28:51.680 --> 1:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to get duped because of the feigned familiarity that they

1:28:55.920 --> 1:28:58.599
<v Speaker 1>have to have with their clients. It's you know, it's

1:28:58.720 --> 1:29:02.439
<v Speaker 1>it's the you know, South calling saying or emailing saying,

1:29:02.479 --> 1:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>as you know, I'm going on a cruise. How did

1:29:04.880 --> 1:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the criminal know this because they went through Sally's emails

1:29:07.160 --> 1:29:09.599
<v Speaker 1>and she's they see she's booked on a cruise, as

1:29:09.600 --> 1:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm on a cruise, put on Instagram or

1:29:12.760 --> 1:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it's on on social media, right, And so these criminals

1:29:16.040 --> 1:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>are scaling down. It's a scalability issue. They're scaling down

1:29:19.400 --> 1:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to the point that they can go after these individual

1:29:22.120 --> 1:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>crimes and they're succeeding unbelievable.

1:29:25.520 --> 1:29:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Unbelievable. All right, So I have two curveball questions I

1:29:29.120 --> 1:29:32.120
<v Speaker 2>got to ask you before we get to our favorite

1:29:32.200 --> 1:29:34.960
<v Speaker 2>questions in our last five minutes. The first is you

1:29:35.000 --> 1:29:38.680
<v Speaker 2>were a chef in the US Coast Guard Auxiliary. How

1:29:38.720 --> 1:29:39.679
<v Speaker 2>the hell did that happen?

1:29:40.120 --> 1:29:46.640
<v Speaker 1>You know? I uh, I'm an incredibly curious person. Some

1:29:46.680 --> 1:29:52.280
<v Speaker 1>would say just you know, I'm just jumping. And anytime

1:29:52.360 --> 1:29:55.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested in something, I want to know. I want

1:29:55.520 --> 1:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to know how people do it, I want to know

1:29:56.760 --> 1:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>how things work. And so I joined the Coast Guard

1:30:00.000 --> 1:30:02.599
<v Speaker 1>Auxiliary when I bought a boat back in two thousand.

1:30:02.680 --> 1:30:05.959
<v Speaker 2>So we're not talking about JAG. We're talking about literally

1:30:06.080 --> 1:30:07.320
<v Speaker 2>the Coast Guard Auxiliary.

1:30:07.360 --> 1:30:10.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the Coast Guard Auxiliary. Now it's you know, it's

1:30:10.600 --> 1:30:15.559
<v Speaker 1>a group of largely retired servicemen and women who get

1:30:15.600 --> 1:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>together to help support the US Coast Guard. Right they

1:30:19.080 --> 1:30:20.519
<v Speaker 1>call it, you know, they call the US Coast Guard

1:30:20.560 --> 1:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the gold Side, And we were the silver Side. And

1:30:23.200 --> 1:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>so I joined to get free boating education. I joined

1:30:27.040 --> 1:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to learn navigation, joined joined to learn weather.

1:30:30.360 --> 1:30:33.599
<v Speaker 2>And they give a lot as a fellow voter, they

1:30:33.640 --> 1:30:36.160
<v Speaker 2>give courses. Yeah, you could sign up. You can learn

1:30:36.200 --> 1:30:38.360
<v Speaker 2>to sail, you can learn to navigate by the stars.

1:30:38.400 --> 1:30:40.040
<v Speaker 2>You can do all of it with them.

1:30:40.120 --> 1:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah and so, and I love the camaraderie of the group.

1:30:42.960 --> 1:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>And one of the programs they had, they used to

1:30:45.200 --> 1:30:48.720
<v Speaker 1>call the Chef program the Auxiliary Chef program. Now they

1:30:48.720 --> 1:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>call it Auxiliary Food Service. But the program is about

1:30:51.920 --> 1:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>augmenting the capabilities of the gold Side so that someone

1:30:55.160 --> 1:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>can take a few days leave or that's or that

1:30:57.880 --> 1:30:59.639
<v Speaker 1>or when they run you know, when they run low,

1:30:59.720 --> 1:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>or when they're having a special event. And taught me

1:31:03.200 --> 1:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>about food safety, taught me about a food quantity, and

1:31:06.800 --> 1:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I just I've always loved the I've always loved the

1:31:10.120 --> 1:31:12.640
<v Speaker 1>gratitude of pulling off what people don't know. Right, you

1:31:12.760 --> 1:31:14.800
<v Speaker 1>did it, and it's kind of an extension of what

1:31:14.840 --> 1:31:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I do.

1:31:15.320 --> 1:31:18.320
<v Speaker 2>That sounds fun. And then you almost had a career

1:31:18.360 --> 1:31:22.519
<v Speaker 2>in radio. Tell us how you sidestep that and went

1:31:22.560 --> 1:31:23.719
<v Speaker 2>into legal practice.

1:31:23.720 --> 1:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I think what you meant to say is have a

1:31:24.880 --> 1:31:25.559
<v Speaker 1>face for radio.

1:31:25.600 --> 1:31:28.800
<v Speaker 2>I definitely same. Same. So you you were in your

1:31:28.800 --> 1:31:31.000
<v Speaker 2>college radio station. Tell us a little bit about that.

1:31:31.080 --> 1:31:37.600
<v Speaker 1>So I was convinced to do college radio early on

1:31:37.880 --> 1:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>our freshman year and we got a show. It was

1:31:40.120 --> 1:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the worst time. It was during Monday night football, right.

1:31:42.240 --> 1:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Who listens to radio during Monday night football at college? Nobody?

1:31:45.960 --> 1:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>But that was freeing, right, because we can kind of

1:31:48.280 --> 1:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>do whatever we wanted on the air and make mistakes

1:31:51.400 --> 1:31:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and no one really noticed. And so over the years

1:31:54.560 --> 1:31:56.680
<v Speaker 1>we got bumped up to the point that we got

1:31:56.720 --> 1:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>our slot Thursday night eight to eleven, which was like prime.

1:32:00.920 --> 1:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Everyone listened to the radio.

1:32:02.280 --> 1:32:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Sure, you're getting ready to go out for a Satursday

1:32:04.400 --> 1:32:05.000
<v Speaker 2>night in college?

1:32:05.400 --> 1:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Pree gaming? Right? And so we, uh, we were doing

1:32:10.120 --> 1:32:13.040
<v Speaker 1>our thing. Unbeknownst to us, there were ratings. I didn't

1:32:13.080 --> 1:32:14.519
<v Speaker 1>know anything about ratings. I knew you had to get

1:32:14.520 --> 1:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>an FCC license, but I didn't know anything about ratings.

1:32:17.240 --> 1:32:21.720
<v Speaker 1>And unbeknownst to us, we hit the UH, you know

1:32:22.080 --> 1:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>as like the top program in that time slot in

1:32:24.880 --> 1:32:27.919
<v Speaker 1>New Haven and got all all sorts of crazy recognition.

1:32:27.960 --> 1:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>But we were just you know, two roommates getting on

1:32:30.160 --> 1:32:32.479
<v Speaker 1>and UH and doing an old school rap show.

1:32:33.040 --> 1:32:35.599
<v Speaker 2>That's a let wait, old school rap show.

1:32:35.640 --> 1:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Old school rap wait.

1:32:36.960 --> 1:32:38.880
<v Speaker 2>So the two of you would drop and beats and

1:32:39.000 --> 1:32:42.120
<v Speaker 2>lyrics on the radio. That sounds really embarrassed.

1:32:42.200 --> 1:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't rapping, okay, but and I call it old school.

1:32:46.280 --> 1:32:49.320
<v Speaker 1>It's only old school sitting here today, right, it wasn't

1:32:49.400 --> 1:32:50.599
<v Speaker 1>old school back then.

1:32:51.120 --> 1:32:54.120
<v Speaker 2>We've talked about this before. To me, old school is

1:32:54.479 --> 1:32:57.760
<v Speaker 2>is Pol's boutique and Beastie Boys. That's about as far

1:32:57.760 --> 1:32:59.200
<v Speaker 2>as my hip hop progressed.

1:32:59.240 --> 1:33:01.160
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty good, Yeah, not too bad.

1:33:01.439 --> 1:33:04.000
<v Speaker 2>So in the last few minutes I have you, let's

1:33:04.160 --> 1:33:08.160
<v Speaker 2>jump to our favorite questions that we ask all our guests,

1:33:08.200 --> 1:33:11.200
<v Speaker 2>starting with what have you been watching? What have you

1:33:11.240 --> 1:33:15.920
<v Speaker 2>been streaming? And what's kept you entertained in the pandemic

1:33:15.960 --> 1:33:17.360
<v Speaker 2>and post pandemic era.

1:33:17.880 --> 1:33:20.880
<v Speaker 1>So I will tell you that I am. I am

1:33:20.920 --> 1:33:21.959
<v Speaker 1>not a good streamer.

1:33:22.160 --> 1:33:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, it's not hard.

1:33:24.800 --> 1:33:27.719
<v Speaker 1>I know it's not hard. But I'm one of these

1:33:27.840 --> 1:33:31.639
<v Speaker 1>people that almost prefers there to be crap on TV right,

1:33:31.720 --> 1:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>so that I can do other stuff and have that

1:33:33.800 --> 1:33:36.080
<v Speaker 1>on in the back. Okay, So I love I love

1:33:36.120 --> 1:33:39.439
<v Speaker 1>putting on sports in the background that I'm marginally interested in. Right,

1:33:39.560 --> 1:33:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Throw on a Yankee game. I could hear the announcer

1:33:41.400 --> 1:33:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of the inflection and the voice. Throw on a soccer game.

1:33:44.200 --> 1:33:46.799
<v Speaker 1>I love watching soccer, or actually I love having soccer

1:33:46.920 --> 1:33:47.839
<v Speaker 1>on right.

1:33:48.040 --> 1:33:51.880
<v Speaker 2>And there is a certain energy to World Cup, the

1:33:51.960 --> 1:33:55.720
<v Speaker 2>back and forth. It's like waves and you can kind

1:33:55.720 --> 1:33:57.240
<v Speaker 2>of half pay attention to it.

1:33:57.240 --> 1:34:01.120
<v Speaker 1>It's awesome and and you know, undeniably anytime you get

1:34:01.120 --> 1:34:03.280
<v Speaker 1>into March madness, it's one of the best times of year.

1:34:04.400 --> 1:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>So I don't really obsess over over much on TV.

1:34:07.439 --> 1:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I will put on any anything on that Geo or

1:34:10.439 --> 1:34:12.839
<v Speaker 1>History channel and kind of geek out over that stuff.

1:34:13.320 --> 1:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>But my deal is I use like one of these

1:34:17.920 --> 1:34:20.400
<v Speaker 1>services where anything I find interesting, I just tag it

1:34:20.439 --> 1:34:22.840
<v Speaker 1>as like a to watch watch it later, Yeah, like

1:34:22.880 --> 1:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>something like that, right, and then and then I have

1:34:25.840 --> 1:34:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that on my TV. So if I'm watching with any

1:34:28.040 --> 1:34:30.519
<v Speaker 1>of my kids or my girlfriend, they they can go

1:34:30.560 --> 1:34:33.840
<v Speaker 1>into that treasure trove and be ensured that it's something

1:34:33.880 --> 1:34:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to watch at some point in time. And

1:34:36.040 --> 1:34:37.160
<v Speaker 1>so that's usually our deal.

1:34:37.600 --> 1:34:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Let's let's talk about mentors who helped shape your career.

1:34:41.960 --> 1:34:46.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think I think everyone that I came

1:34:46.439 --> 1:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>across did in some way, shape or form.

1:34:48.120 --> 1:34:48.240
<v Speaker 2>You know.

1:34:48.280 --> 1:34:51.559
<v Speaker 1>I used to I used to hate this question about

1:34:51.560 --> 1:34:53.800
<v Speaker 1>like who's your idol, because I never I never thought

1:34:53.800 --> 1:34:57.559
<v Speaker 1>that that was a fair assessment of anyone. But but

1:34:57.640 --> 1:35:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of mentors, you know, I had so many

1:35:01.880 --> 1:35:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and continue to have so many that that came before

1:35:05.160 --> 1:35:08.439
<v Speaker 1>me that I learned from. Some I strangely learned what

1:35:08.560 --> 1:35:10.599
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to be and the road I didn't

1:35:10.600 --> 1:35:12.479
<v Speaker 1>want to take right. It was a lot of a

1:35:12.479 --> 1:35:15.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of other people's mistakes that I would that I

1:35:15.720 --> 1:35:18.720
<v Speaker 1>would learn from. But I mean, the list is just

1:35:19.800 --> 1:35:23.360
<v Speaker 1>so plentiful of people that that literally would just give

1:35:23.400 --> 1:35:26.400
<v Speaker 1>me a hand up. I had a very a very

1:35:27.160 --> 1:35:33.599
<v Speaker 1>unique and special type of relationship with with the gentleman

1:35:33.680 --> 1:35:37.800
<v Speaker 1>who was my boss as I interned at merri Lynch.

1:35:37.840 --> 1:35:40.120
<v Speaker 1>One of my first jobs in the securities industry in

1:35:40.280 --> 1:35:45.280
<v Speaker 1>undergrad many many years later, I had we continue to

1:35:45.280 --> 1:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>stay in touch and I had the uh, the privilege

1:35:48.200 --> 1:35:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of helping him and his team leave merri Lynch. Oh yeah,

1:35:53.120 --> 1:35:55.439
<v Speaker 1>and it was and it was fascinating. And then many

1:35:55.479 --> 1:35:58.719
<v Speaker 1>years after that, when he went to exit his his firm,

1:35:59.360 --> 1:36:01.760
<v Speaker 1>A had the privilege of helping him again. And so like,

1:36:01.800 --> 1:36:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, to me, those are the relationships that

1:36:05.479 --> 1:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that just make make this all worthwhile, right, continuing to

1:36:08.800 --> 1:36:11.880
<v Speaker 1>not be involved in the individual transaction, but rather being

1:36:11.920 --> 1:36:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a part of of someone's life.

1:36:14.040 --> 1:36:17.719
<v Speaker 2>And that's interesting that that's a full arc from from

1:36:17.800 --> 1:36:23.599
<v Speaker 2>employer to team leaving to retirement. That that's not usual.

1:36:23.600 --> 1:36:25.280
<v Speaker 2>You don't usually get to see something like that.

1:36:25.400 --> 1:36:27.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not usual. But I'm really really grateful for those

1:36:27.720 --> 1:36:28.640
<v Speaker 1>types of experiences.

1:36:28.800 --> 1:36:30.759
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about books. What are some of your favorites?

1:36:30.760 --> 1:36:31.959
<v Speaker 2>What are you reading currently?

1:36:32.760 --> 1:36:36.880
<v Speaker 1>So you and I went to a conference and we.

1:36:36.880 --> 1:36:43.920
<v Speaker 2>S Darren's Individual Advisor Conference in Independent, Independent, and we

1:36:44.000 --> 1:36:47.280
<v Speaker 2>got to live through a tornado that turned the sky

1:36:47.400 --> 1:36:50.439
<v Speaker 2>black and people standing in front of these giant plates

1:36:50.439 --> 1:36:53.799
<v Speaker 2>of glass and hey, I'm not from Texas, but maybe

1:36:53.840 --> 1:36:55.680
<v Speaker 2>those big windows are not where you want to be.

1:36:55.800 --> 1:36:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Is this funnel comes ripping towards the hotel?

1:36:58.400 --> 1:37:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Probably not, but that's where that's where I pulled my

1:37:01.720 --> 1:37:04.479
<v Speaker 1>latest book from the speaker they had that night was

1:37:04.920 --> 1:37:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy Siegel.

1:37:05.680 --> 1:37:07.639
<v Speaker 2>The professor always great.

1:37:07.880 --> 1:37:10.080
<v Speaker 1>It is always great, and so I jumped into his

1:37:10.120 --> 1:37:11.400
<v Speaker 1>book stocks for the long run.

1:37:12.240 --> 1:37:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Now in like the eighth edition or something six right now,

1:37:15.439 --> 1:37:18.679
<v Speaker 2>sixth edition. But yeah, that sold a couple of million copies.

1:37:18.720 --> 1:37:21.200
<v Speaker 2>It's one of the best sellers in the space.

1:37:22.000 --> 1:37:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I found it. So here's my disclosure about books. Right.

1:37:24.400 --> 1:37:26.719
<v Speaker 1>There are certain books I read when I was young

1:37:27.160 --> 1:37:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that had such an impression on me, and nowadays, anytime

1:37:32.200 --> 1:37:35.120
<v Speaker 1>someone tells me about an interesting book, I buy it

1:37:35.240 --> 1:37:38.479
<v Speaker 1>first and I start reading it. So I've begun reading.

1:37:38.920 --> 1:37:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I looked knowing that you're gonna ask me this question.

1:37:42.200 --> 1:37:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I have one hundred and forty four books that I've

1:37:44.000 --> 1:37:46.200
<v Speaker 1>started reading and I'm in progress as some.

1:37:46.560 --> 1:37:47.559
<v Speaker 2>Are you going to read them?

1:37:47.560 --> 1:37:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Because I will.

1:37:48.200 --> 1:37:52.519
<v Speaker 2>By the way, some people seem to feel that books

1:37:52.560 --> 1:37:55.240
<v Speaker 2>are like homework and once you start, you have to finish.

1:37:55.240 --> 1:37:58.160
<v Speaker 2>There's nothing wrong with picking up a book and saying, oh,

1:37:58.160 --> 1:38:00.559
<v Speaker 2>I'm not enjoying this and moving to a book that

1:38:00.960 --> 1:38:02.000
<v Speaker 2>you'll actually like.

1:38:02.080 --> 1:38:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree with you. I mean, there's too many

1:38:03.680 --> 1:38:05.840
<v Speaker 1>books that I read the first chapter like nine times

1:38:06.120 --> 1:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>because I keep picking up and I'm like, all right,

1:38:07.680 --> 1:38:10.120
<v Speaker 1>if I'm not into this, it's okay, Like just you know,

1:38:10.400 --> 1:38:14.559
<v Speaker 1>toss it to the side. I also started reading book

1:38:14.720 --> 1:38:18.439
<v Speaker 1>The Hard Thing About Hard Things. You know, it's a

1:38:18.479 --> 1:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>fascinating book.

1:38:19.640 --> 1:38:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Who authored that? By Ben Horowitz of Andresen Harrowez. He's

1:38:23.040 --> 1:38:26.040
<v Speaker 2>also a prior guest. He's a fascinating guy.

1:38:26.120 --> 1:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I love his take on we're not talking

1:38:31.960 --> 1:38:35.479
<v Speaker 1>about the herd issues, right, Like, I think through things

1:38:35.560 --> 1:38:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that people call luck or things that people call happenstance,

1:38:38.160 --> 1:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think I love to think through all of

1:38:40.640 --> 1:38:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the permutations that led to that point in time, right,

1:38:44.960 --> 1:38:49.280
<v Speaker 1>all the decision points and even lack thereof. And you know,

1:38:49.320 --> 1:38:51.920
<v Speaker 1>he kind of starts to get to to some of

1:38:51.960 --> 1:38:52.720
<v Speaker 1>that things.

1:38:52.800 --> 1:38:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Just because somebody's lucky doesn't mean they weren't good or

1:38:56.760 --> 1:38:59.720
<v Speaker 2>putting themselves in a position where a little luck and

1:38:59.760 --> 1:39:00.360
<v Speaker 2>shoe on that.

1:39:01.160 --> 1:39:02.280
<v Speaker 1>But where's that right balance?

1:39:02.360 --> 1:39:02.479
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:39:02.479 --> 1:39:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to be you know, you don't want

1:39:04.160 --> 1:39:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to be so pompous to say that there is no luck, right, right,

1:39:07.040 --> 1:39:11.000
<v Speaker 1>But you also don't want to, you know, be you know,

1:39:11.200 --> 1:39:13.840
<v Speaker 1>so soft as to say like, oh, it's all luck, right,

1:39:13.880 --> 1:39:16.679
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not it's you know, it's some it's some logica.

1:39:17.120 --> 1:39:20.320
<v Speaker 1>It's some logical confluence there, right, and setting yourself for luck.

1:39:22.080 --> 1:39:24.600
<v Speaker 1>You know. I'm getting to to that point that you know,

1:39:24.600 --> 1:39:27.920
<v Speaker 1>people recommend books about about how much time we have left.

1:39:28.640 --> 1:39:31.439
<v Speaker 1>So someone recommended this book four thousand weeks.

1:39:31.720 --> 1:39:35.440
<v Speaker 2>I love that title, by the way, it's awesome genius. Yeah, yeah,

1:39:35.479 --> 1:39:39.080
<v Speaker 2>I started that, but I need better time management skills

1:39:39.080 --> 1:39:41.519
<v Speaker 2>in order to finish it. But it's it's you know,

1:39:41.560 --> 1:39:43.439
<v Speaker 2>it's one of those things you could just pick up

1:39:43.479 --> 1:39:44.840
<v Speaker 2>a chapter at a time, so.

1:39:45.320 --> 1:39:47.479
<v Speaker 1>You can, and and it's a I'd say it's a

1:39:47.520 --> 1:39:49.000
<v Speaker 1>light read. It's probably not a light read, but it

1:39:49.040 --> 1:39:51.320
<v Speaker 1>is more of a time management book, right than a

1:39:51.320 --> 1:39:52.800
<v Speaker 1>book about our own mortality.

1:39:53.240 --> 1:39:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Explain what four thousand weeks are?

1:39:55.000 --> 1:39:56.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's it's how much time you have in your

1:39:56.479 --> 1:39:57.400
<v Speaker 1>lifetime if.

1:39:57.280 --> 1:39:59.559
<v Speaker 2>You're if you're lucky, you know, you and I have

1:39:59.560 --> 1:40:01.360
<v Speaker 2>a thousand weeks left, yeah, and.

1:40:01.280 --> 1:40:03.800
<v Speaker 1>So and so it it it puts some degree of

1:40:03.800 --> 1:40:06.160
<v Speaker 1>impetus to get to the things that you're just saying,

1:40:06.280 --> 1:40:07.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll do it later.

1:40:07.320 --> 1:40:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Your bucket list, which most people don't don't tag.

1:40:10.720 --> 1:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>So so, like I I always love having a variety

1:40:13.240 --> 1:40:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of books that that I'm reading that kind of checked

1:40:16.240 --> 1:40:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the box. Whether it's it's hard finance books, or it's

1:40:19.040 --> 1:40:22.679
<v Speaker 1>strategy books, or it's uh, it's it's empathy and uh,

1:40:22.800 --> 1:40:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, emotional books. But the stuff that I read

1:40:26.800 --> 1:40:29.040
<v Speaker 1>when I was younger kind of in my you know,

1:40:29.840 --> 1:40:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess, early late teens, early twenties.

1:40:32.040 --> 1:40:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Give us an example.

1:40:34.479 --> 1:40:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I read The Millionaire next Door right when I was young, Yeah, right,

1:40:38.360 --> 1:40:41.559
<v Speaker 1>and like I just it just stuck with me.

1:40:41.840 --> 1:40:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Really. Yeah, there's just there's certain books that just sit

1:40:45.040 --> 1:40:47.600
<v Speaker 2>with me aspects of that that are very valid. I

1:40:47.600 --> 1:40:50.719
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't just have like an automatic Yeah. And I can't

1:40:50.840 --> 1:40:51.639
<v Speaker 2>respond well.

1:40:51.800 --> 1:40:54.839
<v Speaker 1>And I can't tell you anything about the book itself,

1:40:55.080 --> 1:40:56.639
<v Speaker 1>but what I can tell you it left me with

1:40:56.760 --> 1:41:00.000
<v Speaker 1>is that you always have control over what you spend, right,

1:41:00.479 --> 1:41:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and less over what you what you make.

1:41:03.000 --> 1:41:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Now, by the way, I'm gonna withdraw my I'm gonna

1:41:07.320 --> 1:41:10.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna say that respond to that again because I'm

1:41:10.040 --> 1:41:12.799
<v Speaker 2>thinking of a different book, and it's not this one.

1:41:13.320 --> 1:41:22.519
<v Speaker 2>So raspberry with Raspberry withdrawing, I'm thinking of, well, I

1:41:22.520 --> 1:41:25.559
<v Speaker 2>didn't say that, but yeah, that's what I was. What

1:41:25.680 --> 1:41:30.760
<v Speaker 2>makes Millionaire next Door so fascinating is that we tend

1:41:30.800 --> 1:41:34.920
<v Speaker 2>to think, well, you you read it more recently than

1:41:34.920 --> 1:41:40.840
<v Speaker 2>I probably did. No read so what I remember that is, Hey,

1:41:41.000 --> 1:41:45.920
<v Speaker 2>the fancy car, the big house. That's not the average millionaire.

1:41:46.280 --> 1:41:49.120
<v Speaker 2>The typical person who's accumulated a net worth north of

1:41:49.120 --> 1:41:54.160
<v Speaker 2>a million dollars is living a fairly sedate life there.

1:41:54.280 --> 1:41:57.599
<v Speaker 2>They they have a modest home, not a big, fancy home.

1:41:57.920 --> 1:42:00.320
<v Speaker 2>They have a five year old car, They're not having

1:42:00.320 --> 1:42:04.799
<v Speaker 2>a ferrari or a porch. They basically are are living

1:42:04.960 --> 1:42:09.360
<v Speaker 2>lives of quiet success without that of feeling the need

1:42:09.439 --> 1:42:13.720
<v Speaker 2>to show off. You see the indicitia of wealth. You

1:42:13.760 --> 1:42:16.160
<v Speaker 2>don't see the liabilities on the other side of it.

1:42:16.720 --> 1:42:19.280
<v Speaker 1>There's there's no doubt that if I could sum the

1:42:19.320 --> 1:42:21.920
<v Speaker 1>book up in one word, it was moderation, right, is

1:42:21.920 --> 1:42:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it enjoy just and don't enjoy the success? Right? And

1:42:24.640 --> 1:42:27.760
<v Speaker 1>it was such an offset to popular culture at that time,

1:42:28.040 --> 1:42:31.880
<v Speaker 1>which was celebrating excess. Right. It was athletes and entertainers

1:42:31.920 --> 1:42:34.360
<v Speaker 1>just like that was the look of millionaires until I

1:42:34.400 --> 1:42:38.599
<v Speaker 1>read that book also a little later on read where

1:42:38.600 --> 1:42:39.759
<v Speaker 1>are all the customers Yachts?

1:42:42.080 --> 1:42:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Not been a good speed? What's his name? I read

1:42:45.439 --> 1:42:47.200
<v Speaker 2>that book a long time ago, and it's hilarious.

1:42:47.240 --> 1:42:49.759
<v Speaker 1>It's hilarious, right, I mean, it's about this guy walking

1:42:49.760 --> 1:42:52.920
<v Speaker 1>through Wall Street basically saying, hey, wait, I see I

1:42:52.920 --> 1:42:55.479
<v Speaker 1>see all the yachts from the people who work here,

1:42:55.479 --> 1:42:59.559
<v Speaker 1>But where where are all the customers yachts? And and

1:42:59.600 --> 1:43:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was just a really good take.

1:43:01.479 --> 1:43:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Fred Schwead, Yeah, I had a search for that because

1:43:04.000 --> 1:43:05.080
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't access his.

1:43:05.120 --> 1:43:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Name, and it's just, you know, it just it's very poignant.

1:43:08.080 --> 1:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>And to this day I think about that when we

1:43:11.000 --> 1:43:14.360
<v Speaker 1>think about the inequity that exists between financial institutions and

1:43:14.479 --> 1:43:19.559
<v Speaker 1>retail customers, right, and the good work that since that

1:43:19.600 --> 1:43:25.040
<v Speaker 1>book was written, that advisors have really done to democratize investing.

1:43:25.120 --> 1:43:28.240
<v Speaker 2>And that book was written seventy five years maybe even longer.

1:43:28.280 --> 1:43:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to say it was in the forties if

1:43:29.640 --> 1:43:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I recall like postwar period, yeah, forties, fifties, I'm thinking fifties,

1:43:36.400 --> 1:43:38.200
<v Speaker 1>nineteen forty very good.

1:43:38.880 --> 1:43:40.439
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was a little I thought it was

1:43:40.439 --> 1:43:43.559
<v Speaker 2>a little later. So any other books before we get

1:43:43.600 --> 1:43:45.080
<v Speaker 2>to our last two questions?

1:43:45.240 --> 1:43:49.280
<v Speaker 1>You know there's other books that that stuck with me.

1:43:49.720 --> 1:43:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Freakonomics is one. You know, how to make economics interesting

1:43:53.240 --> 1:43:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to the masses. I just love the approach that those

1:43:57.000 --> 1:44:00.280
<v Speaker 1>guys took. And I'm just a I'm just a heard

1:44:00.320 --> 1:44:03.360
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to economics to technology and all that

1:44:03.400 --> 1:44:06.639
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing and building a business. In two thousand,

1:44:06.720 --> 1:44:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it was tough to avoid books like the e Myth

1:44:09.600 --> 1:44:15.559
<v Speaker 1>write this concept that business process drives consistent results? Which did?

1:44:15.600 --> 1:44:18.920
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't necessarily a foregone conclusion back in two thousand

1:44:19.640 --> 1:44:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and so I thought it was really compelling.

1:44:21.560 --> 1:44:24.519
<v Speaker 2>All right, And our final two questions, what sort of

1:44:24.560 --> 1:44:28.280
<v Speaker 2>advice would you give to a recent college grad interested

1:44:28.479 --> 1:44:33.360
<v Speaker 2>in a career similar to yours? Regulatory compliance, legal finance?

1:44:33.920 --> 1:44:35.080
<v Speaker 2>How would you advise them?

1:44:35.640 --> 1:44:38.000
<v Speaker 1>So, my oldest daughter just graduated from pitt last year.

1:44:38.920 --> 1:44:43.479
<v Speaker 1>My middle that was Ella, my middle one, Jake, is

1:44:43.560 --> 1:44:48.760
<v Speaker 1>graduating from Georgetown next month. And my youngest, Sidney, is

1:44:48.800 --> 1:44:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a freshman at University of Miami. Both Jacob and Sidney

1:44:52.240 --> 1:44:56.080
<v Speaker 1>are in our finance majors. And so I've had some

1:44:56.240 --> 1:44:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I've had these are been real talks. These aren't just theoretical.

1:44:59.280 --> 1:45:02.240
<v Speaker 1>What I would tell them that the finance industry can

1:45:02.280 --> 1:45:03.719
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of things to a lot of people.

1:45:04.240 --> 1:45:07.240
<v Speaker 1>That there's not a single career within the finance industry.

1:45:07.240 --> 1:45:10.720
<v Speaker 1>There's there's an entire world. It's great to work for

1:45:10.760 --> 1:45:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a sector that's on top, but remember that our entire

1:45:13.080 --> 1:45:16.280
<v Speaker 1>economy is cyclical. Right, If you're picking a job today,

1:45:16.320 --> 1:45:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I understand the hot jobs are in finance and pharmaceuticals,

1:45:20.400 --> 1:45:22.599
<v Speaker 1>but you know, you have to think through the duration

1:45:22.720 --> 1:45:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of your career, right, and.

1:45:24.240 --> 1:45:26.759
<v Speaker 2>Was job five years ago, ten years ago?

1:45:27.080 --> 1:45:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Exactly? So do you only want a job that exists

1:45:29.200 --> 1:45:31.760
<v Speaker 1>in the finance sector or do you want to find

1:45:31.760 --> 1:45:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a job that's transportable elsewhere? And so so, speaking to

1:45:36.360 --> 1:45:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Jake about that, right, he had experience working working for US,

1:45:40.600 --> 1:45:45.120
<v Speaker 1>he had experienced working within on the investment banking side,

1:45:45.560 --> 1:45:50.840
<v Speaker 1>working for David Devaux, he had experienced working within with

1:45:50.920 --> 1:45:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a venture capital firm. And when it came time to

1:45:54.280 --> 1:45:56.680
<v Speaker 1>find a full time job, you know, my advice to

1:45:56.760 --> 1:45:59.920
<v Speaker 1>him was, you want a flight to quality that's not

1:46:00.320 --> 1:46:03.400
<v Speaker 1>in the finance space, but hones your skills in finance.

1:46:03.400 --> 1:46:06.599
<v Speaker 1>So he he's going to do a CFO rotation at

1:46:06.920 --> 1:46:10.479
<v Speaker 1>one of large pharmaceutical companies like that to me is

1:46:10.520 --> 1:46:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a good, you know, first step out of college, right,

1:46:13.280 --> 1:46:15.920
<v Speaker 1>fine stability. I know that all the hype is around

1:46:16.000 --> 1:46:20.440
<v Speaker 1>startup and is around fundraising and private and public investors.

1:46:21.080 --> 1:46:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think that that's where I don't think

1:46:24.080 --> 1:46:29.360
<v Speaker 1>that's where you really make your your your foundation of knowledge.

1:46:29.960 --> 1:46:30.759
<v Speaker 1>At those places.

1:46:30.920 --> 1:46:32.800
<v Speaker 2>None of the kids want to go work for the

1:46:32.840 --> 1:46:34.599
<v Speaker 2>old man in his business take it over.

1:46:34.840 --> 1:46:37.719
<v Speaker 1>It's it's never it's we've never discussed it as an option.

1:46:38.520 --> 1:46:41.800
<v Speaker 2>They've all worked with me. But I think and that

1:46:41.920 --> 1:46:42.560
<v Speaker 2>was plenty.

1:46:42.760 --> 1:46:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, no, it wasn't plenty. Actually, I still I still

1:46:47.280 --> 1:46:50.360
<v Speaker 1>love my daughter and I still work together all the time.

1:46:50.479 --> 1:46:55.519
<v Speaker 1>She's a salesforce consultant and she is one of the

1:46:55.520 --> 1:46:57.200
<v Speaker 1>easiest people in the world that I can talk to

1:46:57.240 --> 1:47:00.360
<v Speaker 1>because she knows where I'm going with things before is

1:47:00.360 --> 1:47:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a shorthand that it's amazing and so I would never

1:47:04.560 --> 1:47:08.639
<v Speaker 1>preclude that. But you know, part of what we do

1:47:08.840 --> 1:47:12.160
<v Speaker 1>stems from a degree of confidence in your skills and capabilities.

1:47:12.680 --> 1:47:15.320
<v Speaker 1>And in order for I think in order for any

1:47:15.640 --> 1:47:18.479
<v Speaker 1>child to get that, they have to prove themselves in

1:47:18.640 --> 1:47:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the in the open market. They have to go out

1:47:20.880 --> 1:47:22.960
<v Speaker 1>there and do it for themselves so that when they

1:47:22.960 --> 1:47:26.280
<v Speaker 1>come back, you know, their soul is fulfilled. Right then,

1:47:26.360 --> 1:47:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel like they've worked for Dad their whole life. Right.

1:47:29.160 --> 1:47:30.800
<v Speaker 2>No, that makes a whole lot of sense. And our

1:47:30.880 --> 1:47:36.240
<v Speaker 2>final question, what do you know about the world of finance, investing,

1:47:36.479 --> 1:47:41.200
<v Speaker 2>regulation compliance? Today? You wish you knew twenty five or

1:47:41.240 --> 1:47:43.479
<v Speaker 2>so years ago when you were first getting started.

1:47:44.040 --> 1:47:48.599
<v Speaker 1>That's so easy. I wish I knew not to listen

1:47:49.200 --> 1:47:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to financial media when they would say markets are up

1:47:53.439 --> 1:47:57.920
<v Speaker 1>today because or markets are down on fears of blank.

1:47:58.479 --> 1:48:01.439
<v Speaker 1>I used to think, Barry, that I was missing something.

1:48:01.880 --> 1:48:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I used to think that I was just you know, like,

1:48:04.240 --> 1:48:08.040
<v Speaker 1>how do they know that all of the millions, billions

1:48:07.560 --> 1:48:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of inputs and outputs in the market all came down

1:48:10.800 --> 1:48:12.439
<v Speaker 1>to that. And the fact is they don't, Right, They're

1:48:12.479 --> 1:48:15.880
<v Speaker 1>oversimplifying a very complex problem. And I wish I knew

1:48:15.960 --> 1:48:16.599
<v Speaker 1>that back then.

1:48:17.000 --> 1:48:19.040
<v Speaker 2>I also wish that's fascinating.

1:48:19.120 --> 1:48:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I also wish I knew that that I know

1:48:24.160 --> 1:48:27.439
<v Speaker 1>more than I thought I knew. I wish I had

1:48:27.479 --> 1:48:31.759
<v Speaker 1>a little more confidence. And you know now I'm confident,

1:48:31.800 --> 1:48:33.559
<v Speaker 1>not because I know a lot. I'm confident in my

1:48:33.600 --> 1:48:36.400
<v Speaker 1>ability to recover from failures quickly and to change course.

1:48:36.640 --> 1:48:40.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think most business owners we find ourselves like

1:48:40.120 --> 1:48:42.479
<v Speaker 1>fish in a tank. Right, you hit the glass, you

1:48:42.560 --> 1:48:46.120
<v Speaker 1>just change direction, Whereas when you're earlier, you don't want

1:48:46.120 --> 1:48:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to touch the glass. You know, you don't want to.

1:48:47.960 --> 1:48:50.640
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to hit that glass. And so and

1:48:50.680 --> 1:48:52.720
<v Speaker 1>probably the last thing I would I would wish I

1:48:52.760 --> 1:48:55.320
<v Speaker 1>knew back then was just to start with the objectives

1:48:55.320 --> 1:48:58.679
<v Speaker 1>in mind, because even with investing and work backwards, start

1:48:58.680 --> 1:49:00.719
<v Speaker 1>with the why, what's my thesis? What am I trying

1:49:00.760 --> 1:49:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to go after? I just want to tell you my

1:49:05.040 --> 1:49:07.639
<v Speaker 1>best investing skills came out of a really bad habit,

1:49:08.360 --> 1:49:12.280
<v Speaker 1>which is I would get the newspaper, typically the Sunday paper,

1:49:12.320 --> 1:49:15.240
<v Speaker 1>but you know on Wednesdays there were a certain section Thursday,

1:49:15.479 --> 1:49:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and I would grab them and I would pile them

1:49:17.200 --> 1:49:19.040
<v Speaker 1>up in my office, right. And I used to have

1:49:19.080 --> 1:49:23.360
<v Speaker 1>piles of newspapers everywhere, and I would read certain people's

1:49:23.360 --> 1:49:28.080
<v Speaker 1>columns pretty religiously, but late, right, so I would only

1:49:28.160 --> 1:49:30.719
<v Speaker 1>typically read them after they've been out for a month,

1:49:30.720 --> 1:49:35.280
<v Speaker 1>two months, sometimes six or twelve months. Right. And the

1:49:35.479 --> 1:49:39.720
<v Speaker 1>knowledge that I gained by how wrong people are with

1:49:39.800 --> 1:49:44.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty hindsight was absolutely amazing. So what started out

1:49:44.760 --> 1:49:47.960
<v Speaker 1>as a really bad habit was so helpful to me

1:49:48.680 --> 1:49:51.840
<v Speaker 1>in putting things in context because now naturally, when I

1:49:51.880 --> 1:49:56.559
<v Speaker 1>read something every day, I say, well, they don't know that, right,

1:49:56.920 --> 1:49:59.680
<v Speaker 1>they're asserting that, but they don't know that. And it's

1:49:59.720 --> 1:50:00.920
<v Speaker 1>really so.

1:50:00.920 --> 1:50:05.120
<v Speaker 2>One of my old time favorite publications, laslo Berni, puts

1:50:05.120 --> 1:50:11.120
<v Speaker 2>out an annual media round up and it's presented without commentary,

1:50:11.560 --> 1:50:15.840
<v Speaker 2>and it's just the most important media stories from the

1:50:15.880 --> 1:50:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, the Washington Post,

1:50:18.240 --> 1:50:22.920
<v Speaker 2>the La Times, and it's just xerox and bound, and

1:50:23.240 --> 1:50:25.720
<v Speaker 2>it's by the time you get it, everything's a year

1:50:25.760 --> 1:50:29.800
<v Speaker 2>old and exactly what you're describing as you go through it,

1:50:30.320 --> 1:50:33.519
<v Speaker 2>the things that are the big scary headlines, they just

1:50:33.560 --> 1:50:37.280
<v Speaker 2>look horrific a year later, like that's wrong, Oh my god,

1:50:37.320 --> 1:50:39.080
<v Speaker 2>how did anybody think this guy knew what he's doing.

1:50:39.240 --> 1:50:41.880
<v Speaker 2>You just go through page after page after page, and

1:50:41.960 --> 1:50:46.040
<v Speaker 2>you realize nobody knows anything, and they're just faking it

1:50:46.080 --> 1:50:48.759
<v Speaker 2>till they make it. When you have a little time

1:50:48.840 --> 1:50:53.639
<v Speaker 2>and distance, it's just clear that, hey, people have there

1:50:53.640 --> 1:50:56.320
<v Speaker 2>are hours of TV that need to be filled. There

1:50:56.320 --> 1:50:59.240
<v Speaker 2>are pages of newspaper that need to be filled. There

1:50:59.240 --> 1:51:02.880
<v Speaker 2>are just you know, pixels and pixels online that need

1:51:02.960 --> 1:51:06.479
<v Speaker 2>to be filled, most of which doesn't stand the test

1:51:06.520 --> 1:51:06.840
<v Speaker 2>of time.

1:51:07.040 --> 1:51:11.640
<v Speaker 1>So when the day after Silicon Valley Bank blew up, right,

1:51:12.439 --> 1:51:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I got a call from a reporter and they use

1:51:15.400 --> 1:51:19.559
<v Speaker 1>the words in these unprecedented times, right, And I had

1:51:19.560 --> 1:51:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to stop for a moment and I said, how old

1:51:21.400 --> 1:51:25.439
<v Speaker 1>are you? Because these are precedented times? Like we know

1:51:25.560 --> 1:51:28.720
<v Speaker 1>exactly you know what we're dealing with, and hopefully we

1:51:28.760 --> 1:51:31.439
<v Speaker 1>don't go back to, you know, to to that again.

1:51:31.520 --> 1:51:34.639
<v Speaker 1>But I think it just gives you a sense of place, right,

1:51:34.680 --> 1:51:37.160
<v Speaker 1>And at the end of the day, isn't that what

1:51:37.200 --> 1:51:39.960
<v Speaker 1>we all yearn for? You know, even as as a

1:51:39.960 --> 1:51:42.280
<v Speaker 1>young person starting out their career, you want to find

1:51:42.320 --> 1:51:43.920
<v Speaker 1>your tribe, You want a sense of place, and you

1:51:43.960 --> 1:51:44.559
<v Speaker 1>want a purpose.

1:51:45.120 --> 1:51:46.720
<v Speaker 2>I like that that that you could do a lot

1:51:46.760 --> 1:51:50.560
<v Speaker 2>worse than that. We have been speaking with Brian Hamburger.

1:51:50.600 --> 1:51:53.639
<v Speaker 2>He is the founder of the Hamburger Law Firm, as

1:51:53.680 --> 1:52:00.400
<v Speaker 2>well as the leading regulatory compliance and consulting firm, Market Council.

1:52:00.520 --> 1:52:03.360
<v Speaker 2>If you enjoy this conversation, well, feel free to check

1:52:03.400 --> 1:52:08.320
<v Speaker 2>out any of our previous nearly five hundred discussions we've had.

1:52:08.720 --> 1:52:13.640
<v Speaker 2>You can find those at YouTube, iTunes, Spotify, or wherever

1:52:13.720 --> 1:52:17.320
<v Speaker 2>you find your favorite podcasts. Feel free to sign up

1:52:17.400 --> 1:52:21.000
<v Speaker 2>to my daily reading list at Ridolts dot com, Follow

1:52:21.080 --> 1:52:24.160
<v Speaker 2>me on Twitter at rid Holts, follow all of the

1:52:24.160 --> 1:52:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Family of podcasts at podcast I would be remiss

1:52:29.080 --> 1:52:31.639
<v Speaker 2>if I did not thank the crack team that helps

1:52:31.640 --> 1:52:36.920
<v Speaker 2>put these conversations together each week. Paris Wald is my producer.

1:52:37.080 --> 1:52:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Sean Russo is my head of research. Samantha Danzinger is

1:52:41.960 --> 1:52:46.200
<v Speaker 2>my audio engineer. Attika of Albron is our project manager.

1:52:46.800 --> 1:52:50.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm Barry Ridolts. You've been listening to Masters in Business

1:52:50.760 --> 1:53:05.200
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg Radio.