Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom much. It's the day before
Speaker 1: the election. Let's talk about it. Kamala's COMI commercial, my
Speaker 1: big prediction for how this is gonna go. New York
Speaker 1: City and other places preparing for an election apocalypse, and
Speaker 1: Lady Gaga goes fake redneck. This is the Buck Sexon Show,
Speaker 1: where the mission or mission is to decode what really
Speaker 1: matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake, you're a great American. Again,
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexon Show begins. He's a great guy. No,
Speaker 1: Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. Friends. We are almost there.
Speaker 1: It's been quite a journey together. It's been something that
Speaker 1: we've all been preparing for weeks and months now. We
Speaker 1: knew it would be here. And just know that it's
Speaker 1: all going to be over soon one way or another.
Speaker 1: At least the election day will be over soon. I
Speaker 1: can't tell you that the election will end on the
Speaker 1: same in the same way. And I'll tell you some
Speaker 1: broad dynamics that I see playing out right now. It's
Speaker 1: all tightening toward Trump. M what a surprise, all of
Speaker 1: a sudden. Any poll that's going to show whether somebody
Speaker 1: was right or wrong is starting to head you a
Speaker 1: bit and starting to head more toward the Trumpster. Isn't
Speaker 1: that fascinating? Why would that be the case? You mean
Speaker 1: that some of the polling organizations out there that want
Speaker 1: to make sure that their numbers because it's like free
Speaker 1: advertising for them, are cited by the New York Times,
Speaker 1: or they want to please the people paying for the polls.
Speaker 1: In the case of some of these media organizations right there,
Speaker 1: the upside is always to give people weeks out from
Speaker 1: the election and what they want when it comes to
Speaker 1: these polls, You tell them what they want to hear,
Speaker 1: and then as it gets closer, for reasons of professional reputation,
Speaker 1: you might decide that you're going to switch things up
Speaker 1: a bit. You might decide at that point, Yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: so it's really going to be a toss up between
Speaker 1: Trump and Biden. And that is what we are seeing
Speaker 1: a lot of phrases slipped into this polling analysis out
Speaker 1: there that if you remember, i mean a month ago,
Speaker 1: three or four weeks ago, even two weeks ago, if
Speaker 1: you looked at this, Biden was a Biden looked like
Speaker 1: it was going to be a walk in the park
Speaker 1: win for him. Now I didn't believe that, you didn't
Speaker 1: believe that, but that's what the data was telling us,
Speaker 1: that's what the pollsters were all suggesting. What the heck
Speaker 1: was that all about. I think we're going to see
Speaker 1: polsters joined journalists and fact checkers as professions that well
Speaker 1: informed people do not trust. Doesn't mean that there are
Speaker 1: no good people in those professions, but they're professions where
Speaker 1: there's a lot of dishonesty. I remember the nineties when
Speaker 1: everybody used to make lawyer jokes. That kind of fell
Speaker 1: out of fashion. But there are a lot of lawyer
Speaker 1: jokes in the nineties, in part because of the explosion
Speaker 1: of frivolous lawsuits and all the different ways that ambulance chasing,
Speaker 1: slip and fall attorney types were out there making millions.
Speaker 1: Oh and then John Edwards, for example, became almost President
Speaker 1: of the United States as one of those guys. So,
Speaker 1: you know, you look at the way that professions can
Speaker 1: change over time, the way that people's sense of whether
Speaker 1: they can trust somebody. I think pollsters are going to
Speaker 1: be something that we have to consider whether or not
Speaker 1: they're really for these kinds of things, pulling about whether
Speaker 1: people like cooker Pepsi's sure I believe they can give
Speaker 1: you a pretty good snapshot of that. But just like
Speaker 1: everything else, whether it's sports or comedy, now polls are politicized.
Speaker 1: That's what we're like. Go now, this could be untrue.
Speaker 1: We could end up seeing that the Polsers nail at
Speaker 1: this year. But even if they all stay within the
Speaker 1: margin of error and they're correct, if they're all in
Speaker 1: the margin of error favoring Biden, that this thesis still
Speaker 1: holds up. Let's get away from the Polsers. I actually
Speaker 1: know it. A couple more things. Got a seven or
Speaker 1: eight point lead in Iowa for Trump, and I'll just
Speaker 1: go on the record. Now here's what I'm feeling. And
Speaker 1: you know that one of my mantras, one of my predictions,
Speaker 1: is that nobody can predict the future, and always be
Speaker 1: cautious about believing anybody can. But you can establish trends,
Speaker 1: you can analyze data and extrapolate and come to conclusions,
Speaker 1: and then you should always test and retest and see
Speaker 1: if you're correct. I think I believe. I can't say
Speaker 1: I know, but I feel very strong that Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is going to win this election. He's going to win.
Speaker 1: I do not believe it will be a landslide for him.
Speaker 1: I think the fact that he could win even or
Speaker 1: that if he does win, given what the country has
Speaker 1: gone through with COVID, it'll be almost feel like a
Speaker 1: miracle because this has been the biggest gift to the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party. Is the misery, despair, and destruction, all the
Speaker 1: losses that we have suffered during COVID is politically a
Speaker 1: huge let's just call it what it is, a huge
Speaker 1: advantage for Democrats. Trump running against Biden twelve months ago
Speaker 1: would have been laughable. And that's what he should have
Speaker 1: been able to do, because the Trump economy and the
Speaker 1: Trump approach to governance was bearing so much fruit for
Speaker 1: all of us, including the psycho Libs who hate him.
Speaker 1: The country was at peace, the country was prosperous. And
Speaker 1: if you would had this election twelve months ago, I
Speaker 1: firmly believe that you would be talking about Trump not
Speaker 1: only running the table in the industrial Midwest Michigan, Wisconsin.
Speaker 1: I do think he'd pick off Minnesota. I do think
Speaker 1: he would he would win a few of those states
Speaker 1: that are lean blue. You know, maybe maybe even Colorado
Speaker 1: would have been in play. I mean, there would have
Speaker 1: been some very interesting changes. But because of COVID, it's
Speaker 1: going to be a very tight election, and I think
Speaker 1: that Trump is going to get somewhere in the neighborhood.
Speaker 1: And we'll have to see after the election, right, this
Speaker 1: is a prediction where we can check and see if
Speaker 1: I'm right in forty eight hours, so we will. I
Speaker 1: think Trump will get somewhere from two hundred and seventy
Speaker 1: to two hundred and let's call it eighty five votes,
Speaker 1: so sub three hundred pretty substantially, you know, if you
Speaker 1: ask me a number, I feel like Trump's going to
Speaker 1: get two hundred and seventy two, two hundred and seventy four,
Speaker 1: something like that, just above the threshold. And I do
Speaker 1: believe that Pennsylvania is going to determine who wins the
Speaker 1: election in the end, that that's going to be considered.
Speaker 1: As I've been saying, the Keystone state is the keystone
Speaker 1: to this election. And I also think that the Democrats
Speaker 1: will refuse used to concede on election night and throw
Speaker 1: the country into at least a few days, if not
Speaker 1: a few weeks, of real political friction, you know, the
Speaker 1: chaos would be a better word. And they're preparing for
Speaker 1: it already. You can tell. That's why they're boarding up
Speaker 1: major cities. They were making barricades like they're getting ready
Speaker 1: for a hurricane. Of course we know it's riot. It's
Speaker 1: not a hurricane. Making barricades. First, stores on my street
Speaker 1: where I live getting ready, and some of them are
Speaker 1: stores that have already been broken into and ransacked by
Speaker 1: thugs and Biden voters. So that's in preparation for what
Speaker 1: the Democrats will do. We'll talk more about that and
Speaker 1: how despicable it is that we all know that it's
Speaker 1: going to be Democrats who do it. We all know
Speaker 1: that it will be Democrats who are the ones looting, riding,
Speaker 1: and generally acting in lawless, barbaric ways. But Trump's gonna win.
Speaker 1: He's gonna win Ohio, He's going to win Florida, and yes,
Speaker 1: I do believe he's gonna win Pennsylvania. He's gonna win
Speaker 1: North Carolina. He's gonna win Georgia. He's gonna win Arizona.
Speaker 1: These are the places that people are pointing to and
Speaker 1: they're saying, oh, no, Biden's got this big lead, or Biden, no,
Speaker 1: I'm not I'm not buying it at all. I don't
Speaker 1: think he's gonna win Michigan and Wisconsin. That's where some
Speaker 1: of my conservative positively disposed towards Trump's chances here. That's
Speaker 1: where that's where some break with me. And I know
Speaker 1: that we're talking a big game about Minnesota. I just
Speaker 1: don't see it. Lovely people, but too many Democrats in Minnesota.
Speaker 1: That's the problem. So Trump wins and we'll have so
Speaker 1: much to talk about with what the next four years
Speaker 1: looks like if that occurs. And then there's also the Senate.
Speaker 1: There's the Senate. I believe that there will be a
Speaker 1: narrow Senate majority that there Republicans maintain. I think it's
Speaker 1: going to be a fifty one seats. That's what I
Speaker 1: see happening. It's going to be very so you're gonna
Speaker 1: have a very tight presidential election that ends up with
Speaker 1: a Republican in office, and a very tight Senate election
Speaker 1: that ends up with a fifty one continued majority, but
Speaker 1: a fifty one seat majority for the Publicans. I think
Speaker 1: they lose a seat. As for the House of Representatives,
Speaker 1: I know you're not gonna want to hear it. I
Speaker 1: think it stays in Democrat hands. Sadly. I just think
Speaker 1: the advantage is too big, and it hasn't been a
Speaker 1: strong enough year pointing to the economy and the healthcare
Speaker 1: and all these different issues that move those individual congressional races.
Speaker 1: I just think that that's where we're gonna be. Now,
Speaker 1: we'll have to re visit this, and I could be wrong,
Speaker 1: and I told you that I was wrong in twenty sixteen.
Speaker 1: I thought I was sad about it, but I thought
Speaker 1: Hillary was going to win. I voted for Trump, I
Speaker 1: pushed for Trump, but I just figured the machinery was
Speaker 1: too powerful around her and there just didn't seem to
Speaker 1: be enough of a But as we saw it felt
Speaker 1: like a political miracle. Can lightning strike twice? People ask
Speaker 1: that question and they think, oh, what candidate can Actually,
Speaker 1: in fact, there are many places where lightning strikes a
Speaker 1: whole lot. So I do think the lightning will strike twice.
Speaker 1: I think that Trump will win for a second time,
Speaker 1: and the Democrats will go into spasms and fits of
Speaker 1: rage and despair unlike anything we've ever seen before in
Speaker 1: American politics, certainly in my lifetime. That's what we're heading for,
Speaker 1: I believe, friends. But let's talk about the why, and
Speaker 1: let's also understand the Democrat that the forces at work
Speaker 1: right now and the Democrat mentality going into this election
Speaker 1: and what it means, either for a Trump win or
Speaker 1: heaven forbid, a Trump loss. What this party is that
Speaker 1: we are facing should that should be our focus today
Speaker 1: and that's what we'll dive into together. You're in the
Speaker 1: Freedom This is the Buck sex and Show podcast. Biden,
Speaker 1: they say, is a moderate. Kamala, they suggest, is not
Speaker 1: only very hip, she's a cultural elite, but he's a technocrat,
Speaker 1: you know, a lawyer, a prosecutor. These are not radicals,
Speaker 1: That's what they tell you. These are not radicals, especially
Speaker 1: right now. That's what they're saying because they're hoping people
Speaker 1: that aren't focused on politics, aren't listening to the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show every day, don't know what the heck's going
Speaker 1: on in the country. And I don't say that disparagingly.
Speaker 1: They got bills to pay, they got food to buy,
Speaker 1: and kids to raise and so on and so forth.
Speaker 1: But they're going to go into that polling booth tomorrow
Speaker 1: in Ohio, in Iowa and Florida and they're gonna be thinking, well,
Speaker 1: who's better, who's better for me, Who's gonna make things
Speaker 1: feel more normal after a very abnormal year. Who's going
Speaker 1: to be that returned to normalcy, and that's what they're
Speaker 1: posing Biden and kamalas. That's what they're trying to convince
Speaker 1: us all as true of Biden and Kamala. Unfortunately, that's
Speaker 1: not reality. Biden is whatever the party, whatever the apparatchicks
Speaker 1: within the party decide he should be, and Kamala is,
Speaker 1: by voting record, the most left wing member of the Senate.
Speaker 1: It does remind me quite a bit of Barack Obama,
Speaker 1: who ran as a centrist uniter, a kind of messianic
Speaker 1: figure for America, and was the furthest left member of
Speaker 1: the United States Senate at the time. So this is
Speaker 1: what Democrats keep doing. They have tickets that they put
Speaker 1: forward for the presidential race that they tell us are moderate,
Speaker 1: they tell us are down the center. But when it
Speaker 1: really comes down to it, you look at the actions
Speaker 1: of the people running before and they're either as soul
Speaker 1: for the far left, as in Joe Biden, or they
Speaker 1: are openly themselves far left in their actions, like Barack
Speaker 1: Obama and Kamala Harris, but they pretend to be something
Speaker 1: else to win the election. I am a perfect example
Speaker 1: of that for you. Here. This, I believe is a
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris ad it was making the rounds yesterday. I
Speaker 1: saw this and I almost couldn't believe it was real
Speaker 1: at first, because it's so honest. It's so honest about
Speaker 1: the Democrat left and yes, socialist view of American society.
Speaker 1: And this is why they believe they should have so
Speaker 1: much government power. This is why they believe you should
Speaker 1: bend the need of them on any issue, because they
Speaker 1: are the great champions of equity. And you would say,
Speaker 1: wait a second, what does that even really mean. What
Speaker 1: it means is that they're able to look and see
Speaker 1: parts of society that are unequal, and instead of allowing
Speaker 1: for the fact that society will always be unequal, that
Speaker 1: we are not equal in talents, gifts, hard work, ability,
Speaker 1: luck well, we're not equal in those things. That's the
Speaker 1: price we pay to live in a free society. That
Speaker 1: freedom results in unequal outcomes. Right, Some people decide to
Speaker 1: show up all the time on time, work really hard,
Speaker 1: better themselves, you know, stay away from drugs, stay away
Speaker 1: from alcohol, get married, stay married, get enough sleep, take
Speaker 1: care of themselves, focus on their education, and they get
Speaker 1: to enjoy the upside of that sound decision making. Other
Speaker 1: people are just you know, pounding whole boxes of freedo
Speaker 1: lays and playing too much call of duty and don't
Speaker 1: really want to show up on time for work and
Speaker 1: don't really and you know, it's not about blaming people,
Speaker 1: but it's about choices. We live in a society full
Speaker 1: of choices, and there have been societies where that's not
Speaker 1: the case. And I'll be getting into that in a moment.
Speaker 1: We know what that's like, and it's misery, and it
Speaker 1: makes everyone poorer, and it makes everyone less often, quite honestly,
Speaker 1: it really negates and at some level the human experience.
Speaker 1: It takes away central aspects of your existence. If you
Speaker 1: or not have choice, what's the point. But Kamala wants
Speaker 1: you to know that any difference in wealth, status, health,
Speaker 1: you name it, any of those things in our society
Speaker 1: need to be stamped out, need to be stamped out
Speaker 1: by the government. This is her ad narrated in her
Speaker 1: voice play three. So there's a big difference between a
Speaker 1: quality and equity. Equality suggests, oh, everyone should get the
Speaker 1: same amount. The problem with that not everybody's starting out
Speaker 1: from the same place. So if we're all getting the
Speaker 1: same amount, but you started out that there and I
Speaker 1: started out over here. We can get the same up,
Speaker 1: but you still gonna be that far back behind me.
Speaker 1: It's about giving people the resources of the spament. Equitable
Speaker 1: treatment means we all end up at the same place. Now,
Speaker 1: Put aside the kind of corny background music or you
Speaker 1: know that, the sort of cheesy production values here. Put
Speaker 1: that aside for a second. This is communism, friends. What
Speaker 1: what she's describing is the philosophy of communism that the
Speaker 1: state will make up for all the imbalances among people,
Speaker 1: and the state will have to be empowered to bring
Speaker 1: us all to the same place in the end. This
Speaker 1: is the central philosophical appeal of Marxism. This is the
Speaker 1: basis upon which hundreds of millions of people throughout the
Speaker 1: century were imprisoned, tortured, murdered, impoverished, forced into despair for generations.
Speaker 1: This notion is very it can be very seductive at first.
Speaker 1: Empower the government to make us all the same in
Speaker 1: the end, she's saying it explicitly, empower the government to
Speaker 1: make us all the same when it comes to what
Speaker 1: we have and who we are and what we've accomplished.
Speaker 1: I can look at my life and in honesty determined
Speaker 1: different points where I could have made a better decision.
Speaker 1: I could have worked harder during that period, I could
Speaker 1: have made a better choice on this issue. And I
Speaker 1: try to learn from that and grow and understand that
Speaker 1: there are people who are just lucky. There are people
Speaker 1: who are just born with certain gifts, abilities, and talents.
Speaker 1: We all have something, We all have different things that
Speaker 1: we bring to the table. But if we're going to
Speaker 1: live in a free and prosperous society, part of that
Speaker 1: is accepting that some people have better parents than other people.
Speaker 1: Straight up, some people are born with a lot of
Speaker 1: money and a lot of advantages. Some people come from nothing,
Speaker 1: and you just got to work with what you've got.
Speaker 1: When we talk about equality, what we mean is a
Speaker 1: legal system that treats people the same way, and that
Speaker 1: our underlying foundation as a society that we are all
Speaker 1: human beings who are equal in dignity, worth and value
Speaker 1: in the God. But we don't all get to have
Speaker 1: a Maybach in front of our five million dollar mansion
Speaker 1: and show up for work when we feel like it. Now.
Speaker 1: We don't all get to have that. And Kamala is
Speaker 1: showing you here what the Democrat Party is really turned into.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Bus Show podcasts. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. Every city, every town burn the precincts
Speaker 1: to the ground. Those are Biden voters. Those are leftists
Speaker 1: Democrats mostly. I mean, I don't know if they're all registered,
Speaker 1: but they support the Democrat Party, and I think we
Speaker 1: have to take their threats seriously. In fact, I know
Speaker 1: we have to take them seriously because they have burned
Speaker 1: down police precincts. They've actually done that. So why should
Speaker 1: we think this is harmless rhetoric. Well, there's no good
Speaker 1: answer to that other than Democrats always act like their
Speaker 1: base is the fringe, when in fact what they hold
Speaker 1: up as the fringe is really their base. That those
Speaker 1: who are the most committed to a radical socialist future
Speaker 1: for this country are the truest believers in the Democrat
Speaker 1: Party today. And that's why Kamala Harris is little communism
Speaker 1: tour that we just had in that ad, the little
Speaker 1: visitation of communism upon us, I mean, that was pretty
Speaker 1: astonishing me think about this. She's actually telling you that
Speaker 1: the differences in our society, the differences in the way
Speaker 1: that we end up are the results of a system
Speaker 1: that is inequitable, and so you have to create a
Speaker 1: system that will deal with it. Does anyone really believe
Speaker 1: that such a perfect system could be created? No, What
Speaker 1: really happens, and we've seen this play out through through history.
Speaker 1: What really happens is that when you empower the state
Speaker 1: to make decisions for you, when you empower the government
Speaker 1: to be making all of the major choices in our lives,
Speaker 1: who gets what, who goes where, how much can you have,
Speaker 1: how much can you keep? Doesn't get rid of the
Speaker 1: problems of inequity in society. Right. But again, the transition
Speaker 1: of words here is not a minor thing. This is important.
Speaker 1: It's important to understand what it does. Though. When you
Speaker 1: empower the state in that way, is it gives it
Speaker 1: an excuse to indulge in even more social engineering. It'll say, Okay,
Speaker 1: so we've been doing this and we've made some progress,
Speaker 1: but there's still inequity to be challenge, there's still in
Speaker 1: equity that we have to change. Say well, that means
Speaker 1: you need even more power, right, Oh, No, at that
Speaker 1: point we don't get to say that, you know why,
Speaker 1: because we won't be able to stop it, because they'll
Speaker 1: be in control of so much of the system already
Speaker 1: that now it's just up to those who are in charge.
Speaker 1: But then if we go back and look at what
Speaker 1: happens to the people who are in charge, we also
Speaker 1: get a very important lesson the Kamalas, the Peloss, the
Speaker 1: Chuck Schumer's. Do you think that they suffer? No, they
Speaker 1: don't suffer because while they mouth all of the pre
Speaker 1: approved slogans about equity, while they're running around telling everybody
Speaker 1: about how they how life is not fair. And the
Speaker 1: only reason your neighbor's got a bigger house than a
Speaker 1: nicer car than you is because the system gave it
Speaker 1: to him. But you've worked just as hard, you're just
Speaker 1: as smart, You're just as valued economically in our society,
Speaker 1: which is not the same thing as being valued as
Speaker 1: a human being. I mean, this is a very straightforward.
Speaker 1: If somebody walks past you and they've got a fifty
Speaker 1: thousand dollars rolex on, I mean they probably mean some
Speaker 1: of you probably have really nice watches, but I'm saying
Speaker 1: they might have more money than you do. But if
Speaker 1: they walk past you and they punch you in the face,
Speaker 1: they're gonna get arrested for assault. If you call the
Speaker 1: police and no one cares that they've got money, that's
Speaker 1: a difference to an equality and an equity. Equity complaints
Speaker 1: are why does this person have a nicer watch than me?
Speaker 1: Equality complaints are why is this person able to steal
Speaker 1: from me and not get punished or attack me, violate
Speaker 1: my rights and not have the state interviewed on my side.
Speaker 1: That's the difference to quality and equity. The Democrats, you
Speaker 1: will notice, are focused in here. This is not minor.
Speaker 1: This is central to their philosophy. This is central to
Speaker 1: the way that they view the world and the way
Speaker 1: that they insist that they should govern. And they're not
Speaker 1: going to ask once they get the power, they're going
Speaker 1: to demand, they're going to tell you. This is the
Speaker 1: dictatorial impulse of the Democrats on display. What they're saying
Speaker 1: is any different results in the end for anything is
Speaker 1: somehow evidence of a bias, is evidence of a system
Speaker 1: being unfair, And they never really stop to think, or
Speaker 1: they don't care if they do. What makes them think
Speaker 1: that they can create a more fair system exactly, not
Speaker 1: a system based inequality, which we have except for actually
Speaker 1: some places on our system where for example, an affirmative action.
Speaker 1: There are eliminations of equality as a function of law.
Speaker 1: We are not actually treated equally because of programs like
Speaker 1: affirmative action. There is inequality in the system, and it
Speaker 1: is only for chosen minority groups. Really interesting statistic came
Speaker 1: out of the weekend Asian females in America now, on
Speaker 1: a per capita basis, earn more money than the evil
Speaker 1: white male white males, the scourge of all humanity, the
Speaker 1: creators of colonialism and the patriarchy and all the stuff
Speaker 1: that people are unfortunately being brainwashed with this nonsense all
Speaker 1: the time. Notice white males, We get all that, we
Speaker 1: have all these libradical pseudo intelligensia types talking about how
Speaker 1: damaging and dangerous white males are all the time, but
Speaker 1: they're never like, well, we also want to say thank
Speaker 1: you to white males for some of the good things
Speaker 1: that they've done throughout history. No, never that, that's not
Speaker 1: a discussion that ever gets had. There's no upside. We're
Speaker 1: just the oppressors. Well, somehow we've created a system in America,
Speaker 1: and I guess you know, we all have our hand
Speaker 1: in this one. It's not just white males, but We've
Speaker 1: created a system in America where they're so good at
Speaker 1: enforcing the patriarchy and being oppressors that now white males
Speaker 1: are out earned by female Asian Americans on a per
Speaker 1: capita basis, so they're making more money. That's pretty interesting,
Speaker 1: isn't it. What what kind of system, what kind of
Speaker 1: oppressors create a system where they're not going to be
Speaker 1: in They're not in first place, you know what I
Speaker 1: mean when it comes to earning power. That's very strange.
Speaker 1: Do you think that there were people who were more
Speaker 1: powerful and better off in the communist system than members
Speaker 1: of the polyporo? Do you think there were people that
Speaker 1: were living better than those making the decisions in the
Speaker 1: communist hierarchy in name any communist country. No, so, as
Speaker 1: long as the Pelosi's and the Schumers and the Kamalas
Speaker 1: and the you know, you just name a powerful democrat,
Speaker 1: the Cuomos, the newsoms, as long as they get to
Speaker 1: be a part of this apparatus that determines what equity
Speaker 1: needs to be addressed changed by the government, As long
Speaker 1: as that's happening, they'll be fine because they'll always make
Speaker 1: sure they are carve outs. I mean, they are special.
Speaker 1: They're carve outs for them their family. Look at Gavin Newsom,
Speaker 1: his children are going to very fancy private school, still open,
Speaker 1: still having private school instruction, but his base is psycho
Speaker 1: liberal base demands that there are all kinds of school
Speaker 1: closures in California. So that's what ends up happening for
Speaker 1: public school kids. Too bad for them, Isn't it also
Speaker 1: amazing how many people are big proponents of how great
Speaker 1: the teachers' unions are in public school systems all throughout
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party, and they do everything they can to
Speaker 1: send their children to very expensive, elite private schools, even
Speaker 1: though they live in fancy neighborhoods that probably have pretty
Speaker 1: decent public schools. No, it's never their kids that they
Speaker 1: want to sacrifice to the system. And that's true of
Speaker 1: themselves as well. And that's why this Kamala line here
Speaker 1: about about equity and how we have disparate outcomes in
Speaker 1: the end. Well, Kamala Harris is on the vice presidential ticket,
Speaker 1: and she's somebody who's done nothing particularly impressive in her
Speaker 1: life other than work the system. But she wants to
Speaker 1: tell you that the system is horribly oppressive, sexist, racist,
Speaker 1: and xenophobic. And if you put people who have her
Speaker 1: perspective in charge, and Joe Biden will just share whatever
Speaker 1: perspective she tells him to, they're going to make all
Speaker 1: of this better. This is the foundational lie of communism
Speaker 1: and socialism. And remember the communists in the early days
Speaker 1: referred to themselves as socialists. Marx constantly wrote about socialism
Speaker 1: and socialists. So we think there's this huge separation. We're
Speaker 1: led to believe there's this massive separation between the two,
Speaker 1: when really they are very They are near cousins, they
Speaker 1: might even be considered siblings in political philosophy. So what
Speaker 1: do we see from all of this? They let the
Speaker 1: mask slip sometimes, friends, you begin to understand what the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party is really about. They can never have enough
Speaker 1: power and never infringe upon your rights or your freedom enough,
Speaker 1: because they're never able to eradicate the inequity that is
Speaker 1: inherent in the human condition. I understand this even in
Speaker 1: the most radical of circumstances, even the most radical circumstances,
Speaker 1: which I think you consider for communist purposes the Soviet
Speaker 1: Union to be, and you can find other places as well,
Speaker 1: they were enormous inequities. There were people who live much
Speaker 1: longer than others. There were people who were better looking,
Speaker 1: people who were smarter, people who had nicer houses. And
Speaker 1: then when you add it in the bure aureaucrats and
Speaker 1: the actual apparatus of communism, enormous enormous differences in the
Speaker 1: food and the healthcare and the housing of those individuals received,
Speaker 1: and their whole mission. Remind yourself of this. Their whole
Speaker 1: mission was to eradicate those differences. So the people whose
Speaker 1: reason for getting out of bed in the morning, the
Speaker 1: bureaucrats who justified their very position under the promise that
Speaker 1: they would eliminate, As Kamala discusses here, inequity in society,
Speaker 1: a different end state, different results from life choices. Those
Speaker 1: people were the greatest evidence of inequity in the society.
Speaker 1: Does anyone think that wouldn't happen again? And now you
Speaker 1: could say back, come on, Joe Biden doesn't want the
Speaker 1: tax rate to be eighty percent on people making above
Speaker 1: four hundred thousand dollars a year. He wants it to
Speaker 1: be sixty percent. Yeah, it's all incremental, friends, It all
Speaker 1: comes from this very basic separation within our worldview. You
Speaker 1: can either take the perspective that life is life is unfair.
Speaker 1: Life is unfair. A lot of us wish that we
Speaker 1: were tall or smarter, you know, more beautiful, more handsome,
Speaker 1: that you know, we had been born, you know, a billionaire,
Speaker 1: or born the greatest baseball player in the world or whatever. Right,
Speaker 1: everyone has the things that they wish they could change.
Speaker 1: Of course, they don't really know the struggles that those
Speaker 1: people that they look at, especially if they read too
Speaker 1: much of these tabloids and everything else. They think, oh,
Speaker 1: they're so beautiful and so happy. Really it's actually a
Speaker 1: lot of misery for many of those people, a lot
Speaker 1: of emptiness. But that's another conversation. But we all wish
Speaker 1: that things could be perfect, and they're not. But we
Speaker 1: can either adopt a found and this is a foundational
Speaker 1: point of life philosophy here you're approach to day to day.
Speaker 1: You can either understand that what matters is how you act,
Speaker 1: how you treat other people, how you try to work
Speaker 1: to better yourself, whether you're a moral person, an honorable person,
Speaker 1: somebody who you know people want to work with and
Speaker 1: have as a neighbor, have as a friend, a family member.
Speaker 1: That's what actually matters. All that other stuff, you know,
Speaker 1: having a maserati and a six pack, or you know,
Speaker 1: looking like, you know, a ten out of ten in
Speaker 1: a bikini or whatever. Whatever. These things are, these superficial
Speaker 1: aspects of society, or or thinking that people are all
Speaker 1: going to have the same health outcomes. I wish I
Speaker 1: could eat gluten, friends, but I can't, you know. And
Speaker 1: You've got countless people listening to this who have far
Speaker 1: more serious health problems than that, and they go through
Speaker 1: life as as as heroes to others around them just
Speaker 1: by being really good people. Ah but but empower Kamala Harris,
Speaker 1: she cares so much about you. Empower her. Biden, the
Speaker 1: Democrats and the mainstream media who are all aspiring to
Speaker 1: separate themselves from the very policies they create for the
Speaker 1: rest of us. Now, they're all looking down at us
Speaker 1: from their mansions in bel Air, and the Hampton's telling us,
Speaker 1: and the people who aren't there yet who are part
Speaker 1: of this apparatus are just scrambling to get there as
Speaker 1: fast as possible. That's their life's mission. But they're really
Speaker 1: pretending to care about the poor and the struggling, and
Speaker 1: all they're really going to do is squeeze and hold
Speaker 1: down the middle class, squeeze, and make life harder for
Speaker 1: those who already feel like their challenges are not appreciated
Speaker 1: by the left wing apparatus. That the ability to show
Speaker 1: up to do a job where you are underappreciated and underpaid,
Speaker 1: but know that that's what you have to do for now,
Speaker 1: and you find honor and dignity in doing it, in
Speaker 1: being responsible. The Democrat Party doesn't really have much much
Speaker 1: feeling or respect at all for that group. Democrats have
Speaker 1: turned to a party of elites and winer's independents. You've
Speaker 1: either made your millions. You've either put yourself in a
Speaker 1: great position become some bureaucrat of the public school system
Speaker 1: making one hundred and eighty grand a year does basically nothing.
Speaker 1: You've either milked the system effectively, or you're demanding that
Speaker 1: others provide milk for you from the system. That is
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party of today and everybody else who's saying
Speaker 1: I'll take it upon my own shoulders, I'll find my
Speaker 1: own way. They're getting squeezed in the middle and told
Speaker 1: you're not doing enough. In fact, you haven't built that,
Speaker 1: you haven't earned that, and so we can take it
Speaker 1: from you. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sex and Show podcast. For decades, Joe Biden let
Speaker 1: other countries rip you off, rip off our country, and
Speaker 1: cheat America blind. And there was a group they would
Speaker 1: just they would let him do anything. Biden has been
Speaker 1: there for five decades and the only people who benefited
Speaker 1: from his policies were himself and his family. Frankly, he
Speaker 1: shows up every four years and then goes back to
Speaker 1: washingtondicators to special interests. But my only interest is you
Speaker 1: who benefited the most from Joe Biden being in public office.
Speaker 1: I think that's an important question. I think it's one
Speaker 1: that really deserves an answer. The people who are still
Speaker 1: on the fence about voting for Trump or thinking about
Speaker 1: whether they can pull the lever for Joe Biden, I
Speaker 1: think they should answer this question. I think it's quite
Speaker 1: obvious it's Joe Biden. The president sees it. Joe Biden
Speaker 1: ran for the Senate and sat in the Senate for
Speaker 1: as many decades as he did because it was the
Speaker 1: position of greatest benefit for Joe Biden. He wasn't drawn
Speaker 1: to be a leader because he felt the need to
Speaker 1: serve his country. He wasn't someone who had built a
Speaker 1: really successful career or had done anything prior to being
Speaker 1: a politician, and thought, you know what, I want to
Speaker 1: change things to make people's lives better. No, he figured, Okay,
Speaker 1: I kind of get this game. I'm good at, you know,
Speaker 1: grinning and smiling, and I look the part and I
Speaker 1: sound the part, and it's kind of like being an actor.
Speaker 1: So I can do this and I'll have a nice
Speaker 1: salary and cushy benefits. And the biggest challenge I have
Speaker 1: is fundraising and that just involves a lot of you know,
Speaker 1: glad handing and big grins. And yeah, that's what Joe
Speaker 1: Biden is in the political realm. Not a man who
Speaker 1: stood for any important ideas, not a man who has
Speaker 1: any important ideas, really, And we're supposed to elect him
Speaker 1: to be president of the United States and assume it
Speaker 1: that's going to make everything so much better. Assume that
Speaker 1: that's going to benefit you, make your life better. Friends,
Speaker 1: This is this is nonsense. You don't really believe it's
Speaker 1: I don't really believe this. Nobody really can convince them
Speaker 1: self of this. But that's where we are. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcast. Remember subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: Let's remind ourselves of just who the Democrats hold up
Speaker 1: as the answer to this country's prayer right now for
Speaker 1: a beating, beating COVID or return to normalcy, all these
Speaker 1: things that we want so very badly. Let let's remind
Speaker 1: ourselves who the man is that's supposed to lead us
Speaker 1: out of this darkness. This is what they'll tell us. Wow,
Speaker 1: Trump and Biden are criss crossing the country now at
Speaker 1: a furious pace, trying to make their final pitch. I
Speaker 1: think you should at least listen to the man. Let's
Speaker 1: let's give Joe Biden a fair shake today and hear
Speaker 1: what he's got to say. Play eleven high lad It
Speaker 1: effective strategy to mobilize schooner and I suffage of pressure.
Speaker 1: There you go, Sherman or Serber Shrebert shooting a nice
Speaker 1: Stufferge depressure. That's amazing, isn't it. It's amazing. It's amazing.
Speaker 1: Come on, immerge, they're talking ports. You're getting scrambled upstairs,
Speaker 1: and seven little chipmunks sitting on a branch seating a
Speaker 1: lot of acorns. Haun Joe Biden's ranch shooting a nice
Speaker 1: stuffage depressure rosa bird version. Come on, guys, how many
Speaker 1: of you have had about Like I speak extemporaneously for
Speaker 1: hours and hours and hours every day, and sometimes, you know,
Speaker 1: I'll mumble something a little bit, But I mean that
Speaker 1: was Serbarber, that was what just I mean, I'm we're
Speaker 1: playing you as audio. You know, Trump might mispronounce a word,
Speaker 1: or he has a very particular cadence and way of
Speaker 1: saying things I've never heard heard him say. I mean,
Speaker 1: that sounded like what somebody who is has a high
Speaker 1: fever and is actually delirious. That sounded like something that
Speaker 1: they would say. That sounds like something that you know,
Speaker 1: if somebody was at one hundred and three hundred and
Speaker 1: four fever, which I mean, if you ever get up there,
Speaker 1: that's really bad and it's scary because they'll kind of
Speaker 1: start mumbling stuff and they don't I've been there. I
Speaker 1: know what it's like to be delirious from a high
Speaker 1: fever and you think you're speaking, but everyone else is like,
Speaker 1: what is this person saying? That's what? Joe? That that's
Speaker 1: this is the supposed to be the leader of the
Speaker 1: free world is almost eighty years old. Folks and Democrats
Speaker 1: are like, yeah, you got a vote for him because
Speaker 1: he's gonna effectively immobilize the sub shooting suffage of pressure. Um,
Speaker 1: and you got another one here. Here's here's him talking
Speaker 1: about about healthcare, where he's supposed to have the big advantage.
Speaker 1: Play twelve Brock and I think it's all right for
Speaker 1: people out bad at kept care. Wait, what is baddicup current,
Speaker 1: baddicpt current? Yeah, I mean you get it. Guys. Now, look,
Speaker 1: they're they're the ones that are insisting. They're the ones
Speaker 1: that are insisting that the problem here is Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: and that Joe Biden is the guy who's gonna who's
Speaker 1: gonna answer answer the call right, that this is the
Speaker 1: person that we're supposed to think is going to return
Speaker 1: everything to normalcy and and make everything so much better.
Speaker 1: And I do think that it's it's at least fair
Speaker 1: to ask the question, what evidence is there of that
Speaker 1: there is evidence of one thing and one thing only
Speaker 1: that I can say goes in that column. He is
Speaker 1: not Donald Trump. I think that's it. Though I think
Speaker 1: beyond that, you'd have to wonder what is the pitch here?
Speaker 1: He was around he was just kind of hanging out
Speaker 1: during Barrock's years. I mean, it was a He was
Speaker 1: supposed to be a foreign policy specialist. And the Obama
Speaker 1: administration's foreign policy is so terrible that the media realizes
Speaker 1: it's a risk to even try to bring that up
Speaker 1: much against Trump to try and anything that brings the
Speaker 1: comparison to mind between Trump and Obama on foreign policy
Speaker 1: looks bad for Obama. I mean, they'll talk about the
Speaker 1: Iran deal, which anybody who knows the deal understands was
Speaker 1: crap and also feels that that seething irritation from having
Speaker 1: the most powerful country in the world give some rinky
Speaker 1: dink dictatorship in Iran palettes of cash delivered to them,
Speaker 1: you know, in cash, like they were holding us hostage
Speaker 1: as a country, you know, pay off the mullets. That
Speaker 1: was the Obama team approach. Never mind the disasters in
Speaker 1: Syria and Libya and Iraq and deterioration in Afghanistan, all
Speaker 1: these things that happened, total mess. They didn't even bring
Speaker 1: up foreign policy. But Joe Biden was the foreign policy
Speaker 1: guy of the Obama administration. That's why he got He
Speaker 1: got brought into it. And this is a guy who
Speaker 1: anyone who has worked in foreign pos it's a joke.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden even in the you know, national security expertise circles.
Speaker 1: And I know these circles because I used to exist
Speaker 1: within them as somebody at the CIA. And then afterwards
Speaker 1: everyone laughs about Joe Biden. And this is a guy
Speaker 1: who's been wrong on everything for forty years. Every time
Speaker 1: the US had to make a foreign policy decision, Joe
Speaker 1: Biden was useful and that he was so reliably wrong.
Speaker 1: His judgment was so consistently poor that all you really
Speaker 1: had to know was what side of the issue is
Speaker 1: Joe Biden on? And you'd want to be on the
Speaker 1: other side, right, He's like the guy at the at
Speaker 1: the blackjack table that you know if he's if he's
Speaker 1: going well, I guess it depends on your cards too.
Speaker 1: But he's the guy at the sports betting place there
Speaker 1: you go, where whatever team he's betting on, you want
Speaker 1: to bet on the team that's playing them. That was
Speaker 1: Joe Biden on foreign policy. But oh yeah, he's uh,
Speaker 1: he's gonna make everything better. And and here he is
Speaker 1: in another bide. We got all these Biden This is
Speaker 1: just from the last few Days Play thirteen. This isn't
Speaker 1: a political statement like those ugly folks over there vaping
Speaker 1: the horn. This is a patriotic duty, for God's sake,
Speaker 1: it's your patriotic duty to wear a mask. He's telling you.
Speaker 1: He also called them ugly folks. I know that. But
Speaker 1: see that's that's kind of funny. I play that, not
Speaker 1: to pretend to like that. Say that's that's different than
Speaker 1: you know, leading an effective strategy to mobilize. Sure, sure,
Speaker 1: murmur and Berber shooting pressure exactly. That that's a different
Speaker 1: thing when he says, uh, when he says, you know,
Speaker 1: ugly folks. Look he's speaking, you know he see he
Speaker 1: didn't mean that their faces are ugly, right, that's It's
Speaker 1: not like when he's when he called the supporter along
Speaker 1: lying dog face, pony sold or called the guy fat.
Speaker 1: And then they tried to claim that he was saying
Speaker 1: something else, like fella, I don't know. They had some
Speaker 1: line about this. What was the other they had another
Speaker 1: when he started talking about George Bush, but they really
Speaker 1: four more years of George Lopez. They were saying, yeah, yeah, sure,
Speaker 1: four more years of George Lopez. That's what he was
Speaker 1: talking about. That makes a lot of sense. But look,
Speaker 1: the media. Remember it's like a lawyer in a courtroom.
Speaker 1: If you think of journalists as unscrupulous lawyers for the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party, everything makes sense. Nothing surprises you anymore, because
Speaker 1: you know, a lawyer that's unscrupulous will make all kinds
Speaker 1: of arguments in court that are pathetic and anybody should
Speaker 1: be able to see through them. And they're not based
Speaker 1: in justice, and they're not based on what's right. It's
Speaker 1: just whatever will work, whatever will work in the moment
Speaker 1: for my client. You know, whatever will work in the moment.
Speaker 1: They'll they'll attack their credibility of a witness that should
Speaker 1: be you know, beyond approach, all all the stuff right,
Speaker 1: and they'll say, oh, it's because I have to do
Speaker 1: it's best for my client. And that's lawyers, and that
Speaker 1: is that is the system that we have. But I'm
Speaker 1: just saying, think of journalists like unscrupulous lawyers for the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party, and you'll know every move they're gonna make.
Speaker 1: You'll know everything that they're gonna do. But Biden here,
Speaker 1: you know, making his reference to the folks folks being ugly,
Speaker 1: there's no question that New York City, Washington, DC, and
Speaker 1: some other Democrats strongholds are on edge over the next
Speaker 1: twenty four hours or so. And we're on edge not
Speaker 1: because we're worried about generalized violence. We're on edge not
Speaker 1: because there's a concern that maybe someone somewhere from who
Speaker 1: knows what political party, is going to act out in
Speaker 1: mobs and riots meant to intimidate, meant to destroy, meant
Speaker 1: to show some kind of vengeance against American society, which
Speaker 1: is ultimately what this is about. No, what we are
Speaker 1: seeing is preparation for Democrat riots over the weekend. I
Speaker 1: see a wolf Blitzer at CNN shared some tweet about
Speaker 1: how distressing it was that businesses all over downtown DC,
Speaker 1: an area I've lived in and know very well, businesses
Speaker 1: are setting up really serious, large, sturdy, wooden barricades and
Speaker 1: boarding up their windows and their store their door fronts.
Speaker 1: All of this in preparation for election day stuff. That's
Speaker 1: not the country we're supposed to be. And I agree
Speaker 1: when Democrats like wolf Blitzer point that out, that's we're
Speaker 1: not supposed to be that country. The problem is they
Speaker 1: are the reason we're not that country. The problem is
Speaker 1: it is Democrats who refuse to accept that they don't
Speaker 1: necessarily get their way. They didn't in twenty sixteen, and
Speaker 1: they may not again. That's why we all have to
Speaker 1: deal with this degree of fear. And it is absolutely shameful.
Speaker 1: It's shameful that this is where we are, and we
Speaker 1: should also know who deserves to be shamed for it,
Speaker 1: and it's not Trump supporters. I saw over the weekend
Speaker 1: these massive Trump convoys, one in Beverly Hills, all over
Speaker 1: the place, and the convoy I think there was one
Speaker 1: that was supposed to be one hundred miles long or
Speaker 1: something in Arizona. I mean, these convoys are enormous, thousands
Speaker 1: and thousands, perhaps tens of thousands of vehicles, and I'm
Speaker 1: all in favor. I think that's great. And I see
Speaker 1: the Trump rallies over the weekend. We're absolutely huge, and
Speaker 1: the photos of all the people gathered. It makes me
Speaker 1: feel better about the future of this country when I
Speaker 1: see all of that. I can also tell you that
Speaker 1: I find it very discouraging that the people that are
Speaker 1: supposed to be bringing us information about the state of
Speaker 1: this country, the nature of our democracy, the mainstream media
Speaker 1: not only refuses to be honest about or the threat
Speaker 1: of violence, on election day comes from but they are
Speaker 1: largely to blame for creating that environment. They have been
Speaker 1: saying the President of the United States is a usurper. Effectively,
Speaker 1: is a guy with a who's stolen election on behalf
Speaker 1: of the Russians, that he was part of a Russian plot.
Speaker 1: This was all a lie. They've never apologized, They've never
Speaker 1: come forward to say we're sorry, we got this one wrong. No, no,
Speaker 1: quite the opposite. They doubled down. Now they've gone with
Speaker 1: he should be impeached because of a Ukraine phone call
Speaker 1: for an investigation request that involved Hunter Biden that, as
Speaker 1: we know, was one hundred percent legitimate. Hunter Biden was
Speaker 1: running corrupt games and selling the office of the Vice president.
Speaker 1: We all know it. We've got proof, We've got evidence.
Speaker 1: Couldn't be any more clear. Media is debasing itself to
Speaker 1: avoid that, absolutely debasing itself, And so we have to
Speaker 1: ask the question, why would we ever trust them again?
Speaker 1: Why would we ever believe in what they tell us?
Speaker 1: And I think we shouldn't. But the violence will come
Speaker 1: from the left. We all know it, We all Democrats
Speaker 1: Biden voters, just as they were doing to the country
Speaker 1: all summer with the BLM riots at the left. There's
Speaker 1: some study that says seven hundred people have died from
Speaker 1: COVID because of Trump rallies. M. Where's there, Really, it's
Speaker 1: just based on modeling, which is garbage in, garbage out.
Speaker 1: Where's the really intense, you know, scientifically and mathematically sound
Speaker 1: study of all the people who died from COVID from
Speaker 1: the BLM marches? No? Nothing, Yeah, oh I didn't think so.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hud. This is the Buck Sex
Speaker 1: and Show podcast. Here's a Democrat for you, vocalizing her
Speaker 1: feelings about law enforcement here in New York City. A
Speaker 1: Biden voter, that's right, a Biden voter in New York
Speaker 1: City screaming at police, not even at Trump supporters, at
Speaker 1: police for preventing her and the psychopathic leftists that have
Speaker 1: gathered around her to intimidate and attack Trump voters. Screaming
Speaker 1: at at at a fellow human being, in this case,
Speaker 1: law enforcement. Quote, I hope, I hope your children get
Speaker 1: raped and killed. This was a white girl, probably twenty
Speaker 1: four twenty five years old. What a horrific embarrassment to humanity.
Speaker 1: But also, I mean, this is increasingly standard stuff for
Speaker 1: Biden Democrats. They're going to return us to normalcy. But
Speaker 1: somehow the party that will bring us back to normalcy
Speaker 1: is full of lunatics with bad ideas that will be destructive,
Speaker 1: that don't work, that involve more inefficient, slothful, destructive government policy.
Speaker 1: But it's going to bring us back to normalcy, folks,
Speaker 1: gonna build back better, that's what they're telling us. No,
Speaker 1: the country is going to be in for some convulsions
Speaker 1: here if things get really, really nasty. And as I've
Speaker 1: been saying to you, I do believe that this is
Speaker 1: going to be a tight election. I told him my
Speaker 1: prediction at the top. I think Trump's going to get
Speaker 1: between two hundred and seventy two and two hundred and
Speaker 1: you know, eighty votes Electoral College votes. And I've also
Speaker 1: been saying I don't believe Pennsylvania will concede on election
Speaker 1: night no matter what, because if it's within one, or
Speaker 1: if it's within one or two percentage points, they're going
Speaker 1: to say the mail and ballots it's only to be
Speaker 1: counted that haven't been counted. And to give you a
Speaker 1: sense of what we're heading for here, the Attorney General
Speaker 1: for the State of Pennsylvania now Attorney General for the
Speaker 1: State's supposed to enforce the law, and it's supposed to
Speaker 1: be about the law, but of course the guy's a Democrats.
Speaker 1: The law doesn't really count. And he writes here if
Speaker 1: all of this was on Twitter, if all the votes
Speaker 1: are added up in Pennsylvania, Trump is going to lose.
Speaker 1: That's why he's working overtime is subtract as many votes
Speaker 1: as possible from this process. For the record, he's OZ
Speaker 1: and six against us in court. We've protected voting rights.
Speaker 1: Now ignore the noise and vote. So the attorney general
Speaker 1: in Pennsylvania for the state is straight up saying that
Speaker 1: Trump will lose this election. That's pretty uncomfortable thing for
Speaker 1: the person who may have to weigh in on the
Speaker 1: legality of different precincts and voting issues and everything else.
Speaker 1: Pretty uncomfortableness. But this is where we are. It's all
Speaker 1: out part as in warfare. So while Democrats go around
Speaker 1: pretending they're going to be not just a return to
Speaker 1: normalcy but somehow they respect our institutions, they make it
Speaker 1: quite clear that the only way the institutions will remain
Speaker 1: respected is if their preferred candidate wins. Here you go
Speaker 1: with an MSNBC contributor, making that even more explicit. And
Speaker 1: this dives into the mentality that we're all going to
Speaker 1: be confronting if Trump does in fact end up winning,
Speaker 1: which I believe you will play five once we do
Speaker 1: get into those final forty eight and seventy two hours
Speaker 1: before election day, because we know people are voting in
Speaker 1: mass right now. But if we see in those final
Speaker 1: polls the type of lead that Joe Biden has now
Speaker 1: double digits, let me just give a warning to the
Speaker 1: people of the United States. The polls are not going
Speaker 1: to be wrong when you see that kind of a result.
Speaker 1: Those are indicative, scientifically done poles of what the American
Speaker 1: electorate is suggesting they're going to do, having already voted.
Speaker 1: So it's a counterweight, if you will, to fraud. And
Speaker 1: we need to be very vigilant, all of us about
Speaker 1: looking at all of the average of polls, particularly from
Speaker 1: those reputable polsters in the final twenty four, forty eight
Speaker 1: and seventy two hours, because at that point those polls
Speaker 1: become predictive of the outcome. And these are smart, professional
Speaker 1: polsters in my professions who are doing this. They could
Speaker 1: very much be a counterweight if we have those Poles
Speaker 1: with Biden up double digits, but Trump somehow wins quote
Speaker 1: unquote by one or two points, then something will be
Speaker 1: rotten in the state of Denmark, and we need to
Speaker 1: be very vigilant about that. Polls can help democracy in
Speaker 1: that regard. Poles can help democracy by undermining the results
Speaker 1: of the election. Trump's gonna win. It's gonna be tight.
Speaker 1: A lot of polsters know this, and they're going to
Speaker 1: have some people asking questions. So what are they saying
Speaker 1: right now? Well, if he does win and it's by
Speaker 1: a narrow margin, even though we were saying he was
Speaker 1: going to lose by double digits in all these different
Speaker 1: states that really matter, he must have cheated. That's what's
Speaker 1: happy was a poster. That's what's happening here. They're already
Speaker 1: telling you that if Trump wins, it is because he cheated.
Speaker 1: That's going to be the story. That's the way they're
Speaker 1: going to go with this. Get ready for that. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to The bus Essen Show podcasts. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. Are you concerned at all the President
Speaker 1: Trump might prematurely declare victory based on that and when
Speaker 1: do you think we'll know who won Michigan. Well, I
Speaker 1: think that's a very real possibility, and that's why we
Speaker 1: are trying to make sure that everyone in the press understands.
Speaker 1: The volume of votes that are coming in is like
Speaker 1: nothing we've ever seen before, and it is going to
Speaker 1: take time to count, and it's more important that we
Speaker 1: get account that is accurate than account that is fast
Speaker 1: and might not be accurate. And that's why we will
Speaker 1: continue to keep you posted. We will be very transparent
Speaker 1: and give you regular updates, but we want to get
Speaker 1: this count right. They were going to keep you a postage,
Speaker 1: She says, Oh sure, Yeah, all right, guys, I think
Speaker 1: we all need to prepare for this because there was,
Speaker 1: at least for me psychologically, the election was going to
Speaker 1: be a moment of exhalation. Okay, I just want to
Speaker 1: know what our future is, right, I want to know.
Speaker 1: I want it to be done that night, and yes,
Speaker 1: I want Donald Trump to be president, but I don't
Speaker 1: think that's gonna end up happening now. I think that
Speaker 1: we'll see Trump is leading, and Trump will probably end
Speaker 1: up win, probably end up winning after the election, it's
Speaker 1: not going to be a huge win it's gonna be
Speaker 1: a win, though, but they're gonna say no. This is
Speaker 1: another part of my prediction. I don't see a future
Speaker 1: in which Trump gets to declare victory and the Democrats
Speaker 1: can see that's not the same thing on election night.
Speaker 1: And notice they're already planting the seat here the governor
Speaker 1: of Michigan, the district I mean, the state attorney general
Speaker 1: for Pennsylvania. They're already preparing for a legal fight over
Speaker 1: this election. They haven't seen there's no reason to believe
Speaker 1: that they'll have to do that. There's no no reason
Speaker 1: to think that that's going to be the way this
Speaker 1: plays out. But they are preparing for that. They're getting
Speaker 1: ready to drag it out. And then things will get
Speaker 1: really ugly, because as we saw in two thousand with
Speaker 1: the Bush v. Gore recount situation, they will want to
Speaker 1: change the rules in real time. It's about democracy, they'll say,
Speaker 1: when it comes to ballots that aren't filled out, ballots
Speaker 1: that you know, they lack of signature, ballots that arrive
Speaker 1: lay ballots that you know, whatever it may be, you
Speaker 1: know they'll be they'll be cases of people doing ballot
Speaker 1: harvesting that where they're not supposed and let's say, oh,
Speaker 1: there's no fraud, don't worry. I mean, it's gonna be
Speaker 1: an absolute mess. And that's the way the Democrats want it,
Speaker 1: because they figure if they can turn this into a
Speaker 1: street fight, they'll win. I mean, think about what's happening
Speaker 1: now on the streets. They're boarding up stores, they're preparing
Speaker 1: for unrest and all kinds of madness. And it's because
Speaker 1: the Democrats that that's what's going on. We all know that,
Speaker 1: we all understand that. You don't think that that same frenetic,
Speaker 1: lunatic energy is going to be applied to whatever ends
Speaker 1: up happening on election night when it gets extended. You
Speaker 1: don't think that they're going to still have the shock
Speaker 1: troops of the Democrat Party out there, and then they'll
Speaker 1: be bringing their lawyers with them too. There'll be a
Speaker 1: lot more. So I think that Pennsylvania gets delayed. I
Speaker 1: also think that places like Michigan, perhaps you know, you
Speaker 1: might have you might have a couple of states that say, sorry,
Speaker 1: we don't have a full count for you yet, and
Speaker 1: it's going to be a tight enough election that that
Speaker 1: could very well be the difference. So they they've set
Speaker 1: it up the only way that we have a both
Speaker 1: sides agreed upon victory election night is if Joe Biden
Speaker 1: takes you know, Ohio, Florida and all the rest of
Speaker 1: the Blue states, then it's then it flights out, folks,
Speaker 1: and we'll regroup, We'll be okay, we'll come back, and
Speaker 1: we'll hopefully have a set If we have a Senate majority,
Speaker 1: they're basically going to make sure they sit on the
Speaker 1: Biden agenda, and very little happens for the at least
Speaker 1: for the next two years anyway. So that's the best
Speaker 1: that I can tell you for silver lining on that one.
Speaker 1: And I'm sure there'll be some other races that turn
Speaker 1: out well for Republicans and we'll be able to say
Speaker 1: that's that's promising. I'm really pulling for my friends Sean
Speaker 1: Parnell in PA seventeen and Anna Paulina down in Tampa, Tampa, Florida,
Speaker 1: Anna Paulina Luna, hoping they both win their congressional seats.
Speaker 1: That'll be fantastic and they'll both be real forces in
Speaker 1: the Republican Party either, you know, individually, hopefully they both win,
Speaker 1: they'll be doing very well, and that's that's very important
Speaker 1: I think for everyone to understand expectations wise here. I
Speaker 1: think I'm gonna be talking to you Wednesday, and you
Speaker 1: can follow me obviously social media. I'll be real time
Speaker 1: commenting on all this and watch election night coverage on
Speaker 1: the First TV. Please do that as well. If you
Speaker 1: haven't downloaded the First app, it's free, just download it
Speaker 1: to your smartphone. You can watch me Bill O'Reilly, Jesse, Kelly,
Speaker 1: Dana Lash anytime you want. We'll be doing live coverage
Speaker 1: election night. So you know, I think I'm gonna be
Speaker 1: talking to you saying it's looking good for Trump. But
Speaker 1: the Democrats are trying They're trying to play games here.
Speaker 1: They're refusing to accept a loss. And that's just so ironic,
Speaker 1: isn't it, Because as we know, we always hear about
Speaker 1: how Trump refuses to accept a loss, and for the
Speaker 1: second time, I believe we're going to see Democrats refusing
Speaker 1: to accept a loss. I mean, think of the hyperbolic
Speaker 1: nature of the rhetoric that they used to describe this
Speaker 1: whole contest. Play six. Well, it's just a reminder that
Speaker 1: we still find ourselves in the civil rights movement, and
Speaker 1: right now we have the opportunity to write the next
Speaker 1: chapter in our civil rights history. You know what we're
Speaker 1: fire hoses and dogs are Today's what happened in my district,
Speaker 1: ourson at drop boxes is voter suppression, intimidation with long lines.
Speaker 1: So it is just more of the same. But it
Speaker 1: is also why we must be more emboldened than ever
Speaker 1: before when our democracy, our livelihood, and our very lives
Speaker 1: are all on the ballot. But it is it is
Speaker 1: infuriating our democracy and our lives are on the ballot.
Speaker 1: What's that all about? How are our lives on the ballot?
Speaker 1: I mean that seems quite extreme, doesn't it. And this
Speaker 1: discussion of the new civil rights era, where is this
Speaker 1: voter intimidation taking place? You know, they speak in this
Speaker 1: very vague Democrats will speak in these very vague terms
Speaker 1: about voter suppression. It's everywhere, but they can never really
Speaker 1: find it. It's a little bit like systemic racism. It's
Speaker 1: everything and everywhere, but there's no real instance of it.
Speaker 1: They're gonna point and be able to make the argument, well,
Speaker 1: that's the systemic racism we're talking about, And when they do,
Speaker 1: it's usually a very weak argument. You say, well, hold on,
Speaker 1: where is this systemic racism? Where is this systemic voter suppression, right,
Speaker 1: you know, you would think that voting, which is a process,
Speaker 1: should have rules and those rules should be enforced. But
Speaker 1: the closer we get to the actual election, you can
Speaker 1: see that the Democrat viewpoint on this is rules don't count.
Speaker 1: If discounting the rules helps us, if ignoring what the
Speaker 1: actual rules are is to our benefit, then that's what
Speaker 1: we're going to do. And we're going to pretend that
Speaker 1: anybody who does believe in the rules, anybody who does
Speaker 1: think that we should have, you know, it should be
Speaker 1: more defined based on what's actually written down instead of
Speaker 1: what the Democrats will benefit from politically. That person is
Speaker 1: an engaged in voter suppression. They're a bad person, someone
Speaker 1: you can't trust, someone you they they're part of the
Speaker 1: anti civil rights movement of our day. So just get
Speaker 1: get ready for that, my friends. The fight around all
Speaker 1: of this, around this election, I do not believe it
Speaker 1: will be over tomorrow night. In fact, the only way
Speaker 1: it's over tomorrow night really is if Biden wins by
Speaker 1: a substantial margin. Because our side won't do this. And
Speaker 1: I know some of you don't even want to hear this.
Speaker 1: Don't don't change that dial I'm just I'm just saying,
Speaker 1: but if Biden wins, we're gonna say, wow, okay, COVID
Speaker 1: tough year. Trump did his best, great presidency. Maybe, you know,
Speaker 1: maybe we've got some other great people that are in
Speaker 1: the mix here four years from now, and we got
Speaker 1: to start thinking about the mid terms and running the
Speaker 1: opposition against the Biden agenda. And you know, we go
Speaker 1: on with our lives that we're not gonna burn down
Speaker 1: stores and loot and riot, and that's what Democrats do.
Speaker 1: And I gotta tell you, I saw a little bit
Speaker 1: of stuff over the weekend where it seemed like some
Speaker 1: Trump supporters just in one case, we're shutting down a bridge. No,
Speaker 1: don't do that. Don't do that. It's not helping, it's
Speaker 1: not good. Let the other side be the one hundred
Speaker 1: percent of the politically motivated law breaking by mobs, all
Speaker 1: the stupid stuff they do, you know, blocking traffic and
Speaker 1: you know, running wild in the streets and the mob
Speaker 1: violence and all that stuff. Let that be entirely. Democrats
Speaker 1: do not do those kinds of tactics on the right.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, you know, I love the caravans, I love
Speaker 1: the enthusiasm and the rallies amazing, and I'm so thankful
Speaker 1: of the people out there support Trump as much as
Speaker 1: I do. Were doing that stuff. We only have like
Speaker 1: one or two instances. But you know what happens now
Speaker 1: those get all the focus. You know, you shut down
Speaker 1: the Mario Cuomo Bridge and who know, and I couldn't
Speaker 1: find anywhere was a shutdown for you know, two minutes
Speaker 1: or an hour? If it was two minutes, okay, I
Speaker 1: mean not great, but like not the end of the world.
Speaker 1: There's an hour or thirty minutes. We got a problem. Folks.
Speaker 1: Can't do that. Libs do that crap, Libs pull that nonsense.
Speaker 1: We don't do that stuff. You know, if nothing else,
Speaker 1: the Republican Party is the party of civilization, law and order,
Speaker 1: and in society run by emotionally stable adults. That's what
Speaker 1: the Republican Party of Donald Trump right now represents as
Speaker 1: opposed to their opponents on the other side. You're in
Speaker 1: the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast.
Speaker 1: One other thing I want to throw in here. We
Speaker 1: keep hearing that Donald Trump is and you know, this
Speaker 1: is one of their favorite things. It's very hard to
Speaker 1: argue with liberals over there. They'll say Donald Trump is
Speaker 1: a liar. We'll always hear Donald Trump is a liar,
Speaker 1: and so I can't I can't vote for him. I
Speaker 1: can't support him because he lies. He lies. They always
Speaker 1: say this, And yeah, the president can be a little
Speaker 1: bit of a bs artist sometimes on some things, a
Speaker 1: little imprecise with his words. He does exaggerate a little bit.
Speaker 1: He's he's a salesman, but you know, and now he's president,
Speaker 1: he's a politician. But I can't think of anything that
Speaker 1: Trump has lied about that was a matter of urgent
Speaker 1: public concern that was a true lie, where he took
Speaker 1: us in a direction that was the intentional opposite of
Speaker 1: what he knew to be factually true. I mean, and
Speaker 1: I know they would say there's fifteen thousand cases where
Speaker 1: Trump lies, and then you look at them and it's
Speaker 1: always an opinion, it's always whatever. So then you have
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, who's supposed to be mister honesty. And this
Speaker 1: is something that I have to laugh about because there's
Speaker 1: so much dishonesty in the presentation of Joe Biden as
Speaker 1: an honest guy. Joe Biden has a history of plagiarism,
Speaker 1: of lying about his personal achievements, and his record, I
Speaker 1: mean lying, right. Trump never said I know I have
Speaker 1: a PhD from Harvard, and well he actually has, you know,
Speaker 1: went to Warden, which is one of the best business
Speaker 1: schools in the world. But you know, he hasn't said
Speaker 1: something about where he went to school and where he
Speaker 1: was in class rank because Joe Biden has a total
Speaker 1: lie and try to leverage that, try to benefit from
Speaker 1: that politically. You know, Joe Biden has has lied his
Speaker 1: butt off about things when he was running for president before.
Speaker 1: And we're supposed to just not We're supposed to just
Speaker 1: not care. And here's another case of this, here's another
Speaker 1: case of Joe. But this is just a lie. This
Speaker 1: isn't a difference of opinion. This isn't a matter of
Speaker 1: gauging the extent of the truthfulness. This is a flat
Speaker 1: out lie in the absolute most important moment of an
Speaker 1: election cycle. Here's what Joe Biden says, Play fourteen. There's
Speaker 1: nothing to any of that, nothing to any of that.
Speaker 1: It's all smear. Every major outfit, every serious investigator has
Speaker 1: pointed out that this is a smear. This is clastic Trump.
Speaker 1: We have four days left and all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: there's a laptop. And you may recall there's also talk
Speaker 1: about four months before there was a similar thing that
Speaker 1: somebody had allegedly there's overwhelmine evidence that from the intelligence
Speaker 1: community that the Russians are engaged. I mean, look, this
Speaker 1: is my son's an honorable man. And all the investigations
Speaker 1: that were done around the issue of what was going
Speaker 1: on in Ukraine. If you notice, every one of the
Speaker 1: major people who worked for Trump during the impeachment went
Speaker 1: under oath, and under oath said Biden did his job.
Speaker 1: No law was bro this Biden did his job. Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden broke no laws. That was the testimony, their testimony
Speaker 1: from Republicans and intelligence community people. What a slimy liar
Speaker 1: this guy is. I mean, he's lying his butt off here.
Speaker 1: It's gross Russian. He's straight up going with the one
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden's labbed off is Russian disinformation. Why aren't members
Speaker 1: of the press And I asked that rhetorically, we all
Speaker 1: know why. But if they really did their jobs, every
Speaker 1: single stop he did, every place where he subjected himself
Speaker 1: to any questions, they would say, is the Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: laptop reel? Yes or no? It's a yes or no question,
Speaker 1: not everything's a yes or no question. They try to
Speaker 1: make the do you believe in climate change? Well, what
Speaker 1: does that really mean then the climate changes? Yes? Do
Speaker 1: I think that you know, AOC should be running economic
Speaker 1: policy based on green socialist nonsense? No? I do not.
Speaker 1: But this is a yes or no right. You know
Speaker 1: what is my name? Buck Sexted? Yes, there's there's no. Well,
Speaker 1: it depends on what you meet. No, no, No, I
Speaker 1: mean the answers yes, is the laptop reel? Yes or no.
Speaker 1: They won't push him on that question, and that's because
Speaker 1: he wants to get away with this notice. He lies.
Speaker 1: He talks about testimony. He mentioned something from four months ago.
Speaker 1: NBC News claims to have found some document that was
Speaker 1: from a fake intell community online intelligence person online that
Speaker 1: no one had ever heard of, that had no influence
Speaker 1: on anything. But that's actual disinformation. They're taking something that
Speaker 1: has nothing to do with anything. They drop it out
Speaker 1: there in the public conversation, and then they pretend that
Speaker 1: this report, which is like sort of supposed to be
Speaker 1: the equivalent of the dossier on Hunter Biden, that no
Speaker 1: one's heard of, that no one stopped. We're talking about
Speaker 1: a laptop that was found we have all the stuff,
Speaker 1: We've got all the goods, but they talk about this
Speaker 1: other thing. It's meant to be a just a distraction
Speaker 1: and muddy up the waters. They you cannot make it up. Friends,
Speaker 1: Biden and his little Democrat handlers and allies are using
Speaker 1: actual disinformation to falsely claim that Trump and his allies
Speaker 1: on this issue are peddling disinformation. They're using disinfo to
Speaker 1: lie about fighting dis info. That is what the Biden
Speaker 1: camp is up to right now. And this just goes
Speaker 1: to honesty. I think this guy is honest. Really, anybody
Speaker 1: anybody believe that? Anybody really wanting to explain to me
Speaker 1: why that's true? Now? Of course not, but it just
Speaker 1: goes into the narrative. The narrative is that Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: a good, honorable, decent man and Donald Trump is this
Speaker 1: this evil liar. That's what they always say. That in
Speaker 1: itself is a lot. That's the great irony here, that
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is honest. They just can't help themselves, friends,
Speaker 1: and anything they have to do at this point, as
Speaker 1: I've been telling you, they view is entirely just lying
Speaker 1: about lying to beat Trump isn't really lying if you're
Speaker 1: a Democrat. That's how they view it. Whatever you gotta do, Yeah,
Speaker 1: pretend it's Russian disinformation the laptop. No intelligent person thinks that.
Speaker 1: Pretend it's Russian dissond for me. Sure, went not nonsense.
Speaker 1: It's pathetic, isn't it. But it shows you who they
Speaker 1: are and what they're really all about. And that's something
Speaker 1: that we should all know and we should remember that
Speaker 1: going into election tomorrow. Thanks for listening to the buses
Speaker 1: and show post. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Let's get
Speaker 1: some word from the campaign trail, folks, and a man
Speaker 1: you all know very well. In fact, hopefully you're already
Speaker 1: sleeping on one of his pillows and perhaps taking a
Speaker 1: nap this afternoon or tomorrow morning or whatever on his sheets.
Speaker 1: We got our friend Mike Lindel with us now. He
Speaker 1: is the founder, inventor and CEO of My Pillow and
Speaker 1: we're so happy to have him now. Mike, thanks for
Speaker 1: joining us, Thanks for having me on. So you are
Speaker 1: out at some of these rallies speaking, I'll be half
Speaker 1: the president and in some of the key states Wisconsin, Michigan,
Speaker 1: and I know you do your manufacturing, you in your
Speaker 1: home state of Minnesota. Tell us what are you seeing
Speaker 1: out there at these rallies and what are you hearing
Speaker 1: from the folks who are hoping Trump wins. Well, there's
Speaker 1: a lot of things. One is that the they just
Speaker 1: did they just did a poll, and I guess twenty
Speaker 1: some percent of these people attending these rallies are former
Speaker 1: Democrats or our Democrats. And another twenty some percent never
Speaker 1: voted in two thousand and sixteen. So I'm very encouraged.
Speaker 1: In just the last few days, the real polls came
Speaker 1: out and you had Iowa up by seven, Minnesota, my
Speaker 1: home state, that we're going to shock the world up
Speaker 1: by two. I mean, these are and you know, then
Speaker 1: I went down to Georgia and here sixty thousand people
Speaker 1: show up. I've never seen anything I've been to. You know,
Speaker 1: I've been to concerts, I've been to huge events. I've
Speaker 1: never seen like this. The enthusiasm and the people walk
Speaker 1: for miles miles to get to that rally. And Mike Minnesota,
Speaker 1: this one, would you said, shock the world? That's absolutely
Speaker 1: the right descript his Minnesota. Minnesota is supposed to be
Speaker 1: solidly in the blue column. Right, that's what we're all
Speaker 1: led to believe. But you know that stage very well.
Speaker 1: It's your home state. Just tell us what makes you
Speaker 1: think Minnesota in particular is going to go Trump. Well,
Speaker 1: let me set the things. The stage two. We've been
Speaker 1: with Blew since nineteen seventy two. Oh, this is incredible.
Speaker 1: But we now in two sixteen, the president came within
Speaker 1: forty thousand bulls, within a percentage point of winning and
Speaker 1: he only came there once. That was two days before
Speaker 1: the election. I actually spoke at that. Well, he made
Speaker 1: me Henore Tairman and Minnesota Trump campaign, Well, I took
Speaker 1: that to a level and that you wouldn't believe. But
Speaker 1: we here's what's happened in Minnesota. We reached out to
Speaker 1: five million people either knocking on doors to talk to
Speaker 1: him or by phone. That was done the Iron Range
Speaker 1: in Minnesota. Even all the Democratic mayors there's nine of
Speaker 1: them that flipped and made it very public because the
Speaker 1: presidents saved our Iron Range with his deal, tariffs, everything
Speaker 1: he's done as South, all our farmers. We got the
Speaker 1: big purchase order from China and History just a few
Speaker 1: short weeks ago, so they're all on board. And then
Speaker 1: we have the suburbs, and we have Inneapolis and Saint Paul. Well,
Speaker 1: let me tell you what we had was the worst
Speaker 1: decisions ever made by a governor and mayor. When the
Speaker 1: riots started in Minnesota, that manifested to riots around our
Speaker 1: country in the world. These terrible decisions. Now you have
Speaker 1: all the suburbs, all the women they want, they're going
Speaker 1: to vote for Donald Trump. We want safety and security.
Speaker 1: We want our police force. We want that safety and security.
Speaker 1: You have all the suburban moms wanting their kids to
Speaker 1: go back to school. Then we need to open our schools.
Speaker 1: And then we have another advantage with other states. So
Speaker 1: we have elon Omar and when she got voted in,
Speaker 1: when she got in, took Keith Ellis in place, our
Speaker 1: terrible attorney general. Here's a country where all these people
Speaker 1: came from. That don't she makes it. She's not a
Speaker 1: trojan horse. She makes it very well known. She doesn't
Speaker 1: like the USA and she certainly doesn't like Israel. So
Speaker 1: we have all these advantages. But one of the things
Speaker 1: on the ground, I did a commercial for the President
Speaker 1: in Minnesota where these we had a round table. It's
Speaker 1: kind of like a my pillow commercial, but it was
Speaker 1: very organic. And I asked these Democrats who are former
Speaker 1: Democrats while they're flipping a lot of them said, you know,
Speaker 1: I don't even like the president, but I sure like
Speaker 1: what he's done. I like promises kept that he's kept.
Speaker 1: And a lot of them said, my Democratic Party, that
Speaker 1: ship sailed a long time ago. If I vote Democrat,
Speaker 1: I'm not voting I'm voting for a trojan horse with Biden,
Speaker 1: and I'm voting for this radical, crazy socialist agenda that
Speaker 1: they have, and it would be and we all realize
Speaker 1: that Minnesota, we've gotten the word out, so I'm very
Speaker 1: confident we're going to shock the world. And I told
Speaker 1: the President about two or three weeks ago, I said,
Speaker 1: I said, we're gonna win Minnesota. Sir. We're speaking to
Speaker 1: inventor and CEO of my Pillow. You'll know him, Mike Lindell,
Speaker 1: the man himself, and he's out there on the campaign
Speaker 1: t all trying to make it happen for this president. Mike.
Speaker 1: For people listening, I mean, because you have the unique
Speaker 1: respect of being someone who gets to go to these
Speaker 1: rallies and the president you know, knows you well, but
Speaker 1: you're also day to day you know, you're running a business,
Speaker 1: a very successful, large business that's partnered with this show,
Speaker 1: and appreciate that very much. What has been different about
Speaker 1: these four years? And try to give us, you know,
Speaker 1: as much of the of the real meat of the
Speaker 1: matter as he can. What's different under a Trump administration
Speaker 1: for a big national level business like yours from what
Speaker 1: it would have been facing under the Obama Biden years. Well,
Speaker 1: it was all the regulations that he's been taken out
Speaker 1: of the picture, so tall business can survive. And obviously
Speaker 1: the biggest tax cuts in history. And what I've seen,
Speaker 1: what I've noticed, I was always very my pillow, I
Speaker 1: have fifteen hundred I call him careers, not just job,
Speaker 1: fifteen hundred employees. But what I noticed is Wow, all
Speaker 1: around us and where my factories are, all the other
Speaker 1: people new manufacturing was coming in. The ones that were
Speaker 1: there were paying more. You know, right before this China
Speaker 1: virus pandemic, we had the best economy ever, the lowest
Speaker 1: unemployment ever. But one of the things we had was
Speaker 1: consumer confidence. It was amazing. We're entrepreneurs and people were
Speaker 1: taking chances now with these small businesses and inventions because
Speaker 1: they could fall back to a great paying job, and
Speaker 1: you know, he got us through. This president got us
Speaker 1: through this pandemic shape millions alife, got us through and
Speaker 1: is getting it through better than anyone in history. But
Speaker 1: I just watched all the promises when I met him
Speaker 1: in the summer of two thousand and sixteen and we
Speaker 1: talked about Mike, I'm going to bring the manufacturing back
Speaker 1: and just like my pillow naking the USA, and he
Speaker 1: did all that, and I just watched it happen all
Speaker 1: around me, where my friends that had lost their careers
Speaker 1: prior to two thousand and sixteen, now they had high
Speaker 1: paying jobs again and their houses. Just a confidence and
Speaker 1: I've never seen anything like it in my lifetime, with
Speaker 1: a direction and what he brought us in a few
Speaker 1: short years. And he's going to not only bring us
Speaker 1: out of this pandemic, but we're going to be stronger
Speaker 1: and safer than ever. He's just common sense. He turned
Speaker 1: the Republican Party into the common sense Party. I think
Speaker 1: that's absolutely true. I've been saying before. Anyone who just
Speaker 1: looks at what makes sense in recent years, the policies
Speaker 1: as they've played out, and understands how human nature and
Speaker 1: the economy really functions has to feel like the Democrat
Speaker 1: Party has to put it to put it just honestly
Speaker 1: lost its mind. And it's not even you don't even
Speaker 1: have to be on board for kind of the more
Speaker 1: the more theatrical aspects of MAGA. You just have to
Speaker 1: understand it's gonna be better for the American worker, better
Speaker 1: for the American people. Absolutely. You know, our president he
Speaker 1: has a gift. When I met him in the summer
Speaker 1: of sixteen, I recognized right away he just had a
Speaker 1: gift of problems solution. But there's one where there's a
Speaker 1: god given gift. He knows what it's going to manifest too.
Speaker 1: That's huge. And he makes decisions. I want everyone out
Speaker 1: there to know, you know, I went all in as
Speaker 1: a businessman or whatever. I risk everything going all in,
Speaker 1: but I knew it was the right thing because I'll
Speaker 1: tell you what. He makes decisions based on helping the kids,
Speaker 1: no other agenda other than to help our great country
Speaker 1: and help each and every one of us have joyful lives.
Speaker 1: You know, that's what he's making decisions based on that
Speaker 1: instead of what I've noticed now is I've gotten to
Speaker 1: be very you know, meeting all these people from both
Speaker 1: sides of the of the Democrats and Republicans. They there's
Speaker 1: decisions that are made by lifetime politicians or terrible governors
Speaker 1: like my governor Minnesota. They make them for political reasons
Speaker 1: or for their own personal agenda. It's either or, and
Speaker 1: that's horrible. That's why we've been and when we say
Speaker 1: drain the swamp, that's what he's been doing on both sides.
Speaker 1: And you know it didn't take him. It only took
Speaker 1: him a few short years to turn the republic Party
Speaker 1: into the Common Sense Party. I think we still have
Speaker 1: one name Romney that's still kind of a nut job.
Speaker 1: That's a rhino. But but other than that, you know,
Speaker 1: you're taking this. We need someone to continue after he
Speaker 1: wins this election and in the future that the Democrat Party.
Speaker 1: You guys aren't vote for them where that ship sailed,
Speaker 1: you're voting for a trojan horse. That would be the
Speaker 1: most crazy radical leadership we see it in my home
Speaker 1: state of Minnesota. How terrible it is when you make
Speaker 1: decisions for political reasons. Mike Lindell, inventor and CEO of
Speaker 1: My Pillow. You guys know, we have My Pillow as
Speaker 1: a partner here on the show, and we're very grateful
Speaker 1: and thankful for that. Mike, my friend. I hope from
Speaker 1: your lips to God's ears on this election, we'll have
Speaker 1: you back to talk about how it went as soon
Speaker 1: as we know. Oh, we're gonna know. We're all gonna win.
Speaker 1: Right now, Everybody, if you're a business owner, whoever you
Speaker 1: are out there, give your employees off tomorrow so they
Speaker 1: can go vote. Get your friend's family to get out
Speaker 1: and vote. If they need a ride, get him to
Speaker 1: the polls. Everybody, we got to win this. There is
Speaker 1: no tomorrow. This is for the greatest revival in history,
Speaker 1: and this is the most important election of our lifetime.
Speaker 1: Mike Lindell, everybody, Mike, thanks so much. Thanks me. You're
Speaker 1: in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sex and
Speaker 1: Show podcast. What's my biggest fear about a Biden win?
Speaker 1: And there are a lot of them, and I know, friends,
Speaker 1: I've already told you I think Trump's gonna win and
Speaker 1: everything else. But but it's worth understanding what we face
Speaker 1: if God forbid turns out that my little spidy sense
Speaker 1: on this one, my intuition, my buck radar, whatever you
Speaker 1: want to call it, turned out to be wrong. What
Speaker 1: are we facing with a Biden win, and the single
Speaker 1: biggest problem that I think will have now we also
Speaker 1: got to know do they have the Senator not. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna assume for our purposes now that they don't have
Speaker 1: the Senate, because if they win the presidency and they
Speaker 1: win a majority in the Senate, then I'm really worried.
Speaker 1: Right then we got a whole other conversation to have
Speaker 1: about what goes on in this country. But even if
Speaker 1: we maintain Senate control, you've got to look at what's
Speaker 1: going to happen here with just Biden as president and COVID.
Speaker 1: They really like this power that they have, and that
Speaker 1: this this narrative that Democrats are the ones who take
Speaker 1: science seriously and they fight the virus and it's the
Speaker 1: evil Republicans Trump supporters that are the reason the virus
Speaker 1: still spreads is something that the left, the socialist Democrats,
Speaker 1: are really invested in. Now. They're super comfortable with us.
Speaker 1: They love it, they love it. And and the mask
Speaker 1: wearing as evidence of mask wearing as as pro science
Speaker 1: virtue signaling has become such a norm now when I
Speaker 1: say mask wearing is virtue signaling, he sure there are
Speaker 1: times when if you want to wear a mask, you're
Speaker 1: indoors you around people. Maybe it has some effect or whatever.
Speaker 1: I get that. Mandates, though, mandates are the problem because
Speaker 1: mandates imply state authority to do something and state ability
Speaker 1: to punish you for not doing it, and to wear
Speaker 1: a piece of to be forced to wear this stifling
Speaker 1: piece of fabric over your mouth and knows all the
Speaker 1: time on the government say so, is a massive intrusion.
Speaker 1: It is. It is. People can pretend like it's nothing.
Speaker 1: It's not nothing. It's an enormous intrusion onto your rights.
Speaker 1: And it's also now the government taking a role in
Speaker 1: public health that has no end in sight. If the
Speaker 1: government can do this for COVID, think about what else
Speaker 1: the government can mandate you do based on health concerns,
Speaker 1: And you would think will buck a rational The reasonable
Speaker 1: man standard would stop that from happening. And I'm here
Speaker 1: to tell you the reasonable man standard does not apply
Speaker 1: to Democrats, simply does not apply. They don't care. They
Speaker 1: will abuse, they will abuse their power, they will abuse
Speaker 1: that authority. And this is where Joe Biden comes in
Speaker 1: and tells us all that what is he going to do?
Speaker 1: One day? One play fifteen, We're gonna act to get
Speaker 1: COVID under control. On day one of my presidency, I'll
Speaker 1: put an action a plan I've been taking about talking
Speaker 1: about for months already laid out a national mandate mask warring,
Speaker 1: social distancing, testing, tracing all things. As President Obama just said,
Speaker 1: it should have it could have put in place months
Speaker 1: and months ago. A national mask mandate. That's gonna save us.
Speaker 1: That's what they tell us. That's all you have to do.
Speaker 1: Put a national mask man that in place, and everything
Speaker 1: else will be just fine. No need to be concerned,
Speaker 1: no need to think or worry about anything else. The
Speaker 1: national mask mandate will get it done. Oh testing trace?
Speaker 1: Does anyone take that seriously? They don'tyone really believe that
Speaker 1: we can trace cases of COVID. We absolutely can't. But
Speaker 1: there seems to be this, uh, this notion out there
Speaker 1: that if we just keep talking about it, that Joe's
Speaker 1: got a plan. This is a fairy tale proposal, friends,
Speaker 1: This is a fix that's never going to come to fruition.
Speaker 1: This is not going to happen. We're going to continue
Speaker 1: to have some COVID cases in this country. Tragically, people
Speaker 1: will continue to die until we get to hurt immunity.
Speaker 1: Which a vaccine will be hopefully a considerable part of
Speaker 1: That's it. Everything else is just noise. There's no there's
Speaker 1: no controlling the virus for forever. This is not going
Speaker 1: to happen right there. We're not going to be able
Speaker 1: to do that as a society. It wouldn't work no
Speaker 1: matter how much they mandated. It's not going to change.
Speaker 1: But I'm really worried that what we face is the
Speaker 1: Democrats trying to make this vision a reality of the
Speaker 1: total control that they would need. Here is Buddha Judge,
Speaker 1: who's now a surrogate for the Biden campaign. He was
Speaker 1: formerly a contender against Biden. You remember him, mayor of
Speaker 1: South Bend, Indiana, wanted to be president. And here he
Speaker 1: is when asked about whether a nationwide lockdown. And let's understand,
Speaker 1: mask mandate is by order of the federal government, you
Speaker 1: must wear a mask. I want to know outside because
Speaker 1: that's anti science. But my guess is yes, got to
Speaker 1: wear a mask all the time. And if it's wear
Speaker 1: a mask unless you can social distance, then it's not
Speaker 1: a mandate at all. It's a suggestion. So if they're
Speaker 1: really gonna mandated, it would have to be you can't.
Speaker 1: You can't go anywhere without a mask. Got to have
Speaker 1: a mask on it all times, federal law says, or
Speaker 1: federal executive order. But a lockdown is even more severe.
Speaker 1: As you know, lockdown is you must stay in your
Speaker 1: home for a prescribed period of time. That's some real
Speaker 1: tyrannical stuff. That's crazy, right. This is not like a
Speaker 1: one day thing because there's a tornado and there's a
Speaker 1: state of emergency. This is, you know, as long as
Speaker 1: we say so, you must stay in your home unless
Speaker 1: you're getting food. Italy did this, Oh, that's right. Italy
Speaker 1: has a huge amount of COVID cases right now. Wait,
Speaker 1: you mean that they didn't stamp out the virus. This
Speaker 1: was never about stamping out the virus when we started,
Speaker 1: but it morphed into that because the logic of this
Speaker 1: was people get scared and scared and scared, and the
Speaker 1: government won't admit that it cannot protect them. Lockdowns do
Speaker 1: not work. Mask mandates do not work. That's not the
Speaker 1: same thing as saying a mask will never help you
Speaker 1: at all from aerosolized virus or any kind of disease.
Speaker 1: It's not the same thing. But a mask mandate as
Speaker 1: a policy does not work the way that they have
Speaker 1: told us that it works. Right, if you had a
Speaker 1: law that said you must eat healthy, that's a law
Speaker 1: that will just be abused and is dumb and will
Speaker 1: not work because people are gonna do what they're gonna do.
Speaker 1: It's a big it's an important difference. The left doesn't
Speaker 1: really understand this, or they don't care to understand. It's
Speaker 1: tough to know which one it is. But here's Pete
Speaker 1: Buddha judge on the possibility right away. Remember, the Biden
Speaker 1: team wants to do this right away in January of
Speaker 1: a nationwide lockdown Play nine. If Joe Biden wins, should
Speaker 1: another lockdown be on the table? Well, hopefully it doesn't
Speaker 1: come to that, because we will see swift action coordinating
Speaker 1: with and supporting public health authorities telling us what we
Speaker 1: can do as citizens without requiring any kind of mandates.
Speaker 1: But everything has to be on the table in order
Speaker 1: to keep Americans safe. Look, we should never have got
Speaker 1: to this point. It should never have been allowed to
Speaker 1: get this bad. But what we know is that even
Speaker 1: something as simple and inexpensive as wearing a mask, if
Speaker 1: everybody does, it dramatically changes what's possible. I would also
Speaker 1: note that you know, lockdown or no. I've been talking
Speaker 1: to a lot of small business owners, especially here in
Speaker 1: the Midwest, who are saying, look, even when they're able
Speaker 1: to open, customers aren't going to come unless they know
Speaker 1: they're safe. This is one of many reasons why the
Speaker 1: first rule of virus economics is to beat the virus
Speaker 1: or else you won't have an economy. They keep creating
Speaker 1: these false choices. We're not gonna lockdown, but we're gonna
Speaker 1: keep everybody safe from the virus. That's not possible. So
Speaker 1: they're living in a fantasy here. They've created this completely
Speaker 1: false narrative of they're gonna do things so differently than
Speaker 1: Trump and everything. The economy is going to be better,
Speaker 1: the lockdown is not gonna or you know, there is
Speaker 1: gonna be lockdown, but it won't be that bad. Whatever.
Speaker 1: It's all crap. Lies, friends, this is all nonsense. But
Speaker 1: this is the worst thing that I think will happen
Speaker 1: to us if Biden wins, we'll have to deal with
Speaker 1: their COVID insanity for the next year at least. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to The Bus Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe
Speaker 1: on Apple podcasts. The iHeartRadio app or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. Don't tell anybody, but let me wait till
Speaker 1: a little bit after the election. I don't know if
Speaker 1: you can make it out from the crowd there at
Speaker 1: one of the rallies, but Trump Trump's supporters were yelling
Speaker 1: fire Fouci, and he says he's gonna win out. He
Speaker 1: may have been just been being playful, funny Trump there,
Speaker 1: but I don't know. I hope he fires Fauci. I
Speaker 1: think Fauci's a disaster, a nightmare. This guy's the worst.
Speaker 1: Just makes all he does is show up saying, you know,
Speaker 1: it's gonna be bad, and then it might get a
Speaker 1: little worse, and then it could be worser because it's
Speaker 1: gonna be really bad, and you know, you really got
Speaker 1: a mask and you gotta just you know, not really
Speaker 1: live your life at all, you know, because the infections
Speaker 1: not gonna stop unless you wear a mask. And you
Speaker 1: gotta wear a mask. I mean, this is all this
Speaker 1: guy does. No great ideas, not some brilliant scientists who's
Speaker 1: helping develop the cure or something. No, he just walks
Speaker 1: around saying, you, oh, yeah, you know, wear a mask,
Speaker 1: and what am I gonna do? Another Cuver shoot for
Speaker 1: Vanity Fan. He really seems to care about the brand
Speaker 1: of Foucci. This guy has not been good, not been helpful,
Speaker 1: has not come up with any solutions, any programs, anything
Speaker 1: at all that has really made this markedly better. It's
Speaker 1: just a bureaucrat, a glorified bureaucrat in a lab coat,
Speaker 1: telling America to constantly be terrified of this. Now we
Speaker 1: have at least some hope that he will no longer
Speaker 1: be in charge of Trump wins. If Trump loses, you're
Speaker 1: going to be living in the tyranny of Fauci for
Speaker 1: the next twelve to eighteen months. Even when we think
Speaker 1: the virus has receded, there will be people who say
Speaker 1: it could come back. Oh no, even with a fifty
Speaker 1: or sixty percent effective vaccine. Oh that's not one hundred percent.
Speaker 1: Wear a mask. Wear a mask. They will say, the
Speaker 1: fouch it's gonna tell you to wear a mask. Oh God.
Speaker 1: I really really hope that it doesn't come to this,
Speaker 1: but I think it's going to. And I just hope
Speaker 1: that we don't have to deal with this because it's
Speaker 1: going to be a long, cold, crappy winter. If in fact,
Speaker 1: the Fauci model is what we adopt instead of just
Speaker 1: understanding the virus is going to do what the virus does. Oh,
Speaker 1: speaking of people, we shouldn't listen to some of the
Speaker 1: celebrities out there that speak out about politics. I'm kind
Speaker 1: of glad that they do. I find it. I find it.
Speaker 1: I'm using so in a sense, I'm I'm thankful that
Speaker 1: what we have at some level, that what we have
Speaker 1: here is stupid celebrities who are all Democrats who come
Speaker 1: out and they're just making their self aggrandizing videos telling
Speaker 1: people who they should vote for, you know, the Ilissimlano effect.
Speaker 1: Let's hear from the dumbest, least informed, most most self involved,
Speaker 1: and selfish people in society who are incredibly lucky to
Speaker 1: have the positions they do mostly because they have a
Speaker 1: good looking face. That's most celebrities, most actors that have
Speaker 1: been really successful, it's because of their face. I mean
Speaker 1: actually their physical form. They won the genetics lottery, and
Speaker 1: now we're all supposed to listen to their thoughts on
Speaker 1: political philosophy. I choose not to. I think that that's
Speaker 1: pretty ridiculous. These are among the least connected to society
Speaker 1: and least well informed people who have this kind of
Speaker 1: platform you could ever find. Right, there are dumber people
Speaker 1: than famous actors, but very few, really really dumb people
Speaker 1: have the kind of sway and public discussion that famous
Speaker 1: actors have, And the same thing is true for actors
Speaker 1: slash musicians or musicians slash actors. This was Lady Gaga
Speaker 1: Stephanie German Nada, who fun fact, went to the sister
Speaker 1: high school of my high school, was in my old
Speaker 1: my little brother's year, and went to prom either my
Speaker 1: little brother's year or the year above him went to
Speaker 1: prom at my high school. So you know, what, can
Speaker 1: I say? We got some some notables that would coming
Speaker 1: through the doors at Region's High School in New York.
Speaker 1: But her politics are what you would expect for somebody
Speaker 1: who's probably worth a hundred million dollars or more and
Speaker 1: get to dance around that have everyone adore them. Doesn't
Speaker 1: really understand what it means to just be a normal
Speaker 1: person going through life right now, doesn't really have that
Speaker 1: that connection. And here she is trying to I mean,
Speaker 1: you have to see the visual to really make full
Speaker 1: sense of it, but here she is trying to sort
Speaker 1: of tell everybody, you know, hey, I'm just like you.
Speaker 1: Drinking a beer, hanging out. People say this is her
Speaker 1: redneck impersonation, and you could hear some of it in
Speaker 1: the audio play it. Hey, this is Lady Gaga. I'm
Speaker 1: voting for America, which means I'm voting for Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: And if you live in Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Florida,
Speaker 1: or Arizona, I encourage you to vote. And if you
Speaker 1: have a friend that lives there, tell them to vote.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna be in one of these states tomorrow. Guess
Speaker 1: what's when I'll be in Hence. I used to live there.
Speaker 1: Now you kind of can hear. At the end, she
Speaker 1: drinks and crunches up a beer can and she's like,
Speaker 1: miss yeah, I'm just like a like a Midwestern American
Speaker 1: person who is a you know, super famous pop star
Speaker 1: with a bajillion dollars and armies of fans that adore her.
Speaker 1: But I'm just like, I'm just like you American person,
Speaker 1: driving your pickup truck and drinking your beer with your
Speaker 1: baseball hat on. I mean, she's you gotta see the ad.
Speaker 1: It's so it's like she thinks she's trying to fit
Speaker 1: in with an alien and species known as normal Americans.
Speaker 1: That's really what you get. That's the sense you get
Speaker 1: from this. That's pretty funny. Oh gosh, I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: say it. Really really overrated, Really Overrated has a couple
Speaker 1: of catchy, ketchy pop tunes that I think, really no
Speaker 1: one's going to remember in ten years. And you actually
Speaker 1: a talented musician. But I always feel likeking people say that,
Speaker 1: I want to remind them they're talented musicians all over
Speaker 1: the place who never get famous, never get big. So
Speaker 1: you know, I would like it if if the approach
Speaker 1: of people that are so successful in society was the
Speaker 1: even greater humility and sense of service to others that
Speaker 1: would come from knowing how lucky they are, how how
Speaker 1: fortunate they are, and that they should just be thanking
Speaker 1: the society and the country around them that allowed them
Speaker 1: to achieve these extreme levels of wealth. And now that's
Speaker 1: what I think should happen with celebrities. But the opposite
Speaker 1: actually happens. Like I said, the Ilissimolano effect. You get sanctimonious, imbecile,
Speaker 1: you know, real airheads who think that people that are
Speaker 1: just trying to get a better leadership class of America
Speaker 1: in place Finally that is honorable and smart and knows
Speaker 1: what they're doing. That they're bad people because you don't
Speaker 1: believe in climate change or whatever some other nonsense. You're
Speaker 1: in the freedom hud. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast,
Speaker 1: Team Buck, It's time for roll call. All right, roll call.
Speaker 1: I remember you're gonna buck Sexton dot com. That's buck
Speaker 1: Sexton dot com. We got stories up there. I'll be
Speaker 1: posting an editorial in the election. It's gonna be good stuff,
Speaker 1: good things. You're gonna love that site, right, producer Mark.
Speaker 1: Doesn't it look so nice? Oh? It looks lovely. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we did a whole redo of the site. It's new
Speaker 1: and improved. Big fans of it now go check it
Speaker 1: out Bucksexton dot com And if you want to send
Speaker 1: us more on a rollcall, Team Bucket, iHeartMedia dot com
Speaker 1: or Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton also Instagram messages.
Speaker 1: Send us a DM and let's get to it. Pete
Speaker 1: rights up here. Hey, Buck, I've been listening to calling
Speaker 1: for resistance to the mask mandates and I wholeheartedly agree.
Speaker 1: Early this summer, I took off my mask in the gym.
Speaker 1: There were eight other people in the whole place, and
Speaker 1: they were all slowly dropping their masks. An employee confronted
Speaker 1: me and told me to put my mask on or leave.
Speaker 1: I told him that I would not do that. I
Speaker 1: would do neither. When he asked why I wouldn't put
Speaker 1: the mask on, I responded non violent protest. He became
Speaker 1: clearly agitated when I asserted my rights and said he
Speaker 1: would call the police. I told him they would have
Speaker 1: to bring extra handcuffs through as the eight other people
Speaker 1: who weren't wearing their masks either. I worked out without
Speaker 1: my mask. Asking the police never came. My greatest concern
Speaker 1: is not protesting. The current mandate is enables tyrannical governors
Speaker 1: like Polis to think that if we fell in line
Speaker 1: this time, will fall in line next time too. Our
Speaker 1: compliance only emboldens these tyrants. So my question is how
Speaker 1: are we going to resist? I have my ideas, but
Speaker 1: I want to hear what you think. Uh yeah, Pete,
Speaker 1: I'm I align with you on a lot of this stuff,
Speaker 1: and I think that Look, I do feel badly for
Speaker 1: people in positions where they're employees of an establishment, where
Speaker 1: they're supposed to enforce this and they don't want to.
Speaker 1: But remember Democrats fight very hard about limiting COVID liability
Speaker 1: for people. So you may have COVID liability if you
Speaker 1: if somebody claims they got infected in your place and
Speaker 1: you don't enforce the mask mandate, right So this is
Speaker 1: this is why mandates are a different thing from whether
Speaker 1: or not you want to mask. You want to mask up,
Speaker 1: go for it. And if a private establishment says that
Speaker 1: you should have to mask up, okay, fine, that's their choice.
Speaker 1: But you know, if one bar says mask up and
Speaker 1: the other bar says, you know what, this is kind
Speaker 1: of dumb. Just don't come in here if you're sick.
Speaker 1: People should be able to make the choice between the two.
Speaker 1: But right now there's no choice because either the state
Speaker 1: health authorities or if Biden wins, will be the federal authorities.
Speaker 1: And even still, because of the laws that exist, the
Speaker 1: statutes around liability mean that you don't have a choice.
Speaker 1: You don't have a choice as to whether you could
Speaker 1: just operate your establishment without a mask mandate. Which remember,
Speaker 1: it's not the same thing. Not having a mask mandate
Speaker 1: doesn't mean no one's going to come into your place
Speaker 1: wearing a mask. I remember in the New York City subway.
Speaker 1: You know, for the last ten years, you would see
Speaker 1: people sometimes wearing masks on the subway, though usually were
Speaker 1: from East Asia or you know, we're Asian American, but
Speaker 1: that was a common cultural thing for a while. You
Speaker 1: see it, you see it in Asia. It's very common
Speaker 1: in China and Japan. Though we're masks during flu season.
Speaker 1: So I would see it here in New York City
Speaker 1: and there's no problem. No one's like, oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: person's wearing a mask during flu season. What are they doing?
Speaker 1: Not a big deal. But we have is the other thing.
Speaker 1: But we have is a system now where morons who
Speaker 1: live in my building in New York will see me
Speaker 1: walk alone out of my building without a mask on,
Speaker 1: and I'm standing outside, and they'll call for me to say,
Speaker 1: why do you walk through the lobby without a mask on?
Speaker 1: And I'll say, I mean, i'm outside, man, there's no
Speaker 1: one even in there, like what I was in there
Speaker 1: for five seconds? You want me to put a mask
Speaker 1: on for five seconds? And these are people, remind you,
Speaker 1: You got to remind yourself. They're going to restaurants and
Speaker 1: other places without masks at all, indoors for hours at
Speaker 1: a time. But they're worried about the five seconds that
Speaker 1: I'm not complying walking through the lobby of the building
Speaker 1: that I live in, right I mean, this is this
Speaker 1: stupid world that we're living in right now. This is
Speaker 1: the stupid you know, Michigan now is requiring people to
Speaker 1: give their name and phone number if they go to
Speaker 1: a bar, which I'm sure some of the names that
Speaker 1: are in usage are very creative and not able to
Speaker 1: be said on a nationally syndicated radio program A. But
Speaker 1: that's the society we're adding for now. Yeah, because the
Speaker 1: the state government in Michigan is really going to follow
Speaker 1: up effectively with everyone who goes to a bar, and
Speaker 1: they're going to track down all these cases of COVID.
Speaker 1: This is just dumb, folks, This is just panic stuff.
Speaker 1: No one really thinks this makes this makes it better.
Speaker 1: No one really believes that this solves the problems. But
Speaker 1: they won't accept that they can't solve the problems, so
Speaker 1: they make us do this stupid nonsense. James rides Buck
Speaker 1: The real Dracula episode of Shield's Eye was all I
Speaker 1: hoped that would be. And then some retelling the story
Speaker 1: of lad Dracula in its historical contact was incredibly informive,
Speaker 1: informative and entertaining. And if a heavy metal band hasn't
Speaker 1: already named itself Lord and Paler, they're missing out on
Speaker 1: a golden opportunity. Shield's Eye and all the best to
Speaker 1: you and producer Mark. Thank you so much, James. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm really proud of this Dracula Shields Ye podcast. You
Speaker 1: can check it out if you haven't already. It's timeless, folks,
Speaker 1: so it's not like you missed it from the new
Speaker 1: cycle or something. It's just me telling you the story
Speaker 1: of the real Dracula and doing it away where I
Speaker 1: really covered everything this time. I'd done it in the
Speaker 1: past on radio shows where I would talk about it
Speaker 1: for maybe fifteen minutes or something, but I hadn't really
Speaker 1: done this full on, you know, soup to nuts, top
Speaker 1: to bottom life of Vlad sepesh Lad, the Third Vlad
Speaker 1: the Impaler. That was what I wanted to Dracula, obviously,
Speaker 1: that's what I wanted to do. So Yeah, his dad's
Speaker 1: name is Drakoul, by the way, which I feel like
Speaker 1: it's even scarier sounding, right, And I know you think
Speaker 1: of Dracula, Oh that sounds pretty It means dragon. You
Speaker 1: get see if you know all this if you listen
Speaker 1: to Shields High episode. So yet another reason why you
Speaker 1: should check it out. Man, come join the revolution, Hey,
Speaker 1: Buck Shields High. I don't know if many people have
Speaker 1: noticed this from John, but the left plays this number
Speaker 1: game where ninety seven percent of the protesting is or
Speaker 1: was peaceful and don't worry, while COVID nineteen has an
Speaker 1: overall ninety six percent survival rate, but wear a mask,
Speaker 1: panic and shut everything down. I see it. I hope you.
Speaker 1: I hope I think your listeners see it too, the
Speaker 1: idiocy and stupidity of how the numbers only count for
Speaker 1: one side, and how the left can use those numbers
Speaker 1: to justify their actions no matter what. By the way, John,
Speaker 1: I think this survival raid for COVID is actually much
Speaker 1: higher than that. I think it's more like ninety nine percent,
Speaker 1: but which I know, ninety six percent is high, but
Speaker 1: ninety nine percent is really high or you gotta think
Speaker 1: you're gonna strapolate this out over hundreds of thousands of cases.
Speaker 1: So yeah, I know they play numbers games. The answer
Speaker 1: to what percentage of your political protests in America today
Speaker 1: should involve burning down police stations? Violence? Or the answer
Speaker 1: is zero. That's it should be zero percent. Shouldn't be
Speaker 1: five percent, ten zero percent. Paul writes, Hey, Buck, and Mark,
Speaker 1: I have a question. Most of the leftist ideas about
Speaker 1: making it easier to vote are obviously designed to help
Speaker 1: them cheat. But I can't see how either party would
Speaker 1: benefit from making election to national holiday, and I can't
Speaker 1: see how the party would beef anyway. It actually seems
Speaker 1: like a pretty reasonable idea to me. Is there a
Speaker 1: hidden catch that I'm missing? Keep my shield high and
Speaker 1: occupied California stand hey, Paul Man, keep your shield high
Speaker 1: and yeah. Look, I think that I think a national
Speaker 1: holiday for election day makes sense. I don't see a
Speaker 1: problem with that. I don't know why we can't do it.
Speaker 1: What's the issue? Now? Remember there's still be a lot
Speaker 1: of people that have to work. So I think that
Speaker 1: people say, look, you should be able to find time
Speaker 1: to go do this. The polls are open till eight
Speaker 1: or nine or something. You know, you go when you
Speaker 1: got to go. But I don't know. I think I
Speaker 1: think a holiday would be a good idea. I don't
Speaker 1: see the problem with it. Someone can explain to you you
Speaker 1: what the problem is. I do see the problem with
Speaker 1: daylight savings time? What is producer mark? Where are you
Speaker 1: on this nonsense? This time we gained an hour, so
Speaker 1: I liked it. When we lose an hour, I dislike
Speaker 1: it fair. But what if we if we had to
Speaker 1: go with zero or what we do right now? What
Speaker 1: would you do? I don't see a reason for the
Speaker 1: time change now. It seems so dumb, seems so dumb.
Speaker 1: I gotta I gotta use like I'm a little mcgiver.
Speaker 1: I gotta redo the time on my on my microwave.
Speaker 1: And otherwise I'm in a panic all the time. I
Speaker 1: think I'm even more late than I usually am for
Speaker 1: our show. Right, I'm like, oh my gosh, what I
Speaker 1: gotta do all this? And I got doo doo doo
Speaker 1: pressing little buttons and figure it'll make it easy, It'll
Speaker 1: make it easy. Yeah, I still have to do my stove.
Speaker 1: I think my wife took care of the micro exactly.
Speaker 1: Do the stove clock the bane of my existence? So
Speaker 1: that's what I see there, Um, so let's see here.
Speaker 1: Next up we have Manda who rides buck What is
Speaker 1: your Spotify name? I can't find your beast mode playlist. Um,
Speaker 1: I thought my Spotify name was was, Oh, it might
Speaker 1: be James Buckman Sexton, which is my full name. So yeah,
Speaker 1: it might be in a James Buckman just to give
Speaker 1: out your social Security number. Now, yeah, that's all I
Speaker 1: feel like people know my I think that's on way.
Speaker 1: I know, I'm just messing with you, all right, I
Speaker 1: get very sensitive about that, alright, alright, alright, but yeah, no,
Speaker 1: I think it's James Buckman Sexton and uh yeah that's
Speaker 1: probably why. So I'll maybe you know what, I'll share it.
Speaker 1: I'll share it on my Instagram. So there you go.
Speaker 1: I'll share my beast Mode playlist on Instagram. You can
Speaker 1: tell me what you guys think of it. Thank you, Amanda.
Speaker 1: That's the show for today. Everybody. Tomorrow, Election Day, go vote,
Speaker 1: Please go vote. Until then she'll tie