WEBVTT - Does Anyone Really Believe These Idiots?

0:00:01.000 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>You are entering the freedom Hunt, the tyranny of the

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>interagency consensus, Elizabeth Warren's healthcare debacle, the Katie Hill lies,

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>threats about outing the whistleblower, and Zuckerberg shoots down Sorkin

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that in more coming off the buck Sexton Show. This

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>is the buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:39.559
<v Speaker 1>is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>no mistake American, You're a great American. Again the buck

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Sexton Show begins. He's a great guy. No, Welcome to

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the buck Sexton Show. Everybody, Thank you so much for

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>being here. Great to have a chance to address you

0:00:57.360 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>all across the country and in some cases all around

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:01.279
<v Speaker 1>the world. We have a lot of stuff to get

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to for a Friday, so I feel like shouldn't stand

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>too much on ceremony and just get right to it.

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I do want to note, though, that one of my

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>predictions came true. In fact, many of my predictions come true,

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>but this one in particular, I'm proud of. I told

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you that as soon as everybody learned about Conan the

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>bar Carrian, as we are calling him Conan the Hero Dog,

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:27.679
<v Speaker 1>there would be a surge in interest in Belgian Malinois,

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 1>the breed of dog that Conan happens to be one of.

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>And now ABC News had a story this morning. I

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 1>remember I told you the people are gonna want to

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>start getting the Belgian Malinois. It's going to become very trendy.

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>ABC predicted this morning. Thousands now want the breed of

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:46.839
<v Speaker 1>hero dog involved in the Al Baghdaddy raid, but experts

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>warn that they are too much for most people. Who

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>told you, folks who told you not only that they

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>were too much for most people, but that there would

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>be this surge in interest. So as beautiful and incredible

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>as Belgian Malinois and even German shepherd's Dutch Shepherds, these

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>different working dog breeds are. They are not something that

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to just pick up and bring home to

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the kids. You're gonna have your hands more than full.

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Important safety tip from the Freedom Hut today. All right,

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>let's get to the tyranny of the interagency consensus. Fantastic

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>piece today from my friend Mark Hemingway, husband of Molly Hemingway.

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Mark is a great writer in his own right over

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 1>at the Federalist, and his piece is called Donald Trump

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>versus the Interagency Consensus. And this is a particularly important

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>time for this because as part of all of this

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>impeachment stuff, you see going on bruhaha, which is a

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>fun word to say, this impeachment frakis ruckis. I think

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>those are all words that we could use. You are

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing people come forward who can't help. But let it

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>be known that while they are government employees, they think

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 1>that the bosses within the government that are elected by

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the people to oversee the federal bureaucracy, the machinery of

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the day to day of the federal government, that the

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>people who work inside the machinery think that they're not

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>just executing on orders, they're really there to drive things,

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and that the elected officials come and go, but the

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>bureaucracy is forever. This is troubling stuff. And when you

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>add that to the admission more recently of the former

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he was the former acting CIA director John McLaughlin,

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>when he was being asked by a CBS one of

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the liberal CBS journals about Trump's impeachment, here is what now.

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I know people will take this in different ways. I'll

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>tell you how I'm going to take it, but here

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>is what the former CIA director John McLaughlin, who is

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a guy from inside the bureauxy for a very long time.

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Here's how he talks about the deep state. Play for Please,

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 1>you'd have to agree that naturally the impeachment inquiry is underway,

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>sparked by a complaint from someone within the intelligence community.

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>It feeds the president's concern and often use term about

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a deep state being there to take you know, thank

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>God for the deep state. I mean, I think you

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>know everyone here has seeing this progression of diplomats and

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>intelligence officers and White House people trooping up to Capitol

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Hill right now and saying, these are people who are

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>doing their duty, who are responding to a higher call.

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Think about it for a minute. With all of the

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>people who knew what was going on here, it took

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>an intelligence software to step officer to step forward and

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>say something about it, which was the trigger that then

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>unleashed everything else. Now, why does that happen? What I'm

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>tell American people why that happens is this is the

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>institution in the US government that, with all of its

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:19.119
<v Speaker 1>flaws and it makes mistakes, is institutionally committed to objectivity

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.359
<v Speaker 1>and to telling the truth. I will tell you, as

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>somebody who used to work in the CIA, that that's

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a very rosy picture of what the institutional commitment of

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that organization, or any part of the intelligence bureaucracy, what

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the day to day really is something quite different from that.

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:42.039
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of complexity involved here. There are concerns

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:46.039
<v Speaker 1>about access, how do you shape policymaker beliefs without actually

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>telling policymakers what to do. These are the back and

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>forth that you'll hear about from people who've actually worked

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the intelligence community. But I'm also going to tell you

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>that there are a lot of people who work in

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the federal government who really think that. First of all,

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>they're overwhelmingly personally politically Democrats and in some cases really leftists.

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>They've gone into government work because they believe in the

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>power of government to do good things. And they also

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>think that if we're going to have this big shiny

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>toy that that is the federal government, they want to

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 1>be in control of it, and they want to do

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the things that they are ideologically aligned with it doing that.

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>The mission is not top down from the president as

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 1>the head of the executive branch. A mission is what

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the people inside the walls of whatever this federal agency

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>is think it should be, and they give lip service

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to the guy who's or has always been a guy

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>up to date, lip service to the guy who is

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>giving the orders. Yeah, sure, sure, we'll do what you say,

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>but we're also going to be working to do things

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 1>differently in our own way. And in no presidency has

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>this been more clear than the presidency of Donald Trump.

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's also worth noting that we were initially

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>told that talk of a deep state was a conspiracy theory,

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that if you spoke of bureaucrats inside the federal government

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>who thought they had a mission apart from what the

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>actual mission from the commander in chief was, you were

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>engaged in some misdirection fantasy. You were misled. You must

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>have been a consumer of fake news. And then we

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>found out about McCabe and Comy and Page and Struck

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and Yates and Brennan and Clapper and the top echelon

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of federal law enforcement and the intelligence community under the obamaministration,

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>none of whom are supposed to be explicitly political, and

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>now beyond any reasonable doubt we know that they were

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>deeply political. Objected to Trump, not just on specific issues,

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>but in general, objected to his elevation to the role

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of commander in chief and believed that they had a

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>duty to thwart his desires, his directives, his mission, his

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>promise to the American people. They never really accepted that

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>he won the election, and therefore the will of the

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>American people expressed through that election should be pursued. There

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>should be efforts made to execute upon that plan, not

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the plan of the bureaucrats who had been there for

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a very long time in DC. And this is where

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>we get to the the consensus views of the interagency.

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>What does that really mean? That came up recently in

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the testimony of Vindeman, and this was from his written statement.

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Now you would find that that's a a troubling thing

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>for someone to use as a justification for objection to

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the President of the United States as a policy matter

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine. The views of the inter agency, this, I

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>can tell you, is also really a misnomber. What ends

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>up happening in the intelligence community is that there will

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>be an expression of one point of view from one

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>agency that is the best approximation of what a majority

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of the senior people in that organization, leveraging some of

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the expertise of the younger people think of an issue,

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and then it will often be as part of the

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>interagency process, balanced with the views of other agencies, many

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of whom have different equities, have different mission sets and

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>tools at their disposal and expertise, And at the end

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>they kind of just blurred out this product or this

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 1>briefing or this decision on a specific issue to the

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>President of the United States that represents the so called consensus.

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.199
<v Speaker 1>But by the time it gets to that level, it's

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>often so watered down as to be largely meaningless. And

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>also momentum carries the day. What does CIA think now?

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>What does DIA or NSA or any of these agencies,

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>what do they think now? Chances are it's kind of

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>similar or whatever they thought a year ago or five

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>years ago or ten years ago about the issue, unless

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>there's been some massive change, right. They tend to have

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>their own customs and ways of doing things, ways of

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>thinking about things, institutional biases about different problem sets around

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the world. What do we think of talking to North Korea?

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 1>What do we think of engaging China in a trade war?

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>What do we think of counter terrors? I mean, all

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>across the board, And I know because I sat in

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>meetings where important issues were discussed in the intelligence community,

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and we're trying to find some consensus ish position, and

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 1>there's really no such thing. There's really no such thing.

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't the consensus on Ukraine, well, there was no

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>consensus on you crane policy because the Obama administration refused

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to give them lethal aid. Then the Trump administration came

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 1>in and did give them lethal aid. So that was

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a change from the commander in chief. Were there a

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of complaints before about Obama's unwillingness to do what

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>was necessary to really help the Ukrainians, No, of course not.

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>And then we get to what the real consensus of

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the interagency, and what we find is the consensus of

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the deep state. It's anti Trump. That was the only

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 1>thing that they all really could agree on. Is what

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>was motivating so much of what we saw in terms

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 1>of the actions of these senior bureaucrats to frustrate the

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>president's decision making, and beyond that, to destroy the president,

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to undermine the president, to work with reporters and the

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party and whomever, to work with foreigners, in the

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>case of Christopher Steel, assembling the dossier and using Russian

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>or Ukrainian or whatever sources and running that laundering, that

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>DNC paid for a document through our own intelligence community,

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and then starting spy as a warn on Carter page

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>a full field investigation on George poppadopplas. This stuff is insane.

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>They didn't just oppose in principle. They opposed by taking

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>it upon themselves to use the power within the government

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that they had to wage a political war, a political

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>vendetta against Donald Trump, because the consensus of the deep

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>state was and is that Donald Trump is unfit, unacceptable,

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:41.839
<v Speaker 1>and did not really win the twenty sixteen election. So

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>they are under no obligation. We often hear the Democrats

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>now talking about how Trump swore an oath he has

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to uphold and defend the Constitution. Well, guess what part

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of that constitution establishes President Trump as the commander in

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>chief of the executive branch and of the military. And

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:01.079
<v Speaker 1>they don't get to in the deep state just decide

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that they wash that away. They pushed that aside, and

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>their mission then becomes whatever they say it is. They're

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 1>giving their own orders. Now, you know, the bureaucracy has

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>become self aware, kind of like Skynet and the Terminator movies.

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:20.719
<v Speaker 1>And that didn't end well for us. The only consensus

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 1>opinion that they're really sure of is that they have

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to do everything they can to stop Donald Trump. They

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>used to say there was no deep state. Then they said, okay, fine,

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>there are a few people in the deep state. Now

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>they're saying, thank God for the deep state. And it's like,

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we're supposed to pretend that we didn't know this was

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>coming all along, and they haven't been lying to us

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>all along. First they insisted that the president is a

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Russian agent. Then they claimed he's a money launderer and

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a tax cheat and a fraudulent businessman. And now they've

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>decided they don't like the way he talks to foreign leaders.

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>But they have no evidence and no argument to support impeachment.

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>All they have is the unconditional cooperation of the media

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and their advanced to advance their preposterous narrative. What is

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>more likely to repeat one of my favorite challenges here

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>on the show, what's more likely that President Trump is,

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, according to Democrats, guilty of all

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of these horrible offenses and congress of newness, they're laid

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>out a number of them. Some have gone away as

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a result of finding out more facts others have been

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>stretched out now and they've added to it, or they've

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>moved the goalposts, they found some way to keep the

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>allegation alive. But what is more likely that Trump is

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the idiot that the left says he is, but also

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>able to do all these things and get away with them,

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>or that Democrats have abandoned reason, fairness, and decency and

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>are just throwing every allegation they can against the President

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that they just can stand. They hate this guy. They

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>hate him because of what his ascent means about the

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>way they view the world. They hate him because it

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>means that there's someone who will challenge some of the

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>not just political but some of the cultural norms out

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>there that have affected politicians, especially on the right, for

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a long time, that he'll take the fight right to

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the media. They can't stand this guy, and the only

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>way that they could stop being so crazy about him

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>would be to come to grips with all the lies

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that they've told so far, and they won't do that.

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>And the people that have believed this, the people that

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>have been spoon fed the nonsense from CNN and from MSNBC,

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>those who've been lied to by The New York Times,

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Post, all these expectations about the Muller probe

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>ending the Trump presidency, freeing us all from the long

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>dark night of trumpness. Turns out that that wasn't true.

0:15:57.680 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>But the people that believed it to be true can't

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>be told that. They have to be told. Don't worry,

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it's coming just around the corner. And that's where Nancy

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi and all the Democrats come in. That's where the

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>people who are part of very much at the top

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of the establishment, and who often conflate credentials with credibility

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>or credentials with competence, And just because you're the boss

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of something or the head of something, you're the speaker

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of something, doesn't mean that you're a good person, a

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>knowledgeable person, or a wise person. The elites don't like

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that though. They don't like the challenge of somebody coming

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>forward to say, hey, I know you've all made fun

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of me. You thought I was a joke. Here I

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>am that people have empowered me, and I'm now as

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump pointing fingers at people and saying, well, who

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>are you exactly? Why should you be in this elevated position?

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Why should you be able to walk around so smug

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and dictatorial at the same time based on what a

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, a lot of people in the media,

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Democrats, and academia and the legal profession

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:06.679
<v Speaker 1>in Hollywood, and they don't have good answers for that,

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and it unsettles them. It really bothers them at a

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>core level. And so that's why Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats,

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>as I've been saying along and you listen to the show,

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I try not to be that guys, as

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 1>I predict the future. A lot of people do this

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>on radio, and it's annoying to me because they just

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>tell you about their winners. They don't tell you about

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>their losers. But I tend to be right. Hopefully. It's

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why you listen to the show.

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I've always been saying, Nancy Pelosi, she's going to make

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>sure that this president is impeached. That's stretching back for

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 1>two years now. She's going to impeach this president. Why

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:46.160
<v Speaker 1>because of the emotional psychological need of the Democratic Party

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and the people who run it to lash out at

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump to have yet another moment of not my president.

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>This is not any cause for any glee or comfort

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>this is something that is it's very solemn, that it's

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>something prayerful, and that we had to gather so much

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 1>information to take us to this next step. I rise

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:13.400
<v Speaker 1>in strong support, but I do not take any pleasure

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>in the events that have made this process necessary. I

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>rise in strong support of the resolution, but I do

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>so with an understanding that the task before us is

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a solemn one. How each member of this Chamber approaches

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 1>the vote this morning and the days and weeks ahead

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe the most important service as members of Congress we

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 1>will ever pay to the country and constitution that we

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 1>all love and have pledged to defend. Oh, these Democrats

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>are so it's just they really don't want to do

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:46.959
<v Speaker 1>this to Trump. It's just so serious and they know

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 1>how serious it is. And there's no joy, No, there's

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>no schadenfreude at Trump's misfortune. There's no sense of ha ha.

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>We're pulling off another scam against this guy because he

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>keeps beating us, and we can't accept the reality of

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in the country under a Trump presidency.

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>We have to keep creating this fake world of Trump

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>is destroying everything and everybody. Does anyone believe these idiots

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi and Chiff and all the rest of them. Oh, no,

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>we take no joy in this whatsoever. Really, why are

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>they doing it? It's preposterous. Schiff ran around for two

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>years saying that there was evidence of Trump colluding with Russia.

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Schiff ran around promising his constituents and all Democrats and

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>left us across the country that President Trump's day would

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>come when finally he could no longer hide from his treason. Remember, folks,

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that is what they were accusing this president of. Is

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>there any reflection that comes from being wrong for two years,

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Madam Chiff, Of course not. He served his purpose if

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>nothing else, And the Democrats won't admit this publicly. The

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Muller probe, in a sense worked. It obstructed the president,

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>slowed down his administration, kept good people from going to

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 1>work in this administration. The Democrats have already managed to

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>rob Trump of some of the powers of his office

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>by running around with these insane, deceptive, destructive narratives. But

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>then to have the temerity to have the brazenness to

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>sit there and act like they don't want to do this. Oh,

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to do this. I just Donald Trump

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>is forcing my hand. Ah, it's weak stuff. We all

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.360
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what's going on here. You had the House

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>vote yesterday two hundred and thirty two to one hundred

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and ninety six to approve the resolution setting out rules

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>for an impeachment process. So now there's some rules of

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 1>the road that they have agreed to in the House.

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>How many Republicans went along with this in whatever we're

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 1>calling this vote to begin an impeachment inquiry that we

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 1>were told had already begune a couple weeks ago. How

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>many Republicans have defected? Zero? This is an entirely partisan vote,

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:13.880
<v Speaker 1>which is new, which is new in the history of impeachments.

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Republicans had turned on and we're turning on Nixon, and

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 1>some Democrats went along with the Republicans and the impeachment

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 1>proceedings against Bill Clinton. So this strictly party line vote

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>shows you exactly what's going on here. This is just

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a power played by the Democrats seeking to undo an

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>election that they did not like in advance of just

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 1>barely another election of a president that they say is

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>so stupid and so dangerous that it should be obvious

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the American people wouldn't reelect him. Here's what we all

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>know they are terrified that this president will get reelected.

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Why shouldn't they be. Look at the jobs numbers today,

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:00.919
<v Speaker 1>look at what's going on in the country. Oh, we

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:03.479
<v Speaker 1>were told if Trump move troops out of that part

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of SyRI there'd be genocide and Isis would rebound and

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a huge terrorist army would sweep across. Or we'd find

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>out that Abubakher al Buaghdaddy was dead a week later,

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>thanks to our special operators, some good work by folks

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>in the national security realm at the direction of the

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>President of the United States. Economy is still doing very well.

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:28.439
<v Speaker 1>The biggest problem now is they're so little in the

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 1>way of unemployment. They're so little for Democrats to sink

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>their teeth into as criticism against Trump, that they just

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>have to keep repeating these crazy narratives. And we have

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 1>to sit here and spend time shooting down the insanity,

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 1>impeaching the president for what. What's the purpose of this inquiry?

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>How many of you even heard about the NSC staffer

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>who came forward and said that as soon as he

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>heard this was yesterday when he heard the initial Trump

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>phone call with Zelenski, that he thought there was nothing illegal.

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing wrong with it? What law? What law was broken?

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>And at the end of all this, you have to

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 1>remember the aid was not cut off. The investigation to

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Biden did not occur. So we're going to criminalize a

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>conversation between two heads of state that resulted in no action,

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>nothing done, and that he was completely within his constitutional

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>rights to do in the first place. This is what

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>it is. If the Democrats did not have they're just

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>quizzling little media toadies in their pockets. They would never

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>be able to try to pull this off. It's so flimsy.

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:38.479
<v Speaker 1>There's no there there, There's just nothing to speak of.

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>That's why they worked so hard at pushing stories that

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>any person who spends any time digging into says, is

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.719
<v Speaker 1>this it? This is really what's happening. There are some

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Republicans who, it does seem to me, have an understanding

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of what is really going on here. Representative Cheney, by

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the way, has some fire. Resentative McCarthy has quite a

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>lot to say about this too. Producer Mark, please do

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>five and six for me, if you would, sir. This

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>is a process that has been fundamentally tainted. The president

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>has had no rights inside these hearings. His counsel has

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 1>not been able to be present. So for them now

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to claim that they're suddenly going to open the process up, which,

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>by the way, this resolution does not do. The resolution

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>says that they're going to continue doing what they want

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to do. It gives authority for open hearings, but they

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>cannot go back and fix what is a fundamentally tainted

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and unfair record. Elections have consequences, our furollo. Americans use

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:42.160
<v Speaker 1>their vote to choose who will work for them. So

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I ask you all a simple question, especially to my colleagues,

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>is that what is happening here today? Are we gathered

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>in these final moments before we depart for a week

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to fund our government to pay our troop. Are we

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 1>gathered today to prove a new trade deal? Are we

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>gathered to debate the critical national security issues regarding China

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>r Iran? Well, that answer would be unanimously no, we

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:23.880
<v Speaker 1>are not working for the American people. Those items would

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>resemble the achievements of a productive Congress, a Congress that

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>truly works for the people. What is this Congress doing

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 1>with the Democrats in the majority. It is working in

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the deeply undemocratic fashion that we currently see under way

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>where they're trying to undo an election from twenty sixteen.

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>That's it. We have the American people lined up and ready.

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>In almost exactly twelve months, we'll be able to decide

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>what they really think of a Trump presidency. But Democrats

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>seek to short circuit this by putting forward a process

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:06.679
<v Speaker 1>that could, in theory remove the president from office. And

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>they want to do this based on something that we've

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 1>all heard about and that anyone who is looking at

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 1>honestly says does not rise to the level of a

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>high crime or misdemeanor. If you don't like it, vote

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>against Trump. That's why we have elections. If you think

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that it was unfair in some way, but not illegal,

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:30.919
<v Speaker 1>there is a process for that vote. Democrats pretend to

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>care so much about voting. They say, if only they

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 1>can get more people to vote, of course they would win.

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:38.880
<v Speaker 1>They're always the majority, even when the votes come in

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 1>short of what they need for power. Pelosi in particular,

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I wonder when I could meet somebody who would tell

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>me that Nancy Pelosi is someone that you could feel

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 1>good about supporting as a powerful politician. I know a

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of Democrats. They all seem understand that Nancy Pelosi

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.919
<v Speaker 1>serves a role, but she'll just say whatever. She'll say anything,

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 1>whatever she has to say at any point in time.

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>That is what Nancy Pelosi will do. You had an

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>example of that last night when she was on the Colbet.

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, it's not the Colbert rapport anymore. That was

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the old show, right truthiness. That was actually a much

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>better show. Now he does the Late Show in New York,

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>which I can't imagine. How many nights in a row

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:32.119
<v Speaker 1>can someone just do the same tired Trump jokes before

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 1>people get tired? But the answer is that audience, the

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:38.640
<v Speaker 1>leftists people live in New York, LA, San Francisco, DC,

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:42.239
<v Speaker 1>never never get tired of Trump jokes. Doesn't matter if

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>they're funny, it doesn't matter if they've heard them before.

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Just keep it coming. Anti Trump is m is a

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:52.639
<v Speaker 1>compulsion for these people. It's like they have an addiction

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to people trashing Trump from whatever platform they can. But

0:27:58.119 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>one thing that you'll never have on the right, You'll

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>never have an conservatism, at least not any time in

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:05.199
<v Speaker 1>the near future. And maybe things will change dramatically in

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 1>my lifetime, although I doubt it. When Democrat politicians go

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 1>on these late night shows. The whole point of it

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:18.880
<v Speaker 1>is to massage, massage some of the propaganda, to let

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats have their say, and also have somebody who's

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>cool and has a lot of cultural residence and a

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 1>big platform a lot of people watching, like Colbert does

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>make that Democrat just seem cool. You know, they do this.

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:37.120
<v Speaker 1>They'll have CNN anchors onto who are overwhelmingly unimpressive dorks,

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>but they'll have them on and make them seem cool.

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>You know. Yeah, when they're done with that show, like

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>then they're gonna go hang out at a big fancy

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>cocktail party on the Upper West Side or something with

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>all the other very cool people and media and intelligency

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and all the rest of it. There's a lot there's

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:00.080
<v Speaker 1>a cultural blessing, although I don't think they like the

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>term blessing. There's a cultural blessing that occurs on that

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:05.959
<v Speaker 1>show for Democrats that never extends to Republicans, never extends

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to them. An example was last night when you had

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi on with Colbert. And unfortunately a lot of people

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>still get their news from these stupid, hackneyed late night shows.

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>But here's what she said about I mean, you guys

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>all know that at least doesn't even listen to me

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. I have some rules, right, what's

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>one of my rules about politicians. Whenever they say it's

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>for the children, you know, they're pretty much lying to you. Right,

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Whenever they say it's for the children, they're trying to

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>manipulate your emotions and they're being shameless. Oh look at

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>this Nancy Pelosi, What does she think about what's going

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>on right now? Play twenty two. Look, because they said,

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>what advice would you get people who want to run

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 1>for office? And I told them they have to have

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>their vision and their knowledge and their strategic thinking and

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>their connection to the aspirations of their constituents. But I said,

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>it's this is not for the faint of heart. So

0:29:56.880 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>if you want to go into the arena, you have

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to be paired to take a punch. You also have

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to be prepared to throw a punch for the children.

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Throw a punch more than children. Madame Speaker, thank you

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 1>so much for being here on this momentous day. Good

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>luck to the constitution. There we are, throw a punch

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 1>for the children, everybody. If that's what they're doing in

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>this impeachment hearing, they're throwing punches for the kids. It's

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>for the kids, you see. That's why they're doing all

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. Not so that Nancy Pelosi's fancy liberal friends

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco and New York and DC can think

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that she's doing a good job. Give her a high five.

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if she does high fives, but whatever

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 1>it is. At the next cocktail party, which are real things,

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and people say, oh, stop talking about liberal cocktail parties. No,

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>they exist, trust me. I don't get invited to them,

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>but I know they exist. I have friends who go

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to them. This is just shameful. This whole thing is shameful,

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and the acromotive that you're going to see as a

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>result of it is only going to get worse. There's

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 1>no effort here to restore norms, to bring us back

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to a place where at least we can count on

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Democrats to play by some of the rules, or think

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that some of the rules are important, even when the

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>rules are not favorable to what a Democrat or the

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Democrat majority wants. That's what it means to have a principle.

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 1>That's what it means to respect the system. They speak about,

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>respect for the system. They speak about, respect for the Constitution,

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 1>which is laughable, by the way, to anybody who remembers

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>what was going on with Democrats during the eight years

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Obama presidency. And Democrats went forward with a

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>law that regulates inactivity, and then a five four decision

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Supreme Court keeps that grossly unconstitutional legislation alive.

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>And they want to tell us about the Constitution and

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>about individual rights and liberty. I mean, it's a joke.

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>It's ridiculous. Unfortunately, it's deeply unfunny. We're going to see

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>this now with very few surprises. It's just a shouting

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 1>match Left on one side, the Democrats on one side,

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Republicans on the other. Whatever they can do that hurts

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the president is what they will do. Everything else is

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a distant concern for them, including throwing a punch for

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the children. Founding fathers understood that a leader might take

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>hold of the oval office, who would sacrifice the national security,

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 1>who would fail to defend the constitution, who would place

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>his personal or political interests above the interests of the country.

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 1>They understood that might happen, and they provided a mechanism

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to deal with it. And that mechanism is called impeachment.

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Adam Schiff invoking the Founding Fathers. I don't want to

0:32:57.560 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>throw up because you would hear it on radio and

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you would see it all the Pluto channel, which that

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>would be bad. But I did feel my stomach turn

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. This guy, the one who lied to

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 1>American people for two years saying the president was a trader,

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 1>a trader, folks working with Russia, betraying the United States

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>of America. And now it's oh, he puts his interest

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>above US national security interests. I have a question fadom

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Ship who determines US national security interests? In Ukraine? President

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of United States. They run into some problems here. Anybody

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 1>who understands the way our system of government is really

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 1>built quickly figures out that they're just making this stuff up.

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>They have no idea what they're really saying. It's all

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>just blah blah constitution blah blah, our democracy. Trump is bad,

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Throw Trump out of office. All the rest of it

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is just noise. It's dressing up a flimsy case, which

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 1>is what they currently have against the president. I'm annoyed

0:33:57.520 --> 0:34:00.040
<v Speaker 1>that we have to spend as much time as you

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 1>do as a country going into an election year where

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>there are some big things to talk about, like Medicare

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 1>for all. Elizabeth Warren will get to that, don't warrant

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that's coming up when we should be having very serious

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>discussions about things that will affect you. That will be

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the difference between you sitting in a waiting room and

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 1>finding out that you can see the doctor you want

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:21.279
<v Speaker 1>when you want, or you sitting in a waiting room

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:24.719
<v Speaker 1>and being told sorry, it's gonna be nine months. I

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 1>know your arm really hurts and maybe you need surgery,

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>but Elizabeth Warren's plan doesn't allow you to see a

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 1>specialist that quickly. Because we're overwhelmed. But don't you feel

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:37.799
<v Speaker 1>good because illegal aliens now have healthcare that you're paying for,

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that's in your future if these Democrats when instead of

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about that, though it's all impeachment, Trump, treason, lies,

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>lies and more lies from the Democrats. I suppose we

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 1>should not be surprised. Welcome back to the Box Sexton Show.

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Warren has a plan. Oh yeah, she has a

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>plan for a lot of but how to pay for

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Medicare for all? A signature issue of her presidential run

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 1>is not one of them. Until today, Elizabeth Warren everybody

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:22.240
<v Speaker 1>wants to tell you that you're gonna have free healthcare

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of your life, and basically none of

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you are going to have to pay for that. I

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 1>hate to say this, but we do reach a point

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>at which if somebody is so stupid as to believe

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a thing, I wonder if it's possible that they're smart

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:41.799
<v Speaker 1>enough to believe why that thing is wrong in any capacity.

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:46.399
<v Speaker 1>No matter what I tell them, no one should really

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:50.280
<v Speaker 1>think it is possible. As a function of math, goods

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and services, basic economics, supply and demand, any of them.

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 1>No one should think that what Elizabeth Warren says is

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:03.239
<v Speaker 1>even vaguely possible. Remember it's not just that she says

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:04.759
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be really good health insurance is not

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna pay But then the middle class. No tax hikes

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>on the middle class despite a fifty two trillion dollars

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Medicare for All plan. All right, Elizabeth Warrent tweeter at today, today,

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm relashing my plan to pay for Medicare for all.

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll stop. Here's the headline. My plan won't raise taxes

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>one penny on middle class families. In fact, we'll return

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 1>about eleven trillion dollars to the American people. That's bigger

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:43.280
<v Speaker 1>than the biggest tax cut in our history. Here's how

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 1>my friends, this is. This is utterly absurd. She's not

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>only telling you that she's not going to pay or

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:55.720
<v Speaker 1>she's not going to raise taxes on the middle class.

0:36:56.880 --> 0:37:00.080
<v Speaker 1>She's telling you that she's going to engage in a

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:06.360
<v Speaker 1>tax cut. How is that possible? Here's what she writes

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. I asked top experts to examine my Medicare

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 1>for All plan. They concluded, we can cover everyone, and

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:14.799
<v Speaker 1>this is from Elizabeth Warren, all right, cover everyone and

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:18.759
<v Speaker 1>give them vastly better coverage without a tax increase on

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>middle class families. This analysis was done by doctor Donald Berwick,

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:27.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the nation's top experts in Medicare and Medicaid

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 1>programs under President Obama, and Simon Johnson, the former chief

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 1>economist at the International Monetary Fund and a professor at MIT.

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 1>In addition to providing coverage for everyone, they concluded that

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:41.320
<v Speaker 1>my plan would slightly reduce the amount of money of

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the United States would otherwise spend on healthcare over the

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 1>next ten years. I am fighting for Medicare for all.

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I have the only detailed plan to pay for it.

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 1>And we're the only Democratic primary campaign that has laid

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:55.280
<v Speaker 1>out the true full cost of any healthcare plan medicare. Otherwise,

0:37:55.680 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I look forward to others doing the same, my friends. Oh,

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and here you go. Also, we cover the remaining eleven

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:07.239
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars with taxes on big corporations, Wall Street and

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:10.319
<v Speaker 1>the one percent and enforcing a tax laws we now have,

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:13.919
<v Speaker 1>adding a targeted cut to a Defense department slush fund.

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's it. This is just insane, my friends. This

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:24.839
<v Speaker 1>is completely and utterly bonkers. And she's supposed to be

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the super smart policy wonk of the Democrats who are

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 1>running her and Buddha Judge, who are both he's also

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 1>a Medicare for all guy. They really think that they

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:36.880
<v Speaker 1>can do this. They think they can do this in

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:41.279
<v Speaker 1>a way that's so efficient that you could have Sweden

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 1>or Denmark levels of universal healthcare without their levels of taxation.

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 1>How would that be possible? Why would we be so

0:38:54.160 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 1>much better at this and than it's been. Keeping mind

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:58.239
<v Speaker 1>when we're comparing ourselves, which the Democrats love to do,

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to countries like Sweden that have let's say, twenty million

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:04.399
<v Speaker 1>people in it, Okay, America has three hundred and thirty

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 1>million people. The healthcare system here is much more complex,

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:13.680
<v Speaker 1>much larger, and is dealing with all kinds of complexities.

0:39:13.719 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 1>No one sitting around saying, when are the Swedes gonna

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:17.520
<v Speaker 1>cure cancer? I mean maybe, but it's going to be

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:22.439
<v Speaker 1>America most likely. So we have a lot of things

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to think about for our healthcare system that other countries

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 1>don't really or they're free riders on our system. But

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the claim that she can do this without raising taxes

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 1>in the middle class and without destroying the rest of

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:44.319
<v Speaker 1>the economy is utterly absurd. Here's how Fox News writes

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 1>this up today on It's the main story on the

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:50.800
<v Speaker 1>website Warren's Project Warren projects no new tax burden for

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the middle class. The Warren campaign claims those eleven trillion

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:57.799
<v Speaker 1>in individual costs would drop to practically zero while the

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:01.360
<v Speaker 1>plan maintains and boosts a funding pipeline from other sources.

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 1>The plan carries a total price tag of just under

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty two trillion dollars over the next ten years, or

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 1>slightly less than cost projections for the current system that

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 1>factors in current and additional spending. New spending alone would

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 1>be in the twenty trillion dollar range. Compared with roughly

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:26.799
<v Speaker 1>thirty two trillion dollars for Sanders plan. Now, so let's

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 1>be clear, the fifty two trillion is all in healthcare

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 1>spending under this plan, right, The twenty trillion is in

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 1>excess of current government healthcare expenditures. So the government's going

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to spend, according to Warren, an additional twenty trillion dollars

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 1>over ten years, basically going to double what the government

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:53.480
<v Speaker 1>spends every year for ten years. Bernie Sanders saying it's

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty trillion, which would be doubling with the government spends

0:40:55.680 --> 0:41:00.160
<v Speaker 1>every year. We're going to put these people in charge

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:04.799
<v Speaker 1>of this much of the economy, the genius of our

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 1>system economically, and we see this now we've got great

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:11.600
<v Speaker 1>job numbers. Isn't it so amazing too? Obama, we suffered

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 1>through a recession for years and they kept calling it

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a recovery. Trump. All we have is a booming economy,

0:41:18.080 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and we keep being told any minute now, it's going

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to change, any minute now, it's going to change. Hasn't

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 1>changed yet, almost like they're trying to play games with

0:41:29.160 --> 0:41:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the public's expectations for political reasons. But let's get back

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 1>now for a second. Why is America so rich. You

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:43.800
<v Speaker 1>could argue that Soviet Union, for example, had better strategic geography,

0:41:43.920 --> 0:41:47.360
<v Speaker 1>natural resources. I mean, you could argue that why is

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:50.880
<v Speaker 1>America so wealthy? America has done as well as it

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 1>has done because it has harnessed individual ingenuity, individual initiative,

0:41:57.680 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 1>people pursuing their own self interest economically, and in doing so,

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:08.680
<v Speaker 1>becoming more productive, more efficient, inventing stuff, being entrepreneurs, being

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:13.759
<v Speaker 1>good employees because it benefits them. Human beings, we are

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:17.760
<v Speaker 1>all inherently self interested creatures. This is just a fact.

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I know, the Marxists, others a sea, they're admitting it.

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:24.359
<v Speaker 1>The fat Cats, they're so selfish holdership with warrants like say,

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:26.800
<v Speaker 1>they're just they don't want to give all the money

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:31.280
<v Speaker 1>from the Wall Street to the poor people. Elizabeth Warren's

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:33.480
<v Speaker 1>worth about ten million dollars, by the way, but she

0:42:33.680 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 1>cares so much about poor people. But the system we

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:44.560
<v Speaker 1>have rewards people for doing good, smart, efficient things, providing services,

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:48.160
<v Speaker 1>coming up with new technologies, being better at stuff. We're

0:42:48.200 --> 0:42:52.200
<v Speaker 1>just being good at stuff. And I think that one

0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 1>one important lesson that we all have is, you know,

0:42:55.239 --> 0:42:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you can be the person who works at the gas

0:42:58.239 --> 0:43:01.759
<v Speaker 1>station who does a great job, and everybody's happy to

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:04.359
<v Speaker 1>see and is efficient and quick, and you know, maybe

0:43:04.360 --> 0:43:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you get more tips and then maybe you become a manager,

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and then maybe you become a regional manager. You know

0:43:08.320 --> 0:43:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you or you'd be a person who shows up and

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:11.919
<v Speaker 1>hates their job and is bad at it. We want

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:16.319
<v Speaker 1>a system that that advantage is one person over the

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:20.040
<v Speaker 1>other person based on what they do. That that is

0:43:20.080 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the system that we want. And Democrats also refuse to

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 1>understand that because of the market signals, because of price.

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:32.080
<v Speaker 1>And this now goes back into the central planning, which

0:43:32.120 --> 0:43:33.919
<v Speaker 1>is I know a recurring theme that I've been bringing

0:43:34.000 --> 0:43:36.920
<v Speaker 1>up with you here, but the government is not good

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:40.279
<v Speaker 1>at determining how many different kinds of milk we should have,

0:43:40.520 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 1>who should make the milk, where should the milk go?

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Walk into a whole foods now you'll see not just

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:48.920
<v Speaker 1>moo cow milk. I don't know why I did a

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:51.839
<v Speaker 1>move there, but I just came to my mind. You'll have,

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, almond milk and soy milk and hazelnut milk,

0:43:55.800 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and five different providers of a few of those, and

0:43:58.560 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 1>they'll be in different sizes, in different colored boxes. And

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:05.239
<v Speaker 1>what would happen if the government was saying, yeah, we're

0:44:05.239 --> 0:44:08.560
<v Speaker 1>just gonna be your milk provider. Do you think you'd

0:44:08.560 --> 0:44:13.399
<v Speaker 1>have better, tasting, cheaper milk, does anybody? Elizabeth Warren thinks

0:44:13.400 --> 0:44:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the answers yes, Elizabeth Warren, And they would deny this

0:44:18.160 --> 0:44:21.279
<v Speaker 1>because it makes it it clarify the situation. Elizabeth Warren

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:23.600
<v Speaker 1>wants you to believe that if the government was in

0:44:23.719 --> 0:44:26.080
<v Speaker 1>charge of what milk you could buy in the store,

0:44:26.760 --> 0:44:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the government was the only person paying for milk. The

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:31.759
<v Speaker 1>government got to regulate what kind of milk was out

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 1>there and determine what the price of milk was, that

0:44:37.040 --> 0:44:38.759
<v Speaker 1>you'd be able to go in there and you'd I mean,

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean I drink milk sometimes. Now that's so fancy,

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:44.759
<v Speaker 1>I feel bougie. The first sip I was drinking walnut milk,

0:44:44.760 --> 0:44:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you'd dat even though they made that till recently. It's

0:44:47.600 --> 0:44:52.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of good. Healthcare is even more complicated than the

0:44:52.320 --> 0:44:55.480
<v Speaker 1>dairy or the milk industry. And put aside for a

0:44:55.520 --> 0:44:58.800
<v Speaker 1>moment that almond milk is almond juice. That's lying about

0:44:58.800 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 1>being milk. We have very clear lessons for why we

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 1>have had more people taken out of poverty in the

0:45:06.760 --> 0:45:09.719
<v Speaker 1>last fifty years than in all of human history before

0:45:09.719 --> 0:45:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it combined. It is because of markets, because of individual incentive,

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and because we have a system that leverages the desire

0:45:20.040 --> 0:45:23.520
<v Speaker 1>within human beings to do well and to do better,

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and a system that inherently elevates the good, the efficient,

0:45:28.760 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the smart, the hard working, and does not similarly elevate

0:45:34.080 --> 0:45:36.000
<v Speaker 1>those who don't really care, don't want to do a

0:45:36.000 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 1>good job, don't want to do it the right way. Now,

0:45:39.600 --> 0:45:43.799
<v Speaker 1>if you apply Elizabeth Warren's thinking about or rather our

0:45:43.800 --> 0:45:47.759
<v Speaker 1>discussion about milk, to Elizabeth Warren's thinking about healthcare, all

0:45:47.800 --> 0:45:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the things that I'm telling you're everything that we said

0:45:50.160 --> 0:45:52.640
<v Speaker 1>was true about Obamacare, that conservative said was true about

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Obamacare turned out to be true. Yes, it was a

0:45:57.080 --> 0:45:59.839
<v Speaker 1>stepping stone to single pair. They said that was a lie. Yes,

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it was a stepping stone to socialism. They said that

0:46:02.080 --> 0:46:05.400
<v Speaker 1>was a lie. Now we have open socialists running in

0:46:05.440 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic ticket. Oh what a shock. Yes, it would

0:46:10.120 --> 0:46:15.080
<v Speaker 1>be mostly a massive expansion of Medicaid. You know, when

0:46:15.120 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I was debating healthcare at Politicon with a bunch of

0:46:18.520 --> 0:46:21.440
<v Speaker 1>leftists and my man Glenn Jacobs, who's awesome he was.

0:46:21.600 --> 0:46:24.480
<v Speaker 1>He was on my team he's a libertarian perspective, but

0:46:24.480 --> 0:46:27.919
<v Speaker 1>libertarians also like markets. But we're debating. As I said

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:30.759
<v Speaker 1>to them, just explain this to me, and this this

0:46:30.880 --> 0:46:33.319
<v Speaker 1>really in including the MD. But he's a psychiatrist, so

0:46:33.440 --> 0:46:37.560
<v Speaker 1>we know he's a little leftist wacky. Not all of them,

0:46:38.080 --> 0:46:39.800
<v Speaker 1>but like ninety five percent of them are. I'm just

0:46:39.840 --> 0:46:43.200
<v Speaker 1>telling you it's true. I said to them, why why

0:46:43.280 --> 0:46:46.520
<v Speaker 1>go through all of this? If the real problem is

0:46:46.560 --> 0:46:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the uninsured in this country, why not just expand Medicaid

0:46:52.640 --> 0:46:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to cover anybody who's uninsured? There's no such thing. If

0:46:55.680 --> 0:46:58.919
<v Speaker 1>you don't have health insurance, now you have Medicaid. Why

0:46:58.920 --> 0:47:03.239
<v Speaker 1>not just do that? Wouldn't that take care? If it's

0:47:03.239 --> 0:47:06.319
<v Speaker 1>really just about insuring everybody, just tell any anyone who

0:47:06.360 --> 0:47:07.799
<v Speaker 1>walks in and says, oh, you don't have insurance, Well

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:11.839
<v Speaker 1>now you have Medicaid. I mean, it can't be because

0:47:11.840 --> 0:47:15.440
<v Speaker 1>it's too expensive. If they're talking about thirty trillion dollars

0:47:15.560 --> 0:47:18.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty to thirty trillion dollars of new government spending,

0:47:18.320 --> 0:47:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and you're only really looking at about fifteen

0:47:21.840 --> 0:47:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to twenty million Americans roughly who aren't covered in Medicaid

0:47:25.360 --> 0:47:28.400
<v Speaker 1>don't have insurance. Or you have a problem, why radically

0:47:28.480 --> 0:47:32.120
<v Speaker 1>transform the whole system. Well, because they want you to

0:47:32.160 --> 0:47:35.719
<v Speaker 1>go to the doctor. And they won't say this, but

0:47:35.760 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 1>they want your insurance to be no better than Medicaid,

0:47:38.360 --> 0:47:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and somebody on Medicaid's insurance to be no better than yours.

0:47:41.200 --> 0:47:45.359
<v Speaker 1>You're all going to be the same. Think about how

0:47:46.239 --> 0:47:48.319
<v Speaker 1>what that means for people right now. They are used

0:47:48.320 --> 0:47:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to having insurance, used to having options going to see

0:47:50.680 --> 0:47:53.719
<v Speaker 1>private doctors. You think your insurance is going to get better.

0:47:54.560 --> 0:47:56.440
<v Speaker 1>You think that's gonna be fun. Oh, and Democrats want

0:47:56.440 --> 0:47:58.319
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that illegal aliens are also right there

0:47:58.320 --> 0:48:00.640
<v Speaker 1>with you now, so they have the same insurance that

0:48:00.680 --> 0:48:04.239
<v Speaker 1>you do too. Everyone's gonna have the same insurance, be

0:48:04.360 --> 0:48:06.560
<v Speaker 1>government mandated. This is what the government will pay for.

0:48:08.000 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Go back to the milk on the shelves in the store.

0:48:10.760 --> 0:48:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Government's the only person that pays for milk in the

0:48:12.760 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 1>whole country. The government decides what's acceptable for the size

0:48:16.520 --> 0:48:19.279
<v Speaker 1>of milk, the taste of milk. It's gonna get better,

0:48:19.320 --> 0:48:21.840
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna get a cheaper you're gonna have more options.

0:48:23.440 --> 0:48:27.640
<v Speaker 1>They are fundamentally wrong, Just like what they said about

0:48:27.640 --> 0:48:30.680
<v Speaker 1>how Obamacare is going to be amazing and great. Yeah,

0:48:30.719 --> 0:48:33.239
<v Speaker 1>some people get subsidies, some people get free stuff from

0:48:33.239 --> 0:48:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the government. Other people have to pay for that free stuff.

0:48:35.320 --> 0:48:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Not good for them. I thought this was going to

0:48:37.920 --> 0:48:40.920
<v Speaker 1>fix the problem of the unashored. Why didn't obamacare, Obamacare

0:48:40.960 --> 0:48:45.000
<v Speaker 1>fix the problem of the unashured. Oh, now we need

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:47.839
<v Speaker 1>single pair. They told us we wouldn't need single pair,

0:48:47.880 --> 0:48:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and now we do. The people who are right the

0:48:50.560 --> 0:48:54.279
<v Speaker 1>last time, people like me, among many others. They should

0:48:54.320 --> 0:48:56.799
<v Speaker 1>be listened to. Now. The people that are promising the

0:48:56.840 --> 0:48:59.759
<v Speaker 1>magical chocolate cake that never runs out, that cost you nothing,

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that you can eat tons of and never get fat,

0:49:02.920 --> 0:49:05.440
<v Speaker 1>they should Honestly, their ideas should be ridiculed. Elizabeth Warren's

0:49:05.440 --> 0:49:10.160
<v Speaker 1>ideas is ridiculous. This is absurd, And no tax increases

0:49:10.200 --> 0:49:11.960
<v Speaker 1>on the middle class to pay for this. That's you know,

0:49:12.120 --> 0:49:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, comprises the tax based people that make money.

0:49:15.719 --> 0:49:17.800
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, there's there's a class of rich people in

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:19.359
<v Speaker 1>this country who already, by the way, pay a lot

0:49:19.360 --> 0:49:23.759
<v Speaker 1>of taxes, but everybody else because there's so many of them.

0:49:24.120 --> 0:49:28.160
<v Speaker 1>That's where the real money is. Got to make everybody

0:49:28.200 --> 0:49:31.160
<v Speaker 1>pay value added tax, consumption tax, whatever it may be,

0:49:31.200 --> 0:49:34.120
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna throw all these things into the mix. It's

0:49:34.120 --> 0:49:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a nightmare. So just the next time you're in the store,

0:49:37.680 --> 0:49:39.640
<v Speaker 1>look at the shelves and think about what would these

0:49:39.640 --> 0:49:45.399
<v Speaker 1>shelves look like if Elizabeth warrener Bernie Sanders got their

0:49:45.440 --> 0:49:47.160
<v Speaker 1>way in the Congress, which is also here. That's a

0:49:47.200 --> 0:49:49.760
<v Speaker 1>whole I mean, politically, this all that's never gonna happen, folks,

0:49:51.080 --> 0:49:53.239
<v Speaker 1>They're not going to get there. So why would you

0:49:53.239 --> 0:49:55.640
<v Speaker 1>elect somebody that's got a stupid plan, that's crazy, that

0:49:55.680 --> 0:49:58.560
<v Speaker 1>will bankrupt the country and the Congress won't even go

0:49:58.600 --> 0:50:03.200
<v Speaker 1>along with at least I don't think they would. Well,

0:50:04.239 --> 0:50:05.640
<v Speaker 1>this is because I live in the real world. It's

0:50:05.719 --> 0:50:07.439
<v Speaker 1>very frustrating to live in the real world these days.

0:50:07.440 --> 0:50:10.560
<v Speaker 1>It's much more fun to live in liberal fantasyland where

0:50:10.680 --> 0:50:12.600
<v Speaker 1>everything would just be fine if it wasn't for Donald Trump.

0:50:12.600 --> 0:50:14.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, every we could fix everything, give everyone great healthcare.

0:50:15.520 --> 0:50:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Nobody should be held responsible for their bad decisions, Nobody

0:50:18.200 --> 0:50:20.840
<v Speaker 1>should feel like they're being left out of the economy,

0:50:20.880 --> 0:50:27.000
<v Speaker 1>no matter how little they do, or it's just the

0:50:27.040 --> 0:50:30.560
<v Speaker 1>difference between reality and reality. You know what side of

0:50:30.560 --> 0:50:34.000
<v Speaker 1>this I want to be on. It wasn't until I

0:50:34.160 --> 0:50:37.560
<v Speaker 1>heard of a man by the name of Bernie Sanders

0:50:39.440 --> 0:50:46.040
<v Speaker 1>always began to question and assert and recognize my inherent

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:52.960
<v Speaker 1>value as a human being that deserves healthcare, housing, education,

0:50:53.320 --> 0:50:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and a living way. Wasn't until Bernie Sanders came along

0:50:58.360 --> 0:51:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that AOC who's endorsed Bernie Sanders said she understood or

0:51:04.000 --> 0:51:07.040
<v Speaker 1>rather began to a question and assert and recognize her

0:51:07.080 --> 0:51:15.760
<v Speaker 1>inherent value as a human being, and that means healthcare, housing, food, everything.

0:51:16.800 --> 0:51:19.839
<v Speaker 1>Have we learned nothing from the experiment of the Soviet Union?

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:22.120
<v Speaker 1>The answer with someone like Bernie Sanders is they have

0:51:22.280 --> 0:51:26.359
<v Speaker 1>learned nothing. They don't understand. And you could say, but buck,

0:51:26.400 --> 0:51:29.319
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to be as radical as the Soviets were. Well, one,

0:51:29.440 --> 0:51:33.759
<v Speaker 1>that's because of political possibility. They can't even if they

0:51:33.800 --> 0:51:35.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted to go as radical as a Soviets, where they

0:51:35.520 --> 0:51:37.520
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be able to get there. We are in a

0:51:37.640 --> 0:51:40.680
<v Speaker 1>very different place culturally and just as a country, and

0:51:40.800 --> 0:51:43.120
<v Speaker 1>within our economy much richer by the way as well.

0:51:43.400 --> 0:51:45.000
<v Speaker 1>One of the problems we run into with liberals is

0:51:45.000 --> 0:51:47.399
<v Speaker 1>that even when they're destroying something, if it's rich enough,

0:51:47.400 --> 0:51:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it can take a while for us to figure out

0:51:49.600 --> 0:51:52.279
<v Speaker 1>that they're destroying that thing, and they argue all along

0:51:52.280 --> 0:51:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that they're not destroying it, and by the time it's

0:51:54.760 --> 0:51:57.200
<v Speaker 1>unavoidable to come to the conclusion that they've ruined it,

0:51:57.600 --> 0:52:01.080
<v Speaker 1>like California, it's too late. So then it doesn't matter

0:52:01.080 --> 0:52:04.080
<v Speaker 1>that we were right. That's I think what you can

0:52:04.120 --> 0:52:06.759
<v Speaker 1>expect for the healthcare system with Democrats, if they were

0:52:06.760 --> 0:52:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to get their way with Medicare for all. We have

0:52:10.480 --> 0:52:12.239
<v Speaker 1>to take this very seriously because two of the three

0:52:12.239 --> 0:52:16.600
<v Speaker 1>top candidates, Bernie Sanders Elizabeth Warren, believe that this is

0:52:16.640 --> 0:52:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the way to go. In fact, Buddha Judge, who was

0:52:18.400 --> 0:52:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a top four or five candidate, also thinks that Medicare

0:52:20.800 --> 0:52:23.840
<v Speaker 1>for all is the way to go. But o'canzio cortez,

0:52:23.880 --> 0:52:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean that almost sounded like idol worship. Until Bernie

0:52:27.120 --> 0:52:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Sanders came along. She didn't understand her full inherent value

0:52:31.000 --> 0:52:34.480
<v Speaker 1>as a human being. She needed a gotta come around

0:52:34.520 --> 0:52:36.919
<v Speaker 1>to say, you're gonna have the rich people paying more,

0:52:37.080 --> 0:52:39.319
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna pay less, you're gonna have for housing, you're

0:52:39.320 --> 0:52:42.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna have food, all the things, and then all of

0:52:42.040 --> 0:52:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a sudden you recognize your inherent values of human being.

0:52:44.960 --> 0:52:48.120
<v Speaker 1>That's both bizarre and kind of sad. So I wasn't

0:52:48.160 --> 0:52:53.600
<v Speaker 1>planning to spend much time here talking about Congresswoman Katie Hill.

0:52:56.160 --> 0:53:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And I don't really particularly like to get involved in

0:53:00.640 --> 0:53:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the personal life stuff of public figures. I mean just

0:53:04.600 --> 0:53:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't find it all that interesting. And it was

0:53:07.360 --> 0:53:09.160
<v Speaker 1>already pretty clear to me that she was going to

0:53:09.200 --> 0:53:10.759
<v Speaker 1>have to resign, and now she has resigned. It's a

0:53:10.920 --> 0:53:16.880
<v Speaker 1>congresswoman from California. We had Tiana Lowe from The Examiner

0:53:16.920 --> 0:53:19.360
<v Speaker 1>on her own of the Week talking about this. But

0:53:19.440 --> 0:53:22.319
<v Speaker 1>now I've got a problem. Now I've got a problem

0:53:22.320 --> 0:53:27.359
<v Speaker 1>with this because it's quite clear what happened. She messed up,

0:53:28.120 --> 0:53:30.520
<v Speaker 1>she did think she wasn't supposed to do, and then

0:53:30.560 --> 0:53:33.680
<v Speaker 1>because she associates with some bad people, including apparently her

0:53:33.680 --> 0:53:37.799
<v Speaker 1>ex husband, there was embarrassing stuff that happened to her.

0:53:38.400 --> 0:53:42.400
<v Speaker 1>But on the way out, instead of just accepting responsibility

0:53:42.440 --> 0:53:47.919
<v Speaker 1>for what happened, understanding that she messed up, she made

0:53:47.920 --> 0:53:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a mistake, she's now trying to do what Democrats love

0:53:52.280 --> 0:53:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to do, which is rewrite the narrative, blame their political enemies,

0:53:57.680 --> 0:54:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and then try to probably down the line, resurrect some

0:54:00.200 --> 0:54:05.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of public public life, public career for oneself, just

0:54:05.800 --> 0:54:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to review the facts here. Katie Hill had a had

0:54:10.280 --> 0:54:13.520
<v Speaker 1>multiple set well, she denies one and accepts the other one.

0:54:13.600 --> 0:54:16.280
<v Speaker 1>There's photos though of at least one of them naked

0:54:16.320 --> 0:54:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and brushing each other's hair or something. She had a

0:54:21.600 --> 0:54:25.160
<v Speaker 1>sexual relationships as a member of Congress with people who

0:54:25.200 --> 0:54:27.080
<v Speaker 1>were on her payroll work for her, and she has

0:54:27.080 --> 0:54:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the power to hire and fire. Now, Congress established rules

0:54:33.280 --> 0:54:36.440
<v Speaker 1>that you These are congressional rules, specific Congress. You can't

0:54:36.520 --> 0:54:40.480
<v Speaker 1>do that. So, just by way of a comparison here,

0:54:40.520 --> 0:54:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I if I walk into a country club

0:54:44.680 --> 0:54:47.359
<v Speaker 1>and I insist on walking around the dining room using

0:54:47.360 --> 0:54:48.919
<v Speaker 1>my cell phone, some of you people along the country

0:54:48.920 --> 0:54:51.080
<v Speaker 1>clubs will know that's a big someplaces that's a big

0:54:51.120 --> 0:54:54.400
<v Speaker 1>no no. And they decide that, okay, we have a

0:54:54.480 --> 0:54:56.240
<v Speaker 1>rule against this. If you're not gonna get up your cellphone,

0:54:56.239 --> 0:54:58.000
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna kick you out of the club. And you

0:54:58.080 --> 0:55:01.680
<v Speaker 1>keep talking on your cell phone, that's on you. Those

0:55:01.719 --> 0:55:04.000
<v Speaker 1>are the rules of the club. You won't obey them.

0:55:04.360 --> 0:55:06.000
<v Speaker 1>The club has the right to say these are the rules.

0:55:06.040 --> 0:55:11.719
<v Speaker 1>You're gone. She broke house rules, no question, there's no

0:55:11.760 --> 0:55:14.160
<v Speaker 1>there's no debate about whether or not g and it's

0:55:14.160 --> 0:55:15.840
<v Speaker 1>a pretty serious rule too. I mean, I know the

0:55:15.880 --> 0:55:19.240
<v Speaker 1>cell phone things, but I just mean that different bodies

0:55:19.239 --> 0:55:21.319
<v Speaker 1>have the right to declare, you know, this isn't a

0:55:21.320 --> 0:55:23.640
<v Speaker 1>criminal proceeding. No one saying she sho's going to prison

0:55:23.719 --> 0:55:26.600
<v Speaker 1>for this, but the Congress can say that this is

0:55:26.600 --> 0:55:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the way we're going to conduct ourselves. This is now

0:55:29.440 --> 0:55:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a rule they've come up within the me too era,

0:55:32.040 --> 0:55:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and she broke that rule. This is very this is

0:55:35.080 --> 0:55:39.120
<v Speaker 1>very straightforward, but now it ends up happening. Is it's

0:55:39.200 --> 0:55:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it's about other things she's saying, Oh, he's saying, it's

0:55:41.680 --> 0:55:48.480
<v Speaker 1>about revenge porn. Okay. There is a lack of wisdom

0:55:48.520 --> 0:55:52.239
<v Speaker 1>I think that some people have when they especially if

0:55:52.280 --> 0:55:54.399
<v Speaker 1>you're a person in public life and you're taking these

0:55:54.480 --> 0:55:57.440
<v Speaker 1>kinds of photos, but that's a personal I just I

0:55:57.440 --> 0:56:02.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's a bad move, that's said somebody using that,

0:56:02.320 --> 0:56:04.759
<v Speaker 1>especially anybody who is in a trusted and perhaps an

0:56:04.760 --> 0:56:06.960
<v Speaker 1>intimate setting with someone. I mean, using that against a

0:56:07.080 --> 0:56:11.600
<v Speaker 1>human being is a despicable thing. And do I think

0:56:11.600 --> 0:56:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that there was perhaps a little bit too much in

0:56:15.719 --> 0:56:19.840
<v Speaker 1>some places, at some publications, a little bit of quiet

0:56:19.960 --> 0:56:23.040
<v Speaker 1>glee at being able to share what we're clearly humiliating

0:56:23.040 --> 0:56:28.399
<v Speaker 1>photos of a Democrat. Yeah, probably, and I think there

0:56:28.480 --> 0:56:30.280
<v Speaker 1>was a little too much. Hey, look at this revenge

0:56:30.320 --> 0:56:32.600
<v Speaker 1>porn that we're reporting on. By the way, did we

0:56:32.640 --> 0:56:36.319
<v Speaker 1>tell you this revenge porn things? Now step back for

0:56:36.320 --> 0:56:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a second. If this were a Republican female there, you know,

0:56:42.000 --> 0:56:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times would have been running the photos

0:56:43.560 --> 0:56:44.680
<v Speaker 1>in the front page, right, it would have been a

0:56:44.719 --> 0:56:48.600
<v Speaker 1>totally different situation. So I'm aware of that, right, I

0:56:48.680 --> 0:56:51.000
<v Speaker 1>trust me. The double standard here couldn't be any more clear.

0:56:51.200 --> 0:56:55.279
<v Speaker 1>But if it's because it's a Democrat, they're downplaying it.

0:56:55.320 --> 0:56:56.879
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean that it's a free for all.

0:56:56.920 --> 0:56:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Either people should be able to just or people should

0:56:59.440 --> 0:57:03.320
<v Speaker 1>feel ethical as journalists spreading this stuff all over the place.

0:57:04.239 --> 0:57:08.000
<v Speaker 1>But my problem here is that Katie Hill, I mean,

0:57:08.000 --> 0:57:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I've got an obviously a bunch of problems with this.

0:57:09.480 --> 0:57:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Katie Hill, Democrat, former Democrat congressman from California, is blaming

0:57:13.960 --> 0:57:18.720
<v Speaker 1>other people for this. She's climbing that there's a double standard,

0:57:18.760 --> 0:57:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that there's sexism at work here. Play clip two. Please.

0:57:24.080 --> 0:57:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I will never shirk my responsibility for this sudden ending

0:57:27.240 --> 0:57:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to my time here, But I have to say more

0:57:30.040 --> 0:57:33.400
<v Speaker 1>because this is bigger than me. I am leaving now

0:57:33.480 --> 0:57:36.560
<v Speaker 1>because of a double standard. I'm leaving because I no

0:57:36.640 --> 0:57:39.480
<v Speaker 1>longer want to be used as a bargaining chip. I'm

0:57:39.560 --> 0:57:42.080
<v Speaker 1>leaving because I didn't want to be peddled by papers

0:57:42.120 --> 0:57:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and blogs and websites used by shameless operatives for the

0:57:45.760 --> 0:57:49.240
<v Speaker 1>dirtiest gutter politics that I've ever seen, and the right

0:57:49.280 --> 0:57:52.880
<v Speaker 1>wing media to drive clicks and expand their audience by

0:57:52.920 --> 0:57:56.600
<v Speaker 1>distributing intimate photos of me taken without my knowledge, let

0:57:56.600 --> 0:58:00.919
<v Speaker 1>alone my consent, for the sexual entertainment of millions. I'm

0:58:01.000 --> 0:58:04.840
<v Speaker 1>leaving because of a misogynistic culture that gleefully consumed my

0:58:04.960 --> 0:58:09.040
<v Speaker 1>naked pictures, capitalized on my sexuality, and enabled my abusive

0:58:09.200 --> 0:58:12.080
<v Speaker 1>X to continue that abuse, this time with the entire

0:58:12.120 --> 0:58:18.120
<v Speaker 1>country watching. Nope, that's not why she's leaving. None of

0:58:18.120 --> 0:58:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that is true. She's leaving because she had sex with

0:58:22.320 --> 0:58:25.160
<v Speaker 1>people that she was paying with public funds as a

0:58:25.160 --> 0:58:30.920
<v Speaker 1>member of Congress in her office. That's unacceptable. That's it. Oh,

0:58:30.920 --> 0:58:32.560
<v Speaker 1>she can try to do all this other stuff. Oh,

0:58:32.560 --> 0:58:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'll look at this over here. No, can't do it.

0:58:36.080 --> 0:58:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Not allowed to do it. And the Democrats know that

0:58:38.800 --> 0:58:41.160
<v Speaker 1>if they let her. I want to talk about a

0:58:41.160 --> 0:58:45.200
<v Speaker 1>double stuff. What is the double standard? If they let

0:58:45.240 --> 0:58:47.840
<v Speaker 1>her stay, then there'd be a double standard. So and

0:58:48.280 --> 0:58:50.959
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats now still like to keep this stuff. They're

0:58:51.000 --> 0:58:53.360
<v Speaker 1>waiting for a Republican to mess up in this way.

0:58:53.480 --> 0:58:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Can you imagine what the media frenzy would be. Could

0:58:57.040 --> 0:59:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you imagine the news coverage that would occur if this

0:59:02.640 --> 0:59:09.600
<v Speaker 1>had been Congressman, you know, Newness or Crenshaw or Gates

0:59:10.560 --> 0:59:15.280
<v Speaker 1>brushing a female aid's hair, you know whatever, Like I

0:59:15.560 --> 0:59:17.600
<v Speaker 1>actually I will tell you I didn't even see the photos.

0:59:17.600 --> 0:59:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think I needed to, but whatever was going

0:59:21.560 --> 0:59:24.560
<v Speaker 1>on in those photos, can you imagine the frenzy. Oh,

0:59:24.680 --> 0:59:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the late night jokes, Oh Stephen, Colbert and Kimmel will

0:59:28.040 --> 0:59:29.920
<v Speaker 1>be making all they'd be having a great time with

0:59:30.000 --> 0:59:34.960
<v Speaker 1>this one. The double standard if a male, and particularly

0:59:34.960 --> 0:59:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a male Republican was doing this. By the way, I'm

0:59:38.120 --> 0:59:40.080
<v Speaker 1>not even getting into the thrupple stuff, which I didn't

0:59:40.080 --> 0:59:41.840
<v Speaker 1>even know what that was. It's like a threesome couple.

0:59:42.320 --> 0:59:44.120
<v Speaker 1>You're a three person couple, so you all get to

0:59:44.120 --> 0:59:46.240
<v Speaker 1>have sex with each other. I mean, you know, consenting

0:59:46.280 --> 0:59:48.720
<v Speaker 1>adults can do what they want to do. But if

0:59:48.720 --> 0:59:51.600
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't a Democrat doing that stuff, I assure you

0:59:52.200 --> 0:59:55.440
<v Speaker 1>there would have been a whole lot more interest. So

0:59:55.520 --> 0:59:58.680
<v Speaker 1>there she starts off that that clip and that was perfect.

0:59:58.760 --> 1:00:03.040
<v Speaker 1>This is classic. This is Democrat at mister directured propaganda.

1:00:03.080 --> 1:00:06.439
<v Speaker 1>One on one. Really, she starts up by saying that

1:00:06.440 --> 1:00:09.320
<v Speaker 1>she would never shirk responsibility. Nope, she is trying to.

1:00:09.680 --> 1:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>She couldn't get out of this entirely, but she is

1:00:11.760 --> 1:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to shirk responsibility because the next thing that comes

1:00:14.120 --> 1:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>out of her mouth is basically, this is bigger than me. No,

1:00:19.360 --> 1:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>no it's not. It's actually it's actually not bigger than

1:00:22.480 --> 1:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>her stuff. Don't have sex with people when you're a

1:00:26.600 --> 1:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>congress person who work for you, on your congressional staff,

1:00:30.480 --> 1:00:33.560
<v Speaker 1>who are being paid with public funds, and who you

1:00:33.600 --> 1:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>are entrusted to behave professionally around as a as a

1:00:37.160 --> 1:00:40.200
<v Speaker 1>member of Congress, an elected official in the United States government.

1:00:40.240 --> 1:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>That's it. This is now the standard. By the way,

1:00:44.160 --> 1:00:47.480
<v Speaker 1>if a Republican comes out and has some affair, you know,

1:00:47.520 --> 1:00:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and I, by the way, it's just I think a

1:00:49.880 --> 1:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>matter of time, let's be realistic, before some Republican member

1:00:53.680 --> 1:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>is having some something or other going on with his staffer.

1:00:57.320 --> 1:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>There are some very lovely staffers on Capitol Hill. I've

1:00:59.680 --> 1:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>spent some time around there. It would not be surprising

1:01:01.600 --> 1:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>to anybody that guy's gonna have to go. These are

1:01:05.400 --> 1:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the rules, now, right, These are the rules. Members of

1:01:07.680 --> 1:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Congress agree, agree to buy by the rules. But I

1:01:11.240 --> 1:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>hope that person, whoever it is, and maybe I'm wrong

1:01:13.400 --> 1:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and this won't happen, but I hope that Republican member

1:01:16.040 --> 1:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of Congress doesn't turn around and say, but but you know,

1:01:18.840 --> 1:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>there was a conspiracy against me, or there was a

1:01:20.840 --> 1:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>double standard, and then for her to turn this into

1:01:23.760 --> 1:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a for Katie Hill to say this is about the

1:01:26.480 --> 1:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>right wing media, Well, why is it their fault. They

1:01:32.800 --> 1:01:34.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't make you. They didn't make Katie Hill break the rules,

1:01:35.200 --> 1:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>they didn't make her act in this way. But really,

1:01:39.200 --> 1:01:41.960
<v Speaker 1>what we know is that she's trying to establish, on

1:01:42.040 --> 1:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>her way out the ultimate currency on the left, victimhood status.

1:01:48.360 --> 1:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>She gets to become a victim, well then you know

1:01:50.840 --> 1:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>she'll be able to rewrite the narrative in time, and

1:01:54.400 --> 1:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that she was a victim of a misogynist, you know,

1:01:57.400 --> 1:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>right wing media attack. And it is this almost like

1:02:00.080 --> 1:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Hillary playbook back in the day, the vast right wing

1:02:01.960 --> 1:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy right, just make something up, blame blame some enemies

1:02:06.000 --> 1:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>out there, and act like your conduct had nothing to

1:02:07.880 --> 1:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>do with any of it. Oh and if you really

1:02:12.000 --> 1:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure that you can still get some

1:02:13.480 --> 1:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>speeches on the speaker circuit, maybe get a book, be

1:02:16.400 --> 1:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>invited to fancy luncheons, maybe get a board seat somewhere

1:02:19.480 --> 1:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>or something. You really, you know what, what's the one

1:02:22.120 --> 1:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>thing she hasn't done yet? Katie Hills on the way

1:02:24.800 --> 1:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>out because of her own actions admitted, proven done. But

1:02:29.040 --> 1:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>she's saying all this other stuff. What's the one thing

1:02:31.480 --> 1:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>that she hasn't done yet that other than saying that

1:02:33.720 --> 1:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>she's going to fight the NRA for the rest of

1:02:35.400 --> 1:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>her life, which is that's the classic that is adjustin

1:02:37.720 --> 1:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Trudeau move. I want to take all of yourselftwife weapons

1:02:40.880 --> 1:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>or the Harvey Weinstein. You know, yeah, I'm going to

1:02:42.920 --> 1:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>dedicate myself to fighting the NRA. No, how about Harvey Weinstein.

1:02:45.960 --> 1:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Dedicate yourself to not being a sexual predator. But what

1:02:50.680 --> 1:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>is the one thing that she hasn't done? Oh, that's right,

1:02:54.440 --> 1:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>she has not yet attacked Donald Trump. Play clip through. Please,

1:02:57.320 --> 1:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm leaving. But we have men who have been credibly

1:03:00.400 --> 1:03:04.640
<v Speaker 1>accused of intentional acts of sexual violence and remain in

1:03:04.760 --> 1:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>boardrooms on the Supreme Court, in this very body, and

1:03:09.360 --> 1:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>worst of all, in the Oval office. Wow, just in time.

1:03:16.120 --> 1:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>There what slander? Now? I will just put aside for

1:03:22.080 --> 1:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a second the fact that you've had all these people

1:03:24.120 --> 1:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>come out and accused Trump of this or that. Do

1:03:27.720 --> 1:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>we know any of the who's the really credible source

1:03:30.720 --> 1:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>for Donald Trump engaged in sexual violence against a woman?

1:03:34.600 --> 1:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>And don't tell me this thing about he said he

1:03:35.920 --> 1:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>would grab I know what he said. He was saying

1:03:37.880 --> 1:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that they let they let you, was what he said.

1:03:40.160 --> 1:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>He says, when you're a star, you can be sexually

1:03:42.000 --> 1:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>aggressive with women and they let you, because that is

1:03:45.800 --> 1:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>he was saying, they're consenting to it. Okay, that was

1:03:50.840 --> 1:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>locker room talk. We know that. Who was it the

1:03:53.480 --> 1:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>woman who came forward and wrote that book? And then

1:03:55.120 --> 1:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>on Anderson Cooper so a show on Live TV CNN

1:03:58.320 --> 1:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>said that rape is sexy quote unquote rapist sexy. That

1:04:01.880 --> 1:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>is what she said. She's the credible story. Who's the

1:04:04.280 --> 1:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>credible source for the President the United States as a rapist?

1:04:08.600 --> 1:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Do I believe the presence of Philanderer? Yes? Have I

1:04:10.960 --> 1:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>ever for one second, believed that he's a rapist based

1:04:13.200 --> 1:04:16.280
<v Speaker 1>on the allegations, the stories, the fact pattern. No, I

1:04:16.280 --> 1:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>don't believe it. Sorry, and to put Kavanaugh in there too.

1:04:21.560 --> 1:04:22.840
<v Speaker 1>We are not at a point where if you think

1:04:22.840 --> 1:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>that Kavanaugh assaulted these women, you're just not very smart.

1:04:27.600 --> 1:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what else to say, or you've deceived

1:04:30.200 --> 1:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>yourself so much that you're incapable of rational thought on

1:04:34.360 --> 1:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>this issue. They can't even prove that blasi Ford met him.

1:04:40.320 --> 1:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>She can't even tell a convincing story about meeting him. Where, when, how,

1:04:44.800 --> 1:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>who took you home? That's not credibly accused. It's the

1:04:48.440 --> 1:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>opposite of credibly accused. I don't one more thing in

1:04:51.520 --> 1:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>this since I'm talking about Blassie Ford. She just I

1:04:55.800 --> 1:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>saw yesterday she I'm trying to think of what the

1:04:59.280 --> 1:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>what the award was called? Hold on, let me see

1:05:01.720 --> 1:05:06.439
<v Speaker 1>if I can find this Christine blasi Ford, she got

1:05:06.440 --> 1:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>an award. Daily Wire reporting on this, had he give

1:05:10.880 --> 1:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>us an acceptance speech. She was in the cover of

1:05:13.080 --> 1:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>what was it? Time magazine? Here we Go, accepted an

1:05:16.400 --> 1:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>empowerment award from the YWCA Silicon Valley, gave a speech, etc. Etc. Okay,

1:05:25.480 --> 1:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>all right, my friends, I'm just gonna I'm not letting

1:05:28.160 --> 1:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>this go because it's appalling what they did. The Kavanat's

1:05:32.280 --> 1:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>one of you. It's the ugliest thing I've ever seen

1:05:33.680 --> 1:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>in American politics. To this day. Still, I'm not letting

1:05:40.440 --> 1:05:42.840
<v Speaker 1>go that the press pretended. And I remember having this

1:05:42.880 --> 1:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>dispute publicly with people. The press pretended at the time

1:05:46.880 --> 1:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to be so dumb that they really didn't think that

1:05:49.840 --> 1:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>there was any upside for Christine blasi Ford for accusing Kavanaugh.

1:05:54.120 --> 1:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Why would she lie? She has nothing to gain, they

1:05:56.920 --> 1:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>kept saying. I looked around, saying other than being famous,

1:06:01.560 --> 1:06:05.840
<v Speaker 1>being revered, being rich, being a hero to the left,

1:06:08.440 --> 1:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and fulfilling her own ideological beliefs to stop kavan Off

1:06:14.920 --> 1:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>from being on the court, to protect Roe v. Wade,

1:06:16.720 --> 1:06:21.040
<v Speaker 1>most likely, those are all obvious things. And I was

1:06:21.040 --> 1:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>saying at the time, of course, she's gonna be she's

1:06:22.920 --> 1:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a book deal, she's gonna be on the

1:06:24.680 --> 1:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>cover of Vanity Fair. All these things will happen. But

1:06:26.920 --> 1:06:31.280
<v Speaker 1>they pretended because it was just necessary for the storyline

1:06:31.280 --> 1:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>at the time, trying to fool stupid people. The media

1:06:34.800 --> 1:06:37.600
<v Speaker 1>pretended across the board to be a bunch of morons.

1:06:38.240 --> 1:06:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Why would she lie? She has nothing to gain, She's

1:06:40.640 --> 1:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>got a ton of stuff to gain. Who the heck

1:06:42.560 --> 1:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>NoHo Christine blasi Ford was before? Now we all know

1:06:45.760 --> 1:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>her name. Now she gets awards. Now she's in the

1:06:48.160 --> 1:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>covers of magazines. Now, I'm sure wherever she goes, women

1:06:51.160 --> 1:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>who are leftists who don't know any better approach her

1:06:53.960 --> 1:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and say thank you so much for what you did.

1:06:56.360 --> 1:06:58.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, thank you for making up a story and

1:06:58.080 --> 1:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to ruin a guy's life in front of his

1:07:00.480 --> 1:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>wife and children and all of America, because you know,

1:07:03.800 --> 1:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Rovie Wade sacred. That's why, that's what she had to gain.

1:07:08.760 --> 1:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>This was obvious. Who didn't know that? I knew it,

1:07:12.400 --> 1:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>You knew it. Getting awards, I would just wait for

1:07:16.480 --> 1:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the book to come out. Oh that'll be just give

1:07:18.400 --> 1:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that some time. Ah. This is why, this is why

1:07:22.800 --> 1:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>no one is why you can't trust the media, can't

1:07:24.400 --> 1:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>trust the Democrats. If nothing else, take that from today.

1:07:28.080 --> 1:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>He recently attended the wedding there was also attended by

1:07:31.400 --> 1:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Avanka Trump. What did you talk about? I was I

1:07:39.480 --> 1:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>was a little drunk. I expect nothing, and I was

1:07:45.720 --> 1:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>with Orlando Bloom, who I think was equally, if not

1:07:52.000 --> 1:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>slightly less drunk than I was. And we were stood

1:07:55.840 --> 1:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>at the bar and what did you say? And if

1:07:58.360 --> 1:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Ana was also at the bar, and I can't I

1:08:03.040 --> 1:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>can't one hundred percent remember it, but I remember that

1:08:06.160 --> 1:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that we were quite drunk, and we started going, if

1:08:11.200 --> 1:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>anky you can do something, you can do something, you

1:08:16.720 --> 1:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>can do something, you can make a difference, you can

1:08:19.360 --> 1:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>make a difference, you can make it better. And if

1:08:21.920 --> 1:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Anker stuff was I remember if Unka was going, I'm trying.

1:08:28.040 --> 1:08:31.559
<v Speaker 1>And then the night carried on. I kept drinking, and

1:08:31.600 --> 1:08:34.599
<v Speaker 1>then the next day it was like a two day wedding.

1:08:34.600 --> 1:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>And the next day there was like a drinks thing

1:08:36.120 --> 1:08:38.679
<v Speaker 1>in the afternoon, and I'd forgotten all about it until

1:08:38.720 --> 1:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I saw her across this sort of garden and it

1:08:42.120 --> 1:08:49.439
<v Speaker 1>all came back and she just said, I bet you've

1:08:49.479 --> 1:08:52.479
<v Speaker 1>got a headache this morning, and like I just was like,

1:08:52.640 --> 1:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>can you just like do something. It's like, I'm not

1:08:55.320 --> 1:08:58.479
<v Speaker 1>even from this country, but I just I believe that

1:08:58.640 --> 1:09:02.920
<v Speaker 1>liberal narrative of you know, if Vunka could like maybe

1:09:03.000 --> 1:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>stop or Dad from being, you know, such a lunatic,

1:09:08.600 --> 1:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>And so I was this is I just I wish

1:09:12.320 --> 1:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I could be and I would be so much more

1:09:15.120 --> 1:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>fun to be a left wing newsperson, a left person

1:09:19.720 --> 1:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>in the media, on the left, because you just walk

1:09:21.800 --> 1:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>around and you know that everyone's kind of gonna just

1:09:25.120 --> 1:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>love whatever stupid thing you say about this. All you

1:09:27.240 --> 1:09:28.479
<v Speaker 1>can do is all you can do is come over

1:09:28.520 --> 1:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>into the darkness, just be anti Trump, and you just

1:09:31.360 --> 1:09:33.479
<v Speaker 1>be like I want to. It was like you can

1:09:33.600 --> 1:09:36.840
<v Speaker 1>do something. And I was drunk, and everyone's like, Oh,

1:09:37.080 --> 1:09:40.840
<v Speaker 1>that's like awesome, because it's like it's like drunk hashtag resistance,

1:09:41.000 --> 1:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean. It's fantastic. Yeah, not so much.

1:09:45.920 --> 1:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting to like Mark Zuckerberg. His unorthodox haircut is

1:09:52.640 --> 1:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>something that might take him getting used to for me still.

1:09:55.320 --> 1:09:59.200
<v Speaker 1>But but I like that he now has perhaps seen

1:09:59.439 --> 1:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>enough of the leftism out there and the desire for

1:10:06.240 --> 1:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>censorship which comes from the left, the desire for domination

1:10:10.320 --> 1:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of information and speech and dissemination of all of that

1:10:14.000 --> 1:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>which comes from the left, that now he's like, Wow,

1:10:17.240 --> 1:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>these people are crazy. We got to figure out a

1:10:18.920 --> 1:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>way to allow for the exchange of ideas in what

1:10:23.160 --> 1:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>is a massively powerful platform Facebook. So he's been better.

1:10:29.960 --> 1:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that what he's doing for example, on political

1:10:33.280 --> 1:10:38.439
<v Speaker 1>ads is better than what Jack Dorsey's doing over at Twitter,

1:10:38.479 --> 1:10:40.519
<v Speaker 1>which is, yeah, we're gonna let people pay for political ads,

1:10:40.520 --> 1:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>like we're not gonna do what the left wants here

1:10:43.880 --> 1:10:49.479
<v Speaker 1>and try to rely on the built in, the built

1:10:49.479 --> 1:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>in advantages that the left tends to have in these

1:10:52.080 --> 1:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>platforms to make it organic, because it's never really organic.

1:10:55.000 --> 1:10:58.440
<v Speaker 1>It's never really what it's just supposed to be. There's algorithms,

1:10:58.439 --> 1:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and there's upgrading and downgrading and all these things. But

1:11:02.200 --> 1:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>some of you probably are familiar with Aaron Sorkin. Aaron

1:11:07.200 --> 1:11:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Sorkin has made quite a name for himself as a

1:11:09.439 --> 1:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>screen He actually wrote The Social Network, the movie The

1:11:12.720 --> 1:11:15.559
<v Speaker 1>Social Network, which was not particularly favorable to Mark Zuckerberg,

1:11:15.600 --> 1:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>by the way, but it's very It is a very

1:11:17.120 --> 1:11:22.080
<v Speaker 1>entertaining movie for what it is, justin Timberlake, husband of

1:11:22.160 --> 1:11:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Jessica Biel, did do a pretty good job in it,

1:11:25.200 --> 1:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>much to my chagrin anyway. But Aaron Sorkin in the

1:11:31.600 --> 1:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>New York Times has written an open letter to Mark Zuckerberg.

1:11:37.760 --> 1:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Facebook isn't defending free speech, it's assaulting the truth. M

1:11:46.400 --> 1:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>let's take a look at this, shall we. Mister Sorkin,

1:11:50.520 --> 1:11:52.439
<v Speaker 1>who you know, and by the way, for making his

1:11:52.520 --> 1:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>name in Hollywood, for writing very snappy, witty dialogue between people.

1:11:57.040 --> 1:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>No one really talks like the way that the characters

1:11:59.360 --> 1:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and Aaron Sorkin shows or movies talk. I mean, it's

1:12:02.720 --> 1:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>just it's the weird. I mean, I guess some people

1:12:06.120 --> 1:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>find entertaining, but just it's very forced. I think. Here's

1:12:10.840 --> 1:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>what he writes in this EDITORI though, where he's telling

1:12:14.400 --> 1:12:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Mark Zuckerberg that it is assaulting truth instead of defending

1:12:17.840 --> 1:12:22.599
<v Speaker 1>free speech. Quote, this is Aaron Sorkin. Most people don't

1:12:22.600 --> 1:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>have the resources to employ a battalion of fact checkers. Nonetheless,

1:12:27.520 --> 1:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>while testifying before a congressional committee two weeks ago, Representative

1:12:31.840 --> 1:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Alexandria Occasio Cortez asked you the following, do you see

1:12:35.920 --> 1:12:38.599
<v Speaker 1>a potential problem here with a complete lack of fact

1:12:38.640 --> 1:12:42.639
<v Speaker 1>checking on political advertisements? Then, when she pushed you further,

1:12:42.840 --> 1:12:45.759
<v Speaker 1>asking you a Facebook would or would not take down lies,

1:12:45.800 --> 1:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you answered, Congresswoman, in most cases, in a democracy, I

1:12:50.840 --> 1:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>believe people should be able to see for themselves what

1:12:53.880 --> 1:12:56.799
<v Speaker 1>politicians they may or may not vote for are saying

1:12:57.240 --> 1:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and judge their character for themselves. Now, if you tell me. Now,

1:13:01.800 --> 1:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you tell me. If I'd known you felt that way,

1:13:05.280 --> 1:13:12.719
<v Speaker 1>I'd have had the Winklevoss Twins invent Facebook. Ooh, burn

1:13:14.040 --> 1:13:20.479
<v Speaker 1>burn the Winklevoss Twins and many Facebook. Oh no, that's

1:13:20.760 --> 1:13:22.439
<v Speaker 1>because you know, the winkle Vast Twins are supposed to

1:13:22.439 --> 1:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>be the preppy elite, always get their way and don't.

1:13:25.920 --> 1:13:27.559
<v Speaker 1>By the way, they're worth a ton of money now,

1:13:27.640 --> 1:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>not just from Facebook, but from cryptocurrency. They crushed it

1:13:31.439 --> 1:13:34.559
<v Speaker 1>and being early in the cryptocurrency world. So those guys

1:13:34.600 --> 1:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>are you know, I don't know. They want to start

1:13:36.720 --> 1:13:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a conservative Hey, Winklevoss Twins, you want to start a

1:13:38.600 --> 1:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>conservative media outlet? I know I know a guy. We

1:13:41.080 --> 1:13:44.479
<v Speaker 1>could do some things. This guy's got cash to burn.

1:13:45.760 --> 1:13:48.679
<v Speaker 1>But here's how Mark Zuckerberg responded, And like I said,

1:13:48.720 --> 1:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like Zuck unleashed here. Zuck and Buck

1:13:53.360 --> 1:13:55.479
<v Speaker 1>could be good. That may be fun. I gotta be

1:13:55.560 --> 1:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>fun guy to interview. Actually, America isn't easy. America is

1:14:00.960 --> 1:14:04.599
<v Speaker 1>advanced citizenship. You gotta want it bad because it's gonna

1:14:04.600 --> 1:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>put up a fight. It's gonna say you want free speech.

1:14:08.920 --> 1:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's see you acknowledge a man whose words make your

1:14:11.360 --> 1:14:15.559
<v Speaker 1>blood Boil who's standing center stage and advocating at the

1:14:15.600 --> 1:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>top of his lungs, which you would spend a lifetime

1:14:19.240 --> 1:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>opposing at the top of yours. You want to claim

1:14:22.320 --> 1:14:24.479
<v Speaker 1>this land as the land of the free, then the

1:14:24.479 --> 1:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>symbol of your country can't be a flag just a flag.

1:14:28.680 --> 1:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>The symbol also has to be one of its citizens

1:14:31.240 --> 1:14:35.639
<v Speaker 1>exercising his right to burn that flag and protest. Show

1:14:35.680 --> 1:14:41.400
<v Speaker 1>me that, defend that, celebrate that in your classrooms. Then

1:14:41.439 --> 1:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you can stand up and sing about the land of

1:14:44.439 --> 1:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the free. That's what Mark Zuckerberg posted on Facebook. You

1:14:48.960 --> 1:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>know where it comes from. It was written by Aaron

1:14:52.360 --> 1:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Sorkin in the movie The American President. Yeah, so clear

1:15:00.240 --> 1:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that was meant to be a soaring moment of oratory

1:15:03.080 --> 1:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>in the film written by Aaron Sorkin, and so to that,

1:15:07.800 --> 1:15:11.559
<v Speaker 1>I would just want to ask, hold on a moment,

1:15:13.360 --> 1:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>what changed between that movie, which I think came out

1:15:16.880 --> 1:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>in probably nineteen ninety eight or something. It was quite

1:15:19.800 --> 1:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a bit old now and today that seems also true.

1:15:24.080 --> 1:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>In fact, these principles about I don't have to like

1:15:28.479 --> 1:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>your speech, but I'll defend to the death your right

1:15:30.439 --> 1:15:32.799
<v Speaker 1>to say it. You know that this is what old

1:15:32.880 --> 1:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>school liberals used to say this was the standard way

1:15:37.040 --> 1:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that they would approach these topics. You know, it became cliche,

1:15:41.920 --> 1:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that phrase idea of whatever. I forget what the exact

1:15:44.040 --> 1:15:45.639
<v Speaker 1>one is, but you know, you have these these old

1:15:45.680 --> 1:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>school liberals who believed in the freedom to burn flags

1:15:50.080 --> 1:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and burn bras, and the freedom to say really bad stuff,

1:15:54.120 --> 1:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and the freedom to march and to be you know,

1:15:56.479 --> 1:16:00.080
<v Speaker 1>and to be racist. And you know they used Now

1:16:00.320 --> 1:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you have in the pages of the most revered liberal

1:16:04.120 --> 1:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>outlets in the news outlets in the country, people on

1:16:08.439 --> 1:16:10.519
<v Speaker 1>the editorial boards of the New York Times Washington Post

1:16:10.600 --> 1:16:15.439
<v Speaker 1>advocating for hate speech laws criminalizing it. Now liberals will

1:16:15.479 --> 1:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>say that a couple of stupid and I believe drunk

1:16:20.000 --> 1:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>white kids walking across a campus and I think I

1:16:23.840 --> 1:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>can't remember they drunk or not, doesn't matter. And yelling

1:16:27.320 --> 1:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the N word isn't just stupid and something that should

1:16:33.200 --> 1:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>be condemned, but should be criminal. You go to prison

1:16:37.000 --> 1:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>for that, for saying a word. And then I can

1:16:40.000 --> 1:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>go into a gym, as I did yesterday, to try

1:16:41.800 --> 1:16:43.679
<v Speaker 1>to work out a little bit, and hear people blasting

1:16:43.680 --> 1:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>over the PA system songs with lots of people saying

1:16:48.840 --> 1:16:52.479
<v Speaker 1>the N word. So some people can say it, it's fine,

1:16:52.520 --> 1:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>other people go to prison for it, and liberals today

1:16:55.320 --> 1:16:59.639
<v Speaker 1>will say, yeah, that's the way it should be. Really,

1:16:59.640 --> 1:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought freedom of speech was something we all agreed on.

1:17:04.800 --> 1:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Here's the troubling reality. It's not just Aaron Sorkin. There

1:17:08.320 --> 1:17:12.400
<v Speaker 1>are others too. Freedom of speech when it really matters,

1:17:12.439 --> 1:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not something the left believes in anymore. They believe

1:17:15.000 --> 1:17:18.160
<v Speaker 1>in power. They believe that they know what is right,

1:17:18.880 --> 1:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that government should be empowered to do what they think

1:17:22.920 --> 1:17:25.360
<v Speaker 1>is right, and anyone who stands in the way of

1:17:25.400 --> 1:17:29.879
<v Speaker 1>that is bad, not just wrong, but bad. And all

1:17:29.920 --> 1:17:34.799
<v Speaker 1>decision making, all policy disputes are taken through are pulled

1:17:34.800 --> 1:17:39.880
<v Speaker 1>through that filter. First. This is troubling. This is not

1:17:39.960 --> 1:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the way it's supposed to be, and this is not

1:17:43.439 --> 1:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the way liberals were even going back a few you know,

1:17:46.880 --> 1:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe five or ten years. It's it's been getting worse,

1:17:49.040 --> 1:17:51.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean progressively with college campuses. They have the speech codes,

1:17:51.800 --> 1:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and they've been trying to silence people that liberals now

1:17:55.840 --> 1:17:59.559
<v Speaker 1>want censorship, and they want censorship help from the most

1:17:59.560 --> 1:18:04.599
<v Speaker 1>powerful platforms of information exchange in the history of the world.

1:18:05.280 --> 1:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>And you have to remember that too. This isn't just

1:18:08.600 --> 1:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, one abusive cleric in one town of Renaissance

1:18:15.439 --> 1:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>era Italy or something saying, no, we're going to burn

1:18:18.120 --> 1:18:22.880
<v Speaker 1>these books. Okay, that's bad, but that's one town. This

1:18:23.120 --> 1:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>now would be information dominance and control of the dissemination

1:18:27.880 --> 1:18:31.679
<v Speaker 1>of information on a global scale, much more powerful, much

1:18:31.720 --> 1:18:37.439
<v Speaker 1>more far reaching. And what's at stake here is the

1:18:37.560 --> 1:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>perception of millions, hundreds of millions of people on any

1:18:42.160 --> 1:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>number of issues. And the left will not give this up.

1:18:46.320 --> 1:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>They want it the way they want it. They will

1:18:50.080 --> 1:18:52.479
<v Speaker 1>not adhere to the principle here. They do not believe

1:18:52.880 --> 1:18:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that people should have their say on this. There's only

1:18:57.160 --> 1:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>one say what they say. That's it. Mark Zuckerberg gets

1:19:03.320 --> 1:19:07.479
<v Speaker 1>credit here. Man, that was a fantastic response to Aaron

1:19:07.560 --> 1:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Sorkin calling him out. Aaron Sorkin's a sanctimonious lib. There's

1:19:11.240 --> 1:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>no surprise Mark Zuckerberg, I would think is a Democrat.

1:19:17.320 --> 1:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>But he seems to at least be a Democrat who,

1:19:20.640 --> 1:19:23.880
<v Speaker 1>having built a very large company and having seen what

1:19:24.040 --> 1:19:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the left of his own party believes about how that

1:19:27.960 --> 1:19:32.559
<v Speaker 1>company should be run, now understands that the so called

1:19:32.560 --> 1:19:34.360
<v Speaker 1>liberals and I hate that term for them, but they've

1:19:34.479 --> 1:19:36.639
<v Speaker 1>used it specifically as a way of throwing us off

1:19:36.680 --> 1:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the truth. They're not liberals. They are statists, they are progressives,

1:19:40.600 --> 1:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>they're leftists, they're socialists. But they are a threat to liberty.

1:19:48.120 --> 1:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's not the talking point, that's not exaggeration. What

1:19:54.040 --> 1:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>liberties do we really have if we don't have the

1:19:55.760 --> 1:20:00.160
<v Speaker 1>liberty to say things that liberals don't like, so called liberals,

1:20:01.160 --> 1:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>how can we be considered a free people if we're

1:20:03.040 --> 1:20:06.799
<v Speaker 1>not free to say things that are offensive. This was central,

1:20:06.840 --> 1:20:08.439
<v Speaker 1>This was taught in schools. This was one of the

1:20:08.479 --> 1:20:11.200
<v Speaker 1>few areas where left and right could really come together

1:20:11.240 --> 1:20:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and agree. They could coincide, they could have a worthwhile

1:20:15.240 --> 1:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>discussion about this, and at the end of the day

1:20:17.040 --> 1:20:21.479
<v Speaker 1>they tended to be at least willing to adhere to

1:20:21.520 --> 1:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the basic principle of free speech. It's gone now. It's

1:20:25.040 --> 1:20:26.639
<v Speaker 1>just a question of how long it'll be on life

1:20:26.680 --> 1:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>support before liberals can completely eliminate it. They don't even

1:20:31.600 --> 1:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>aspire to share the basic tenets of free speech with us.

1:20:36.840 --> 1:20:41.519
<v Speaker 1>They don't even they don't. They've openly embraced censoring things

1:20:41.560 --> 1:20:44.439
<v Speaker 1>they don't like. They've openly embraced control of the government

1:20:45.000 --> 1:20:46.880
<v Speaker 1>so that they can shut down things that they say

1:20:46.880 --> 1:20:53.519
<v Speaker 1>are offensive. Mark Zuckerberg credit where it's due, not only

1:20:53.520 --> 1:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>just for slapping down Aaron Sorkin, who's just really insufferable.

1:20:58.240 --> 1:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Just go watch a little bit of the West Wing.

1:21:00.120 --> 1:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>It's so cute, both sides presented. But like the Left

1:21:02.240 --> 1:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>is always a little smarter, a little better, a little

1:21:04.040 --> 1:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>more moral, a little more courageous. And the Democrats are

1:21:08.720 --> 1:21:14.799
<v Speaker 1>always the good guys. Really, the Conservatives are basically all

1:21:14.840 --> 1:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>being paid off by big oil or something, or they

1:21:16.800 --> 1:21:20.160
<v Speaker 1>just need some really clever lib to explain to them. Why,

1:21:20.280 --> 1:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, drooling in anmore is a terrible idea, And

1:21:22.680 --> 1:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I remember that one in that show. I would try

1:21:26.680 --> 1:21:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to watch some of it, but I've seen a few

1:21:28.200 --> 1:21:31.920
<v Speaker 1>episodes and it's just a fantasy land for liberals where

1:21:31.920 --> 1:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>they win every argument. And John Stewart basically took that

1:21:33.960 --> 1:21:36.120
<v Speaker 1>format of the Daily Show. Let's have a comedy show

1:21:36.120 --> 1:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>where we talk about the issues of the day and

1:21:39.320 --> 1:21:41.439
<v Speaker 1>just make fun of the other side and present straw

1:21:41.479 --> 1:21:44.120
<v Speaker 1>man arguments and our side always wins. People love this stuff.

1:21:44.360 --> 1:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>They love it. I loved it during the Bush administration

1:21:47.960 --> 1:21:50.679
<v Speaker 1>to pretend that there was really an alternative presidency on TV.

1:21:50.800 --> 1:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>That's what it was, with Martin Sheen in the role

1:21:54.800 --> 1:21:58.120
<v Speaker 1>of the what was it Jeff Bartlett I think was

1:21:58.160 --> 1:22:02.880
<v Speaker 1>his name or something. Brilliant all American professor from New

1:22:02.920 --> 1:22:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Hampshire who's a Democrat. Yeah, I wonder if Jeff Bartlett

1:22:06.360 --> 1:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>thinks that they're two genders. Would be a fun question

1:22:09.280 --> 1:22:11.559
<v Speaker 1>to ask on that show. But the show's gone. Now, Well,

1:22:11.560 --> 1:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>it's happening, my friends. President Trump is moving to Florida.

1:22:18.000 --> 1:22:21.879
<v Speaker 1>That's right. It has been established now that the President

1:22:21.920 --> 1:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of the United States is officially changing his personal residence.

1:22:26.000 --> 1:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Obviously technically lives in DC, but he would he now

1:22:34.240 --> 1:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>will be a resident of the great State of Florida.

1:22:37.040 --> 1:22:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Reasons for this are pretty clear, right, Florida no state

1:22:39.120 --> 1:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>income tax. Florida is a place that has better weather

1:22:44.280 --> 1:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>than New York, I'll just admit it, and better politics

1:22:47.120 --> 1:22:51.599
<v Speaker 1>than New York. At least there's some red parts of Florida.

1:22:51.680 --> 1:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>There's some real conservatism, some Republican politics that matter in Florida.

1:22:57.080 --> 1:23:00.559
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately here in DC, I'm sorry, in New York. Also

1:23:00.600 --> 1:23:03.120
<v Speaker 1>true in DC where I used to live. Here in

1:23:03.160 --> 1:23:07.599
<v Speaker 1>New York, that is not the case. There is, in fact,

1:23:08.600 --> 1:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>no real Republican party in New York City that really

1:23:15.000 --> 1:23:18.360
<v Speaker 1>does very much or does much of anything. So I

1:23:18.400 --> 1:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to share this with those looking for this.

1:23:20.040 --> 1:23:21.720
<v Speaker 1>So you got the President United States saying that he's

1:23:21.800 --> 1:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>leaving the place that he's called, the state that he's

1:23:23.800 --> 1:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>called his primary home for his entire adult life. He's

1:23:26.960 --> 1:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>from here. Everyone's forgets that eighty percent of New York

1:23:29.960 --> 1:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>City voted for Hillary Clinton in the last election. I

1:23:32.640 --> 1:23:36.839
<v Speaker 1>think so many people forget that somehow Hillary Clinton a total,

1:23:38.280 --> 1:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, transplant to New York, a fraud in that

1:23:41.360 --> 1:23:45.200
<v Speaker 1>regard one a lot of regards. She's more embraced by

1:23:45.200 --> 1:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>New York than a guy who's a native born New

1:23:47.840 --> 1:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Yorker who's lived here his whole life and been really

1:23:49.800 --> 1:23:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a part of the city his whole life. Just goes

1:23:53.360 --> 1:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to show you the power of Democrat narrative in politics.

1:23:56.320 --> 1:23:58.679
<v Speaker 1>But in response to this, you had a mayor Build

1:23:58.680 --> 1:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a Blasio tweet out, don't let the door hit you

1:24:02.720 --> 1:24:07.519
<v Speaker 1>on the way out or whatever. Andrew Cuomo, the Governor

1:24:07.520 --> 1:24:10.400
<v Speaker 1>of New York, good riddance. It's not like real Donald

1:24:10.439 --> 1:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump paid taxes here. Anyway, He's all yours Florida. The

1:24:17.439 --> 1:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>first Lady of New York City, Charlaine McCray, the wife

1:24:21.200 --> 1:24:25.599
<v Speaker 1>of Mayor Bill de Blasio, just wrote boy bye in

1:24:25.680 --> 1:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>reference to Donald Trump leaving, and Mayor Bill de Blasio

1:24:30.360 --> 1:24:32.479
<v Speaker 1>also wrote our deepest condolences to the good people of

1:24:32.520 --> 1:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Florida as Trump attempts to outrun his past and near future.

1:24:36.240 --> 1:24:40.479
<v Speaker 1>So here you have the politician, politicians for the City

1:24:40.479 --> 1:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of New York and for the State of New York,

1:24:43.479 --> 1:24:46.599
<v Speaker 1>who are celebrating the loss of probably the most well

1:24:46.600 --> 1:24:48.639
<v Speaker 1>I think you could say now, no question, the most

1:24:48.680 --> 1:24:54.120
<v Speaker 1>famous New Yorker alive. And because of the tax situation,

1:24:54.280 --> 1:24:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and also I'm sure at some level, because of the

1:24:57.000 --> 1:25:01.519
<v Speaker 1>insane politics of this city, which increasingly people don't realize.

1:25:01.560 --> 1:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street is liberal. Everybody needs to get this through

1:25:04.800 --> 1:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>their heads. Most people on Wall Street, most of these

1:25:08.360 --> 1:25:11.679
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund billionaires, these people they like Hillary, they donate

1:25:11.680 --> 1:25:14.639
<v Speaker 1>to Democrats. Wall Street is liberal. It's not some bastion

1:25:14.720 --> 1:25:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of right wing stuff. Yeah, they want lower taxes, maybe

1:25:18.439 --> 1:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that's it. They want to keep more of their money

1:25:20.840 --> 1:25:24.559
<v Speaker 1>on everything else. Trust me, they're socially liberal. They're probably

1:25:24.600 --> 1:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>all about climate change. This is just you know, the

1:25:27.600 --> 1:25:29.439
<v Speaker 1>rest of the country. Because you hear hell hush about

1:25:29.439 --> 1:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the Warren Whyn't she talks about, huh, we're gonna have

1:25:32.320 --> 1:25:35.719
<v Speaker 1>a tax on Wall Street? People say, oh yeah, those

1:25:35.800 --> 1:25:38.160
<v Speaker 1>right wingers on there's the right wing Wall Street. They're

1:25:38.200 --> 1:25:42.519
<v Speaker 1>people who are on Wall Street. But overwhelmingly golden sacks,

1:25:42.680 --> 1:25:47.519
<v Speaker 1>liberal liberal place, left wing donates. The Dems. You got

1:25:47.520 --> 1:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>on the line, these big financially, these megabanks, financial institutions,

1:25:51.840 --> 1:25:55.120
<v Speaker 1>they're all about supporting Democrats, all about supporting the left.

1:25:55.400 --> 1:26:01.479
<v Speaker 1>So you just look at the donations. Somehow rich people

1:26:01.520 --> 1:26:03.599
<v Speaker 1>gets conflated with Republicans all the time, and it's it's

1:26:03.640 --> 1:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>total nonsense. This is where I have to think, Man,

1:26:06.120 --> 1:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it'd be kind of nice to move

1:26:07.880 --> 1:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>down to Florida got better weather. I have to think

1:26:10.280 --> 1:26:12.559
<v Speaker 1>of where i'd go. Miami comes to mind from because

1:26:12.560 --> 1:26:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm a single guy and that would be kind of fun.

1:26:14.960 --> 1:26:18.120
<v Speaker 1>But Palm Beach, I hear is very very nice. West

1:26:18.200 --> 1:26:21.559
<v Speaker 1>Palm Beach, I hear is very nice. Other places in

1:26:21.600 --> 1:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Florida that are, you know, more up and coming or

1:26:25.520 --> 1:26:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a little less a little less bougie. Perhaps what's there

1:26:30.040 --> 1:26:31.599
<v Speaker 1>where would you if you had to move a Tampa

1:26:31.720 --> 1:26:34.920
<v Speaker 1>has some great places. Naples has some great stuff. Where's

1:26:34.960 --> 1:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the where if you had to move to Florida to

1:26:36.640 --> 1:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Marrow producing Mark, where to be? I'd like the West

1:26:39.280 --> 1:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Palm area. West Palm. I have some family down there.

1:26:41.760 --> 1:26:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Really nice. Yeah. I used to live in Coral Springs, Florida.

1:26:44.240 --> 1:26:46.599
<v Speaker 1>Actually from middle and high school. I I live there.

1:26:46.920 --> 1:26:49.160
<v Speaker 1>How was it? I mean, as a kid, it's a

1:26:49.160 --> 1:26:52.160
<v Speaker 1>lot different, just because I couldn't drive a lot of

1:26:52.160 --> 1:26:54.479
<v Speaker 1>old people stuff like that. So as a kid, I

1:26:54.520 --> 1:26:56.400
<v Speaker 1>would say it was bad. But now that there's no

1:26:56.720 --> 1:26:58.519
<v Speaker 1>state income tax in Florida, I'd go in a second.

1:26:58.560 --> 1:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I probably need to spend time in the pan Handle,

1:27:00.400 --> 1:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>right Jacksonville and places like that that are up in

1:27:03.080 --> 1:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the red part of Florida. Don't go to Key West.

1:27:05.320 --> 1:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>They get obliterated by hurricanes all the time. I've been

1:27:08.320 --> 1:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>then there a couple of times. Don't move there. Yeh,

1:27:09.960 --> 1:27:11.880
<v Speaker 1>don't move there. You can go to Key West. Nice

1:27:11.880 --> 1:27:14.640
<v Speaker 1>place to visit. That's where the party ad anytime you

1:27:14.640 --> 1:27:16.920
<v Speaker 1>want to move the Freedom Hut down there. Yeah, we

1:27:16.960 --> 1:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>want to move to Florida. You're good, I'm some I'm

1:27:19.320 --> 1:27:21.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna think about. But no state income tax. That's all

1:27:21.479 --> 1:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that matters New York City. I think it's like, what

1:27:23.720 --> 1:27:27.439
<v Speaker 1>is it twelve or thirteenth or something ridiculous? Outrageous for

1:27:27.600 --> 1:27:31.200
<v Speaker 1>what I did. I mean the stuff you have to

1:27:31.200 --> 1:27:32.439
<v Speaker 1>deal with here in this city sometimes. I know a

1:27:32.439 --> 1:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of your saying, buck, come out to wherever. Probably

1:27:35.040 --> 1:27:36.880
<v Speaker 1>got a great place, man, I don't even want to

1:27:36.920 --> 1:27:39.400
<v Speaker 1>know how far my money would go. And a wonderful

1:27:39.400 --> 1:27:41.960
<v Speaker 1>city like Omaha be great. I have a great time there.

1:27:47.600 --> 1:27:59.679
<v Speaker 1>It's time for roll call, man. I can't believe another

1:27:59.760 --> 1:28:04.360
<v Speaker 1>week of fantastic shows done here in the Freedom Hunt.

1:28:04.360 --> 1:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for listening. I hope you're enjoying

1:28:05.920 --> 1:28:11.519
<v Speaker 1>also watching us on the first which is on Pluto

1:28:12.320 --> 1:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>TV and you can watch the channel two forty eight.

1:28:14.880 --> 1:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>If you're listening on the radio or the podcast, you

1:28:16.840 --> 1:28:20.639
<v Speaker 1>can watch a video live stream of the radio show.

1:28:20.720 --> 1:28:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Please do check it out, and thank you so much

1:28:25.160 --> 1:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>for that. I also want to say today, in case

1:28:27.240 --> 1:28:31.799
<v Speaker 1>she is listening, happy birthday to my mom, Missus Sexton.

1:28:33.040 --> 1:28:35.280
<v Speaker 1>She is the only Missus Sexton running around right now.

1:28:35.280 --> 1:28:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Because some of the kids are taking you know, not,

1:28:37.760 --> 1:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>We're not The boys are not married yet so Mom,

1:28:42.160 --> 1:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Happy birthday or the best mom in the world. Thank

1:28:44.200 --> 1:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you so much for our support. Love you and you

1:28:48.840 --> 1:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>know like a day over thirty five. All right, let's

1:28:52.160 --> 1:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>get to what we have going on here in the

1:28:56.479 --> 1:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>role call inbox Wayne, Hey Buck. I started listening to

1:29:02.240 --> 1:29:05.720
<v Speaker 1>your show recently from Denver. I've gotten tired of Hannity, etc.

1:29:06.000 --> 1:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Because they all seem to allow the leftist to control

1:29:07.960 --> 1:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the game by going into defense mode for Trump even

1:29:11.160 --> 1:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>though he's done nothing. It reminds me of the years

1:29:13.840 --> 1:29:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I've spent in Ukraine listening to and reading Ukrainian, American

1:29:17.960 --> 1:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and Russian media. Putin would commit crimes and incursions against Ukraine,

1:29:21.960 --> 1:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>then immediately accused Kiev. It's actually they say, Kiev, I

1:29:25.360 --> 1:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>believe over there of the crime, or justify the crime

1:29:27.960 --> 1:29:32.679
<v Speaker 1>as a protection of Russian families in Ukraine. Ukraine would

1:29:32.720 --> 1:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>go right into defense mode and try to explain what

1:29:35.720 --> 1:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>really happened, sometimes making themselves seem like a guilty party,

1:29:40.200 --> 1:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>falling all over themselves in reactive response. Putin owned them

1:29:44.200 --> 1:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>every time, running the game as a propaganda master. Kiev, Brussels,

1:29:48.320 --> 1:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Washington would all scramble. When Putin went to lunch in

1:29:51.760 --> 1:29:55.519
<v Speaker 1>Sochi with his twenty five year old mistress. My question,

1:29:55.920 --> 1:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>when will we stop reacting to kremlines strategy and start

1:29:58.439 --> 1:30:01.519
<v Speaker 1>controlling the game? Hearing all the punts squawking about what

1:30:01.560 --> 1:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the Dems are doing, the Dems are playing everyone for

1:30:03.320 --> 1:30:07.760
<v Speaker 1>idiots and winning the pr game. Thanks Buck, Wayne. If

1:30:07.800 --> 1:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you're asking me when, Wayne, I think the answer is

1:30:10.520 --> 1:30:14.559
<v Speaker 1>it may never happen. Democrats excel at propaganda. Democrats have

1:30:14.600 --> 1:30:16.519
<v Speaker 1>control of the media, They've control of the academy, they

1:30:16.520 --> 1:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>have control of most of these social media platforms that

1:30:20.200 --> 1:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>really move the conversation. Right now, how do we go

1:30:24.439 --> 1:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>on offense? And we just keep fighting, just keep fighting.

1:30:27.200 --> 1:30:29.679
<v Speaker 1>It's never this battle has never done. There's no victory.

1:30:29.760 --> 1:30:33.960
<v Speaker 1>There's only just you know, the day to day who's

1:30:33.960 --> 1:30:37.559
<v Speaker 1>winning right now? The score changes all the time, and

1:30:37.640 --> 1:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the stakes are the future of this country and in

1:30:39.920 --> 1:30:41.960
<v Speaker 1>some ways the future of the of the world. So

1:30:42.320 --> 1:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it matters. It certainly matters, Michael. Let's see here. Indeed,

1:30:50.560 --> 1:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the Trump legacy may very well become his unprecedented effective

1:30:54.120 --> 1:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>outing double agent statists, swampers, and leftists from their cozy

1:31:00.240 --> 1:31:04.479
<v Speaker 1>little fiefdoms, if only enough voters would recognize them. At

1:31:04.479 --> 1:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>primary time instead of being played by the state committees.

1:31:08.120 --> 1:31:10.519
<v Speaker 1>Don't really like mandatory term limits, but I'm all into

1:31:10.560 --> 1:31:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the current agenda of Convention of States. Thanks for all

1:31:13.800 --> 1:31:16.519
<v Speaker 1>the great radio work, Mike in Pennsylvania. Well, Mike, thank

1:31:16.560 --> 1:31:21.519
<v Speaker 1>you so much for writing in. And yes, Trump has

1:31:21.600 --> 1:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>definitely had this side effect of exposing people, in some

1:31:25.760 --> 1:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>cases people who have been supposedly conservatives for a very

1:31:30.240 --> 1:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>long time. That's been interesting to see that happen. And yes,

1:31:36.840 --> 1:31:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I would have to agree with you that there's there

1:31:40.280 --> 1:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of benefits of Trumpism that I could

1:31:42.160 --> 1:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>not have even expected from the beginning. I think he's

1:31:44.800 --> 1:31:49.080
<v Speaker 1>done quite a good job with them. Uh let's see,

1:31:50.560 --> 1:31:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Hey Buck, it's from marine and producer Mark Human of

1:31:54.520 --> 1:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Mystery about that whole polyamory thing. Oh no, this sorry,

1:31:59.160 --> 1:32:01.519
<v Speaker 1>we already read this one. This was about the book

1:32:01.600 --> 1:32:04.559
<v Speaker 1>wants to talk about polyamory and Polly something or other

1:32:05.520 --> 1:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>another one. What's this polyandry? What was the other one?

1:32:07.680 --> 1:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>We learned this other one though, poly andry. That's one

1:32:12.880 --> 1:32:14.720
<v Speaker 1>woman with more than one husband. Yeah. I just want

1:32:14.720 --> 1:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to point out you were reading the email where we

1:32:16.479 --> 1:32:19.240
<v Speaker 1>learned it. Yeah, so you could have just looked down Yeah, No,

1:32:19.360 --> 1:32:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I know. I'm just that's what I'm That's what I did.

1:32:21.640 --> 1:32:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Took me a second. Polyandry was the new one that

1:32:24.000 --> 1:32:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I learned about. That one sounds the worst. You learn

1:32:26.439 --> 1:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>something new every day. I'm gonna have a wife and

1:32:28.040 --> 1:32:30.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna sharing it with multiple dudes. This is the worst.

1:32:30.920 --> 1:32:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Now do you have to be intimate with the other dudes?

1:32:34.520 --> 1:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. That's a that's an interesting question. That

1:32:37.080 --> 1:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>is another if Maureene can write in and tell us

1:32:39.560 --> 1:32:41.439
<v Speaker 1>that in other part of it? Right? Or is it

1:32:41.520 --> 1:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>just like a harem, except you're it's a it's a dude,

1:32:44.320 --> 1:32:46.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a man harem. You know what I mean, like

1:32:47.000 --> 1:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you take turns. Yeah, yeah, I know. To look and

1:32:50.000 --> 1:32:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the people are pushing this lifestyle these days of Polly whatever,

1:32:55.040 --> 1:32:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just trying to learn. I'm just trying to Oh,

1:32:57.280 --> 1:33:01.599
<v Speaker 1>we got somebody else who wrote it on this, Jacob

1:33:01.600 --> 1:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>writes Buck, I'm a millennial six months older than you,

1:33:04.439 --> 1:33:07.919
<v Speaker 1>os Team Buck, Las Vegas. Here, I'm listening to Friday's

1:33:07.920 --> 1:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>show as I write this. I've seen a show on

1:33:10.000 --> 1:33:13.840
<v Speaker 1>polyamory already. About twelve years ago, the Learning Channel ran

1:33:13.880 --> 1:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a documentary series that followed a couple of polyamorous relationships.

1:33:19.280 --> 1:33:21.439
<v Speaker 1>There was a married couple who shared a girlfriend and

1:33:21.479 --> 1:33:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a woman who had two line a live in boyfriends.

1:33:24.880 --> 1:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I watched it once out of curiosity and couldn't make

1:33:27.080 --> 1:33:28.640
<v Speaker 1>myself watch it again. I thought, you want to know

1:33:28.720 --> 1:33:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you're right without knowing it. Keep it up. PS, The

1:33:32.760 --> 1:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>La Panto Show is the coolest two hours in the

1:33:35.240 --> 1:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>history of digital media. And long live commy bearra Man Jacob,

1:33:38.160 --> 1:33:40.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Yeah, we didn't talk about La

1:33:40.360 --> 1:33:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Panto Day October seventh this year, but you can still

1:33:43.760 --> 1:33:45.240
<v Speaker 1>find it on the internet. We should just drop that

1:33:45.280 --> 1:33:47.519
<v Speaker 1>into the feed. It'd be fun get everyone to listen to.

1:33:48.520 --> 1:33:50.519
<v Speaker 1>Next year, we'll just drop the La Panto Show as

1:33:50.520 --> 1:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>an extra into the into the feed. And why not.

1:33:53.920 --> 1:33:58.479
<v Speaker 1>I'll be fun. I think, yeah, we could definitely do that.

1:33:58.960 --> 1:34:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I miss it. I miss it. Little Panto Show was

1:34:02.080 --> 1:34:07.479
<v Speaker 1>good times. Chuck rhymes with buck. So if Trump is

1:34:07.520 --> 1:34:10.439
<v Speaker 1>impeached by the super secret impeachment, will he even know

1:34:10.760 --> 1:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>he is impeached? I realized that we should expect a

1:34:13.640 --> 1:34:16.679
<v Speaker 1>trial or something, but the way the Dems are doing things,

1:34:16.760 --> 1:34:19.640
<v Speaker 1>why should that happen? Everon agrees and impeaching would be

1:34:19.680 --> 1:34:21.680
<v Speaker 1>destructive to our democracy, so wouldn't For the sake of

1:34:21.680 --> 1:34:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the country, it'd be better to keep the whole process secret.

1:34:24.880 --> 1:34:26.880
<v Speaker 1>This is no more ridiculous than many other claims they

1:34:26.920 --> 1:34:30.200
<v Speaker 1>have made recently. That leads back to the question what

1:34:30.400 --> 1:34:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump even no he was impeached? What might that look like?

1:34:35.800 --> 1:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>What do you think, Buck? I'm not really sure what

1:34:41.120 --> 1:34:43.280
<v Speaker 1>we're being asked. I'm not really sure whether if Trump

1:34:43.360 --> 1:34:46.880
<v Speaker 1>is impeached, will he even know he is impeached? Yes,

1:34:47.880 --> 1:34:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he would know if he's impeached. So and

1:34:51.479 --> 1:34:54.599
<v Speaker 1>then right, I think he's asking me if the Dems

1:34:54.640 --> 1:34:58.439
<v Speaker 1>are even gonna do a trial with Trump there like

1:34:58.520 --> 1:34:59.920
<v Speaker 1>they did with it. I believe they did that. Within

1:35:00.560 --> 1:35:01.800
<v Speaker 1>if they're even going to do a trial, they're just

1:35:01.800 --> 1:35:04.400
<v Speaker 1>impeach him with that him even there. I think that's

1:35:04.400 --> 1:35:06.960
<v Speaker 1>what he's getting at. Yeah, Okay, Well the answers I

1:35:07.000 --> 1:35:09.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know, so we'll have to see what they end

1:35:09.920 --> 1:35:11.800
<v Speaker 1>up doing. I gotta go back. I was too young

1:35:11.840 --> 1:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to remember much of the Trump, I mean, the Clinton

1:35:13.920 --> 1:35:18.519
<v Speaker 1>impeachment stuff, so I should go and check some of

1:35:18.560 --> 1:35:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that stuff out. This is where being a graybeard millennial

1:35:21.160 --> 1:35:24.360
<v Speaker 1>is not fantastic because you don't have the institutional knowledge

1:35:24.360 --> 1:35:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of being an adult who is politically involved at that

1:35:27.960 --> 1:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>point in time. All right, my name is Hunter and

1:35:34.120 --> 1:35:36.519
<v Speaker 1>I am twelve. I really enjoy your show. I listen

1:35:36.560 --> 1:35:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to it every day after school. You've really helped me

1:35:38.840 --> 1:35:41.439
<v Speaker 1>enjoy politics. I've been listening for about a year now.

1:35:41.680 --> 1:35:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I heard my dad listen to it and I thought

1:35:43.280 --> 1:35:46.160
<v Speaker 1>it was cool. Well, Hunter, I think you're cool. Thank

1:35:46.160 --> 1:35:48.439
<v Speaker 1>you so much for listening to the show. Really appreciate it.

1:35:48.439 --> 1:35:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Give your dad a big high five and a hug

1:35:50.080 --> 1:35:51.760
<v Speaker 1>from all of us here in the Freedom Hunt. And

1:35:51.880 --> 1:35:53.640
<v Speaker 1>it's great to have so many twelve years old man

1:35:53.640 --> 1:35:55.679
<v Speaker 1>listen to the show every day. That's really really cool.

1:35:55.760 --> 1:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I am humbled and very appreciative. So thank you so much. Hunter.

1:36:00.920 --> 1:36:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Stay with it. You'll never turn into a crazy lib

1:36:03.080 --> 1:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>like the rest of them. Dan, Hey Buck, I am.

1:36:09.680 --> 1:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I am original Saturday Squad from Green Bay, Wisconsin. Was

1:36:12.720 --> 1:36:14.679
<v Speaker 1>having dinner with my wife the other night and found

1:36:14.680 --> 1:36:17.479
<v Speaker 1>this gluten free beer had a pine felt that had

1:36:17.479 --> 1:36:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to be a serviceable alternative. If you're ever in the

1:36:19.720 --> 1:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay area, let me know I'll buy you one. Dan,

1:36:22.200 --> 1:36:26.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. I have never been up to

1:36:26.439 --> 1:36:28.559
<v Speaker 1>a Green Bay, but if I get up there, I

1:36:28.600 --> 1:36:31.960
<v Speaker 1>will certainly reach out. And I appreciate very much hearing

1:36:32.040 --> 1:36:37.400
<v Speaker 1>from you, my man. And gluten free beer is okay

1:36:37.479 --> 1:36:39.439
<v Speaker 1>if you really, if you're going to go that route,

1:36:39.840 --> 1:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>somebody who has ciliac disease. I've had to think about

1:36:42.040 --> 1:36:45.599
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. Cider producer, Mark is what you because cider

1:36:45.720 --> 1:36:49.160
<v Speaker 1>is naturally gluten free. I was just going to say, yeah,

1:36:49.160 --> 1:36:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that cider, it can be fan to actually have. I

1:36:52.160 --> 1:36:55.160
<v Speaker 1>have some tart cider in my fridge. That's really excellent.

1:36:55.160 --> 1:36:57.280
<v Speaker 1>There's actually a place out on Long Island and Riverhead

1:36:57.320 --> 1:36:59.840
<v Speaker 1>called the Riverhead Cider House. Really they have They make

1:36:59.880 --> 1:37:04.559
<v Speaker 1>their own ciders. They're delicious. Yeah, no ciders like candy. Yeah, yeah,

1:37:03.720 --> 1:37:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it's yeah. I was gonna say, don't know how to

1:37:05.560 --> 1:37:08.439
<v Speaker 1>sugars there, that's the problem. You're basically drinking like Mott's

1:37:08.439 --> 1:37:10.960
<v Speaker 1>apple juice with a little bit of booth thrown into it. Basically, Yeah,

1:37:10.960 --> 1:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it's still good though. It's delicious, delicious, It's delicious. Gina, Gina,

1:37:18.560 --> 1:37:20.640
<v Speaker 1>here we go. Watching you on the Blaze about four

1:37:20.680 --> 1:37:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to five years ago, while living in Texas was a

1:37:22.400 --> 1:37:26.439
<v Speaker 1>start of my political awakening. I've not stopped searching since

1:37:26.479 --> 1:37:29.439
<v Speaker 1>that time thanks to you. I've also called you twice

1:37:29.439 --> 1:37:31.679
<v Speaker 1>while I lived in Charlotte's. So happy to finally see

1:37:31.680 --> 1:37:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you on TV again, Gina. Thank you so much for

1:37:34.080 --> 1:37:36.360
<v Speaker 1>watching me on TV again. Thank you for being a

1:37:36.400 --> 1:37:38.439
<v Speaker 1>part of what we do here in the Freedom Hut.

1:37:39.439 --> 1:37:45.719
<v Speaker 1>I very much appreciated. It really means a lot. Noah, Wow,

1:37:46.000 --> 1:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>here we go. Oh no, Noah rode in. Some of

1:37:48.040 --> 1:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>these are old emails that look like their new emails.

1:37:50.200 --> 1:37:52.519
<v Speaker 1>Why did that happen? He was fifteen? He's writing in

1:37:52.520 --> 1:37:54.600
<v Speaker 1>about minimum wage. We got I've got to do a

1:37:54.640 --> 1:37:56.160
<v Speaker 1>better job. Okay, you know what, I'm just gonna go.

1:37:56.560 --> 1:37:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's do some Facebook. All right. Now we get into

1:37:58.479 --> 1:38:02.679
<v Speaker 1>the Facebook portion of this and homage in a sense

1:38:02.680 --> 1:38:04.519
<v Speaker 1>to Mark Zuckerberg, who we had to give a high

1:38:04.560 --> 1:38:10.200
<v Speaker 1>five to today for slapping down sanctimonious Aaron Sorkin on

1:38:10.400 --> 1:38:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the show. All right, let us let us get let

1:38:13.880 --> 1:38:16.760
<v Speaker 1>us get two itch my friends. Uh, let's see where

1:38:16.760 --> 1:38:20.840
<v Speaker 1>are we here? We're doing the Facebook? Okay, yes, par

1:38:21.200 --> 1:38:25.920
<v Speaker 1>pardon me. We have Alex who writes, hey, Buck, I

1:38:25.960 --> 1:38:29.320
<v Speaker 1>worked for a congressman, and he recently quoted Buck during

1:38:29.320 --> 1:38:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a floor speech in Congress. He'd like to send Buck

1:38:31.920 --> 1:38:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a copy of the speech. Is there a mailing address

1:38:34.160 --> 1:38:35.760
<v Speaker 1>that I could send this too? I'm very happy to

1:38:35.880 --> 1:38:37.840
<v Speaker 1>verify everything, so you know this is in some sort

1:38:37.880 --> 1:38:41.719
<v Speaker 1>of scam. Sure I got quoted by re member Congress

1:38:41.720 --> 1:38:43.880
<v Speaker 1>on the floor. Look at that. Yeah, we can DM

1:38:43.960 --> 1:38:47.679
<v Speaker 1>him personally. Yeah, we'll send the stuff. Yeah, the congressman

1:38:47.680 --> 1:38:50.080
<v Speaker 1>can call on Buck. I loved your quote or whatever

1:38:50.080 --> 1:38:54.719
<v Speaker 1>it was. The Buck is very quotable. Charlie, Hey Buck,

1:38:54.800 --> 1:38:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Charlie from Penn State. My question is how do you

1:38:58.880 --> 1:39:02.519
<v Speaker 1>go to a wedding without a date. That's sad haha,

1:39:02.640 --> 1:39:07.799
<v Speaker 1>jokes aside, I'm a big fan shield Side. Well, sorry

1:39:07.840 --> 1:39:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that some of us have had to go to weddings

1:39:09.320 --> 1:39:13.800
<v Speaker 1>without a date. Sometimes, you know, it's a thing that

1:39:13.840 --> 1:39:16.000
<v Speaker 1>can happen. I'll never have to worry about this again

1:39:16.000 --> 1:39:18.320
<v Speaker 1>because you will be married very soon. Yeah. The only

1:39:18.360 --> 1:39:20.080
<v Speaker 1>weddings I've gone too, at least as an adult. I'm

1:39:20.120 --> 1:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>not talking about as a kid, I've had a date. Yeah,

1:39:25.160 --> 1:39:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean if it's a family wedding, though in your situation,

1:39:27.360 --> 1:39:29.639
<v Speaker 1>it's not that big of a deal. But like my

1:39:29.680 --> 1:39:32.120
<v Speaker 1>wedding for example, you're not gonna go without a day.

1:39:32.160 --> 1:39:35.080
<v Speaker 1>You only know me, exactly, You're not gonna see me, yeah, exactly,

1:39:35.120 --> 1:39:36.479
<v Speaker 1>you got every the other else. You're just like a

1:39:36.520 --> 1:39:39.000
<v Speaker 1>stranger wander around the no anybody at all, No I know,

1:39:39.040 --> 1:39:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I know. Well. Also, wedding crashers is propaganda, damn it.

1:39:43.320 --> 1:39:45.160
<v Speaker 1>That's not that's not how it works. You don't go

1:39:45.200 --> 1:39:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to a wedding and you don't know anybody's remember they're

1:39:47.800 --> 1:39:49.479
<v Speaker 1>crashing weddings. They don't know. You don't go to wedding,

1:39:49.479 --> 1:39:51.639
<v Speaker 1>you don't know anybody, and there's nothing but beautiful bridesmaids

1:39:51.680 --> 1:39:53.600
<v Speaker 1>who are like, I just like really need someone to

1:39:53.640 --> 1:39:55.439
<v Speaker 1>give me some love and attention. Now, Like, that's not

1:39:55.479 --> 1:39:58.519
<v Speaker 1>how it happens. The bridesmaids are all being shuttled by

1:39:58.520 --> 1:40:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Bridezilla back in fourth for photos and gotta be in

1:40:02.160 --> 1:40:04.240
<v Speaker 1>place at the time, and the whole thing. It's not

1:40:04.560 --> 1:40:06.519
<v Speaker 1>You're not like dancing around with a bunch of sports

1:40:06.560 --> 1:40:09.000
<v Speaker 1>illustrated swimsuit models who are like, I just feel the

1:40:09.080 --> 1:40:11.160
<v Speaker 1>need for some love because I'm not getting married and

1:40:11.240 --> 1:40:12.920
<v Speaker 1>she is. That's not how it works. That's what it

1:40:12.920 --> 1:40:14.960
<v Speaker 1>looks like. A wedding crashers the anger and your voice

1:40:14.960 --> 1:40:17.400
<v Speaker 1>makes me think that you don't understand the concept of

1:40:17.400 --> 1:40:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a movie. Buck, No, because I saw wedding Crashers and

1:40:22.080 --> 1:40:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought to myself, this is the way it's supposed

1:40:24.040 --> 1:40:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to be. But it's not a documentary. Yeah, but no

1:40:26.080 --> 1:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>one thinks it's a documentary. Obviously. Just made me sad.

1:40:30.360 --> 1:40:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Could you start a fraternity like an old school? Yes,

1:40:32.840 --> 1:40:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you could, if you wouldn't be that much fun. Probably not.

1:40:36.000 --> 1:40:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I think it was false promises. That's all

1:40:37.960 --> 1:40:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to say. Braham Rights. You keep saying you

1:40:42.360 --> 1:40:45.320
<v Speaker 1>don't have a college team to cheer four, You're more

1:40:45.360 --> 1:40:49.080
<v Speaker 1>than welcome to cheer for the Oklahoma Sooners. Thank you

1:40:49.120 --> 1:40:51.720
<v Speaker 1>so much, man. I will, I will when I found

1:40:51.800 --> 1:40:54.479
<v Speaker 1>What is a Sooner? I don't know, but I know

1:40:54.520 --> 1:40:57.719
<v Speaker 1>it's the nickname for the team. I figured out out too,

1:40:57.880 --> 1:41:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Sherlock. But I'm just saying there's I don't know

1:41:00.720 --> 1:41:02.400
<v Speaker 1>what a Sooner is. We'll figure that out. I'll go

1:41:02.520 --> 1:41:06.680
<v Speaker 1>for it. Here we go, Jeremy writs, Buck. If you're

1:41:06.680 --> 1:41:08.840
<v Speaker 1>over the age twenty five and don't have or work

1:41:08.840 --> 1:41:14.240
<v Speaker 1>with kids, you should be banned from wearing Halloween costumes. Also,

1:41:14.320 --> 1:41:15.920
<v Speaker 1>even as a graduate of a Big ten school and

1:41:15.960 --> 1:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>with an above average basketball program. I agree with you

1:41:20.479 --> 1:41:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that school should be for school. If people are so

1:41:23.200 --> 1:41:25.800
<v Speaker 1>bent on college athletes getting paid, maybe they can be

1:41:25.840 --> 1:41:28.879
<v Speaker 1>compensated for how far they go in their respective college tournament,

1:41:29.240 --> 1:41:32.000
<v Speaker 1>something crazy like rewarding excellent, since that's how the real

1:41:32.040 --> 1:41:35.920
<v Speaker 1>world works. Shields High Jeremy, Yeah. I mean, people will

1:41:35.960 --> 1:41:39.519
<v Speaker 1>get very emotionally attached to college athletics, and so when

1:41:39.560 --> 1:41:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I tell them that, I'm not saying we shouldn't have

1:41:42.160 --> 1:41:46.280
<v Speaker 1>college sports or college competition. I'm just saying we shouldn't

1:41:46.320 --> 1:41:52.400
<v Speaker 1>do this thing. We shouldn't do this thing where we

1:41:52.960 --> 1:41:55.040
<v Speaker 1>pretend that people that are coming to these schools are

1:41:55.200 --> 1:41:59.040
<v Speaker 1>students when they're really just athletic mercenaries who are brought

1:41:59.080 --> 1:42:01.759
<v Speaker 1>in to do that. And some of them can barely read,

1:42:01.880 --> 1:42:05.320
<v Speaker 1>can barely do the most basic of classes in college.

1:42:06.200 --> 1:42:09.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's just it. Also, the whole focus of these

1:42:09.120 --> 1:42:13.240
<v Speaker 1>schools on, oh, is our team winning. The focus should

1:42:13.240 --> 1:42:15.679
<v Speaker 1>be on like what's the average sat the incoming class,

1:42:15.680 --> 1:42:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and what jobs are people getting when they graduate and

1:42:17.720 --> 1:42:19.880
<v Speaker 1>how much are they earning, and like that should really

1:42:19.920 --> 1:42:23.040
<v Speaker 1>be the school pride. I hate the school pride to

1:42:23.160 --> 1:42:26.960
<v Speaker 1>me about how good is this school at preparing people

1:42:27.040 --> 1:42:31.439
<v Speaker 1>to be successful and excellent adults. Not? Yeah a team

1:42:31.520 --> 1:42:36.160
<v Speaker 1>went nine and pool last year? Yea, who cares? And

1:42:36.200 --> 1:42:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I know I get I can hear the booze. Who cares.

1:42:40.960 --> 1:42:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying don't watch and enjoy. I'm talking about

1:42:43.000 --> 1:42:45.800
<v Speaker 1>when you're a student in the school. You know, if

1:42:45.840 --> 1:42:48.559
<v Speaker 1>they win, they lose. Fine, you know, school pride is fine.

1:42:48.600 --> 1:42:50.599
<v Speaker 1>But I know it's like it's like I'm a communist

1:42:50.640 --> 1:42:53.120
<v Speaker 1>now everyone hates this. Why can't you do both? Fuck?

1:42:53.200 --> 1:42:55.799
<v Speaker 1>Why can't you be invested in the college sports teams

1:42:55.880 --> 1:42:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and be a good student. I'm gonna say you can't

1:42:57.760 --> 1:42:59.240
<v Speaker 1>be a good student to be invests in college sports.

1:42:59.240 --> 1:43:01.760
<v Speaker 1>That would be crazy. I'm saying the focus of the

1:43:01.840 --> 1:43:07.400
<v Speaker 1>school and administrators is too heavily on their athletic programs

1:43:07.400 --> 1:43:09.880
<v Speaker 1>at some of these big major schools, and it's just

1:43:10.040 --> 1:43:12.240
<v Speaker 1>not what school is supposed to be. I mean saying, like,

1:43:12.320 --> 1:43:15.160
<v Speaker 1>let's take Ohio State for example, We're going to go there.

1:43:15.240 --> 1:43:18.439
<v Speaker 1>They're a good school too. Yeah, it's a good school too,

1:43:18.479 --> 1:43:21.599
<v Speaker 1>but most of the top programs are also good schools. Yeah.

1:43:22.160 --> 1:43:24.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I just add why can't they just

1:43:24.520 --> 1:43:27.200
<v Speaker 1>have like people show up and do tryouts. Why do

1:43:27.240 --> 1:43:29.040
<v Speaker 1>they have to have all this recruiting and all this nonsense?

1:43:29.080 --> 1:43:33.639
<v Speaker 1>Who cares? Because they need to make money. I mean

1:43:34.080 --> 1:43:37.840
<v Speaker 1>there is a saying that's the big schools. It's not

1:43:37.880 --> 1:43:40.280
<v Speaker 1>all the schools. And what I'm really talking about is like,

1:43:40.400 --> 1:43:44.040
<v Speaker 1>why does Princeton recruit for the squash team? Who the

1:43:44.080 --> 1:43:47.639
<v Speaker 1>hell cares? It makes no sense. Princeton and other Ivy

1:43:47.680 --> 1:43:50.599
<v Speaker 1>League schools don't allow scholarships, Yeah, but they still recruit,

1:43:50.600 --> 1:43:54.440
<v Speaker 1>they still bring but get in otherwise top tier. Not necessarily.

1:43:54.479 --> 1:43:56.400
<v Speaker 1>It depends on the sport. Look at you with the

1:43:56.439 --> 1:43:59.040
<v Speaker 1>sports knowledge over here, actually know some stuff. Yes, yea

1:43:59.400 --> 1:44:02.080
<v Speaker 1>my background in sportspot I remember this night. Yeah, but

1:44:02.160 --> 1:44:04.080
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, I went to Amherst and we had

1:44:04.080 --> 1:44:05.760
<v Speaker 1>guys who are on the football team who could who

1:44:05.760 --> 1:44:07.519
<v Speaker 1>could like barely put a sentence together. And I was

1:44:07.560 --> 1:44:10.799
<v Speaker 1>always like, what four it's a D three school. They stink?

1:44:11.080 --> 1:44:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Who cares? But that was my experience. That was my experience.

1:44:15.880 --> 1:44:18.360
<v Speaker 1>What what do I what I know except about everything?

1:44:19.000 --> 1:44:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Please tell people this weekend. First of all, right, in

1:44:21.640 --> 1:44:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to tell producer Mark that he's wrong and Buck is right.

1:44:23.840 --> 1:44:27.000
<v Speaker 1>That's always important, so that he knows that Teambucket. iHeartMedia

1:44:27.000 --> 1:44:30.280
<v Speaker 1>dot com, Facebook dot com, Slashbuck Sexton, please tell somebody

1:44:30.280 --> 1:44:32.000
<v Speaker 1>about the show this weekend. I hope you're enjoying the

1:44:32.000 --> 1:44:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Pluto stream Channel two forty eight, the first on Pluto TV.

1:44:36.200 --> 1:44:39.240
<v Speaker 1>And uh oh yeah, that's right, Shields High