WEBVTT - Chris McCann on Cryptocurrency in the Real World

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for downloading making a killing. I'm Bethany McLean, and

0:00:04.000 --> 0:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm cutting through the noise to reframe the stories you

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>know about and uncover the ones you don't know. I'll

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>admit it, until very recently, the word fiat mostly meant

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>cute little car. Okay, that's not quite fair, But if

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that sentence really resonates with you, you probably think more

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>about crypto than I ever did. I remember friends telling

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>me years ago that I had to buy bitcoin, but

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like a fad. There were too many unknowns.

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:36.279
<v Speaker 1>Fast forward eleven years, Bitcoin is celebrating double digit birthdays,

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>at least if you're counting from Halloween two thousand and eight,

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>when Satoshi Nakamoto first anonymously released his white paper Bitcoin

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Appeer to peer Electronic Cash System. Now bitcoin is the

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>popular poster child or whipping boy for cryptocurrency in general.

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>There are still so many unknowns, yet companies and investors

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>are flocking to the space, despite so called crypto winters

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>when bitcoin prices have crashed. Major global leaders are now

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:10.199
<v Speaker 1>making significant bets on the space. Starbucks, Microsoft, Visa, Facebook,

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the entire nation of China. Gone are the days of

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>cyberpunks and computer science majors being the only ones in

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>on the joke. But is it a joke? Digital assets

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>are still in their infancy, yet it also feels like

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>we're at a tipping point. What happens if cryptocurrencies totally

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>upend the real financial markets? Is real? Even the right word?

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Are we in danger of that? I've learned never to

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 1>look at any technology in isolation, and when I look

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:40.639
<v Speaker 1>at something like cryptocurrency, I think about the radiant effect

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it might have on how we transact in our everyday lives,

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>how we value things, what the bigger effect might be

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>on capital markets, trade relations, the US dollar. Today I'm

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>in a San Francisco studio and my guest today is

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Chris McCann, an investor at proof of Capital, which recently

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>announced a fifty million dollar fund to invest in blockchain

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and crypto related companies. I can't think of a better

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>person to discuss the future of bitcoin with. Before we

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>dive into all things crypto, I want to understand you

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and how you fit into this ecosystem. So tell us

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>how did you get interested in crypto? So back in

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 1>early twenty thirteen, I bought my first bitcoin, and the

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>way I found out about it was, I guess so

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>much to a lot of people in Silicon Valley. It

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>was on a sort of random internet thread in hacker

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>news if you know what that is. Yeah, And so

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I started looking into it, and then I stumbled upon

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 1>like Silk Road and sort of tour and sort of

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff. But the thing that sort of fascinated

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>me the most was not necessarily the marketplace, where I

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>was like, what is this thing? Everybody's paying each other

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and like what is this bitcoin thing? And so it

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>just sort of sparked my curiosity, and then I first

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>bought a little bit, and then at the time I

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>recently enjoined Greylock Partners, which is a more sort of

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>traditional venture fund in the space, and so back in

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the twenty fourteen fifteen time frame, invested in Blockstream, Zappo,

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and coin Base, three sort of companies within the bitcoin space.

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>And that really forced me to not look at it

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>just from a more pure sort of currency angle, but

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:13.639
<v Speaker 1>more the actual companies, the operators, the developers, and sort

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of more like the overall market landscape, and long story short,

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I just really sort of fell in love with this

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>category for a whole bunch of reasons. Yep, and what

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>made you say though that this made sense as an

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>investment as a startup landscape rather than is just a

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of intellectual curiosity. I think bitcoin in sort of

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency as as a whole is actually very very different

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>than a traditional investment per se. One of the analogies

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I like to use is imagine if you're in a

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>more traditional, you know, investment role, you know, venture capital firm,

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and you're looking at this bitcoin thing, and like, let's

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>say you actually, you know, believe in the thesis and

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of the overall story. One of your first questions

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>might actually be like, Hey, this bitcoin thing is cool.

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Can we have the founder the CEO come and pitch us? Right?

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>And no such thing? No such thing. So you're like, okay,

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Like that's a little weird, but I can get over that.

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Can I buy like equity in this company? All right? No? Okay,

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>who's on the board? Okay? Fine? I get over all that.

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, if I buy some of this bitcoin thing,

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 1>what governance decisions do I get? Who actually controls this thing? Okay? Fine?

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>All that? How do I actually store this thing? All

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>like very normal traditional questions, But bitcoin is very counter

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to all of that, which again, it's a very simple analogy,

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>but I think that's like a That's a major reason

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>why I think a lot of people have a lot

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of difficulty with this is you almost sort of have

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:45.359
<v Speaker 1>to suspend your disbelief to a certain extent and treat

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>this as kind of its own net new thing. Back

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>then it was much more of a curiosity sake in

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>wanting to learn more. But much more over the time

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and sort of have this market developed, and as I

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>meant more people in the space, I've become much much

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>more convicted that this isn't just a fat or fly

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>by night thing like this is a much more real

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:07.599
<v Speaker 1>market landscape that I don't feel enough people are really

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>spending the time and paying attention towards. Is there some

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>way in which this grew out of the global financial

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 1>crisis of two thousand and eight and a lack of

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>trust in the financial system as it is, and does

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>that form part of the founding principles of bitcoin? Or

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>am I just reaching actually very much? Is so bitcoin?

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 1>The first initial white paper and the first initial code

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>implementation and was launched in two thousand and nine. It

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 1>was actually very much a response to all the stuff

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.679
<v Speaker 1>we were seeing in the global financial system at the time. Again,

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 1>the founder of Stosi, Nakamoto, is unknown, so you know,

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you kind of have to read into the tea leaves

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:41.239
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and a lot of his public form comments.

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>You can't ask him or her directly. And then the

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>other interesting thing is actually in the first transaction, so

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>they call it like the Genesis transaction when you look

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>actually look at like the hex code behind it, embedded

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>in that is I think at the time there was

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>a newspaper article about some sort of problem with one

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>of the central banks in the United Kingdom, so that's

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>actually embedded into it. So a lot of people sort

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of again read the tea leaves and say like, hey,

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.280
<v Speaker 1>this is actually a direct kind of correlation to it.

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>So there definitely is a large contingency of people that

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>just treat this as a more kind of call it

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>sound form of money, and they very very much kind

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of buy into this thesas I was like the main

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of front and center, call it more like cipher

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>punks kind of more people on the next gen sort

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:32.679
<v Speaker 1>of own financial rails, kind of its own form of currency.

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>But now that it's it's a much much bigger market,

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you have much more traditional players from you know, Facebook

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to JP Morgans now even like large parts of the

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:43.599
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government sort of getting involved in getting involved into

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 1>all this. So I would say the philosophical part is

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>still a very important contingency, however, not the only one today.

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's such a major migration in a really short

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>amount of time. How does that happen? How does it

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 1>go from being this fringe thing celebrated by hackers and

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>thebertarians to being very mainstream. How would you chart the

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>key moments in that evolution. Yeah, no, it's a really

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 1>good question because, yeah, back in twenty thirteen, like when

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>we were looking into a lot of this stuff, nobody

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>could have imagined the amount of just interests in development

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in the space today. I think at the time there's

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:21.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people theorizing you maybe at some point

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of the central bank governments would treat this more

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>seriously and maybe even like buy bitcoin to put on

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet. But that was such a fringe for sort

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of out there notion. But literally within the span of

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>ten years we've actually seen this only been a decade,

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's actually pretty remarkable. Yeah, like now you're starting

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to see much more of the larger, legitimate financial institutions,

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>technical institutions, and even governments from around the world do

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>real serious pilots in the space. Again, a lot of

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the stuff is still experimental and kind of early and

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>a little weird, but like you're for the first time,

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you're actually starting to see real institutions treat the space

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>as serious, not just like this really weird fringe thing.

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Is the world of crypto a world of competing platforms

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and technologies or is it a world of cooperating platforms

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and technologies. As much as I would love to say cooperating,

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>most of the times, it feels more competitive when you

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>add in a lot of the more philosophical and I

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>almost feel sometimes more religious beliefs into and any one

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of these. Yeah, and definitely, and probably what also compounds

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>this thing is you have a lot of these philosophical beliefs,

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>but then you also buy whatever your choice of asset is,

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>so then you actually really really feel strongly about it

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>because your money's on the line. So people almost shoot

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it kind of like a religion sometimes, and you have

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>people on very different sort of camps that literally will

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>not even listen to an argument or not even you know,

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>take other sides or not even be empirical about this. Wow,

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>And does the divide generally fall among among uses for it,

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>does it fall among sort of strictly technical arguments, or

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:07.839
<v Speaker 1>does it fall on these philosophical lines like this is

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>what bitcoin was supposed to be and how can it

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>be corrupted or co opted by the mainstream financial system.

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd say it's a little bit of all the above. Okay.

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:18.559
<v Speaker 1>So in terms of like the bigger camps that are

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>out there, you definitely have the people on the bitcoin side,

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>you have the people on the ethereum side. There's a

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>whole other world of call it more people in the

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>traditional financial institutions, you know, mostly in York and Chicago,

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>that are trying to take all this stuff and fit

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>this into the existing system. Some people in the corrupted

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>world love this because it would bring actual more distribution

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and adoption. Some people hate this because this is the

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>almost antithesis of Okay, it's anathema right to the original

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:47.079
<v Speaker 1>founding belief of what they've built this for. And then

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you have another almost separate sidecamp that more like blockchain

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>for enterprise applications like supply chains, or like identity networks

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.839
<v Speaker 1>or sort of any of the consortiums or any of

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>these kind of things that's like its own separate side view.

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes a lot of these different camps, a lot

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of them have religious and philosophical debates amongst one another,

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and also to some extent, like a lot of them

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>don't even necessarily speak the whole the same language. And

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of people treat the blockchain or cryptospace

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>in general as like this one monolithic thing. But the

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>more and more time you spend with the actual people

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>building this, it's actually much much much more divided than

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you might think, and the feature is much much much

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>less clear than you might think. That's really interesting analogous

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, at least in the first part of it,

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to the financial system, which seems monolithic to people on

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the outside, but is actually composed of all these warring

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and very differently motivated entities. Right, So in some ways

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>there's an analogy there. I guess where does bitcoin fit

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>into this, fear? Do you still think of it as

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the critical part of this universe or do you think

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of it as a little corner of the universe that

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>has since been eclipsed by all sorts of other more

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting developments. Yeah, so before this actually pulled some quick stats.

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>So one, if you look at the overall market today,

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is still sixty six percent of the total cryptocurrency market. Wow,

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that's bitcoin. So Bitcoin has been dominant, and it's still

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.479
<v Speaker 1>very dominant, and that market share has actually been increasing.

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>So bitcoin alone, the asset as a whole, is worth

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and sixty eight billion dollars. There's three thousand

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to six thousand other tokens out there, depending on sort

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of what you look at, but by and large, bitcoin

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>has the most dominant market share. And so again I

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's easy to get distracted by a lot of

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the new and emerging and sort of smart contracting, all

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>this other stuff out there. But again, just when you

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>look kind of empirically at the market, bitcoin is still

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>buy and large the biggest one. That's really surprising to me.

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>So you've likened to where we are in the crypto

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>revolution to the early nineties, mid nineties and the Internet revolution.

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Talk about that a little bit. So about call it

0:11:54.760 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty to forty million people worldwide in total probably have

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>store own or whole cryptocurrencies in totality. That's probably a rough,

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>rough measure and that number's granted about twenty percent per year,

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>again with the caveats of sometimes during the crazy periods

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>it grows very very fast. Sometimes it drops much lower,

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>but that's kind of a volatility as part of the

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 1>name of the game, right. Yeah, that's kind of a rough,

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:29.079
<v Speaker 1>summed out estimation on the space. And that's analogous too

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the number of users and the growth

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>rate to the mid nineties Internet. In my post you

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>have the second portion, I was trying to plot that again,

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>how big is this space currently and how does that

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>look like to the Internet landscape. So again with all

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:46.839
<v Speaker 1>of that assumptions and kind of roughness to it, Yeah,

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 1>we look like we're closer to nineteen ninety two to

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety four, even though we had the crazy run

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>up that looked like the dot com. When you actually

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>just look at the raw number of people interacting with

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the system, it's still a smaller subset of people. So

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.559
<v Speaker 1>we're still in that early phase, even though for a

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of people in the space that might not necessarily

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>feel like that. But we're still kind of very much

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>in that early adopter phase. We've not really moved over

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to the earlier late majority what are the areas that

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you guys are most excited about. You mentioned all these possibilities.

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>What are the things that you're seeing real usage and

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that you're seeing the most opportunity and are the most

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>excitement around. Yeah, So from a proof of capital fund standpoint,

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:32.199
<v Speaker 1>there's three broad areas we tend to gravitate towards. So

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>there's one sort of all use cases around fintech and

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>financial infrastructure, so think like exchanges, derivatives, wallets, lending, merchants, payments,

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of that whole world. It's the use case where

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>we see the much more real traction in terms of

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>like real volume and real payments, sort of real things

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:55.199
<v Speaker 1>flowing through. Secondly, which is a slightly unique tess, is

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.199
<v Speaker 1>we actually look at a lot of things on pull

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>it the mining side, so mining, mutation, A six hardware,

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>These are all the things that actually provide all the

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>security guarantees for all the public open blockchains. You see

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:11.479
<v Speaker 1>most of the sectors tends to be mostly located in Asia,

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>so from proof of capital we do about half investments

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:17.199
<v Speaker 1>half Asia, half US. And then the third category we

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>tend to gravitate towards is things on the privacy and

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>self sovereignty application side, so not necessarily the new privacy protocols,

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>but the things more real people could use. So think

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>like VPNs, secure messaging clients. Browser is kind of that

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>whole more application side of things. Pause now, and that

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>divide between the US and Asia and why that's important. Yeah,

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>So this is another thing that's if the asset class

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>in the space and the entrepreneurs is very different than

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, Web one or Web two. The other biggest

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>difference is the geographical dispersion of this. It's not Silicon Valley. Yeah,

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the basic answer. But yeah, when you looked at

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the most significant companies in the Web

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>two space, they all were mostly located thirty miles around

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley. Sure there were some pockets and you know

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a few other locations around the US, but a lot

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of the innovation and entrepreneurs and larger companies and everything

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>tended to be in this space. Bitcoin and crypto very

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>much challenge this notion where when you actually look at

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the entrepreneurs and where people are, Silicon Valley is a hub,

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>but not the only one. In fact, I would actually

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>very much argue that in this space, Asia actually plays

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a much much more important role because when you actually

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>look at a lot of the trading volume and distribution

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and usage of this, it's actually mostly in Asia, not

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>so much in the US. So while a lot of

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the technology and protocol developers and that side of the

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>world still might be located here or visit here, a

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of the real activities actually mostly going on in Asia.

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>And why is that? Yeah, another quick, very overgeneralized analogy.

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>So one, when you talk about you know, bitcoin and

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>all this cryptospace to a developer in Silicon Valley very generalistically,

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>most people's reactions are, this is really cool. What can

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I use this for? What applications could I build? How

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>is the protocol constructor to tell me about the rules,

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>show me the code. When you say this exact same

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>story to somebody in call it Hong Kong, let's be

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>very general and you say, hey, we have this you

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>know new thing. It has an asset, it's like you know, traded,

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>it's on all these different exchanges. The purse the over

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>generalization person in Hong Kong would say, Okay, that's cool.

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I get it. There's almost no question about what do

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you use it for? Like, what applications can you build?

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>They're like, Nope, this is an asset that trades, that

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>has a price that is independent of all the other

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>things before, and then it's return profile also tends to

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>be very discorrelated with everything else, so it doesn't really

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>follow equities or debts. It kind of just does its

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>own thing. And you know, traders and speculators and quant

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>funds and financial people, they totally get that. In are

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 1>just much more inherently natively comfortable with that fact. Are

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>there some sort of cultural or personal associations with what

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>money is that dictate that? Do you think? Two things?

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I had two other partners, so Edith Young's used to

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 1>be gp AT five unders start ups doing a lot

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.880
<v Speaker 1>of their China and Asia investments. And our third partner's

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>name is Phil Chen used to be a gp AT

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Horizon Adventures with le Cushing and Hong Kong. So they're

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>much more equipped to like talk about a lot of

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the cultural aspects. But two sort of things that they're

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>out there. One is, in general, there tends to be

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot less investment products. So in a lot of

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the specific countries, like even in Korea, for example, it

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>was actually much harder to get access to the equity markets,

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it was much harder to do a lot of the

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>things that people were doing in the US, so there

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of pent up demand for something new.

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>And then maybe a second point is in general, like

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>say specifically like mainland China, people there tend to be

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:02.479
<v Speaker 1>much more comfortable with just purely digital currencies. Like actually,

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 1>when you even look at the primary forms of moving

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 1>money in China is mainly we chat and alipay, and

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>in that form, like there is almost no physicality to it.

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>It's all on a phone, it's all sens people, it's

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>all through QR codes. So if you have something like

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a bitcoin which has no physical form or not, like

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>they they're just more inherent inherently. Okay with that that concept,

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if there's something to it that because the

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>US dollar has been the reserve currency of the world,

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that there's something about moving away from that in the

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>in the US. There might be some sort of interesting

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>cultural underpinning there. But that's just pure speculation. I just

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:40.199
<v Speaker 1>just just thinking thinking out loud. Have you during your

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:43.120
<v Speaker 1>your adventures, I'm just going to call them adventures in cryptocurrency,

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>has it changed the way you think about what money is? Yes,

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 1>and I've always had a little bit of this h

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>bias in me. One thing I actually don't talk about

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 1>all too much. But back in the two thousand and

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 1>seven two thousand and eight time frame, it's so much

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>much longer story. But me and are a really close

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 1>college friend of mine, we actually shorted a lot of

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>things in the housing in sort of financial space, didn't

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you You could have been a character in the big

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 1>short it was. It was aweso smaller amount. We're much

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>poor college students. We didn't raise like a big fund

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>or anything. I was. I tended to be a little

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>bit more distrustful of that side. But you don't view

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 1>money as this thing that just is that is absolutely solid,

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the way you might have if it hadn't been for

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>this experience. Yeah, that's probably fair to say. And again

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the just going back to to bitcoin,

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>what they do, which is a it's a very revolutionary concept,

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 1>but they take all of the preconditions and rules and

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>all that and they actually embedded into code and they

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>put it open source school you can read it, so

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't necessarily have to trust the people who are

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>building this or trust the founders. In fact, like the founders,

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>SOTOSI is completely unknown. You just read it for yourself

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and you see the fix. The supply sketch schedule of

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is fixed. There will only ever be twenty one

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 1>million bitcoin ever minted, and it has a very fixed

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.880
<v Speaker 1>supply schedule that has every like one to two years

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>or show depending on the mining schedule, where the issuance

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:17.120
<v Speaker 1>actually dropped. So all of that has actually known upfront

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>from day one. So what happens when the last one

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>is from mind? So right now, if you're a part

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>of the mining ecosystem, part of your reward comes from

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the It's actually called a coin based reward. That's actually

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>where coinbase gets its name from. Oh I didn't realize that.

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>So you get a coin based reward, so that's the

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin that is is minted for you solving a new block,

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and then you get the transaction reward. So those two

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>things together that's your revenue so to speak, for for

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 1>mining that block. So when the last bitcoin gets mine,

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>instead of having the coin based reward plus the transaction fee,

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>there will be no more coin based reward anymore, and

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>it'll just have to be purely subsidized by just the

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.719
<v Speaker 1>transaction fees. Okay, so it doesn't cease to exist at

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that point right now? Okay, back to that notion of

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>what you believe in and what is money? There is

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a great tweet on Twitter that someone said about gold

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>versus bitcoin. What do you believe in old shiny rocks

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 1>or breakthrough in human incentives that enable the new species

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of money? Right? I mean, there's a point to that.

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>And yet the thing I still get hung up on

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>is that with the US dollar, with a fiat currency,

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's backed by something. There's there's tax dollars behind it,

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's the government's ability to pay its bills.

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>So how does bitcoin just float out there without any

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 1>without any support? Am I thinking about that the wrong way? Yeah?

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.400
<v Speaker 1>So maybe two ways to answer that, one the more

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>philosophical way, one the more real empirical way. I tend

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to feel have that split on a lot of things.

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 1>I like that slot. So the much more philosophical version

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of that is, well, like, what truly is the dollar

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 1>backed by a long time ago? It ud be backed

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 1>by a gold standard, and you could actually redeem your

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars for amount of gold, And right now there's no

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 1>sting that individually backs it. Sure it's you know, it's

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>part of taxes. Sure, it's part of the US military,

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Sure it's it's it's it's a kingmaker as the worldwide

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 1>reserve currency. But again, all those are valuable, and all

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>of those are not necessarily going to stay forever, and

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>so you know, you can get into much much more

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>philosophical conversations like what is money and a lot of

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 1>people in the bitcoin space like go back to like

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>when people you know, treated like cshells like other sort

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of objects. Is money and money is really just a

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of a concept or figment of humanity to really

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>put a unit of account in. So when you actually

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>look into it, the definition is far more fuzzy than

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 1>you might think. Again, a more realistic standpoint is the

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 1>thing that actually really backs bitcoin specifically is actually all

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 1>of the all of the people in the mining ecosystem,

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.199
<v Speaker 1>because all of the people in the mining ecosystem have

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>to buy hardware, so specifically ASIC chips, they have to

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:58.160
<v Speaker 1>build these really huge facilities and do long term energy contracts,

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and so they are backs stopping or they have a

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>fixed price on the supply side of what it actually

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.880
<v Speaker 1>costs to generate a bitcoin, and so that price today

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is about call it six to seven thousand dollars, depending

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>on the energy sort of input in the system. So

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>miners in general have an incentive not to let it

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 1>fall before below that because their base cost for doing

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 1>it is that that price. So it's really sort of

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 1>that energy that mining in that hardware ecosystem that is

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:30.959
<v Speaker 1>giving it the security is also the supply input that

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>gives it its real world sort of value to it.

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>The short version that people say is mining ecosystem is

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>basically converting energy into bitcoin, and the real world cost

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of the energy is the thing that gives the bitcoin

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the price weight to it. So I see you could

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>get into a very deep philosophical argument about which is

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.199
<v Speaker 1>more real and which is more stable right between this,

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 1>But let's go back to this the intersection of these

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 1>two worlds. Now that you have these things colliding, where

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>you have whether it's the existence of an ex change

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and custody, or whether it's the idea that you have

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 1>this system that can convert crypto into US dollars and

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>these stable coins, how do these two worlds coexist and

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.479
<v Speaker 1>does that mean some inherent corruption of the crypto ideal?

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>So maybe answer the question in two parts one and

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a more broader long term time horizon. There's a certain

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>camp of people that want to fit bitcoin in the

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>cryptosystem into the traditional financial institutions. So think like there's

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a one of the more well known companies in the

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>space as a company called Backed, which is found in

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and started by Ice, which is the parent company that

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>owns the New York Stock Exchange. So back to I

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>think around one hundred sixty two hundred and eighty million dollars,

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>about as establishment as you can get, right as establishment

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>as you can get. They're doing exchange and sort of

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>features and options. They have a partnership with Starbucks, you

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>know for all this. To try to kind of fit

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>all this and put this into the purview of the

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:03.919
<v Speaker 1>traditional sort of financial system and fit it under the rules,

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of friction in this because, you know,

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>at its most basic level, then people start asking the question, well,

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:12.959
<v Speaker 1>like what is bitcoin? Is it a commodity, is it

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a currency, is it a asset? Is it a property?

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>It sort of has a little bit of everything. It's

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:23.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of not it's not one thing explicitly, So bitcoin

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>as a whole like doesn't really fit into an easy definition.

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 1>And what a lot of also people say in the

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:32.439
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin world is bitcoin is is what bitcoin does. Like

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really have a it doesn't have a need,

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have a want. It's not trying to be something.

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's trying to put its own definitional rules on it.

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>But no matter what you what you want, bitcoin is

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:44.400
<v Speaker 1>just going to keep doing what it does. I think,

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>so I think therefore I am. So there's definitely sort

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 1>of that side in that world. And then on the

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:54.120
<v Speaker 1>other hand, you actually have what I think is the

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:58.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of far more interesting side of the equation, where again,

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>when you actually look at a lot of the trading volume,

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>most of it actually tends to be outside the US,

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>And so what some exchanges are doing is like, well,

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll just lean into that and just completely cut off

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>all US users, and you know, maybe we'll set up

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>in Singapore or Hong Kong or mainland China or Malta

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>in sort of all these other places. So there's a

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>company that I was a personal and early investor and

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>called Binance Finance is a started office like just a

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>pure spot market exchange, although they've now branched off to

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>doing their own form of derivatives they have staking they

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>have their own decentralized exchange, and they actually created their

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>own currency that ties all this stuff together called it's

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.919
<v Speaker 1>called the Binance token, so B and B token. And

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 1>what gives the B and B token its value or

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 1>its weight is they actually take a portion of all

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the profits made through the exchange, and that goes to

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>buy back their own token so restrict the supply. So

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 1>almost think like a share buy back, although it doesn't

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.959
<v Speaker 1>have all that definition attached to it. So Binance as

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a whole this past year did a billion dollars in profit. Wow,

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>which again like for like taking a step back just

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:10.479
<v Speaker 1>as a pure empirical investor to see a company start

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>in less than two years to a billion dollars in profit,

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you almost never see that. No, that surpasses Amazon, Google everything, Right,

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:20.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's ever even been anything like that

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>in history before. Yeah, I don't know if anybody's actually

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>compared that. A lot of people show like the time

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.199
<v Speaker 1>to valuation and like the times of revenue, but like

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>this isn't just revenue literally profit of the exchange. So yeah,

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 1>you almost never never see this happen. And what makes

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 1>this company so interesting is they are purely tied to

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the call it pure bitcoin and crypto world. So what

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>actually makes this crazy is like they actually pay their

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>employees in the own b and be token. When you

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>look at where their company headquarters are, they don't have

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a place that they're in there. The whole team, I

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:57.880
<v Speaker 1>think there's three hundred people. They're literally distributed all over

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the place. There's no exact jurisdiction. All the employees are

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>getting paid. And like the native asset, all the traders

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of this are all mostly coming from not us, so

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:10.400
<v Speaker 1>all sort of natives to the crypto world. So another

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>contrasting vision of all this is it's going to take

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>some more time, but the entire bitcoin and cryptocurrency is

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 1>its own quasi micro ecosystem, and that economy is going

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>to grow in and of itself, and people could get

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 1>paid in bitcoin or crypto, people would spend in bitcoin

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>or crypto, and it's actually going to live apart and

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>outside of the system versus being one to one part

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of it. But will regulators around the world allow that

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to happen? Will governments around the world allow that to happen?

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess the following would be, can I stop it

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>from happening. But let's start with will Let's start with

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>will they allow it to happen, Because the government's control

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of its currency is what a government has right for

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the longest time, I think people would have assumed that

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>this whole space is way too early. None of these

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>questions need to be answered for the longest time, and

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:03.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, they might not necessarily like it, but it

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>might be very sort of hard to stop and once

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>it's big enough that these companies can kind of solve

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that at the end. But I think what has happened

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>over this ten years is this space has grown faster

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>than what most people thought, and you have far more

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>people paying attention to this than what you've thought. And

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>so I do think that all of these companies as

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a whole will need to answer all of these questions

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:30.040
<v Speaker 1>for themselves from a regulatory standpoint, from a government standpoint,

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to how this fits into existing financial institution standpoint, and

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 1>even if not necessarily all of them are solved. Like

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the mean critical thing that most of these companies really

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about is the FIA in and out

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>portion of this, because most financial institutions, like what they

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>really care about is when you're in putting money into

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the financial institution, or when you're taking it out, where

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 1>has it gone? What have you done with it? What

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>is the source of funds? So I think from an

0:29:57.360 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>immediate term, like most of the exchanges are around the world,

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 1>are really paying attention to those portions. I don't think

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>there's far enough emphasis on the longer term standpoint of Okay,

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>if you treat you know, bitcoin as a as an

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>asset with you know, a real dollar value attached to it,

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean for all these other things? And

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:17.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, now with the some of the announcement of

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>what's Facebook's doing versus what China is doing, I think

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that makes that question even more pressing. But yeah, I

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's necessarily an easy answer for that yet.

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>But we don't really have any answers. That's fascinating. And

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>so the following question then, I want to get to

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean for the US dollar? But that's

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 1>also equally unanswerable. Yeah, I think it's it's equally answerable.

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 1>And there's also another call it trend, which is sort

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of similar but slightly different to the whole bitcoin narrative,

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>is there's a lot of these stable coins that are

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>out there. So stable coins, if you've heard of these before,

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 1>are basically tokens that represent one to one peering of

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a real world asset. So the easiest way to think

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>about it is a US dollar stable coin. You know,

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>one token equals one dollar, the one dollars held in reserve,

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you could always see, it's always there. So there's companies

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 1>like USDC, which is done by coin Base and Circle

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that are out there. The one that is far more

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>used than traded is this thing called USDT, which is

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>slightly sketchier with the reserves not one hundred percent necessarily

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>being there, but that's the one that people actually use

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and sort of trade with, but kind of zooming out

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 1>in the longer term time frame when you look at

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:31.959
<v Speaker 1>that is that is actually very much in line, and

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in fact, that's almost the hyperdollarization, if you will, because

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you're actually getting dollars in the hands of more and

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 1>more people, you're locking up more dollars, you're making dollar

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>almost the native underpinning currency of a lot of these

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>different things. So again, like maybe just the step back,

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's sometimes hard to characterize this space as

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 1>one monolithic thing. There's a lot of different experiments going

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 1>into this, and from a venture investor, I think that's

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>what makes the space so exciting too. Yeah, and you've

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 1>had a big change in the government. There is a

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 1>great quote from of all people, Senate Banking Committee Chairman

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Mike Krappo who said during a hearing, if the United

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>States were to decide we don't want cryptocurrency to happen

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>in the United States and tried to ban it, I'm

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty confident we couldn't succeed in doing that, which is

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big statement. Right. You have this development that

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>could challenge the supremacy of the US dollar and could

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>challenge many things about our world as it is, and

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you have powerful person and government essentially saying we can't

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 1>do anything about it. That's pretty pretty dramatic, I thought. Yeah. Again,

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to take aside from the more purely bitcoin side, is

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to hold their store bitcoin, all you need to do

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>is generate a public and private key pair. That's essentially

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 1>how you hold it. And to transact with somebody else

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>as you just need to know their public address and

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it goes directly to the person and it's settled with

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the person in about ten to twenty minutes, and you

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have to go through any third party. That was

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:00.959
<v Speaker 1>kind of the whole point of bitcoin to begin with.

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 1>And so I think there's ways to restrict the feet

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in outpoints, there's a way to restrict like the merchants involved.

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>But when you just look at the pure P to

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>P side of this, it's very very hard, if not impossible,

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to outright ban this, even if you really wanted to.

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's what I think makes bitcoin to some

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>extent so powerful. Is that like setoshi for better for worse,

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 1>meet it. So there's no there's no person, there's no entity,

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>there's no company. Yeah, it goes back to your point

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 1>about why it was hard to figure out investment in

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, But it's also why it's hard to control

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and hard to figure out what to do with it. Right.

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>It's the that that that whole point of who is it?

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:45.719
<v Speaker 1>What is it? Where is it? The basic questions are

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that's what that's what gives it both it's it's mystique

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's scariness and it's appeal, right all wrapped

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>up into one. Okay, so I've found this quote from

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 1>John McAfee, who of course has a competing um Tech

0:33:57.040 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of don't laugh, But he said, in his view

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of books, labor is an abomination, a twisted perversion of cryptocurrency.

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 1>But it's very definition. Cryptocurrency wants to free us from control.

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 1>But libra is nothing but control. Is that fair? I

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>might not go so far in the fact to say

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that Facebook is the end all and be all evil.

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 1>It is that it is. However, I will say from

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:22.839
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it is very opposite what many of

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the ideals that a lot of people in the bitcoin

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 1>world share. In the fact that you know, in the

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 1>Facebook world, it would have to be mediated. It would

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>go through a big company or multiple sort of big companies,

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>or a part of the association. It would effectively get

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 1>to see all the transactions that were happening. They could

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 1>probably do you know, more targeted ads on you based

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 1>on what you're actually buying and selling who you're transacting with.

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I don't necessarily agree with many of the

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:50.280
<v Speaker 1>things that mcaffee has to say, but to some extent,

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 1>like people in the bitcoin space, do feel that Libra

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 1>is opposite towards many of the ideals that they hold

0:34:57.040 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 1>very strongly. Does that explain why you've had such a

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>reaction to it. One thing I found interesting is you

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>had so many people signing onto it initially, and then

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 1>now you've had everybody saying, whoa stepping back? And is

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it because of pushback from regulators or is it because

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:14.319
<v Speaker 1>they figured out that it actually is just part of

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Facebook's ongoing bid to rule the world personally, Like, I've

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:20.319
<v Speaker 1>been somewhat critical of the Facebook leab story, so on

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 1>day one when they made the announcement, I wrote this

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 1>long post talking about the announcement, and my main prediction

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:28.359
<v Speaker 1>at the end of it is I thought that they

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>would be delayed, not for any technical reasons, but majority

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 1>regulatory reasons, just because of Facebook's is a very unloved

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>company for lack of a better word. I was actually

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:41.320
<v Speaker 1>really surprised when you actually look at the NPS score

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 1>for Facebook. I think it's negative forty seven, Like it's

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:48.399
<v Speaker 1>really really bad, like actually worse than most financial institutions,

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:53.839
<v Speaker 1>And so that's an astounding accomplishment. Actually yeah, so yeah,

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought there was no way that they'd be able

0:35:56.560 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>to launch us on the timescale that they initially set

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:02.760
<v Speaker 1>out to do so, and it's looking that is likely

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 1>to be the case. To say the other side, I

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:09.239
<v Speaker 1>think many people in the crypto ecosystem we're very initially

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:13.240
<v Speaker 1>excited about Libra is because one of the biggest questions

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people ask in the spaces, hey

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 1>when is real mainstream adoption going to happen? And Facebook

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 1>had the answer was, well, we have It's about as

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 1>mainstream as it gets, right, you know, we have I

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:26.839
<v Speaker 1>don't know the exact stats, we have two to three

0:36:26.840 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 1>billion daily active users. So if you know, we really

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:31.880
<v Speaker 1>create this cryptocurrency, put in everybody's walls, put into a

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:35.400
<v Speaker 1>messenger like, we can push it out to many people.

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:38.879
<v Speaker 1>And I think many people in the cryptospace will might

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily have loved that per se, they might have

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 1>liked the fact that, hey, if you get this in

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the hands of enough people, a certain subset or portion

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of them are going to say, hey, now that I

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>have this digital asset, well, hey what about this bitcoin thing?

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>What about this ethereum thing? It kind of gets them

0:36:54.680 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 1>crypto curious for lack cryptocurious is the best phrase for

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:05.480
<v Speaker 1>lack of a better phrase. I think it's dangerous because again,

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you're giving up a lot of those ideals for the

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 1>hope of distribution and adoption. But then also, like my

0:37:11.560 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 1>personal takeaway is I think the sole reason why Facebook

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 1>was doing this from the beginning was not necessarily to

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:22.880
<v Speaker 1>create a new, open, decentralized sort of finance ecosystem. If

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 1>they did, they would have just bought into bitcoin very

0:37:25.200 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>so much like what Square and Jack is doing, I

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 1>actually think they did this more for monetization reasons for

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Facebook itself. My two cents. I don't know if this

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:35.840
<v Speaker 1>is true or not, but when you look at the

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>actual LTV of a user, most of the values coming

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:41.920
<v Speaker 1>from all their US users. They have a lot of

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:44.960
<v Speaker 1>users outside of the US, but they an LTV, I

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:47.840
<v Speaker 1>mean long term value just to okay, yeah, sorry for

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the acronyms, but yeah, the value per users much higher

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in the US, and when you look outside of the US,

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it tends to be lower because the ad rates and

0:37:56.560 --> 0:38:00.239
<v Speaker 1>that sort of ad purchases is a lower amount. And

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 1>so my opinion, I think Facebook has always had this

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:05.239
<v Speaker 1>dream that hey, if we can actually get into the

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 1>payment flow, in the monetary flow of particularly users outside

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of the US, then we can increase the value per

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>user for all these other ones. So when you actually

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 1>look at Facebook's history, they actually did like a Facebook

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:20.720
<v Speaker 1>credit system that they were doing, like things with PayPal

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and David Marcus from before. This is kind of just

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 1>another iteration on the chain that they've been following. And

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I think this is actually a much more inherently Facebook

0:38:31.239 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 1>revenue monetization sort of story. They just kind of co

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:38.360
<v Speaker 1>opted bitcoin and crypto and this all other stuff in

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 1>order to push their narrative. I think it's smart and

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of sneaky at the same time, but at least

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 1>from my opinion, I think that's the larger reason why

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 1>they did it, not necessarily because they're bought into this

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:52.319
<v Speaker 1>new financial system. It's a perfect way of sending up

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:54.799
<v Speaker 1>for the epitome of this conversation we've been having, right,

0:38:55.080 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>which is the benefits of co option and a cooperation

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>versus idealism. And Facebook's move in some ways is the

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 1>ultimate cynicism, right, And then the ideas do you celebrate

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that and go along with it because it's making the

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:10.280
<v Speaker 1>market bigger and more vibrant potentially, or do you say, WHOA,

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:12.239
<v Speaker 1>this is not the direction we want this to go.

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:15.840
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of a fascinating encapsulation of the whole debate

0:39:15.840 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, right, Thank you so much for being here.

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 1>It's been really fun to talk to you. Yeah, I

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's been really fun. Thank you for having me so.

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I never would have guessed then in a conversation about Crypto,

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I would have learned a new story about the financial crisis.

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 1>But maybe given crypto's philosophical underpinnings, I should have guessed

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:37.319
<v Speaker 1>that which in Gears entirely. My producer Megan and I

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:39.880
<v Speaker 1>were both thinking the same thing as we listened to Chris.

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:43.840
<v Speaker 1>We were thinking Dune. Seriously, remember the famous science fiction

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:48.320
<v Speaker 1>book with its warring fiefdoms, but also the hero of sorts,

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Paul Atreides, becomes the one who can be many places

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:54.280
<v Speaker 1>at once and can see many paths into the future.

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we can see many paths for cryptocurrency, including

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:01.319
<v Speaker 1>that it upends one of our most basic institute money,

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:03.279
<v Speaker 1>but we can't yet see the path it will take.

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Makia Killing is a co production of Pushkin Industries and

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Chalk and Blade. It's produced by Ruth Barnes and Laura Hyde.

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>My executive producers are Alison McClain no relation in making Casey.

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:21.239
<v Speaker 1>The executive producer at Pushkin is Mia Loebell. Engineering by

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Jason Rostkowski. Our music is by Jed Flood. Special thanks

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to Jacob Weisberg at Pushkin and everyone on the show.

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bethany McClain. Thanks so much for listening. Find me

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:35.759
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Bethany mac twelve and let me know

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 1>which episodes you've most enjoyed.