WEBVTT - Credit Suisse Takeover Upends Global Bond Markets

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Live from the Bloomberg Interact Day Brokers Studios. This is

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg day Break for Monday, March twentieth. Coming up today,

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:10.239
<v Speaker 1>UBS takes on Credit Suis buying the troubled bank for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.799
<v Speaker 1>more than three billion dollars to move up ends the

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>bond market, wiping out seventeen billion dollars of the riskiest

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>bawns at Credit Suite. Shares of UBS plunge as analysts

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>point to potential earnings risk and global banking stocks slump

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in the wake of the deal. A lawyer ally with

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump testifies today before New York grand jury plus

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Chinese president. She meets today with the Russia's Vladimir Putin.

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm Michael Barr. More ahead, I'm down stash Aaron's boards.

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Another easy win for the Rangers, that Devils won, the

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>Nets lost their down to the sweet sixteen of the

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>NCBA tournaments. That's all straight Ahead on Bloomberg day Break,

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 1>The business news you need, disturn your day, and just

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>one fifteen minute podcast each pointing on Apples, Spotify, the

0:00:53.640 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Appen everywhere you get your podcasts. Good morning,

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm Nathan Hager and I'm Kieron Moscow. Here are the

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>stories we're following today. We begin with reaction to the

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:10.759
<v Speaker 1>hastily arranged takeover of Credit Suis. So far, the deal

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.839
<v Speaker 1>is failing to calm fears in the banking industry. Shares

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of Credit Suis right now are down nearly sixty percent,

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:22.479
<v Speaker 1>while the bank that bought that firm, UBS is lower

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>by nine percent. That's after UBS agreed to buy Credit

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Suie for three point two billion dollars. The chairman of UBS,

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Calm Kelleher, is trying to soothe concerns about the government

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>broker deal. It's a historic day in Switzerland, then, a

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>day frankly we hoped would not come. I would like

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to make it clear that while we could not initiate discussions,

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>we believe that this transaction is financially attractive for UBS shareholders,

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>protects UBS from additional downside and should support earning his

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>growth over time. UBS chairman Calm Kellerher says he will

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>shrink the investment bank a Credit Suie, a unit that

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>racked up losses in recent years, and Nathan, I mean

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a global team. Coverage of this historic dl we begin

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg's francy in Lakwise in Switzerland who attended

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the UBS Credit Suite press conference in Berne yesterday. They

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>feel the questions for about an hour and a half.

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I think they thought this would last for about forty

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>five minutes, and there are so many questions. First of all,

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>UBS got this quite on the cheap. I mean, why

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:20.239
<v Speaker 1>did they get it so cheap? I think it is

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>probably one of the first questions when you look at

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 1>the valuation on Friday and also the amount of liquidity

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of guarantees that they had to get from the government.

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Do they know something in Cretty sueee that no one

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:32.239
<v Speaker 1>else knows. I think this is one of the first

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>questions that a lot of people will ask. Certain market

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>participants will try and tell did they see a scary

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 1>movie and so wanted to make sure that they were protected.

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Francy Laquais reporting from Switzerland and we continue our

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>team coverage in Zurich now where a long time Credit

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Suice reporter man As Cranny picks up the story. This

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:53.239
<v Speaker 1>is about liquidity, a lifeline and ensuring the borders of

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Switzerland remain robust of financial borders. This could be the

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>steel of the century for UPS. Colin Gallaher and Ralph Hammers. Actually,

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>if they slept on it overnight, I thought, wow, your

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>credit space was worth eighty billions? Was Franks At one

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>juncture they got a three and Bloomberg's menace Cranny reporting

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>from Zurich, more team coverage on the way now as

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we assessed the fallout from this deal, Bloomberg Finance reporter

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Marion Helftermeyer says thousands of job cuts are likely on

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the way now. The next step to watch for will

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>be just how they actually combine these two banks. There

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.239
<v Speaker 1>will be massive, massive job cuts here because there is

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>an incredible amount of overlap between the two banks, both

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:33.119
<v Speaker 1>in Switzerland and globally, and in particular UBS has said,

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have our own investment bank, so you know,

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>watched out for a massive windown of the Credit swieas

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>investment bank and Bloomberg Finance reporter Maryon Halftermeyer reports bondholders

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>are also angry about the terms of the takeover. The

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>fourth sale means seventeen billion dollars of the risky of

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>bonds at Credits Suite are now worthless well Karen. Reaction

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>continues to pour into the takeover of THEE hundred sixty

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>six year old bank. We got the take from Bloomberg

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>opinion calumnist Muhammadhalarrian and Bain Appital CoA chairman Steve Pagliuka.

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>This was not the best solution, but it dominated the

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>other two, which was either nationalization or trying to wind

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>down the bank. But it's full of contradictions. When the

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>first crisis happened in two thousand and eight, the whole

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>issue was systemic collapse. We don't have a systemic collapse.

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Now we have a crisis of confidence, and that crisis

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of confidence can ratchet into a bad economy. Muhammadal Area

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and Steve Pagliuca made their comments on yesterday special edition

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Surveillance on Bloomberg Radio and Television. So how

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>will this banking turmoil impact rates at this week's FED decision, Nathan,

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>While we spoke with former Atlanta Fed President Denis Lockhart.

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>At this stage, I am inclined to give a majority

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>probability to a twenty five basis point hike, but a

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>non trivial probability to a pause. And former Atlanta Fed

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>President Denis Lockhart says the Fed's rapid rate increases have

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>taken some bank executives by surprise. Now back here in

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the US, Karen banking turmoil is also in focus. Signature

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>was a three major banks that collapsed this month, and

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>starting this morning, it's forty branches will operate as Flagstar.

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>We get more in this live report from Bloomberg's John Tucker.

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, John, and Nathan. Flagstar Bank of Hicksville, a

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 1>unit of New York Community Bankcorps, agreed to buy thirty

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>eight billion dollars of Signature's assets from the FDIC. Well,

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the sale didn't offload all of Signature, it does show

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>there are buyers out there for such assets. Regulators hope

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a move that could calm some of the turmoil.

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Flagstar also assumed liabilities about thirty six billion dollars. That

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>includes thirty four billion dollars in deposits a bunch. Like

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley Bank, Signature had a deposit base that was

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>mostly unensured. Live in New York, I'm John Tucker, Bloomberg Daybreak.

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, John, thank you. When it comes to Silicon

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Valley Bank, it looks like US regulators are getting closer

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to a breakup plan, and we get the details live

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg. Steve Rappaport, Steve, good morning, Good morning,

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Karen and Nathan. Sources tell us the plan is to

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>sell SVB in two parts. The FDIC set up a

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>so called bridge bank to take receivership of the firm's

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>assets and liabilities. Bids for that or do Friday. The

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>regulator will take bids by Wednesday for SBB Private Bank.

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>That's the remnants of Boston Private acquired by the bank

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty one. The FDIC tried to sell both

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 1>parts together over the weekend, but extended the deadline to

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>attract more potential buyers. Live in New York. I'm Steve Rappaport,

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Daybreak. Thank you, Steve. And when it comes to

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>First Republic Bank, those shares are plunging again this morning.

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>There's still no word of a rescue plan there. SMP

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Global has downgraded the bank again. First Republic shares are

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:37.599
<v Speaker 1>falling nearly twenty percent in early trading. It's thirty two

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>degrees in New York. It's going to be sunny and

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>mild today, heading the low fifties, and we'll get down

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to the upper thirties tonight under a clear sky. Time

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Now for a look at some of the other stories

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>making news in New York and around the world, with

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.799
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Michael Barr a Good Morning, Mike Call, Good Morning Nathan.

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>A lawyer allied with Donald Trump, plans to testify before

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>New York grand jury today. Robert Costello is expected to

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.359
<v Speaker 1>make the kays the former president should not face criminal

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>charges over hush money paid during his twenty sixteen campaign

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to poor and start Stormy Daniels. Costello says he has

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>information raising questions about the credibility of a key witness

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:15.119
<v Speaker 1>in the investigation, former Trump lawyer and fixer, Michael Cohen.

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren that investigation should be allowed to

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>go forward appropriately. If it's time to bring indictments, then

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>they'll bring indictments. That's how our legal system works. Senator

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Warren spoke on ABC's This Week, which can be heard

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Sundays on Bloomberg. Trump says if he is arrested tomorrow,

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>he is calling for protests if it happens. Among his

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>supporters outside Merolago yesterday was this woman who traveled from

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey. It's just about everybody coming out together and

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>supporting altogether. It's like one big happy family Manhattan. DA

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Bragg is not saying whether he'll charge Trump, but

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>he emailed his staff over the weekend saying we do

0:07:56.480 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>not tolerate attempts to intimidate all our office. Instigations continue

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>after five children from Connecticut, ranging an age from eight

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to seventeen, were killed in a fiery early morning crash

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>yesterday on a New York highway in Westchester County. Police

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>believe the vehicle was being driven by a sixteen year

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>old boy when it veered off the Hutchinson River Parkway

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and Scarsdale, hit a tree and caught fire. The only

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>survivor was a nine year old boy. Russian President Vladimir

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Putin hosts Chinese President Chijingping for meetings today in Moscow.

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Fordham University professor Beth Noble says the ongoing conflict with

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine will be a major focus. The Chinese leader, Shijinping

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>is portraying his visit to Russia as a personal mission

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to help bring peace to Ukraine, but he's hardly been

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>an honest broker so far. China has proposed a peace

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>plan for Ukraine, but it's one that many world leaders

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 1>have said is a non starter since it leans heavily

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>towards Russia. Professor Noble as China and Russia is said

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to have a no limits partnership. About twenty five thousand

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:01.359
<v Speaker 1>runners participated in the New York City half Rathon. Olympian

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Jacob to Plomo from Uganda won the race. Global teams

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours a day, powered by more than twenty

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred journalists and analysts and over one hundred twenty countries.

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Michael Barr and this is Bloomberg. Nathan. All right, Michael,

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:20.719
<v Speaker 1>thank you time now for the Bloomberg Sports Update, brought

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to you by Trice State. Howdy you got Morney John

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Stash After morning, Nathan, the Nights of Fairlie Nakin. Soon

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>they'll be back on campus in Teenac today. They had

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a heck of a weekend at the NCAA Tournament Columbus, Ohio.

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 1>The stunning upset Friday night of top seeded per DWO

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and FTU came out strong second half last night, had

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:39.959
<v Speaker 1>a five point lead on Florida Atlantic with the Owls,

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>who are thirty three and three on the season, came

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>back to win seventy eight to seventy When Marquette the

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>two seed in the East was upset by Michigan State.

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Had meant that each of the four days of the

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Attorney a one or two seed had lost. Michigan State

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>will now play at the Garden Thursday against Kansas State,

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 1>who'll be Kentucky. The other game at MSG will be

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Florida Atlantic again Tennessee. It was hockey at the Yard

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>last night, and the Rangers tied a club record with

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.839
<v Speaker 1>a six goal first period. They meet in Nashville seven

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to nothing the night after the Blue Shirts. They had

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>beaten Pittsburgh six to nothing. KeAndre Miller last night two

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>goals to assist just in the opening period. Devil's Lightning

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>met for the third time in the six days. New

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Jersey one at Tampa five two, first career hat trick

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>for Yesford Bratt at Barclay's Nets lost to Denver one

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 1>O eight, one h two, thenothers Jamal Murray twenty five

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>points in the first quarter. Nick's host Minnesota tonight, a

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>US route at the World Baseball Classic semifinals in Miami,

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.599
<v Speaker 1>fourteen to two over Cuba. Pair of home runs for

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 1>Trade Turner Paul goldschmid homer. They both drove in four

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>runs championship game tomorrow against either Mexico or Japan. Mets

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>lost the Cardinals eight seventy. Yankees lost in the Oils

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>five to three. Garrett Cole four scoreless innings, but then

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>he gave up four runs in the fifth. Carlos Alcarez

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:52.439
<v Speaker 1>won the tennis at ending Wells regained the world number

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>one night. Johnskashawar Bloomberg Sport live from coast to coast,

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 1>from New York to San Francisco, Boston to Washington, DC,

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>nationwide on Sirius, XAMP, the Bloomberg Business app, and Bloomberg

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. This is Bloomberg Daybreak. Good morning on Nathan Hagar.

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>The hastily arranged takeover over the weekend of Credit Suis

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.439
<v Speaker 1>by UBS does not appear to be offering solace to

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:22.559
<v Speaker 1>investors this morning. Worries continue about even wider fallout from

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a crisis in banking confidence that has now been going

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:29.199
<v Speaker 1>on for several days. Let's bring in Alison william senior

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 1>analysts for Global investment banks and asset managers at Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>as well as Bloomberg's Mannis Cranny, who has covered UBS

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and Credit Suis for years, was in burn Switzerland, for

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the takeover announcement, and Mannis joins me from Switzerland. Now Mannis,

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm watching shares of UBS and Credit suis plummet this morning.

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Before we get to the price action, though, let's just

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about how historic this is that a bank that

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>has more than one hundred sixty year history is now

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>being taken over by its rival right across the street.

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Made in a very good days year, Allison, This just

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>symbody was never supposed to happen. Ever again post GFC

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>taking my own back to Leahman's going under, to Namura

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 1>coming in and scooping up the paths to RBS in

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:20.439
<v Speaker 1>the UK being nationalized, this was a marriage of very

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>unequal partners. This is a very uncomfortable, one could say,

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and many have used the phrase shotgun wedding. The issue

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>with that is you never know what your in laws

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>are going to be like. In other words, what is

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>still remaining inside Credit Suites that UBS has not had

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the chance to do due diligence on the finance minister

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>in Burne last night. Frantine was in Burne, I was

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in Zurich. And the phrase that was used, this is

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>not a bail ote, this is not a baylight. Well,

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 1>if this is not a baylight, one hundred billion of

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a backstop in liquidity for credits for the new entity

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>is there? And a nine billion backstop in terms of

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>losses potential losses that the new entity may need to

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>take in the event of winding down what are called

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>highly liquid or level three instruments inside the credit police vehicles.

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>So right now this is a bail in of bombs

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's the big spooky issue for markets, credit and

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>equity markets today. What kind of unanswered questions, manness, are

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>there about Credit suisses books? I mean, we understand that

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>they have had a number of scandals over the years,

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a number of crises over the years. Is that part

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of the reason why we're seeing this drop in both

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>companies shares this morning, that we don't have a fully

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>clear picture of what the books look like at Credit Suez. Look,

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's part of it. But be assured there's

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a liquidity boxtop of one hundred billions so stranks at

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the point one, this was a liquidity issue, not a

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>capital issue that drove this shotgun wedding. However, Colin callaher

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the new chairman of the joint entity, and the chairman

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.319
<v Speaker 1>of UBS made it very very clear we're going to

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>de risk. We're going to bring that investment bank dying

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to about twenty five percent of the overall size of

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the combined entity. That is going to mean some serious

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>addressing of higher risk assets that are inside the investment bank.

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>The issue with that, and I take you back to

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty fourteen, when you're trying to sell off assets

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that are highly a liquid, difficult to price and nobody

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>really wants. That's when the difficulty comes in. And that's

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe where the losses are potentially to come. But there

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>is a backstop and I will use that word time

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and time again because that is yet to be fully comprehended. Here.

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Want to bring in Alison Williams this discussion and our

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>senior analyst for a global investment big asset managers at

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. Alison, what are some of the unanswered questions

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>for you when it comes to this UBS credit sweet tip? Well,

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest the biggest question for UBS shareholders

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>is you know the length of time it's going to

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>take for this deal to be a creative and in

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>some sense they're they're taking on some of the restructuring

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>challenges that credit Swos is already facing. They're doing it

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>with a stronger balance sheet. Um, so that's helpful. But um,

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the deal I think is a little unnerving

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to markets, just because of the treatment of the at

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>ones and also that it's um not requiring approval of

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>UBS shareholders. So I think those two things definitely are

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>not something that the market likes. The market doesn't like

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>when when the rules change like that, I guess if

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you will, but I would say that you know, if

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you if you look at the deal from the long

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>term perspective of UBS, Yes, they are going to as

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>many said, they want to limit the investive bank. But

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>it is important to note that credits we had already

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>been doing a lot of work in that direction. So um,

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>they're already sort of at that twenty five percent. They've

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>been selling off credits, we had been selling off assets

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to Apollo, and they're putting the remainder of those assets

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>in the bank. And that does remain a big question.

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>And to Manny's point, those assets can be hard to sell,

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and that is why you know they're taking the first

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars of loss, and then the government is

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>taking the next nine billion, so those those assets are

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>where they got the government guarantee. There's also the remaining

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>legal risks, and I think that is sort of the

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>playbook that a lot of US investors look to when

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>we think about deals like bear Stearns and Washington Mutual

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and some of the legal risks behind. But I would

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>say that two things. First, this is a very different

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>situation than two thousand and eight. It's very different for

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the banking system as a whole. And second, most of

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the legal risks are are identified. There are obviously there's

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>always a risk for unknowns, but ubs did take an

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>added provision related to those risks. And that gets back

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to a point that Manness made Allison at the very

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 1>beginning of this discussion that something like this wasn't supposed

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to happen after the two thousand and eight crisis. A

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>bank that's systemically important, the likes of Credit Suite wasn't

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>supposed to fail after this. Well, we have a deal

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>like this where ubs is becomes the one systemically important

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>bank in Switzerland. What kind of risk does that pose

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>for UBS? Well, I think you know, one of the

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>key drivers for Credit Suite to want to stabilize the

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>situation is just a fact that these two banks do

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:49.199
<v Speaker 1>have ties to each other, and Credit Swee does have

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 1>ties globally. And even though their capital and liquidity position

0:17:55.280 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>were strong, as we know that liquidity, sometimes the situation

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>can change quickly. And I think there's you know, there

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>there are big differences between Credit suits and what's happening

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>in the US, but the one similarity is just um,

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:15.959
<v Speaker 1>the sentiment and the confidence and so at Credit Suitee,

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the issue was that, especially with you know, a lot

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of the social media that they saw, it was sort

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of reminiscent to what they had seen in the fourth quarter.

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>They saw significant outflows as a result of the sentiment

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 1>sentiment and reports are that they were seeing significant UM

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:38.880
<v Speaker 1>outflows hopefully I use the word outflows earlier and um,

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>but you know, and that was what the Swiss regulator

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.199
<v Speaker 1>pointed to as the reason why they they stepped in

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>because they started to see those outflows and they really

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>felt that they needed to stem you know, stem that

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 1>and instill confidence. You know. The issue with all of

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>these measures is that I think, you know, bank regulators,

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it's tough because they have to walk a fine line.

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 1>They have to do enough to install confidence and not

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>do too much that you shake investors confidence for the

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>need for them to have to step in man. So

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring you back into the discussion. The

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Swiss National Bank is bringing in a hundred billion franc

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>liquidity guarantee for UBS in this merger. What does that

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:27.719
<v Speaker 1>potentially mean when it comes to the type of confidence

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that investors can continue to have in this bank. Well,

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we've got to disaggregate here between depositors, people

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of Switzerland, people around the world, the rich, ultra rich

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 1>and billionaire community around the world in terms of their

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>allocation to credit suits in ubs, they probably have a

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>kounds with both. So you have the depositor risk and

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>then you have investor. An investor confidence and depositor confidence

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>are very similar, but they are slightly different things. The

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>issue this morning, I'm just looking at g or Or

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>on the stock six hundred on the banks page, Deutsche

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Bank dying five percent, Iron Dine six percent, Bodies down

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 1>five percent. The issue is this what has happened here

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>from my very first initial reading, Alison, you can maybe

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>help clarify this. Urinanalyst and just a vintage banker broker

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>commodity drader, which is there has been an inversion of

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the capital structure. In other words, the at one bonds,

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 1>those additional capital bonds have been subsumed to equity. There's

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a morsel of equity given to the shareholders, the pension fundholders,

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the pension people of Switzerland, your equity. You still get

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 1>a morsel and a potential upside the bond. The eighty

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>one bondholders have been wiped out. That's what's dislocated banking

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>markets in Europe this morning. The cost of capital for

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>everybody has shot higher this morning. That is a material risk.

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 1>You waken up this morning to a higher risk of

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the cost of capital in banking, and that as a

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>potential fcom or defcon moment in terms of constricting capital

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to the real economy. That's the chronology of risk as

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I see it from where I'm sitting this morning. Now,

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that is a big part of this story, the fact

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that we have something like seventeen billion dollars of these

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 1>riskiest bonds now being completely written down because of this deal.

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Alison Williams, why do that? Why put the bondholders at

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>risk rather than the shareholders, changing the order of who

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>gets hit hardest by this. So management made clear that

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 1>this was a government decision, and actually the way that

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:36.400
<v Speaker 1>it structures the deal, it actually provides some capital protection

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:39.919
<v Speaker 1>to UBS. But I think that Manny is right that

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I that holders of these securities were surprised in terms

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of the way that the capital structure worked. But there's

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>actually a great note out this morning by your own

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Julius who covers these securities, and he does to Manny's point,

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, point out that precedent means that these type

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of investors for these securities will demand higher yields, and

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 1>so obviously that puts us some questions about the future

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of securities, and it raises the cost of capital. But

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>there is you know, with the securities of both UBS

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and Credit Suites are a little bit unique in terms

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 1>of the permanent write down. It's the exception in Europe.

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>And he points to the fact that as these securities

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 1>are issued, the language is likely to be different in

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the future. So that's a little bit of a technical issue,

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>but I think that's also an important to note. I

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>also want to ask about the future of this bank. Now.

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Before the takeover happened, we know that Credit Suite had

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>been in the process of cutting nine thousand jobs. Now,

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:52.439
<v Speaker 1>we do expect that there are going to be a

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of redundancies as this deal continues to play out

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>work itself out over the next few months. Allison, where

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>do you expect job cuts to come down between Credit

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Suites and ubs? I think you know the cuts are

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be broad. If you looked, you know, Credit

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>sweets their plan as it was, a lot of it

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>involved simplic simplification and eliminating redundancy. I know that there

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 1>will probably be a lot of stories about the investment

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>bank UM and certainly there there might be some cuts there.

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 1>But again I would just point to the fact that

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, those trading assets have come down a lot,

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think you know, the one remaining question is

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>really what happens to UM the investment bank just in

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of the underwriting and advisory business. This was the

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:45.120
<v Speaker 1>business UM that that was going to be spun out

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in the Credit Sweets first. Boston Harbout and the UBS

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>did point to the fact that they feel that as

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a result of this deal they can and expand their

0:23:56.000 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>global banking and research capabilities, add to some the M

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and A capability. So it does suggest that there is

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a place for some of that talent. Manis Cranny. Obviously

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you've covered both these banks for some time. What are

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you looking for to come next in the fallout from

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>this takeover, We've got to hear from tellahr and WELB

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Hammas In terms of strategy, how do you reduce the

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 1>investment bank? Where are the duplications wealth management asset management?

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>There is huge crossover in terms of human capital, in

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of technology, and in terms of footprint. This is

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:36.199
<v Speaker 1>going to mean a fundamental reassessment of two of the

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>biggest institutions in Switzerland, and that has a human cost

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and indeed an economic cost. I'm going to have to

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>buy out of the conversation. Ladies and gentlemen. A busy

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>morning forgives me Alison Nathan off to a rooftop near you,

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 1>continuing the conversation on radio and on TV right now.

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, I appreciate you coming on with us. Mannis

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>thanks for your coverage throughout the weekend. I hope we

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 1>can check in with you in the days to come

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 1>as we continue following this story. But as we conclude

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 1>this conversation with Alison Williams of Bloomberg Intelligence, Obviously we've

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:18.199
<v Speaker 1>been talking about the the overlap and the potential for

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>future job cuts at Credit Suite and UVS. At our

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>last twenty seconds here, Allison, what are you looking for

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to come next? I think we do need details on

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the plan. It was clear from it it's clear that

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 1>this was a few day process, and it was clear

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 1>for management that they don't have a lot of the details.

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>In terms of some of the numbers that they put

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:48.400
<v Speaker 1>out there, it seems like they could be conservative, but

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll want to know more about exactly where the eight

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>billion cuts are coming from. Those cuts are being said

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to execute through twenty twenty seven, so how much and

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 1>how are we going to see some of those reductions.

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Today, your morning brief on the

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>stories making news from Wall Street to Washington and beyond.

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 1>Look for us on your podcast feed at six am

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Eastern each morning, on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts. You can also listen live each morning

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 1>starting at five am Wall Street time on Bloomberg eleven

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 1>three zero in New York, Bloomberg ninety nine one in Washington,

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg one oh six one in Boston, and Bloomberg nine

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to sixty in San Francisco. Our flagship New York station

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 1>is also available on your Amazon Alexa devices. Just say

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty plus listen coast to coast

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg Business app, serious XM Channel one nineteen,

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, and on Bloomberg dot Com. I'm Nathan

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Hager and I'm Karen Moscow. Join us again tomorrow morning

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>for all the news you need to start your day,

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>right here on Bloomberg Daybreak