WEBVTT - Shared False Memories and The Mandela Effect

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Are you a Stuff to Blow your Mind fan? Are

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you a New Yorker Do you plan to attend this

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>year's New York Comic Con. If so, then you've got

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to check out our exclusive live show NYCC presents Stuff

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind Live Stranger Science. Join all three

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of us as we record a live podcast about the

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>exciting science and tantalizing pseudo science underlying the hit Netflix

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>show Stranger Things. It all goes down Friday October six

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>from seven pm to eight thirty pm at the Hudson

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:32.279
<v Speaker 1>Mercantile in Manhattan. Stuff You missed in history class has

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a show right before us, so you can really double down,

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>learn more and buy your tickets today at New York

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Comic Con dot com slash NYCC hyphen presents Welcome to

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind from How Stuff Works dot com. Hey,

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>are you welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind? My

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:00.080
<v Speaker 1>name is Robert Lamb and I'm Christian Seger. Robert, do

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you remember this movie? This is how a Lot of

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind? Episode to begin? But do

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 1>you remember this movie that had Sinbad in it from

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the nineties where he played a genie. Uh, you're you're

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you're discussing the film Shazam. Yeah, but I don't think

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Sinbad is actually in it. I just think a lot

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>of people remember Sinbad being in it. It turns out

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>it's Shaquille O'Neill who raised and it's Kazam as opposed

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to show exactly. Yeah, this is uh, this is a

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>big deal. This is This is one of those cases

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>where the joke, the conspiracy theory, all of it sort

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:41.119
<v Speaker 1>of wrapped together, like ends up actually taking shape because

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's a college humor came around and eventually

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 1>put out like they got Sinbad. Is that right? I

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't know this. Okay, they got Sinbad. They filmed him

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>in like a scene from this movie, and they put

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>all these filters over it to make it look like

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it was retrieved you know, video footage from a VHS

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>tape from the nineties. Okay. Yeah, And essentially what we're

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about here is actually, and I hesitate to say,

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>this a phenomena that many people report. Uh, and it's

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>all connected and bundled under terminology referred to as the

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Mandela effect. Yeah, it basically comes down to something that

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>is an alleged shared false memory where it gets it

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>gets more complicated than that. We're going to discuss it.

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 1>But the idea is that you'll have multiple people sharing

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a false memory, generally of something from sort of you know,

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>obscure pop culture, but in some cases like world history,

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that that everyone has the same mistaken notion in their mind,

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 1>and then they suddenly say, hey, why do we why

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>do we all believe this thing that simply is not

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>So you can go to Synbad's filmography on IMDb and

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>clearly that he was never in such a film. It's

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>not listed. I mean you can, you can. You can

0:02:57.639 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>get into situations where, all, right, there are films that

0:02:59.880 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>are not maybe not listed on IMDb because they never

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>reached a stage of completion, but people claim to have

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>remembered seeing it or seeing trailers for it. So it

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>would for that to be the case for it to

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>have legitimately existed in some form or another, like they

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>would have had to have seen it or at least

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>sen a trailer. Right. Well, but I think you're spending

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>too much time thinking about the possibilities here, because I

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's pretty obvious that it's just the people who

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>thought that they had seen Shazam with Sinbad are actually

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>originally from an alternate reality. Oh yes, well, there's there's

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that argument, or that a time traveler traveled back in

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>time and changed time and we're all remembering it now

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>only because of the Sinbad. They traced the like the

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>butterfly effect, and they said, if we can stop the

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Shazam movie from existing, then we'll um will prevent say,

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>World War three exactly. Now, those of you out there

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>might think I'm being a facetious jerk right now, but

0:03:56.400 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>actually that is a explanation for this effect we're talking

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>about again, the Mandela effect. You're gonna have a hard

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>time finding legitimate academic research done on this topic, but wow,

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>it is all over the internet. Like when I started

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>doing research on this yesterday, every listical site had a

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty two instances of the Mandela effect that you won't

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 1>remember something like, Yeah, you'll find reddits where people are

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>arguing back and forth about the various ridiculous conspiracy theory

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 1>explanations like oh, it's it's a glitch in the matrix.

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>We're already in a computer simulation, and this is because

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>somebody you know, hit delete on Shazam by accident, or

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.359
<v Speaker 1>or yeah, where it's the we've drifted over into an

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 1>alternate reality. Then the only difference is that there's no

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Shazam movie in this universe. Yeah, and I also want

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to make it clear to like, we're not here to

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>make fun of the idea of alternate realities or time travel.

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Those are actually topics that we are going to cover

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>in the future on this show. But we're going to

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 1>cover them from an actual research angle. Yeah. The computer

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>simulation angle came up recently in an episode that I

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>did with Joe about growing a universe in a bottle,

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>creating university. Uh, the thing. But but a lot of

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>this comes down to Aucam's razor. Right, what is the

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>what is the most reasonable explanation that we can we

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>can take, you know, if we're if we're forced to

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 1>draw Aucam's razors from its sheath, which of course this

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 1>is named for William of Ockham. Uh, then it's it's simple.

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>It's the simple notion that among competing hypotheses, the one

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 1>with the fewest assumptions should be selected. Right, So, should

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>we assume that there are multiple realities and we're shifting

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 1>among them, that should we assume that we're living in

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a computer simulation, or should we assume based on what

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>we know about memory and uh and how infallible it

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>is and how malleable it is, that that is where

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 1>we can place all the blame for this shared misinformation. Yeah.

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>This is especially interesting coming on the heels of our

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>alien abduction two parter that we did, because we talk

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit in those episodes about the science behind

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>inserting false memories and how easy that actually turns out

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to be. There's been a lot of research done on that,

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and this seems to be similar, but just on a

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>much smaller level. Right, instead of remembering that you were

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 1>abducted by aliens, you remember a movie that Sinbad didn't make. Yes, Now,

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>well let's go ahead and get just the name out

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of the way, because we are saying Mandela effect, not Mandola,

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>which was would sound more esoteric and mysterious. But now

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Mandela as in Nelson Mandela. Right. Yeah. So the popular example,

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 1>actually more popular than the sin Bad example, is that

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>some people seem certain that they remember Nelson Mandela dying

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen eighties, and they think they saw his

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 1>funeral on television, or more specifically, they remember that he

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>died in prison, as opposed to you know, dying later

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>after he like WHI which I have. I have a

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>hard time relating to this one because I distinctly remember

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 1>like news footage about his relief getting out of person. Yeah,

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>me too, Yeah he actually died in So what's going

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 1>on here? Well? It this seems like a case of

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>false memories, right, just like we talked about in those

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>alien abduction episodes. But some people do wonder if they're

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>remembering something from an alternate reality or if a time

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>travelers slightly altered our presence. So Robert and I were like,

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a kind of fascinating topic. Why don't we

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>dive into this and see what the research says. Um

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Most commentators out there, I want to be clear about this,

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>suggest that these are examples of false memories that are

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>just shaped by similar factors that are affecting multiple people. Okay,

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>but the main proponent of this is a person named

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Fiona Broom. Uh and that that sounds like a witch name.

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>It's like like a made up witch name. But Fiona

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Broom is a quote paranormal consultant who dubbed this the

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Mandela effect. She claims that perhaps thousands of other people

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>have the same experience and She points to speculation of

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>alternate realities as an explanation, and then as I dug deeper,

0:07:57.480 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I found out that this actually all occurred in our

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>backyard here in Atlanta, at our local sci fi comic

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>book fantasy uh convention slash party dragon Con. Interesting. Yeah,

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>so it was at dragon Con in two thousand and ten.

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>She was in. She was there, apparently, she was a guest.

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>They have a paranormal track where people talk about things

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>like this, and uh, she was in the V I P.

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Suite and a security person mentioned to the other people

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in the room, hey, do you remember when Nelson Mandela

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>died in the eighties? But then he just died like actually,

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and this was in two thousand ten. Sorry, he hadn't

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>even died yet. He just said, remember when Nelson Mandela

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>died in the eighties and he was still alive and

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>nobody else remembers that. And she was like, I remember

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that too, And out of that conversation was born this

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>whole thing. Another example, she says, also comes from Dragon Con.

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>She was there and someone insisted they remembered a Star

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Trek episode that, according to one star of the show,

0:08:57.760 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>was never filmed, So there was a person in the

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>audience who clearly remembered seeing this episode, but it had

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>never actually been filmed. Maybe they had read about it

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 1>in so much detail that they thought they had seen

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it they they false remembered it. Anyways, the quote from

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>from fion A brooms site. She actually has a site.

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the Mandela Effect dot com or dot

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>net or something like that. She's a book coming out.

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>This is profitable and she says on her site, these

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't simple errors in memory. They seem to be fully

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:32.079
<v Speaker 1>constructed incidents or sequential events from the past. They exceed

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:34.959
<v Speaker 1>the normal range of forgetfulness. So she's saying this is

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>something beyond just our our memory being fallible. Well, I

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I strongly disagree with that. Well, and we'll discuss I

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>do too. You know what's funny is like on our show,

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm usually the one who's most willing, well maybe not

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>most willing out of the three of us, but I'm

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>always like I want to give these people a chance,

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Like I want to give their idea a chance. Let's let's,

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of poke at it and see how

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:00.719
<v Speaker 1>it works. But immediately with this one, my reaction is

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>just like nope, like that that just doesn't sound like

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a thing. I feel like you're just making something up. Well,

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the thing is like that. There's basically a statement that

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that she's making something amazing is happening, and it's blank.

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I agree with the first part of that statement, because

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>something amazing is happening, But the what's amazing about it

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>is what it reveals about our memory and how we

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>influence each other's memory of events. Now I do I

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>do have to say, I really wish we could rename

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>this the Shazam effect, etcetera Mandela effect, because when you

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>call it a Mandelo effect, and I'm sure our South

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>African listeners will agree it, it betrays a sense of

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>historical ignorance. And you know, I don't want to be

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to judge you with that, but because I think that

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the relatable example of this that I can relate to is,

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>for instance, there's a period about a year or two

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>before Gene Wilder's actual death that I kind of had

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in my mind that he had died, uh, which you know,

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.439
<v Speaker 1>he just wasn't acting in anything. He just kind of

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think for the last ten or fifteen

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>years of his life, right, yeah, yeah, I think he

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>just got super choosy with his projects, and you know,

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't wasn't really that into doing it anymore, which

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>is fine, he has everybody had every right to to

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>do that. But for some reason, you know, when it

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>comes to the existence of celebrities, somehow my mind kind

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 1>of clicked it off that oh, he's an older guy.

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>He must he died or something, you know. And granted

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that was allowed to happen because I like Gene Wilder,

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not a Gene Wilder super fan. I'm not

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the kind. I wasn't checking his IMDb profile every day

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>for up upcoming projects. Your ram wasn't backing up information

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>about what was going on with Gene Wilder currently if

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>there was any media reportage on it, right right, So

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of like in the in my my rear view

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>mirrors or you know, in my peripheral cultural vision, the

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the the the timeline of Gene Wilder had ended. And

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>so I I think what's happening with Nelson Mandela's case

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>is that for many people, uh you know, maybe African

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>South African politics especially is not something that bere zeroed

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>in on. It's happening in in their peripheral vision. It's

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>happening based on what is you know, climbing up through

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the news cycle to to greet them. And therefore the

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>timeline of Nelson Mandela ended, you know, in his incarceration.

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>So and I think it's fair to say that it

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>would be extremely rare to find this effect in South Africa.

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Like I would imagine that citizens of South Africa are

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>probably very aware of how long he was in prison,

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>when he passed away, when he was you know, in

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>charge of the country, etcetera. Like there isn't this uh

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of like weird cognitive distance from it, right, Um,

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>So let's go through some other examples here. We talked

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 1>about Shazam and Sinbad, and we've talked about the Mandela one.

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>What about the Barren Stain Bears. Oh, yes, this one

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>of course relates to the spelling of the Barrensteine Bears

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>is in the Barrensteine Bears children's book series, whether it's

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 1>spelled Barren Stain or Barren stein Stein. And uh, you know,

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 1>it basically comes down to an argument over what how

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>how to pronounce the name right right? Yeah? And it's

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:16.959
<v Speaker 1>also like, like I think this one just is like

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a simple instance of misspelling and also cognitive bias, right,

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and that like we're more used to Stein being in

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>names than stain being in name, so our brain sort

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of self corrects if you see it as stain and

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.679
<v Speaker 1>turns it into Stein. Right. Uh. There was another one

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>like this that I saw floating around where people were like,

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna blow your mind. You're ready for it.

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>The peanut butter isn't Jeffy peanut butter. It's just jeff

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>peanut butter. And I was like, okay, fair enough, Like

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I did, like in the back of my head, I

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>did think of it as Jiffy peanut butter. But I

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>think that's just because the word jiffy is probably used

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>more often and it's probably like search to the surface

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of my memory data bank than the word jiff which

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>most people use now to describe like an image file type. Yeah,

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>now one. I don't think this is a widespread example,

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:17.079
<v Speaker 1>but this one came up recently on Twitter Comal and

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Johnny shared his amazement that Dan Ackroyd and then Dan

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a Chroid of The Ghostbusters that his name his last

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>name is spelled a y k r O y d

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and there's no like c uh c k going on

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in there and uh, and I when I read that,

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I was like, you know, I kind of just that's

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>odd as well. You know, I've I've certainly seen his

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>name plenty of times, but for some reason, I just

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of thought there was a C in there. Yeah,

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>me too. And I definitely didn't think there was a

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>y at the beginning. I mean, there's two wise in

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>his name. I didn't think there was a a y exactly.

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Like That's another perfect one where it's like, how many

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Dana Chroid movies have I seen? But how closely am

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I paying attention to the spelling of his name versus

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>just how I think it should be spelled on how

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it sounds. Yeah, members of the Acroid family, I'm sure

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>how do not have this this effect? Right? So I've

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>got an example here actually from the research that is

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>much smaller and that it doesn't pertain to pop culture

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and won't be as broadly felt, but it's a really

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>good example of how this takes place. Okay, at a

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>town clock at the Bologna Central Railway station, which was

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>damaged in a massacre in nineteen eighty. When they surveyed people,

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>nine percent of them falsely remembered that this specific town

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>clock had stopped working since the bombing. Actually, what had

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>happened was they repaired the clock immediately after the attack,

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>but then they manually stopped at sixteen years later in commemoration.

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>These are people who lived in the area, but they

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>had basically erased the sixteen years between the bombing and

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>it being turned off where it was working. And again,

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it's just how memory works, I think more than it

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>is an example of all these people sliding into an

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>alternate dimension. Now, one fun personal example of this that

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I that I have to share concerns the Konami video

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>game for the original Nintendo Entertainment System, Top Gun, the

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>second mission. Yeah, vaguely remember this, Okay, so it's tied

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>into the Top Gun movie. Yes, but it was very

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>much It was a loose kind of a sequel because

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you're presumably still Maverick, You're still Tom Cruise, and you're

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>going up in these little dog fights against progressively more

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 1>difficult like Soviet dog fight. Okay, I was thinking it

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>was like goose Iceman. No remembered in the first one,

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I know, but maybe you fight as ghost. Well, this

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>is the thing I was. It's at some point in

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the past like ten years. I was reminiscing about this

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>game with my friend Dave, and I was joking to

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>him that that at the end you fight Goose, because

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>there's this reveal that Goose didn't die in the first one,

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that the Soviets, uh, you know, fished him out of

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:06.199
<v Speaker 1>the water and they brainwashed him into a you know,

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a Soviet agent, and so now he's just like You've

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Winter Soldiers and uh. And I joked about it, and

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 1>then I think, I think Dave kind of, you know,

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>thinking back on it, kind of believed that it was real,

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and I kind of, since I don't think about Top

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Gun to all the time, I kind of fooled myself

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. So we talked about it later and

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>he was and he would he would ask like, was

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>is that isn't Goose the villain and Top Gun two?

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>And I think, yeah, I think I think he is.

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 1>And then I have to remember, oh, wait, I made

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that up. That was just a joke. Well, so did

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>this come back up again recently because they announced Tom

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Cruise announced that they're actually doing a Top Gun too.

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I know, I I feel like I feel like I

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>got the script done. Well, yeah, I feel like it'll

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>be a personal betrayal. If Goose is not the Winter

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Soldier villain of Top Gun two, well, Anthony Edwards, if

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you're listening, please plead with Tom Cruise once you get

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.919
<v Speaker 1>Winter sold I know he wants then, So for me,

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a lot of examples of this with

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 1>I Just when things like this happened, I just often

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>say like, oh, there goes your memory, right, Like, there

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.120
<v Speaker 1>are definitely moments, especially as I'm getting older, where I'm

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>like acutely aware. It's funny to use that term, but

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm very aware of how my memory is starting to fail,

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:23.959
<v Speaker 1>not in like a like an Alzheimer's type way or anything,

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>but just in like things like this that I don't

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 1>really keep close to the surface, I tend to forget

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>over a long period of time. Right. It's like the

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>first you know, several decades of your life for about accumulation,

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and then you run out of room and stuff just

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 1>can yeah, exactly. Like sometimes my wife will be like,

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe you don't remember this important event that happened,

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, well, look, I've got three hundred pages

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of D and D manuals up here, Like I'm gonna

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 1>have to start deleting loads in order to keep all

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.439
<v Speaker 1>this other information. So yeah, I mean it happens. My

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>memory is fallible. I'll misremember an actor who was in

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a movie for an since, or maybe I'll think an

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>older celebrity is already dead, like your instance with Gene Wilder.

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Happened to me. When Martin Landau died recentthing. I was like,

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>what didn't that guy already die like ten years ago?

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, and I feel bad, But then I'm like, well,

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 1>he just hasn't been working for a while, right, The

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>last thing I remember him and was probably ed Wood.

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I definitely get spelling and pronunciation of

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>things wrong, as many of the listeners of the show now.

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 1>But I've never felt like there's anything going on here

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>beyond the fallibility of my recollection. But let's you want

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to take a break, and then when we come back,

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>let's get into some of the theories surrounding this before

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>we hit the science. Okay, we're back, so what are

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>let's go. Let's cover like the broad gamut of I

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>guess wild theories as to what's going on here with

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 1>what is called the Mandela effect. All right, Well, as

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>we already mentioned. There's the alternate reality multiverse view of it.

0:19:57.720 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>There's the the idea that we're in a computer s

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>relation that some far future civilization has decided that the

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>best way for us to live is to live in

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 1>a simulation of an earlier, more simple time. You know

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting to me about that is like when you

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 1>take like philosophy one oh one in school, right, you

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>learn about Descartes and his whole argument with himself centuries

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 1>ago about whether or not his brain was actually in

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a jar being tortured by a demon and reality was

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>just all fake illusions. It's essentially the same thing, just

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a different framework. Yeah, it's actually a topic with don't

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I discussed on the recent episode Order Out of Chaos

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:40.360
<v Speaker 1>how to create a universe? It's it's it's a fascinating

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.439
<v Speaker 1>area of sort of thought experiment and discussion. Uh. And

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.959
<v Speaker 1>there's some there's some interesting arguments on both sides, but

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's again, it's one of those cases

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>where when we're looking at at an alleged phenomenon in

0:20:54.560 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>our world, what what hypothesis entails the fewest assumption about reality? Yeah,

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.199
<v Speaker 1>and you can see how like you know, you go

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>back and you look at that Decartes stuff, and he

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 1>pretty firmly was able to ground his argument and say, well,

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the world is actually real. I'm not braining a jar,

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>but you can see how in our present day circumstances,

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>because so much of life is simulated via entertainment or computers,

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>right for most of us, um that it would be

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>easy to fall back on that and be like, well,

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, what if none of this is real? Well,

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting that a lot of this relates to thinking

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>about the human mind and human experience in terms of

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a computer, because they're analyze the real error. I think,

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>because we tend to think of our mind as as

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>as like video footage and a surveillance, uh, you know,

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.239
<v Speaker 1>a system or just a computer record of what has

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 1>occurred and uh. And then when we pull up an

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>actual computer record of what has occurred Sinbad's IMDb profile,

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>for instance, we say, WHOA, what's going on? My database

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't match with this database? But I but we're resistant

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to completely throw out our own database, not realizing that

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the memory, of course, is full of flaws and holes

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and false memories and uh and false flourishes. Uh. As

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>we will discuss there is something inherently egocentric about the

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>argument that it's like, no, I have to be the

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>center of things. Even though these other records are different

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:33.920
<v Speaker 1>from my internal record, they must be wrong and it's

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 1>clearly not me. It's like, am I wrong? Or do

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>we live in a computer simulation? I'm I'm I'm going

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.239
<v Speaker 1>with the computer simulation. And again, like I would love

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 1>to say, men, if there's evidence out there that we

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>live in a computer simulation, send it our way. And

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know people actually have brought this up

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 1>to us before and said, you guys should do an

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>episode on it, But like that seems to be something

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that has more evidence to it elsewhere than me not

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>remembering a sin bad boo. I'm going to use this

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the next time I forget something at the grocery store

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and my wife says, hey, did you pick up the

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>SEC and such? How we go, Well, do you see

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>we live in a computer simulation? I think we're just

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>this this is essentially turning into excuses for our wives. Well, okay,

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 1>before we go too far down that road, how about

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>we revisit a stuff to blow your mind favorite, which

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>is a psychologist Daniel Schackter in his book, The Seven

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Sins of Memory. Yes, the Seven Sins of Memory, How

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the mind forgets and remembers. It's a it's a fabulous book.

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I recommend anyone who isn't more interested in deeper dive

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>here check this out. Um. Now here's an interesting memory tidbit.

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 1>I cannot, I honestly cannot remember if I have seen

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Shackter speak on this live at the World Science Festival,

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>or if I've merely seen a video of him speaking

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>about this. Um, I think I saw him live, but

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I could be mistaken. Yeah, that's happened to me before,

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>for sure, especially like when you go to conferences and

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you can watch the events from like your hotel room,

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>sometimes on the TV as it's happening. Yeah. Yeah, So

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not certain, but this might be a you know,

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 1>a false memory as well. But he basically takes the

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:17.360
<v Speaker 1>way our memory works and the way that we form

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 1>false memories, and he breaks them down into seven different categories.

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I've hit this on the on the show before, and

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 1>I think I've we've done it recently in the Alien Abduction.

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'll try and be quick with it here. But

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>there's transience. This is the weakening, weakening or loss of

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.399
<v Speaker 1>memory over time. There's absent mindedness. So this just has

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to do with attention in memory. And I think we

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>can already see how these line up with say the

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Shazam example. You know, transience, it's been a while since

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the nineties. Absent mindedness, maybe you didn't care that much

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>about sin bad movies to begin with. And then there's blocking.

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>This has failed attempts to recall tidbits of memories. So

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to remember a film that came out of

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the night. Maybe you're trying to remember Kazam, and then

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you end up, you know, blocking it something. Maybe you

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 1>saw a Kazam and you're trying to to forget yes,

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>And then there's a misattribution. This is we crawled. We

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>recall an authentic memory, but aspects of it are misattributed,

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and that of course is key into what we're talking

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>about here. Suggestibility. This is the power of suggestion, the

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 1>ability for someone else to make a suggestion about what

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you should recall, what you do recall, and affect your memory.

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 1>So an example of this would be like you saw

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Kazam with Shaquille O'Neil, but then your friend was like,

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't it be cooler if Sinbad was in that movie

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and then twenty years passed and you remember Sinbad being

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>in that movie? Yeah. Or for instance, this came up

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>just the other other night with my wife and I

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>because we sat down to watch the latest episode of

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Rick and Morty, which is The Defenders Part three, and

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>they're the characters are talking about their previous adventures with

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the Defenders, but they haven't actually shown them on the

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 1>TV show. It's just off screen adventures. Yeah. But my

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 1>wife asked me, she said, is that a previous episode?

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Did we see that one? And? Uh? If I had

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 1>insisted that we we had, If I thought we had,

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I could have probably made a pretty strong case because

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm the one who fills their head with useless TV information.

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>But I was able to to to sort of see

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:11.199
<v Speaker 1>through it and say, no, no, no, they're they're doing

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 1>a bid here. There is I've read about this. I

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 1>haven't actually seen this, but it's essentially like Rick and

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Morty are part of like a group like the Avengers

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of. Ok. Yeah, and they there have been past adventures,

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:25.919
<v Speaker 1>but they don't actually factor into any previous episode. Alright,

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>So then there's bias. This is just you know the

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.679
<v Speaker 1>power of biased to influence memories. There's persistence, the failure

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of of the memory system that involves the unwanted recall

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of information that it's just that is disturbing. Again. Maybe

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you're just trying to forget that because them movie. Yeah,

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean it sounds like the kind of film that

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, if one if it existed and one saw it,

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you might want to do you know, the only reason

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>I know about that movie is because of a podcast,

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that podcast How Did This Get Made? Which is all

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:57.400
<v Speaker 1>about comedians. Yeah, they just watch bad movies and talk

0:26:57.440 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>about them, and I remember they're conversation about how bad

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:05.959
<v Speaker 1>that movie is stronger than I remember that movie ever existing. Man,

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 1>we're still waiting for a shock to make that great film.

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>You never saw Steal, No, I didn't. I felt I

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>think I felt part of it. I want to see

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a film adaptation of Shack Fu. Yeah. So those are

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 1>the seven sins of memory. Some of those are going

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to be more important than others as we move forward.

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>So one of the key things to keep in mind

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>is that that that you can have binding failures in

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>what's called memory binding. So this is where a false

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>memory can certainly emerge on the individual level, So we're

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna we're gonna focus on individual false memories before we

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 1>get into the idea that we can share them. So

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>memory binding is the gluing together of various components of

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:52.719
<v Speaker 1>an experience into a hole. Okay, a binding failure at

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 1>the time the event occurs in action or object is

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>not properly bound to a particular time and place, and

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>these can cause the actual actions and objects to bind

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>together incorrectly. But they can also dragon events that we've

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>merely thought about or imagined. So one example that the

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:13.440
<v Speaker 1>checked always brings up is this, this real life example

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>of a woman who was assaulted and there was a

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>TV on in the room and she she was able

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 1>to it because his binding failure, which she put the

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 1>face of the individual on the TV, the face of

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the attacker. Now, another example he brings up is a

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 1>particular experiment where he took younger and older adults and

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>they were shown one object and then asked to imagine

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>a similar object. So they were dealing with like magnifying

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 1>glass and then a lollipop, uh, and then two dissimilar objects.

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>And older adults were more likely to say they'd actually

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 1>seen the lollipop that they were asked to imagine instead

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of the magnifying glass that they actually saw. Oh that's interesting, okay.

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And I would imagine like an empirical test like this

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>would probably have like measurable amounts of time in between

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the memories, right and now. Another this is another big

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>one too, is the misset attribution for the source of memories.

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>So people regularly say that they read something in the newspaper,

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>they saw it on the news, when actually a friend

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>told them, or they saw it in an advertisement or something.

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>So in In one particular study, and this is one

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that Shafter was involved with in the N four with

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>hard Book and McLaughlin UH, participants with normal memories UH

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>were shown to regularly make mistakes of thinking they had

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>acquired a trivial fact from a newspaper when actually the

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>experiment it's the experimenters themselves had supplied it. I have

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a similar study to talk about related to that later

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>in the episode. Yeah, I think this one is especially

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this goes beyond contemplations of of Shazam and whatnot,

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>because you know, clearly we're in an age now where

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of misinformation that is out there,

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>some of it intentionally confusing, you know, can intentionally u

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>crafted to mislead individuals, and so even you know, it's

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 1>easy to see how people would get their memories crossed,

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>especially with all the information that's coming out you're on

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>various social media accounts. Yeah, I think that this is

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a really good example of why media literacy is so

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>important and understanding how media is made, like whether it's

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>your newspaper or Wikipedia or your podcast that you're listening to, right, Like,

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>like having a general idea of how that information is

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 1>coming to you, so you can judge for yourself whether

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>or not that is worth storing a memory of, right

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>And and I think our go to with newspapers for

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the longest time, maybe that's starting to fade now, was Okay,

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I can trust that if it's printed on that kind

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of paper and that and it's in that big font,

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that's a true thing. Right. But then the dangerous part

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 1>is when it's days later and you have this this

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 1>fact or this viewpoint rolling around in your head and

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>you have to ask yourself, did I did I get

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>that from the New York Times? Did I get that

0:30:56.800 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>from Reuters? Or did I get that from inquirer, from

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>inquired or just or somebody on Twitter who's just very

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>alarmist and and and therefore should I build anything on that?

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Should I build any of my thoughts on that foundation? Yeah? Absolutely, Yeah.

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>We are definitely in a period of time where it's

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>very it's it's easier for this stuff to happen, I think,

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and like I think it's sort of contingent upon all

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of us to train ourselves to be able to sort

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of what would be the term here cut the wheat

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 1>from the cheff. Now. Another memory error that is worth

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the focusing on here again for the individual false memory

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>formation is uh that of a memory conjunction error. So

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a memory conjunction error is is common and this occurs

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 1>when we incorrectly combine parts of previously experienced memories to

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 1>create an entirely new memory. For example, such an error

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>has occurred when when people are remembering the you know

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that they see the word toothache after viewing the words

0:31:56.600 --> 0:32:00.479
<v Speaker 1>toothpick and earache instead. I've had this occurring and referring

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to notes or you know, they're just going to be

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 1>two particular words in a sentence and then they end

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 1>up forming together and do a different word. We had that. Okay,

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 1>this week, here's a little behind the scenes for your listeners.

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>So the other episode we're recording this week is about

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Cleo Dynamics, and both Robert and I, you know, we

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>spent hours doing this research ahead of time, just staring

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>at these notes, typing them out, reading article after article

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 1>after article, and reading that word over and over again,

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 1>typing that word over and over again. And yet I

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 1>could not get it to stick the landing in my brain,

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Like even after eight hours of reading about it. My

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 1>wife came home and said, well, what were you researching today?

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, uh, ker fluffle Dynamo. I don't know,

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Like it couldn't It wouldn't stick for some reason. So

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 1>it's Cleo dynamics. And I kept combining it in my

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 1>head with Kell Deldonis, which has come up in the

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>past concerning like the future re virtual sex. Well that's

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the other thing too, is that you and I and

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Joe are just constantly absorbing so much information that it's

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 1>hard to get all of it to stick, right. Like

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people when they meet us

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 1>assume that we have all like nine episodes we've done

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 1>like at total recall in our main and it's hard.

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, sometimes that stuff I only remember like the main,

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't know three or four points of an

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 1>episode six months later. Yeah, indeed, it all just become

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of a confused jelly in there. Uh. Now, as

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>we've stressed many times on the show, merely recalling a

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>memory also entails reconsolidation of that memory. So each memory

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>is a thing of soft clay, and by touching it

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>we alter its form. The memories you handle the most

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>are sometimes the one you can trust the least. And uh,

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and then this is an important to note to our

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>brains work that don't work this way for you know,

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 1>no reason. Reconsolidation can aid in learning. Its strengthens neural

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 1>connections and allows the formation of new associations. Like essentially

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 1>it's about updating your knowledge of a thing. But you know,

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the way the human mind works, and the complexity of

0:33:57.680 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the of the of the modern human mind is that

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you can update existing information with false information, with purely

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>emotional information, and it just changes it over time. Uh.

0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>And it and it also can occur just sort of

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 1>based on when you were absorbing other information. So there's

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 1>an article in Ian magazine on this on the Mandel

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 1>effect from Caitlin A. Mont and she brings up the

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>example of Alexander Hamilton's. So here's the here's this is

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>all pre Hamilton's the musical. I'm not sure to what

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 1>extent that would change this, but for a lot of people,

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you went to school, you learned that Alexander Hamilton's was

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>a founding father of the US but never a U

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 1>S president. But a study on false memories from this

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 1>was published in Psychological Science titled Recognizing the Presidents was

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the Alexander Hamilton's President. This looked at who most Americans

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 1>identify as presidents, and the subjects were more likely to

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 1>incorrectly select Hamilton's but not several other actual former presidents.

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Hamilton's simply became encoded at the same time as the

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>other presidents wired together. Ben Franklin is similar to this.

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 1>That's another one where like you learn about Ben Franklin

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:10.800
<v Speaker 1>at the same time as you learn about the founding

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:13.400
<v Speaker 1>fathers and the first presidents of the country, and and

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and then twenty years later, as an adult, your brain

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:18.879
<v Speaker 1>just kind of wires it all together and goes, wait,

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 1>he was a president, wasn't he and then somebody goes, oh,

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 1>come on, no, he wasn't you know. Yeah, well, I

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 1>mean even you know, there was a time I remember

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 1>we where we had to in school memorize all the

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>president the United States in order, and you know, maybe

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you even had a visual aid there with little pictures

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of all these guys, and and I didn't retain that completely.

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:40.719
<v Speaker 1>I so I don't know to what extent I could

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 1>set here and and get a one when I have,

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, presidential history exam, so I can understand how

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 1>this kind of thing happens. Yeah, yeah, absolutely. Yeah, That's

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 1>one of those things where like when you when you're

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:55.800
<v Speaker 1>little and you're learning that stuff in school, you're like

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:59.879
<v Speaker 1>agonizing over being able to actually remember all however many

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of them there were, and now here in the present day,

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:05.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just kind of like when is there ever a

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:07.840
<v Speaker 1>moment when it comes up where it's like, if you

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know when Grover Cleveland was president, then it's going

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to be like an absolute, uh, you know, life threatening scenario. Yeah. Well,

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 1>our American history education tends to be kind of rushed

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and and even and even then, if you're going back

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and doing deep dives, you're doing deep dives into certain

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:28.280
<v Speaker 1>sections of history, so you know, the formation of the country,

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the Civil War, Uh, you know, the twentieth century history, etcetera.

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 1>And they're still gonna be holes and and also just

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:41.719
<v Speaker 1>something less newsworthy, less interesting phases in presidential history. But

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to bring it back to Shazam. Uh, it's easy to

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:47.320
<v Speaker 1>walk through the various ways that a vague pop culture

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 1>or historical memory could get twisted around in your mind.

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:52.720
<v Speaker 1>So you remember that there was that film called Kazam.

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 1>It starts shack and shack plus Kazam kind of sounds

0:36:57.000 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 1>like Shazam, which is the name of a comic book character.

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:04.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's not just a completely new nonsense word shazam.

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 1>This is like a major comic guy. Right. Yeah, they're

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:09.800
<v Speaker 1>actually making a Shazam movie pretty soon. The rock is

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be in oh man. But it's uh so Shazam.

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Here's here's a fun memory fact for you. A lot

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of people thought the name of the character with Shazam

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 1>for a very long time. The name of the character

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 1>is actually Captain Marvel. But he says Shazam to turn

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:30.359
<v Speaker 1>from a little boy into like the Superman figure, right,

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:33.439
<v Speaker 1>oh man, it's that that his current power. He's really

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a boy. Oh yeah, he's always been like a little

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:38.360
<v Speaker 1>ten year old kid, and and his power is to

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 1>turn into like a like a magical superman. Yeah. Oh

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:43.399
<v Speaker 1>my goodness. So this movie, we're gonna have some child

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that turns into the Rock. I think the Rock is

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 1>playing the villain in this, but I'm not sure. Yeah,

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>but it might be a child turns into the Rock. Which,

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that's the premise of the new Jumanji

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 1>movie coming out too, that a child turns into the Rock. Yes, yes, well,

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the bottom line though, is you're telling me

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:04.239
<v Speaker 1>there's still a chance that Sinbad could play Shazam and

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 1>an actual film. I think so, yeah, yeah, I mean

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't see why this can't happen. Now. Another aspect

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to all of this is the idea that the character

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is a genie and uh, and the genie is, of course,

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the creature of that emerges from Arabic mythology Sinbad the

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 1>actor his name is Sinbad. Sinbad of course also emerges

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:28.800
<v Speaker 1>from from from folk tales and mythology of of the

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the Arab people, right, yeah, tales of a thousand and

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 1>one Nights, I think, and the timeline is right for this.

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:38.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's the nineties, you have various films and hopping,

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:41.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of the clinging on films that come

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 1>off out around the same theme. And it's the sort

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:46.839
<v Speaker 1>of film that you probably wouldn't have seen, the kind

0:38:46.880 --> 0:38:49.319
<v Speaker 1>of thing that just a trailer came out, you heard

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:51.839
<v Speaker 1>about it, you didn't watch it. The false memory kind

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of gets stored away incorrectly. Yeah, I gotta say, Sinbad

0:38:56.400 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>is one of these guys, and look, Sinbad, if you're listening,

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:02.399
<v Speaker 1>this is nothing into you, buddy. But I just don't

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 1>really have any memory of anything he actually was in,

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 1>just a memory of him being a pop culture figure, right,

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Like I think he was in that Cosby show spent

0:39:12.120 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 1>off a different world. But other than that, I don't

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 1>remember anything he was in. Oh, I feel like he

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 1>was in. Like, here's here's a potential. If you told me, hey,

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:25.319
<v Speaker 1>Sinbad was in Stallone's Judge Dread movie he played one

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of the other judges, I would be tempted to believe you,

0:39:28.920 --> 0:39:31.800
<v Speaker 1>even though I've seen the film and and and actually

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:35.359
<v Speaker 1>I think prefer it to the most recent Judge Dread film. Yeah,

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I love the new Dread film the New Dread film.

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:41.440
<v Speaker 1>The New Dread film was was was very entertaining, but um,

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I feel like both of these films

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 1>get something wrong about the the the actual comic book.

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, absolutely that it's a satire. Yeah, so I

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 1>really I really need those two films to sort of

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 1>come together into one film and and maybe it will

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:58.359
<v Speaker 1>in your memory after a couple of years. I need

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I need talking robots and and Italian nanny's and uh

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and aliens. I need all the wacky stuff in there

0:40:05.239 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to really buy into. Yeah. Alright, So at this point,

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we've we've given you a good idea of

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:14.320
<v Speaker 1>how the false memory of Shazam or what have you

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>can emerge. But what we're gonna get into after this

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:19.839
<v Speaker 1>next break is then how do we share it? How

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 1>do we end up in this weird scenario where we're

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 1>talking to other people and and and reminiscing about things

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that simply were not so alright, we're back. So, okay,

0:40:34.600 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 1>we've got a little bit more from that Eon article

0:40:37.520 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 1>to discuss here about false memories leading us into what's

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 1>actually happening. Amatt argues that that a lot of this,

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:46.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's going to come down to two issues.

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 1>One is definitely the case suggestibility, which we'll get to.

0:40:50.480 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 1>But then there's also confabulation. So confabulation is the brain's

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:57.879
<v Speaker 1>attempt to fill in missing memory gaps by adding fabricated

0:40:57.960 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 1>facts and experiences. This is tied to various neurological disorders

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 1>like stroke, brain injury, Alzheimer's um corsa cough syndrome, epilepsy, schizophrenia.

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing too, it can happen to healthy

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:14.960
<v Speaker 1>individuals as well. Yeah, I have a note here about

0:41:15.080 --> 0:41:19.160
<v Speaker 1>how the term is used clinically confabulation, and it refers

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to memory defects that are experienced when patients have brain damage,

0:41:23.200 --> 0:41:26.920
<v Speaker 1>but it also applies to everyday events, like when we

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 1>embellish the truth while recounting events. For instance, she brings

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:33.280
<v Speaker 1>up one particular case. So there's a there's a editor

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:36.840
<v Speaker 1>with the name Epic Journeyman who apparently was key and

0:41:37.400 --> 0:41:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, being I guess, ah, you know,

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 1>spokesman for the idea that that Shazam existed. And he

0:41:44.760 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 1>worked at a video store in the nineties and he

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 1>had to watch multiple copies of film several times to

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:53.200
<v Speaker 1>verify that the you know, the tape wasn't damaged and

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:55.360
<v Speaker 1>they could actually rent it again or they or have

0:41:55.400 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a rent or complained they'd have to like watch it through.

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:02.719
<v Speaker 1>And UH, so in this case, he was he was

0:42:03.080 --> 0:42:08.000
<v Speaker 1>he was engaging in this repetitive unpacking of memory. And

0:42:08.400 --> 0:42:10.919
<v Speaker 1>she says that this, uh, this is a situation where

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:14.880
<v Speaker 1>confabulation seems to be more frequent. So that's a possibility

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that that's that's what occurred with this particular individual. But

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 1>then to draw in uh shacters um commentary not not

0:42:25.560 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 1>particular to uh Mandela syndrome or what have you, but

0:42:30.239 --> 0:42:34.920
<v Speaker 1>just memory in general. He talks a lot about flashbulb memories.

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:40.200
<v Speaker 1>So these are memories of events, you know, very emotional events,

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:43.919
<v Speaker 1>such as nine eleven, uh and UH, and they're stored

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:46.680
<v Speaker 1>in the amygdala, an emotion processing center of the brain

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that is particularly involved in fear. So uh. The basic

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:56.400
<v Speaker 1>situation here is that the a magdala focus is so

0:42:56.520 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 1>heavily on emotions that it doesn't store all the details

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of an event it. But because our emotions are so

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 1>involved in recalling flashboat bald memories, we remain confident about them,

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and this confidency uh spills over into poorly remember details.

0:43:11.719 --> 0:43:14.319
<v Speaker 1>So the example here is when you have people who

0:43:15.160 --> 0:43:17.279
<v Speaker 1>and this has been tested and studies, the idea that

0:43:18.000 --> 0:43:19.880
<v Speaker 1>when asked, people say, oh, yeah, I remember what I

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:22.720
<v Speaker 1>was eating for breakfast, when when eleven occurred, I remember

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:25.520
<v Speaker 1>what shirt I was wearing, you know, my shoes, and

0:43:25.600 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that you see examples of this in other you know,

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 1>very emotional events. Uh, the idea that it's just you know,

0:43:30.520 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 1>etched in the stone of memory. But but when when

0:43:34.080 --> 0:43:36.080
<v Speaker 1>we've been able to check up on that, we find

0:43:36.120 --> 0:43:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that that's not the case, that the brain is is

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 1>filling in the blanks and these flash bold memories. Yeah.

0:43:41.640 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean when I think back to nine eleven, what

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I was doing that morning, I don't remember what I

0:43:46.440 --> 0:43:49.000
<v Speaker 1>had for breakfast. I don't remember what I was wearing,

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:53.759
<v Speaker 1>but I like distinctly remember being at my job, the

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:57.720
<v Speaker 1>radio being on in us listening intensely to what was happening.

0:43:58.120 --> 0:44:00.279
<v Speaker 1>And then at the time I lived in Boston, when

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I looked out the windows there were fighter jets flying

0:44:04.239 --> 0:44:07.360
<v Speaker 1>overhead because the planes have flown out of logan, and

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I remember all those things distinctly. But I'm remembering those

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:15.840
<v Speaker 1>memories right like it's like I'm looking at like a

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 1>like a movie file. Uh, and it's slightly distorted, right

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:24.920
<v Speaker 1>or blurry. So all these examples we've discussed so far,

0:44:25.200 --> 0:44:27.200
<v Speaker 1>these might not explain everything, but I think they're enough

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to create certain individuals who are who are very confident

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:34.240
<v Speaker 1>in their memory of something, even though that memory is false,

0:44:34.800 --> 0:44:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and then it just has to be planted in the

0:44:36.480 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 1>heads of others. And luckily we're quite susceptible to that

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. So we've already talked about misinformation, be

0:44:43.120 --> 0:44:46.640
<v Speaker 1>it you know, a deliberate misinformation campaign on social media,

0:44:47.200 --> 0:44:50.200
<v Speaker 1>or me telling you know, making something up and telling

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:53.719
<v Speaker 1>somebody about the boss of a of a video game.

0:44:54.520 --> 0:44:59.239
<v Speaker 1>And in these cases it's been it's been shown in

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and studies it misinformation can actually compromise the fidelity of

0:45:02.840 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 1>an existing memory. Uh. This is the reason leading questions

0:45:06.520 --> 0:45:09.560
<v Speaker 1>are so frowned upon in journalism and objectionable in a

0:45:09.640 --> 0:45:13.680
<v Speaker 1>court of law. If you're asking the question, that is

0:45:13.719 --> 0:45:18.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of inserting the answer into the individual's mind. Yeah.

0:45:18.440 --> 0:45:22.239
<v Speaker 1>If you ever want to be more terrified by our

0:45:22.360 --> 0:45:25.879
<v Speaker 1>justice system, be on a jury for like a couple

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:28.279
<v Speaker 1>of days and then go into the deliberation room and

0:45:28.480 --> 0:45:32.240
<v Speaker 1>see how well you and your fellow jurors remember everything

0:45:32.320 --> 0:45:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that was presented to and how you recollect it back

0:45:35.200 --> 0:45:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to each other, because it's it's scary how everybody remembers

0:45:38.480 --> 0:45:41.040
<v Speaker 1>things a little bit differently, and then the jurors can

0:45:41.160 --> 0:45:44.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of start like convincing one another that they remembered

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:48.640
<v Speaker 1>something the wrong way necessarily or the right way. Yeah. Yeah,

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of it relates could just basically

0:45:50.440 --> 0:45:53.719
<v Speaker 1>boils down to comments and suggestions made when a person

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:56.880
<v Speaker 1>is trying to recall a past experience. And you know,

0:45:57.000 --> 0:45:58.960
<v Speaker 1>this ties in with some of what we talked about

0:45:59.000 --> 0:46:03.520
<v Speaker 1>with alien abduction or or allegations of ritual satanic abuse

0:46:04.000 --> 0:46:07.400
<v Speaker 1>where an individual, you know, and it's even more complicated.

0:46:07.480 --> 0:46:10.719
<v Speaker 1>It's a very young individual, but they're being questioned about

0:46:10.760 --> 0:46:14.759
<v Speaker 1>what happened and if their seeds being planted uh in

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that questioning while they're trying to recall, then it can

0:46:17.560 --> 0:46:20.000
<v Speaker 1>it can alter the memory. Yeah, when we talked about

0:46:20.040 --> 0:46:24.360
<v Speaker 1>that at length, uh in the alien abduction episode. There's

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:27.640
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of factors that can lead to faulty memories. Right,

0:46:27.719 --> 0:46:31.880
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about everything in distortions from bias to association,

0:46:32.040 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to imagination sometimes even peer pressure. Right, So like the

0:46:35.120 --> 0:46:37.880
<v Speaker 1>jury example, I was just giving. That's because our memory

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:42.080
<v Speaker 1>is constructive, not reproductive. We think of it as being reproductive,

0:46:42.120 --> 0:46:45.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's not. The brain actually builds memories out of

0:46:45.239 --> 0:46:48.160
<v Speaker 1>various pieces of information and then it plays them back

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 1>like a recording. And this is why when you're discussing

0:46:51.320 --> 0:46:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a memory, we often say here on the show, we

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:58.400
<v Speaker 1>have to say, you're not remembering what happened, You're remembering

0:46:58.440 --> 0:47:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the last time you remembered it, last time you watched

0:47:01.160 --> 0:47:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that file, that recording, right and real quick. Some more

0:47:05.239 --> 0:47:07.760
<v Speaker 1>notes on false memories that we covered in alien abduction,

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:11.360
<v Speaker 1>So false memory implantation. It's important to recognize that this

0:47:11.520 --> 0:47:15.879
<v Speaker 1>does happen in hypnotherapy, but most hypnotherapists are earnest about

0:47:15.880 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 1>their desire to help patients. But experimental psychology has actually

0:47:20.000 --> 0:47:22.960
<v Speaker 1>shown it's it's pretty easy to implant false memories in

0:47:23.000 --> 0:47:27.480
<v Speaker 1>an individual's mind. So there was a study where researchers

0:47:27.520 --> 0:47:30.640
<v Speaker 1>were able to implant false memories of getting lost in

0:47:30.680 --> 0:47:33.319
<v Speaker 1>a shopping mall and participants when they never had been

0:47:33.400 --> 0:47:35.759
<v Speaker 1>lost in the shopping mall. And then in another two

0:47:35.840 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 1>thousand one study, they showed that even when events are

0:47:39.239 --> 0:47:42.359
<v Speaker 1>unlikely such as alien abduction. They can be implanted as

0:47:42.400 --> 0:47:46.880
<v Speaker 1>false memories. This leads to suggestive information being presented to

0:47:46.920 --> 0:47:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the participants and that can increase the plausibility or implausibility

0:47:51.960 --> 0:47:55.359
<v Speaker 1>of an event to them. So take for example, a newspaper, right, yeah,

0:47:55.360 --> 0:47:57.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean there have been numerous studies that have back

0:47:58.000 --> 0:48:00.960
<v Speaker 1>this up with restart showing the suggest can influence how

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:04.319
<v Speaker 1>we perform a memory tasks, how we learned tasks are

0:48:04.480 --> 0:48:08.640
<v Speaker 1>product preference response to supplements and medications. Even so, the

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:12.480
<v Speaker 1>placebo effect comes into play. One example personal example that

0:48:12.520 --> 0:48:15.640
<v Speaker 1>comes to my mind is so growing up, when my

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 1>family would have boiled eggs, like hard boiled eggs, my

0:48:18.360 --> 0:48:22.239
<v Speaker 1>mom would always enjoyed putting mustard on them. And I

0:48:22.840 --> 0:48:25.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think I actually put mustard on it. I mean

0:48:25.600 --> 0:48:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't like yuck, but I didn't do it. And

0:48:28.600 --> 0:48:30.799
<v Speaker 1>then at some point, like in grade school, I had

0:48:30.840 --> 0:48:32.799
<v Speaker 1>to write a story, and I wrote a story about

0:48:32.840 --> 0:48:37.239
<v Speaker 1>someone who put mustard on an egg and and my

0:48:37.440 --> 0:48:39.200
<v Speaker 1>my mom got to read it. And then at some

0:48:39.280 --> 0:48:41.680
<v Speaker 1>point my mom was like, oh, you really like mustard

0:48:41.840 --> 0:48:43.880
<v Speaker 1>on your eggs. Let me get mustard out for you.

0:48:44.239 --> 0:48:47.320
<v Speaker 1>And and it ends up with me loving putting mustard

0:48:47.360 --> 0:48:49.400
<v Speaker 1>on my eggs, like like it made it happen, like

0:48:49.520 --> 0:48:52.759
<v Speaker 1>somehow the false memory got implanted in my head and

0:48:52.840 --> 0:48:55.640
<v Speaker 1>then became a reality. But I know that I didn't

0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:58.239
<v Speaker 1>always love mustard on on my egg This is a

0:48:58.400 --> 0:49:01.719
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous thing to spend an time disgusting, but it's I

0:49:01.800 --> 0:49:03.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's a mile in a mild example, and I

0:49:03.880 --> 0:49:06.359
<v Speaker 1>imagine everyone else has these mild examples as well, where

0:49:06.600 --> 0:49:10.279
<v Speaker 1>the idea gets implanted in your head and becomes the reality. Yeah.

0:49:10.320 --> 0:49:13.719
<v Speaker 1>I think actually that's a really good like area, like

0:49:13.840 --> 0:49:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a fertile area for researching on. This is like things

0:49:17.640 --> 0:49:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that we have convinced ourselves that we like or don't

0:49:20.200 --> 0:49:23.040
<v Speaker 1>like food wise the course of time. And then of

0:49:23.120 --> 0:49:25.480
<v Speaker 1>course with childhood memories, there's a lot of this too

0:49:25.640 --> 0:49:28.040
<v Speaker 1>where you have to ask yourself, do I remember this

0:49:28.440 --> 0:49:31.560
<v Speaker 1>or was I told that this happened by my parents

0:49:31.800 --> 0:49:34.759
<v Speaker 1>and now I remember it being so right? Like your

0:49:34.800 --> 0:49:37.759
<v Speaker 1>parents say, boy, you hated Brussels sprouts, And the next

0:49:37.760 --> 0:49:39.799
<v Speaker 1>time Brussels sprouts show up on your plate, You're like, wait,

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:42.840
<v Speaker 1>do I like these are not? Yeah? Yeah, Well in

0:49:43.000 --> 0:49:46.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteen there is this other study McNally and Clancy researched

0:49:46.840 --> 0:49:49.920
<v Speaker 1>memory function in women who believed that they had recovered

0:49:50.040 --> 0:49:53.520
<v Speaker 1>memories of sexual child abuse, and they found that such

0:49:53.680 --> 0:49:57.759
<v Speaker 1>victims were actually more likely to create false memories of

0:49:58.080 --> 0:50:01.120
<v Speaker 1>non traumatic events in the lab, so not false memories

0:50:01.160 --> 0:50:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of their abuse, but of non traumatic events than the

0:50:04.239 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 1>women who had always remembered being sexually abused. Uh, and

0:50:08.200 --> 0:50:11.319
<v Speaker 1>that women and also women who had never been abused. Right.

0:50:11.400 --> 0:50:14.200
<v Speaker 1>So this is actually what led to them studying alien

0:50:14.280 --> 0:50:17.680
<v Speaker 1>abductions because they were like, we can't implant false memories

0:50:17.760 --> 0:50:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of sexual abuse in these people. That's unethical. We need

0:50:21.239 --> 0:50:24.359
<v Speaker 1>to come up with something that that we're pretty sure

0:50:24.440 --> 0:50:28.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't happen, but they that we can maybe trick them

0:50:28.040 --> 0:50:33.680
<v Speaker 1>into thinking happened. What about alien abduction? Yeah, Now, another

0:50:33.840 --> 0:50:40.200
<v Speaker 1>study on false memory implantation comes from Darren Strange, Marianne Gary,

0:50:40.600 --> 0:50:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Daniel M. Bernstein that's Bernstein, not Burned Stain, and d

0:50:46.160 --> 0:50:50.239
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Lindsay and it's titled Photographs cause false Memories for

0:50:50.280 --> 0:50:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the news. This is the newspaper when I was telling

0:50:52.160 --> 0:50:56.239
<v Speaker 1>you about. In this study, participants were tested to see

0:50:56.239 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 1>if false memories were more prevalent when images were used

0:51:00.600 --> 0:51:05.600
<v Speaker 1>in conjunction with words rather than when words were used alone. Okay,

0:51:05.960 --> 0:51:09.319
<v Speaker 1>So participants would look at ten newspaper headlines for four

0:51:09.400 --> 0:51:13.319
<v Speaker 1>seconds each. Sometimes the headlines were real, sometimes they were fake,

0:51:13.719 --> 0:51:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and after each viewing, they were asked to rate, on

0:51:16.600 --> 0:51:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a scale of one to five how confident they were

0:51:19.640 --> 0:51:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that they actually recognized the story. Now, when a picture

0:51:23.360 --> 0:51:26.560
<v Speaker 1>was next to the headline, participants were way more likely

0:51:26.640 --> 0:51:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to remember a false event as being a real thing,

0:51:30.040 --> 0:51:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and on the true events, the participants were totally comfortable

0:51:34.200 --> 0:51:36.560
<v Speaker 1>reporting when they did not remember it at all. So

0:51:36.719 --> 0:51:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't a factor here. It wasn't like these participants

0:51:40.120 --> 0:51:43.000
<v Speaker 1>were scared to admit they didn't know anything. They would

0:51:43.040 --> 0:51:46.680
<v Speaker 1>admit to it if they didn't remember something that actually happened. Now,

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the data here supports the idea that images can cause

0:51:50.760 --> 0:51:54.759
<v Speaker 1>false memories, and according to this, memories seem to need

0:51:54.880 --> 0:51:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a support system to make them personally believable to us.

0:51:59.239 --> 0:52:03.200
<v Speaker 1>What provides that support pictures? As we searched through our memories,

0:52:03.280 --> 0:52:06.879
<v Speaker 1>we're looking for cues and we provide evidence for our

0:52:06.960 --> 0:52:10.360
<v Speaker 1>memories so we can make sure they're accurate with these images.

0:52:10.880 --> 0:52:13.319
<v Speaker 1>So this is even scarier, especially when you take into

0:52:13.320 --> 0:52:15.920
<v Speaker 1>account you and Joe talked about this in the Uncanny

0:52:15.960 --> 0:52:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Valley episodes about how easy it is to replicate uh images,

0:52:21.760 --> 0:52:25.480
<v Speaker 1>And now we're getting closer to replicating video of things

0:52:25.719 --> 0:52:28.560
<v Speaker 1>people didn't actually do or say, right, Like, I just

0:52:28.719 --> 0:52:31.719
<v Speaker 1>actually related to what you guys had talked about in

0:52:31.800 --> 0:52:34.359
<v Speaker 1>that episode. I just saw a video the other day

0:52:34.400 --> 0:52:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that somebody did a c g I Barack Obama and

0:52:37.239 --> 0:52:39.279
<v Speaker 1>had him saying things that he didn't really say in

0:52:39.400 --> 0:52:41.719
<v Speaker 1>real life, and it was it wasn't quite there yet,

0:52:41.800 --> 0:52:43.680
<v Speaker 1>but you know what I'm saying, Like, we're gonna get

0:52:43.719 --> 0:52:45.879
<v Speaker 1>to a point where that can be floating around out there.

0:52:46.360 --> 0:52:48.680
<v Speaker 1>And again, media literacy is important. You need to be

0:52:48.760 --> 0:52:51.320
<v Speaker 1>able to determine is this something that I can trust

0:52:51.440 --> 0:52:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to remember my to ensure my memory is accurate, or

0:52:55.600 --> 0:52:58.120
<v Speaker 1>is this something I need to like judge on a

0:52:58.200 --> 0:53:03.320
<v Speaker 1>different system. Yeah, it's interesting this we're discussing the ability

0:53:03.400 --> 0:53:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to use the Internet and modern technology to fact check ourselves,

0:53:06.960 --> 0:53:09.440
<v Speaker 1>because I think that's where a lot of the the

0:53:11.000 --> 0:53:16.120
<v Speaker 1>situation of the Mandela effect emerges from, because we've always had,

0:53:16.360 --> 0:53:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, false information kicking around in the back of

0:53:18.440 --> 0:53:21.399
<v Speaker 1>our head, you know, and memories that have been become

0:53:21.480 --> 0:53:25.800
<v Speaker 1>skewed over time. But with the with with the Internet

0:53:25.840 --> 0:53:28.440
<v Speaker 1>at hand, with for instance, IMBB at hand, we've been

0:53:28.440 --> 0:53:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in the position to just instantly look ups and Bad's

0:53:32.200 --> 0:53:35.919
<v Speaker 1>biography and see what's on there, and and so we're

0:53:36.080 --> 0:53:40.000
<v Speaker 1>forced to confront a lot of our our our false

0:53:40.120 --> 0:53:43.360
<v Speaker 1>memories and then discuss them with each other. But is

0:53:43.440 --> 0:53:47.680
<v Speaker 1>i AMDB community built the same way like Wikipedia? Oh yeah.

0:53:47.680 --> 0:53:51.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean to imply that IMDb is infallible, but

0:53:52.080 --> 0:53:54.239
<v Speaker 1>it is a pretty good source. And and if you

0:53:54.400 --> 0:53:58.359
<v Speaker 1>do not see a film that you remember on there,

0:53:58.520 --> 0:54:01.520
<v Speaker 1>then then it's a pretty good sign that something's up.

0:54:01.640 --> 0:54:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm just imagining this reditor guy that you were talking

0:54:04.120 --> 0:54:07.520
<v Speaker 1>about earlier, like constantly going in and editing IMDb and

0:54:07.560 --> 0:54:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia on Sinbad's pages and like adding Shazam there. Well,

0:54:13.440 --> 0:54:16.560
<v Speaker 1>about I guess ten years or more ago, I remember

0:54:16.600 --> 0:54:19.560
<v Speaker 1>there being a few cases of films that don't exist

0:54:19.719 --> 0:54:23.160
<v Speaker 1>in IMDb that then fraudently put there, and they are

0:54:23.200 --> 0:54:25.480
<v Speaker 1>always a lot of fun because they had weird descriptions.

0:54:26.320 --> 0:54:28.839
<v Speaker 1>I haven't looked into this recently, but I I don't

0:54:29.040 --> 0:54:31.560
<v Speaker 1>know that there's anything like that anymore. I would love

0:54:31.600 --> 0:54:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to hear if there are any known false films in

0:54:35.160 --> 0:54:38.920
<v Speaker 1>IMDb or if that's something that has been completely removed

0:54:39.000 --> 0:54:42.879
<v Speaker 1>through oversight or just the hive mind of the people involved. Yeah.

0:54:42.880 --> 0:54:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I get the impression just overall from Wikipedia that the

0:54:45.600 --> 0:54:49.279
<v Speaker 1>act the community is so active that like I don't know,

0:54:49.360 --> 0:54:51.640
<v Speaker 1>they're they're paying attention, and they're able to sort of

0:54:52.320 --> 0:54:56.719
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, keep things factual. I I know,

0:54:57.040 --> 0:54:59.040
<v Speaker 1>for the most part when I visit Wikipedia. This is

0:54:59.080 --> 0:55:01.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why we don't do our research

0:55:01.080 --> 0:55:03.560
<v Speaker 1>based on Wikipedia. It is a good place though to

0:55:03.719 --> 0:55:08.200
<v Speaker 1>go find sources, uh for further research, but for instance,

0:55:08.280 --> 0:55:11.799
<v Speaker 1>like almost always, if there's an article that's in dispute,

0:55:11.960 --> 0:55:14.080
<v Speaker 1>it's got one of those uh what do you call them?

0:55:14.120 --> 0:55:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Like there there's like a header up on top that

0:55:16.000 --> 0:55:18.680
<v Speaker 1>lets you know, hey, some of the information in this

0:55:19.000 --> 0:55:23.680
<v Speaker 1>article is up for dispute right now. Um now Strange,

0:55:24.160 --> 0:55:27.440
<v Speaker 1>this is Darren Strange, which is an interesting name for

0:55:27.480 --> 0:55:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a psychologist, right right. Uh. Strange had other colleagues and

0:55:32.440 --> 0:55:35.239
<v Speaker 1>went on to publish another experiment in two thousand and eight.

0:55:35.800 --> 0:55:39.840
<v Speaker 1>This showed that it's easier to implant false memories and

0:55:39.960 --> 0:55:43.520
<v Speaker 1>people for an event that supposedly happened when they were

0:55:43.600 --> 0:55:46.680
<v Speaker 1>two years old rather than when they were ten years old.

0:55:47.000 --> 0:55:50.600
<v Speaker 1>And basically this shows that our childhood memories are sparse

0:55:50.800 --> 0:55:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and they lack detail, so we filled them in with

0:55:53.600 --> 0:55:56.880
<v Speaker 1>distortions from other information. So going back to our food example, right,

0:55:56.960 --> 0:55:59.840
<v Speaker 1>like things our parents tell us that we did or

0:56:00.040 --> 0:56:02.919
<v Speaker 1>we believed or we felt, uh you know up until

0:56:02.960 --> 0:56:05.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, maybe age five or something like that. Right,

0:56:05.480 --> 0:56:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and then you sort of take that on as fact. Yeah,

0:56:09.640 --> 0:56:11.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think this, Uh, this gets a little

0:56:11.920 --> 0:56:16.719
<v Speaker 1>bit into the the power of creepy pasta because there

0:56:16.760 --> 0:56:19.920
<v Speaker 1>are certain creepy pasta tales to sort of play on this,

0:56:20.080 --> 0:56:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea that hey, everybody remembers this, right, Yeah, and

0:56:23.840 --> 0:56:26.320
<v Speaker 1>uh and then goes from their crafting some form of

0:56:26.400 --> 0:56:28.879
<v Speaker 1>fiction that reminds me, we're coming up on October. We're

0:56:28.880 --> 0:56:31.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna need to pull out a creepy Pasta episode again

0:56:31.520 --> 0:56:34.319
<v Speaker 1>this year. Yeah. Yeah, I wonder if there's hopefully there's

0:56:34.400 --> 0:56:36.719
<v Speaker 1>there's fuel for one at least one that's gotta be

0:56:36.880 --> 0:56:39.440
<v Speaker 1>yeah part four. There was that whole TV show that

0:56:39.480 --> 0:56:42.400
<v Speaker 1>came out after we did the last Yeah. Uh. So

0:56:42.640 --> 0:56:45.920
<v Speaker 1>there are other studies to support mass distortions of memories.

0:56:45.960 --> 0:56:47.359
<v Speaker 1>As well, and we're not gonna go through all of them,

0:56:47.400 --> 0:56:48.960
<v Speaker 1>but here's two more that I want to give you.

0:56:49.280 --> 0:56:52.880
<v Speaker 1>First is, in two thousand five, Stephen Lewandowski and his

0:56:53.000 --> 0:56:57.239
<v Speaker 1>colleagues showed that Americans were more likely than Australians and

0:56:57.480 --> 0:57:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Germans to falsely remember that actual weapons of mass destruction

0:57:01.840 --> 0:57:04.719
<v Speaker 1>were found in Iraq. So that's pretty interesting, like like

0:57:05.000 --> 0:57:08.920
<v Speaker 1>your your memory distortions can be based on your national identity.

0:57:09.600 --> 0:57:12.320
<v Speaker 1>And then another study in two thousand seven showed that

0:57:12.440 --> 0:57:16.360
<v Speaker 1>when we look at doctored photos of past public events,

0:57:16.560 --> 0:57:19.440
<v Speaker 1>that can distort our memories. So tying back into that

0:57:19.600 --> 0:57:22.400
<v Speaker 1>newspaper study, you have to really be careful about which

0:57:22.440 --> 0:57:25.920
<v Speaker 1>you believe now, because it's so easy to use photoshop

0:57:26.080 --> 0:57:30.360
<v Speaker 1>essentially right now, there's other examples where two people witness

0:57:30.440 --> 0:57:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the same event and then they discuss it. One person's

0:57:32.600 --> 0:57:35.080
<v Speaker 1>memory can contaminate the other, kind of like how you

0:57:35.200 --> 0:57:37.760
<v Speaker 1>did with Top Gun the video game, Top Gun two

0:57:37.960 --> 0:57:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the video game. Um, let's tackle quickly the two big

0:57:43.360 --> 0:57:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Mandela effect ones though. Okay, so we've got Barren Stain

0:57:47.600 --> 0:57:51.480
<v Speaker 1>versus Barren Stein bears. Okay, maybe the explanation is just

0:57:51.640 --> 0:57:55.160
<v Speaker 1>simply that names ending in stein are more common than

0:57:55.280 --> 0:57:59.600
<v Speaker 1>names ending in stain. But because we have this prior association,

0:58:00.240 --> 0:58:04.960
<v Speaker 1>we think it's Barren Steaen or Nelson Mandela's death. Frankly,

0:58:05.440 --> 0:58:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the only two moments people in America, for the most part,

0:58:09.080 --> 0:58:11.600
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be familiar with Mandela are when he was

0:58:11.680 --> 0:58:14.560
<v Speaker 1>imprisoned and when he died. And so it's possible that

0:58:14.640 --> 0:58:17.760
<v Speaker 1>they're piecing together a false memory from these disparate pieces

0:58:17.800 --> 0:58:21.760
<v Speaker 1>of information. Yeah, yeah, that makes sense. Okay, So leading

0:58:21.880 --> 0:58:25.440
<v Speaker 1>us out here, what if? What if this? What if

0:58:25.680 --> 0:58:29.240
<v Speaker 1>this Mandela effect? Stuff that's sprinkling up and we're we're

0:58:29.400 --> 0:58:31.840
<v Speaker 1>considering it now, and I think we've gotten past the

0:58:31.880 --> 0:58:34.200
<v Speaker 1>point that, like you and I are pretty sure this

0:58:34.320 --> 0:58:37.440
<v Speaker 1>is an alternate dimensions at play. Yeah, I'm I'm I'm

0:58:37.520 --> 0:58:40.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty positive. What if it's a good thing? What if

0:58:40.560 --> 0:58:43.280
<v Speaker 1>this is a necessary thing for the human mind. In

0:58:43.360 --> 0:58:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a paper for Frontiers in Psychology from twelve, Adam D. Brown,

0:58:49.280 --> 0:58:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Nicole Curry, and William Hurst argued that there's growing evidence

0:58:53.680 --> 0:58:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that the reconstructive process of memory, which includes its distortions,

0:58:58.480 --> 0:59:03.680
<v Speaker 1>might provide us with great cognitive flexibility. So this helps,

0:59:04.000 --> 0:59:07.800
<v Speaker 1>for instance, support the construction and maintenance of your identity. Subsequently,

0:59:07.960 --> 0:59:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the malleability of an individual's memory can then transform shared

0:59:12.400 --> 0:59:15.920
<v Speaker 1>collections and a group. And then through social interactions, we

0:59:16.080 --> 0:59:20.240
<v Speaker 1>try to take out distinct individual memories and make them

0:59:20.320 --> 0:59:24.080
<v Speaker 1>converge together with other people's memories, and from this emerges

0:59:24.160 --> 0:59:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a collective memory, which establishes our collective identity. So maybe

0:59:28.400 --> 0:59:31.280
<v Speaker 1>all of this isn't as much like a flaw in

0:59:31.360 --> 0:59:34.640
<v Speaker 1>our programming as it is like a like a tactic,

0:59:34.720 --> 0:59:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a strategy that the human mind uses as a social animal. Yeah,

0:59:39.160 --> 0:59:41.320
<v Speaker 1>when you realize that your memory and recollection is not

0:59:41.480 --> 0:59:44.680
<v Speaker 1>just this iron chain, you know, reaching back through time

0:59:44.760 --> 0:59:47.880
<v Speaker 1>behind you, there's there's something liberating in that, Like you

0:59:48.160 --> 0:59:51.160
<v Speaker 1>can realize that you have a certain amount of control

0:59:51.760 --> 0:59:55.840
<v Speaker 1>over your own memories, over your own identity based on those,

0:59:55.840 --> 0:59:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and you're not just a you know, a slave to

0:59:57.600 --> 1:00:02.439
<v Speaker 1>what has come before. Yeah, yeah, very much. So, all right, audience, Look,

1:00:02.520 --> 1:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm dying to hear what your examples of the Mandela

1:00:05.560 --> 1:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>effect are, because if there are twenty two up there

1:00:08.720 --> 1:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>out there on buzz feed, I'm sure our audience has

1:00:11.080 --> 1:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>got even more than that. So let us know what

1:00:13.560 --> 1:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>some of your examples are. Let us know what you think,

1:00:16.080 --> 1:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>did we come down a little too hard on the

1:00:17.720 --> 1:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>alternate realities theory? Or should we do an episode on

1:00:21.040 --> 1:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>alternate realities in the future. Maybe we will. Yeah, and

1:00:24.960 --> 1:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>if you want to check out all the episodes of

1:00:27.160 --> 1:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, you want to check out videos, blog, post,

1:00:30.640 --> 1:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, head on over to Stuff Table your mind

1:00:33.480 --> 1:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com. You'll also find links out to our various

1:00:36.040 --> 1:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>social media accounts. That's right, We're on Facebook, Twitter, Tumbler,

1:00:40.000 --> 1:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram. We also have our brand new Facebook discussion

1:00:44.040 --> 1:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>module up for people who want to chat with each

1:00:47.080 --> 1:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>other about the show in particular, or you can maybe

1:00:50.800 --> 1:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>sometimes get find us in there. Were occasionally lurking around

1:00:53.760 --> 1:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in there, and we'll comment on things as well. Yeah,

1:00:55.880 --> 1:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a fun thread. They just popped up in there

1:00:58.640 --> 1:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>in the last a few hours us about contemplations of mortality. Yeah,

1:01:04.400 --> 1:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>so stuff like that's pretty fun. Doesn't even necessarily tie

1:01:06.800 --> 1:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and directly to an episode. Uh. And Hey, if you

1:01:09.320 --> 1:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>want to reach out to us directly and get in

1:01:11.800 --> 1:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>touch and discuss this episode or others make suggestions, you

1:01:15.920 --> 1:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>can do so by emailing us at below the mind

1:01:18.440 --> 1:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and how Stuff works dot com For more on this

1:01:30.720 --> 1:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and thousands of other topics, does it, how stuff works,

1:01:33.240 --> 1:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>dot com