1 00:00:04,600 --> 00:00:06,720 Speaker 1: Hey, guys, thanks for listening to Breaking Points with Crystal 2 00:00:06,720 --> 00:00:08,840 Speaker 1: and Sager. We're gonna be totally upfront with you. We 3 00:00:08,880 --> 00:00:11,600 Speaker 1: took a big risk going independent to make this work. 4 00:00:11,680 --> 00:00:16,280 Speaker 1: We need your support to beat the corporate media CNN, Fox, MSNBC. 5 00:00:16,560 --> 00:00:20,160 Speaker 1: They are ripping this country apart. They are making millions 6 00:00:20,160 --> 00:00:22,760 Speaker 1: of dollars doing it. To help support our mission of 7 00:00:22,800 --> 00:00:25,079 Speaker 1: making all of us hate each other, less hate the 8 00:00:25,120 --> 00:00:28,360 Speaker 1: corrupt ruling class more support the show. Become a Breaking 9 00:00:28,400 --> 00:00:30,920 Speaker 1: Points Premium Member today, where you get to watch and 10 00:00:31,040 --> 00:00:34,000 Speaker 1: listen to the entire show ad free and uncut, an 11 00:00:34,040 --> 00:00:36,839 Speaker 1: hour early before everyone else. You get to hear our 12 00:00:36,840 --> 00:00:39,720 Speaker 1: reactions to each other's monologues. You get to participate and 13 00:00:39,760 --> 00:00:42,320 Speaker 1: weekly ask me any things, and you don't need to 14 00:00:42,360 --> 00:00:45,440 Speaker 1: hear our annoying voices pitching you like I am right now, 15 00:00:45,520 --> 00:00:47,680 Speaker 1: So what are you waiting for? Go to Breakingpoints dot 16 00:00:47,720 --> 00:00:50,479 Speaker 1: com become a Premium member today, which is available in 17 00:00:50,520 --> 00:01:09,520 Speaker 1: the show notes. Enjoy the show, guys, Good morning, everybody, 18 00:01:09,560 --> 00:01:12,479 Speaker 1: Happy Tuesday. We have an amazing show for everybody today. 19 00:01:12,520 --> 00:01:15,520 Speaker 1: What do we have, Crystal, Indeed we do. We've got 20 00:01:15,560 --> 00:01:18,480 Speaker 1: a bunch of really fascinating stories this morning. So Amazon 21 00:01:18,640 --> 00:01:21,880 Speaker 1: was caught destroying out one warehouse over one hundred and 22 00:01:21,880 --> 00:01:26,320 Speaker 1: thirty thousand items per week. We're going to dig into that, 23 00:01:26,480 --> 00:01:29,560 Speaker 1: some really fascinating rulings from the Supreme Court, including on 24 00:01:29,640 --> 00:01:32,080 Speaker 1: the NCAA, and then I'm also focused on my monologue 25 00:01:32,120 --> 00:01:35,000 Speaker 1: on one regarding Goldman Sachs. Everybody coming together to let 26 00:01:35,000 --> 00:01:37,840 Speaker 1: them off the hook. Good old fashioned bipartisanship. Gotta love 27 00:01:37,920 --> 00:01:41,880 Speaker 1: that Sager's taking a look at the rise of barstool conservatives. 28 00:01:42,200 --> 00:01:46,160 Speaker 1: Today is New York City's mayoral race primary, and like 29 00:01:46,280 --> 00:01:49,840 Speaker 1: the worst political contest of all time. Ross Barkana is 30 00:01:49,840 --> 00:01:52,360 Speaker 1: going to dig into all of the dynamics there and 31 00:01:52,400 --> 00:01:55,040 Speaker 1: what to expect. But we wanted to start with American 32 00:01:55,120 --> 00:01:58,320 Speaker 1: Airlines canceling a whole bunch of flights and basically blaming 33 00:01:58,360 --> 00:02:01,960 Speaker 1: their workers. This is a huge story that actually ABC News, 34 00:02:02,040 --> 00:02:04,880 Speaker 1: mainstream media actually does a decent job enough at least 35 00:02:04,880 --> 00:02:06,960 Speaker 1: in order to sum up the situation. Let's take a listen, 36 00:02:07,000 --> 00:02:10,040 Speaker 1: we'll dissect it on the other side. This morning, the 37 00:02:10,120 --> 00:02:13,720 Speaker 1: cancelation of hundreds of flights is being partially blamed on 38 00:02:13,760 --> 00:02:17,200 Speaker 1: a staffing crunch, as a record number of travelers returned 39 00:02:17,200 --> 00:02:20,960 Speaker 1: to the skies. American Airlines canceling one hundred and twenty 40 00:02:20,960 --> 00:02:24,519 Speaker 1: three flights on Saturday, one hundred and seventy eight on Sunday, 41 00:02:24,800 --> 00:02:28,239 Speaker 1: and today more than one hundred flights are canceled already, 42 00:02:28,560 --> 00:02:33,440 Speaker 1: the airline blaming significant staffing shortages and maintenance issues. American 43 00:02:33,560 --> 00:02:36,520 Speaker 1: says it will continue to cancel at least fifty to 44 00:02:36,560 --> 00:02:39,360 Speaker 1: sixty flights a day for the rest of June and 45 00:02:39,560 --> 00:02:43,679 Speaker 1: fifty to eighty flights per day in July. So there's 46 00:02:43,680 --> 00:02:45,400 Speaker 1: a lot going on here, Chris. We'll obviously people look 47 00:02:45,400 --> 00:02:46,880 Speaker 1: at that and say, hey, what's going on here? Do 48 00:02:46,880 --> 00:02:49,160 Speaker 1: we have a labor shortage? All of that? Well, you know, 49 00:02:49,280 --> 00:02:51,040 Speaker 1: it just turns out though that if you dig a 50 00:02:51,040 --> 00:02:53,840 Speaker 1: little bit deeper, you might remember about a year and 51 00:02:53,840 --> 00:02:57,040 Speaker 1: a half ago, whenever we designed a custom bailout for 52 00:02:57,160 --> 00:02:59,679 Speaker 1: the airline industry, which I was fine with. We had 53 00:02:59,720 --> 00:03:02,160 Speaker 1: Sarah Nelson on the show who was talking about how 54 00:03:02,240 --> 00:03:04,119 Speaker 1: vital it was in order to make sure flight attendants 55 00:03:04,160 --> 00:03:07,000 Speaker 1: got paid, and because the airline industry itself like if 56 00:03:07,000 --> 00:03:09,640 Speaker 1: you let it bottom out, you're completely screwed. Part of 57 00:03:09,639 --> 00:03:11,160 Speaker 1: the thing, though, is if you're going to bail them out, 58 00:03:11,200 --> 00:03:13,360 Speaker 1: you would say, oh, maybe we're gonna put some restrictions 59 00:03:13,360 --> 00:03:15,839 Speaker 1: on that money. Well, let's take a trip down memory lane. 60 00:03:15,840 --> 00:03:17,760 Speaker 1: Shall we put it up there on the screen. In 61 00:03:17,840 --> 00:03:20,880 Speaker 1: terms of how exactly we designed this thing ten point 62 00:03:21,040 --> 00:03:25,080 Speaker 1: six million dollars in compensation the CEO received last year 63 00:03:25,280 --> 00:03:29,760 Speaker 1: and still forced thousands of workers into leave early retirement 64 00:03:29,840 --> 00:03:33,959 Speaker 1: and furloughs. Now blaming labor shortages. Go ahead and throw 65 00:03:34,000 --> 00:03:35,920 Speaker 1: the next one up there. In terms of how we 66 00:03:36,000 --> 00:03:41,320 Speaker 1: exactly designed this bailout, five point eight billion dollars in 67 00:03:41,440 --> 00:03:44,720 Speaker 1: pandemic assistance from the Department of Treasury. Four point one 68 00:03:44,920 --> 00:03:48,840 Speaker 1: billion of that was a grant. It wasn't even alone. 69 00:03:48,960 --> 00:03:51,680 Speaker 1: Only one point seven billion of that was actually the loan. 70 00:03:51,960 --> 00:03:55,640 Speaker 1: And yet today they are canceling now one percent of 71 00:03:55,640 --> 00:03:59,160 Speaker 1: their total flights. And it's not me saying boohoo for 72 00:03:59,720 --> 00:04:03,320 Speaker 1: you know, commercial airline passengers. There are freight concerns, but 73 00:04:03,400 --> 00:04:06,640 Speaker 1: really what it is is that these companies took literally 74 00:04:06,800 --> 00:04:11,600 Speaker 1: billions of dollars in pandemic bailout, and now they spent 75 00:04:11,720 --> 00:04:16,520 Speaker 1: that time furloughing people, firing people, reducing their labor, and 76 00:04:16,560 --> 00:04:18,479 Speaker 1: now they can't keep up with the demand and they're 77 00:04:18,480 --> 00:04:21,159 Speaker 1: trying to create some artificial story about, oh, we have 78 00:04:21,200 --> 00:04:24,680 Speaker 1: the labor shortage or whatever. We gave you literally billions 79 00:04:24,720 --> 00:04:27,400 Speaker 1: and billions and billions of dollars, and now you're crippling 80 00:04:27,400 --> 00:04:31,320 Speaker 1: the US economy once again, and you're making it seem 81 00:04:31,400 --> 00:04:33,839 Speaker 1: as if this entire thing was a total joke in 82 00:04:33,880 --> 00:04:36,240 Speaker 1: the first place. It really is terrible what they've done here, 83 00:04:36,279 --> 00:04:38,760 Speaker 1: and I do feel bad for people who maybe this 84 00:04:38,920 --> 00:04:42,679 Speaker 1: is like their first vacation, their first venture out after 85 00:04:42,720 --> 00:04:46,120 Speaker 1: business pandemic. For those people like the regular families who've 86 00:04:46,200 --> 00:04:49,159 Speaker 1: saved up their money to go somewhere after the pandemic 87 00:04:49,200 --> 00:04:51,320 Speaker 1: and it's like their first time. I do feel really 88 00:04:51,320 --> 00:04:53,159 Speaker 1: bad for these people where it turns into a total 89 00:04:53,320 --> 00:04:56,200 Speaker 1: might marry, your entire trip might be ruined. And I 90 00:04:56,320 --> 00:04:59,000 Speaker 1: love that they don't give any context for oh, it's 91 00:04:59,000 --> 00:05:02,160 Speaker 1: a labor shortage. Well, why do you have a labor shortage. 92 00:05:02,240 --> 00:05:06,160 Speaker 1: We bailed you out with the express provision in the 93 00:05:06,160 --> 00:05:09,839 Speaker 1: original bailout package that this money should go to keeping 94 00:05:09,920 --> 00:05:13,520 Speaker 1: your workforce. So what happened They took the money, They 95 00:05:13,600 --> 00:05:17,240 Speaker 1: kept those workers until the date that we said okay, 96 00:05:17,320 --> 00:05:19,520 Speaker 1: after September thirty. If I think was the last day. 97 00:05:19,600 --> 00:05:22,320 Speaker 1: Then you can do whatever you want after those bailout 98 00:05:22,320 --> 00:05:25,680 Speaker 1: provisions expire and they want ahead and laid off, furloughed 99 00:05:25,720 --> 00:05:30,440 Speaker 1: or forced down thirty thousand of their workers. So it's 100 00:05:30,520 --> 00:05:32,600 Speaker 1: not like just oh, boo hooo, we have a labor 101 00:05:32,640 --> 00:05:34,840 Speaker 1: shortage and there's nothing we can do about it. You're 102 00:05:34,839 --> 00:05:39,200 Speaker 1: the one that created that labor shortage, and somehow that 103 00:05:39,320 --> 00:05:43,400 Speaker 1: context is wildly missing for most of the mainstream coverage. 104 00:05:43,640 --> 00:05:46,880 Speaker 1: I took a look at I was actually perusing CNBC yesterday. 105 00:05:46,960 --> 00:05:49,080 Speaker 1: I need to watch them more often because it is 106 00:05:49,279 --> 00:05:52,200 Speaker 1: incredible the type of content they put on. I jumped 107 00:05:52,240 --> 00:05:55,040 Speaker 1: right from a segment. The headline of the segment was 108 00:05:55,200 --> 00:05:59,039 Speaker 1: Jim Kramer weighs in on like American airlines layoffs, but 109 00:05:59,120 --> 00:06:01,520 Speaker 1: it was even worse than He didn't even say anything about. 110 00:06:01,520 --> 00:06:04,080 Speaker 1: It was just him complaining about like lazy millennials not 111 00:06:04,120 --> 00:06:06,360 Speaker 1: wanting to come to the office. And then the next 112 00:06:06,440 --> 00:06:08,960 Speaker 1: one up with some dude who was like trashing redditors 113 00:06:08,960 --> 00:06:12,920 Speaker 1: for not respecting the fundamentals anyway, this is how CNBC 114 00:06:13,279 --> 00:06:17,159 Speaker 1: covered the American airline situation, just framing it as a 115 00:06:17,240 --> 00:06:20,400 Speaker 1: labor shortage, just coming dropping out of the sky with 116 00:06:20,480 --> 00:06:23,600 Speaker 1: absolutely zero context. Let's take a listen. CBC dot com 117 00:06:23,600 --> 00:06:26,800 Speaker 1: airline reporter Leslie Josephs is covering the story for US. 118 00:06:27,000 --> 00:06:30,279 Speaker 1: She joins us, Now, Leslie, why is it American in 119 00:06:30,320 --> 00:06:34,400 Speaker 1: particular that can't seem to get workers? So what American 120 00:06:34,440 --> 00:06:37,240 Speaker 1: is dealing with now they have packed their schedule a 121 00:06:37,240 --> 00:06:40,239 Speaker 1: little bit fuller than some of their competitors or closest 122 00:06:40,240 --> 00:06:43,400 Speaker 1: competitors like Delta and United. And what they're finding is 123 00:06:43,440 --> 00:06:46,160 Speaker 1: there are a shortage of workers during the middle of 124 00:06:46,279 --> 00:06:50,960 Speaker 1: training pilots that might have been idled during the pandemic. 125 00:06:51,040 --> 00:06:53,320 Speaker 1: I mean, remember, think back to a year ago, we 126 00:06:53,320 --> 00:06:58,239 Speaker 1: were retiring planes. Airlines were telling employees to please, please 127 00:06:58,279 --> 00:07:02,039 Speaker 1: please take an early retirement or a bio package. So 128 00:07:02,080 --> 00:07:05,960 Speaker 1: their focus has switched entirely. So that's why they're seeing 129 00:07:05,960 --> 00:07:08,320 Speaker 1: a little bit of this strain. Add to that a 130 00:07:08,320 --> 00:07:11,240 Speaker 1: little bit of seasonal weather, and this is the recipe 131 00:07:11,280 --> 00:07:15,640 Speaker 1: for what we're seeing right now. It's amazing. Nothing about 132 00:07:15,680 --> 00:07:18,720 Speaker 1: nothing about the bailout provisions, nothing about how they laid 133 00:07:18,720 --> 00:07:21,640 Speaker 1: off thirty thousand workers. Just like well, you know, they're 134 00:07:21,720 --> 00:07:24,040 Speaker 1: ramping up a little different than everybody. They got to 135 00:07:24,040 --> 00:07:27,440 Speaker 1: get these pilots back online. Ridiculous. No, it's terrible. And 136 00:07:27,480 --> 00:07:30,000 Speaker 1: this is actually this maybe is a little bit of 137 00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:32,320 Speaker 1: a corollary to I've talked about how in many ways 138 00:07:32,320 --> 00:07:34,720 Speaker 1: I think the labor shortage is just revenge for Americans 139 00:07:34,800 --> 00:07:37,440 Speaker 1: bad policy, which is that at the beginning of the pandemic, 140 00:07:37,680 --> 00:07:40,360 Speaker 1: we made the choice to force people onto unemployment. What 141 00:07:40,360 --> 00:07:42,120 Speaker 1: we should have done is actually what we did for 142 00:07:42,160 --> 00:07:45,120 Speaker 1: the airline industry in the very first place, which was say, hey, 143 00:07:45,120 --> 00:07:47,720 Speaker 1: we're going to pay you billions and billions of dollars fine, 144 00:07:47,800 --> 00:07:49,840 Speaker 1: and in exchange, you have to use that money in 145 00:07:49,920 --> 00:07:52,960 Speaker 1: order to keep people on your workflaw on your in workplace, 146 00:07:53,240 --> 00:07:55,320 Speaker 1: because the airline industry is critical to the way we 147 00:07:55,400 --> 00:07:58,840 Speaker 1: function freight and all that. Actually, I think every industry 148 00:07:58,840 --> 00:08:00,680 Speaker 1: should have been declared critical, and that's how we should 149 00:08:00,720 --> 00:08:03,400 Speaker 1: have done everything. But what did I forget, which is 150 00:08:03,400 --> 00:08:05,600 Speaker 1: that in the United States, what they did is they 151 00:08:05,600 --> 00:08:09,239 Speaker 1: wrote in these ridiculous provisions making it so oh until 152 00:08:09,280 --> 00:08:12,520 Speaker 1: September thirtieth. I actually remember covering it at Rising. It 153 00:08:12,560 --> 00:08:15,760 Speaker 1: was maybe David Dane or somebody else there who's like, listen, guys, 154 00:08:15,840 --> 00:08:20,000 Speaker 1: like come September or not September thirty. First, what August 155 00:08:20,080 --> 00:08:23,280 Speaker 1: or whatever comes back October? Okay, there we go October. 156 00:08:23,480 --> 00:08:26,320 Speaker 1: Come October first. He's like, everyone's going to get fired, 157 00:08:26,360 --> 00:08:28,040 Speaker 1: everyone's going to get furloughed. And I was like, oh 158 00:08:28,080 --> 00:08:31,560 Speaker 1: my god, he's totally right, and that is exactly what happened. 159 00:08:31,720 --> 00:08:34,880 Speaker 1: And now here we are, sixteen seventeen months now into 160 00:08:34,960 --> 00:08:37,880 Speaker 1: the pandemic. These people have been laid off. Travel demand 161 00:08:37,960 --> 00:08:40,160 Speaker 1: is actually surged. A lot of people have savings, like 162 00:08:40,200 --> 00:08:42,240 Speaker 1: you were saying, people who bought flights that want to 163 00:08:42,240 --> 00:08:44,520 Speaker 1: take their first vacation, and now there's a fake labor 164 00:08:44,559 --> 00:08:47,800 Speaker 1: shortage in terms of American airlines. We actually did everything 165 00:08:47,800 --> 00:08:50,040 Speaker 1: that we were supposed to do in terms of designing 166 00:08:50,080 --> 00:08:53,040 Speaker 1: that program. We just wrote it so that they get billions. 167 00:08:53,200 --> 00:08:55,319 Speaker 1: Then they didn't actually have that much restrictions on the 168 00:08:55,320 --> 00:08:57,280 Speaker 1: way that they were going to spend the money, and 169 00:08:57,320 --> 00:09:00,440 Speaker 1: then made it so that they created their own fake 170 00:09:00,520 --> 00:09:03,280 Speaker 1: labor shortage. And what also grinds my gears is if 171 00:09:03,280 --> 00:09:06,040 Speaker 1: you were a small business in your paycheck production program 172 00:09:06,200 --> 00:09:09,120 Speaker 1: and you got alone like this, you did not have 173 00:09:09,160 --> 00:09:11,560 Speaker 1: the ability to fire people at all. You had to 174 00:09:11,600 --> 00:09:13,760 Speaker 1: use all that money to keep people on payroll again 175 00:09:13,800 --> 00:09:16,800 Speaker 1: a provision I support. So if you were a small business, 176 00:09:17,080 --> 00:09:20,040 Speaker 1: you had all these restrictions on how you got your money. 177 00:09:20,160 --> 00:09:22,480 Speaker 1: You did get some custom bailout from the Fed. You 178 00:09:22,480 --> 00:09:25,320 Speaker 1: didn't get some post bailout from Congress. You had to 179 00:09:25,320 --> 00:09:27,600 Speaker 1: apply to the bank. And even then the bank like 180 00:09:27,800 --> 00:09:31,800 Speaker 1: put you in whatever order they want. Limited pool airline 181 00:09:31,840 --> 00:09:35,800 Speaker 1: gets a specially cut and tailor designed bailout and they 182 00:09:35,800 --> 00:09:38,000 Speaker 1: get all this money, and then in the end, at 183 00:09:38,000 --> 00:09:40,280 Speaker 1: the end of the day, what's going on. They didn't 184 00:09:40,280 --> 00:09:41,840 Speaker 1: even use it in the way that we told them to. 185 00:09:41,920 --> 00:09:45,000 Speaker 1: It's fundamentally unfair the way that we did this entirety. 186 00:09:45,120 --> 00:09:48,840 Speaker 1: So this whole episode with the airlines, and as I 187 00:09:48,880 --> 00:09:51,720 Speaker 1: was thinking about this yesterday, has actually kind of changed 188 00:09:51,720 --> 00:09:54,640 Speaker 1: my mindset over what we should have done at the 189 00:09:54,679 --> 00:09:57,080 Speaker 1: beginning of the pandemic. I'll tell you why in just 190 00:09:57,120 --> 00:10:00,280 Speaker 1: a second. So I was reading Andrew ross Orkin when 191 00:10:00,280 --> 00:10:04,080 Speaker 1: these bailout programs were being contemplated a while back, wrote 192 00:10:04,120 --> 00:10:07,360 Speaker 1: a piece about does the airline industry really need this bailout? 193 00:10:07,520 --> 00:10:10,000 Speaker 1: And what he wrote is no other industry affected by 194 00:10:10,040 --> 00:10:11,960 Speaker 1: the pandemic received more from the government. There was no 195 00:10:12,000 --> 00:10:15,600 Speaker 1: special program for hotels, for restaurants, for travel agencies. Companies 196 00:10:15,600 --> 00:10:17,280 Speaker 1: in those industries had to line up for the Small 197 00:10:17,320 --> 00:10:21,280 Speaker 1: Business Focus paycheck protection program and prey the largest loan 198 00:10:21,320 --> 00:10:23,640 Speaker 1: in the program could make was ten million dollars, as 199 00:10:23,640 --> 00:10:28,000 Speaker 1: opposed to the five billion that the airline industry received. 200 00:10:28,080 --> 00:10:31,319 Speaker 1: And so what I realized here is that you're right. 201 00:10:31,400 --> 00:10:33,240 Speaker 1: We actually sort of held this up and we talked 202 00:10:33,280 --> 00:10:35,120 Speaker 1: to Sarah Nelson as the model of what they should 203 00:10:35,120 --> 00:10:37,600 Speaker 1: have done for other industries. Well, you know what, it 204 00:10:37,679 --> 00:10:42,280 Speaker 1: turns out, actually the most effective part of the program, 205 00:10:42,600 --> 00:10:45,320 Speaker 1: of all the different relief programs that we had in place, 206 00:10:45,720 --> 00:10:49,160 Speaker 1: was just given people cash, just straight giving people cash. 207 00:10:49,360 --> 00:10:52,960 Speaker 1: The addition of the child tax credit, the unemployments insurance system, 208 00:10:53,000 --> 00:10:55,880 Speaker 1: Yeah it was clunky, but that also just putting cash 209 00:10:55,920 --> 00:10:59,080 Speaker 1: straight in people's pockets, if that worked more effectively, those 210 00:10:59,080 --> 00:11:03,000 Speaker 1: were the pieces that lowered poverty. And actually now are 211 00:11:03,120 --> 00:11:06,400 Speaker 1: giving workers a tiny bit of cushion so that they 212 00:11:06,440 --> 00:11:08,680 Speaker 1: can say, like, screw you, I'm not going back to 213 00:11:08,720 --> 00:11:11,000 Speaker 1: work on the frontlines for seven to twenty five. Screw y, 214 00:11:11,080 --> 00:11:12,920 Speaker 1: I'm not working for tips at whatever what is it, 215 00:11:13,040 --> 00:11:17,280 Speaker 1: two dollars and whatever. So I actually think we have 216 00:11:17,559 --> 00:11:21,880 Speaker 1: so much of a mindset in this country that like, oh, 217 00:11:21,920 --> 00:11:24,319 Speaker 1: we have to be skeptical every time we're handing out 218 00:11:24,360 --> 00:11:26,280 Speaker 1: cash directly to people. Maybe they're going to be lazy, 219 00:11:26,360 --> 00:11:28,280 Speaker 1: maybe they're not going to spend it in the right way, 220 00:11:28,360 --> 00:11:31,320 Speaker 1: maybe they're going to be irresponsible for this money. But 221 00:11:31,360 --> 00:11:35,640 Speaker 1: the reality is actually the individual human beings use the 222 00:11:35,720 --> 00:11:40,800 Speaker 1: money in far more efficient and productive ways than these 223 00:11:40,840 --> 00:11:44,840 Speaker 1: giant companies. So even this program, which again was kind 224 00:11:44,840 --> 00:11:47,000 Speaker 1: of the best of the best in terms of it 225 00:11:47,040 --> 00:11:49,400 Speaker 1: required that you kept the employees on. Of course, the 226 00:11:49,440 --> 00:11:51,160 Speaker 1: minute that they can lay them off, the minute those 227 00:11:51,160 --> 00:11:53,640 Speaker 1: provisions expire, they go ahead and do that. They give 228 00:11:53,679 --> 00:11:57,480 Speaker 1: their CEO ten million dollar pay compensation so that he 229 00:11:57,559 --> 00:12:00,240 Speaker 1: can apparently like completely fail on the other side kind 230 00:12:00,240 --> 00:12:03,479 Speaker 1: of the pandemic. So even in the best case scenario, 231 00:12:04,040 --> 00:12:07,160 Speaker 1: we were better off just straight giving cash to people. 232 00:12:07,160 --> 00:12:09,120 Speaker 1: And oh, by the way, that's something our federal government, 233 00:12:09,160 --> 00:12:12,880 Speaker 1: which is capacity has been stripped down over years and 234 00:12:12,920 --> 00:12:15,679 Speaker 1: years and decades and decades, something that they were able 235 00:12:15,720 --> 00:12:18,439 Speaker 1: to do very efficiently and very effectively. Yeah, actually it's 236 00:12:18,440 --> 00:12:20,560 Speaker 1: more of a matter of timeline. I agree with you. Look, 237 00:12:20,559 --> 00:12:21,719 Speaker 1: at the end of the day, I want people to 238 00:12:21,800 --> 00:12:23,680 Speaker 1: have the money. I think at the time the reason 239 00:12:23,720 --> 00:12:25,959 Speaker 1: I was arguing for it was because people's bank account 240 00:12:25,960 --> 00:12:28,880 Speaker 1: information already existed with their employers and we didn't. We 241 00:12:28,920 --> 00:12:32,240 Speaker 1: had some initial implementation problems around the stimulus checks. I 242 00:12:32,280 --> 00:12:34,760 Speaker 1: want to say, I think we own that. Just didn't 243 00:12:34,800 --> 00:12:38,640 Speaker 1: think it was likely that the American political system would 244 00:12:38,679 --> 00:12:42,360 Speaker 1: be like, instead, let's just hand out large amounts of cash. Yes, 245 00:12:42,440 --> 00:12:45,440 Speaker 1: this was more like a pree Overton window. I was like, 246 00:12:45,520 --> 00:12:47,319 Speaker 1: look like, we got to give people money we need 247 00:12:47,520 --> 00:12:50,600 Speaker 1: as soon as humanly possible. And the way I was 248 00:12:50,640 --> 00:12:52,640 Speaker 1: thinking about it was that, look, people are already attached 249 00:12:52,679 --> 00:12:54,480 Speaker 1: their payroll. And also, if you think about it from 250 00:12:54,480 --> 00:12:57,320 Speaker 1: a business concerned perspective, like the businesses are like we 251 00:12:57,320 --> 00:13:01,239 Speaker 1: can't find anyone, etc. I actually understand that. I sympathize, 252 00:13:01,280 --> 00:13:03,640 Speaker 1: especially if you're one of the smallest businesses or one 253 00:13:03,679 --> 00:13:05,640 Speaker 1: of those people who truly can't compete, or you didn't 254 00:13:05,640 --> 00:13:08,360 Speaker 1: get a PPP loan or any of these things. The 255 00:13:08,440 --> 00:13:12,080 Speaker 1: problem that we had, again is that Washington basically kicked 256 00:13:12,080 --> 00:13:15,480 Speaker 1: people off onto unemployment then left them to dry and 257 00:13:15,559 --> 00:13:18,280 Speaker 1: screwed around with the plus ups. Did we not have 258 00:13:18,360 --> 00:13:20,920 Speaker 1: any plus up in terms of like extra cash for 259 00:13:21,120 --> 00:13:23,480 Speaker 1: months on end while Congress was getting its act together, 260 00:13:23,840 --> 00:13:27,559 Speaker 1: and then people because of these like crazy lockdown procedures, 261 00:13:27,720 --> 00:13:31,520 Speaker 1: some people were on unemployment, went off unemployment back on, 262 00:13:31,640 --> 00:13:34,280 Speaker 1: but that takes months, so that those systems were total 263 00:13:34,360 --> 00:13:36,839 Speaker 1: are totally regular. We're a total disaster. I've heard from 264 00:13:36,840 --> 00:13:39,120 Speaker 1: many of you actually telling me about how often how 265 00:13:39,120 --> 00:13:42,280 Speaker 1: difficult it was in order to get your unemployment, and 266 00:13:42,320 --> 00:13:44,679 Speaker 1: so I was saying, like, look, the easiest way thing 267 00:13:44,840 --> 00:13:47,160 Speaker 1: to do this is the payroll. But all the retconning 268 00:13:47,240 --> 00:13:49,480 Speaker 1: of like what we should have done, et cetera. It's 269 00:13:49,559 --> 00:13:52,920 Speaker 1: just so disgusting to watch this company who got billions 270 00:13:52,920 --> 00:13:55,719 Speaker 1: of dollars and to come out and now say they 271 00:13:55,720 --> 00:13:57,960 Speaker 1: have some labor shortage. It was like, what was the point? 272 00:13:58,040 --> 00:14:00,280 Speaker 1: Why did we bail you out? It gave you billillions 273 00:14:00,280 --> 00:14:03,800 Speaker 1: and billions to make sure your industry remained robust. And 274 00:14:03,840 --> 00:14:08,480 Speaker 1: again fair airlines are we need airlines. The country needs 275 00:14:08,480 --> 00:14:11,200 Speaker 1: it in order to move freight passengers. Is critical, even 276 00:14:11,240 --> 00:14:13,120 Speaker 1: at the height of the pandemic. We had it all 277 00:14:13,160 --> 00:14:15,920 Speaker 1: for a reason. But it really pisses me off watching 278 00:14:15,960 --> 00:14:18,840 Speaker 1: them come out and make these fake excuses, and it 279 00:14:18,920 --> 00:14:20,840 Speaker 1: just makes you think, like, can we do anything fairly 280 00:14:20,840 --> 00:14:22,920 Speaker 1: in this country anymore? Yeah, what are you supposed to 281 00:14:22,920 --> 00:14:25,000 Speaker 1: think if you can't catch a flight because of this? 282 00:14:25,080 --> 00:14:27,120 Speaker 1: And you see how much money that these people got 283 00:14:27,160 --> 00:14:29,600 Speaker 1: in the pandemic. So this is also for Andrew Ross 284 00:14:29,640 --> 00:14:32,720 Speaker 1: Sorkin again about like how we could have used the 285 00:14:32,760 --> 00:14:35,600 Speaker 1: money in a better fashion. So the money that we 286 00:14:35,600 --> 00:14:38,240 Speaker 1: gave the airlines likely saved about seventy five thousand jobs, 287 00:14:38,440 --> 00:14:41,760 Speaker 1: really significant, right, critical for those people at a cost 288 00:14:42,000 --> 00:14:45,840 Speaker 1: of three hundred thousand dollars per job. Wow, those people 289 00:14:45,840 --> 00:14:48,000 Speaker 1: are not making three hundred thousand dollars by the way. 290 00:14:48,080 --> 00:14:50,760 Speaker 1: I mean, you know, some of the pilot's flight attendants, 291 00:14:50,800 --> 00:14:53,560 Speaker 1: like these are good middle class jobs or flight attendants, 292 00:14:53,600 --> 00:14:56,200 Speaker 1: but they're not making three hundred k a year. So 293 00:14:56,840 --> 00:15:00,520 Speaker 1: we spent that much money. It's just wildly inefficient, right 294 00:15:01,080 --> 00:15:05,200 Speaker 1: give it. I really have come to believe that individual 295 00:15:05,440 --> 00:15:10,200 Speaker 1: human beings can be trusted with direct cash infusions to 296 00:15:10,360 --> 00:15:14,520 Speaker 1: a far greater extent than any of these businesses that 297 00:15:14,600 --> 00:15:19,240 Speaker 1: are always, always, always looking for every way to cheat 298 00:15:19,480 --> 00:15:22,560 Speaker 1: suck up that money for themselves, like buy back their 299 00:15:22,600 --> 00:15:24,680 Speaker 1: stock all of that stuff. And that's the other piece 300 00:15:24,680 --> 00:15:26,760 Speaker 1: of this if we even go back before the pandemic, 301 00:15:27,200 --> 00:15:30,120 Speaker 1: why were the airlines so close to the wall that 302 00:15:30,200 --> 00:15:32,480 Speaker 1: the minute there was a drop in their revenue and 303 00:15:32,800 --> 00:15:36,000 Speaker 1: their passengers who were flying they were totally screwed. Well, 304 00:15:36,000 --> 00:15:38,600 Speaker 1: it's because they spent all that the corporate tax cut 305 00:15:38,600 --> 00:15:41,560 Speaker 1: money from Trump. They spent that on stock buybacks so 306 00:15:41,600 --> 00:15:44,520 Speaker 1: that they could enrich themselves and enrich their shareholders, rather 307 00:15:44,520 --> 00:15:46,720 Speaker 1: than investing in their business and making sure that they 308 00:15:46,800 --> 00:15:51,400 Speaker 1: had that resiliency if there was a downturn. So again, 309 00:15:51,560 --> 00:15:53,880 Speaker 1: as I look at this kind of my big takeaway 310 00:15:54,080 --> 00:15:58,480 Speaker 1: is we should just trust people and working Americans way 311 00:15:58,600 --> 00:16:02,000 Speaker 1: way way before we trust these idiots who find every 312 00:16:02,000 --> 00:16:04,680 Speaker 1: way they possibly can to fail and then just expect 313 00:16:04,680 --> 00:16:06,560 Speaker 1: that they're going to be bailed out no matter how 314 00:16:06,640 --> 00:16:09,080 Speaker 1: uncomfortable they're Actually, this is the thing. These people don't 315 00:16:09,120 --> 00:16:11,680 Speaker 1: get people. I don't know, how often do you think 316 00:16:11,720 --> 00:16:13,440 Speaker 1: you can get away with this, like in terms, we 317 00:16:13,480 --> 00:16:15,720 Speaker 1: had it on two thousand and eight Wall Street bailout, 318 00:16:15,920 --> 00:16:19,720 Speaker 1: give everybody bonuses AIG. I mean, that was probably as 319 00:16:19,840 --> 00:16:22,840 Speaker 1: close to the biggest popular outrage that we saw on 320 00:16:22,880 --> 00:16:27,000 Speaker 1: something economically in a long time. Obviously that faded, but 321 00:16:27,120 --> 00:16:30,520 Speaker 1: then you see this American Airlines story next time around, 322 00:16:30,640 --> 00:16:32,400 Speaker 1: How are you, like, do you think you're going to 323 00:16:32,440 --> 00:16:35,000 Speaker 1: get bailed out? Do you really think so? Maybe? Now, 324 00:16:35,040 --> 00:16:37,920 Speaker 1: maybe you will because the government did all that congressional 325 00:16:37,920 --> 00:16:40,240 Speaker 1: system is there, but like this all has to break 326 00:16:40,280 --> 00:16:43,560 Speaker 1: at some point. And so look, I've I mean American 327 00:16:43,600 --> 00:16:45,400 Speaker 1: Airlines yesterday it was like trending. It was one of 328 00:16:45,440 --> 00:16:48,360 Speaker 1: the biggest stories in the country. And coincidentally, I didn't 329 00:16:48,360 --> 00:16:50,520 Speaker 1: see very much coverage of it, Like yes, you know, 330 00:16:50,600 --> 00:16:53,840 Speaker 1: CNBC goes and covers it for about thirty seconds with 331 00:16:53,920 --> 00:16:57,480 Speaker 1: some thirty seconds or the American Airlines pr tells us 332 00:16:57,920 --> 00:17:02,640 Speaker 1: and they're like, and now let's happen to you. You're 333 00:17:02,680 --> 00:17:05,800 Speaker 1: on to explain why he can't get any workers and 334 00:17:05,960 --> 00:17:09,400 Speaker 1: didn't misspend five billion dollars. Same thing though, I mean, 335 00:17:09,440 --> 00:17:12,000 Speaker 1: I saw it trending all across the country in terms 336 00:17:12,000 --> 00:17:15,240 Speaker 1: of the Internet outrage. People were contacting us about it 337 00:17:15,480 --> 00:17:19,240 Speaker 1: and more, but the actual mainstream coverage of it wasn't there. 338 00:17:19,440 --> 00:17:21,359 Speaker 1: So it just seems to me like one of those 339 00:17:21,480 --> 00:17:26,240 Speaker 1: mainstream backlashes again sorry, a backlash against the mainstream and 340 00:17:26,440 --> 00:17:30,040 Speaker 1: very popular outrage around this type of story because people 341 00:17:30,160 --> 00:17:33,040 Speaker 1: understood and saw that while they were waiting for a check, 342 00:17:33,200 --> 00:17:35,800 Speaker 1: while they were waiting for extra unemployment, while they wanted 343 00:17:35,840 --> 00:17:38,680 Speaker 1: the lockdowns to end, while they wanted some proper information 344 00:17:39,040 --> 00:17:42,040 Speaker 1: that these people were getting bailed out to the tune 345 00:17:42,080 --> 00:17:45,880 Speaker 1: of billions. And we remember some of the initial bailout 346 00:17:45,960 --> 00:17:49,520 Speaker 1: outrage whenever people understood I think it was David Dayan 347 00:17:49,600 --> 00:17:52,119 Speaker 1: talking about the trillions of dollars a federal reserve and 348 00:17:52,200 --> 00:17:55,800 Speaker 1: all that were shooting, which would have been fine if 349 00:17:56,200 --> 00:17:59,800 Speaker 1: you had reciprocal programs for people who were working, and 350 00:17:59,840 --> 00:18:02,760 Speaker 1: that just faded off as time went. Now we're at 351 00:18:02,760 --> 00:18:05,280 Speaker 1: this strange time, like people do have money in the bank, 352 00:18:05,520 --> 00:18:07,760 Speaker 1: two hundred million Americans or so or not. I mean, 353 00:18:07,760 --> 00:18:09,440 Speaker 1: they're not like a you know, they're like still a 354 00:18:09,480 --> 00:18:12,040 Speaker 1: paycheck away from bankruptcy. But you know, that's a little 355 00:18:12,040 --> 00:18:16,080 Speaker 1: bit better apparently than where things were before. And yet 356 00:18:16,119 --> 00:18:19,679 Speaker 1: the memory has not faded around how people remember this 357 00:18:19,760 --> 00:18:22,120 Speaker 1: type of stuff. And I suspect that the next time 358 00:18:22,160 --> 00:18:24,760 Speaker 1: around that it made things be different. Although you know, 359 00:18:24,800 --> 00:18:27,040 Speaker 1: maybe I should be more cynical. Our political class doesn't 360 00:18:27,119 --> 00:18:29,560 Speaker 1: respond to popular will. I mean, that's just the reality 361 00:18:29,600 --> 00:18:32,320 Speaker 1: and so, and especially when you have a situation like 362 00:18:32,600 --> 00:18:35,480 Speaker 1: maybe you're in Atlanta or what's is it Houston that's 363 00:18:35,480 --> 00:18:38,040 Speaker 1: the big hub in Texas where there's a lot of 364 00:18:38,119 --> 00:18:40,640 Speaker 1: jobs at stake and the airlines kind of oh, well, 365 00:18:40,800 --> 00:18:42,919 Speaker 1: your economy is going to crash if you don't get 366 00:18:42,960 --> 00:18:47,120 Speaker 1: the bailout. It's very compelling case. You know, your point 367 00:18:47,119 --> 00:18:50,000 Speaker 1: about media, I think is really important, really interesting because 368 00:18:50,080 --> 00:18:52,600 Speaker 1: why does this not get coverage because there's not a 369 00:18:52,640 --> 00:18:55,520 Speaker 1: Trump angle and there's not a Biden angle, So because 370 00:18:55,560 --> 00:18:58,719 Speaker 1: you can't fit it neatly into this like Democrats are 371 00:18:58,760 --> 00:19:02,000 Speaker 1: bad or Republican are bad. Narrative, they're just like, eh, 372 00:19:02,040 --> 00:19:04,119 Speaker 1: we don't really care, even though it, you know, is 373 00:19:04,160 --> 00:19:07,240 Speaker 1: something that says so much, not just about this current moment, 374 00:19:07,520 --> 00:19:09,480 Speaker 1: but there's so many lessons to be taken from it 375 00:19:09,720 --> 00:19:12,240 Speaker 1: about how we approach this entire situation to start with. 376 00:19:12,240 --> 00:19:13,480 Speaker 1: And if you don't think that we're going to find 377 00:19:13,480 --> 00:19:18,879 Speaker 1: ourselves in another downturn, pandemic, collapse, crash where we're faced 378 00:19:18,880 --> 00:19:21,800 Speaker 1: with these kinds of questions again, you're fooling yourself. And 379 00:19:21,840 --> 00:19:24,520 Speaker 1: actually to that point, and it's not just Democrats bad, 380 00:19:24,560 --> 00:19:27,680 Speaker 1: Republicans bad. Everybody was complicit in this. The White House 381 00:19:27,720 --> 00:19:30,199 Speaker 1: at all parties, I mean a past ninety nine. Oh, 382 00:19:30,320 --> 00:19:33,040 Speaker 1: if I recall through the US Senate, this is what happens, 383 00:19:33,080 --> 00:19:36,040 Speaker 1: you know, when you have total and complete bipartisanship. And 384 00:19:36,080 --> 00:19:39,360 Speaker 1: I think it's an important lesson to remember exactly how 385 00:19:39,400 --> 00:19:42,159 Speaker 1: these things play out. Speaking of corporate mouthfeasans, we get 386 00:19:42,200 --> 00:19:44,679 Speaker 1: another good one for you from Amazon. Yeah, okay, this 387 00:19:44,840 --> 00:19:47,440 Speaker 1: is probably one of the craziest things I've ever seen. 388 00:19:47,520 --> 00:19:52,280 Speaker 1: So ITV news out of the UK has caught Amazon 389 00:19:53,080 --> 00:19:58,720 Speaker 1: destroying millions of dollars worth of merchandise for no discernible reason. 390 00:19:58,800 --> 00:20:01,679 Speaker 1: And I'll explain why they say that they do so, 391 00:20:02,000 --> 00:20:04,320 Speaker 1: but let's watch this video first because it's totally nuts. 392 00:20:04,400 --> 00:20:27,240 Speaker 1: Let's take a listen. So from a Friday to a Friday, 393 00:20:27,359 --> 00:20:30,359 Speaker 1: our target was approximately one hundred and thirty thousand items 394 00:20:30,400 --> 00:20:33,879 Speaker 1: a week. The target to destroy from one center was 395 00:20:33,920 --> 00:20:38,560 Speaker 1: one hundred and thirty thousand items. Yes, okay, So let 396 00:20:38,640 --> 00:20:40,280 Speaker 1: me explain this to you, which is that what they 397 00:20:40,359 --> 00:20:43,000 Speaker 1: caught there with the guy who was on camera, was 398 00:20:43,000 --> 00:20:46,760 Speaker 1: that Amazon is destroying millions of items of unsold stock 399 00:20:47,160 --> 00:20:50,280 Speaker 1: in just one of its UK warehouses every single year, 400 00:20:50,600 --> 00:20:53,400 Speaker 1: and that this is indicative of a company wide policy. 401 00:20:53,600 --> 00:20:56,639 Speaker 1: So what they found is that they are destroying one 402 00:20:56,720 --> 00:21:00,600 Speaker 1: hundred and thirty thousand items a week, and we're talking 403 00:21:00,640 --> 00:21:04,359 Speaker 1: about brand new stuff, dice and fans, hoover vacuums, the 404 00:21:04,440 --> 00:21:09,639 Speaker 1: occasional MacBook and iPad. The other day, twenty thousand face 405 00:21:09,760 --> 00:21:13,399 Speaker 1: masks still in their wrappers. Here's what he said. Overall, 406 00:21:13,480 --> 00:21:16,680 Speaker 1: fifty percent of all items are unopened, still in their 407 00:21:16,720 --> 00:21:20,199 Speaker 1: shrink wrap. The other half are returns and in good condition. 408 00:21:20,760 --> 00:21:23,400 Speaker 1: Staff have become numb in terms of what they are 409 00:21:23,440 --> 00:21:27,199 Speaker 1: asking to do. So you might ask why exactly is 410 00:21:27,240 --> 00:21:30,639 Speaker 1: all of this happening, Well, what's happening is that because 411 00:21:30,680 --> 00:21:33,520 Speaker 1: of their business model, they have it such that they 412 00:21:33,600 --> 00:21:37,960 Speaker 1: store with stuff inside of their warehouse. It's called fulfilled 413 00:21:38,000 --> 00:21:40,240 Speaker 1: by Amazon. It's actually one of the most profitable parts 414 00:21:40,240 --> 00:21:42,879 Speaker 1: of their business, which is that you're a third party seller. 415 00:21:43,080 --> 00:21:46,680 Speaker 1: But in order to take advantage of Amazon's distribution, you can. 416 00:21:46,840 --> 00:21:51,000 Speaker 1: Amazon will list your goods on its website obviously, and 417 00:21:51,040 --> 00:21:54,080 Speaker 1: then when I buy it, Amazon will fulfill the order 418 00:21:54,160 --> 00:21:57,080 Speaker 1: because they have the third party goods inside of their warehouse. 419 00:21:57,080 --> 00:22:00,359 Speaker 1: But then the question arises, like what exactly do you 420 00:22:00,400 --> 00:22:03,960 Speaker 1: do whenever you have extra stuff, and it turns out 421 00:22:04,200 --> 00:22:07,800 Speaker 1: that the actual physical policy at least look at least 422 00:22:07,800 --> 00:22:10,639 Speaker 1: in the UK in terms of what's happening, is that 423 00:22:11,080 --> 00:22:15,240 Speaker 1: they are destroying it. They're not even going in trying 424 00:22:15,280 --> 00:22:18,200 Speaker 1: to donate it to anybody, They're not making any efforts. 425 00:22:18,280 --> 00:22:23,480 Speaker 1: They're literally incinerating and destroying hundreds of millions of dollars 426 00:22:23,520 --> 00:22:27,280 Speaker 1: worth of goods. And this is so insane it's actually 427 00:22:27,359 --> 00:22:30,560 Speaker 1: royaling UK politics. Even Boris Johnson weighed in on this, 428 00:22:30,680 --> 00:22:33,600 Speaker 1: but I thought this was important enough, Christel, because are 429 00:22:33,680 --> 00:22:35,879 Speaker 1: they doing the same stuff here? We should ask a 430 00:22:35,920 --> 00:22:38,040 Speaker 1: lot of questions because if they are, I think there's 431 00:22:38,040 --> 00:22:40,119 Speaker 1: a lot of people out there who could view some 432 00:22:40,200 --> 00:22:42,880 Speaker 1: of this stuff and it's just totally unopened and they're 433 00:22:42,920 --> 00:22:46,760 Speaker 1: just destroying it. It's insane. It is completely nuts. And 434 00:22:46,800 --> 00:22:49,960 Speaker 1: your question is the right one because just to emphasize again, 435 00:22:50,520 --> 00:22:56,040 Speaker 1: one hundred and thirty thousand items from one warehouse every 436 00:22:56,480 --> 00:23:00,720 Speaker 1: single week. Yeah, like think about that. Well, you think 437 00:23:00,760 --> 00:23:03,920 Speaker 1: their policies are different here. Do you see Amazon giving 438 00:23:03,960 --> 00:23:07,080 Speaker 1: out goods to the needy across America? No, we don't, 439 00:23:07,119 --> 00:23:10,119 Speaker 1: So what's happening to those goods? It's an excellent question 440 00:23:10,160 --> 00:23:11,920 Speaker 1: and could us them for doing the reporting here they 441 00:23:11,920 --> 00:23:14,920 Speaker 1: got basically a whistleblower inside the warehouse. They were able 442 00:23:14,960 --> 00:23:19,200 Speaker 1: to film undercover footage revealing how this was taking place. 443 00:23:19,280 --> 00:23:22,080 Speaker 1: They even had footage of them like taking these electronics 444 00:23:22,080 --> 00:23:25,800 Speaker 1: to essentially the dump for them to be destroyed. You know, 445 00:23:25,960 --> 00:23:27,800 Speaker 1: I got to give it to and Boris Johnson actually 446 00:23:27,800 --> 00:23:30,120 Speaker 1: made a pretty good josh about it. He said, this 447 00:23:30,200 --> 00:23:33,960 Speaker 1: is an indictment of a consumerist society, so as much 448 00:23:34,000 --> 00:23:37,679 Speaker 1: of it as it's an indictment of Amazon and their practices, 449 00:23:37,800 --> 00:23:40,119 Speaker 1: and how gross it is that I mean, basically, the 450 00:23:40,119 --> 00:23:42,800 Speaker 1: bottom line is why would they do this. It's because 451 00:23:43,040 --> 00:23:45,760 Speaker 1: they have to keep the prices for all these goods high. 452 00:23:46,080 --> 00:23:48,239 Speaker 1: So they can't just be given stuff away because then 453 00:23:48,280 --> 00:23:50,320 Speaker 1: people won't want to buy stuff as much, right, so 454 00:23:50,480 --> 00:23:53,320 Speaker 1: it would depress demand for the other stuff that they're 455 00:23:53,320 --> 00:23:55,280 Speaker 1: trying to sell. So rather than giving it to people 456 00:23:55,320 --> 00:23:57,640 Speaker 1: who need these goods, who can't afford these goods, they 457 00:23:57,760 --> 00:24:01,000 Speaker 1: rather just destroy it in order to protect their profit margins. 458 00:24:01,080 --> 00:24:04,800 Speaker 1: So certainly an indictment of Amazon and their practices. And also, 459 00:24:04,840 --> 00:24:06,240 Speaker 1: by the way, there are a lot of questions over 460 00:24:06,280 --> 00:24:09,600 Speaker 1: whether they've been lying about exactly what they do, because 461 00:24:09,600 --> 00:24:12,920 Speaker 1: apparently they've been asked before, like how much of your 462 00:24:12,920 --> 00:24:16,440 Speaker 1: goods are destroyed? And they're like almost nothing, next to nothing, 463 00:24:16,800 --> 00:24:20,320 Speaker 1: very very little is your definition of very very little? 464 00:24:20,440 --> 00:24:24,840 Speaker 1: One hundred and thirty thousand items at one warehouse every 465 00:24:24,880 --> 00:24:26,960 Speaker 1: single week. I don't think that would be a reasonable 466 00:24:26,960 --> 00:24:31,159 Speaker 1: person's definition of very little. So Amazon totally culpable. But 467 00:24:31,640 --> 00:24:34,720 Speaker 1: it does just show, you know, how gross it is 468 00:24:34,960 --> 00:24:38,440 Speaker 1: the fact that we've all had drilled into us in 469 00:24:38,640 --> 00:24:42,400 Speaker 1: American society, Western society ri at large, like this religion 470 00:24:42,440 --> 00:24:46,440 Speaker 1: around consumerism, Like we're always sold this bill of goods 471 00:24:46,440 --> 00:24:49,560 Speaker 1: that like the next item, the next purchase, the next whatever, 472 00:24:49,680 --> 00:24:51,359 Speaker 1: is going to make us happy, it's going to make 473 00:24:51,440 --> 00:24:54,159 Speaker 1: us popular, it's going to make us beautiful, it's going 474 00:24:54,200 --> 00:24:57,720 Speaker 1: to make us fulfilled, when the reality is anything but. 475 00:24:58,320 --> 00:25:00,400 Speaker 1: And at the same time, it's just it's such an 476 00:25:00,400 --> 00:25:06,840 Speaker 1: incredibly wasteful it's like grotesquely wasteful. So while we're at 477 00:25:06,880 --> 00:25:09,600 Speaker 1: the same time, at the individual level, like trying in 478 00:25:09,640 --> 00:25:11,840 Speaker 1: different ways to be responsible, let me see if I 479 00:25:11,840 --> 00:25:13,680 Speaker 1: can recycle a little more. Let me see if I 480 00:25:13,760 --> 00:25:15,320 Speaker 1: can you know, use a little bit more of the 481 00:25:15,359 --> 00:25:18,760 Speaker 1: food run and throwing it out. These giant corporations are 482 00:25:18,960 --> 00:25:24,919 Speaker 1: just incredibly abusive with the resources of the world. Just 483 00:25:25,080 --> 00:25:28,639 Speaker 1: you know, all of these manufactured goods that create tremendous 484 00:25:28,680 --> 00:25:32,880 Speaker 1: pollution and tremendous waste then just being tossed aside into 485 00:25:32,920 --> 00:25:36,760 Speaker 1: a landfill to compose over hundreds and hundreds of years. 486 00:25:37,200 --> 00:25:40,440 Speaker 1: It really is a sort of like grotesque picture of 487 00:25:40,520 --> 00:25:43,240 Speaker 1: exactly what we're doing here as a society. Yeah, and 488 00:25:43,280 --> 00:25:45,560 Speaker 1: what's crazy to me too, is it just shows how 489 00:25:45,600 --> 00:25:47,200 Speaker 1: full of it they are and how much they've bought 490 00:25:47,200 --> 00:25:49,800 Speaker 1: the political system. Because yes, while Boris Johnson may have 491 00:25:49,880 --> 00:25:52,160 Speaker 1: said that, yeah, I love this and it's just good 492 00:25:52,160 --> 00:25:54,720 Speaker 1: to see that all Western societies are the same. The 493 00:25:54,800 --> 00:25:58,440 Speaker 1: business secretary told ITV news this is in the UK. 494 00:25:58,600 --> 00:26:01,159 Speaker 1: M hm. It was very surprise about the findings of 495 00:26:01,200 --> 00:26:03,760 Speaker 1: our investigation and said he wanted to get to the bottom. 496 00:26:03,760 --> 00:26:07,240 Speaker 1: But he adds, I know Amazon is committed to net zero. 497 00:26:07,560 --> 00:26:11,000 Speaker 1: They've committed huge amounts of investment to the rainforest to 498 00:26:11,080 --> 00:26:14,240 Speaker 1: keep the rainforest going. I'm surprised. I haven't read the report, 499 00:26:14,400 --> 00:26:16,120 Speaker 1: so I'll have to take a look at the response 500 00:26:16,240 --> 00:26:19,480 Speaker 1: is But what's funny is if you read Amazon's statement, 501 00:26:19,760 --> 00:26:22,720 Speaker 1: they basically use the same They use the same language. 502 00:26:22,800 --> 00:26:25,639 Speaker 1: We are working towards a goal of zero product disposal. 503 00:26:25,880 --> 00:26:29,280 Speaker 1: Our priority is to resale, donate to charitable organizations, or 504 00:26:29,320 --> 00:26:32,640 Speaker 1: recycle unsold products. No items are sent to the landfall 505 00:26:32,680 --> 00:26:35,120 Speaker 1: in the UK. As a last resort, we will send 506 00:26:35,200 --> 00:26:38,119 Speaker 1: items to energy recovery. But we are working hard to 507 00:26:38,240 --> 00:26:40,720 Speaker 1: drive the number of times as happens down to zero. 508 00:26:40,920 --> 00:26:43,000 Speaker 1: So it's like we're a little harder guy. The same 509 00:26:43,359 --> 00:26:47,320 Speaker 1: language that Amazon uses baking like, we're working hard to 510 00:26:47,320 --> 00:26:49,440 Speaker 1: get zero. And you know they talk about net zero 511 00:26:49,480 --> 00:26:52,280 Speaker 1: climate and all this stuff is the same stuff that 512 00:26:52,320 --> 00:26:54,680 Speaker 1: comes out of the mouth of the I think it's 513 00:26:54,680 --> 00:26:57,880 Speaker 1: the equivalent of our commerce secretary in the UK. Amazing 514 00:26:58,440 --> 00:27:01,240 Speaker 1: even Amazon runs stuff over in the UK. I didn't 515 00:27:01,240 --> 00:27:03,040 Speaker 1: even know, of course, And this is the amazing thing. 516 00:27:03,280 --> 00:27:05,800 Speaker 1: If they're throwing away millions of things in the UK, 517 00:27:06,040 --> 00:27:08,159 Speaker 1: which has a population I think like one sixth or 518 00:27:08,200 --> 00:27:11,040 Speaker 1: like one seventh the size of the US, what the 519 00:27:11,080 --> 00:27:13,400 Speaker 1: hell is going on over here in terms of what's 520 00:27:13,400 --> 00:27:16,880 Speaker 1: going on in our warehouses and what exactly is being done, 521 00:27:16,960 --> 00:27:19,080 Speaker 1: because not just in terms of the way they treat 522 00:27:19,119 --> 00:27:22,959 Speaker 1: their workforce, but the physical goods inside of these inside 523 00:27:22,960 --> 00:27:25,960 Speaker 1: of these warehouses that could be used for so many 524 00:27:26,040 --> 00:27:29,320 Speaker 1: better purposes. I think it just reveals again and it's true, 525 00:27:29,520 --> 00:27:32,000 Speaker 1: which is that we were talking yesterday about widget brain 526 00:27:32,440 --> 00:27:34,800 Speaker 1: around housing, where people are like, oh, look, when you're 527 00:27:34,800 --> 00:27:37,880 Speaker 1: a widget, you're just better off if you know renting 528 00:27:38,080 --> 00:27:42,080 Speaker 1: and you know, disregarding any of the social benefits of housing. 529 00:27:42,840 --> 00:27:44,760 Speaker 1: This is the same thing. They're like, look, we need 530 00:27:44,840 --> 00:27:48,040 Speaker 1: thirty percent more warehouse space. The fastest way to get 531 00:27:48,160 --> 00:27:50,440 Speaker 1: of that warehouse space is just a junket. I mean, 532 00:27:50,480 --> 00:27:54,000 Speaker 1: in one of these pictures is a Samsung q LED TV. 533 00:27:54,400 --> 00:27:58,280 Speaker 1: It's like a three thousand dollars TV. It's complex's nuts 534 00:27:58,480 --> 00:28:01,760 Speaker 1: in terms of what who could imagine like a nursing 535 00:28:01,760 --> 00:28:03,760 Speaker 1: home or like, I don't know, a kid's home. There 536 00:28:03,760 --> 00:28:06,159 Speaker 1: are so many people out there UK too. They're not 537 00:28:06,200 --> 00:28:08,760 Speaker 1: actually that rich of a country in terms of what 538 00:28:08,960 --> 00:28:11,040 Speaker 1: some of the people over there could use it. So 539 00:28:11,240 --> 00:28:14,160 Speaker 1: I just think it's a really gross indictment of everything. 540 00:28:14,280 --> 00:28:16,920 Speaker 1: I am very glad that ITV did this investigation. Yeah, 541 00:28:16,960 --> 00:28:19,480 Speaker 1: and you're right to say, like, let's not give Boris 542 00:28:19,560 --> 00:28:21,959 Speaker 1: Johnson too much credit here. You made a nice comment, 543 00:28:22,080 --> 00:28:24,160 Speaker 1: but you know, you have power to do a lot 544 00:28:24,200 --> 00:28:26,119 Speaker 1: more than make a nice comment. And it is also 545 00:28:26,200 --> 00:28:29,399 Speaker 1: interesting that his focus is not he says this is 546 00:28:29,400 --> 00:28:32,440 Speaker 1: an indictment of a consumer society, rather than like, this 547 00:28:32,480 --> 00:28:34,239 Speaker 1: is an indictment of Amazon, and we're going to get 548 00:28:34,240 --> 00:28:36,480 Speaker 1: to the bottom of what have in here? Right, So, yeah, 549 00:28:36,480 --> 00:28:38,840 Speaker 1: that's a good point. That's one point there. Hey, So 550 00:28:38,880 --> 00:28:42,280 Speaker 1: remember how we told you how awesome premium membership was. Well, 551 00:28:42,320 --> 00:28:44,480 Speaker 1: here we are again to remind you that becoming a 552 00:28:44,520 --> 00:28:47,160 Speaker 1: premium member means you don't have to listen to our 553 00:28:47,240 --> 00:28:50,040 Speaker 1: constant please for you to subscribe. So what are you 554 00:28:50,080 --> 00:28:52,640 Speaker 1: waiting for? Become a premium member today by going to 555 00:28:52,760 --> 00:28:55,080 Speaker 1: Breakingpoints dot com, which you can click on in the 556 00:28:55,120 --> 00:28:58,120 Speaker 1: show notes. Okay, we have an update for you on 557 00:28:58,280 --> 00:29:03,760 Speaker 1: the bipartisan instructure negotiations that have been ongoing. I mean, 558 00:29:03,760 --> 00:29:07,560 Speaker 1: the bottom line here is this whole attempt at a 559 00:29:07,680 --> 00:29:12,240 Speaker 1: bipartisan package is pretty much a hot mess. One good 560 00:29:12,240 --> 00:29:15,520 Speaker 1: thing did happen. Biden came out. Remember one of the 561 00:29:15,560 --> 00:29:17,760 Speaker 1: pay fors that they've been floating with. This is a 562 00:29:17,840 --> 00:29:21,400 Speaker 1: guest to x, which is absurd, absurd that you're going 563 00:29:21,440 --> 00:29:24,760 Speaker 1: to make the working class of this country long suffering 564 00:29:25,120 --> 00:29:27,720 Speaker 1: and with the least ability to pay that you're going 565 00:29:27,800 --> 00:29:31,080 Speaker 1: to put the infrastructure price tag on their back. So 566 00:29:31,160 --> 00:29:34,280 Speaker 1: Biden did come out and rule that out, and they're 567 00:29:34,280 --> 00:29:37,120 Speaker 1: framing it, and I mean he is on these sorts 568 00:29:37,120 --> 00:29:39,480 Speaker 1: of things. He has pretty good political instincts, I think, 569 00:29:39,680 --> 00:29:42,880 Speaker 1: and he also sees it as would be breaking his 570 00:29:43,080 --> 00:29:45,680 Speaker 1: pledge not to raise taxes on anyone making less than 571 00:29:45,680 --> 00:29:47,720 Speaker 1: four hundred thousand dollars a year, which I think is true. 572 00:29:47,720 --> 00:29:49,880 Speaker 1: We could throw this tweet up on the screen showing 573 00:29:49,880 --> 00:29:52,920 Speaker 1: what Biden had to say there. So this was Jensaki 574 00:29:53,320 --> 00:29:55,400 Speaker 1: to CBS this morning said Biden is a hard no 575 00:29:55,640 --> 00:29:57,880 Speaker 1: on the gas tax. An idea that's been floating around 576 00:29:57,880 --> 00:30:00,880 Speaker 1: that certainly the President would not support is a gas 577 00:30:00,920 --> 00:30:03,200 Speaker 1: tax which would raise taxes on people making less than 578 00:30:03,200 --> 00:30:05,440 Speaker 1: four hundred k a year. We're not going to stand 579 00:30:05,440 --> 00:30:08,840 Speaker 1: for that. So very clear language, very unequivocal. At least 580 00:30:08,840 --> 00:30:10,760 Speaker 1: someone has half a brain over there, because a gas 581 00:30:10,800 --> 00:30:13,040 Speaker 1: tax is like the dumbest idea that is ever. It's 582 00:30:13,360 --> 00:30:16,400 Speaker 1: politically dumb, and it's also the wrong thing to do, 583 00:30:16,840 --> 00:30:19,000 Speaker 1: just like on every level, it would be a bad 584 00:30:19,040 --> 00:30:20,840 Speaker 1: direction to go in. Okay, So that's off the table. 585 00:30:21,320 --> 00:30:24,640 Speaker 1: So what are the other payfors that are being proposed 586 00:30:24,680 --> 00:30:29,360 Speaker 1: in this bipartisan infrastructure deal. Well, David dan who always 587 00:30:29,480 --> 00:30:31,480 Speaker 1: always follow what this guy is doing, he's one of 588 00:30:31,520 --> 00:30:34,000 Speaker 1: the few that really digs into the details and gets 589 00:30:34,000 --> 00:30:36,240 Speaker 1: down to the nitty gritty of what's actually being proposed. 590 00:30:36,720 --> 00:30:39,840 Speaker 1: And it turns out, remember when Trump was proposing his 591 00:30:39,920 --> 00:30:42,640 Speaker 1: infrastructure deal time and time again, and a lot of 592 00:30:42,680 --> 00:30:46,120 Speaker 1: liberals and a lot of progressives were rightfully very exercised 593 00:30:46,120 --> 00:30:49,600 Speaker 1: that this was like basically, it was a privatization of infrastructures, 594 00:30:49,720 --> 00:30:52,920 Speaker 1: give away to the private sector, and the payfors there 595 00:30:52,920 --> 00:30:56,840 Speaker 1: were very uncomfortable. Well, a lot of those same mechanisms 596 00:30:57,200 --> 00:31:00,480 Speaker 1: are being included in this bipartisan deals. So let's throw 597 00:31:00,560 --> 00:31:03,920 Speaker 1: David Dayan's tear sheet up here on the screen. He says, 598 00:31:04,080 --> 00:31:08,280 Speaker 1: Bipartisan Senate Infrastructure Plan is a stocking horse for privatization. 599 00:31:08,360 --> 00:31:13,200 Speaker 1: The scheme would fund new infrastructure by selling off old infrastructure. 600 00:31:13,280 --> 00:31:16,680 Speaker 1: And by the way, Trump proposed the same thing. So 601 00:31:17,360 --> 00:31:20,000 Speaker 1: here's some of the details. Let me just read you 602 00:31:20,040 --> 00:31:21,640 Speaker 1: a little bit from the piece. He says, the really 603 00:31:21,680 --> 00:31:24,240 Speaker 1: scary piece in terms of the pay force is labeled 604 00:31:24,680 --> 00:31:30,360 Speaker 1: public private partnerships, private activity bonds, and asset recycling. Okay, 605 00:31:30,720 --> 00:31:33,480 Speaker 1: in the name of building world class infrastructure, these lawmakers 606 00:31:33,520 --> 00:31:36,960 Speaker 1: will sell it off in fire sales to private financiers. 607 00:31:37,200 --> 00:31:40,560 Speaker 1: We have lots of experience with infrastructure privatization that strongly 608 00:31:40,760 --> 00:31:44,120 Speaker 1: suggest it should be avoided. Those first two things. Public 609 00:31:44,120 --> 00:31:47,440 Speaker 1: private partnerships, you can imagine what that is. That's basically 610 00:31:47,480 --> 00:31:49,560 Speaker 1: like toll roads, that sort of thing where you're like, hey, 611 00:31:49,560 --> 00:31:51,840 Speaker 1: private company, why don't you build our infrastructure, and then 612 00:31:51,840 --> 00:31:54,680 Speaker 1: you can charge user fees, again largely to work in 613 00:31:54,680 --> 00:31:58,440 Speaker 1: class people to pay for it. You have private activity 614 00:31:58,480 --> 00:32:03,320 Speaker 1: bonds that's just like debt by another name, an asset recycling, 615 00:32:03,440 --> 00:32:05,200 Speaker 1: which is one of these terms that you'd read and 616 00:32:05,200 --> 00:32:08,440 Speaker 1: you're like, oh, recycling, that sounds good, right, Like, what's 617 00:32:08,480 --> 00:32:11,520 Speaker 1: going that sounds crazy? What's going on there? What they 618 00:32:11,600 --> 00:32:15,160 Speaker 1: mean is we're going to take our existing port or whatever, 619 00:32:15,760 --> 00:32:19,120 Speaker 1: sell it off and then use that money to build 620 00:32:19,160 --> 00:32:22,440 Speaker 1: some other thing. This has been tried here, It was tried, 621 00:32:22,520 --> 00:32:25,480 Speaker 1: he points out. It was tried notably in Australia, total failure, 622 00:32:25,560 --> 00:32:30,320 Speaker 1: total disaster. Oftentimes, the projects that they sell off were 623 00:32:30,360 --> 00:32:34,360 Speaker 1: actually good public works. Projects that the public was benefiting 624 00:32:34,360 --> 00:32:37,240 Speaker 1: from the government was receiving tax revenue from, like a 625 00:32:37,280 --> 00:32:39,520 Speaker 1: port is a good example of that. And then the 626 00:32:39,560 --> 00:32:42,920 Speaker 1: things that they build, the asset that they're I guess 627 00:32:42,960 --> 00:32:46,000 Speaker 1: recycling this into turned out to be sort of like 628 00:32:46,080 --> 00:32:49,360 Speaker 1: hair brained and useless and not particularly well done. The 629 00:32:49,400 --> 00:32:52,160 Speaker 1: other bottom line piece here is we talked about this 630 00:32:52,160 --> 00:32:54,560 Speaker 1: a little bit yesterday. There's always this assumption that's like 631 00:32:54,680 --> 00:32:59,520 Speaker 1: baked into the American economic political ethos that, oh, the 632 00:32:59,520 --> 00:33:02,960 Speaker 1: privatesctor must be more efficient, they must do a better job, 633 00:33:03,040 --> 00:33:05,880 Speaker 1: they must do it in lower costs and all of 634 00:33:05,920 --> 00:33:08,680 Speaker 1: that and a shorter timeframe. But it's really not the 635 00:33:08,760 --> 00:33:11,240 Speaker 1: case because, I mean, for a very obvious reason, the 636 00:33:11,240 --> 00:33:15,960 Speaker 1: private sector has to build in profit margins into whatever 637 00:33:16,000 --> 00:33:19,120 Speaker 1: it is they're doing. So we've seen time after time 638 00:33:19,280 --> 00:33:22,240 Speaker 1: that you should not assume that relying more on the 639 00:33:22,240 --> 00:33:24,520 Speaker 1: private sector is going to get you into a better place. 640 00:33:24,520 --> 00:33:26,480 Speaker 1: But it's just it's interesting because a lot of the 641 00:33:26,520 --> 00:33:30,320 Speaker 1: criticism of the infrastructure package, the bipartisan infrastructure package this far, 642 00:33:30,720 --> 00:33:33,440 Speaker 1: has been around it's not enough money, something we've talked 643 00:33:33,480 --> 00:33:36,760 Speaker 1: about here also from the left, like this isn't dealing 644 00:33:36,840 --> 00:33:40,600 Speaker 1: with climate change whatsoever, both totally in my view, legitimate criticisms. 645 00:33:40,920 --> 00:33:43,280 Speaker 1: But this piece has gotten it has been ignored until 646 00:33:43,360 --> 00:33:45,720 Speaker 1: David Day and pointed out. And it's also really super important. 647 00:33:45,760 --> 00:33:47,760 Speaker 1: It's super important. And also he just shows how many 648 00:33:47,800 --> 00:33:49,880 Speaker 1: Democrats are full of it. I mean, I love this line. 649 00:33:49,920 --> 00:33:52,280 Speaker 1: There was a time when Democrats oppose such schemes. It 650 00:33:52,320 --> 00:33:55,960 Speaker 1: was during the Trumps, it was any years talks exactly 651 00:33:56,120 --> 00:33:59,120 Speaker 1: about how Democrats rightfully and loudly objected to giving up 652 00:33:59,120 --> 00:34:02,520 Speaker 1: public access to investors because the biggest money makers would 653 00:34:02,520 --> 00:34:06,080 Speaker 1: be forward, it would be favored. But so why would 654 00:34:06,120 --> 00:34:08,879 Speaker 1: he I love this, Why would Democrats entertain going down 655 00:34:08,920 --> 00:34:12,399 Speaker 1: the exact same road under Biden until despite the fact 656 00:34:12,440 --> 00:34:14,759 Speaker 1: that they rebuffed it under Trump. And I think that 657 00:34:14,840 --> 00:34:16,840 Speaker 1: we all know what the answer to this is. And 658 00:34:16,880 --> 00:34:20,040 Speaker 1: it actually is a decent example of like uniparty whenever 659 00:34:20,080 --> 00:34:23,000 Speaker 1: it comes to the economic proposals that we put forward. 660 00:34:23,160 --> 00:34:26,400 Speaker 1: And I agree, this is a terrible, absolutely terrible idea. 661 00:34:26,760 --> 00:34:29,359 Speaker 1: And the Australia part I actually didn't know. I looked 662 00:34:29,360 --> 00:34:31,080 Speaker 1: a little bit into it, and he's totally right, which 663 00:34:31,120 --> 00:34:34,359 Speaker 1: is that we borrowed this from a previous scheme and 664 00:34:34,480 --> 00:34:36,279 Speaker 1: in that case of what happened in Australia, there was 665 00:34:36,320 --> 00:34:38,360 Speaker 1: actually a lot of outrage over some of the things 666 00:34:38,480 --> 00:34:41,440 Speaker 1: that were auctioned off that were actually quite not profitable 667 00:34:41,480 --> 00:34:44,040 Speaker 1: but net positive or whatever in terms of Jack's revenue. 668 00:34:44,239 --> 00:34:48,000 Speaker 1: And I've said this a million times instead of faking 669 00:34:48,080 --> 00:34:50,799 Speaker 1: all these pay fors. If there is one thing on 670 00:34:50,840 --> 00:34:55,200 Speaker 1: Earth that you deficit spend, it's called infrastructure, because we 671 00:34:55,239 --> 00:34:59,560 Speaker 1: all know that the social and economic benefits explode whenever 672 00:34:59,600 --> 00:35:03,560 Speaker 1: you have infrastructure. It can open up new areas of commerce, 673 00:35:03,719 --> 00:35:06,200 Speaker 1: it can open up new business lines, it can open 674 00:35:06,280 --> 00:35:08,719 Speaker 1: up all sorts of different things, and that you will 675 00:35:08,760 --> 00:35:11,800 Speaker 1: more than recoup it in terms of tax revenue, benefit 676 00:35:11,840 --> 00:35:15,520 Speaker 1: to the community and more. Infrastructure is by definition, the 677 00:35:15,640 --> 00:35:18,040 Speaker 1: type of thing that you're supposed to deficit spend for. 678 00:35:18,280 --> 00:35:22,320 Speaker 1: And instead we're playing all these like kabuki theater games 679 00:35:22,320 --> 00:35:26,400 Speaker 1: in DC around auctioning things off that we already have, 680 00:35:26,880 --> 00:35:30,879 Speaker 1: around raising the private bonds or whatever. Reading like why 681 00:35:30,960 --> 00:35:33,680 Speaker 1: is any of this necessary? Go out and ask people 682 00:35:33,880 --> 00:35:37,200 Speaker 1: do you care about how the infrastructure package is paid for? 683 00:35:37,880 --> 00:35:40,640 Speaker 1: In the most intuitive thing, even people who have businesses 684 00:35:40,680 --> 00:35:42,640 Speaker 1: and more understand that the type of things that you 685 00:35:42,719 --> 00:35:45,440 Speaker 1: deficit spend for are investments which are going to pay 686 00:35:45,480 --> 00:35:48,120 Speaker 1: out ten x longer in the long run, so you 687 00:35:48,160 --> 00:35:50,480 Speaker 1: put the money down. Well, when you're a government, this 688 00:35:50,560 --> 00:35:52,520 Speaker 1: is one of the few times that the business whatever 689 00:35:52,560 --> 00:35:55,960 Speaker 1: example actually does apply. You should do the exact same thing. 690 00:35:56,040 --> 00:35:58,319 Speaker 1: And so I think the politics around this are just 691 00:35:58,360 --> 00:36:02,880 Speaker 1: so farcical generally, and that the David Dayan piece reveals 692 00:36:02,920 --> 00:36:06,479 Speaker 1: how in a way people use deficit politics and pay 693 00:36:06,520 --> 00:36:08,879 Speaker 1: force in order to just cover up for a lot 694 00:36:08,880 --> 00:36:12,560 Speaker 1: of corporate giveaways. Yeah, that's what social mightyological agenda. That's right. 695 00:36:12,640 --> 00:36:15,480 Speaker 1: And actually I think I think if you ask people, 696 00:36:15,520 --> 00:36:17,080 Speaker 1: and we've seen some of the polling on this, how 697 00:36:17,120 --> 00:36:19,120 Speaker 1: they want it to be paid for, they do have 698 00:36:19,320 --> 00:36:22,480 Speaker 1: a preference. They want rich people in corporate right to 699 00:36:22,520 --> 00:36:25,360 Speaker 1: be taxed. That's what they want. I mean, we saw 700 00:36:25,480 --> 00:36:28,760 Speaker 1: in some of the polling that just the infrastructure package 701 00:36:28,760 --> 00:36:30,279 Speaker 1: on its own, like oh, we're going to invest in 702 00:36:30,360 --> 00:36:33,359 Speaker 1: roads and bridges, et cetera, et cetera pretty popular. You 703 00:36:33,400 --> 00:36:35,279 Speaker 1: add to that like oh, and we're going to pay 704 00:36:35,320 --> 00:36:37,279 Speaker 1: for it by taxing rich people, and they're like, oh, 705 00:36:37,400 --> 00:36:40,439 Speaker 1: hell yeah, I'm in The polling numbers actually jump up, 706 00:36:40,800 --> 00:36:43,600 Speaker 1: so it says everything. Just I think that's really important 707 00:36:43,640 --> 00:36:46,960 Speaker 1: to keep in mind as you're watching these negotiations play out, 708 00:36:47,480 --> 00:36:51,040 Speaker 1: because oftentimes the way that they're portrayed in mainstream media 709 00:36:51,120 --> 00:36:53,719 Speaker 1: is like, oh, the bipartisan deal. They have to make 710 00:36:53,760 --> 00:36:57,360 Speaker 1: these trade offs to make it politically palatable for frontline 711 00:36:57,440 --> 00:37:00,000 Speaker 1: Democrats in the midterms, et cetera, et cetera. No, No, 712 00:37:00,239 --> 00:37:03,520 Speaker 1: you're actually proposing a plan that is less popular because 713 00:37:03,560 --> 00:37:05,919 Speaker 1: you're trying to pair it initially with a gas tax, 714 00:37:05,960 --> 00:37:10,080 Speaker 1: which is ridiculous, but now with these various privatization schemes 715 00:37:10,120 --> 00:37:15,040 Speaker 1: which are also unpopular, versus what is a clearly extremely 716 00:37:15,120 --> 00:37:19,359 Speaker 1: popular position of paying for it with increased taxes on 717 00:37:19,440 --> 00:37:24,040 Speaker 1: people who got tremendously wealthy during the pandemic, whether it's 718 00:37:24,120 --> 00:37:27,960 Speaker 1: wealthy individuals or corporations. That is what the American people 719 00:37:28,239 --> 00:37:31,520 Speaker 1: actually want. And so the fact that the political class 720 00:37:31,760 --> 00:37:35,400 Speaker 1: is so nervous and unsure and basically putting off the 721 00:37:35,440 --> 00:37:39,080 Speaker 1: table any of that tells you something. This isn't about 722 00:37:39,160 --> 00:37:41,879 Speaker 1: them wanting the good politics of it. It's about them 723 00:37:41,880 --> 00:37:45,560 Speaker 1: protecting their donors and protecting their friends in their social circle. 724 00:37:45,960 --> 00:37:48,279 Speaker 1: And that's exactly how you end up with these hair 725 00:37:48,320 --> 00:37:51,319 Speaker 1: brain schemes of like let's sell off a port in 726 00:37:51,400 --> 00:37:53,880 Speaker 1: order to build a new bridge. Watching this thing become 727 00:37:53,920 --> 00:37:56,600 Speaker 1: Obamacare two point zero has been really sad to show 728 00:37:56,600 --> 00:37:59,680 Speaker 1: that Biden and them actually just learned nothing. Obama'scare ended 729 00:37:59,719 --> 00:38:03,040 Speaker 1: up becoming a corporate nightmare mess. It became the political 730 00:38:03,080 --> 00:38:06,360 Speaker 1: albatross that hung around his neck. Now it's June twenty second. 731 00:38:06,680 --> 00:38:11,760 Speaker 1: Remember that they've already said they cannot hit the September deadline. Okay, 732 00:38:11,840 --> 00:38:13,359 Speaker 1: I think the exact same thing is going to happen. 733 00:38:14,000 --> 00:38:16,040 Speaker 1: Republicans are going to filbuster. It's going to go all 734 00:38:16,040 --> 00:38:19,960 Speaker 1: the way up until like Thanksgiving or Christmas Day or whatever. 735 00:38:20,200 --> 00:38:21,560 Speaker 1: And at the end of the day, it's going to 736 00:38:21,600 --> 00:38:23,600 Speaker 1: be a BS bill which actually doesn't even do very much, 737 00:38:23,840 --> 00:38:26,480 Speaker 1: probably like a trillion dollars or whatever in new spending. 738 00:38:26,680 --> 00:38:29,560 Speaker 1: It won't be forcefully felt in many different communities, and 739 00:38:29,600 --> 00:38:32,640 Speaker 1: there'll be some like Windmill Package, which will become the 740 00:38:32,680 --> 00:38:36,239 Speaker 1: bane of every single Democrat running in the mid terms 741 00:38:36,280 --> 00:38:38,840 Speaker 1: because of a bunch of attack ads. And what do 742 00:38:38,880 --> 00:38:40,839 Speaker 1: we get from all of this? I think maybe what 743 00:38:40,880 --> 00:38:43,720 Speaker 1: a modest tax increase on people who are wealthy. Maybe 744 00:38:44,120 --> 00:38:46,440 Speaker 1: even then, I don't actually think that's going to pass 745 00:38:46,640 --> 00:38:48,680 Speaker 1: at all. So yeah, actually the only thing that might 746 00:38:48,719 --> 00:38:50,800 Speaker 1: pass is some sort of fake gas tax. So he 747 00:38:50,880 --> 00:38:53,319 Speaker 1: may have ruled it out now, but I won't hold 748 00:38:53,320 --> 00:38:56,440 Speaker 1: my breath understanding how these things are moving through Congress. 749 00:38:56,600 --> 00:38:59,239 Speaker 1: It's a huge political failure for the Biden administration in 750 00:38:59,280 --> 00:39:04,240 Speaker 1: my opinion. Yeah, and again a totally unnecessary one. Totally unnecessary, 751 00:39:04,280 --> 00:39:07,120 Speaker 1: and I just think I'll say it again, I think 752 00:39:07,120 --> 00:39:09,720 Speaker 1: it says everything about the sort of failed state nature 753 00:39:09,719 --> 00:39:13,319 Speaker 1: of this country that just the least controversial thing you 754 00:39:13,320 --> 00:39:17,239 Speaker 1: could possibly do, like fixing a damn bridge, you can't 755 00:39:17,239 --> 00:39:20,799 Speaker 1: even get your act together to do that. The basics 756 00:39:20,840 --> 00:39:24,640 Speaker 1: of providing not just an investment for you know, jobs 757 00:39:24,640 --> 00:39:27,560 Speaker 1: and business community, et cetera. But part of why these 758 00:39:27,600 --> 00:39:31,399 Speaker 1: privatization schemes are such a problem is there's a lot 759 00:39:31,440 --> 00:39:35,440 Speaker 1: of basic infrastructure that provides for safe quality of life 760 00:39:35,960 --> 00:39:40,000 Speaker 1: water systems, wastewater treatment plans. As I covered yesterday in 761 00:39:40,120 --> 00:39:43,720 Speaker 1: large parts of West Virginia, other rural communities across the country, 762 00:39:43,760 --> 00:39:46,799 Speaker 1: they don't even have clean drinking water Like that's never 763 00:39:46,840 --> 00:39:49,439 Speaker 1: going to turn a profit for a company, of course, 764 00:39:49,640 --> 00:39:52,880 Speaker 1: so we can't be in the business of only doing 765 00:39:52,960 --> 00:39:55,000 Speaker 1: projects that are you're going to be able to, like 766 00:39:55,080 --> 00:39:57,840 Speaker 1: charge enough toll fees to turn a profit on or 767 00:39:57,920 --> 00:40:00,759 Speaker 1: charge enough user fees to turn a profit. You're not 768 00:40:00,760 --> 00:40:04,759 Speaker 1: going to make money building a wastewater treatment plan or 769 00:40:05,239 --> 00:40:09,359 Speaker 1: a new water system in McDowell County, West Virginia. So 770 00:40:09,400 --> 00:40:12,520 Speaker 1: what and that's basically what's happened is anything that hasn't 771 00:40:12,560 --> 00:40:16,360 Speaker 1: been profitable for the private sector hasn't gotten done. And 772 00:40:16,400 --> 00:40:19,480 Speaker 1: so you've got parts of the country that are reverting 773 00:40:20,120 --> 00:40:24,520 Speaker 1: back to like pre New Deal era conditions, reverting back 774 00:40:24,560 --> 00:40:28,359 Speaker 1: to like developing world conditions because we don't put any 775 00:40:28,440 --> 00:40:33,399 Speaker 1: sort of a priority on people having the basic standards 776 00:40:33,440 --> 00:40:38,120 Speaker 1: for like the basic level quality of living. Everything is 777 00:40:38,120 --> 00:40:41,960 Speaker 1: about profit profit profit, and apparently that ethos has thoroughly 778 00:40:42,040 --> 00:40:46,560 Speaker 1: pervaded this new bipartisan infrastructure efforts. Really sad to see, 779 00:40:46,719 --> 00:40:48,840 Speaker 1: very sad story. But I think we have some good news. 780 00:40:48,880 --> 00:40:53,120 Speaker 1: Slightly sorry, it's yeah, good news. I would temper my 781 00:40:53,239 --> 00:40:56,200 Speaker 1: enthusiasm for this a little bit more than what some 782 00:40:56,280 --> 00:40:58,200 Speaker 1: of the media coverage has been. So we got a 783 00:40:58,239 --> 00:41:03,080 Speaker 1: couple of Supreme Court notable court decisions yesterday. I'm covering 784 00:41:03,160 --> 00:41:06,439 Speaker 1: one of them in my monologue, which is everybody coming 785 00:41:06,440 --> 00:41:08,319 Speaker 1: together to give away the store to Golden Sex and 786 00:41:08,360 --> 00:41:10,680 Speaker 1: make sure they can't be held accountable for any of 787 00:41:10,760 --> 00:41:13,000 Speaker 1: their crimes. So the during the financial crisis will get 788 00:41:13,000 --> 00:41:15,280 Speaker 1: into that one in a second. They did do something 789 00:41:15,920 --> 00:41:19,640 Speaker 1: modestly good here, though, in a case involving the nc DOUBLEA. 790 00:41:19,840 --> 00:41:21,680 Speaker 1: So I'm sure a lot of you have been following 791 00:41:21,680 --> 00:41:23,840 Speaker 1: the sort of back and forth of n CUBLEA is 792 00:41:23,840 --> 00:41:28,080 Speaker 1: basically like a racket and a monopoly that completely abuses 793 00:41:28,560 --> 00:41:31,840 Speaker 1: their workers, which are the players, right, especially in lucrative 794 00:41:31,880 --> 00:41:36,480 Speaker 1: sports like basketball and football, NCUBLEA breaking in billions and 795 00:41:36,680 --> 00:41:40,279 Speaker 1: viewership fees to the television networks. And meanwhile, you know 796 00:41:40,320 --> 00:41:42,719 Speaker 1: they're very adamant about, oh, we have to protect the 797 00:41:42,760 --> 00:41:46,319 Speaker 1: purity integrity of the sport and amateur competition, as if 798 00:41:46,320 --> 00:41:48,719 Speaker 1: this is some virtuous thing that they're doing, even though 799 00:41:48,719 --> 00:41:52,040 Speaker 1: they themselves can't really even define what it means to 800 00:41:52,080 --> 00:41:54,520 Speaker 1: be an amateur. They've changed the definition over the years. 801 00:41:55,040 --> 00:41:58,160 Speaker 1: So I'm going to read here a little bit from Vox. Yesterday. 802 00:41:58,200 --> 00:42:02,040 Speaker 1: The Supreme Court handed down a caveat in victory for 803 00:42:02,120 --> 00:42:04,920 Speaker 1: elite college athletes on Monday. The immediate impact of the 804 00:42:04,960 --> 00:42:09,240 Speaker 1: Court's unanimous decision nine to nothing in NCAA versus Alston 805 00:42:09,400 --> 00:42:13,440 Speaker 1: is that many elite student athletes will receive additional education 806 00:42:13,600 --> 00:42:17,359 Speaker 1: related compensations, such as additional scholarship money. But the case 807 00:42:17,440 --> 00:42:21,239 Speaker 1: could have broader implications and could eventually lead to these 808 00:42:21,280 --> 00:42:24,160 Speaker 1: athletes being paid salary. So let me break down for 809 00:42:24,200 --> 00:42:27,719 Speaker 1: you what that means. The question in this case that 810 00:42:27,760 --> 00:42:31,120 Speaker 1: they decided to rule on was not whether these athletes 811 00:42:31,160 --> 00:42:35,319 Speaker 1: could be compensated for playing their sport. The question was 812 00:42:35,360 --> 00:42:38,719 Speaker 1: this one that they made very narrow around this question 813 00:42:38,760 --> 00:42:43,120 Speaker 1: of additional educational scholarship limited benefits. Right, So this was again, 814 00:42:43,160 --> 00:42:45,799 Speaker 1: this isn't about receiving payment. This was about sort of 815 00:42:45,840 --> 00:42:51,759 Speaker 1: like scholarships and educational scholarships essentially. And this is one 816 00:42:51,800 --> 00:42:55,319 Speaker 1: of the hallmarks of the Roberts Court in this era 817 00:42:55,760 --> 00:42:59,520 Speaker 1: is he has really tried to sort of cabin these 818 00:42:59,560 --> 00:43:04,120 Speaker 1: decisions to be as narrow as possible because I think 819 00:43:04,160 --> 00:43:06,400 Speaker 1: what a lot of court watchers feel is that he 820 00:43:06,680 --> 00:43:09,720 Speaker 1: recognizes the credibility of the Supreme Court and the structure 821 00:43:09,760 --> 00:43:11,839 Speaker 1: of the Supreme Court as it stands is very much 822 00:43:11,840 --> 00:43:14,359 Speaker 1: at risk right now. So he's trying not to make 823 00:43:14,360 --> 00:43:16,480 Speaker 1: a lot of waves and he's trying to have as 824 00:43:16,480 --> 00:43:19,560 Speaker 1: many decisions as possible where it's not just the conservatives 825 00:43:19,560 --> 00:43:22,240 Speaker 1: overwriting the liberals. So that's how you get a decision 826 00:43:22,360 --> 00:43:25,719 Speaker 1: like this where they very narrowly rule on this very 827 00:43:25,760 --> 00:43:31,919 Speaker 1: specific question about education scholarships, but it's unanimous. And what's 828 00:43:31,960 --> 00:43:35,880 Speaker 1: giving people hope that this could lead to more dramatic 829 00:43:35,960 --> 00:43:38,680 Speaker 1: changes is in the opinion as it was written, I 830 00:43:38,680 --> 00:43:41,680 Speaker 1: think by Gorsicch. Actually he essentially said, look, we're not 831 00:43:41,840 --> 00:43:44,960 Speaker 1: ruling on the larger compensation piece because you didn't specifically 832 00:43:45,000 --> 00:43:47,440 Speaker 1: ask us to, but maybe you should try again and 833 00:43:47,440 --> 00:43:50,479 Speaker 1: see what happens. Actually, So what's other also interesting here 834 00:43:50,520 --> 00:43:53,520 Speaker 1: was Justice Kavanaugh. Here's what he wrote. Quote Nowhere else 835 00:43:53,600 --> 00:43:57,640 Speaker 1: in America can businesses get away with agreeing not to 836 00:43:57,719 --> 00:44:00,680 Speaker 1: pay their workers a fair market rate on the theory 837 00:44:00,960 --> 00:44:04,480 Speaker 1: that the product is defined by not paying their workers 838 00:44:04,560 --> 00:44:08,880 Speaker 1: a fair market rate. Adding quote and under ordinary principles 839 00:44:08,880 --> 00:44:12,560 Speaker 1: of antitrust law, it is not evident why college sports 840 00:44:12,840 --> 00:44:17,880 Speaker 1: should be any different. The NCAA is not above the law, 841 00:44:18,080 --> 00:44:20,960 Speaker 1: and so just to recoup, remember what they have said 842 00:44:21,160 --> 00:44:24,440 Speaker 1: is that the students who play sports as amateurs should 843 00:44:24,480 --> 00:44:27,520 Speaker 1: not be getting paid because they should not should not 844 00:44:27,560 --> 00:44:30,760 Speaker 1: be getting paid because the amateur nature of the sport, 845 00:44:30,960 --> 00:44:34,440 Speaker 1: which would corrupt it and make it so that these rules, 846 00:44:34,480 --> 00:44:37,280 Speaker 1: you know, are cross subsidized, and it would make it unfair, 847 00:44:37,560 --> 00:44:40,520 Speaker 1: et cetera. Now, maybe there was something to that in 848 00:44:40,560 --> 00:44:45,239 Speaker 1: like nineteen sixty, but right now it's totally ridiculous. Just 849 00:44:45,239 --> 00:44:47,680 Speaker 1: to give you guys insight, Like, I'm from College Station, Texas, 850 00:44:47,719 --> 00:44:51,040 Speaker 1: where Texas A and M IS. Football is the lifeblood 851 00:44:51,160 --> 00:44:54,080 Speaker 1: of that town. Whenever they moved to the SEC, I 852 00:44:54,120 --> 00:44:57,280 Speaker 1: think over a billion dollars of new revenue came in 853 00:44:57,280 --> 00:44:59,960 Speaker 1: to College Station, and I remember Johnny football and Johnny 854 00:45:00,200 --> 00:45:02,759 Speaker 1: selling all that. The guy single handedly, I think, brought 855 00:45:02,760 --> 00:45:05,560 Speaker 1: in hundreds of millions of dollars into the town itself, 856 00:45:05,640 --> 00:45:07,920 Speaker 1: and he wasn't making in time. Many of the stars 857 00:45:07,920 --> 00:45:10,279 Speaker 1: that I've seen come through Collegs Station in my entire 858 00:45:10,280 --> 00:45:13,200 Speaker 1: lifetime were not compensated until at least some of them 859 00:45:13,239 --> 00:45:16,359 Speaker 1: went to the NFL. Some of them, like Johnny, didn't 860 00:45:16,400 --> 00:45:18,719 Speaker 1: end up doing so well even when they got there. 861 00:45:18,760 --> 00:45:21,480 Speaker 1: But the point is that their time and the amount 862 00:45:21,520 --> 00:45:24,560 Speaker 1: of economic and social benefit that they were bringing to 863 00:45:24,640 --> 00:45:28,640 Speaker 1: the towns was immense, and they were being profited off 864 00:45:28,640 --> 00:45:31,440 Speaker 1: of by the NCAA and by many of these schools 865 00:45:31,440 --> 00:45:36,799 Speaker 1: who can sell merchandise and who can see huge additions 866 00:45:36,800 --> 00:45:39,280 Speaker 1: to their endowments, to their bottom lines if they invest 867 00:45:39,280 --> 00:45:41,920 Speaker 1: in the stadiums and like all this other stuff, but 868 00:45:42,040 --> 00:45:44,440 Speaker 1: which the students don't get any of. And it's just 869 00:45:44,520 --> 00:45:46,759 Speaker 1: a fundamental question of fairness. So we've seen in like 870 00:45:46,800 --> 00:45:50,120 Speaker 1: the video games industry in terms of how their likenesses 871 00:45:50,120 --> 00:45:53,200 Speaker 1: are used in terms of how much they're profited off of. 872 00:45:53,520 --> 00:45:56,640 Speaker 1: It is just totally unfair. And I think the fact 873 00:45:56,680 --> 00:46:00,400 Speaker 1: that Justice Kavanaugh and Justice Gorsich both put in like 874 00:46:00,440 --> 00:46:03,560 Speaker 1: little caveats there inviting it. That's kind of the more 875 00:46:03,880 --> 00:46:06,239 Speaker 1: interesting part here. I think what a lot of the 876 00:46:06,239 --> 00:46:08,680 Speaker 1: court watchers saw, and this was the lead in the 877 00:46:08,719 --> 00:46:11,920 Speaker 1: New York Times story as well, is that it underscored 878 00:46:12,640 --> 00:46:16,520 Speaker 1: that the band it basically invited a new case. Right, 879 00:46:16,600 --> 00:46:19,080 Speaker 1: So it may take a couple of years, but at 880 00:46:19,160 --> 00:46:21,600 Speaker 1: least in the current composition of the court, I would 881 00:46:21,600 --> 00:46:24,719 Speaker 1: say that things are looking pretty good for college athletes, 882 00:46:24,960 --> 00:46:26,279 Speaker 1: and I think that's the way that it should be. 883 00:46:26,360 --> 00:46:28,840 Speaker 1: It's not fair to let these schools make billions of 884 00:46:28,880 --> 00:46:30,879 Speaker 1: dollars on the backs of these kids and they don't 885 00:46:30,880 --> 00:46:33,960 Speaker 1: get to make a dime again, I would. I'll believe 886 00:46:33,960 --> 00:46:35,560 Speaker 1: it when I see it. Yeah right. I mean, we've 887 00:46:35,600 --> 00:46:38,319 Speaker 1: had all these big decisions over the years that people thought, 888 00:46:38,320 --> 00:46:40,200 Speaker 1: we're definitely going to go this way, We're definitely going 889 00:46:40,280 --> 00:46:42,560 Speaker 1: to go that way, and oh, you know ACB is 890 00:46:42,600 --> 00:46:45,200 Speaker 1: definitely going to rule against Obamacare because she said this 891 00:46:45,320 --> 00:46:47,319 Speaker 1: or that in the past, or you know, I mean, 892 00:46:47,360 --> 00:46:49,879 Speaker 1: how long have people who really care a lot about 893 00:46:49,880 --> 00:46:52,160 Speaker 1: abortion rights on either side of that debate or they're 894 00:46:52,200 --> 00:46:54,440 Speaker 1: pro or against, how long have they thought this is 895 00:46:54,440 --> 00:46:55,960 Speaker 1: going to be the one and we're reading the tea 896 00:46:56,000 --> 00:46:59,480 Speaker 1: leaves and it doesn't come to fruition Roberts. The hallmark 897 00:46:59,520 --> 00:47:04,279 Speaker 1: of Robert has been to be extremely, extremely cautious and 898 00:47:04,400 --> 00:47:10,680 Speaker 1: not to make any big sweeping decisions with massive ramifications, 899 00:47:11,040 --> 00:47:13,640 Speaker 1: which is what we're talking about here, but to talk 900 00:47:13,680 --> 00:47:17,080 Speaker 1: about like the morality of it and the actual you know, 901 00:47:17,160 --> 00:47:21,120 Speaker 1: situation that college athletes are facing. They not only they 902 00:47:21,200 --> 00:47:23,279 Speaker 1: should they be compensated, they should also be able to 903 00:47:23,360 --> 00:47:25,680 Speaker 1: unionize because this is this is the other thing. And 904 00:47:25,719 --> 00:47:27,560 Speaker 1: I mean I was a college athlete as I was 905 00:47:27,560 --> 00:47:29,439 Speaker 1: a swimmer, though wasn't like one of these sports where 906 00:47:29,719 --> 00:47:33,640 Speaker 1: there's actually lucrative and money money involved. So, but I 907 00:47:33,719 --> 00:47:36,760 Speaker 1: did have a firsthand experience of just how much control 908 00:47:36,840 --> 00:47:39,120 Speaker 1: they have over your life, right, I mean, you're there 909 00:47:39,320 --> 00:47:43,520 Speaker 1: supposedly as a student first, but your sport really controls 910 00:47:43,640 --> 00:47:46,839 Speaker 1: every aspect of your day. They have entire control over 911 00:47:46,960 --> 00:47:49,960 Speaker 1: like you know, even what times you're studying and whether 912 00:47:50,000 --> 00:47:52,399 Speaker 1: you're required to go to study hall. You have these 913 00:47:52,440 --> 00:47:56,400 Speaker 1: like academic counselors, but obviously your schedule in terms of 914 00:47:56,440 --> 00:47:58,600 Speaker 1: when you're at the gym and what your training regimen 915 00:47:58,680 --> 00:48:01,040 Speaker 1: looks like and all of those things even when you 916 00:48:01,120 --> 00:48:04,520 Speaker 1: can have classes and when you can't have classes. Much 917 00:48:04,560 --> 00:48:08,160 Speaker 1: more control over your life when you're an NC double 918 00:48:08,200 --> 00:48:11,400 Speaker 1: a athlete than I would say almost any other certainly 919 00:48:11,520 --> 00:48:15,399 Speaker 1: like profession, because they truly have rules that govern every 920 00:48:15,440 --> 00:48:18,799 Speaker 1: single aspect of your life. So to me, it's not 921 00:48:18,920 --> 00:48:22,160 Speaker 1: just about the compensation. It's also like players should be 922 00:48:22,200 --> 00:48:25,080 Speaker 1: able to have a say and what those rules are 923 00:48:25,120 --> 00:48:27,799 Speaker 1: and what the limitations are, and how their days and 924 00:48:27,800 --> 00:48:30,799 Speaker 1: their schedules are governed, because again, you know, if you're 925 00:48:30,800 --> 00:48:34,840 Speaker 1: trying to balance a rigorous academic schedule with your sport, 926 00:48:35,040 --> 00:48:38,839 Speaker 1: sometimes that's made nearly impossible by the requirements that they 927 00:48:38,920 --> 00:48:41,279 Speaker 1: that they put on top of you. So I think 928 00:48:41,320 --> 00:48:44,680 Speaker 1: that pieces also needs to not be overlooked the fact 929 00:48:44,719 --> 00:48:48,120 Speaker 1: that it's not just about players should be profiting off 930 00:48:48,160 --> 00:48:50,680 Speaker 1: of their skills and their talents, that the NC double 931 00:48:50,719 --> 00:48:54,680 Speaker 1: A is exploiting for massive, massive profits, but they also 932 00:48:54,760 --> 00:48:59,000 Speaker 1: should have a say in what their employment looks like, 933 00:48:59,360 --> 00:49:02,200 Speaker 1: essentially from on a day to day basis. Actually, this 934 00:49:02,280 --> 00:49:05,000 Speaker 1: reminds me there's actually currently a bill in Congress which 935 00:49:05,080 --> 00:49:08,080 Speaker 1: was introduced by Bernie and by Chris Murphy. I remember 936 00:49:08,120 --> 00:49:11,200 Speaker 1: reading about this at the time, which would actually allow 937 00:49:11,480 --> 00:49:15,719 Speaker 1: college athletes to form unions and become employees. Coincidentally, of course, 938 00:49:15,719 --> 00:49:18,440 Speaker 1: the NC DOUBLEA has been lobbying hard against it. And 939 00:49:18,440 --> 00:49:21,000 Speaker 1: this is actually something which how they have tried to 940 00:49:21,040 --> 00:49:24,719 Speaker 1: push through several times, and college football players, I know 941 00:49:25,080 --> 00:49:28,319 Speaker 1: a last year in particular, were really beginning to talk 942 00:49:28,360 --> 00:49:30,759 Speaker 1: a little bit about this, and there's at least a 943 00:49:30,800 --> 00:49:33,480 Speaker 1: little bit of momentum behind it. But of course the 944 00:49:33,560 --> 00:49:37,120 Speaker 1: NC double A is throwing everything they possibly can against this. 945 00:49:37,239 --> 00:49:39,520 Speaker 1: They really are a cartel. I mean, whenever the way 946 00:49:39,640 --> 00:49:41,759 Speaker 1: Justice Kavanaugh was writing about it, It's true, it's like yeah, 947 00:49:41,800 --> 00:49:44,440 Speaker 1: you can't define your industry as one which makes money 948 00:49:44,440 --> 00:49:49,400 Speaker 1: by not paying his employees. It's bs and yeah, it's 949 00:49:49,480 --> 00:49:52,760 Speaker 1: basically what it is. Right, let's boil it down. Imagine 950 00:49:52,760 --> 00:49:56,239 Speaker 1: Amazon being they just for the love of the warehouse work, 951 00:49:56,360 --> 00:49:59,760 Speaker 1: they're getting trained. This is apprenticeship. It's like slate, you know, literally, 952 00:49:59,800 --> 00:50:03,480 Speaker 1: that's it's like modern modern forms of obviously not the 953 00:50:03,480 --> 00:50:06,239 Speaker 1: same thing as chattel slavery. Okay, so don't anybody go 954 00:50:06,480 --> 00:50:09,359 Speaker 1: and quote that. But indentured servitude and all of that 955 00:50:09,440 --> 00:50:12,120 Speaker 1: had its own very ugly parts in early American history 956 00:50:12,160 --> 00:50:14,160 Speaker 1: and in Europe. And I think that there's a lot 957 00:50:14,200 --> 00:50:16,279 Speaker 1: to be said about what you have. And by the way, 958 00:50:16,600 --> 00:50:20,000 Speaker 1: like we always focus on the stars who then go 959 00:50:20,080 --> 00:50:22,480 Speaker 1: on to the NBA, go on to the NFL, the 960 00:50:22,719 --> 00:50:25,799 Speaker 1: overwhelming majority of these athletes are not going to be 961 00:50:25,840 --> 00:50:27,560 Speaker 1: making it to the next level. This is it for them. 962 00:50:27,600 --> 00:50:30,000 Speaker 1: I think it's like three percent. Yeah, this is it 963 00:50:30,040 --> 00:50:33,040 Speaker 1: for them in terms of their career. Are their athletic 964 00:50:33,120 --> 00:50:36,400 Speaker 1: career and they deserve to be paid commensurate with the 965 00:50:36,400 --> 00:50:38,839 Speaker 1: profits that are being made off of them for their 966 00:50:38,880 --> 00:50:41,239 Speaker 1: skills in their labor. Wow, you guys must really like 967 00:50:41,280 --> 00:50:43,240 Speaker 1: listening to our voices. Well, I know this is annoying, 968 00:50:43,280 --> 00:50:45,879 Speaker 1: instead of making you listen to a Viagric commercial. When 969 00:50:45,920 --> 00:50:48,040 Speaker 1: you're done, check out the other podcast I do with 970 00:50:48,080 --> 00:50:50,640 Speaker 1: Marshall Kassoff called The Realignment. We talk a lot about 971 00:50:50,680 --> 00:50:54,080 Speaker 1: the deeper issues that are changing, realigning in American society. 972 00:50:54,200 --> 00:50:56,520 Speaker 1: You always need more Crystal and soag in your daily lives. 973 00:50:56,600 --> 00:50:58,759 Speaker 1: Take care guys. All right, Crystal, what are your breaking 974 00:50:58,800 --> 00:51:03,120 Speaker 1: points today? Well, right now, the Trump administration and Senate 975 00:51:03,160 --> 00:51:06,560 Speaker 1: Republicans are urging the Supreme Court to strike down the 976 00:51:06,800 --> 00:51:10,879 Speaker 1: entire Affordable Care Act and all of its patient protections. 977 00:51:11,280 --> 00:51:15,919 Speaker 1: Republicans are scrambling to confirm this nominee as fast as 978 00:51:16,040 --> 00:51:20,480 Speaker 1: possible because they need one more Trump judge on the 979 00:51:20,520 --> 00:51:25,040 Speaker 1: bench before November tenth to win and strike down the 980 00:51:25,200 --> 00:51:30,680 Speaker 1: entire Affordable Care Act. This is not hyperbole, This is 981 00:51:30,760 --> 00:51:35,799 Speaker 1: not a hypothetical on This is happening. That was then 982 00:51:35,840 --> 00:51:39,240 Speaker 1: Senator Kamala Harris during confirmation hearings for Amy Cony Barrett, 983 00:51:39,280 --> 00:51:42,040 Speaker 1: asserting that Barrett's edition to the Court would almost certainly 984 00:51:42,080 --> 00:51:44,600 Speaker 1: be the end of the Affordable Care Act. This is 985 00:51:44,640 --> 00:51:48,640 Speaker 1: not hyperbole, she said, this is happening. Of course, Senator 986 00:51:48,719 --> 00:51:51,279 Speaker 1: Harris and every other Democrat confidently predicting the demise of 987 00:51:51,280 --> 00:51:53,760 Speaker 1: Obamacare turned out to be wrong. Last week, the majority 988 00:51:53,880 --> 00:51:56,719 Speaker 1: ruled that plaintiffs in the case did not have standing, 989 00:51:56,960 --> 00:52:01,600 Speaker 1: leaving the ACA ultimately unscathed. AC joined the majority in 990 00:52:01,760 --> 00:52:05,720 Speaker 1: protecting that law. Now, this outcome was predictable, and in fact, 991 00:52:05,840 --> 00:52:08,200 Speaker 1: we've predicted it at the time. That's not to say, though, 992 00:52:08,239 --> 00:52:10,720 Speaker 1: that from a left perspective, this court poses no threat 993 00:52:10,719 --> 00:52:14,279 Speaker 1: to galitarian values or the quality of life of ordinary Americans. 994 00:52:14,600 --> 00:52:17,160 Speaker 1: On the contrary, the problem is when it comes to 995 00:52:17,280 --> 00:52:19,960 Speaker 1: Supreme Court, the media seems to only know how to 996 00:52:20,000 --> 00:52:23,880 Speaker 1: cover culture things like LGBTQ rights, abortion, guns, and I 997 00:52:23,880 --> 00:52:27,279 Speaker 1: would submit Obamacare's achieved full culture war status. Now, I'm 998 00:52:27,320 --> 00:52:30,359 Speaker 1: not saying these issues are not important, but covering them 999 00:52:30,600 --> 00:52:34,320 Speaker 1: and obsessing over them exclusively can create a false impression 1000 00:52:34,360 --> 00:52:36,960 Speaker 1: of the Court and can also mask the profound way 1001 00:52:36,960 --> 00:52:40,120 Speaker 1: that the Court has transformed the nation into a corporatocracy. 1002 00:52:40,600 --> 00:52:43,200 Speaker 1: It also makes it easy for Chief Justice John Roberts 1003 00:52:43,239 --> 00:52:46,200 Speaker 1: and the other conservative justices to confuse the public into 1004 00:52:46,200 --> 00:52:49,359 Speaker 1: thinking the Court isn't really so regressive. Throw a bone 1005 00:52:49,400 --> 00:52:52,640 Speaker 1: to the liberals on Obamacare, and everyone immediately goes, golly gee, 1006 00:52:52,640 --> 00:52:55,799 Speaker 1: maybe we're wrong about ACB and Kavanaugh, Gorsich. Maybe the 1007 00:52:55,840 --> 00:52:59,040 Speaker 1: Court isn't so bad after all. On the other hand, 1008 00:52:59,320 --> 00:53:02,719 Speaker 1: you're much like likely to hear about this opinion, which 1009 00:53:02,760 --> 00:53:06,560 Speaker 1: came down yesterday. The US Supreme Court on Monday handed 1010 00:53:06,600 --> 00:53:09,640 Speaker 1: a victory to Goldman's Sachs in its bid to avoid 1011 00:53:09,640 --> 00:53:12,720 Speaker 1: an investor class action lawsuit accusing the bank of hiding 1012 00:53:12,760 --> 00:53:16,680 Speaker 1: conflicts of interest when creating risky subprime securities before the 1013 00:53:16,680 --> 00:53:20,480 Speaker 1: two thousand and eight financial crisis. So, in a decision 1014 00:53:20,480 --> 00:53:23,799 Speaker 1: that was authored by Amy Cony Barrett, the court threw 1015 00:53:23,840 --> 00:53:25,840 Speaker 1: on a decision by the Second US Circuit Court of 1016 00:53:25,840 --> 00:53:29,359 Speaker 1: Appeals that would have allowed that class action lawsuit to 1017 00:53:29,480 --> 00:53:32,400 Speaker 1: move forward. Essentially, what happened is this rewind back to 1018 00:53:32,400 --> 00:53:34,880 Speaker 1: the two thousand and eight financial crisis. One of the 1019 00:53:34,880 --> 00:53:39,040 Speaker 1: things we learned about Goldman's outrageously criminal behavior was at 1020 00:53:39,040 --> 00:53:41,960 Speaker 1: the very same time they were selling certain securities to 1021 00:53:41,960 --> 00:53:46,160 Speaker 1: their clients, they were also betting against those same securities 1022 00:53:46,440 --> 00:53:50,680 Speaker 1: with full knowledge that they were total and complete garbage. So, 1023 00:53:50,880 --> 00:53:54,399 Speaker 1: just to restate, Goldman knew they were selling crap, they 1024 00:53:54,400 --> 00:53:58,000 Speaker 1: were betting against that crap, and they stood to benefit 1025 00:53:58,080 --> 00:54:00,520 Speaker 1: by having their own clients bid up the price of 1026 00:54:00,560 --> 00:54:02,800 Speaker 1: the crop so that their gains in the inevitable crash 1027 00:54:02,840 --> 00:54:05,719 Speaker 1: would be more spectacular. David Serrot, I want to give 1028 00:54:05,800 --> 00:54:07,640 Speaker 1: him credit here. He flagged the story for me and 1029 00:54:07,680 --> 00:54:11,319 Speaker 1: reminded me of this memorable exchange between a Goldman executive 1030 00:54:11,600 --> 00:54:14,800 Speaker 1: and Senator Carl Levin of Michigan about the shitty deals. 1031 00:54:14,880 --> 00:54:18,200 Speaker 1: His words, Goldman was pushing on their clients. Look what 1032 00:54:18,280 --> 00:54:24,480 Speaker 1: your sales team was saying about Timberwolf, boy, That Timberwolf 1033 00:54:24,640 --> 00:54:32,759 Speaker 1: was one shitty deal. They sold that, mister Naman. This 1034 00:54:32,840 --> 00:54:36,399 Speaker 1: email was from the head of the division, not the salesforce. 1035 00:54:36,760 --> 00:54:39,160 Speaker 1: Whatever it was it was. It's an internal It's an 1036 00:54:39,160 --> 00:54:43,000 Speaker 1: internal Goldman document. This was an email to me in 1037 00:54:43,360 --> 00:54:46,759 Speaker 1: late June. Right, and you sold Timberwolf action. No, No, 1038 00:54:46,880 --> 00:54:52,120 Speaker 1: you sold Timberwolf after as well. We did trades after that, yeah, okay, 1039 00:54:52,200 --> 00:54:55,760 Speaker 1: and the trades after some contexts, Yeah, might be helpful. 1040 00:54:56,239 --> 00:54:58,839 Speaker 1: The context. Let me tell you, the context is mighty clear. 1041 00:54:59,320 --> 00:55:03,360 Speaker 1: June twenty two is the date of this email. Boy, 1042 00:55:03,880 --> 00:55:08,640 Speaker 1: that Timberwolf was one shitty deal. How much of that 1043 00:55:08,880 --> 00:55:12,880 Speaker 1: shitty deal did you sell to your clients after June 1044 00:55:12,880 --> 00:55:17,480 Speaker 1: twenty two, two thousand and seven. The answer to the 1045 00:55:17,480 --> 00:55:20,200 Speaker 1: Cenator's question was, hundreds of millions of dollars of that 1046 00:55:20,239 --> 00:55:23,640 Speaker 1: shitty deal was sold after that email was sent. And 1047 00:55:23,640 --> 00:55:25,759 Speaker 1: by the way, it's not just some nameless, faceless ridge 1048 00:55:25,760 --> 00:55:28,480 Speaker 1: ghule that's getting hurt by this type of fraud. Obviously, 1049 00:55:28,520 --> 00:55:31,600 Speaker 1: the entire economy was rocked by the cumulative weight of 1050 00:55:31,640 --> 00:55:35,320 Speaker 1: Wall Street's crimes, but in this specific instance with Golden Sacks, 1051 00:55:35,680 --> 00:55:38,719 Speaker 1: some of the institutional investors fleeced in these schemes are 1052 00:55:38,800 --> 00:55:42,360 Speaker 1: rather important to working class Americans. For example, the Arkansas 1053 00:55:42,440 --> 00:55:46,440 Speaker 1: Teacher Retirement System, relying on Goldman's lives about how they 1054 00:55:46,480 --> 00:55:49,839 Speaker 1: always put the client first, they were hurt greatly by 1055 00:55:49,840 --> 00:55:53,040 Speaker 1: their investments in Goldman Sacks. In fact, the Arkansas Teacher 1056 00:55:53,040 --> 00:55:55,880 Speaker 1: Retirement System, they were part of this class action lawsuit 1057 00:55:56,080 --> 00:55:59,200 Speaker 1: that led ultimately to this ruling by the Supreme Court. 1058 00:55:59,640 --> 00:56:03,200 Speaker 1: With this decision for Goldman, ACB is doing what she 1059 00:56:03,480 --> 00:56:05,960 Speaker 1: was really put on the court to do, which was 1060 00:56:06,000 --> 00:56:09,759 Speaker 1: to protect the American plutocracy. She's not alone, though. Her 1061 00:56:09,800 --> 00:56:13,120 Speaker 1: majority opinion handing a win to Goldman Sacks wasn't just 1062 00:56:13,160 --> 00:56:16,840 Speaker 1: the work of Trump's evil justices, liberals Kagan and Bryer. 1063 00:56:17,040 --> 00:56:19,960 Speaker 1: They both signed on to the opinion agreeing that Goldman 1064 00:56:20,040 --> 00:56:23,799 Speaker 1: Sachs should be protected from accountability. Don't you just love 1065 00:56:23,880 --> 00:56:27,160 Speaker 1: to see that by partisanship in action, guys. In this way, 1066 00:56:27,280 --> 00:56:30,040 Speaker 1: the Supreme Court is kind of like every other institution 1067 00:56:30,120 --> 00:56:32,480 Speaker 1: in this country. They play to the crowd and whatever 1068 00:56:32,520 --> 00:56:36,279 Speaker 1: their perceived interests are on culture war issues, allowing them 1069 00:56:36,320 --> 00:56:39,600 Speaker 1: to quietly hand more and more power to corporations and 1070 00:56:39,640 --> 00:56:43,000 Speaker 1: away from workers without anyone really even noticing. The media 1071 00:56:43,080 --> 00:56:45,960 Speaker 1: typically plays along, creating a conversation and perception of the 1072 00:56:45,960 --> 00:56:49,480 Speaker 1: Court that is a funhouse mirror distortion of its true intent. 1073 00:56:50,080 --> 00:56:52,840 Speaker 1: Chief Justice Roberts He's a savvy operator. He knows the 1074 00:56:52,880 --> 00:56:56,080 Speaker 1: credibility and makeup of the Court is in serious peril. So, 1075 00:56:56,320 --> 00:56:59,799 Speaker 1: unlike Republican politicians, whose incentives are to be ever more 1076 00:57:00,120 --> 00:57:03,200 Speaker 1: radical on the right wing culture war, Roberts sees his 1077 00:57:03,360 --> 00:57:06,640 Speaker 1: interest in mollifying liberals, not rocking the boat too much, 1078 00:57:06,719 --> 00:57:08,879 Speaker 1: so that efforts to reform the Court into a more 1079 00:57:08,920 --> 00:57:12,040 Speaker 1: representative and frankly less awful institution don't pick up too 1080 00:57:12,080 --> 00:57:14,200 Speaker 1: much steam. New York Times is out with a pretty 1081 00:57:14,200 --> 00:57:16,439 Speaker 1: interesting piece on how the Court appears to be very 1082 00:57:16,480 --> 00:57:19,680 Speaker 1: intentionally issuing opinions that can keep it from facing full 1083 00:57:19,800 --> 00:57:23,600 Speaker 1: liberal iyre and backlash on culture war issues. Roberts has 1084 00:57:23,600 --> 00:57:27,760 Speaker 1: been pushing extremely narrow rulings on the most hot button 1085 00:57:27,800 --> 00:57:31,160 Speaker 1: cultural issues, things like gay rights and Obamacare, getting majorities, 1086 00:57:31,280 --> 00:57:34,200 Speaker 1: including some liberals, to agree on these small and very 1087 00:57:34,240 --> 00:57:36,800 Speaker 1: technical opinions that have very little in the way of 1088 00:57:36,800 --> 00:57:40,360 Speaker 1: broader implications. In other words, they know that while there 1089 00:57:40,360 --> 00:57:42,480 Speaker 1: would be hell to pay for a major ruling on 1090 00:57:42,560 --> 00:57:44,920 Speaker 1: gay rights, they can give a store away to Goldman 1091 00:57:45,000 --> 00:57:48,240 Speaker 1: Sachson barely anyone will even notice. As Saga and Rachel 1092 00:57:48,280 --> 00:57:51,120 Speaker 1: Beauvart have as well have long pointed out, this is 1093 00:57:51,160 --> 00:57:53,280 Speaker 1: also part of a shell game of manipulation of the 1094 00:57:53,320 --> 00:57:57,240 Speaker 1: religious right. The federalist society, bankrolled by wealthy business interests, 1095 00:57:57,320 --> 00:57:59,959 Speaker 1: turns out nominee after nominee pledging to be a true 1096 00:58:00,240 --> 00:58:03,680 Speaker 1: believing social conservative, But what those business interests are really 1097 00:58:03,720 --> 00:58:05,960 Speaker 1: paying for is to make sure the nominees are not 1098 00:58:06,200 --> 00:58:08,960 Speaker 1: going to give workers power or hold business or Wall 1099 00:58:08,960 --> 00:58:12,160 Speaker 1: Street to account. Ever so, in the same way democrats 1100 00:58:12,240 --> 00:58:14,480 Speaker 1: lie to their voters about the threat to Obamacare in 1101 00:58:14,560 --> 00:58:18,040 Speaker 1: order to gin up votes, Republicans routinely lie to their 1102 00:58:18,120 --> 00:58:21,320 Speaker 1: voters about nominating justices who will roll back abortion rights 1103 00:58:21,440 --> 00:58:24,120 Speaker 1: and protect wedding cake bakers or whatever the issue du 1104 00:58:24,200 --> 00:58:27,880 Speaker 1: jour is. Meanwhile, in court after court, the big money 1105 00:58:27,880 --> 00:58:31,440 Speaker 1: interests rack up win after win after win. Just another 1106 00:58:31,520 --> 00:58:35,080 Speaker 1: front in the class war that America's plutocrats are relentlessly pursuing, 1107 00:58:35,560 --> 00:58:39,480 Speaker 1: even as they aggressively pretend it does not exist. And Sager, 1108 00:58:39,560 --> 00:58:42,160 Speaker 1: we talked about the NCUA. One more thing, I promise. 1109 00:58:42,520 --> 00:58:44,720 Speaker 1: Just wanted to make sure you knew about my podcast 1110 00:58:44,720 --> 00:58:47,560 Speaker 1: with Kyle Kolinski. It's called Crystal, Kyle and Friends, where 1111 00:58:47,560 --> 00:58:50,320 Speaker 1: we do long form interviews with people like Noam Chomsky, 1112 00:58:50,440 --> 00:58:53,720 Speaker 1: Cornell West, and Glenn Greenwald. You can listen on any 1113 00:58:53,760 --> 00:58:57,160 Speaker 1: podcast platform, or you can subscribe over on substack to 1114 00:58:57,160 --> 00:58:59,160 Speaker 1: get the video a day early. We're going to stop 1115 00:58:59,160 --> 00:59:01,680 Speaker 1: bugging you now. Enjoy all right, Zacer, what are you 1116 00:59:01,720 --> 00:59:04,040 Speaker 1: looking at? Well? I mean, one of my favorite things 1117 00:59:04,080 --> 00:59:06,160 Speaker 1: to do is I say I told you so. It's 1118 00:59:06,200 --> 00:59:09,160 Speaker 1: a natural human inclination. I'm not above it. I love 1119 00:59:09,200 --> 00:59:11,280 Speaker 1: being right, or at very least one of the first 1120 00:59:11,280 --> 00:59:14,080 Speaker 1: to popularize an idea. Some of you may have noticed, 1121 00:59:14,080 --> 00:59:16,400 Speaker 1: but Chrystial and I were recently on Joe Rogan's podcast. 1122 00:59:16,640 --> 00:59:19,880 Speaker 1: Joe asked me an interesting question about social conservatism, how 1123 00:59:19,920 --> 00:59:22,360 Speaker 1: it applies to both my views and to the right generally. 1124 00:59:22,600 --> 00:59:25,080 Speaker 1: I turned the tables. I actually explained to Joe I 1125 00:59:25,160 --> 00:59:27,920 Speaker 1: thought the new social issues of our time have nothing 1126 00:59:27,960 --> 00:59:29,760 Speaker 1: to do with many of the fights of the past, 1127 00:59:30,080 --> 00:59:33,440 Speaker 1: And in my explanation I named Dave Portnoy as the 1128 00:59:33,480 --> 00:59:36,520 Speaker 1: current largest conservative icon in the country. Let's review for 1129 00:59:36,560 --> 00:59:40,840 Speaker 1: those who missed it. I think Social Conservatism today is 1130 00:59:41,000 --> 00:59:42,920 Speaker 1: actually one of the best pieces I read on this 1131 00:59:42,960 --> 00:59:45,360 Speaker 1: shout out to Matthew Walther is called Rise of the 1132 00:59:45,440 --> 00:59:48,200 Speaker 1: Barstool Conservatives. So if you were to ask me who 1133 00:59:48,240 --> 00:59:51,440 Speaker 1: I think like the most the biggest right wing social 1134 00:59:51,640 --> 00:59:54,520 Speaker 1: icon in America right now twenty five years ago, I 1135 00:59:54,520 --> 00:59:56,720 Speaker 1: would have said, like Franklin Graham or something like that, 1136 00:59:56,760 --> 00:59:59,560 Speaker 1: I think it's Dave Portnoy. I really think it is 1137 00:59:59,600 --> 01:00:05,560 Speaker 1: somebody like Portnoy who is anti PC. The current social conservatism, 1138 01:00:05,640 --> 01:00:07,520 Speaker 1: or at least the way that I think things are 1139 01:00:07,640 --> 01:00:11,800 Speaker 1: moving forward, is anti woke, anti PC, and that is 1140 01:00:11,840 --> 01:00:14,600 Speaker 1: where I think the emerging fights are. I didn't invent 1141 01:00:14,640 --> 01:00:17,040 Speaker 1: the thesis. As I said, I stole it from Matthew Walter, 1142 01:00:17,240 --> 01:00:20,400 Speaker 1: who is a columnist over at the Week. But interestingly enough, 1143 01:00:20,600 --> 01:00:23,080 Speaker 1: someone else appears to have taken notice and added to 1144 01:00:23,120 --> 01:00:27,040 Speaker 1: the discourse, with Politico Magazine writing a new piece titled quote, 1145 01:00:27,120 --> 01:00:31,000 Speaker 1: how Republicans became the barstool Party. Now this might confuse 1146 01:00:31,040 --> 01:00:34,920 Speaker 1: some casual observers of politics because the question even arises, 1147 01:00:35,160 --> 01:00:39,280 Speaker 1: is Dave Portnoyd conservative by his account? Not really if 1148 01:00:39,280 --> 01:00:41,600 Speaker 1: you're thinking in terms of old ways of doing business. 1149 01:00:41,920 --> 01:00:45,040 Speaker 1: Dave is pro choice, He's had multiple sex tapes released, 1150 01:00:45,040 --> 01:00:48,240 Speaker 1: which he's proud of. He's pro gay marriage. So what 1151 01:00:48,400 --> 01:00:52,040 Speaker 1: conservative thing is about him? Well, look, he's conservative in 1152 01:00:52,080 --> 01:00:54,440 Speaker 1: the way that Trump kind of was. He just refuses 1153 01:00:54,480 --> 01:00:57,000 Speaker 1: to bow to the liberal intelligentsia, and he likes to 1154 01:00:57,040 --> 01:01:00,720 Speaker 1: drive them crazy. Portnoy refuses to apologize for past jokes. 1155 01:01:00,800 --> 01:01:03,360 Speaker 1: He basically holds up a middle finger up to the elite. 1156 01:01:03,400 --> 01:01:05,880 Speaker 1: He was one of the most prominent people against lockdowns 1157 01:01:06,040 --> 01:01:08,600 Speaker 1: and look to his eternal credit, he raised tens of 1158 01:01:08,640 --> 01:01:11,920 Speaker 1: millions of dollars for small businesses. Every time he tells 1159 01:01:11,960 --> 01:01:15,800 Speaker 1: the liberal media fu he gets richer and more popular. 1160 01:01:16,120 --> 01:01:20,960 Speaker 1: Walter describes of Trump and of Portinoy, describing the phenomenon 1161 01:01:21,000 --> 01:01:25,800 Speaker 1: this way, quote Trump recognized there are millions of Americans 1162 01:01:25,960 --> 01:01:29,360 Speaker 1: who do not oppose or even care about abortion or 1163 01:01:30,280 --> 01:01:34,080 Speaker 1: same sex marriage, much less stem cell research or any 1164 01:01:34,200 --> 01:01:37,720 Speaker 1: of the other causes that had animated traditional conservatives. He 1165 01:01:37,800 --> 01:01:42,560 Speaker 1: adds quote Instead, he correctly intuited the new culture war 1166 01:01:42,760 --> 01:01:46,000 Speaker 1: would be fought over very different and very more nebulous issues. 1167 01:01:46,360 --> 01:01:51,760 Speaker 1: Vague concerns about political correctness, sjw's opposition to the popularization 1168 01:01:51,840 --> 01:01:55,520 Speaker 1: of critical race theory, sentimentality about the American flag and 1169 01:01:55,560 --> 01:01:59,080 Speaker 1: the military, the rights of mail undergraduates to engage in 1170 01:01:59,120 --> 01:02:02,960 Speaker 1: fornication while in intoxicated without fear of the title ten mafia. 1171 01:02:03,080 --> 01:02:06,040 Speaker 1: That's basically it right there. That's port NOI's appeal and 1172 01:02:06,080 --> 01:02:08,840 Speaker 1: the direction of the new American right. The fights of 1173 01:02:08,880 --> 01:02:11,480 Speaker 1: the past are in the past. The fights of the 1174 01:02:11,480 --> 01:02:13,760 Speaker 1: future are How do we teach our kid's history? Is 1175 01:02:13,760 --> 01:02:16,800 Speaker 1: it okay to be outspokenly patriotic in popular culture and 1176 01:02:16,840 --> 01:02:20,040 Speaker 1: in elite circles? Do we say Merry Christmas? Again? Can 1177 01:02:20,120 --> 01:02:23,480 Speaker 1: we say quote unquote problematic words? Can we roll our 1178 01:02:23,560 --> 01:02:26,200 Speaker 1: eyes at people's pronouns and their email signatures without being 1179 01:02:26,240 --> 01:02:29,280 Speaker 1: called homophobic. Now, look, I know none of these seem 1180 01:02:29,360 --> 01:02:32,080 Speaker 1: that important, but let's be real. This is what gets 1181 01:02:32,080 --> 01:02:34,360 Speaker 1: people going in America, whether you like it or not. 1182 01:02:35,200 --> 01:02:38,280 Speaker 1: This is how Trump won ten million more votes in 1183 01:02:38,320 --> 01:02:41,320 Speaker 1: twenty twenty, and I suspect if the GOP ever wins 1184 01:02:41,320 --> 01:02:44,240 Speaker 1: a popular vote margin in the future again, it's gonna 1185 01:02:44,240 --> 01:02:47,560 Speaker 1: look like Dave Portnoy's fan base. Pretty diverse, pretty male, 1186 01:02:47,960 --> 01:02:51,200 Speaker 1: a huge base of support outside of its traditional voting space. 1187 01:02:51,520 --> 01:02:54,320 Speaker 1: I call it grill dad conservatism. I actually think it's 1188 01:02:54,320 --> 01:02:57,680 Speaker 1: the future. And look already in the twenty twenty data, 1189 01:02:57,880 --> 01:03:01,240 Speaker 1: you can see signs of this everywhere. Hispanic males voted 1190 01:03:01,240 --> 01:03:03,560 Speaker 1: for Trump at a higher rate than anyone else compared 1191 01:03:03,560 --> 01:03:07,280 Speaker 1: to twenty sixteen, and cited Trump's opposition to woke shibbaltz 1192 01:03:07,440 --> 01:03:10,320 Speaker 1: like defund the police and lockdowns as a number one 1193 01:03:10,360 --> 01:03:12,480 Speaker 1: reason they voted for him. You see the same thing 1194 01:03:12,480 --> 01:03:14,960 Speaker 1: in the modest but soill noticeable increase in black men 1195 01:03:15,160 --> 01:03:17,920 Speaker 1: voted for Trump, and ironically, the only group who voted 1196 01:03:17,920 --> 01:03:19,960 Speaker 1: for him at a lower rate was white men, which 1197 01:03:20,040 --> 01:03:22,720 Speaker 1: I will find eternally funny. But look, I don't want 1198 01:03:22,720 --> 01:03:26,320 Speaker 1: to fully sing the praises of barstool conservatism, because if 1199 01:03:26,320 --> 01:03:29,800 Speaker 1: I have one great worry, it's this. The barstoolification of 1200 01:03:29,840 --> 01:03:33,720 Speaker 1: the GOP can easily win, but economically things aren't going 1201 01:03:33,800 --> 01:03:37,240 Speaker 1: to be too great. As Walter writes, quote, where will 1202 01:03:37,360 --> 01:03:41,040 Speaker 1: barstool conservatism leave what remains of the old conservative movement? 1203 01:03:41,360 --> 01:03:44,280 Speaker 1: In the case of free market dogmatists, I believe there's 1204 01:03:44,400 --> 01:03:47,800 Speaker 1: almost zero daylight between them. The policy papers on why 1205 01:03:47,840 --> 01:03:51,200 Speaker 1: blockchain enabled future markets in organ donation, brought to you 1206 01:03:51,240 --> 01:03:55,120 Speaker 1: by Manscape, will revitalized Dayton, Ohio is going to rite itself. 1207 01:03:55,600 --> 01:03:59,440 Speaker 1: Part of Portnoy's core ethos is an economic libertarianism, and 1208 01:03:59,480 --> 01:04:02,200 Speaker 1: look I mean and served him quite well. It's obviously 1209 01:04:02,240 --> 01:04:05,800 Speaker 1: evident in his stand for retail investors during GameStop and more. 1210 01:04:06,120 --> 01:04:09,000 Speaker 1: But when you translate that to public policy, you actually 1211 01:04:09,000 --> 01:04:11,280 Speaker 1: get a lot of the same old Paul Ryan stuff 1212 01:04:11,360 --> 01:04:14,440 Speaker 1: with a new flare on it. Barstool and Conservatism could 1213 01:04:14,520 --> 01:04:17,200 Speaker 1: easily end up being the new cover album for the 1214 01:04:17,240 --> 01:04:19,840 Speaker 1: tax cut GOP of old. All of this, I guess 1215 01:04:19,960 --> 01:04:21,840 Speaker 1: is to say, is if you want to keep on 1216 01:04:21,960 --> 01:04:25,080 Speaker 1: your eye on where things are headed, look to our culture. 1217 01:04:25,280 --> 01:04:28,160 Speaker 1: For people who are anti PC and anti woke. That's 1218 01:04:28,200 --> 01:04:30,920 Speaker 1: where the new conservative movement is and what it actually 1219 01:04:31,000 --> 01:04:33,440 Speaker 1: probably could win and who will likely be in charge 1220 01:04:33,520 --> 01:04:36,240 Speaker 1: a decade from now. It's interesting, Crystal, there's a lot 1221 01:04:36,240 --> 01:04:39,880 Speaker 1: of debate. Joining us now to talk about the mess 1222 01:04:40,000 --> 01:04:42,760 Speaker 1: that is the New York City mayor roal race this 1223 01:04:42,880 --> 01:04:45,720 Speaker 1: year is Ross Barkin. He is a contributor to the Nation, 1224 01:04:45,880 --> 01:04:47,840 Speaker 1: wrote a fantastic piece there we're going to talk about. 1225 01:04:48,000 --> 01:04:51,640 Speaker 1: He's also author of a brand new book out today, 1226 01:04:52,040 --> 01:04:56,200 Speaker 1: The Prince Andrew Cuomo, Coronavirus and the Fall of New 1227 01:04:56,280 --> 01:05:00,120 Speaker 1: York timely stuff. Congrats on the book, Roscard, to see you, Yes, 1228 01:05:01,160 --> 01:05:03,520 Speaker 1: thank you, and thank you for having me a very 1229 01:05:03,600 --> 01:05:06,400 Speaker 1: crazy day in New York City and also the release 1230 01:05:06,440 --> 01:05:11,480 Speaker 1: of my books for you that perfect day to make 1231 01:05:11,520 --> 01:05:13,160 Speaker 1: sure I dropped on a low key day where you 1232 01:05:13,200 --> 01:05:16,240 Speaker 1: could really focus on it. So good job there. I 1233 01:05:16,240 --> 01:05:17,959 Speaker 1: want to ask you about the book actually, but first 1234 01:05:18,000 --> 01:05:21,000 Speaker 1: just break down for us for people who haven't been 1235 01:05:21,160 --> 01:05:24,680 Speaker 1: immersed in the details of this mayor's race, which has 1236 01:05:24,720 --> 01:05:28,200 Speaker 1: like completely gone off the rails. Who are the main players, 1237 01:05:28,600 --> 01:05:31,200 Speaker 1: what's the state of the race, who's the front runner, 1238 01:05:31,320 --> 01:05:35,040 Speaker 1: what have the contours been like? Sure, so right now, 1239 01:05:35,080 --> 01:05:39,400 Speaker 1: there are four Democrats who all have some shot at winning. 1240 01:05:39,440 --> 01:05:42,120 Speaker 1: The front runner in the pools last month has been 1241 01:05:42,640 --> 01:05:46,640 Speaker 1: the Brooklyn Burger president Eric Adams, and he's been followed 1242 01:05:46,640 --> 01:05:51,200 Speaker 1: by different candidates at different times. Originally Andrew Gang the 1243 01:05:52,120 --> 01:05:56,960 Speaker 1: celebrity for presidential candidate, then he no longer is. You 1244 01:05:57,040 --> 01:06:01,920 Speaker 1: have Maya Wiley, who's the Plasio's former council an MSNBC pundit, 1245 01:06:02,080 --> 01:06:05,440 Speaker 1: and you have Kathlin Garcia, who is the Blasio's former 1246 01:06:05,520 --> 01:06:08,920 Speaker 1: sanitation commissioner. And there was a fifth candidate who was 1247 01:06:09,040 --> 01:06:13,120 Speaker 1: once one of the top contenders, Scott Stringer, but he 1248 01:06:13,320 --> 01:06:17,240 Speaker 1: was accused of sexual assault. The allegation was never substantiated, 1249 01:06:17,240 --> 01:06:20,760 Speaker 1: but that really deroulds his campaign. So there's really four contenders. 1250 01:06:21,080 --> 01:06:25,080 Speaker 1: Adams is the favorite. Three of them are running explicitly 1251 01:06:25,120 --> 01:06:28,560 Speaker 1: I would define them as moderates, and one Wiley, is 1252 01:06:28,640 --> 01:06:32,640 Speaker 1: kind of occupying this left liberal lane. But certainly most 1253 01:06:32,640 --> 01:06:36,480 Speaker 1: of the candidates are talking about issues like crime, public safety, 1254 01:06:37,120 --> 01:06:41,440 Speaker 1: are pro charter school, and have come out explicitly against 1255 01:06:41,440 --> 01:06:44,160 Speaker 1: the funding of Please. So very interesting race coming off 1256 01:06:44,200 --> 01:06:47,880 Speaker 1: of what happened in twenty twenty. Yeah, and so Ross, 1257 01:06:48,040 --> 01:06:49,640 Speaker 1: you wrote this piece let's put it up there on 1258 01:06:49,680 --> 01:06:52,880 Speaker 1: the screen in the Nation, which I saw get some play. 1259 01:06:53,160 --> 01:06:55,640 Speaker 1: We were talking a little bit about how Eric Adams 1260 01:06:55,680 --> 01:06:58,480 Speaker 1: in particular, who has been really kind of a strange 1261 01:06:58,520 --> 01:07:02,520 Speaker 1: figure who uses identity politics in order to cover for 1262 01:07:02,640 --> 01:07:05,040 Speaker 1: some of these corporate things that he's doing. Could you 1263 01:07:05,080 --> 01:07:09,360 Speaker 1: just explain that a bit. Yeah, So Eric Adams, he 1264 01:07:09,680 --> 01:07:12,840 Speaker 1: is fascinating political history. He was a police captain for 1265 01:07:12,880 --> 01:07:15,000 Speaker 1: a long time. He was in the transit police and 1266 01:07:15,080 --> 01:07:18,080 Speaker 1: the NYPD. He's elected to the state Senate and then 1267 01:07:18,160 --> 01:07:22,720 Speaker 1: to the relatively powerless perchaur president. He would be the 1268 01:07:22,880 --> 01:07:26,680 Speaker 1: bur of the city's second black mayor. And he is 1269 01:07:26,680 --> 01:07:29,880 Speaker 1: someone who is both very anti woke, I would say, 1270 01:07:29,880 --> 01:07:33,000 Speaker 1: in terms of he talks a lot about, you know, 1271 01:07:33,120 --> 01:07:35,800 Speaker 1: public safety and crime and being tough on crime. He 1272 01:07:35,840 --> 01:07:39,520 Speaker 1: said he carried gun on him if he was elected 1273 01:07:39,560 --> 01:07:42,320 Speaker 1: mayor because he can legally do that. He has a 1274 01:07:42,400 --> 01:07:45,920 Speaker 1: history of making very incendiary statements. He once told the 1275 01:07:46,160 --> 01:07:49,440 Speaker 1: people who are from out of the town, so called gentrifiers, 1276 01:07:49,480 --> 01:07:53,200 Speaker 1: to go back to Iowa. At the same time, welc 1277 01:07:54,280 --> 01:07:56,960 Speaker 1: identity politics. So I don't know if if that's like 1278 01:07:57,000 --> 01:07:59,200 Speaker 1: the little look side of him or it's more just 1279 01:07:59,280 --> 01:08:02,640 Speaker 1: kind of a classic cynical ploy but repeatedly throughout this 1280 01:08:02,800 --> 01:08:06,440 Speaker 1: campaign and throughout his political career, his youth race as 1281 01:08:06,480 --> 01:08:11,280 Speaker 1: a way to deflect whether talking about tenant protections as 1282 01:08:11,280 --> 01:08:14,680 Speaker 1: an attack on black wealth even though real estate developers 1283 01:08:14,680 --> 01:08:20,800 Speaker 1: and landlords are almost exclusively very wealthy white people, or 1284 01:08:20,880 --> 01:08:24,120 Speaker 1: these kind of large corporate firms, and also you know, 1285 01:08:24,240 --> 01:08:28,160 Speaker 1: saying he can, you know, illegally use these parking PLACU 1286 01:08:28,160 --> 01:08:30,920 Speaker 1: cards because the last former president got to do it 1287 01:08:30,960 --> 01:08:33,559 Speaker 1: and he was white, So you can't have corruption for 1288 01:08:33,600 --> 01:08:35,680 Speaker 1: the white guy, not the black guy. So he's a 1289 01:08:35,760 --> 01:08:40,200 Speaker 1: very handy and incendiary figure, a little bit like Rudy Giuliani, 1290 01:08:40,320 --> 01:08:45,040 Speaker 1: maybe more left wing Rudy, and even tiny shades of Trump. 1291 01:08:45,240 --> 01:08:47,639 Speaker 1: I don't like to liken anyone to Trump, but he's 1292 01:08:47,640 --> 01:08:50,640 Speaker 1: definitely someone who makes a lot of outrageous statements and 1293 01:08:50,680 --> 01:08:52,679 Speaker 1: it can be very hard to keep track of all 1294 01:08:52,680 --> 01:08:55,519 Speaker 1: of them. I mean, he's really weaponized race and what 1295 01:08:55,640 --> 01:08:59,479 Speaker 1: is a disgraceful manner in this campaign, and it's been 1296 01:08:59,520 --> 01:09:02,720 Speaker 1: called out by you know, Maya Wiley, and certainly some 1297 01:09:02,800 --> 01:09:05,920 Speaker 1: of his attacks have been on Yang and Catherine Garcina, 1298 01:09:05,960 --> 01:09:09,880 Speaker 1: who kind of teamed up together, the campaigned together, including 1299 01:09:09,960 --> 01:09:13,559 Speaker 1: on June teenth, Eric Adams tried to pretend like that 1300 01:09:13,680 --> 01:09:16,560 Speaker 1: was some racial affront and they were trying to disenfranchise 1301 01:09:16,600 --> 01:09:20,479 Speaker 1: black voters. He likened it to horrific legacy, the Jim 1302 01:09:20,479 --> 01:09:24,120 Speaker 1: Crow South and poll taxes. I mean, that's how aggressive 1303 01:09:24,160 --> 01:09:30,000 Speaker 1: he's been in essentially using these identity politics terms and 1304 01:09:30,080 --> 01:09:32,840 Speaker 1: the very real scourge of racism to cover for what 1305 01:09:32,920 --> 01:09:36,600 Speaker 1: is essentially a like corporate police state agenda. You have 1306 01:09:36,680 --> 01:09:38,800 Speaker 1: this paragraph in your piece that I think is really 1307 01:09:38,800 --> 01:09:40,760 Speaker 1: important because it takes it out of the context of 1308 01:09:40,960 --> 01:09:43,479 Speaker 1: just the New York City mayor's race and poses a 1309 01:09:43,560 --> 01:09:46,559 Speaker 1: larger question for the left. You say, for a long time, 1310 01:09:46,560 --> 01:09:49,760 Speaker 1: many on the left have favored in identitarian politics over 1311 01:09:49,840 --> 01:09:53,880 Speaker 1: one that aligns class with race. If identity is elevated 1312 01:09:53,920 --> 01:09:58,360 Speaker 1: above class and critiques of capitalism no longer matter, politicians 1313 01:09:58,520 --> 01:10:01,400 Speaker 1: like Adams will be in. As a black man, he's 1314 01:10:01,439 --> 01:10:04,559 Speaker 1: been able to effectively denounce calls for greater tenant protections 1315 01:10:04,560 --> 01:10:07,920 Speaker 1: on the grounds they would adversely affect minority landlords, while 1316 01:10:07,920 --> 01:10:13,200 Speaker 1: rebuking all criticism criticism of himself as a racist as racist. 1317 01:10:13,240 --> 01:10:15,720 Speaker 1: So he's basically saying like, if you're critiquing May, then 1318 01:10:15,720 --> 01:10:18,360 Speaker 1: you must be racist, no matter how legitimate the critique is. 1319 01:10:18,720 --> 01:10:23,519 Speaker 1: His supporters have attacked rank choice voting itself erroneously, claiming 1320 01:10:23,560 --> 01:10:26,559 Speaker 1: that it weakens the power of non white voters. So again, 1321 01:10:26,760 --> 01:10:30,080 Speaker 1: this is a guy who is basically cynically exploiting some 1322 01:10:30,160 --> 01:10:34,200 Speaker 1: of the well intentioned proclivities of a lot of people 1323 01:10:34,240 --> 01:10:38,160 Speaker 1: on the left to position himself as a progressive, while 1324 01:10:38,240 --> 01:10:42,800 Speaker 1: his ideals and what he stands for is anything but Yes. 1325 01:10:42,920 --> 01:10:45,960 Speaker 1: So I think Adams supposes a unique danger to the 1326 01:10:46,080 --> 01:10:49,200 Speaker 1: left if he wins, and it looks like he may 1327 01:10:49,320 --> 01:10:52,519 Speaker 1: very well win because he has a lot of the 1328 01:10:52,600 --> 01:10:55,600 Speaker 1: populist rhetoric, and he's someone who'd come in with a 1329 01:10:55,640 --> 01:10:59,960 Speaker 1: real populist coalition working class blacks and Latinos labor union. 1330 01:11:00,200 --> 01:11:02,720 Speaker 1: Is he's kind of dying out of borough political machines, 1331 01:11:03,120 --> 01:11:05,320 Speaker 1: and he could say, on one hand, incredibly I was 1332 01:11:05,320 --> 01:11:07,880 Speaker 1: elected by the people. But unlike sort of you know, 1333 01:11:08,280 --> 01:11:13,760 Speaker 1: left populist type politicians, there will be no large redistributive agenda. Right. 1334 01:11:14,200 --> 01:11:17,719 Speaker 1: Eric Adams is backed by like Andrew Yang is supported 1335 01:11:17,720 --> 01:11:22,920 Speaker 1: by you know, billionaire charter school supporters, billionaire real estate developers. 1336 01:11:23,160 --> 01:11:26,200 Speaker 1: The city's power elite are very excited about Eric at 1337 01:11:26,640 --> 01:11:29,080 Speaker 1: they might be a bit weary because he is unpredictable 1338 01:11:29,120 --> 01:11:32,439 Speaker 1: in the scendiary. They prefer someone like Michael Bloomberg, who 1339 01:11:32,840 --> 01:11:36,000 Speaker 1: you know very much fit in a box. Whereas Adams 1340 01:11:36,160 --> 01:11:38,200 Speaker 1: used to be a Republican now is a Democrat. He's 1341 01:11:38,200 --> 01:11:41,639 Speaker 1: all over the place, but fundamentally he's not a challenge 1342 01:11:41,680 --> 01:11:43,879 Speaker 1: to capital. He's not a challenge to the power elite. 1343 01:11:44,040 --> 01:11:46,879 Speaker 1: At the same time, he's very a depth at invoking 1344 01:11:47,000 --> 01:11:50,559 Speaker 1: race and making it seem like he himself is some 1345 01:11:50,760 --> 01:11:54,240 Speaker 1: kind of underdog or some kind of populist, like a 1346 01:11:54,280 --> 01:11:59,639 Speaker 1: lot of candy politicians. So challenging him, organizing against him 1347 01:12:00,120 --> 01:12:03,160 Speaker 1: will be difficult in my eyes, because he has a 1348 01:12:03,200 --> 01:12:07,400 Speaker 1: strong coalition and he's very good at using these weapons 1349 01:12:07,400 --> 01:12:10,200 Speaker 1: of identity against the left. That's why I'm always warning 1350 01:12:10,200 --> 01:12:12,559 Speaker 1: my friends in the left, you really have to pair 1351 01:12:12,760 --> 01:12:16,200 Speaker 1: the class critique with race, otherwise you get this kind 1352 01:12:16,240 --> 01:12:20,480 Speaker 1: of woke capitalism, which is what Eric Adams ultimately represents. 1353 01:12:20,840 --> 01:12:23,760 Speaker 1: So ross have New York City progressive is how are 1354 01:12:23,760 --> 01:12:27,040 Speaker 1: they going to square that working class blacks are likely 1355 01:12:27,080 --> 01:12:29,559 Speaker 1: to elect a black mayor who wants more cops and 1356 01:12:29,560 --> 01:12:31,600 Speaker 1: doesn't want to defund the police. I just feel like 1357 01:12:31,640 --> 01:12:33,640 Speaker 1: this has to be one of the biggest reckonings for 1358 01:12:33,720 --> 01:12:37,000 Speaker 1: what's happening with left politics in New York City right now. 1359 01:12:37,040 --> 01:12:39,479 Speaker 1: I'm curious for your thoughts on that. Yeah, I mean, 1360 01:12:39,600 --> 01:12:41,760 Speaker 1: I would like to see that reckoning. So after the 1361 01:12:41,800 --> 01:12:44,719 Speaker 1: twenty twenty election, you know, I and some other people 1362 01:12:44,720 --> 01:12:46,880 Speaker 1: on left were saying, look, you know New York City, 1363 01:12:47,560 --> 01:12:51,480 Speaker 1: Trump threw his vote share in working class Latino neighborhoods 1364 01:12:51,520 --> 01:12:54,640 Speaker 1: and then to a lesser extent in working class Black neighborhoods. 1365 01:12:54,760 --> 01:12:57,080 Speaker 1: He did not really grow a share in white neighborhoods. 1366 01:12:57,080 --> 01:12:59,920 Speaker 1: And this was true nationally. This really followed national trends 1367 01:13:00,200 --> 01:13:04,040 Speaker 1: that waiting for like the professional left reckoning with that, 1368 01:13:04,720 --> 01:13:07,960 Speaker 1: and it just never came. I think unfortunately a lot 1369 01:13:08,000 --> 01:13:10,559 Speaker 1: of these kind of NGO type groups, you know, they 1370 01:13:10,720 --> 01:13:14,720 Speaker 1: really have incentive to ignore what's going on. So you 1371 01:13:14,760 --> 01:13:19,320 Speaker 1: have you have these weird scenarios where you know, a 1372 01:13:19,360 --> 01:13:23,320 Speaker 1: nonprofit NGO organization will say we speak for the working class. 1373 01:13:23,640 --> 01:13:27,000 Speaker 1: Meanwhile the working class is booting a certain way. I 1374 01:13:27,040 --> 01:13:30,200 Speaker 1: think there are smarter, cannier groups like the ESA, but 1375 01:13:30,320 --> 01:13:35,160 Speaker 1: still there is this disconnect and the reckoning has not come. Yeah, 1376 01:13:35,200 --> 01:13:38,120 Speaker 1: and even the like left candidate in the race now 1377 01:13:38,240 --> 01:13:42,400 Speaker 1: Maya whiley the only marginally progressive person who has a shot. 1378 01:13:42,560 --> 01:13:45,200 Speaker 1: I mean, she was like on MSNBC every day opposed 1379 01:13:45,200 --> 01:13:48,519 Speaker 1: to Bernie Sanders. So and Scott Stringer, who was the 1380 01:13:48,560 --> 01:13:50,839 Speaker 1: other one, was also like, you know, a Hillary Clinton 1381 01:13:50,920 --> 01:13:55,280 Speaker 1: type progressive I guess. So the left really didn't have 1382 01:13:55,439 --> 01:13:57,160 Speaker 1: much of a showing in this race or anyone to 1383 01:13:57,240 --> 01:14:00,800 Speaker 1: root for whatsoever. Look, we don't what's going to happen, 1384 01:14:00,840 --> 01:14:04,559 Speaker 1: and ranked choice makes this very dicey in order in 1385 01:14:04,680 --> 01:14:06,920 Speaker 1: order to effectively predict what's going to happen in this 1386 01:14:07,040 --> 01:14:09,599 Speaker 1: race first time having ranked choice voting in New York 1387 01:14:09,680 --> 01:14:13,640 Speaker 1: City mayor oal primary. But Andrew Yang was once solidly 1388 01:14:13,680 --> 01:14:16,360 Speaker 1: at the top of this field and has really fallen 1389 01:14:16,400 --> 01:14:18,800 Speaker 1: off to where you know, I think if he were 1390 01:14:18,840 --> 01:14:21,280 Speaker 1: to win at this point, it would be a tremendous comeback. 1391 01:14:21,320 --> 01:14:24,600 Speaker 1: He's a large underdog at this point. What happened that 1392 01:14:24,680 --> 01:14:26,600 Speaker 1: caused him to fall off in the polls to that 1393 01:14:26,680 --> 01:14:33,719 Speaker 1: significant amount? So my theory is Andrew Yang really lost 1394 01:14:34,080 --> 01:14:39,160 Speaker 1: educated liberal voters. Unlike the national Democratic electorate, the left 1395 01:14:39,240 --> 01:14:42,439 Speaker 1: liberal PMC. Part of the Democratic electorate in New York 1396 01:14:42,479 --> 01:14:45,439 Speaker 1: City is a lot bigger. So, you know, Elizabeth Warren 1397 01:14:45,760 --> 01:14:48,919 Speaker 1: flopped on the national stage right, I think an Elizabeth 1398 01:14:48,960 --> 01:14:51,000 Speaker 1: Warren type candidate could do a lot better in New 1399 01:14:51,080 --> 01:14:54,679 Speaker 1: York City just because this kind of you know, wealthyre, 1400 01:14:54,800 --> 01:14:59,400 Speaker 1: affluent type democrat who consumes a lot of news and 1401 01:14:59,760 --> 01:15:03,479 Speaker 1: has as a graduate degree matters. Right, You really can't 1402 01:15:03,520 --> 01:15:07,679 Speaker 1: win the mayoralty being entirely shut out by them. And 1403 01:15:07,880 --> 01:15:11,240 Speaker 1: my theory so far is that despite their revulsion towards 1404 01:15:11,320 --> 01:15:14,400 Speaker 1: Eric Adams, they're more accepting of Eric Adams because he's 1405 01:15:14,439 --> 01:15:17,960 Speaker 1: been an elected official, his gaps take on a different quality. 1406 01:15:18,320 --> 01:15:20,320 Speaker 1: Andrew Yang really came in with a lot of energy 1407 01:15:20,320 --> 01:15:23,639 Speaker 1: and excitement. He just has shown a real knowledge gap 1408 01:15:23,680 --> 01:15:26,360 Speaker 1: around certain issues. He's gotten a lot of media scrup me. 1409 01:15:27,400 --> 01:15:30,400 Speaker 1: Eric Adams did not really get any media scrutiny until 1410 01:15:30,400 --> 01:15:34,280 Speaker 1: I would say around May of twenty twenty one, and 1411 01:15:34,320 --> 01:15:37,080 Speaker 1: it's almost entirely absent from the media. It's very strange 1412 01:15:37,080 --> 01:15:40,200 Speaker 1: to even see this. Whereas Andrew Yang wall to wall coverage, 1413 01:15:40,240 --> 01:15:42,760 Speaker 1: I think ultimately that hurt him. I think if Eric 1414 01:15:42,800 --> 01:15:45,600 Speaker 1: Adams got the level to scrutin me Yang did, he 1415 01:15:45,640 --> 01:15:48,880 Speaker 1: would not be so high in the pools. That being said, 1416 01:15:48,960 --> 01:15:52,400 Speaker 1: I think Andrew Yang did a really poor job of 1417 01:15:52,560 --> 01:15:57,320 Speaker 1: mitigating the fears of progressives and also at least trying 1418 01:15:57,360 --> 01:16:02,439 Speaker 1: to assuage some of this kind of educated liberal voter base, 1419 01:16:02,840 --> 01:16:06,760 Speaker 1: which does matter Lasio one with educated liberals, one with 1420 01:16:06,880 --> 01:16:10,040 Speaker 1: working class black voters. Eric Adams will not do well 1421 01:16:10,240 --> 01:16:14,160 Speaker 1: educated liberals, But my own sense is he's probably better 1422 01:16:14,200 --> 01:16:17,240 Speaker 1: positioned in ranking choice voting to show up on their 1423 01:16:17,320 --> 01:16:23,439 Speaker 1: ballots more than Ye'll get to listen to those Yang 1424 01:16:23,520 --> 01:16:26,719 Speaker 1: listen to those consultant, those Bloomberg consultants a little too much, 1425 01:16:26,840 --> 01:16:30,120 Speaker 1: I think. Tell us about the book, congrats on it 1426 01:16:30,120 --> 01:16:32,559 Speaker 1: coming out today again. It's called The Prince Andrew Cuomo 1427 01:16:32,600 --> 01:16:35,040 Speaker 1: Coronavirus in the Fall of New York. We've certainly been 1428 01:16:35,080 --> 01:16:37,400 Speaker 1: talking to you about these topics for a while. What 1429 01:16:37,479 --> 01:16:39,160 Speaker 1: is it that you wanted to dig into in this 1430 01:16:39,200 --> 01:16:41,920 Speaker 1: book and expose about Andrew Cuomo and his reign as 1431 01:16:42,000 --> 01:16:45,640 Speaker 1: governor there? So I really see this book as a 1432 01:16:45,680 --> 01:16:48,920 Speaker 1: rejoinder to the propaganda memoir he put out last year 1433 01:16:49,000 --> 01:16:52,439 Speaker 1: the focus of late mayor's race. But Andrew Cuomo is 1434 01:16:52,479 --> 01:16:54,719 Speaker 1: still the King of New York. He has not resigned. 1435 01:16:54,760 --> 01:16:58,439 Speaker 1: He's inordantly powerful. He wants to run for fourth term. 1436 01:16:58,479 --> 01:17:00,760 Speaker 1: So this is a book about the horrible year of 1437 01:17:00,800 --> 01:17:03,799 Speaker 1: COVID in New York State. It's about how Andrew Culomo 1438 01:17:04,000 --> 01:17:07,280 Speaker 1: failed in New York, how he downplayed COVID, compared it 1439 01:17:07,320 --> 01:17:10,480 Speaker 1: to the flu like Donald Trump did, was late to respond, 1440 01:17:10,880 --> 01:17:14,920 Speaker 1: mismanaged nursing homes, courted scandal and controversy. And it's also 1441 01:17:14,960 --> 01:17:17,439 Speaker 1: about its political history. So if an interest in kind 1442 01:17:17,479 --> 01:17:20,040 Speaker 1: of how Clomo came to be who he is, how 1443 01:17:20,080 --> 01:17:23,280 Speaker 1: he betrayed the left Oprah and over again, and really 1444 01:17:23,320 --> 01:17:26,320 Speaker 1: a work to foil the ambitions of democrats, this is 1445 01:17:26,360 --> 01:17:29,200 Speaker 1: definitely a book for you. It's pretty, it's very readable, 1446 01:17:29,280 --> 01:17:31,519 Speaker 1: it's fairly short, and if you really you know, you 1447 01:17:31,560 --> 01:17:34,240 Speaker 1: read the memoir last year or ignored the memoir last year, 1448 01:17:34,280 --> 01:17:36,280 Speaker 1: and you want to really find out what happened with 1449 01:17:36,320 --> 01:17:39,160 Speaker 1: Andrew Clomo, what happened with COVID, Who is this guy? 1450 01:17:39,320 --> 01:17:42,519 Speaker 1: Why is he so powerful? I really think this is 1451 01:17:42,520 --> 01:17:44,439 Speaker 1: a book you will enjoy and you should go buy 1452 01:17:44,439 --> 01:17:47,040 Speaker 1: it from four Books. Today, I'm going to go ahead 1453 01:17:47,040 --> 01:17:49,040 Speaker 1: and a say in our audience did not read the 1454 01:17:49,080 --> 01:17:53,080 Speaker 1: Andrew Cuomo memoir. However, they should read your book because 1455 01:17:53,240 --> 01:17:56,479 Speaker 1: you have been the most astute observer, one of the 1456 01:17:56,479 --> 01:18:00,760 Speaker 1: most street observers, certainly of Cuomo and his failures. From 1457 01:18:00,760 --> 01:18:03,639 Speaker 1: the very beginning. You weren't buying into the media hype. 1458 01:18:04,280 --> 01:18:07,720 Speaker 1: You've had already a lot of journalistic revelations that have 1459 01:18:07,760 --> 01:18:09,840 Speaker 1: been important, and you're incredible writer. Everybody. We're going to 1460 01:18:09,920 --> 01:18:12,599 Speaker 1: put the information for the book down in the description 1461 01:18:12,680 --> 01:18:15,400 Speaker 1: so you can find it. Definitely check it out again. Ross, 1462 01:18:15,400 --> 01:18:17,120 Speaker 1: great to have you, Thanks for joining us on this 1463 01:18:17,280 --> 01:18:20,720 Speaker 1: spectacularly busy day for you. Thank you, Ross, Thank you 1464 01:18:20,760 --> 01:18:25,080 Speaker 1: for having me. Of course, thanks everybody for watching, guys, 1465 01:18:25,080 --> 01:18:27,840 Speaker 1: we really appreciate it. As a reminder, if you want 1466 01:18:27,840 --> 01:18:30,240 Speaker 1: to watch the full show, completely uncut, you can become 1467 01:18:30,280 --> 01:18:32,519 Speaker 1: a Premium member today. You get to listen to it 1468 01:18:32,560 --> 01:18:35,040 Speaker 1: as a full audio show as well, and you get 1469 01:18:35,080 --> 01:18:37,360 Speaker 1: to help support our work here. We're one hundred percent 1470 01:18:37,479 --> 01:18:40,720 Speaker 1: powered by Supercast. We love them. It's an awesome partnership 1471 01:18:40,720 --> 01:18:42,760 Speaker 1: and we will see you all on Thursday. Have a 1472 01:18:42,760 --> 01:18:59,599 Speaker 1: great day, guys, We'll see you back here on Thursday. Enjoy. 1473 01:19:00,000 --> 01:19:02,280 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the show. Guys, we really appreciate it. 1474 01:19:02,280 --> 01:19:04,280 Speaker 1: To help other people find the show, Go ahead and 1475 01:19:04,360 --> 01:19:07,200 Speaker 1: leave us a five star rating on Apple Podcasts or 1476 01:19:07,240 --> 01:19:10,439 Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Really helps other people find 1477 01:19:10,560 --> 01:19:14,080 Speaker 1: the show as always special thank you to Supercast for 1478 01:19:14,200 --> 01:19:17,080 Speaker 1: powering our premium membership. If you want to find out more, 1479 01:19:17,200 --> 01:19:19,360 Speaker 1: go to Crystalansager dot com