WEBVTT - Trade Is Now War, Kotok Says

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Jay Ley. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg YEA,

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>what is going on in the market. It feels like

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>we're going back to January. The VIX has a ten handle,

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the SMP five is just points away from a record high.

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>To discuss you want to us here in New York

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>is David Kotok, Cumbled Advisers, Chief investment officer and co

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>found a Good morning to David. Good morning John. It's

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure to be here and we back at January. Well,

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>it certainly looks like it you just described it, but

0:00:55.440 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>remember February follows January, and we'll see what this next

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>two months it's going to bring. In January February, we

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>explored the concept with people like yourself as to whether

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>we were going to go into a new trading regime,

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and you market regime of high volatility, lower returns. Is

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that where we're at? And if we are, why are

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>we going back to a ten on the vix at

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a record handy SMP five. Well, I remember that discussion

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 1>here along with a bunch of other folks who had

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>during that period of time and felt the same way.

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>One thing is different now. Trade is now war not

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>even threatened. Rhetoric number two. All the promises that Peter

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Navarro made there will be no retaliation, there will be

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>no penalties, everybody's gonna have a negotiation. I think that

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>was March are proven wrong. And every single day we

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>get another anecdote of the effects of trade war and

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>how bad this can be. Ken lang Owned did an

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>interview here yesterday. Yeah, and he's right, he's got well here.

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's trade words. We're headed for trouble. All

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the warnings of history say so. And we now have

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>an administration which is entrenched in this policy and doesn't

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>have a way out. It's trying to do a bilateral

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>deal with Mexico. Then it's going to try to co

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>opt in Canada when it comes to China. I think

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>this adversary is patient, doesn't have our political issues, has

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>studied us exceptionally well, and is advancing faster than we are.

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I read about how the rollout at five G in

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>China is light years ahead of the United States, and

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you say to yourself, if China's gonna have this massive

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 1>bandwidth and roll out, and we're going to be busy

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>imposing tariffs and getting retalied. They were tariffs on soybeans

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and lobsters, what does the matter with us? Okay, the

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Good Morning I had to find the red button folks

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:11.519
<v Speaker 1>on New good Morning. David um, if that's true, what

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>do I do with my investments? I mean you at

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Ohio last night with a suburban vote radically changed from

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the GOP traditional alliable. You've got all the Yanks with China.

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>You and John have just voiced. Does it change Cumberland

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:30.959
<v Speaker 1>Advisors investment approach? Well, it has, and in that in

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the US portfolios with et F portfolios, we are now

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>focused domestically. We are focused on small and mid caps.

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>We are staying away from international exposure which is at

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>risk to trade war. And we have a cash reserve.

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>And in the in the bond side, the treasury is

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>being flattened and suppressed by a tax effect which expires

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:57.119
<v Speaker 1>on the fift September. Let's see what the yield curve

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>looks like. Are you gonna make like effort through there

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>when the dog days of August? Are you gonna make

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>your gold this year? A fishing two two days? That's

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>your record is kind of tough. I'll get a little

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>tired of my arms. So you moved to Florida to

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>do that? I get the idea what you saw in

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Ohio last night? Is that gonna happen in Florida? Are

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 1>you gonna have the suburban voters of Florida walk away

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>from the GOP? Mr? Trump? I think that's an interesting question.

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>The congressman in my district where I live in Sarisoda's

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Verne Buchanan, I think seven or eight term Republican. He's

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>running ads, walking down the street, holding hands with his granddaughter.

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't mention Trump, he doesn't mention Republicans. He is

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>now worried. He's had a reason to be worried. So

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>then how does that affect your I mean, Phararell wants

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to know this. Farrell, you don't understand John Farrell is

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>sleeping under a park bench in Central Park. If Sterling

0:04:53.720 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 1>goes to and he's wiped out, I know, though, so

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>much for Franzy summer place in Italy. But but what

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 1>I want to know is does all this mumbo jumbo

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the John and I talked about every day on politics,

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 1>does it affect what we do in investment? I think

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>it raises risk profiles. I don't care where the vix goes.

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a contemporaneous indicator. It has no forecast power. Everybody, Well,

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>if there's no distortion in a treasury curve, you would

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>look at the flatness of the curve and you would

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 1>say there's a message here. But we now find in

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>this tax code change that the purchases of strips are

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>consuming a great deal of the monthly action of the

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 1>thirty year bond. And it's because of a tax code

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>change which will expire on September. Anybody who's any corporation

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>has got to define benefit pension plan that's underfunded as

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>huge incentives right now today to buy long strips. They

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 1>get paid for doing so in a big way. Do

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you know what I thought got lost in all the

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>tests the noise yesterday? Tom was Pimco and Dan Iverson

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>possibly one of the most talented portfolio managers on the planet,

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>turning cautious and defensive. This is where the sequent fund. Yeah,

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Dan is a fantastic PM with a huge track record

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>over the last few years, and he has taken the

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>funds for a more defensive, cautious stance, and he says

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the following um, the populist parties have already gained traction

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:29.840
<v Speaker 1>across the globe. The major central banks are trying to

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>step away from accommodation they've provided for the markets for

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>many years. Their influence has been quickly replaced by that

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of politics. His view, the fund's view for both equity

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and fixed income investors, we think this means of returns

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and unfortunately higher volatility. Now that might not be the

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.600
<v Speaker 1>story of the morning, but that's the story they're anticipating.

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know fixed income really really well, David, So

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>right now, the way that PIMCO would describe it is

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:55.559
<v Speaker 1>that you can quite simply expose yourself to two pools

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.599
<v Speaker 1>of assets. A pall of assets leverage to economic growth

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States, more back securities, corporate credit.

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Then a pool of assets that give you a hedge. Inky,

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>so we get it down to it, highly liquid treasuries,

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>things like treasury bills, et cetera, et cetera. How do

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you want to balance yourself between those two poles? Of

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>assets through the duration of the ship. You just described

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the classic bond manager's barbell. That's what we call it

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to a ladder. If you're in a ladder today,

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you are taking on risk. You think you're reducing risk

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>with the ladder, and you're failing. You're taking on risk

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>with the letter. You need a barbel. Now, how do

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you do the barbell? Peace? Long, peace, short and in between.

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>You measure the duration of the whole, You measure the

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>yield curve for its sweet spot, and you match it.

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Only you match it with a barbell, not linearly or

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a ladder. That is a lot of technical jargon on like,

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>but but that's how you do it. What are we

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>doing in the barbell? When this curve gets fat like this?

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>You shorten and build one side of the bar bill

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>larger than the other, leans, lodge hard the fish. You're

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>out there with a bunch of people fishing. Yeah, we

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>had fifty folks. We had great conversation, divided views. Of course.

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>You see the shot of me and John Farron. We

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>went sturgeon fishing this weekend. Your sturgeon went viral? Did

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>go viral? Yes? And we and we decided that the

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>sturgeon is about the size of what we use for

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>bait fish. But Leans close. You're Leans Lodge. We're over Patrosian.

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>It's called vodka. You guys are permanently and invited. You

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>would be ten years if you came up. There's no

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:38.559
<v Speaker 1>UK equivalent. It is so far in the middle of nowhere.

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Did you go by private like one of those planes

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>with the pontoon things on it? You get to the

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>lake plane you want, You're gonna hold my hand. If

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I do that, I will. I'll carry your bag. David Kotalk,

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, coming that with a bottle of Carosotic.

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll be out there in the grumming canoe taking dramamine.

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>David Kotalk, humble of advisors. Why don't you bring in

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>our next guest and idiosyncratic em Pabla Goldberg blank Rock,

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:21.439
<v Speaker 1>head of a merchant market. Dad, I'm sure, Pablo A.

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna tell me some of these issues are idiosyncratic.

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:30.559
<v Speaker 1>But Turkey, Argentina, Brazil, it's sounding gap, isn't it. Well?

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I think they we need to separate these. I think

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that there are idiosyncredic vulnerabilities to global factors. If you

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>want to put it like that. I think Argentina and

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Turkey belong to the same camp. Brazil is a little

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>bit of a different story. Um, what is the trigger

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to Argentina and Turkey? The trigger is you tighter financial

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:50.959
<v Speaker 1>conditions globally. In that sense, it is not indiosy incredic issue.

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>What it is idiosyncratic is that these two countries have

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>been um, you know, in out of balance for for

0:09:57.000 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>some time, and now the market has indicated that is

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.839
<v Speaker 1>time for reckoning. And the difference is that Argentina has

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>bidden the bullet, I mean, has gone to the I

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>m F, has tried to interest rates significantly, is lad

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in the economy to the adjudgment, but Turkey is not.

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's why now the pressure is on Turkey. Still

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a wall of silence over the last forty eight hours, Pamp.

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:21.119
<v Speaker 1>What are you expecting to say from the Turkish authorities

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of policy response? Well, I think that

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>we're the Turkish authorities are working in three different camps

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>right that The first one is try to um you

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>know the case they go to gone to Washington. They're

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to deal with this issue of the sanctions, because

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that's quite important because for a country that has large

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>external funding needs, anything that can affect, you know, the

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 1>willingness of foreign lenders to roll over that debt would

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>be a complication. And of course the process of sanctions

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>or potential sanctions are the deterrent potentially to a cross

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>border landing. So that's one area of work that they're doing.

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:01.319
<v Speaker 1>The other area of work is are they're gonna is

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.079
<v Speaker 1>the central band gonna be racing grates who you know,

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>get ahead of the curve. And and and there's where

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>we are not being so much advantced yet. Look, give

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>us a clinic on any nation. In this case Turkey,

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:15.839
<v Speaker 1>it has to debt. They have debt in Turkish lira

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 1>and they have debt in the US dollar. Both are

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>going up and yield priced down, yields dramatically higher on

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Turkish debt. What does that mean for Turkish finance and

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Turkish banks? Let me let me do another cut on

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>top of the one you've done. You you've done the

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>cut by currency. Let me do a cut by borrower.

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Right there, sovereign dead, basically dead of the government. And

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>there's that of the corporate sector being banks and corporate

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:46.679
<v Speaker 1>now financial corporate, where Turkey is heavily in debted, it

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>is in dollars. So that's one part of the quadrant

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and the other part of the quadram that is the

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:53.719
<v Speaker 1>actually corporate sector, the one that is so in that

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not the government, it is the corporate sector. Um.

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>And the banks are in between, right. The banks are

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the US who are just bringing dollars from abroad and

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>lending to the guys inside. So where we need to

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:08.839
<v Speaker 1>put an eye on is on the corporate sector and

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the rollovers. Now, if they fail to roll over and

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.719
<v Speaker 1>they have payment problems, that's kind of eventually knock on

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the banks. And that's why the banks have been suffering.

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Do we see that within whatever is the short term

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>paper market in Turkey is the you know, the proverbial

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>canary in the coal mine. Is it some form of

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Turkish library or bank commercial paper? Well, I mean if

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you look at the sort of short term borrowing costs

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 1>in Turkey, of course they've gone up. We've seen uh,

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of cross currency swaps going up. We have seen

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>spreads of turkeysh banks gone up. So that pressure is

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 1>pain felt through a system. Um. The question is, uh,

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>we are the point where women have some failures or

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>not and so far if you look at the data,

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and now granted that the data has a couple of

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>months lag, but even an eg total and still whatevers

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>are going through. I think investors are worried will they

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>stop right or not? And that's probably where we have

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.439
<v Speaker 1>not a daily information and that's bring everybody to be

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a little apprehensive. So the other thing that I think

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:14.599
<v Speaker 1>many people are worried about whether these technical issues just

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 1>become real fundamental issues paplow when you have short term

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>interest rates this high in countries like Argentina and essentially

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a response will have to follow in a country like Turkey.

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Essentially that's going to choke off growth, and that's going

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to choke off NIX and then the whole thing just

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of ends up in this big loop that it's

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:33.439
<v Speaker 1>very hard to get out of. Pamplow. To what extent

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:37.679
<v Speaker 1>were entering that kind of cycle, we you know, you're

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>totally right, and and this is an exercise of adjustment,

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>right and and and the big question when you go

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>into an exercise of adjustment is how to distribute the

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>cost of the adjustment. And this is what we are

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:51.239
<v Speaker 1>seeing debated in Turkey today. I mean, in case of Argentina.

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>It is clear that the fiscal side is doing it adjustment,

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>but also the costumers are doing the adjustment on higher utility, terrests, etcetera.

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Um the general the corporate sector through lower growth. UH.

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>In Turkey, the question is will the government fight back

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the necessary adjustment as they did into thousand and seventeen.

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Remember they did a massive push up in credit into

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:17.559
<v Speaker 1>thousand and seventeen. Turkey grew seven percent when this economy

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>was already heavily dollarly indebted and with a large account deficits.

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>So are they going to try to the fire gravity

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>for longer, which actually stretches the court which you could

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>eventually break or not, or they're gonna buy the bullet

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and just go through the slower and right now and

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to distribute the judgment. The banks are in generally

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>solid and they will have good provisions to cover some

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of the not performing loans that are going to go

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>up as the economy slow down as you indicate it

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>um so, but they usually are you going to do

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>it or you're just gonna fly back and you're gonna

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>make the situation worse. And I think that's where the

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>market is still debating because we're not seeing the right

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>reaction function by the government yet. What how does contagions start?

0:14:57.480 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if we have all these events here there,

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>if you look back to Ecuador in Mexico two or

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>three times, and we all remember ninety eight, how does

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>contagion happen? We all remember ninety eight very well, unfortunately,

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and contagion, contagion. The first thing about contagients happened, uh

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>when you spected in the list. So that's that's one

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of the problems with contagion, right and uh and and

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>this happens when investors start to pair uh different countries

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>by sort of where they wulnerability lize and and and

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>then you guys start to separate the winners and losers.

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that we have had a little bit of

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>contagion before in emerging markets, kind of when the dollars

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>started to move higher in April and May, we started

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to see contagion. We saw some contingent from Argentina to

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>other countries. If anything, you could say that Turkey, you know,

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>having a minded on vulnerabilities, it is a little bit

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of the effect of the contagion coming from Argentina. But

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>we're not seeing contingent from Turkey to the rest. At

0:15:56.880 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>this point, um, there's one you know line that is

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 1>women through some of the countries. That is the issue

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of sanctions right today to look at the Russian ruble

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>is under pressure on expectations of potential higher sanctions to Russia.

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>So that is a new access that investors are dealing

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>with that all of a sudden from Washington, that could

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>be something that will impair the liquidity of some of

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the markets. That will prevent some place to play in

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>significant markets. So that is things that could bring contagients

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the public Goldberg, thank you. So it's the black Rock folks.

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>This will be out on our podcast on Spotify, Apple

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Music as well. Public Goldberg just brilliant there on e

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>M as well, without cyphering its economics. And I want

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to rip up the script here. Just spend a good

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>amount of time getting a clinic from Dr Weinberg on

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:09.880
<v Speaker 1>why we can't clear markets anymore. Carl Weinberg is legendary

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>for his experience with many others and I think of

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Bill Rhodes a City group over the years in saying

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to troubled countries, you know what, you made some mistakes.

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Here's how you work it out, and you usually work

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 1>it out, folks, by extending debt. Maybe there's a cram

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>down where somebody takes a loss up front to make

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 1>all benefit down the road. There's an interest rate workout

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 1>in other creative adventures as well. Carl, what happened? Why

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>can't we do this anymore? Well, um, we can. Uh.

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>The politics of it have become increasingly difficult, and a

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of countries, even countries that still remain committed to

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>globalism within their own houses, are not willing to commit

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>domestic resources to international events. And I'm talking specifically about

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Europe here where Um, while the nations of Europe presumably

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>are united in the Union, where they presumably share common

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>interests in common causes and think of themselves as Europeans

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:15.919
<v Speaker 1>rather than Germans, Dutch or Italians, Nonetheless, when countries like Italy, Greece, Portugal, Spain,

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Ireland get into financial difficulty, the politics are unfavorable to

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>burden sharing. Is part of this that we've eliminated, for

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the most part fixed currencies, in that a disciplinarian was

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the reality of selected fixed currencies which forced the politicians

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:39.439
<v Speaker 1>hands well. I think that the recent Europe's not working.

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Isn't the fixed currencies, it's all the things to support

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>fixed currencies that have not been implemented. The Europeans, to

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>their credit, have been making big strides recently, right better

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>late than never on things like banking union, on deposit insurance,

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>across borders, on shared risks, on burden sharing, on shared responsibilities,

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>but still have a way to go on fiscal responsibilities,

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:05.439
<v Speaker 1>which is what makes it possible for the United States

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to have a Massachusetts in New York and Arkansas and

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 1>the West Virginia all within the same nation, in the

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:15.919
<v Speaker 1>same banking system without having to worry about capital flows

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>or currency adjustment. Do you worry? Do you worry about?

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>I guess this new theology of politics trumping all no

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:27.439
<v Speaker 1>pun intended with a pacific rim or with idiosyncratic stories

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>like Argentina and Turkey. I mean they don't have the

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>europe excuse, do they? No, they don't, and there we have.

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>But the same basic thing is there. You know, the

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>domestic um response to any crisis, you know, is to um,

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, blame the foreigner for its shut down on

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>foreign transactions and um, you know, try to clamp down

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:49.880
<v Speaker 1>on the parts of the boat that are leaking, which

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 1>is uh maybe a first instance a good thing, but

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>when the credit flows or across borders, you have to

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>look across the border for cooperation and for a solution.

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.479
<v Speaker 1>You can't close well well said, and it shows your

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 1>experience the phrase cop cooperation and solution. Are we not

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>solving some of these debt workouts because they're really not

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 1>that big of a crisis. Don't tell that to the Greeks, no,

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And they certainly are very real to the countries that

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>are involved. And I think the most relevant example right

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>now is Italy, and I think everything that we've experienced

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.959
<v Speaker 1>recently in Europe and as well in emerging markets, even

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>though Italy is not an emerging market comes to bear

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 1>when we think about Italy. We have a crushing public

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 1>sector debt, we have crushing private sector debt. We have

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>cross border cumulative balance of payments obligations which are hidden

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in the e CBS a clearing system, the so called

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>target too. And then we have domestic politics where repuviation

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of relationships and obligations seems to be the populous factor

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that's winning the votes. So a government that comes in

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>on that kind of vote can't do the right thing

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>because it undermines its political base. Well, how do you

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>reas on to the idea and this moves on from

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>debt workouts, how do you respond to the idea of

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Asia that learned their lessons in and they have a

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>bigger piggy bank and all that. How do you respond

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to that? I mean, is that do you buy the

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 1>story that they're stealed for crisis? Yeah? I mean you

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>have to respond to that story on seven different levels. Right,

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>First of all, crises have always occurred. They're never going

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to stop occurring. Their part of the human condition, all right,

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that things get hot, they overheat, and then somebody has

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to pay for it. So you're never going to eliminate crisis,

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>no matter how smart or sophisticated you are. But the

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>real story that I think you allude to, which is

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the important one, which is that the growth in the world,

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the economic growth, the population in the world, the money

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>in the world, the investment of the world, the future

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of the world is now pivoted towards Asia. And Asia

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>is the new place where the action is for investors,

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>both for its rewards and for its risks. Because, as

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>we know, for us to have the investor risks can

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>breed opportunities. Carl Weinberg, thank you so much, greatly appreciate it.

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>This morning, Carl Weinberg with my frequency economics with a

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>little more thoughtful time constrained, uh idea from what we

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 1>see in the heat and all that, Fim Fox and

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keenan. Now I really enjoyed Gina smiling with us

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the Blueberg Economics and Bloomberg News, and she's written up

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a bang up story about one of the major trends.

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, just to set this up for you,

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Villain Bowder turned to me one day and he said, Tom,

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>this is secret and you can't say publicly, but we

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>have hired Catherine Man. And I felt so wonderful to

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 1>see Kathy Man out of brand Ice, who went to O. E. C. D.

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:55.159
<v Speaker 1>With one of the giant books on trade and one

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 1>of the real theories of dysfunction China in the U

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:02.159
<v Speaker 1>s to to leave the shop at City Group, tell

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>us what you learned about women as chief economists. So

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 1>women are increasingly becoming private sector chief economists, which is

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a big deal because this his for a long time.

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Just spend one of those ceilings that women have a

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:18.119
<v Speaker 1>lot have had a lot of trouble cracking, and so

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing Kathy Man at City Group, michelmar Cusin, and

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Marian Stanley. Yeah, just across that, really across the globe,

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing these women get these great, big jobs Janet

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Henry at HSBC and so one of the things that's

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:39.959
<v Speaker 1>really interesting is the women who are getting elevated now

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 1>they have these stellar resumes, they just have amazing histories

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and economics, and they're really helping to elevate women sort

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of behind them as well. They're sort of pulling women

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>up the career ladder. So I think that is a

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>positive sign for sort of gender equity in this field.

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 1>There sounds like there's a negative here too. There's like

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a butt there's a big but, and that is that

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a pipeline issue in economics. You know. I feel like,

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's great to say we should hire women,

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>we should strive for gender equity, but the reality is

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>that there aren't as many women going into this field,

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and if you just don't have the folks with the qualifications,

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be hard to get near anything like

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 1>a quality. It's it's not even a reasonable goal to

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>ask banks or central banks to achieve. At this point,

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you describe in your story a conversation that has had

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>between head hunters and one particular economists, one of if

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>you could just describe that. So I absolutely loved this anecdote.

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>So my my colleague Lucy Meekin in the UK talked

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to Janet Henry and Janet was telling her that she

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>often gets this call from head hunters and they want

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 1>to hire women, or they want to hire economists, and

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>they say, you know, do you know anybody? Do you

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 1>know anyone would be good? And she's like, well, I'm

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 1>not interested, but here's a list. She'll give them a

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>list and then they'll say, but do you know any women?

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 1>And she just finds this happening again and again. And

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I heard the same thing when I talked to Mary Daley,

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:03.120
<v Speaker 1>who is senior vice president for research at San Francisco.

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:06.119
<v Speaker 1>Fat can we roop up the script? Ms? Smile like

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Folks is one of my former interns, and wandered through

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 1>the door. Brilliant tell us your experienced, Gina of just

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 1>what you described about economists, which is everybody's looking for

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 1>bright women. You came out of what was the school.

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>It was a small school, in the South Chapel Hill,

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Chapel Hill. Excuse me, it's Chapel Hill, not U n

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>C Called Chapel Hill. Anyways, you came out and how

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 1>did you get I mean the rap here is women

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>don't take micro women don't do econometrics Bologney because you

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>did it. So what was it like for you being

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:46.679
<v Speaker 1>in the trenches like Janet Andrey getting as smart as

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you are? Yeah, you know so, I actually feel like

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 1>my experience is really emblematic of what we can You know. So,

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I came from a small town, working class family in Pennsylvania,

0:25:58.000 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and when I went to school, I never would have

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>occurred to me to study economics. I didn't think that

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>was a thing girls did. And so I study journalism

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and I had a couple of really good professors who

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 1>really pushed me to look into economics, to look into accounting.

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:14.719
<v Speaker 1>And then Tom Cantiliano, who runs the Bloomberg's internship program.

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Tom Cantiliano really did me a solid and forcing me

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to take accounting. Um, and I think those things. And

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>then obviously Tom, working with you when I was an intern,

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you sort of forced me to read a book every

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:29.640
<v Speaker 1>week about economic I would yell, just read a book

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and you know, like some of the great interns we've had,

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and I heard I heard the voice Colby Smith would

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>have been the same thing. Yeah, And so I think

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that is consistent with what we heard and

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 1>reporting this story, which is women sort of you know,

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>often don't think of this as a field that is

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>open to them, but then mentors get them into it

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and sort of pull them up the ladder. And I

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 1>think that that is what we see happening now. I

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 1>was gonna say, maybe they're just smarter. I don't know

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.880
<v Speaker 1>if that's true, but I do think there's this intes

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.640
<v Speaker 1>saying sort of untapped aptitude for economics um that women

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>can bring to the table, but that maybe isn't introduced

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to them at early levels like high school or even

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 1>early college. But it doesn't not have to do with

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the notion that and I've heard this, so I can't

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.719
<v Speaker 1>really there's no documentation where men really operate because they

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:21.719
<v Speaker 1>want to be right, they themselves want to be right,

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>whereas women are more interested in finding the correct solution

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's not about them. So that is a really

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting observation, only in the sense that it's actually really

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>squares with something. One of the women I was talking

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to set for the story. So she Tatyana Avalova at

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the Columbia University runs undergraduate Women in Economics and the

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>whole point of this program is to encourage folks to

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>study economics from from a younger age. And one thing

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>she says is we see women going into micro going

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>into applied and the reason is when you talk to them,

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>they can see the outcomes immediately. They like to see

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that effect. Yeah, major shout out there to Susan Ah,

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the first woman to win the John Bates Clark Award,

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and we are honor Bloomberg to do the first interview

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:11.879
<v Speaker 1>with her. Then can we shout out another woman in

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>economics who I'm sure I'm forgetting many We have to

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>mention Julia Cornado of BMP Perry but when she was

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 1>named head of North American Economics or BMP Parry. But

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that was a huge deal, huge deal at the French

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:28.160
<v Speaker 1>bank that would do that. Ginna, this is the most

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>important article to day. Thank you. So what are you

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 1>reading right now? I was just telling you I'm reading

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a Nissim telebs foo by randomness again for one of

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>my classes at n y Uh. Do we agree she

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>needs to get a life? Yeah? Okay, Gina smile like

0:28:43.520 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. I'm Bloomberg Economics. Tom Keane, do you know

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>how you can go from growing up on a farm

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>in Iowa to running Bowing? You need to go to

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Iowa State University. Yeah. That helps the crack Aerospace program

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you do. And you know, one of the ways we're

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>going to learn all about this is with David Rubinstein

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and the David Rubinstein Peer to peer Preview. It's brought

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to you by Wells Fargo Technology Banking. Wells Fargo helps

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>business leaders find their moments of truth. A little outside

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>perspective can create a lot of clarity. And here with

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>his perspective is David Rubinstein. David, what was it like

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:41.479
<v Speaker 1>interviewing the chief executive of Bowing? Did he explain how

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>he went from that farm to uh to be the

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>head of Bowing? To grow up on a farm and

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>milk the cows as you would expect in Iowa, and

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 1>then he got an internship at boeing Um one summer

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and then ultimately got a job there when he graduated

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 1>from college. He's been at the company thirty three years,

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 1>but he's only fifties are years old. Amazingly, he is

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>able to increase the value of a company quite considerably

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 1>in three years. The stock is up about a hundred

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>and forty nine since he's been the CEO. But the

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 1>amazing part is not only that he's done that, but

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>he rides about a hundred and fifty miles a week

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>on his bike, about two hours a day. He's relentless,

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, when you interview him, you realize

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you might be able to overweight yourself because when you

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>look at him, he is so thin. He's in great shape.

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>But he says that riding a bike two hours a

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>day clears his mind, and obviously it must work. So

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I begun to think maybe I should try that. Well,

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>it maybe would help everybody when they get on those

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Boeing aircraft because the airlines have been cramming more and

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>more seats into those fuselages. What does he say about

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the future of air traveler, We're gonna have to spend

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>so much time in the air Well, only the people

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>in the face of the earth have ever been on

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the airline. It's hard to believe because the people we

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.239
<v Speaker 1>know are flying all the time. But only and other

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:01.959
<v Speaker 1>people on the face of the earth have ever been

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>on an airplane. So he's got a big market. His

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>biggest challenge, I think is that he's got a friend

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of me, you might say, in China. He sells a

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>lot to China, but ultimately China probably will build its

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>own business in the aircraft area. Right now, it's been

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 1>largely a duopoly for the last years or so, which

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is to say Airbus in Europe and and and Boeing

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. In terms of major airline aircraft.

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Obviously there there planes that are made made by others

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>for smaller regional things or for um business jets, but

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>those are the two dominant airlines aircraft companies, and I

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>suspect China will ultimately become a major one as well. David,

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>this guy is maybe more qualified than anyone from the Midwest.

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 1>The fabric of Iowa in Iowa State, on the University

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of Washington and bowing to explain to the President United States,

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 1>how is trade policy? Obviously affects defense in commercial Boeing,

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>but Frank, he affects everything else as well. Did he

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>discuss the president in our new tariff tax policy? Well,

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>he has met with the President from time to time,

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's been supportive of the President's tax proposal,

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and Boeing was a big proponent of the tax cut. Obviously,

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the tariffs are a different matter. He didn't say what

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 1>he said specifically to the President on a particular tariff,

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 1>but there's no doubt that he doesn't think this is

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>probably a great way to proceed. Um But he's not

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a person who tries to seek a lot of public

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 1>attention for his views. He does operate very much in

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the background in some respects, but he's a very charming person.

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>He's very um focused on philanthropy. Boeling has dramatically increased

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 1>philanthropy under his leadership. But again, he's very very much

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:49.479
<v Speaker 1>on top of the job. He worked his way up

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 1>through the defense part of the business, now runs everything.

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>What's his style of Ellen Moleley Aerospace out of Kansas,

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Kansas State. Rather, we had a style one ford and

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 1>all that. If you told me he was running a

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>agribusiness company, I wouldn't be shocked because he does have

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a farmer kind of mindset in the sense that he's

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>he's very modest, unassuming, uh not louduh and and just

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>goes ahead and does what he thinks is right. And

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>uh salute solitude is something that's important to my guess

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>because he rides a bike so much. UM, I just

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know how he can do it, but he obviously does.

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 1>A stock has done extremely well in the company is

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 1>not extremely well, David. These are delicate matters, but on

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 1>this historic day, we must ask you first of all

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 1>about if you, Carlisle, have any relationships with Tesla. We

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>don't want to step on those. But it's an absolutely

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 1>original morning, David, in my career to see the headlines

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>come across, I am familiar with it, but you do

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 1>not have a relationship with the company. I saw it.

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it would be an incredible buy out. At

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>seventy billion dollars or so, that would be the largest

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 1>buyout ever done pure bio. But we'll see what happens.

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll see what happens. But there has to be a

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>relationship with owning principal entrepreneur if you will, and his board.

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>How would you advise the board and a proper action

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 1>given all the transactions across the David Rubinstein career. While

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:25.239
<v Speaker 1>the board obviously has to retain UM an independent um

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:28.840
<v Speaker 1>set of advisors, because if the CEO of a publicly

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:33.320
<v Speaker 1>traded company is leading a bio, you have some potential conflicts.

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>So you'd have to make certain that there's no other

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>offer that would come along from somebody other than the CEO,

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:41.839
<v Speaker 1>and the CEO is going to lead it. The board

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>would have to make certain that everything is done fairly

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 1>so that it's not to the advantage just of the CEO.

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>David Rubinstein as someone that has an extensive list of

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 1>experience with companies going public, going private, and the operations

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of aarious companies. If one of your portfolio companies c

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:07.000
<v Speaker 1>e O s who maybe had a fifth of a company,

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 1>came out with a Twitter tweet about a potential UH

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:16.920
<v Speaker 1>buy out at a specific price during market hours, what

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 1>would be your first call? It would be unusual to

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 1>think that that would happen. I haven't had that experience.

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Carlisle's had hundreds of companies have owned if we've never

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 1>seen something like that, But you know, Mr Musk is

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 1>an unusual person. He's done some things that people didn't

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>think could be done before, including creating Tesla for nothing

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 1>and right. But what would you do well? I would

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:45.279
<v Speaker 1>handle it in a way that would be private. I

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:48.879
<v Speaker 1>probably wouldn't publicly say what I would do, fair enough,

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:52.760
<v Speaker 1>David Rubinstein, thank you so much for those Thank you, Tesla,

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and of course David Rubinstein peered up here tonight at

0:35:56.080 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 1>five pm and ten pm at Bloomberg Radio. Thanks for

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 1>interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer.

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Tom Keene before the podcast. You

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:23.959
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio