WEBVTT - Anaylists vs. Operations in The Middle East (with David McCloskey)

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm John Cipher and I'm Jerry O'Shea. I was a

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 1>CIA officer stationed around the world in high threat posts

0:00:07.840 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, Russia, and in Asia.

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 2>And I served in Africa, Asia, Europe, the Middle East

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 2>and in war zones. We sometimes created conspiracies to deceive

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:17.799
<v Speaker 2>our adversaries.

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Now we're going to use our expertise to deconstruct conspiracy

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>theories large and small.

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Could they be true? Or are we being manipulated?

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>This is mission implausible. Today's guest is David McCluskey. He's

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>actually a friend and a former colleague, and he is

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>now best known for his best selling spy novels Damasca, Station,

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 1>Moscow X and The Seventh Floor, all worth reading. We'll

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>probably talk about him in the podcast, but he's probably

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>even better known nowadays, especially in England, for his well

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>regarded podcast The Rest Is Classified with British security journalist

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Gordon Carrera.

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 2>It's good.

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>David previously worked at the CIA on issues related to

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East and worked in embassies abroad, but he

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>was in the sort of snotty, whimpy side of the agency.

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Jully and I who were busy saving the world so

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that it could be destroyed later. So sorry about that.

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 2>So I can't be friends, you know, Manars and Venus

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 2>can d O and d I people. We'll explore that.

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry over here, you go.

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 3>I was I was trying to translate all the garbage

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 3>you were writing up in the field so the people

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 3>making the decisions in DC would know what the hell

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 3>you were talking about.

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I have lots of questions, but here's where I'd like

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 1>to start off with. What is it like now to

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:36.119
<v Speaker 1>be making a living off of our exploits?

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 3>I like I like to I like to say John

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 3>that you know, I was certainly not a I was

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 3>certainly not a case officer like you out there saving

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 3>the world regularly day by day. But but you know

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 3>every day. Yeah, what better person to actually be able

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 3>to write down on paper those exploits than an analyst, right?

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is this It's just a continuation of

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 3>my sort of prior career right now. Now I get

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 3>to write more fantastical stories and UH and occasionally you know,

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 3>poke fun at you guys, and UH and some of

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 3>my analysts friends as well. So it's not too bad.

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 3>It's not too bad.

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I have to say as we start that when

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 2>I entered the agency the first couple of tours, I

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 2>was like the agency version of hermaphrodite, sort of a

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 2>I was because I was between I was between the

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 2>d I, the intelligence guys, the analysts, guys, intelligence folk,

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 2>the analysts, and the operations officer, tough guys like John

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 2>and both of you, the DI analyst and the do

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 2>O operators. Both of you gave me noggies and swirlies

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 2>right and looked good.

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Point, this is a real besmirching of our reports, officer friends,

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 3>isn't it. It is. It's terrible.

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I all of us deserve a besmirching, So that's not

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:06.959
<v Speaker 1>that's true. I was trying to go on offense til

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that my besmirching is a little further down the pike.

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 3>That's true. That's true. Yeah, No, I mean, uh, I

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 3>mean analysts, though I don't think they were analysts, weren't

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 3>the type to be given out like noggi's and swirlies. Jerry,

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 3>and I feel like it was very much a heads down,

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 3>eating lunch at your desk crowd for the most part, right,

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 3>That's what I remember.

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:29.119
<v Speaker 2>Mostly I got like eye rolls and like oh yeah,

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 2>you got oh And then I get use a big

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 2>word and I have to go look it up and

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 2>realize I've been besmirched.

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 3>But this is an influencing thing. We were talking, We

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 3>were talking about this before we even hit record, that

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 3>what Jerry just did is a classic case officer influencing

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 3>tactic for analysts, which is, when you're sitting down in

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 3>a briefing, they tell you, they the case officers, tell

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 3>you how smart you are and how they don't know anything,

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 3>and how they're just desperate for your knowledge, and then

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 3>use the analyst. You know, even if you kind of

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 3>know what's happening, you feel good when the briefing starts

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 3>right and it's just a classic I swear that they

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 3>taught you that somewhere along the line, because I got

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 3>every case officer I sat down with ever period.

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 2>I have to get this out, so they get this

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 2>out early. We had a a an analyst, a very

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 2>senior analyst woman. She came to Manila and we were

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 2>talking and you know, around the table, and we were

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 2>giving a briefing. And at the time, one of the

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 2>terrorist groups, the Moro Islamic Liberation Front, was something we

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:31.039
<v Speaker 2>were concerned with. And so the reports officer says, well, well,

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 2>there's no way around this, you know. He says that

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 2>it's called the MILF, And everybody smiles around the table

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 2>except for the analyst, and she's like yeah, and he's

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 2>like the mill and uh, she's like and she's like

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 2>smart enough to pick up that's supposed to mean something.

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 2>He says, well, maybe you should look it up later,

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 2>but don't use a government computer.

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Well it was abbreviated milf in' that's the name.

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, the MILF. Yeah. Yeah, we're going down. We're

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 2>already sort of launching down a path, and conspiracy theories

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 2>come out of like the CIA, And David, I was

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:11.119
<v Speaker 2>wondering if you could talk a little bit about maybe

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 2>some of the tribes inside of CIA really briefly, and

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 2>then discuss what the DII the analysts do, and then

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 2>we can sort of talk about conspiracy theories and conspiracies

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 2>both within the agency and who gets blamed for conspiracy

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 2>theories and so forth. So why don't you why don't

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 2>I kick it over to you?

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure you're well, yeah, I mean, and the most

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.119
<v Speaker 3>important tribe is the analyst, because they're the ones writing

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.280
<v Speaker 3>and stuff that goes goes to the policymakers, right, that's

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 3>what the CIA is there to do. For the most part.

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Occasionally we'll spin up some covered action stuff which usually

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 3>doesn't go that well. But you know, the analysts are

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 3>sort of we're holding the flame. I mean, so the

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 3>analysts is certainly one tribe, right, your your case officer

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 3>brethren are another.

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Relations officers.

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's right.

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 3>There's there's a whole host of like teers and ness

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 3>in tiers. Yeah, yeah, the support guys. But like even

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 3>within like the d O, right, there's a bunch of

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 3>different sort of you know, there's like a sort of hierarchy.

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 4>Right, And how do you see the hierarchy? That's that's all.

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 4>How do I see it in the operations side?

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 3>Well I was thinking that, Yeah, there's there's reports officers,

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 3>there's cmos, there's there's sues, right, and I always forgot

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 3>what that stood for, essentially, like essentially like an analyst.

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:31.359
<v Speaker 1>In the d O.

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 3>Is that right? Okay? There were targeting officers, which I

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 3>guess could be in either the d I or the

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 3>d O, as I recall, you know, interestingly enough, the

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:47.359
<v Speaker 3>last time I went into Langley up in the newly

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 3>renovated museum. There is a wall that has a list

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 3>of every or what seems like every possible job title

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 3>you could have at the CIA, and it is an

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 3>entire wall. Have you seen this. It's well, let us in.

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 4>There anymore to be clear.

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:07.359
<v Speaker 2>And you still have pictures in me on a horse

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 2>in Afghanistan. Those are all going we didn't go real

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 2>well yeah, yeah, I mean.

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 3>My perception was always the case. Officers believed themselves to

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 3>be the reason the entire place existed, and thus the

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 3>most important people there thatived believed, yes, believed themselves to

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 3>be the most important Who I mean, who else there was?

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 3>You know, a variety of techie type roles. There were

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 3>those guys in the green jackets who monitored the uh,

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 3>the contractors who came in who I always like to

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 3>include them in any kind of book, if I could

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 3>just randomly throw a reference at them.

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 4>You've done a good job with your books. You've thrown

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 4>in that you had the hot dog machine, and the hot.

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 3>Dog machine in there, sadly was it was ripped out

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 3>at some point in the past decade, probably for like

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 3>code violations. I tried to get a reference to the

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, the gift shop in there as much as

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 3>I can, and I used I think John, I actually

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 3>took this line from you with permission, of course, because

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 3>at one point in some conversation you said that we

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 3>stopped being a real spy service as soon as the

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 3>gift shop went in. You know, we put that. Put

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 3>that in the mouth of.

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 4>The CIA on it the end.

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 2>But David, so there's there's the analysts and the operator,

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.679
<v Speaker 2>so the two core tribes. But there's another split, another

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 2>schism inside of the agency. And I want to know

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 2>which side you fall on. Were you dunkin Donuts or

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 2>were you Starbucks? There's two places to get coffee.

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 3>That's right, That's right. You know what I I migrated

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:33.839
<v Speaker 3>over the course of my career. I began as a

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 3>dunkin Donuts.

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:37.719
<v Speaker 4>Man, made more money, went to Starbucks.

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly. And then once I made gs ten I started,

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 3>I went to Starbucks. It was Duncan to start, and

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 3>then it became Starbucks. Although I heard a rumor, I

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 3>wasn't there. A director at some point wanted to like

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 3>rip out the coffee stands, right, I don't know which one.

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 4>Our friends Rob Danberg wanted to do that.

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 3>He oh, Okay, yeah, yeah, get rid of them. But yeah, no,

0:08:57.880 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm I became a Starbucks man as it went on,

0:08:59.880 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 3>and there were plenty of my analyst friends who probably

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 3>spent good portions of their days kind of like just

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 3>milling around the Starbucks writer having various like ostensible work

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.959
<v Speaker 3>chats in the cafeteria or at the Starbucks that were

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 3>that were not.

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.079
<v Speaker 4>That's why he wanted to rip them out, because.

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly exactly the strength.

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about you for a second. I mean, really,

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you have become quite popular both for your books, which

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>are high praise, but also this podcast, which is newer.

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:33.719
<v Speaker 1>So which do you like better nowadays? The writing or

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:34.559
<v Speaker 1>the podcasting.

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 3>Oh that's hard. I mean I enjoy both of them.

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 3>I think the writing is the central thing that that

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, I will never I will never stop writing,

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 3>and I hope the podcast never stops. But kind of

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 3>the central piece of all of it's the books. But

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Gordon and I having a ton of fun on the podcast,

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.959
<v Speaker 3>and I see it as very like symbiotic with the

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 3>writing because it's an opportunity to go into spy stories

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 3>that I know some thing about and then actually go

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 3>deep and do the research to come up with kind of,

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, the arc for a tour or four six

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:09.319
<v Speaker 3>part series and and learn a whole bunch of stuff

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 3>that I don't I didn't otherwise know, and then frankly,

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, try to find ways to work some of

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 3>that material into books if I can. And so kind

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 3>of going into real stuff and finding interesting characters or

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 3>situations is really fruitful. So I think the two things

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 3>really work well.

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Again, fiction and John's war stories are pretty much the

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 2>same thing.

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, there I was. It does be an igor.

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 4>Let's take a break. We'll be right back.

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 2>So I want to I'm gonna endeavor to say something

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 2>good about.

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Analysts, okay, And I know it's gonna be hard for you.

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 2>And it's and I'm going I want to get down

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 2>this rabbit hole. And this gets into conspiracies and conspiracy theories.

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 2>So one of the bigger ones is IRAQ w WEMD

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 2>and it's something that I have an indirect insight into,

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 2>and I imagine also you indirect through hearsay and so forth.

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 2>But my sense was it is billed as and on

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 2>permission to swear, because this is a big one. This

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:23.319
<v Speaker 2>is like a huge agency fuck up. And I think

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to shy away from that, but I

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 2>think the real for me, in any case, the real

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 2>conspiracy here is that the Bush administration basically had decided

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 2>to go to war, and they built their own with

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Doug Fife, they built their own intelligence service in the

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Pentagon for a little while for two years to basically

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 2>prove that case and to throw out any evidence that

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 2>didn't support it. And then of course they went down

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 2>the road of Saddam and al Qaeda were very close,

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 2>which was completely untrue. And then they said that, you know,

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 2>they hooked into a whole host of scammers that claimed

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 2>that Saddam had this you know, curveball and all the

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:08.719
<v Speaker 2>rest of this. And my understanding is that the analysts

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 2>who wouldn't go along with this were systematically weeded out,

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, sort of pushed off to the side or

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 2>demoted or asked to move off, and that the analyst

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 2>at the end said, the evidence that we have indicates

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 2>that they likely do. There was sort of probability, I

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 2>don't know as high, medium, low, and the White I

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 2>said that's not good enough. And George Tennant, who I

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 2>think highly uncaved is my understanding, and he said, look,

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 2>it's it's yes or no. There's no maybe's here. We're

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 2>going to war. Say yes or no, and you'd better

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 2>be friggin yes, right, And so they did they said yes.

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 2>And so the agency, through a conspiracy, has been stuck

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 2>with this has been pinned to us as a one

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 2>of our great failures. And I think it's you know,

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:54.719
<v Speaker 2>the analysts are sort of at the center of this,

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 2>the pressures on them. So I'm wondering from where you sat,

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:00.160
<v Speaker 2>from what you heard, you weren't involved in this. It's

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 2>your sense of pressure on analysts. And this goes today

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 2>with this administration to all sorts of things like you know,

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 2>where COVID came from and so forth. So I wonder

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 2>wonder if you could go into that.

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's my understanding as well. The rock WMD story

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:18.559
<v Speaker 3>is that it's a it is in some sense a

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 3>story about analytic failure, because at the time there wasn't

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 3>I actually don't think that there were embedded across the DII.

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 3>There weren't sort of the the confidence statements and all

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 3>these kind of other and frankly, a lot of the

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 3>clarity around how good or bad or fragmentary or otherwise

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 3>the sourcing was like those were not as consistently embedded

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 3>in the assessments, and so it was easier in some ways,

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:50.079
<v Speaker 3>I think, to sort of handwave maybe or for consumers

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 3>of the intel to take away different stories from what

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 3>they were reading. And a lot of the changes made,

0:13:57.200 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 3>like just as I was joining, were to try to

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 3>like systematize the way that we communicated INTEL assessments and

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 3>to be very clear about what we knew and what

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:07.959
<v Speaker 3>we didn't know and things like that.

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 3>The art of the story you told on Rock WMD,

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 3>I think is a that's a particularly egregious example of

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 3>the politics kind of dipping in and dictating or really

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 3>influencing what the CIA puts down on paper. I think

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 3>the politicization of analysis, though it's rarely that easy. I

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 3>think to sort of go back and say that's exactly

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 3>what happened, I think a Rock WMD, because I mean

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 3>my understanding is that sometimes like there were NSC or

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 3>Pentagon or White House officials who would literally I mean

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 3>it came out to Langley on multiple occasions to like

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 3>basically sit with the analysts right and right and like

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 3>so I mean that's a lot of pressure right, and

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 3>to your point, like, if the decision has already been

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 3>made to do this, to go to war, I guess

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 3>becomes more of a political question for you know, the

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 3>director for the seventh floor to figure out how do

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 3>you not lose the trust of the White House, right

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 3>if they've already made the decision. But but yeah, I

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 3>mean the politicization pressure and sort of I guess the

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 3>risk is real and it is really I think hard

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 3>to it's not It shouldn't be hard for the line

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 3>analysts to navigate because they're the ones that are looking

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 3>at the stuff, and ideally they're being backed up the

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 3>chain by people who have an interest in like maybe corny,

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 3>but like, yeah, speaking the truth regardless of what the

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 3>politics are. But there's really many different ways that the

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 3>analysis can get politicized at different parts of the chain.

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 3>A lot of different people are touching it, and frankly,

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 3>stuff can get politicized by what's not written or what's

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 3>not reported into the White House or what doesn't get

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 3>read in the PDB. So brief yeah, yeah, so you know,

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 3>it's a really and it's really subtle, I think, because frankly,

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 3>the politicization could start with you know, someone who's editing

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 3>one of those pdbs just kind of softening some stuff

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 3>a little bit, or saying, is this really a moderate

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 3>confidence judgment? This seems more like a low confidence judgment

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 3>to me based on this definition, And that's more art

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 3>than science. And if something's a low confidence judgment, then

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 3>maybe it's you know, maybe it's not worth actually briefing

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 3>to the president period. And so it never makes, you know,

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 3>it never makes it into any kind of higher level

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 3>conversation down in the oval. So there's lots of different ways.

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, frankly, i'd be curious for your guys thoughts

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 3>on this, And you know, on the collection side, I'd

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 3>imagine there's plenty of ways that someone on the seventh

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 3>floor in the DdO shop could say on these three

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 3>or four topics, I want to see the stuff before

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 3>it gets descemnded. And you could decide, for any reason,

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 3>you kind of cook up maybe we don't descend this

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 3>kind of thing, and because it's gonna set off fireworks downtown,

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 3>and maybe I make up some stuff about how the

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 3>sourcing's bogus or whatever in order to justify it. So

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of different ways you could play around

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 3>with it. I think throughout the chain, right, I.

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Think it's important to discuss what descend means, right. People

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 2>that may not realize this. So people like John and I,

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 2>we would collect the information from a source what it

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 2>just putatively get a human source. He gives us the information.

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 2>We don't like hand it to the president. We actually

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 2>hand it to a reports office or a CMO and

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 2>they take the information, decide how it's written up. Then

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 2>it goes to headquarters where they look at it again,

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 2>and then they descem it to whomever needs it, whoever

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 2>is in need to know, so to the analysts. And

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 2>there's always a danger that if that raw disseminated report

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 2>goes directly to the White House and it's wrong, or

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 2>if it's lanted, then you've got other problems. But so

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 2>that's the way it should go. But there's lots of

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 2>places to slip TwixT the it fixed the spoon in

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 2>the lip, right I mean, and not always to influence it.

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, if you go to go back to the

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>WMD a rock WND problem, A lot of people have

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:13.160
<v Speaker 1>gone back after the analysts for making a bad call there,

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>but frankly there was no good collection then either. So

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it was a real intelligence failure. We had no good sources. Really,

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>we had a White House that decided they needed to

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 1>go to war, and we had no Americans living in

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the country. We had no good sources, and the analysts

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>were being pressured to come up with an analytic judgment,

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think they tried to use what would be logical. Well,

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.439
<v Speaker 1>he had WMD before and he tried to hide it,

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 1>so we must be doing so again. And so it

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:40.360
<v Speaker 1>was a real problem. And I think we've seen even

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 1>more recently. You talked about it in one of your

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>podcasts recently about the twenty twenty two invasion of Ukraine.

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 4>It seems in that.

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Case we actually had good collection. We had some sort

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 1>of source or sources. They were telling us that Putin

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>was about to invade. But some of the analysis clearly

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>was wrong because we had information Putin was going to invade.

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>But then were the decision was what's going to happen next?

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>And essentially our analysts in some fashion must have told

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:09.879
<v Speaker 1>the White House, well, Ukraine's gonna lose quickly, and so

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 1>you better get Lenski out of there, and that's not

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>what happened.

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 4>Someone had to.

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Make a decision on how were the Ukrainians willing to fight,

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and we obviously did not have good intelligence on that either.

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 2>And David, so you were involved a lot with Syria

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:25.640
<v Speaker 2>that's reflected in your book. You were there for Prog

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Prog Spring, Christ dates me for the Arab Spring. Spring

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 2>springs and people tend to think, in conspiratorial thinking that

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 2>the agency is omnipotent when things surprise us. So like

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 2>the Arab Spring, people tend to think that the agency

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 2>is involved in prophesying that we've got You guys have

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:51.880
<v Speaker 2>a crystal ball. So I was wondering if you could

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 2>give us your senses an analyst of what we could

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 2>know about the Arab Spring. Right, a fruit seller gets

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 2>slapped in the world falls apart and then whether and

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 2>then more recent is like when a sad fell, like

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 2>everybody was like holy shit, I mean nobody predicted it.

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:07.919
<v Speaker 2>So I just wondering if you could give folks a

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 2>sense of like how you guys are just as much

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 2>at sea as the rest of us, right, and it's

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 2>not a conspiracy to hide or that we've got all

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 2>this information. Yea, this information, we have all this power

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 2>that people assume we have.

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 3>I think that The way I would maybe frame it is,

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 3>I think making a call on the eruption of mass

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:33.400
<v Speaker 3>sort of popular uprising in the Middle East is a mystery.

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 3>It is a sort of mass psychological phenomenon that is

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 3>inherently unpredictable and actually nobody is capable of predicting it.

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 3>Whereas does Saddam possess chemical, biological weapons whatever is a secret,

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 3>We in theory could have collected information that would have,

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, sort of proved or disproved whether or not

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 3>that's true, Which is why I think I would say

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 3>to your point, John, I'd never thought about WMD. Actually

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:05.199
<v Speaker 3>is a doo failure, a collection failure that's also a

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 3>piece of it. The whole kind of chain failed because

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 3>the analysts we didn't have good information, and then the

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 3>analysts sort of through pressure and otherwise, you know, messed

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:18.120
<v Speaker 3>up the call. But I think an intelligence failure involves

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 3>like are there secrets to collect that should have been

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 3>collected or analysis that should have been conducted given the

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 3>available information that wasn't right, Whereas I think predicting Syria

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 3>it's not possible, and so we certainly did not have

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 3>a crystal ball, and most of what the country analysts

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 3>were doing in those late twenty ten early twenty eleven

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 3>months were either writing pieces that explained sort of what

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.439
<v Speaker 3>are the hurdles to a protest movement or to an

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 3>insurgency or a civil war, like what has to be

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:52.880
<v Speaker 3>overcome to get there? So said differently, like what would

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 3>you have to believe for this to happen? Or writing

0:21:55.760 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 3>scenarios that lay out, you know, three or four worlds

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 3>or paths you could travel down should the sort of

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 3>security apparatus and general kind of pillars of stability in

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 3>a given country start to crumble, And none of us

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 3>had any eye. I mean I had friends who were

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 3>working on other you know, milliased accounts at that point

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 3>in time, who were literally writing essentially writing pieces that

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:22.439
<v Speaker 3>had them in draft form that were like, this is

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 3>why it's not going to happen here, and then the

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 3>protest movement would start to May would be like delete these,

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, So like no one saw that stuff coming, right,

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean no more than like nobody saw the sort

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 3>of collapse of communism across Eastern Europe happening so quickly

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:42.199
<v Speaker 3>in eighty nine either, right, So it's just it's not predictable.

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 3>Those kind of mass events.

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:46.679
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't know. I don't know about that. I

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 2>mean I went to West Berlin in the in April

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 2>of eighty nine, and you know, five months later it

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 2>all fell apart, the wall came down. Coincidence.

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, I'm in analysis right there.

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 2>In my mind.

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>No, and more of this enlightening banter after a quick break.

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Just because I was sort of involved in this. It

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 2>was also a process issue. So there was this source

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 2>called Curveball. Now Curveball, he was the main source. Singles

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 2>never do things on single source. He was the main

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 2>source that told us with great confidence and specificity about

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 2>the state of the WND programs. And Curveball was living

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 2>in Munich at the time, and German Station and I

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.719
<v Speaker 2>got a pretty good view into this talked to the

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Germans about him because he refus to meet the CIA,

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:03.880
<v Speaker 2>but he did talk to the German intelligence and he said,

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 2>I won't meet the CIA, but you know, you can

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 2>give their information to HIT to them, to US intelligence.

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 2>I think the station took a look at his stuff

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 2>and said, we can't verify any of this and maybe

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:16.920
<v Speaker 2>it's true, maybe it's not, but it's like we can't

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 2>verify it. So it's really not any good. And then

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 2>what happened is the military came in and they said, well,

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 2>we'll do it, right, but they didn't tell the station.

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 2>So all that reporting that went out went out through

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 2>the US military, and we in the station and our

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 2>analysts were getting it, but we didn't know where it

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 2>was coming from, right, I mean, we didn't have a

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 2>need to know that it was coming out of Munich.

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 2>And it only sort of at the very end did

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 2>we solve that. Yeah, it was like.

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 3>A big circular references.

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 4>This is that same guy.

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 2>There's the same guy. And I think it's been in

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 2>the press that the station chief actually wrote and said,

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 2>I hope this isn't the case, and Tyler Drumhill are famously,

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 2>again according to the media, went and said, I hope

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 2>you're not basing it and on this guy in Munich

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 2>on curveball, And by then it was sort of too late.

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 2>But the process, the military and you know, they they

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 2>talked to each other, but they didn't talk about sourcing

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 2>to each other, right, So it gets I don't want

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 2>to get too much into the weeds, but yeah, it

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:17.400
<v Speaker 2>was also a process issue for sure.

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 3>And the way I remember this kind of rolling Downhill.

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 3>To me as an analyst when I joined a few

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:28.440
<v Speaker 3>years after, this was being really really explicit. When you're

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 3>writing a finished intelligence product. You know, you're not giving

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:34.120
<v Speaker 3>obviously the name of the source, you're not describing where

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 3>they work, but you don't cure like like extensive descriptions

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 3>of how much confidence we have in the source and

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 3>whether they actually have good access and all of that,

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 3>like have they been vetted? So there's there was a

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 3>lot more information that got included post like three oh

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 3>four oh five than if you go back and read

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 3>stuff that was written in one or two, like oftentimes

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 3>the sourcing statements were very thin.

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Trust me, dude, you know that it's a sourcing statement.

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I mean kind of yeah, that's the way

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 3>it read.

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 1>To go back to Syria, I think Syria is a

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>big deal. Like there was environmental concerns and things that

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 1>led to you know, lots of people leaving Syria, which

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 1>led to problems in Europe and political problems that related

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 1>to immigration and things that put pressure on political leaders.

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is happening now? Do you think

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 1>this is a policy question not an intelligence question? Do

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you think we are handling it well, we have a

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>new leader in Syria, and it sounds to me like,

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the administration wants to sort of blow him off,

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and I worry that more problems in Syria are a

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>potential problem for outside of Syria as well.

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm weirdly as an analyst. I'm a natural pessimist,

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 3>and I think Syria for like fifteen years, has given

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 3>me plenty of reasons to be pessimistic about pretty much everything,

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 3>a lot of reasons to continue to be pessimistic, although

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 3>strangely enough, at this point I'm sort of cautiously hopeful

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 3>or optimistic about the future. I mean, and it is.

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 3>It's not to say that I think it's possible that

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 3>we get like a flowering Jeffersonian democracy in Syria. That

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 3>seems unlikely, but I think it's also very possible, if

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 3>not even likely, that we get a better outcome than

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 3>Assad by a wide margin in terms of it is

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 3>a low bar, but I think it's it's possible that

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 3>we end up with a Syria that is at least

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 3>not sort of actively creating, you know, massive problems for

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 3>all of its neighbors, and maybe hopefully in the future

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:37.679
<v Speaker 3>politically more stable and also more open, right than the

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 3>regime Osad Ran and frankly managing you know, it's repressive

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 3>apparatus on a much less sort of industrial horrific scale.

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:47.439
<v Speaker 3>We will cross that bar for sure, right is that

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 3>this is going to be a far less repressive regime

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 3>than the one oside Ran. That's said, I mean, you

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 3>know where to start with the problems. And frankly, you know,

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 3>even though we still have true groups in the northeast,

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 3>I think maybe about nine hundred or so that are

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:09.200
<v Speaker 3>there supporting our comrades in the SDF, the Syrian Democratic Forces.

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:13.399
<v Speaker 3>You know, I don't think this administration has any Do

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 3>they have a Syria policy or an interest in developing one?

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, and if so, what would it even be.

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think this is kind of one of

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 3>those pockets of the world that's just probably not going

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 3>to be getting a lot of interest from Trump two

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 3>point zero.

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:30.120
<v Speaker 4>But it will be getting a lot of interest from

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 4>Israel and Turkey.

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 3>And we will be getting a lot of interest from

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Israel and Turkey, and I think they're the two major

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 3>geopolitical winners here. I read that the Israeli Air Force

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 3>in the days after Osad fled flew more air sorties

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 3>over Syria than they had in any day in any

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 3>conflict since nineteen sixty seven. They essentially destroyed most of

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Syria's military capacity in like about seventy two hours. And

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 3>the Turks, you know, have are probably the group with

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 3>the most influence both in the North and then with

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 3>the new new crew in Damascus, so big winners. Iran

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 3>US not so much. So we'll see.

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 2>We just need an independent Curtis stan that'll fix it exactly.

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 3>I've got an idea for the Middle East. I do

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 3>feel I mean, I do feel bad for that. It's

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 3>like the Kurds is just the constant every time, like

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 3>every time at one of these conflicts ends, it's the

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Kurds end up getting screwed. So it's really tragic.

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 5>We're gonna stop here for today and continue next week

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 5>with more of our conversation with David McCloskey here on

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 5>Mission Implausible. Mission Implausible is produced by Adam Davidson, Jerry O'sha,

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 5>John Ceipher, and Jonathan Stern. The associate producer is Rachel Harner.

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 5>Mission Implausible It's a production of honorable mention and abominable

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 5>pictures for iHeart podcasts,