Speaker 1: Depending on what side of the ail you're on, she's
Speaker 1: either one of the most beloved or most hated members
Speaker 1: of the House. I guess this week is none other
Speaker 1: than Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Green. She's been a fighter in
Speaker 1: the MAGA movement, fighting for America First and fighting for
Speaker 1: her district. But the left hates her, and they hate
Speaker 1: her so much that a group called the Free Speech
Speaker 1: for People actually followed the lawsuit trying to kick her
Speaker 1: off the primary ballot. They say that she violated the
Speaker 1: fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, that she was trying to
Speaker 1: wage some sort of insurrection when it comes to January six,
Speaker 1: So if you got that right, it's a group, a
Speaker 1: liberal group called Free Speech for America purporting to stand
Speaker 1: up for free speech, who are trying to kick her
Speaker 1: off the ballot for things that she said, who say
Speaker 1: that they care about election integrity and democracy, trying to
Speaker 1: thwart just that and deny Georgia vote orters the ability
Speaker 1: to vote for her. So raises some questions, doesn't it.
Speaker 1: But she's a fighter and she's not backing down. So
Speaker 1: we're going to get into that and a whole host
Speaker 1: of other things like Ukraine, the Biden administration and why
Speaker 1: Americans keep getting screwed and all of this. It's gonna
Speaker 1: be an interesting conversation and I hope you enjoy it.
Speaker 1: Stay with us for Congress Owen Marjorie Taylor Green cogres A,
Speaker 1: Marjorie Taylor Green, thanks so much for joining the show.
Speaker 1: Thanks for having me ar today. So, Congress, when I
Speaker 1: met you a while ago at a Project Faritas event,
Speaker 1: and I actually saw you again in the bathroom and
Speaker 1: came up to you, not in like a weird way,
Speaker 1: not not like what they did to you know, Kirsten Cinema,
Speaker 1: but in a very nice way. And and I told
Speaker 1: you you're so lovely, because the media tries to paint
Speaker 1: you as all these different things, but I found you
Speaker 1: to be absolutely lovely and so kind and sweet. Well,
Speaker 1: thank you. I really appreciate that. You're right, It wasn't
Speaker 1: in a weird way in the bathroom. So we do
Speaker 1: want to make that, make that no, No, you were great. Um. Yeah.
Speaker 1: The media, they basically have created a character that they
Speaker 1: have sold to the public, um, ever since I became
Speaker 1: a member of Congress, And it's not me at all.
Speaker 1: And that's your comment, is the comment that I hear
Speaker 1: pretty much all the time when people are saying you're
Speaker 1: not at all like I thought you would be. And
Speaker 1: my response as always, well, you know that's the media
Speaker 1: has lied about me and presented me as someone that
Speaker 1: I'm not. UM. So I very much appreciate any opportunity
Speaker 1: to have to to you know, talk with people and
Speaker 1: and let them get to know the real me. You know, what,
Speaker 1: do you think the biggest misconception about you is? Um? Oh,
Speaker 1: my gosh, there's several. Uh, I don't know. To be
Speaker 1: honest with you, Lisa, I quit watching the news and
Speaker 1: quit reading stories about myself because I found them to
Speaker 1: be so abhorrent and awful. And they they create me
Speaker 1: as someone to not be liked. They make me out
Speaker 1: as if I'm angry or crazy or basically just unintelligent um,
Speaker 1: which you know is completely unfair. But they they say,
Speaker 1: give me all the isms, you know, or it's like
Speaker 1: the racist, homophobic, um, you know, anti semitic, they give
Speaker 1: me all. They put all those labels on me, and
Speaker 1: none of them were true, and UM, you know that's
Speaker 1: pretty frustrating. So I think people get the wrong idea
Speaker 1: about me. Unfortunately, if they only know me through the
Speaker 1: mainstream media. Do you think those attacks work anymore because
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, how many times can they call
Speaker 1: insert anyone races, you know, sex is all these different things.
Speaker 1: Do you think that's sort of falling flat now because
Speaker 1: of overuse? I do think they're falling flat, especially as
Speaker 1: people are paying attention to the Democrats and the way
Speaker 1: they're controlling our country. I mean, they'll they'll label someone
Speaker 1: like me all these terrible names. But yet they're the
Speaker 1: ones whose policies actually uh proved. They are those things.
Speaker 1: You know, take for example, the squad in in Congress,
Speaker 1: you know that I unfortunately have to work with on
Speaker 1: a day by day basis. Um, they're truly anti semitic.
Speaker 1: You know, those are the ones. Those are the ones
Speaker 1: that we should be talking about being anti semitic. Um
Speaker 1: and racists talk. Let's talk about race. Um. They always
Speaker 1: use Black Americans basically for their votes. Yet they support
Speaker 1: abortion and they're fighting for it right now. And abortion
Speaker 1: has killed more Black Americans, uh than than anything. Abortion
Speaker 1: is basically genocide of the of of Black Americans because
Speaker 1: of how many black babies that have been aborted, and
Speaker 1: planned parenthood targets these communities and so you know, Democrats
Speaker 1: policies proved that they're racist. And we could go on
Speaker 1: and on. I mean, look at the gun control policies. Uh,
Speaker 1: and in cities where that increased crime, you know, and
Speaker 1: if they cared about Black Lives matters, they would certainly
Speaker 1: care about supporting law enforcement and reducing crime in these communities.
Speaker 1: And after after that whole summer of the Summer of
Speaker 1: rage and riots, uh, after George Floyd, you know, with
Speaker 1: Black Lives Matter and Democrats funding Black Lives Matters and
Speaker 1: all the riots that occurred, well, none of that money
Speaker 1: ever went back to rebuild any of those communities that
Speaker 1: they claimed they cared about. They all that money when
Speaker 1: in in the pockets of the founders of Black Lives
Speaker 1: Matters and apparently bought a bunch of million dollar mansions. Uh.
Speaker 1: So there's things that we need to investigate there. But
Speaker 1: you know, the Democrats are the party of identity politics,
Speaker 1: but yet they really do nothing to take care of
Speaker 1: the identities they supposedly say they care about. Well, I mean,
Speaker 1: eugenics was the mission of planned parenthood. So um, but
Speaker 1: you know, so have you ever just thought like this
Speaker 1: is too much? You know, this just isn't worth it. No,
Speaker 1: not at all. And I think that's what people don't
Speaker 1: know about me, is I'm I'm not that kind of person.
Speaker 1: I'm always used to, you know, finishing the drill, finishing
Speaker 1: the job, following through on my task, completing the race,
Speaker 1: completing the competition. And and I'm actually the type of
Speaker 1: person um you know, once I dig into something, I
Speaker 1: usually dig in deeper, and I'm stronger in my position,
Speaker 1: I feel more confident, and I'll continue to fight until
Speaker 1: I win because I'm I'm competitive in that way, and
Speaker 1: I like to win, and I want to win on
Speaker 1: things that matter. I think America is worth fighting for.
Speaker 1: I'll give you for example, today, I've I've lit up
Speaker 1: a tweet storm on my my my congressional twitter page.
Speaker 1: I don't have my personal Twitter page anymore, tweeting about
Speaker 1: this bill, uh, the the Ukraine, some supplemental that we
Speaker 1: just got the text for the bill just a few
Speaker 1: hours ago. That's spending forty billion dollars. And here we
Speaker 1: are in a crisis right now where American mothers can't
Speaker 1: find baby formula, you know, and here's our border wide open.
Speaker 1: We're Fentonal is now the number one cause of death
Speaker 1: uh in young people from age eighteen to forty five.
Speaker 1: These are things that I think are worth fighting for.
Speaker 1: Farmers in my district, oh my goodness, let me tell
Speaker 1: you it's the saddest thing. Farmers are barely hanging on.
Speaker 1: Small farmers, cattle farmers, chicken integrators. You know, food security
Speaker 1: is national security, and the Biden administration, the Democrats, that's
Speaker 1: not something they understand. So when we're in a situation
Speaker 1: where American mothers can't find baby formula and are crying
Speaker 1: and grocery stores and desperately searching for baby formula, and
Speaker 1: we have our own farmers about to go out of
Speaker 1: business and not be able to supply food for our country. Um, yeah,
Speaker 1: I think America is worth fighting for and I will
Speaker 1: continue to dig in and I just won't stop. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, it's your point. There's this sort of collective
Speaker 1: effort to to give you know, to the billions of
Speaker 1: dollars to Ukraine right now. And you mentioned a list
Speaker 1: of things that Americans are struggling with. Why do Americans
Speaker 1: keep getting screwed because our government is completely corrupt? And
Speaker 1: I don't say that lightly. I'm it is a serious problem.
Speaker 1: And I've my eyes have been open to it actually
Speaker 1: serving in Congress. I mean, it's it is unbelievable the
Speaker 1: things that are These bills fund and give our Americans
Speaker 1: harder and tax dollars too, but yet they do nothing
Speaker 1: for Americans. I mean, look at President Trump when he
Speaker 1: was first in office in seventeen, what was it he wanted,
Speaker 1: like I think it was twenty six six billion to
Speaker 1: build the wall. But today they're wanting to give forty
Speaker 1: billion dollars to Ukraine. And you add that forty billion
Speaker 1: on top of the money that we've already given that
Speaker 1: that brings it the fifty three billion dollars that is
Speaker 1: actually over two thirds of the eight Department's entire budget
Speaker 1: for the year. That's just to put in, you know,
Speaker 1: to conceptualize how much money we're spending in Ukraine. But
Speaker 1: they do this because they fund um nonprofits, they fund NGOs,
Speaker 1: they fund grants, grants that go to people, and and
Speaker 1: you know, if you really look into it, a lot
Speaker 1: of times it's their friends and families that operate these
Speaker 1: nonprofits and NGOs and it's basically like money laundering schemes.
Speaker 1: I mean, this doesn't this not only happens in Ukraine.
Speaker 1: It happens at our southern border. Um, there's a lot
Speaker 1: of nonprofits that that supposedly help migrants, and of course
Speaker 1: we want to help people. It's it's not that we
Speaker 1: don't want to help people. And you know, we we
Speaker 1: want to have good immigration laws, but we want them
Speaker 1: to be followed. But our American tax dollars get abused
Speaker 1: because they go to these nonprofits and these NGOs and
Speaker 1: and fund all kinds of grants that just go to
Speaker 1: things that don't need to be spent when our own
Speaker 1: own people are suffering. I mean, homelessness is record high
Speaker 1: here in wash at m d C. It's pathetic. There's
Speaker 1: so many homeless people. It's the saddest thing you've ever seen.
Speaker 1: Veterans aren't taking care of um. You know, we've got
Speaker 1: human trafficking happening at record high numbers. Young people, oh,
Speaker 1: my goodness, young people. This generation of young people, children,
Speaker 1: young people have just been cast aside and no one
Speaker 1: even cares about them. And it's it is it is
Speaker 1: to me, it's a complete failure and absolute failure of
Speaker 1: our government. And it's just one big you know, our
Speaker 1: tax dollars are like one big slush fund. For criminal
Speaker 1: operations and it's it needs to end well. And to
Speaker 1: that point, I know you've been looking through this Ukraine
Speaker 1: funding bill. Has anything stood out to you of you know,
Speaker 1: why is this in there? I mean among probably a
Speaker 1: lot of things, but what stood out to you so far? Oh? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I can run through a couple of things. Uh, fifty
Speaker 1: four million dollars for COVID just for over there for
Speaker 1: fifty four million dollars to be spent um screening and
Speaker 1: and vaccinating and doing all these things for Ukrainian reference refugees.
Speaker 1: But yet the Biden administration wants to get rid of
Speaker 1: Title forty two, so that doesn't make sense. Uh, here's
Speaker 1: another one. Nine hundred million is just like I was
Speaker 1: talking about nonprofits and ngs. Nine hundred million is to
Speaker 1: be given to qualified organizations and nonprofits which are basically
Speaker 1: friends and family of politicians and you know, their so
Speaker 1: called businesses to provide wrap around services, housing, medical services,
Speaker 1: and everything you name it. They get it, including um,
Speaker 1: you know, they're they're basically eligible for any help that
Speaker 1: the US government will give them, and we're putting nine
Speaker 1: hundred million dollars right there. Uh. Also here's there they
Speaker 1: they can get entitlement programs in this bill entitlement programs.
Speaker 1: Does that mean like all of our welfare programs. I mean,
Speaker 1: it doesn't give it doesn't give a description. It just
Speaker 1: says they're eligible for entitlement programs. UM. It gives basically
Speaker 1: a slush fund for the State Department because it is
Speaker 1: giving them. Let me look at it right here, uh,
Speaker 1: A hundred and ninety million that is to remain available
Speaker 1: available to UM. Then they get another additional ten million
Speaker 1: dollars for capital investments capital investments in Ukraine. UM. And
Speaker 1: then we get an additional four million UH for the
Speaker 1: Office of Inspector General to remain available until four for
Speaker 1: embassy security construction and maintenance. Uh. So apparently we're building
Speaker 1: a brand new embassy in a in a country that
Speaker 1: is currently you know, they're they're at war, but they're
Speaker 1: putting all this money in place. But yet there's no
Speaker 1: baby formula for American mothers. So that's that's just the
Speaker 1: name a few things. I'm I'm trying to pull up
Speaker 1: some more. Oh, here we go, UM, there's money. Wait
Speaker 1: a minute, let me Oh, yeah, they've got money in
Speaker 1: here for to defend Ukraine's border, but not to secure
Speaker 1: our border, which is absolutely insane. They have here's the
Speaker 1: amount of five hundred million dollars for the payment by
Speaker 1: the Secretary of the Treasury to the European Bank for
Speaker 1: Reconstruction and Development and its trust funds and facilities, five
Speaker 1: hundred million dollars to remain available and until expended for
Speaker 1: assistance and related programs for Ukraine and countries impacted by
Speaker 1: the situation in Ukraine, so not just Ukraine, other countries.
Speaker 1: And then they have for the globe for Global Agriculture
Speaker 1: and Food Security program a hundred and fifty million dollars.
Speaker 1: But yet our farmers are literally on the verge of
Speaker 1: going out of business. I talked to them all week
Speaker 1: last week in my district and they they're getting hurt
Speaker 1: so badly by inflation, high fuel costs with diesel fuel.
Speaker 1: I mean everything that the chemicals for their field cost,
Speaker 1: war money, fertilizer is outrageous, the cost of feed for
Speaker 1: their for their stock, you know, you name it. They
Speaker 1: can they're barely they're not even breaking even right now.
Speaker 1: But we're going to give all this money for global agriculture.
Speaker 1: It's just it's America laughed at every single term. Do
Speaker 1: you think people realize that no, no, they don't know.
Speaker 1: They don't know because they only see the headlines that
Speaker 1: the media puts out um or the way the name
Speaker 1: of the bill. You know, a lot of these bills
Speaker 1: have really nice names. They sound fantastic when you when
Speaker 1: you read the name of the bill, and that'll be
Speaker 1: what's talked about in the news, and then the news
Speaker 1: will be like, we're helping the Ukrainian people, which all
Speaker 1: none of us want anyone to be hurt or weren't.
Speaker 1: We don't want this to be happening to innocent people.
Speaker 1: But yet they totally ignore the fact that guess what,
Speaker 1: Ethiopia is having a civil war right now. There's thousands
Speaker 1: of people that have been killed and millions have been displaced.
Speaker 1: So it's it's such a hypocrisy. It's not really about
Speaker 1: saving lives, but it certainly is about Ukraine. You know
Speaker 1: what I mean. Well, I mean the hypocrisy is just
Speaker 1: all around, and it's continuous, and there's never any accountability
Speaker 1: for anyone on the left. You know, for instance, you've
Speaker 1: come under fire for some of the things you've said
Speaker 1: about January six, and in fact that I want to
Speaker 1: get into the group called the free speech for people
Speaker 1: who actually try to thwart you off the ballot in
Speaker 1: a minute. But Chicago Mayor Laurie Lightfoot recently tweeted to
Speaker 1: my friends in the LGBTQ community, the Supreme Court is
Speaker 1: coming for us next. This moment has to be a
Speaker 1: call to arms and actual cold arms, is what the
Speaker 1: Chicago mayor said. Yet you know, where's the where's the
Speaker 1: accountability for that? And actual called arms? Oh absolutely, I
Speaker 1: retweeted her, asking, you know, is this an ins direction?
Speaker 1: Are you declaring a civil war? You know what's really
Speaker 1: disturbing about her tweet other than the call for arms,
Speaker 1: call to arms, you know, she's calling for people to
Speaker 1: pick up guns and go fight for something that is
Speaker 1: in her head. Nowhere is the Supreme Court talking about
Speaker 1: ending um l g b t Q plus or whatever
Speaker 1: she said rights that we're talking about abortion. They're talking
Speaker 1: about overturning Row versus Wade, which sends it back to
Speaker 1: the states to be able to regulate and make their
Speaker 1: laws when it when it comes to abortion, each state
Speaker 1: individually on its own and that has nothing to do
Speaker 1: with lgbt Q rights. But yet this woman, the elected
Speaker 1: and current serving mayor in Chicago, is calling for a war,
Speaker 1: which is absolute insanity and and it's dangerous. But yet
Speaker 1: here she is the mayor of Chicago, which has one
Speaker 1: of the highest murder rates in the United States um
Speaker 1: and also the strictest gun control. So it's like, wait
Speaker 1: a minute, you're for strict gun control, your city is
Speaker 1: one of the worst in the country, but you're calling
Speaker 1: for everyone to pick up pick up your guns and
Speaker 1: go fight for for your lgbtwo key rights that are
Speaker 1: not being threatened at all by the Supreme Court. She's unhinged,
Speaker 1: absolutely unhinged. She should be removed, she shouldn't be mayor. Well,
Speaker 1: but there's just never any accountability. Maybe the incoming pre
Speaker 1: secretary tweeting that the Georgia gubernatorial election was stolen from
Speaker 1: Stacy Abrahams. We have Nancy Pelosi in tweeting our election
Speaker 1: was hijacked. But you know, again, never any accountability. Take
Speaker 1: a quick commercial break back with Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Green
Speaker 1: on the other side, there is an actual attempt to
Speaker 1: try to kick you off. The primary about the group
Speaker 1: is called free Speech for People Correct, which is obviously
Speaker 1: they don't believe in free speech, and this was allegedly
Speaker 1: done in an effort to preserve democracy, elections, whatever, whatever,
Speaker 1: when they're actually trying to disqualify you from the ballot
Speaker 1: and deny Georgians the ability to choose, which you know,
Speaker 1: I can't think of anything that's more in ethetical to
Speaker 1: democracy than that. But a judge fortunately knocked down their
Speaker 1: attempt found you qualify to run for office. The Secretary
Speaker 1: of State than accepted that judges ruling. But for those unfamiliar,
Speaker 1: walk us through what they're trying to do and what
Speaker 1: you just went through just defending your right to run
Speaker 1: for office. Well, this this attorney group, their nonprofit I
Speaker 1: think there are five oh one C three or five
Speaker 1: oh one C four Free speech for people. Yes, that
Speaker 1: is that is a hilarious name for for an attorney
Speaker 1: group that's trying to get rid of, like you said,
Speaker 1: completely annihilate people's freedom of speech by taking away their
Speaker 1: ability to vote for who they want to represent them
Speaker 1: in Congress. Um that that's that's one part you can't
Speaker 1: even make up. They're funded, So they are a funded
Speaker 1: attorney group. They asked for donations. Um, they're funded by
Speaker 1: other five oh one C three's other foundations, So it's
Speaker 1: kind of dark money. If you can imagine it. When
Speaker 1: it's transferred from one group to the next, you can't
Speaker 1: really track who the actual donors are, but you only
Speaker 1: get the donation the foundation or or group names. But yeah,
Speaker 1: free speech for people. Attorneys from New York and Massachusetts.
Speaker 1: They decide to come down and meddle and urge for elections,
Speaker 1: claiming that that using the Fourteenth Amendment, Section three on
Speaker 1: the Fourteenth Amendment, claiming that, uh, that I somehow waged
Speaker 1: an insurrection against the United States of America, which I
Speaker 1: absolutely did not. Um. But they they are making that claim.
Speaker 1: Now they're doing this not only to me, but they're
Speaker 1: doing it to a number of elected Republicans. So I'm
Speaker 1: not the only one. But my case got completely out
Speaker 1: of control. Uh. Each state is different, Each state has
Speaker 1: different laws. So in my state of Georgia, it just
Speaker 1: so happened that this case went to the Administrative Law
Speaker 1: Court where a judge allowed them to subpoena me onto
Speaker 1: the witness stand as their witness, where they could question me,
Speaker 1: you know, about anything they wanted to ask me. Um.
Speaker 1: So I had to go on the witness stand. I
Speaker 1: was there for nearly four hours, where they asked me
Speaker 1: over and over all kinds of insane questions. Um. The
Speaker 1: only thing I did on January six is I objected
Speaker 1: to Joe Biden's electoral College votes. I would do that
Speaker 1: again today. I would do it again tomorrow because of
Speaker 1: the amount of voter fraud that I believe happened there,
Speaker 1: and because there were over two thousand American Americans who
Speaker 1: signed their name uh stating that they witnessed voter fraud,
Speaker 1: and they did that at risk of perjuring themselves in
Speaker 1: a court of law. So I objected on January six, Um,
Speaker 1: and that is legal. That's the same thing that Democrats
Speaker 1: have done in the past three Republican presidential elections. UM.
Speaker 1: So they definitely believe in doing it. But this attorney group,
Speaker 1: you know, they targeted me. Um. They had to find
Speaker 1: voters in my district. That was one of their requirements,
Speaker 1: and they found five voters. And these five voters, it's
Speaker 1: it's kind of funny. One of them happened to be
Speaker 1: the Democrat chairwoman uh for my district, so she there
Speaker 1: was clear a clear political uh uh purpose and why
Speaker 1: she was one of the voters. And I think a
Speaker 1: couple of them were from Canada. They had moved just
Speaker 1: to move there from Canada, so they weren't really a
Speaker 1: very good representation of most people live in my district.
Speaker 1: But out of over seven hundred thousand people in my district,
Speaker 1: congratulations to free speech for people, they found five voters
Speaker 1: to do the silly lawsuit with them, and um, I
Speaker 1: gotta tell you it was it was absolutely absurd. They
Speaker 1: even ended up playing a clip from the movie Independence Day. Uh,
Speaker 1: And I mean I was embarrassed for him and how
Speaker 1: stupid they looked. But they were claiming that I supposedly
Speaker 1: got my ants for ration from Independence Day, which I
Speaker 1: did not. I don't I'd seen that movie maybe fifteen
Speaker 1: years ago. I don't even know, but it was it
Speaker 1: was pretty it was pretty bad. Well, you don't also,
Speaker 1: if Nancy Pelosi can question elections and the incoming White
Speaker 1: House Press Secretary can question elections, you know, so can we,
Speaker 1: particularly when it's the first time we've used mail and
Speaker 1: ballots on that scale before. So it's sort of skeptical
Speaker 1: that no one has any concerns about what went down,
Speaker 1: you know, given that. But I feel like CNN sort
Speaker 1: of gave away the game a little bit. I was
Speaker 1: reading an article about it uh, and it said that
Speaker 1: if the effort is successful against Green, there's a school
Speaker 1: thought it could be used against Trump in so mean,
Speaker 1: is that basically what this was against you? And I
Speaker 1: know they try to do it to Madison called Thorne
Speaker 1: as well as I believe Congressman go Star and Andy Biggs.
Speaker 1: My understanding I think I've read that as well, is
Speaker 1: that what this was is just a practice run to
Speaker 1: try to use this against President Trump potentially running again.
Speaker 1: I think it it's a combo of two things. I
Speaker 1: think they definitely wanted to get us off the ballot.
Speaker 1: They know they can't beat us at the ballot box
Speaker 1: in November. They know that we have strong support in
Speaker 1: our districts. Were also the group they have targeted, um,
Speaker 1: you know, me and others where some of the like
Speaker 1: toughest fighters in Congress. We were the most conservative members
Speaker 1: of the Freedom Caucus. That's who they mainly targeted. And Um,
Speaker 1: so they were hoping to be successful. But yes, I
Speaker 1: do think they were also hoping to find like loopholes
Speaker 1: in the law, hoping to be able to do this
Speaker 1: to President Trump, you know, in twenty four So they
Speaker 1: they would have loved to do it. Um, Thankfully, the
Speaker 1: judge in my case completely ruled against them, and our
Speaker 1: Secretary of State has already signed off. So my name
Speaker 1: is on the ballot and no one's freedom of speech
Speaker 1: in my district has been taken away by these these people.
Speaker 1: But I do think that, you know, they need to
Speaker 1: be disbarred, these attorneys. They shouldn't be allowed to politicize
Speaker 1: our courtrooms like this. They shouldn't be able to bring
Speaker 1: these type of frivolous challenges that that cost me a
Speaker 1: lot of money, cost other people a lot of money, um,
Speaker 1: and put a lot of stress on people. It's it's
Speaker 1: completely unfair. So that that is damage that they've done
Speaker 1: to me over this this ridiculous uh case they brought.
Speaker 1: And I plan on, you know, making sure that I'm
Speaker 1: made whole again against these people. We said to take
Speaker 1: a real quick break and then we're going to get
Speaker 1: more from Congress when Marjorie Taylor Green stay with us.
Speaker 1: But what's concerning is there there just seems to be
Speaker 1: this increase mass weaponization of either the law or the government,
Speaker 1: you know, against conservatives. And when we saw this during
Speaker 1: lockdowns attempts to force vaccinations with the CDC was tracking
Speaker 1: Americans to see if they're complying with COVID lockdown orders.
Speaker 1: You know, obviously, the d O, j FBI against President Trump.
Speaker 1: We've got a Ministry of truth now, even the Post
Speaker 1: Office has admitted to spying on Americans social media accounts. So,
Speaker 1: I mean, what do we do in in in the
Speaker 1: wake of this, when we've just got this mass weaponization
Speaker 1: of both the law and the government against us. Well, Lisa,
Speaker 1: I mean, you just name the list that should be
Speaker 1: the most alarming thing. It should fright probably missing something, Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: we could add some more, but you just named a
Speaker 1: list that should frighten every single American and our government
Speaker 1: is it's not it's it's not the same government. It's
Speaker 1: it's a regime. It's their communist They are waging a
Speaker 1: war against America. I mean that's how I look at it.
Speaker 1: Look at the FBI and the Department of Justice. They
Speaker 1: are completely political weapons against the political enemies of the Democrats.
Speaker 1: So anyone that went inside the capital on January six,
Speaker 1: whether they just walked around or they actually fought police
Speaker 1: officers or broke their way in, no matter what level
Speaker 1: they were on, they have become political targets. They have
Speaker 1: been arrested, they're being prosecuted, and some of them are
Speaker 1: still held held in jail to this very day. Um,
Speaker 1: the Ministry of Truth is absolutely absurd. And I mean
Speaker 1: that woman. We have a lot to say about her. She's, um, yeah, Nina, Nina.
Speaker 1: She's written quite a book, but she's she's one that
Speaker 1: I mean imagine it's torturous enough just to listen to
Speaker 1: her seeing but the very idea that they can make
Speaker 1: her the decision maker of what's true and what isn't true,
Speaker 1: and she's she's just a clearly far left progressive woman
Speaker 1: that seems miserable in her own right. And I just
Speaker 1: feel sorry for her child, uh, to have that kind
Speaker 1: of mother. But she she clearly hates hates everyone, She
Speaker 1: hates all of us, and they put her in charge.
Speaker 1: And then we've got the Press secretary. Oh my, I'm
Speaker 1: excited about the new Press secretary actually, given the fact
Speaker 1: that she and I both agree that elections can be stolen.
Speaker 1: So that's that's a good thing, you know. Um. But
Speaker 1: there's so there's so many bad things I think Americans
Speaker 1: have to wake up to. At least you said the
Speaker 1: perfect list. I mean, CDC is using geofencing data. We
Speaker 1: got the FBI using geo fencing data tracking our every movements.
Speaker 1: But yet everyone's uh calling foul and about two thousand
Speaker 1: dules and saying, oh, the fact checkers are like, no,
Speaker 1: that's impossible, that didn't happen. You can't do that. That's
Speaker 1: not even true. That's the big lie, you know, it's
Speaker 1: it's absurd. So I think what everyone needs to do
Speaker 1: is they need to double down, make sure they vote
Speaker 1: and never elect Democrats again, because they're they're not They're
Speaker 1: not American Democrats. They're america last globalist communist. Well, and
Speaker 1: of course the arny is Nina, the Minister of Truth,
Speaker 1: has bought into every you know, disinformation, fake narrative there
Speaker 1: is on the left of all the Russia Gate, and
Speaker 1: the list goes on. So uh, you know, obviously she
Speaker 1: can't spot a lie when she sees one. Uh. You know,
Speaker 1: I know you're on a tight timeline today. Anything else
Speaker 1: you want to leave us with before we go, well,
Speaker 1: I think I just want to let everyone know that there,
Speaker 1: that there's America is still here and it's worth fighting
Speaker 1: for and I'm committed to doing that. And and there's
Speaker 1: people like you, Lisa who are willing to do shows
Speaker 1: to get the truth out and and interview people like
Speaker 1: me um, which I'm really grateful for. And I hope,
Speaker 1: I hope people listen and find out that I'm not
Speaker 1: the person that they maybe think I am from the news.
Speaker 1: But but we have a lot, we have a lot
Speaker 1: of work to do. This isn't going to go away overnight.
Speaker 1: This is going to take a commitment and and in
Speaker 1: order to get our country back on track, it may
Speaker 1: take us ten years, but it's worth doing. And we
Speaker 1: have to finish the drill. We have to finish the job,
Speaker 1: and we have to complete this very important task in
Speaker 1: front of us, and I'm committed to doing that. Well.
Speaker 1: I appreciate your time, Congress, and thanks so much for
Speaker 1: joining the show. Thank you, MHM.