WEBVTT - ASML Data Stolen and Elon Musk Not Leaving Twitter Just Yet

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline Higher, Bloomberg's world headquarters in New York, and

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I made Lovelow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 1>coming up. Espionage in the chip industry ASML accusing a

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:28.639
<v Speaker 1>former China based employee are stealing confidential information, the second

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>such breach in less than a year. We discussed plus

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.480
<v Speaker 1>are we there yet? Elon Musk says he needs until

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>late this year to fix Twitter before handing over to

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:41.599
<v Speaker 1>a new CEO. Will bring you the details and valuing

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>the AI opportunity. We sit down with Sonja Juang, partner

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>on Sequoia's capital growth team, for a look at the

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>future of generative AI technology and the startups driving it.

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>But first were checking on the markets because well, initially

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>there was panic that retail sales were growing at almost

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the fastest clip in two years up three. Does that

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>mean inflation is going to be high too? But then

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the market decides to drive higher and in fact we

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>closed session highers in the natstack up nine. The modern

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>markets more worried about the good data and there are

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>some six spaces points as they think the Fed's going

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to have to tackle that inflammation inflation. Interestingly, we've got

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a sell off in Chinese related names

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. Maybe this is a bit more of

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:23.479
<v Speaker 1>a focus on what's happening in terms of geopolitics rather

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>than what's happening in the macro economy in the US.

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 1>Flipping on a gear, I'm going to delve into some

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of the micro stories. On the day, we had some

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>significant rallies. I mean notably Roadblocks up twenty six percent,

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:37.320
<v Speaker 1>best day since December twenty Everyone was gaming over the

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:40.919
<v Speaker 1>holiday season, and also they were really adding those active users.

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>Airbnb up best dayance November twenty one really on a

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>tear as well, as it seems as though the strength

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of twenty two it's going to continue into next year. Yeah,

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>earning is a real driver, and that's still the case

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>after ours this Wednesday. These are names I'm watching. Cisco

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>forecasting sales in the April quarter will rise eleven to

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>thirteen sent, double what analysts were forecasting, that stock having

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a positive reaction. Twilio of course just gone through a

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>second round of layoffs, but a surprise forecast for an

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>adjusted profit cents per share for the current fiscal quarter.

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>The street looking for a two cent lost That a

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>big surprise and boosting that stock boos Roku one that

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>we haven't spoken about as much carry up even after

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>saying first quarter sales will be seven hundred million dollars

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>slightly above street expectations. That there's been concerned about how

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>they're losing market share to everyone else out there and

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be weathering the storm. The big story of

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the day in markets but also geo politically was a

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>SML the Dutch chip equipment makers saw It's u s

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>A d r S actually under pressure for most of

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday session but basically closing flat. What we know, the

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>company disclosed that a former employee in China stole information.

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>That's what was driving the narrative. Now in the last

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty minutes of breaking bloomberg scoop which gives us some

0:02:56.040 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>more insight into exactly what that information, what that data was.

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>That's bringing an executive editor, Tom Giles, who has the details. Tom,

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>what have we learned in the last thirty minutes We

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:09.519
<v Speaker 1>have gotten information about We've got more information on exactly

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>what was stolen. So this ex employee, this China based employee,

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>took information from a data management system that's used internally

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to let employees collaborate on products, and the products in

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>this instance are very expensive lithography machines that a s

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>m L uses that that customers use to actually make chips.

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>It's very expensive equipment. It's these these are these could

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>be the size of busses and costs upwards of a

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy million dollars a piece. So it's very

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>very valuable information. And what this person took, we don't

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>have the specifics, but they we know where it came from,

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and it came from this like information sharing system called

0:03:55.480 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>life Cycle life Center, Team Center. Is that what I mean?

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>If he seems to be coming from the likes of

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Siemens Tom. What's so interesting is that this is what

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the second time that we've seen such a breach from

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>China being linked for a s mL, and all of

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>this just speaks to the tension around US and China,

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 1>particularly in technology. Yeah, you know, the US is doing

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>everything it can to deprive China of the information and

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>the and the and the technology it needs in order

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to become a force in hip making. It legs far

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:34.559
<v Speaker 1>behind the US in this critical technology, and the US

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>is doing everything it can, and it has asked players

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>in Japan and the Netherlands, which are some of the companies,

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>including a s mL that make the most sophisticated equipment.

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>If you don't have a s m L on your side,

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard for you to come anywhere near the

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>capabilities of the US and the West. And that's why

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a s m L is so critical. It is one

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>of the very few companies in the world that makes

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>these photography systems that the information was stolen about UM

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:08.479
<v Speaker 1>using everything from e vs to military gear. Tom As always,

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for helping break down what is

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>another great scoop coming from your team. Now turning to

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 1>another company that we're watching, just talking about Evis and well,

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the man that's behind one of the key ones, but

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.160
<v Speaker 1>he's also behind Twitter at the moment. Elon Musk spoke

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to the World Government's summit in Dubai earlier today, so

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 1>that he may need to rest, in fact, have the

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>rest of this year to make things right at Twitter

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>before handling off to a new chief executive officer. Just

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 1>take a listen. I think I need to um stabilize

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the organization and just make sure it's in a financially

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>healthy place. UM and that the product road map is

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>clearly laid out. UM, So I don't know. I'm guessing

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>probably towards the end of this year, UM, we should

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>would be good timing to um find someone else to

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 1>run the company, because I think it should be in

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>a stable position around you know, at the end of

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>this year, well Man has followed his entire journey over

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is one cut Wagner and I feel like a

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of Tesla shareholders were a bit disappointed by that timeline.

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 1>But what it was the Twitter reaction? Yeah, Well for me,

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 1>having you know, seen the pole that Elon Musk came

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>out with at the end of last year saying should

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I find someone? I think the expectation from folks is

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that this was going to happen a lot quicker than

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a full calendar year, right, But as he pointed out,

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>he has really been dramatically trying to cut down on

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the costs at Twitter. He's still spending a lot more

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>time physically in the building than I would have predicted

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>when he first took over. So you know, he he

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>clearly doesn't feel like Twitter is in eight place where

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>he can hand it off to someone else. Now. I

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.159
<v Speaker 1>also think, let's be real when he does find a

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>new CEO. It's not as if he's suddenly going to disappear, right.

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>This is someone who likes to be very, very hands

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>on with the companies that he has. But I do

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>think that it's taking a lot longer it will. It

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:58.919
<v Speaker 1>sounds like take a lot longer than I had expected.

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>As we do each and every day, we went to

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>our audience and asked, what do you think must should

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>be doing right now? Should he be doubling down on Twitter?

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Should he go back to Tesla? These are the results.

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>They kind of speak for themselves. Respondents say, get a

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>new CEO in a SAP. What I'm finally hard to

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>pass is what has he actually done there? What is

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>he actually changed? And what is a brief amount of

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>time since taking over? Well, we know that he has

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>gotten rid of a lot of people, right in terms

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of costs, They've cut more well over half of the staff.

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>They're not paying some of their bills, they're trying to

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>renegotiate contracts with vendors. So you know, there are business

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>things that he's doing to try and drastically limit how

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>much money Twitter is spending. So that's one thing from

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a product standpoint, you know, it doesn't feel like there's

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>been a ton. Of course, for those of us who

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>use Twitter all the time, we've seen things like, uh,

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the algorithm changes or the tweaks too, maybe

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the types of things we see in our feed that

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>we didn't before. But it's not as if there's been

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>some major new product then none of us were expecting

0:07:57.880 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that's come out yet. Yeah. Well, I guess Twitter blue

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to a setting stand you have the edit if you

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you know edit button issues. I canna ask you a

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>difficult question, knowing full well none of us had an answer.

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>But who could be yea and the next CEO at Twitter? Well,

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>what's funny is that, you know, I think we we've

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>heard and reported that there's kind of a search going on,

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>or there was a search at the end of last year.

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>But what's you know, My read on this is that

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be someone who Ellen is very close

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>with already, right, I mean, he's not going to just

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>hand this company over to someone that a search firm

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>finds for him. It's going to be a trusted adviser.

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be a friend. And you know, I

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>think that list is probably relatively short. You see you

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>look at the people who have been helping out most

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>at Twitter, which maybe it gives you the best idea.

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>There's people like David Sachs, right, who he knows from

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:42.959
<v Speaker 1>his PayPal days of venture capitalist Steve Davis, the president

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 1>of the boring Company, has been spending a lot of

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>time on Twitter. Those are the types of names that

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I would be leaning toward. But again it sounds like

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of time before he's going to

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>make that decision. Cogner, love having you on about it,

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Meanwhile, let's stick on the theme

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of elon Musque because thanks to Tesla's se many scent

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 1>rise this year, that's the stock price. The millionaire is

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>closing in on recapturing his title as the world's which

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>is person since, of course he fell behind Bernard oh

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>No in December, but may take a bit longer for

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>mus to actually overtake No, who's of course behind LVMH.

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>He disclosed in fact this week he gave eleven point

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>six million Tesla shares to unnamed charitable causes between August

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and December two. Now, the stock was worth about one

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>point nine billion dollars based on closing prices on the

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>days must donated the securities. Earlier today, the SEC proposed

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:46.599
<v Speaker 1>expanding certain requirements to cover a range of assets, including

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>virtual currencies. Bloomberg Shnali Bassek caught up with coin Bases

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 1>General counsel and chief legal officer Paul Grell about how

0:09:54.000 --> 0:10:00.040
<v Speaker 1>these changes were impacked his company, coin Base cuse c

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Truck's company is a qualified custodian today, It was a

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>qualified custodian yesterday, and it will remain a qualified custodian tomorrow.

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>UM And the reason for that is that in many ways,

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 1>coin bases operated exactly in accordance with these rules, and

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>we think that's good for the industry, and we think

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that's good for consumers and investors. Against that, back draw, Paul,

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of these SEC share comments that

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>investment advisors can't necessarily rely on platforms such as coin

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Base as qualified custodians. Well, I think that when it

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 1>comes to coin But when it comes to coin Base,

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 1>we've seen actually SEC officials explicitly recognized that UM coin

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:45.079
<v Speaker 1>based can and does operate operate as a qualified custodian

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>in a safe, reliable manner that investors and consumers can

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>have confidence in as for others, we think standards are

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a good thing. We think that UM investors and consumers

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>have a right to understand that their assets are safe,

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 1>that the standards are being followed by those charge with

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that responsibility. Are are those our standards that have been

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>vetted by appropriate UH over overseers and regulators. So in

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways, this is about bringing the rest

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of the industry up to the standard coin basis set

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>for itself, and on balance, we think that's positive, Pa Paul.

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>What does that then mean for something like international expansion?

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the day, UH, cryptocurrencies broadly are

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>an international prospect. How does that translate? They are? I mean,

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>there's no question about it that UM. One of the

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>things that I think is has has has accounted for

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>LAD to so much of the interests in crypto is

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>it's borderless nature. But the factor remains that each jurisdiction

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>has its own rules, and coin base of course follows

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>those rules UM in to the strict letter of the law. UM.

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>The thing is though, that for UM, for many in

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>crypto UM, the options to operate are are truly international.

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:56.839
<v Speaker 1>What that means is that the United States needs to

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>understand that um its standards are in some ways, uh

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>competing against those of the rest of the world, and

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 1>so yes, we always want to make sure that investors

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and consumers are protected. Yes, we want to make sure

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that those standards are clear. But it's also important to

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>strike the right balance between innovation on the one hand

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and protection on the other. That was Coin Basis Teeth

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>legal officer Pool Grail. Let's get into it with Bloomberg

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Shnali Bassek, who is a part of that conversation that

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>brought us that intoview. I guess the starting point is

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean for coin bases business? How does

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:32.719
<v Speaker 1>this complicate things for them going forward? Well, I think

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things are interesting here. Ed you have

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 1>them clearing the record here and seeing them as a

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>qualified custodian even under these new proposed rules that it's

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>still unclear on how long they would take to become

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>real rules given the feedback that they're getting. Overall, remember,

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>even though you have coin Base here kind of applauding

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>certain parts of this process here, coin base has such

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>a nuanced relationship with the SEC they applaud certain parts

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of this rule making process us. But remember there are

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>other things that they heavily dispute, such as some things

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>that the SEC feels about staking. Even when it comes

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to this qualified custodian issue, remember coin based is one,

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you have other members of the crypto community a little

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:16.679
<v Speaker 1>more concerned. Jake Travinsky, for example, of the Blockchain Association

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>voicing his frustrations online about how these proposed changes could

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>violate the SEC's mission by making investors less safe and

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>discouraging capital formation. And I have to say, when you

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>look at the other SEC commissioners that have weighed in,

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>there are a number that have also voiced concerns about

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the amount of qualified custodians. What happens outside of coin

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>based in this industry, remember both because Bitcoin was up

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:44.119
<v Speaker 1>over the twenty four hour period as well as some positive,

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>frankly regulatory news for coin based you saw the shares

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>just completely ripping today. But again there are some things

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>on the sidelines, like the staking issue, which remains to

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>be unresolved. Let's go outside the world of coin based

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 1>las because my husband's a manager over there, so I

0:13:57.720 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>don't want to talk about it too much, but I'm

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>interested in you'll world outside what other ripple effects, What

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>is you know, e crypto at large being reading into

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the SEC crackdown? Is it where did the ripple effects

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>go well outside of coin based Like I was saying,

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the reason this matters so much is because we've reported

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times this week that the SEC and

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>other regulators have largely been whispering to the rest of

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the financial industry, is saying that listen, your relationship to

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>crypto matters to you, and by the way, could open

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you up to more liabilities. So if you're a hedge fund,

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>do you have to worry about how your assets are custody?

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting because let's see how the next twelve months

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>play out, because as that forced these hedge funds like

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a Brevan Howard or others to start working with the

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>likes of a coin base more, what happens to something

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>like b n y Melon you have, for example, just

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a couple of days ago. Brian, I'm so from talking

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>about how institutional interests has grown in this space, even

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>despite some of the crypto winter issues. But what happens

0:14:55.680 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>as the SEC brings down a stronger arm on the industry,

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>do the traditional players start to get a little spook

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>to the main question and to take it full circle

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>back to why the SEC is so rankled about crypto

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and why in many ways people are staying acting with

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>hindsight is because of what happened in the fd X.

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>It's up to speeding. What's happening with the founder of

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>f t X. Some I'm not freed has been all

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>over the press today. What a day. So this has

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>been weeks where we knew that Sam Bank been freed

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>as well as his lawyers have been trying to keep

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the name of the guaranteurs behind this really record setting

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>bail package, this bond that you wander fifty million dollar

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>bond secret. But now we have the judge really saying

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that this doesn't apply to these particular instances because these

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>guaranteurs decided to be involved in such a public case.

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>These are two people that are very closely closely related

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to the parents of Sam Bank been freed. Remember this

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>is Barbara Freed and Joseph Bankman, who were been Stamford

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>law professors. Remember this is one of the people involved

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>in the guarante guarante our program. Here's Larry Kramer, who

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>was a Stanford lawd d mean a legal historian alongside

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Barbara Feed for a very long time. And if you

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>take a look at the statement here, really he makes

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>it very very personally. Has nothing to say about the

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>legal matter itself. But his family has faced a harrowing

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>battle with cancer, he says, and the Bankman Freed family

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>has been the truest of friends, and so this is

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a very personal matter for him to show up for

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bankman Freed family and the time of need. According

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to his statement provided to us on Wednesday, Tomorrow, Thursday,

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Sam Bankman Freed does face court in New York again

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to discuss his bail conditions. Remember, there's been a lot

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of questions about how he's been communicating with people via

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>signal and other means in the course of his house

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>arrest here where he is living with his family on

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>essentially what is uh land and property owned ultimately by

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Stanford as well. I'm sure you'll be giving us up

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to speed with all that happens in that court tomorrow,

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>shnais we kind come Meanwhile, sticking with oversight, the CEOs

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of Apple, Metta, Amazon, Microsoft, well, they've all been subpoenaed

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>by the House does are Committee chair Jim Jordan is

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>seeking more information from the tech giants on content moderation

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 1>that the subpoenas requires and a bit Shiye and new Jasseye,

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Tim Cookmark Zuckerberg, and Satyanadella to respond to the committee

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>with documents and communications by Marche. We do not know

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>if there will be an in person hearing. Ed Thank you, Karen.

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Are coming up. Apple pushing back it's long awaited debut

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of its mixed reality headset. We bring you the Bloomberg scoop.

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>That's next before we head to break, I'm checking in

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>on Roku cool Underway shares continues to push higher, up

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>almost eleven percent, forecasting revenue of seven hundred million in

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the fiscal first quarter, above expectations. I'm looking at commentary

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 1>on the call from Anthony Wood, CEO, Steve Loud and

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>CFO saying two very tough year, but the outlook going

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>forward a bit brighter and on that adjusted the bit

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>dar basis they're moving towards positivity. Will continue to try

0:17:54.520 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that stop as the calls ongoing. This is Bloomberg, let's

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about Apple, and they're setback for the company's next

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 1>big initiative. According to people familiar in the matter, that

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>touch Jon is postponing that planned introduction of its first

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 1>mixed reality headset. Let's go go to June instead of April,

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Mark German. Of course he did. Of course he

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 1>had the scoop for us. Just talk to us a

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit about well, what's having to put the brakes

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>on here? Yeah, thank you so much for having me

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>as always. So this is the latest incarnation of the

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>status of Apple's long awaited mixed reality headset. They wanted

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to get it out the door in about this time

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:53.199
<v Speaker 1>last year. They pushed it back to the end of

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.439
<v Speaker 1>last year, than to January of this year, than to

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>April of this year. Now it's being postponed yet again

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>early June at the annual Worldwide Developers Conference, Right, that's

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>ww d C. This makes a lot of sense. This

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>is Apple's big showcase every early summer, late spring, where

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>they introduced their next platforms, their next software updates for

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>all the devices. So it makes sense to showcase this

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>device there too. I get that. I get the marketing decision,

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>but was that what drove it? According to our sources,

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>did they basically say, you know what, let's wait for

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the big splash, or in looking at the products, was

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it just that there were issues, it wasn't ready. What

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>have you found out? I'm sure it was a blend

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of both. Obviously, Apple's a very marketing and PR driven company,

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>so I'm sure that had a big role to play

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in it. But this was mostly an engineering based decision. Uh.

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>There were quite a few issues related to both hardware

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:49.919
<v Speaker 1>and software on the device, and maybe a little bit

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>attributed to production as well, So it made sense to

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:54.880
<v Speaker 1>push it back, keeping the oven for a couple more

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 1>months and really have that introduction down correctly and have

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that gap in between when the products introduced and released

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>really stay in that initial time frame, right, because if

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>they introduced it in April, you know, they probably would

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>have to push back the release by a couple of

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>months as well because there were still quite a few

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>snags to to work through its pivoting from hardware to services.

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>You had another story twenty four hours ago about Apple

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>strategy when it comes to buy now, pay later, and

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it's changing how it makes decisions on basically lending to

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the consumer. What have you found out? So this is

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 1>actually quite interesting. So Apple will be doing lending for

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:38.959
<v Speaker 1>the first time. They'll be actually giving out these loans

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>up to about a thousand dollars for by now pay later. Uh.

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>This would be very similar to what a firm and

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>clarn on some of the other providers do. And so

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>what Apple will be doing is they'll be using all

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that data and that history they have on individual customers

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to make those decisions to decide how much they want alone. Baby.

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>You know they look at your Apple Pay right, how

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>many cards you have on Apple Pay, where you move

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 1>you're denied for an Apple card? How many apps do

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 1>you buy on the App Store? How much have you

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>spent and then paid are devices in the past Bloomberg

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Smart German, just ongoing terrific reporting on Apple. Thank you

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>so much. If you think that that artificial intelligence is

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>going to is going to influence the enterprise in a

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>big way, then I think this represents a just a

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:37.400
<v Speaker 1>staggering addressible market opportunity. Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>card Hard in New York and I made Lovelow in

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. You heard their carry the thoughts of C

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:46.119
<v Speaker 1>three AI CEO Tom Sebo on the show twenty four

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 1>hours ago. Let's carry on this conversation because it just

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>won't stop euphoria, the buzz around AI. It won't go away.

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>It won't go away. And I think what's notable is

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>we're all thinking about the consumer use right now, what

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:01.639
<v Speaker 1>is the enterprise use? And I know that there's some

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>big bets and the fact that they're gonna be some

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>killer apps out there, but not just for you and

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>E by the way in which we work and which

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>we put this to a real productive endpoint. Yeah, and

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>those are some of the names. They're continuing to raise

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:14.880
<v Speaker 1>funds as well. So let's get all of this under

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 1>wraps with Sonya Huang, a partner as the Oil Capital's

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Growth Teams's co led investment in AI focused companies such

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>as Gong where Sonya is on the board, as well

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>as Glean and Hugging Face. You can see some of

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the portfolio names there. Sonya, welcome. You set out a

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 1>thesis in September, and in that thesis you said, here's

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>where generative AI takes us. A lot has changed since September.

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Has any of what's happened accelerated, what's possible and how

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>soon it could happen? To your mind? Thank you so

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>much for having me here. We think this is a

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>watershed moment for a technology if we think about previous

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>platform shifts going from desktop to mobile, going from on

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>premise assass we think that this one is even larger

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>in magnitude as a PLATFORMSFT. I want to just take

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:03.959
<v Speaker 1>a moment to underscore the significance of what is happening

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>right now in technology. We now have models that are

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>capable of writing, of creating, of conversing at human or

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:15.400
<v Speaker 1>even superhuman levels of intelligence. That's something that computer scientists

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>have been dreaming of since the nineteen fifties and it's

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>finally arrived, and I think the impacts are going to

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>be profound. Every industry is getting reinvented by AI. Nieva

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and Glean are doing that, the search Gong is doing

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that with sales, iron Cloud is doing it with legal.

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>There's this Cambrian explosion of applications right now because whenever

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 1>there is a platform shift, it opens the door for

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:37.880
<v Speaker 1>founders to build new and daring, legendary companies. And that's

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 1>exactly the gold rush that we're seeing right now in

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the startup ecosystem. You've called it a gold rush. Bloomberg

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and some of his headlines is called it a frenzy.

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>There are publicly traded stock C three AI Big Bai

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that are of triple digits year today. Is this overhyped

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 1>or is the hype justified? Look, I think there's hype

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and there's substance, and we try to separate the two.

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Hype comes and goes. It kind of creates this crazy

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>animal spirits. You can't control it, and so for the

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>better of our part, we try to ignore what happens

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>with hype and focus on the substance. And when it

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>comes to substance, it is just stunning to see some

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of the results in generative AI already. If you think

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:17.719
<v Speaker 1>about previous times when everyone got excited about AI, a

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of it was a head fake. This time is different.

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 1>This time is it's not vapor where everyone has chat

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:26.640
<v Speaker 1>chypt in the palm of their hands. Everyone is using

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:28.640
<v Speaker 1>this technology. If you look at some of the results

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that are being delivered, get hub has some results that

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>they've published that fort lines of codes are now being

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:37.120
<v Speaker 1>auto completed by their model co pilot. If you look

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 1>at AI that can now generate entire screenplays and movies

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:42.919
<v Speaker 1>from scratch, the results are there. So we try to

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>ignore the hype and focus on the substance. And when

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>we see the substance of the results are being created

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:49.679
<v Speaker 1>right now. Boy, do we get excited. And when you

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>wrote in September that thought leadership pace Sonya, what was

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting is you hold it a large model War's law

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>dream for us. Therefore, already we got chat chypt on

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 1>a han. Where in the next decade does it take us?

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>What will we be able to do? Yeah, as as

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>we think about it, the pace of progress and R

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and D on the large models has just been breathtaking,

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's only going to accelerate. If you

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>see all the announcements that Google and Microsoft have been made.

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:20.159
<v Speaker 1>There is an arms race happening right now as it

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>comes to training and investing in these large models, both

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the algorithms and the compute and the data. And I

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 1>think that benefits the entire ecosystem because all these applications

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>rely on great foundational models. And as the foundational models

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>get larger and larger, their emerging capabilities just are blowing

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>everybody away. And I think that means it positive for

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the entire ecosystem. These applications are now capable of doing

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.360
<v Speaker 1>things that weren't possible before. Let me give you example,

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>iron Clad in our Portfolio is a company that does

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>legal contracting software. Now that GPT three three point five,

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 1>now we're going onto GPT four is getting so good

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>it is finally becoming possible for us to automate away

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the creation in the analysis of legal contracts. These are

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the sorts of capabilities that get unlocked at the application

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 1>layer when the foundational layer starts to get really good.

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:12.959
<v Speaker 1>Talked to the previous answer you gave was about separating

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>hype from reality, and the way in which you talk

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it does, unfortunately take me back a year or so

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>when the hype was all around crypto and I know

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you have nothing to do with f t X yourself personally,

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>but Sequoia has has itself abroad in that in some way.

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>And I'm interested as to how you think about the

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:33.239
<v Speaker 1>due diligence you do an AI and really understanding the

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>value of these companies, because it must be really hard

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to understand when you think it's such explosive growth. How

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>do you line up the valuations, how do you decide

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>what checks you're going to write and where this company's

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>future can go. Well, I was an investor or a

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>specialist in crypto, so I can't speak to that. What

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you is when it comes to AI,

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 1>we are leaning into the approach that we always take,

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>which is to find each of us finds one or

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:01.920
<v Speaker 1>two companies that we really really want to partner with

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 1>um every year. It's a very small number of companies.

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:07.399
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to find future category leaders, and then we

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>are running down due diligence in order to understand whether

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the evidence lines up with the story. Right now, the

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>story of these companies is incredibly promising when you think

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>about the things that they're able to do with They're

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 1>able to automate away the entire film creation process, the

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>entire game development process. The burden is then on us

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>as investors to go and make sure that the evidence

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:29.879
<v Speaker 1>lines up to the story, and that means talking to customers.

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 1>That means looking at dollar retention rates to make sure

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that customers as are as finding value out of these

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 1>products and that we're not just dreaming and hoping that

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>they will see and see that value. What's been so

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting about open AI in particular is its closed profit model,

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of emphasis has been on the investment

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>from Microsoft into that business, but a question that has

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>kept coming out of that is how do these companies monetize,

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Will they ever monetize to a level where they they

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 1>change the game? Can? Normically speaking? Yeah, Well, first of all,

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:05.199
<v Speaker 1>Opening Eye deserves a ton of credit for taking what

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:08.439
<v Speaker 1>happened with transformers and large language models and taking it

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 1>out of the research labs of these big tech companies

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and turning it into a real arms race. And they

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>have the results to show GPT three, GPT three point

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:20.719
<v Speaker 1>five chat GPT Dolly, these results are stunning. To your

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 1>question on business model, I actually think the business models

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 1>fairly straightforward. It is intelligence as an API, just as

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>we were in an API economy, just as you buy

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Stripe over API, you buy Twilio over a PI. A

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of the companies were working with need to rely

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:37.360
<v Speaker 1>on these foundational models in orders to run their goods

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and services, and a lot of them are looking to

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>pay open Aye for that. So the same way you

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 1>pay for an AP I call the Stripe, you pay

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 1>for an API called the open Eye. What's interesting around

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>open Ai, of course, has been the rapid pace at

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>which we've suddenly seen everyone wanted to use a hundred

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>million within a week or so. It's also now we

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>as they team up with Microsoft. They are trying to

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>very slowly but surely get it into consumers hands, people

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>learning it, t wating and proving with it. But unsurprisingly

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>humanity falls his chat bolts to the brink sometimes, and

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>there has been some reporting around some of the inaccuracies

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>or sometimes some of the extraordinary comments around sentient or not.

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>To that point, how do you feel about some of

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the regulation or indeed focus on ethics that we're getting

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to in the point in artificial intelligence. I think all

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of these questions are very real, They're very thoroughny, they're

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>very hairy. Some of them are getting solved as we speak. So,

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 1>for example, the concept that you were just talking about hallucinations,

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>which is that these models have the tendency to make

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:35.959
<v Speaker 1>up things on the fly, that's getting solved by these

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 1>foundational model companies. I wouldn't be surprised if in the

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:40.959
<v Speaker 1>next six to twelve months we have models that are

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>actually capable of truthfulness. There's other questions over ethics, over copyright.

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>These are sort of harrier problems that require all the

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>stakeholders together on the table and agree on what's fair.

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Is it's fair for stability and to profit off the

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 1>back of other artists work and stability for their part

0:29:57.480 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>has been a really good ecosystem player, and you collaborating

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and bringing artists to the table. I think these are

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 1>all problems that are solvable in the nearest medium term.

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I actually think long term about the economic impact what

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>happens when all these jobs start to get automated way.

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it has the potential to create a lot

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of disruption in terms of our labor force, in terms

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of the fabric of our society and the economy. And

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in that sense, I think it's incredibly important that we're

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>all investing in reskilling to make sure that we are

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>all able to make use of these new technologies and

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>nobody is left behind. This is a rising tide here.

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>We want the rising tide to lift all boats. So

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting to see also names from China by Do

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>ten Cent kind of follow suit very quickly. How interesting

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>is the opportunity there? There's an initiative in Conquress to

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of block access to investing into Chinese companies right now.

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Is that an area that you'll look to the talent

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and innovation that's coming out of China in Ai? Yeah, absolutely,

0:30:57.000 --> 0:31:00.080
<v Speaker 1>I focus on investments in the US and Europe. We

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>are Sequoia are set up as three separate teams US, Europe,

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>China and India Southeast Asia. So I primarily focus on

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>investments in the US and Europe, where we're seeing a

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of investment and efforts from the legs of Microsoft, Google,

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>n ai UM. I think that this will likely play

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 1>out similar to the cloud computing revolution, where you ended

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>up with Microsoft Asser, you ended up with Google Cloud

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 1>platform platform, you ended up with a WS in the US,

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and then the western world in China has its equivalent clouds.

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I think a similar thing will play out in the

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 1>foundational model world. Absolutely fascinating, a calm believe they're called hallucinations.

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>That's absolutely brilliant. Sekoia Capital partner Sonja Kaim, thank you

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 1>so much for spending some time with us. Wonderful to

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 1>deep dive on AI there. Meanwhile, coming up, let's deep

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>dive on ACoM I the shares falling after the infrastructure

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>software company reported results that well show pressure from the

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 1>cloud computing costs. The investment there, we're going to discuss

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>it all with the CEO and co founder is Tom Laton,

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Johnnys next and Ed you've got some breaking news. Yeah,

0:31:56.640 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 1>President Biden has done a surprise tweet. Actually in lading

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 1>our EV charging network. We have to ensure there's many

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>charges work for as many drivers as possible. He name

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>checks to that end at Elon Musk will open a

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>big part of that Tesla's network up to our drivers.

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Remember President Biden naming Tesla and naming Elon Musk. That

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>does not happen often. It's a story. Will continue to track.

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg most check in on the shares of

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>ACAM Technologies like they fell the most. It's May of

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 1>last year after reporting results. That's as Alice started to

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>note perhaps that the coward computing costs are pressuring some

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>free cash flow margins. Let's talk about why that investment

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>is being made and what the future of the company is.

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Tom Layton is a doctor. Is Acham i CEO as well.

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>They're just great to have some time with you. Tom,

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Just talk to us about it. Seems as though Alice

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 1>were a bit worried about the conservative nature of your

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 1>forward looking guidance in the first quarter full cost Talk

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to us about the shift to compute. Why will it

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>pay off eventually? Because perhaps you're pulling back home as

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and when it will pay off. Yeah, the compute market

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is enormous, you know, well north of a hundred billion

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year, and Acomy is in a great position

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to tap into that market with our launch of Acoma

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Connected Cloud. You know, we already have a platform with

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 1>over four thousand locations doing edge computing where function as

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a service, and now we're integrating in Lenode and growing

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it so that we'll have a core cloud compute functionality

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and a distributed compute functionality so containers and vms can

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>get a lot closer to end users around the world.

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>And by putting it all together, we're going to be

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>able to offer major enterprises better performance for a lot

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of compute function at a lower price point. And cost

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>is a big issue today with the cloud, and that's

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the place I think am I can really help. So

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>when all bcs on this says you're going all in

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 1>on compute, we would wait for evidence it can pay

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>off before getting back involved in your stock. When can

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 1>they get back involved? When will it pay off? Fienji thing, Tom, Well,

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I think now is a great time to get involved.

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, obviously weren't happy with a sell off today

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 1>but I think Akama has it a great value now

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 1>uh and as we do the build out this year

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and add the functionality, will be signing up more customers.

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:26.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've had the chance to meet with senior

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 1>executives at many of the world's leading media companies, commerce companies,

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and they are very excited about being able to use

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 1>ACAM Connected Cloud. Uh. You know, they care a lot

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>about performance, they care about getting their apps close to

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:43.319
<v Speaker 1>end users, and they care about cost. Uh. And so

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll see increasing numbers of large enterprises start

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 1>to adopt Akama Connected Cloud, and then that will translate

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:53.239
<v Speaker 1>into substantial revenue growth for ack AM. I down the

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 1>road saw me mentioned costs. I think one specific uh

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>complaint from the street I point out is they worried

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 1>about you taking on the likes of AWS and Asual

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:07.479
<v Speaker 1>on price. They you know, all BC for example, says,

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty tough value proposition. Is that your strategy

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 1>to take on the big boys when it comes to price. Well, yeah,

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've been competing with the cloud giants for

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:19.800
<v Speaker 1>over ten years, uh, and we still have the market

0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>leading delivery solutions and the market leading security solutions. Despite

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 1>competing with the hyper scalers. In fact, you know, the

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:29.759
<v Speaker 1>hyper scale ers are some of our largest customers. They

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:33.760
<v Speaker 1>use those services from ocom I, even though we're competing

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 1>with them, And now we're going to compete on core

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 1>cloud compute too, and you know, I think it'll be

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a compelling, compelling value proposition for major enterprises. Also, it's

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 1>it's good to realize we're not a threat to the

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:49.359
<v Speaker 1>hyper scale ers. You know, we're going after a one

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 1>or two percent market share over the next few years,

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 1>which for us is huge. That's billions of dollars, which

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>makes a big difference to doc am I. But you know,

0:35:57.040 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 1>they've got businesses that are growing fifteen percent a year

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and if Alcamy, you know, manager to take one or

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 1>two percent, that's not gonna slow them down. So I

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're worried about, oh, they've got a lower

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 1>price to compete with Acama. You taught us on the

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 1>cool about new segmentation customers. I just wondered if you

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 1>could took us through some of the areas where you

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>feel you're winning. What kind of customers are they? What

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 1>sectors are all spending money with you right now? Yeah,

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>for segmentation that's the companies that have you know, mission

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>critical functions, key infrastructure, banks, utilities, UH, companies that can't

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 1>afford to get be hit with ransomware. And increasingly you're

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:42.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing the government authorities require a solution there. And Guardicle

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>now is recognized as the market leader. So I think

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, over time, pretty much every major enterprise is

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:52.439
<v Speaker 1>going to need that solution. But today it's starting with

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:57.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, mission critical infrastructure. Tom Laighton A, come, I see,

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you for your time on a busy earnings stay

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and let's stick with earnings. Bloomberg caught up earlier with

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Airbnb CEO Brian Chesky post earnings, talking about robust travel demand.

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:11.319
<v Speaker 1>Here's what he had to say about where exactly the

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:15.279
<v Speaker 1>company is seeing any signs of that strength. We are

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>expecting pretty steady growth. Now. We are expecting a little

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 1>bit more accelerated growth in the short term stays, but

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that's that's more of a recovery. We're seeing more recovery

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 1>short term stays. We're seeing more people go to cities,

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing more people cross borders between urban and

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 1>cross border. That was around eight percent of our night's

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>book before the pandemic. So it's really more a matter

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of a recovery of the old ways of traveling and

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:42.919
<v Speaker 1>a real sustainability of the new ways, like including people

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>staying longer and traveling to more to places. C O.

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Brian Chesky that let's talk about UFOs and how they

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 1>can help the US fend off Russia and China. In

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the past few years, the US has been a lot

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:06.799
<v Speaker 1>more willing to talk about UFOs, and for a very

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:09.759
<v Speaker 1>good reason. It's not that authorities wants to talk about aliens,

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:13.799
<v Speaker 1>but there is no again, no indication of aliens or

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 1>extraterrestrial activity. They mean unidentified flying objects in the truest sense,

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 1>something airborne that they can't identify. They prefer to call

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:25.839
<v Speaker 1>them unidentified aerial phenomena. The u S breaks these so

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 1>called u a p s into five categories, according to

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a declassified report from one airborne clutter such as birds,

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 1>plastic bags, and civilian drones, natural atmospheric phenomena such as

0:38:37.320 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 1>ice crystals or thermal fluctuations, the US government or industrial

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>development programs which speak for themselves, foreign adversary systems, including

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:50.719
<v Speaker 1>technologies allegedly deployed by Russia or China, and the fairly nebulous.

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 1>On the other that's the one that tends to excite

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 1>people because it includes flying sources and little green men.

0:38:57.120 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 1>But it's the penultimate category foreign adversaryist that the government

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 1>really has, which is why it's been trying to encourage

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the military to report UFO sightings. Navy or Air Force

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 1>personnel might have felt embarrassed about reporting a potential UFO

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 1>sighting for fear of ridicule, but some of those might

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 1>actually have been spy balloons or drones from a geopolitical

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>competitor such as China. If the UFO isn't reported, then

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the government may never know that a spy balloon has

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>entered its airspace. The issue soared into the headlines when

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the U S shot down what it said was a

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Chinese spy balloon in February and said it was part

0:39:31.120 --> 0:39:33.839
<v Speaker 1>of a broader trend. If pilot's report what they think

0:39:33.880 --> 0:39:36.920
<v Speaker 1>are alien sightings more often, that it might help the

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:45.399
<v Speaker 1>US better identify actual threats from terrestrial rivals. Wimberg quick

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:48.319
<v Speaker 1>takes Alex web there and let's dig into this more.

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Hartman is president and CEO of Worldview. It's a

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:54.880
<v Speaker 1>company that focuses on remote sensing and stratospheric surveillance, and

0:39:54.920 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 1>which has we to go public through a merger with

0:39:57.160 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a black check firm, Ryan, stratosphere, it is a new economy.

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:05.239
<v Speaker 1>Explain that for us? Well, I think what we've seen

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 1>over the last few weeks is that the stratosphere is

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:12.360
<v Speaker 1>in fact a contested domain and what that means is

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:15.400
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be nations all around the world that

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:19.920
<v Speaker 1>are using this kind of technology to deliver remote sensing

0:40:20.120 --> 0:40:23.319
<v Speaker 1>or surveillance types of capabilities. And that's why we call

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:26.919
<v Speaker 1>it the stratospheric economy. Ryan, can you give us any

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 1>size and scope on how your business has been buffered

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:32.840
<v Speaker 1>by what's happening in the headlines of recent weeks. Are

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you winning new business because of this, Well, we're certainly

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:38.279
<v Speaker 1>getting a lot more interest, and I think, you know,

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:43.279
<v Speaker 1>the timing of us taking the company public helps UH

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 1>investors understand that, you know, this is an area where

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:51.239
<v Speaker 1>it's a great place to invest. There's there's certainly a

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 1>lot more work to be done in the in the stratosphere,

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's not just government work, it's commercial work. You

0:40:57.360 --> 0:41:00.479
<v Speaker 1>can do things like methane detection or monitoring our lines

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:03.800
<v Speaker 1>are other critical infrastructure, and so you know, it's it's

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really exciting. Um. You know, it's concerning as

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:09.920
<v Speaker 1>well to see those kind of technologies flying over our

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 1>own country, but but it's quite exciting. Put your technology

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 1>versus what we've seen out of China. How much more

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the game are they or not? Well, you know,

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:25.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the key difference differences of our technology is

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the ability to navigate. You know, we're not going to

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 1>fly over a country where we shouldn't be flying. Our

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 1>technology enables us to maneuver quite freely and enables us

0:41:34.160 --> 0:41:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to stay over an area for a very long period

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of time. And so those are the things that are important.

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Hartman, president and CEO of world View, will continue

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to track your company. I am sure now that does

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. Car Yesh sadly,

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be off in the next couple of days.

0:41:52.120 --> 0:41:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Time at schools shut down for a couple of days.

0:41:54.160 --> 0:41:55.680
<v Speaker 1>But I know that you're gonna do an amazing job.

0:41:55.680 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna be tuning in it, and you don't want

0:41:57.160 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to forget to choose to listen to our podcast to

0:41:59.760 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you can finding on the terminal Hill online on Apple

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and Spotify, on iHeart and our Twitter spaces. I'm already

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:09.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna start promoting that for Friday midday New York Time

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:12.319
<v Speaker 1>from New York. From San Francisco, discipline Berg