WEBVTT - Ep. 119: Walking the Edge

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>This is me eat your podcast coming at you shirtless, severely,

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>bug bitten and in my case, underwear listening podcast. You

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>can't predict anything, all right, Bracy V. Hill. The second,

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna role play for a minute. You're you're at

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>a party and you're you're up at the punch bowl

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and someone comes up and they say, no, what do

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>you what do you do for a living? And you

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>tell him what I say, I'm a history professor, kind

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 1>of okay to continue role playing. Then I'll be Then

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll say I'm I'm your interlockate tour at this party.

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.279
<v Speaker 1>I say, well, what like what? And I go, you know,

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 1>I did my dissertation on British rational religion in the

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>late seventeenth century and early eighteenth century, but I teach

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>American hunting history and particularly how it intersects with religion.

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm tracking what most people don't at that point in time.

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>So they've gone up there, so my my character has

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>now left. They answered the question I could also is

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:33.559
<v Speaker 1>they go hunting? And I say yeah, and they go hunting. Yeah,

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot to study there. And I started going

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:39.680
<v Speaker 1>off into my spiel about how that hunting culture, particularly

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in America has transformed over centuries, adapted itself to various

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>peoples and animals that have been present on the continent. Uh,

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and that it continues to change even to today. And

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>so what I do is I look at how American

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>culture of hunting, really cultures of hunting have changed throughout

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the years. And I actually teach classes at my university

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>on the history of hunting, in which case, well I

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>teach to I teach a senior level of course that

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>is nominally called the History of Hunting in North America.

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>And then I teach you you know that I've got,

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, this great subtitle that no one ever prints. Uh,

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:23.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it says something about from basically from

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 1>survival to controversy. Uh. And then I teach a freshman

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>only version, which is it's a they walk in the door,

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 1>it's called a freshman Academic seminar, and they get me

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>and I don't even get to pitch the class to them.

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>They they sign up for a doing orientation, so I

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know who's selling it, but they walk in and

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>we do a freshman version of it. So it kind

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of teaches them how to write, etcetera. But they engage

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the idea of that there's a history of this cultural

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>phenomena in America. They get credit for their American history

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 1>for it. But this is great, right um. And you know,

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>if I get a chance to tell them first aimsod

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, yes, we're gonna watch Bambi alright, and we're

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna watch a little Ted Nugent because I have to

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>our roll some Doug dynasty And that's my in a

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>way of trying to bring him in something that they

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>may have seen before. I said that this is real history.

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna look at primary sources, gonna people's experiences. Uh

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and in particular because of my focus, we're gonna at

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>least look at how religion plays into this, from Paleo Indians,

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 1>Native American tribes, the arrival of Puritans, don't forget the

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Spanish already here too, write the French as well, and

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>how that plays out as particularly Anglo Americans sweep westward

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>across the continent and encounter new people's, new animals, economics,

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and how all plays together. Now, I'm not sure that

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>actually fulfill that, and of course the semester, but that's

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>my grand goal. That's the that's the ambitious grand ambitious game.

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Would you mind there's a lot I'm already backed up

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>in my mind, but real quick, can you can you

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>tell people? I don't think we've ever talked about this before.

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain a people the difference between the primary

0:03:54.720 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and secondary resources. That's a great question. Um. So, a

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>primary source is material and it used to be just texts.

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>But historians are not opening their minds to looking at

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>things more than this text we talked about like a

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>material culture, so we'll look at things. But an artifact

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>something that humans have modified, they've created from a particular

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>time period, and that's the time period that we're investigating.

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>That's a primary source. So a primary source can be

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a diary entry from eight and I'm studying eight. A

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>primary source could be a computer if I were studying

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a particular period where that computer was relevant. Uh So,

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>primary sources are in some ways limitless, but not really

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 1>because primary sources have a tency to disappear, right so

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>paper hesitency to wrot, mold, disappear. Would if you're studying

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>paleon Indian cultures, you don't find their their their homes

0:04:57.400 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that are constructed of wood. What you find, at best

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>is the hollow that was left by the post, right,

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 1>that's filled in with a different type of We perceive

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>it as a history that's written in rock exactly because

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>everything else is gone. So most of what we find

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>in our our our blade technology, right, so your Clovis technology, etcetera,

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>folds and stuff like that, and that stuff has intensity

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to last. So that's a primary resource. But so is

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>UH Patagonia, coats, um or textbooks. If I'm studying a

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>period and those are resources that tell me something about

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that culture of that time period, etcetera, that's a primary source.

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>So primary sources, uh can be stories that were told

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and recorded, whether they were written down or recorded literally

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>on various types of technology. So someday this conversation could

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>be a primary sources primary sources. It's exactly right now,

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 1>it's so what if loose the Clark journals, primary sources, um,

0:05:56.560 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>undaunted courage secondary source? Right, well, secondary secondary source is

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>uh a Julian. We take about the secondary source as

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a secondary history, secondary source for history. So that what

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>happens is it's where the historian intentionally or unintentionally analyze

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>is material that's in front of them, and so she

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>she has these various types of data in front of

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it that are primary sources, and she analyzes them, determines

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>their importance, and in most cases weaves them into a narrative.

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Now many times the historian then will not just use

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>primary sources, but she'll also use secondary sources. So if

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I were writing a history of hunting, which I'm supposed

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to be doing right now front undisclosed University Press, I

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>hope to finish it a history of hunting of U

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>culture in Texas, then I would look to histories of Texas.

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>That's a secondary source. But that's useful to me as

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I construct my narrative of hunting cultures in the state

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of Texas and the Regian Texas. But I also would

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>turn into primary sources as I write my secondary source.

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>So the secondary source is this analysis and report, because

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>this is what historians do. Historians have to communicate. That's

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>what we do. We communicate by speaking, we communicate our

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>writing um and if we fail in that venture, of course,

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>then we failed to as a historian. But the historian

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>distills places importance on certain data ignores others. It's science

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and art. The art is the idea that I have

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to communicate to you whatever my audience is that I perceive,

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I communicate to you what I think is important about

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>this period. And I take many times in all this

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>various data that doesn't seem to fit together, and I

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>make a coherent, I hope story for you to understand

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the past. But of course ignore other stuff too, and

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that's where scientifically I have to be very careful. I'll

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 1>go into archives, I look at paintings, Um, I look

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>at guns. Although us last summer I spent time in

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a museum and a fellowship just basically mess around with

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>knives and guns, particularly from Texas in the nineties. Entry.

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>It was fun, it was great. But I've got to

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>give meaning to that thing. So we tell the story. Um,

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's that secondary source, whether I'm telling you about

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>it myself or I'm writing it and presenting it to

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you as an audience. Okay, now can you humor from

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>me me from it? Like while I have you here? Yea,

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>there's there's three trying to think there's a few areas

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that in past episodes we've touched on matters of a

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>biblical nature, didn't have the expertise. Okay, so we should

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 1>say that, right. So my expertise is right. This is

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>where I like pull out my union card. So I

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:42.599
<v Speaker 1>am a historian, but I have a master's degree in theology,

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and I have a PhD in the religion. So for

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the audience, who's going So why are they asking his

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>story and about the Bible. I'm still not the best source,

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>but in theory, someone educated me on these things to

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a degree in the past. Alright, this, I'm gonna ask

0:08:56.480 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you some trust me up questions. I'm gonna ask you

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>some low level because this is just cleaning up some

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>messes we've made in past episodes. And I want as

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:11.079
<v Speaker 1>a way to introduce you and just to bring a

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:12.719
<v Speaker 1>thing up because we got a lot of feedback from

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>this recently. Okay. We have a friend that we work with,

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Mark Kenyon, and Mark Kenyon has been trying to kill

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the same deer for years, okay, And I was explaining

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>to him one day that he was gonna have a

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>saul on the way to Damascus moment where he saw

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:35.199
<v Speaker 1>the light and decided to not shoot this deer. After all,

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I was predicting that this would happen, And I said,

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember if it's if the dude's name was

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Paul or Saul, and a lot of people wrote in

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to say, what, Yes, it's a tricky question. It's the

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>same guy. Okay, it's the same guy. So if you

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>look at the So the story takes place in the

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Book of Acts, which it's a history, by the way,

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a two part history. So the Book of Luke,

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>which you may have heard of the Gospel Luke and

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the Book of Acts are one book. It's just in

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>two parts. So you can tell because the intro it says,

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:14.079
<v Speaker 1>dear theophilis in the beginning of Luke, that's a guy's

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>name like lover of God. And we don't know if

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that's really a guy or if it's just this, you know,

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>this character he is writing out there for the because

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>he says, basically, Luke. The writer of Luke says, so

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you know that there's been these other histories written about

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>our faith, but it's I'm paraphrasing these they this they're

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a mess, he said. So I've done is I've tried

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to put together for you an orderly history. So that's

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>his intro at the beginning of Luke, and then you

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>get to Acts, and actually chapter one says dear theophilis

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>part two. All right, now, I'm gonna tell you about

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>what happens after Jesus goes. Now, he starts with the

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>resurrected Jesus and acts number one. And then of course

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Jesus goes. You know, he's gone. Angels go what are

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you doing here? And he lays out They lay out

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the thesis. They say, basically, why are you still standing here?

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:01.319
<v Speaker 1>Basically go tell the message from Jerusalem to the ends

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of the earth, and gives a lot of other place

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 1>names in there. And so he lays his thesis out

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>number one. I'm gonna tell you about Jesus, and we're

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna do an orderly fashion. Is the basis your faith,

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Luke number Luke, Chapter one, Acts Chapter one. You say,

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>but why aren't they next to each other? Don't ask

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:18.839
<v Speaker 1>me about the cannon. Alright, but the canon is a mess.

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>But anyhow, they separated in the stick all the little

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>biographies about Jesus together, and they separated these two books.

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>So the second chapter, if you're the second part of

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>this history by this writer, which is historically, or i said,

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>traditionally called Luke, describes the story of really kind of

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>two major characters in the formation of the early Christian Church.

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>The first is Peter. So Peter gets like the first

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:43.959
<v Speaker 1>couple of chapters, and then they shifted this guy named Saul,

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>all right, a great persecutor, great persecutor. He's he's he's

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>born in southern Asia minor Turkey, Tarsus. Uh. He comes

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to get educated in Judea. So he's a he's a

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 1>pharisee's he's a bright guy, trained at the best school,

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>if you will. All right, So he's a persecutor. The

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>early Christians famously overseas, Oh man, you're making me pull

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 1>the stuff in the back of it. He oversees the

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>martindom of Stephen. Right, Okay, what's my name? Right? There

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you go. It wasn't for him, I wouldn't be named me.

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>There you go. Yeah. So in or out Damascus, which

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>is the capital of Syria, Soul has his experience. The

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 1>resurrected Christ somehow speaks to him and calls him Saul, Soul,

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>why do you persecute blinds in basically knocks him off

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>his ass or blinds him for the rest of his life.

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, no, no, no no no, to be

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a miracle. Alright, So so I don't know if he's

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>on an ass or a horse anyhow, knocks him a right,

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 1>So he's he's blinded, and he goes in and there's

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a fellow who's part of the Christian community who basically

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>praise for him, and he's blind for a little bit

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and then his side his gang. So there's a miracle.

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>So he gets this divine this uh, the christophany, what

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>if you wanna call it, this vision of the Christ

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>are the voice of the Christ, his appearance. And this

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 1>is how Paul later on we'll talk about his names.

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>This is how he validates he was an apostle because

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>while the other guys that there were twelve, right, they

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>were close, one of them apparently got it wrong. Right.

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>So the eleven that the close associates of Jesus, Uh,

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>they're the apostles. They're called their commissioned to go out there.

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>And there's a lot of others who were as well.

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:24.439
<v Speaker 1>But Paul says, hey, Jesus called me himself, all right.

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>If you go through the Book of Acts, as the

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>writer Luke, let's just call him, is working through his

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>thesis of showing how the Christians take the message from

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.199
<v Speaker 1>Jerusalem to Judea to Samarian, to the ends of the earth.

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>He picks it up with Paul, who goes by Saul.

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>But Saul uses the name Saul and Paul back and forth. Actually,

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the end of Acts, he still calls himself Saul. He

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>tells the story that Jesus appears to him and calls

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:52.959
<v Speaker 1>him Soul. It's Luke as he tells his story that

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>shifts to Paul. In fact, once Paul leaves the area

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of Jerusalem, Luke subtly shifts from Seul to Paul. Now

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>here's my theory on why Saul is a Hebrew name.

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:09.959
<v Speaker 1>It's the first king of Israel, right the United Kingdom

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>there of Israel, uh, and that's a good Hebrew name.

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>But he was born in Asia Minor, in a Roman city,

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's why he has Roman citizenship. Now he comes

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to jude all that kind of stuff, but he has

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a Roman name. So Paul or Paulus is his Latin name,

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and so he goes by Paul, just like you would

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>go by Soul. Just like there are other characters in

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the New Testament, like this guy named um Thomas who's

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>also known as Didimus the Twin. So there's people who

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>have multiple names. So what you see is the shift

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>from Saul to Paul in the Book of Acts to

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>fit the historians thesis. So as he leaves the center

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of Judaism and moves into the gentile, the world of

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the Goyem, the gret a Roman world, he shifts to

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Paul to show how Paul is taking the Gospel to

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the ends of the area. As a long answer, that's good,

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I liked it. Can move on to the next part.

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>My next question, blue laws, Oh, just real quick to

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>touch on this with your expertise. A guy was pointing

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>out that we had something terribly wrong. He says, one, okay,

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, let me let me get this right here,

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>he says. Here in North Carolina, as Janice might be

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>able to tell you, we have recently modified the laws

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>for Sunday hunting to be much less restrictive. And to

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the listener, there are states in the American South and

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere you're not allowed to go hunting on a Sunday,

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>although there are still certain prohibitions, especially to your normal

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Sunday morning church service hours. One minor correction to Steve's

0:15:55.960 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>point about the Sabbath is that Sunday isn't really considered

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to be the Sabbath. I was saying the Sabbath right

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>for Sunday. Sabbath is just the Hebrew word for seventh

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and corresponds to the Christian account when God arrested on

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the seventh day. It is always Sunday. Christians worship corporately,

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>corporately on Sunday and remembrance of Jesus resurrection. Now there

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>are plenty of Christians that confuse the two, but nowhere

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>does the Bible talk about Sabbath laws, rest from work,

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>short distance of travel, et cetera. Applying to Christians on Sunday,

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>this guy says, I don't see it why it should

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>be mandated as free from all activity. I don't hunt

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday because that's because I'm at church. Does resonate

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>with you at all? All right, So a little bit

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of a number of things going on here, all right.

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>First off, there are number of states that do have

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>blue laws. Uh. My best friend, his name's Josh. He

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>grew up in Pennsylvania, a little place called Enan Valley, Uh,

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and opening a deer season it was like a holiday,

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>like a holy day. But from what I gathered from

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 1>the stories he's told, me it was a Monday, because

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>in Pennsylvania you can't hunt deer on Sunday. So there

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>are number of states. Yes, okay, so it which is

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting because this whole William Penn's experiment. If you're from me,

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>he was a Quaker, right, and so Pennsylvania was supposed

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to be a place where freedom of religion took place

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 1>in a unique and in brand new way. You know

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>what William Penn wants describing that state, talked about how

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 1>grouse would walk into his house. He had observations about wildlife,

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 1>so that Benjamin Franklin, we should talk about him. He's

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 1>got some weird views snakes anyway. Uh. Blue laws then

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 1>ironically show up in places, and I believe Rhode Island

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>which is as well, which is also established on religious freedom.

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:47.679
<v Speaker 1>I could be wrong with Rhode Island, so we're right

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>in and tell me all right, But the point is,

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>ironically that as we see the establishment and sometimes in

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>places you would expect to see religious freedom and not

0:17:56.119 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 1>expect to see religious ideas pervaded secular life. For lack

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of a better way of saying it, that's where you

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>find it. So there are number states that don't allow

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>hunting on Sunday. Why well, there was generally this assumption

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>for hundreds of years among Christians that the Sabbath was Sunday.

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>But the Sabbath isn't Sunday. The Sabbath is actually Friday night.

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Is when it starts sundown Friday to sundown Saturday. You

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.400
<v Speaker 1>got it right, And that's why that's like when like

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>like Jews, Yeah, absolutely, you go to synagogue with Orthodox jewesday.

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:32.640
<v Speaker 1>That's when they do their honor the Sabbath from sundown

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Friday sundowns not just Orthodox but Reformed Jews as well.

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not infrequent we go to synagogue. Uh, the number

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of synagogues actually even in the town where I live,

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 1>but where I've grown up, and it starts on Friday nights.

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>It's your Schobat service. So that was the day of rest.

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 1>And where does this come from? There's a couple of

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>different hints about it in in in particularly the Penitute

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:57.439
<v Speaker 1>the first five books of the Hebrew Bible or the

0:18:57.440 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Old Testament if you want to use that if you're

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Christian first active. But the probably the most interesting one

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>is of course the first chapter Genesis one, which lays

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 1>out this creation story and it rolls into early part

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 1>of Genesis too. Um, And do you have these these

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:18.880
<v Speaker 1>days in which God creates through various means, uh, the world.

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>That is that he separates water from land, and he

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:26.679
<v Speaker 1>puts vegetation, and and then he creates uh, you know,

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>he has light and darkness in it as the stellar formations,

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and then he has the birds and the four legged critters,

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and eventually on the sixth day he creates humans right

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 1>along with other things, but humans and all these creations

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:41.360
<v Speaker 1>are basically good, but the ones with human it's it's

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 1>very good. And then it says on the seventh day

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>he rests now again, I'm gonna pull us in back

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of me. But I believe it's in the book of Exodus.

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>You have a retelling of this, and it's etological, which

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:54.239
<v Speaker 1>is a fancy way of saying it's a story that

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>has an explanation for why we do what we do.

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>And there it's explicit because God sit on the seventh day,

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>so we rest as well. Um. And there's two different

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:08.199
<v Speaker 1>ideologies going on there and the two books. But so

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>it's established in in the in the Hebrew culture that

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>you rested on the seventh day. It was a way

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of essentially, Um, I hate to say it, but mimicking God,

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>but in a in a positive fashion. Um. And so

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 1>on the seventh Day you rested, and there were certain

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>behaviors you didn't do in the rabbis. Jewish rabbis years

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 1>afterwards continued to comment on this. There's certain things you

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be doing right, probably hunting, working, Um, off top

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of my head, cutting wood. You have sacks, by the way,

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.959
<v Speaker 1>on on the Sabbath. That's not work, that's that's okay. Uh,

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that's what I remember hearing in class. That caught my attention.

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:48.479
<v Speaker 1>I remember that in class. But so certain the fishing, fishing,

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>fishing is okay. I don't know. I don't know what.

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, I don't remember. No state has outlawed

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 1>Sunday fishing or Cinday sacks, I guess. But the point

0:20:56.760 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>is you do have this intriguing extension then of and

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>the Christian you say, why Christmas on Sunday? Here's the shift.

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:07.360
<v Speaker 1>They go back to the Book of Acts. Uh. These

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>were Jews that came to believe them that this Jesus

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 1>was the Messiah, the awaited One. Um. And they continue

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to do Jewish things. They still went to the Temple.

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>It was there hadn't been destroyed by the Romans in

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the year seventy by the guy named Titus, So it's

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>still there. Um and uh. They continue to do but

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:25.919
<v Speaker 1>they have to figure out who they are though, right.

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>So there Jews, but they believe that the Messiah has come. Uh.

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>They seemingly still are doing sacrifices in the Temple. They're

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>still gathering. But you see in there early in the

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Book of Acts, increasing tension then between these Jews or

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>followers of Jesus and Jews that didn't buy into the

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>he was of Messiah, until eventually they kicked out of

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the out of the synagogues where they would gather, and

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 1>they're essentially pushed out of the Temple region. And so

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>they pick a new day to worship on Sunday. That's

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>how that all came about. Yeah, and Christians have turned

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Sabbath Sunday not too as again as Christianity

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Christian Yeah, yeah, right now, so you have Seventh Day

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>ad ventice for instance, if you're driving them, they follow

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>more of a Herbraic code. It's I am a little

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>picky choosing right there. Certain things there, for instance, most Sunday,

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:17.879
<v Speaker 1>i'd ben as I know, or vegetarian, right, um, And

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>they have very strict diets, and so they keep many

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of the date of the Seventh Day had been this

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>one time for a few days. I was gonna say,

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>how did it go? Well, she didn't date Friday night

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 1>to Saturday night. Yeah, and as a meat eater, I

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>can't remember. Yeah, right, okay, so it's gonna be a problem. Possibly, so,

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>but seven Day. Even so, there's groups of what you

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>might consider radical Christianity. She was vegetarian, you're right, but

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>it really date. It was like I was. I was,

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I was interested in trying to date her. Yeah, all right,

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>so that's where you began to see and you still

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>see written that said that particuarly in the nineteenth century

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 1>where you see kind of utopian movements and more radical

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 1>types of Christianity, and even in America go back and

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>back to the old ways exactly. But whoever it was

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that said, hey man, we're gonna do some semblance of well,

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna like exclude by law the most egregious things

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>heavy drinking, hunting. Well, most people were Sunday people who

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>were Sunday people, which I mean again, there's a lot

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of states you can't buy hard liquor on Sundays. It's

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the same principle. And then we call those blue laws

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 1>as well. Yeah, but there's like I guess it's around

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 1>a dozen or so states that still have blue laws

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>for hunting. Okay, can you now tell me give me

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the quick wrap on your your your book? All right?

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 1>All right? Is it? Can I still called a Newish book? Yeah?

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:42.359
<v Speaker 1>It came out in November of two. Yeah, I can

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:46.199
<v Speaker 1>see that friendly all right, so real quick? Um, the

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>books called God Nemerod in the World exploring Christian perspectives

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 1>on sport hunting. It's published by Mercer University Press, which

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>has a Sports and Religion series. Yeah, Sports and religious

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and sports and religion like what Yeah, okay, so it's

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a competitive verb. It pulls it two together. So it's

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 1>sports and religion together. Yeah, alright, printed, I don't have

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to yeah. Um, And so they've got books on baseball football. Yeah,

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 1>well there's nothing to write. I don't know. I didn't

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>read the book. Yeah, but as you as we learned

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in this book, there's all kinds of ways that hunting

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>plays into the Bible. Is not a lot of baseball

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>plays into the Bible. It's ridiculous idea. I didn't write

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 1>that book. I did write this. If you have you

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.439
<v Speaker 1>step out the long as show it is what is

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>there to be said? Yeah, I don't know. I didn't

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>read the book. I didn't realize. I knew that there

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of hunting in the Bible, yeah, I

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize how much. And so I started looking at

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 1>this book. Yeah, yeah, I mean there's a lot going

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>on there. Um, so real quick. The story of the

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 1>book was I was writing a dissertation and my dissertation

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 1>was looking at radical groups in England and Britain. I

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>started out with a law large, which is a group

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 1>in the fourteenth century in England. I ended up losing

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 1>my director from a distant religious group, radical religious. I

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 1>like radical minority religious groups, all right, I just do um.

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>And so then I ended up for various reasons, things

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.120
<v Speaker 1>got shifted around. Ended up working with a fellow from

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the University of Storily in Scotland. He was visiting in

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 1>the United States as a distinguished scholar um and we

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>we we found a topic that I could study with

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 1>him that fit within his purview. So I started studying

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:27.239
<v Speaker 1>late seventeent century early eighteenth century radical religion we call

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>rational religion. It's as a proto Unitarian. People who grew

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>up within the Orthodox Christian movement actually were defending it

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>against the Anglicans in Britain, and then suddenly came to

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the conclusion that in particularly things like the Trinity were problematic.

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>One plus one plus one did not equal one. And

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>so they were applying reason in the British Enlightenment to

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the religion of their tradition. As you can well imagine,

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 1>they were soon ostracized by everyone. And so I particularly

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 1>worked on a guy by the name of James Pierce.

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>So I'm working with people on the edge um in

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and seven. Of course, I'm always for a

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.719
<v Speaker 1>diversion because I'm a procrastinator. Suddenly I'm walking with this

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>guy across campus and me he's so cool. He's got

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 1>the voice of God right with this British accident with

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the Cambridge. His name is David Bebington, and uh, David

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Bevington's is just fantastic. Uh. And we're walking across campus

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and I mentioned he mentioned he don't go to this

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>guy's house for dinner. I said, I know him. Actually,

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>my wife and I've been hunting white wing doves there

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 1>and he stops, just stops in the middle campus on

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the sidewalk, and it looks at me and it's like

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:30.439
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't know what to say. He just we just

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>had Thai food. He just invited me to do his distion,

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>my dissertation with him, and he looks at me, goes,

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that's that's so French, French, French, he's British, and he's like,

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:44.120
<v Speaker 1>what doesn't America. Yeah, so and and we just kept

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:47.400
<v Speaker 1>walking along and I started thinking, all right here I am.

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm committed to doing Christian history within two degree with

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 1>things on the edges, but also within Christian community on

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:57.119
<v Speaker 1>the edges. I thought hunting was okay. I mean, I

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>knew there a lot of people didn't hunt, but I

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>guess this is a big question. And so I started

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>bouncing it around, came up the topic, found a guy

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to kind of work with me who's does sports, uh

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and leisure studies. We proposed I proposed it in particular

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:13.439
<v Speaker 1>to a number of presses, and their responses was sexy,

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>but that ain't gonna sell, and so it didn't go anywhere.

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 1>I finished my dissertation. I didn't want to work on

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>my dissertation anymore. I still owe it seven years later

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to the publisher. But I started looking for a diversion.

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>And I was in San Francisco and I had this

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>idea of you know, about hunting. It's been bouncing back

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>in my head to look at it from all kinds

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of different perspectives, from history, uh, from religious, theological, ethical perspectives,

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 1>and clearly I couldn't do them all. So I needed

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>other voices. I wanted other people to participate in this,

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>but no one's really doing this um and the idea

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>was it was? It was? It was nascent, shall we say.

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>But I went to the session with this series editor

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Sports and Religion series, and Mercer was there

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>already talking. Went up after him. I said, I had

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>got this idea for this book. You listened to me.

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>He said, send me an email. I send him an email.

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 1>He said, see me a proposal, and he said I'll

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:11.639
<v Speaker 1>take it. So I started creating this book. And that

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>is I wanted to write some some some essays myself.

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:17.199
<v Speaker 1>And there were people that I talked to of the

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>last several years that were interested in writing about the

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>ethics of hunting, the history of hunting, about why it

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>was good while it was bad, how to do it

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 1>better than other ways, but with a particular attention to religion,

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>not just to ethics. Be there's a lot of discussion

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of ethics out there, but with a particular attention to

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 1>history of the religion and the current situation of religion,

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>particularly Christianity. And I began assembling these this group of

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>more than two dozen people. UM. I eventually brought out

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>a co editor to talk a little bit about sports,

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and he wasn't four hunting, if you will, and he

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>brought in his friend Sean Graves UH to to do

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a kind of anti hunting piece. The main central anti

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:58.239
<v Speaker 1>like a religious based anti hunting and philosophy. It's it's

0:28:58.240 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a composite. So if you look at the book, it's

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 1>into parts. The first eleven chapters are descriptive, they're historically descriptive.

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>They talk about hunting communities today UH closely associated with religion. UM.

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>They go all the way back to the Hebraic tradition

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>as an essay front by a guy named Uh Basque

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>can at bass hunting buddy of mine UH and also

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a scripture scholar, and we work away through the Middle Ages,

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 1>we work our way to the early modern period, and

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 1>then we work away to the President. And in that

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>section with doing oral history, so recording primary sources from

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>people who hunted to the last century, analyzing it, making report,

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and then allowing hunters from all types of walks of life.

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 1>UM athletes in particual because of sports and religion, UH, musicians, artists, UH, teachers, academics,

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>soldiers all kind of talk about their story, but just

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 1>tell a story, have them right their essay if possible.

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a few celebrity hunters that you would see on

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>things like the Outdoor Channel. UH, like Ralph since lur

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>always been to pronounce his name from Archer's choice. Jason

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Robertson did an essay with him from the dynasty UM

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and to letting them speak. And then the last half

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>is from the Ivory Tower. So if you will, the

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>first half is about the field and the people who

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 1>are in it, and the last half is people who

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>live in the I retire academics who want to tell

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you the hunting is right wrong or this is a

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>better way to do it. And then there's a conclusion.

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>So the book is a composite of perspectives. Um And

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>one would argue from about years of experience. What first

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>got me interested in the idea um that there was

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>something to think about here is I was reading years,

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 1>many years ago in Barry Lopez's Arctic Dreams, and in

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the epilogue to the book, he's hunting walrus with Alaska natives,

0:30:57.560 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>though he's actually in Russian Wars, and they're slaughtering walrus

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>on the ice and the smell of blood and gunpowder

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>are still lingering in the air. And Lopez doesn't get

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>into it, but he alludes to the reconciliation or the

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>need to reconcile Jacob and Esau, or this reconciliation that occurs.

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I remember thinking, like, what's that. So I go and

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>look at the story of Jacob and Esau, which I interpreted.

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I've been told by people that it's not I interpreted

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>it to be a story about hunters and non hunters.

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna tell you, like my understanding of um and

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 1>and I want to get it. I want to touch

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>on Nimrod to who I wasn't even aware of. Okay,

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>but Jacob and Esaw, here's this mother. She's pregnant with twins,

0:31:55.720 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and the first baby passes out, and it's Harry, covered

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>in hair and clinging to his ankle is a fair baby.

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>The hair covered baby that comes out first is Saw.

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>And the fair, non hairy baby that comes out clinging

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to his ankle is Jacob. He Saw becomes a hunter.

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>He's a savage, and he hunts with his bow, and

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 1>he Saw the hairless one, it's an agrarian. Oh sorry, Jacob.

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>The hairless one becomes a farmer. Their father likes wild

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>game and often sends Saw with his bow to go

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>scrounge him up some wild game, and he Saw, being

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the eldest, is entitled to the birthright. The old man

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 1>grows old and blind and sends Saw off with his

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>bow to kill him some wild meat. Jacob goes and

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 1>kills one of his lambs, drapes it over his shoulder,

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 1>cook some lamb for the old man. The old man

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 1>eats it, likes it, touches, feels the fur, thinks it's Saw,

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and bestows upon him his birthright. I took it to

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 1>mean that this was the moment when God gave favor

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to the agricultural people's and shunned the hunters through trickery,

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's telling because Jacob is second born. But this

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 1>is clinging to the ankle of the hunter. So I

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>couldn't see it any other way. That it was sort

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of a way of pointing out that the the Christians

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 1>were a grarians, they were pastorists, they weren't wild savages,

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 1>they weren't out hunting. And here's a story to sort

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of account for how God's favoritism was granted to the

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>agricultural peoples and not to the wild savages. But I've

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>been told that that's not how that's not how you

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 1>should look at it. The great thing about it as

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>is up for interpretation, right. So so the story you're

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at is in Genesis chapter twenty five. Uh. And

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>so Jacob and he saw born and he saw is

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 1>described then as being uh he comes out red and

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 1>he's hairy, right, and it says he's harry like a

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 1>garment like like a I don't know, mo hair suit,

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, right, And and and then there's Jacob

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>um our body dirt looks like this. Yeah, So did

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you got two stories? One of course is that has

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 1>been out hunting and it comes in he's famished, and

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you know what that's like, right, he's just gonna eat anything.

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 1>And he comes in and uh, Jacob says, basically, I'm cooking.

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>No interesting thing is you think about cooking, and some

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 1>cultures of course cooking, well, so cooking. It's interesting. We

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 1>cook in American culture, and I know things are shifting.

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Gender roles are are malleable. But I would see in

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the twentieth century if I said, oh, look he's cooking stew,

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you would go mm. Because the image we have post

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Victorian era is of the woman cooking in the home.

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Now that's we we play with that because if it's

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 1>something large and muscular translation meat men have taken this

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:19.800
<v Speaker 1>over and by the way, man, I think you've always

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 1>done this. If they can make it difficult, they will, right.

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 1>So we get smokers and we slap slash slabs of

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of a hog and and all kinds of other things

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>are sausages on a smoker. And suddenly the masculine, right,

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:35.360
<v Speaker 1>we allow that to come in. Yeah, you know this

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 1>is it's funny been because like an interesting thing with

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 1>in our home Thanksgiving my mom, Right, we'll take the turkey,

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 1>do all the work on the turkey. Okay, cook the giblets, rolls,

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole damn thing, make the stuffing stuff and all

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff. But my old man, who had

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with this all day, all day, you

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 1>just do whatever you want hunting usually would come home

0:35:57.160 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>at night and be like, I will carve the turkey.

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah exactly, because like clearly you'd be incapable woman of

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:09.720
<v Speaker 1>now slicing it. You've done all this but your skill

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:12.279
<v Speaker 1>set and somewhere and we've found the moment. We've got that,

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:15.280
<v Speaker 1>we've got the tool that the symbol of, if you will,

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:17.919
<v Speaker 1>of life and death. That not the blade, right, whether

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 1>it's electric knife or it's this big chef's knife and

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the and the masculine takes over and Jacob's cookinge. So

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:27.440
<v Speaker 1>he's cookinge, he's not hunting. And so you get this

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 1>idea of Esau who's on he a liminal character, liminal

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 1>not like you know, like the thing that's sour, but

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>l I M E N on the limits, on the edge.

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Hunters are always there. They have to be there on

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the edge, right, I mean, even if it's on the

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 1>edge of suburbia, your bow hunting, you're still on the edge.

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:50.319
<v Speaker 1>So hunters are always a marginalized group. Because as we

0:36:50.400 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>see the domestication of the earth by way of the

0:36:54.640 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Neolithic agricultural revolution and continuing agriculture, we all these are

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 1>pushing wildlife to the edges. Now I know, some do well, right,

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>So white tailed deer have done exceptionally well with some

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of this type of edge, if you will, kind of environment.

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Others don't write migratory animals generally don't. Whether we're building

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a road or doing something else, we're disrupting their patterns

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 1>of migration. So hunters are always liminal stalls, a liminal character.

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:27.720
<v Speaker 1>And he's all on the edge. Jacob's at home, Jacob's

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:30.720
<v Speaker 1>hanging out with the women, all right, that's what Genesis says.

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 1>He's a mama's boy. He's breaking some gender roles of sorts.

0:37:36.400 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>He's breaking some gender roles here. And Isaac the Dead

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 1>has a taste for venison he saw his first born

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 1>provides into this. So what you get it's almost kind

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of like a hunter gatherer myth in conflict with this

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:54.959
<v Speaker 1>movement toward a grarianism and the domestication of animals, and

0:37:55.080 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 1>so comes up and he ends up selling his birthright

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to Jacob for this poor rige for this because he's

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 1>so hungry. He's so he's famished, right and Jacob, it

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:08.760
<v Speaker 1>says uh, And Jacob gave esau bread and stew of lentils.

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Think about it. Both those things are products of agriculture.

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:14.719
<v Speaker 1>Lentils you're growing from the earth. And bread is a

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 1>product of course growing grains and cereal milling producing bread.

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 1>So Esa brings meat, Jacob brings Neolithic agriculture. Here it is.

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 1>But there's also a comment here too, where a criticism

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 1>when you do have hunter gatherer cultures up against agrarian cultures.

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>From the agrarian perspective, a criticism of the hunter gathered

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 1>culture is the feast and famine, the highs and lows exactly,

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 1>so the fact that he's coming back, he's coming back

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:47.799
<v Speaker 1>starving from an unsuccessful hunt. He's this guy like right here,

0:38:47.840 --> 0:38:53.879
<v Speaker 1>bro bowl lentils, small produce it just so you get

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the second story that shows up, the when you alluded to,

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:58.239
<v Speaker 1>and it's like a second story about how he loses this.

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't catch this though, a right, and I forgot it. Yeah,

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 1>that he already bought it fair and square from his brother.

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:05.319
<v Speaker 1>He bought the birthright, fair and square. All right, So

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:07.239
<v Speaker 1>when the great things about looking at the Revival in

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 1>particular is it's woven together over centuries, and so a

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:13.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of times we get these stories that seem to

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to be redundant um and many times there and there's

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of arguments among biblical scholars, and they get

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:21.319
<v Speaker 1>all they know they're right, and they get in their

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:23.759
<v Speaker 1>little schools of thought. But you likely have here are

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:26.560
<v Speaker 1>two different myths, two different oral traditions that were floating

0:39:26.600 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 1>around one, which explained then how you saw is marginalized

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in Jacob becomes the one who inherits not just the

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 1>birthright but the covenant that's made with Abraham and passed

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 1>down to Isaac and then to Jacob um. And so

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you get these not that you shouldn't be seen them

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:43.480
<v Speaker 1>as competing stories. It's like the story of Noah, right,

0:39:43.520 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 1>how many animals did Noah taken through the ark? When

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 1>one account says to the other, thing says seven. Well,

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:52.759
<v Speaker 1>what it is is probably stories woven together. Is the

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:55.319
<v Speaker 1>genesis one account different than the genesis to account to

0:39:55.400 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 1>creation stories. So we probably have here are two myths,

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 1>two stories. And by myth, I don't that he bought

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 1>it one that he got tricked out. You got it right.

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:05.399
<v Speaker 1>So again when I say myth, I should say that's

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:08.440
<v Speaker 1>not to say a story about something that didn't happen.

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:13.359
<v Speaker 1>It's a story that a culture tells over time, and

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:19.719
<v Speaker 1>that story encapsulates what it means to be us. It's

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it's what ties us together. Hunters do this really well, right.

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:25.840
<v Speaker 1>We tell stories. We tell stories, and we tell the

0:40:25.880 --> 0:40:28.760
<v Speaker 1>next generation how not to act and how to act

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:31.960
<v Speaker 1>by way of the stories. Sometimes we laugh at him,

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:34.920
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we mock characters and the story. But you know

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 1>then the cultural values. So these are stories that were told.

0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a myth um and mythology has that two elements logos,

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that reason, rational, kind of coherent nous. And the myth

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:50.200
<v Speaker 1>is the good story that he's told well over a fire.

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:52.840
<v Speaker 1>And so we had two stories. So the second story,

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 1>so you've got Isaac and he likes his innocent, he

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 1>likes his his his serabids, and so you right, good

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:04.160
<v Speaker 1>whatever um he sends, he saw out and sa is

0:41:04.200 --> 0:41:09.920
<v Speaker 1>his favorite. But then the mother of Jacob uses deception.

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:13.279
<v Speaker 1>She takes first she places on his arms. Oh the ma,

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it's Mama's in there too. I mean he's a mama's boy.

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 1>So she's the one that favors the egg guy. You

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 1>got it, exactly, the big egg. And so you get

0:41:24.560 --> 0:41:28.480
<v Speaker 1>them this story about how she dresses him up in

0:41:28.480 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the to make him seem like the Harry Hunter. So

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 1>what you get then is this story about the Hunter

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:40.440
<v Speaker 1>literally being carved out of the Covenant. The trickster Jacob

0:41:41.000 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 1>ends up getting the Covenant blessing. Now, I gotta I

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 1>gotta warn you here. I think the stories of the

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:50.959
<v Speaker 1>patriarchs Abraham, Isaac and Jacob should not be used as

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:54.399
<v Speaker 1>and this is how you should act, because they all

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 1>do things not so great. Um. But the the story

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:02.120
<v Speaker 1>from the break to is not to emphasize the behavior

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of the patriarchs, but emphasize the faithfulness of God still

0:42:05.520 --> 0:42:09.800
<v Speaker 1>dealing with these miscreants and still continuing to promise there's

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:12.719
<v Speaker 1>a lesson. But embedded in there sure sounds like a

0:42:12.760 --> 0:42:17.960
<v Speaker 1>little hunter and gathering, passing away and putting forward the

0:42:18.040 --> 0:42:22.839
<v Speaker 1>idea of these pastoralists that eventually become urbanites. Um. And

0:42:22.920 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the story that's that wins after all. Think about it.

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Christianity is an inheritor or a descend of Judaism. And

0:42:31.160 --> 0:42:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Judaism is a story written by domesticators, and it's a

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 1>domesticating story. God wants you to be domesticated and that

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean that in a bad way, but to

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 1>submit yourself. It's a story that comes out of the

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:52.719
<v Speaker 1>agricultural revolution. It's a story written by pastoralists and urbanites.

0:42:53.280 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 1>It's written by agricultural interests. And it's not surprising that

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you don't see hunting Lionized put forward as a model.

0:43:03.800 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Well but in your okay, hold that thought, because I'm

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:09.799
<v Speaker 1>only gonna I'm only gonna counter it with what I

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:11.719
<v Speaker 1>learned from the book. Go for it. But first I

0:43:11.719 --> 0:43:14.799
<v Speaker 1>got another thing I got like coming from Judy. Are

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:18.319
<v Speaker 1>you mean with the Hobad the Orthodox? There's like a

0:43:19.160 --> 0:43:21.359
<v Speaker 1>there's thing called Hobbad House, right, and it's like some

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:27.160
<v Speaker 1>strain or sect of ultra Orthodox Jews who have a

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:30.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of ministry. Were they a sort of ministry to

0:43:31.000 --> 0:43:34.440
<v Speaker 1>wayward or what they would regard as wayward reform Jews.

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:36.800
<v Speaker 1>So anyways, I used to go to these Habad lectures

0:43:37.480 --> 0:43:40.960
<v Speaker 1>because it's really interesting. Okay, no background, no not, you know,

0:43:41.000 --> 0:43:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you go back as far as you want. My family's

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:46.000
<v Speaker 1>history is not a Jewish character in it. But one

0:43:46.080 --> 0:43:48.920
<v Speaker 1>day said to him, considering the dietary laws, like if

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you look in the Old Testament, what it says like

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:53.319
<v Speaker 1>you you do and don't eat, I'm like, seems to

0:43:53.320 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 1>me that it rules out wild game, Like if you

0:43:55.239 --> 0:43:57.320
<v Speaker 1>look in the Old Testament, you can't go near wild

0:43:57.360 --> 0:44:00.279
<v Speaker 1>game because it wasn't killed in the way that they

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:02.719
<v Speaker 1>say animals should be killed, which is to have them

0:44:02.760 --> 0:44:06.520
<v Speaker 1>be totally healthy and have their throat cut. And in fact,

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:08.920
<v Speaker 1>it says in the Old Testament you can't eat carrying,

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:11.799
<v Speaker 1>which is taken to mean you can't eat crippled up

0:44:11.800 --> 0:44:15.440
<v Speaker 1>animals that the animal like to the point where they

0:44:15.440 --> 0:44:17.239
<v Speaker 1>would take the lungs out of the animal to make

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:20.719
<v Speaker 1>sure that it hadn't had any lesions from having been

0:44:20.719 --> 0:44:23.560
<v Speaker 1>sick in the past and recovered from it is taken

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that literally. So you have to have a super healthy

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:27.960
<v Speaker 1>animal that you kill with a special knife and you

0:44:28.000 --> 0:44:30.520
<v Speaker 1>cut its throat. So I said, so, how can how

0:44:30.600 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>could a person eat wild game at all? And he said,

0:44:33.040 --> 0:44:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess you have to catch the net, catching the

0:44:36.440 --> 0:44:41.320
<v Speaker 1>net and then have and then do the sacramental like

0:44:42.320 --> 0:44:46.759
<v Speaker 1>the ritualistic slaughter of the animal is what he explained,

0:44:47.040 --> 0:44:49.239
<v Speaker 1>and the net thing caught me because this is the

0:44:49.280 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 1>thing that surprising about your book, and I'll explain what

0:44:52.680 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 1>it's surprising about this and then you can speak on it.

0:44:55.560 --> 0:44:57.759
<v Speaker 1>But one of the writers in the book, early on

0:44:59.040 --> 0:45:01.279
<v Speaker 1>it goes on to a staff She's like, listen, the

0:45:01.360 --> 0:45:06.920
<v Speaker 1>intended audience of this book was intimately familiar with hunting,

0:45:07.840 --> 0:45:10.480
<v Speaker 1>because when you're writing something, you take for granted what

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:14.560
<v Speaker 1>your audience knows. And he goes into looking at metaphor

0:45:14.680 --> 0:45:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and similarly in the Bible, and just to explain in metaphor,

0:45:18.120 --> 0:45:22.400
<v Speaker 1>like his metaphor, he chooses as the metaphor time is money. Okay,

0:45:22.760 --> 0:45:26.200
<v Speaker 1>now this is like the metaphor time is money is

0:45:26.239 --> 0:45:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a is a way of explaining time. You're like saying time.

0:45:29.840 --> 0:45:32.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna try to define and help explain time. To

0:45:32.840 --> 0:45:35.720
<v Speaker 1>explain time, I'm gonna use something we all know about

0:45:35.880 --> 0:45:40.279
<v Speaker 1>and we all understand money. So here you're using, like

0:45:40.440 --> 0:45:42.640
<v Speaker 1>using this thing we all agree on the parameters of

0:45:42.680 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it to explain something that we don't that we might

0:45:45.120 --> 0:45:47.200
<v Speaker 1>not or he's assuming is is a little bit our

0:45:47.280 --> 0:45:49.759
<v Speaker 1>understands a little more flaccid. So then he goes on

0:45:49.840 --> 0:45:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to say how many times explain how many times in

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:56.279
<v Speaker 1>the Bible there are metaphors that are like, you know,

0:45:57.080 --> 0:45:59.640
<v Speaker 1>like when you're out net and birds, or you know,

0:46:00.200 --> 0:46:02.160
<v Speaker 1>when you get like a bad hit on something with

0:46:02.239 --> 0:46:05.680
<v Speaker 1>your bow, again and again and again. The way most

0:46:05.680 --> 0:46:07.520
<v Speaker 1>people won't even like see that this is going on,

0:46:07.640 --> 0:46:09.399
<v Speaker 1>and so you kind of make this assumption that they

0:46:09.440 --> 0:46:12.160
<v Speaker 1>were speaking to people who they like knew would get

0:46:12.200 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 1>all this exactly. So this is the essay by Kenneth

0:46:17.120 --> 0:46:20.879
<v Speaker 1>Bass and uh again, Bass is a scripture scholar. Uh

0:46:21.160 --> 0:46:25.799
<v Speaker 1>he's a professor at Central Texas College and um, so

0:46:26.560 --> 0:46:28.560
<v Speaker 1>it was just an idea he had, So we kind

0:46:28.560 --> 0:46:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of developed as almost all these essays that kind of

0:46:30.600 --> 0:46:32.759
<v Speaker 1>worked with the authors try and find something I could do.

0:46:33.440 --> 0:46:35.120
<v Speaker 1>So he thought he'd just kind of go back and

0:46:35.200 --> 0:46:37.880
<v Speaker 1>explore where's hunting in the Old Testament, because I mean,

0:46:37.920 --> 0:46:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you think about it, the hunters that are named in

0:46:40.680 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the Old Testament the Hebrew Bible by name are a

0:46:44.120 --> 0:46:48.440
<v Speaker 1>guy named Nimrod. Yeah, I forgot, because I forgot to

0:46:48.440 --> 0:46:50.600
<v Speaker 1>have even talked about the name of the book god

0:46:50.719 --> 0:46:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Nimrod in the world Esau. And then the hunter who

0:46:54.719 --> 0:46:59.480
<v Speaker 1>appears the most who is named is Yale. God is

0:46:59.520 --> 0:47:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the most prominent hunter in the entire Hebrew. God is hunter,

0:47:03.120 --> 0:47:05.960
<v Speaker 1>God is hunter. So the question is how is God

0:47:06.000 --> 0:47:07.839
<v Speaker 1>hunting and how these people hunting? So what he uses

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:11.359
<v Speaker 1>is this audience response criticism where you expect then your

0:47:11.640 --> 0:47:14.680
<v Speaker 1>your audience to get the metaphor and similar And when

0:47:14.680 --> 0:47:19.000
<v Speaker 1>he began to explore it, he began to track, pardon

0:47:19.040 --> 0:47:21.279
<v Speaker 1>the pun things that really he had never found in

0:47:21.400 --> 0:47:25.680
<v Speaker 1>print before. That is that there is this continual, well

0:47:25.960 --> 0:47:32.360
<v Speaker 1>frequent reference to hunting culture. Now it's almost always negatively spun,

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and most of the time it's spun from the perspective

0:47:36.320 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of the prey. So the metaphor in the assembly that

0:47:40.200 --> 0:47:43.200
<v Speaker 1>show up in the Hebrew Bible expect you to understand

0:47:43.239 --> 0:47:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the whole idea of hunting, and that you understand both sides,

0:47:47.080 --> 0:47:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the hunter and the hunt head. And it's used many

0:47:50.640 --> 0:47:54.440
<v Speaker 1>times to pull out the poignancy of that relationship and

0:47:54.520 --> 0:47:59.719
<v Speaker 1>to project in particular the the the plight of the

0:48:00.640 --> 0:48:03.680
<v Speaker 1>not so much to strength of the predator. And in

0:48:03.719 --> 0:48:05.640
<v Speaker 1>this process he begins to look at how did they

0:48:05.719 --> 0:48:08.200
<v Speaker 1>hunt in the ancient Near East? And yes, they do

0:48:08.360 --> 0:48:10.400
<v Speaker 1>use the bow, which is most commonly used to think

0:48:10.440 --> 0:48:15.600
<v Speaker 1>about it. When when God Yahweh places the the the

0:48:15.840 --> 0:48:21.880
<v Speaker 1>rainbow in the sky at the Noah Uh covenant in Genesis,

0:48:22.239 --> 0:48:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and he says, by the way, among other things, I'm

0:48:23.920 --> 0:48:25.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna judge you how you treat each other as humans

0:48:25.960 --> 0:48:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and also animals as animals treat each other, but then

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:31.640
<v Speaker 1>gives permission to eat animals. This is in the storyline,

0:48:31.880 --> 0:48:36.200
<v Speaker 1>is to shift away from vegetarianism. Presumed the vegetarianism. He

0:48:36.239 --> 0:48:39.120
<v Speaker 1>puts a weapon in the sky. It's a bow in

0:48:39.200 --> 0:48:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the Hebrew. It's the same word bow weapon. He places

0:48:43.200 --> 0:48:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a weapon of the Yeah, and what he doesn't say

0:48:46.120 --> 0:48:48.200
<v Speaker 1>is ain't gonna be no death. What he says, I'm

0:48:48.200 --> 0:48:51.279
<v Speaker 1>just not gonna kill anybody anymore this way. But it's

0:48:51.320 --> 0:48:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a bow. So what Bass does is he works his

0:48:54.160 --> 0:48:56.920
<v Speaker 1>way through it. When he finds is that the Hebrew people,

0:48:57.280 --> 0:48:59.719
<v Speaker 1>while they didn't hunt, they were familiar with it and

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:03.120
<v Speaker 1>as no cable TV. So how did they know about hunting?

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:05.319
<v Speaker 1>How do they get all these metaphors the stories are

0:49:05.320 --> 0:49:07.719
<v Speaker 1>still being told. People on the edges must have still

0:49:07.760 --> 0:49:09.960
<v Speaker 1>been hunting. And as he looked in particular at the

0:49:10.040 --> 0:49:13.279
<v Speaker 1>laws the political laws uh in the Hebrew Bible. In

0:49:13.280 --> 0:49:15.600
<v Speaker 1>those first five books, there's this book called Leviticus that

0:49:15.640 --> 0:49:17.239
<v Speaker 1>has all the things you should and shouldn't do as

0:49:17.239 --> 0:49:19.600
<v Speaker 1>part of the cultic practice. What he finds is there's

0:49:19.600 --> 0:49:21.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of animals that are permitted for you to eat.

0:49:22.080 --> 0:49:27.680
<v Speaker 1>You could only get by hunting. They're not domesticated animals,

0:49:28.200 --> 0:49:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Ibex and the like, these gazelle types, these are all

0:49:31.680 --> 0:49:34.880
<v Speaker 1>viable foods, but you had to course hunt them. So

0:49:34.920 --> 0:49:39.560
<v Speaker 1>what he recognizes is is that Hebrew scriptures seem to

0:49:39.560 --> 0:49:43.040
<v Speaker 1>be anti hunting because they give you these metaphors and

0:49:43.080 --> 0:49:46.480
<v Speaker 1>similes that play at the poignancy then of the prey

0:49:46.560 --> 0:49:49.799
<v Speaker 1>being captured or sometimes of course bad people falling into

0:49:49.840 --> 0:49:52.520
<v Speaker 1>their own traps, etcetera. And when he recognizes it's not

0:49:52.600 --> 0:49:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the weapons of hunting, as we would only think of

0:49:54.960 --> 0:49:57.480
<v Speaker 1>them just the bow and arrows, spear or javelin, But

0:49:57.600 --> 0:50:01.680
<v Speaker 1>their nets, their pits, these are the things that they

0:50:01.680 --> 0:50:04.640
<v Speaker 1>could use. There would be walls where they drive animals

0:50:04.680 --> 0:50:06.960
<v Speaker 1>into them, into the pit, or into a reason they

0:50:07.160 --> 0:50:11.080
<v Speaker 1>called a kite, that they could capture them and net them.

0:50:11.160 --> 0:50:14.480
<v Speaker 1>These were actually quite frequently referenced in the Hebrew Bible.

0:50:14.760 --> 0:50:17.120
<v Speaker 1>The Hebrew people may not have hunted that much, but

0:50:17.120 --> 0:50:20.640
<v Speaker 1>they knew about hunting culture and that whole react relationship

0:50:20.719 --> 0:50:23.319
<v Speaker 1>then between the hunter and the prey, the hunter and

0:50:23.320 --> 0:50:27.919
<v Speaker 1>the hunted, was pivotal to understanding who they were, who

0:50:27.920 --> 0:50:31.120
<v Speaker 1>they were in relationship to each other, and most importantly,

0:50:31.719 --> 0:50:35.360
<v Speaker 1>how humans related to their God, because God was a hunter.

0:50:35.520 --> 0:50:40.480
<v Speaker 1>But when you say that it's it's negative. Yeah, but

0:50:40.600 --> 0:50:45.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't the author explain that, well, he's not. They don't. Really.

0:50:45.280 --> 0:50:48.880
<v Speaker 1>They don't like then go and condone agriculture either. They

0:50:48.920 --> 0:50:50.879
<v Speaker 1>sort of use it in a in a similar way,

0:50:50.960 --> 0:50:53.800
<v Speaker 1>like it's not like hunting is bad relative to other stuff.

0:50:53.960 --> 0:50:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Think about the most if you've read the Hebrew Bible

0:50:56.840 --> 0:51:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and the Christian New Testament, probably the most poignant symbol

0:51:00.800 --> 0:51:03.719
<v Speaker 1>is one tied to an animal. Now it's not a

0:51:03.760 --> 0:51:07.560
<v Speaker 1>wild animal, it's a lamb, the lamb led to the slaughter.

0:51:07.640 --> 0:51:09.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a sacrifice lamb. If you get to the final

0:51:09.800 --> 0:51:12.799
<v Speaker 1>end of the story where the Christians win revelation, right,

0:51:13.080 --> 0:51:16.839
<v Speaker 1>it's a sacrifice lamb that appears that is triumphant. So

0:51:17.280 --> 0:51:20.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Hebrew Bible there's also this focus on the

0:51:20.080 --> 0:51:24.440
<v Speaker 1>killing of domesticated animals for cultic practice or for food,

0:51:25.440 --> 0:51:29.440
<v Speaker 1>So hunting and animals dying and being captured, animals being

0:51:29.520 --> 0:51:31.880
<v Speaker 1>led to a slaughter, ignorance of their fate which is

0:51:31.920 --> 0:51:36.280
<v Speaker 1>about to come. The writers use those metaphors and similes

0:51:36.480 --> 0:51:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to pull out, if you will, what he calls the target.

0:51:40.520 --> 0:51:44.880
<v Speaker 1>That that that emotion, that relationship, that idea that was

0:51:44.920 --> 0:51:46.640
<v Speaker 1>hard for them to teach, so they did it by

0:51:46.640 --> 0:51:50.719
<v Speaker 1>way of this analogous language. So yeah, it's not explicitly

0:51:50.760 --> 0:51:53.959
<v Speaker 1>anti hunting. But a problem is what the writer's turn

0:51:54.040 --> 0:51:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to was that point in the hunt, the trap, the capture,

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the animal cause in the net at that point in

0:52:02.160 --> 0:52:04.960
<v Speaker 1>time no longer able to flee. That's what they turned

0:52:05.000 --> 0:52:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to most often, and that comes across as being negative.

0:52:07.680 --> 0:52:09.560
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting about that is it gives us the idea

0:52:09.560 --> 0:52:12.360
<v Speaker 1>that there was that level of sympathy and regret and

0:52:12.440 --> 0:52:18.080
<v Speaker 1>empathy about animal life even then. Yeah, exactly, why can

0:52:18.120 --> 0:52:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I ask? What did that lamb? Ca? Yeah, hey, this

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:25.200
<v Speaker 1>is Michelle. He might have heard some giggles in the background,

0:52:25.360 --> 0:52:30.080
<v Speaker 1>but uh, what did that lamb represent? Like? Symbolically? Well,

0:52:30.160 --> 0:52:32.760
<v Speaker 1>at various times it represented number of things. It depended

0:52:32.840 --> 0:52:35.600
<v Speaker 1>upon the symbol right or or this similar um, and

0:52:35.640 --> 0:52:38.680
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it represented those who were ignorant, who were going

0:52:38.719 --> 0:52:42.040
<v Speaker 1>into trouble. In many cases, of course, the innocent lamb,

0:52:42.080 --> 0:52:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the one that had no blemish, no spot, represented something

0:52:46.400 --> 0:52:48.799
<v Speaker 1>that willingly went. Of course, most famously, it's going to

0:52:48.840 --> 0:52:52.080
<v Speaker 1>be used by the Christians to represent Christ who knowingly

0:52:52.200 --> 0:52:56.080
<v Speaker 1>in some ways went to right, willingly gave itself up

0:52:56.160 --> 0:52:59.200
<v Speaker 1>for the redemption, to the accomplishment of something a blood sacrifice.

0:52:59.200 --> 0:53:01.239
<v Speaker 1>And then I'm perceiving it not so much as what

0:53:01.360 --> 0:53:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Steve said, We're like you're thinking about the plight of

0:53:03.680 --> 0:53:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the prey. I'm seeing it as like this is what's

0:53:07.000 --> 0:53:09.400
<v Speaker 1>at steak. And a lot of times again, even in

0:53:09.440 --> 0:53:12.279
<v Speaker 1>the hunting metaphors, there's what's at steak as well. So

0:53:12.520 --> 0:53:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you get people who dig pits to trap their neighbor.

0:53:15.840 --> 0:53:17.560
<v Speaker 1>That's not literally right. It's not like you don't want

0:53:17.560 --> 0:53:20.640
<v Speaker 1>your neighbor to phone to a bit. My neighbors are

0:53:20.640 --> 0:53:22.399
<v Speaker 1>pretty decent. I wouldn't want that to happen to him,

0:53:22.400 --> 0:53:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean. But it's this is what happens.

0:53:24.920 --> 0:53:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Or most famously, of course, is there's this this uh

0:53:27.719 --> 0:53:30.239
<v Speaker 1>saying that Jesus has he's got his disciples around. He says,

0:53:30.400 --> 0:53:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you see the sparrows. No sparrow falls without God seeing it. No,

0:53:35.239 --> 0:53:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you think, what's the sparrow falling for? I always wondered

0:53:37.560 --> 0:53:39.120
<v Speaker 1>about that as a kid, and I heard it in church.

0:53:39.560 --> 0:53:42.840
<v Speaker 1>What's bass pointed out? The sparrow is the cheapest animal

0:53:43.040 --> 0:53:45.799
<v Speaker 1>that would be eaten. You could get a sparrow for

0:53:45.840 --> 0:53:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a penny. Even spells out what sparrows, what dead sparrows

0:53:49.120 --> 0:53:51.960
<v Speaker 1>call exactly, so you can even get like in bulk right,

0:53:51.960 --> 0:53:54.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like going to Costco or Sam's or something. You

0:53:54.360 --> 0:53:57.200
<v Speaker 1>can get your sparrows. They were cheap food. Notice that

0:53:57.280 --> 0:53:59.960
<v Speaker 1>God doesn't stop the killing of the sparrow, the netting

0:54:00.000 --> 0:54:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of the sparrow, but he's observant of it, he sees it,

0:54:04.040 --> 0:54:06.080
<v Speaker 1>he's aware of it. So what makes them you get

0:54:06.080 --> 0:54:08.840
<v Speaker 1>by the assemblies is an awareness of like how no

0:54:09.000 --> 0:54:12.640
<v Speaker 1>turkey dies about is hearing about hearing about it? And

0:54:12.680 --> 0:54:17.200
<v Speaker 1>where it happened, you know, and and but God doesn't

0:54:17.760 --> 0:54:19.960
<v Speaker 1>not empower the hunter. But think about it and the

0:54:20.000 --> 0:54:24.000
<v Speaker 1>story of Esaul and his father Isaac, it's made very

0:54:24.120 --> 0:54:27.040
<v Speaker 1>clear that you don't always get game, and if you

0:54:27.080 --> 0:54:29.520
<v Speaker 1>do get game, it's made clear it's by the blessing

0:54:29.560 --> 0:54:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of God. God blesses the hunter and empowers him, allows

0:54:34.280 --> 0:54:37.760
<v Speaker 1>him then to find prey for his own. So God's

0:54:37.840 --> 0:54:40.439
<v Speaker 1>mixed in all that's the God, the Nimrod in the world.

0:54:40.520 --> 0:54:42.680
<v Speaker 1>It's the idea of looking to the divide and and

0:54:42.760 --> 0:54:46.120
<v Speaker 1>looking in this this faith or multiple faith traditions, the

0:54:46.200 --> 0:54:49.399
<v Speaker 1>idea of the hunter. Who's this character Nimrod? So if

0:54:49.400 --> 0:54:52.719
<v Speaker 1>you will the divine now right well and then and

0:54:52.840 --> 0:54:56.479
<v Speaker 1>then the world. And an environmental approach, which I gotta

0:54:56.520 --> 0:54:58.360
<v Speaker 1>say most Christians don't pay any attention to to the

0:54:58.400 --> 0:55:00.960
<v Speaker 1>environmental and most hunters, I gotta tell you thing that

0:55:01.000 --> 0:55:03.600
<v Speaker 1>they don't go to a church or synagogue and find

0:55:03.640 --> 0:55:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a recycle bin at the back. But you're not this

0:55:08.560 --> 0:55:11.160
<v Speaker 1>counters um, this counter something that was in an email

0:55:11.280 --> 0:55:14.759
<v Speaker 1>just got no, it's not in this one. Do you

0:55:14.760 --> 0:55:18.239
<v Speaker 1>think about like the creation story in the garden and

0:55:18.280 --> 0:55:21.840
<v Speaker 1>being tenders of the garden and like Stewart's like, it

0:55:22.000 --> 0:55:26.640
<v Speaker 1>seems like how are they missing that big point? And

0:55:26.680 --> 0:55:29.960
<v Speaker 1>this is the huge issue, And that's the question of

0:55:30.040 --> 0:55:32.920
<v Speaker 1>dominion and the question this is one that gets bounced

0:55:32.920 --> 0:55:36.120
<v Speaker 1>around with multiple interpretations. And you're gonna talk about Nimron

0:55:36.320 --> 0:55:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and there's a connection I got a ton of questions

0:55:38.160 --> 0:55:40.200
<v Speaker 1>about what you're talking about, cause you talked about you

0:55:40.440 --> 0:55:44.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about Elder Leopold, and yeah, okay, well here's here's

0:55:44.520 --> 0:55:45.879
<v Speaker 1>the thing. The guy wrote in this is the guy

0:55:45.880 --> 0:55:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that wrote in about Paul and Saul all right. Goes

0:55:48.000 --> 0:55:50.400
<v Speaker 1>on to say a lot of Christians, myself included, have

0:55:50.520 --> 0:55:55.360
<v Speaker 1>a passion for caring for our world and are very grateful.

0:55:55.480 --> 0:55:58.560
<v Speaker 1>And he goes on, let's say some nice stuff. All right,

0:55:58.680 --> 0:56:01.600
<v Speaker 1>So there's one. So so one of the things I

0:56:01.680 --> 0:56:05.000
<v Speaker 1>particularly look at my own studies, um, and look at

0:56:05.280 --> 0:56:07.680
<v Speaker 1>in my classes, but it shows up in this book,

0:56:07.760 --> 0:56:10.400
<v Speaker 1>not just in my essays, but in some of the

0:56:10.719 --> 0:56:13.759
<v Speaker 1>latter half from the academy, where you begin to see

0:56:13.800 --> 0:56:17.319
<v Speaker 1>people who embraced an idea of hunting, but they want

0:56:17.360 --> 0:56:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to do it in particular way. So, for instance, you

0:56:19.080 --> 0:56:20.920
<v Speaker 1>have the Roman Catholic priest. You're not hitting me with

0:56:21.040 --> 0:56:25.600
<v Speaker 1>nemrod right now. I'm weaving it back, I promise, um.

0:56:26.000 --> 0:56:29.160
<v Speaker 1>And they're going to turn to Aldo Leopold um, and

0:56:29.800 --> 0:56:33.520
<v Speaker 1>so Ted vitally he's at St. Louis University. Um, you've

0:56:33.560 --> 0:56:39.719
<v Speaker 1>got uh, we've got a pacifist uh from Chicago, and

0:56:39.960 --> 0:56:43.640
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna write in particular, he hunts any hunts with

0:56:43.640 --> 0:56:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a bow. And the question is, you know, how can he,

0:56:46.640 --> 0:56:49.560
<v Speaker 1>as a pacifist embrace this? And so he his name

0:56:49.600 --> 0:56:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is Greg Clark. He turns to Aldo Leopold. So a

0:56:52.719 --> 0:56:57.160
<v Speaker 1>number of Christian writers from the Academy are very much

0:56:57.280 --> 0:57:00.439
<v Speaker 1>acquainted with Leopold, particularly San County Almanac. If you've read

0:57:00.480 --> 0:57:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that and you know the story, it's the story of

0:57:02.880 --> 0:57:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the wolf, right the green Eyes, right as as they

0:57:06.840 --> 0:57:09.800
<v Speaker 1>just kill the wolf for the sake of supposedly increasing

0:57:09.880 --> 0:57:13.280
<v Speaker 1>numbers of deer, and it begins to realize you can't

0:57:13.400 --> 0:57:17.160
<v Speaker 1>look at hunting and at game management uh and managing

0:57:17.200 --> 0:57:22.000
<v Speaker 1>resources with the idea of immediate gratification of increased populations.

0:57:22.240 --> 0:57:24.400
<v Speaker 1>You have to see it like the Mountain sees it.

0:57:24.560 --> 0:57:28.000
<v Speaker 1>You've got to think long term. So many Christian ethosis

0:57:28.120 --> 0:57:31.200
<v Speaker 1>have turned to this, but what they're they're encountering is

0:57:31.240 --> 0:57:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the challenge of the question of dominion. So one of

0:57:34.960 --> 0:57:37.959
<v Speaker 1>the problems for people who want to be positive about

0:57:38.080 --> 0:57:42.520
<v Speaker 1>hunting and they're looking for role models in the Bible

0:57:43.080 --> 0:57:46.080
<v Speaker 1>is there's not that many. One of the interesting characters,

0:57:46.080 --> 0:57:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the guy Iman nime Rod here we Go I promise

0:57:49.360 --> 0:57:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you follow that rabbit. Thank you. There. It's an interesting character.

0:57:55.960 --> 0:57:57.960
<v Speaker 1>He shows it just for a few verses. In Genesis.

0:57:58.680 --> 0:58:01.880
<v Speaker 1>He's he's early, he's early, he's early on alright, So

0:58:01.960 --> 0:58:06.080
<v Speaker 1>he's after Noah, after the flood story, and he's from

0:58:06.120 --> 0:58:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a descendants of Ham. Now there's a whole story, uh Noah,

0:58:11.040 --> 0:58:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and they all get the promise. Yehaw. He starts growing grapes.

0:58:14.520 --> 0:58:17.400
<v Speaker 1>He gets drunk off his ass, he gets naked. Um,

0:58:17.560 --> 0:58:21.760
<v Speaker 1>is you remember this story? And unfortunately you gotta read

0:58:21.800 --> 0:58:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the Hebrew Bible. Well no, no, no, that's a lot.

0:58:24.280 --> 0:58:29.520
<v Speaker 1>That's that's grapes Fermentum gets drunkunk, gets drunken, naked, gets

0:58:29.600 --> 0:58:33.880
<v Speaker 1>drunken naked, and his his son shows up and sees

0:58:33.960 --> 0:58:37.560
<v Speaker 1>his nickeheadedness. Right, this is nakedness. This is good stuff

0:58:37.600 --> 0:58:41.520
<v Speaker 1>in the Bible. There's adultery, there's murder, there's nakedness, there's

0:58:41.680 --> 0:58:45.240
<v Speaker 1>there's just all kinds of great stuff. Their myths, their

0:58:45.320 --> 0:58:48.480
<v Speaker 1>stories that had I mean they had traction around the fireplace,

0:58:48.880 --> 0:58:52.080
<v Speaker 1>um and the heart. So anyhow, he gets drunk. He

0:58:52.120 --> 0:58:54.400
<v Speaker 1>has a son named Ham, who sees his nakedness, goes

0:58:54.400 --> 0:58:58.600
<v Speaker 1>back to his brother's dude dad's naked and drunk the

0:58:58.680 --> 0:59:00.640
<v Speaker 1>other two brothers, and we don't know exactly what that means.

0:59:00.680 --> 0:59:03.080
<v Speaker 1>He's all kinds of different interpretation that he saw his father,

0:59:03.200 --> 0:59:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you know. Uh. The two other sons come in and

0:59:05.520 --> 0:59:08.080
<v Speaker 1>cover the nakedness of their father. They showed their respect

0:59:08.120 --> 0:59:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and for this, then Noah curses his son Ham. Now

0:59:12.800 --> 0:59:14.920
<v Speaker 1>it gets tricky because suddenly it goes from curs did

0:59:14.960 --> 0:59:17.400
<v Speaker 1>nothing to help, who did nothing to help? Ends up

0:59:17.440 --> 0:59:20.400
<v Speaker 1>shifting to cursing descendant he has gotten named Canaan, and

0:59:20.440 --> 0:59:26.680
<v Speaker 1>then it gets ideological and then can enabled Canaan, No Canan, Canaan. Okay,

0:59:26.720 --> 0:59:29.040
<v Speaker 1>So all this is Nimrod is a descendant of this

0:59:29.200 --> 0:59:33.480
<v Speaker 1>cursed lineage, and then light shows up. Nimrod is a

0:59:33.560 --> 0:59:35.919
<v Speaker 1>descendant of the cursed lineage of the guy that saw

0:59:36.080 --> 0:59:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Noah drawnk and just ran off to the squeal on

0:59:39.560 --> 0:59:43.920
<v Speaker 1>him right right, So it's really it's a short section,

0:59:44.040 --> 0:59:47.760
<v Speaker 1>so it goes real quick. It's in Genesis chapter Tennis

0:59:47.880 --> 0:59:51.680
<v Speaker 1>is coush Hey, great names right there, Cush, Spaghett, and Nimrod.

0:59:51.720 --> 0:59:53.600
<v Speaker 1>He began to be a mighty one on the earth.

0:59:53.840 --> 0:59:56.680
<v Speaker 1>He was a mighty hunter before the Lord. Therefore it

0:59:56.800 --> 0:59:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is said, like Nimrod the mighty hunter before the Lord,

1:00:00.360 --> 1:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and the beginning of his kingdom was babel eric a

1:00:03.000 --> 1:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>cod Kalna in the land of Shinar, and from that

1:00:06.280 --> 1:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>land he went to Assyria and built Nineveh, and it

1:00:09.320 --> 1:00:11.960
<v Speaker 1>goes on. So what you get is this interesting character

1:00:12.000 --> 1:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>who was a mighty hunter before the Lord. The god

1:00:14.920 --> 1:00:19.080
<v Speaker 1>saw him and seemingly empowered him and noticed it's proverbial,

1:00:19.160 --> 1:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>it's like before the Lord means in view of in

1:00:21.520 --> 1:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>view of Lord. And again interpretations very but many scholars

1:00:25.720 --> 1:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>will say that actually he was empowered and successful because

1:00:29.520 --> 1:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of the gifts from Yahweh. But what he does is intriguing.

1:00:34.920 --> 1:00:38.160
<v Speaker 1>He's a mighty hunter before the Lord, but he begins civilization,

1:00:38.320 --> 1:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>he starts founding cities. So you have a liminal character

1:00:41.360 --> 1:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>who's powerful and at the same time then goes and

1:00:45.200 --> 1:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>establishes these major kingdoms that you become aware of in

1:00:48.800 --> 1:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>ancient or Eastern history, most famously of course the Syria Um.

1:00:52.480 --> 1:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>So there's not much there. So Nimrod becomes an intriguing

1:00:56.400 --> 1:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>touchstone for both people who are positive or negative about

1:00:59.560 --> 1:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>hunting and culture. If I do this just serving is

1:01:03.080 --> 1:01:06.960
<v Speaker 1>not much to go off and it's not. But if

1:01:06.960 --> 1:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you read my entire chapter you'll find there's tons And

1:01:09.440 --> 1:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>what happens is the Rabbis talk about it and they

1:01:12.360 --> 1:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>have their own commentary. So this is kind of extra

1:01:15.120 --> 1:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>biblical commentary that floats around as well. But if I

1:01:18.080 --> 1:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>were to turn to Janice and say, dude, you're a Nemerod,

1:01:21.440 --> 1:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's going to be perceived as a

1:01:24.280 --> 1:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>positive evaluation. Definitely not. But isn't that like like I

1:01:28.880 --> 1:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>think if you look in the Urban Dictionary talks about

1:01:30.760 --> 1:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>like Elmer Fudd, like right, because the blundering hunter. But

1:01:35.120 --> 1:01:38.680
<v Speaker 1>if you were to look at a a journal, a

1:01:38.720 --> 1:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>sporting journal in the early eighteen hundreds, early hunters and

1:01:43.040 --> 1:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>early hunters, I should say, hunters in the British and

1:01:45.000 --> 1:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>American traditions, we're calling themselves nemerods based on that little

1:01:49.040 --> 1:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>dinky messters because how is that more important than because

1:01:52.840 --> 1:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>he was a mighty hunter before the before the Lord.

1:01:55.680 --> 1:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>So what you get his nimrod, where there's so little

1:01:57.960 --> 1:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>there becomes either the wonderful argument against hunting look twisted

1:02:03.640 --> 1:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>into the negative and then twist in the Historically, what

1:02:06.520 --> 1:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it was used is it was interpreted that he was

1:02:08.400 --> 1:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>one who was a hunter, and not a hunter of animals,

1:02:11.120 --> 1:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>but a hunter of men. That he subjugated men and

1:02:14.720 --> 1:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>people's and thus became a founder of empires. Empires by

1:02:18.200 --> 1:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the way that we're not democratic republics, right, these were

1:02:21.720 --> 1:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>tyrannical empires. And so it's perceived then that Nimroid becomes

1:02:26.680 --> 1:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>then this symbol of oppression. And so that's what he was.

1:02:31.480 --> 1:02:33.439
<v Speaker 1>And they don't give that power to him by God.

1:02:33.480 --> 1:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>They simply say that God observed and or saw him

1:02:36.040 --> 1:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the positive view, Okay, would the Bible have let that happen?

1:02:44.120 --> 1:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>That they meant hunter of man? So is there a

1:02:48.880 --> 1:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>precedent for using hunter to mean hunter of man? Well,

1:02:53.760 --> 1:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>what happens is you begin to get these commentaries and

1:02:56.520 --> 1:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>then among other people, there's a guy by the name

1:02:59.000 --> 1:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of Augustine. You may have heard of him. Augustine's a

1:03:02.400 --> 1:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>theologian uh in the late three hundreds. I think he's

1:03:05.120 --> 1:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>born in three fifty four and he dies in four

1:03:07.880 --> 1:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty a d uh. And he lives in North Africa.

1:03:10.640 --> 1:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>He's from a place called Hippo, pretty cool carthage Um,

1:03:13.960 --> 1:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and he ends up writing some really important books and commentaries.

1:03:17.560 --> 1:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>He writes an autobiography called Confessions, and he also writes

1:03:22.000 --> 1:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a way of trying to figure out what's going with

1:03:23.560 --> 1:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Rome because Rome is sacked by the Visigoths uh in

1:03:27.320 --> 1:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>four ten. And he writes a book called basically Two Cities.

1:03:29.800 --> 1:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>So Augustine's really really important. He also gives the West

1:03:33.880 --> 1:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>it's clear view kind of about sin, original sin. They're

1:03:37.840 --> 1:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>all born busted. Thank Augustine for this. It's an Augustine

1:03:41.120 --> 1:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the world view. But Augustine spends Nimrod as well in

1:03:45.800 --> 1:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>this perspective, and so you get this tradition that builds

1:03:48.520 --> 1:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>on other you can say, bills on other ignorances, but

1:03:51.640 --> 1:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>essentially begins to expand it. And you have the Nimrod

1:03:54.760 --> 1:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>disinterpreted in many different ways. And this idea of posts

1:03:59.800 --> 1:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>or should say extra biblical commentary that's floating around that

1:04:04.120 --> 1:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>many of these early Christian scholars tap into have him

1:04:07.440 --> 1:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>being in this empire founder not necessarily a hunter. And

1:04:12.360 --> 1:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>so I mean, you just gotta scrape away at the layers,

1:04:14.880 --> 1:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>going through all those primary sources, right, and you begin

1:04:17.360 --> 1:04:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to see how you work your way to this. Now,

1:04:19.960 --> 1:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>what happens is in the eighteen hundreds, while early sportsmen

1:04:23.360 --> 1:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>who are particularly moving then towards the idea of sports

1:04:26.800 --> 1:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>hunting and developing it into something that we began to

1:04:29.360 --> 1:04:31.920
<v Speaker 1>write about in Europe or in the US, both because

1:04:31.920 --> 1:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>it starts in Britain in particular, but a lot of

1:04:34.960 --> 1:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Brits come over in the eighteen forties and eighteen fifties

1:04:37.600 --> 1:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and they bring with them hunting sporting culture. They begin

1:04:41.520 --> 1:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to create journals like the Spirit of the Times is

1:04:44.120 --> 1:04:46.160
<v Speaker 1>probably the most famous ones. It's coming out from the

1:04:46.160 --> 1:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>East Coast, but the major writers are actually British sporting

1:04:50.080 --> 1:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>writers couldn't make it in Britain to come to America,

1:04:52.640 --> 1:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and they began to push america uh sportsman into a

1:04:57.240 --> 1:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>new perception of hunting because up to that point in time,

1:05:00.080 --> 1:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>hunters were basically what we might call pot hunters. They

1:05:02.680 --> 1:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>were there to hunt for meat, et cetera. The Daniel

1:05:06.040 --> 1:05:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Boone's who's the hero? Right that Davy Crockett's even right,

1:05:09.800 --> 1:05:12.160
<v Speaker 1>sorry about the Alumo, but he nonetheless was a guy

1:05:12.200 --> 1:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>on the edge. So you see them moving forward. The

1:05:14.760 --> 1:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of cuts point out real quick like the differences

1:05:17.360 --> 1:05:21.280
<v Speaker 1>there because Boone and Crockett are often like discussed together,

1:05:21.320 --> 1:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>they're very different people there. They are really are Boone

1:05:25.960 --> 1:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>was a market hunter. So talked about a guy on

1:05:29.400 --> 1:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the edge, right, he spent his whole life chasing the edge, um,

1:05:33.400 --> 1:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the edge of civilization, right. But he was a market hunter.

1:05:35.440 --> 1:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Hunted bear meat to sell the meat, hunted deerskins to

1:05:38.920 --> 1:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>sell the highs, and that's how he made his income.

1:05:40.880 --> 1:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Crockett was attached to military campaigns and would hunt to

1:05:46.120 --> 1:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>feed people out in punitive expeditions against the Indians. But

1:05:50.640 --> 1:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that you gotta eat, right, and so Crocket would higher

1:05:52.680 --> 1:05:55.720
<v Speaker 1>on to go and meat for these expeditions. Both are

1:05:55.720 --> 1:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>associated with the frontier. Oh yeah, absolutely, And this is

1:05:58.840 --> 1:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>this isn't this isn't trying to take apart what you're

1:06:01.000 --> 1:06:03.160
<v Speaker 1>saying was pointing out to people like what sort of

1:06:03.240 --> 1:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>hunting they were up to to be, like they were

1:06:06.240 --> 1:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>commercial individuals, pot hunters, meat hunters, market hunters. Well, what

1:06:10.240 --> 1:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you get here is just basically hunters, um. And you

1:06:12.960 --> 1:06:15.280
<v Speaker 1>don't get the whole idea of pot hunters until you

1:06:15.320 --> 1:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>have sport hunters. So what sport hunters began because they

1:06:18.480 --> 1:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>invite the distinction exactly. So rather than so it's like

1:06:21.840 --> 1:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about earlier, there's you can be a hunter,

1:06:23.880 --> 1:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>but there's a better way to be a hunter. Right,

1:06:25.760 --> 1:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>So and so today we have the same distinctions. We

1:06:28.080 --> 1:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>have things like meat hunters and we have a right

1:06:31.600 --> 1:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and then how does that work out? That's another ethical thing.

1:06:33.760 --> 1:06:35.360
<v Speaker 1>We can show that the side. But we come back

1:06:35.400 --> 1:06:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to it. By the way, it's a great book came

1:06:37.880 --> 1:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>out around the year two thousand, two thousand one. It's

1:06:40.880 --> 1:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>out of print now, but I courage you anyone to read.

1:06:43.760 --> 1:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>It's called Hunting in the American Imagination. It's by a

1:06:47.160 --> 1:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>guy named Daniel Justin Herman. He's a professor, do you good? Right?

1:06:51.720 --> 1:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>So he develops this distinction. Quote him, I don't want

1:06:54.920 --> 1:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to oversell it. Um. I mean, there's some things I

1:06:56.560 --> 1:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>don't agree with, but he really does something pivotal in

1:06:59.440 --> 1:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the discussion hunting cultures in America. It's his dissertation. But

1:07:02.560 --> 1:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't a hunter, and someone basically said, oh, we

1:07:04.880 --> 1:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>don't have a topic here right on this and it

1:07:06.440 --> 1:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>worked and I'm so thankful he did this. He laid

1:07:09.360 --> 1:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the grandmark. But he describes that these British hunters come over,

1:07:12.400 --> 1:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>they develop a sporting culture by way of particularly periodicals,

1:07:16.080 --> 1:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and Americans as we continue to push the frontier further

1:07:19.040 --> 1:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and further west take up this sport hunting. And cand

1:07:22.560 --> 1:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I had another thing in here. Man Boon's people were

1:07:26.160 --> 1:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>from his family was British, not at all hunters when

1:07:30.640 --> 1:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>they came well, they had they discovered hunting in a

1:07:34.640 --> 1:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>very practical way. So these people you're talking about, our

1:07:37.560 --> 1:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>our upper like Boons people were working people. These British

1:07:41.920 --> 1:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>sport hunters are are the genteel. It's so particularly that

1:07:49.000 --> 1:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>come to America year afric But these are like wealthy individuals.

1:07:53.400 --> 1:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>They've been doing this for centuries in Britain, but in

1:07:55.760 --> 1:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>America we see this cultural shift towards sport hunting and

1:07:59.640 --> 1:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>there in bracing even if they're not wealthy, they embraced

1:08:02.680 --> 1:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>this idea. So for instance, there's this is this poem

1:08:06.600 --> 1:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I found in Spirit of the Spirit of the World, uh,

1:08:09.920 --> 1:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Spirit of Times from I think it's from eighteen fifty two,

1:08:12.800 --> 1:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and of course I do Texas history as well, and

1:08:16.200 --> 1:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>uh it's it's Scattering the Morning Do and it's by

1:08:20.200 --> 1:08:23.439
<v Speaker 1>an anonymous author and it's from It's just like it's

1:08:23.920 --> 1:08:26.599
<v Speaker 1>eight years before the Civil War. It's written along the

1:08:26.640 --> 1:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>mouth of the the mouth of the Brases, if remember correct.

1:08:29.840 --> 1:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>So at the Gulf Coast. They're in Texas and it's

1:08:32.360 --> 1:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of guys talking about getting drunk and tomorrow

1:08:34.840 --> 1:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna go hunt. But it's sport hunting. Now eighteen

1:08:38.280 --> 1:08:42.839
<v Speaker 1>fifty two, Texas has only been a state for seven years.

1:08:43.040 --> 1:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>It's only been a republic and then a state for twenties.

1:08:46.240 --> 1:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Someone vanquish command commanches are are fixed the gang get

1:08:50.960 --> 1:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>territory during the Civil War. They're gonna push in back

1:08:53.080 --> 1:08:56.519
<v Speaker 1>into central Texas. So Texas is just really East Texas

1:08:56.520 --> 1:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and the coastal region. But they're already distinguishing themselves as

1:09:00.280 --> 1:09:03.599
<v Speaker 1>sport hunters and the writing poetry and getting it published

1:09:03.600 --> 1:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>in New York for the journals. They are the periodicals

1:09:06.240 --> 1:09:08.599
<v Speaker 1>that are coming out. So we have this birth of

1:09:08.920 --> 1:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>sport and they turned to nimerod As as their kind

1:09:11.800 --> 1:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of their hero. He's a gifted hunter based on Yeah,

1:09:14.920 --> 1:09:20.479
<v Speaker 1>it's just because he's hairy and red. Not think about

1:09:20.520 --> 1:09:23.479
<v Speaker 1>that one for a minute. You're talking about racism and

1:09:23.680 --> 1:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and things that are going on with the Native Americans, etcetera.

1:09:26.439 --> 1:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>You can see why they wouldn't write no, No, we're

1:09:29.439 --> 1:09:33.599
<v Speaker 1>not nimerod We're mighty hunters. Just it's a mighty hunter,

1:09:33.720 --> 1:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>mighty hunter. Yeah, and so they that one adjective, that

1:09:39.120 --> 1:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>is it. And that's how the r now nimerod then

1:09:40.840 --> 1:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>becomes a reaction again, a pejorative, an insult, because it

1:09:44.920 --> 1:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>begins to be seen, particularly in Britain. When it comes

1:09:46.800 --> 1:09:49.439
<v Speaker 1>over to America in the twentieth century, people would be

1:09:49.439 --> 1:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>called nimerods. But they were being seen in as a

1:09:51.720 --> 1:09:53.519
<v Speaker 1>bunch of country gentlemen who wanted to be like the

1:09:53.560 --> 1:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>wealthy of previous centuries who around road to hounds, right,

1:09:57.280 --> 1:10:00.960
<v Speaker 1>chase the fox. And there were these new gentry. They're bunchly,

1:10:01.120 --> 1:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of rednecks, rubes, country folk who basically trying

1:10:06.160 --> 1:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to act like gentlemen. And so they would be mocked

1:10:08.280 --> 1:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>then as oh, you nimrods. And you begin to have

1:10:11.760 --> 1:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>just as you have the use of the name as

1:10:14.080 --> 1:10:19.439
<v Speaker 1>this um positive no man, if you will have taken

1:10:19.439 --> 1:10:22.439
<v Speaker 1>on by characters, you also have this pejorative that the

1:10:22.479 --> 1:10:25.840
<v Speaker 1>critics on the outside are using. Also economically, it becomes

1:10:25.880 --> 1:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>like the term fake news, where you take something just

1:10:28.439 --> 1:10:31.719
<v Speaker 1>turn it around on itself. Yeah, and so of course,

1:10:32.040 --> 1:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>fud right, thank you. Let's personify hunters as idiots, as

1:10:36.720 --> 1:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>rubes as people who can't actually get the rabbit, and

1:10:40.360 --> 1:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>so you get the fud kind of approach. Um the Nimerod, Yeah,

1:10:45.640 --> 1:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>man Nimrod gets a lot of traction. Thing is, and

1:10:48.920 --> 1:10:51.840
<v Speaker 1>if you read my essay in the book, he's been

1:10:52.320 --> 1:10:56.519
<v Speaker 1>he gets traction. Not just recently, he gets traction for centuries. Yeah,

1:10:56.560 --> 1:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>there's not much there, but you know what, if you're

1:10:58.320 --> 1:11:00.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to make an argument, it helps. If the not

1:11:00.200 --> 1:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of evidence, you know what I mean, you

1:11:02.720 --> 1:11:04.680
<v Speaker 1>can make it what you wanted to make it. It's

1:11:04.760 --> 1:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of like what you're always saying about Laramie, and uh,

1:11:07.840 --> 1:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>who's Who's Who's like a great Western Oh, the mountain

1:11:11.000 --> 1:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>man Laramie, Yeah, he got everything names shows up out west,

1:11:14.200 --> 1:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>promptly gets killed and stuff down through a hole in

1:11:16.280 --> 1:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the ice and the beaver pond, and it winds up

1:11:17.880 --> 1:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>at half the damn state. Now, no one knows. No

1:11:21.360 --> 1:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>one knows where this dude came from. Nothing's known about him.

1:11:25.040 --> 1:11:27.559
<v Speaker 1>It's just that somewhere someone's like, oh and some dude

1:11:27.600 --> 1:11:30.479
<v Speaker 1>named Laramie couldn't find him. Sure enough, I found him

1:11:30.520 --> 1:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>dead in the beaver pond. The less you know, the

1:11:33.120 --> 1:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>more you know. It just winds up. It just gives

1:11:35.120 --> 1:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you a lot of room to run. See, now, here's

1:11:38.800 --> 1:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a question I want to ask you towards them, but

1:11:40.160 --> 1:11:41.519
<v Speaker 1>I almost want to ask it to you now, but

1:11:41.520 --> 1:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's too big of a question. Tell me

1:11:44.400 --> 1:11:46.679
<v Speaker 1>this is too big of a question, all right, because

1:11:46.880 --> 1:11:48.559
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of stuff from the book that I

1:11:48.560 --> 1:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>want to get into. But I need to ask this

1:11:51.680 --> 1:11:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in your world, in the world of biblical scholarships, just

1:11:57.040 --> 1:11:58.679
<v Speaker 1>a hard question to ask because it's like you need

1:11:58.720 --> 1:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to have it be this way or else they wouldn't

1:12:00.360 --> 1:12:04.479
<v Speaker 1>be biblical scholarship. Is it? Is it discussed how the

1:12:04.520 --> 1:12:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Bible is too open to individual interpretation? Meaning there are

1:12:09.360 --> 1:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>those who look at the Bible and the main thing

1:12:12.360 --> 1:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>they see is by God, I should persecute gay people.

1:12:17.720 --> 1:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Some people look at the Bible and they see I

1:12:20.400 --> 1:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>should do everything in my power to alleviate suffering. Like

1:12:25.960 --> 1:12:30.759
<v Speaker 1>how right? How is it so big and so open

1:12:30.920 --> 1:12:33.559
<v Speaker 1>to interpretation? So what you're asking me right now, is

1:12:33.800 --> 1:12:35.719
<v Speaker 1>you see this land mine? Would you like to step

1:12:35.800 --> 1:12:40.519
<v Speaker 1>on it? Okay? Okay, let me find let me okay,

1:12:40.520 --> 1:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>how could it be? Okay, let's let's not even go big.

1:12:43.040 --> 1:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's go small Nimrods good? How could it be like

1:12:49.840 --> 1:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>what do you see when you begin to see that

1:12:52.880 --> 1:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that some people in some time? Because here, let's let's

1:12:58.920 --> 1:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>bring it even more narrow. I'm sure that when that was,

1:13:02.080 --> 1:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>when that was being told around the campfire as a

1:13:04.800 --> 1:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>story to explain who we are, what we believe, what

1:13:06.760 --> 1:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>we ought to do, there probably was not a lack

1:13:09.040 --> 1:13:12.639
<v Speaker 1>of clarity around how you're supposed to feel about nimrod Okay,

1:13:12.760 --> 1:13:15.639
<v Speaker 1>that's okay, So let me let me touch it and

1:13:15.640 --> 1:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and we'll see. I don't want to go too far

1:13:17.280 --> 1:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>with it. This is a huge question. It is a

1:13:20.960 --> 1:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>big question. Um, and it's a question. Okay, it's a

1:13:23.680 --> 1:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>big question. Let's see what I can do with it

1:13:27.560 --> 1:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>in my American history courses. Can you ask my question

1:13:29.880 --> 1:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>real quick? Do That's why I'm gonna read it. I

1:13:33.640 --> 1:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure it's clearly I've I've muggied the

1:13:35.320 --> 1:13:39.439
<v Speaker 1>waters when it was when it was a narrative, like

1:13:40.280 --> 1:13:42.519
<v Speaker 1>when it was a narrative that people were telling in

1:13:42.600 --> 1:13:45.479
<v Speaker 1>real time to explain who we are, what we believe,

1:13:45.479 --> 1:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>what our traditions are, and it was being impactful in

1:13:48.360 --> 1:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the intended way. Do you feel that it was confusing

1:13:52.560 --> 1:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>then or is that? Is that not answerable? I think

1:13:56.000 --> 1:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not answerable, not answerable. I think it's not answerable.

1:13:59.080 --> 1:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Bible itself is a composite composed for centuries.

1:14:09.400 --> 1:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>And at least this is the prospective historians and bilbl scholars,

1:14:13.360 --> 1:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>okay today um. And as a result of that, many

1:14:17.880 --> 1:14:22.639
<v Speaker 1>times the beginning, the origins have been lost. We don't

1:14:22.760 --> 1:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>we don't know how it started. Now, historical criticism many

1:14:26.920 --> 1:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>times tries to work its way back to figure out

1:14:29.320 --> 1:14:32.839
<v Speaker 1>where this came from, how it originated, what its import

1:14:32.880 --> 1:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>was then, and why it finds its way into the

1:14:35.240 --> 1:14:40.599
<v Speaker 1>stories in the Hebrew Bible. What There's a guy named

1:14:40.800 --> 1:14:43.559
<v Speaker 1>Lhausen in the nineteenth century puts forwards something called the

1:14:43.600 --> 1:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>documentary thesis. And what he argues is, if you look,

1:14:47.320 --> 1:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>for instance, just at the pentitute, this first five books

1:14:49.280 --> 1:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about against the word pentitude five books, Genesis, Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus,

1:14:56.040 --> 1:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Numbers and Deuteronomy, is that the Old Testament, No, no,

1:14:59.520 --> 1:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you got like a butler a ton more, a ton

1:15:03.240 --> 1:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>more books than the Old Testament in the here re Bible. Now,

1:15:06.840 --> 1:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>in those first five books, in particular, what you see

1:15:09.439 --> 1:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>than are various layers of sources being brought together. The

1:15:16.120 --> 1:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>sources themselves, many times were composites of oral traditions, maybe

1:15:23.920 --> 1:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>written traditions that were being brought together. Now he he

1:15:27.120 --> 1:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>defines them. He particularly looks, and he's saying, I think

1:15:29.840 --> 1:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that these patterns are there, and that these sources can

1:15:32.920 --> 1:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>be looked at chronologically so famously. If I can do

1:15:35.800 --> 1:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>this right, it's j E p D. I think it's

1:15:40.760 --> 1:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>rights p D. I have to look it up. So

1:15:42.400 --> 1:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>what he has to see as the y'all list, the

1:15:44.240 --> 1:15:49.439
<v Speaker 1>elois uh, the priestly source, and the deuteronomous. So what

1:15:49.479 --> 1:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>he looks at is he looks at the scriptures and

1:15:51.680 --> 1:15:53.719
<v Speaker 1>he looks like, for instance, what name is used for God?

1:15:54.560 --> 1:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>So in Genesis one you see one name for God,

1:15:57.920 --> 1:16:00.639
<v Speaker 1>and Genesis too you see a different name for God. Well,

1:16:00.680 --> 1:16:02.879
<v Speaker 1>what is it, hit, You have two different creation stories.

1:16:03.439 --> 1:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>What this hints to the scholar who looks at it

1:16:05.720 --> 1:16:07.639
<v Speaker 1>from a critical point of view is you have two

1:16:07.680 --> 1:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>different stories from two different sources. They even call God

1:16:13.320 --> 1:16:16.639
<v Speaker 1>two different names. Once Eloheim, the plural of l or God.

1:16:16.680 --> 1:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>The other is Yahweh, this particular personal name that the

1:16:19.680 --> 1:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Hebrew people had for God. So these seem to be

1:16:22.360 --> 1:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>two dishes to do, two different traditions that existed that

1:16:25.680 --> 1:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>were pulled together by an editor at various times, maybe

1:16:29.200 --> 1:16:34.439
<v Speaker 1>multiple editors, and they're brought together because they're seemingly tight

1:16:34.680 --> 1:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>enough to communicate the story a salvation story, perhaps right,

1:16:38.880 --> 1:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time that you get them many times,

1:16:41.000 --> 1:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>or where these stories originated and how they started in

1:16:44.040 --> 1:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>what their original meeting was. One argument is, if you

1:16:46.960 --> 1:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>read the story of Abraham and Isaac and Jacob, is

1:16:50.240 --> 1:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that really these actually weren't father son and grandson. There

1:16:53.400 --> 1:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>were three different stories about founders of tribes that as

1:16:57.880 --> 1:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the Israelites came together, Hebrews came together. There they said, well,

1:17:01.000 --> 1:17:04.360
<v Speaker 1>let's put them together, and somebody began to The stories

1:17:04.479 --> 1:17:07.439
<v Speaker 1>began to grow and meld, and surely then Abraham had

1:17:07.439 --> 1:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a son whose name was Isaac, and Isaac had a

1:17:09.960 --> 1:17:14.160
<v Speaker 1>son whose name was Jacob, and the stories get melded together. Well,

1:17:14.200 --> 1:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>when you meld all that together, assuming you don't have

1:17:17.840 --> 1:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>divine inspiration, it gets complicated and meaning gets lost there.

1:17:24.680 --> 1:17:26.439
<v Speaker 1>And that's what you get is the argument of these

1:17:26.439 --> 1:17:30.160
<v Speaker 1>faith communities that brought these texts together. The Hebrew people

1:17:30.160 --> 1:17:32.879
<v Speaker 1>who brought their texts together, and then the Christian community

1:17:33.080 --> 1:17:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that took centuries. By the way, we don't the Bible

1:17:35.439 --> 1:17:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that we have, that is the New Testament today was

1:17:38.160 --> 1:17:41.400
<v Speaker 1>not really kind of brought together, and in the arrangement

1:17:41.439 --> 1:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>we have today to almost four hundred, it takes basically

1:17:45.560 --> 1:17:48.360
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and fifty years for the New Testament to

1:17:48.400 --> 1:17:50.679
<v Speaker 1>get there. There are books that Christians in the early

1:17:50.800 --> 1:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>centuries held us being inspired and and and guiding that

1:17:54.920 --> 1:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>are not in your Bible. Books like the Book of

1:17:57.760 --> 1:18:01.800
<v Speaker 1>James was troublesome, but because the books associated the letters

1:18:01.800 --> 1:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>associated with Paul seemed to be in juxtaposition to the

1:18:05.080 --> 1:18:08.200
<v Speaker 1>themes that are found in the Book of James Revelation.

1:18:09.200 --> 1:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Revelation almost didn't make the cut because if you've read

1:18:12.000 --> 1:18:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the Book of Revelation, who knows what it means? That

1:18:14.920 --> 1:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>was written by a guy in prison on the island

1:18:16.720 --> 1:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>right there, John, right John on patmos So. But the

1:18:19.360 --> 1:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>point is it's so out there that many Christians like,

1:18:21.920 --> 1:18:23.960
<v Speaker 1>this sounds like good stuff, but I'm not sure what

1:18:23.960 --> 1:18:25.559
<v Speaker 1>it means. It could be interpret a lot of different ways.

1:18:25.560 --> 1:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure we want to keep it in the cannon.

1:18:27.200 --> 1:18:29.920
<v Speaker 1>So the cannon tics forever for it to be formed. Well,

1:18:30.000 --> 1:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>basically three fifty years the Hebrew cannon, it depends on

1:18:33.680 --> 1:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the interpreter, but years for the Hebrew cannon to be finalized.

1:18:40.040 --> 1:18:44.559
<v Speaker 1>So so your question is excellent, how can you have

1:18:44.640 --> 1:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>different interpretations? And the answer is huge, and that is

1:18:49.360 --> 1:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you're going to so me do it this way. I'll

1:18:51.720 --> 1:18:54.439
<v Speaker 1>give you a short example to show how complex this

1:18:54.479 --> 1:18:57.200
<v Speaker 1>issue is. I teach American history. Yeah, I know, I

1:18:57.200 --> 1:18:59.120
<v Speaker 1>have degrees in theology, but I'm made my way over

1:18:59.120 --> 1:19:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to history and the historians kind of taken in. They

1:19:03.200 --> 1:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>slap cultural historian tab on me and they're like, hey,

1:19:05.280 --> 1:19:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you're good, stay over in your corner, all right. So

1:19:07.479 --> 1:19:09.519
<v Speaker 1>I teach American history and I focused in particularly on

1:19:09.560 --> 1:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the various interpretations of freedom in the years leading up

1:19:12.800 --> 1:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to the Civil War in particular. But you look at slavery,

1:19:17.800 --> 1:19:20.559
<v Speaker 1>the issue is and it's a thesis that was put

1:19:20.560 --> 1:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>out there by a number of historians, uh, and I

1:19:22.960 --> 1:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's got a lot of value. Is that what

1:19:25.080 --> 1:19:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you see is that in America, the interpretation of slavery

1:19:31.160 --> 1:19:34.719
<v Speaker 1>as America is eight And I'm gonna put quotes around

1:19:34.720 --> 1:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>this because please hear the quotes Christian nation. That is

1:19:38.320 --> 1:19:42.559
<v Speaker 1>the myth that ties Christian primary America together is that

1:19:42.680 --> 1:19:45.599
<v Speaker 1>of Christianity. I don't think that wrong, But the point

1:19:45.680 --> 1:19:48.519
<v Speaker 1>is that story of Christian story. Even people who would

1:19:48.520 --> 1:19:52.519
<v Speaker 1>never go to a church, we're still familiar with the

1:19:52.520 --> 1:19:55.479
<v Speaker 1>Biblical Yeah, yeah, I mean, but I mean if you

1:19:55.520 --> 1:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>look like the founding of like the Euro American tradition

1:19:58.880 --> 1:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>was guided. They knew the stories and the morality was

1:20:03.400 --> 1:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>defined many times about the stories that they heard or

1:20:05.280 --> 1:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>at least as interpreted. What you find is that Christianity,

1:20:09.240 --> 1:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>particularly the Bible. I should say the Bible loses its

1:20:12.120 --> 1:20:16.519
<v Speaker 1>traction in American culture as a document that is an

1:20:16.520 --> 1:20:20.559
<v Speaker 1>authority for making policy and determined the most important issues

1:20:21.120 --> 1:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in the eighteen fifties. And it's not Darwin's Origin a

1:20:24.320 --> 1:20:27.519
<v Speaker 1>species that kills it, which comes out in eight it's

1:20:27.560 --> 1:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the problem that the Bible failed to properly answer with

1:20:32.120 --> 1:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>one answer only is slavery right or wrong? And what

1:20:38.280 --> 1:20:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you get then are very I would argue good arguments

1:20:43.920 --> 1:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that say slavery is a biblical institution, that God allowed

1:20:48.240 --> 1:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it to be formulated and created in the Israelite communities,

1:20:51.760 --> 1:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and that God even set rules on it looked from

1:20:54.000 --> 1:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the Leviticus, etcetera, and that the New Testament provided no

1:20:58.720 --> 1:21:04.120
<v Speaker 1>caveats regarding the extension of slavery forward. In fact, there's

1:21:04.120 --> 1:21:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a little book that no one ever uses. It's called

1:21:06.200 --> 1:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the Book of Phileman or Philaman. Uh, get bored in church,

1:21:09.280 --> 1:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>go read it. You can do it. It just takes

1:21:10.800 --> 1:21:13.519
<v Speaker 1>a minute. And it's written to a guy who's lost

1:21:13.520 --> 1:21:16.519
<v Speaker 1>the slave of a fugitive slave. He ran away, became

1:21:16.560 --> 1:21:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a Christian, came to Paul. Paul sends him back, buddy, Paul.

1:21:22.120 --> 1:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Paul sends him back to his owner, who's Philamen. The

1:21:27.320 --> 1:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>slaves a guy named Ossimus, and says basically, look, Fleaman,

1:21:32.160 --> 1:21:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you treat him like a Christian brother, and if you can't,

1:21:35.439 --> 1:21:39.599
<v Speaker 1>you send him back to me. But Paul never says don't. Well,

1:21:39.680 --> 1:21:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Paul never says free him, keep him as your slave,

1:21:41.960 --> 1:21:43.880
<v Speaker 1>but treat him like treat him. If you can't do it,

1:21:43.920 --> 1:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>sending back. So what many of the Southern theologians argued was,

1:21:48.439 --> 1:21:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and they were politicians as well, as that slavery had

1:21:51.200 --> 1:21:57.880
<v Speaker 1>a biblical foundation. Northern increasingly rabbis and Christian ministers began

1:21:58.000 --> 1:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to argue that the particularly the New tests Men offered critiques,

1:22:01.080 --> 1:22:03.519
<v Speaker 1>notably that Jesus came to set the captives free, give

1:22:03.600 --> 1:22:07.559
<v Speaker 1>sight to the blind, and that the Golden Rule was

1:22:07.680 --> 1:22:12.160
<v Speaker 1>this ultimate challenge to slavery. Why would you enslave another

1:22:12.160 --> 1:22:14.360
<v Speaker 1>man or woman when you wouldn't want that done to you.

1:22:14.560 --> 1:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>So the spirit of the New Testament was against slavery.

1:22:19.080 --> 1:22:20.679
<v Speaker 1>So by the time we get to the eighteen fifties,

1:22:20.720 --> 1:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the nation is ripping itself apart. The compromisers like Henry

1:22:24.320 --> 1:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Clay and John C. Calhoun is not a compromiser, but

1:22:27.320 --> 1:22:29.679
<v Speaker 1>he's dying the whole generation of men that had held

1:22:29.720 --> 1:22:32.599
<v Speaker 1>the nation together over this issue. We had the Missouri

1:22:32.680 --> 1:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Compromise of eighteen twenty, where we keep compromising. The Compromise

1:22:36.280 --> 1:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of eighteen fifty brings California in and all those Southwest territories.

1:22:40.000 --> 1:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>There's nobody there anymore. And no longer does the Bible

1:22:43.160 --> 1:22:47.639
<v Speaker 1>give a valid or acceptable answer to the huge question,

1:22:47.840 --> 1:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>because there's multiple interpretations about the most critical thing. If

1:22:53.080 --> 1:22:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you want to put it this way, the country's facing

1:22:55.400 --> 1:22:59.400
<v Speaker 1>is a black man, a man as in all men

1:22:59.400 --> 1:23:03.759
<v Speaker 1>are created equal. And if it can't answer that simple question,

1:23:04.880 --> 1:23:06.720
<v Speaker 1>is the black man a man and his slavery of

1:23:06.760 --> 1:23:10.439
<v Speaker 1>valid institution or invalid institution, what good is it for

1:23:10.479 --> 1:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>making public policy? And so that example demonstrates how our

1:23:15.439 --> 1:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>nation itself, which was at least of some historians evangelical

1:23:20.600 --> 1:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>at the time and turned to the Bible as its

1:23:23.080 --> 1:23:26.599
<v Speaker 1>main authority, couldn't find an answer or by the way

1:23:26.640 --> 1:23:29.439
<v Speaker 1>of saying it, without multiple answers. And then they go

1:23:29.479 --> 1:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>out and kill more of each other than we lost

1:23:34.320 --> 1:23:37.559
<v Speaker 1>in all of our other wars combined, somewhere between six

1:23:37.640 --> 1:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred and six un Now there's a great history, and

1:23:41.320 --> 1:23:43.439
<v Speaker 1>he's just retired. His name is Martinel. He was at

1:23:43.720 --> 1:23:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Wheaton and then at Notre Dame. Who uses a line

1:23:46.240 --> 1:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna paraphrase, I'm gonna do a horrible job, he says. Basically,

1:23:49.360 --> 1:23:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the matter is decided by the great theologians. William to

1:23:52.439 --> 1:23:56.160
<v Speaker 1>come to Sherman and Philip Sheridan. If you know those names,

1:23:56.760 --> 1:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you're buffalo stories. You know those names, they're not theologian

1:24:00.479 --> 1:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>what they are or as there are men of war.

1:24:02.439 --> 1:24:04.799
<v Speaker 1>And so the decision about how to interpret the Bible

1:24:04.880 --> 1:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>was decided on the battlefield God. If God is a

1:24:07.960 --> 1:24:11.160
<v Speaker 1>god of time and history and a providence determined what

1:24:11.200 --> 1:24:17.559
<v Speaker 1>was the right interpretation. Yeah, he did. He did it

1:24:17.600 --> 1:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>through a proxy. He did it through a proxy for

1:24:20.000 --> 1:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a sun that which is not surprising because he does

1:24:21.800 --> 1:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things to So. Yeah, so scripture has

1:24:25.439 --> 1:24:28.759
<v Speaker 1>been interpreted in any different ways, and for our own nation,

1:24:29.320 --> 1:24:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it points them to a major major issue. Man, Okay,

1:24:38.200 --> 1:24:44.559
<v Speaker 1>can be back up now. Sorry, Okay, you talk about

1:24:44.600 --> 1:24:48.160
<v Speaker 1>perceptions of hunters, and when I say you talked about

1:24:48.160 --> 1:24:50.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean people. Yeah, like your your book is structured

1:24:50.479 --> 1:24:52.879
<v Speaker 1>and people you have, you know, people that are contributing

1:24:52.880 --> 1:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>to your book that this idea the perceptions of hunters

1:24:54.640 --> 1:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>comes up. But do you feel that there's a religious

1:24:58.320 --> 1:25:03.479
<v Speaker 1>perception of hunters that gegorically differs from a secular perception

1:25:03.479 --> 1:25:14.559
<v Speaker 1>of hunters? Meaning, Okay, our attack attack hunting from a

1:25:14.600 --> 1:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>religious perspective. That's probably a better way to get what

1:25:17.760 --> 1:25:19.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting at, because I could do it very well.

1:25:19.760 --> 1:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I could attack hunting from a secular perspective because I

1:25:21.960 --> 1:25:24.760
<v Speaker 1>would just go borrow all the secular arguments I know

1:25:25.120 --> 1:25:29.519
<v Speaker 1>that are out there about right suffering of any form

1:25:29.640 --> 1:25:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and sentient beings and no, no, no no, no, right implications

1:25:33.920 --> 1:25:37.559
<v Speaker 1>of wildlife management. How hunting has been unregulated, hunting caused

1:25:37.560 --> 1:25:41.120
<v Speaker 1>all these you know, catastrophic losses in the wildlife world.

1:25:41.120 --> 1:25:44.519
<v Speaker 1>I could do it all day long. Um, I understand

1:25:44.560 --> 1:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>all the arguments. I don't agree with them all. There's

1:25:48.000 --> 1:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of caveats, but I get them. So hit

1:25:50.400 --> 1:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>for me what a religious critique of hunting would look like. Okay,

1:25:55.960 --> 1:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>so let me answer me answer a question you didn't ask,

1:25:57.760 --> 1:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and then try and get at it. So why is

1:25:59.600 --> 1:26:02.160
<v Speaker 1>it even a valley question? Why should we be asking

1:26:02.760 --> 1:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>do Christian hunters have why DoD Why do we even

1:26:08.000 --> 1:26:09.519
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about them? Did they have a different

1:26:09.560 --> 1:26:12.160
<v Speaker 1>world view? Well? I think it's I think it's important.

1:26:12.160 --> 1:26:13.599
<v Speaker 1>Are you asking me to know? I'm saying that's I'm

1:26:13.640 --> 1:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna answer. That's rhetorical. Sorry. So in one of the

1:26:17.080 --> 1:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>chapters it's called Hunters of the Past and President all right,

1:26:19.760 --> 1:26:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I look at some sociological instruments. In other words, they

1:26:22.720 --> 1:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>went out and the questionnaires about all kinds of things.

1:26:25.080 --> 1:26:27.120
<v Speaker 1>But one of the things that they point out is

1:26:27.160 --> 1:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>if you go through and I analyze the data, is

1:26:30.040 --> 1:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that hunters in America not surprised. And of course we

1:26:33.240 --> 1:26:35.559
<v Speaker 1>just had the new report that came out. Then hunters

1:26:35.600 --> 1:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>in America are just we're just losing numbers. We're losing

1:26:39.120 --> 1:26:42.479
<v Speaker 1>only percentages, but we're losing We're losing hunters. This in

1:26:42.479 --> 1:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the last two years, dramatic loss. And so the question

1:26:46.360 --> 1:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>is why is this culture we need to save? How

1:26:51.360 --> 1:26:54.719
<v Speaker 1>can we encourage the identity or formation of an identity

1:26:54.720 --> 1:26:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of this culture? And this is, by the way, is

1:26:56.880 --> 1:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>this is when the underlying objectives of my book is

1:26:59.760 --> 1:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I want hunters to realize they have an identity. They

1:27:02.680 --> 1:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>need to figure it out. But there's no way for

1:27:05.000 --> 1:27:09.320
<v Speaker 1>this culture to survive if they don't have a common identity.

1:27:09.439 --> 1:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>They don't identify who they are, what they are, who

1:27:13.080 --> 1:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>they're probably what they're doing in a relationship both to

1:27:16.080 --> 1:27:18.599
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world and the natural world as well.

1:27:18.960 --> 1:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>So you've got to formulate. But by looking at the

1:27:23.240 --> 1:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>data that came out and analyzing it, when the fascinating

1:27:26.760 --> 1:27:31.120
<v Speaker 1>things I discovered was that according to the questionnaires, while

1:27:31.200 --> 1:27:37.880
<v Speaker 1>hunters are dropping in number, hunters that remain are increasingly religious.

1:27:39.479 --> 1:27:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Now that doesn't mean they go to church all the

1:27:41.200 --> 1:27:44.680
<v Speaker 1>time and they're the questionnaires address this. Many of them

1:27:44.720 --> 1:27:47.519
<v Speaker 1>are just what I would call religious, and that is

1:27:47.560 --> 1:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that they identify themselves as being religious, believe in a God, uh,

1:27:52.880 --> 1:27:55.599
<v Speaker 1>go to service occasionally, maybe once a year, et cetera.

1:27:55.880 --> 1:27:59.880
<v Speaker 1>That's what you get then is this very large number

1:28:00.000 --> 1:28:04.439
<v Speaker 1>of hunters every year in a decreasing minority that are

1:28:04.520 --> 1:28:08.880
<v Speaker 1>overtly religious. So if we're gonna talk about hunters in America,

1:28:09.000 --> 1:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>we need to recognize that more and more hunters, as

1:28:11.880 --> 1:28:14.599
<v Speaker 1>the numbers draw, are going to be religious. To continue.

1:28:14.760 --> 1:28:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Another question is if there's going to be a debate

1:28:17.760 --> 1:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>about hunting, whether it's a valid enterprise or not, then

1:28:22.160 --> 1:28:24.360
<v Speaker 1>there's going to have to be the only philosophical or

1:28:24.360 --> 1:28:27.679
<v Speaker 1>ethical kind of secular arguments. But if there are people

1:28:27.720 --> 1:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>who see themselves as doing something that is religiously approved,

1:28:32.680 --> 1:28:37.120
<v Speaker 1>divinely appropriated, you're gonna have to argue against that as well.

1:28:37.200 --> 1:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>And a secular argument may not cut to the roots

1:28:40.320 --> 1:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of where they see as maybe their prerogative or even

1:28:44.200 --> 1:28:48.479
<v Speaker 1>their responsibility. Okay, all right, So why is it do

1:28:48.600 --> 1:28:52.679
<v Speaker 1>hunters see the world differently? Um? The answer I think

1:28:52.920 --> 1:28:58.360
<v Speaker 1>is complex. The problem I find with the Christian hunter

1:29:00.120 --> 1:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>is to still align from Martinel as well, from a

1:29:02.000 --> 1:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>different book he wrote called Scandal the Evangelical Mind, where

1:29:05.000 --> 1:29:07.519
<v Speaker 1>he said, the problem with the evangelical mind is there

1:29:07.600 --> 1:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>is no evangelical mind. What I would argue is the

1:29:10.360 --> 1:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>problem with the Christian hunter is the Christian hunter doesn't think.

1:29:16.120 --> 1:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean? I mean just that they don't think.

1:29:18.000 --> 1:29:20.479
<v Speaker 1>In other words, what I found when I interviewed Christian

1:29:20.520 --> 1:29:23.639
<v Speaker 1>hunters is they didn't think about being Christian and a hunter.

1:29:24.680 --> 1:29:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Only a minority did so. While they identify trying the

1:29:28.439 --> 1:29:32.160
<v Speaker 1>two things together now, so they're not so. While they

1:29:32.439 --> 1:29:37.639
<v Speaker 1>supposedly have a worldview that should be dominated by their

1:29:38.520 --> 1:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>identity as a Christian in particular, they don't actually take

1:29:42.960 --> 1:29:47.559
<v Speaker 1>that Christianity and think about it in an enterprise that

1:29:47.640 --> 1:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>many of them choose as being Yeah, their father, perhaps,

1:29:51.120 --> 1:29:54.599
<v Speaker 1>their wife, their spouse, their mother, their whatever they happen

1:29:54.680 --> 1:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to be. But the next thing they're gonna put on

1:29:56.320 --> 1:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>theirs and I'm a hunter, but they're Christian, probably was

1:30:00.120 --> 1:30:03.439
<v Speaker 1>before that. But they don't think about it um and

1:30:03.520 --> 1:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>so should they. And so I'm gonna give you a

1:30:05.360 --> 1:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>quote here from a book just came out. It's called

1:30:07.120 --> 1:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Knowing Creation Prospectives and Theology, Philosophy and Science by guy

1:30:10.880 --> 1:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>named Andrew Torrance. Sees the editor and Thomas McCall I

1:30:14.240 --> 1:30:16.439
<v Speaker 1>like to think this is spectacular because I actually taught

1:30:16.479 --> 1:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Torrance was human his ninth grade, and so everything

1:30:18.960 --> 1:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>he says that's brilliance belongs to me. He's a lecture

1:30:22.320 --> 1:30:27.120
<v Speaker 1>at the um in Scotland at I think where he's

1:30:27.120 --> 1:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a He's at St. Andrew's University. Okay, So, but he

1:30:30.040 --> 1:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>makes this quote, and he's talking about science, but it's

1:30:32.120 --> 1:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>applicable to the Christian hunter. The Christian, he writes, believes

1:30:36.560 --> 1:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that the natural world is created, ordered, and maintained by God,

1:30:40.240 --> 1:30:43.479
<v Speaker 1>who acts in its history in special ways. As I've

1:30:43.479 --> 1:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>been arguing, there's no reason for the Christian scientists, nothing

1:30:46.320 --> 1:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>from an Hunter, but in her capacity as a scientist,

1:30:49.160 --> 1:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to think that maintaining those beliefs would get in the

1:30:51.840 --> 1:30:55.960
<v Speaker 1>way of the scientific task. She should, and now I'm summarizing,

1:30:56.160 --> 1:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>do her job as a scientist, but she still needs

1:31:00.040 --> 1:31:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to do it as a Christian because, now skipping of

1:31:03.160 --> 1:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>page furthermore, the Christian believes that God is actively involved

1:31:07.240 --> 1:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in history, creating a faith that can serve as a

1:31:10.680 --> 1:31:16.639
<v Speaker 1>witness to God's creative, providential, and redentive activity. For this reason,

1:31:17.000 --> 1:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>there should be a difference between the way in which

1:31:19.000 --> 1:31:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the Christian scientists insert historian Promman Hunter here, and the

1:31:23.040 --> 1:31:26.719
<v Speaker 1>naturalistic scientists approach and interpret the structure behavior in history

1:31:26.760 --> 1:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in the natural world. If a Christian is truly a

1:31:29.000 --> 1:31:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Christian and believes that there's a world that has been

1:31:31.760 --> 1:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>created shaped, has a narrative that's tied to a god,

1:31:35.280 --> 1:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that is whatever they see in scripture, then they should

1:31:38.439 --> 1:31:42.400
<v Speaker 1>act according toly accordingly. So for the critic who turns

1:31:42.439 --> 1:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to the Christian Hunter and wants to argue ethics, they

1:31:45.160 --> 1:31:48.599
<v Speaker 1>should if they're arguing with an intelligent and reflective Christian

1:31:48.680 --> 1:31:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Hunter turned then too ethical questions arguments that challenge them

1:31:53.760 --> 1:31:57.599
<v Speaker 1>the basis of that Christian interpretation. What I discovered is

1:31:58.000 --> 1:32:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Christian sea hunting a lot of different ways, and actually

1:32:02.320 --> 1:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>from critics, they would see it many times just like

1:32:05.160 --> 1:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of slavery. And that is what you get are

1:32:09.040 --> 1:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>people who say, I look at the story of Genesis

1:32:12.680 --> 1:32:14.800
<v Speaker 1>one and Genesis too, and what I see is that

1:32:14.920 --> 1:32:19.799
<v Speaker 1>humans are empowered to have dominion, to be not just simply,

1:32:19.920 --> 1:32:23.360
<v Speaker 1>if you will, cultivators of the earth, but to subdue it,

1:32:25.200 --> 1:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and therefore I can do with it as I will.

1:32:27.880 --> 1:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I find these people don't recycle good all right, now,

1:32:32.360 --> 1:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>not all of them do so without thinking. Perhaps from

1:32:35.880 --> 1:32:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the best arguments I've seen is by a um, a

1:32:39.120 --> 1:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>theologian and a biologist by the name of Stephen van Tassel,

1:32:42.840 --> 1:32:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and he has he's extraordinarily erudite. Uh. He teaches at

1:32:47.000 --> 1:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a school in Britain, but also works in the West

1:32:49.080 --> 1:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>here in America dealing with rotents. By the way he

1:32:51.800 --> 1:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>deals with his stick stick is how do you kill things?

1:32:55.439 --> 1:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Are a pest um? So he does it from a

1:32:59.000 --> 1:33:03.519
<v Speaker 1>very erudite approach, but it's rare. The problem is when

1:33:03.560 --> 1:33:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you begin to question how then humans should relate to

1:33:07.040 --> 1:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the natural world. If you believe in the Christian view

1:33:11.800 --> 1:33:16.679
<v Speaker 1>that somehow the incarnation of Jesus Christ as the Divine

1:33:16.760 --> 1:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>now within the human somehow, giving both approval to the

1:33:21.160 --> 1:33:24.719
<v Speaker 1>divine creation that we know however that happened, but also

1:33:24.960 --> 1:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that the sacrifice of that lamb on the cross somehow

1:33:29.439 --> 1:33:33.679
<v Speaker 1>brings about a new reality. Does that new reality of

1:33:33.840 --> 1:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the crucifixion and the resurrection change how we should relate

1:33:39.040 --> 1:33:41.799
<v Speaker 1>to the natural world. Does it bring about a new covenant?

1:33:42.000 --> 1:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't bring about a new relationship to animals? Two to

1:33:47.200 --> 1:33:49.719
<v Speaker 1>the Flora and fauna of the earth if it does,

1:33:50.080 --> 1:33:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and it particularly many times critics of of of hunting

1:33:53.160 --> 1:33:56.160
<v Speaker 1>turned to the Book of Isaiah and they see this

1:33:56.280 --> 1:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of messianic where the lamb lies down with the lion,

1:34:00.160 --> 1:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that this is the way it was and this is

1:34:02.360 --> 1:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the way it should be. They're going to argue that

1:34:06.000 --> 1:34:08.439
<v Speaker 1>you are a new creation in Christ. So the world

1:34:08.560 --> 1:34:11.960
<v Speaker 1>also participates in that covenant, just like the world participated

1:34:11.960 --> 1:34:15.360
<v Speaker 1>with the covenant and Noah's covenant with God. So it

1:34:15.400 --> 1:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just Noah who was going to be protected from

1:34:17.920 --> 1:34:20.519
<v Speaker 1>the flood, but the earth was, and the animals are

1:34:20.520 --> 1:34:23.519
<v Speaker 1>going to be protected from that kind of flood uh

1:34:23.560 --> 1:34:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and destruction. So that covenant extends then to the entire world,

1:34:28.240 --> 1:34:32.439
<v Speaker 1>natural world, animals, etcetera. So stop killing animals. Now that's

1:34:32.479 --> 1:34:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a horribly simplified view. But if your creation, new creation

1:34:36.200 --> 1:34:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in Christ, quit sending live properly inappropriately with your fellow humans,

1:34:41.360 --> 1:34:44.479
<v Speaker 1>and live appropriately in a non violent way with the

1:34:44.560 --> 1:34:48.800
<v Speaker 1>flora and fauna around you. But the problem is the

1:34:48.840 --> 1:34:51.840
<v Speaker 1>reality problem is a number of things. One is, does

1:34:51.880 --> 1:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that mean then that I have to make large cats vegetarians?

1:35:00.080 --> 1:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Is the natural world of view a window through which

1:35:03.920 --> 1:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I can see the divine plan. That's been a long

1:35:06.520 --> 1:35:10.240
<v Speaker 1>held claim of Christianity. It's called natural theology. That I

1:35:10.280 --> 1:35:12.120
<v Speaker 1>can look at the world and I can see, in

1:35:12.160 --> 1:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>its magnificence and its complexity and its diversity, the hand

1:35:16.240 --> 1:35:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of a divine and providential, divine hands working in this

1:35:20.880 --> 1:35:24.320
<v Speaker 1>world that, even if I don't know or can't see

1:35:24.320 --> 1:35:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a God, the magnificence, the beauty that I see when

1:35:27.160 --> 1:35:29.639
<v Speaker 1>I see a waterfall or a mountain, when I'm sitting

1:35:29.760 --> 1:35:32.240
<v Speaker 1>up there and not having seen any game animals, moves

1:35:32.280 --> 1:35:34.640
<v Speaker 1>me to what we might call a religious experience, the

1:35:34.680 --> 1:35:38.720
<v Speaker 1>idea there's something greater than me, a greater than human reality.

1:35:38.800 --> 1:35:41.880
<v Speaker 1>So I may not know that there's three and one trinity,

1:35:41.920 --> 1:35:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I know that there's this thing, this greater than thing,

1:35:44.880 --> 1:35:48.439
<v Speaker 1>greater than me, thing that has provided, that has created me,

1:35:48.520 --> 1:35:51.719
<v Speaker 1>brought me into being in some fashion, whether evolutionary theory

1:35:51.800 --> 1:35:56.040
<v Speaker 1>or whatever you have. So if there's a new creation,

1:35:57.320 --> 1:36:00.559
<v Speaker 1>is therefore the predatory world that is reality that all

1:36:00.680 --> 1:36:04.160
<v Speaker 1>things consume all things. We die, and if they can

1:36:04.160 --> 1:36:06.320
<v Speaker 1>get to the steel, they're end up, worms are gonna

1:36:06.320 --> 1:36:09.960
<v Speaker 1>get me, etcetera. We all get eaten. Is that not

1:36:10.120 --> 1:36:13.559
<v Speaker 1>really God's plan. And if that's so, isn't this world

1:36:13.600 --> 1:36:16.400
<v Speaker 1>then something that's not really the creator God's isn't this

1:36:18.240 --> 1:36:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and some nastick if you read, for instance, the essay

1:36:22.560 --> 1:36:26.760
<v Speaker 1>by Nathan um And and the question is where do

1:36:26.840 --> 1:36:29.920
<v Speaker 1>we go from here? Is the argument that we're supposed

1:36:29.960 --> 1:36:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a new creation, and that we're supposed to

1:36:31.960 --> 1:36:34.360
<v Speaker 1>see the world, the natural world, a new way live

1:36:34.439 --> 1:36:38.840
<v Speaker 1>with humans and animals, and a new covenant of peace, tranquility,

1:36:39.040 --> 1:36:42.599
<v Speaker 1>and of love. Most importantly, does that deny the world

1:36:42.640 --> 1:36:48.200
<v Speaker 1>we know? We'll see answer. I don't know. I just

1:36:48.280 --> 1:36:51.559
<v Speaker 1>write about this stuff. No, for me, it's it's a

1:36:51.560 --> 1:36:54.679
<v Speaker 1>difficult question because I think about this and I look

1:36:54.720 --> 1:36:59.519
<v Speaker 1>around and I see, I see that the world does consume.

1:37:00.479 --> 1:37:05.840
<v Speaker 1>It just does. And I, as a hunter, feel I'll

1:37:05.880 --> 1:37:12.080
<v Speaker 1>admit euphoria when I am, if you want to call

1:37:12.120 --> 1:37:15.759
<v Speaker 1>it successful, when I kill, and at the same moment,

1:37:15.840 --> 1:37:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel absolute guilt and loss when I look at

1:37:20.960 --> 1:37:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that which was once beautiful no longer moving. I feel

1:37:25.360 --> 1:37:27.760
<v Speaker 1>pride when I feed friends and family with the meat

1:37:27.800 --> 1:37:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that I've taken. Ill even I even have pride when

1:37:31.280 --> 1:37:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I look at the furs on my floor. The I

1:37:33.880 --> 1:37:36.720
<v Speaker 1>don't have any great trophies, but the taxidermy amounts on

1:37:36.760 --> 1:37:39.680
<v Speaker 1>my wall. I tell the stories about those things, and

1:37:39.760 --> 1:37:42.519
<v Speaker 1>for that moment me, it's kind of sacramental that animal

1:37:42.600 --> 1:37:45.600
<v Speaker 1>lives again when I tell that story. It's why to me,

1:37:45.640 --> 1:37:47.720
<v Speaker 1>taxidermy amounts, by the way, mean nothing if if you

1:37:47.760 --> 1:37:50.360
<v Speaker 1>find him in a junk store, because there's no story

1:37:50.400 --> 1:37:53.120
<v Speaker 1>attached to them. There's no reality. That's no longer being

1:37:53.200 --> 1:37:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it's no longer being associated with them. It's just plastic

1:37:57.120 --> 1:37:59.719
<v Speaker 1>form with first stretched on it. But for me, all

1:37:59.720 --> 1:38:02.240
<v Speaker 1>these things are going on, and as I read the

1:38:02.240 --> 1:38:04.760
<v Speaker 1>scriptures there, they don't answer. To be honest, a lot

1:38:04.800 --> 1:38:10.200
<v Speaker 1>of great questions they there's challenges, but there's a multiplicity

1:38:10.200 --> 1:38:14.599
<v Speaker 1>of responses. For me, what I take away from it

1:38:14.720 --> 1:38:16.680
<v Speaker 1>is I look to the natural world, a look to

1:38:16.720 --> 1:38:20.640
<v Speaker 1>what moves me as a hunter who sees himself as

1:38:20.680 --> 1:38:22.320
<v Speaker 1>one of his. You know, I hope when they put

1:38:22.400 --> 1:38:25.080
<v Speaker 1>my gravestone it will be something like hopefully you know,

1:38:25.160 --> 1:38:32.400
<v Speaker 1>faithful husband, good friend, teacher, hopefully good teacher, and hunter.

1:38:33.120 --> 1:38:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Those four things would encapsulate who I am in so

1:38:36.040 --> 1:38:39.240
<v Speaker 1>many different ways. I've hunted for grades, I've hunted for

1:38:39.320 --> 1:38:42.320
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of facts and data in history, and I'm

1:38:42.400 --> 1:38:45.519
<v Speaker 1>hunted for animals. But with that moment of gain, there

1:38:45.560 --> 1:38:48.720
<v Speaker 1>comes loss. And I think that I can find an

1:38:48.880 --> 1:38:53.320
<v Speaker 1>argument for hunting in the Bible, but it requires a

1:38:53.439 --> 1:38:57.840
<v Speaker 1>hunting that is responsible, that is reflective, that looks then

1:38:57.880 --> 1:39:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to the health of the entire go lee pulled on

1:39:00.439 --> 1:39:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in biotic community, and that my failure to be responsible

1:39:05.040 --> 1:39:08.320
<v Speaker 1>in both the kill, the hunt, and for simply trying

1:39:08.400 --> 1:39:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to find the good of this earth. If I failed

1:39:11.960 --> 1:39:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to do that, that's a sin, because that's a crime

1:39:16.880 --> 1:39:20.559
<v Speaker 1>against what I know to be true and the God

1:39:20.800 --> 1:39:24.040
<v Speaker 1>who gave this beauty in this world. So in the

1:39:24.120 --> 1:39:28.000
<v Speaker 1>act of killing, consuming, I hope that I'm bringing life.

1:39:29.320 --> 1:39:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Um And there's an article or a chapter who by

1:39:33.320 --> 1:39:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a kind of Jim Tantalo, and Jim argues that even

1:39:37.200 --> 1:39:41.280
<v Speaker 1>in the tragedy of death, I am transformed. If I'm

1:39:41.320 --> 1:39:45.080
<v Speaker 1>reflective as an hunter, I'm transformed because in the moment

1:39:45.120 --> 1:39:47.840
<v Speaker 1>of death, of killing something, I live more than I

1:39:47.880 --> 1:39:51.439
<v Speaker 1>live before, because I recognize the reality of death for

1:39:51.479 --> 1:39:56.519
<v Speaker 1>me to come. Yeah for for the hunter, because just

1:39:56.680 --> 1:39:59.320
<v Speaker 1>as I kill, and just as I consume with joy,

1:39:59.800 --> 1:40:03.719
<v Speaker 1>with poignancy, with sorrow, so I too will be consumed,

1:40:04.040 --> 1:40:09.000
<v Speaker 1>whether by aberrant cells, clogged arteries, are something more violent,

1:40:09.720 --> 1:40:13.400
<v Speaker 1>it's our end for the Christian. The hope is that

1:40:13.439 --> 1:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>there's something more. Because the covenant that embraced humanity in

1:40:17.360 --> 1:40:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the very beginning of Genesis, one that embraces humanity and

1:40:21.160 --> 1:40:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the woe with Noah uh in Genesis,

1:40:25.360 --> 1:40:30.160
<v Speaker 1>then is also the covenant that is going to embrace Christians,

1:40:30.200 --> 1:40:32.719
<v Speaker 1>and if you will, in the sacrifice of Christ and resurrection,

1:40:32.800 --> 1:40:36.240
<v Speaker 1>but also in Revelation, all those covenants also embraced the

1:40:36.360 --> 1:40:39.799
<v Speaker 1>entire creative world. It's extended to the earth, to the soil,

1:40:40.000 --> 1:40:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to the animals, to the vegetation. There's a redemptive process

1:40:43.280 --> 1:40:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that goes on, and right now this is what we have.

1:40:47.760 --> 1:40:55.400
<v Speaker 1>If I failed to be responsible, reflective, serious, right now,

1:40:55.760 --> 1:41:00.439
<v Speaker 1>there's something that should also be going on. So that

1:41:00.520 --> 1:41:03.000
<v Speaker 1>leads me to diet, tribes and class about other things.

1:41:03.040 --> 1:41:05.360
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, well, I want to make sure I'm getting

1:41:05.360 --> 1:41:08.080
<v Speaker 1>your last point that you say, right now this is

1:41:08.120 --> 1:41:12.439
<v Speaker 1>what we have, meaning that you would feel is not

1:41:13.400 --> 1:41:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the one. Can't just trash this knowing that you have

1:41:18.600 --> 1:41:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the afterlife to fall back on. When I was a

1:41:20.760 --> 1:41:23.960
<v Speaker 1>kid in church, we used to sing this song. This

1:41:24.000 --> 1:41:27.320
<v Speaker 1>world is not my home. I'm just passing through. My

1:41:27.400 --> 1:41:30.160
<v Speaker 1>treasures are laid up somewhere beyond the blue. The angels

1:41:30.200 --> 1:41:33.479
<v Speaker 1>beckon me from Heaven's open door, and I can't feel

1:41:33.520 --> 1:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>at home in this world anymore. It's a great moving song,

1:41:37.840 --> 1:41:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and I sang it for you know when I was

1:41:39.640 --> 1:41:42.439
<v Speaker 1>in church as a kid. But now I think about it,

1:41:43.960 --> 1:41:46.599
<v Speaker 1>that's not right. This is a creative world for me.

1:41:46.960 --> 1:41:52.880
<v Speaker 1>It is a window to the divine plan. Yes it's predatory,

1:41:52.920 --> 1:41:55.639
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time, out of death comes new life,

1:41:56.160 --> 1:41:58.240
<v Speaker 1>whether it be Christ's story or what we see in

1:41:58.240 --> 1:42:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the world around us. And so this is my home.

1:42:02.560 --> 1:42:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not just passing through. If this is where I

1:42:05.720 --> 1:42:09.640
<v Speaker 1>have my beginning, whatever is beyond this life has to

1:42:09.720 --> 1:42:14.400
<v Speaker 1>be built on this experience right here, right now. This

1:42:14.479 --> 1:42:17.559
<v Speaker 1>is where I'm being formed. This is where I'm finding truth.

1:42:17.840 --> 1:42:20.920
<v Speaker 1>There may be truth beyond, but this is what I've

1:42:20.960 --> 1:42:23.880
<v Speaker 1>got and it can't just simply be a waste of time.

1:42:26.720 --> 1:42:30.200
<v Speaker 1>So this world is my home. I'm not passing through.

1:42:30.320 --> 1:42:34.320
<v Speaker 1>My treasures are here and beyond. Have you ever heard

1:42:34.360 --> 1:42:42.800
<v Speaker 1>anyone talk about extinction, meaning that through human actions we

1:42:42.800 --> 1:42:46.040
<v Speaker 1>would drive species extinction. Have you ever heard anyone talk

1:42:46.080 --> 1:42:51.360
<v Speaker 1>about that and talk about Noah's Ark? Oh? Yeah, the

1:42:51.439 --> 1:42:55.439
<v Speaker 1>pains that people went through to make sure that we

1:42:55.479 --> 1:43:00.080
<v Speaker 1>were not losing animals. Oh, whoa, that's interesting. Oh I

1:43:00.080 --> 1:43:03.439
<v Speaker 1>see what you're saying. Um, No, I never have. It's like, no,

1:43:03.560 --> 1:43:07.120
<v Speaker 1>we will save two of everything. Yes, if it's result,

1:43:07.120 --> 1:43:08.679
<v Speaker 1>I'll shoot it and I'll put it in a museum.

1:43:10.560 --> 1:43:12.640
<v Speaker 1>The elker disappearing, But dad gambit I saw when I

1:43:12.640 --> 1:43:15.720
<v Speaker 1>shot it. We'll put it in the Bronx Zoo. That's

1:43:15.720 --> 1:43:17.839
<v Speaker 1>not an idea I've ever heard anyone bringer. I haven't.

1:43:17.920 --> 1:43:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Actually now. It could be because I just don't read

1:43:20.360 --> 1:43:24.880
<v Speaker 1>widely enough, but I haven't. Um. I got another one

1:43:24.880 --> 1:43:28.120
<v Speaker 1>for you. Here's no and this is from this from

1:43:28.160 --> 1:43:31.439
<v Speaker 1>your own Um, this is like an idea that comes

1:43:31.479 --> 1:43:35.520
<v Speaker 1>up in your own book. How could a Christian reconcile

1:43:35.640 --> 1:43:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the tension of embracing the bloody wild? I guess your

1:43:40.880 --> 1:43:47.320
<v Speaker 1>words while finding salvation and a domesticating religion found by pastures.

1:43:49.360 --> 1:43:51.559
<v Speaker 1>It's a hard question. And if you notice, I don't

1:43:51.600 --> 1:43:56.320
<v Speaker 1>answer it, or you don't, I don't not me personally. Um,

1:43:56.479 --> 1:44:00.120
<v Speaker 1>is there even attention there? Like do you be like

1:44:00.360 --> 1:44:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I love the wild, like the fecundity and blood of

1:44:06.120 --> 1:44:10.680
<v Speaker 1>it all? Right, Um, does that mean you're turning your

1:44:10.720 --> 1:44:13.479
<v Speaker 1>back on this like pastoral history of of of the

1:44:13.680 --> 1:44:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the early Christians, right, And the nineteen eighties and nine ninies,

1:44:22.000 --> 1:44:25.439
<v Speaker 1>feminism reached into theology and women began to want to

1:44:25.439 --> 1:44:28.920
<v Speaker 1>look for their places in Christianity. The problem is Christianity

1:44:28.960 --> 1:44:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is the patriarchal religion, and it had been in patriarchal societies.

1:44:32.360 --> 1:44:33.960
<v Speaker 1>So what they had to do is they had to

1:44:34.000 --> 1:44:37.320
<v Speaker 1>go look, and they went back and they found women

1:44:37.400 --> 1:44:40.559
<v Speaker 1>as best they could, who were influential in their own realms,

1:44:40.720 --> 1:44:43.240
<v Speaker 1>who thought amazing things, and there was this kind of

1:44:43.280 --> 1:44:48.600
<v Speaker 1>revisionist history. As a hunter and I read a religion

1:44:48.880 --> 1:44:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that's based upon agriculture, domestication and pastors, I had to

1:44:53.760 --> 1:44:56.120
<v Speaker 1>do that and kind of go back and try and

1:44:56.200 --> 1:45:00.799
<v Speaker 1>find those spots because it's a minority perspective at least today,

1:45:00.840 --> 1:45:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think it always has been, except in America.

1:45:03.600 --> 1:45:06.360
<v Speaker 1>If you want to argue, basically during the mid nineteenth century,

1:45:06.400 --> 1:45:11.120
<v Speaker 1>as we expanded westward, because we've been civilized, an urbanite,

1:45:11.640 --> 1:45:14.120
<v Speaker 1>one could argue at least since the end of the

1:45:14.160 --> 1:45:17.360
<v Speaker 1>medieval period and even then prior to that, when people

1:45:17.439 --> 1:45:20.720
<v Speaker 1>got the hunt officially, of course we're royalty and the nobility,

1:45:20.760 --> 1:45:25.160
<v Speaker 1>so that brief period. I have to look for those

1:45:25.479 --> 1:45:29.120
<v Speaker 1>those answers to the question is this is there a

1:45:29.240 --> 1:45:31.080
<v Speaker 1>tension between my religion or not? And I try and

1:45:31.080 --> 1:45:34.160
<v Speaker 1>find those examples where there's not tension. Because in in

1:45:34.240 --> 1:45:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the book there's a guy that comments, an American observer

1:45:38.200 --> 1:45:42.120
<v Speaker 1>goes out to the edge, okay, the land of Boone

1:45:43.040 --> 1:45:45.479
<v Speaker 1>and points out that man, guys that get out on

1:45:45.520 --> 1:45:53.559
<v Speaker 1>the edge morally like, in a religious sense, they fall apart. Yeah,

1:45:53.600 --> 1:45:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that was these guys that flirt with the flirt with

1:45:56.240 --> 1:45:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the wilderness. The Puritans didn't like that. Puritans are agricultural.

1:45:59.640 --> 1:46:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's just store the forest, right, burn the tree so

1:46:01.640 --> 1:46:05.040
<v Speaker 1>we can have great agricultural land. Hunters were always problematic.

1:46:05.160 --> 1:46:07.680
<v Speaker 1>They weren't in church on Sunday. They hung out with

1:46:07.680 --> 1:46:10.639
<v Speaker 1>the Native Americans. They were always on the edge. They

1:46:10.640 --> 1:46:15.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't come, uh, confine themselves to behavior that society approved of.

1:46:16.680 --> 1:46:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Does does that mean that they could be not Christian?

1:46:22.200 --> 1:46:24.479
<v Speaker 1>It depends how Christian was interpreted at the time. You

1:46:24.560 --> 1:46:26.720
<v Speaker 1>ment being on church on Sunday, well, little house on

1:46:26.760 --> 1:46:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the prayer there, damn sure, Christian, there's a there's the

1:46:30.600 --> 1:46:33.160
<v Speaker 1>thing I mentioned. I feel like I talked about this

1:46:33.200 --> 1:46:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in my Buffalo book, but I can't remember. And it's

1:46:35.000 --> 1:46:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a letter when So, when the conquisators are in the

1:46:38.880 --> 1:46:44.160
<v Speaker 1>American Southwest and they're, you know, subjugating Native Americans and

1:46:44.200 --> 1:46:46.439
<v Speaker 1>trying to introduce them to like how you're supposed to be,

1:46:47.479 --> 1:46:52.120
<v Speaker 1>someone writes back a letter to Spain complaining about the hunters,

1:46:53.200 --> 1:46:56.240
<v Speaker 1>saying like, I don't get it. We've given them livestock,

1:46:56.640 --> 1:47:00.240
<v Speaker 1>We've given them home, we taught them how to farm.

1:47:00.320 --> 1:47:04.040
<v Speaker 1>They have all the stuff here, like, all the components

1:47:04.080 --> 1:47:09.200
<v Speaker 1>are in place. But these people get wind overheard of

1:47:09.240 --> 1:47:13.439
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo somewhere and they are gone, and it doesn't make

1:47:13.520 --> 1:47:16.680
<v Speaker 1>any sense. It's almost like they want to be doing this.

1:47:19.360 --> 1:47:23.000
<v Speaker 1>We've eliminated the need, so why if you can go

1:47:23.080 --> 1:47:27.360
<v Speaker 1>buy beef at your corner store. They're like, what was

1:47:27.520 --> 1:47:30.160
<v Speaker 1>what is the allure? What exactly is the problem with

1:47:30.200 --> 1:47:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you people? And again I think that most anyone who's

1:47:34.400 --> 1:47:41.240
<v Speaker 1>hunted and is again reflective they're looking at things, would

1:47:41.360 --> 1:47:45.320
<v Speaker 1>argue that there's so much more than the acquisition of meat.

1:47:45.360 --> 1:47:49.000
<v Speaker 1>And hunting. And I think some would argue that it's

1:47:49.000 --> 1:47:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a religious experience. Now by religious, I don't mean like

1:47:52.760 --> 1:47:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you you know, it's it's like going to church and

1:47:54.640 --> 1:47:59.400
<v Speaker 1>at the homily. But in that in that moment of

1:47:59.560 --> 1:48:03.479
<v Speaker 1>again pursuit the shot, the death and it may not

1:48:03.560 --> 1:48:06.280
<v Speaker 1>be a prompt death, but hopefully were short in humane,

1:48:06.680 --> 1:48:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that there is a sense of something greater than you,

1:48:09.960 --> 1:48:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a power that's more powerful than you, a greater than

1:48:13.960 --> 1:48:20.560
<v Speaker 1>human reality. And if you encounter that, you want to

1:48:20.680 --> 1:48:25.639
<v Speaker 1>encounter it again. As at St. Paul's Cathedral in London

1:48:25.760 --> 1:48:29.000
<v Speaker 1>one time and we were visiting and there was gonna

1:48:29.000 --> 1:48:31.959
<v Speaker 1>be a service that evening and the choir was practicing

1:48:32.000 --> 1:48:34.960
<v Speaker 1>as adults and children, and the place was fairly empty

1:48:36.520 --> 1:48:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and they were practicing, and it was a religious experience.

1:48:42.680 --> 1:48:46.439
<v Speaker 1>I was moved out of myself. What took place. The

1:48:46.560 --> 1:48:51.680
<v Speaker 1>sounds it was, it was intoxicating, it was goose bump lee.

1:48:51.880 --> 1:48:54.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to call it. It was something truly manniccent,

1:48:54.880 --> 1:48:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted to recapture that every single time that's

1:48:58.880 --> 1:49:01.439
<v Speaker 1>a religious experience, it's it's a sense of something greater

1:49:01.520 --> 1:49:04.519
<v Speaker 1>than us. It's a sign. I would argue that there's

1:49:04.560 --> 1:49:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a divine And I think hunters, if they are reflective

1:49:09.360 --> 1:49:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and not just something pumping fists and slapping hands when

1:49:12.400 --> 1:49:16.519
<v Speaker 1>they have success, or even when they fail, when they

1:49:16.600 --> 1:49:22.200
<v Speaker 1>simply surrender themselves to nature, will begin to hopefully access

1:49:22.360 --> 1:49:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that religious experience. So for me, that's addictive. If I

1:49:28.720 --> 1:49:31.040
<v Speaker 1>went to a concert and I thought, man, that was

1:49:31.080 --> 1:49:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the greatest Hi, not from you know, contact, talking about Hi,

1:49:34.560 --> 1:49:37.560
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't I want to go to another concert? If I

1:49:37.640 --> 1:49:39.519
<v Speaker 1>get a sense of the divine? Wouldn't I want to

1:49:39.600 --> 1:49:42.639
<v Speaker 1>do that again? And a reality that you can't access

1:49:42.680 --> 1:49:46.439
<v Speaker 1>by eating murders here or even going to church, because

1:49:46.479 --> 1:49:49.479
<v Speaker 1>doesn't church essentially just try and grab that experience from

1:49:49.520 --> 1:49:52.320
<v Speaker 1>many different types of denominations, and like, let's reproduce it.

1:49:53.120 --> 1:49:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's have this music, let's have this coral arrangement, let's

1:49:56.000 --> 1:49:59.439
<v Speaker 1>have this sermon, Let's have the great vaults right above

1:49:59.520 --> 1:50:02.040
<v Speaker 1>us with the man magnificent building that tries to make

1:50:02.160 --> 1:50:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you feel that religious experience. You can't be religious all

1:50:05.840 --> 1:50:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the time, you just can't be. You can't always live

1:50:08.920 --> 1:50:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in it. But hunting, to me is a religious experience.

1:50:11.160 --> 1:50:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Some people starry interrupting. Some people have religious experiences at

1:50:14.680 --> 1:50:21.680
<v Speaker 1>rock concerts. I'm not as a as a whole, but

1:50:21.760 --> 1:50:23.600
<v Speaker 1>again but not from the high. But I feel like

1:50:24.360 --> 1:50:28.439
<v Speaker 1>music can transports you. Sure it can. It can give

1:50:28.479 --> 1:50:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you what you just described exactly what I might get

1:50:31.920 --> 1:50:35.559
<v Speaker 1>when I'm out there on a unsuccessful or successful turkey hunt.

1:50:35.760 --> 1:50:39.519
<v Speaker 1>You know. Yeah, I was listening to Rogan's podcast the

1:50:39.520 --> 1:50:42.200
<v Speaker 1>other day and he had on Howard bloom Who's um

1:50:42.520 --> 1:50:47.639
<v Speaker 1>this fascinating just certifiable genius, and he has tired, he's dead.

1:50:48.400 --> 1:50:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Howard bloom Um specifically has researched these experiences that you

1:50:54.640 --> 1:50:58.320
<v Speaker 1>are speaking of, this religious experience, this greater than you

1:50:58.640 --> 1:51:02.160
<v Speaker 1>moment um, like this cohesion um that can happen in

1:51:02.280 --> 1:51:06.479
<v Speaker 1>mass groups also such as concerts, rock concerts, and how

1:51:06.600 --> 1:51:09.880
<v Speaker 1>they just grab hold of you and create this moment

1:51:09.960 --> 1:51:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you'd like to replicate. Um. You know you saw that

1:51:12.880 --> 1:51:16.439
<v Speaker 1>in you know, certain speeches like he brought up you know,

1:51:16.600 --> 1:51:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Hitler and talking about how the fervor of grabbing that

1:51:19.960 --> 1:51:24.280
<v Speaker 1>that audience, um, and people just get addicted to that experience.

1:51:24.320 --> 1:51:27.519
<v Speaker 1>So absolutely, yeah. And the question is in that case,

1:51:27.600 --> 1:51:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the experience of scapegoading is the experience then something that

1:51:32.200 --> 1:51:34.120
<v Speaker 1>is a valid experience? All Right, so that's where you

1:51:34.120 --> 1:51:38.040
<v Speaker 1>begin to be reflective. Is what I'm doing something that

1:51:38.439 --> 1:51:44.040
<v Speaker 1>is appropriate, is right, is redeeming, is fulfilling, is making

1:51:44.160 --> 1:51:46.960
<v Speaker 1>me in the world. There's a utilitarian proprocious sorts, but

1:51:47.120 --> 1:51:51.799
<v Speaker 1>making us better, making us happy. I think the Christian

1:51:51.880 --> 1:51:54.680
<v Speaker 1>hunter and the hunter in general can make arguments like that,

1:51:54.800 --> 1:51:58.479
<v Speaker 1>but they have to be careful. Um. I think when

1:51:58.520 --> 1:52:02.519
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned how you have to be that reflective, I

1:52:02.640 --> 1:52:05.400
<v Speaker 1>almost see it as achieving like a sense of purity

1:52:05.920 --> 1:52:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to the moment. So I think there is like the

1:52:09.000 --> 1:52:11.560
<v Speaker 1>validity in that. Yeah, I mean you see that in

1:52:11.720 --> 1:52:14.240
<v Speaker 1>some some of them argue. David Peterson's famous for doing

1:52:14.280 --> 1:52:16.679
<v Speaker 1>this right. So there's like hunters, the hunter, the hunter,

1:52:16.760 --> 1:52:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and writer David Peterson exactly. So there's a hunter and

1:52:19.400 --> 1:52:23.240
<v Speaker 1>then there's the right hunter who is reflective. He draws

1:52:23.320 --> 1:52:24.800
<v Speaker 1>some he draws a lot of lines. Oh he does.

1:52:24.880 --> 1:52:26.920
<v Speaker 1>And there's a lot of hunters who aren't hunters right.

1:52:27.120 --> 1:52:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Might might just be one and maybe you'm my only

1:52:30.439 --> 1:52:32.280
<v Speaker 1>but that kind of approach, and so you begin to

1:52:32.400 --> 1:52:35.280
<v Speaker 1>draw those lines because you begin to say there is

1:52:35.360 --> 1:52:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a better way, because there's a better way that makes

1:52:38.439 --> 1:52:41.599
<v Speaker 1>you better, the world better, whether it be a traditional

1:52:41.680 --> 1:52:44.479
<v Speaker 1>hunter with a bow, whether you keep seeking the greater

1:52:44.680 --> 1:52:48.280
<v Speaker 1>challenge where you always allow of course, fair chase, you

1:52:48.360 --> 1:52:51.439
<v Speaker 1>always allow the animal out. You only hunt public land

1:52:52.000 --> 1:52:53.800
<v Speaker 1>for me people who have that option. So you find

1:52:53.840 --> 1:52:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the other challenge, that pursuit of again the experience, but

1:52:57.960 --> 1:53:02.720
<v Speaker 1>also something that you think may you better, transforms you

1:53:02.880 --> 1:53:05.560
<v Speaker 1>into the better version of you and hopefully extends that.

1:53:05.680 --> 1:53:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Then that's important. That makes you better than you then

1:53:10.200 --> 1:53:13.240
<v Speaker 1>now right now? Not you better than everyone else? No, no, no,

1:53:13.760 --> 1:53:17.240
<v Speaker 1>And it makes that that makes you a better person

1:53:18.280 --> 1:53:22.439
<v Speaker 1>relative to your own experience right right. All the leopole

1:53:22.439 --> 1:53:24.760
<v Speaker 1>would argue, are you making about it community better? Are

1:53:24.800 --> 1:53:26.439
<v Speaker 1>you making healthy because, by the way, that's gonna have

1:53:26.479 --> 1:53:31.920
<v Speaker 1>repercussions for you down the line. Ethically, are you being okay?

1:53:32.120 --> 1:53:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Are you following fair chase? Are you seeking the good

1:53:34.880 --> 1:53:37.759
<v Speaker 1>of the population, whether it be trimming down the numbers

1:53:38.040 --> 1:53:40.920
<v Speaker 1>or allowing those numbers to recuperate. As a Christian, are

1:53:40.960 --> 1:53:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you doing something that seems to be within the divine

1:53:44.200 --> 1:53:47.720
<v Speaker 1>framework set up? Are you showing appreciation for the life

1:53:47.800 --> 1:53:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that was there? You couldn't make that life, but you

1:53:50.160 --> 1:53:53.280
<v Speaker 1>just took it. Are you showing you appreciation for the

1:53:53.400 --> 1:53:57.160
<v Speaker 1>creator for the founder, if you will, are you recognizing

1:53:57.240 --> 1:54:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the gift that was that animal? Do you continue to

1:54:00.720 --> 1:54:04.400
<v Speaker 1>give sharing? I think so very important. Game dinners I

1:54:04.479 --> 1:54:07.680
<v Speaker 1>think are really pivotal and sacramental events for Christian That's

1:54:07.680 --> 1:54:10.000
<v Speaker 1>an interesting thing that I had never thought of. You

1:54:10.080 --> 1:54:12.719
<v Speaker 1>talked ab up, was like that, there's a sacramental quality

1:54:12.760 --> 1:54:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to hunting, but there's nothing like cooking your own food.

1:54:15.240 --> 1:54:18.680
<v Speaker 1>But there's nothing like cooking it for someone else. And

1:54:18.800 --> 1:54:21.560
<v Speaker 1>if you do it in the context of this is

1:54:21.640 --> 1:54:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a gift from the creator, how much more so, and

1:54:25.400 --> 1:54:28.040
<v Speaker 1>respect the life that was there. I know guys who

1:54:28.040 --> 1:54:29.800
<v Speaker 1>want do taxing me right, they want they want to

1:54:29.800 --> 1:54:32.760
<v Speaker 1>have them out. I disagree with that because I think

1:54:32.840 --> 1:54:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I continue to give life to that experience by telling

1:54:34.960 --> 1:54:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the story. But I understand to respect that because they

1:54:38.600 --> 1:54:42.520
<v Speaker 1>do it out of respect for this beautiful creature. They

1:54:42.720 --> 1:54:47.360
<v Speaker 1>don't choose not to have out of respect. Yeah, there are,

1:54:47.600 --> 1:54:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Um it's silly to me. It's silly to me when

1:54:50.560 --> 1:54:52.200
<v Speaker 1>someone's like, oh, I leave the antlers in the woods,

1:54:52.200 --> 1:54:55.320
<v Speaker 1>because I'm like, but why not appreciate the whole thing? Exactly?

1:54:55.400 --> 1:54:57.760
<v Speaker 1>But here's this thing that you could always have, right,

1:54:58.080 --> 1:55:02.240
<v Speaker 1>But remember, But like I'm open, I don't agree with it,

1:55:02.440 --> 1:55:04.720
<v Speaker 1>but I think that people arrive at these decisions in

1:55:04.760 --> 1:55:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the way that that come from meaning and come from

1:55:08.200 --> 1:55:10.960
<v Speaker 1>someplace honest. So whether I look at some of these

1:55:11.160 --> 1:55:15.360
<v Speaker 1>things that people do um in order to acknowledge the

1:55:15.440 --> 1:55:19.960
<v Speaker 1>importance of what happened does not light right. And people

1:55:20.040 --> 1:55:24.000
<v Speaker 1>come up with these these personal ceremonies, um, a lot

1:55:24.080 --> 1:55:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of them I look on like not for me, but

1:55:27.240 --> 1:55:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you did something and I'm glad you arrived

1:55:30.560 --> 1:55:34.520
<v Speaker 1>somewhere because what we both see is it something important

1:55:34.600 --> 1:55:43.520
<v Speaker 1>is happening here. So I understand the motivation. Alright, man, Michelle,

1:55:44.480 --> 1:55:46.480
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get around and make sure everybody knows what

1:55:46.560 --> 1:55:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the book is. But Michelle, you got any rapper, uppers, concluders,

1:55:50.400 --> 1:55:54.120
<v Speaker 1>goals and thoughts. Oh my gosh, this has been super interesting,

1:55:54.480 --> 1:55:58.600
<v Speaker 1>more questions than answers, and really just I would like

1:55:58.720 --> 1:56:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to just conclude by saying that I can't wait to

1:56:01.040 --> 1:56:06.560
<v Speaker 1>read your book, and you know, really kind of trying

1:56:06.600 --> 1:56:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to wrap my head around, you know, my motivations and

1:56:10.160 --> 1:56:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I've thought a lot about that aspect um my motivations

1:56:13.120 --> 1:56:17.640
<v Speaker 1>for hunting, and um, just what's going to keep me

1:56:17.720 --> 1:56:19.960
<v Speaker 1>getting out there. And I do see a lot of

1:56:20.080 --> 1:56:22.960
<v Speaker 1>alignment with kind of what the message you've shared here today,

1:56:23.320 --> 1:56:28.400
<v Speaker 1>So thank you. M Yeah, I can say a couple

1:56:28.400 --> 1:56:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of things. Uh, what I found what stuck and it

1:56:32.280 --> 1:56:34.320
<v Speaker 1>was early on. There's a lot to take in today,

1:56:34.480 --> 1:56:39.000
<v Speaker 1>but the fact that we've always been marginalized, a marginal group,

1:56:39.640 --> 1:56:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, so it's kind of like we've been hanging

1:56:44.000 --> 1:56:51.280
<v Speaker 1>on for two thousand, how many thousand years? Well it

1:56:51.280 --> 1:56:53.640
<v Speaker 1>would be like, yeah, like a secular understanding would be

1:56:53.640 --> 1:56:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the agricultural advent of the agriculture. So four thousand b c.

1:56:58.920 --> 1:57:01.560
<v Speaker 1>That's when we again have Neil Thick agriculture. Since then,

1:57:02.160 --> 1:57:04.200
<v Speaker 1>hunters have always been on the edge, you've been. Yeah,

1:57:04.600 --> 1:57:10.400
<v Speaker 1>So for Harvard, Harvard long you define human history, it

1:57:10.600 --> 1:57:14.480
<v Speaker 1>was strictly hunter gatherer cultures. And then all of a sudden,

1:57:14.560 --> 1:57:17.560
<v Speaker 1>some guys like man, you know that grass that we're

1:57:17.560 --> 1:57:20.080
<v Speaker 1>always bringing home and then we like eat the grass

1:57:20.240 --> 1:57:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and then we go defecate down in the creek bed,

1:57:23.480 --> 1:57:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and now that grass has grown, Dude, I'm telling you, look,

1:57:25.880 --> 1:57:27.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot more there than there is everywhere else.

1:57:28.200 --> 1:57:30.200
<v Speaker 1>The mint someone made that connection was the beginning of

1:57:30.240 --> 1:57:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the end man, or you know that deer I found

1:57:34.000 --> 1:57:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and brought home. We'll check it out. He's still here

1:57:36.040 --> 1:57:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and had a baby and he's still hanging around. But

1:57:39.200 --> 1:57:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like it's it's relevant to today because

1:57:41.800 --> 1:57:44.720
<v Speaker 1>we have this conversation and it seems like there's this

1:57:45.000 --> 1:57:47.520
<v Speaker 1>these fanning of the flames. Is like it's the end

1:57:47.760 --> 1:57:51.600
<v Speaker 1>because we're pushed to the But it's true, it's there, right.

1:57:51.680 --> 1:57:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I think people have been saying that for so long.

1:57:53.200 --> 1:57:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure, but what I'm what I'm saying is they've

1:57:56.200 --> 1:57:57.880
<v Speaker 1>been saying it for so long because it's the truth.

1:57:57.960 --> 1:58:01.040
<v Speaker 1>And maybe that's just because that's where we're this group

1:58:01.120 --> 1:58:03.840
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to be and it's always has been. Yeah,

1:58:03.880 --> 1:58:10.280
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, sure, so it's fine. There's nothing to worry

1:58:10.280 --> 1:58:13.720
<v Speaker 1>about because we've been to ten percent for ten thousand years.

1:58:15.640 --> 1:58:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I think like like the story of I've said, I

1:58:18.920 --> 1:58:22.040
<v Speaker 1>thought that the story of Western civilization could be interpreted

1:58:22.080 --> 1:58:25.839
<v Speaker 1>as a story of the gradual depersonal the the gradual

1:58:26.040 --> 1:58:30.880
<v Speaker 1>de personalization of your food. Um, but yeah, I know

1:58:30.920 --> 1:58:36.920
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying. They had it's been Yeah, it's a slow,

1:58:37.320 --> 1:58:42.000
<v Speaker 1>seemingly never ending death. But yeah, but it's maybe it's

1:58:42.040 --> 1:58:45.080
<v Speaker 1>not that. Maybe it's just like that's our place. Just

1:58:45.440 --> 1:58:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it seems like it's seems to be always died. But

1:58:48.360 --> 1:58:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that means something's gonna adapt. We adapted to the life

1:58:51.360 --> 1:58:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of our frontier right by eighteen ninety Frontiers Gone Right

1:58:54.120 --> 1:58:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in America. Alistair Drey he died unfortunately just after the

1:58:57.920 --> 1:59:01.920
<v Speaker 1>book came out. He was from Scotland and he would

1:59:01.960 --> 1:59:06.040
<v Speaker 1>go shooting, uh, Professor Sterling. But his type of hunting

1:59:06.080 --> 1:59:07.800
<v Speaker 1>is he'd send me pictures of him and the guys.

1:59:08.240 --> 1:59:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Was radically different than my type of hunting when I

1:59:10.680 --> 1:59:12.320
<v Speaker 1>sent him pictures from me from Texas. But he was

1:59:12.360 --> 1:59:16.920
<v Speaker 1>still hunting even with the restrictions in Britain and all

1:59:16.960 --> 1:59:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that regarding firearms, and that they still found a way

1:59:21.280 --> 1:59:25.240
<v Speaker 1>for his dogs for shooting birds, etcetera. Definitely on the

1:59:25.440 --> 1:59:29.600
<v Speaker 1>edge at least of society, if not physically on the edge. Yeah.

1:59:29.680 --> 1:59:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that the salvation or the path forward um

1:59:35.800 --> 1:59:41.280
<v Speaker 1>was clearly articulated as long ago as it began to

1:59:41.360 --> 1:59:46.320
<v Speaker 1>be articulated by Roosevelt. It was clarified and beautifully articulated

1:59:46.360 --> 1:59:54.960
<v Speaker 1>by Leopold of what um, of what role this this

1:59:55.600 --> 1:59:58.960
<v Speaker 1>discipline will have in the future. I just don't know

1:59:59.080 --> 2:00:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that hunting will as democratic as it is so in Britain.

2:00:02.360 --> 2:00:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Wild pigs, but who gets at the professional hunters? The

2:00:06.600 --> 2:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>hunt for cities, etcetera, hunt at night, suppressors night vision.

2:00:10.640 --> 2:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>So it'll still be hunters. But the question is what

2:00:14.080 --> 2:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>will be the population of those hunters. Yeah, that's a

2:00:17.400 --> 2:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>battle of the war. That's that's a portion of the

2:00:20.240 --> 2:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>war that will need to be fought. I don't mean

2:00:22.160 --> 2:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to get to marshal and start using a bunch of marshals. Okay,

2:00:25.960 --> 2:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>here's my concluder. You are you good on concluders? Uh?

2:00:31.040 --> 2:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I understand. I feel that there should be a law

2:00:35.760 --> 2:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the academics write two books simultaneously. Okay, okay, while you

2:00:43.360 --> 2:00:46.480
<v Speaker 1>were writing this book, working on this book, I feel

2:00:46.520 --> 2:00:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that you should have simultaneously written a popular book. Now,

2:00:52.920 --> 2:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>my friend Dan Flores spent his whole life writing academic books.

2:00:56.520 --> 2:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Then he retired, and now he's taking all of that

2:01:00.320 --> 2:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>wonderful information that he learned through his discipline and he's

2:01:05.000 --> 2:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>now saying to the guy in the bar, Hey, buddy,

2:01:09.280 --> 2:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>here's what I've been talking about. Here's all of these

2:01:12.920 --> 2:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>ideas I've been wrestling with, and I'm just gonna lay

2:01:15.480 --> 2:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>it out for you like a guy talking to an

2:01:19.000 --> 2:01:29.960
<v Speaker 1>interested party. So do do you envision taking this and

2:01:31.720 --> 2:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>these ideas and just putting them out in a way

2:01:34.920 --> 2:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>that's that's and this is not a criticism, but in

2:01:38.000 --> 2:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the way that's more accessible to the layman um or

2:01:42.760 --> 2:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>can't you because of your profession? Uh? No, it's possible. Uh.

2:01:48.240 --> 2:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, I teach it a position where I am

2:01:50.680 --> 2:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a professional teacher, so I teach four classes at least

2:01:54.040 --> 2:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a semester. So it's hard to do research at all

2:01:56.520 --> 2:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>because because you do all kinds of research. Yeah, but

2:01:59.440 --> 2:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>no one's a word to mean my institution doesn't support me, Okay,

2:02:02.760 --> 2:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So I do this on my own, so it's hard

2:02:04.640 --> 2:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to do that. Right now, I'm working on a book

2:02:07.160 --> 2:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>for Texas A and M Press, a History of Hunting

2:02:10.320 --> 2:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>in Texas. That's going to be an academic book, but

2:02:12.680 --> 2:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I do want to try and make it and I

2:02:14.160 --> 2:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>want some people understand the distinction here. And when you're

2:02:16.880 --> 2:02:20.360
<v Speaker 1>writing an academic book, you have to be very forthright,

2:02:21.280 --> 2:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>absolutely transparent about where this information is from, and being

2:02:26.280 --> 2:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>very transparent about biases, and just very open to both sides,

2:02:33.520 --> 2:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at everything right right in a popular book. You

2:02:37.760 --> 2:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>can be like, okay, WRONGNA cut the chase here and

2:02:40.560 --> 2:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>just give you kind of like, here's here's my view

2:02:42.560 --> 2:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>of Starr. There's here's my view of how this is going.

2:02:45.400 --> 2:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to do that. I'm not there right now, maybe,

2:02:50.120 --> 2:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>but I don't even know. Like so, I wasn't saying

2:02:54.000 --> 2:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>that you should want to do that. I'm asking like,

2:02:57.160 --> 2:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>do you want to do that? Do you think you

2:02:58.920 --> 2:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>will someday do that? And I'm totally cool if you

2:03:03.240 --> 2:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>just say no, I don't really I think I'd like

2:03:05.640 --> 2:03:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to h This is not anything I intend to do.

2:03:08.080 --> 2:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>This is not my in theory, my academic discipline. This

2:03:10.480 --> 2:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>was just a hair brained idea that took ten years

2:03:13.720 --> 2:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to finally develop. Get all these people on board, right, essays,

2:03:17.240 --> 2:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>many of them didn't write about history from me about hunting,

2:03:20.280 --> 2:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>but get them to think about this that it took

2:03:22.680 --> 2:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>so much energy. Would have been easier just for me

2:03:25.120 --> 2:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to write it myself. Yeah, but I wouldn't have I

2:03:28.920 --> 2:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have all these voices. Lord, I don't know if

2:03:31.480 --> 2:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll ever added another book. Um, it is hard. It's

2:03:36.000 --> 2:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>hard for me though, because I haven't fully formulated my ideas. Essentially,

2:03:39.960 --> 2:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>what I need to do is mature. I need to

2:03:42.600 --> 2:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>mature another ten years or so. I need to figure

2:03:45.560 --> 2:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>out again who I am, and just like we see

2:03:48.120 --> 2:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>hunters mature themselves where you've seen these studies, how they

2:03:51.800 --> 2:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>mature to the age of basically, give me a gun,

2:03:54.080 --> 2:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll kill anything that moves if it's brown. It's down

2:03:57.040 --> 2:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to the trophy hunter, perhaps the one who seeks the

2:03:59.800 --> 2:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>ever increasing challenges to find, the one who's really only

2:04:02.720 --> 2:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>looking to just be with others, to hang out at camp.

2:04:06.240 --> 2:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>We met day. We spent some time with one of

2:04:09.360 --> 2:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>those guys who passed through Hey, the other side, and

2:04:13.000 --> 2:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>he was a hunter who does not hunt, but celebs.

2:04:17.080 --> 2:04:20.040
<v Speaker 1>If you ask him what he is, he's honored. Only

2:04:20.120 --> 2:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>later do you realize, well, I don't actually hunt anymore.

2:04:23.480 --> 2:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I can tell you what I think about

2:04:25.600 --> 2:04:27.280
<v Speaker 1>from time I wake up to the time I go

2:04:27.360 --> 2:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to bed. Exactly. I think I need to mature a

2:04:29.440 --> 2:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit. I have to come I need to come

2:04:32.560 --> 2:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to grips with who I am and what I actually

2:04:34.680 --> 2:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>think before I write that book. That's going to be

2:04:37.320 --> 2:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>more of an apology, not like, excuse me, but this

2:04:40.840 --> 2:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>is what I believe an argument but from maybe not

2:04:44.480 --> 2:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>from an academic perspective, but from the heart. But instead

2:04:47.720 --> 2:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of saying to the reader, hey man, here's a whole

2:04:49.520 --> 2:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>bunch of things you could believe. Here's some questions that

2:04:53.760 --> 2:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>you should answer, but I'm not gonna answer for you. Yeah,

2:04:57.160 --> 2:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>so give me a decade. Okay, now you go to me.

2:05:04.600 --> 2:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>My goal for writing this book was to simply encourage

2:05:09.480 --> 2:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>people to think and to create a conversation, because the

2:05:16.120 --> 2:05:18.720
<v Speaker 1>conversation has essentially been so far people who said hunting

2:05:18.800 --> 2:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is bad and leave me alone, hunting is just fine.

2:05:22.000 --> 2:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>God's that is okay if they thought about it as

2:05:26.360 --> 2:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I see the decline of hunting, at least in participation.

2:05:30.840 --> 2:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>It bothers me because I think it's so important. It's

2:05:34.160 --> 2:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>who I am, perhaps too much, but it's who I am,

2:05:39.800 --> 2:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and for me, it's my tribe. But my tribe doesn't

2:05:43.400 --> 2:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>have an identity, and I want the tribe to come

2:05:47.240 --> 2:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to formulate an identity. Now, not everybody's a Christian hunter

2:05:51.880 --> 2:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>or religious hunter, but I think that we all could

2:05:54.680 --> 2:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>experience a kind of religious element to hunting. I think

2:05:58.120 --> 2:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>it's there, And like I ask you to believe what

2:05:59.400 --> 2:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I believe, Sure what I do, but my goal is,

2:06:03.600 --> 2:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and my hope is the hunters will simply begin to think,

2:06:08.800 --> 2:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>who am I, what am I doing? Why am I

2:06:12.080 --> 2:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>doing it? And in the process of thinking and reflecting,

2:06:17.280 --> 2:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>they'll tell their stories with greater honesty and with greater enthusiasm.

2:06:24.160 --> 2:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>That next generation will be fired up. That will create

2:06:27.720 --> 2:06:32.600
<v Speaker 1>new generations of hunters who tap into the wonder and

2:06:32.760 --> 2:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>all it's splendor and frustration that is hunting, and that

2:06:36.440 --> 2:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>out of all of that will come another generation of

2:06:39.960 --> 2:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>hunters who think, who celebrate um and I think that

2:06:44.560 --> 2:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>we've been missing that for various reasons, partially because hunters

2:06:48.160 --> 2:06:52.280
<v Speaker 1>haven't had to explain themselves, and now they do so.

2:06:52.960 --> 2:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>A reflective generation of hunters, people who recognize the beauty

2:06:56.560 --> 2:06:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and the magnificence that we still get to play in,

2:06:59.520 --> 2:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and that in process of play we find out something

2:07:02.480 --> 2:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>about ourselves, about the world around us, and even perhaps

2:07:06.040 --> 2:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>about our God, okay God nim Rod and the world.

2:07:13.280 --> 2:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Exploring Christian perspectives on sport hunting Bracy V. Hill the

2:07:18.480 --> 2:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>second and Uh, if you want to check this out,

2:07:23.520 --> 2:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>how do they what? What's the best way to find it?

2:07:25.640 --> 2:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>The most beneficial to you? You know it? I'm probably

2:07:28.440 --> 2:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna get very few royalties out of this. So you

2:07:30.360 --> 2:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>can get it on Amazon, Books, Barnes and Noble, most

2:07:34.080 --> 2:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>any type of mostly online. I haven't actually gone it's

2:07:39.680 --> 2:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Barnes and Noble to see if it's on the shelf,

2:07:41.920 --> 2:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>but I do see that they occasionally lose, like nine,

2:07:44.920 --> 2:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>nine left, three left, two left, we're back, so somebody's finding. Yeah,

2:07:51.160 --> 2:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that's great man. Thank you, thank you for coming on,

2:07:53.320 --> 2:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for this opportunity. I thoroughly enjoyed it.