Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome back to another episode of the Mark
Speaker 1: Mass Show where we talk about the decentralized Revolution. How
Speaker 1: the world is changing, of course, right before our very eyes.
Speaker 1: And you know, we like to look at it through
Speaker 1: the lens of politics, technology, and finance. And when you
Speaker 1: look at the world through those three lenses, in my opinion,
Speaker 1: it helps bring context to what all of this is,
Speaker 1: makes sense of where, how we got here, what is
Speaker 1: going on more importantly, where we are going, you know,
Speaker 1: And we like to look at it from a bunch
Speaker 1: of different angles to see how this world is changing.
Speaker 1: And one of the ways that it's changing is, as
Speaker 1: I say, is the decentralized revolution. And so the world
Speaker 1: that most of us know that we've been living in
Speaker 1: for most of our lives is really an anomaly throughout
Speaker 1: history where we've had this continued globalization, if you will,
Speaker 1: where the world has become connected. Of course, the Internet
Speaker 1: has enabled that, and so all of a sudden, we
Speaker 1: can go hire people from Pakistan or the Philippines and
Speaker 1: you know, zoom conferencing and all those things, and it's
Speaker 1: really connected the world. And it's always technology that changes
Speaker 1: the world, but that same technology is also breaking the world.
Speaker 1: Apart at the same time. So there's this effect of
Speaker 1: this technology that's doing two things. One it's connecting the world,
Speaker 1: but it's also breaking the world apart. But it's not
Speaker 1: exactly what's happening. The people of the world are being connected,
Speaker 1: the central planners or the governments are being disconnected. It's
Speaker 1: an interesting phenomenal to see what happens. Like I said,
Speaker 1: it's always technology that changes the world, and so I
Speaker 1: talk about this all the time. You go to my
Speaker 1: main YouTube pianel Mark Moss and just looking under the
Speaker 1: playlist for these cycles. But basically from a super high level,
Speaker 1: we can see about every two hundred and fifty years
Speaker 1: the pendulum swings from centralization to decentralization. And so roughly
Speaker 1: two hundred and fifty years ago was the American Revolution,
Speaker 1: which was America and France had a revolution basically rejecting
Speaker 1: centralization of the monarchy. Two hundred fift years before that
Speaker 1: was the Protestant Reformation, again rejecting the centralization of the
Speaker 1: the powers of the church and the state, and both
Speaker 1: of those were driven by technology. Five hundred years ago
Speaker 1: during the Protestant information it was the printing press, the
Speaker 1: ability to have books the ability to have information that
Speaker 1: changed the world. When everybody was looking towards one central
Speaker 1: authority of information, which was the church and state at
Speaker 1: the time. Once the people got the printing press, we're
Speaker 1: able to start printing bibles, We're able to start to
Speaker 1: read the information for themselves. They realized two things. One
Speaker 1: what the state had been telling us was a lie,
Speaker 1: and two, we don't need them anymore. We can get
Speaker 1: the information on our own. And it did. It broke
Speaker 1: that centralization. The world moved into a decentralized world. Then
Speaker 1: about two undre and fifty years ago, we had another
Speaker 1: technological revolution, which was the Industrial Revolution. And the industrial
Speaker 1: revolution brought people from the farms and the cottage industry
Speaker 1: into the city, so it had this centralizing effect and
Speaker 1: we all moved into the cities so we could work
Speaker 1: in the factories. And over the next one hundred years,
Speaker 1: these factories got bigger and bigger. In their early nineteen hundred,
Speaker 1: Henry Ford, the father of the automobile but also the
Speaker 1: father of the assembly line, created these massive institutions to
Speaker 1: bring the masses into factories. And everybody can basically do
Speaker 1: the same job, whether you were really smart or really dumb.
Speaker 1: You could both sit on the same assembly line and
Speaker 1: do about the same job. And a management style was
Speaker 1: created to manage these workers, manage the masses as cogs
Speaker 1: in the wheel, so everybody could do their part and
Speaker 1: they could become very efficient. And because of that, we
Speaker 1: had a government style that grew in the same form
Speaker 1: as this industrial management style, and so we had just
Speaker 1: like we had this management system to manage the masses
Speaker 1: as cogs in the wheel of a manufacturing floor. Now
Speaker 1: we have this government that's grown to have these central
Speaker 1: planners that want to manage the population as cogs in
Speaker 1: a wheel. They want to boil people down to a
Speaker 1: line on a spreadsheet. In Italy, the new PM over there,
Speaker 1: what's her name, Maroni, when she took over, she said,
Speaker 1: she gave a speech that was awesome and she said
Speaker 1: something about they want to take away our identities. I
Speaker 1: can no longer be a woman, a mother, a daughter.
Speaker 1: Now I have to be person one or person two.
Speaker 1: And she said, they want to take away our identities
Speaker 1: and make us just a line on a spreadsheet, basically
Speaker 1: saying the same thing. And that's how this management style
Speaker 1: has worked. But the problem is, again we have technology
Speaker 1: and so the Internet has done two things. One, it's
Speaker 1: connected the world, as I already said, but it's also
Speaker 1: making the style of government that we have today obsolete.
Speaker 1: And we can see this in a bunch of different ways.
Speaker 1: We're seeing signs of this happening all over And one
Speaker 1: I want to dig into today, which I think is
Speaker 1: pretty important, is this leak that happened from the Pentagon.
Speaker 1: It's been all over the news, but I think most
Speaker 1: people have been covering the facts of what was going on,
Speaker 1: but really haven't discussed what this means. Right, So whenever
Speaker 1: get a piece of information, we're like, Okay, that's news. Okay,
Speaker 1: you read the news headline. Okay, information was leaked about
Speaker 1: the Pentagon. Okay, you know I had some telling things
Speaker 1: about Well, we'll get into what it was telling. But ultimately,
Speaker 1: what does it mean? Why do I care? What do
Speaker 1: I do with this information? What does this tell me
Speaker 1: about where things are going? And that's what I want
Speaker 1: to talk about today. So let's talk. Let's talk first
Speaker 1: about what happened, So we'll get through the data stuff.
Speaker 1: What happened, Well, information got leaked. Now you might know
Speaker 1: that information leaks continued to get seemingly more and more prominent.
Speaker 1: We can go back to, you know, Julian Assan's with
Speaker 1: Wiki leaks, but of course they continue to happen. So
Speaker 1: this d D leak, this Pentagon leak, was big news.
Speaker 1: Of course, we had other big news where the Supreme Court,
Speaker 1: one of the highest, you know, the highest divisions in
Speaker 1: our entire US government, the Supreme Court, their records got
Speaker 1: leaked over something super controversial, of course, which was Roe v. Wade,
Speaker 1: And of course we don't know who leaked that. We
Speaker 1: still don't know. We know that the Supreme Court also
Speaker 1: had really struck a blow to what California was doing
Speaker 1: with gun rights, and the Attorney General in California said,
Speaker 1: we're going to do everything in our power to push
Speaker 1: back against this, and then mysteriously all the records of
Speaker 1: gun owners in California just got released. We saw a
Speaker 1: few months ago, we saw the IRS had this strange
Speaker 1: leak where one hundred and twenty thousand taxpayer information's records
Speaker 1: were released, and they just happened to be for nonprofits
Speaker 1: that were mostly conservative leaning, sort of like operation took
Speaker 1: point under President Obama when Lois Learner was running the
Speaker 1: IRS and the IRIS was being weaponized against conservative non profits.
Speaker 1: So we have this sort of these same things happening,
Speaker 1: these leaks that are happening, and they seem to be
Speaker 1: getting worse and worse and worse. And this leak is
Speaker 1: important for two reasons. And one I think it demonstrates
Speaker 1: that the Internet is taking away the power from the elite.
Speaker 1: They are trying to control the narrative, but it's also
Speaker 1: being used by the elite to push a narrative that
Speaker 1: they need more control. So on one hand, it shows
Speaker 1: that the people, we the people, are getting the upper hand,
Speaker 1: but on the other side, the elites, the powers that be,
Speaker 1: want to use it to gain more control. So let's
Speaker 1: dig into this a little bit more so we can see,
Speaker 1: like I said, this information was leaked. A couple of
Speaker 1: things that I think were interesting is one, the information
Speaker 1: started being leaked in January and then some of the
Speaker 1: more of the information started getting leaked in March. But
Speaker 1: the Pentagon says that they didn't know the documents were
Speaker 1: being leaked until like a week ago, So it just
Speaker 1: kind of shows how out of touch they are, which
Speaker 1: of course is part of their problem. We'll talk about
Speaker 1: that in a minute. We know that there was about
Speaker 1: fifty documents that were labeled secret or top secret that
Speaker 1: were released. A lot of these went onto discord, which
Speaker 1: is a community site or app if you've been on
Speaker 1: that before, four Chan, which is a website that's kind
Speaker 1: of known for showing this kind of what they would
Speaker 1: consider Maybe I don't know black market data, but we
Speaker 1: know that these documents showed a lot of things that
Speaker 1: were sort of damaging to the United States intelligence community, like,
Speaker 1: for example, that the US was spying on Zelensky and
Speaker 1: uncovered a lot of things they didn't like about him,
Speaker 1: and it had what was in there, so he didn't
Speaker 1: like that. We saw information that the US was basically
Speaker 1: trying to figure out how they could coerce Israel, and
Speaker 1: some of the ideas they had to coerce Israel were,
Speaker 1: you know, starting protests in their country, creating havoc for
Speaker 1: their president. At Yahoo, we saw that it showed that
Speaker 1: the Ukraine's air defenses were running out and they were
Speaker 1: very suceptible to an attack by Russia. Lots of information
Speaker 1: that was in there. We saw information about South Korean
Speaker 1: officials didn't want to send any more ammunition to the
Speaker 1: US because they were concerned that it would be sent
Speaker 1: directly to Ukraine. Lots and lots of stuff. So we'll
Speaker 1: talk about that. But like I said, I really want
Speaker 1: to get into what does this mean? Why do you care?
Speaker 1: And how does this tell us what's going to happen
Speaker 1: in the future. That's also mean we're trying to always
Speaker 1: figure out, right, what does this mean? What's going to
Speaker 1: happen in the future, So I know what I should
Speaker 1: be doing off of this information because the world's going crazy.
Speaker 1: One thing we do know is it's going to mean
Speaker 1: a lot more defense spending, It's going to be a
Speaker 1: lot more censorship and control, and it's probably going to
Speaker 1: be very bad for the markets, would be my opinion. Now,
Speaker 1: I think we can all agree that the markets have
Speaker 1: been a complete mess. The economy is crashing, inflation is
Speaker 1: still raging. I gotta take a quick break. I'll be
Speaker 1: back with more in a minute. Don't go away, I'll
Speaker 1: be right back. All right, Welcome back. If you're just
Speaker 1: tune in, you're listening to the Mark Mos Show. Of course,
Speaker 1: we're talking about the decentralized Revolution, and we're talking about
Speaker 1: how the largest data breach in at least the last
Speaker 1: decade just happened in the US. And what does that mean?
Speaker 1: How does it work into this decentralized revolution thesis. Well,
Speaker 1: if you're just tune in, we're talking about the release
Speaker 1: of these Pentagon documents, this classified these top secret documents
Speaker 1: that got leaked onto the web, and how the DoD
Speaker 1: Department of Pens was like the last one to know
Speaker 1: about it, which is pretty interesting. And so what is
Speaker 1: this what does this tell us about this decentralized revolution? Well,
Speaker 1: as I was saying, it shows that this technology that
Speaker 1: we have is changing the world, and that's the Internet.
Speaker 1: And what we're seeing all over the place is that
Speaker 1: the powers that be, the elites are having a very
Speaker 1: tough time maintaining the narrative. And the reason why is
Speaker 1: because of the Internet. Because we have this collective mind.
Speaker 1: And this is why central planning never works. Central plan
Speaker 1: never has enough information, enough data. One guy or a
Speaker 1: couple guys or a committee of people will never know
Speaker 1: what the collective millions or billions of people will know.
Speaker 1: And so why we need to have free markets so
Speaker 1: the market collectively can work together. Why we need to
Speaker 1: have free open communication so the market collectively can discuss
Speaker 1: these ideas, because collectively we're more or more powerful we're smarter,
Speaker 1: we're more creative than one guy or a few guys
Speaker 1: or a committee that could do that. But of course
Speaker 1: the powers that we want to maintain control and so
Speaker 1: a few things. I talk about this in this decentralized Revolution,
Speaker 1: and I've framed it up many times as the battle
Speaker 1: for the fate of humanity, talking about how the goal
Speaker 1: of these elites, the goal of these people that hold
Speaker 1: power today, is to install this digital panopticon that can
Speaker 1: control us, like this digital prison that we may never
Speaker 1: come out of. And of course China is the test
Speaker 1: bed for that. China has been working on this social
Speaker 1: credit score system for a really long time and they've
Speaker 1: been very successful with it. Now they of course, they
Speaker 1: have their central bank digital currencies, which are sort of
Speaker 1: like this last piece, and they've been blocking people's ability
Speaker 1: to move freely around the country. You know, you say
Speaker 1: mean things online. You know, I allowed to buy a
Speaker 1: bus ticket or a train ticket. We've seen most recently
Speaker 1: in the last year or two, they're using this health passport,
Speaker 1: this COVID health passport, to stop people's movements. So there
Speaker 1: were bank protests going on over there. For example, people
Speaker 1: were trying to go to the protest and oh now
Speaker 1: my passport show's read. I guess I can't buy a ticket,
Speaker 1: I can't go anywhere. They're doing that, and we know
Speaker 1: that the rest of the world wants to put this
Speaker 1: in place, and they need to control two things. I mean,
Speaker 1: really they need to control well, they want to control
Speaker 1: our movement, they want to control our ability to transact
Speaker 1: our money, but they also really want to control our
Speaker 1: ability to communicate, to talk, to have open communication, which
Speaker 1: of course leads to this censorship. And so when you
Speaker 1: see them talking and Davos talking about misinformation and malinformation
Speaker 1: is the biggest problem. And then you also see them
Speaker 1: talking about a cyber pandemic. Of course, they're predicting that
Speaker 1: we'll see a massive, massive, massive cyber pandemic in the
Speaker 1: next year or two. I think within the next two years,
Speaker 1: they predict this. And so they're sort of using, if
Speaker 1: you will, like a carrot and a stick approach to
Speaker 1: get us to where they ultimately want to get to.
Speaker 1: I was talking with someone the other day and I
Speaker 1: was explaining how I'm new to having livestock. I have
Speaker 1: a little ranch going and I got some cows and goats,
Speaker 1: and it's been a big learning experience, and we recently
Speaker 1: had this little baby goat and we were having to
Speaker 1: move the baby goat into the stable every night. And cows, well,
Speaker 1: I say, cows and goats aren't like dogs, where dogs
Speaker 1: will come, but my dog doesn't come, come when she's called.
Speaker 1: So that's kind of a bad analogy. But trying to
Speaker 1: get these goats from the pen over to the stables
Speaker 1: has been very difficult, and we use two different things.
Speaker 1: We were dragging like a little bucket full of their
Speaker 1: feed that they love, and so they would chase the bucket.
Speaker 1: That's like the carrot and actually I try to carroy
Speaker 1: it first, and then there's the stick, which is then
Speaker 1: I'll have somebody else like my wife come alongside of
Speaker 1: them and like clap their hands to scare scare the goat.
Speaker 1: And so we're using the carrot and the stick, or
Speaker 1: in this case, we're using fear clapping a hand, loud
Speaker 1: noises or greed which would be their their feed to
Speaker 1: move them to lure them into the gate into the
Speaker 1: into the stable. And that's sort of what they're doing here.
Speaker 1: And so it's like this, there's the there's the stick,
Speaker 1: and then there's the carrot. The stick is the fear,
Speaker 1: and now we're seeing here says the White House tells
Speaker 1: journalists that they have no business this on reporting on
Speaker 1: the leak because if you do this, information is getting
Speaker 1: into the wrong hands and this could be the end
Speaker 1: of America. Our national security is at risk and you
Speaker 1: could die, your family could be killed by terrorists if
Speaker 1: you do this. So there's that fear, and now, of
Speaker 1: course we're also seeing them use it to their advantages.
Speaker 1: I think it was a manual under the Oba administration.
Speaker 1: He said never let a crisis go to waste. You've
Speaker 1: heard that saying many times. And now, of course the
Speaker 1: Biden administration is molling over expanding online surveillance after the leak,
Speaker 1: So never let a crisis go to waste. Well, it
Speaker 1: looks like we got found out, our data got leaked,
Speaker 1: and now we just have to crack down even more.
Speaker 1: We just need even more power and we could stop
Speaker 1: this from happening some of the things that we're in there.
Speaker 1: Of course, like I said Zelenski, we found out that
Speaker 1: the US has been spying on Zelensky this whole time.
Speaker 1: We found that Chinese hypersonic missiles have a high probability.
Speaker 1: We have penetrated in US defenses. That doesn't sound very good.
Speaker 1: We saw Australia's defense chief got really upset, saying that
Speaker 1: he considered a serious incident. A couple other things that
Speaker 1: we saw on there. We saw five photos of a
Speaker 1: printed presentation slide showing the training and preparation of the
Speaker 1: Ukrainian brigades. We saw other documents lead from the Pentagon
Speaker 1: but that showed that Ukraine's air defenses would be exhausted
Speaker 1: by May twenty third. Like I said, we saw how
Speaker 1: they were exploring how to persuade Israel to provide lethal
Speaker 1: aid to Ukraine. We saw a CIA intelligence claimed that
Speaker 1: Israel's massad intelligences he had made explicit calls to action
Speaker 1: against as I said Prime Minister Benjamin Nutt Yahoo. I mean,
Speaker 1: these are some really damning things, and of course it's
Speaker 1: all leads to more crackdown on information and this really
Speaker 1: it's a battle. It's a cat and mouse, if you will,
Speaker 1: where you have one side us the information and the
Speaker 1: internet to share this information. On the other side is
Speaker 1: trying to contain it. And it's really this paradox where
Speaker 1: a nation knows that it needs to have free and
Speaker 1: open speech in order to have education, or to have communication,
Speaker 1: or to have creativity, if they want to continue to
Speaker 1: have progress, if they want to continue it to invent
Speaker 1: things like starlink satellites or you know, spaceships or you know,
Speaker 1: their yachts so they can go vacation on them in
Speaker 1: the summer. And they need this educated, creative society in
Speaker 1: order to get those things they want. But the problem
Speaker 1: is if they allow this free flow of information and
Speaker 1: they can't control it, and the people are going to
Speaker 1: continue to revolt and push back on that form of government.
Speaker 1: You know, it's interesting the Internet back to this kind
Speaker 1: of hive mind, this crowdsource mind. It's that there's no
Speaker 1: longer this single source of truth anymore, because you know,
Speaker 1: I'll see something on Twitter all the time where someone
Speaker 1: posts something where I'm like, wow, that that's pretty important,
Speaker 1: and then I'll just start to read the comments realize
Speaker 1: that they were wrong, and it's really brought down all
Speaker 1: credibility of mainstream institutions. And that's why we're seeing the
Speaker 1: New York Times and CNN and all these people lose
Speaker 1: relevance because they're constantly being found out to being liars.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact. Just this week, we saw
Speaker 1: two of maybe the most prestigious news outlets both just
Speaker 1: kind of shoot themselves in the foot, if you will,
Speaker 1: got found out for just completely lying. And as fast
Speaker 1: as they're losing relevance, it's only continues to accelerate. So
Speaker 1: I want to talk about that when we come back,
Speaker 1: and then I want to talk about what this means
Speaker 1: moving forward and what we could expect. If you're just
Speaker 1: tuning in, you're listening to the Mark mos Show, of course,
Speaker 1: we talk about the decentralized revolution each and every week,
Speaker 1: and right now we're talking about the big news of
Speaker 1: this Pentagon leak. What happened. We talked about that, we're
Speaker 1: going to talk about what this really means, and like
Speaker 1: I said, more importantly, what you can expect moving forward,
Speaker 1: what you should be doing. So we'll come back with
Speaker 1: more on that in a minute. Don't away, we'll be
Speaker 1: right back. All right, Welcome back. If you're just tune in,
Speaker 1: you're listening to the Mark Moss Show, we're talking about
Speaker 1: the decentralized revolution, of course, each and every week, and
Speaker 1: we're talking about right now this big breaking news that
Speaker 1: happened this week that really just drives home the point
Speaker 1: that we are going into this decentralized world, a multi
Speaker 1: polar world. Of course, we talked about, i believe last week,
Speaker 1: talking about the rise of the bricks nations and the
Speaker 1: de dollarization, and now we're talking about just how governments
Speaker 1: are breaking apart and how technology is to blame. And
Speaker 1: so we're talking about this leak, the Pentagon leak that
Speaker 1: leaked a whole bunch of classified information. We got of
Speaker 1: talked about what that was, but more about what it's
Speaker 1: doing is that it continues to drive these countries apart,
Speaker 1: and it continues to unfortunately bring down America's competence. Not
Speaker 1: only do we have leaks that continually happen over and
Speaker 1: over and over, we have President Trump, we have President Biden,
Speaker 1: Vice President Pence, all being caught with having classified information
Speaker 1: at our homes or wherever they have it unguarded. Stories
Speaker 1: of this are just kind of rampant, and it shows
Speaker 1: a couple of things. One, I mean, if this is
Speaker 1: how they're handling the very most private and secret information,
Speaker 1: how do you think your own information is being safeguarded?
Speaker 1: And I'd say it's probably not. But this continues to
Speaker 1: just stoke the fires of this war unfortunately, and some
Speaker 1: of the stuff that we saw come out of it
Speaker 1: shows the levels of corruption that are around these types
Speaker 1: of wars. Julianasaw On, who again he was behind Wiki leaks,
Speaker 1: which is one of the the biggest data leaks in
Speaker 1: history as well, all about the Iraq War. You know,
Speaker 1: he talked about the Afghanistan war as a way the
Speaker 1: elites were using The elites were using the Afghanistan war
Speaker 1: as a way to funnel money from the taxpayers and
Speaker 1: into their own pockets through a war. That's what wars
Speaker 1: do they get. They get the insiders rich. And we
Speaker 1: saw information about that come out as well. The levels
Speaker 1: of corruption that were pretty crazy. I've talked about and
Speaker 1: you might remember hearing about this Seymour Hirsch in his
Speaker 1: article he was talking about how so so, first of all,
Speaker 1: Seymour Hirsch is a rather old investigative journalist when actually
Speaker 1: journalist journalists used to actually investigate things and actually would
Speaker 1: write things that would sort of expose hidden conspiracies. I
Speaker 1: believe he's a Pulitzer Prize winner. He's won many awards
Speaker 1: for his investigative journalism. So one of the good guys.
Speaker 1: He's been doing this for a really long time. Of course,
Speaker 1: he came out with his story that he did his
Speaker 1: investigative journalism into talking about how it was the US
Speaker 1: that was behind the Nord Stream pipeline. Now, of course
Speaker 1: he's been discredited. A lot of people came out, you know,
Speaker 1: all the mainstream media press outlets came out against him
Speaker 1: and said, oh, he's just some reporter. It's like he's
Speaker 1: not just some reporter, right, He's still arguably one of
Speaker 1: the biggest and kind of best known investigative journalists who's
Speaker 1: broken many great stories, like I said, award winning and
Speaker 1: so he was sort of discredited. They threw out some
Speaker 1: you know, half assed kind of response to who really
Speaker 1: blew up the nord Stream pipeline, But he's been able
Speaker 1: to defend his position with data and facts. Anyway, he
Speaker 1: put out another article this week that I thought was
Speaker 1: pretty interesting, and he really dug into the corruption that's
Speaker 1: actually going on in the in the situation over there,
Speaker 1: and he talked about how the Ukrainian government and of
Speaker 1: course President Zelensky over there, how he was using American
Speaker 1: taxpayer funds to basically, you know, fund the war effort,
Speaker 1: but skimming hundreds of millions of dollars off the top.
Speaker 1: I've seen videos online and you might have as well
Speaker 1: of high ranking Ukrainian officials in their you know, very
Speaker 1: very very exclusive and fancy and expensive exotic cars, rolls
Speaker 1: royces like that. Of course, we know Zelensky, as was
Speaker 1: evidenced in I believe the leaking of the Panama papers
Speaker 1: about a year ago, has hundreds of millions of dollars
Speaker 1: parked offshore. Like, where does he get hundreds of millions
Speaker 1: of dollars from? Right, Well, this is part of the
Speaker 1: way he's taking the money from American taxpayers. You and
Speaker 1: I the hundreds of billions again, hundreds of billions that
Speaker 1: the US has sent over there, and he's skimming off
Speaker 1: the top, at least according to Seymour Hirsh. Now we
Speaker 1: don't necessarily have to take Seymour Hirsch's word for it.
Speaker 1: We can just see that there's hundreds of millions of
Speaker 1: dollars in Zelenski's bank accounts, and then you would just
Speaker 1: ask yourself where did he get those That's certainly not
Speaker 1: his salary being the president of a war torn country.
Speaker 1: He was a TV actor before that, a comedian at that,
Speaker 1: and he certainly wasn't making that kind of money then
Speaker 1: so you just ask yourself where that money come from.
Speaker 1: And I think it's it's pretty interesting. One of the
Speaker 1: ways that Seymour Hirsch talks about how they're able to
Speaker 1: skim money is that Zelensky's government is paying for diesel fuel.
Speaker 1: It takes diesel fuel to fight the war. And we
Speaker 1: know that the Pentagon was paying as much as four
Speaker 1: hundred dollars per gallon of gasoline during the war in
Speaker 1: Afghanistan back to Julian Nissans. That's how they siphon money out.
Speaker 1: And so the Pentagon was paying four hundred per gallon
Speaker 1: for gasoline. And then what we know is that Zelenski
Speaker 1: is also buying fuel, and so potentially the Pentagon is
Speaker 1: paying him up to two three four hundred dollars per
Speaker 1: gallon of gasoline there. But instead of buying the expensive
Speaker 1: fuel that he says he is, he's actually buying fuel
Speaker 1: from Russia, the country with that. Yeah, Ukraine's and Washington
Speaker 1: are at war with and the Ukrainian president and many
Speaker 1: people in his entourage are skimming untold millions of dollars
Speaker 1: from American taxpayers that are earmarked for diesel fuel payments. Now,
Speaker 1: he put in his article as an estimate by analysts
Speaker 1: from the Central Intelligence Agency the CIA. By the CIA
Speaker 1: put the embezzled funds at four hundred million last year,
Speaker 1: four hundred million. Another expert compared the level of corruption
Speaker 1: in Kiev in Ukraine as approaching that of the Afghan
Speaker 1: War and said quote, although there will be no professional
Speaker 1: audit reports emerging from the Ukraine, HM, Surprise, surprise. Of course,
Speaker 1: there's no professional audits coming from the Ukraine, just like
Speaker 1: there was no professional audits that came from the war
Speaker 1: in Afghanistan. Two trillion dollars was spent in Afghanistan. Now,
Speaker 1: when we give Afghanistan, we spend two trillion dollars in Afghanistan,
Speaker 1: Where does that money go mint spent, it goes to
Speaker 1: Somebody's got to follow the money. But of course there
Speaker 1: are no audits. Of course we know the Pentagon has
Speaker 1: never passed an audit. The Pentagon can't pass an audit.
Speaker 1: And trillions and trillions and trillions, tens of trillions of
Speaker 1: dollars are just gone, just gone missing, and they're gone
Speaker 1: to people just like this. Four hundred million dollars just
Speaker 1: last year now, says many government ministries in Kiev have
Speaker 1: been literally quote, heating to set up front companies for
Speaker 1: export contracts for weapons and ammunition with private arms dealers
Speaker 1: around the world, all of which provide kickbacks. So that's
Speaker 1: how they do it, right. The money goes to somebody,
Speaker 1: but it goes to overpriced, overpaid contracts with massive amounts
Speaker 1: of kickbacks to come back to them. War's a racket,
Speaker 1: he says. Here. The issue of corruption was directly raised
Speaker 1: with the Zelenski in a meeting last January in Kiev
Speaker 1: with CIA director William Burns. They said the CIA director said, hey,
Speaker 1: we see what you're doing. We understand what you're doing.
Speaker 1: But what's interesting about this is, he says he told
Speaker 1: the Ukrainian President Lensky, hey, I was told by the CIA,
Speaker 1: the intelligence official, that you know, you've been getting money,
Speaker 1: and he was angry because quote, he was taking a
Speaker 1: larger share of the skim money than was going to
Speaker 1: the general's end. Quote. So according to the CIA, a
Speaker 1: meeting was done with the director, Director William Burns, and
Speaker 1: he told the careing president like, hey, we see that
Speaker 1: you're skimming money, but you're taking too much. You're supposed
Speaker 1: to give more of a kickback to the other generals apparently,
Speaker 1: Burns CI director William Burns also presented Zelensky with a
Speaker 1: list of thirty five generals and senior officials whose corruption
Speaker 1: was known to the CIA and others in the American government.
Speaker 1: Zelensky responded to the American pressure ten days later by
Speaker 1: publicly dismissing ten of the most ostentatious officials on the
Speaker 1: list and doing a little else So he got rid
Speaker 1: of ten people that were bragging about the money they
Speaker 1: were driving around of the new Mercedes. They were making
Speaker 1: them look bad. They got rid of them. Interesting, now,
Speaker 1: as this money is continued being printed and sent over
Speaker 1: to Ukraine, that leads to inflation that just won't seem
Speaker 1: to go away. And if you're just tune in, you're
Speaker 1: listening to the Mark mass Show talking about the decentralized Revolution.
Speaker 1: I'm going to take quick break, maybe be right back.
Speaker 1: Don't go away, all right, welcome back. If you just
Speaker 1: tune in, you were listening to the Mark Show, we're
Speaker 1: talking about the decentralized revolution, and we're talking about the
Speaker 1: way the world's decentralized. And we're talking about the latest
Speaker 1: breaking news of this Pentagon leak and what that means.
Speaker 1: Of course, not just what happened. Anybody could watch the
Speaker 1: news for themselves, but what does it mean and where
Speaker 1: does this go? And we talked about how it's really
Speaker 1: just changing the narratives, changing the discussion right, that the
Speaker 1: Internet has now allowed for this free flow of information
Speaker 1: and they can't control it, they can't stop it. And
Speaker 1: the problem is is that it continually shows that the
Speaker 1: emperor is wearing no clothes, so to speak. We saw
Speaker 1: this week it was it was awesome on Twitter, which
Speaker 1: if you're not following me on Twitter, you should check
Speaker 1: it out. I'm at one Mark Moss. That's just the
Speaker 1: number one Mark Moss. Hit me up on Twitter. I'd
Speaker 1: love to hear that you're watching the show. Ask me
Speaker 1: some questions there. I probably spend too much time on there,
Speaker 1: so feel free to reach out. But on Twitter they
Speaker 1: use these Twitter spaces and Elon Musk had a Twitter
Speaker 1: space this week had three point three million people in
Speaker 1: the room watching live. Now to put that in perspective
Speaker 1: for you, CNN, which used to be the number one
Speaker 1: news source in the United States, maybe the world onlike
Speaker 1: their primetime shows, gets I think somewhere like five hundred
Speaker 1: thousand people watching, like five hundred thousand, so half of
Speaker 1: one million. Elon Musk had three point three million people
Speaker 1: in the room at one time listening to him, and
Speaker 1: he was joined. He was being interviewed by a reporter
Speaker 1: from the BBC, which is another global news source, respected
Speaker 1: news source. And what was interesting is a couple of things. One,
Speaker 1: how Elon Musk is able to get three point three
Speaker 1: million people in a room at one time when no
Speaker 1: news outlet can do that, And so it shows you
Speaker 1: the authority that's been in place, how the narrative has shifted,
Speaker 1: where people get their information has shifted. But also the
Speaker 1: head of the BBB was grilling Elon Musk, not the
Speaker 1: head the reporter, I forget his name off the top
Speaker 1: of my head, but it was grilling Elon Musk about
Speaker 1: now that he's allowed this free speed and how there's
Speaker 1: all this information, misinformation, all this malinformation. Elon Musk has
Speaker 1: gotten rid of moderators, and how that's such a bad thing.
Speaker 1: And he goes on to say something about he goes
Speaker 1: on to say something about, you know, now there's so
Speaker 1: much hate speech and all these things. I see it
Speaker 1: all the time. And Elon Musk says, Okay, could you
Speaker 1: give me some examples of that, which of course he couldn't,
Speaker 1: and then Elon Musk said, so you're lying. Then basically
Speaker 1: just called him out in real time. James Clayton was
Speaker 1: his name, that's it. So yeah, he kept pressing Elon
Speaker 1: Musk on these topics and Elon Musk was just like, okay,
Speaker 1: well give me an example, right, and he couldn't. He
Speaker 1: couldn't come up with one thing. As he was making
Speaker 1: all these baseless claims, basically that there was after must takeover,
Speaker 1: there was hateful content. He said, there was you know,
Speaker 1: racist content, and he said, you know, give me a
Speaker 1: specific example of the hate speeds that should be censored
Speaker 1: on Twitter, and Clayton came up empty and he said, quote,
Speaker 1: I don't actually use that feed anymore. And then mus said, quote,
Speaker 1: you said you've seen more hateful content, but you can't
Speaker 1: name a single example, not even one. Clayton continued to
Speaker 1: avoid given an example, but Musk would not let him
Speaker 1: off the hook. Then I say, sir, that you don't
Speaker 1: know what you're talking about must stated, so it must
Speaker 1: says you just lied. And so, right there in front
Speaker 1: of three point three million people in real time, the
Speaker 1: people got to see exactly what goes on. You have
Speaker 1: very biased reporters making baseless claims that can't be backed up.
Speaker 1: And just like that the emperor was seen to be naked,
Speaker 1: the Emperor wearing no clothes, you have the BBC showing
Speaker 1: right there, perfect illustration for the whole world to see,
Speaker 1: all three point three million people, which many more have
Speaker 1: seen it now because it's it's not being talked about
Speaker 1: of course, and the recordings have been released. But in
Speaker 1: real time they saw how these news outlets, trying to
Speaker 1: control the narrative, just throw out lies. And in the past,
Speaker 1: people would watch those and take that as truth, take
Speaker 1: that as fact, they would believe that. But now in
Speaker 1: real time we can just openly discuss it, openly debate it,
Speaker 1: and instantly find out that they are lying about that.
Speaker 1: We saw another piece this week came out the New
Speaker 1: York Times, another well known establishment piece that's you know,
Speaker 1: put up on this pedestal of you know, apparently giving
Speaker 1: us valuable information truth et cetera, put out a hit
Speaker 1: piece on bitcoin mining in Texas, specifically Riot Blockchain, and basically,
Speaker 1: you know, they put out this. It was a hit
Speaker 1: piece talking about how bad it was and how bad
Speaker 1: they were for the environment, how bad it was for
Speaker 1: the power industry, and all these different things, all these claims.
Speaker 1: But the problem is they release it to the Internet,
Speaker 1: where instantly thousands and millions of people can debunk all
Speaker 1: the information they put out. It was all debunked. From
Speaker 1: the name of the town that they were reporting from
Speaker 1: was wrong, the photo that they used of the town
Speaker 1: was doctored. All of the facts and information not all
Speaker 1: many of the points that they made in there were
Speaker 1: debunked and proven to be false. And just like that,
Speaker 1: the collective crowd was able to take that information and
Speaker 1: destroy it. And not just destroy it, it destroys the
Speaker 1: reputation of The New York Times, just I could destroyed
Speaker 1: the reputation of the BBC. If I continue to lie
Speaker 1: to you, it's going to destroy my reputation. Eventually, You're
Speaker 1: not going to listen to me anymore. You're not going
Speaker 1: to believe anything I say anymore. And that's exactly what's
Speaker 1: happening with the New York Times, That's exactly what's happening
Speaker 1: with the BBC, and it's exactly what's happening with the
Speaker 1: US government, which is exactly what happened in the prostant
Speaker 1: Reformation when people were able to get the books off
Speaker 1: the printing press, the Bible, and they said, wait a minute,
Speaker 1: everything you've told us is a lie. And that's exactly
Speaker 1: what we're seeing. Everything is a lie, and it's exposing
Speaker 1: all this corruption. Like I said earlier, we were talking
Speaker 1: about how Ukraine has been caught skimming even the CIA
Speaker 1: says potentially up to up to four hundred million dollars
Speaker 1: has been skimmed off of that and so now with
Speaker 1: this information moving around, they just can't contain it anymore.
Speaker 1: Talking about corruption, we also saw a massive corruption coming
Speaker 1: out this week. It's sort of interesting. I saw the
Speaker 1: White House Press Secretary Jean Pierre. She's been being grilled
Speaker 1: asking why is it that Biden never comes out and
Speaker 1: answers questions anymore. She said, well, what are you talking about.
Speaker 1: He's taken more press questions than Trump, Obama, and Bush combined.
Speaker 1: That's what she said. If you remember when Trump was
Speaker 1: running aainst Biden, he called him hiding Biden because he
Speaker 1: was just hiding out in the basement. He never came
Speaker 1: in to address the press. You remember, Trump stood there
Speaker 1: every single day just getting hammered by the press, and
Speaker 1: he would just deal with it. So anyway, they said, hey,
Speaker 1: why is it that he never comes talk to us.
Speaker 1: He won't take any questions from the press, And she says,
Speaker 1: what are you talking about? He's had more questions than
Speaker 1: all these Trump, Obama, and Bush combined, which of course
Speaker 1: is a lie. And it's not just a lie. The
Speaker 1: White House actually had to come out and make an
Speaker 1: adjustment to the transcript of the press Secretary's Google gaggle
Speaker 1: is what it's called, and so they wanted to come
Speaker 1: out and they had to adjust it because it was
Speaker 1: a flat out lie. Now why are they trying to
Speaker 1: protect Biden from these press questions? Well, it's because of
Speaker 1: all this information that's coming out. We saw lots of
Speaker 1: news that have come out in the last last week
Speaker 1: or so that a lot of people would like to
Speaker 1: ask some questions about, but he won't make himself, like,
Speaker 1: for example, bank records showing millions of dollars in transactions
Speaker 1: between Hunter Biden and all these China firms, or how
Speaker 1: China sent not so subtle threats to Joe Biden by
Speaker 1: revealing Hunter's bank records, or how Joe Biden knew that
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden was on the bure he is him a
Speaker 1: board in Ukraine at the same time he was pushing
Speaker 1: for natural gas in Ukraine. And this is from the
Speaker 1: former Obama stenographer who says he has enough information, first
Speaker 1: hand information, whistleblower information, to put Biden in prison. Like
Speaker 1: this is stuff that we know. This is stuff that's
Speaker 1: already been out in the open, but now it's becoming
Speaker 1: very exposed. It's being brought back up. And of course
Speaker 1: Biden doesn't want to make himself available to these questions,
Speaker 1: which of course is why he won't and of course
Speaker 1: when his White House Press secretary tries to cover up,
Speaker 1: she is caught lying as well. So what do we
Speaker 1: do with this information? Well, expect for this to continue
Speaker 1: and continue to see the world continue decentralized, and of
Speaker 1: course we'll have to continue to protect ourselves by securing
Speaker 1: our savings, securing our purchasing power, and of course I
Speaker 1: think that bitcoin is one of the best ways to
Speaker 1: do that. If you're just tuning in you're listening to
Speaker 1: the Mark mal Show, we've been talking about what this
Speaker 1: data breach means, not just in context of the US
Speaker 1: this week, but in the world and where it's going.
Speaker 1: And it continues to lead into this decentralized thesis. Hopefully
Speaker 1: that helps you make sense of what is going on
Speaker 1: in the world today and where we're going. That's what
Speaker 1: I got for you today. I appreciate you listening. Thanks
Speaker 1: so much, Until next time.