WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Too Many WRs?

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.319
<v Speaker 1>The following. He's a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football clubs. Are you ready for

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah, and so much for that.

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:40.239
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, A bar Garcia, and Derek Eagleton.

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>It is thirty December seventeenth, twenty twenty, season sixteen, episode

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>number eighty two. Welcome to the latest edition of The Break,

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>presented by Geico. Got my crew in studio with me

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>here from the s WBC Mortgage Studios. Nick back with us.

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Happy to have him bat you Ambrasier Studio. We got

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Dave remote to maybe at some point day we'll decide

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to join us. We'll see how that goes. We'll have

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Bucky joining us in just a little bit. He'll give

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>us our breakdown of the I'm sorry the play in

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, San Francisco's defense versus the Cowboys offense. Before

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 1>we do that, though, I know we do need to

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>catch up though on some injury updates to day. Why

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>don't you catch us up on the entire secondary Like

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>what's happening with them as far as injuries are concerned.

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>We might have some dbs playing in this game. Maybe

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll see Mike. Mike McCarthy loves to say like he's like,

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>today's the big day. Today's the day we'll find out

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and then like tomorrow, we'll be like, all right, yesterday

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it was the big day. So how do they look?

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>And he'll be like, oh, we'll make those determinations over

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the weekend. Just classic football coach stuff. But he did.

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he said he was very impressed by the

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>work that Donovan Wilson and Anthony Brown were able to do. Specifically,

0:01:56.400 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Cheeto practice yesterday as well. So I mean, I like

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the odds that two of those guys, if not all

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>three of them play on Sunday, which I mean, you

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>can roll your eyes if you want to. I know

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the team is four and nine, but we really haven't

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>seen this team play with a full complement of starters

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>in the secondary all year. You know, Cheeto missed a

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of time, AB has been in and out of

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the lineup. Oh, I'm an idiot. Trevier Diggs also practiced

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and look good. I'm sorry. Yeah, these guys have not

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>all been available at the same time throughout the season.

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.079
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of exciting to think that they might

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>all be able to play together for at least, you know,

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of games here. So I'm hopeful that they

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>can all get on the field on Sunday. I ask

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you that question, Nick, if let's assume all four of

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>them are back, how much of a difference do you

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>think that makes for this defense? Oh, we just mentioned

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>like it. It really doesn't matter a ton because you

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think that they're all that great. I don't know, well,

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>well both, I mean, because you know, they went into

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>this thinking the wee can get a lot of pass rush,

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.959
<v Speaker 1>our defensive backs are going to be solid at best.

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>These four guys Diggs and Cheeto and Jordan Lewis and

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:05.839
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Brown. So no one was thinking that these four

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>were gonna be like Hall of Famers anyway, or Pro

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Bowlers even at that. So then when they are all

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna go down, I mean, they Dave said they've not

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:16.679
<v Speaker 1>played one game together. Those four haven't not once. And

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 1>then I still don't know if they'll play this one,

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, because I think they'll look at it and go, well,

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>if we're getting him back, we don't have to rush

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>this guy or vice versa. So but yeah, I think

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>it makes a difference because they were hoping to be

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>average and they never they didn't get that. So what

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>do you think him? I think. You know what's funny

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>is lately I've been getting a lot of fans on

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Twitter getting mad at me, some that are happy and

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>some that are mad just because apparently I'm not a

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>diehard Cowboys fan and I'm over here talking about what

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I actually see with my eyes. But good news is

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>for those fans, I mean, this is something good because

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>if the Cowboys do somehow find themselves into the playoffs,

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>then you're gonna have some of these guys is in

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the secondary to be available by then. So if you're

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>looking for something positive and a lot of hope, that

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that's something good. But if it's me personally, I just don't.

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm with that doesn't really matter at this point. I'm

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>just wanting to see some of these younger guys being

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 1>able to play and take advantage of that time. Guys

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>like Cheeto, I mean, unfortunately for him, his time is

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>running out. You know, these free agent guys are are

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>really really needing to put something out there on film.

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Their time is running out, So I hope that that

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>guys like him are able to get back on the

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>field and put up some stuff that could, hopefully in

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>two games, help them to put something good out there

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to find the team or even if the Cowboys are

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>wanting to send them back, who knows. You know, it's

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:51.359
<v Speaker 1>interesting in a season of mainly disappointments, particularly on the

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>defensive side of the ball, you got two guys right

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:55.919
<v Speaker 1>there that have been a part of the bright spots

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>at least the few bright spots that you've seen in

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Donovan Wilson and treyvond Dick. So I'm excited to see

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>them back on the field because I want to see

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 1>if they can keep developing and if maybe, just maybe

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you may have found two members of an ongoing secondary

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>that maybe a better in the future, because again, some

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of the best plays that have happened this year for

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>this defense have come from those two players, and they're young,

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and so you haven't even be able to say that

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>in quite a while when you talk about the secondary

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>for the Cowboys, So that I think is very positive.

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Dave talked to us about Zeke Elliott. What's the deal

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>on him. I heard he still did not I don't

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>think he practiced here or he's limited. Yeah, he was limited,

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and McCarthy said he's gonna continue to be limited. Just

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>talking to I mean it just again, Mike McCarthy hates

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>giving out any type of details one way or the other,

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>but just talking to Zeke's it kind of sounds like

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the same thing as last week, which is to say

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna limit him and he's you know, I would

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 1>guess he's gonna be questionable tomorrow when the final report

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>comes out. But I get the feeling that he's gonna

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>play just from talking to him. You know, Zeke was

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 1>the one yesterday he was like, he was like, I'm

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a competitor. I don't I don't care about any of

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 1>that other stuff. I want to go. I want to

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 1>get on the field and try to win every game

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that I'm involved in. So yeah, I mean, they're gonna

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>be very It sounds like they'd be very cautious with

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 1>his workloaded practice, but I think he'll play. Okay, Nick,

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll ask you this question. We asked those these guys

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the question yesterday, but i'd love to get your opinion

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 1>on and Tyler Biotis returned last week, he only played

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:29.840
<v Speaker 1>six snaps. They were all on special teams. Do you

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>think that at some point you could expect that he's

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be moving back into the starting role as

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the center or and going beyond that question, do you

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>think he should be the guy that they should insert

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>into the starting lineup in place of Joe Luney? I

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>do I think that they should. I mean, you know,

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>I think you play the best players right now. You know,

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>with any kind of chance you have to maybe win

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and get to the playoffs. But if but if it's

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>if it's close, if it's a tiebreaker, and I don't

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>really know if there's a difference between Joe Looney and

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Biadas right now, I think Joe's better, but just

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 1>because I would think that being in the league for

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that long would make you better. But I think you

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.239
<v Speaker 1>got to see what you have and be honest as well,

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>because you know you're gonna get to a point next

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 1>year where you have to decide is he the guy

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>we're going to lean on here? And I think he

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>needs to get some of these games. So if it's

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>close like this one, then I would probably go towards

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the younger guy. All right, we're gonna take a quick

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>early break. When we come back, we're going to be

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>joined by Bucky Brooks of NFL Network. He's going to

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>talk us through the San Francisco defense versus the Cowboys offense.

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>We got lots of questions that will roll his way.

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>We'll do that when we come right back. This is

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. There's nothing as unique as

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>our eyes, which is why SLOR pioneers ways to make

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>lenses as unique as you. Very Lux for super sharp vision,

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Essential Blue for protection, and Chrisol for freedom from glare.

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Three cutting edge solutions in a single unique lens. So

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever you need to insist on Selor visit your local

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>essel or experts and find a perfect lens for you.

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Seymore do Moore Selore. Since eighteen sixty five, Stetson hats

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>are American maid with pride right here in Texas, and

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Stetson is proud to be on the field with America's team.

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Want to show your Texas and Team pride too? You

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>can by purchasing your own Stetson. You can look just

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>like how the flag guys do on field at every

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>home game. Stetson hats, the official crown of all self

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>respecting Cowboys and your favorite football team. Get yours today

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>at shop dot Dallas Cowboys dot com or at Stetson

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 1>dot com. I'm Jay Novachek, former tight end for the

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys. Back in the day. I was the guy

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 1>who always got the tough yards, and that's why I

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>run with John Deer today. In fact, I have a

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:51.319
<v Speaker 1>John Deer three zero twenty five E tractor that can

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>handle any yardwork I need to do, even the tough

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 1>yards way out back. So if you have one acre

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>or a thousand, John Deer has the equipment that's just

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>right for you. Visit a John Dear dealer today and

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>run with us. We are the official tractor provider of

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>your Dallas Cowboys. Here it's nineteen oh eight. Don't you

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>think we should get electricity and stop using candles to

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>see at night? It's just electricity lights up the room fast.

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 1>It's more reliable than candles blowing out, and people seem

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to love it nationwide. Well, candles, dare, did you just

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>run into the wall? I have a new candle. Please. Historically,

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:26.959
<v Speaker 1>switching to new technology is a no brainer. Today it's

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>at and t five G fast, reliable, secure, and nationwide.

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Switch to AT and T five G. It's not complicated.

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Five GET requires compatible plant may not be in your area.

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>See at dot com Slash five G for you for details.

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Back to the break find out why this year's Dallas

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys cheerleaders making the team is the most competitive yet.

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Don't miss new episodes of season fifteen every Tuesday night

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>at nine pm Central on c MT. There we go,

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:55.559
<v Speaker 1>That's all I'm talking about. All right, check it out

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.839
<v Speaker 1>in fifteen fifteen seasons a lot. That's a long time.

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:02.079
<v Speaker 1>One really really good programs out there that didn't go fifteen.

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm saying. Fifteen years a long time. All Right,

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:06.680
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna jump in. We got Bucky Brooks of NFL

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Network joining us now presented by Chevron with techron Bucky.

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>We start, well, we start every time. Let's talk about

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>those strengths and weaknesses of the San Francisco defense. Look,

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 1>this team is talented and even though they're without like

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>they're big guns, Nick Bosa, de Ford, a number of

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>other injuries have prevented some of their top guys from playing,

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>they're talented and they play hard. And so when I

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>think about Eric Armstead and Fred Warner and the intelligence

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>of Richard Sherman and the re emergence of Justin Barette. Like,

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>this is a very very talented team. And what they

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>do is I mean, they play counter to the way

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that the Cowboys play. They're pretty simple and how they

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>attack it. They believe that their guys are better than

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>your guys, and they believe over time that they're able

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to create pressure on you by being in the right

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:55.959
<v Speaker 1>spot down after down after down and det you a

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.079
<v Speaker 1>crack on theer the premise of having to play discipline football.

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I may be exaggerating a little bit based on this

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>past game because they actually ended up scoring two touchdowns,

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>but is this a game where the Cowboys can actually

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:15.439
<v Speaker 1>score more than one touchdown? I mean, it's talking. I

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>mean it's a really good scheme. Robert Sala has done

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a really good job of changing and adjusting on the fly.

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>He used to be a guy who wanted to sit

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and cover three and maybe a little man free, but

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>now they've evolved. They use a little quarters coverage, which

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>is what Dallas plays. They really do a good job

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>but basically throwing a blanket around your passing game and

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>forcing you to nickeling down the ball down the field,

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and they just believe the odds are in their favor

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that you will mess it up. And if they're able

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to generate any pressure at the line of scrimmage, but

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>then the ball comes out high and tips and overthrows

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>lead to interceptions, and so they just do a really

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 1>good job for the Cowboys. It's about finding a way

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to protect upfront and selectively taking your shots. Richard Sherman

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and Veraett both are not the players that he once

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 1>were in their primes. They're good, but they still can

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>be susceptible to getting guy. So can you selectively find

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:07.839
<v Speaker 1>your opportunities to push the ball down the field while

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>also operating in a fishing passing game and finding a

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 1>way to run the ball enough with Zeke to control

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the temple of the game. Bucky, one of your points

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>this week on your five points a five bucks article

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>is you think Tony Pollard is ready for the prime time.

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>He said he's ready to take over. So you're looking

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>at forty Niners defense. How tough is it when you

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>have a guy like Pollard and Zeke, when you really

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>have two true backs that you have the game plan

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>for I mean, what kind of challenges is that for defense?

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, depending on how they're deployed, you can create

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of different challenges. The one thing that we

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen, and they did it a little bit, maybe

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks ago, putting Tony Pollo and Zeke on

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the field at the same time. The personnel alignment that

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:52.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm waiting to see would be twenty personnel, two backs,

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Tony Pollo, Zeke Elliott, three wide receivers Ceedee Lamb Gallop

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and Amari Cooper and being able to challenge the defense

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>in a different number of ways. If they continue to

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>do what they've been doing, then I think it's enough.

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Give him Polits enough snaps where he can impact the

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>game without taking away from what Zeke needs to do. So,

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>if Zeke is going to get twenty touches, Paula needs

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to get somewhere six to eight, eight to ten where

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:16.439
<v Speaker 1>he can impact the game. But it has to be

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>a priority and it has to be scripted into the

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:23.199
<v Speaker 1>car sheet. I know that Fred Warner is a very

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>good player, but can you give me a little bit

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>more detail, maybe just provide me with a snapshot of

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 1>what he does for them and why he's so valuable, Well,

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:33.719
<v Speaker 1>he does everything that you want to see Jayleen Smith do.

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>He's instinctive, he reacts, he can fly sideline the sideline,

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>he can make plays, he's tough. He has a natural

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>leadership ability to him that comes out in his play,

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think when you look at him, he has

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>emerged as one of the top linebackers. And as he

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:54.079
<v Speaker 1>goes that defense goals, he controls the middle and they

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>just do a good job of just keeping it very

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>simple for those guys, so they play without clutter and

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>so you can see their talent on the splat. Hey, Bucky,

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:04.319
<v Speaker 1>you look at the numbers for this defense, it bears

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 1>out exactly what you're saying. They're very good. I think

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>they're fifth overall defense, fifth and overall defense, but currently

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>right now they're fifth and pass defense, they're eighth and

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>rush defense, both in top ten. That being considered based

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>on what Dallas does well, and you can decide for

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>yourself what you think Dallas does well. How are they

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>are Is Dallas more likely to be successful running the

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>ball or passing the ball against a good defense that

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>does both pretty well. I think it's a mix. I

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>think this is a game, and I am the biggest

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>proponent of a You have to run the ball, but

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I think what you have to do with any Dalton

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to throw unfavorable down so first and ten

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>quick rhythm passes. We've seen Dalton shows catch a ton

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of passes over the middle of the field eight to

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>ten yards. You have to put your offensive position where

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you can stay ahead of the chain, so second and short,

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>third and short situation. You want to stay out of

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>those long yarder situations. So it may be a situation

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>where you throw early so you can eventually run late.

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of it depends on Anti Dall's ability

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to take care of the ball. But yeah, at this

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>point of the season and with everything how this year

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>has gone for the Cowboys, what would you say to

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a Cowboys fan to look for as far as excitement,

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>What's something that Cowboys fans should be excited about in

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>this game, whether it's on offense or in defense. Well,

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the excitement in this game, I would say it comes

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>from the winner go home nature of the game. If

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys are going to do it, you should see

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>them play with more energy than we've seen them. As

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you get closer to the postseason, the urgency and the

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>speed of the game picks up. So in my mind,

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>if I'm a Cowboys fan and I'm looking for this game,

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>if the Cowboys will have any chance of winning, the

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>physicality should mirror what we saw in the Pittsburgh game.

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>It should be the most physical game that we've seen.

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Because the urgency is if we don't win, the players

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>out of questions. So I think that has to be

0:15:57.920 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a part of it. I think you need to see

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the coach is really working together to make sure that

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>all of the game plans complement one another, and that

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>they're doing everything in this game just to win the game.

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's about winning the game, not compiling staffs and

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>whatever is necessary you're willing to do. And so I

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>would expect you would see not a level of desperation,

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>but a level of urgency from everybody that's involved in

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>this game. Buck, you just said that Cheltz has caught

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the ball over the middle a lot. Did they Did

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys lose anything this year without Jarwin? I mean

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty one catches, five hundred yards, three touchdowns. Is that

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>what you thought Jarwin would be or do you think

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that they lost something because they didn't have two of

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>those guys. No, I mean, I think he gave them

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a production that you would think. I think when you

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>evaluate the tight end position in relation to the wide receivers,

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the pecking orders should still be the three wide receivers

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>before you get two whoever's playing tight end, And so

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I think for Sheltz to have fifty one receptions, I

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>think that is a very very solid job. I think

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the interesting thing going for it will be how do

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 1>they elect to use both tight ends twenty twenty one

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and beyond dou they utilize more twelve personnel, two tight

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>end sets and maybe one of the wide receivers. I

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>would say maybe Michael Gallant finds is his way on

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 1>the silent like what is what does the plan of action? Do?

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 1>They have more versatility going for it. But I think

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Dalton Sheels has certainly been a nice surprise for the Cowboys. Bucky.

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I'm gonna step out on a limb and

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>guess that Robert solid is gonna feel head coaching opening

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>this offseason. That seems like a decent bet. And it's funny,

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 1>you know you mentioned that he kind of favors a

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 1>cover three scheme. So like, he completely reminds me of

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Chris Richard. Then, like he's like this fiery players coach

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>guy seems like he you know, if he prefers that scheme,

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:51.639
<v Speaker 1>it's an even bigger similarity. You know, if he's the

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>head coach of a team, I mean, what can I

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>expect from that? I you know, it seems like a

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>good bet the Cowboys will have to deal with him

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>at some point. What would you imagine his ideal blue

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>print for a defense and maybe a whole team would

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>be if he gets one of those jobs, Well, I

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 1>think the big thing and much like Chris had to

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>evolve down in Dallas, I think Robert this year has

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>shown more adaptability and flexibility. I think before it was

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>easy to say, oh, man, this guy he has everything

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that is disposed to. Look at all those first rounders

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:20.959
<v Speaker 1>on the D line, Nick Boles and anybody, anybody can

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>close their eyes and generate a pass for us and

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>play coverage behind it. This year he has shown the

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>ability to be adaptable because they didn't have those guys

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and people were eating up their scheme early in the

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>year to cover three, and so they went to a

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:35.360
<v Speaker 1>more of a split safety defense and so I think

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>as a head coach there right there says he has

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>enough adaptability and flexibility to be able to change as necessary.

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>The big thing when you get a defensive coordinated to

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 1>be the head coach who is going to be the

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>offensive play caller? And Canny have an offensive play caller

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that has what I say sticking power, meaning he can

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>last for two or three years without being plucked by

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>an owner who views him as the next head coach

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>in candidate, that would be the thing. I think The

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 1>key is who does he higher as an offensive coordinator

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>because the defense will fall on his shoulders? What is

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 1>his vision for how they play offense? But I do

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>think they'll they'll be fast, they'll be relentless, and I

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:14.719
<v Speaker 1>think there will be a little simple nature to what

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>they do to a lot of players to play fast.

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 1>We're joined by Bucky Brooks of NFL Network presented by

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Chevron with techron one more question for you, Bucky, Buffalo.

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>A couple weeks ago, we're able to put up three

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty eight pass yards against the San Francisco defense.

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>What did they do that led to their success? And

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>does Dallas have any of those components that they could

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>then try to mirror some of those things to have

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 1>a similar success. I mean Brian day Ball was in

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>his bag that he attacked them and retacked them relentlessly.

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>He did some things that he could attack their scheme.

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 1>They went three by one and really caught them in

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>some of their single high coverages, and they put the

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 1>pressure on the safety in the middle of the field

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to make choices, and Josh Allen with his arm was

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>able to really throw it over the top. And I'll say,

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean Stefon Diggs is outstanding, but the wide receivers

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 1>in Dallas, I would say, are still better. I think

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the big thing comes down to the trigger man and

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>can you protect. They were able to script some things.

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>They really exploited the coverage and as I say, like

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 1>with Verrett and Sherman, they're good, but they're still both

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:19.120
<v Speaker 1>susceptible to getting guys. So if the past president Rush

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get home, you can get those guys. It's just

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a matter of can you protect long enough to do

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 1>double moves and long routes that you can spend Richard,

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Sherman and Verrett around where you can expose some of

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the diminishing athleticism that they have. All right, so tell

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>us what's gonna happen, Who's gonna win this game? And

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>what's your final on this one? Man, This is a

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 1>tough one because anytime anytime you can run the ball,

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>this is tough. And so cal Shanahan is going to

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>run the ball and he's going to attack them, and

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>all the things that the Cowboys are put on tape

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>in recent weeks Baltimore and watch, they will see those

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>things at them. I don't have a lot of confidence

0:20:57.359 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to be able to solve those issues.

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think it comes down to turnovers, and so

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys have to create two or more turnovers. Nick

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>mullas has been very generous. It is the holiday season,

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>so maybe he'll give some away, but they have to

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>find a way to make it Nick Mullin's game. They

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 1>have to take the running game away, and that's a

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 1>huge challenge for Mike Nolan his defense. All Right, Buck,

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate you joining us. Man. We'll have you back

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 1>next week and it'll be Christmas week, so we'll talk

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about those Philadelphia Eagles that'll be coming

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>coming around to been that that week. So let's go

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and take our final break. When we come back from

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:29.919
<v Speaker 1>this break, we'll talk a little bit more about this

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys offense when we come right back. This is

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot com Radio. We're back in a tasty

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 1>treat that's sweeping airwaves and taste buds. It's new Doctor

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>pepper and cream Soda. Let's take a listen, Doctor cream Soda.

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Is he a new combone that's music to my ears? Okay,

0:21:53.520 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>doctor music to my ears and mouths New Doctor pepper

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 1>and Cream Soda A delicious There's nothing as unique as

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 1>our eyes, which is why Selor pioneers ways to make

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>lenses as unique as you. Varilux were super sharp Vision,

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Essential Blue for protection and Krisol for freedom from glare.

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Three cutting up solutions and a single unique lens. So

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>whatever your needs, insist on Selor visit your local slor

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>experts and find a perfect lens for you. Seemore do

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Moore Selre the Cowboys Way, where sixteen Hall of Famers

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and five championships shows us what success looks like. Where

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Turkey is always the second best part of Thanksgiving Day,

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>where we are all defined by one single thing, the Star,

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Where we as fans know it's our job to keep

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the tradition going. Bank of America is proud to be

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the official bank of the Dallas Cowboys and to support

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the quest of living life the Cowboys Way. Copyright twenty

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty Bank of America Corporation. Dear, it's nineteen oh eight.

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Don't you think we should get electricity and stop using

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 1>candles to see at night? It's just electricity lights up

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the room fast. It's more reliable than candles blowing out,

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and people seem to love it nationwide. Well, candle, dar,

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>did you just run into the wall? I have a

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>new candle please. Historically, switching to new technology is a

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>no brainer. Today it's AT and T five G, fast, reliable, secure,

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and nationwide. Switch to AT and T five G. It's

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>not complicated. Five G requires compatible plan may not be

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>in your area. See att dot com slash five G

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>for you for details. Back to the break. If you

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>can't go to AT and T Stadium this weekend, you

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:46.119
<v Speaker 1>can definitely bring the food to you if you're craving

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the stadium's famous Cowboys cheese, state nachos, Cowboy rita. When

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:52.719
<v Speaker 1>you're watching the game at home, you can place your

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 1>order online for pickup at at and T Stadium every

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>week this season. Check out the menu at at and

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>T stadium dot com slash at home good stuff. All right,

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.959
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get this final segment rolling. We're alive from

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the SWBC Mortgage studios at the Star, and I want

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to have a couple of questions for you guys about

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys offense. Let's see where we go with these.

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's start first with the offensive line. We talked a

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:16.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit about them earlier this week, but I thought

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it was worth bringing this back up. They allowed two

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>sacks this past game against the Cincinnati team that really

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't very good on defense. They also allowed one hundred

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>also only ran for one hundred and one yards. Were

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you disappointed, because I got the impression after watching them

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of games that this offensive line was

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:41.199
<v Speaker 1>seemingly getting better. Were you at all disappointed by their

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>effort against Cincinnati or about their production against Cincinnati or

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 1>do you think it's still just kind of rides with

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>what you thought about this offensive line. Let's start first

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>with you, Nick. I think that the offensive line is

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>I've said this the other day. I think they're an

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.879
<v Speaker 1>athletic group they're younger. I think when the whole fields

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 1>in front of them, they're gonna be pretty decent, especially

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 1>against the average you know, to blow average defense like that.

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>But where they struggle, it's just stay. They're not very

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>strong and when you get down in the red zone

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and you see that, then you think, oh, the offensive

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>line didn't play as well. So but that's my only

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.159
<v Speaker 1>really issue is with them is that I think that

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>they're just not very good at pushing some people back.

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>They didn't change anything about what you thought of them

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>what they did in this last game. Like if you're

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>were you a guy that was thinking their arrow was

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>pointing up a little bit and it leveled off or

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>were you just thinking they were playing okay before that? Well,

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>this is this is in my if I had to,

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, if I could pick the offensive line for

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>next year, I mean, this would be my backups. Yeah,

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 1>I think right. So you think some of these guys

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>have earned a place on this team. Maybe obviously not starters,

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:46.120
<v Speaker 1>but they've earned a place on this team based upon

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 1>how they've played. I mean, I think I think this

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>is your second team offensive line next year, or maybe

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know what's gonna happ with Connor Williams.

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>That one's kind of tricky. But other than that, I mean,

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 1>these guys could be backups, so you're gonna feel better

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>about Oh well, if if Terry steals your fourth tackle,

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>you're probably gonna feel better about it than obviously if

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>he starts. All right, Amber, The only problem with that

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>is that you really really don't know and cannot predict what,

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>like all call in situation is going to be Terren

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Smith Sack Martin. I mean, I think we went into

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>this year thinking that we were pretty good at the

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>old line and pretty set and comfortable with the backups

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and the depth at the position just in the old

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:29.919
<v Speaker 1>line in general, and then look what happened. So that's

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>my problem with that whole thinking is there's no certainty

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>with these guys, and as much as they're great and everything,

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the starter I'm talking about, you cannot predict if they're

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be healthy or not. And when it comes

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>down to that and when you're looking to win games,

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>when you're looking to get a touchdown, passing the red zone,

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>helping the running game, Ezekiel Elliott, we see how much

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that has affected Ezekiel Elliot, which is a big, big

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 1>element in this offense. So I think that that, yeah,

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:06.639
<v Speaker 1>they're still gonna need help there as far as some

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 1>backup guys that can actually go in there with some power.

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I do think that these guys they've I mean, they've

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:15.640
<v Speaker 1>been thrown out there and it's not their fault. It's

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 1>just kind of what happened, and they're gonna grow. But

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 1>it takes time to grow and get that strength. We've

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>seen that with Connor Williams. Connor Williams is still kind

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:28.159
<v Speaker 1>of battle in there, so you just never know how

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>how long it's gonna take for one of these linements

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 1>to progress into what you're looking for. So as of

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 1>right now, to answer your question, I do think that

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>they're just what I expected at this point. You know,

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those games that you know, I'm not

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 1>expecting them to do much. But at the same time,

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I didn't come out of the game thinking, man, this

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>old line that was the problem, That's why the Cowboys

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 1>play it this way or that way. So at this

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>point it's just kind of what I expect personally, all right, Dave,

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 1>I was confused at the way you frame the question.

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:08.679
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, I mean I thought they played great,

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>like and again, I mean again like for what they are. Yeah,

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>like Nick said, like, there's not a guy other than

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Connor Williams. There's not a guy on this line that

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you would prefer to be starting for you next year.

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>So I keep that in the back of my mind

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and everything that they do. They let Andy, you know,

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>like they kept him upright for the most part. He

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>was able to spread the ball around the offense scored

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty three points. No, like, they're not explosive or awesome,

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:36.199
<v Speaker 1>but they're not. I mean, how could you expect him

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to be. They're all backups. I mean other than like

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Joe Looney is the one I'm not sure of because

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, he needs a new contract and you know,

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe he gets it, maybe he doesn't. I don't know. Um,

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>but I tend to expect all of these guys to

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>be in camp next year, and I mean that's a

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>good sign, and I want them to be, Like they've

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>all earned an opportunity to make the fifty three next year.

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I think even even Terrence Steele, because yeah, I'm totally

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>fine with him being my fourth offensive tackle. Not I

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>don't want him to start, But you need a you

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 1>know you need. So all these guys I hope are

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>in camp next year, and I hope that Tyrn Smith

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and Lyle Collins are healthy. And that's you know, those

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 1>are topics for the offseason. But I feel good about

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 1>where they are for who they are. All right, let's

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 1>move on. Let's talk about Zeke Elliott. And I was

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>actually I saw this on the website. There was a

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:30.479
<v Speaker 1>mail back question I thought was pretty interesting. They were

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about some of the reasons why Zeke's production may

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>have gone down. And so what I did was, I

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>have four things here that I've listed as reasons why

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Zeke's production might have gone down, and I want each

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of you guys to rank them from the thing that

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you think is the biggest reason all the way down

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to the thing that's the least reason. Here are the things.

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>You've got the offensive line injuries, You've got opponents focusing

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>on stopping the run with Dak being out, so basically

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Dak being out. Third, you've got they've been playing from

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>behind quite a bit this year. And then fourth, simply

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that Zeke's declined as a runner. Let's start first with you,

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Amber oh Man. I have a short term memory. I

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>should have written those down. I think I think that

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 1>would be my number one because I've seen the power

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that Zeke has. I think he has the if regardless

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of Dak not being there, which is a huge element

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>in the offense as well. But I still think that

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Zeke has that power. We just haven't been able to

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>see it because maybe the old line hasn't been able

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to help him. So that would be my number one,

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and then you have the opponents focusing on stopping it,

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 1>with Dak being number two would be that one for okay,

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and then playing from behind and then Zeke not just

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>being as good. Um, I think Zeke not being as

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>good would be number three for me, and then playing

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>from behind would be number four. I think that him

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:58.479
<v Speaker 1>losing the ball so many times, I mean, that's on him.

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>You cannot blame that on any one else but him.

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>That's his hands and his own doing basically, but also

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe the way that Kellen Moore has been utilizing him,

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe not giving him enough opportunities. But maybe that's just

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 1>an effect of him losing the ball so many times

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and then maybe losing somewhat some confidence in him. But

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:27.239
<v Speaker 1>that would be my ranking, all right. Dave Oh I mean,

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have his quarterback, and I think that's that's

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the big part of it. And I mean, I know

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line has been banged up, but I think

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>anybody who follows the Cowboys closely is probably aware that,

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the narrative of this Great Wall of Dallas

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>has been more myth than reality over the last you know,

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>two or three years. You know, they haven't been this

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>elite unit that just bulldozes everybody since probably twenty sixteen.

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it would help to have those guys, but

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a quarterback league, and if you like,

0:31:56.720 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>if the defense isn't afraid of your quarterback, they're going

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to key on the next best weapon, which is Zeke.

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I have his stats right in front of me. With

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott. I know the team wasn't good, or you know,

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 1>they were eight and eight mediocre, but with Dak Prescott

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in the lineup last year, Zeke ran for thirteen hundred

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>yards and twelve touchdowns. He averaged four and a half

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry, and he had what he had like

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight hundred yard games. He's got one this year,

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know, some of that is a byproduct of

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 1>they were out of games early when Dak was still

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>in the lineup. But I'm confident that wouldn't have held up,

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>like those turnover problems wouldn't have held up throughout the

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 1>whole season. They would have had a chance to lean

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>on some teams the way that they did against Cincinnati

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>in Minnesota. And I just think, I think it's hard

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>when you don't have a quarterback that scares defenses. So

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I chalk most of it up to not having Dak. Okay,

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 1>so that's your first one. Where do you rank the

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 1>other three? Oh, well, no Dak, no offensive line, Zeke's

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and Zeke's decline in that order. And I answered it

0:32:57.840 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 1>was me that answered that question on the mail bad.

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 1>They're all three val They're all three valid questions. And

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't think Zeke is as explosive or

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>dynamic as he was earlier in his career. He's got

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of tread on his tires. But and I've

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>said this more times than I can count on this show,

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Like when he's got Dak and a healthier offensive line,

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he'll be just fine. Like, I'm not worried

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 1>about him in the long run. He's just fighting through

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a crappy season, and it's actually amazing that when you

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>look at that that you say he's relying on Zeke,

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean on Dak being here, because that the narrative

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>has always been since he got here that Dak is

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 1>reliant on Zeke. And I think what we're starting to

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>see now is maybe the flip of that, where maybe

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>having Dak is just as important, if not more important

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to Zeke being able to do well, as opposed to

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the flip Nick Well, oh good, sorry, go ahead, because

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I have a point to that, Okay, I was just

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna ask in that point. I mean back then where

0:33:55.840 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 1>defenses asked scared of Dak earlier years probably not weren't

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 1>this year. I mean, like, if you think about it,

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:08.439
<v Speaker 1>even this year, they they still were keying on on Zeke.

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's why look at all the yards that

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 1>they racked up against Cleveland against Seattle. I mean they

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:17.719
<v Speaker 1>still wouldn't let I mean, the focus was always on

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Zeke even this year, and that's why. Well, but Dak

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 1>was able to take advantage of it way more well.

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know if I agree with that, because

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 1>there were a lot of those games with those yards

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and though all that mass production came when they were

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:32.320
<v Speaker 1>way behind, in which case defensive were playing back like

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:34.919
<v Speaker 1>they weren't necessarily at that point in the game, going

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:36.839
<v Speaker 1>up and trying to stop the running games they were

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:41.320
<v Speaker 1>finella at the end. Yeah, maybe, I mean, I don't know.

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean maybe that's the answer. My point is, I

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 1>just don't know that it was. I don't know that team. Now.

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I do think teams probably went into games saying there's

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 1>probably not been a team the Cowboys if played over

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:51.879
<v Speaker 1>the last four years. It didn't go in the game,

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and first priority was we got to stop the run.

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:56.279
<v Speaker 1>But by the way, that's most NFL games, right, But

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I do think that there there were a lot of

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 1>games when they were keying on the pass the time

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 1>that Dak got going, and Dak was still going, you

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>know often. I mean, the quarterback would be number one

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 1>for me, just because any team that plays four quarterbacks

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 1>in a season is probably going to have a bad year.

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 1>And so that's because we saw the offensive line was

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:18.240
<v Speaker 1>good in fourteen, terrible and fifteen because they had any quarterback,

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and then back to good again in sixteen when they

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 1>had a better quarterback. So I would say a quarterback

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 1>offensive line, playing from behind. Those things kind of all

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 1>trickled together, and then seeks decline would be the last

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:31.360
<v Speaker 1>one for me. And that's interesting because none of you

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 1>guys add Zeke decline any higher than third. And I

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 1>think there are questions that people are bringing up right now.

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 1>So do you guys think those questions are invalid when

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you start talking about do you think Zeke is still

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the same runner that he was three years ago? I

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's the same runner that he was, But

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:50.359
<v Speaker 1>I think the difference between where he was three years

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 1>ago and now is not as great as the difference

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of Zack Martin and Connor McGovern and Terrence Steele and

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:00.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, and Lyle Collins. I think that drop off

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 1>is way more, way greater than his own drop off. Dave,

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 1>what do you think? I just want to I mean

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>back to the other point, Like, it's not wild to

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 1>think that that's changed. Like Dak Prescott is a much

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 1>better quarterback in twenty twenty than he was in twenty seventeen,

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Like he has developed as a player, So it's not

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 1>like this crazy shift. It's like, oh, the most important

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:24.839
<v Speaker 1>player on your team has gotten a lot better over

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:28.839
<v Speaker 1>the last three years. I mean it makes sense, and yeah,

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean Zeke has Zeke has declined. That's what running

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 1>backs do. It's like driving a It's like driving a

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 1>car off the lot. Like the minute you take it

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:38.399
<v Speaker 1>off the lot, it loses value and it doesn't gain

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:42.319
<v Speaker 1>it back ever, like every carry declines your value by

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:46.719
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I don't think it's severe. I still

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:49.239
<v Speaker 1>think he's a talented running back. But the proof is

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 1>in the pudding. He's he can't. You know, he ain't

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Barry Sanders. He can't do it without some help. He

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 1>just I mean he can't or else he would be,

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, and I don't. I mean, I don't

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 1>want that to sound too harsh. And that's what I

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:04.359
<v Speaker 1>keep saying is for the price, for the price they're

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 1>paying for him, you would like to see that dynamic

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:11.359
<v Speaker 1>ability that makes him dangerous without a better supporting cast,

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 1>but there's no evidence to suggest that that's true. I mean,

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I agree with what he said. I think that what

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing this year is just realizing that Zeke maybe

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:25.759
<v Speaker 1>is a guy that needs the help around him. And

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you talked about Deck. Yes, obviously that's going to be

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:31.839
<v Speaker 1>completely different weapon than the other quarterbacks that they've had,

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and obviously the old line we've seen that and I

0:37:36.120 --> 0:37:39.839
<v Speaker 1>but regardless of that, I still think that Zeke has

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it in him and I think he will be better

0:37:43.360 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 1>next year, but he needs those other guys around him,

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:51.239
<v Speaker 1>and that's maybe what we're really realize in this year. Yeah,

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I think if you go back and remember where the

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys were when they made the decision to draft him

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 1>as high as they did, he was supposed to be

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the cherry on top of a great offensive line like

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:02.280
<v Speaker 1>they I don't think if they didn't have that offensive

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 1>line at that time, I don't think they select Zeke

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Elliott with that pick. I think they probably go Jalen

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Rams quarterback, right right. I just think that. I just

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:13.279
<v Speaker 1>think that there was a whole different set of circumstances

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:16.719
<v Speaker 1>that And by the way, those circumstances aren't here this year, right,

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 1>And you don't have that offensive line, you don't have

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:21.719
<v Speaker 1>that quarterback, and so to expect that Zeke is going

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to perform in the same way as what you were

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>as a same way despite the circumstances being completely flipped,

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:29.759
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a little bit unfair to Zeke in

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 1>some respects All right, We're gonna take a couple of

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:34.319
<v Speaker 1>questions here, maybe one or two questions we can get

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 1>too from fans. And but what you got, well, I

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:40.239
<v Speaker 1>have a draft question. Or as far as trades, do

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:42.399
<v Speaker 1>you guys think I mean, we've talked about the three

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers and how great they are and all the

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 1>talent there. Do you guys see a possibility where the

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys decide to trade either Michael Gallup or Amari Cooper

0:38:53.120 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 1>for something. I was a lot more. I was a

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 1>lot more opposed to it when the Cowboys still had

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 1>something to play for this year. You know, I hated

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the idea in October, you know, when you're thinking this

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 1>team might have a chance to accomplish something. I still

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:13.040
<v Speaker 1>don't like it because I would rather have three really

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:18.239
<v Speaker 1>good receivers than not. But you know, Michael Gallup is

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 1>now into it. I mean, he's basically entering a contract year.

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:24.840
<v Speaker 1>He's got three years left this season. It would depend

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 1>get for him. But if if somebody wanted him in

0:39:27.800 --> 0:39:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the off season and they would give me a high

0:39:31.200 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 1>draft pick, I would consider it. I don't, I really

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I would have I'd be reluctant to move

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Amari Cooper and like he's got his haters, like people

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 1>want to hate on him. He's gonna set career highs

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:46.320
<v Speaker 1>for catches and yards this year. And as Nick mentioned,

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 1>when you start four quarterbacks, that usually means you're not

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 1>having a good year and your offense is not going

0:39:50.800 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to be good. With the exception of the Bend Nucci experiment,

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:57.720
<v Speaker 1>he's still producing at a pretty good click even without

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 1>his preferred quarterback. He's a and like he's dynamic enough,

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 1>like he can have a two hundred yard day where

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 1>he scores two touchdowns, but he's also been a reliable

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:10.800
<v Speaker 1>possession guy where your quarterback can look to him for

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 1>six seven, eight catches and eighty yards on a reliable basis.

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I think he's pretty underrated at this point. I would

0:40:17.200 --> 0:40:20.840
<v Speaker 1>be reluctant to get rid of him. But if somebody

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 1>offered me, like a second or a third round pick

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 1>for Michael Gallop, I might do it. Yeah, if I

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 1>got more, if I got better value than what I

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 1>drafted him in, I would think about it. The thing

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>about Gallup is that he most When you have three

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:36.880
<v Speaker 1>really good receivers, that can be a problem because we

0:40:37.000 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 1>know how, we know what kind of players good receivers are,

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and but having three together could be an issue. Just

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 1>listening to him the other day, it didn't sound like

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:48.359
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be a problem with him. And I'll

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 1>say this, that might be the reason why he's never

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 1>really great. And I hate saying it that way, but

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the reason, you know what, I mean, like he probably

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 1>won't rock the boat that he's not getting the ball

0:40:56.640 --> 0:40:58.440
<v Speaker 1>all the time, because he even said that, like, you know,

0:40:58.520 --> 0:40:59.840
<v Speaker 1>it is what it is. Some games you do some

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:02.640
<v Speaker 1>game if you don't. But that right there might be

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the one little thing holding him back that makes him

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:08.239
<v Speaker 1>not like an elite, elite player because he doesn't have

0:41:08.400 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that drive. I don't know. I don't want to say that.

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>It just doesn't seem like he's too worried about it.

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's okay. I mean, it's okay that they want

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to be three guys together, you know, and that that

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 1>could be pretty dangerous. So I'm gonna play at Devil's

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:22.920
<v Speaker 1>advocate because I was actually having this. I was actually

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:27.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this yesterday. Have you seen in the NFL

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a team do really well, a team get deep in

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, a team go to Super Bowl. Maybe a

0:41:33.840 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 1>team win it that had this much talent at wide receiver,

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 1>because with every really talented guy you got at one position,

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:43.719
<v Speaker 1>that's one less talented guy you may have at another position. Right,

0:41:44.080 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 1>And it made me start thinking, is this team becoming

0:41:46.960 --> 0:41:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta Falcons where they've got really great receivers? They

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:53.840
<v Speaker 1>got a pretty good trigger man, but their defense not

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:57.920
<v Speaker 1>very good. And as time goes on, it just starts

0:41:57.960 --> 0:42:00.719
<v Speaker 1>wearing on other things because you're putting so much into that.

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that this is the wrong strategy? Maybe

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 1>not seeing anything about the players themselves. I know we

0:42:06.880 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>all want those three players to be here, but strategically,

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:12.920
<v Speaker 1>is it the right move to have that much talent

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:15.319
<v Speaker 1>at wide receiver versus taking at least one of those

0:42:15.360 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 1>pieces and turning them into another player on another at

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:21.919
<v Speaker 1>another position where you could really use them. That's that's fair.

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:24.279
<v Speaker 1>That's fair because when they had them with Dak in

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the first five games, they were trying to outscore teams

0:42:26.680 --> 0:42:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and they weren't right, you know, so you can you

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:31.440
<v Speaker 1>can make the argument. I mean, and and you know

0:42:31.560 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe that they could use a better cornerback or safety

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:36.800
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. So yeah, I mean, that's fair. Dave, what

0:42:36.840 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>do you think. I mean, I hate to compare dak

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:43.600
<v Speaker 1>to one of the best two or three quarterbacks to

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:47.480
<v Speaker 1>ever play the sport, but twenty thirteen Broncos were pretty nice.

0:42:47.560 --> 0:42:50.160
<v Speaker 1>They had three wide receivers that were awesome and an

0:42:50.160 --> 0:42:53.399
<v Speaker 1>awesome tight end. I mean, I think in a game

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 1>with as small as sample size as football for that matter,

0:42:56.560 --> 0:42:59.440
<v Speaker 1>m the Chiefs that just won the Super Bowl have

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a mean. Patrick Mahomes is incredible, but the guys catching

0:43:03.480 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the ball in Kansas City do not get remotely enough

0:43:06.200 --> 0:43:09.720
<v Speaker 1>credit for how good they are. You know, Tyreek Hill, Kelsey,

0:43:10.360 --> 0:43:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, even Sammy Watkins to a degree. The Cowboys

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted to pay Sammy Watkins a lot of money not

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that long ago. So I in a sport with this

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:21.239
<v Speaker 1>small of a sample size, I don't know that it's

0:43:21.320 --> 0:43:24.279
<v Speaker 1>fair or right to just assume that there's only one

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:26.920
<v Speaker 1>way to do it. I absolutely think you could win

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a Super Bowl with the best receiver corps in the

0:43:29.600 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 1>game putting up big numbers. I mean, you got to

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:35.320
<v Speaker 1>do something about your defense, you have to, But I

0:43:35.400 --> 0:43:38.520
<v Speaker 1>mean you can do that with the draft. The Cowboys

0:43:38.640 --> 0:43:41.440
<v Speaker 1>could you know, opt to spend some money to do that,

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Like that's That troubles me way more than how many

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 1>resources they commit to wide receiver. Is I just I

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:51.759
<v Speaker 1>don't know in today's NFL if you can build a

0:43:51.920 --> 0:43:54.920
<v Speaker 1>contender without spending money in free agency, Like, but your

0:43:54.960 --> 0:43:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Cats is probably gonna go down this year though, right,

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I if not completely understand that. I mean I totally

0:44:04.320 --> 0:44:07.200
<v Speaker 1>get that, but I mean, okay, like let's just let's

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 1>just play this out and you trade Michael or a

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:15.080
<v Speaker 1>second pick that's like somewhere in the sixties. Now, let's

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:17.920
<v Speaker 1>think about the defenders that you can probably get in

0:44:18.000 --> 0:44:20.799
<v Speaker 1>that range, and you know, maybe you hit and they

0:44:20.840 --> 0:44:22.960
<v Speaker 1>blossom into a great player, But the odds that they're

0:44:23.000 --> 0:44:26.160
<v Speaker 1>going to become this incredible defender in the first year

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 1>or two of their contract, that's not very realistic. I mean,

0:44:28.960 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 1>think about what you got from Treyvon Diggs this season,

0:44:31.280 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Like that's probably what you're getting for whatever you get

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:37.239
<v Speaker 1>from Michael Gallup. So I mean you're not getting You're

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:39.799
<v Speaker 1>not getting Ed Reid at pick fifty one to come

0:44:39.840 --> 0:44:41.719
<v Speaker 1>in and fix all your problems in the secondary. So

0:44:42.440 --> 0:44:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it's the classic case of what you know Jerry loves

0:44:44.640 --> 0:44:47.480
<v Speaker 1>to say, you know you you got it. The Jello

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:49.200
<v Speaker 1>in your hand and it's squeezing out one in while

0:44:49.200 --> 0:44:53.919
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to fix the other. I mean, like I said,

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not opposed to it, but I don't know that

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be this cure. All yeah, and it might.

0:44:57.840 --> 0:45:00.279
<v Speaker 1>There is no fast answer here. I think it's the point,

0:45:00.360 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 1>like you you're you got what you got. By the way,

0:45:02.719 --> 0:45:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys do have ton of talent like that, if they

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:06.920
<v Speaker 1>had everybody healthy, you would think they would be a

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:09.839
<v Speaker 1>team that would be at least a playoff caliber team,

0:45:09.880 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 1>if not more. Right, But I don't think there's a

0:45:12.680 --> 0:45:14.880
<v Speaker 1>quick fix to this defense. I think it's going to

0:45:14.960 --> 0:45:17.080
<v Speaker 1>require some parts, and I just don't know if they

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:19.480
<v Speaker 1>have enough. With the resources they have right now in

0:45:19.880 --> 0:45:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the draft and knowing that they're gonna lose a lot

0:45:22.640 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of guys free agency, and knowing that the cap may

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:27.359
<v Speaker 1>go down, like all those things combine, I just don't

0:45:27.400 --> 0:45:29.120
<v Speaker 1>know that there's a good fix right now other than

0:45:29.200 --> 0:45:32.879
<v Speaker 1>getting more picks to be able to bring in more players. Well.

0:45:32.920 --> 0:45:36.640
<v Speaker 1>See my argument to that would be, they absolutely need

0:45:36.719 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to draft defense. They need to address the defense. They

0:45:39.239 --> 0:45:42.080
<v Speaker 1>but but that's the long game, you know. That's kind

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of like that's like a major house renovation and in

0:45:45.160 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, like it's it's still true it didn't work

0:45:48.640 --> 0:45:51.080
<v Speaker 1>this year because of injuries, but like their offense is

0:45:51.080 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be their best bet to win games in

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:56.279
<v Speaker 1>the short term. Yeah, Fixing the defense is like a

0:45:56.320 --> 0:45:59.600
<v Speaker 1>two or three year project, and the offense can help

0:45:59.640 --> 0:46:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you get there while you're working on it. That's the

0:46:01.360 --> 0:46:03.719
<v Speaker 1>way I view it. Although a good draft and some

0:46:03.880 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 1>good picks and maybe a good free agent or two

0:46:06.400 --> 0:46:08.279
<v Speaker 1>can get your defense the middle of the road. You

0:46:08.360 --> 0:46:10.239
<v Speaker 1>get a middle of the road defense with a high

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:13.920
<v Speaker 1>powered offense. Now, maybe you're working with something right, Yeah, exactly.

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:15.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, we appreciate you guys. Join us. We'll be

0:46:15.600 --> 0:46:17.400
<v Speaker 1>back tomorrow. We're gonna wrap this thing up. Get you

0:46:17.480 --> 0:46:21.799
<v Speaker 1>guys ready for this final, final game, or not final game,

0:46:21.840 --> 0:46:24.360
<v Speaker 1>but get you guys finally ready for the game on

0:46:24.480 --> 0:46:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Sunday or the Cowboys will take on the San Francisco

0:46:27.280 --> 0:46:29.879
<v Speaker 1>forty nine ers. Till then for Nick even, Dave Helmet, Ambergarci. Yeah,

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:31.719
<v Speaker 1>I am Derek Eilton. This has been The Break live

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>on Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. This has been a

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:40.640
<v Speaker 1>production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys

0:46:40.719 --> 0:46:41.399
<v Speaker 1>Football Club