WEBVTT - On Background: White-Collar Crime and Punishment

0:00:15.276 --> 0:00:29.876
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Hey, there, Against the Rules listeners, I appreciate you

0:00:29.956 --> 0:00:32.796
<v Speaker 1>indulging me while I record some background interviews from my

0:00:32.876 --> 0:00:36.716
<v Speaker 1>next book, which is mostly about Sam Bankman Free, the

0:00:36.756 --> 0:00:41.716
<v Speaker 1>founder of the cryptocurrency exchange FTX. Last year, while I

0:00:41.756 --> 0:00:45.996
<v Speaker 1>was on the scene, FTX collapsed dramatically. As I record this,

0:00:46.676 --> 0:00:49.756
<v Speaker 1>Sam Bankman Freed is under house arrest and awaiting what

0:00:49.836 --> 0:00:52.916
<v Speaker 1>looks like a very complicated trial. The whole thing feels

0:00:52.916 --> 0:00:55.036
<v Speaker 1>like it could become the white collar criminal event of

0:00:55.036 --> 0:00:58.236
<v Speaker 1>our age. But if you took the long view, the

0:00:58.316 --> 0:01:01.996
<v Speaker 1>historical view, maybe this whole affair would look a little different.

0:01:03.156 --> 0:01:06.556
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to on background from Against the Rules. I'm

0:01:06.596 --> 0:01:19.596
<v Speaker 1>Michael Lewis. As i've been writing about Sam backman Fried's case,

0:01:19.716 --> 0:01:22.156
<v Speaker 1>I've also been wondering about how this would all have

0:01:22.196 --> 0:01:25.316
<v Speaker 1>gone down fifty or a hundred years ago. Of course,

0:01:25.316 --> 0:01:27.596
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't any crypto back in the day. But I

0:01:27.596 --> 0:01:31.076
<v Speaker 1>find myself curious to hear an historical perspective on white

0:01:31.116 --> 0:01:34.636
<v Speaker 1>collar crime in America. I've been wondering, have we gotten

0:01:34.676 --> 0:01:39.076
<v Speaker 1>more lenient about it tougher? And what is prison like

0:01:39.436 --> 0:01:42.556
<v Speaker 1>for white collar criminals these days compared to what it

0:01:42.636 --> 0:01:45.516
<v Speaker 1>used to be. Fortunately I found someone who could answer

0:01:45.556 --> 0:01:49.676
<v Speaker 1>these questions and more. Eugene Saltis. He's a professor at

0:01:49.676 --> 0:01:52.516
<v Speaker 1>the Harvard Business School, or HBS as it's also known.

0:01:53.436 --> 0:01:55.476
<v Speaker 1>A lot of his students have gone on to populate

0:01:55.516 --> 0:02:00.556
<v Speaker 1>boardrooms and c suites superachievers. But at some point Saltis

0:02:00.596 --> 0:02:04.396
<v Speaker 1>got interested in the type of superachiever who achieves bad things.

0:02:05.596 --> 0:02:09.396
<v Speaker 1>He sought them out, usually in prison, an interview them,

0:02:10.476 --> 0:02:13.596
<v Speaker 1>and he published their accounts and his analysis in an

0:02:13.636 --> 0:02:17.756
<v Speaker 1>excellent book called Why They Do It Inside the Mind

0:02:17.796 --> 0:02:29.556
<v Speaker 1>of the White Collar Criminal. I kind of just want

0:02:29.556 --> 0:02:33.556
<v Speaker 1>to start by asking you how you business school professor

0:02:33.636 --> 0:02:40.476
<v Speaker 1>got interested in white collar crime? So I began quite accidentally,

0:02:41.396 --> 0:02:43.636
<v Speaker 1>I think, probably like anyone that gets involved in I

0:02:43.716 --> 0:02:45.636
<v Speaker 1>heard thinking about white collar crime. Who was up at

0:02:45.636 --> 0:02:47.876
<v Speaker 1>three in the morning watching actually a show called lock

0:02:47.956 --> 0:02:51.716
<v Speaker 1>Up on MSNBC, And I was imagining, if I had

0:02:51.876 --> 0:02:54.276
<v Speaker 1>half an hour with the white collar criminals, these former

0:02:54.276 --> 0:02:57.476
<v Speaker 1>executives who were in the news, what would they say

0:02:57.516 --> 0:03:00.396
<v Speaker 1>what led them there to their current predicament, which is

0:03:00.396 --> 0:03:03.116
<v Speaker 1>generally a medium security prison. And so that night I

0:03:03.276 --> 0:03:05.636
<v Speaker 1>actually wrote some letters to individuals who I had been

0:03:05.636 --> 0:03:08.316
<v Speaker 1>following the news then loan behold. A couple of months later,

0:03:08.796 --> 0:03:11.516
<v Speaker 1>some volunteered that I could come visit them in prison.

0:03:12.036 --> 0:03:14.036
<v Speaker 1>One thing led to the next. A couple of years later,

0:03:14.076 --> 0:03:16.556
<v Speaker 1>writing a book, and now my entire world is immersed

0:03:16.556 --> 0:03:20.116
<v Speaker 1>there and it's found at home. In the Harvard Business School,

0:03:20.116 --> 0:03:22.596
<v Speaker 1>you actually teach a course I do. I teach a

0:03:22.996 --> 0:03:26.676
<v Speaker 1>second year of course called Borderline that titles very descriptive.

0:03:26.676 --> 0:03:30.556
<v Speaker 1>It's on conduct that somewhere between legal, illegal, moral, immoral.

0:03:30.996 --> 0:03:33.876
<v Speaker 1>It's all the things in business that fall in between

0:03:33.876 --> 0:03:37.116
<v Speaker 1>the cracks of business. What we spent a lot of

0:03:37.116 --> 0:03:40.396
<v Speaker 1>time focusing on are actually entrepreneurs. And I think that

0:03:40.516 --> 0:03:44.036
<v Speaker 1>in the best case, entrepreneurs who for a while you

0:03:44.116 --> 0:03:47.756
<v Speaker 1>might engage in something like puffery, you don't actually put

0:03:47.796 --> 0:03:49.396
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of internal controls. I mean, this is

0:03:49.436 --> 0:03:51.916
<v Speaker 1>what we do see in a case like FTX, and

0:03:51.956 --> 0:03:53.996
<v Speaker 1>then you go from this little working out of your

0:03:53.996 --> 0:03:57.476
<v Speaker 1>garage the next thing running a multibillion dollar enterprise, and

0:03:57.516 --> 0:04:00.756
<v Speaker 1>then bad things happening and you look back and say,

0:04:00.796 --> 0:04:04.116
<v Speaker 1>how did that occur? Could that have been prevented? And

0:04:04.156 --> 0:04:05.676
<v Speaker 1>so that's in the best case what we look at.

0:04:05.676 --> 0:04:08.796
<v Speaker 1>We look at other instances of people's circumventing rules thinking

0:04:08.836 --> 0:04:12.276
<v Speaker 1>it's very clever. This is very enron esque. You see

0:04:12.276 --> 0:04:14.556
<v Speaker 1>a law and you think of a way of going

0:04:14.596 --> 0:04:18.196
<v Speaker 1>around it because the law doesn't say you can't, and

0:04:18.356 --> 0:04:21.236
<v Speaker 1>you have the mentality show me where it says I can't.

0:04:21.756 --> 0:04:24.036
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it works and people come very wealthy because of that.

0:04:24.116 --> 0:04:26.116
<v Speaker 1>Other times you get a lot of trouble. So the

0:04:26.116 --> 0:04:28.516
<v Speaker 1>students when they're coming to the class, they sort of

0:04:28.516 --> 0:04:30.956
<v Speaker 1>in a frame of mind of what do I do

0:04:31.036 --> 0:04:34.996
<v Speaker 1>to prevent this happening to me? Everyone starts in what

0:04:35.076 --> 0:04:37.716
<v Speaker 1>I call them more moral mode, almost like an ethics class.

0:04:38.236 --> 0:04:41.876
<v Speaker 1>How ought you behave in these situations? That's not how

0:04:41.916 --> 0:04:44.916
<v Speaker 1>these decisions are made. No one spends half an hour

0:04:44.996 --> 0:04:47.556
<v Speaker 1>pondering them. You don't have all the information. You're not

0:04:47.596 --> 0:04:50.196
<v Speaker 1>bringing diverse viewpoints, and that's why a lot of times

0:04:50.236 --> 0:04:53.116
<v Speaker 1>smart people make, with the benefit of hindsight, poor decisions.

0:04:53.836 --> 0:04:57.796
<v Speaker 1>As your class paid any attention to FTX, We're absolutely

0:04:57.836 --> 0:05:02.196
<v Speaker 1>going to get there because FS is fascinating. Would interest

0:05:02.236 --> 0:05:06.676
<v Speaker 1>you about it? So I will say two dimensions. The

0:05:06.756 --> 0:05:10.636
<v Speaker 1>first is again and I'm relying on the publicly available

0:05:10.636 --> 0:05:13.796
<v Speaker 1>information is separating on the two narratives. The one that

0:05:14.196 --> 0:05:18.756
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutors and sec and other agencies are describing, which

0:05:18.756 --> 0:05:23.076
<v Speaker 1>is this is a fraud since its inception, which is

0:05:23.116 --> 0:05:26.276
<v Speaker 1>story one. In story two is these are these are

0:05:26.316 --> 0:05:30.756
<v Speaker 1>are set of very very smart kids effectively who built

0:05:30.756 --> 0:05:34.356
<v Speaker 1>actually in a pretty remarkable business that frankly would have

0:05:34.396 --> 0:05:36.836
<v Speaker 1>benefited from a couple of weeks at HBS about internal

0:05:36.836 --> 0:05:39.756
<v Speaker 1>controls and compliance systems, and never set any of that up.

0:05:40.196 --> 0:05:43.236
<v Speaker 1>So it wasn't someone overnight decided to take ten billion

0:05:43.236 --> 0:05:46.116
<v Speaker 1>dollars in transfer from one entity to another. But it's

0:05:46.156 --> 0:05:48.676
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they never actually spent the time to

0:05:48.676 --> 0:05:52.276
<v Speaker 1>put together ways of not coal mingling funds. So it's

0:05:52.396 --> 0:05:56.356
<v Speaker 1>not this egregious, deliberate fraud. It's just a matter of

0:05:56.636 --> 0:06:02.716
<v Speaker 1>really incredible sloppiness, which still has the extraordinary detrimental consequences

0:06:02.756 --> 0:06:05.396
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen. I'm surprised that you've been able to

0:06:05.396 --> 0:06:09.556
<v Speaker 1>discern that much that the first narrative is so powerful

0:06:09.916 --> 0:06:12.396
<v Speaker 1>in the media right now, that you've even heard the

0:06:12.436 --> 0:06:16.596
<v Speaker 1>second narrative. I spent a lot of time thinking, probably

0:06:16.636 --> 0:06:19.076
<v Speaker 1>always about what these other narratives are, because I think

0:06:19.716 --> 0:06:22.476
<v Speaker 1>there's this simple story that we like to tell, and

0:06:22.516 --> 0:06:26.876
<v Speaker 1>it's also the same story that enforcements and prosecutors they

0:06:26.916 --> 0:06:29.796
<v Speaker 1>need to tell. But I will say, having spent a

0:06:29.836 --> 0:06:31.676
<v Speaker 1>lot of time with a lot of very smart people

0:06:32.036 --> 0:06:34.916
<v Speaker 1>that have found themselves, you know, facing these circumstances, I

0:06:34.916 --> 0:06:37.916
<v Speaker 1>think it's much more complicated when it starts digging down.

0:06:38.436 --> 0:06:40.876
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think people don't like to see that?

0:06:42.756 --> 0:06:45.076
<v Speaker 1>I bet you when you when you find yourself at

0:06:45.076 --> 0:06:47.796
<v Speaker 1>a dinner party and you start to explain that Bernie

0:06:47.836 --> 0:06:51.156
<v Speaker 1>Madoff was much more complicated than you know. I bet

0:06:51.156 --> 0:06:54.596
<v Speaker 1>people bridle at that it was fraud. You're welcome to

0:06:54.596 --> 0:06:56.676
<v Speaker 1>being my like wingman at any dinner party when this

0:06:56.756 --> 0:07:04.316
<v Speaker 1>pops up. Yes, when you get to know any particular

0:07:04.476 --> 0:07:09.436
<v Speaker 1>messy situation where maybe some illegal stuff was done, and

0:07:09.436 --> 0:07:11.356
<v Speaker 1>and you start to really understand it, and then you

0:07:11.436 --> 0:07:13.756
<v Speaker 1>try to explain it as in as complicated a way

0:07:13.836 --> 0:07:16.756
<v Speaker 1>as it actually happened. People who are watching it from

0:07:16.756 --> 0:07:20.156
<v Speaker 1>the distance that most people watch these things, reading, reading

0:07:20.156 --> 0:07:22.596
<v Speaker 1>the newspaper, you know, whatever, whatever news, whenever it gets

0:07:22.596 --> 0:07:25.556
<v Speaker 1>to them, they're not they're not they don't really want

0:07:25.596 --> 0:07:30.356
<v Speaker 1>to enter into that conversation. I'm empathetic because there are

0:07:30.396 --> 0:07:33.716
<v Speaker 1>a lot of victims. I mean, FPX, there's a million

0:07:33.756 --> 0:07:36.156
<v Speaker 1>people roughly that are wondering, am I going to get

0:07:36.196 --> 0:07:38.156
<v Speaker 1>my money back? It? Did I just lose everything? As

0:07:38.196 --> 0:07:41.476
<v Speaker 1>it down to zero and anything? But I will say

0:07:42.396 --> 0:07:45.716
<v Speaker 1>the kind of strong, vilified argument I understand, and if

0:07:45.716 --> 0:07:47.636
<v Speaker 1>I was in their position, I wouldn't want to hear

0:07:47.676 --> 0:07:51.836
<v Speaker 1>any other explanation. But but simultaneously, it doesn't go a

0:07:51.876 --> 0:07:55.596
<v Speaker 1>long way to explain underlying root causes, the psychology about

0:07:55.636 --> 0:07:58.236
<v Speaker 1>what happened and how can we stop this from happening again. Yes,

0:07:58.236 --> 0:08:00.716
<v Speaker 1>it's not very helpful. It's not it's not very helpful

0:08:00.756 --> 0:08:03.836
<v Speaker 1>at improving us. So the ANLJA I've often thought of

0:08:04.036 --> 0:08:07.596
<v Speaker 1>is when there's an airplane crash, yep, immediately what happened?

0:08:07.596 --> 0:08:09.436
<v Speaker 1>You call, oh, you call the airlines in, you call

0:08:09.596 --> 0:08:11.956
<v Speaker 1>you know, FA, you call a pile of agencies. They

0:08:11.956 --> 0:08:16.116
<v Speaker 1>come in and a manufacture and their first and foremost

0:08:16.156 --> 0:08:17.996
<v Speaker 1>goal is let's get to the bottom of this. Is

0:08:17.996 --> 0:08:20.916
<v Speaker 1>it whether is it air traffic controllers? Is it the pilot?

0:08:21.316 --> 0:08:24.076
<v Speaker 1>And they really want to know what happened here? That's

0:08:24.116 --> 0:08:26.436
<v Speaker 1>not true with white collar crime. Everyone has what I

0:08:26.476 --> 0:08:29.196
<v Speaker 1>call an agenda. You know, the people that prosecutors, their

0:08:29.276 --> 0:08:31.796
<v Speaker 1>job is to get people, send people to jail, the

0:08:31.836 --> 0:08:34.876
<v Speaker 1>people working on you know, the claimants in bankruptcy, they're

0:08:34.876 --> 0:08:37.556
<v Speaker 1>trying to get money back, the defense counsels, trying to

0:08:37.716 --> 0:08:39.716
<v Speaker 1>explain why this is not the story that you hear

0:08:39.756 --> 0:08:43.916
<v Speaker 1>in the news, the promise there's no independent third party

0:08:43.996 --> 0:08:46.236
<v Speaker 1>that's sitting there. Interesting. I want to know why this

0:08:46.356 --> 0:08:49.476
<v Speaker 1>happened and what can we do to make this not

0:08:49.556 --> 0:08:52.676
<v Speaker 1>happen again. That's what I'm supposed to do. That's what

0:08:52.796 --> 0:08:54.476
<v Speaker 1>your book is. I mean, there is a there are

0:08:54.556 --> 0:08:57.076
<v Speaker 1>players in the society who have an incentive to play

0:08:57.076 --> 0:09:00.796
<v Speaker 1>this role, right, and that's that's it's sort of what

0:09:00.836 --> 0:09:03.196
<v Speaker 1>a writer is supposed to do. Who walks into this situation.

0:09:04.316 --> 0:09:06.836
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I've noticed is that when someone

0:09:06.876 --> 0:09:09.716
<v Speaker 1>gets into this kind of trouble, whether it's Dan Ryan

0:09:09.756 --> 0:09:15.236
<v Speaker 1>People or Bernie made Off or Sam Bankman Freed, their

0:09:15.276 --> 0:09:18.436
<v Speaker 1>point of view becomes kind of taboo that they're not

0:09:18.796 --> 0:09:21.916
<v Speaker 1>actually allowed to offer their point of view. They try,

0:09:22.636 --> 0:09:25.236
<v Speaker 1>but people don't want to hear their point of view anymore.

0:09:25.876 --> 0:09:28.196
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that part of the problem is

0:09:28.196 --> 0:09:31.276
<v Speaker 1>just like who's allowed to speak once one of these

0:09:31.316 --> 0:09:34.756
<v Speaker 1>things blows up, and who's allowed to have any kind

0:09:34.796 --> 0:09:38.116
<v Speaker 1>of credibility, and the cases got me wondering a little

0:09:38.116 --> 0:09:41.156
<v Speaker 1>bit about just the history of white collar crime, like

0:09:41.836 --> 0:09:45.436
<v Speaker 1>when even the term was invented and why, and sort

0:09:45.476 --> 0:09:48.596
<v Speaker 1>of like who's the original white collar criminal? What's the

0:09:48.636 --> 0:09:52.316
<v Speaker 1>history of the subject. So the term white collar crime

0:09:52.356 --> 0:09:55.276
<v Speaker 1>is actually comparatively new. We can actually point to a

0:09:55.276 --> 0:09:59.476
<v Speaker 1>sphysific person sociologist named Edward Sutherland, and this is back

0:09:59.516 --> 0:10:03.076
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen thirties. He literally created a book white

0:10:03.076 --> 0:10:08.436
<v Speaker 1>Collar Crime that coined the term and raise the idea

0:10:08.476 --> 0:10:10.756
<v Speaker 1>at the time that there were a lot of things

0:10:10.796 --> 0:10:14.436
<v Speaker 1>that companies were doing that ought to be criminal, but

0:10:14.516 --> 0:10:16.796
<v Speaker 1>simply because there were no laws on the book, we're

0:10:16.876 --> 0:10:18.916
<v Speaker 1>not criminal. What were the kind of things? Was he

0:10:19.076 --> 0:10:22.036
<v Speaker 1>talking about? A lot of basic fraud, A lot of

0:10:22.516 --> 0:10:26.316
<v Speaker 1>stuff that we look pretty conventionally it's pretty criminal today.

0:10:26.476 --> 0:10:31.156
<v Speaker 1>Anti competition was a big area, but there were i'll

0:10:31.156 --> 0:10:33.756
<v Speaker 1>say massive gaps that you could do some pretty awful things.

0:10:33.836 --> 0:10:36.236
<v Speaker 1>I mean, at this point we were pre sec This

0:10:36.316 --> 0:10:39.116
<v Speaker 1>is pre to a lot of our modern securities laws.

0:10:40.236 --> 0:10:42.716
<v Speaker 1>We've come a long way since. I mean I was

0:10:42.716 --> 0:10:45.476
<v Speaker 1>looking back at like Occupy Wall Street where people were saying,

0:10:45.476 --> 0:10:47.996
<v Speaker 1>you know, no one's held accountable, and I appreciate where

0:10:47.996 --> 0:10:50.716
<v Speaker 1>people were coming from. I take a long window. Let's

0:10:50.756 --> 0:10:54.316
<v Speaker 1>go back decades in fifty and seventy five years. We've

0:10:54.316 --> 0:10:56.956
<v Speaker 1>come a long way and people are held to account,

0:10:57.076 --> 0:11:00.436
<v Speaker 1>maybe not perfectly by any means, but we're not another

0:11:00.556 --> 0:11:04.436
<v Speaker 1>Southerland's time. And why did this problem exist? Explain why

0:11:04.596 --> 0:11:06.596
<v Speaker 1>there was room for someone to come in and write

0:11:06.596 --> 0:11:08.596
<v Speaker 1>a book that said, look, there's all this bad stuff

0:11:08.596 --> 0:11:11.196
<v Speaker 1>going on and it should be illegal. It's not illegal.

0:11:11.636 --> 0:11:15.116
<v Speaker 1>We need this whole category called white collar crime. When

0:11:15.156 --> 0:11:18.956
<v Speaker 1>you say crime, people thought it meant a street offense.

0:11:18.956 --> 0:11:21.716
<v Speaker 1>It's a violent offense of someone you know, hurting you

0:11:21.956 --> 0:11:25.596
<v Speaker 1>or taking your pocketbook. White color crime bides very nature,

0:11:25.676 --> 0:11:28.276
<v Speaker 1>much more amorphous. If there's a murder, you have a

0:11:28.316 --> 0:11:32.316
<v Speaker 1>body and the question is who did it, it's unquestionable

0:11:32.396 --> 0:11:34.916
<v Speaker 1>that had happened. If you think of white collar crime,

0:11:34.956 --> 0:11:38.236
<v Speaker 1>in almost all the instances, it's the prosecution not only

0:11:38.276 --> 0:11:41.436
<v Speaker 1>has to show that X did it, but they're trying

0:11:41.436 --> 0:11:43.236
<v Speaker 1>to show that it was a crime in the first place.

0:11:43.276 --> 0:11:46.516
<v Speaker 1>Because how do you separate sloppiness or a mistake or

0:11:46.596 --> 0:11:51.356
<v Speaker 1>an adverse market change from someone deliberately tried to take

0:11:51.396 --> 0:11:54.036
<v Speaker 1>a company under for their own benefit gain. White color

0:11:54.076 --> 0:11:57.156
<v Speaker 1>crime is messy and harder to dramatize the victims. So

0:11:57.316 --> 0:12:00.356
<v Speaker 1>this book gets published. Does it have an effect? No, no,

0:12:00.716 --> 0:12:03.076
<v Speaker 1>it didn't get a lot of press outside of more

0:12:03.116 --> 0:12:06.276
<v Speaker 1>obscure academic circles, and a lot of people said, whoa, whoa,

0:12:06.316 --> 0:12:08.476
<v Speaker 1>this guy is saying all these people are doing things

0:12:08.476 --> 0:12:10.756
<v Speaker 1>that are criminal. Let's look at the law. The law

0:12:10.796 --> 0:12:13.316
<v Speaker 1>says these are not crimes. And so it kind of

0:12:13.316 --> 0:12:15.916
<v Speaker 1>looked like, in some kind of ultra progressive argument that

0:12:15.956 --> 0:12:17.676
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to call people a criminal who are not.

0:12:18.436 --> 0:12:20.596
<v Speaker 1>But they missed the broader point which he was making

0:12:20.676 --> 0:12:22.396
<v Speaker 1>is that maybe we need to think about all the

0:12:22.436 --> 0:12:26.916
<v Speaker 1>institutions that protect these entities and powerful individuals. Let's take

0:12:26.916 --> 0:12:38.516
<v Speaker 1>a quick break. I'm back with Eugene Saltis on background.

0:12:39.356 --> 0:12:41.516
<v Speaker 1>Before the break, we heard how the term white collar

0:12:41.596 --> 0:12:43.916
<v Speaker 1>crime didn't really get much traction when it was first

0:12:43.956 --> 0:12:47.476
<v Speaker 1>introduced in the nineteen thirties, but in the nineteen sixties,

0:12:47.716 --> 0:12:52.556
<v Speaker 1>during the Kennedy administration that started to change. There was

0:12:52.996 --> 0:12:56.276
<v Speaker 1>a massive case of price fixing in the electrical space

0:12:56.716 --> 0:12:59.556
<v Speaker 1>ge and Westinghouse. This is the first time you had

0:12:59.916 --> 0:13:04.356
<v Speaker 1>senior level executives at major companies being criminally prosecuted. Actually

0:13:04.716 --> 0:13:08.316
<v Speaker 1>front page of Life magazine. It was an executive, a

0:13:08.396 --> 0:13:12.596
<v Speaker 1>well known an executive literally going into jail. So the

0:13:12.596 --> 0:13:15.436
<v Speaker 1>main arguments that the lawyers were making in defense of

0:13:15.476 --> 0:13:18.716
<v Speaker 1>their their their clients were this is a fine gentleman.

0:13:18.836 --> 0:13:21.596
<v Speaker 1>You should not send this fine gentleman in a prison

0:13:21.716 --> 0:13:24.916
<v Speaker 1>with I believe they actually used the word pimps and prostitutes,

0:13:25.716 --> 0:13:27.276
<v Speaker 1>and so it wasn't they didn't do it, but like,

0:13:27.396 --> 0:13:29.756
<v Speaker 1>why would you send this fine gentleman? That's not where

0:13:29.996 --> 0:13:35.476
<v Speaker 1>gentlemen go? So class class distinctions were being made. Yeah,

0:13:35.556 --> 0:13:37.676
<v Speaker 1>and was there a place to send them other than

0:13:37.716 --> 0:13:40.916
<v Speaker 1>the places where pimps and prostitutes were were their white

0:13:40.956 --> 0:13:44.756
<v Speaker 1>collar prisons? I don't believe there were. Since they weren't

0:13:44.756 --> 0:13:47.036
<v Speaker 1>bringing these people to book, that wasn't really a special

0:13:47.036 --> 0:13:49.516
<v Speaker 1>place to put them. No, no, not at all. But

0:13:49.916 --> 0:13:51.676
<v Speaker 1>I mean these senses were shut. I mean we're talking

0:13:51.676 --> 0:13:54.396
<v Speaker 1>like a couple of months. Because what happened immediately when

0:13:54.396 --> 0:13:59.356
<v Speaker 1>the Westinghouse executives got out, the president of Westinghouse actually

0:13:59.396 --> 0:14:02.956
<v Speaker 1>noted again about these fine gentlemen, and they were rehired

0:14:03.196 --> 0:14:07.916
<v Speaker 1>back in their exact same positions. I mean, it's really

0:14:07.916 --> 0:14:10.756
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting how the ulture is moved, right, I mean,

0:14:10.796 --> 0:14:14.676
<v Speaker 1>it really is different. It is really different. I'll give

0:14:14.676 --> 0:14:17.356
<v Speaker 1>one other spin that's interesting. I will say the person

0:14:17.396 --> 0:14:20.436
<v Speaker 1>who probably had the greatest impact, Actually we go to

0:14:20.436 --> 0:14:22.356
<v Speaker 1>the eighties. We have to jump all the way to

0:14:22.396 --> 0:14:24.236
<v Speaker 1>the eighties. Yeah, we gotta go all the way to

0:14:24.236 --> 0:14:25.876
<v Speaker 1>the eighties. But the person who led it is the

0:14:25.916 --> 0:14:28.796
<v Speaker 1>part that's interesting is Rudy Giuliani. When he was a

0:14:28.956 --> 0:14:31.556
<v Speaker 1>US Attorney of the Southern District of New York, he

0:14:31.636 --> 0:14:33.956
<v Speaker 1>did over fifty prosecutions. He's the one that we now

0:14:33.996 --> 0:14:36.196
<v Speaker 1>think of the purp walk is like that's standard affair now.

0:14:36.476 --> 0:14:39.836
<v Speaker 1>That was Giuliani's innovation. And so you know, Giuianni's had

0:14:39.996 --> 0:14:43.116
<v Speaker 1>a really a storied career and he's the one that

0:14:43.156 --> 0:14:46.716
<v Speaker 1>created that. I'll say, the modern senior prosecutor who holds

0:14:46.796 --> 0:14:50.876
<v Speaker 1>senior executives and and doesn't mess around, you know, prais

0:14:50.876 --> 0:14:54.556
<v Speaker 1>them through the office and handcuffs and uh, you know,

0:14:54.916 --> 0:14:56.516
<v Speaker 1>puts them in the back of the car. You know,

0:14:56.596 --> 0:14:58.116
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting about that. I mean, there's a lot that

0:14:58.156 --> 0:15:01.436
<v Speaker 1>is interesting about that, but that that first, it doesn't

0:15:01.436 --> 0:15:03.876
<v Speaker 1>happen till then. So the question is like why then,

0:15:04.556 --> 0:15:07.316
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if that approach becomes the standard approach afterwards,

0:15:07.356 --> 0:15:09.076
<v Speaker 1>it is because it worked. I mean that it worked

0:15:09.156 --> 0:15:12.076
<v Speaker 1>for Giuliani, it made it more popular, people liked it.

0:15:13.516 --> 0:15:16.916
<v Speaker 1>But what is it about that period that leaves it

0:15:16.956 --> 0:15:21.956
<v Speaker 1>open to this innovation. I mean, I think because a

0:15:21.996 --> 0:15:25.756
<v Speaker 1>prosecutor him or herself makes a name, and I think

0:15:25.756 --> 0:15:28.476
<v Speaker 1>there is an element of the personality in building up

0:15:28.516 --> 0:15:30.876
<v Speaker 1>you know, the career of the individuals who are holding

0:15:30.876 --> 0:15:35.116
<v Speaker 1>people to account. Is it a uniquely American phenomenon. Yeah,

0:15:35.196 --> 0:15:39.436
<v Speaker 1>there's no country that that that is even close. It's

0:15:39.516 --> 0:15:43.556
<v Speaker 1>challenging to hold individuals accountable. You indict an individual, they

0:15:43.556 --> 0:15:45.916
<v Speaker 1>fight for their life because there's nothing left other than

0:15:45.996 --> 0:15:48.716
<v Speaker 1>trying to protect their reputation. So they will go to court.

0:15:48.716 --> 0:15:52.076
<v Speaker 1>They will spend every penny they have. The white color criminels.

0:15:52.116 --> 0:15:54.756
<v Speaker 1>Many of the ones that you interacted with had long sentences,

0:15:54.796 --> 0:15:57.676
<v Speaker 1>and we're not in minimum security prisons. They were in

0:15:57.956 --> 0:16:00.756
<v Speaker 1>what looked like a real jail. Yeah. Yeah, you have

0:16:00.796 --> 0:16:03.516
<v Speaker 1>a year plus sentence, which means you're you're not getting

0:16:04.476 --> 0:16:07.396
<v Speaker 1>lighter touch facility, You're getting the real deal. I mean,

0:16:07.436 --> 0:16:10.436
<v Speaker 1>they're dangerous and so this is where we hear them

0:16:10.556 --> 0:16:13.596
<v Speaker 1>hiring consultants and other people to kind of inform them

0:16:13.596 --> 0:16:15.876
<v Speaker 1>about what their experiences like and how to quote, you know,

0:16:15.956 --> 0:16:20.316
<v Speaker 1>survive during their their sentence. So once you're up and

0:16:20.436 --> 0:16:22.836
<v Speaker 1>you have a couple of years sentence, you're you're not

0:16:22.956 --> 0:16:24.916
<v Speaker 1>going to a prison camp, which would be I think

0:16:24.956 --> 0:16:27.996
<v Speaker 1>what most people think of as the white collar prison. Yea.

0:16:28.156 --> 0:16:30.596
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're you're in oftentimes a medium security prison.

0:16:31.156 --> 0:16:33.516
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's it's not a pleasant place, I will say.

0:16:33.716 --> 0:16:37.436
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're loud, noisy, dirty, They're they're exactly what

0:16:37.476 --> 0:16:39.916
<v Speaker 1>people think. Who did you? Who did you? Who did

0:16:39.916 --> 0:16:41.596
<v Speaker 1>you visit? By the way, anybody I would have heard

0:16:41.636 --> 0:16:43.916
<v Speaker 1>of My first visit probably was one of the more

0:16:43.916 --> 0:16:47.436
<v Speaker 1>prominent Dennis Kolswalski, the former CEO of Tycho. I remember him, yep,

0:16:48.236 --> 0:16:50.636
<v Speaker 1>one of the most highest paid executives in the country.

0:16:50.996 --> 0:16:53.036
<v Speaker 1>A rock star by any account. I mean, he was

0:16:53.116 --> 0:16:56.596
<v Speaker 1>the next up and coming Jack Welch and uh yeah,

0:16:56.276 --> 0:16:58.916
<v Speaker 1>he was the first person that went from you know,

0:16:58.956 --> 0:17:01.276
<v Speaker 1>flying in a Gulf stream to you know, being in

0:17:01.436 --> 0:17:05.196
<v Speaker 1>actually a prison in upstate New York. Described visiting him.

0:17:05.236 --> 0:17:07.676
<v Speaker 1>What was it like? I was really nervous coming in.

0:17:07.676 --> 0:17:09.996
<v Speaker 1>I will say, it was this pretty off place and

0:17:10.556 --> 0:17:14.036
<v Speaker 1>there's you know, downs Koswalski there wearing a polo shirt.

0:17:14.436 --> 0:17:16.476
<v Speaker 1>The warden was kind enough to give us effectively a

0:17:16.556 --> 0:17:19.476
<v Speaker 1>lawyer visiting room, which sounds like it was nice. But

0:17:19.516 --> 0:17:21.676
<v Speaker 1>it had like a one of those flashing lights that

0:17:21.756 --> 0:17:25.116
<v Speaker 1>was like half flashing and it and it felt very

0:17:25.196 --> 0:17:29.356
<v Speaker 1>very small and again kind of dirty and cold. But

0:17:29.636 --> 0:17:33.116
<v Speaker 1>what was amazing is immediately I remember, you know, kind

0:17:33.156 --> 0:17:35.676
<v Speaker 1>of the I would say, almost the grace that mister

0:17:35.836 --> 0:17:39.356
<v Speaker 1>Kolzwalski had when we started the conversation. And I appreciate

0:17:39.436 --> 0:17:42.636
<v Speaker 1>how quickly people can evolve. You can go from flying

0:17:42.636 --> 0:17:46.116
<v Speaker 1>into G six to prison and it's not immediate, but

0:17:46.196 --> 0:17:49.036
<v Speaker 1>you learn how to evolve and adapt, and we're surprisingly

0:17:49.036 --> 0:17:53.356
<v Speaker 1>adaptable creatures. Did you go visit Bernie made Off? I

0:17:53.396 --> 0:17:56.516
<v Speaker 1>was never actually permitted by the prison. Every Wednesday night,

0:17:56.636 --> 0:17:58.996
<v Speaker 1>actually I would speak to him at seven pm in

0:17:59.036 --> 0:18:01.596
<v Speaker 1>my office. You would call collect my Harvard office and

0:18:01.596 --> 0:18:04.876
<v Speaker 1>we would speak and hundreds of pages of correspondence. What

0:18:04.916 --> 0:18:06.916
<v Speaker 1>did he want to talk about? Did he acknowledge that

0:18:06.956 --> 0:18:10.556
<v Speaker 1>he had done something wrong? Yes, he absolutely did admit

0:18:10.716 --> 0:18:13.596
<v Speaker 1>that he did something wrong, But he did have the

0:18:13.596 --> 0:18:18.836
<v Speaker 1>ability to rationalize and justify why the adverse impact that

0:18:18.876 --> 0:18:22.156
<v Speaker 1>that had on on so many victims was not what

0:18:22.276 --> 0:18:25.116
<v Speaker 1>people were making it out to be. I call he

0:18:25.116 --> 0:18:27.356
<v Speaker 1>had they put all their eggs in one basket. That's

0:18:27.396 --> 0:18:31.396
<v Speaker 1>like investing one on one failure. He had these interesting

0:18:31.396 --> 0:18:35.956
<v Speaker 1>ability to kind of explain or provide a different way

0:18:36.316 --> 0:18:41.316
<v Speaker 1>of seeing the world. Did he feel wronged? He would

0:18:41.316 --> 0:18:43.876
<v Speaker 1>have preferred obviously to not have been in prison. But

0:18:43.956 --> 0:18:47.036
<v Speaker 1>I think for a long time he thought that was

0:18:47.116 --> 0:18:48.596
<v Speaker 1>the end of the road. I mean, at some point

0:18:48.876 --> 0:18:52.356
<v Speaker 1>by its very nature, whether you know, he admitted it,

0:18:52.396 --> 0:18:55.436
<v Speaker 1>which is what he did, or he died and those

0:18:55.476 --> 0:18:58.956
<v Speaker 1>pieces would have been exposed, it was inevitable in some way,

0:18:59.076 --> 0:19:01.596
<v Speaker 1>and I think he knew that getting to know these people,

0:19:02.036 --> 0:19:04.196
<v Speaker 1>did you find the more you got to know them,

0:19:04.276 --> 0:19:07.876
<v Speaker 1>more sympathetic you were with their plight. I'm empathetic and

0:19:07.956 --> 0:19:10.636
<v Speaker 1>the basis of you know, this is not what they

0:19:10.676 --> 0:19:13.836
<v Speaker 1>wanted to have their career. And as I became a

0:19:13.916 --> 0:19:16.996
<v Speaker 1>husband and had some kids during the course of the project,

0:19:17.076 --> 0:19:19.596
<v Speaker 1>so you know, missing your kids growing up, that would matter.

0:19:20.196 --> 0:19:22.356
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, what they did deserve the

0:19:22.356 --> 0:19:25.636
<v Speaker 1>sanction that they're getting and it's harsh and it's difficult,

0:19:25.996 --> 0:19:29.596
<v Speaker 1>but that's what we demand. Did you have the sense

0:19:29.676 --> 0:19:31.836
<v Speaker 1>that in most cases these were not people who were

0:19:31.916 --> 0:19:36.036
<v Speaker 1>kind of born criminals, that they circumstances and their personality

0:19:36.076 --> 0:19:38.276
<v Speaker 1>had interacted in such a way they kind of found

0:19:38.276 --> 0:19:40.596
<v Speaker 1>themselves at the top of a slippery slope and slid down.

0:19:40.596 --> 0:19:43.676
<v Speaker 1>It exactly made off. I don't think he was a

0:19:43.716 --> 0:19:46.636
<v Speaker 1>born criminal. I think he had a lower ability to

0:19:46.676 --> 0:19:49.156
<v Speaker 1>empathize with others. So it's the extent that he found

0:19:49.196 --> 0:19:52.516
<v Speaker 1>himself in a position engaging in behavior that ultimately was

0:19:52.516 --> 0:19:55.476
<v Speaker 1>taking advantage of people. He didn't have the compunction to

0:19:55.956 --> 0:19:58.316
<v Speaker 1>stop in a way that maybe other people might may have.

0:19:58.796 --> 0:20:02.196
<v Speaker 1>But he was not destined to create a massive pyramid

0:20:02.236 --> 0:20:05.316
<v Speaker 1>scheme or Ponzi scheme. It just made a series of mistakes,

0:20:05.316 --> 0:20:07.876
<v Speaker 1>and rather than pulling back from those mistakes, he I

0:20:07.916 --> 0:20:10.156
<v Speaker 1>would say double down and triple down, and you know,

0:20:10.676 --> 0:20:12.556
<v Speaker 1>it starts as something much smaller and grows to something

0:20:12.676 --> 0:20:15.476
<v Speaker 1>much more significant, and often starts as something very legitimate.

0:20:16.316 --> 0:20:19.796
<v Speaker 1>I mean, a lot of great entrepreneurs start with creative

0:20:19.836 --> 0:20:22.796
<v Speaker 1>ideas that do push the bounds of law. We can

0:20:22.836 --> 0:20:25.196
<v Speaker 1>think of uber and airbeing b You know, they looked

0:20:25.236 --> 0:20:29.476
<v Speaker 1>at zoning laws, they looked at taxicab laws and thought

0:20:29.596 --> 0:20:33.596
<v Speaker 1>they're outdated, or they're antiquated, or they don't fit the

0:20:33.636 --> 0:20:35.796
<v Speaker 1>modern world. Just kind of ignoring them for a while

0:20:35.876 --> 0:20:38.876
<v Speaker 1>until quote the law catches up or you're able to

0:20:38.916 --> 0:20:41.836
<v Speaker 1>lobby and change them. Sometimes that works very well, and

0:20:41.916 --> 0:20:44.876
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it ends very badly. If you to get your

0:20:44.916 --> 0:20:47.756
<v Speaker 1>students in a room and say here's what you need

0:20:47.796 --> 0:20:52.956
<v Speaker 1>to watch for to prevent you becoming the next Bernie

0:20:52.996 --> 0:20:58.476
<v Speaker 1>made Off or whoever, what tips would you give them?

0:20:58.556 --> 0:21:01.356
<v Speaker 1>I've had sinstead of run into two issues and problems

0:21:01.436 --> 0:21:04.276
<v Speaker 1>later on. Who are savvy and smart and I think

0:21:04.316 --> 0:21:06.916
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful people by by all accounts from all my interactions.

0:21:07.676 --> 0:21:09.996
<v Speaker 1>We go through all the exercises, all do the training,

0:21:10.676 --> 0:21:13.436
<v Speaker 1>we all talk about how we're high integrity, moral people,

0:21:14.196 --> 0:21:16.196
<v Speaker 1>but we never really are able to step back and

0:21:16.196 --> 0:21:18.796
<v Speaker 1>look at our organizations and look at ourselves at what

0:21:18.876 --> 0:21:21.756
<v Speaker 1>I call it an unbiased way. Something that I always

0:21:21.756 --> 0:21:24.156
<v Speaker 1>struggled with is while I'm talking to people that are

0:21:24.156 --> 0:21:27.396
<v Speaker 1>literally sitting in prison, people were still reflecting how they

0:21:27.396 --> 0:21:32.476
<v Speaker 1>were high integrity. You know, businessmen or attorneys are entrepreneurs,

0:21:32.796 --> 0:21:35.436
<v Speaker 1>who made a mistake, but otherwise they're high integrity people.

0:21:36.236 --> 0:21:38.436
<v Speaker 1>And I always reflected, well, that's the same thing we

0:21:38.476 --> 0:21:40.716
<v Speaker 1>all do, you know if we you know, when we

0:21:40.756 --> 0:21:43.596
<v Speaker 1>make mistakes, it's not like we change our view of ourselves.

0:21:43.636 --> 0:21:46.116
<v Speaker 1>Why should we expect someone that does it one hundred

0:21:46.156 --> 0:21:49.356
<v Speaker 1>times more and would view it differently. And so humility,

0:21:50.276 --> 0:21:53.516
<v Speaker 1>I guess the characteristic that I'm most fearful of when

0:21:53.556 --> 0:21:58.636
<v Speaker 1>people are so confident in themselves that they can't see others.

0:21:58.636 --> 0:22:00.596
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to surround themselves by people who may

0:22:00.596 --> 0:22:04.316
<v Speaker 1>have different views and opinion because that isolation is what

0:22:04.396 --> 0:22:08.196
<v Speaker 1>leads to poor decision making. So it's interesting you're identifying

0:22:08.276 --> 0:22:11.196
<v Speaker 1>the condition in the person in the environment that might

0:22:11.276 --> 0:22:13.676
<v Speaker 1>lead to this sort of thing, lack of humility being

0:22:13.676 --> 0:22:17.996
<v Speaker 1>one of them. What else are there other signs that

0:22:18.036 --> 0:22:22.956
<v Speaker 1>this is like fertile ground for white collar crime. Individuals

0:22:22.956 --> 0:22:26.676
<v Speaker 1>can engage in almost a degree of mindlessness. They are

0:22:26.796 --> 0:22:31.876
<v Speaker 1>not internalizing the broader ramifications, the lack of a feeling

0:22:31.876 --> 0:22:34.756
<v Speaker 1>of harmfulness. And that's because most of the victims and

0:22:34.796 --> 0:22:38.036
<v Speaker 1>white color crimes are they're distant, they're morphous. I mean,

0:22:38.116 --> 0:22:41.196
<v Speaker 1>some crimes like insider training, we can't even identify the victim.

0:22:41.276 --> 0:22:44.236
<v Speaker 1>We say it's the interior the market. That's not something

0:22:44.276 --> 0:22:46.796
<v Speaker 1>that resonates in our gut, and so you can go

0:22:46.836 --> 0:22:51.556
<v Speaker 1>ahead with the decision without feeling it. Have you ever

0:22:51.636 --> 0:22:55.996
<v Speaker 1>had one of your students end up in jail? I

0:22:56.076 --> 0:22:59.556
<v Speaker 1>have had, I have had. It's one of the last

0:22:59.596 --> 0:23:03.316
<v Speaker 1>slides I actually show in my last last lecture. It's

0:23:03.316 --> 0:23:07.076
<v Speaker 1>a picture of the class cards of former Harvard Business

0:23:07.076 --> 0:23:10.036
<v Speaker 1>School students that are either currently or recently been in prison.

0:23:10.476 --> 0:23:13.076
<v Speaker 1>Roger cooped out, the former head of McKinsey, just skilling

0:23:13.076 --> 0:23:16.196
<v Speaker 1>the former CEO of Venron. But I make the point

0:23:16.436 --> 0:23:19.876
<v Speaker 1>that no one on their last day at HBS is

0:23:19.916 --> 0:23:23.636
<v Speaker 1>thinking of doing anything else but going out doing something productive.

0:23:24.316 --> 0:23:26.436
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's, you know, to change the world in some way.

0:23:26.476 --> 0:23:28.516
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they just want to make a lot of money.

0:23:28.556 --> 0:23:30.356
<v Speaker 1>But no one is ever thinking, you know what, I'm

0:23:30.356 --> 0:23:34.076
<v Speaker 1>gonna go out make a pile of money, change the world,

0:23:34.196 --> 0:23:35.836
<v Speaker 1>get on the cover of a magazine. You know what,

0:23:35.876 --> 0:23:37.636
<v Speaker 1>Then I'm going to try that. You know that wire

0:23:37.676 --> 0:23:40.916
<v Speaker 1>fraud that I heard about her engaging insider trading. No

0:23:40.956 --> 0:23:42.796
<v Speaker 1>one's ever thought that, right, But we look at the

0:23:42.876 --> 0:23:45.556
<v Speaker 1>data and we see people like Roger Coop. I mean,

0:23:45.916 --> 0:23:48.756
<v Speaker 1>he's as celebrated as you can get. I mean, you

0:23:48.756 --> 0:23:51.916
<v Speaker 1>don't become the managing director of McKinsey and Company by

0:23:52.156 --> 0:23:57.396
<v Speaker 1>being anything but a incredibly thoughtful, strategic, respected leader for

0:23:57.436 --> 0:24:01.156
<v Speaker 1>literally decades. And so to see someone of that position,

0:24:01.796 --> 0:24:04.996
<v Speaker 1>you know, literally twenty seconds after a Goldman sex board

0:24:05.076 --> 0:24:09.476
<v Speaker 1>meeting divulging information to a hedge fund. Some people think

0:24:09.516 --> 0:24:12.556
<v Speaker 1>of that as damning and just kind of indictment on business.

0:24:12.956 --> 0:24:15.796
<v Speaker 1>I actually look at the other way. That's humbling. To

0:24:15.836 --> 0:24:18.556
<v Speaker 1>see someone that we could rightfully respect in so many

0:24:18.596 --> 0:24:22.356
<v Speaker 1>ways do something that is so incredibly myoptic. Should make

0:24:22.396 --> 0:24:24.596
<v Speaker 1>us all sit down and think about ourselves and how

0:24:24.756 --> 0:24:29.556
<v Speaker 1>what limitations and capacity that we might make these simple

0:24:29.796 --> 0:24:32.956
<v Speaker 1>myopic decisions that have these extraordinary ramifications. Do you get

0:24:32.956 --> 0:24:35.636
<v Speaker 1>a sense that your students internalize this and are terrify

0:24:35.756 --> 0:24:37.556
<v Speaker 1>that it might happen to them. You see at the

0:24:37.556 --> 0:24:40.236
<v Speaker 1>wheels turning. And I've had a lot of i'll say, deep,

0:24:40.316 --> 0:24:44.316
<v Speaker 1>like heartheart conversations with students sometimes of facing difficult decisions

0:24:44.316 --> 0:24:48.156
<v Speaker 1>and trade offs. I've seen many instances. Now I don't

0:24:48.156 --> 0:24:51.236
<v Speaker 1>want to call it crime in progress, but people getting

0:24:51.236 --> 0:24:54.716
<v Speaker 1>into situations that, depending on how it goes, are going

0:24:54.756 --> 0:24:59.116
<v Speaker 1>to go from a tough business decision to potentially books

0:24:59.116 --> 0:25:01.836
<v Speaker 1>and records kind of like called regulatory violation too. If

0:25:01.876 --> 0:25:04.876
<v Speaker 1>that continues down the same slippery slope, it's going to

0:25:04.916 --> 0:25:07.916
<v Speaker 1>turn to something that a prosecutor would become interested in.

0:25:08.236 --> 0:25:10.156
<v Speaker 1>What do you think it is about American culture that

0:25:10.236 --> 0:25:15.036
<v Speaker 1>has encouraged the prosecution of white color crime. I think

0:25:15.036 --> 0:25:17.676
<v Speaker 1>there is something as people become more and more powerful

0:25:17.716 --> 0:25:21.476
<v Speaker 1>in companies, become more and more powerful, the desire to

0:25:21.996 --> 0:25:27.036
<v Speaker 1>hold those an account, which I believe is only appropriate.

0:25:27.076 --> 0:25:31.156
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's a byproduct of inequality. Yeah, I'm playing

0:25:31.156 --> 0:25:33.556
<v Speaker 1>by the rules and you're not, and you're getting something

0:25:33.596 --> 0:25:36.476
<v Speaker 1>because of that. This is probably like wild West justice too.

0:25:36.476 --> 0:25:39.276
<v Speaker 1>It's like cheating at cards. We might all be equal

0:25:39.316 --> 0:25:41.116
<v Speaker 1>at the card table, but if you see someone cheating

0:25:41.116 --> 0:25:44.356
<v Speaker 1>and you take you know, they take your chips from you,

0:25:44.356 --> 0:25:46.196
<v Speaker 1>you know you're gonna you know, this is like you

0:25:46.236 --> 0:25:49.876
<v Speaker 1>take them out back. This is the more civilized professional

0:25:49.916 --> 0:25:52.396
<v Speaker 1>form with our institutions. We want to hold people to

0:25:52.476 --> 0:25:54.676
<v Speaker 1>account that cheat and deceive us, because in the end,

0:25:54.716 --> 0:25:57.716
<v Speaker 1>what is what color or crime about? It's about deception.

0:25:57.836 --> 0:26:00.556
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's at the heart of everything you deceive me,

0:26:00.876 --> 0:26:03.196
<v Speaker 1>and because of that you should be held to account.

0:26:06.316 --> 0:26:08.636
<v Speaker 1>After a break, Eugene Soltis and I talk about the

0:26:08.676 --> 0:26:11.676
<v Speaker 1>worst or of any white color convicts life, and it's

0:26:11.836 --> 0:26:14.356
<v Speaker 1>not the year they get convicted and go to prison.

0:26:22.636 --> 0:26:25.676
<v Speaker 1>I'm back with Eugene Saltis, the author of Why They

0:26:25.796 --> 0:26:28.716
<v Speaker 1>Do It Inside the Mind of the White Collar Criminal.

0:26:29.316 --> 0:26:31.716
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any sense of what happens to white

0:26:31.756 --> 0:26:34.356
<v Speaker 1>collar criminals once they get out of jail? Like, how

0:26:34.356 --> 0:26:38.076
<v Speaker 1>do they get on with their lives? It's hard having

0:26:38.116 --> 0:26:41.476
<v Speaker 1>a felony conviction, a criminal conviction on your record changes

0:26:41.516 --> 0:26:44.716
<v Speaker 1>your life. One thing I've observed is they're married, they

0:26:44.716 --> 0:26:47.476
<v Speaker 1>have kids. While they're going through the trial, everything is

0:26:47.476 --> 0:26:51.196
<v Speaker 1>held together. Failing this family grows stronger. I actually came

0:26:51.236 --> 0:26:53.196
<v Speaker 1>to admire many of their relationships I saw with their

0:26:53.196 --> 0:26:55.636
<v Speaker 1>family while they're in prison. And then what happens they

0:26:55.716 --> 0:26:58.476
<v Speaker 1>leave prison in a year later, it all falls apart.

0:26:59.196 --> 0:27:02.636
<v Speaker 1>Almost everyone I see getting divorced. It's not because the

0:27:02.916 --> 0:27:06.476
<v Speaker 1>spouse is not supportive. But you're frustrated because you say,

0:27:06.716 --> 0:27:09.156
<v Speaker 1>I did my time, I paid the cost that I

0:27:09.196 --> 0:27:11.356
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to. Why can't I move on with my life,

0:27:11.356 --> 0:27:14.196
<v Speaker 1>and you realize your friends don't want to associate with you.

0:27:14.196 --> 0:27:16.676
<v Speaker 1>You can't get a job, you can't do a lot

0:27:16.676 --> 0:27:19.196
<v Speaker 1>of things actually, once you have a criminal conviction, and

0:27:19.276 --> 0:27:22.636
<v Speaker 1>that's incredibly frustrating to especially type A people who want

0:27:22.636 --> 0:27:24.516
<v Speaker 1>to go forward and if you're you know, you're forty

0:27:24.556 --> 0:27:25.996
<v Speaker 1>and you're right and move on forty five right and

0:27:26.076 --> 0:27:28.716
<v Speaker 1>move on, you can't. So there's two groups. There's the

0:27:28.716 --> 0:27:30.436
<v Speaker 1>one group that has a lot of money still left

0:27:30.476 --> 0:27:32.596
<v Speaker 1>even after they paid all the lawyer bills and all.

0:27:33.236 --> 0:27:35.956
<v Speaker 1>You become an entrepreneur because you're not beholding anyone, so

0:27:35.996 --> 0:27:38.796
<v Speaker 1>you can reinvent yourself. There's a second group that if

0:27:38.876 --> 0:27:42.636
<v Speaker 1>sometimes will find I will say the Middle East, sometimes

0:27:42.636 --> 0:27:44.556
<v Speaker 1>Southeast Asia, but I've seen quite a few people going

0:27:44.596 --> 0:27:47.916
<v Speaker 1>to the Middle East or other jurisdictions in Asia where,

0:27:48.436 --> 0:27:50.716
<v Speaker 1>if anything, you had a criminal conviction. But then you

0:27:50.996 --> 0:27:55.276
<v Speaker 1>describe the improper American justice system, people say, yes, you know,

0:27:55.316 --> 0:27:58.076
<v Speaker 1>they kind of agree that that's you know, those crazy Americans,

0:27:58.116 --> 0:28:01.396
<v Speaker 1>and you you kind of reinvent yourself overseas where you

0:28:01.396 --> 0:28:05.036
<v Speaker 1>don't have those same limitations. So the pattern is their

0:28:05.076 --> 0:28:07.836
<v Speaker 1>marriages and families stick together while they're in jail and

0:28:07.876 --> 0:28:10.396
<v Speaker 1>they get out, they fall apart, moved asia. Yeah, but

0:28:10.596 --> 0:28:12.236
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a good, good way of putting it.

0:28:12.316 --> 0:28:15.316
<v Speaker 1>The hardest people actually are people that are younger like FTX,

0:28:15.476 --> 0:28:18.396
<v Speaker 1>like Sam Bankman freed, He's thirty years old and faces

0:28:18.836 --> 0:28:21.916
<v Speaker 1>jail time. Can you think of analogies to him? I mean,

0:28:21.956 --> 0:28:24.756
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Holmes. A lot of the cases you don't hear

0:28:24.756 --> 0:28:27.396
<v Speaker 1>about when you see the article. I'll say of the

0:28:27.436 --> 0:28:30.036
<v Speaker 1>trader that is at a you know, the Goldman sachs

0:28:30.156 --> 0:28:33.876
<v Speaker 1>Or or JP Morgan who's a vice president who had

0:28:33.916 --> 0:28:35.756
<v Speaker 1>a cousin play some trades, and you have an insider

0:28:35.796 --> 0:28:38.476
<v Speaker 1>training charge, I mean you're making a couple hundred thousand

0:28:38.476 --> 0:28:40.396
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year. I mean these are lower key cases

0:28:40.436 --> 0:28:43.796
<v Speaker 1>than than than SPF. But you know, what do you

0:28:43.796 --> 0:28:46.676
<v Speaker 1>do even to plead guilty with a reasonable lawyer, you're

0:28:46.716 --> 0:28:49.356
<v Speaker 1>going to spend a million dollars or more. What do

0:28:49.396 --> 0:28:51.356
<v Speaker 1>you do after, you know, and you go to prison

0:28:51.396 --> 0:28:53.556
<v Speaker 1>for you know, six months or a year. No one

0:28:53.596 --> 0:28:55.916
<v Speaker 1>will hire you. You don't have enough money to create

0:28:55.956 --> 0:28:58.916
<v Speaker 1>your own business. That's hard. What you're saying is our

0:28:58.996 --> 0:29:02.596
<v Speaker 1>society judges you by the worst thing you did once

0:29:02.636 --> 0:29:04.076
<v Speaker 1>you have a criminal record. I mean, this is the

0:29:04.116 --> 0:29:05.916
<v Speaker 1>same thing if you have a low level drug offense

0:29:05.916 --> 0:29:08.716
<v Speaker 1>when you were you know, nineteen, or we're talking you know,

0:29:08.796 --> 0:29:11.756
<v Speaker 1>a trade or a bank. You don't get to participate

0:29:11.796 --> 0:29:15.076
<v Speaker 1>in insociety in the same way anymore, which is brutal.

0:29:16.276 --> 0:29:21.516
<v Speaker 1>So Sam Bankman freed, play out various futures for him.

0:29:22.236 --> 0:29:25.116
<v Speaker 1>You said, there are two narratives, the two narratives that

0:29:25.116 --> 0:29:27.116
<v Speaker 1>will be spun basically in the courtroom, one by the

0:29:27.156 --> 0:29:30.196
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors and one by the defense. One of the narratives

0:29:30.236 --> 0:29:32.756
<v Speaker 1>is that it's is a criminal conspiracy from the start,

0:29:32.796 --> 0:29:35.596
<v Speaker 1>and this is a born criminal. And the other narrative

0:29:35.676 --> 0:29:38.756
<v Speaker 1>is this is something that it was an accident. Some

0:29:38.876 --> 0:29:42.676
<v Speaker 1>kids got sloppy and they kind of should be forgiven

0:29:42.676 --> 0:29:45.436
<v Speaker 1>and understood. If you want to create like White called

0:29:45.436 --> 0:29:47.716
<v Speaker 1>the perfect white collar crime, and this is I should

0:29:47.756 --> 0:29:49.556
<v Speaker 1>be very clear, not what we teach in class. But

0:29:50.436 --> 0:29:53.676
<v Speaker 1>you don't create any written records. This is what prosecutors use.

0:29:53.716 --> 0:29:57.236
<v Speaker 1>You look at emails, you look at you know, transcripts

0:29:57.236 --> 0:30:00.956
<v Speaker 1>of phone calls. There's actual evidence there. And so the

0:30:01.236 --> 0:30:04.236
<v Speaker 1>perfect white collar criminal the prosecutors have to rely on.

0:30:04.476 --> 0:30:06.796
<v Speaker 1>He said, she said, where you get other people to

0:30:06.796 --> 0:30:10.316
<v Speaker 1>turn and they try to recall conversation, and then the

0:30:10.356 --> 0:30:13.236
<v Speaker 1>defense cast out about the quality of those witnesses, those

0:30:13.276 --> 0:30:17.596
<v Speaker 1>cooperating witnesses. I think what's really difficult in the case

0:30:17.636 --> 0:30:21.316
<v Speaker 1>of you know, FTX is I mean there's lengthy in

0:30:21.396 --> 0:30:24.716
<v Speaker 1>well documented pieces of information. I mean this has also

0:30:24.756 --> 0:30:26.996
<v Speaker 1>look at the speed of the indictment which it came down.

0:30:27.396 --> 0:30:30.836
<v Speaker 1>I think prosecutors feel very confident and you know, I

0:30:30.836 --> 0:30:33.316
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's one council in the entire world that

0:30:33.316 --> 0:30:37.156
<v Speaker 1>would suggest defending yourself and I'll say the public court

0:30:37.356 --> 0:30:40.276
<v Speaker 1>while you're going through will help your case. You're talking

0:30:40.316 --> 0:30:43.196
<v Speaker 1>about Sam Bankman Freed actually talking to journalists while he's

0:30:43.236 --> 0:30:46.436
<v Speaker 1>going through this. Ye talking, yes, you know, well well

0:30:46.436 --> 0:30:49.396
<v Speaker 1>respected writers. Yes, But unfortunately, I think this is what

0:30:49.436 --> 0:30:51.316
<v Speaker 1>happens when you're criminally indicted. You get your time in

0:30:51.396 --> 0:30:54.156
<v Speaker 1>court to explain why that's wrong, and then if you're

0:30:54.196 --> 0:30:56.116
<v Speaker 1>not convicted, you get to then you know, write a

0:30:56.116 --> 0:30:59.596
<v Speaker 1>book and like some people, then explain why prosecutors are

0:30:59.636 --> 0:31:03.276
<v Speaker 1>wrong too. But doing it in real time that's just dangerous. Yeah,

0:31:04.476 --> 0:31:07.476
<v Speaker 1>So my view, if prosecutors are not able to make

0:31:07.516 --> 0:31:10.076
<v Speaker 1>at least one count. I would be pretty shocked actually,

0:31:10.276 --> 0:31:14.116
<v Speaker 1>just given with the volume misinformation and frankly they you

0:31:14.196 --> 0:31:17.436
<v Speaker 1>can see prosecutors Off have been very vocal and there's

0:31:17.476 --> 0:31:20.236
<v Speaker 1>already well known that there are other prominent individuals that

0:31:20.236 --> 0:31:24.836
<v Speaker 1>were around him that are cooperating, even with the best counsel.

0:31:25.516 --> 0:31:28.436
<v Speaker 1>That's a high bar to surmount as a defense. So

0:31:28.476 --> 0:31:30.556
<v Speaker 1>you go to prison. I mean, I think the question

0:31:30.596 --> 0:31:34.036
<v Speaker 1>is how long. We're talking like, you know, not six

0:31:34.076 --> 0:31:35.996
<v Speaker 1>months in prisoner or a year. I mean, you're looking

0:31:36.076 --> 0:31:39.916
<v Speaker 1>like a life sentence. That's scary. The reason why most

0:31:39.916 --> 0:31:41.996
<v Speaker 1>people don't go to court and put this in front

0:31:42.036 --> 0:31:44.596
<v Speaker 1>of a jury is you're literally looking at, you know,

0:31:44.796 --> 0:31:47.516
<v Speaker 1>theoretically one hundred years in prison. What kind of deal

0:31:47.596 --> 0:31:51.036
<v Speaker 1>do you imagine a prosecutor might offer him? I will say,

0:31:51.076 --> 0:31:55.876
<v Speaker 1>what makes this case so extraordinary is I mean again,

0:31:55.916 --> 0:31:59.316
<v Speaker 1>and this is the simplification, but you have one entity

0:31:59.596 --> 0:32:02.076
<v Speaker 1>that's independent from another entity in ten billion dollars of

0:32:02.076 --> 0:32:05.836
<v Speaker 1>customer money transferred. That's extraordinary. I mean I will say

0:32:05.876 --> 0:32:09.036
<v Speaker 1>that that pales in comparison anything made Off did. If

0:32:09.236 --> 0:32:11.236
<v Speaker 1>you take that simple story, I mean, that would be

0:32:11.236 --> 0:32:13.436
<v Speaker 1>an equivalent of you know, an owner of fidelity, like

0:32:13.476 --> 0:32:16.716
<v Speaker 1>the Johnson family transferring it to some other company they own,

0:32:16.876 --> 0:32:19.756
<v Speaker 1>like ten billion dollars. I mean, you don't that doesn't happen,

0:32:20.196 --> 0:32:23.556
<v Speaker 1>But it did. There's a million individual claimates. And so

0:32:23.676 --> 0:32:26.956
<v Speaker 1>I think in the case for prosecutors, they think about victims.

0:32:27.076 --> 0:32:29.876
<v Speaker 1>You have literally a million victims. You make, you know,

0:32:29.916 --> 0:32:32.596
<v Speaker 1>eighty thousand hours a year, you lost thirty in FTX.

0:32:33.436 --> 0:32:35.836
<v Speaker 1>You kind of want blood, so to speak. Yep, And

0:32:35.916 --> 0:32:38.236
<v Speaker 1>so I think even the deal that they would offer

0:32:38.276 --> 0:32:40.836
<v Speaker 1>would be something that would have looked so unpalallable. You

0:32:40.836 --> 0:32:44.076
<v Speaker 1>know we're gonna offer you. I'll just say ten to twenty.

0:32:44.156 --> 0:32:47.436
<v Speaker 1>He's thirty, thirty thirty, Yeah, I mean you're gonna be

0:32:47.476 --> 0:32:49.676
<v Speaker 1>in your mid forties. You think some reason that you

0:32:49.676 --> 0:32:52.396
<v Speaker 1>can avoid that. I will say, I don't see that

0:32:52.436 --> 0:32:55.716
<v Speaker 1>being possible here. So, if you're a betting man, you're

0:32:55.756 --> 0:32:58.716
<v Speaker 1>betting he's going to jail for a long time. I'm

0:32:58.756 --> 0:33:00.356
<v Speaker 1>betting he's going to be in prison for a while.

0:33:00.796 --> 0:33:03.316
<v Speaker 1>If you had had Sam Bankman freed as a student,

0:33:04.516 --> 0:33:06.076
<v Speaker 1>and you had a time machine, so you had a

0:33:06.116 --> 0:33:08.156
<v Speaker 1>sense that he was going to be facing these temptations

0:33:08.236 --> 0:33:14.356
<v Speaker 1>or difficulties, what would you have told him, what advice

0:33:14.356 --> 0:33:16.076
<v Speaker 1>would you have given him that would have kept him

0:33:16.076 --> 0:33:20.956
<v Speaker 1>out of trouble? So I wish the entire team would

0:33:20.956 --> 0:33:23.036
<v Speaker 1>have spent a month with us, let's say our first

0:33:23.076 --> 0:33:28.516
<v Speaker 1>month of HBS, let's say, doing some basic business internal controls, governance,

0:33:28.756 --> 0:33:32.916
<v Speaker 1>risk management, the kind of things that clearly lacked. If

0:33:32.916 --> 0:33:34.436
<v Speaker 1>I gave them a month of what I called the

0:33:34.436 --> 0:33:36.956
<v Speaker 1>basics and then they went ahead and did what's alleged,

0:33:37.836 --> 0:33:40.156
<v Speaker 1>then I know which story it is. They ignored that

0:33:40.316 --> 0:33:42.796
<v Speaker 1>and they went ahead, but to the extent that they

0:33:42.796 --> 0:33:47.076
<v Speaker 1>were genuinely so ignorant, there's a cost associate with that,

0:33:47.116 --> 0:33:50.516
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's a an appropriate set of sanctions,

0:33:50.596 --> 0:33:53.036
<v Speaker 1>but it's a very different set of root causes and

0:33:53.316 --> 0:33:56.916
<v Speaker 1>how I would think about their actions and their shortcomings

0:33:56.916 --> 0:34:00.876
<v Speaker 1>as business leaders. Can you think of another white collar

0:34:01.076 --> 0:34:04.836
<v Speaker 1>case like this? One of the questions I look at

0:34:05.116 --> 0:34:08.676
<v Speaker 1>this case and I really struggle with is that, you know,

0:34:08.716 --> 0:34:12.796
<v Speaker 1>there's a million individual claimants that lost money and and

0:34:12.956 --> 0:34:15.476
<v Speaker 1>feel that they've been defrauded. The question so why did

0:34:15.476 --> 0:34:17.916
<v Speaker 1>they trust to put their money into FDx given how

0:34:17.916 --> 0:34:21.076
<v Speaker 1>little governance there was? And we go, well, let's look back.

0:34:21.436 --> 0:34:24.716
<v Speaker 1>FTX was extraordinarily well funded. It was funded by i'll

0:34:24.756 --> 0:34:27.316
<v Speaker 1>say many of our former students that work at well

0:34:27.316 --> 0:34:31.636
<v Speaker 1>known venture capital shops and endowments and other organizations who

0:34:31.676 --> 0:34:33.716
<v Speaker 1>put money in. And this came out very much in

0:34:33.756 --> 0:34:36.596
<v Speaker 1>theanois as well. Put in hundreds of millions of dollars

0:34:36.636 --> 0:34:40.676
<v Speaker 1>with limited to oftentimes summonance, is no due diligence. It's

0:34:40.716 --> 0:34:42.276
<v Speaker 1>kind of the FOMO. They didn't want to miss out

0:34:42.476 --> 0:34:44.876
<v Speaker 1>those homes. Literally, it was well known was turning down

0:34:44.916 --> 0:34:47.196
<v Speaker 1>money if people ask questions. So you throw a one

0:34:47.236 --> 0:34:49.676
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars in or two hundred million in for

0:34:49.716 --> 0:34:52.316
<v Speaker 1>a venture capital company to write off two hundred million,

0:34:52.316 --> 0:34:54.876
<v Speaker 1>which is what they've all done. Frankly, isn't that big

0:34:54.916 --> 0:34:56.196
<v Speaker 1>of a deal. I mean, that's part of the risk

0:34:56.236 --> 0:34:59.156
<v Speaker 1>business they're in. But the challenge we face right now

0:34:59.236 --> 0:35:02.116
<v Speaker 1>is by all those venture capital companies and endowments and

0:35:02.116 --> 0:35:04.996
<v Speaker 1>other organizations putting in hundreds of millions of dollars each

0:35:04.996 --> 0:35:08.516
<v Speaker 1>into enterprises with little due diligence, what do they do?

0:35:08.636 --> 0:35:13.316
<v Speaker 1>They actively create credibility for an organization like FTX, and

0:35:13.316 --> 0:35:15.836
<v Speaker 1>then a million people rush and put money in and

0:35:15.996 --> 0:35:19.116
<v Speaker 1>really no one's watching the shop and actually helping a

0:35:19.116 --> 0:35:21.196
<v Speaker 1>company like FTX grow up, which is what could have

0:35:21.236 --> 0:35:26.196
<v Speaker 1>prevented this. We have money throwed young entrepreneurs that may

0:35:26.196 --> 0:35:29.236
<v Speaker 1>not have experience or knowledge, and then what happens at

0:35:29.236 --> 0:35:32.636
<v Speaker 1>the end the investors, institutional investors can write that off

0:35:32.676 --> 0:35:34.316
<v Speaker 1>and it's not that big of a deal, and then

0:35:34.316 --> 0:35:37.276
<v Speaker 1>you have a million individual investors that feel deceived by

0:35:37.276 --> 0:35:39.876
<v Speaker 1>the system. And this is why I think people are

0:35:39.916 --> 0:35:42.556
<v Speaker 1>critical about business. Why they're critical about places like Harvard

0:35:42.596 --> 0:35:46.316
<v Speaker 1>Business School is because they don't think business is looking

0:35:46.316 --> 0:35:48.516
<v Speaker 1>out for them. And this is exactly what makes people,

0:35:48.876 --> 0:35:51.476
<v Speaker 1>I think a purporately cynical of kind of business is

0:35:51.956 --> 0:35:54.036
<v Speaker 1>it looks like people are just making money and kind

0:35:54.076 --> 0:35:58.516
<v Speaker 1>of gambling when it has real consequences on unreal people. Eugene,

0:35:58.556 --> 0:36:07.436
<v Speaker 1>this was great. Absolutely. Eugene salt Us is a professor

0:36:07.476 --> 0:36:10.716
<v Speaker 1>of business administration at Harvard Business School and the author

0:36:10.756 --> 0:36:13.756
<v Speaker 1>of Why They Do It Inside the Mind of the

0:36:13.756 --> 0:36:17.676
<v Speaker 1>White Collar Criminal. Let's end today by answering a question

0:36:17.716 --> 0:36:19.596
<v Speaker 1>from one of our listeners, or maybe more than one.

0:36:20.156 --> 0:36:25.196
<v Speaker 1>Here's the first, Jake, who asks, how do you think

0:36:25.196 --> 0:36:28.676
<v Speaker 1>of the informative aspects of your books? Do you view

0:36:28.716 --> 0:36:31.196
<v Speaker 1>it as a dual purpose along with your broader goal

0:36:31.236 --> 0:36:34.596
<v Speaker 1>of building a large, broader narrative. Is it an ends

0:36:34.636 --> 0:36:36.516
<v Speaker 1>to the means to be able to have the reader

0:36:36.596 --> 0:36:38.996
<v Speaker 1>understand the story or do you see it as the

0:36:39.036 --> 0:36:42.956
<v Speaker 1>core of your works? First off, I don't break it

0:36:42.996 --> 0:36:46.356
<v Speaker 1>down quite like that. I don't think, oh, I'm going

0:36:46.396 --> 0:36:49.476
<v Speaker 1>to inform the reader about credit default swaps or baseball

0:36:49.516 --> 0:36:55.236
<v Speaker 1>statistics or cryptocurrency. What happens is there's an idea, or

0:36:55.276 --> 0:36:58.396
<v Speaker 1>there's a character, or there's both that I become really

0:36:58.436 --> 0:37:01.956
<v Speaker 1>interested in, and I realize that I can't get the

0:37:02.076 --> 0:37:06.436
<v Speaker 1>character or the idea cross without informing the reader more

0:37:06.636 --> 0:37:11.156
<v Speaker 1>about this or that. So the characters in The Big Short,

0:37:11.996 --> 0:37:15.436
<v Speaker 1>they were obsessed with the rigging of Wall Street and

0:37:15.476 --> 0:37:18.556
<v Speaker 1>the crashing of the American financial system, and that involve

0:37:19.356 --> 0:37:23.236
<v Speaker 1>some really technical financial instruments that they got very obsessed with.

0:37:23.676 --> 0:37:26.236
<v Speaker 1>So the reader had to understand them in order to

0:37:26.356 --> 0:37:31.636
<v Speaker 1>understand the character. The same is true of you know,

0:37:31.636 --> 0:37:33.916
<v Speaker 1>if I'm writing about Sam Bankman Freed, It's very hard

0:37:33.956 --> 0:37:36.796
<v Speaker 1>to do that and engage the reader in the way

0:37:36.796 --> 0:37:39.676
<v Speaker 1>I need to engage the reader unless they understand, at

0:37:39.756 --> 0:37:43.396
<v Speaker 1>least with Sam Bankman Freed understands crypto to be and

0:37:43.476 --> 0:37:46.036
<v Speaker 1>some other things. So you know, it's just sort of

0:37:46.076 --> 0:37:49.516
<v Speaker 1>like when you're entering into the world of another person.

0:37:50.236 --> 0:37:52.956
<v Speaker 1>There's sometimes some complicated things about that world that need

0:37:52.996 --> 0:37:57.876
<v Speaker 1>to be explained, and I try to explain them in

0:37:57.916 --> 0:38:00.836
<v Speaker 1>a way that doesn't disrupt the reader's pleasure in the narrative.

0:38:01.236 --> 0:38:04.676
<v Speaker 1>It's funny when I'm thinking about how to do that,

0:38:04.716 --> 0:38:07.836
<v Speaker 1>I think my mother needs to understand this. And the

0:38:07.876 --> 0:38:10.516
<v Speaker 1>funny thing about that my mother doesn't read my books,

0:38:10.636 --> 0:38:13.836
<v Speaker 1>but I still have that thought in my head. So anyway,

0:38:13.876 --> 0:38:16.476
<v Speaker 1>I hope that answer your questions and happy to take

0:38:16.556 --> 0:38:21.996
<v Speaker 1>more down the road. Thank you. If you have a question,

0:38:22.116 --> 0:38:24.116
<v Speaker 1>let me know, just write me by clicking the link

0:38:24.156 --> 0:38:29.476
<v Speaker 1>in our show notes or visiting ATR podcast dot com.

0:38:29.516 --> 0:38:34.476
<v Speaker 1>That's atr podcast dot com. On Background is hosted by

0:38:34.516 --> 0:38:38.116
<v Speaker 1>me Michael Lewis and produced by Katherine Girardot and Lydia

0:38:38.196 --> 0:38:42.836
<v Speaker 1>Jane Cott. Our editor is Julia Barton. Our engineer is

0:38:42.876 --> 0:38:47.076
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Brugere. Our show is recorded by Tofa Ruth at

0:38:47.076 --> 0:38:51.476
<v Speaker 1>Berkeley Advanced Media Studios. Our music was composed by Matthias

0:38:51.476 --> 0:38:55.236
<v Speaker 1>Bossy and John Evans of Stellwagon Symphonette. My old friend

0:38:55.356 --> 0:38:59.156
<v Speaker 1>Nick Brittell composed our theme song. On Background is a

0:38:59.156 --> 0:39:04.236
<v Speaker 1>production of Pushkin Industries. Define more Pushkin podcasts, listen on

0:39:04.276 --> 0:39:08.476
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:39:09.196 --> 0:39:11.356
<v Speaker 1>and if you'd like to listen to add free and

0:39:11.516 --> 0:39:15.076
<v Speaker 1>learn about other exclusive offerings. Don't forget to sign up

0:39:15.116 --> 0:39:19.916
<v Speaker 1>for a Pushkin Plus subscription at pushkin dot fm, backslash Plus,

0:39:20.716 --> 0:39:22.156
<v Speaker 1>or on our Apple show page.