WEBVTT - Larry Rosenthal: Near Term Cautious, More Optimistic Q4 (Audio)

0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Global business news twenty four hours a day at Bloomberg

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>dot com, the Radio plus mobile app, and on your radio.

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>This is a Bloomberg Business Flash from Bloomberg World Headquarters.

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:16.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm Charlie Pellett. We have got thirteen minutes to go

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the close on a Tuesday, ahead of the

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Fed decision tomorrow, and stocks are on track for their

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>longest losing streaks since February. Stops slipping for a fourth

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>day amid growing uncertainty about the UK's future in the

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>European Union. Right now, the SMP five hundred index down six,

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>dropping three tenths of one percent to two thousand seventy three.

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Ness stacked down two tenths of one percent, down nine

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>points to thirty eight down, Industrials down seventy two, a

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 1>drop of four tenths of one percent. The tenure down

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>three thirty seconds, with the yield of one point six

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>two percent. Gold little changed up point one percent, now

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>advancing a dollar thirty to tweight eight. I'm Charlie Pellett,

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's a Bloomberg Business Flash. Thank you, Charlie Pellett.

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>It is time now for the e t F Report.

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>It is brought to you by Van Eck Vectors e

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>t f s. Expect more from your muni's target tax

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:13.320
<v Speaker 1>exempt income by maturity and credit quality, all with low

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>cost e t f s. Visit vanek dot com slash

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Muni van Eck access the opportunities. Let's go now to

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Catherine Calgary for our et F report. Gold is up

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty one percent so far this year and it's trading

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>at its highest in four weeks on growing uncertainty over

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:34.960
<v Speaker 1>whether Britain will exit the European Union and caution ahead

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of Central Bank meetings this week. The rally and gold

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>is reflected in interest in e t f s backed

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>by the precious metal. The biggest, the Spider Gold Shares

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>or g l D, has attracted nearly ten billion dollars

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>since this start of the year. In contrast, e t

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>s that focus on gold mining companies have attracted far less.

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>On eighty million dollars has flowed into the Van Eck

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Vector's Gold Miners e t F so far this year.

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Here's Joe Foster, a portfolio manager at the The stocks

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>are performing very well. I mean our fund is up

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>over this year, whereas the gold price is up somewhere

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>around so they're performing very well, but we're just not

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>saying the flows into the gold stocks. I think this

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>rally caught the market off guard, and I think I

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>think what investors are looking for is a pullback or

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>some sort of a consolidation before they step into these equities.

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Foster is calling this a new bowl market for gold

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.119
<v Speaker 1>that's in its early stages. That's your Bloomberg etf Force.

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Catherine Cowdery. You're listening to Taking Stock with Kathleen

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Hayes and Pim Fox on Bloomberg Radio. Yes, stocks are

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>on track for their longest slide since February. And yes,

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:49.799
<v Speaker 1>more and more government bond yields are heading below zero today.

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>The big news the German bund the tenure note going

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to a negative rate. So what do you do if

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you're managing more than a half billion dollars worth of

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>money for investors? Let's ask Larry Rosenthal. He's president of

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Roseenthalt Wealth Management Group and he's joining us from Nassas,

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Virginia today. Larry, welcome, Thank you for having me. How

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 1>are you today? Just great? Uh, You've been in the

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>business for a long time. Did you ever think you'd

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>see a day when eleven trillion dollars worth of government

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 1>bonds around the world had negative yields. Definitely not UM.

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>But that's sort of what's going on now, and it's

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>all a movement to create stimulus and economic UH, you

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>know movement the velocity of money UM. Savers are going

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to continue to be punished and risk takers are going

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to continue to be rewarded with volatility. But if the

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>banks aren't offering any incentive to park your money there

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>or government bonds to park your money there, then you're

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to employ the dollars elsewhere, laury money. If

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you could talk a little bit about employing those dollars elsewhere.

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you find that investors are pile into just a

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>few names when it comes to stocks UM, your your yes,

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I think your your household names are getting the majority

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of that UH, And I do like different sectors UM

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>from a from a short term perspective and a long

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>term perspective. Let's take a look at the long term

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:25.559
<v Speaker 1>perspective first. For the long term standpoint, I like UH

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>some some dividend payers, large cap UH stocks with good

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>balance sheets in this environment, as well as the sectors

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of biotech and technology going forward. Short term, I'd be

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>cautious a little bit with your less popular names and

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>names that have had lots of run up recently. Um,

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, the market is seeming is seeming to stall

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, especially ahead of the Brexit conversation as

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:55.039
<v Speaker 1>well as the FED meetings UH this week. So little

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>caution short term, but I think in the long term

0:04:57.440 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be okay and push through this a little bit,

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>provide the investors have the appropriate balanced portfolio that they

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>need to accomplish their objectives and goals. And that's where

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.600
<v Speaker 1>some people get confused sometimes, is is looking at a

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>short term investment versus you know, like a trade versus

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>really investing to produce income for themselves in retirement or

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>college funding or the case may be there. Yeah, and

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>this is very short term in terms of these big

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>picture questions. The FED meeting starts today, we get the

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>decision tomorrow, breggsit vote June. We'll see even if they

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>leave the you know, we'll see the volatility. We'll see

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>what happens. You just mentioned though, for example, technology for

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 1>the long term, can you give us if you can't

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>give us a specific name that you are owning or recommending, Uh,

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>could you give us an example of the kind of

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>tech company you're talking about, because there's you know, if

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>chip makers are tech, then Intel is very different from Microsoft,

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:53.479
<v Speaker 1>is pretty different from Facebook, I would agree. And when

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I talk tech, the first thing I think of is

0:05:56.040 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>how certain technology companies are changing the way you and

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I as individuals and businesses send and receive information. Uh,

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>not only domestically, but as well as around the world.

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>And the access to data, the efficiency of data is

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the areas that I'm really really talking about. We we like, uh,

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the E T F space there to buy the whole

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>basket versus individual companies. We just think it's a rising

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>tide that's going to continue for several years down the

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>road as people continue to increase their technology. I mean,

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 1>just think about this. Just just imagine ten fifteen years

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 1>ago going to a car dealership today and back then

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and buying a car that's that comes pre fitted with WiFi.

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Back then, we would have never understood that at all.

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>But yet now that's happening, and it's going to continue

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 1>to happen. Technology is going to continue to change the

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>way we send and receive information. That's going to help

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:53.479
<v Speaker 1>businesses out it's going to help people out in the

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>healthcare sector as well, so it's gonna be well rounded.

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I just want to pick up on something having to

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:01.720
<v Speaker 1>do with healthcare because at the end of the Affordable

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Care Acts third open enrollment period, total enrollment was about

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>twelve point seven million individuals. This shows that enrollments are

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>falling in each successive period. Does that affect your call

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>on healthcare stocks? Not really, UM, the Affordable Care Act

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>is basically designed to get people ensured, get them into

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the program. That's one scenario there that's different than what

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about. I'm talking about biotech, UM, advanced pharmaceuticals,

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Alzheimer's research, cancer, hip replacement, knee replacement. That space is

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>designed to improve quality of life and extend quality of life.

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>So we're very specific when we go into the healthcare

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>space using some ets like that. I'd like to come

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>back to technology et s. Are you saying, then, if

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at how information is transferred? Are you looking

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>at ets that hold uh cloud? Uh? You know, enterprise

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of service companies? Uh? What kind? Could you just

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>be a little more specific there? Again, tech is pretty broad.

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Would you do something more more specialized or are you

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>just saying buy something it owns, you know, lots and

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>lots of different kinds of technology companies. Well that's a

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>great question. Let me give you the answer from a

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>financial planning perspective, if I may. We work with clients

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that are close to are already retired, so we're building

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and designing portfolios to accomplish their objectives at this point

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in life and down the road. So if we're if

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>we're liking the tech space, we may put them into

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>an e t F that buys the basket of technology. However,

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.079
<v Speaker 1>from on a case by case basis, we may then

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>go find a name if the stock looks to be

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>an appropriate buy at the particular time. But we just

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>like the entire space, along with the biotech space. Long term,

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>viewing it from the rising tide is going to lift

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole all the boats in the harbor. All right.

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:02.199
<v Speaker 1>I noticed that you've been speaking about exchange traded funds.

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you specialize justin exchange traded funds or would you

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>be willing to put money to work in individual stocks?

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 1>We do both. We have active and passive mutual funds

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>as well as ets and individual stocks inside of our

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:19.079
<v Speaker 1>portfolios for our clients depending on what their objectives are

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and what we see in the marketplace. You know, it's

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty easy to to uh buy some SMP five

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>stocks and e t F passive investment like that, uh

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>in the SMP five space. But when you start looking

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:39.679
<v Speaker 1>abroad at uh uh intermatt International emerging small company growth

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.839
<v Speaker 1>stocks there, you might want to employee active management in

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a mutual fund versus something that's passive. So the further

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>away it is from the center of the dartboard, the

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>more we would lean towards active management. How about income,

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>If the ball market is kind of crazy right now,

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>how do you get income dive it mpairs it is,

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we we look at it a few different ways.

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>UM dividend payers. We also like the middle of the

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>curve as far as the bond market goes right now,

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>UM publicly traded reats if you can put in some

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>trailing stop losses just to limit volatility, and they're yielding

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>very attractive numbers as well, So we do sort of

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a mixture between the two or three. They're depending on

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the client's objectives as well. So you know, we are

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>definitely in a yield starved environment, so we need to

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>find quality bonds when it comes to that, and a

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of bond ladders are being you know employed now

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in the investment world. Uh, you know, as far as

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>all that goes for people. Thank you very much for

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>spending time with us. Larry Rosenthal is the president of

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:49.959
<v Speaker 1>Rosenthal Wealth Management Group, helping to manage more than six

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars of client assets. Speaking bullish about healthcare,

0:10:56.880 --> 0:11:01.839
<v Speaker 1>specifically biotech as well as technology stocks, We're going to

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>take you through to the clothes next right here on

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>taking stock. I'm pim Fox, my co host Kathleen Hayes,

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and this is Bloomberg Radio. Yeah,