WEBVTT - Killer Mom Trial: Lindsay Clancy’s First Words To Chaplain: “I’m So Glad My Children Are Safe” 

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Hey, that folks. It is Friday, August twenty first, and

0:00:05.400 --> 0:00:10.120
<v Speaker 1>it was another shortened day and the Lindsay Clancy triple

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>murder trial. But we learned a lot about Lindsey Clancy yesterday.

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>And one other note, the drama started before folks even

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>got into the court room and with that, welcome to

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>this episode of Amy and TJ.

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Robes.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Drama outside did lead to some dramatic moments and delays inside.

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, you mentioned a shortened day.

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 3>It began late and it ended early, But what happened

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 3>before and after the testimony are actually a huge part

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 3>of why yesterday was such a fascinating and interesting day

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 3>in court. And yes, we saw a jurors individually being

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 3>brought up to a sidebar, sworn in and answering questions

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 3>from the judge one by one. That delayed the start

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 3>of testimony by at least thirty mon Why were they

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 3>being brought up and questioned by the judge? Well, apparently

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 3>this is all because there was a massive silent rally

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 3>that was going on outside the courthouse and prosecutors were

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 3>very concerned and we would argue rightfully so that this

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 3>show of support, and we'll get into what was going

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 3>on outside the courtroom for Lindsay Clancy could have an

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 3>emotional reaction or could elicit some sort of emotional empathy

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 3>sympathy for Lindsay Clancy.

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 2>As those jurors walked into the Courtporo.

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean the jurors, they've been wiping tears as they've

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>been listening to a lot of this, The same jurors

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>who've seen her cry, what did you say, hyperventilating almost

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>in the way she's been ventilating without a debt at times.

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>So there has been a lot of emotion. It was

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and just here we go again, ropes. It's just some

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of way emotion is playing into this trial every

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>single day in some manner. It was remarkable that it

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>played into it on the way in to the court yesterday.

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yeah, about three hundred women all dressed in pink

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 3>with support for Lindsay Clancy. And again we'll get into

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 3>those details in a bit, what their intent was and

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 3>what they said to reporters outside.

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 2>But look, each of the jurors obviously.

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Told the judge they could put that into a compartment

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 3>and not let it impact their ability to objectively listen

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 3>to witness testimony and take in the evidence, all of that.

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 3>But also then the jury was sent home before eleven

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 3>am because the attorneys and the judge decided to hold

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 3>their own conference to discuss possible jury instructions.

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 2>And that got really interesting as well.

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Right, we say interesting jury instructions are some of the

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>some of these trials. They're so long and tedious and

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 1>confusing to the average listener. They're arguing over words and

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>word placement and prepositions and this kind of stuff. This

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 1>one is going to be a doozy ye to put

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>these instructions together.

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 3>It certainly is what the basically what the jury can consider,

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 3>what the jury cannot consider.

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 2>And we'll get into this too.

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 3>But the defense, this was interesting to me, was pushing

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 3>that the judge include in the jury instructions how to

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 3>consider intoxication when it comes to a criminal act. But yeah,

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 3>we only had one witness take the stand. And by

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 3>the way, it was a packed courtroom. One of the

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 3>reporters described it as the most packed they had seen it.

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 3>More than sixty people, everyone trying to get into this courtroom.

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:34.399
<v Speaker 3>As I believe, it does seem like more and more

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 3>people are becoming more and more interested in this case.

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 3>What it means to have postpartum depression or in this case, psychosis,

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 3>listening to women's health issues, whether or not a mother

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 3>who murdered her three children should be helped. Responsible people

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 3>are really as we're seeing this testimony start to come

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 3>to a close, people are really getting interested in what

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 3>the outcome is going to be.

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, we noticed this yesterday that some news outlets

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that normally wouldn't necessarily be covering a story like this.

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>It's high up in their rundowns. Yes there is more.

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>This is what full third or fourth full week?

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the I believe this is.

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 3>We're in the fourth week, and so yes, people are

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 3>taking notice. And that one witness that took the stand

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 3>on What's Today Friday on Thursday, you even said, Wow,

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 3>I am paying attention. This woman had an an energy

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 3>about her, an authenticity about her. A you sat up

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 3>to listen to her when she spoke.

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, she had a manner of speaking. I'm not sure

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>how to describe it.

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 2>It was.

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it was soft, but it was pleasant.

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>It was it was angelic. It was therapeutic to someone.

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>It was almost like you were getting guidance from some

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>fairy godmother.

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 3>It was actually a really good way to put it.

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 3>She looked like a fairy godmother. But we're talking about

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Sheila Kavanas. She is hospital chaplain, so that might actually

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 3>explain what we're describing. She was at Brigham and Women's Hospital,

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 3>she was the chaplain. She saw and spoke with Lindsay

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Clancy more than two hundred times, Babe. She I would say,

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 3>based on all the witnesses we've seen take the stand

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 3>for either the prosecution or the defense, is the one

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 3>person who has seen and spoken with Lindsay Clancy more

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 3>than anyone else.

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>And you know she's not a doctor, Bros. I'm just

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 1>putting that together, as you say, because I'm thinking about

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the other guy who met her sixty times, or the

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 1>other defense guy who's been on the stay in last couple.

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 2>Of days, forensic psychiatrists.

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>But the one who has spent the most time talking

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to this lady happens to be a woman of faith

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and not necessarily the doctor. I don't know what we

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>make of that. She can't diagnose her. She can say

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>what she said and how she came off, but she

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>can't do the medical part. So what does she How

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>does she help the defense here?

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 3>She I think she helped the defense significantly because she

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 3>spoke to Lindsay's stany of mind. She spoke to where

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 3>and that has been under assault by the prosecution in

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 3>terms of this callous, cold, calculated, controlling mom who wanted

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 3>to take her children with her no matter what, and

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't let anyone else protect them other than her, And

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 3>that was what made her so evil and calculating in

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 3>killing her children. When you hear from Sheila Kavanaugh describing

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 3>a much different Lindsay Clancy, it goes a long way,

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 3>I think for jurors in terms of intent, motive, and

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 3>whether or not she was in her right mind.

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and a lot of what this lady right, she's

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>examining just a human being. She's looking at it through

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a different lens. Rose and she there's no medical degree

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that let her know a woman was in trouble. It

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>was her training. It's theological training that helped her see

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a woman who was in need. And it was this

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>is not a woman who sat up there. It felt

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>like she was trying to help this side or that side,

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>but ropes. She'd sound like somebody who was just trying

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to help Lindsay Clancy like authentically not get away with

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 1>a crime. What covers just she's here. She seemed like

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a really impartial observer in the courtroom.

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 3>I agree, and that's why what she said carried so

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 3>much weight, And I thought what stood out to me

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 3>She talked about going in to see Lindsay in those

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 3>first few days and how Lindsay was intubated. She described

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 3>physically how she looked, how she was unable to speak

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 3>or communicate. That also went a long way just to

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 3>show just how injured Lindsay Clancy was. That several days

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 3>when she went to go see her, she couldn't speak

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 3>because she had tubes down her throat. But she said

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 3>the first time Lindsey Clancy could use her voice and spoke,

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 3>she said this to her, I'm so glad my children

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 3>are safe. That was incredibly impactful.

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, But which way right? What is that an admission of?

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>What is that a confirmation of? What is that evidence of?

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that.

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 2>She thought she was doing right by her kids.

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>In that moment, and then the prosecution dismisses that as

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>what right? That's what I mean, Robes, It's they're giving

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you enough in a bigger picture that you cannot help,

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>but no robes that this lady was in trouble of

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>some kind.

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 3>To me, that speaks to her level of insanity, because

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 3>no woman would think her children were safe when she

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 3>killed them unless you have something really serious going on.

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 3>That is not something a mother says when her child

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 3>is dead. Now, we've heard mothers say after their child's

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 3>been murdered or had some horrible debt that they're glad

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 3>their child is in a better place or not suffering anymore.

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 3>This was very, very different. The other big moment is

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 3>when she described and testified to the fact that she

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 3>said that Lindsey told her that she heard a voice.

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 3>She said that voice told her if she did not

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 3>follow the command, neither she nor her children would be safe.

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 3>So that is a big moment.

0:08:58.559 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 2>That is what the.

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely wants the jurors to believe that Lindsay did what

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:09.439
<v Speaker 3>she did because she was following a command and obviously

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 3>that was a hallucination. That voice didn't actually exist, which

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 3>means that Lindsey Clancy was in a state of psychosis

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 3>all right.

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>That part the prosecution was trying to jump on that

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>because she only told her afterwards, and only told her once,

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 1>and she hadn't heard it since is that she never

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess the prosecutor is trying to get at she

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>wasn't going along this line of a voice in her

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>head until after the murder. She wasn't discussing it at all. Ah,

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the chaplain didn't put in her notes.

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 3>That was the big, big point that the prosecution says

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 3>that okay, And then they went through all of her notes,

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:48.839
<v Speaker 3>and she had detailed notes, and she said, you never

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:53.239
<v Speaker 3>put once that Lindsay Clancy told you she heard a voice.

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 3>And the response from the chaplain was, I'm not there

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:58.559
<v Speaker 3>to evaluate the patient. I'm there to bear witness to

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 3>their suffering. Her prosecution did make a little bit of

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 3>a It poked a hole in some of the chaplain's testimony,

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 3>saying you put quotes from Lindsay Clancy. On several other occasions,

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 3>you directly quoted her, You talked about positive observations you

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 3>made of her.

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 2>You never once put this in your notes. That that

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 2>worked a little bit, But I still.

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Didn't believe that the chaplain was lying when she said

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 3>Lindsay Clancy said what she said. I still think she

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 3>was such a credible witness. She was that I didn't

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 3>it didn't bother me too much that she didn't note

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 3>it in her written notes about her meetings with Lindsay Clancy.

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>As Margins might be small in a jury room, Where

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>does that trick? I think about it? I do ask

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the question, why didn't she write that down? Why wasn't

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that important enough for her to write down? It is

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:53.959
<v Speaker 1>a detailed woman. I like this woman. I trust this woman,

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:56.559
<v Speaker 1>she's legit. Why wasn't she write that down?

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 3>It might not at a juror like it's just a

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 3>it's like hmm, that it does?

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 2>It is?

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 3>It was absolutely worth the question, and her answer wasn't

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 3>really good enough.

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, But then you know what I would go to

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>after that, Robes is in the jury room, I would

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>say this to my eleven other fellow jurors, say, well, actually, guys,

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>this lady is not a doctor. She doesn't know maybe

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that that's a really important note to write down.

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 2>And say that. I'd be like, you know what, that's

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 2>a good point.

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think yes, And in the deliberation room that

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:35.839
<v Speaker 3>could absolutely be understood from that point of view. The

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 3>other thing I thought she said that was important for

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 3>the defense, She said. Lindsey talked and talks frequently about

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 3>her children, she loves them deeply, she carries immense grief.

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 3>And when she said that, the prosecution objected, the judge

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 3>overruled because they were like hearsay. But look, she got

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 3>her point across to jurors that this person that the

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 3>prosecution is trying to depict of someone who was laughing

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 3>and playing games and playing dominoes and feeling joyful and

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 3>seemed positive and upbeat on the anniversaries of the death

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.079
<v Speaker 3>of her children, on the anniversaries of what would be

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 3>the birthdays of her children.

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 2>This flew in the face of that.

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 3>Hearing a chaplain say she talks frequently, she loves them deeply,

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 3>she carries a men's grief and roabes.

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the lady. If the prosecution wants to challenge,

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:31.719
<v Speaker 1>you can't tell me that you're experts that you put

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>up there who spent twenty minutes with her, and this

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>woman spent two hundred two hundred visits.

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Isn't she more.

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Expertly aware of where this woman's head is than anybody else,

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:45.079
<v Speaker 1>even though she's not a doctor. That is going to

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 1>be tough to discredit this woman who has spent more

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>time you want me to believe the person that's been

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:52.839
<v Speaker 1>out of college for a month, that only met her

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>via FaceTime. Is that what you're telling me, prosecutors, that's

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a challenge.

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 2>I agree, I agree.

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 3>And so once Kavanaugh, she like Kavanaugh, left the stand,

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 3>the jury was sent home. I mean they actually were

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:11.079
<v Speaker 3>there for about an hour yesterday and then they were

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 3>sent home. But what happened next was this preliminary charge conference,

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 3>that's what it's called. But they're discussing what the jury

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 3>is going to be hearing in the judge's instructions to

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 3>them when they begin deliberations. And the prosecutors are very

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 3>much concerned about this notion that the juror could be

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 3>instructed about what intoxication means to criminal responsibility, and so

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 3>they said this to the judge. From our perspective, there

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 3>has been no evidence of intoxication by drugs or alcohol

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 3>during the killings. And that's interesting because we've seen them

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 3>with each of these witnesses try to say, well, she

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 3>didn't take all the pills. There were plenty of pills

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 3>left in the pill bottles. There were more pills in

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 3>the pill bottles than there should have been based on

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 3>her prescription dose, so meaning not only was she not

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 3>over medicated, she was actually potentially undermedicated. And now we

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.559
<v Speaker 3>understand why they don't want the defense to be able

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 3>to say that the drugs were part of the reason

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 3>why she ended up killing her children.

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I can't and this is what I've said. Off the

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>top words that go in jury instructions explaining intoxication and

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the application of that when it comes to criminality. Wow,

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean just wow. And the judge, don't they always

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>they have to read these instructions word for word. They're

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>going to get the They still get them when they

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>go back there, do they?

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 3>Uh, Yes, they get them, and they can refer back

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 3>to them. And that's why you'll see, like in these

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 3>trials sometimes they'll send the jury home early. They need

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 3>days and days and days of meeting out what the

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 3>jury instructions will be.

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 2>And in this case, the defense pushed back, he said.

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Reddington said, this is clearly an involuntary intoxication defense.

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 3>So that was the first time we heard that. We've

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 3>heard postpartum psychosis defense. But in this insanity defense, they

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 3>also want to bring up this notion of involuntary intoxication,

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 3>and that was pretty interesting. They said the over prescription

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 3>of drugs directly impacted Lindsey Clancy's actions that day, so

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 3>that will be fascinating the judges considering we'll decide later,

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 3>but when we come back, we're going to tell you

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 3>about that demonstration that was going on outside the courthouse

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 3>and why it mattered so much to the prosecution, and

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 3>welcome back everyone to Amy and TJ. It was a

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 3>short but powerful day once again in court, but it

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 3>began outside of the courthouse. Three hundred or so women

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 3>gathered that it was a big showing. If you see

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 3>the pictures there were, it was a mass of pink

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 3>And normally I would say, oh wow, there's a breast

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 3>cancer survivors reunion going on, just happens to be outside

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 3>of the courthouse. But no, these women, they weren't protesting,

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 3>they weren't wearing signs. It was notably what was called

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 3>a silent rally, but many of the women had t

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 3>shirts that had phrases like believe she needed help, peace

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 3>for Lindsey. So they didn't speak, but they were speaking.

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>That's going to be a big part of this conversation

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>moving forward. Robes and a lot of people and I

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>know you've seen it, are just spouting off online and

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>calling anybody who would dare not even support her but

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>be willing to listen to what might have been wrong

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>with her. A lot of people think this woman strangle

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>three kids, burn her and that's it. That is really

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>all the debate seems to be online. That group is

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>just saying she deserves to burn in hell, don't want

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to hear anything else that's hurting. I guess robes in

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>our understanding. I don't know why somebody's just not willing

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>to listen to what's happening in this debate versus just automatic.

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>These folks aren't listening and who are just saying burn

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and hell?

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, they're like she looked her children in the

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 3>eyes while she was strangling them. There was even this

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 3>notion by prosecutors that she did. Oh, this was a

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:19.919
<v Speaker 3>gross part of yesterday. I didn't even want to hear this,

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:22.879
<v Speaker 3>but the prosecutor brought up this is when we had

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 3>she like Kavanaugh, on the stand. Did you know that

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, they introduce evidence by asking someone if they

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 3>knew something, even though they almost certainly didn't, but just

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 3>to get the jury to hear and to enter this testimony,

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 3>But the prosecutor said, did you know that Lindsay Clancy

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 3>was working out using exercise bands after the killings? That

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:48.360
<v Speaker 3>was just a really ugh moment for me listening to okay.

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 1>And unbiased, just real reason for why really, from a

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>legal standpoint, why was that necessary? Why was that effect

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of what was she trying to get at?

0:17:58.080 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 2>Emotional manipulation?

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 3>But she was so callous that she could use a

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 3>murder weapon to stay fit while she's in a mental hospital,

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 3>after she used that same exact exercise band or a

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 3>version of it to murder her children, that how could

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 3>she ever even pick up an exercise band again?

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:18.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 2>That was tough.

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 1>That adds to another a line of moments sometimes for

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutions to where I'm just as a juror, I mean,

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:27.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how they're taking it, but as I

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>sit there, well, come on, do we really have to?

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>It just seemed petty. It seemed it seems like she

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>was trying to. It was another one of those roles.

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 1>We keep saying what she say, huhuh, right, she'll say

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>something to say, so yours seriously, like for real, she's

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:46.439
<v Speaker 1>using these things that wait, you didn't know sarcasm.

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 3>Sarcasm and you know what, So I take away from

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 3>the fact that a woman who strangled and killed her

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 3>children using exercise bands, how that same woman could pick.

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Up an exercise band and work out with it.

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 3>To me, would only a mentally ill person would be

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 3>able to do that, because actually, even if you were

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 3>cruelly killing your kids, if you're telling me that that

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 3>didn't impact her emotionally, then that tells me her she

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 3>is out of her mind.

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Or she is literally Satan himself.

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Because those are your only two options, and that might

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 3>be why we see such a polarizing reaction from folks,

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:27.199
<v Speaker 3>because yeah, either she is that is true. Either she

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 3>is the most evil, monstrous human being that could ever exist,

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 3>like Satan like, or she was mentally ill.

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:39.959
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it could be anywhere in between. So

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:41.959
<v Speaker 2>that's why you've got these two factions.

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>The prosecutors are telling you there is an in between, Yes,

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>because she's just a calculated killer. There can be something else,

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:51.199
<v Speaker 1>There is another option here, Robes. All is confusion you have.

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>You can't understand why this woman would do it. We

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:56.919
<v Speaker 1>have an answer for you. She's just a bad person

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>who was a controlling mother and it was too much

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>for her, and she decided to end it all by

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>killing her kids and then faking a suicide attempt by

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>jumping onto rock hard ice from two stories up. That's

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 1>how you can.

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Understand it wrote just not really working.

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 3>Also, I don't know if prosecutors saw this, and maybe

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 3>perhaps this prompted them having the judge pull the jurors

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 3>one by one to see if the silent rally outside

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:29.679
<v Speaker 3>had impacted them in any way as they were walking

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 3>into the courthouse. But as folks and players from the

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 3>courthouse were walking in, guests who got a huge round

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 3>of applause from these otherwise silent protesters. Defense attorney Kevin

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 3>Reddington when he walked it, people were they were They

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 3>all broke into applause for defending a woman who they

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 3>believe needs to be defended, because the whole point of

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 3>this rally was to raise awareness about how the mental

0:20:56.040 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 3>health system and the legal system treats women who are

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:02.360
<v Speaker 3>suffering from postpartum depression.

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, even if this case, however it turns out,

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 1>we still should take an examination of how the legal

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>system and how we all society treats women with the postpartum.

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 1>That's worthy no matter what the outcome of this trial is.

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Ah.

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 3>Yes, but it is expected to be a full day.

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 3>They're claiming a full day of testimony. And we also

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 3>got word that this thing may be headed to the

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 3>jury soon, that we may be seeing closing arguments as

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 3>soon as early next week. But we'll probably have more

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 3>information on the timing of it all after today's testimony.

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 2>We will be watching.

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 3>We will let you know what happened, but we always

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:42.120
<v Speaker 3>appreciate you listening to us I Ami Roebock alongside TJ.

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Holmes. We'll talk so