WEBVTT - 56: Actually, You Probably Can't Make It in New York

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.480
<v Speaker 1>And he goes to his parents showing how it's a

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>great investment and if they'll only give him, you know,

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and fifty thousand dollars, it will be a

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>great investment. Blah blah blah. The apartment is about one

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>point two million dollars. And the kicker, of course, is

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that the apartment is five hundred square feet. Hi, and

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>welcome back to Bloomberg Benchmark let show about the global economy.

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>It is Thursday, September twenty nine, and I'm Keith Smith,

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>editor for Bloomberg News here in New York. I am

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 1>joined today by my co host, Dan Moss, Executive editor

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>for Economics, Hi Kate. Today we're going to be talking

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>about home price inequality. Now, it's no surprise that in

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>some metro areas of the United States, like New York

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 1>and San Francisco, home prices are incredibly expensive. What you

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>might not know is that the growth of house values

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>in those areas has significantly, and we mean significantly, outpaced

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the country. It's true over the past

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty years, apparently, prices in the twenty most expensive markets

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 1>have risen much faster and much much faster. Like Dan

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>was saying in prices in the twenty least expensive markets,

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>according to a truly A report that was written by

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Ralph McLaughlin. For those of you who don't know, Trulya

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>is an online aggregator of real estate listings across the US. Now, Dan,

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>what I found really really interesting about this report is

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that it confirmed this theory that I've had about New York,

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>specifically Manhattan for a while. In New York is so

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>unique to me in that it's a city of successful

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>wealthy people, but not just that those people had to

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>have been raised by successful wealthy people, and that I

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>think makes it really unique and completely cut off to

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 1>people who, let's face it, just didn't grow up with

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>financial stability. It's another take on this term inequality, which

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>seems to be everywhere at the moment. But before we

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>get to New York and spoiler a look, we're going

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to talk about your apartment as well. Before we get

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to New York and where he can still make it here,

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>let's focus first on the country as a whole to

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about housing inequality. We have Robert Shiller on the

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>line joining us from New Haven, Connecticut. Robert's really the

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>gold standard when it comes to home prices. He's the

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>name behind the Case Shiller Index, the authority on housing

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>prices in America. He's a Nobel laureate, the second we've

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>had on the show, and currently Sterling Economic Professor at

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Yale University. He probably even owns a house. Robert, thanks

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. My pleasure, Bob. So I

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>want to get your thoughts on this trilier report. Do

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you buy the idea that the most expensive areas in

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:43.119
<v Speaker 1>the US are growing much much faster than the least

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>expensive that that seems to have an element of truth

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to it. You have to specify the time and of

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 1>all that. I'm thinking. For example, San Francisco is among

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the most expensive cities, and it has been growing lately,

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's slowed down on a little bit in our

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>latest numbers. It's a complicated picture, of course. Historically the

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>most expensive places must have grown faster than others at

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>some point in history. But it's a complicated story. You know.

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>It's expensive places don't necessarily grow fast. I think maybe

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>it is happening now, but I'd have to carefully study

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>how accurate that statement is, and with a one year

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>time interval, So the truly report was actually looking at

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a thirty year time horizon, and they were looking at

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>areas specifically like San Jose and San Francisco into the

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Bay Area of course, and then New York and a

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>couple others, and that it was that those had grown

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>at such an exponentially larger, larger pace, faster pace. I

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>should say, Oh, you're talking Silicon Valley. Yes, I can

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly believe that because there was a technological revolution in

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the last thirty years and they're the center for that.

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>So I certainly believe that. And how about the New

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>York question, Well, New York is an expensive city, but

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>lately it hasn't been growing, not over thirty years. I

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>think it has grown substantially, but not as much as

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>people might think. New York has emerged as the financial

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>center that it is, uh since uh the early nineteenth century,

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>so it's had two hundred years. So you know, you

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>figure out what's the excess return on New York real

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>estate over two centuries, it's going to be something like

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 1>one percent a year. Nothing to get that excited about.

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>So people often make that mistake in judging differences between cities. Well,

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about the long view. How do you account for

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>this difference between perception and what your dater is indicating. Well,

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 1>I think people are fascinated by the housing market and

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>they love to tell stories, but that doesn't mean they

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>ever look at data and do calculations. The cities that

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:08.679
<v Speaker 1>have achieved high levels are not surprisingly glamorous cities, cities

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that celebrities live in, and the stories about those cities

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:18.720
<v Speaker 1>feel people's imagination. It's not surprising. We're human, most of

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:22.479
<v Speaker 1>us aren't financial analysts. So in terms of real estate,

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>are these cities even part of the United States national economy?

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Are they really part of an economy that is comprised

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of sy Singapore, Dubai and neighborhoods in London? Well, uh,

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the problem with real estate, it's a very diverse thing.

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>There's always a story practically for all of these. When

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you say London, London has more stories written about it

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:51.359
<v Speaker 1>than just about any other any other city, and it

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>has been a world financial center of great distinction. So

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:02.799
<v Speaker 1>it seems plausible to investors from wherever, China, India, Russia,

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>wherever they're coming from, that's the place to put money.

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's also London has a reputation for political stability,

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:16.559
<v Speaker 1>and lack of usurpations. So all those things come together

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to a story for London. I'm not surprised that there's

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a vulnerability to bubbles in London real estate. Let me

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>jump in here and bring it back to the US

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 1>for just a second and kind of trying to tie

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>this together with income growth, I mean, in in your

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 1>own research and the way you've seen kind of the

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>way prices have evolved over the past thirty years. Is

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>there a strong correlation between income growth in a particular

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>area and the home prices or do they tend to

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:51.039
<v Speaker 1>be decoupled. We find a correlation and forecasting we've found

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>especially useful employment growth that means more people coming into

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the city, and you can find a fairly good correlation

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>between in home price increases across cities and employment growth.

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>So here's what happens. Some industry starts expanding in a city,

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>They start hiring and bring people in. There aren't enough

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>houses for all these people, so they start bidding against

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the residents, and you know, some of the residents will

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>end up if they're lower income, they can't win the bid,

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>so they end up moving in with their parents or

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>something like that. But that stimulates the construction industry, and

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the construction industry then increases the supply, and eventually prices

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>tend to come back down or at least slow their appreciation.

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's a typical cycle of cities there. Their growth

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>is irregular through time, and you see bursts of home

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>price increases that will later very likely be reversed. Now fault.

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>That line about people moving in with their parents is

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a good one. There's been a lot said and written

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>about that. Lightly Kite is a MILLENNIAU all herself and

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>has an interesting personal story, and Bob, i'd like you

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to comment on whether you think that is part of

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>what's going on right now. And before I get into

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>my personal story, I'd like to get some numbers, because

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not just me. Right. One in three adult children

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>in the US they receive monetary support of some kind

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of their parents. And that's not just on the other

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>end of the spectrum of you know, the millennial sleeping

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>on their parents couch. It's the millennial receiving you know,

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a rent subsidy from mom and dad so that they

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>can live in Manhattan and pursue their dream of whatever.

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>So one thing that I find interesting living in New

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>York is that there are very very few people I

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>know that have not received some kind of parental subsidy

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>along the way to get here. Me personally, I was

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>only able to move into my first apartment because my

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>parents were willing to co sign my lease and to

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>give our listeners a little peek into what the glamorous

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>life is like in New York. This was a maybe

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>three hundred fifty square foot studio if I'm being generous,

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>in Hell's Kitchen for sixteen fifteen a month, and what

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that required was excellent credit and I'm talking like seven fifty.

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>My income had to be forty times the monthly rent,

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and the guarant tour had to be eighty. So the

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>only way I could have moved into that apartment was

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>with my parents co signing at least, And I thought

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.559
<v Speaker 1>that was fascinating. When I spoke to my friends, I

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>was actually receiving some of the least amount of support

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 1>some of them were getting, you know, I mean, I

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>have one friend whose mom pays for half her rent. Like, so, Robert,

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>can you tell me about how is the parental subsidy

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>issue impacting rents in places like Manhattan? It's interesting you

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that my own son is not getting He has

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>an apartment in the New York near Manhattan. Um, maybe

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>he didn't go to Manhattan. Maybe it's cheaper a little

0:09:56.040 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>bit further out, but I think that yeah. I mean,

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's natural that this would happen because people have

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>an instinct to promote their own children. And I think

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>it's probably since time and memorial, right, they were doing

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that in ancient Rome too. Our bet now, just to

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>bring it back to this issue of inequality, and Bob,

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you know this better than anyone. It's a term that

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of buzz right now. Picketty didn't specifically

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>discuss millennials and Manhattan real estate in his book, but

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:35.599
<v Speaker 1>to the general idea of inequality, is this a manifestation

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:40.439
<v Speaker 1>of inequality? Wealthy parents beget kids getting a foothold in

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a major city, which begets the opportunity to work for

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:51.719
<v Speaker 1>fantastic companies like Bloomberg. Is this fueling this inequality zeitgeist? Well,

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's it's stronger than it was in

0:10:55.160 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the past. That it's the millennial generation that I'm not

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>an expert on this, but my impression is they weren't

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>asked to do any household chores when they were children.

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Used to be you did, But most parents today are

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>are preoccupied on getting their kids an advantage, So you

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>don't want them to do Most people don't want them

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to do a household chores because that takes away from

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>their studying and they've got to get into a good

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>high school or a good college and a good job

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 1>after that. And parents, Uh, I think that's the sitegeist

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:40.439
<v Speaker 1>right now, and so renting them an apartment in New

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>York sounds perfectly believable for for now, and I'm bet

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>it's much stronger than it was fifty or a hundred

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Is that a good thing for economic mobility

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 1>in the country? Well, I think, Uh, what's the alternative?

0:11:55.160 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Carl Marks okay, and with angles in eight wrote the

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>communists they didn't want to know about, but they want

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:08.719
<v Speaker 1>to abolish the family. It didn't happen. I think this

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>shows that they were stronger on rhetoric than rhetoric than

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>they were on observing reality. Uh, there's a parental instinct

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>to want your children to do well. And once we

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>get past the marginal living, what do parents want to

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>do with their income is to help promote their children.

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>But of course the idea of parental support is is

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly nothing new, obviously, But I think what I find

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting is and it's universal, but it's not universal that

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>parents can afford that, right, So like only a certain

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:46.079
<v Speaker 1>kind of parent and a certain kind of person can

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>is able to afford to spend that kind of money

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>on their kids. So I think I think that's what

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about a little bit about the economic mobility question,

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 1>because it's not universal that everyone can move to New

0:12:57.760 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 1>York and have half their rent paid for by mom

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and dad, right, right. And it's getting as you know,

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:09.959
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Picquety showed that it's getting worse. I think it's

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:14.319
<v Speaker 1>getting to the point where if you are in what

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>he calls the Tope one, there's almost no way to

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 1>spend the money on yourself. That's why you've ended up

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 1>lavishing it on your children, and that we would hope

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 1>they would do more on philanthropy, but somehow the children

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>get favored. What you described would certainly pick true in

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>some parts of the United States, but in others. I'm

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 1>thinking about New York City. To live the life that

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you've described, you need a bit more than that wouldn't you.

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I haven't done the calculations you think going out to

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>eat and going to show. I mean this figorite. We

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>can try to figure it out. But in all seriousness though,

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's been a lot said and written about

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>income disparity in various parts of the country. New York

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Times had a big piece on this last Sunday, and

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the extent to which this might be entrenched. The phenomenon

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>that we're talking about in say New York City or

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, has measured over the past thirty years. Again,

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>just to press you on this, it is fueling this

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>sense of inequality and political and economic discomfort. I think

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that it's the trouble of our times, and it's reflected

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>in the election campaign recent election campaign. I think if

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 1>you read Toma Picat, I'm trying to pronounce it right.

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>He's French, okay. Uh. The A lot of what's in

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>his book is a discussion of the literature at the

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>at different times in history, notably the so called Gilded Age,

0:14:55.760 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>around when inequality was especially add and he argued that

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>it affects their their whole sense of life and living

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and even romance. You know, a lot of novels of

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that time would talk about marrying into wealth because that

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>was perceived as the only way you could arrive inequality

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>being so high. Now, Kate, you have some more stories,

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>some of which might surprise our listeners, but they may

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>not surprise Bob. It's beyond parents um being sort of

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>hassled by their children to contribute to a down payment,

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's beyond rental subsidies, and it's beyond your own

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>experience of least guaranteurs. You know, people who are doing

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>spreadsheet presentations for their parents about liquidity and rates of

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>returning if only they can help them with the down

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>payment exactly. And I think that's I mean, it almost

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>seems like a parody. It is. I mean, are you

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>saying that they're optimistic about housing as an investment. Yes. Absolutely.

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I was talking to a friend last night, and I

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>should mention that he he owns an apartment on the

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Midtown East. He doesn't actually live in it, though, and

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>he was talking about how he views New York real estate,

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and he is not American. He views New York real

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>estate as the ultimate investment that he could possibly make

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>with his money, because it is to him always growing

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you're never gonna you're hardly ever going to experience a

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>loss in New York City real estate. And then it's

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>liquid and more. Look what I should say, then, let's

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>say a hedge funder private equity. So if he wants

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to park a million dollars, what better way to do

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it than Manhattan real estate to him? So it's not

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>like dad kind of borrowed the car. He sits his

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>parents down and does a spreadsheet presentation based on rights

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of return as a wife of persuading his parents to

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>cough up a down payment. Bob, you're gonna love this.

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>So the guy who bought that apartment, he was able

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to afford it on his own, but I know another

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>person who I mean, I guess he didn't really afford it.

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, so he wants to buy an apartment in

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the West Village. And for our listeners who aren't in

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 1>New York, West Village is I think one of the

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>most expensive neighborhoods in Manhattan. It's beautiful, it's you know,

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>tree lined. When you think of New York, this is

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>the neighborhood you're thinking of. Probably, So anyway, so he

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 1>wants to buy an apartment in in that neighborhood, and

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:25.919
<v Speaker 1>he goes to his parents and he comes up with

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a power point presentation showing how it's a great investment

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and if they'll only give him, you know, three hundred

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and fifty thou dollars, it'll be you know, they'll make

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 1>their money back. It'll be a great investment. Blah blah blah.

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 1>The apartment is about one point two million dollars, and

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>they agree, and it's just this investment that they view.

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>And the kicker, of course, is that the apartment is

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 1>five hundred square feet. And I think that was kind

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of like what Dan and I are talking to. Is

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:56.120
<v Speaker 1>there just I mean, how many families have the liquidity

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and the cash that they can just look at a

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>presentation say okay, yeah, that makes sense for me to

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>give to my kid. I just have to imagine that

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that's not a universal phenomenon. It can't be. No, it's

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>not you're talking about. But that's who New York is now.

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>But this feels like it's of it does, and I

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 1>think making it more universal, that's to me what it

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>New York has become. Because that's the only way you

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 1>can buy a home in New York. By the way,

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>our numbers for New York metro area show a one

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 1>point seven increase in home prices over the last year.

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 1>Now is that New York, Brooklyn, all the borrows or

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>is that just Manhattan. Well, in fact, that is the

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>emphasizing in Manhattan really because we're talking about I don't

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>think we represent the co ops. Well, maybe it's not

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the only number that you could look at. I think

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>New York, you know, the tens to go through periods

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of strength and weakness, and New York was weakened by

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>the financial it being a financial center. Of course, London

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 1>is still going up. And I can't really explain all

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>these things. But I'm wondering what the spreadsheet that this

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>person showed and what the time horizon was. But I

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 1>have a spreadsheet showing US home price, not Manhattan, US

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>home prices back to eight and it shows that between

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 1>eighteen ninety and nine, home prices in the US did

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 1>a little better than increase with inflation. But there's often

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>been an idea that it's done well. It seems to

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>be apocryphal, but it does. Of course. I mean, of

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 1>course New York has become an expensive city, and that

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 1>happened over a long time, and it gave people, you know,

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>one or two percent a year return on capital gains.

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:01.679
<v Speaker 1>I find it a little strange that people are so

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 1>excited about it at various times, but that's human nature,

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I suppose, so, Bob, again taking the long view, and

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you're very good at this, looking at these cycles over

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the past hundred hundred fifty years, seeing what you see now,

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>discussing what we're discussing now in the big picture. How

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>does this end for our economy? Well, I hope there

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>isn't an end for our economy. Um, the bubble and

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>burst that we saw that peaked in two thousand and

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 1>six was a huge historical anomaly. We've never seen anything

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that dramatic. There was the the bubble in Florida in

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the mid nineties, but that was more isolated. So I

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know what to make of of these Uh why

0:20:55.520 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>are we likely to have that happen again? I don't maybe,

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>but right now it's not really happening. It's not that

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 1>dramatic on a broad scale. Maybe in certain places. Robert,

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:11.959
<v Speaker 1>this has been a fascinating conversation. Thank you so much

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. We've enjoined it immensely. Benchmark Will be

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>back next week, and until then, you can find us

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:22.239
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg Terminal and on Bloomberg dot com, as

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>well as on iTunes, podcast, and Stitcher. While you're there,

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:27.719
<v Speaker 1>take a minute to rate and review the show so

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that more listeners can find us and do let us

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>know what you thought of the show. You can talk

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to and follow us on Twitter at at Daniel Moss

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 1>d C and at by Kate Smith, and you can

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 1>follow our guest as well. Robert can be found on

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at at Robert J. Schiller. We'll have to get

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>your spreadsheet friend and here. I don't think he's going

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to want to come in here after the show. See

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>you next week.