WEBVTT - Surveillance: Small Business With Goldman's Solomon

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene Jailey.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you inside from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. It

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>is the most interesting year for Goldman Sachs, but it was.

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>What's so important in back the eighteen sixty nine is,

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>at one point Goldman Sachs was a small business. Things

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>have changed, and for David Solomon, the history of Goldman

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.639
<v Speaker 1>Sachs is front and center and also the future as

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>well with Mr Solomon Urani. Thank you Tom, and thank

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you David for joining me today. You know, we're here

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>outside the Capitol building and you have picketed the lawn

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>with help wanted signs. You know you had said Goldman

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.919
<v Speaker 1>Sachs had said just weeks ago that more than thirty

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>percent of small businesses didn't even know that they could

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>survive through this pandemic. What's at stake here, well, small

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>businesses are First of all, thank you for having me.

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm thrilled to be here, you know, out cold with

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 1>you outside the Capitol on this this gray morning but

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>small businesses are such a vitally important part of our economy,

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and they're so important in terms of how they employ,

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>take care of families, contribute to the communities that we

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>all live and operated. And they've been so badly hit,

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>so badly affected by the pandemic, and they need help.

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>And some help has come, but more help is needed.

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>And so one of the things we're trying to do

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:43.680
<v Speaker 1>by picketing here on the hill is to let Congress

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>know there are a number of things that small businesses

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>still need help and support on to get to the

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>other side. They can see the light at the end

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of the tunnel, but they need some help, you know,

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to get through the tunnel and get to the other side. Now,

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this is about stimulus, and Joe Biden

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>himself has called the current package a down payment. So

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>what is the David Solomon plan? What would you say

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>is needed in terms of the amount needed to save

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>this economy. So one of the things that we've done

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the last few months, given that

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>we have over ten thousand businesses, small businesses that have

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>been through our program over the course of the last descade,

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>as we've gone out we've surveyed them and we've talked

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to them, and we've created something called ten thousand Small

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Businesses Voices, which is really an advocacy platform, and we've

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>asked them, what do you need help with? And if

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you look at these placards that are on the lawn,

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>they raise a number of issues that the small businesses

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>are saying, Hey, we need help with this, And i'd

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>highlight three of them to you that I think are

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>very very important. The first is they need access to capital.

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>They need capital to bridge them through this challenging period

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of time, and something like the Restart Act I think

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>is a good way to get it. That Second, they

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about the need to support the people who work

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>for them, particularly around healthcare, and healthcare costs are just

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>so prohibitive. Often they're not in a position to take

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>care of the healthcare issues that their employees have, and

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>so they need some way to create better incentives to

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>provide healthcare support for their employees. And Third, because people

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>are working harder given the challenges they face, they need

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>more help with childcare and just basic support so they

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>can be president at work but also make sure that

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>their children are taken care of. You know, while they're

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>working and trying to keep their businesses afloat. So all

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of this is happening as unemployment still remains very elevated,

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's even worse for Black Americans, even worse for

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Hispanic Americans and Asian Americans. What do you think on

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>day one is going to be Joe Biden's toughest task

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>in fixing that gap. Well, the toughest task that the

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>new administration has is continuing to march forward, to make

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>progress on getting the vaccines distributed so we can get

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to the other side of the virus. There is going

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a lot of discussion about what additional stimulus

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>is needed. We've raised a bunch of issues here this

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>morning where we're trying to get people focused on things

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that we think needs to be included in any additional

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>stimulus that's brought forward. But I think the big focus

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>right now is we've got to get people vaccinated. We've

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>got to get to the other side of the virus. Well,

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the market had been reacting to this

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>vaccine hope, but the role out has been so slow

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>so far, and it's done a lot of concerns. How

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>is that impacting your own plans and how is that

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>impacting the plans of your clients. Well, I think there's

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>still a lot of uncertainty, and there's no question that

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the supply of vaccine is growing. In fact, I'm very

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>encouraged by the amount of vaccine that's out there. But

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 1>we have to find more flexible, nimble, more efficient ways

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to get that vaccine distributed. And I'm hopeful that, in

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>addition to the state actions that are being taken around

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the country, potentially will allow the private sector to help

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>with plans to get this vaccine distributed. There's plenty of vaccine,

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>we have to create increased speed and efficiency in getting

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that vaccine to people who are in need, especially vulnerable

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>people and frontline workers who need the support. Right now,

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>do you think it's moving fast enough that you'll be

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>able to bring Goldman SAX employees back and full by

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year. I I certainly would expect

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that we'll have Golden SAX employees back and full by

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:57.919
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year. We will get through this

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>um and I'm really hopeful that over the course of

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the next six months we see a real improvement. But

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>they still work to be done, and once we deal

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>with the vaccine and the virus and people feel safe.

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>We're still going to have to deal with the economic

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>consequence of the shutdowns and the impact on our economy

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that this pandemic has had, and that I think will

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 1>be a bumpier a longer period of time before we

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>get to the next six months. We have to get

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>past the next three weeks and tonight with Georgia going on.

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I know everyone would love your opinion here on if

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats were to win the seats, what kind of

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>impact would that have on the markets. Well, I'm watching

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the election as anybody everybody is, and you know, we'll

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>see over whether it's tonight or it's over the next

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of days, what the what the result is um

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, depending on the result, that obviously can have

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 1>an impact on policy policy effects markets. I think the

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>markets think that this this election at the moment is

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>still very uncertain, very close, too close to call, and

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>so like you, we'll watch and we'll see the outcome,

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll listen to the policy responses. The policy

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 1>responses will have an impact on markets at that point

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>in time. It's a lot of the concerns simply around

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>taxes and the taxation of corporations on well the individuals

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>or what is really the concern? I think I think

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 1>people like people like to know the answer. The answer

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is uncertain at the moment. I'm sure once we know

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the answer will move forward. Markets will be Markets will

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>be fine. That doesn't mean they'll go up the way

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>they've gone up the last few months, but markets will

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>be fine. We'll move forward. I think the big focus

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>has to be on getting the economy back in shape,

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>getting people employed, helping small businesses, really dealing with the

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>consequence an impact of the pandemic, not so much the

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 1>short term gyrations of the market. And on top of

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the Georgia elections, we do have this issue of certifying

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 1>the Biden win. And you are one of two almost

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>two hundred executives that had signed a letter urging Congress

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to do so. What's at risk here amid all these uncertainties. Well,

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I think at this point in time, it's important for

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>us to get focused on the tasks that are at hand.

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>We have to get through the pandemic, we have to

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>help those in need in the economy. We've got to

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>get the economy running again. And so I congratulated the

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>president elect back in November when it was clear to

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>me that he was the president elect and we were

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>going to go move forward. What's going on here the

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>next couple of days, I think is a distraction. I

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>know what will happen on the twentie of January, and

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>we will move forward, and that's what's important at this point.

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you have the twentieth of January, then, in the

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>first days of Biden's and in presidency, what do you

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>expect from him? What do you want to see beyond

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine I'd like to see. I'd like to see

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>some leadership around helping us all move forward around the pandemic,

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>helping us move forward in terms of economically supporting those

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that need help because of the pandemic, particularly small businesses.

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to see a consistent message as to what

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>we all need to do to come together to solve

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>these problems. This is a time for us to come

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>together as a country to get past the pandemic and

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>move forward and help people that have been really adversely

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>affected by this this horrible twelve months that we've had.

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think there's a lot of been a

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of concerns for many months about why the stock

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>market has been rallying so much while we have so

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>many of these underlying concerns. Do you have any concerns

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>about the fragility of the market at these current levels,

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>given that we still have so much wrong? Well, I

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>think that there's no question that the monetary policy and

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>fiscal policy actions have definitely been very, very supportive of

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>asset prices, and so obviously equity markets benefit from that.

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I said a few weeks ago, and I stand by

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 1>it now. It's hard to justify some of the valuations

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I see in the market, particularly around very very growthy companies,

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>around some of the I p O s that have come. Uh.

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.959
<v Speaker 1>We've seen other periods of ebulence and markets before they

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>rebalance over time, and my expectation is some of the

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 1>excess we've seen maybe over the course of the last

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 1>few months, will rebalance in the coming months. But I'm

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>much more focused on the medium or long term. I

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>don't get too upset about short term market generations. I

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:01.839
<v Speaker 1>do gonna get your opinion here on something else that's

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>going on in the market that a lot of other

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>people are concerned about. You know, we saw this big

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>move by the New York Stock exchange also to potentially

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>delist some Chinese companies and then reverse that course. You know,

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 1>you're somebody who has a lot of business abroad, huge

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>growth areya in China. I'm wondering what all these uncertainties

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>mean for you in terms of China reopening its financial system. Well,

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the first the first stage of the first phase of

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the trade agreement called for broader access for financial firms

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to markets in China, and that's being executed. You know,

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, we'll see if it carries through and

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>executes all the way. But the relationship between the US

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and China right now, the by latter relationship is incredibly complex,

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's one of the big challenges that

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration has going forward. The foreign policy strategy

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>that we've really executed on with China over the last

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>forty years, and that allowing them to participate with all

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the other economies around the world, including the S and

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>thinking they'll move in our direction in terms of how

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>they operate. That does not seem to have worked. Uh,

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>And we need to ensure as we go forward that

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the playing field is level and fair and appropriate. And

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna be big challenges to that as

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>we move forward, But that's something that the administration will

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>have to take on. But there's a lot of uncertainty

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 1>around that, and I think that's something that we're going

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to be talking about and living with and thinking about

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>for a number of years as we move forward to

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the future. Right, That's what that was gonna be. My

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>other question, how much of an overhang do you think

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:30.719
<v Speaker 1>that uncertainty will be? I mean, Biden has all these

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>other issues as we discussed to take care of first,

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.599
<v Speaker 1>how how quickly do you think the trade relationship with

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 1>China will get figured out? I think this is a

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:40.679
<v Speaker 1>complicated issue that's going to take time to sort out,

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>but certainly I know will be a big focus of

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration, as it was with the Trump administration.

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll be important for us to continue to

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>focus on improving that relationship and making progress to level

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the plane for field and assure that that that partnership.

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>We have to work with China as a trade partner.

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>We have to work with China sometimes as a competitor.

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>We have to work with China sometimes as an adversary.

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>But we have to balance all that and do what's

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>right for the US to move forward. So I want

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to turn to your business for a second, because in

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the most recent quarter you had a standout quarter, right

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it was returns of equity of more than sevent uh

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, people look into one and I think everyone

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>wants to know what is the biggest growth driver for

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you this year? Well, we um we have a number

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of businesses I think, as you know and you and

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.079
<v Speaker 1>I have talked before. We obviously have our big corporate

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>investment bank with our business that serves governments, institutions, corporate

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>clients broadly, that's investment, banking, sales and trading UH and

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 1>there are clients given the uncertainty in the world, have

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>been very very active and we expect that activity to continue.

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>We also have a large asset management business. We're very

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>very significant asset manager globally around the world in almost

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>all products broadly, and we think there's a lot of

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for us to continue to help our clients in

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the asset management business and that's an area of growth

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 1>for us and something that we've been focused on. In addition,

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>we have a consumer wealth business that we're expanding, a

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>digital consumer business that we're trying to grow so that

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>we can serve a broader array of clients with respect

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.559
<v Speaker 1>to all their financial leads digitally, and we're very focused

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>on the growth of that business. So those are three

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>big platforms broadly, and we see growth opportunities and all

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>three of them as we move forward, and we're gonna

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.319
<v Speaker 1>work hard to help our clients manage their financial needs

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>because that's that's a big part of what we do

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>on a day to day basis. You know, even after

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic, you still have all this excess capital. What

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna do with all of that. Well, we're

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>making investments in our business, as we just discussed, and

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that obviously requires capital. Um We have not been able

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to return capital to shareholders during the course of this

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>year because we took that action with a number of

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the other large banks back in the spring because we

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't think it's appropriate. We probably are in a position

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to start that at some point one and so we

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>will consider, uh, you know, we will consider both investments

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and return of capital as appropriate as we've forward. Also

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 1>be watching for deals. Thank you so much David for

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>joining us in a tone best thank you so much

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>with the leader of Goldman Sex and again extraordinary year

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>for Goldman Sex. You wonder what two one will bring

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>James everything, because with everything standard, he's given us wonderful

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>perspective across assets as well. James, how have you already

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>rewritten your two thousand twenty one outlook morning, Tom? Thankfully

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I haven't had to just yet. Um, it was obviously

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a very strong market consensus coming into this year that

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>we were going to see really a very happy market environment,

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>with everything risk facing and cyclical performing extremely well, and

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>possibly a steady but low volatility, and in no way

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>concerning rising in treasury yields and steepening of the curve

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the dollar. I think everybody wants to be selling the dollar.

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>There are inje of views as to how far that

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>will move. You mentioned City. I think that they're up

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>there with one of the bigger moves that they're forecasting.

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:09.839
<v Speaker 1>But that's all part of the saint market environment of

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>risk on. And then yesterday happened, and and already I

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>can I can imagine that some people might be sweating

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a little about the one cause, but we've been cautious

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and defensive and circumspect about the economic how look, certainly

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>for the first half of the year, so nothing that

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>happened yesterday has changed James. We just hit on Russ

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>coster Rich of black Rock, who's taken a massive victory

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>lap on a on A two thousand twenty where his

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>portfolio was up plus. You know, really extraordinary when you

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>look at everybody's returns mixed in. Mr Costrich mentioned a

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Barbell strategy, and I would compare that to a diversified strategy.

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Discuss how you're approaching that. Are we diversified in two

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty one or do we make bets within an

0:14:56.760 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>equity Barbell strategy. Sometimes diversification seems to be seen as

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a dirty word. People make ex post comparisons against the

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>best performing asset or asset class and say, well, if

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you didn't achieve that return, then then what you've achieved

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>is not not acceptable. The reality is that long term

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>performance is achieved not by being top top percentile one

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>year and bottom percentile the next, but by sticking around

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the pack um and chipping away at

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>those returns over a long period, and diversification is a

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>way of achieving that. Now, in the current market environment,

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>diversification is difficult because we have very slim number of

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>themes driving markets and a high degree of of correlation

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>across assets in relation to those macro themes. But that

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that there aren't diversification benefits and there aren't

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>ways of diversifying side. Still highly recommend that, you know,

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority of investors should be diversifying wherever possible

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 1>across assets, and that includes you know, things like precious metals,

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and if you're that way inclined, potentially even things like

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency that I have to say, I am skeptical on

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that front. Wait, hold on a second. We're not going

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to let you go mentioning bitcoin just sort of on

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the side here as a potential alternative. Are you seriously

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>considering this going forward if there is more stability and

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>say bitcoin, No, not really, because I still don't see

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the use case as being convincing in the slightest. You know,

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the big advantages apparently of bitcoin is that

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>it has limited supply, and that's true, but cryptocurrencies do

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>not have limited supply. So given that the blockchain is

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty open source, what is really to prevent an alternative

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to bitcoin appearing and having another twenty one million coins available?

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>There is nothing really to prevent that, given that you

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>can't pay your taxes in bitcoin, and it's volatility relative

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to the kinds of fear currency that you do pay

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>your taxes in is incredible. It really isn't a store

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of value that can be used on a day to

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>day basis at the moment. Anyway, I think the case

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>for Bitcoin today, and the one that seems to be

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>driving the price in dramatic fashion, it is merely that

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>thea currency is being played with by central banks to

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>an extreme that we really haven't seen in the Western world.

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>And therefore the chances of fear currency across the board

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 1>losing its value, not relative to one another, but all

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of them, is meaningful and people are saying, well, what

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:19.719
<v Speaker 1>can I invest in that doesn't involve me being denominated

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in fear currency? And so Bitcoin, you know, it does

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:26.640
<v Speaker 1>satisfy I think that requirement, but without a use case,

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I still struggle to believe that that is a long

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>term investment that I believe truly has value. I've got

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to say, I haven't heard a lot of people talk

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:36.239
<v Speaker 1>about how you can't pay taxes in bitcoin and how

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a potential detraction for the crypto acid. I

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>will say yesterday's sell off was sort of heralded as

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:44.479
<v Speaker 1>some as bringing risk back to the market. What did

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you make of it? Yeah, it was a funny one, really,

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't it. I Mean there are a number of again

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:52.439
<v Speaker 1>expost rationalizations as to why I guess my on a

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 1>daily basis, Obviously we have no idea. Excuse me, we

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>have no idea really what drives markets. But I would

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>just look at the preponderance of things which are going

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 1>on macro, political, technical, in financial markets and inequity markets

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.199
<v Speaker 1>in particular, and say that we were really at some

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 1>extremes in terms of what was implicitly being discanted or

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>priced or expected by markets. They really were managing to

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>see the best in everything um and that includes some

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, some well known tech companies which have got

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 1>astronomical valuations, but some not very well known tech companies

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>which have got astronomical valuations as well. And so the

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>combination of these things I think meant that we had

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a market which was particularly fragile, and I still think

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it is particularly fragile. I don't think it's going to

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 1>take much in terms of disappointment to see some further

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 1>froth coming out of equities James, the gloom crew is

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>out in force. You're not part of that crew. Can

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you see a bear market coming? I mean all the fundamentally,

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>all the conditions really have been there for a bear

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>market for quite some time, because in spite of what

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>we've seen, equities have managed to maintain a complete disconnect

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>from the real world. And all the people are doing

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>is trying to expost justify that by saying, well, the

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 1>equity market has never been the real economy. But that's

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>not really true. Over long periods of time, there is

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 1>absolutely a link between economic activity UM and company revenues.

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>There has to be. That's inevitable UM. So it's not

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a question of you know, the conditions being there today necessarily,

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 1>because that's looking for triggers, and we've always said that

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>triggers are difficult to identify until you see them in

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the rear view mirror. For me, it's about identifying where

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>there are risks and fragilities, and I think there are

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:33.640
<v Speaker 1>so many of those that we don't have long enough

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to cover them all. Really, James Afi, thank you so much.

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Just a lot of elveryn in standard investment senior investment manager.

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Right now, the gentleman has given us the greatest leadership

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>during this pandemic. Peter ots of conversations of February and

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>March at Baylor College, and of course he has received

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine. No shark there, Peter ote Is. To go

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>to the directness of it, What was it like the

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>jab in the arm? That was? It was fine? Tom,

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for asking. You know, it was uh that evening.

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I had some arm soreness and somebody aches, maybe even

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of low grade fever um the next morning,

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a little achy by mid morning the next day. Totally fine.

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>So no worse than any other adult vaccination, no worse

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>than mastion gricks. Like in the cable TV business, Peter Hotez,

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and you've been everywhere on cable TV informing America. It's

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 1>about the cable of the last mile. We're at the

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:36.360
<v Speaker 1>last mile now on vaccines. We're trying to get vaccines

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>worldwide to people, and we're not doing very well at it.

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Are you surprised? Yeah, I'm actually profoundly disappointed Tom. It

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>we're now starting to realize the reality that there is

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>no national strategy in the United States to vaccinate the

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>US population. You know, everything we've heard about with operation

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>work speed around the logistics. What they were really talking

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>about was the logistics of getting boxes onto the ups

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and FedEx trucks and FedEx planes and and ensuring that

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>there was no violation of the freezer chain, and but

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that there was no plan after that to vaccinate the

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>American people. I remember Alan Meltzer, where the freezer in

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the corner in the fifties, Peter Hotez, we got from

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Sock to Sabin, and now we've got to get out

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to Hotez and your low cost vaccine. Why could we

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>do this with other things and we can't do it

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>with COVID nineteen. You know, this has been the story

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of We've come up small every time in terms of

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 1>our public health response and an absence of a national strategy.

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>We muffed on the diagnostic testing. We never did hold

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>of virus genomic sequencing at the level that we needed

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to like to have in the UK or Australia. And

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:50.159
<v Speaker 1>this is just more of the same assist insistence that

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the States have to be in the lead when we

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>know they don't have the epidemiology and scientific horsepower to

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>know how to lead this and we need the intervention

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 1>of the federal government, and now we've got to vaccinate

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>tom The estimates are we want to vaccinate two d

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>forty million Americans, three quarters of the US population to

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 1>interrupt transmission by stay September one. That's one to one

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>point five million Americans every day from now until September one.

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>So far, we've vaccinated about four millions. So we need

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to step up. This is our last chance, really, because

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, the US government has backed us into a

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>corner without any national containment strategy. They've now said, we've

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>got to vaccinate our way out of this, and that's

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>what we have to do. We have to find a

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:33.880
<v Speaker 1>way to stop coming up small and and and get

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 1>this done. Doctor, who does can we quantify some of

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 1>what you're talking about in terms of when the pandemic will,

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>for all intents and purposes be over based on the

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>vaccination schedule that you see versus what it could have

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>been over in the United States had there been a

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>plan that you think would have been more adequate. Well,

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think right now what we need to

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 1>focus on is getting the US population vaccinated by the summer.

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>That's the only way we're going to interrupt virus trans mission.

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's a really high bar. You know, again, three

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>quarters of the US population. That's that's our estimate with

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a group of city University of New York, that's two

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty million Americans. Let me give you an

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>example of New York City. Let's say the metro area

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>is eighteen million people. That's a roughly twelve million New

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Yorkers that we have to vaccinate by the summer. That's uh,

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>what is that's two million vaccinations every month. That's five

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand per week. We're not going to get there,

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, with people calling up Dwayne Reid and write

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>aid in Sam's Club and saying, do you have vaccination

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>vaccine for my mom and dad? Or the hospital change.

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>We're going to have to open up City fielding Yankee

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Stadium and create a high throughput mechanism for making this happen.

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's just shocking that there seems to be this

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>lack of situational awareness across the country that this is

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>what we need to do. Lisa, do you see how

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Hotess does a math there? That's why he's Peter Hotests

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:58.159
<v Speaker 1>and we're not. He's pounded through the math down to

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:01.239
<v Speaker 1>per hour vaccinations. We talk about the math of the

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>dosing of some of these vaccines. Dr Hotels, There's been

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>some discussion not only just about the distribution mechanism that

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about, but also about the supplies, whether we

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>have enough to get two rounds of vaccinations to that

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>critical mass of population, with some proposals now saying reduce

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>the dosing and it will be just as effective. What's

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 1>your take on that. My take is the evidence space

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 1>is not there to support that. The Phase three trials

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 1>were done with a very deliberate dose and a very

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>delifferent schedule. That's what the company CEOs have said. This,

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 1>at least a visor ceo. This is what Dr Fauci

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>has said. We know what works, and anytime you monkey

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.679
<v Speaker 1>with either dose or schedule, you're introducing an enormous amount

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 1>of risk to give vaccine that won't work as well.

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>So all you'll do by that is take a crummy

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>vaccination infrastructure and instead of giving delivering a good vaccine

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and reliable vaccine, you'll introduce one that is less than optimal.

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 1>It makes no sense. So we knew that the m

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:00.400
<v Speaker 1>R and A technology is as still image or it's

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:02.640
<v Speaker 1>not really robust enough to do the whole job. That's

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>why the whole plan for Operation Warp Speed was to

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>bring in the Adamo virus vaccines or or their particle vaccines.

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Are are vaccine and that's what we need to focus on,

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 1>getting an additional vaccines, not turning a good vaccine into

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 1>a mediocre one. Dr. Hote is just to put a

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.719
<v Speaker 1>bow on everything that you said that is so profound.

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 1>How much of the slowdown and distribution of vaccines is

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>due to a lack of a federal plan and how

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>much is due to a supply issue of the vaccines

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 1>and how quickly we can get them online. Well, clearly

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:34.360
<v Speaker 1>there's no federal plan and you're never going to get

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:37.400
<v Speaker 1>there unless you have that roadmap, unless you have an

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>over our arching infrastructure. So we have to fix the infrastructure.

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>That's absolutely paramount. There are going to be supply chain issues. Look,

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be lots of bumps in this road. We

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>also have to have a communication strategy. But right now,

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:52.919
<v Speaker 1>to me, it's less about the dosing and the supply

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 1>chain than it is not having the infrastructure to vaccinate

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>lots of people. Feuterre Hotel's amount of time, But I've

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>got to ask about the shock of lining them up

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>at Yankee Stadium. You want us to get in line

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.360
<v Speaker 1>at Yankee Stadium will affects that at the state level

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of the city level, or is that at the federal level,

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 1>And you have to do it safely, and you have

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to have medical personnel there in case there's a severe

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 1>allergic reaction. It's gonna be It's doable, but it's complicated,

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and uh, right now, I don't know who. I don't

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>know where the leadership comes in. Clearly we're gonna need

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>federal support. They're not the dollars there, I don't think

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>at the local and state level to make that happen.

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 1>So there's got to be an appropriation from Congress to

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 1>help with that, and a lot of the logistics are

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>probably going to have to come from the state. Maybe

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>bringing the National Guard would be helpful, but we're going

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to have to provide some uh, you know, reinforce homeland

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 1>security a little bit. Make people feel comfortable knowing that

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 1>they're taking care of you know, people are frantic now

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.159
<v Speaker 1>calling pharmacies and doctors saying how do I get my

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>mom and dad vaccinated and my brother and sister and

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the line's busy or it's it's really it's beyond freshmanting.

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I gotta leave it there. Dr hote Us, thank you

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>for showing us your vaccination. We greatly appreciate it. With

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Baylor College of Medicine, this is a joy. Tina Forda

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>is one of the clearest thinkers we have on synthesizing

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the moment, and I love her word here. I never

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 1>can pronounce it correctly, but I'll go there. Fibrial f

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 1>E b R I L E. It's almost a medical

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 1>concoction around the pandemic and those horrific fevers people get

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>with the pandemic, and yet it's our political fever of

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the moment. In Tina, within your research, note what I

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 1>love that you do as you focus on the Democratic

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Party experiment, where is the middle ground of the Democratic Party?

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>As we staggered these two votes in Georgia. Well, if

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the policy agenda, I mean, I actually

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>think even if Democrats pull off a miracle um in

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the Georgia Senate race today, UM Joe Biden is going

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a weaker president than certainly would like to be,

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and that his numbers suggest when it comes to the agenda,

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 1>this might be a relief for investors in terms of

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, um kind of raising taxes or more progressive

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>elements of the agenda, because even if they have that

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>tiny Senate majority, um, it's not going to be of

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the magnitude needed to do the more dramatic stuff. If

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it is a more conservative America over the last thirty

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 1>forty fifty years, is the Democratic Party adjusted to it

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 1>so they can commit policy. These are very highly charged

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>terms in in the US context. Remember, you know, I'm

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>an American has been living in Europe for twenty years,

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>which I realized it makes me suspicious in some way.

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the kinds of policies that are on the

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>so called more progressive agenda, like healthcare, like um, you know,

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>family leave and a stronger social contract would help the US.

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>For example, whether the pandemic and what we're seeing played

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>out in Georgia in a microcosm, is a lot of

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>why we're having such a difficult time as a nation

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>fighting this pandemic. It's low trust, its lack of legitimacy,

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it's polarization over the kinds of policies that, frankly, Tom

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>are are not in dispute in the rest of the world. Tina,

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>how much does the certification of the election outcome of

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the electoral College vote tomorrow in Washington, d C. And

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the questions circulating around that, how much does

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the question mark around that challenge the democratic nature of

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 1>this country in a way that we really haven't seen before.

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the answer is twofold. A lot of my

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>investor clients are are are asking me this question. You know,

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>how important is it? Well, from the point of view

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of the erosion of democratic norms, it's really meaningful and um, However,

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>it won't overturn the final result. What it adds to

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that forty percent of Republicans believe that

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:07.479
<v Speaker 1>Biden was not legitimately elected, even though every one of

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the Trump campaign's fifty legal challenges was overturned. This means

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that misinformation and disinformation works, um, and it does have

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>have an impact on policy. Can you give us a

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>sense of how this could change something specific about policy

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 1>going forward, especially given the fact that social media intervention

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 1>probably is happing to go away anytime soon. Uh No,

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not so. What it means, for example, is that

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>vaccine rollout efforts are are clouded and compromised by this

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>sense that they might be part of a liberal agenda,

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a liberal progressive agenda, right, that people don't believe that

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the state has the authority to do this, and we saw,

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, so what's the impact on the SMP. It's indirect,

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>but we saw that yesterday UM equities softened on on

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the back of I rocketing numbers, and so there is

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 1>an interplay with a concrete impact on markets. Tina, I've

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>got to rip up the script and it has to

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>be about Mr mccrawl. I am absolutely fascinated by France

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 1>with vaccines. If I think five hundred or six hundred vaccines,

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember the details, but to be Mr McCary

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>is an incredibly key player of a tumultuous two thousand

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty one. Does he have a strategy, Well, he absolutely

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 1>does have a strategy. At the moment, he's trying to

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>balance his own kind of lunatic fringe UM the National

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Front having been at a minor level anti vax for

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, and the French public is also

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 1>strikingly one of the most of of developed world countries

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>populations that are most vaccine hesitants. Now, ultimately, I suspect

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you'll see it in higher numbers also in the US.

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>But he's got big problems. He also has uh some

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 1>regional elections this year to to contend with, and we're

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>about to start the European election cycle. It's Germany this year,

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 1>France not till till after that. But he's fighting for

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>his political life, and he's borrowing a few pages out

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of the far right hand book. I mean, a bit

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a bit distant for America, but just absolutely extraordinary. And

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I've heard this consistently, the fight for political life. Tina Fordham,

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Avaner's had a global political strategy.

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:35.479
<v Speaker 1>We continue, of course, with Eurasia's top risks to one

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and Thomas story that of course has captured both of

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>our imaginations. The New York Stock Exchange reversing plans to

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>delist three of the largest state owned Chinese telecom companies.

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 1>That's backtracking on the decision just four days after it's unveiling.

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 1>The measure also threatens to tescalate tensions between Washington and Beijing,

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 1>falling combiance with the Trump administration executive order. The reasons

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>for this reversal at the moment remain unclearable. Joining his

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>as Michael Herson. He's your AGA Group practice head for

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>China and Northeast Asia. Michael, thank you for joining us.

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 1>And before we get to the top risks and how

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that plays out with the U S and China, what's

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly happening in the New York Stock Exchange? Well, I

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know the full story behind the scenes, but I

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>think frankly, what we're seeing here is the inter agency

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 1>turf fight within the Trump administration as to how this

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 1>executive order is going to be implemented, and the guidance

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>has been unclear, and so what we saw from the

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>New York Stock Exchanges first a assumption that this is

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be sweeping and that they would be forced

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to delist these companies, and then with further guidance from Treasury,

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>which has been somewhat on the back foot in this

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 1>whole process, they have drawn the conclusion that, in fact, no,

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 1>they don't have to go that far. So I think

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're seeing is this slow guidance coming out

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 1>as first the hardliners in the administration had pushed this move,

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and now Treasury has had the opportunity need to try

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to limit the full extent of market disruption. What does

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 1>that mean, Michael, For how the Biden administration will will

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 1>deal with China, well, we'll have to see how the

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:16.239
<v Speaker 1>Biden team works with measures like this. I don't think

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to be particular fans of this executive order,

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:23.759
<v Speaker 1>partly because of how messy the processes, where you've got

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Defense deciding which companies should be banned

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>from essentially US financial markets, rather than the Treasury Department.

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:35.399
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think that this particular issue is going

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to be important enough for them to reverse it quickly.

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think we'll see this basically held in, you know,

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of in status quo, at least for the first

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 1>several months of the Biden administration, while they wrap it

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 1>into broader um, you know, broader review China strategy. Michael

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:54.760
<v Speaker 1>thom Keaton, New York, Good morning. I read an entirety

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the November twelfth executive Order by the President of the

0:34:57.280 --> 0:34:59.839
<v Speaker 1>United States this morning. I read the three documents by

0:34:59.840 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury Department as well. This is the most stunning

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:06.759
<v Speaker 1>thing I've seen in my present view of investment or

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 1>my reading of the history of the New York Stock

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Exchange going back at least to three if not two

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight years is let's cut to the chase. The

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 1>President did an executive order that looks like it was written,

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:23.360
<v Speaker 1>say by Navarro or someone else. I don't want to

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:27.399
<v Speaker 1>speculate on that, and they got crushed last night by

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Minution. Is that accurate? I think that's fairly accurate. Tom.

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 1>This executive order was rushed out. It's the type of

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 1>thing that usually would have been from the get go. Yeah.

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 1>But Michael, look, I don't mean to interrupt it. Come on,

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>it's thirty paragraphs. It was not rushed out. It was

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:51.320
<v Speaker 1>it was chiseled out by President Trump and his anti

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 1>China advisors. That's a fact everybody can agree on. Is

0:35:55.600 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>this gonna end with President Biden? Or do we consider

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:06.879
<v Speaker 1>do we continue these ad hoc procedures with President Biden? Oh? No, Tom,

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's going to be completely different under Biden.

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:12.839
<v Speaker 1>You this is the whole process of this executive order

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>is unprecedented. Thank you. You know clearly this in any

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:20.759
<v Speaker 1>normal I'd say, in any typical administration, this would have

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 1>come out with full guidance from Treasury. They were passive

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:27.360
<v Speaker 1>in this process. And as you said, the hardliners in

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the administration pushed this out with huge questions as to

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 1>how this, this novel executive order should be interpreted. And

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 1>so what we've seen more recently is a bit of

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a return to normalcy in the sense that the agency

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:43.319
<v Speaker 1>that's actually executing this Treasury has had to worry about

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 1>market disruption and fill in the details to Biden administration

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>will be much more predictable and conventional in this. So

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>your your raisier group top risks. Then how would you

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 1>suspect that China will respond to this? The language speaks

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Communist party they've got I don't have a

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 1>language in front of me, folks, but it's basedly military

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:03.840
<v Speaker 1>industrial complex. It reads like a Dick tod out of

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen fifties, the November twelfth Executive Order. How would

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>you expect Beijing to respond to such language? Do they

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:16.320
<v Speaker 1>just wait for Biden? Yes, they're going to wait for Biden,

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 1>and frankly, you know they can stomach. I think a

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:23.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of these ideological attacks so long as the practical

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 1>impact for China is limited, And let's be honest, this

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 1>executive order is not really going to deter Chinese military

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 1>linked companies from obtaining financing They've got plenty of financing

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 1>available from China's state owned banking system and from other

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 1>sources of finance. So with symbolic moves like this, you know,

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Beijing is willing to stomach some of this, especially, as

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you said, as they wait for Biden to come in

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and try to try to re establish some kind of

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:55.840
<v Speaker 1>stability for the relationship. Michael, what will stability look like?

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 1>And it was actually a surprise to see a lot

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of these, you know, Chinese companies on the U S

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 1>stock exchanges in the first place. Is it going to

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:06.319
<v Speaker 1>be a deterents you know, will Chinese companies just be

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 1>less present in the US de facto, I think that

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:12.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, the writing to some extent is on the

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:15.479
<v Speaker 1>wall here. Biden is not necessarily I mean, we don't

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:19.360
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to take as directly a confrontational approach

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 1>with the U S and China excuse me, towards China.

0:38:22.080 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 1>But the reason we included this as a top risk

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:28.240
<v Speaker 1>is that the broader underlying issues driving US China tensions

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 1>are still there. This is a very competitive relationship, it's

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:37.239
<v Speaker 1>got an increasingly ideological tinge, and none of this is

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:41.360
<v Speaker 1>going to change. So I think we will see growing tensions,

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:44.920
<v Speaker 1>increase tensions spilling into financial markets, but it's not going

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to be because the Biden administration is throwing out executive orders.

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 1>It will be more concerns about governance issues, about investors

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:57.759
<v Speaker 1>putting pressure on companies over for example, treatment of the weakers.

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be those kinds of I think deeper

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 1>um concerns than it's going to be um, you know,

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of bomb throwing so to speak, coming from Biden directly.

0:39:08.239 --> 0:39:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Michael Hurston, thank you so much, A hugely valuable brief

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:15.360
<v Speaker 1>on news made overnight. Is a Treasury Department really walks

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 1>back that executive order of November twelve, Mr Hurston, of course,

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:21.360
<v Speaker 1>with you raise your group. Thanks for listening to the

0:39:21.400 --> 0:39:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 1>or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:36.799
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio