1 00:00:00,760 --> 00:00:03,920 Speaker 1: Hello everybody, Welcome into the Fantasy Pros Football Podcast. I'm 2 00:00:04,000 --> 00:00:07,680 Speaker 1: Ryan Warmly joined by Andrew Erickson and Derek Brown. Fellas 3 00:00:07,720 --> 00:00:10,520 Speaker 1: we are talking draft day decisions. 4 00:00:10,560 --> 00:00:11,680 Speaker 2: It's still the middle of. 5 00:00:11,680 --> 00:00:14,440 Speaker 1: June, but Draft season is just around the corner. It'll 6 00:00:14,480 --> 00:00:15,880 Speaker 1: be here sooner than you think. I was just telling 7 00:00:15,880 --> 00:00:17,960 Speaker 1: you guys before the show, I have my Scott Fishball 8 00:00:18,040 --> 00:00:20,480 Speaker 1: draft this weekend, which kind of stuck up on me here, 9 00:00:21,280 --> 00:00:23,720 Speaker 1: and we're looking at some players across all the positions 10 00:00:24,040 --> 00:00:26,960 Speaker 1: that are ranked near each other, and we see as 11 00:00:27,000 --> 00:00:28,840 Speaker 1: sort of debatable head to head. 12 00:00:28,880 --> 00:00:29,840 Speaker 2: Hey, who do you got here? 13 00:00:29,880 --> 00:00:31,440 Speaker 1: Maybe you guys will see some of these is not 14 00:00:31,520 --> 00:00:34,639 Speaker 1: that close. I went based on the expert consensus rankings, 15 00:00:34,840 --> 00:00:37,040 Speaker 1: not your guys' rankings, So we'll see where you guys 16 00:00:37,080 --> 00:00:39,199 Speaker 1: come down on these players. But we've got a few 17 00:00:39,240 --> 00:00:41,959 Speaker 1: running backs, some receivers, quarterback, tight end, and we've got 18 00:00:41,960 --> 00:00:44,400 Speaker 1: some rookies versus veterans at the end of the show, 19 00:00:44,440 --> 00:00:46,320 Speaker 1: so we're hitting a bunch of different names here. 20 00:00:46,400 --> 00:00:47,360 Speaker 2: In the episode. 21 00:00:47,640 --> 00:00:49,320 Speaker 1: I also was just saying, deebro, I think it's been 22 00:00:49,320 --> 00:00:50,559 Speaker 1: a minute since he's in a show with the three 23 00:00:50,600 --> 00:00:50,800 Speaker 1: of us. 24 00:00:50,800 --> 00:00:52,200 Speaker 2: How are you doing buddy. 25 00:00:52,080 --> 00:00:55,480 Speaker 3: Doing good man. Yeah, Scott Fishball I think is stinking 26 00:00:55,560 --> 00:00:58,760 Speaker 3: up on everybody. I mean, we're drafting teams before training 27 00:00:58,800 --> 00:01:01,600 Speaker 3: camp starts, but we're all in it to win it, man. 28 00:01:01,640 --> 00:01:05,160 Speaker 3: But no, it's been a minute, probably since what last 29 00:01:05,200 --> 00:01:08,080 Speaker 3: year regular season, Worm, maybe even maybe. 30 00:01:07,920 --> 00:01:10,200 Speaker 1: Last year preseason. Last that was the three of us 31 00:01:10,240 --> 00:01:12,920 Speaker 1: something like. You know, we've obviously done shows together, just 32 00:01:12,959 --> 00:01:14,400 Speaker 1: not with the with the spry. 33 00:01:14,560 --> 00:01:16,119 Speaker 3: You got a little bit of tan. Looks like you've 34 00:01:16,120 --> 00:01:17,240 Speaker 3: been outside. 35 00:01:17,800 --> 00:01:20,880 Speaker 1: Skress mid nineties out here, so not spending that much 36 00:01:21,000 --> 00:01:23,920 Speaker 1: time outside these days. My dog can't really handle it, 37 00:01:23,959 --> 00:01:26,279 Speaker 1: but a little here and there ericson. 38 00:01:26,319 --> 00:01:28,600 Speaker 2: How are you doing in the Great Northeast. 39 00:01:29,000 --> 00:01:30,880 Speaker 4: I'm doing great, Worm. I don't know if we've talked 40 00:01:30,880 --> 00:01:34,440 Speaker 4: about since I've gotten my puppy how that experience has been. 41 00:01:34,560 --> 00:01:36,840 Speaker 4: I don't know if we've done a show scars. Yeah, 42 00:01:36,840 --> 00:01:38,720 Speaker 4: I got a lot of battle scars. My hands are 43 00:01:38,720 --> 00:01:40,760 Speaker 4: pretty beaten up, a lot of bloody hands over the 44 00:01:40,840 --> 00:01:44,040 Speaker 4: last couple of days. But we're making it work. Archie 45 00:01:44,160 --> 00:01:47,319 Speaker 4: is a bundle of joy, super cute, and I'm just 46 00:01:47,400 --> 00:01:49,320 Speaker 4: very looking forward to seeing him grow up and p 47 00:01:49,480 --> 00:01:50,600 Speaker 4: outside consistent. 48 00:01:51,960 --> 00:01:56,000 Speaker 1: I remember his name is Archie. I don't actually remember 49 00:01:56,120 --> 00:01:57,520 Speaker 1: what type of dog is he. 50 00:01:57,520 --> 00:02:00,360 Speaker 4: He is a Golden Retriever, but he's very light, so 51 00:02:00,600 --> 00:02:02,760 Speaker 4: like that's why we get a lot of questions about, oh, 52 00:02:02,760 --> 00:02:04,560 Speaker 4: what kind of dog is he? He's a golden Retriever 53 00:02:04,600 --> 00:02:06,880 Speaker 4: because he's not really gold he's much more white. We'll 54 00:02:06,880 --> 00:02:09,040 Speaker 4: see how sad white. See if he stays lighter as 55 00:02:09,080 --> 00:02:11,240 Speaker 4: he gets a little bit older. But uh, yeah, he's 56 00:02:11,280 --> 00:02:13,440 Speaker 4: a Retriever for sure. I throw the ball, he comes back. 57 00:02:13,560 --> 00:02:16,440 Speaker 4: Throw the ball again. He comes back, very Golden Retriever esque. 58 00:02:16,720 --> 00:02:19,320 Speaker 1: When I adopted by a dog, I was like, dog 59 00:02:19,400 --> 00:02:21,120 Speaker 1: must be at least two and a half years old. 60 00:02:21,200 --> 00:02:22,680 Speaker 2: I had no interest in getting a puppy. 61 00:02:22,720 --> 00:02:24,560 Speaker 1: I was like, I want a dog that's already seen 62 00:02:24,639 --> 00:02:27,280 Speaker 1: some stuff and we'll be a little more called. 63 00:02:27,360 --> 00:02:29,560 Speaker 3: Trying to give Eric the heads up, I'm like, this 64 00:02:29,600 --> 00:02:31,560 Speaker 3: is the closest thing you get to having a baby 65 00:02:31,560 --> 00:02:34,960 Speaker 3: without having a baby. Man, it's getting up in all times, 66 00:02:35,040 --> 00:02:36,720 Speaker 3: you know, being all over the house. 67 00:02:36,960 --> 00:02:42,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, well, we've got some babies against veterans, rookies against veterans. 68 00:02:42,680 --> 00:02:43,919 Speaker 1: Like I said, that's coming at the end of the show. 69 00:02:43,960 --> 00:02:46,160 Speaker 1: Let's start off with the ruddy backs here just a 70 00:02:46,280 --> 00:02:48,720 Speaker 1: reminder for everybody. All of our twenty twenty six consensus 71 00:02:48,760 --> 00:02:51,640 Speaker 1: rankings and tears can be found at fantasypros dot com 72 00:02:51,680 --> 00:02:52,519 Speaker 1: slash rankings. 73 00:02:52,720 --> 00:02:54,840 Speaker 2: We're going based off the half PPR rankings. 74 00:02:54,840 --> 00:02:56,200 Speaker 1: When I so when I list, oh, this guy's a 75 00:02:56,240 --> 00:02:59,320 Speaker 1: LAB thirteen whatever, that's what I'm referring to half PPR. 76 00:02:59,520 --> 00:03:01,960 Speaker 1: You guys can so check out ericson and debros and 77 00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:05,280 Speaker 1: fits his rankings on the staff rankings page as well 78 00:03:05,280 --> 00:03:07,080 Speaker 1: if you want to see where they're coming at with 79 00:03:07,160 --> 00:03:08,320 Speaker 1: some of these players too. 80 00:03:08,600 --> 00:03:11,240 Speaker 2: That's enough of a preamble. Let's dive right in at 81 00:03:11,240 --> 00:03:11,880 Speaker 2: the running backs. 82 00:03:11,880 --> 00:03:13,520 Speaker 1: I wanted to do one kind of at the top, 83 00:03:13,600 --> 00:03:16,000 Speaker 1: like a real first round head to head, since most 84 00:03:16,040 --> 00:03:18,240 Speaker 1: of our debates are a little further down the rankings. 85 00:03:18,320 --> 00:03:19,640 Speaker 2: So we're gonna start off with that. 86 00:03:20,120 --> 00:03:24,800 Speaker 1: Christian McCaffrey RB three versus Jonathan Taylor RB four. Obviously, 87 00:03:24,800 --> 00:03:26,960 Speaker 1: both guys are kind of in that tier one range 88 00:03:27,000 --> 00:03:31,080 Speaker 1: in redraft rankings right now in consensus. You know, I 89 00:03:31,080 --> 00:03:33,520 Speaker 1: don't need to tell you, guys, Christian McAffrey and Jonathan Taylor, 90 00:03:33,560 --> 00:03:36,040 Speaker 1: right both have been league winners at times in the past. 91 00:03:36,040 --> 00:03:39,320 Speaker 1: Both have finished as RB one in previous seasons. Deebra, 92 00:03:39,400 --> 00:03:41,200 Speaker 1: I'll start with you, who do you prefer this year, 93 00:03:41,520 --> 00:03:42,600 Speaker 1: CMC or Taylor. 94 00:03:43,160 --> 00:03:45,920 Speaker 3: That's Christian McCaffrey. And I understand the risk that he 95 00:03:45,960 --> 00:03:48,160 Speaker 3: presents with the high volume and all that kind of stuff, 96 00:03:48,160 --> 00:03:50,680 Speaker 3: But if you freaking stay as healthy guys, he's probably 97 00:03:51,320 --> 00:03:53,720 Speaker 3: in the very short list of RB one overall or 98 00:03:53,800 --> 00:03:56,880 Speaker 3: least in contention for it. So I understand the problems 99 00:03:56,880 --> 00:04:00,440 Speaker 3: in the volume. I understand his declining efficiency last year 100 00:04:00,440 --> 00:04:02,520 Speaker 3: only thirty fifth and an explosive run rate fortieth in 101 00:04:02,600 --> 00:04:05,640 Speaker 3: yards of the contact per attempt. He was still immaculate 102 00:04:05,640 --> 00:04:07,200 Speaker 3: as a receiver out of the backfield. The dude had 103 00:04:07,240 --> 00:04:09,200 Speaker 3: a twenty one percent target chair and I don't see 104 00:04:09,240 --> 00:04:11,960 Speaker 3: that slowing down at all. With we have questions about 105 00:04:11,960 --> 00:04:16,200 Speaker 3: George kittle, Ken Ricky Pierstall stay healthy. Can Christian Kirk 106 00:04:16,240 --> 00:04:18,920 Speaker 3: stay healthy? Can Mike Evans? Even though I'm high about him, 107 00:04:18,920 --> 00:04:21,039 Speaker 3: We're going to talk about him later. A little tea's 108 00:04:21,080 --> 00:04:24,880 Speaker 3: there Still Christian McCaffrey. I can't shy away from the volume. 109 00:04:24,920 --> 00:04:27,960 Speaker 3: They're not going to decrease his workload. I have a 110 00:04:28,000 --> 00:04:31,360 Speaker 3: lot of concerns about the state of Daniel Jones and 111 00:04:31,400 --> 00:04:34,120 Speaker 3: the Colts offense considering all the Alec Pierce stuff that's 112 00:04:34,120 --> 00:04:37,960 Speaker 3: come out, So this is easy honestly, Christian McCaffrey for me. 113 00:04:38,680 --> 00:04:40,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, McCaffrey's kind of an easy guy to talk about 114 00:04:41,000 --> 00:04:43,400 Speaker 1: this time of year. Just like, if you can set 115 00:04:43,440 --> 00:04:45,560 Speaker 1: aside the health, he's going to finish as a top 116 00:04:45,600 --> 00:04:47,960 Speaker 1: two running back on the season, and probably a pretty 117 00:04:47,960 --> 00:04:50,159 Speaker 1: good chance of number one because anytime he plays at 118 00:04:50,240 --> 00:04:52,880 Speaker 1: least sixteen games, he's inside that top two. I think 119 00:04:52,880 --> 00:04:55,440 Speaker 1: in twenty eighteen he was RB three, but he's basically 120 00:04:55,440 --> 00:04:57,640 Speaker 1: every other season since he's since then that he's played 121 00:04:57,680 --> 00:05:00,280 Speaker 1: sixteen games, he's been RB one or two, and then 122 00:05:00,320 --> 00:05:02,000 Speaker 1: the season is where he does it. He's like outside 123 00:05:02,040 --> 00:05:05,479 Speaker 1: the top forty ericson do you see any more certainty 124 00:05:05,600 --> 00:05:08,360 Speaker 1: with Jonathan Taylor, just like the fact that you know, 125 00:05:08,440 --> 00:05:11,320 Speaker 1: Christian McCaffrey has this career of injury stuff. 126 00:05:11,320 --> 00:05:12,200 Speaker 2: I mean, only one in the. 127 00:05:12,200 --> 00:05:14,160 Speaker 1: Last four years has McCaffrey missed a lot of time, 128 00:05:14,279 --> 00:05:17,359 Speaker 1: So maybe that's a little bit overblown. Or also just 129 00:05:17,400 --> 00:05:20,400 Speaker 1: the fact that Jonathan Taylor was the RB one prior 130 00:05:20,440 --> 00:05:23,000 Speaker 1: to Daniel Jones getting hurt last season. Where are you 131 00:05:23,040 --> 00:05:24,920 Speaker 1: at on these two in the first round. 132 00:05:24,960 --> 00:05:26,520 Speaker 4: Well, I think that both of them have like similar 133 00:05:26,560 --> 00:05:28,520 Speaker 4: concerns when it comes to again, you can play the 134 00:05:28,520 --> 00:05:31,280 Speaker 4: health card in both situations, but these are guys that 135 00:05:31,320 --> 00:05:34,520 Speaker 4: are coming off number one and number two respectively in 136 00:05:34,640 --> 00:05:37,640 Speaker 4: total touches last season. So both guys are coming off 137 00:05:37,680 --> 00:05:41,000 Speaker 4: of massive workloads. Christ McCaffrey just turned thirty years old, 138 00:05:41,240 --> 00:05:43,760 Speaker 4: so he's really starting to get up there in age. 139 00:05:44,120 --> 00:05:46,800 Speaker 4: And we've seen this story not once but twice where 140 00:05:46,800 --> 00:05:50,120 Speaker 4: he's led the NFL in touches. The fantasy finishes after 141 00:05:50,120 --> 00:05:54,599 Speaker 4: those seasons nowhere near number three overall among running backs, 142 00:05:54,800 --> 00:05:57,880 Speaker 4: Like that's the thing for me. So for me, I 143 00:05:57,960 --> 00:06:01,840 Speaker 4: trust the process when it comes to this particular player, 144 00:06:02,360 --> 00:06:04,240 Speaker 4: the guy that leads the NFL in touch especially when 145 00:06:04,240 --> 00:06:06,760 Speaker 4: it's four hundred and fifty done it over the past 146 00:06:06,960 --> 00:06:10,560 Speaker 4: four or five years, and every year it's been beneficial 147 00:06:10,600 --> 00:06:13,719 Speaker 4: to not draft that player. So understand that if he 148 00:06:13,800 --> 00:06:16,400 Speaker 4: is healthy, I will be wrong. The receiving is definitely 149 00:06:16,400 --> 00:06:19,440 Speaker 4: what helps separate him, especially with the rushing efficiency falling off. 150 00:06:19,440 --> 00:06:22,240 Speaker 4: But I saw enough from him last year with the 151 00:06:22,320 --> 00:06:25,479 Speaker 4: rushing that does concern me about the long term outlook 152 00:06:25,520 --> 00:06:27,080 Speaker 4: and that is he going to continue to just get 153 00:06:27,120 --> 00:06:30,480 Speaker 4: better as he turns to age thirty. Only two running 154 00:06:30,480 --> 00:06:32,320 Speaker 4: backs of finishes RB one's fall in the year after 155 00:06:32,400 --> 00:06:36,080 Speaker 4: leading the NFL and touches since twenty thirteen. The data 156 00:06:36,120 --> 00:06:39,159 Speaker 4: is very strong that points to this player as one 157 00:06:39,200 --> 00:06:41,320 Speaker 4: that is really hard to bet on being there for 158 00:06:41,400 --> 00:06:43,280 Speaker 4: the entirety of the season. Now, if you draft him, 159 00:06:43,520 --> 00:06:45,320 Speaker 4: you've got to be aware that, hey, maybe someone that 160 00:06:45,360 --> 00:06:47,400 Speaker 4: you sell high after the first month of the year. 161 00:06:47,440 --> 00:06:50,080 Speaker 4: So I can get behind that. But that's those are 162 00:06:50,080 --> 00:06:52,080 Speaker 4: my concerns for CMC. Again, I like door number three, 163 00:06:52,120 --> 00:06:54,880 Speaker 4: which is James Cook. That's who I would have over 164 00:06:54,920 --> 00:06:58,240 Speaker 4: both McCaffrey and Jonathan Taylor personally as my RB three. 165 00:06:58,400 --> 00:07:00,000 Speaker 4: So I know we didn't bring him up, but I 166 00:07:00,040 --> 00:07:01,960 Speaker 4: think that it naturally comes them into the conversation. Because 167 00:07:01,960 --> 00:07:04,240 Speaker 4: I have Jonathan Taylor at RB four, I think that 168 00:07:04,240 --> 00:07:05,760 Speaker 4: he's fine where he goes. I think he's gonna see 169 00:07:05,760 --> 00:07:08,480 Speaker 4: a boatload of volume. And last year, when Daniel Jones 170 00:07:08,560 --> 00:07:11,320 Speaker 4: was healthy, Jonathan Taylor was I think the best running 171 00:07:11,320 --> 00:07:13,480 Speaker 4: back in the NFL by far. I mean, he was 172 00:07:13,600 --> 00:07:15,600 Speaker 4: a front runner for Offensive Player of the Year. He 173 00:07:15,680 --> 00:07:19,920 Speaker 4: was scoring three touchdowns seemingly every single game. It was insane. 174 00:07:20,280 --> 00:07:22,400 Speaker 4: What the odds were hearing him to score three touchdowns 175 00:07:22,400 --> 00:07:25,240 Speaker 4: from the betting perspective, So, I think Taylor's fine his 176 00:07:25,320 --> 00:07:26,960 Speaker 4: EASTO that's where I have him. But I'm lower ranking 177 00:07:26,960 --> 00:07:28,640 Speaker 4: sens in CMC. I'm not going to have him this year, 178 00:07:28,840 --> 00:07:30,960 Speaker 4: and I'm okay with that because I've just faded this 179 00:07:31,040 --> 00:07:33,120 Speaker 4: profile and it's worked off more often than not. 180 00:07:34,120 --> 00:07:35,080 Speaker 2: That's interesting, Uncook. 181 00:07:35,080 --> 00:07:36,920 Speaker 1: He's at the top of tier two in the rankings, 182 00:07:36,920 --> 00:07:38,520 Speaker 1: which is why I focused on these two because they're 183 00:07:38,520 --> 00:07:40,040 Speaker 1: at the bottom of tier one. I'm not going to 184 00:07:40,080 --> 00:07:41,720 Speaker 1: ask this for anybody else, but just because these guys 185 00:07:41,760 --> 00:07:43,080 Speaker 1: are in the first round, I do want to ask 186 00:07:43,120 --> 00:07:43,480 Speaker 1: for them. 187 00:07:43,880 --> 00:07:46,360 Speaker 2: Are you going, let's set aside cook for a second. 188 00:07:46,360 --> 00:07:48,800 Speaker 1: Are you going with CMC and Taylor with your pick 189 00:07:48,840 --> 00:07:50,360 Speaker 1: in the second half of the first round, or are 190 00:07:50,360 --> 00:07:52,480 Speaker 1: you guys going with a receiver in the first round 191 00:07:52,520 --> 00:07:55,640 Speaker 1: this year? Which would you prefer positionally because they are 192 00:07:55,680 --> 00:07:59,200 Speaker 1: ranked seventh and ninth in the overall rankings, not positionally deepro. 193 00:07:59,600 --> 00:08:02,000 Speaker 3: I'll go Cooker, I'm gonna take a receiver. That's the 194 00:08:02,040 --> 00:08:04,520 Speaker 3: other part of this is I'm not like I'll take 195 00:08:04,560 --> 00:08:08,760 Speaker 3: CMC in this debate, but the I mean, in a 196 00:08:08,760 --> 00:08:10,880 Speaker 3: lot of aspects and drafts, I'm just gonna go all 197 00:08:10,920 --> 00:08:12,720 Speaker 3: the directions outside of both of these. 198 00:08:12,560 --> 00:08:15,760 Speaker 4: Players you take. Would you take I'mnra over both these guys, Yeah, 199 00:08:15,880 --> 00:08:18,640 Speaker 4: I feel I feel I would do that as well. 200 00:08:18,920 --> 00:08:21,120 Speaker 3: I mean a Monra has literally been the wide receiver 201 00:08:21,600 --> 00:08:23,400 Speaker 3: in Fantasy Boys per game like each of the last 202 00:08:23,400 --> 00:08:25,600 Speaker 3: three seasons. He's the new wide receivers. 203 00:08:25,640 --> 00:08:27,240 Speaker 4: So yes, I would take just to lock it in, 204 00:08:27,720 --> 00:08:28,320 Speaker 4: just walk away. 205 00:08:28,560 --> 00:08:31,200 Speaker 3: Just give me the top five wide receiver four in ranks, 206 00:08:31,240 --> 00:08:33,200 Speaker 3: Like honestly, I question what are you doing in life? 207 00:08:33,200 --> 00:08:35,079 Speaker 3: But anyway, the conversation for a different day. 208 00:08:35,200 --> 00:08:38,280 Speaker 1: Yeah, Now there's a consensus top five overall this year, 209 00:08:38,400 --> 00:08:42,080 Speaker 1: Bjeon Chase gives Puka JSN in some order in the 210 00:08:42,120 --> 00:08:43,000 Speaker 1: consensus rankings. 211 00:08:43,040 --> 00:08:44,320 Speaker 2: Amen Ra is the sixth player. 212 00:08:44,360 --> 00:08:46,640 Speaker 1: He's the first guy behind that top five, so it 213 00:08:46,640 --> 00:08:49,480 Speaker 1: goes him, then CMC, then LAMB, then JT, then you 214 00:08:49,520 --> 00:08:51,000 Speaker 1: get in some of the other names. So that's kind 215 00:08:51,000 --> 00:08:52,679 Speaker 1: of the range that we're at. Like I said, I 216 00:08:52,679 --> 00:08:53,960 Speaker 1: just wanted to ask with them because they're right at 217 00:08:54,000 --> 00:08:56,040 Speaker 1: the top. Let's move a little further down the rankings 218 00:08:56,120 --> 00:09:00,560 Speaker 1: RB nineteen Bucky Irving versus Quinn Shawn Judkins at RB 219 00:09:00,679 --> 00:09:03,439 Speaker 1: twenty one. Ericson, I'll start with you on this one, So. 220 00:09:03,400 --> 00:09:05,400 Speaker 4: I'm going to go with Bucky Irving. I have him 221 00:09:05,440 --> 00:09:07,280 Speaker 4: ranked a little bit higher. He's my RB nineteen. I 222 00:09:07,320 --> 00:09:09,720 Speaker 4: have Judkins as RB twenty two, so pretty close to 223 00:09:09,720 --> 00:09:12,559 Speaker 4: where the ECR is, pretty close to where there are 224 00:09:12,640 --> 00:09:15,280 Speaker 4: in the projections. Actually Mightke Clay and their projections basically 225 00:09:15,320 --> 00:09:18,319 Speaker 4: has them the same, So very close, and I think 226 00:09:18,360 --> 00:09:21,960 Speaker 4: that's right. I understand the concerns with Bucky, and I 227 00:09:22,000 --> 00:09:24,360 Speaker 4: have real concerns about what kind of workload he has 228 00:09:24,400 --> 00:09:27,120 Speaker 4: with Kenney Gainewell and Sean Tucker also vuying for touches 229 00:09:27,160 --> 00:09:29,480 Speaker 4: in the Buccaneers backfield. But I don't think that quin 230 00:09:29,520 --> 00:09:32,080 Speaker 4: John Judkins is necessarily like a locked and loaded bell cow. 231 00:09:32,440 --> 00:09:34,840 Speaker 4: I think Dylan Sampson can play. He's a second year 232 00:09:34,880 --> 00:09:36,640 Speaker 4: running back who could also take a leap. I think 233 00:09:36,640 --> 00:09:39,280 Speaker 4: that he's a better pass catcher than quin John Judkins is. 234 00:09:39,640 --> 00:09:42,520 Speaker 4: And which offense do I feel more confident is going 235 00:09:42,559 --> 00:09:45,680 Speaker 4: to be scoring touchdowns? I'm going to take Tampa Bay Buccaneers, 236 00:09:45,760 --> 00:09:47,559 Speaker 4: who look like a top ten offense at the beginning 237 00:09:47,559 --> 00:09:49,840 Speaker 4: of the first half of last year. I like the 238 00:09:49,840 --> 00:09:52,680 Speaker 4: Bucks offensive line more than the Browns offensive line. I 239 00:09:52,679 --> 00:09:54,360 Speaker 4: know they've made a lot of additions, but the Buccaneer's 240 00:09:54,360 --> 00:09:56,120 Speaker 4: offensive line just has to get healthy and I think 241 00:09:56,240 --> 00:09:59,320 Speaker 4: they'll be better than the Browns offensive line. To me, 242 00:09:59,360 --> 00:10:01,199 Speaker 4: when I look at Udkins, who's also coming off a 243 00:10:01,280 --> 00:10:04,280 Speaker 4: fibula injury, and Ryan Heath has done some great work 244 00:10:04,280 --> 00:10:07,160 Speaker 4: on this from fantasy points, where you're seeing running backs 245 00:10:07,200 --> 00:10:10,160 Speaker 4: that come off these type of fibula ankle injuries, they 246 00:10:10,320 --> 00:10:13,760 Speaker 4: average or minus six point seven fantasy points per game, 247 00:10:13,800 --> 00:10:16,360 Speaker 4: fewer than they did the year before coming off of 248 00:10:16,360 --> 00:10:20,319 Speaker 4: the injury. So Judkins, to me, he was a volume 249 00:10:20,320 --> 00:10:23,200 Speaker 4: induced running back last year in RB two, RB twenty 250 00:10:23,280 --> 00:10:25,800 Speaker 4: six and fantasy points per game. This is straight from 251 00:10:25,880 --> 00:10:29,800 Speaker 4: the Fantasy Black Book. Per Derek Brown. Judkins last year 252 00:10:30,240 --> 00:10:33,400 Speaker 4: thirty eighth and Juke great fifty fifth in yards per touch, 253 00:10:33,679 --> 00:10:36,960 Speaker 4: fifty second, yards created per touch twenty seventh, and breakaway runs. 254 00:10:37,280 --> 00:10:39,520 Speaker 4: None of that to me screams like this guy should 255 00:10:39,520 --> 00:10:42,719 Speaker 4: be a locked and loaded superstar guy with a ton 256 00:10:42,760 --> 00:10:44,160 Speaker 4: of upside and an offense that we have a lot 257 00:10:44,160 --> 00:10:47,360 Speaker 4: of question marks, and that was averaging nearly nineteen touches 258 00:10:47,400 --> 00:10:50,600 Speaker 4: per game. So last year he was a volume based 259 00:10:50,720 --> 00:10:53,600 Speaker 4: RB two, he didn't even crack the top twenty four, 260 00:10:53,840 --> 00:10:56,640 Speaker 4: whereas with Bucky Irving. Yeah, there are volume concerns with him, 261 00:10:56,640 --> 00:10:58,840 Speaker 4: but I know that he can make plays with what 262 00:10:58,920 --> 00:11:02,040 Speaker 4: every opportunity that he does end up getting. Because last year, 263 00:11:02,160 --> 00:11:04,480 Speaker 4: or has a rookie because I kind of want to 264 00:11:04,520 --> 00:11:06,200 Speaker 4: throw out most of last year because he was injured, 265 00:11:06,320 --> 00:11:08,280 Speaker 4: I really don't think that he was super effective, so 266 00:11:08,320 --> 00:11:10,680 Speaker 4: I'm not really holding the efficiency marks against him. But 267 00:11:10,679 --> 00:11:14,240 Speaker 4: his rookie year, he had similar workload to quinshow Judkins, 268 00:11:14,280 --> 00:11:17,160 Speaker 4: but he caught more passes and was a fringe fantasy 269 00:11:17,240 --> 00:11:19,680 Speaker 4: RB one because he was able to do more with 270 00:11:19,720 --> 00:11:22,000 Speaker 4: the actual touches. So I get that people have been 271 00:11:22,040 --> 00:11:24,360 Speaker 4: down on Bucky, and I felt that way earlier in 272 00:11:24,360 --> 00:11:27,400 Speaker 4: the offseason when he was ranked as the RB fifteen. 273 00:11:27,800 --> 00:11:30,040 Speaker 4: I was like, man, I'd rather have him like in 274 00:11:30,080 --> 00:11:32,800 Speaker 4: the lower RB two territory, And now that he's fallen, 275 00:11:32,880 --> 00:11:34,840 Speaker 4: I'm like, okay, Like I'm not going to keep moving 276 00:11:34,880 --> 00:11:37,160 Speaker 4: him down and double counting the spackfl because I was 277 00:11:37,160 --> 00:11:39,720 Speaker 4: already accounting for that. So for me, I think Bucky 278 00:11:39,800 --> 00:11:43,439 Speaker 4: just has more straight up upside than Judkins because game 279 00:11:43,480 --> 00:11:45,040 Speaker 4: wel Wavey doesn't really have that big of a role. 280 00:11:45,440 --> 00:11:47,840 Speaker 4: So I think that. So that's why I lean on Bucky. 281 00:11:48,240 --> 00:11:50,760 Speaker 4: I think it's close, but I lean on him. 282 00:11:50,960 --> 00:11:53,880 Speaker 1: Yeah, obviously I do a lot of Dynasty shows with Fits, 283 00:11:53,920 --> 00:11:57,040 Speaker 1: and he's been all over Bucky as a target this offseason, 284 00:11:57,040 --> 00:11:59,160 Speaker 1: and he thinks that the pendulum has swung too far 285 00:11:59,320 --> 00:12:01,319 Speaker 1: against him. I mean, you look at the game logs 286 00:12:01,360 --> 00:12:02,920 Speaker 1: last year, like when he was playing, like, you know, 287 00:12:02,960 --> 00:12:04,480 Speaker 1: we think about it as such a down year, and 288 00:12:04,480 --> 00:12:06,160 Speaker 1: obviously the injuries were a huge part of that, but 289 00:12:06,200 --> 00:12:08,280 Speaker 1: like when he was on the field, he was like 290 00:12:08,400 --> 00:12:10,959 Speaker 1: RB nineteen at worst, outside of that stretch at the 291 00:12:11,000 --> 00:12:12,480 Speaker 1: end of the season, Like to start the season it 292 00:12:12,480 --> 00:12:15,040 Speaker 1: was RB nineteen, RB fourteen, RB seventeen, RB nine. Then 293 00:12:15,080 --> 00:12:17,280 Speaker 1: when he came back RB fourteen, RB twelve, he finished 294 00:12:17,360 --> 00:12:19,160 Speaker 1: RB nineteen. It was really just that three game stretch 295 00:12:19,200 --> 00:12:21,839 Speaker 1: in December that was such a sour finished to the 296 00:12:21,880 --> 00:12:24,840 Speaker 1: season that was already marred by injury. And you know, 297 00:12:24,880 --> 00:12:27,360 Speaker 1: you would hope that the offensive line and Baker himself 298 00:12:27,400 --> 00:12:30,160 Speaker 1: and just this offensive general is just healthier this season, 299 00:12:30,760 --> 00:12:33,040 Speaker 1: new play caller, all that stuff. So I Fitz has 300 00:12:33,080 --> 00:12:35,520 Speaker 1: kind of won me over on Bucky this year, particularly 301 00:12:35,600 --> 00:12:37,640 Speaker 1: where he is ranked, like you said, Ericson, now that 302 00:12:37,640 --> 00:12:39,680 Speaker 1: he's not had he is down. Excuse me at that 303 00:12:39,800 --> 00:12:42,800 Speaker 1: RB nineteen range as opposed to a higher end RB. 304 00:12:42,600 --> 00:12:43,600 Speaker 2: Two d bro. 305 00:12:43,760 --> 00:12:46,120 Speaker 1: You gave kind of a ooh when Ericson gave his pick. 306 00:12:46,120 --> 00:12:47,520 Speaker 1: Does that mean you're going against him here? 307 00:12:48,320 --> 00:12:50,280 Speaker 3: I am. I'm gonna go with Judkins in this, and 308 00:12:50,320 --> 00:12:52,400 Speaker 3: maybe you know, I don't want to say that that 309 00:12:53,160 --> 00:12:55,600 Speaker 3: the pendulum has swung too far from me with Irving. 310 00:12:55,679 --> 00:12:57,400 Speaker 3: I do have a lot of concerns because we have 311 00:12:57,520 --> 00:13:00,640 Speaker 3: seen this be a split backfield even with we're white. 312 00:13:00,720 --> 00:13:03,800 Speaker 3: So if we've already seen this be a split backfield, 313 00:13:03,800 --> 00:13:06,960 Speaker 3: and I know Bucky's excelled with that split, but Kenneth 314 00:13:07,000 --> 00:13:09,559 Speaker 3: Gamewell is a better player than Rashad White. I think 315 00:13:09,640 --> 00:13:12,160 Speaker 3: Kenneth game Wall is going to eat into Bucky Irvings's 316 00:13:12,600 --> 00:13:14,960 Speaker 3: touch count, maybe in the red zone, especially in the 317 00:13:14,960 --> 00:13:17,200 Speaker 3: passing game, a lot more than people or maybe even 318 00:13:17,240 --> 00:13:20,400 Speaker 3: factoring in and this all goes back to two. I 319 00:13:20,440 --> 00:13:23,440 Speaker 3: am worried about Bucky Irving's health. It's not even just 320 00:13:23,520 --> 00:13:26,640 Speaker 3: the the shoulder stuff that's going right now. But you know, 321 00:13:26,760 --> 00:13:28,880 Speaker 3: playing last year, like Erics had talked about, with a 322 00:13:28,880 --> 00:13:31,839 Speaker 3: foot sprain, It's not like that's the only injuries he's 323 00:13:31,880 --> 00:13:33,560 Speaker 3: dealt with in the NFL. You go back to twenty 324 00:13:33,559 --> 00:13:37,200 Speaker 3: twenty four, he dealt with a hip issue, a back issue, 325 00:13:37,320 --> 00:13:40,520 Speaker 3: toe issue, and hamstring issues in that season as well. 326 00:13:40,559 --> 00:13:44,360 Speaker 3: So Bucky Irving and this is where this isn't applicable 327 00:13:44,360 --> 00:13:48,320 Speaker 3: for every single running back, but where it's like, is 328 00:13:48,360 --> 00:13:52,360 Speaker 3: the size and the workload. Can he hold up to 329 00:13:52,360 --> 00:13:55,720 Speaker 3: the workload in the NFL because of his size, because 330 00:13:55,800 --> 00:13:58,080 Speaker 3: in the two seasons we have seen him, seen him 331 00:13:58,120 --> 00:14:03,200 Speaker 3: be banged up pretty religiously and it's affected, as it 332 00:14:03,320 --> 00:14:08,360 Speaker 3: has effective his per touch efficiency massively at certain spurts. 333 00:14:08,920 --> 00:14:12,200 Speaker 3: But so really it's it's not only Bucky Irving's health 334 00:14:12,240 --> 00:14:14,880 Speaker 3: that concerns me. It's Kenneth Gamewell being a better player 335 00:14:14,920 --> 00:14:17,480 Speaker 3: in a similar role and they can bite off more 336 00:14:17,520 --> 00:14:21,280 Speaker 3: than Rashad White ever could in that backfield. But going 337 00:14:21,320 --> 00:14:24,000 Speaker 3: to Quinn Shawn Judkins, I think he's gonna have the 338 00:14:24,000 --> 00:14:27,560 Speaker 3: lion's share of the touches, and I don't dismiss the 339 00:14:27,600 --> 00:14:30,120 Speaker 3: work that Ryan Heath has done. The only caveat that 340 00:14:30,160 --> 00:14:32,880 Speaker 3: I'll give with this is that I think a lot 341 00:14:32,920 --> 00:14:35,360 Speaker 3: of that stuff with the ankle of the phibulus stuff. 342 00:14:35,360 --> 00:14:36,920 Speaker 3: I mean, we can go back to previous years of 343 00:14:37,200 --> 00:14:39,000 Speaker 3: like when I was so high on Tony Pollard, I 344 00:14:39,040 --> 00:14:42,120 Speaker 3: didn't account for the tight rope procedure and a lot 345 00:14:42,160 --> 00:14:43,880 Speaker 3: of that, at least when you look back, has been 346 00:14:43,920 --> 00:14:46,040 Speaker 3: a lot of the players that had tight rope procedures. 347 00:14:46,400 --> 00:14:48,720 Speaker 3: I could be emphatically wrong, and the comments come for 348 00:14:48,800 --> 00:14:51,720 Speaker 3: me on YouTube on this one. To my knowledge, Judkins 349 00:14:51,720 --> 00:14:53,960 Speaker 3: has not had a tight rope procedure. And if that 350 00:14:54,120 --> 00:14:56,040 Speaker 3: is the case, yes, well I bump him down and 351 00:14:56,040 --> 00:14:59,440 Speaker 3: worry more about his effectiveness. Absolutely, But to my knowledge 352 00:14:59,640 --> 00:15:02,080 Speaker 3: that it's not the procedure that he had, I feel 353 00:15:02,080 --> 00:15:04,360 Speaker 3: pretty good about the volume that Judkins is gonna get. 354 00:15:04,400 --> 00:15:07,200 Speaker 3: I wasn't impressed with Samson as a rookie. I wasn't 355 00:15:07,200 --> 00:15:09,640 Speaker 3: impressed with him as a prospect. You can go back 356 00:15:09,640 --> 00:15:12,200 Speaker 3: to his time in college. He's never really been a 357 00:15:12,240 --> 00:15:15,160 Speaker 3: truly efficient player on a per touch basis. So I 358 00:15:15,200 --> 00:15:17,720 Speaker 3: think Judkins is gonna own most of the backfield, if 359 00:15:17,760 --> 00:15:20,800 Speaker 3: not the entirety of the red zone touches. And for 360 00:15:20,920 --> 00:15:25,320 Speaker 3: an offense that I think can surpass as expectations, they 361 00:15:25,400 --> 00:15:27,880 Speaker 3: actually have skilled players that could do something this year. 362 00:15:27,960 --> 00:15:31,560 Speaker 3: Jared Judy was a nothing in Cleveland last year. You 363 00:15:31,600 --> 00:15:34,120 Speaker 3: have Harold fan in Casey conceptsy on Denzel Boston. If 364 00:15:34,120 --> 00:15:38,040 Speaker 3: they get at least league average play lee average, depending 365 00:15:38,080 --> 00:15:40,720 Speaker 3: on whoever the heck is under center for Cleveland this year, 366 00:15:41,040 --> 00:15:43,240 Speaker 3: they could surprise as an offense. And if that's gonna 367 00:15:43,280 --> 00:15:46,040 Speaker 3: be the case, I'm not gonna dispute anything that Erickson 368 00:15:46,080 --> 00:15:48,680 Speaker 3: laid out about. Is the offensive line better in Tampa 369 00:15:48,720 --> 00:15:53,440 Speaker 3: emphatically yes? Is the offensive ecosystem better in Tampa emphatically yes? 370 00:15:54,000 --> 00:15:57,000 Speaker 3: But that also can kind of held up together with 371 00:15:57,240 --> 00:16:00,600 Speaker 3: duct tape and chewing gum. Chris Godwin health is not 372 00:16:00,600 --> 00:16:04,320 Speaker 3: a certainty. Jaylan McMillan's health is not a certainty. So again, 373 00:16:04,480 --> 00:16:07,320 Speaker 3: Baker Mayfield's health is not a certainty. So I think 374 00:16:07,360 --> 00:16:09,280 Speaker 3: there's risk factors on both sides of the coin. I'm 375 00:16:09,280 --> 00:16:12,360 Speaker 3: just gonna lean on the volume of Judkins and shy 376 00:16:12,400 --> 00:16:15,040 Speaker 3: away from Bucky because I think Kenneth Gainwell is actually 377 00:16:15,080 --> 00:16:17,200 Speaker 3: really damn good at football and is gonna hurt Bucky 378 00:16:17,200 --> 00:16:17,840 Speaker 3: Irving this year. 379 00:16:17,960 --> 00:16:20,240 Speaker 4: Let me see if I can win you over or 380 00:16:20,280 --> 00:16:25,040 Speaker 4: make a one last argument. Browns opened the schedule playing 381 00:16:25,040 --> 00:16:28,680 Speaker 4: at Jacksonville number one run defense last year at Tampa Bay, 382 00:16:29,000 --> 00:16:31,960 Speaker 4: another very strong run defense. The Buccaneers opened the schedule 383 00:16:31,960 --> 00:16:35,120 Speaker 4: against the Cincinnati Bengals, who are the worst run defense 384 00:16:35,200 --> 00:16:36,280 Speaker 4: in the NFL last year. 385 00:16:36,320 --> 00:16:38,520 Speaker 3: But it had been mass Will being proof. We've talked, yes, 386 00:16:39,240 --> 00:16:39,800 Speaker 3: defense is. 387 00:16:39,720 --> 00:16:42,440 Speaker 4: Better, Yes, However, are we still not going to be 388 00:16:42,480 --> 00:16:44,200 Speaker 4: study to play bucket again? You're gonna be right out 389 00:16:44,200 --> 00:16:46,360 Speaker 4: the primer Kenneth game well week one, Baby, fire him 390 00:16:46,440 --> 00:16:48,280 Speaker 4: up as a flex play, and then they play the 391 00:16:48,280 --> 00:16:50,720 Speaker 4: Browns who don't have Miles Scarrett anymore. I'm just saying 392 00:16:50,760 --> 00:16:53,360 Speaker 4: after the first two weeks, it could be rough, stunning 393 00:16:53,400 --> 00:16:57,120 Speaker 4: for Quinshaw Judkins, like against two really strong run defense, 394 00:16:57,160 --> 00:16:59,800 Speaker 4: especially because that's what he's a volume based RB two. 395 00:17:00,160 --> 00:17:03,000 Speaker 4: I think that his production is more replaceable than what 396 00:17:03,040 --> 00:17:06,600 Speaker 4: Bucky can do in his upside case. So that's that's 397 00:17:06,640 --> 00:17:08,480 Speaker 4: one thing I wanted to match with the schedule. 398 00:17:08,119 --> 00:17:10,440 Speaker 3: Like you could be tilting your face off when Kenny 399 00:17:10,480 --> 00:17:13,359 Speaker 3: Gainwell goes double Tuddy in week one or week two 400 00:17:13,840 --> 00:17:16,120 Speaker 3: and Judkins gets two short scores that they get into 401 00:17:16,160 --> 00:17:19,040 Speaker 3: the red zone. 402 00:17:19,119 --> 00:17:20,440 Speaker 1: Let's go to one more head to head at the 403 00:17:20,520 --> 00:17:21,520 Speaker 1: running back position. 404 00:17:21,920 --> 00:17:23,000 Speaker 2: Kind of two interesting names. 405 00:17:23,040 --> 00:17:25,240 Speaker 1: It's fun that they're back to back in ECR RB 406 00:17:25,320 --> 00:17:27,960 Speaker 1: thirty three and RB thirty four. That's Kyle Manungai and 407 00:17:28,080 --> 00:17:32,320 Speaker 1: Blake Korum, both guys who share backfields with other established 408 00:17:32,400 --> 00:17:35,719 Speaker 1: running backs. There's clear contingent upside with both of these 409 00:17:35,760 --> 00:17:38,320 Speaker 1: guys if somebody else in the backfield were to get hurt. 410 00:17:38,600 --> 00:17:41,200 Speaker 1: I wonder how you guys see these two Manungay and 411 00:17:41,280 --> 00:17:44,160 Speaker 1: Korum in terms of if they you know, their backfield 412 00:17:44,160 --> 00:17:46,680 Speaker 1: mates don't get hurt, and what kind of playability they 413 00:17:46,760 --> 00:17:49,240 Speaker 1: have you know, as they are right now because you 414 00:17:49,240 --> 00:17:50,960 Speaker 1: don't you know, injuries can happen, but you don't know 415 00:17:51,000 --> 00:17:52,520 Speaker 1: that they're going too deepra I'll start with you here, 416 00:17:52,600 --> 00:17:53,560 Speaker 1: Manunga or Korum. 417 00:17:54,280 --> 00:17:57,520 Speaker 3: I'm taking Korum and this is I feel like I'm 418 00:17:57,520 --> 00:17:59,760 Speaker 3: buying into the better offense. I feel like I'm buying 419 00:17:59,800 --> 00:18:03,560 Speaker 3: into the team with the better defense, more positive game scripts, 420 00:18:03,600 --> 00:18:07,040 Speaker 3: which should lead to more late game Blake Koram, I'm 421 00:18:07,040 --> 00:18:09,160 Speaker 3: also buying into a player that on a per touch 422 00:18:09,200 --> 00:18:11,639 Speaker 3: basis crush Kyle Manan Guy. And this is no like 423 00:18:11,680 --> 00:18:14,080 Speaker 3: shade against kaman On Guy. I loved him as a prospect. 424 00:18:14,600 --> 00:18:18,440 Speaker 3: He was solid last year, but he wasn't otherworldly special 425 00:18:18,560 --> 00:18:21,680 Speaker 3: like Blake Koram was amongst forty nine qualifying backs last 426 00:18:21,760 --> 00:18:24,680 Speaker 3: year Blake Koram sixth and explosive run rate eleventh and 427 00:18:24,720 --> 00:18:27,480 Speaker 3: miss tackle rate. It was a really freaking good man. 428 00:18:27,520 --> 00:18:29,480 Speaker 3: And if if, if we're to play the game of 429 00:18:29,760 --> 00:18:32,840 Speaker 3: if Swift goes down and Kyron William goes down in 430 00:18:32,880 --> 00:18:35,840 Speaker 3: a vacuum, who would you want? I want Blake Koram. 431 00:18:36,240 --> 00:18:37,159 Speaker 2: Where are they right for you? 432 00:18:37,200 --> 00:18:40,639 Speaker 3: By the way, Debro, I've got Koram at RB thirty five. 433 00:18:40,720 --> 00:18:43,040 Speaker 3: I've got Kylamanan Guy RB thirty nine. 434 00:18:43,640 --> 00:18:46,479 Speaker 2: Okay, so close, but Koram ahead close, but Korum's got 435 00:18:46,520 --> 00:18:48,479 Speaker 2: the edge. Yeah, what do you think? Ericson? 436 00:18:49,480 --> 00:18:52,320 Speaker 4: I agree with everything Deebro said, so I also I 437 00:18:52,359 --> 00:18:54,399 Speaker 4: also have Koram, so I don't actually have a lot 438 00:18:54,520 --> 00:18:56,920 Speaker 4: more to add Korm RB thirty five, khaman On Guy 439 00:18:56,920 --> 00:18:59,400 Speaker 4: at RB thirty six, Because I think that the conversation 440 00:18:59,440 --> 00:19:02,119 Speaker 4: really should be about the contingent upside play because I 441 00:19:02,160 --> 00:19:04,080 Speaker 4: think in most scenario is like, you're not going to 442 00:19:04,119 --> 00:19:06,440 Speaker 4: play either of these guys if you draft them. They're 443 00:19:06,480 --> 00:19:08,879 Speaker 4: gonna be bench running backs that we know have a 444 00:19:08,920 --> 00:19:11,440 Speaker 4: ton and ton of upside, and I'm just not going 445 00:19:11,480 --> 00:19:13,000 Speaker 4: to be trying to play the game. Well, well, maybe 446 00:19:13,040 --> 00:19:15,400 Speaker 4: this guy takes over for Swift or maybe this guy 447 00:19:15,400 --> 00:19:17,160 Speaker 4: takes over for Kyro, Like, I'm just not gonna play 448 00:19:17,160 --> 00:19:19,000 Speaker 4: that game. It's a matter of like, hey, when one 449 00:19:19,040 --> 00:19:20,639 Speaker 4: of these guys gets a chance, who am I going 450 00:19:20,680 --> 00:19:22,960 Speaker 4: to be ranking top five? It's probably gonna play Corn 451 00:19:23,200 --> 00:19:25,200 Speaker 4: and not Kyle Manunga. Not to say that Manungi still 452 00:19:25,200 --> 00:19:27,840 Speaker 4: can't be useful, but I think that you really should 453 00:19:27,840 --> 00:19:30,440 Speaker 4: be looking at as especially because they're just they're bench 454 00:19:30,480 --> 00:19:33,520 Speaker 4: players going outside the top thirty running backs again in 455 00:19:33,560 --> 00:19:35,280 Speaker 4: a pinch, And I didn't think about it too, but 456 00:19:35,359 --> 00:19:36,800 Speaker 4: de Row brings up a good point about like the 457 00:19:36,840 --> 00:19:39,560 Speaker 4: positive game scripts, right, because that's where you get these 458 00:19:39,560 --> 00:19:42,439 Speaker 4: secondary running backs. They get a little bit more run. 459 00:19:42,760 --> 00:19:44,600 Speaker 4: That's where kuorm if the Rams are killing some other 460 00:19:44,640 --> 00:19:47,119 Speaker 4: team oras the Bears like they're probably gonna be more 461 00:19:47,119 --> 00:19:49,000 Speaker 4: in back and forth games because I don't think their 462 00:19:49,000 --> 00:19:51,280 Speaker 4: defense is nearly as good as the Rams defense is, 463 00:19:51,359 --> 00:19:53,720 Speaker 4: so for me, it's also Blake korm. 464 00:19:53,680 --> 00:19:56,280 Speaker 1: Yeah, the Rams are gonna be favorites in every game 465 00:19:56,320 --> 00:19:58,960 Speaker 1: they play this season, outside of maybe at Seattle. Like 466 00:19:59,280 --> 00:20:02,040 Speaker 1: that's a lot of opportunity for Blake Koram. Let me 467 00:20:02,040 --> 00:20:03,760 Speaker 1: just throw another name at you, guys, because he wasn't 468 00:20:03,800 --> 00:20:06,399 Speaker 1: near them in ECR, but he is in our staff ranking, 469 00:20:06,480 --> 00:20:09,200 Speaker 1: so I'm curious you guys have him closer. Jonathan Brooks 470 00:20:09,280 --> 00:20:11,560 Speaker 1: is right behind these two, and the staff rankings again 471 00:20:11,600 --> 00:20:13,480 Speaker 1: not expert consensus, just our fantas bros. 472 00:20:13,560 --> 00:20:14,000 Speaker 2: Rankings. 473 00:20:14,600 --> 00:20:17,000 Speaker 1: What do you think about Brooks versus these? I'll say 474 00:20:17,080 --> 00:20:18,880 Speaker 1: verus korum since he's ahead for both of you, Brooks 475 00:20:18,920 --> 00:20:19,320 Speaker 1: or Koram. 476 00:20:19,680 --> 00:20:22,240 Speaker 3: I've got Brooks over both of them. Okay, but even 477 00:20:22,480 --> 00:20:24,480 Speaker 3: I'm not even scared about it at all. I think 478 00:20:24,480 --> 00:20:26,240 Speaker 3: Brooks is gonna break out. I think it's gonna be 479 00:20:26,240 --> 00:20:29,600 Speaker 3: the lead running back. I don't care. I'm all in 480 00:20:29,640 --> 00:20:32,160 Speaker 3: on Jonathan Brooks this year. Ericat you for not trading 481 00:20:32,200 --> 00:20:33,080 Speaker 3: him to me warm. 482 00:20:34,080 --> 00:20:36,840 Speaker 1: Sorry about that, Eric, So how do you feel about 483 00:20:37,320 --> 00:20:39,000 Speaker 1: you know, Brooks versus these two. 484 00:20:39,440 --> 00:20:41,480 Speaker 4: Of the three names you mentioned, there was only one 485 00:20:41,520 --> 00:20:44,000 Speaker 4: of them that was in my must have targets and 486 00:20:44,040 --> 00:20:46,439 Speaker 4: his name is Jonathan Brooks, So that's the guy that 487 00:20:46,760 --> 00:20:50,760 Speaker 4: got some Look understand that Brooks probably has way more 488 00:20:51,040 --> 00:20:54,159 Speaker 4: risk and totally chance to just completely dut out, whereas 489 00:20:54,160 --> 00:20:56,639 Speaker 4: these guys you see the path are gonna have value 490 00:20:56,680 --> 00:20:59,560 Speaker 4: all year long. But I mean, Brooks is the one 491 00:20:59,560 --> 00:21:01,680 Speaker 4: guy that does in necessarily need injury to take overs backfield. 492 00:21:01,920 --> 00:21:03,560 Speaker 4: I think that we can all agree with that, and 493 00:21:03,640 --> 00:21:06,879 Speaker 4: that matters so significantly, especially when you're not drafting Brooks 494 00:21:06,880 --> 00:21:09,159 Speaker 4: as a starter still, like he's still going outside the 495 00:21:09,160 --> 00:21:11,440 Speaker 4: top thirty running backs. He's just a late run running 496 00:21:11,480 --> 00:21:13,800 Speaker 4: back with a ton of upside that I think when 497 00:21:13,840 --> 00:21:16,480 Speaker 4: push comes to shove, you're just gonna want to make 498 00:21:16,480 --> 00:21:17,560 Speaker 4: sure you get them on your team. 499 00:21:18,000 --> 00:21:20,440 Speaker 1: If you told me, if you told me one of 500 00:21:20,480 --> 00:21:22,879 Speaker 1: these guys finished inside the top eighteen ah a position, 501 00:21:24,280 --> 00:21:25,800 Speaker 1: the one who has the best chance of that happening 502 00:21:25,840 --> 00:21:28,399 Speaker 1: without an injury is Brooks. Like that's exactly exactly right 503 00:21:28,440 --> 00:21:30,720 Speaker 1: what you just said, Eric Sance, for sure, So yeah, 504 00:21:30,760 --> 00:21:31,359 Speaker 1: I love Brooks too. 505 00:21:31,400 --> 00:21:31,760 Speaker 2: That's fine. 506 00:21:31,960 --> 00:21:33,240 Speaker 1: I actually kind of like all three of these guys. 507 00:21:33,359 --> 00:21:35,240 Speaker 1: I'm going to want to have them on my benches. 508 00:21:35,840 --> 00:21:38,440 Speaker 1: With the contingent upside with these two, and then built 509 00:21:38,440 --> 00:21:39,280 Speaker 1: in upside for Brooks. 510 00:21:39,320 --> 00:21:41,080 Speaker 2: So I want to let everybody know. 511 00:21:41,080 --> 00:21:43,440 Speaker 1: That hard draft decisions are a lot easier when you've 512 00:21:43,480 --> 00:21:46,120 Speaker 1: already practiced them. With the draft simulator, you can run 513 00:21:46,160 --> 00:21:49,639 Speaker 1: realistic mock drafts in minutes, compare different roster builds, and 514 00:21:49,680 --> 00:21:52,280 Speaker 1: see what happens when you choose one similarly ranked player 515 00:21:52,359 --> 00:21:55,359 Speaker 1: over another. So before you're on the clock deciding between 516 00:21:55,400 --> 00:21:59,240 Speaker 1: two players with almost identical ECRs, go to fantasypros dot com, 517 00:21:59,240 --> 00:22:02,359 Speaker 1: slash mock or download the Fantasy Pros app, use the 518 00:22:02,440 --> 00:22:05,480 Speaker 1: draft simulator and build a draft plan you can trust 519 00:22:05,920 --> 00:22:07,879 Speaker 1: a right, guys, Let's get to the wide receivers, always 520 00:22:07,920 --> 00:22:11,520 Speaker 1: a really fun position to talk about debates during draft season. 521 00:22:11,560 --> 00:22:14,159 Speaker 1: This time in the summer, we've got some names spread 522 00:22:14,160 --> 00:22:17,240 Speaker 1: out throughout the rounds. We'll start closer to the top here, 523 00:22:17,240 --> 00:22:19,400 Speaker 1: not a first round names, but guys who are ranked 524 00:22:19,480 --> 00:22:22,320 Speaker 1: just outside the top twelve of the position. That's Teteroa 525 00:22:22,440 --> 00:22:25,800 Speaker 1: McMillan at wide receiver thirteen and DeVante Smith at wide 526 00:22:25,840 --> 00:22:29,720 Speaker 1: receiver fifteen. Obviously, Smith has the interesting factor of aj 527 00:22:29,840 --> 00:22:31,120 Speaker 1: Brown no longer being there. 528 00:22:31,480 --> 00:22:32,879 Speaker 2: I know Ericsson's going to be all over that. 529 00:22:32,960 --> 00:22:35,800 Speaker 1: Ttero McMillan, a player that Deebro and I both really 530 00:22:35,880 --> 00:22:38,000 Speaker 1: really liked wing into last season and now steps into 531 00:22:38,040 --> 00:22:39,480 Speaker 1: year two. So I'm curious to see where you guys 532 00:22:39,480 --> 00:22:41,320 Speaker 1: go in this direction. Ericson, I'll start with you on 533 00:22:41,320 --> 00:22:42,639 Speaker 1: this one. McMillan or Smith. 534 00:22:43,040 --> 00:22:45,240 Speaker 4: I like both guys at their prices that they have 535 00:22:45,320 --> 00:22:47,880 Speaker 4: at I have, but I have t Mac high wide 536 00:22:47,920 --> 00:22:51,960 Speaker 4: receiver thirteen versus Devanta Smith at wide receiver fifteen. I 537 00:22:52,000 --> 00:22:53,879 Speaker 4: think that when I'm looking at who's going to be 538 00:22:53,920 --> 00:22:58,880 Speaker 4: a number one true alpha target machine, I slightly lean 539 00:22:58,920 --> 00:23:02,960 Speaker 4: towards Team Mac, just based on the growth projection that 540 00:23:03,000 --> 00:23:04,880 Speaker 4: I had for him entering his second season. I mean, 541 00:23:04,920 --> 00:23:06,800 Speaker 4: offensive Rookie of the Year last year, and I know 542 00:23:06,880 --> 00:23:09,480 Speaker 4: that it wasn't It was more due to the lack 543 00:23:09,640 --> 00:23:12,920 Speaker 4: of the competition around him, and he kind of backdoored 544 00:23:12,960 --> 00:23:14,679 Speaker 4: his way into it. But the fact that he was 545 00:23:14,720 --> 00:23:18,240 Speaker 4: able to be really consistent throughout a seventeen or eighteen 546 00:23:18,280 --> 00:23:21,680 Speaker 4: game season where the Panthers made the playoffs, that's where 547 00:23:21,880 --> 00:23:25,199 Speaker 4: I lean on McMillan. I think when they built the 548 00:23:25,240 --> 00:23:28,520 Speaker 4: passing game out of him last year, any game where 549 00:23:28,520 --> 00:23:31,560 Speaker 4: he out double digit targets, averaged eighteen points per game 550 00:23:31,600 --> 00:23:33,720 Speaker 4: in those four contents. Is so, I think that the 551 00:23:33,720 --> 00:23:35,280 Speaker 4: Panthers are going to throw a little bit more this year. 552 00:23:35,280 --> 00:23:37,720 Speaker 4: I think by the moves that they're telling us that 553 00:23:37,920 --> 00:23:39,480 Speaker 4: they got to figure out what they have with Bryce Young. 554 00:23:40,040 --> 00:23:41,919 Speaker 4: They got to know if can this guy be a 555 00:23:42,080 --> 00:23:44,159 Speaker 4: player that we can win because of and not just 556 00:23:44,200 --> 00:23:46,280 Speaker 4: win with. I think I know where I settle on that, 557 00:23:46,400 --> 00:23:47,760 Speaker 4: but I think the Panthers have to do the due 558 00:23:47,760 --> 00:23:49,600 Speaker 4: diligence of being like, hey, we got to let him 559 00:23:49,640 --> 00:23:52,080 Speaker 4: drop back and throw some more. We have weapons around him. 560 00:23:52,320 --> 00:23:55,880 Speaker 4: I'm not concerned that the Jalen Cocher emergence is going 561 00:23:55,880 --> 00:23:57,960 Speaker 4: to hurt team act because I think that is in 562 00:23:58,080 --> 00:24:00,480 Speaker 4: essence of I don't think t X tar are going 563 00:24:00,560 --> 00:24:01,960 Speaker 4: to be going away. I think it's just gonna be 564 00:24:02,000 --> 00:24:03,679 Speaker 4: those of the top two guys that get fed in 565 00:24:03,720 --> 00:24:05,920 Speaker 4: the offense. I don't think there's a title of consequence there. 566 00:24:06,040 --> 00:24:07,639 Speaker 4: I think Chris Brazl is there to just kind of 567 00:24:07,680 --> 00:24:10,760 Speaker 4: make things open up underneath for a player like Tea 568 00:24:10,880 --> 00:24:13,920 Speaker 4: Mac So for me again, seventy catch one thousand yards, 569 00:24:13,960 --> 00:24:17,320 Speaker 4: seven touchdowns in his first year. I mean that's kind 570 00:24:17,320 --> 00:24:19,200 Speaker 4: of what Devanta Smith has been doing for the most 571 00:24:19,240 --> 00:24:21,840 Speaker 4: of his career. Round that type of range, a little 572 00:24:21,880 --> 00:24:25,480 Speaker 4: over a thousand yards five to seven seven eight, four touchdowns. 573 00:24:25,880 --> 00:24:28,840 Speaker 4: I get that there's a growth progression with DeVante Smith, 574 00:24:29,440 --> 00:24:32,960 Speaker 4: but he still has, in my opinion, more target competition 575 00:24:33,200 --> 00:24:36,800 Speaker 4: between Dallas Goddard, who's Jalen Hurt's favorite target, especially underneath. 576 00:24:37,160 --> 00:24:40,480 Speaker 4: And I don't want to totally disregard McKayle Lemon. He's 577 00:24:40,480 --> 00:24:43,600 Speaker 4: a first round pick. T Mac I think has much 578 00:24:44,000 --> 00:24:46,720 Speaker 4: less competition in his receiver room, and I also just 579 00:24:46,720 --> 00:24:49,000 Speaker 4: think he's a superstar. I think both guys are really, 580 00:24:49,040 --> 00:24:51,159 Speaker 4: really good. But if I'm betting on who's going to 581 00:24:51,200 --> 00:24:53,800 Speaker 4: be a number one alpha Dog, it's going to be 582 00:24:53,840 --> 00:24:54,399 Speaker 4: Team Maac for me. 583 00:24:55,119 --> 00:24:56,440 Speaker 2: Yeah, but both players are good. 584 00:24:56,480 --> 00:24:58,600 Speaker 1: I don't think any of us are going to discree 585 00:24:58,640 --> 00:25:00,200 Speaker 1: at that point obviously, So it's going to come down 586 00:25:00,240 --> 00:25:03,639 Speaker 1: to things like situation, role, quarterback play, deepra Where do 587 00:25:03,680 --> 00:25:04,840 Speaker 1: you come down on it between the two? 588 00:25:05,680 --> 00:25:07,280 Speaker 3: Yeah, I want to be very clear, this is not 589 00:25:07,520 --> 00:25:10,640 Speaker 3: a shade at Tterrorro Macvillan's talent at all. Freaking love 590 00:25:10,680 --> 00:25:12,359 Speaker 3: the kid. I mean, like a pounded the table for 591 00:25:12,440 --> 00:25:14,280 Speaker 3: him when everybody said he was too big, too slow, 592 00:25:14,400 --> 00:25:16,480 Speaker 3: didn't watch film, all that kind of stuff. He didn't 593 00:25:16,480 --> 00:25:18,760 Speaker 3: deserve to be the wide receiver one over that of 594 00:25:18,760 --> 00:25:21,320 Speaker 3: that class. And I just laughed my butt off the 595 00:25:21,320 --> 00:25:23,920 Speaker 3: whole time that people were making that conversation. This comes 596 00:25:23,920 --> 00:25:27,880 Speaker 3: down to, like I think we have passing volume concerns 597 00:25:27,880 --> 00:25:31,160 Speaker 3: for both of these offenses. We know what Philly wants 598 00:25:31,160 --> 00:25:33,600 Speaker 3: to do. They want to run the ball. This comes 599 00:25:33,640 --> 00:25:36,199 Speaker 3: down to, I want to bet on the better quarterback, 600 00:25:37,440 --> 00:25:39,639 Speaker 3: and that's Jalen Hurt's, hands down. I don't think anybody's 601 00:25:39,640 --> 00:25:43,359 Speaker 3: gonna debate that either. And I have big concerns about 602 00:25:43,359 --> 00:25:47,080 Speaker 3: the passing volume for Carolina, even though like because of 603 00:25:47,119 --> 00:25:50,320 Speaker 3: the quarterback play, even though like you could say the 604 00:25:50,359 --> 00:25:53,600 Speaker 3: same thing for Philly again, Jalen Hursts is hands down 605 00:25:53,640 --> 00:25:56,040 Speaker 3: a better quarterback than Bryce Shung. And I'm just gonna 606 00:25:56,040 --> 00:25:58,680 Speaker 3: throw all these numbers out of y'all, guys. Like weeks 607 00:25:58,720 --> 00:26:02,800 Speaker 3: three through eighteen with Terrorow, Bryce Schunk surpassed thirty five 608 00:26:02,800 --> 00:26:07,000 Speaker 3: passing attempts only once. He had only two games with 609 00:26:07,080 --> 00:26:10,080 Speaker 3: over two hundred and twenty five passing yards. He only 610 00:26:10,080 --> 00:26:15,080 Speaker 3: surpassed two hundred passing yards in three games. So I 611 00:26:15,119 --> 00:26:18,520 Speaker 3: think Carolina this comes down to they want to win ballgames, 612 00:26:18,600 --> 00:26:21,920 Speaker 3: and they went to a run first offense last year. Again, 613 00:26:21,960 --> 00:26:24,240 Speaker 3: going back to Jonathan Brooks, I think they can lean 614 00:26:24,320 --> 00:26:26,199 Speaker 3: on Brooks this year, leon on Brooks and Hubbard if 615 00:26:26,200 --> 00:26:28,000 Speaker 3: you want to throw him into that mix and they're 616 00:26:28,000 --> 00:26:30,440 Speaker 3: going to try to grind out wins again. You could 617 00:26:30,440 --> 00:26:33,320 Speaker 3: say the same thing for the Eagles. But I feel 618 00:26:33,359 --> 00:26:37,160 Speaker 3: better about Devonte Smith and his ability to carve out 619 00:26:37,600 --> 00:26:41,679 Speaker 3: volume because Tedoro McMillen is good. Like Erickson talked about, 620 00:26:41,720 --> 00:26:44,520 Speaker 3: like even last year, we saw this be a problem too. 621 00:26:44,600 --> 00:26:47,080 Speaker 3: It's like after let me see, let me go back 622 00:26:47,119 --> 00:26:50,640 Speaker 3: here after week nine or early since week nine. Last year, 623 00:26:50,760 --> 00:26:53,640 Speaker 3: he did only have double digit targets in two games 624 00:26:54,320 --> 00:26:58,360 Speaker 3: in the small snippet and it is incredibly small. Over 625 00:26:58,400 --> 00:27:01,720 Speaker 3: the last two years without aj Round in the freaking offense, 626 00:27:02,320 --> 00:27:05,080 Speaker 3: DeVonta Smith has earned a thirty two point nine percent 627 00:27:05,119 --> 00:27:07,359 Speaker 3: target chair and had two point sixty five yards per 628 00:27:07,480 --> 00:27:10,320 Speaker 3: route run. He has been in alpha and he can 629 00:27:10,359 --> 00:27:12,159 Speaker 3: be this year of a Phillies. So this comes down to, 630 00:27:12,240 --> 00:27:15,320 Speaker 3: like two run first offenses, which quarterback do I like better? 631 00:27:15,840 --> 00:27:18,920 Speaker 3: And I have a better feel on can they support 632 00:27:19,200 --> 00:27:22,280 Speaker 3: or raise up a wide receiver and honestly the skill 633 00:27:22,320 --> 00:27:24,240 Speaker 3: set and the target earning potential. I'm going with DeVonta 634 00:27:24,280 --> 00:27:27,320 Speaker 3: Smith in this one, and I'm more worried about tederomy Millon. 635 00:27:27,840 --> 00:27:30,600 Speaker 3: I think it also is something to note, like, I 636 00:27:30,600 --> 00:27:32,800 Speaker 3: don't think jagalen Cocher is coming for the wide receiver 637 00:27:32,880 --> 00:27:36,040 Speaker 3: one chair, But in the sample we're talking about in 638 00:27:36,119 --> 00:27:39,040 Speaker 3: the rookie season for Tederomy Millon, Jalen Cocher was not 639 00:27:39,080 --> 00:27:41,359 Speaker 3: even a full time player until Week eight last year. 640 00:27:41,520 --> 00:27:43,560 Speaker 3: So that also has to get thrown into the mix 641 00:27:43,560 --> 00:27:46,760 Speaker 3: of when we talk about target share and the volume 642 00:27:46,760 --> 00:27:48,800 Speaker 3: in this passing attack and what Ted did and what 643 00:27:48,880 --> 00:27:52,080 Speaker 3: he didn't do last year, the Jalen Cocher as the 644 00:27:52,080 --> 00:27:55,400 Speaker 3: clear wide receiver two in this passing attack wasn't even 645 00:27:55,400 --> 00:27:57,200 Speaker 3: a factor for half the season last year. 646 00:27:58,720 --> 00:27:59,000 Speaker 2: Yeah. 647 00:27:59,400 --> 00:28:02,040 Speaker 1: Sorry, did you say deeper where you have McMillan ranked, Actually, 648 00:28:02,080 --> 00:28:03,680 Speaker 1: because it sounds like it's. 649 00:28:03,560 --> 00:28:05,439 Speaker 3: More I have a little huge divide. 650 00:28:05,520 --> 00:28:07,320 Speaker 1: I was gonna say you're more down on him than 651 00:28:07,359 --> 00:28:11,280 Speaker 1: it is that you're particularly up on Smith, right, Yeah, Well, 652 00:28:11,280 --> 00:28:13,320 Speaker 1: I mean I mean relative to consensus ranking. 653 00:28:13,680 --> 00:28:18,760 Speaker 3: So because Smith is where in consensus wide receiver fifty fifteen, Yes, 654 00:28:19,000 --> 00:28:21,879 Speaker 3: I have him a smidg above that, just splitting hairs 655 00:28:21,880 --> 00:28:24,119 Speaker 3: between other guys in that range. Like I have Smith 656 00:28:24,160 --> 00:28:27,520 Speaker 3: a wide receiver eleven, again not very far off, but 657 00:28:27,560 --> 00:28:30,840 Speaker 3: I have Teed down at wide receiver twenty five. And 658 00:28:31,119 --> 00:28:34,520 Speaker 3: this is just more because I am worried about Bryce Shung. 659 00:28:35,160 --> 00:28:37,880 Speaker 3: And let's also like, let's let's project this out if 660 00:28:37,920 --> 00:28:41,040 Speaker 3: Bryce Shung is not good. Guys, do we think that 661 00:28:41,160 --> 00:28:43,520 Speaker 3: Kenny Pickett is rolling in to save the day for 662 00:28:43,600 --> 00:28:44,560 Speaker 3: this passing attack? 663 00:28:44,880 --> 00:28:45,800 Speaker 2: I definitely do not. 664 00:28:46,520 --> 00:28:49,840 Speaker 1: Hell no, Eric said anything else to add before we 665 00:28:49,960 --> 00:28:50,680 Speaker 1: move off these two. 666 00:28:51,360 --> 00:28:54,440 Speaker 4: I think that with tam Mac it's a matter of 667 00:28:54,480 --> 00:28:56,280 Speaker 4: I think he can be more efficient this year, and 668 00:28:56,320 --> 00:28:58,000 Speaker 4: I think that getting Jan Kocher is going to help 669 00:28:58,040 --> 00:29:00,239 Speaker 4: that because when you look at his rookie year, more 670 00:29:00,280 --> 00:29:02,880 Speaker 4: of it is counting stats, right over a thousand yards, 671 00:29:02,920 --> 00:29:05,640 Speaker 4: over one hundred and twenty targets, seventy catches. But his 672 00:29:05,720 --> 00:29:08,080 Speaker 4: efficiency didn't really scream out again, and I didn't even 673 00:29:08,080 --> 00:29:09,840 Speaker 4: really write anything about his yards per out run in 674 00:29:09,840 --> 00:29:12,120 Speaker 4: the Black Book this year because there was really nothing 675 00:29:12,160 --> 00:29:14,360 Speaker 4: that stood out about it. It was a matter of Okay, 676 00:29:14,360 --> 00:29:16,680 Speaker 4: he was just really consistent, offered a steady floor, didn't 677 00:29:16,680 --> 00:29:19,600 Speaker 4: have those spiked games. I think with Jalen Coker in 678 00:29:19,640 --> 00:29:21,760 Speaker 4: the fold, yeah, it doesn't mean he's going to get 679 00:29:21,800 --> 00:29:24,080 Speaker 4: more targets, but it means he's going to get less 680 00:29:24,360 --> 00:29:26,880 Speaker 4: coverage towards him. He's going to operate, I think be 681 00:29:26,880 --> 00:29:29,280 Speaker 4: more efficient, especially with Brazle too. So I think that 682 00:29:29,320 --> 00:29:31,920 Speaker 4: this Panthers passing game is going to get more opportunities 683 00:29:32,080 --> 00:29:33,880 Speaker 4: this year, which is where I just like, I just 684 00:29:33,920 --> 00:29:36,640 Speaker 4: disagree with you, but say. 685 00:29:37,400 --> 00:29:40,360 Speaker 3: So Eric ericson where do you have because this is 686 00:29:40,360 --> 00:29:42,400 Speaker 3: another concern than I have for tet because if you 687 00:29:42,440 --> 00:29:45,640 Speaker 3: look at like the table two seasons for him, weeks 688 00:29:45,680 --> 00:29:48,920 Speaker 3: one through ten, he had two receiving touchdowns and they 689 00:29:48,960 --> 00:29:51,840 Speaker 3: both came in the same game. Now after that, so 690 00:29:51,960 --> 00:29:58,600 Speaker 3: weeks eleven through say eighteen, he scored for five touchdowns. Dude, 691 00:29:58,600 --> 00:30:01,720 Speaker 3: that is a tail of two seasons. So which how 692 00:30:01,720 --> 00:30:04,160 Speaker 3: do you project his touchdown equity in this offense? Like 693 00:30:04,760 --> 00:30:06,200 Speaker 3: is it what we saw at the beginning of the 694 00:30:06,200 --> 00:30:08,560 Speaker 3: season or is it what we saw at the back end? 695 00:30:08,600 --> 00:30:11,120 Speaker 3: Because it's like, if you look at the beginning of 696 00:30:11,160 --> 00:30:12,880 Speaker 3: the season, it's like, oh, crap, he might be like 697 00:30:12,920 --> 00:30:17,520 Speaker 3: a five to six touchdown guy if everything works out. Okay, 698 00:30:17,920 --> 00:30:19,320 Speaker 3: if you look at the back end of the season, 699 00:30:19,320 --> 00:30:21,160 Speaker 3: it's like, oh, Ted might score like ten to twelve 700 00:30:21,240 --> 00:30:24,680 Speaker 3: touchdowns and that could massively swing where he finishes this year. 701 00:30:24,920 --> 00:30:27,800 Speaker 4: Yeah. I think that the touchdowns are tough to try 702 00:30:27,800 --> 00:30:29,640 Speaker 4: to parse between because it's going to be tending on 703 00:30:29,800 --> 00:30:32,479 Speaker 4: when Caroline is playing a bad matchup where Bryce Young 704 00:30:32,560 --> 00:30:35,080 Speaker 4: can throw the ball a little bit more. However, with me, 705 00:30:35,160 --> 00:30:37,200 Speaker 4: it's the floor that he offered last year as a 706 00:30:37,240 --> 00:30:39,320 Speaker 4: rookie again, thrown in the fire the day once like hey, 707 00:30:39,360 --> 00:30:41,600 Speaker 4: you gotta be our alpha, do it, and I thought 708 00:30:41,600 --> 00:30:43,840 Speaker 4: he delivered. I think that's really impressive and shouldn't go 709 00:30:44,000 --> 00:30:46,280 Speaker 4: unnoticed now entering year two, where we see guys take 710 00:30:46,360 --> 00:30:49,040 Speaker 4: massive leaps. Getting his wide receiver fifteen last year as 711 00:30:49,080 --> 00:30:51,480 Speaker 4: a rookie attached to Bryce Hung in a run first offense, 712 00:30:51,720 --> 00:30:54,440 Speaker 4: it's pretty pretty good. So I think that he's justeduld 713 00:30:54,440 --> 00:30:55,160 Speaker 4: continue to grow. 714 00:30:56,200 --> 00:30:58,440 Speaker 1: Yeah, let's go to what I think is another fun one, 715 00:30:58,680 --> 00:31:02,800 Speaker 1: Lad mccackey wide receiver nineteen versus Emecca Agbuka Wide receiver 716 00:31:02,880 --> 00:31:05,280 Speaker 1: twenty one a couple of young guys, a couple of 717 00:31:05,280 --> 00:31:07,880 Speaker 1: guys with new play callers this year and their offenses, 718 00:31:08,160 --> 00:31:11,240 Speaker 1: talented guys too who have really flashed at times, players 719 00:31:11,240 --> 00:31:13,440 Speaker 1: that I both really like it. I'll just say even 720 00:31:13,480 --> 00:31:16,320 Speaker 1: at this cost, I'm very in on both Lad and Agbuka, 721 00:31:16,840 --> 00:31:18,680 Speaker 1: but I had to head a little tougher. So Dee 722 00:31:18,680 --> 00:31:20,920 Speaker 1: brough start with you on this one. Lad mcconckie and 723 00:31:20,960 --> 00:31:21,600 Speaker 1: mecha a Buka. 724 00:31:22,440 --> 00:31:26,280 Speaker 3: This is easy Agbuka for me, like, I don't have 725 00:31:26,360 --> 00:31:32,040 Speaker 3: this particularly close. I think we've already seen Agbuka right now. 726 00:31:32,080 --> 00:31:34,320 Speaker 3: He's wide receiver twenty one. We've already seen him crush 727 00:31:34,360 --> 00:31:36,920 Speaker 3: that like last year before the hamstring injury, weeks one 728 00:31:36,920 --> 00:31:39,920 Speaker 3: through five he was the wide receiver three in fantasy 729 00:31:39,920 --> 00:31:41,760 Speaker 3: points per game. And again going back to like a 730 00:31:41,760 --> 00:31:45,600 Speaker 3: previous Bucks conversation, we already had, what does Chris Godwin 731 00:31:45,680 --> 00:31:48,680 Speaker 3: have left in the tank? Ted Hurst? I really love him, 732 00:31:48,680 --> 00:31:50,920 Speaker 3: but is he going to hit through the ground running 733 00:31:50,960 --> 00:31:53,360 Speaker 3: this year? Jimimcmillan. Can he stay healthy? He's not a 734 00:31:53,400 --> 00:31:55,880 Speaker 3: high end target shair earner. We know Kate Otton is 735 00:31:55,920 --> 00:31:59,080 Speaker 3: not that guy, So Igbuka, I just think Delane is 736 00:31:59,200 --> 00:32:02,360 Speaker 3: absolutely clear for him to be a wide receiver one 737 00:32:03,000 --> 00:32:05,200 Speaker 3: this year in fantasy at least had the upside to 738 00:32:05,240 --> 00:32:07,480 Speaker 3: do that. And we've already seen him perform like that. 739 00:32:07,720 --> 00:32:11,000 Speaker 3: And then I know everybody's so concerned about the falloff, 740 00:32:11,040 --> 00:32:12,640 Speaker 3: and ericson you made this point and I thought it 741 00:32:12,640 --> 00:32:15,520 Speaker 3: was incredibly sage when you said this before in previous shows. 742 00:32:15,640 --> 00:32:18,120 Speaker 3: Is that if you flipped a Buka's season on its 743 00:32:18,160 --> 00:32:22,239 Speaker 3: head and he's finished the season like he started it, 744 00:32:22,520 --> 00:32:26,400 Speaker 3: the conversation around at Buka would be absolutely astronomically different. 745 00:32:26,800 --> 00:32:30,200 Speaker 3: And I can't agree with that more. And when even 746 00:32:30,200 --> 00:32:33,280 Speaker 3: when we saw a Buka struggle, he still was earning 747 00:32:33,560 --> 00:32:36,360 Speaker 3: week six through eighteen a twenty three point one percent 748 00:32:36,400 --> 00:32:39,720 Speaker 3: target chare. He had almost a twenty nine percent first 749 00:32:39,800 --> 00:32:43,760 Speaker 3: read share in that offense. Those are both metrics that 750 00:32:43,840 --> 00:32:48,040 Speaker 3: even Lad mcconki at his best, has never in the 751 00:32:48,200 --> 00:32:52,800 Speaker 3: NFL earned market share marks that high. He has been 752 00:32:52,840 --> 00:32:55,760 Speaker 3: consistent like a twenty two percent target chair guy, a 753 00:32:55,800 --> 00:32:59,160 Speaker 3: guy that's hovered in like the blow to mid twenties 754 00:32:59,280 --> 00:33:03,040 Speaker 3: in first LA share. Could he take another leap this year? 755 00:33:03,680 --> 00:33:06,440 Speaker 3: Sure that could happen. The other thing that we don't 756 00:33:06,480 --> 00:33:08,720 Speaker 3: know about Laden McConkey is for a player that was 757 00:33:08,800 --> 00:33:11,600 Speaker 3: last year like a sixty sixty five percent slot player. 758 00:33:12,160 --> 00:33:15,320 Speaker 3: If the Chargers run more twelve and thirteen personnel this year, 759 00:33:16,120 --> 00:33:18,080 Speaker 3: is he on the field when they go too wide? 760 00:33:18,600 --> 00:33:20,880 Speaker 3: Or is it q J and Trey Harris? And that 761 00:33:20,960 --> 00:33:24,160 Speaker 3: might sound blasphemous and crazy to people, but if he's 762 00:33:24,200 --> 00:33:27,160 Speaker 3: the freaking starting slot rode receiver and they don't run 763 00:33:27,200 --> 00:33:30,400 Speaker 3: him in two wide, he's going to be capped as 764 00:33:30,400 --> 00:33:32,880 Speaker 3: far as his route chear goes. And I don't think 765 00:33:32,920 --> 00:33:35,560 Speaker 3: any of us know definitively if he's going to be 766 00:33:35,680 --> 00:33:38,040 Speaker 3: that wide receiver in two wide receiver sets, and if 767 00:33:38,040 --> 00:33:40,640 Speaker 3: he's not, it's gonna hurt him. And that's not even 768 00:33:40,680 --> 00:33:43,560 Speaker 3: talking about which version of Mike nc Daniel do we get? 769 00:33:43,920 --> 00:33:45,800 Speaker 3: Is he run first or is he pass heavy? Because 770 00:33:45,840 --> 00:33:47,920 Speaker 3: in four years of Miami, you got two years of 771 00:33:47,960 --> 00:33:50,080 Speaker 3: sample on both sides of the coin. I don't know 772 00:33:50,080 --> 00:33:51,320 Speaker 3: what to do with that damn offense. 773 00:33:52,400 --> 00:33:54,560 Speaker 1: I know what I want to do with that damn offense. 774 00:33:54,840 --> 00:33:57,200 Speaker 1: Just invest in it. I just want to have as 775 00:33:57,240 --> 00:33:59,040 Speaker 1: much as But. 776 00:33:58,960 --> 00:34:01,080 Speaker 3: It's hurt, hurt, and it's a'm mariy On Hampton and 777 00:34:01,120 --> 00:34:04,000 Speaker 3: it's a free Trey Harrison QJ that I want to 778 00:34:04,040 --> 00:34:06,520 Speaker 3: invest in. It's not Lad McConkie as a top twenty 779 00:34:06,520 --> 00:34:09,160 Speaker 3: wide receiver where you're paying to invest in it. 780 00:34:10,000 --> 00:34:11,080 Speaker 2: I think it's so. 781 00:34:11,160 --> 00:34:12,719 Speaker 1: I'm not surprised that you have at BUKA higher. I 782 00:34:12,760 --> 00:34:15,279 Speaker 1: think that's totally justifiable. I am surprised that you don't 783 00:34:15,280 --> 00:34:18,919 Speaker 1: think it's close. I really like, again, this offense in general. 784 00:34:18,920 --> 00:34:20,240 Speaker 2: I want to invest in as much as possible. 785 00:34:20,360 --> 00:34:23,279 Speaker 1: I just I think Mike McDaniel is too smart and 786 00:34:23,320 --> 00:34:25,719 Speaker 1: too creative of a guy to say, oh, our best 787 00:34:25,760 --> 00:34:27,920 Speaker 1: receiver happens to have played in the slot mostly in 788 00:34:27,920 --> 00:34:29,799 Speaker 1: the last couple of years. Well, I guess we're just 789 00:34:29,840 --> 00:34:31,239 Speaker 1: not going to put him on the field now. Lad 790 00:34:31,320 --> 00:34:34,560 Speaker 1: mccacky's really fast. Mike McDaniel loves speed. Lad mccacky's their 791 00:34:34,560 --> 00:34:37,640 Speaker 1: best receiver. I mean, I think we I certainly think 792 00:34:37,680 --> 00:34:41,080 Speaker 1: that's pretty obvious. He's shown an upside before in with 793 00:34:41,120 --> 00:34:43,640 Speaker 1: a much worse play caller. He was wide receiver twelve 794 00:34:43,680 --> 00:34:46,000 Speaker 1: and half VPR scoring as a rookie. Now he gets 795 00:34:46,040 --> 00:34:49,960 Speaker 1: Mike McDaniel hopefully more healthy offensive line this season. You know, 796 00:34:50,120 --> 00:34:52,359 Speaker 1: I'm really excited for Herbert in this offense. I think 797 00:34:52,440 --> 00:34:55,160 Speaker 1: McConkie is going to benefit. I think Omrion Hampton will 798 00:34:55,160 --> 00:34:57,600 Speaker 1: also benefit. I think McDaniel is good enough to like 799 00:34:57,920 --> 00:35:01,279 Speaker 1: the stuff with like the run heavy things in in Miami, Like, yeah, 800 00:35:01,280 --> 00:35:02,600 Speaker 1: he hit to a tongue of b I looa like 801 00:35:02,640 --> 00:35:05,400 Speaker 1: a broken version of Tua that he was working around 802 00:35:05,440 --> 00:35:07,560 Speaker 1: and a great running back. Now he's got both. I 803 00:35:07,600 --> 00:35:10,239 Speaker 1: think he's too smart to not have mccackie in the field. 804 00:35:10,239 --> 00:35:12,280 Speaker 3: That's that's he's got a head coach that he's working 805 00:35:12,280 --> 00:35:13,719 Speaker 3: for that wants to run the damn ball. 806 00:35:14,040 --> 00:35:15,040 Speaker 2: Harbust, harbust. 807 00:35:15,120 --> 00:35:17,480 Speaker 1: Talking about like he's just gonna let McDaniel do what 808 00:35:17,480 --> 00:35:19,400 Speaker 1: he wants. He's talking about not putting his thumb on 809 00:35:19,440 --> 00:35:21,600 Speaker 1: the scale and trusting. 810 00:35:21,320 --> 00:35:23,920 Speaker 2: That you know, brought me to the media. That's that's 811 00:35:23,920 --> 00:35:26,320 Speaker 2: a fair rebuttal it's totally fair. 812 00:35:26,280 --> 00:35:28,399 Speaker 3: In the media and be like, hey, you know what, 813 00:35:28,600 --> 00:35:30,480 Speaker 3: I got the reins in on this guy. He's only 814 00:35:30,480 --> 00:35:31,880 Speaker 3: gonna do what I tell him to do. He's not 815 00:35:31,880 --> 00:35:33,239 Speaker 3: gonna say that to the media. 816 00:35:33,280 --> 00:35:35,799 Speaker 1: You're you're exactly right, But I'm cheusing to be optimistic 817 00:35:35,840 --> 00:35:37,640 Speaker 1: of that. I just I just want as much Chargers 818 00:35:37,680 --> 00:35:39,279 Speaker 1: as I can get and Ladd is in. 819 00:35:39,480 --> 00:35:41,680 Speaker 3: I'm in on the offense. I'm in on the offense. 820 00:35:41,680 --> 00:35:42,399 Speaker 3: I want to I. 821 00:35:42,320 --> 00:35:45,120 Speaker 1: Also want Quentin Johnston, Lee and Trey Harris for free, 822 00:35:45,239 --> 00:35:49,000 Speaker 1: and O'maron Hampton, I want them all ericson what do 823 00:35:49,000 --> 00:35:51,239 Speaker 1: you think you seem to be agreeing on? 824 00:35:51,239 --> 00:35:51,760 Speaker 2: On Lad? 825 00:35:52,040 --> 00:35:55,360 Speaker 4: I also have Lad ranked higher. I've met wide receiver seventeen. 826 00:35:55,440 --> 00:35:57,960 Speaker 4: Abuka I have at wide receiver twenty two. It's interesting 827 00:35:58,000 --> 00:36:01,360 Speaker 4: that you put these players against each other because Ladd 828 00:36:01,880 --> 00:36:04,600 Speaker 4: kind of did what Egbuka did last year, but it 829 00:36:04,640 --> 00:36:07,000 Speaker 4: was separated by two seasons where Ladd is rookie again. 830 00:36:07,120 --> 00:36:12,160 Speaker 4: Ladd's rookie year seventeen games, ninety one catches for nearly 831 00:36:12,280 --> 00:36:15,960 Speaker 4: thirteen fifty yards and eight touchdowns. How many guys hit 832 00:36:16,120 --> 00:36:19,480 Speaker 4: over thirteen hundred yards receiving last year? Five five guys. 833 00:36:20,000 --> 00:36:22,520 Speaker 4: So yeah, I buy that. Mike Daniels probably going to 834 00:36:22,560 --> 00:36:25,720 Speaker 4: have that player that hit almost fourteen hundred yards receiving 835 00:36:26,160 --> 00:36:29,400 Speaker 4: as a featured piece in his passing game. That's you know, 836 00:36:29,640 --> 00:36:31,520 Speaker 4: I don't think I'm going out on a limb by 837 00:36:31,560 --> 00:36:33,960 Speaker 4: suggesting that. And this is from the Coach Speak Index 838 00:36:34,000 --> 00:36:36,920 Speaker 4: talking about Harbaugh and how his fit in Ladd McConkie 839 00:36:36,920 --> 00:36:40,239 Speaker 4: and Mike McDaniel's offense, and he was basically paraphrasing with 840 00:36:40,280 --> 00:36:42,560 Speaker 4: Mike and saying that, Yeah, this is the potential for 841 00:36:42,640 --> 00:36:44,000 Speaker 4: him to have his best year he's ever had in 842 00:36:44,000 --> 00:36:47,080 Speaker 4: pro football. And so if he's able to top thirteen 843 00:36:47,160 --> 00:36:50,680 Speaker 4: one hundred yards, eight touchdowns, ninety one plus catches, get 844 00:36:50,719 --> 00:36:54,600 Speaker 4: over one hundred catches, yeah, I want all of LADDI mcconk, 845 00:36:54,640 --> 00:36:56,360 Speaker 4: I want Yeah again, I want to invest in the 846 00:36:56,400 --> 00:36:59,240 Speaker 4: Chargers offense anywhere I can in these drafts. They're playing 847 00:36:59,239 --> 00:37:02,520 Speaker 4: the Arizona Car in Week one. Boys, like, this team 848 00:37:02,600 --> 00:37:05,160 Speaker 4: is going to come out guns blazing, and I think 849 00:37:05,160 --> 00:37:07,640 Speaker 4: they're going to smash to start the year. They play 850 00:37:07,719 --> 00:37:10,319 Speaker 4: a lot of tougher offenses. As the season progresses, I 851 00:37:10,320 --> 00:37:13,160 Speaker 4: think it just means more shootouts. So I want the Chargers, 852 00:37:13,160 --> 00:37:14,520 Speaker 4: and I think Lad's gonna be the No. Number one 853 00:37:14,560 --> 00:37:16,839 Speaker 4: wide receiver here. Again, going back to my original point, 854 00:37:17,000 --> 00:37:20,200 Speaker 4: Bladd had one great year and one bad year. Aguka 855 00:37:20,239 --> 00:37:22,279 Speaker 4: had one half of a good year and one half 856 00:37:22,360 --> 00:37:24,319 Speaker 4: of a bad year. I'm going to lean into a 857 00:37:24,400 --> 00:37:28,200 Speaker 4: more complete sample size of Ladd's rookie season, where he 858 00:37:28,360 --> 00:37:31,040 Speaker 4: was great the entire year, whereas Abuka the tail of 859 00:37:31,080 --> 00:37:34,200 Speaker 4: two halves. So I think that it's the bigger sample size. 860 00:37:34,200 --> 00:37:37,320 Speaker 4: With mcconkee playing at an elite level for fantasy production, 861 00:37:37,640 --> 00:37:39,600 Speaker 4: I think that just pushed him a little bit over 862 00:37:39,640 --> 00:37:42,680 Speaker 4: Agbuka for me, and both guys are benevitting from vacated targets. 863 00:37:42,719 --> 00:37:45,279 Speaker 4: Just to be clear, Mike Evans is gone, Keenan Allen 864 00:37:45,360 --> 00:37:47,680 Speaker 4: is gone again. If Keen Allen comes back, okay, we 865 00:37:47,680 --> 00:37:50,960 Speaker 4: can have a different conversation. But right now, Keenan Allen 866 00:37:51,040 --> 00:37:53,040 Speaker 4: and his team leading targets are no longer part of 867 00:37:53,080 --> 00:37:54,879 Speaker 4: the Chargers picture, and I think that's a big win 868 00:37:55,040 --> 00:37:55,680 Speaker 4: for McConkie. 869 00:37:56,480 --> 00:37:58,760 Speaker 3: With Ladd as good as he was as a rookie, 870 00:37:58,840 --> 00:38:01,320 Speaker 3: he was still only wide receiver sixteen in fantasy points 871 00:38:01,320 --> 00:38:03,200 Speaker 3: per game? Does he have the meat on the bone 872 00:38:03,239 --> 00:38:06,719 Speaker 3: to be a wide receiver one? And hold on, I 873 00:38:06,760 --> 00:38:09,680 Speaker 3: want to ask you that question, Ericson. But also, for 874 00:38:09,760 --> 00:38:12,320 Speaker 3: as good as he's been, he's only earned a nineteen 875 00:38:12,360 --> 00:38:14,839 Speaker 3: point eight percent target chaer and a twenty two point 876 00:38:14,920 --> 00:38:17,520 Speaker 3: nine percent target chare in his rookie season. Do you 877 00:38:17,600 --> 00:38:20,280 Speaker 3: think lad can be a wide receiver one in fantasy, 878 00:38:20,360 --> 00:38:24,560 Speaker 3: and do you see him bucking this trend over two 879 00:38:24,680 --> 00:38:27,960 Speaker 3: seasons and becoming a twenty five to twenty six percent 880 00:38:28,000 --> 00:38:30,000 Speaker 3: target s Chaer guy. Because if he doesn't do that, 881 00:38:30,719 --> 00:38:34,680 Speaker 3: I just don't see the upside where you're drafting Lad 882 00:38:34,760 --> 00:38:38,480 Speaker 3: versus Agbuka has already shown us the upside in a 883 00:38:38,520 --> 00:38:42,719 Speaker 3: small sample, albeit to crush his ADP, and Ladd hasn't 884 00:38:42,719 --> 00:38:43,359 Speaker 3: shown that yet. 885 00:38:43,440 --> 00:38:46,840 Speaker 4: Well, that put up thirteen hundred yards. It's a rookie. 886 00:38:47,080 --> 00:38:50,319 Speaker 4: That's a lot of upside. You look, you gottaok at 887 00:38:50,320 --> 00:38:50,920 Speaker 4: the PLAYFF. 888 00:38:50,640 --> 00:38:53,320 Speaker 3: Game and he was wide receiver sixteen and fantasy points 889 00:38:53,360 --> 00:38:53,680 Speaker 3: per game. 890 00:38:53,719 --> 00:38:56,080 Speaker 4: Yeah, well you gotta include that postseason game against Houston 891 00:38:56,120 --> 00:38:58,200 Speaker 4: Texans where he had like two hundred receiving yards. 892 00:38:58,239 --> 00:38:59,520 Speaker 3: It's still kind of fantasy. 893 00:38:59,680 --> 00:39:00,719 Speaker 2: I he's going to bring this up. 894 00:39:00,719 --> 00:39:02,480 Speaker 1: He had one hundred and ninety seven yards and a 895 00:39:02,560 --> 00:39:06,560 Speaker 1: touchdown receiving in that game against the fourteen targets nine 896 00:39:06,640 --> 00:39:07,239 Speaker 1: or sevens. 897 00:39:07,719 --> 00:39:09,640 Speaker 4: Again, like, I'm going to use all the data at 898 00:39:09,640 --> 00:39:12,000 Speaker 4: my disposal to try to project these players moving forward. 899 00:39:12,640 --> 00:39:15,799 Speaker 3: But do you think you sidestepped it? You're like a politician. Now, 900 00:39:15,880 --> 00:39:18,839 Speaker 3: Oh you thinks become a twenty five or twenty six 901 00:39:18,840 --> 00:39:22,080 Speaker 3: percent target share earner when he hasn't done that over 902 00:39:22,120 --> 00:39:24,759 Speaker 3: his first two seasons even gotten close to it. 903 00:39:26,080 --> 00:39:27,960 Speaker 4: Maybe I don't, but I don't know if he really 904 00:39:28,040 --> 00:39:30,880 Speaker 4: I don't know. I mean, I mean, you're you're being 905 00:39:31,000 --> 00:39:32,880 Speaker 4: very granular, though. It's got to be twenty five percent 906 00:39:32,920 --> 00:39:35,040 Speaker 4: target share or else he can't be a wide receiver. One. 907 00:39:35,080 --> 00:39:37,000 Speaker 4: He was a receiver thirteen in points per game when 908 00:39:37,000 --> 00:39:37,440 Speaker 4: you could. 909 00:39:37,400 --> 00:39:39,279 Speaker 3: Play out run heavy. Yeah, he's going to have to 910 00:39:39,320 --> 00:39:41,560 Speaker 3: earn that type of target share because the passing volume 911 00:39:41,600 --> 00:39:43,920 Speaker 3: isn't going to be for him to unless he runs 912 00:39:43,920 --> 00:39:48,280 Speaker 3: out with incredible touchdown production the top. Like he's literally 913 00:39:48,280 --> 00:39:50,960 Speaker 3: not going to have enough volume unless he just spikes 914 00:39:50,960 --> 00:39:55,160 Speaker 3: and touchdowns if they're run heavy to get there. Yeah, 915 00:39:55,200 --> 00:39:56,000 Speaker 3: like that's a concern. 916 00:39:57,480 --> 00:39:59,359 Speaker 1: I think there's upside with both, is what I would 917 00:39:59,400 --> 00:40:01,320 Speaker 1: say to kind of to put a bow on it. 918 00:40:01,360 --> 00:40:03,600 Speaker 2: Is like, I think it's totally fine to prefer one 919 00:40:03,640 --> 00:40:04,000 Speaker 2: or the other. 920 00:40:04,080 --> 00:40:06,040 Speaker 1: I do think they should be close, though, which is 921 00:40:06,040 --> 00:40:07,680 Speaker 1: where I disagree with Deebro and that he sees a 922 00:40:07,680 --> 00:40:09,880 Speaker 1: wider gap. I think there's upside with both of them. 923 00:40:10,280 --> 00:40:12,680 Speaker 1: But I will not fight anybody who says I'd rather 924 00:40:12,719 --> 00:40:14,680 Speaker 1: have a Buka. I Buka is a stud and I'm 925 00:40:14,719 --> 00:40:17,279 Speaker 1: really excited about him as well. So let's do one 926 00:40:17,280 --> 00:40:19,839 Speaker 1: more wide receiver one here, Roma Dunze wide receiver twenty 927 00:40:19,880 --> 00:40:22,839 Speaker 1: eight versus Marvin Harrison Junior at wide receiver thirty two. 928 00:40:22,920 --> 00:40:25,120 Speaker 1: Two guys, And this is coming from the same class, right, 929 00:40:25,200 --> 00:40:29,279 Speaker 1: Your three guys who have been disappointments relative to you know, 930 00:40:29,320 --> 00:40:31,279 Speaker 1: being top ten picks and some of the excitement there. 931 00:40:31,320 --> 00:40:33,759 Speaker 1: But I've had moments here there for both of them 932 00:40:34,000 --> 00:40:38,160 Speaker 1: have two interesting players, I think, players that I largely 933 00:40:38,320 --> 00:40:41,520 Speaker 1: want to be taking swings on, but have not quite 934 00:40:41,520 --> 00:40:44,560 Speaker 1: decided on where I'm comfortable doing that, like at what 935 00:40:44,680 --> 00:40:47,279 Speaker 1: ranking exactly I will be more excited to do that 936 00:40:47,320 --> 00:40:50,080 Speaker 1: sort of thing. Deebro, I'll start with you here, Roma 937 00:40:50,120 --> 00:40:51,520 Speaker 1: Dunze or Marvin Harrison Junior. 938 00:40:52,160 --> 00:40:53,919 Speaker 3: God, I want to so badly just say nine. 939 00:40:55,239 --> 00:40:57,439 Speaker 4: This is the one that gave me a stomach Egge, 940 00:40:57,480 --> 00:40:59,520 Speaker 4: I was like, oh no, hey, man. 941 00:40:59,480 --> 00:41:02,000 Speaker 3: I kind of a sheet and I was like, I'm 942 00:41:02,040 --> 00:41:04,200 Speaker 3: gonna puke. Let me get to this freaking debate, like 943 00:41:04,280 --> 00:41:05,160 Speaker 3: this is horrible. Man. 944 00:41:05,200 --> 00:41:11,280 Speaker 1: I gave you guys the opportunity to veto. 945 00:41:09,800 --> 00:41:13,080 Speaker 3: The real conversation that people need to hear this because 946 00:41:13,280 --> 00:41:16,319 Speaker 3: I think they're concerns with both of these guys like 947 00:41:16,360 --> 00:41:18,640 Speaker 3: Marvin Harrison Junior. You want to talk about the quarterback play, 948 00:41:18,680 --> 00:41:21,759 Speaker 3: you want to talk about being alfud by Michael Wilson 949 00:41:21,840 --> 00:41:24,839 Speaker 3: and Trey McBride, an offense that I think we all 950 00:41:24,840 --> 00:41:27,239 Speaker 3: collectively think is going to throw much less than they 951 00:41:27,239 --> 00:41:30,960 Speaker 3: did last year. Uh, Harrison Junior has not proven really 952 00:41:31,000 --> 00:41:34,120 Speaker 3: anything to this point. Roma Doon say, I am scared 953 00:41:34,120 --> 00:41:35,440 Speaker 3: to death of the of his foot. 954 00:41:35,640 --> 00:41:35,880 Speaker 4: Like I. 955 00:41:36,400 --> 00:41:39,640 Speaker 3: Foot injuries are problematic. They usually last over multiple years. 956 00:41:39,640 --> 00:41:43,040 Speaker 3: They could derail entire careers. Hello Sammy Watkins, hell over 957 00:41:43,080 --> 00:41:45,440 Speaker 3: Shod Bateman. They've never been the same players since the 958 00:41:45,440 --> 00:41:49,239 Speaker 3: foot injuries. So you know, in a vacuum, I want 959 00:41:49,239 --> 00:41:51,279 Speaker 3: to tell you neither one of these guys if I 960 00:41:51,400 --> 00:41:54,000 Speaker 3: if I'm picking between them, which we're doing here, I 961 00:41:54,040 --> 00:41:56,399 Speaker 3: will give this light lean to Rome. We could point 962 00:41:56,400 --> 00:41:59,759 Speaker 3: to early season production of last year. Also, I think 963 00:41:59,800 --> 00:42:04,880 Speaker 3: we can point to a quarterback play play caller, passing volume, 964 00:42:04,960 --> 00:42:07,239 Speaker 3: all the things. So I'll give this light nod to Roam. 965 00:42:07,440 --> 00:42:10,440 Speaker 3: I have him at wide receiver thirty seven, and I 966 00:42:10,480 --> 00:42:13,719 Speaker 3: have Marvin Harrison Junior at wide receiver forty. But you know, 967 00:42:13,800 --> 00:42:15,720 Speaker 3: if I'm in a draft right now, I'm not picking 968 00:42:15,719 --> 00:42:16,680 Speaker 3: either one of these guys. 969 00:42:17,000 --> 00:42:18,760 Speaker 2: It's funny you mentioned the foot stuff. 970 00:42:19,040 --> 00:42:21,400 Speaker 1: I'm trying really hard to not let my own personal 971 00:42:21,440 --> 00:42:26,600 Speaker 1: experience your history. Well, I had foot surgery last October 972 00:42:26,680 --> 00:42:28,840 Speaker 1: and it still hurts to run. Now, I am not 973 00:42:28,880 --> 00:42:31,880 Speaker 1: a professional athlete, don't I even had professional training and 974 00:42:31,920 --> 00:42:34,880 Speaker 1: recovery from you know, doctors and a team of people. 975 00:42:34,640 --> 00:42:37,840 Speaker 3: Who put different worm. Is it different and not the 976 00:42:37,880 --> 00:42:38,920 Speaker 3: same as it was before? 977 00:42:39,120 --> 00:42:41,040 Speaker 2: It is different? And like I said, it still hurts 978 00:42:41,040 --> 00:42:41,399 Speaker 2: to run. 979 00:42:41,560 --> 00:42:44,040 Speaker 1: And we're in June and I got that surgery in October, 980 00:42:44,120 --> 00:42:46,240 Speaker 1: So I get I'm trying to not let that color 981 00:42:46,239 --> 00:42:48,640 Speaker 1: of my thoughts on a dose too much because again, 982 00:42:48,680 --> 00:42:51,279 Speaker 1: he has a much different of resources than I. 983 00:42:51,280 --> 00:42:53,279 Speaker 2: Do and athleticism level than I do. 984 00:42:53,440 --> 00:42:55,640 Speaker 1: But it is in the back of my mind whenever 985 00:42:55,680 --> 00:42:56,800 Speaker 1: you mentioned the foot stuff. 986 00:42:57,120 --> 00:42:59,160 Speaker 3: Is your foot like a divining rod, Like when you 987 00:42:59,200 --> 00:43:01,839 Speaker 3: get into the raft simulator, do you just close your 988 00:43:01,840 --> 00:43:04,920 Speaker 3: eyes and as it goes through there the sound one 989 00:43:05,080 --> 00:43:07,399 Speaker 3: you can feel when Rome is coming up on the clock, 990 00:43:07,480 --> 00:43:11,360 Speaker 3: Like your foot just starts hurting. This this is the 991 00:43:11,400 --> 00:43:14,200 Speaker 3: wrong part of the draft simulator. Exactly what do I do? 992 00:43:14,360 --> 00:43:17,160 Speaker 3: The pain is is intense. No, no, I will not 993 00:43:17,239 --> 00:43:17,520 Speaker 3: give in. 994 00:43:18,760 --> 00:43:22,960 Speaker 1: Uh basically ericson what do you think of Denza or 995 00:43:23,000 --> 00:43:25,919 Speaker 1: Harrison here? And deever I said he had them both 996 00:43:25,960 --> 00:43:27,320 Speaker 1: ranks lower than they are here. 997 00:43:27,520 --> 00:43:28,680 Speaker 2: Do you also agree with that? 998 00:43:29,360 --> 00:43:31,719 Speaker 4: I have them kind of in line with where consensus 999 00:43:31,760 --> 00:43:34,160 Speaker 4: has them. But again, like we head at the top, 1000 00:43:34,239 --> 00:43:37,040 Speaker 4: don't necessarily get this warm and fuzzy feeling about either 1001 00:43:37,160 --> 00:43:40,120 Speaker 4: guy being on my fantasy team. I think that Deeper 1002 00:43:40,160 --> 00:43:42,760 Speaker 4: did a good jump outlining the concerns with both players. 1003 00:43:43,080 --> 00:43:46,640 Speaker 4: For me, just kind of looking zooming out. I'm not 1004 00:43:46,640 --> 00:43:49,040 Speaker 4: gonna lose any sleep over not drafting an Arizona Cardinals 1005 00:43:49,080 --> 00:43:51,439 Speaker 4: this year. It's gonna be pretty honest with you, guys. 1006 00:43:51,480 --> 00:43:51,960 Speaker 3: It's a good call. 1007 00:43:52,000 --> 00:43:55,879 Speaker 4: You don't really care Chicago Bear's players, though. I don't 1008 00:43:55,880 --> 00:43:59,359 Speaker 4: get Chicago Bear in this offense, the NFL putting them 1009 00:43:59,360 --> 00:44:01,560 Speaker 4: in all these prime time games and they really take off. 1010 00:44:02,000 --> 00:44:04,160 Speaker 4: I'm gonna feel a lot of fomo if I don't 1011 00:44:04,160 --> 00:44:06,000 Speaker 4: get exposure to some type of Bear and right now, 1012 00:44:06,040 --> 00:44:09,240 Speaker 4: Ramadunzay is the cheapest of the pass catchers. Because Loveland 1013 00:44:09,280 --> 00:44:13,000 Speaker 4: is expensive, Luther Burden is expensive, and Adunzay when he 1014 00:44:13,040 --> 00:44:15,920 Speaker 4: was healthy last year, he was good. And the other 1015 00:44:15,960 --> 00:44:19,480 Speaker 4: thing with Adunsay two that's important to note is he's 1016 00:44:19,680 --> 00:44:23,719 Speaker 4: had an brutal uncatchable rate the last couple seasons sixty 1017 00:44:23,760 --> 00:44:27,800 Speaker 4: one percent as a rookie, fifty nine percent last year. Terrible, terrible. 1018 00:44:28,640 --> 00:44:32,800 Speaker 4: Eventually some of this stuff should regress positively in his fashion, 1019 00:44:32,840 --> 00:44:36,239 Speaker 4: where he's just getting some more catchable targets downfield. Now, 1020 00:44:36,400 --> 00:44:37,800 Speaker 4: maybe it's just never going to click with him in 1021 00:44:37,840 --> 00:44:41,440 Speaker 4: Caleb Williams, that's totally possible. But even with not the 1022 00:44:41,440 --> 00:44:45,000 Speaker 4: greatest catch raider accuracy last year, he was still putting 1023 00:44:45,080 --> 00:44:49,279 Speaker 4: up top ten fantasy numbers essentially, So even though I 1024 00:44:49,320 --> 00:44:53,440 Speaker 4: agree with him being the latest Bears pass catcher, he 1025 00:44:53,480 --> 00:44:55,600 Speaker 4: has a chance that he could be that sacrificial X 1026 00:44:55,800 --> 00:44:58,960 Speaker 4: in this offense, which could be really frustrating. He also has, 1027 00:44:59,040 --> 00:45:00,959 Speaker 4: I think, the chance to put up massive, massive spike 1028 00:45:01,000 --> 00:45:04,080 Speaker 4: weeks in games where they do connect downfield and he 1029 00:45:04,080 --> 00:45:07,760 Speaker 4: does get opportunities in the red zone. Where's Marvin Harrison Junior. Yeah, 1030 00:45:07,800 --> 00:45:10,680 Speaker 4: he could see similar type of targets down the field 1031 00:45:10,680 --> 00:45:12,640 Speaker 4: and in the red zone. But that's gonna happen way 1032 00:45:12,719 --> 00:45:15,400 Speaker 4: less frequently on the freaking Arizona Cardinals then it is 1033 00:45:15,440 --> 00:45:18,239 Speaker 4: on the Chicago Bears. So for me, that's ultimately what 1034 00:45:18,360 --> 00:45:21,359 Speaker 4: pushed o'doonsay over the top. For Marvin Harrison Junior went 1035 00:45:21,400 --> 00:45:24,800 Speaker 4: in doubt. Guys, Stone draft Arizona Cardinals players. 1036 00:45:25,520 --> 00:45:27,560 Speaker 3: Do you want Caleb Williams targets or would you like 1037 00:45:27,640 --> 00:45:29,240 Speaker 3: Carson targets? 1038 00:45:29,360 --> 00:45:31,279 Speaker 4: Which will take one of those sounds. I will take 1039 00:45:31,280 --> 00:45:33,520 Speaker 4: the guy on the on the mount and cover place. 1040 00:45:33,760 --> 00:45:36,440 Speaker 1: I will say, if not for the foot injury stuff, 1041 00:45:36,880 --> 00:45:38,960 Speaker 1: I would be pounding the table for a dounsday as 1042 00:45:38,960 --> 00:45:40,800 Speaker 1: like at least eight spots too low in this ranking. 1043 00:45:40,960 --> 00:45:43,640 Speaker 1: I actually really like him, and with DJ Moore gone 1044 00:45:44,200 --> 00:45:46,719 Speaker 1: like we saw some really fun stuff before he got 1045 00:45:46,760 --> 00:45:49,319 Speaker 1: hurt last year. I like Luther Burden a lot, but 1046 00:45:49,360 --> 00:45:52,319 Speaker 1: I think we're a little too quick to anoint him 1047 00:45:52,320 --> 00:45:54,120 Speaker 1: as like he should be going ahead of a doonsay, 1048 00:45:54,400 --> 00:45:57,360 Speaker 1: like I you're two of the Ben Johnson you know 1049 00:45:57,400 --> 00:46:00,959 Speaker 1: Caleb Williams pairing, I would be all over a dude. 1050 00:46:01,000 --> 00:46:03,279 Speaker 1: The foot is the only thing that makes me more 1051 00:46:03,320 --> 00:46:06,080 Speaker 1: okay with him being down here. I'm willing to take 1052 00:46:06,080 --> 00:46:08,400 Speaker 1: the swing at this ranking, but I would be like, 1053 00:46:08,400 --> 00:46:10,319 Speaker 1: this guy should be like a top eighteen receiver if 1054 00:46:10,360 --> 00:46:12,520 Speaker 1: not for the foot, I would be that excited about him. 1055 00:46:13,000 --> 00:46:14,759 Speaker 2: If not like I would be all over it. 1056 00:46:14,840 --> 00:46:17,439 Speaker 3: So agree, the foot issue scares the buta Jesus out 1057 00:46:17,440 --> 00:46:19,439 Speaker 3: of me, though, Like, because we've seen this play out 1058 00:46:19,560 --> 00:46:26,200 Speaker 3: over multiple years. It just yes, that scares the crap 1059 00:46:26,239 --> 00:46:28,960 Speaker 3: out of me because I'm worried that can Rome not 1060 00:46:29,000 --> 00:46:30,919 Speaker 3: only the effective, can he make it through the entire 1061 00:46:30,960 --> 00:46:32,480 Speaker 3: season playing on the foot? I don't know. 1062 00:46:33,680 --> 00:46:35,800 Speaker 1: Today's show is brought to you by our presenting sponsor, 1063 00:46:35,880 --> 00:46:36,720 Speaker 1: hard Rock Bet. 1064 00:46:36,760 --> 00:46:38,080 Speaker 2: That's Florida's sports book. 1065 00:46:38,080 --> 00:46:39,959 Speaker 1: We talk a lot about football here, but right now 1066 00:46:40,160 --> 00:46:42,960 Speaker 1: all is about the other football. The world's biggest soccer 1067 00:46:42,960 --> 00:46:46,160 Speaker 1: tournament is here. Everyone is watching, National pride is on 1068 00:46:46,200 --> 00:46:49,560 Speaker 1: the line, superstars are chasing immortality, and for the next month, 1069 00:46:49,600 --> 00:46:51,719 Speaker 1: every match feels like a final. If you haven't tried 1070 00:46:51,760 --> 00:46:54,040 Speaker 1: hard Rock Bet yet, there's no better time to get 1071 00:46:54,080 --> 00:46:55,919 Speaker 1: in the game. Hard Rock Bet is a top rated 1072 00:46:55,920 --> 00:46:59,280 Speaker 1: sportsbook app built to viva la copa. Whether you're backing 1073 00:46:59,280 --> 00:47:01,759 Speaker 1: your country, bet on your favorite superstar, or building a 1074 00:47:01,800 --> 00:47:04,160 Speaker 1: same game parlay for the biggest matches of the tournament. 1075 00:47:04,440 --> 00:47:06,000 Speaker 1: Hard Rock Bet is your way to get in on 1076 00:47:06,040 --> 00:47:07,640 Speaker 1: the action, and if you're ever late to kick off, 1077 00:47:07,640 --> 00:47:10,200 Speaker 1: don't worry. Hard rock Bet lets you live bet all 1078 00:47:10,239 --> 00:47:12,880 Speaker 1: match long, from the first minute to the final whistle. Plus, 1079 00:47:12,880 --> 00:47:15,880 Speaker 1: hard rock Bet has new promos daily. We're talking profit boosts, 1080 00:47:16,000 --> 00:47:18,719 Speaker 1: no sweat bets, bonus bets, and more. And be sure 1081 00:47:18,719 --> 00:47:21,200 Speaker 1: to check out no Goals, No Problem and Super Sub 1082 00:47:21,360 --> 00:47:24,680 Speaker 1: two promos designed to give your bets insurance all tournament long. 1083 00:47:25,280 --> 00:47:27,480 Speaker 1: Sign Up with hard rock Bet today. Place a five 1084 00:47:27,560 --> 00:47:29,400 Speaker 1: dollar bet if it wins. You also score one hundred 1085 00:47:29,400 --> 00:47:31,879 Speaker 1: and fifty dollars in bonus bets a winning bet plus 1086 00:47:31,880 --> 00:47:34,000 Speaker 1: an extra hundred and fifty dollars to bet with. Now 1087 00:47:34,040 --> 00:47:36,359 Speaker 1: that's how you get this summer's party started. Hard Rock 1088 00:47:36,360 --> 00:47:38,920 Speaker 1: Bet is Florida's only legal sportsbook, but you don't have 1089 00:47:38,920 --> 00:47:40,680 Speaker 1: to be in Florida to join the party. Hard Rock 1090 00:47:40,680 --> 00:47:45,760 Speaker 1: Bet is also live in Arizona, Ohio, New Jersey, Indiana, Tennessee, Virginia, Illinois, Colorado, 1091 00:47:45,800 --> 00:47:48,359 Speaker 1: and Michigan. Download the hard rock Bet app today, Roll 1092 00:47:48,400 --> 00:47:51,280 Speaker 1: with us, Goal with us, hard rock Bet. 1093 00:47:51,640 --> 00:47:53,719 Speaker 5: Payble and bonus bets not a cash offer. Offered by 1094 00:47:53,760 --> 00:47:55,880 Speaker 5: the Seminal Tribe of Florida and Florida offered by the 1095 00:47:55,880 --> 00:47:56,560 Speaker 5: Seminal Hard. 1096 00:47:56,480 --> 00:47:57,399 Speaker 3: Rock Digital LLC. 1097 00:47:57,520 --> 00:47:59,440 Speaker 5: In all the states, must be twenty one plus in 1098 00:47:59,520 --> 00:48:03,360 Speaker 5: physically as an in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, 1099 00:48:03,400 --> 00:48:06,600 Speaker 5: New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia. Play terms and conditions apply. 1100 00:48:06,600 --> 00:48:08,839 Speaker 5: Concerned about gambling in Florida, I'll call one eight three 1101 00:48:08,880 --> 00:48:11,359 Speaker 5: to three play wise. In Indiana, if you are someone 1102 00:48:11,400 --> 00:48:13,279 Speaker 5: you know as a gambling problem, lawns help called one 1103 00:48:13,360 --> 00:48:15,799 Speaker 5: eight hundred and nine with it. Gambling problem called one 1104 00:48:15,800 --> 00:48:20,000 Speaker 5: eight hundred gambler in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia. 1105 00:48:20,360 --> 00:48:21,919 Speaker 1: All right, guys, we've got pretty long on the running 1106 00:48:21,920 --> 00:48:23,520 Speaker 1: backs of receivers, which I think is five. That's where 1107 00:48:23,520 --> 00:48:25,200 Speaker 1: we get most of the fun debates, anyway, So we'll 1108 00:48:25,200 --> 00:48:27,239 Speaker 1: go a little quicker here on quarterbacks at tight ends. 1109 00:48:27,440 --> 00:48:29,800 Speaker 1: At quarterback, the one that's ranked a little bit higher 1110 00:48:29,800 --> 00:48:32,560 Speaker 1: more in the QB one range, Trevor Lawrence at QB ten, 1111 00:48:33,000 --> 00:48:36,560 Speaker 1: Dak Prescott at QB eleven. Back to back in ECR 1112 00:48:37,040 --> 00:48:40,120 Speaker 1: ericson start with you, Trevor Or, Dak, Trevor Lawrence. 1113 00:48:40,120 --> 00:48:43,440 Speaker 4: For me, the highest scoring quarterback from Week five onward 1114 00:48:43,520 --> 00:48:46,680 Speaker 4: last year was Trevor Lawrence, averaging twenty three Fantasy points 1115 00:48:46,680 --> 00:48:49,839 Speaker 4: per game, better than Josh Allen, Matthew Stafford, and Drake May. 1116 00:48:50,239 --> 00:48:53,320 Speaker 4: If he carries that over into the start of twenty 1117 00:48:53,360 --> 00:48:56,359 Speaker 4: twenty six second year in Liam Cohen's offense, I think 1118 00:48:56,360 --> 00:49:00,040 Speaker 4: Trevor Lawrence could be the QB one overall potentially. So 1119 00:49:00,040 --> 00:49:02,120 Speaker 4: so I'm going with Dee. 1120 00:49:01,960 --> 00:49:03,920 Speaker 1: Bro, what do you think about that finishan I'm curious 1121 00:49:03,960 --> 00:49:06,200 Speaker 1: to you, like between Dak and Trevor, but like specifically 1122 00:49:06,200 --> 00:49:08,000 Speaker 1: with Trevor that finished to the season last year. Do 1123 00:49:08,040 --> 00:49:10,560 Speaker 1: you see that as him elevating and taking a step 1124 00:49:10,600 --> 00:49:13,040 Speaker 1: forward with you know, second half the season, first year 1125 00:49:13,040 --> 00:49:14,719 Speaker 1: with Liam Cowin and like this is sort of the 1126 00:49:15,120 --> 00:49:16,640 Speaker 1: not that he's gonna be the number one QB, but 1127 00:49:16,880 --> 00:49:19,000 Speaker 1: closer to the new normal for Lawrence. Or do you 1128 00:49:19,000 --> 00:49:20,920 Speaker 1: see that more just like, hey, he ran hot to 1129 00:49:20,920 --> 00:49:23,040 Speaker 1: finish the season. It was great, but let's dial it 1130 00:49:23,080 --> 00:49:23,560 Speaker 1: down a bit. 1131 00:49:24,520 --> 00:49:27,560 Speaker 3: I think it was an incredible run of production. It 1132 00:49:27,640 --> 00:49:30,279 Speaker 3: felt very much and I don't want to cast this 1133 00:49:30,360 --> 00:49:32,960 Speaker 3: on him. And say he can't continue it. But it 1134 00:49:33,000 --> 00:49:35,120 Speaker 3: felt very much like kind of like yesterdyear, how we 1135 00:49:35,120 --> 00:49:38,600 Speaker 3: were chasing then incredibly hot run by Jordan Love. I 1136 00:49:38,640 --> 00:49:40,880 Speaker 3: get some of the same vibes. Now, I'm not saying 1137 00:49:40,880 --> 00:49:43,920 Speaker 3: that te law can't take us another step forward. The 1138 00:49:44,320 --> 00:49:46,840 Speaker 3: big question that I have about Trevor Lawrence that fueled 1139 00:49:47,320 --> 00:49:49,399 Speaker 3: everything that Ericson kind of laid out here was nine 1140 00:49:49,480 --> 00:49:51,879 Speaker 3: freaking rushing touchdowns. I think we all agree that that's 1141 00:49:51,880 --> 00:49:54,600 Speaker 3: going to take a step back. Maybe he compensates more 1142 00:49:54,680 --> 00:49:57,480 Speaker 3: with you know, upping a five point two percent passing 1143 00:49:57,520 --> 00:50:01,560 Speaker 3: touchdown rate. But I'm going Dak Prescott here QB seven 1144 00:50:01,600 --> 00:50:04,360 Speaker 3: weeks one through seventeen last year. I think there's definitely 1145 00:50:04,440 --> 00:50:06,320 Speaker 3: some more mean on the bone for Dak to improve 1146 00:50:06,400 --> 00:50:10,160 Speaker 3: this year, not from you know, per se a volume perspective, 1147 00:50:10,200 --> 00:50:11,960 Speaker 3: because I think the attempts are still gonna be high, 1148 00:50:11,960 --> 00:50:13,640 Speaker 3: there's still gonna be a pass first offense. I don't 1149 00:50:13,680 --> 00:50:16,680 Speaker 3: think any of that changes. But Dak Prescott only had 1150 00:50:16,680 --> 00:50:19,359 Speaker 3: a five percent passing touchdown rate and he's eclipsed He's 1151 00:50:19,360 --> 00:50:21,920 Speaker 3: gotten into the sixes in previous year. So I think 1152 00:50:21,960 --> 00:50:24,040 Speaker 3: if one of these guys I'm looking at a little 1153 00:50:24,040 --> 00:50:27,040 Speaker 3: bit more regression versus another guy that I think like 1154 00:50:27,080 --> 00:50:29,480 Speaker 3: the touchdowns could flow in his direction a little bit more. 1155 00:50:29,560 --> 00:50:31,360 Speaker 3: This year, I'm gonna go Dak, but it's close. 1156 00:50:33,160 --> 00:50:38,239 Speaker 1: Yeah, I I really liked Dak going into last year, 1157 00:50:38,640 --> 00:50:40,560 Speaker 1: and I'm kind of curious where do you think he 1158 00:50:40,640 --> 00:50:43,120 Speaker 1: is going to end up in consensus ranking? Is when 1159 00:50:43,160 --> 00:50:46,760 Speaker 1: we get to like real draft weekends, like late August stuff, 1160 00:50:46,840 --> 00:50:49,880 Speaker 1: Because right now he's at QB eleven, and I wonder 1161 00:50:49,920 --> 00:50:51,759 Speaker 1: if that's gonna move much. 1162 00:50:51,840 --> 00:50:53,040 Speaker 2: Between now and then. What do you think do you 1163 00:50:53,400 --> 00:50:55,960 Speaker 2: think it'll be? Right about the quback end QB one. 1164 00:50:56,160 --> 00:51:00,319 Speaker 3: People just don't respect Dak as good as he's been run. 1165 00:51:00,360 --> 00:51:02,840 Speaker 4: They just don't like the zero the zero rushing And 1166 00:51:03,280 --> 00:51:05,160 Speaker 4: to your point about like, I'm not so sure the 1167 00:51:05,200 --> 00:51:07,560 Speaker 4: Lawrence touchdowns are going to go away like they called 1168 00:51:07,600 --> 00:51:09,000 Speaker 4: design they called I. 1169 00:51:09,000 --> 00:51:10,640 Speaker 3: Think he's gonna get nine again this year. 1170 00:51:10,719 --> 00:51:13,040 Speaker 4: How many times has Josh Allen scored a billion rushing 1171 00:51:13,080 --> 00:51:15,400 Speaker 4: touchdowns that never go down? They called this. 1172 00:51:16,120 --> 00:51:18,040 Speaker 3: It's not Josh Allen. Come on, but let's let's not 1173 00:51:18,080 --> 00:51:19,399 Speaker 3: get too crazy here, dude. 1174 00:51:19,440 --> 00:51:22,239 Speaker 4: He was third in red zone rushing attempts last year. 1175 00:51:22,600 --> 00:51:25,560 Speaker 4: This is design stuff for Trevor Lawrence in the red zone, 1176 00:51:25,600 --> 00:51:27,440 Speaker 4: Like he's calling his own number and running it in. 1177 00:51:27,640 --> 00:51:30,160 Speaker 4: So yeah, maybe it's not nine, but it can be five. 1178 00:51:30,719 --> 00:51:32,839 Speaker 4: Like that's still more than what Dak Prescott is going 1179 00:51:32,840 --> 00:51:35,440 Speaker 4: to have in terms of rushing touchdown and rushing production overall. 1180 00:51:35,840 --> 00:51:38,720 Speaker 4: So I I like, I don't know if I've convinced 1181 00:51:38,719 --> 00:51:40,719 Speaker 4: Worm to go with Trevor Lawrence, but you've got to 1182 00:51:40,800 --> 00:51:43,600 Speaker 4: break the tie. According to the show sheet Worm. 1183 00:51:43,520 --> 00:51:46,040 Speaker 1: I actually find this to them to be very close. 1184 00:51:46,120 --> 00:51:48,719 Speaker 1: So this is a really difficult one for me, and 1185 00:51:48,840 --> 00:51:50,439 Speaker 1: I don't think either of you did a good enough 1186 00:51:50,480 --> 00:51:56,000 Speaker 1: job convincing me to you know, now you both did. 1187 00:51:57,000 --> 00:51:58,440 Speaker 2: You made perfectly fine cases. 1188 00:51:58,440 --> 00:51:59,879 Speaker 1: It's just I see it as so close that it's 1189 00:52:00,000 --> 00:52:03,360 Speaker 1: hard for me to really make a decision. I think 1190 00:52:03,480 --> 00:52:07,480 Speaker 1: if I were on the clock right now, I probably 1191 00:52:07,520 --> 00:52:11,239 Speaker 1: would take Trevor, just saying when in doubt, let me 1192 00:52:11,320 --> 00:52:13,480 Speaker 1: lean slightly to the guy that I have seen have 1193 00:52:13,640 --> 00:52:17,120 Speaker 1: rushing recently. But that's not to say I have a 1194 00:52:17,160 --> 00:52:20,120 Speaker 1: ton of conviction in that, and it will not surprise 1195 00:52:20,160 --> 00:52:22,279 Speaker 1: me if Dak has a great year, because I just 1196 00:52:22,360 --> 00:52:24,839 Speaker 1: I like the setup obviously, like we've seen you guys 1197 00:52:24,880 --> 00:52:27,120 Speaker 1: were talking in our slack channel about how George Pickens 1198 00:52:27,200 --> 00:52:29,279 Speaker 1: isn't going to hold out, Like like, I think that 1199 00:52:29,360 --> 00:52:31,160 Speaker 1: there's a lot of real reasons to be excited about 1200 00:52:31,160 --> 00:52:34,920 Speaker 1: this offense for Fantasy this year, and and I'm definitely 1201 00:52:34,960 --> 00:52:38,279 Speaker 1: in on Dak at cost here. I just think, like again, 1202 00:52:38,280 --> 00:52:40,640 Speaker 1: if if I have to flip a coin, I'll lean 1203 00:52:40,680 --> 00:52:42,880 Speaker 1: slightly towards the guy who I have a little bit 1204 00:52:42,880 --> 00:52:46,440 Speaker 1: more faith in the rushing upside and who could maybe 1205 00:52:46,440 --> 00:52:48,440 Speaker 1: get another eight touchdowns this year, even if I'm not 1206 00:52:48,480 --> 00:52:50,080 Speaker 1: really expecting respect. 1207 00:52:49,680 --> 00:52:51,560 Speaker 4: Respect a law, maybe respect a law. 1208 00:52:52,200 --> 00:52:55,279 Speaker 3: Well, Worm's secretly like flipping the Harvey Dent coin. He's 1209 00:52:55,320 --> 00:52:57,279 Speaker 3: trying to pretend like he's impartial, but he's really not. 1210 00:52:58,520 --> 00:53:01,799 Speaker 1: Harvey d all Right, one more quarterback here, Kyler Murray 1211 00:53:01,840 --> 00:53:05,520 Speaker 1: at QB seventeen, Jordan Love at QB eighteen. 1212 00:53:06,000 --> 00:53:07,879 Speaker 2: Who do you guys prefer here at dee bro Start with. 1213 00:53:07,840 --> 00:53:10,840 Speaker 3: You Jordan Love. I'm gonna take Jordan Love and just 1214 00:53:12,160 --> 00:53:14,840 Speaker 3: we've seen Jordan Love just be the better quarterback. And 1215 00:53:14,880 --> 00:53:18,040 Speaker 3: if the passing rate goes up in Green Bay this 1216 00:53:18,160 --> 00:53:20,000 Speaker 3: year with and we still don't know what happens with 1217 00:53:20,080 --> 00:53:23,200 Speaker 3: Josh Jacobs and everything like that. And I've got some 1218 00:53:23,239 --> 00:53:26,360 Speaker 3: concerns about Jacob's like the volume, can he stay healthy, 1219 00:53:26,480 --> 00:53:30,160 Speaker 3: the knees, like he was beat up last year. So Love, 1220 00:53:30,200 --> 00:53:31,879 Speaker 3: I just want to go with the talent man, Like 1221 00:53:32,480 --> 00:53:34,799 Speaker 3: he's also showed us that, like he can be that 1222 00:53:34,880 --> 00:53:38,719 Speaker 3: outlier consistently and passing touchdown rate like five point five, 1223 00:53:38,800 --> 00:53:41,319 Speaker 3: five point nine, five point two passing touchdown rates of 1224 00:53:41,320 --> 00:53:43,040 Speaker 3: the last three years. I don't think that that's just 1225 00:53:43,080 --> 00:53:45,799 Speaker 3: like an outlier. I think that Love is kind of 1226 00:53:45,840 --> 00:53:49,600 Speaker 3: like on that Russell Wilson trajectory where we keep expecting 1227 00:53:49,680 --> 00:53:53,160 Speaker 3: the passing touchdown rates to go down and they just don't. 1228 00:53:53,640 --> 00:53:56,120 Speaker 3: So if the passing volume goes up. And the other 1229 00:53:56,120 --> 00:53:58,239 Speaker 3: thing about Kyler Murray is like we've just seen this 1230 00:53:58,400 --> 00:54:01,560 Speaker 3: yolo effect, like yoyo effect of like one week he's 1231 00:54:01,640 --> 00:54:04,840 Speaker 3: QB one, the next week he's QB twenty four, twenty five. 1232 00:54:05,280 --> 00:54:07,600 Speaker 3: Holy crap. I never know when to freaking start him. 1233 00:54:07,640 --> 00:54:08,239 Speaker 3: I'll take Love. 1234 00:54:09,280 --> 00:54:10,160 Speaker 2: I really like Love. 1235 00:54:10,160 --> 00:54:11,399 Speaker 1: The other thing, And I don't know if this makes 1236 00:54:11,440 --> 00:54:14,799 Speaker 1: sense from a rankings perspective, but we're talking head to 1237 00:54:14,800 --> 00:54:18,759 Speaker 1: head draft debates here, and if you're taking a quarterback 1238 00:54:18,800 --> 00:54:21,080 Speaker 1: in this range. It's likely because you're talking about a 1239 00:54:21,120 --> 00:54:23,080 Speaker 1: super flex league. I mean, otherwise it's a backup, in 1240 00:54:23,080 --> 00:54:24,880 Speaker 1: which case, like it's not that relevant. But if you're 1241 00:54:24,880 --> 00:54:27,279 Speaker 1: thinking about it from a super flex perspective, I'd rather 1242 00:54:27,320 --> 00:54:28,920 Speaker 1: have the guy that I have a little more certainty, 1243 00:54:28,920 --> 00:54:32,320 Speaker 1: and in Jordan Love with that QB two spot. So again, 1244 00:54:32,440 --> 00:54:34,319 Speaker 1: rankings wise, like I could see a case for if 1245 00:54:34,320 --> 00:54:36,120 Speaker 1: you want to say Kyler, like just with the upside 1246 00:54:36,120 --> 00:54:38,800 Speaker 1: swing in a rankings competition, but for like a little 1247 00:54:38,800 --> 00:54:40,879 Speaker 1: more level of certainty, Like I just know Jordan Love 1248 00:54:40,960 --> 00:54:43,040 Speaker 1: is a good quarterback at the very least, And I 1249 00:54:43,080 --> 00:54:45,160 Speaker 1: do think there's a real world with the passing volume. 1250 00:54:44,920 --> 00:54:47,680 Speaker 2: Goes up this year, So I actually like Love quite 1251 00:54:47,680 --> 00:54:47,960 Speaker 2: a bit. 1252 00:54:48,400 --> 00:54:50,359 Speaker 3: Eric Stan your point two worm, it's like we can't 1253 00:54:50,440 --> 00:54:52,760 Speaker 3: roll out, like while I don't think that this happens, 1254 00:54:52,760 --> 00:54:56,680 Speaker 3: and I think Kyler Murray starts, if he sucks, does 1255 00:54:56,680 --> 00:54:59,520 Speaker 3: he get benched? That that we can't roll that out 1256 00:55:00,080 --> 00:55:01,799 Speaker 3: zero chance, even if it's not likely, it's a non 1257 00:55:01,840 --> 00:55:05,200 Speaker 3: zero chance. Yea, Love is not getting benched, just he's 1258 00:55:05,200 --> 00:55:05,959 Speaker 3: not yet. 1259 00:55:06,719 --> 00:55:07,919 Speaker 2: Eric, who you like between the two? 1260 00:55:08,480 --> 00:55:10,239 Speaker 4: I think you guys did a great job of outlining 1261 00:55:10,280 --> 00:55:13,120 Speaker 4: the super flex versus redraft, because I think in redraft 1262 00:55:13,120 --> 00:55:15,200 Speaker 4: you just go with Kyler Murray and you just shoot 1263 00:55:15,200 --> 00:55:16,720 Speaker 4: for the upside. Again, he was fourth in and rushing 1264 00:55:16,760 --> 00:55:18,600 Speaker 4: arts per game AM on quarterbacks last year, where with 1265 00:55:18,719 --> 00:55:20,200 Speaker 4: Jordan Love, we kind of feel like we know what 1266 00:55:20,200 --> 00:55:22,040 Speaker 4: we're going to expect and we can also see the 1267 00:55:22,040 --> 00:55:24,080 Speaker 4: season play out where oh, they are trying to lean 1268 00:55:24,080 --> 00:55:26,960 Speaker 4: into the passing game more. Not having Tucker crap maybe 1269 00:55:26,960 --> 00:55:28,719 Speaker 4: one hundred percent to start the year also makes me 1270 00:55:28,760 --> 00:55:30,480 Speaker 4: a little bit. Do I need to get Jordan Love 1271 00:55:30,560 --> 00:55:34,240 Speaker 4: for Week one? Maybe not? Whereas Kyler Murray, the Vikings 1272 00:55:34,280 --> 00:55:36,960 Speaker 4: scutle to open the year isn't too bad, and if 1273 00:55:37,000 --> 00:55:39,400 Speaker 4: he is running, he's mobile, he looks good throwing to 1274 00:55:39,480 --> 00:55:42,440 Speaker 4: Jefferson Addison. That's the direction I go in a one 1275 00:55:42,560 --> 00:55:45,000 Speaker 4: quarterback league is shoot for upside. I'm okay, if he's 1276 00:55:45,040 --> 00:55:46,520 Speaker 4: a bust, I can just cut him and move on 1277 00:55:46,600 --> 00:55:48,600 Speaker 4: and draft get a different quarterback on my team. If 1278 00:55:48,600 --> 00:55:50,920 Speaker 4: I go late run quarterback, I would lean on Kyler. 1279 00:55:50,960 --> 00:55:54,279 Speaker 4: But in a super flex where I don't want to 1280 00:55:54,320 --> 00:55:56,840 Speaker 4: draft Kyler Murray in the third round, like because that 1281 00:55:56,920 --> 00:56:00,400 Speaker 4: is like way too risky. When you when you valuing 1282 00:56:00,560 --> 00:56:03,400 Speaker 4: starting quarterback play every single week, you're going to get 1283 00:56:03,400 --> 00:56:05,080 Speaker 4: that from Jordan Love, and then you do get that 1284 00:56:05,160 --> 00:56:06,960 Speaker 4: untapped potential of oh well, maybe they do lean in 1285 00:56:06,960 --> 00:56:09,120 Speaker 4: the passing the game, because it's no debate who the 1286 00:56:09,120 --> 00:56:12,560 Speaker 4: better quarterback is. Jordan Love, right, I'm not the last 1287 00:56:12,600 --> 00:56:13,680 Speaker 4: thing I want to do is come on here and 1288 00:56:13,719 --> 00:56:16,279 Speaker 4: be like, well, Kyler Murray can do X, Y and Z. No. 1289 00:56:17,160 --> 00:56:18,680 Speaker 4: I don't want to be that guy, but I want 1290 00:56:18,719 --> 00:56:21,200 Speaker 4: to recognize he runs more than Jordan Love does, which 1291 00:56:21,239 --> 00:56:23,480 Speaker 4: is why I mentioned I like Turvor Lawrence more than 1292 00:56:23,560 --> 00:56:27,320 Speaker 4: Dak Prescott, and the environment may be more fantasy friendly 1293 00:56:27,600 --> 00:56:31,040 Speaker 4: for him in Minnesota. If he's running, they're throwing the 1294 00:56:31,080 --> 00:56:32,799 Speaker 4: ball more than the Green Bay Packers. And he's got 1295 00:56:32,880 --> 00:56:36,880 Speaker 4: really good weapons too. Addison Hawkinson, Jefferson, Jawan Jennings is 1296 00:56:36,920 --> 00:56:38,840 Speaker 4: his number three wide receiver. That's pretty good. And I 1297 00:56:38,840 --> 00:56:41,520 Speaker 4: also don't have good running backs, so is it more 1298 00:56:41,600 --> 00:56:43,879 Speaker 4: lean on Kyler Murray. That's why I would lean into 1299 00:56:43,920 --> 00:56:46,279 Speaker 4: the unsturdy upside with him in a one quarterback league, 1300 00:56:46,280 --> 00:56:49,359 Speaker 4: whereas in two QB super flex, just lock in Jordan 1301 00:56:49,440 --> 00:56:52,000 Speaker 4: Love and look elsewhere than Kyler Murray unless he just 1302 00:56:52,000 --> 00:56:54,200 Speaker 4: like falls really really far in drafts, because the JJ 1303 00:56:54,280 --> 00:56:57,120 Speaker 4: McCarthy thing is real, Like, if he sucks, he's not 1304 00:56:57,160 --> 00:56:59,080 Speaker 4: a lot to be there, and that is not something 1305 00:56:59,120 --> 00:57:00,640 Speaker 4: you want to be staring at when you draft a 1306 00:57:00,680 --> 00:57:01,800 Speaker 4: quarterback super early. 1307 00:57:02,840 --> 00:57:05,600 Speaker 1: So Erickson is very willing to not draft Cardinals, but 1308 00:57:05,640 --> 00:57:08,640 Speaker 1: he's willing to draft former Cardinals in the right situation. 1309 00:57:08,719 --> 00:57:11,440 Speaker 2: As WI we're hearing well. 1310 00:57:11,160 --> 00:57:14,600 Speaker 1: See how he drafts all players on his Best Ball drafts. 1311 00:57:14,600 --> 00:57:16,480 Speaker 1: Make sure you join us on twitch for a live 1312 00:57:16,600 --> 00:57:19,680 Speaker 1: Best Ball draft. Andrew Rickson and Tom Strachen we'll be 1313 00:57:19,720 --> 00:57:22,800 Speaker 1: drafting live on Monday, June twenty second at two pm Eastern, 1314 00:57:22,840 --> 00:57:26,560 Speaker 1: breaking down their picks, stacks, values, fades, and draft room 1315 00:57:26,640 --> 00:57:30,160 Speaker 1: decisions in real time right from the draft assistant. Watch 1316 00:57:30,200 --> 00:57:33,200 Speaker 1: it live on the Fantasy Pros twitch channel. That's Monday, 1317 00:57:33,360 --> 00:57:36,520 Speaker 1: June twenty second at two pm Eastern, Twitch dot tv 1318 00:57:36,680 --> 00:57:40,520 Speaker 1: slash Fantasy Pros. All right, guys, a tight end, one 1319 00:57:40,640 --> 00:57:42,400 Speaker 1: that actually think is really interesting. I've been on the 1320 00:57:42,440 --> 00:57:44,560 Speaker 1: clock for a few of our mock draft episodes that 1321 00:57:44,600 --> 00:57:47,680 Speaker 1: we've done this year, and on more than one occasion, 1322 00:57:47,760 --> 00:57:49,880 Speaker 1: I have been faced with the decision of Kyle Pitts 1323 00:57:49,920 --> 00:57:52,920 Speaker 1: tight end seven or Sam Laporta tight end eight and 1324 00:57:52,960 --> 00:57:54,360 Speaker 1: the mocks I have done, and they have gone off 1325 00:57:54,400 --> 00:57:57,440 Speaker 1: the board very close to each other. And it's been 1326 00:57:57,440 --> 00:57:59,640 Speaker 1: a real decision to make, and it's been one that 1327 00:57:59,640 --> 00:58:01,560 Speaker 1: I haven't really felt that strongly about. So I'm kind 1328 00:58:01,600 --> 00:58:03,680 Speaker 1: of curious to see what direction do you guys, go 1329 00:58:03,800 --> 00:58:06,880 Speaker 1: Ericson's starting with you here, Kyle Pitts or Sam Laporta. 1330 00:58:07,320 --> 00:58:09,920 Speaker 4: I'm gonna go with Sam Laporta. And this is not 1331 00:58:10,120 --> 00:58:13,400 Speaker 4: a pro Laporta conversation. It's more of a negative Kyle 1332 00:58:13,400 --> 00:58:16,680 Speaker 4: Pitts conversation. Twenty nine games sample sides with Drake London. 1333 00:58:17,160 --> 00:58:19,800 Speaker 4: Kyle Pits in full PPR eight point five PPR points 1334 00:58:19,800 --> 00:58:21,880 Speaker 4: per game that would have ranked outside the top twenty 1335 00:58:21,920 --> 00:58:25,880 Speaker 4: tight ends last season. Drake London is the way that 1336 00:58:25,920 --> 00:58:29,560 Speaker 4: this Falcons passing game moves, regardless of whoever the quarterback is. 1337 00:58:29,960 --> 00:58:31,920 Speaker 4: So Kyle Pitts, I know that he finished last year 1338 00:58:31,960 --> 00:58:33,680 Speaker 4: on a really high note. Take a lot of that 1339 00:58:33,720 --> 00:58:35,640 Speaker 4: to do with Drake London being out and missing time, 1340 00:58:35,760 --> 00:58:38,840 Speaker 4: and he and Kirk Cousins have a connection. Neither of 1341 00:58:38,880 --> 00:58:42,280 Speaker 4: those situations are playing into his favor in twenty twenty six, 1342 00:58:42,600 --> 00:58:44,960 Speaker 4: and the other point about this being a negative Kyle 1343 00:58:45,000 --> 00:58:48,080 Speaker 4: Pitts conversation and not a pro Sam Laporta conversation. I 1344 00:58:48,080 --> 00:58:49,919 Speaker 4: do think Laporta does have some things that are working 1345 00:58:49,960 --> 00:58:52,120 Speaker 4: in his favor. He goes later than Kyle Pitts, He's 1346 00:58:52,120 --> 00:58:53,840 Speaker 4: actually coming off a season where he was actually still 1347 00:58:53,880 --> 00:58:56,560 Speaker 4: really efficient, hit career highs and catch rate yarts per 1348 00:58:56,600 --> 00:58:59,479 Speaker 4: target yards per route run. He does have this back 1349 00:58:59,520 --> 00:59:01,760 Speaker 4: injury that coming off of, and the Lion's offense is 1350 00:59:01,760 --> 00:59:04,160 Speaker 4: a little bit crowded. But even with Jamison Williams, Sam 1351 00:59:04,200 --> 00:59:07,560 Speaker 4: Laporta's splits don't fall off nearly as much as the 1352 00:59:07,640 --> 00:59:09,760 Speaker 4: splits with Kyle Pits and Drake London in the lineup. 1353 00:59:10,120 --> 00:59:12,640 Speaker 4: My last point, these tight ends are going in the 1354 00:59:12,640 --> 00:59:15,640 Speaker 4: middle of drafts with the tight end rankings, where the 1355 00:59:15,680 --> 00:59:18,840 Speaker 4: return investment drafting the tight end seven eight Tina nine 1356 00:59:18,880 --> 00:59:21,400 Speaker 4: is always really bad. So I don't want to draft 1357 00:59:21,440 --> 00:59:22,960 Speaker 4: either of these guys at their cost. I want to 1358 00:59:22,960 --> 00:59:25,120 Speaker 4: take a guy early, an elite guy, or I want 1359 00:59:25,120 --> 00:59:27,400 Speaker 4: to draft a guy late, and considering both of these 1360 00:59:27,440 --> 00:59:29,960 Speaker 4: guys are the middle tier of tight end, I don't 1361 00:59:29,960 --> 00:59:31,760 Speaker 4: want to draft either of them. But if you have 1362 00:59:31,800 --> 00:59:33,960 Speaker 4: to make me pick one, I would take Laporta because 1363 00:59:34,000 --> 00:59:36,560 Speaker 4: I Kyle Pits really scares me when Drake London is healthy. 1364 00:59:37,400 --> 00:59:39,840 Speaker 1: But before I throw to Debro, I just want to 1365 00:59:39,880 --> 00:59:42,480 Speaker 1: follow up ericson is any of your concern about Drake 1366 00:59:42,560 --> 00:59:45,760 Speaker 1: London at all mitigated by the fact that Kevin Stefanski 1367 00:59:45,800 --> 00:59:48,240 Speaker 1: is now calling plays and has likes thrown the tight 1368 00:59:48,360 --> 00:59:49,040 Speaker 1: ends in the past. 1369 00:59:50,720 --> 00:59:53,960 Speaker 4: Not necessarily. I think that Drake London is in alpha 1370 00:59:54,160 --> 00:59:57,160 Speaker 4: and he commands targets, and I think that Kevin Stefanski 1371 00:59:57,280 --> 01:00:00,439 Speaker 4: is going to know that and acknowledge that, and that's 1372 01:00:00,440 --> 01:00:02,880 Speaker 4: where the office is going to foul through with Tua 1373 01:00:02,920 --> 01:00:05,360 Speaker 4: as well. I think it's gonna Drake London and a 1374 01:00:05,400 --> 01:00:07,640 Speaker 4: lot of b Jenan Robinson and does Kyle pitsselfall to 1375 01:00:07,680 --> 01:00:10,160 Speaker 4: third in the pecking order and we're talking about tight ends. 1376 01:00:10,440 --> 01:00:12,120 Speaker 4: I don't want to be drafting a middle range tight 1377 01:00:12,200 --> 01:00:14,440 Speaker 4: end that might be the third target on his offense. 1378 01:00:14,680 --> 01:00:17,080 Speaker 4: That an offense that how good are the Falcon's going 1379 01:00:17,120 --> 01:00:19,000 Speaker 4: to be offensively? I know they have a lot of 1380 01:00:19,040 --> 01:00:21,400 Speaker 4: fun pieces, but they've had a lot of fun pieces 1381 01:00:21,400 --> 01:00:24,080 Speaker 4: every year, and it seems like someone always disappoints. Usually 1382 01:00:24,120 --> 01:00:27,600 Speaker 4: it's been Kyle Pitts, so that just concerns me. Again, 1383 01:00:28,320 --> 01:00:31,080 Speaker 4: I think that maybe Stevens can make adjustments, but tight 1384 01:00:31,200 --> 01:00:32,920 Speaker 4: end seven where he's locked and loaded, like you got 1385 01:00:33,000 --> 01:00:34,680 Speaker 4: to start him every week as your tight end one, 1386 01:00:35,160 --> 01:00:37,840 Speaker 4: and I'm not sure that's the best investment drafters can make. 1387 01:00:38,520 --> 01:00:39,400 Speaker 2: Okay, I think that's fair. 1388 01:00:39,600 --> 01:00:41,959 Speaker 1: I just wanted to ask on this Stefansky point deeper, 1389 01:00:42,000 --> 01:00:42,960 Speaker 1: who do you like between the two? 1390 01:00:43,520 --> 01:00:47,800 Speaker 3: I'm on the Laporta side as well. And to Erickson's point, 1391 01:00:48,400 --> 01:00:51,640 Speaker 3: last year, without London in the lineup, Kyle Pitts had 1392 01:00:51,640 --> 01:00:54,600 Speaker 3: a twenty six point seven percent target chair two point 1393 01:00:54,600 --> 01:00:57,280 Speaker 3: eight yards per route run, a twenty seven point eight 1394 01:00:57,320 --> 01:01:00,240 Speaker 3: percent first read chaer. With London in the lineup up, 1395 01:01:00,440 --> 01:01:03,680 Speaker 3: his target share fell to nineteen percent, his yards per 1396 01:01:03,720 --> 01:01:06,720 Speaker 3: route run dipped to one point four and his first 1397 01:01:06,720 --> 01:01:09,480 Speaker 3: red chair dropped to twenty percent. Now, yes, new offense 1398 01:01:10,360 --> 01:01:13,040 Speaker 3: with Kevin Stefanski's feature tight ends all that kind of 1399 01:01:13,080 --> 01:01:15,280 Speaker 3: good stuff. It's probably London and Pits at the top, 1400 01:01:15,320 --> 01:01:17,800 Speaker 3: but maybe, like Ericson alluded to, maybe it's not. Maybe 1401 01:01:17,800 --> 01:01:21,600 Speaker 3: Bjean Robinson how targets Pits this year and I think 1402 01:01:21,680 --> 01:01:24,439 Speaker 3: just zooming out, which offense do we want to buy 1403 01:01:24,440 --> 01:01:28,280 Speaker 3: in two more, the Detroit Lions with Jared Golf or 1404 01:01:28,320 --> 01:01:31,360 Speaker 3: the Atlanta Falcons with two a tongue of aaloa And 1405 01:01:31,920 --> 01:01:34,520 Speaker 3: so I think everybody's emphatically going to agree and say 1406 01:01:34,560 --> 01:01:37,080 Speaker 3: the Lions. The other things that I want to point 1407 01:01:37,080 --> 01:01:39,480 Speaker 3: out about Sam Laporta, he was the tight end seven 1408 01:01:39,640 --> 01:01:42,800 Speaker 3: before he lost the rest of his year due to 1409 01:01:42,840 --> 01:01:46,600 Speaker 3: the back injury. He was the clear number two option 1410 01:01:46,840 --> 01:01:49,720 Speaker 3: in that passing attack. You look at red zone targets, 1411 01:01:50,200 --> 01:01:52,440 Speaker 3: it was Sam Laporta right behind Amanass Sam Brown. You 1412 01:01:52,480 --> 01:01:54,800 Speaker 3: look at target chair, it was Sam Laporta right behind 1413 01:01:54,880 --> 01:01:58,000 Speaker 3: Amanas Sam Brown. So he is the number two option 1414 01:01:58,200 --> 01:02:01,520 Speaker 3: in that passing attack. And boys, we haven't even talked 1415 01:02:01,520 --> 01:02:04,120 Speaker 3: about the fact of Drew Petsing coming into town. Is 1416 01:02:04,160 --> 01:02:07,040 Speaker 3: he going to feature Sam Laporta? Are we going to 1417 01:02:07,080 --> 01:02:11,000 Speaker 3: get more versatile usage out of Sam Laporta? Just looking 1418 01:02:11,040 --> 01:02:14,440 Speaker 3: at what Petsing has done with Trey McBride over the 1419 01:02:14,520 --> 01:02:17,720 Speaker 3: last few years. So I feel good about Sam Laporta. 1420 01:02:17,760 --> 01:02:20,439 Speaker 3: I feel better about the offense, the quarterback play, all 1421 01:02:20,480 --> 01:02:22,720 Speaker 3: of it with Sam Laporta. If you were telling me 1422 01:02:22,760 --> 01:02:25,479 Speaker 3: both of these guys in a vacuum who has top 1423 01:02:25,560 --> 01:02:29,800 Speaker 3: three upside if everything works out in their favor. I'm 1424 01:02:29,800 --> 01:02:31,800 Speaker 3: gonna take Sam Laporta ten times out of. 1425 01:02:31,760 --> 01:02:32,320 Speaker 2: Ten for that. 1426 01:02:33,200 --> 01:02:35,200 Speaker 1: Do you agree with Erickson that you don't really want 1427 01:02:35,200 --> 01:02:38,720 Speaker 1: to be drafting players in this range regardless, or do 1428 01:02:38,760 --> 01:02:40,560 Speaker 1: you just like just like Laporta enough that you would 1429 01:02:40,560 --> 01:02:42,040 Speaker 1: take him here even though he's ranked in kind of 1430 01:02:42,080 --> 01:02:44,840 Speaker 1: this risky ring. It's almost it's not like the RB 1431 01:02:44,920 --> 01:02:46,600 Speaker 1: dead zone, but it's almost like the tight end dead 1432 01:02:46,680 --> 01:02:48,640 Speaker 1: zone in some years, like this kind of mid range, 1433 01:02:48,680 --> 01:02:49,560 Speaker 1: you want to be avoiding this. 1434 01:02:50,320 --> 01:02:53,000 Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean in a lot of instances, I'm avoiding this, 1435 01:02:53,120 --> 01:02:55,960 Speaker 3: or I'm just like I'm either drafting Brock Bauers or 1436 01:02:56,000 --> 01:02:59,280 Speaker 3: Colston Lovelin, or I'm taking a swing on Tyler Warren 1437 01:02:59,440 --> 01:03:01,080 Speaker 3: or I'm just gonna to wait on tight end and 1438 01:03:01,120 --> 01:03:04,160 Speaker 3: I'm gonna grab somebody late like an Isaiah Likely or 1439 01:03:04,320 --> 01:03:07,160 Speaker 3: a Greg Dulcic or Dallas Goddard or something like that. 1440 01:03:07,200 --> 01:03:10,000 Speaker 3: So yes, I agree with ericson about just the structural 1441 01:03:10,080 --> 01:03:14,600 Speaker 3: point of this part of tight end rankings. Year in ADP, 1442 01:03:14,880 --> 01:03:17,760 Speaker 3: year after year after year, burns us more than we 1443 01:03:17,800 --> 01:03:19,360 Speaker 3: find just diamonds in the raw. 1444 01:03:19,440 --> 01:03:23,000 Speaker 4: Yeah, these guys are more likely to at least historically speaking, 1445 01:03:23,040 --> 01:03:25,400 Speaker 4: they're more likely to finish closer to the guys being 1446 01:03:25,680 --> 01:03:28,640 Speaker 4: drafted after them than the ones being drafted before them. 1447 01:03:28,640 --> 01:03:31,040 Speaker 4: So unless you really recognize, like Sandloport, a tight end 1448 01:03:31,040 --> 01:03:33,000 Speaker 4: one this year, Like that's kind of how I felt 1449 01:03:33,000 --> 01:03:35,000 Speaker 4: about Tucker Craft, where like, no, this guy's gonna make 1450 01:03:35,000 --> 01:03:38,480 Speaker 4: the leap into the elite territory, then I think you 1451 01:03:38,520 --> 01:03:40,640 Speaker 4: have to be waiting on the position. 1452 01:03:40,840 --> 01:03:43,400 Speaker 2: And this is We've fallen into this trap in the past. 1453 01:03:43,440 --> 01:03:45,080 Speaker 1: But there really are a lot of late round guys 1454 01:03:45,080 --> 01:03:46,960 Speaker 1: that I like, Like Isaiah Likely, I like now that 1455 01:03:46,960 --> 01:03:48,640 Speaker 1: he's not on Baltimore. I like Mark Andrews now that 1456 01:03:48,720 --> 01:03:50,760 Speaker 1: Likely is not with him in Baltimore quite a bit 1457 01:03:50,800 --> 01:03:53,600 Speaker 1: in Redraft. I like Goddard with aj Brown God. I 1458 01:03:53,680 --> 01:03:56,640 Speaker 1: like Chicka konkoa a lot with the target opportunity. Ericson's 1459 01:03:56,680 --> 01:04:00,200 Speaker 1: been all over Dulcisues. You know, totally fil Dultage. 1460 01:03:59,880 --> 01:04:01,760 Speaker 3: Is free square, baby, don't it's gonna be a top 1461 01:04:01,760 --> 01:04:02,320 Speaker 3: twelve tight end. 1462 01:04:02,720 --> 01:04:05,280 Speaker 2: You do not spend I just I. 1463 01:04:05,200 --> 01:04:09,040 Speaker 4: Just hope I'm not getting Chris Herndon, please, like, Okay, 1464 01:04:09,080 --> 01:04:12,040 Speaker 4: why would you take a quo would have last? Got no, 1465 01:04:12,080 --> 01:04:14,640 Speaker 4: because I gotta acknowledge. Because I remember when I was 1466 01:04:14,640 --> 01:04:16,560 Speaker 4: doing red at Ama a lot of years ago, people 1467 01:04:16,560 --> 01:04:18,240 Speaker 4: asked me how Chris Herndon was doing, and I was like, 1468 01:04:19,120 --> 01:04:23,760 Speaker 4: Alberto also said not good enough, Albert, Oh yeah, all right, 1469 01:04:23,800 --> 01:04:25,000 Speaker 4: well Albert. 1470 01:04:24,680 --> 01:04:27,840 Speaker 1: Who we wanted to give some bonus rookie verse veteran 1471 01:04:27,880 --> 01:04:30,480 Speaker 1: picks here. So we've got three, that's two running backs 1472 01:04:30,480 --> 01:04:31,440 Speaker 1: and a receiver here. 1473 01:04:31,480 --> 01:04:33,040 Speaker 2: So we'll move quickly through these and they get out 1474 01:04:33,040 --> 01:04:33,280 Speaker 2: of here. 1475 01:04:33,960 --> 01:04:35,800 Speaker 1: Right at the top of the rookie running back rankings, 1476 01:04:35,840 --> 01:04:39,520 Speaker 1: Jeremiah Love. He's RB thirteen, one spot ahead of kyn Williams, 1477 01:04:39,520 --> 01:04:42,280 Speaker 1: the veteran at RB fourteen. Who do you like, rookie 1478 01:04:42,320 --> 01:04:44,080 Speaker 1: with the upside or the veteran with a little bit 1479 01:04:44,120 --> 01:04:46,560 Speaker 1: more safety ericson Love or Williams. 1480 01:04:46,800 --> 01:04:50,240 Speaker 4: I'm going to go with Jeremiah Love. Just looking at 1481 01:04:50,280 --> 01:04:53,120 Speaker 4: the draft capital and he got seventy eight percent of 1482 01:04:53,160 --> 01:04:56,280 Speaker 4: running backs drafted inside the top twelve overall in the draft, 1483 01:04:56,600 --> 01:04:59,960 Speaker 4: finished top twelve in their first season in the NFL. 1484 01:05:00,360 --> 01:05:03,880 Speaker 4: I think that Love it's not necessarily a ceiling year 1485 01:05:03,880 --> 01:05:06,200 Speaker 4: for him. Per Se but I think that finishing as 1486 01:05:06,240 --> 01:05:08,640 Speaker 4: a back end fantasy RB one is in his range 1487 01:05:08,640 --> 01:05:12,720 Speaker 4: of outcomes. I do think that's kind of where that's 1488 01:05:12,800 --> 01:05:14,360 Speaker 4: kind of where his ECR is ranked. I don't think 1489 01:05:14,360 --> 01:05:16,280 Speaker 4: it's gonna be going much higher than that, but that's 1490 01:05:16,360 --> 01:05:18,040 Speaker 4: kind of whe Kyroen has been as well, Like he's 1491 01:05:18,080 --> 01:05:20,760 Speaker 4: been a low end back end RB two RB one 1492 01:05:20,840 --> 01:05:24,720 Speaker 4: the last two seasons, and I'm pretty hung up on 1493 01:05:24,760 --> 01:05:27,360 Speaker 4: the Williams quorum type of split. I know last year 1494 01:05:27,440 --> 01:05:29,160 Speaker 4: that's kind of what this backfield formed. They knew and 1495 01:05:29,160 --> 01:05:31,400 Speaker 4: it worked really well because Kyroen was way more efficient 1496 01:05:31,560 --> 01:05:35,880 Speaker 4: as we're seeing fewer touches. However, I do question is 1497 01:05:35,920 --> 01:05:37,760 Speaker 4: he ever going to get back to that RB two 1498 01:05:37,840 --> 01:05:39,840 Speaker 4: in points per game that he was three years ago. 1499 01:05:40,240 --> 01:05:42,840 Speaker 4: I don't think so. So both guys are kind of 1500 01:05:42,840 --> 01:05:46,000 Speaker 4: me on that fringe of back end RB one conversation, 1501 01:05:46,920 --> 01:05:49,920 Speaker 4: and if I'm gonna bet on if J I think 1502 01:05:49,960 --> 01:05:52,240 Speaker 4: the thing that differentulates the love for me and not 1503 01:05:52,440 --> 01:05:54,960 Speaker 4: talking about the offense is if love really takes off 1504 01:05:55,000 --> 01:05:58,080 Speaker 4: as a receiver, like that's what ultimately would push him 1505 01:05:58,120 --> 01:06:00,240 Speaker 4: over the top for me. If he just sees like 1506 01:06:00,560 --> 01:06:03,520 Speaker 4: a bunker's target share the offense is feeding him, the 1507 01:06:03,600 --> 01:06:05,880 Speaker 4: floor is getting him targets like he did with Breise 1508 01:06:05,960 --> 01:06:08,640 Speaker 4: Hall during his young years with the New York Jets. 1509 01:06:08,960 --> 01:06:10,880 Speaker 4: Then I could see leading towards Love. I am lower 1510 01:06:10,920 --> 01:06:13,560 Speaker 4: and consensus than both of these players, though, so I 1511 01:06:13,600 --> 01:06:15,280 Speaker 4: haven't really been going out of my way to target 1512 01:06:15,320 --> 01:06:17,680 Speaker 4: either Jeremiah Love or Karen Williams. 1513 01:06:18,520 --> 01:06:21,160 Speaker 1: Broad The NFL tends to get right with early running backs, 1514 01:06:21,200 --> 01:06:22,919 Speaker 1: especially in the last ten years or so. They don't 1515 01:06:22,960 --> 01:06:24,760 Speaker 1: often miss If they're willing to take a guy at 1516 01:06:24,760 --> 01:06:28,720 Speaker 1: this position this highly, they're usually pretty productive at least early. 1517 01:06:29,160 --> 01:06:30,720 Speaker 2: What do you think about Love versus Kien. 1518 01:06:31,480 --> 01:06:33,440 Speaker 3: I've got them back to back in my rankings, but 1519 01:06:33,480 --> 01:06:36,439 Speaker 3: i'd have Kyron getting the slight edge RB fifteen versus 1520 01:06:36,560 --> 01:06:40,280 Speaker 3: RB sixteen. To Erickson's point, like I just want to 1521 01:06:40,280 --> 01:06:45,040 Speaker 3: invest in the better offense, more touchdown equity. And honestly, 1522 01:06:45,200 --> 01:06:47,080 Speaker 3: I'm kind of at the point too of like we 1523 01:06:47,760 --> 01:06:49,880 Speaker 3: like I've made this bet against Kyroen Europe for a 1524 01:06:49,960 --> 01:06:51,480 Speaker 3: year of for a year and stuff like that, and 1525 01:06:51,520 --> 01:06:54,440 Speaker 3: I feel like I'm just I'm conceding, like I'm wrong, 1526 01:06:54,640 --> 01:06:57,760 Speaker 3: Like he's been RB two, RB ten, RB ten over 1527 01:06:57,760 --> 01:07:01,040 Speaker 3: the last three years, Kien, I get it. I'm sorry. 1528 01:07:01,160 --> 01:07:03,920 Speaker 3: I apologize. I'm just gonna draft Kyron Williams. 1529 01:07:04,520 --> 01:07:07,920 Speaker 1: Another running back here, Jadarium Price RB twenty seven versus 1530 01:07:07,920 --> 01:07:09,880 Speaker 1: Tony Pollard RB twenty nine. 1531 01:07:10,000 --> 01:07:11,960 Speaker 2: Debra, why is. 1532 01:07:11,960 --> 01:07:15,280 Speaker 3: Tony Pollard not a top twenty four back? I'm taking 1533 01:07:15,320 --> 01:07:20,160 Speaker 3: Tony Pollard here this. I love javedarium Price's talent. I 1534 01:07:20,160 --> 01:07:22,880 Speaker 3: don't know what happens in that backfield. Can he be 1535 01:07:23,000 --> 01:07:25,360 Speaker 3: Kenneth Walker plus and actually get the red zone touches 1536 01:07:25,920 --> 01:07:27,120 Speaker 3: with Zach sharbonay out? 1537 01:07:27,200 --> 01:07:27,520 Speaker 4: Sure? 1538 01:07:27,680 --> 01:07:31,520 Speaker 3: And then Seattle decides to throw Emanuel Wilson or George 1539 01:07:31,560 --> 01:07:34,040 Speaker 3: harelaanee our way, and then we're all like, oh crap, 1540 01:07:34,080 --> 01:07:36,520 Speaker 3: why didn't we see this coming. Tony Pollard, I think 1541 01:07:36,600 --> 01:07:38,120 Speaker 3: is gonna get all the freaking touches. I'm not that 1542 01:07:38,160 --> 01:07:41,320 Speaker 3: worried about Taja Spears, who has been unable to stay healthy, 1543 01:07:42,160 --> 01:07:44,600 Speaker 3: has been an effective last year when he was on 1544 01:07:44,640 --> 01:07:47,800 Speaker 3: the field. I think Tony Pollard is going to get 1545 01:07:47,800 --> 01:07:49,520 Speaker 3: a crap done a volume and what I think is 1546 01:07:49,520 --> 01:07:51,600 Speaker 3: going to be an improved offense this year. And you 1547 01:07:51,600 --> 01:07:55,439 Speaker 3: look at Brian Daboll's history, he feeds one freaking running back, 1548 01:07:55,640 --> 01:07:57,600 Speaker 3: so like while Sala was talking about, oh we got 1549 01:07:57,600 --> 01:08:00,480 Speaker 3: two Bill Cows and Tony Pollard and Taja Spears, what 1550 01:08:00,640 --> 01:08:06,040 Speaker 3: has the offensive coordinator done over legit his entire history? 1551 01:08:06,600 --> 01:08:08,320 Speaker 3: I mean, you go back to the Peyton Hill this year. 1552 01:08:08,320 --> 01:08:10,360 Speaker 3: You can talk about cam' skataboo. Last year. You can 1553 01:08:10,400 --> 01:08:12,800 Speaker 3: talk about Saquon, you can talk about Devin Singletary, you 1554 01:08:12,800 --> 01:08:15,280 Speaker 3: can throwbout all these different guys. One guy is gonna 1555 01:08:15,280 --> 01:08:17,559 Speaker 3: get the freaking rock a crap ton and I think 1556 01:08:17,560 --> 01:08:19,479 Speaker 3: that's gonna be Tony Pollard, and I think he should 1557 01:08:19,479 --> 01:08:21,479 Speaker 3: be a top twenty four running back in rankings right now. 1558 01:08:21,520 --> 01:08:23,759 Speaker 3: I think it's wrong versus easier Erickson. 1559 01:08:24,920 --> 01:08:27,559 Speaker 4: I don't disagree with these you are. I don't want 1560 01:08:27,680 --> 01:08:30,040 Speaker 4: Tony Pollard. I don't think there's a lot of upside 1561 01:08:30,040 --> 01:08:31,799 Speaker 4: with Tony Pollard this year, to be honest. 1562 01:08:32,000 --> 01:08:33,960 Speaker 3: Oh, you don't love the Titans hunts not what you 1563 01:08:34,000 --> 01:08:35,000 Speaker 3: love that on previous shows. 1564 01:08:35,040 --> 01:08:37,439 Speaker 4: Man, I love I like the Titans, but it doesn't 1565 01:08:37,439 --> 01:08:39,360 Speaker 4: mean that I love their twenty nine year old running 1566 01:08:39,360 --> 01:08:41,760 Speaker 4: back who has over a fifteen hundred career touches. The 1567 01:08:41,800 --> 01:08:43,960 Speaker 4: guy's right ahead of him in the career touch list 1568 01:08:44,080 --> 01:08:48,040 Speaker 4: for running backs. Austin Eckler, dust Nick Chubb, dust Kareem Hunt, 1569 01:08:48,120 --> 01:08:51,080 Speaker 4: dust James Connor, like he's hitting that point of his 1570 01:08:51,120 --> 01:08:53,439 Speaker 4: career where things start to really fall off for a 1571 01:08:53,520 --> 01:08:56,639 Speaker 4: running back and accumulating nearly three hundred touches per season 1572 01:08:56,680 --> 01:08:59,599 Speaker 4: over the last three years. Last two seasons, he has 1573 01:08:59,760 --> 01:09:02,960 Speaker 4: zero top twenty finishes in season long standings, despite the 1574 01:09:02,960 --> 01:09:04,920 Speaker 4: fact that he has been already seen, Like Deebro, your 1575 01:09:05,000 --> 01:09:07,040 Speaker 4: argument has been, he's seeing all this volume. He's gonna 1576 01:09:07,040 --> 01:09:08,800 Speaker 4: see all this volume. He's been seeing the volume. 1577 01:09:08,880 --> 01:09:12,000 Speaker 3: Dude talking about like a bottom five Will Levis saying 1578 01:09:12,080 --> 01:09:14,760 Speaker 3: leading this offense this year man and Brian Callahan's but 1579 01:09:15,000 --> 01:09:16,479 Speaker 3: is not calling a freaking play. 1580 01:09:16,600 --> 01:09:17,280 Speaker 4: Okay, I get that. 1581 01:09:17,320 --> 01:09:19,920 Speaker 3: Can I agree on that? And they actually have skilled players, 1582 01:09:19,920 --> 01:09:22,439 Speaker 3: like we're not throwing to el am and Or and 1583 01:09:22,520 --> 01:09:26,880 Speaker 3: Shamiri DK and Exam freaking restrict But that's not happened. 1584 01:09:26,920 --> 01:09:28,800 Speaker 4: But the thesis of your argument was he's gonna see 1585 01:09:28,800 --> 01:09:30,840 Speaker 4: all the volume. It's like in my argument is, like, dude, 1586 01:09:30,960 --> 01:09:32,519 Speaker 4: the guy's been getting the volume and he hasn't done 1587 01:09:32,560 --> 01:09:33,240 Speaker 4: anything with it. 1588 01:09:33,360 --> 01:09:36,799 Speaker 3: In a horrible offense, they couldn't score any freaking touchdowns 1589 01:09:36,800 --> 01:09:39,560 Speaker 3: like Tony Palard had five scores last year? Can we 1590 01:09:39,600 --> 01:09:41,360 Speaker 3: agree he's gonna have more than that this year? 1591 01:09:41,439 --> 01:09:43,559 Speaker 4: I mean, I mean maybe, But like, do you think 1592 01:09:43,960 --> 01:09:45,040 Speaker 4: I think? 1593 01:09:45,080 --> 01:09:46,879 Speaker 3: I guess the Titans are gonna be that much improved. 1594 01:09:46,880 --> 01:09:50,080 Speaker 4: Erickson, I think Jerium Price has way more upside if 1595 01:09:50,080 --> 01:09:52,280 Speaker 4: you so, you're telling me Tony Pollard has a better 1596 01:09:52,320 --> 01:09:54,800 Speaker 4: chance of being a league winner than Jendarium Price. Answer 1597 01:09:55,040 --> 01:09:56,760 Speaker 4: and to that, answer that question, to me, who has 1598 01:09:56,760 --> 01:09:59,559 Speaker 4: a better chance of being a league winner? League price 1599 01:09:59,600 --> 01:10:01,840 Speaker 4: and app salute upside? I will give you the lean 1600 01:10:01,920 --> 01:10:04,120 Speaker 4: the price. But can we also talk about who has 1601 01:10:04,200 --> 01:10:05,000 Speaker 4: more risk here? 1602 01:10:05,479 --> 01:10:05,719 Speaker 3: Oh? 1603 01:10:05,920 --> 01:10:07,760 Speaker 4: I mean yeah, it's a guy that has never played 1604 01:10:07,800 --> 01:10:10,360 Speaker 4: in the NFL before. But in this okay, in this 1605 01:10:10,479 --> 01:10:12,800 Speaker 4: range in the draft, Tony Pollard, I can find someone 1606 01:10:12,840 --> 01:10:15,720 Speaker 4: to fill my RB two slot easy. I can't find 1607 01:10:15,760 --> 01:10:17,800 Speaker 4: Jenarium Prices. There's two guys that were drafted in the 1608 01:10:17,800 --> 01:10:20,120 Speaker 4: first round of this year's draft. One's Jeremiah Love and 1609 01:10:20,120 --> 01:10:22,679 Speaker 4: one is janedarium Price. And your price is going outside 1610 01:10:22,680 --> 01:10:24,720 Speaker 4: the top twenty four. We're talking about who should be 1611 01:10:24,720 --> 01:10:27,599 Speaker 4: top twenty four. Jenarium Price should be a top twenty 1612 01:10:27,600 --> 01:10:29,880 Speaker 4: four running back. When you look at seventy. 1613 01:10:30,479 --> 01:10:33,719 Speaker 3: In this argument, they didn't trust Kenneth Walker on passing 1614 01:10:33,760 --> 01:10:38,400 Speaker 3: downs or in pass pro last year, considering his college resume. 1615 01:10:39,120 --> 01:10:42,280 Speaker 3: Can you definitively tell me they're gonna trust Jendarium Price 1616 01:10:42,439 --> 01:10:44,599 Speaker 3: in either one of those roles this year? 1617 01:10:44,920 --> 01:10:46,720 Speaker 4: No, I cannot. But if you're telling me, I can 1618 01:10:46,720 --> 01:10:49,840 Speaker 4: get a Kenneth Walker s type of production profile from 1619 01:10:49,840 --> 01:10:52,599 Speaker 4: a guy that's really explosive on the Seahawks offense outside 1620 01:10:52,600 --> 01:10:54,439 Speaker 4: the top twenty again, people wouldn't be complaint of they 1621 01:10:54,520 --> 01:10:56,760 Speaker 4: drafted Ken Walker outside the top twenty four last year, 1622 01:10:57,200 --> 01:10:59,360 Speaker 4: like you would have been fined as an RB three. 1623 01:10:59,400 --> 01:11:01,479 Speaker 4: And that's where Jendarium Price also like. 1624 01:11:01,479 --> 01:11:03,240 Speaker 1: I want, I wonder what the usage will look like 1625 01:11:03,240 --> 01:11:05,000 Speaker 1: with I mean, Sharbonnay is not gonna be back to 1626 01:11:05,040 --> 01:11:07,240 Speaker 1: what mid November like, I mean his searchy was in 1627 01:11:07,320 --> 01:11:08,080 Speaker 1: late February. 1628 01:11:08,160 --> 01:11:11,320 Speaker 2: That's that's like he's going to miss this so all lot. 1629 01:11:11,479 --> 01:11:13,640 Speaker 4: I was really hesitant after Price got drafted in the 1630 01:11:13,640 --> 01:11:15,120 Speaker 4: first round. I thought he was going to be really 1631 01:11:15,120 --> 01:11:17,680 Speaker 4: expensive in redraft and to see him outside the top 1632 01:11:17,720 --> 01:11:20,720 Speaker 4: twenty four, I'm seventy percent of running backs drafted in 1633 01:11:20,800 --> 01:11:23,639 Speaker 4: round one finish top twenty four in their first year 1634 01:11:23,840 --> 01:11:27,040 Speaker 4: seventy percent since twenty thirteen. Those are the odds I 1635 01:11:27,040 --> 01:11:29,679 Speaker 4: want to lean into. So I will take Jenerium Price. 1636 01:11:29,680 --> 01:11:32,040 Speaker 4: I think he has way more upside than Tony Pollard does. 1637 01:11:32,880 --> 01:11:34,639 Speaker 3: I want to be very clear, I want to draft 1638 01:11:34,640 --> 01:11:36,599 Speaker 3: both of these guys. But if I chose, if I'm 1639 01:11:36,680 --> 01:11:39,360 Speaker 3: picking here, it's Tony Pollard. I just have more holes 1640 01:11:39,400 --> 01:11:43,759 Speaker 3: to poke in the conversation for Jendarium Bright Price versus 1641 01:11:43,760 --> 01:11:47,640 Speaker 3: Tony Pollard. But I don't disagree that Price has more upside, 1642 01:11:47,680 --> 01:11:50,600 Speaker 3: and I really do want to draft both of these guys. 1643 01:11:51,840 --> 01:11:53,680 Speaker 1: We got to wrap, so let's go very quickly here 1644 01:11:53,720 --> 01:11:55,800 Speaker 1: in the last one, Mike Evans wide receiver twenty six 1645 01:11:55,880 --> 01:11:58,400 Speaker 1: or sticking with the Titans, Carnell Tate wide receiver thirty 1646 01:11:58,479 --> 01:12:02,559 Speaker 1: rookie versus a much older veteran here Tater. Evans quickly 1647 01:12:02,640 --> 01:12:03,599 Speaker 1: ericson who do you like better? 1648 01:12:04,439 --> 01:12:07,160 Speaker 4: I think Evans if I need more early wide receiver production. 1649 01:12:07,920 --> 01:12:10,559 Speaker 4: But if it's Hey, you have to ride or die 1650 01:12:10,560 --> 01:12:12,120 Speaker 4: with this player all year long. I would go with 1651 01:12:12,160 --> 01:12:15,000 Speaker 4: Carnell Tate, but you can draft both guys Evans round five, 1652 01:12:15,040 --> 01:12:16,960 Speaker 4: Tait and round six. That's honestly what I would want 1653 01:12:16,960 --> 01:12:18,320 Speaker 4: to do, so that's my cop out. 1654 01:12:19,280 --> 01:12:20,680 Speaker 2: Devro, You going to take a cop out? 1655 01:12:21,320 --> 01:12:23,040 Speaker 3: No, I'm not taking a cop out. This is Mike 1656 01:12:23,040 --> 01:12:26,240 Speaker 3: Evans and it's not closed for me. Mike Evans last 1657 01:12:26,280 --> 01:12:29,760 Speaker 3: year in seven ful games, played twenty four percent target share, 1658 01:12:29,840 --> 01:12:33,200 Speaker 3: thirty percent first read share. He was top thirteen in 1659 01:12:33,320 --> 01:12:35,879 Speaker 3: multiple different metrics that I freaking care about. The problem 1660 01:12:35,960 --> 01:12:37,920 Speaker 3: for Mike Evans is that he had a seventy point 1661 01:12:38,000 --> 01:12:40,760 Speaker 3: nine percent catchuple target rate, which amongst one hundred and 1662 01:12:40,800 --> 01:12:43,719 Speaker 3: nine qualifying wide receivers last year was eighty freaking fourth. 1663 01:12:44,040 --> 01:12:47,519 Speaker 3: He was second best amongst all wide receivers at least 1664 01:12:47,560 --> 01:12:50,320 Speaker 3: two hundred routes last year in separation and route win rate. 1665 01:12:50,600 --> 01:12:53,040 Speaker 3: Mike Evans has the ability in the upside to lead 1666 01:12:53,080 --> 01:12:56,240 Speaker 3: the entire freaking NFL in touchdowns and be this year's 1667 01:12:56,280 --> 01:12:59,200 Speaker 3: Devonte Adams. I'm betting on Mike Evans. 1668 01:13:00,000 --> 01:13:01,559 Speaker 1: We'll ahead and wrap things up. There went a little 1669 01:13:01,600 --> 01:13:03,160 Speaker 1: long for you had a lot of names to get through, 1670 01:13:03,200 --> 01:13:05,400 Speaker 1: so that makes sense. Why, Thanks everybody for checking out 1671 01:13:05,400 --> 01:13:08,479 Speaker 1: this episode of tough draft data decisions for de Bro 1672 01:13:08,560 --> 01:13:08,960 Speaker 1: and Ericson. 1673 01:13:09,000 --> 01:13:10,679 Speaker 2: I'm ryan warmly. We'll see again next time. 1674 01:13:11,000 --> 01:13:14,120 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy football podcast. 1675 01:13:14,280 --> 01:13:16,799 Speaker 1: If you love the show, the best freeway to support 1676 01:13:16,880 --> 01:13:19,960 Speaker 1: us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts 1677 01:13:20,040 --> 01:13:23,360 Speaker 1: at Fantasypros dot com slash review or on Spotify. 1678 01:13:23,680 --> 01:13:24,320 Speaker 2: Follow us on 1679 01:13:24,600 --> 01:13:28,080 Speaker 1: X, Instagram, and TikTok at Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to 1680 01:13:28,120 --> 01:13:31,000 Speaker 1: our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com slash Fantasypros.