Speaker 1: Watch up and welcome back to another episode and No
Speaker 1: Sillers podcast with your host Now funk that with your
Speaker 1: low classes. Malone, Now, explain to me why am I
Speaker 1: supposed to care that Russia and Ukraine is a war?
Speaker 1: Mind you. I come from a culture of nation's warring,
Speaker 1: and I know the average human being won't really respect
Speaker 1: or understand right that the culture of gangs and community,
Speaker 1: you know, grouping can be asked. They don't understand how
Speaker 1: much it can really be just like what's going on?
Speaker 1: Like that? I hear him say all the time to me, oh, man,
Speaker 1: it's senseless violence. But when has violence ever made sense?
Speaker 1: It depends oftentimes when the one has instigating violence ever
Speaker 1: made sense? Because if you're getting shot at and bombed,
Speaker 1: it probably makes sense to fire back. I think it does.
Speaker 1: I don't know in this liberal space of the world,
Speaker 1: you feel me if that makes sense, because I talked
Speaker 1: to my childhood partner share you all the time, and
Speaker 1: she is like entirely just so scared of having to
Speaker 1: stand up and fight back. And it's always the weirdest
Speaker 1: thing when I hear people say to me, oh, you know, um,
Speaker 1: people killing each other is so bad. But if you're
Speaker 1: a spiritual person, right, And let's say you're a Christian
Speaker 1: or you practice Catholicism, right, you're Catholic like Adam and
Speaker 1: Eve's son's kilty like like, people have been killing each
Speaker 1: other since the beginning of time and finding every in
Speaker 1: any reason to fight. And what I noticed is it's
Speaker 1: always a wealthy person or person that's in a in
Speaker 1: a of these situations telling people stuck in poverty to
Speaker 1: behave Yeah, oftentimes, I mean there's been uprisings and things
Speaker 1: like that throughout history as well, but we're not necessarily
Speaker 1: well driven, and so the wealthy people were telling them
Speaker 1: to behave, sure, behave rather, you know what I mean. So, um,
Speaker 1: it's it's a bunch of white people fighting Pete like,
Speaker 1: and it happened to be a bunch of white people
Speaker 1: who historically don't have favor towards black people. I mean
Speaker 1: they're not obviously you know, the slave drivers of but
Speaker 1: historically right, So I do tend to have a certain
Speaker 1: feel towards Ukraine just because my nation in Watts is
Speaker 1: a small nation, you feel me and fighting great nations,
Speaker 1: you know, they will try to bully you. So that's
Speaker 1: why I find myself cheering for Ukraine, you know, And
Speaker 1: and I like the Clisskoe brothers. I like the Clissko brothers,
Speaker 1: and I like you feel me. So I don't know
Speaker 1: if I should be as liberal because people are dying
Speaker 1: like it is a war. But I guess I've been
Speaker 1: conditioned by the community right that this is normal, you know,
Speaker 1: I mean not to mention every book I read is normal.
Speaker 1: People always fight. They just find a reason to fight.
Speaker 1: I mean Ukrainians and Russians fighting buying. It's not that
Speaker 1: o of that regular um so, so, so this is
Speaker 1: your world peak. First off, this is no sellers g L.
Speaker 1: I'm man Peter in the Spin is not sometimes you
Speaker 1: know what else has no ceilings with many of the
Speaker 1: buildings in the Ukraine. Okay, so this is your specialty.
Speaker 1: Now I don't know if it's your specialty. So I'm
Speaker 1: literally being uh prejudiced by assuming you, as a white
Speaker 1: man in America, would have any idea what's going on
Speaker 1: in European nations. But I would bet you have a
Speaker 1: greater understanding of what's going on than I did. I
Speaker 1: actually thought about starting a couple of social media channels
Speaker 1: to do long form videos about this kind of stuff
Speaker 1: this week. I just didn't get around to it. It's
Speaker 1: been a weird week. But yeah, this is kind of
Speaker 1: one of those conflicts of the market, so to speak. Um,
Speaker 1: there's there the amount of to put it generously, spin on,
Speaker 1: like the premise and context leading up to this thing
Speaker 1: has been a joke and a lot of media circles.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of strategic benefit to um the Russia
Speaker 1: taking Ukraine. It's kind of something that has been on
Speaker 1: the agenda basically since what's his name, since Putin, like
Speaker 1: ran boris the Elston out of office and like the
Speaker 1: late nineties, and he also has this no no I
Speaker 1: was a Putin also has a grand division of I
Speaker 1: think trying to reconstruct the boundaries of the original. It
Speaker 1: sounds like almost the original Russia Zars Empire, somebody got
Speaker 1: a lot of Russia. That's where I was getting to.
Speaker 1: So Russia was so in theory Ukraine initially was Russian
Speaker 1: depends on when I mean, because at the same time
Speaker 1: Stallin took over the Ukraine and basically it was like
Speaker 1: the bread basket of year because one of the largest
Speaker 1: grain producing countries in the world as far as like
Speaker 1: wheat and ship goes, and he tried to socialize it
Speaker 1: famously by giving all the peasants all the property. Well,
Speaker 1: guess what, the peasants weren't really good farmers. That's why
Speaker 1: the really good farmers got really good at farming. So
Speaker 1: they all fucking we're shitty farmers. They all starve today.
Speaker 1: It's not funny. It's only funny because you just it's
Speaker 1: funny because all the people who seized all the farms
Speaker 1: decapitated all the farm owners and their families and then
Speaker 1: ended up and they were like, yeah, now we've got
Speaker 1: all the farms that they couldn't farm, but the ship
Speaker 1: and start to that. So it's that's kind of funny.
Speaker 1: But it's not funny, but it's funny, Okay. So it
Speaker 1: started off initially as Ukraine or did it start off
Speaker 1: initially as Russians or he's talking a lot And I
Speaker 1: don't even know. I don't even know, and I don't
Speaker 1: even know when you could even I don't know how
Speaker 1: far I have to go back to make that assessment.
Speaker 1: So what I imagined in my mind now it's imagined, right,
Speaker 1: It's imagination that Russia is trying to claim territory that
Speaker 1: was once theirs. That's what they're saying. That's what I
Speaker 1: would want to believe is happening. Right. But now at
Speaker 1: this point there's been a culture established, well there's a
Speaker 1: schism there. So there are pockets of the Ukraine that
Speaker 1: identify maybe more as Russian and others that don't. And
Speaker 1: and he's trying to use that as a predictor to say, oh,
Speaker 1: we're gonna go the Russian sectors of Ukraine are being
Speaker 1: oppressed by the non Russian sympathizing Ukrainians, and we're gonna
Speaker 1: go liberate our Russian people and take those things back.
Speaker 1: But they're still being oppressed by the other Ukrainians. So
Speaker 1: this is how I imagine this ship going, right, and
Speaker 1: give you the the gang analogy. So there's this huge
Speaker 1: gang in Los Angeles, right, one of the earliest gangs
Speaker 1: um early seventies, maybe right towards the mid seventy three
Speaker 1: seventy four h Trade gangster cript legendary Hrade gangster cript. Right, Um,
Speaker 1: TOOKI would have been you know, west side crips is
Speaker 1: the emphasis, you know, it's the origin. But TOOKI probably
Speaker 1: would have identified as gangs split up into an H
Speaker 1: Trade gangster cript um, A lot of the earliest members
Speaker 1: of the West Side Cripts are a trade gangster Cripts.
Speaker 1: Monster Cody is an h trade gangster cript They're like
Speaker 1: a super legendary militant gang. Right. So at that time,
Speaker 1: if you kind of failed, if you named your gang
Speaker 1: gangster crips, you kind of fell into a simple alliance
Speaker 1: with them alone, right, because you guys all shared the
Speaker 1: last name. So there's a gang also in Los Angeles called, well,
Speaker 1: initially it was called Menlo Gangster Crips. Yeah. Menlo is
Speaker 1: off of Vermont, you know, right near Florence. Yeah, Florence.
Speaker 1: Yea Menlo runs a long way. It goes all the
Speaker 1: way into Guardina. I didn't know north south wise where
Speaker 1: a Menlo Crypts really was over near the Florence. It's
Speaker 1: over by Florence. It's not by where the horse horses
Speaker 1: are all with the stuff down there, and not that
Speaker 1: they're not that far down. So they were Menlo Gangster Crips.
Speaker 1: So imagine they were closer in proximity a tres huge
Speaker 1: and Menlo is actually not that far the more I
Speaker 1: think about, it's pretty close to where a trade border starts.
Speaker 1: But let's say it was a part of the territory
Speaker 1: that was because they are part of the territory that
Speaker 1: is known as against crypt Well, sometime I think in
Speaker 1: the late nineties thousands, they spell out that's some kind
Speaker 1: of conflict. I don't know if it was over week,
Speaker 1: it was over something that was there's some some kind
Speaker 1: of most likely some type of economics and some types
Speaker 1: of mishapp and they decided, hey, man, we don't really
Speaker 1: agree with the way things are going, so we're gonna
Speaker 1: drop gangster crip off of our name. That's what we're
Speaker 1: gonna do. We're gonna just be Menlo Crips. And there's
Speaker 1: another gang in Los Angeles that's probably even more famous
Speaker 1: than the h Trade against the crips. And while they aren't,
Speaker 1: while they aren't as militant, they are very popular. Films
Speaker 1: have been made about about them. One of the most
Speaker 1: famous rappers from Los Angeles over the last fifteen years,
Speaker 1: actually it's from this neighborhood, right, is the Rolling Safety Crips. Now, historically,
Speaker 1: the Rolling sifety Crips have had a long standing rivalry
Speaker 1: with the A trades. Right, I like to look at
Speaker 1: the Rolling sixty Crips as America. I like to look
Speaker 1: at Russia as day trades. I like to look at
Speaker 1: Menlo as the Ukraine. So the Rolling sixty crips, right,
Speaker 1: they are a part of a greater somewhat treaty or organization,
Speaker 1: right called neighborhood crips. Maybe they're kind of like the EU, Yeah,
Speaker 1: something like that, I can, I go, I go you,
Speaker 1: But it's more like NATO. And the reason it's more
Speaker 1: like NATO is because it's really like one one main
Speaker 1: source is stimulating the whole concept, and really Loki has
Speaker 1: entirely too much saying that would be the Rolling sixty crips. Um,
Speaker 1: I would like to think of the one e elevens,
Speaker 1: Rolling hundreds, the one eleven neighborhood crips as the UK
Speaker 1: You know, they're the older established neighborhood game. But long
Speaker 1: story short, all of these different gangs around Los Angeles
Speaker 1: are part of this NATO organization neighborhood crips. Though Rolling
Speaker 1: forties are neighborhood crips, the Rolling nineties are neighborhood crips.
Speaker 1: The five five famous c MAC shout out to c
Speaker 1: MAC five, five, five seven, and five eight are neighborhood crips.
Speaker 1: All of the neighborhood crips. That whole thing was started
Speaker 1: by the East coast, right, these coasts are the original
Speaker 1: neighborhood crips. So they all these different gangs nine ohs
Speaker 1: neighborhood crips, all these different gangs kind of came together
Speaker 1: and created a treaty that they will somewhat function together
Speaker 1: and organized together and think together. So the sixties saw
Speaker 1: what was happening, right, and different people that associate them
Speaker 1: saw what was happening with the conflict with between Menlo
Speaker 1: you know, which was previously known as Menlo gangster crips
Speaker 1: and the actual A Trade gangster crips, and decided to
Speaker 1: start politicking with the Menlo's and say, hey, man, you
Speaker 1: guys have conflict these A Trade guys. You guys should
Speaker 1: be a part of our alliance, right, and we'll support you,
Speaker 1: you know, in your standing few with the trades. So
Speaker 1: Menlo's decided to become neighborhood Menlo crips, even to the
Speaker 1: point where some are claiming, if I'm correct, like rolling seventies, right, Okay,
Speaker 1: So the way I see the war going, it's like
Speaker 1: Russia saying and and now mind you, the neighborhood alliance. Right,
Speaker 1: it's starting to use the mental territory to position people
Speaker 1: are against Russia, you know, in that territory, to get
Speaker 1: the drop or whatever they think is needed, you know,
Speaker 1: in that territory. So one day the trades decided, hey,
Speaker 1: enough is enough. We're going to run leadership out and
Speaker 1: then all the citizens you know, are going to fall along.
Speaker 1: This is going to be gangster crypt territory a gain.
Speaker 1: That's how I imagine it happening. Yeah, and there's kind
Speaker 1: of a twist I can put if I can put
Speaker 1: a hypothetical into this, because you're just kind of not
Speaker 1: being hypothetical. Sure, it would be like additionally, if Medos
Speaker 1: are relying on sixties to get them all the ship
Speaker 1: they need because they gotta Medos as an a war now, right.
Speaker 1: But you get some activist guy who like a big you,
Speaker 1: you know, orre to step down whatever, and some of
Speaker 1: his predacessor, the precess, his air or whatever, steps in
Speaker 1: and goes, we're not gonna push no more dope anywhere
Speaker 1: here in six You're not allowed to do that anymore. Well,
Speaker 1: now your resources are diminished. They hustling. So it's the
Speaker 1: equivalent if big you, right, is the chairman of the
Speaker 1: NATO Group, which he probably did some degree has it's
Speaker 1: not crazy to say he would have, you know, a
Speaker 1: pretty close relationship to that title. If it's not him,
Speaker 1: he's one of the closest guys. He says. Okay, the
Speaker 1: Mentos are funding this war because they're buying drugs from
Speaker 1: the thirties or they're buying you know, they're buying all
Speaker 1: the drugs that they're selling in Mento has like it
Speaker 1: would be like if Mento just had like no, let me,
Speaker 1: let me finish my thoughts. Sorry, so so so so. So.
Speaker 1: What you're saying, what what the NATO car with the
Speaker 1: neighborhood cars do one is they're going to okay, so no,
Speaker 1: you're saying people that people are cutting off. Oh so
Speaker 1: they're trying to handicap their trades us. Well, they're not.
Speaker 1: What I'm saying is like say a Trey wanted to
Speaker 1: do this and it us been going on for a
Speaker 1: long time and Menlo just by virtue of its location,
Speaker 1: it just doesn't have that kind of market. They're not. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's not enough territory to create. Yeah, and in their
Speaker 1: territory they don't have the audience. Yeah, they can't make
Speaker 1: any money over there. So if they're really gonna have
Speaker 1: a problem with trades and if there's a drought and
Speaker 1: whatever else, Now all of a sudden, Trey has a
Speaker 1: plug and six ose who usually would hook Menlo up
Speaker 1: to make sure that they were straight. You know, everybody,
Speaker 1: Menlo go get your burner for six ohs We got you.
Speaker 1: We're not gonna let you just get eradicated by these guys.
Speaker 1: And then you goes, We're not gonna hustle no more.
Speaker 1: We're gonna we're gonna look out for the community where
Speaker 1: gonna sell no more dope than six olse. Well, then
Speaker 1: the well, hold on, slow down. BIGU is from six oh,
Speaker 1: he's from Yeah. Like if you were to say, in
Speaker 1: our area, okay in sixties in sixties, no one from
Speaker 1: sixties is selling any dope with the sixties or you're
Speaker 1: out of here. So that does two things. That means
Speaker 1: anybody who wants to get anything to you know, to
Speaker 1: smoke whatever the hell, has to go with the eight trades.
Speaker 1: And they can spike up their prices because it's super
Speaker 1: droughting their benefit and they're getting all the money. So
Speaker 1: now what is so what is America cutting off that
Speaker 1: Russia is able to benefit from America. Um, well, yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean Joe Biden has completely, if not entirely locked
Speaker 1: down here. He has really stamped down our oil extraction.
Speaker 1: So what you're saying is because he decided so so
Speaker 1: what so Yeah, So what Joe Biden did was it
Speaker 1: is attempt to handicap a trades economy, apt to handicap
Speaker 1: their trader. Well, I think that that's how it's being
Speaker 1: that's how it's being told to us. Maybe well after
Speaker 1: the fact. So so again, so let's focus for you
Speaker 1: going to the depth of Yo, none love for Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: Let's focus on what he's not said. Let's let's focus
Speaker 1: on how it's being positioned to the public. What's being
Speaker 1: positioned to the public is big. You came out and said, hey,
Speaker 1: you know what, everybody was providing drugs to the a trades,
Speaker 1: you know, to sell and make profit, right so they
Speaker 1: can fund this war. We're gonna cut you off. We're
Speaker 1: not going to get drugs in that community, don't sell
Speaker 1: guns to that community, don't do anything right with a
Speaker 1: goal of cutting golf their way of financing or fighting
Speaker 1: the war against the Menlo's right, That's that's how it's
Speaker 1: being told to the rest of all of the communities
Speaker 1: to say that the sixties are truly back in the Menlo. Huh,
Speaker 1: they're trying to sanction out trades. Yeah, right, So it's saying, Hey,
Speaker 1: nobody else that's around the eight trades, don't give them
Speaker 1: both drugs wholesale drugs to sale. They don't need to
Speaker 1: be making money. Hey, don't sell them guns. Hey, don't
Speaker 1: do anything that could. You know, We're gonna cut off
Speaker 1: the economic base that the A trades are using to
Speaker 1: fund the war against the Menlos. That's their way of
Speaker 1: helping the mineros. And that sounds being position to and
Speaker 1: that's true now kind of it's more so true then
Speaker 1: while the US is saying we're gonna sanction Russia, we
Speaker 1: really didn't want to sanction in Russia. It'd be like
Speaker 1: six was really didn't wanna play that card that hardcore
Speaker 1: because they need something from their trades and just the
Speaker 1: need from their trays. If I could really quick go
Speaker 1: back in time, just briefly, so like when prior to
Speaker 1: six oh, saying we're gonna sanctionate trades, prior to that,
Speaker 1: prior before the whole before they shed down all their
Speaker 1: ways to fund the war against Menlo go ahead, yes,
Speaker 1: properly exactly. So a year before that, big he wants
Speaker 1: to hypothetically take a principal stand and say, we're not
Speaker 1: gonna sell no dope in six ohs. So what is
Speaker 1: the dope? They're not settling in America oil, So he's
Speaker 1: saying the President of America is not saying he wants
Speaker 1: to sell oil in America. That's correct. I'll all just
Speaker 1: give a quick synopsis on that real fast, so that
Speaker 1: we're not jumping back and forth too much. What happened
Speaker 1: was we were supposed to have what's called the Keystone
Speaker 1: XL pipeline was a math Trump was building that was
Speaker 1: going across the Indian that was going across somebodyhood with
Speaker 1: dead people. And it was like, yo, don't build that
Speaker 1: ship in the hood. Yeah, which again you could sig
Speaker 1: it's not the other world. He just his environmental um
Speaker 1: contributors said we don't want a period, so we shut
Speaker 1: it down. Additionally, for in other words, again they're using
Speaker 1: false propaganda to shut it down. Yeah, and on top
Speaker 1: of that was always told or position that it's native
Speaker 1: land and people died there. But go ahead. Yeah. Again,
Speaker 1: it hasn't been built yet, so you can just read
Speaker 1: it's a pipe for Christ's sake, It's not like we're whatever. Sure.
Speaker 1: The other and that was to really bring Canadian oil
Speaker 1: down to all the refinery hub in the port. You
Speaker 1: know when you drive down to tent from Houston to
Speaker 1: Port Arthur and Beaumont. So the real issue that drove
Speaker 1: barrel of oil from arresting general equilibrium of about forty
Speaker 1: dollars a barrel up to a hundred dollars a barrel
Speaker 1: was that. He also said I'm gonna cut all the
Speaker 1: leases on extractions. So we went. We went from the
Speaker 1: number one oil producing country in the world, not sawdi
Speaker 1: Arabia not rushing to anybody, was US under Trump and
Speaker 1: oil was way down at forty. Well, you take all
Speaker 1: of that supply out of the market, it goes way up,
Speaker 1: way way up. So now we're what's all that? Also
Speaker 1: now they're scarcity, So now the rest of the markets
Speaker 1: worth more. They can charge more for their further demand
Speaker 1: for their stuff because exactly I mean in case in
Speaker 1: points explaining and they now explain it in gang term. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and and what you saw happen here, right, before we're
Speaker 1: gonna levy all our sanction and be all you know,
Speaker 1: on top of ship we drove up. We more than
Speaker 1: doubled the value of Russia as a country by doubling
Speaker 1: all their resources, which is all that they have. And
Speaker 1: in the last month and a half, the Chinese, who
Speaker 1: have now aligned with Russia because we didn't manage that
Speaker 1: relationship with the Damn either purchased a quarter of a
Speaker 1: trillion dollars in fossil fuels from Russia. So now Russia
Speaker 1: has money to play with, so they don't need to
Speaker 1: give a fun We're gonna sanction you. What do I
Speaker 1: care you? I just got a quarter trillion dollars and
Speaker 1: and the who so so I'm going to go So
Speaker 1: I'm gonna translate that and game to them. Give me
Speaker 1: a second, I'm putting it together. So what you're saying
Speaker 1: is Florencias was wholesaling out to everybody. Got you so big?
Speaker 1: You right? Decided? Then too many of the homies he's
Speaker 1: he's using a propagandist sands. Too many of the homies
Speaker 1: are being harmed and dying, right, And I like, I
Speaker 1: had to use big because it's some It's a whole
Speaker 1: bunch of real GE's that got too much say over there.
Speaker 1: But Big you, for just to sake of conversation, as
Speaker 1: part of America and its part is an important person
Speaker 1: in the whole NATO organization. So big Us is saying, Hey,
Speaker 1: too many of the homies are dying from drugs. So
Speaker 1: what we're going to do is we're not going to
Speaker 1: sell drugs. But his underlying motive for not really selling
Speaker 1: drugs would be, what, like, why is he not trying
Speaker 1: to what it would be the point of him not
Speaker 1: doing the pipeline for real? There really isn't the point
Speaker 1: the point of one of two things. You can say
Speaker 1: he woke up and having epiphany and wanted to be
Speaker 1: some pursue some exalted vision, or you could say l
Speaker 1: ap or the city, or somebody bank rolled a bunch
Speaker 1: of cash and said, hey, look, property values are going
Speaker 1: up over here in the sixties. I'm gonna give you
Speaker 1: five million dollars through the back door, and you need
Speaker 1: to make sure to want self drugs in this neighborhood.
Speaker 1: That's really more like it. So he cut off the
Speaker 1: opportunity for other sixties yeah right, to make money selling
Speaker 1: drugs after the community by saying other members of the
Speaker 1: sixties were getting sick and dying from the drugs, So
Speaker 1: now or just from the from neighborhood, because the neighborhood
Speaker 1: is supposed to look out for the neighborhood to sure,
Speaker 1: sure and and yeah, yeah he's very much Yeah sure,
Speaker 1: not just what I'm saying. So we cut off his
Speaker 1: homies from creating their own revenue right in the neighborhood.
Speaker 1: Feel me by the propaganda is, oh, too many homies
Speaker 1: is dying from drugs. So now the home have to
Speaker 1: buy drugs from other communities, and they're paying exponentially more. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and they're buying them from a trade largely, and now
Speaker 1: it's dangerous to even deal in it. It's it's it's
Speaker 1: and it's not because people were just to sell drugs. Anybody.
Speaker 1: He'll make it safety to spend your money. But so
Speaker 1: it's driving the price up. And you're saying they don't
Speaker 1: care about the relationship NATO has or the neighborhoods have
Speaker 1: with all the difference alliances, because the main alliance that
Speaker 1: a trade gets their finances from is China, which is
Speaker 1: Hoover and the and the neighborhood alliance, the NATO alliance
Speaker 1: has no say in China or Hoover. Yeah. Oh that's deep.
Speaker 1: That's deep. So so what could be happening is now,
Speaker 1: this is me thinking as a gang member. He didn't
Speaker 1: take a cut from somebody a big you didn't take
Speaker 1: a cut from somebody in the sixties. Big you took
Speaker 1: a cut from somebody from a trade and from somebody
Speaker 1: from Hoovers. Yeah. Sure, it's a personal coat in order
Speaker 1: to sell out your nation, exactly to sell out the sixties.
Speaker 1: So he would have to he would he would have
Speaker 1: to make a deal with the biggest de boys in
Speaker 1: a trade and the biggest de boys in Hoover. And
Speaker 1: they said, hey, man, cut off all the dealers, all
Speaker 1: the six old dealers, I mean, and we're you don't
Speaker 1: have to sell anything, and we're gonna pack your personal
Speaker 1: pockets at the expense of the whole community. That is,
Speaker 1: to make it more accurate. We're gonna pad your son's
Speaker 1: personal pockets. And you're gonna get a commission because you're
Speaker 1: not gonna be alive too much of the Yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: oh yeah, I could. I could buy it, yeah hunter you, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'll buy I buy that? How buy that? I buy it?
Speaker 1: That's it's it's pretty easy to to follow that. That's
Speaker 1: about what's happening as d damn. I mean, if you
Speaker 1: think about exactly like gangbanging. Yeah, like it hypothetically, like
Speaker 1: if if Russia wanted, like, the one thing Russia has
Speaker 1: is fossil fuels, they have natural gas, oil and coal, right,
Speaker 1: they have a lot, They have nothing else. The one
Speaker 1: thing China needs is cheap energy. They have everything else.
Speaker 1: You know, if they wanted to buy the same volume
Speaker 1: of cheap energy fossil through fossil fuels eighteen months ago
Speaker 1: that they bought eighteen days ago instead of paying two
Speaker 1: hundred and forty billion or whatever, it has been like
Speaker 1: a hundred and twenty. So just just the difference alone
Speaker 1: on market from from market manipulation that was done domestically
Speaker 1: here gave them more money than they'll ever need to
Speaker 1: take over Krane. It happles to their stupid countries. M hmm.
Speaker 1: So what does this really mean if what happens if
Speaker 1: the A trades eventually turned if Russia, if the A
Speaker 1: trades a k A Russia turns the mental territory back
Speaker 1: into gangsh the crip, how does that truly affect the world.
Speaker 1: That's who it is. It really affect the rest of
Speaker 1: the egosphere, Like does it really affect everything else? It
Speaker 1: depends on if that domino tips over and hits another domino.
Speaker 1: So you're saying, if the Hoovers decided to go in
Speaker 1: and colonize some other part of it, let's say the
Speaker 1: tropes or or or just say let's say that the
Speaker 1: Hoovers and the Eight Trades then are like, we're basically
Speaker 1: lockstep whatever we're doing and who we said, We're gonna
Speaker 1: back you and fund a trade for whatever the hell
Speaker 1: they want to do. And they trade goes, you know something,
Speaker 1: I want, bodies I want. I'm gonna go snatch up Denvers,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna snatch up Nineties. I'm gonna grab Harlem's, I'm
Speaker 1: gonna grab everybody near me. And then and and now,
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, the entire landscape is totally shifted.
Speaker 1: And and that's really I think the concern. And you
Speaker 1: don't really want to get in their way because now
Speaker 1: they're so bankroll because they got exclusives with Hoover's that
Speaker 1: it becomes really, really really hard to stop that snowball
Speaker 1: when it's rolling downhill. Do people really want to go
Speaker 1: to war that bad? Like, do they really want to
Speaker 1: like this? This is my thing. It's a lot of
Speaker 1: talks of nuclear war, right, But I don't genuinely believe
Speaker 1: no leader except who I would like to call the
Speaker 1: Inglewood Families North Korea, Right. I think their leader for
Speaker 1: sure wants to use whoever. He don't give a funk.
Speaker 1: But I didn't pretty soon win whatever Gang Iran is
Speaker 1: has one about tomorrow, they're gonna use them. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: they definitely are looking to you if they can get
Speaker 1: their hands on them. It's on. The only hope we
Speaker 1: have is if they're so anxious to pull the rip
Speaker 1: cord on them that they blow up before they get
Speaker 1: them out of their own country, just out of sheer enthusiasm. Okay, okay, okay,
Speaker 1: it's I think. I think are we being ridiculous by
Speaker 1: thinking that the A trades would go past hollandizing gangster
Speaker 1: crypt territory again, Like they're going to try to flip
Speaker 1: a completely like a part like a power in the
Speaker 1: NATO organization, in the neighborhood organization, even with Hoover backing them,
Speaker 1: like like a war, even with the A trade with
Speaker 1: the Hoover's backing a trade to take over Japan, which
Speaker 1: would be the thirties, would be tough because wow, that's
Speaker 1: all like the East Side. That would be like a
Speaker 1: Hoover by themselves that you guys go and do that.
Speaker 1: And meanwhile on the sneak badways, we're gonna grab East Coast.
Speaker 1: We're gonna grab, but you can't grab. But that's my
Speaker 1: point that the reality is the Ukraine didn't align themselves
Speaker 1: with neighborhood, right they didn't. They're not. Actually they were
Speaker 1: still like ally and respected. But again, now you start
Speaker 1: talking about going to funk with the forties, this is
Speaker 1: a different kind of nation. This ain't like this, ain't
Speaker 1: the motherfucking know. This ain't the Menlos per Sae. And
Speaker 1: I'm not saying you know these are. These are much
Speaker 1: bigger gangs, much bigger territories, and a lot more closer
Speaker 1: to America the sixties. Yeah, so it would be a
Speaker 1: different kind of Like it's one thing to to go
Speaker 1: at the Menlo's right, because the Mendlos are in a
Speaker 1: part of town that that really is close enough to
Speaker 1: gainst the crypt and and really they're actually the America's
Speaker 1: further away from the Menlo's right that the neighborhood the
Speaker 1: sixties is further away, and they do have other like
Speaker 1: just like around you create there's other NATO countries, but
Speaker 1: those countries aren't big enough to step in and deal
Speaker 1: with the trades. It would probably be like them grabbing,
Speaker 1: like the Harlems of the world and stuff like that,
Speaker 1: Like Harlem's Harlems is like Japan, like you're not going
Speaker 1: to take harm. Japan is like the East side gangs.
Speaker 1: No no, no, no Frances like these side games, not
Speaker 1: geographically because what don't don't look at it, you grab. Yeah,
Speaker 1: China also wants to make moves, so there is a
Speaker 1: physical shield. You see what I'm saying. If Russia flanks
Speaker 1: out to the west, it affords China the ability to
Speaker 1: flank out to the east and grab Taiwan. Start to
Speaker 1: press short, which which I agree, it's one thing for
Speaker 1: them to grab Taiwan. Right, Let's say Taiwan is the troubles.
Speaker 1: Troubles are pretty much cool with Hoover. They have a
Speaker 1: lines they straight you mean, but it was a part
Speaker 1: considered at one time Hoover, So it is a nation
Speaker 1: form right within a nation said Taiwan and China are
Speaker 1: not cool. Who Taiwan and China. No, they but they
Speaker 1: still have a relationship. They're not like they're not enemies
Speaker 1: at this point. Yes, there if you ask the Taiwanese, huh,
Speaker 1: if you ask the Taiwanese, yeah, But but again, as
Speaker 1: the Taiwanese asked China, like did they China decided to
Speaker 1: be something, but even geographically for them to make a
Speaker 1: move on Japan is a different kind of war. That's
Speaker 1: not that's not like going to war with Taiwan. No,
Speaker 1: it's just different. Now. I'm not saying it's not a
Speaker 1: winnable war for the for the Hoovers to to take
Speaker 1: over the thirties, but nigga, it is ship and and
Speaker 1: it's a chance because like the thirties are such a
Speaker 1: culture country and well prepared, like well prepared, maybe not
Speaker 1: as deep, you know, there's some ton of Hoovers, Hoovers
Speaker 1: stretched the huge ton, huge gang, right, violent gang, right,
Speaker 1: But the thirties is some violet sick motherfucker's historically, i mean,
Speaker 1: complete with suicide bombers over there in the thirties. Them
Speaker 1: niggas get cracking. They're not Ukraine and ain't no posing
Speaker 1: for pictures with them. You know, how do how do
Speaker 1: Ukraine dudes got they pulled on joining. Yeah, that's not
Speaker 1: that's not thirty they you're gonna lose motherfucker's and I
Speaker 1: don't think. And that's funny because they are very much
Speaker 1: not a part of NATO. They are alliance, they are allied,
Speaker 1: but they're not a part of me, which is funny
Speaker 1: because the Bertins are not quite they're not neighborhoods. They're rolling,
Speaker 1: they're allied, but they're not a part of the alliance. Mhm.
Speaker 1: It's funny. So it's a different thing like do we
Speaker 1: think even if it's happen. Let's say that happens, Let's
Speaker 1: say a trade overtakes the Medlo leadership and makes that
Speaker 1: territory against the crip. Again, you're saying between the trades
Speaker 1: and the Hoovers that they can start to move on
Speaker 1: different nations, different hoods and take them over. You think
Speaker 1: that's the fear, Well, yes, that is the fear. Um
Speaker 1: whether it's whether it would play out like that or not,
Speaker 1: that is the fear. The fear is not Oh my god,
Speaker 1: the most corrupted, impoverished country in Europe now just got
Speaker 1: taken over by the second most impoverished in corrupt country
Speaker 1: to Europe. That's not the fear. The fear is the
Speaker 1: second domino. And really I think the issue comes down to, like,
Speaker 1: you know, how much do you want to hamstring yourself
Speaker 1: and like a financial war. I mean, China's laying in
Speaker 1: roads all over the world right now for strategic positioning
Speaker 1: for all sorts of things, you know, and whether it
Speaker 1: be you know, military based board access, strategical positioning. Man
Speaker 1: like I'm the same thing. Yeah, access to but they're
Speaker 1: not a market economy, so it's bad for other parties
Speaker 1: when they do it, more so than in the United States,
Speaker 1: does it, you know, access to resources and whatnot, like
Speaker 1: the the whole like the whole green movement and all
Speaker 1: that ship with the batteries in the United States and
Speaker 1: Western Europa they're obsessed with. They all require these things
Speaker 1: called rare earth met or US rare being the key word.
Speaker 1: China's staking out and laying claim to access points to
Speaker 1: all of those things I call Africa watts. So like
Speaker 1: magically tomorrow, if like California passed laws or every car
Speaker 1: by sold in California has to be an electric car,
Speaker 1: I still don't have the same problem at the batteries.
Speaker 1: It's like nobody even looked around for the past at all.
Speaker 1: Is passed it on passion. So like when you start
Speaker 1: to see, okay, well, if they're buying, and if if
Speaker 1: they have an energy source. And additionally also Chinese Air
Speaker 1: Force they can't produce a jet on their own. They
Speaker 1: need Russian technology and they need to steal ours to
Speaker 1: do most of what they do militarily. Anyway, Well, Russia
Speaker 1: is more sophisticated in certain areas, so that solves that
Speaker 1: problem for them. Um, you're talking about major like hegemonic interests.
Speaker 1: It can get a little slippery kind of quickly. Mm hmm.
Speaker 1: Re made sense, It make a lot of sense. So
Speaker 1: if you were running let's say you were running your sixties,
Speaker 1: Let's say let's say a monkey, cav chief Stone, Bigue.
Speaker 1: They say, you know what, we need to nominate Pete
Speaker 1: to be the triple O G of sixties, the triple
Speaker 1: O G of sixties. Pete, you have to guide the
Speaker 1: sixth old nation and the complete alliance that is neighborhood
Speaker 1: into the right direction and not allow the a trades
Speaker 1: or not allow the second Domindo to happen. Yeah, what
Speaker 1: is your move at that point. Honestly, I am going
Speaker 1: out and calling Mexicans and I am sourcing my product
Speaker 1: for cheaper, and I am flooding the market, and I'm
Speaker 1: going to all the state facilities and I'm putting money
Speaker 1: on every MS books saying I'm gonna cash you guys
Speaker 1: the funk up. Make sure that nobody on the streets,
Speaker 1: in any of them thirteen sells anything to anybody from
Speaker 1: Whover or at Trey green Light. And if they do,
Speaker 1: and we'll starve them out and flood the market, whatever
Speaker 1: they have is gonna be worth less. We're gonna have more.
Speaker 1: We're gonna expand our influence, and we're gonna control things
Speaker 1: on the market side peacefully through the dollar and through
Speaker 1: the supply and demand principles of the market. So who
Speaker 1: are the hoods that you're calling at this point? If
Speaker 1: you're saying, it's pretty much who are the other hoods?
Speaker 1: You have to you have to kind of use, isn't
Speaker 1: that theory kind of what they're doing now? Kind of Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm using, like say, the Mexican gang and that whole
Speaker 1: sourcing apparatus of that's the Bye chain as a constant
Speaker 1: is the same way that like our oil reserves already constant,
Speaker 1: you know, So I said, I would call on everybody,
Speaker 1: every every source point that we have and start to
Speaker 1: bribe you know, interests and exclusivity with them to make
Speaker 1: sure they're selling to us at a cheaper rate and
Speaker 1: not selling to them, or if they're selling to them whatever.
Speaker 1: Their ship just went down because the price of the
Speaker 1: bird just went from twenty to thirteen. And who cares.
Speaker 1: We got a whole fucking ton of them, So it
Speaker 1: doesn't matter. Is there anything you can do as the
Speaker 1: leader of let's say, the sixth Sole Nation in the
Speaker 1: Neighborhood Alliance to stop eight Trade from taking back from
Speaker 1: turning Menlo back into against the Crypt territory at this point, Yeah,
Speaker 1: you're actually to their credits stepped up, Like we had
Speaker 1: a lot of sanctions that we really were just kind
Speaker 1: of like, yeah, they really did. And they if they
Speaker 1: wanted to like pack a bunch of like take like
Speaker 1: a risk of their neck on delivery and go put
Speaker 1: a bunch of you know, military arsenal equipment for Ukrainians
Speaker 1: to use inside of Ukraine, you know it come of
Speaker 1: the way like the Chinese did with Vietnam. Then yeah,
Speaker 1: that'd be fine because I mean, like there's runs on
Speaker 1: Russian banks right now, Russian bonds are down like fifty fifty.
Speaker 1: I mean, they're having a major catastrophe right now in
Speaker 1: that country. So if they don't get it now, they're
Speaker 1: not gonna get it. And if they funk that up,
Speaker 1: they could be in a real world of hurt. And
Speaker 1: then like let's say, hypothetically, Russia has nothing on China,
Speaker 1: So let's suppose except technology. I mean, they got nothing
Speaker 1: out of leverage twise, outside of their both disdained for
Speaker 1: the sixties. Yes, and there's also an issue where a
Speaker 1: trades is concerned hoovers might try to take them over
Speaker 1: because that's just what they do. So it's not possible, possible,
Speaker 1: very possible. That's the only reason why Russia has historically
Speaker 1: worked with the Western countries to try to keep China
Speaker 1: bathe the last seventy years. It was certainly last twenty
Speaker 1: It's been in our policy since the seventies to make
Speaker 1: sure that So you're saying, you believe world leaders Nigga's
Speaker 1: running these hoods are still trying to colonize in two
Speaker 1: thousand two, if not blatantly raised the Chinese flag there
Speaker 1: then then exerts so much influence that there's just no
Speaker 1: practical autonomy and your pup at state. I really, population wise,
Speaker 1: China is more than ten times the size of Russia,
Speaker 1: and monetarily they're more than ten times the size of Russia.
Speaker 1: So if they wanted to really exert influence and start
Speaker 1: to choke off their ability to do their thing, and
Speaker 1: they don't have anywhere to run to for help, they're
Speaker 1: gonna become I have no choice. But when j Pink
Speaker 1: says jump to simply ask how high, sir, m hm,
Speaker 1: So you think Russia could actually be putting themselves in
Speaker 1: the bas situation with the hovers. Trains could be putting
Speaker 1: themselves in the bast situation with the overs. If they
Speaker 1: allow them to get too strong in them to get
Speaker 1: and they themselves to become too dependent, that would be
Speaker 1: something that they'd have to look out for, because when
Speaker 1: you get too dependent on one single source and their
Speaker 1: whole ability to do all that ship is depending on
Speaker 1: one relationship, then that first has the power over you.
Speaker 1: Good looking out for tuning into the No Sillers podcast.
Speaker 1: Please do us a favorite, subscribe, rate, comment, and share.
Speaker 1: This episode was recorded right here on the West coast
Speaker 1: of the USA and produced by my homeboy A King,
Speaker 1: for the Black Effect Podcast Network and I Heart Radio. Yeah.