WEBVTT - I Never Meta Pixel That I Liked

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>John than Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio.

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>And how the Tech? Are you? A listener whom I

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>will refer to as are twe did in a request.

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>The reason I'm not giving the listener's name is that

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the request has to do with a privacy breach issue,

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and just to make sure I don't make a uncomfortable

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>situation even worse, I'm not going to say their name

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>on here, but I will say thank you are for

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>your request. Are wanted to know more about what is

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>now called meta pixel. Formally we would call it Facebook

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>pixel because some of ours personal data became compromised due

0:00:55.880 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to an issue with Novant Health which apply misconfigured a

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>pixel tracker, which led to the unintentional sharing of personal

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>patient information with Facebook, which included medical data. That medical

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>data would include stuff like a type of of doctor's

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>appointments someone was searching for, or which physician they selected

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to see that kind of thing. It didn't auto magically

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>know everything about a patient's medical history. It was more

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:31.559
<v Speaker 1>about specific activities having to do with an online tool.

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>So the pixel was meant to track the use of

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>this tool that no Vent had already launched but was

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>really promoting early on during the pandemic. The tool is

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>called my Chart. It's kind of a patient portal tool,

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and Novent was trying to get more patients to be

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>aware of it and to use it to do things

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>like schedule virtual doctor visits because of course at the

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>time most of us were stuck at home. So the

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>tracking tool was really intended to give feedback to Novent

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>about how it's marketing campaign on Facebook was performing and

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>whether or not it was actually leading to more people

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>making use of the tools. So the intentions were good,

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just it plaid out in a bad way. We'll

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>talk more about that later in this episode. So today

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about the meta or Facebook pixel,

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>what that is, where it came from, and some of

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the issues surrounding it. And while I'll mainly be talking

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>about Facebook in this episode when we're talking about the

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>platform used to display ads, pixel is something that also

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>plays a part in other meta platforms like Instagram. But

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:51.799
<v Speaker 1>let's let's start off, let's talk about what a pixel

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>with a little P is because obviously meta pixel that

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>pixels and upper case P so lower case P what

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is that kind of pixel? Normally, when I talk about

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>pixels in tech, i'm talking about the individual units in

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a digital display that make up the points of light

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that you see. When we talk about a displays resolution,

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>we're really talking about the number of pixels that are

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 1>on that display. You measure it by going horizontally so

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>across and vertically up and down the screen. So if

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I were to talk about Apple's sixteen inch macbuck Pro

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Retina display, that specific device has a resolution that shows

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>three thousand seventy two pixels across, So it's three thousand

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>seventy two pixels wide and one thousand nine twenty pixels tall.

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>You multiply those two numbers together and you get the

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>total number of pixels that display is capable of showing

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>at one time. For this particular device, that happens to

0:03:56.600 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>be five million, eight hundred thousand, two hut picks piles uh.

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>In a very general sense, the more pixels you have

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>in a display, the higher resolution it is. Resolution is

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>not the be all, end all of everything, but for

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a very long time, resolution was like the shorthand way

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of saying this display is better because the number is bigger.

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>That's what your mainstream customers understand. Bigger number means better tech.

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>It's not always true, but that is kind of like

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the easy shorthand. Anyway, when I'm talking about pixels, usually

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>these are the sort of things I'm talking about, these

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>little points of light. Either that or I'm talking about

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 1>a very disappointing film that starred Adam Sandler and Peter Dinglige.

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>But the less said about that pixels the better in

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, And in this case, neither of those definitions

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 1>really apply. The meta pixel, when you really get down

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to it, isn't truly a pixel at all, or rather,

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 1>it's not quote unquote just of pixel. It's really a

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 1>package of code that web masters can incorporate into their

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>own web pages, so it's more like a cookie than

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>an actual pixel. Now, there is a pixel created in

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>this process, at least initially there was, and it's a

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>one by one pixel, So it's a single point on

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a website, one little point. And usually it's transparent, so

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:29.799
<v Speaker 1>you can't actually see it. You're seeing through the pixel

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to the background, or it's it's coded in position so

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>that it blends right in with the background, so you

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>don't notice a pixel. That makes sense, because otherwise you

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>would have this tiny little point of light that was

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>out of sync with all the other pixels around it,

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and that would look strange. You might even think that

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 1>there was something wrong with your display. So there is

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a pixel involved technically, but the point of lay itself

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't really the important bit. It's the code underneath that matters,

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>all right, So the tracking pixel is more like a cookie.

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>But that raises the question what is a cookie? Right?

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>If you don't know what a cookie is a web cookie,

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>then that that's not a very satisfying explanation. So a

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:19.040
<v Speaker 1>web cookie is some data from a website that your

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 1>web browser will actually store within the browser itself, and

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the website can then retrieve that data stored in the

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 1>web browser later on. So let's say that you visit

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a website and you leave it, and then later on

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you go back to that website. The site could check

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to see if your browser already has a cookie from

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the site, and if it finds the cookie and the

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 1>data there indicates what you had been doing the last

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>time you were on the website, then the website can

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.679
<v Speaker 1>customize your experience so that you don't have to retrace

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>your steps. I'll give a very quick, simple example. Let's

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 1>say you go to an online store and you shop around,

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 1>and in your shopping you actually add a few things

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 1>to your online shopping cart, but you don't actually go

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 1>to the checkout process in the store. Let's say that

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>your session has been interrupted by something you had to

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>shut down and go do something else, uh, that demanded

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>your attention, and you come back later, you come back

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to your computer and you go back to this website. Well,

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the cookie in your web browser is what lets the

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>website know that you still have stuff in your virtual

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>shopping cart, so that you don't have to go through

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing again, lets you pick up where you

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>left off. And that is a very simple example, but

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a very powerful one because it shows how this

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>little tool makes using the web a seamless experience. In fact,

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>cookies emerged not long after the web. Did you know

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the web? It only been around for literally a couple

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of years, and a guy named lou Montouli created the

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>basic web cookie expressly for the purpose of making the

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>web rousing experience as seamless as possible. Because you don't

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>want to have a situation where you have to retrace

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>all your steps every time you go to a website,

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>whether that is logging into the site so that your

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>customer profile is there, or you know, having to pick

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>up where you left off in a search like that.

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>That stuff gets frustrating if you have to redo everything.

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>It would be kind of like if you were reading

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a book and you got to, you know, a page

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.119
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, and you had to put the book down,

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and when you pick the book back up again, instead

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of having to just go to page twenty three and

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 1>pick up where you left off, you actually had to

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>start skimming the book from page one until you got

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>to where you had stopped and then read it more.

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>That would be a very frustrating experience. No one would

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>read books. Arguably very few people are reading books now.

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure a lot of my listeners are the exception

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to that, because y'all are awesome. But you get what

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying. So you had different kinds of cookies. They

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 1>were aren't all one size fits sold. There are some

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>major major categories. For example, you had session cookies. These

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>exist only as long as you are visiting the site

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>in question, So This is just while you're on a site.

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 1>You might be navigating page to page on a single website,

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:21.559
<v Speaker 1>and the cookies are tracking you and keeping your your

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>session active so that as you navigate to these different pages,

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:30.679
<v Speaker 1>you're still having the seamless experience. But once you leave

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the site, the session expires, your browser deletes the cookie,

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't you know. Next time you go to

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the website, you're on a fresh slate. Essentially. Then you

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>have what are called persistent cookies or sometimes they're called

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>tracking cookies. These cookies live perpetually within your web browser.

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>They can't expire sometimes sometimes they don't have an expiration date,

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and really the only way to clear them is to

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>go through your browser settings and to clear cookies, to

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>delete cookies. Uh, some of you have probably done that,

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>where you've gone through to do things like clear out

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>your cash and delete browsing cookies. These are cookies that

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 1>can store stuff like your overall browsing habits, and obviously

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that can become really helpful if you're hoping to learn

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>more about the people who visit your site, like you

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>can actually see what people have been clicking on on

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>your site. By installing and programming in the right kind

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of cookies, and that can tell you a lot like

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that can be really valuable information. Not not necessarily just

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:36.199
<v Speaker 1>to exploit the data of you know, people their personal information.

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.199
<v Speaker 1>It could be useful just from a design perspective, right,

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Like you can look and see, oh, based on the

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:46.079
<v Speaker 1>information I'm getting from these cookies, people are gravitating towards

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>these buttons that are on the site, but they're ignoring

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>these others. So maybe I don't need to offer the

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>buttons that everyone's ignoring, or maybe I need to reposition

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>them or redesign them so that people actually use them.

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>So there are legitimate uses for cookies that can help

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>webmasters create better websites, which means people visiting those websites

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>have a better experience. That's a I think an overall

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>benign use of cookies. You can also use them to

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:18.559
<v Speaker 1>learn more about the people who visit your site. If

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you're offering you know, products or services, you can use

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that information to learn which ones are really popular, which

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>ones are speaking to your audience, and it might tell

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you that you need to shift your business strategy in

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>order to maximize that effectiveness. You might also be able

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to learn things about the people that don't directly relate

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to your website. Maybe through the design of a cookie,

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you learned that a lot of the people who are

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>visiting your site have of shared love of, say, anime,

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.199
<v Speaker 1>which could indicate that maybe you should get some anime

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>inspired merchandise in your store. And obviously, if you go

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>down that pathway where you are looking at users behaviors

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that don't directly relate to your own business, this gets

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty darn creepy, pretty darn fast, and it can really

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>become a privacy concern. But don't worry. When we talk

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>about pixel that's gonna blow all of this out of

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the water. They go nuclear. So that's your your your

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>typical tracking or persistent cookie. There are also things called

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>super cookies. Sometimes they're called zombie cookies. Uh. These are

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>different from web based cookies. For one thing, you can't

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:37.839
<v Speaker 1>delete them by clearing out your cash of cookies in

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>your browser. They don't live there. Super cookies typically come

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>from Internet service providers, and so these are little bits

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of code that end up tracking user activity. So your

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I s P knows which websites you visit and how

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>long you're there and where you went from that point.

0:12:55.920 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>They can actually track you across different browsers and different devices.

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>So let's say you go into incognito or private mode,

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>WELLS still tracking you there too, because you're still connecting

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:10.439
<v Speaker 1>to your Internet service provider. Those little data packets are

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>still going to your I s P and telling your

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.199
<v Speaker 1>I SP what you're up to. So you're in anonymous

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>or incognito mode or whatever it may be called, that's

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>not good enough. Your I s P still knows where

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you're going. Now, you you can definitely get more protection

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 1>if you restrict yourself to just using encrypted connections. So

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>these are connections where the sites you visit are using

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, HTTPS. So if you see that little padlock

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>icon and the padlock is closed, that indicates that you're good,

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that this is an encrypted transaction. So the I s

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>P is getting less information about what you're doing. They

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>can see where you're going, but they can't really see

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing. Or you could go a step further

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and rely on a VPN. Now, this, as far as

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I know, is not a VbN sponsored show. It may

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:00.199
<v Speaker 1>be that someday an ad for a VPN will play

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>against the show, but as of the time of recording,

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I have no connection to any VPN. I'm not gonna

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>mentioned any specific ones, but VPNs are good tools to

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>have and research them, y'all. If you're gonna use one,

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>make sure that it's a reputable VPN that preferably doesn't

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>hold on to customer information at least for any real

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>length of time. But if you use the VPN, then

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that will end up kind of letting you bypass this

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I s P issue because all the I s P

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>will see is that you visited the VPN, and then

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>all other traffic will go through the VPN, so the

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I s P will be unable to see what you

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>are going where you're visiting. The VPN, however, can see,

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>which is why you want to really research your VPN

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>providers to make sure that you know they're not just

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>acting like an I s P and tracking everything you

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>do through them. All Right, That kind of gives us

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a overview of what cookies are and their purpose on

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the web, and pretty early on folks got concerned about cookies,

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>tracking them and gathering information. It's one of the big

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>drivers for the privacy rules in the European Union, the

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>most recent being the g d p R rules. It's

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>why the EU requires websites to request permission to use cookies,

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's supposed to make them not just get consent,

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>but explain why cookies are used and how they are

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>used and how a person's personal information could be used.

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>So that kind of sets the scene. We're gonna take

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a quick break. When we come back, we'll talk more

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 1>about what we used to call Facebook Pixel and how

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that came to be. But first let's take this break. Okay,

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>we're back. We just talked about cookies. Let's talk about

0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the emergence and evolution of Facebook Pixel or Meta pixel. Now,

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that tool originally debuted back in so it's been around

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>for nearly a decade. At this point, well before Pixel,

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Facebook had relied on other advertisising tools. So advertising has

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>long been the way that Facebook has generated revenue. It's

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>just that the strategy for how to do that through

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>advertising has changed. So in the olden days before two

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven, we're talking about stuff like good old banner

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>ads with a very select group of advertisers, and that

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>was it. So essentially everyone going to Facebook was seeing

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the same you know, ads displayed when they would log

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>into their profile and there would be a banner ad

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>along the side or along the top of the page,

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and that was it. Now, in late two thousand seven,

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Facebook created an ad strategy that would let any business

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>purchase ads on Facebook. So now it was no longer

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>this select group of partners that Facebook would work with,

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 1>but rather more businesses. Now. I would say that that

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>decision wasn't just Facebook saying we're limiting ourselves too much.

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 1>It was that Facebook was growing to a point where

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:15.880
<v Speaker 1>other businesses said, this is a valuable place to put ads.

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:18.880
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like choosing to put up a billboard

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:22.360
<v Speaker 1>ad along a very busy highway that that's gonna get

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>literally more traffic than if you had that same billboard

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>ad put up against a rarely used back road. Right.

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Facebook was starting to become a highway, so there was

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:38.919
<v Speaker 1>a push to have advertisers, more advertisers put their ads

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>up on Facebook, and in those early days, the main

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>strategy was to put up an ad that would drive

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Facebook users to go to the associated Businesses Facebook page.

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>So there were business pages that you could visit. They

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.639
<v Speaker 1>were very much like a Facebook profile, but it was

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:58.199
<v Speaker 1>a profile for a business, not for a person, and

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>then you could subscribe to that business you know, you

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 1>could quote unquote like it is what we would say

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 1>these days, and that would mean that you were essentially

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>granting permission to the business to publish posts that would

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>appear on your Facebook feed as if the business were

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>one of your friends. Right, This was like opening up

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a door to serve up ad content to potential customers.

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>But while that was attractive to businesses, that was not

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>nearly as powerful as what would come later. Facebook executives

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>realized that they were sitting on a freaking gold mine.

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.679
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think this realization was like a sudden thing.

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I think this was something that gradually came to grasp.

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>So they had this rapidly growing community of users who

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 1>were on Facebook a lot, and Facebook was getting a

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:48.640
<v Speaker 1>ton of insight on what people liked and what they

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>felt were important just by looking at what they were

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>doing on the platform. Right, you just track the behavior

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>on the platform and Facebook and you start to see

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>what kind of things are ending. You know, what people like,

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 1>what people are responding to. And so Facebook began pouring

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 1>resources into making more sophisticated ad tools that could leverage

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>this information, because you know, this data is valuable, but

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:14.880
<v Speaker 1>you have to do something with it in order to

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:18.959
<v Speaker 1>realize that value. Right, you don't magically just make money

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.719
<v Speaker 1>because the data is valuable, you have to put it

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to work some way. Facebook's approach was to reach out

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to advertising companies and say, hey, your clients want an

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>effective ad campaign. That means you have to make sure

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>that you have the right ads showing up in front

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of the right people, and we can help you do

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that by giving you access to tools that will help

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you target ads to the people who are most likely

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to act on those ads. What's more, we're making a

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>tool that can live on your clients sites, so the

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>end business and keep track of when people act on

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>an ad, including when someone actually makes a purchase based

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.679
<v Speaker 1>off an ad, so your clients will know that the

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>ads are valuable and thus your service is a valuable service,

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and they'll stay your client. That was a very powerful

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:12.160
<v Speaker 1>sales pitch to the advertising agencies because you know, it's

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of a rising tides situation for three of the

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 1>parties involved in this, Facebook ad agencies and the end

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>businesses that want to advertise on Facebook, and mostly we're

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna just look at the businesses and Facebook and kind

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of remove ad agencies from the conversation because they kind

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of get in the way when we're talking about this,

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately, while they serve a very important purpose, uh

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>for the for the purposes of our discussion, we can

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>largely ignore them. So on one end, you have the

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>businesses that we're buying up ads. These companies ultimately want

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>more customers, right, and more sales. That's what they want.

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>That's the whole purpose of marketing is to bring attention

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and then business to your business, right. So those are

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the most important elements to them, our customers and more,

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, purchases, so and ads effectiveness is critically important.

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>And if you found out that the ad that you

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:12.360
<v Speaker 1>had purchased was not driving customers to your products or services,

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you'd cut that ad and you might not work with

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>that ad agency again because it's like throwing money away.

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>You want to make sure that the dollars you budget

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>for marketing are returning value, that there is a positive

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>return on investment. So for the advertising companies, those companies

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>that service kind of a go between for businesses and

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the platforms where the ads will appear. Facebook's pitch was

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 1>really attractive. The platform's tools would give real time feedback

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>on how well an ad was performing, and which audiences

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:45.479
<v Speaker 1>were responding best to the ad, and even insight into

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the different groups and what they liked and disliked, which

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>would then help advertisers when they were crafting ads in

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 1>the first place, to make a more effective ad in

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the future. So this gave advertisers a chance to offer

0:21:56.520 --> 0:22:00.640
<v Speaker 1>more valuable services to their clients, so again more benefit.

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>As for Facebook, this was like striking oil because the

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 1>company could demonstrate the effectiveness of this tool, the pixel,

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:12.199
<v Speaker 1>and begin to demand higher fees from advertisers because of

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the proof and how effective the strategy was. Facebook's revenues

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>with skyrocket and considering that almost all of Facebook's revenue,

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>like up to ninety seven point nine according to Statista, anyway,

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>all of that was coming from advertising, like the tiniest

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>percentage we're coming from other sources. So Facebook is a

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>preferred nexus for ads, and advertising strategy is critical for

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>company success. All right, So let's talk about what pixel

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 1>is beyond some lines of JavaScript code and a one

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>by one point on a website. By the way, JavaScript

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>just benefits to mention this really quickly. JavaScript is a

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>web focused programming language that's in plain text. It essentially

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>determines web page behavior, so you can use JavaScript to

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to uh create specific behaviors on web pages based on

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>user interactions. JavaScript is not related to the programming language

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that's called Java, which is admittedly a very confusing thing.

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Java and JavaScript are not related at all. Java is

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:25.400
<v Speaker 1>a programming language that has to be compiled. JavaScript isn't

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>because it's a plain text programming or scripting language. Anyway,

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 1>no need to go into all of that now. I

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>just felt like it's always good to mention it because

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>it's something I get hung up on occasionally. I keep

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I have, in the best made the blunder of referring

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 1>to something that was written in JavaScript as being written

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>in Java, and the two cannot be. You know, they're

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:47.919
<v Speaker 1>not the same thing. You should not confuse the two now. Originally,

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Facebook introduced a few different pixel tools and most of

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>which have kind of merged into a single tool today.

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>So there was the website custom Audience pixel and the

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Facebook Conversion pixel, and these tools were meant to provide

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a connection. So it was acting like a link between

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and the end business that was advertising on Facebook,

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:15.919
<v Speaker 1>and it was a two way communications link between the

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>two parties. Here's how the idea would manifest. You would

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 1>have a website they would enter into the pixel program.

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 1>As part of that, they would insert this JavaScript code

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>into their web code, which would insert the pixel into

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the website for the business. So now this pixel component

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 1>is an integrated component within the target business and links

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 1>back to Facebook. So you have a user on Facebook.

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's say you're on Facebook and you're browsing through your

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 1>Facebook feed and you come across an ad that shows

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.880
<v Speaker 1>this really cute puppy dog leash, and you know that

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 1>leash is going to look amazing with your beloved puppers.

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>So you click on the ad and it takes you

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to the corresponding businesses shopping page for the leash. Maybe

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>you actually add the leash to your online shopping cart,

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe you go so far as to purchase the leash. Now,

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>in the old days, Facebook would be able to tell

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that you had clicked on the ad, but that would

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>be it. That's all they would know. They knew that

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you clicked on the ad and you went to the page.

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>What happened after that would have been a mystery. But

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 1>because this particular business had installed the pixel within its

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>web code, it can actually send data back to Facebook

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 1>that not only did you visit the page, it could

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 1>include everything else you did once you got to the page,

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>including stuff like adding the leash to your cart or

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>even purchasing it. Well, let's look at this same scenario,

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>but let's reverse things a little bit. Let's say instead

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:49.479
<v Speaker 1>of you seeing an ad on Facebook, you open up

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>your web browser and you're just shopping for a new

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>dog leash. You're looking for a new leash for your dog,

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and your search takes you to this business. And you

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>look at the listings for leashes on this business and

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you see this super cute doggie leash. Maybe you even

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>click on it and add it to your online cart,

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.360
<v Speaker 1>but you leave the site without actually making the purchase.

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>You you haven't really decided to pull the trigger yet,

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:20.160
<v Speaker 1>so you exit your browsing session. But this business has

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>installed a meta pixel on its web page, right, So

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the code in the background on this business is web

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>page notes that you've visited, and that it sees that

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you spent time on the site, that you browsed through

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:39.959
<v Speaker 1>it that you visited the the page for this particular leash,

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.479
<v Speaker 1>and you know the fact that you even put that

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>leash in your online cart, but you didn't seal the deal,

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 1>you didn't buy it, and through pixel it sends that

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>data to Facebook. So Facebook gets the information about your

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>visit to this business. Even though you didn't come to

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the business from Facebook itself, you naturally arrived at the

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>business through your housing, through your searching. Right well, Facebook

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>notices that this particular data relates to you, you know,

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a Facebook user, and that means that Facebook can now

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>start serving up targeted ads for this business to you

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>through your Facebook feed, which it's essentially reminding you about

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 1>that adorable leash you saw and probably the fact that

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you could still buy it you just hopped on over

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to the business. So not only can Facebook provide valuable

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>information about which ads on the platform are effective for

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>specific users, Facebook can also offer to serve up ads

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:41.919
<v Speaker 1>to users who have already demonstrated an interest in the business. So,

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:44.920
<v Speaker 1>in other words, like a business, the's double value, right,

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 1>they see value by being able to see how well

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>their ads are performing on Facebook, but also they can

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>have their ads that are in Facebook's database served up

0:27:56.760 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to users who had already visited the business independently. That

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 1>is an enormous benefit. Like if the commercials on your television,

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:11.159
<v Speaker 1>know what shops you've been visiting, and can send you

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 1>ads that relate to those shops. That would be transformational

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:19.119
<v Speaker 1>for the TV advertising business. It's also kind of something

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that's being talked about in smart TV circles, but it's

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>already happening on the web. And another huge benefit from

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Facebook to these businesses is that Facebook is analyzing user

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>behavior across more than a billion users worldwide. Right, that's

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a huge amount of information about user activity and preferences.

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 1>So as data flows back from browser activity prompted by

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>these pixel links between Facebook and businesses, Facebook can analyze

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the types of ads that are more effective than others.

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Which ones actually prompt people to go and visit a business,

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>which ones go even a step further and convince people

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to purchase goods and services. This is what we call

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a conversion in the ad biz. It converts someone from

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>being a browser to an actual customer. The information itself

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 1>by itself has value, as it can mean the advertising

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 1>strategies can be adjusted and evolved to become more effective

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>over time. Plus, Facebook can dynamically target users who are

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>more likely to respond positively to a specific type of advertisement.

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Now this type of data feedback loop continues to benefit

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>all the parties involved. Well, I mean, you could argue

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that users are kind of left out of this discussion, right,

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>like we the individual users who go to Facebook don't

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>necessarily benefit so much from this all. You could argue

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that with this approach, you're theoretically going to at least

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 1>encounter ads that are more relevant and interesting to you,

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>So you could say that that's a benefit. But otherwise,

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>we are of the product that's being exploited here. So

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:06.479
<v Speaker 1>Facebook was uncovering a really uncomfortable truth about all of us,

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's the fact that we're not maybe as special

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and unique as we like to think we are. I'm

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>not judging you, by the way. I'm sure that you,

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the person listening to this, you are an amazing person.

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>You've got quirks and you've got traits, You've got all

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>these things that make you you, and you're the only

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you out there. But the truth of the matter is

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that when you start to accumulate data about more than

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a billion users, you're bound to start seeing some patterns emerge,

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and those patterns create what Facebook calls look alike audiences,

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>meaning that Facebook could identify populations of users who are

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>most likely to respond to specific products or specific messaging,

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>because what they would do is they would say, this

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>person here has responded positively to an AD, whether that's

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>by clicking on it or actually going and becoming a conversion. Right,

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>they can say that person marks a positive experience for

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>that AD. We have analyzed that person's behavior, and we

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>have identified all these other people who share similar qualities

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to that in this one particular arena, this very niche case.

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 1>And by serving up the AD to that audience of

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 1>people who have these similar traits, we have a higher

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 1>likelihood of that AD having more positive responses. So that

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>means that you could be more of a you could

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>give more of a guarantee to your businesses that the

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 1>right AD is going to go to the right people

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>at the right time. And Facebook transformed online advertising, or

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>at least it kicked it up a big old notch,

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>because there are other companies that are doing very similar things,

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>like Google is another example. All Right, we're gonna take

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>another break. When we come back, I'm going to talk

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 1>about another thing that was happening at the same time

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 1>as the pixel debuting and how that became another important

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>element with Facebook's advertising strategy. But first this break. Before

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the break, I alluded to the fact that something else

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>was going on around the same time that the pixel

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>was debuting, and that was the mobile revolution. By that,

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean that by two thousand thirteen, the smartphone was

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>firmly established as a popular device, and more people were

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>using smartphones to interact with the web. That was transforming

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the web itself. You want to talk about disruption, smartphones

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 1>disrupted the web. Web page administrators were scrambling to optimize

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 1>their sites for the mobile experience. If your audience has

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 1>turned to mobile devices in order to access the web,

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>it only makes sense to cater to that audience, or

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 1>else you risk losing it. I saw that firsthand over

0:32:56.840 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 1>at How Stuff Works as we tried to figure out

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the best way to remain elevant while still writing heavily

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>researched articles. This was an uncertain time. In general. It

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 1>was filled with experimentation across the web, as content creators

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 1>were testing out different approaches, from creating more short form

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>content designed to be consumed in little bites, to an

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>over reliance on video content. In fact, we could do

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a whole episode on the mistakes that various sites and

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>businesses made in an effort to stay relevant or to

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 1>capture attention during this transition to the mobile web. Everything

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>from Whimby to entire newsrooms getting gutted in favor of

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 1>small and frankly criminally overworked teams of video producers. Full

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of that springs to mind, But the reason I bring

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 1>it up here is that Facebook was able to unify

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the desktop and mobile experience when it comes to add customers.

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Because these sites, because they were connected to Facebook through pixels,

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and because users were connected to their Facebook accounts across

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>multiple platforms like computers and smartphones, Facebook and its advertisers

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 1>could track users even when those users were switching from

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 1>one device to another. Because of this underlying connection to Facebook,

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 1>both the businesses had it and the users had it.

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:22.799
<v Speaker 1>So here's another simple but very effective example. Let's say

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm on my phone on my Facebook app and I

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:27.919
<v Speaker 1>see that ad for a dog leash, and I tap

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 1>on the ad using my phone and I look at

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the leash more closely. But let's say I don't do

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:35.799
<v Speaker 1>anything at the time other than that, and then later

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>on I'm on my laptop and I'm working away and

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Facebook knows that I clicked on that ad in the

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 1>mobile version, and that furthermore, it knows because of pixel

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that I didn't go any further than just looking at

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the leash. Maybe I've just forgotten about it, right. So

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 1>let's say I'm on my laptop and I go to

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 1>check my Facebook profile and I encounter the ad on

0:34:58.920 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>my lad top profile, not my mobile one, or maybe

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a different ad, but it still features that leash, and

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that reminds me of that thing I was interested in

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 1>but didn't actually purchase, and now maybe I will purchase it.

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 1>My experience has tracked across devices from smartphones to laptop,

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and it can go the other way as well. So again,

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>like maybe I'm on my phone and I'm browsing this

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 1>shop and I see this leash, and then later I'm

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:28.240
<v Speaker 1>on my laptop and I go to my Facebook profile

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:30.879
<v Speaker 1>and there's the ad for the leash. So let's say

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 1>you really want to deck out your home for Halloween.

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>This is another great example because it's something that I

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:40.320
<v Speaker 1>can relate to because I like Halloween, My partner loves Halloween.

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 1>We have friends who obsess over Halloween, and so we

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 1>frequently are trying to come up with fun ways to

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 1>decorate for Halloween, and so we will search for Halloween

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 1>decorations and other content that relates to Halloween. Now, Facebook

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know what I'm searching for on Google, right, It

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:05.280
<v Speaker 1>can't see the things that I'm searching for. However, because

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 1>at least some of the sites I visit happen to

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 1>have pixel incorporated into them. There's this invisible Facebook presence there.

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:16.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't, no, automatically it's there because I

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 1>can't see it, right, this little transparent pixel. I don't

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>know that it's there, but it is, and that pixel

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 1>cookie is collecting information about my visit and sends that

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to Facebook. So then the next time I popped into Facebook,

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I would see an awful lot of Halloween themed ads

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 1>popping up in my feed. And you know, maybe I

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 1>would assume that part of the reason for that is

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>just because we're approaching the holiday. I mean, I don't

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 1>know when you start seeing Halloween ads, but August is

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:49.720
<v Speaker 1>become a pretty common for me, sometimes even in July,

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and so everyone is probably seeing at least some uptick

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 1>in Halloween content. So you could say, all right, well,

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:58.240
<v Speaker 1>this is just because it's seasonal, But really the reason

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 1>is because Facebook knows what I've been looking at. It

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 1>knows what sites have been going to and what I've

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:06.799
<v Speaker 1>been browsing, and so Facebook has catered the ads that

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 1>I see to be more likely to appeal to me

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 1>and to get me to act on those ads. And

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 1>this is dynamic obviously, so I'm not suggesting that from

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 1>this moment forward, I will only get Halloween content. Instead,

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I would be likely to see stuff relating to whatever

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 1>it is I've been browsing around that time. This is

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 1>why you sometimes get that weird feeling that Facebook is

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 1>spying on you. Like if you've been independently shopping for

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>shoes online and then you notice that when you go

0:37:36.120 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to Facebook all your ads are relating to shoes, you

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 1>might think Facebook's peeping on you, and it is kind

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 1>of And the reason for that is because the sites

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you've been shopping on have pixel incorporated into them. So

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Facebook knows what you're shopping for because of these behind

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the scenes agreements with these stores, and it's more likely

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:59.879
<v Speaker 1>to happen as you visit online shops. But even other

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>types of sites can have pixel installed within them. So

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:06.400
<v Speaker 1>while we mostly are thinking about like online stores or

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:10.479
<v Speaker 1>companies that offer a specific service. You can sometimes find

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Pixel installed on things that you wouldn't immediately associate with commerce.

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:18.840
<v Speaker 1>So this means that if your job is to, I

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know, research various stuff online in order to make

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 1>a podcast, your Facebook feed ads might reflect that and

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 1>show you lots of ads that you're not actually interested in,

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:32.360
<v Speaker 1>but somehow relate back to whatever it was you were researching. Uh.

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess that I actually haven't visited Facebook

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in a really long time, so I can't say that

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:40.839
<v Speaker 1>for sure from a first person perspective, but it is

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the sort of thing that I noticed occasionally. So again,

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the pixel tool works in both directions. It's like installing

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a tiny little spy in every store, and it's well

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:55.719
<v Speaker 1>every store that opts to work with Facebook in this way.

0:38:55.800 --> 0:38:57.959
<v Speaker 1>So the stores want the spy there because the spy

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 1>knows which Facebook users have visited the store, it can

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:04.800
<v Speaker 1>reinforce the store's presence by feeding ads for the store

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to those users whenever they're on Facebook. Facebook wants the

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:11.240
<v Speaker 1>spy there because it helps the platform make its tools

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:14.319
<v Speaker 1>more effective, and if they're more effective, then they are

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 1>more valuable to customers, which means Facebook can charge more

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 1>money for them. Now, I know it sounds like I'm

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 1>saying the same thing over and over, but I really

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>wanted to drive all this home to explain how this

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 1>system works and how your information factors into it. Now,

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:33.360
<v Speaker 1>when a business chooses to use Pixel, they actually have

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 1>options when it comes to the types of information it

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:39.880
<v Speaker 1>will share with Facebook and how Facebook should treat ads

0:39:39.960 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 1>for the business. For example, the lookalike audience tool is

0:39:44.560 --> 0:39:47.279
<v Speaker 1>an option you can choose. You don't have to use it.

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 1>So with a lookalike audience tool, Facebook will pull information

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:54.840
<v Speaker 1>from the business's website. It will look from matches and

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Facebook's profiles for users who have visited that business, and

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 1>then search for other our profiles that shows similarity with

0:40:02.640 --> 0:40:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the users who have actively visited the business and serve

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:09.440
<v Speaker 1>them the ad in order to increase the scope the

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 1>reach of this business. This brings us to no Vent.

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>So that was the the health care business I was

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:19.439
<v Speaker 1>talking about the top of this show. No Vent has

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:22.879
<v Speaker 1>this web based portal tool called my Chart. In May

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:27.239
<v Speaker 1>of Novent pushed out a marketing campaign on Facebook to

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 1>raise patient awareness of my Chart, with the hopes of

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:34.239
<v Speaker 1>providing services to more patients who otherwise were isolated due

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to the pandemic. So no Vent entered into the Pixel

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:41.240
<v Speaker 1>program so that it could track the performance of the

0:40:41.239 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the campaign on Facebook, presumably also tracking the performance of

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the tool itself in order to get more insight onto

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:51.040
<v Speaker 1>what was working in what needed to be tweaked, and

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 1>all of that makes sense, But the problem was that

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:57.319
<v Speaker 1>the way no Vent had configured its Pixel agreement meant

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that Facebook was getting more information about patients then was intended.

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:04.360
<v Speaker 1>No Vent issued a statement about this whole thing, and

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it sounds to me like the company wasn't really fully

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:11.240
<v Speaker 1>aware of the two way nature of this arrangement with Pixel.

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's an unfair assumption. I'm just drawing it based

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:21.360
<v Speaker 1>upon the statement itself. But anyway, people who visited Novent's

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 1>site where Pixel was installed, or people who used related

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:29.759
<v Speaker 1>services where no Vent was ultimately offering the services but

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't necessarily the the the entity in the forefront things

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 1>like scheduling a vaccine, well, inadvertently, these people were sharing

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:45.840
<v Speaker 1>their personal information, including their activities relating to healthcare, with Facebook.

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:49.359
<v Speaker 1>No Vent sent out alerts to affected users, including folks

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:53.240
<v Speaker 1>who weren't even aware that they were Novant customers because

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 1>again they were doing stuff like scheduling a vaccination through

0:41:56.560 --> 0:42:01.400
<v Speaker 1>an affiliate, but they weren't directly dealing with NOVN, or

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:04.080
<v Speaker 1>at least they weren't knowingly directly dealing with NOVN, and

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 1>they would get these notifications. And it also included people

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:09.840
<v Speaker 1>like our who was the one who wrote to me

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 1>in the first place, who don't have Facebook profiles, because again,

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the information was sent to Facebook that related to people

0:42:16.760 --> 0:42:20.239
<v Speaker 1>who were active on this Novent page, whether they were

0:42:20.239 --> 0:42:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Facebook users or not. So you didn't have to have

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a profile for you to be affected. Now, even in

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the US, where privacy laws are pretty darn pathetic, we

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:31.520
<v Speaker 1>still have strict standards when it comes to medical data,

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and so no Vent was trying to get ahead of

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 1>this and offering services like credit monitoring to certain affected folks. Now,

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 1>according to no Vent, the vast majority of people who

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:46.279
<v Speaker 1>are affected by this, they didn't have information like their

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:50.799
<v Speaker 1>Social Security number or any other financial info leaked that

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that was not part of these uh these these transmissions,

0:42:55.440 --> 0:42:58.760
<v Speaker 1>but the statement implies that at least in a few

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:03.640
<v Speaker 1>cases that did happen, which is a big old yikes. Now,

0:43:03.680 --> 0:43:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Novents stressed that meta had shown no sign of having

0:43:06.600 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>inappropriately used this information, and that while this was an

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:17.080
<v Speaker 1>improper example of sharing information like private and sensitive data,

0:43:17.360 --> 0:43:20.280
<v Speaker 1>it didn't go any further than that, at least according

0:43:20.320 --> 0:43:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to the statement. But there are some developing class action

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits that are aimed at Facebook and some hospitals that

0:43:28.760 --> 0:43:31.960
<v Speaker 1>indicate that this is not always the case. It may

0:43:31.960 --> 0:43:33.960
<v Speaker 1>be the case with Novent, it may be that Facebook

0:43:34.000 --> 0:43:37.000
<v Speaker 1>did not act in properly with the data beyond the

0:43:37.000 --> 0:43:40.319
<v Speaker 1>fact that it received data it shouldn't have. But in

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:45.439
<v Speaker 1>other cases, at least according to allegations in lawsuits, other

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 1>things have developed. So in early August of this year,

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 1>two for those listening from the future, two different proposed

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:55.840
<v Speaker 1>class action lawsuits alleged that Facebook and certain U S

0:43:55.920 --> 0:44:01.319
<v Speaker 1>hospitals had violated patient privacy laws through pick full So.

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:05.359
<v Speaker 1>The lawsuits claim that a lot of hospitals, in fact,

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:08.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty three of the top one hospitals in the United

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:13.360
<v Speaker 1>States according to the markup, had inserted meta pixel into

0:44:13.719 --> 0:44:18.319
<v Speaker 1>their hospital websites, and that at seven of those hospitals

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that installation happened on password protected patient portals, which is

0:44:24.440 --> 0:44:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of alliteration. And also it sounds not good

0:44:28.120 --> 0:44:31.320
<v Speaker 1>with a capital in in a capital G. And since

0:44:31.360 --> 0:44:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Pixel can track user activity such as which options a

0:44:35.160 --> 0:44:39.680
<v Speaker 1>user clicks on as they navigate a patient portal where

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Pixel has been installed, that means Facebook was gathering up

0:44:43.040 --> 0:44:47.400
<v Speaker 1>data relating to people's health conditions. So one lawsuit alleges

0:44:47.440 --> 0:44:51.840
<v Speaker 1>that a patient, after using her hospital's portal, visited her

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Facebook profile and saw that the ads that she was

0:44:55.160 --> 0:44:59.440
<v Speaker 1>encountering in her profile all related to her medical conditions.

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Now that is a huge problem if it is true,

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:09.320
<v Speaker 1>because not only is Facebook receiving sensitive medical information which

0:45:09.560 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 1>it already should not be doing, it is then acting

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:17.319
<v Speaker 1>on the information in order to profit from it, which

0:45:17.360 --> 0:45:20.279
<v Speaker 1>it absolutely shouldn't be doing. That's a big old you

0:45:20.600 --> 0:45:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and raises tons of ethical concerns. Now, when it comes

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:28.399
<v Speaker 1>to placing blame for this, you can point fingers both

0:45:28.440 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 1>at Facebook slash Meta and at the hospitals which the

0:45:33.120 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits are doing. Meta says that it's really the responsibility

0:45:37.000 --> 0:45:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of Pixel customers to ensure that they have the right

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to share the information that they're going to send to Meta.

0:45:44.440 --> 0:45:48.080
<v Speaker 1>That Meta is not responsible for the info that a

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:52.600
<v Speaker 1>endpoint shares with them because they're they're not in control

0:45:52.600 --> 0:45:54.719
<v Speaker 1>of that. That's the collection point, and it should be

0:45:54.760 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 1>at the collection point where the end business makes certain

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it's only electing the information it is legally allowed to

0:46:03.320 --> 0:46:06.400
<v Speaker 1>share with Meta, which kind of makes sense, right, And

0:46:06.440 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 1>then Meta also says that it actively filters out sensitive

0:46:10.040 --> 0:46:14.760
<v Speaker 1>health data. Now, the lawsuit says that this is mostly

0:46:14.840 --> 0:46:17.480
<v Speaker 1>posturing on Meta's part, and that Meta has failed to

0:46:17.600 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 1>enforce its own policies, and that even allowing Pixel to

0:46:21.840 --> 0:46:25.880
<v Speaker 1>be on healthcare websites, even for for Meta to market

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Pixel to healthcare companies, shows that Meta is not taking

0:46:30.800 --> 0:46:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a responsible and in this case, legal stance when it

0:46:35.040 --> 0:46:38.960
<v Speaker 1>comes to sensitive health data. The lawsuit also names the

0:46:39.000 --> 0:46:41.719
<v Speaker 1>hospitals as defendants, which I add here because I think

0:46:41.760 --> 0:46:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it's only fair that we not let hospitals off the hook.

0:46:45.040 --> 0:46:48.280
<v Speaker 1>It's not like the hospitals were forced to use Pixel,

0:46:48.840 --> 0:46:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think you can make a very strong argument

0:46:51.000 --> 0:46:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that the hospitals have the obligation to research Pixel thoroughly

0:46:55.400 --> 0:46:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and to ensure that their use of the tool would

0:46:58.080 --> 0:47:02.080
<v Speaker 1>not compromise patient data, and clearly that did not happen.

0:47:02.440 --> 0:47:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Assuming that the allegations and these proposed lawsuits are accurate,

0:47:06.440 --> 0:47:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of course, if it turns out these allegations are baseless,

0:47:09.719 --> 0:47:13.080
<v Speaker 1>then maybe the hospitals did their due diligence and that's great,

0:47:13.320 --> 0:47:16.640
<v Speaker 1>but according to these lawsuits, that did not happen. Alright.

0:47:16.680 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 1>So let's say your Facebook user and you do not

0:47:20.200 --> 0:47:23.680
<v Speaker 1>want those personalized ads popping up whenever you visit Facebook

0:47:23.800 --> 0:47:26.440
<v Speaker 1>because you think it's creepy. Well, you can actually choose

0:47:26.480 --> 0:47:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to change your off Facebook activity in your user settings.

0:47:30.880 --> 0:47:34.120
<v Speaker 1>You can go into your user settings, find off Facebook activity,

0:47:34.440 --> 0:47:37.479
<v Speaker 1>and you can turn those targeted ads off. So doing

0:47:37.520 --> 0:47:39.560
<v Speaker 1>that means that Facebook is no longer going to serve

0:47:39.600 --> 0:47:43.359
<v Speaker 1>you ads based upon your browsing behaviors, which is great, right,

0:47:43.920 --> 0:47:47.319
<v Speaker 1>except it's not totally great because Facebook is still completely

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:50.640
<v Speaker 1>tracking you. The tracking is still happening, you're just not

0:47:50.680 --> 0:47:53.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing the ads based off of it. So it's not

0:47:53.040 --> 0:47:56.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna serve you up ads based on the information it's tracking.

0:47:57.040 --> 0:48:00.400
<v Speaker 1>But the proliferation of meta pixel across the web means

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that frequently your browsing behavior is just being logged and

0:48:03.880 --> 0:48:05.920
<v Speaker 1>sent to Facebook anyway, and so it's building up a

0:48:05.960 --> 0:48:09.120
<v Speaker 1>profile on you, even if it can't act directly on

0:48:09.160 --> 0:48:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that within the Facebook experience. So if you have a

0:48:12.200 --> 0:48:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Facebook account, and if you're not browsing in incognito mode

0:48:15.880 --> 0:48:19.319
<v Speaker 1>and maybe using a VPN, chances are Facebook is able

0:48:19.360 --> 0:48:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to link your behavior to you the person. Now, if

0:48:23.080 --> 0:48:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you are browsing in incognito and through a VPN, Facebook

0:48:26.200 --> 0:48:28.319
<v Speaker 1>is probably not going to figure out it's you. The

0:48:28.360 --> 0:48:31.840
<v Speaker 1>company will have a data point that someone went to

0:48:32.000 --> 0:48:34.759
<v Speaker 1>this website and did something, but I won't know that

0:48:34.760 --> 0:48:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that someone was you. But then it's hard to do

0:48:37.320 --> 0:48:40.919
<v Speaker 1>useful stuff when you're going pure incognito and VPN. When

0:48:40.920 --> 0:48:44.319
<v Speaker 1>it comes to commerce, it gets tricky. Then. Now, you're

0:48:44.360 --> 0:48:46.640
<v Speaker 1>also going to still see ads on Facebook if you

0:48:46.719 --> 0:48:49.840
<v Speaker 1>opt out of this off Facebook tracking activity is just

0:48:49.960 --> 0:48:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that the ads won't be targeted to you. So you

0:48:53.480 --> 0:48:55.960
<v Speaker 1>could argue that the only thing that really changes is

0:48:55.960 --> 0:48:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that you're not confronted with your browsing activities through your

0:48:59.040 --> 0:49:02.640
<v Speaker 1>ad experience on Facebook. But everything else remains the same.

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:06.760
<v Speaker 1>All Right. That was it for Meta Slash Facebook Pixel.

0:49:06.760 --> 0:49:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I hope you enjoyed that. If you have suggestions for

0:49:09.200 --> 0:49:11.439
<v Speaker 1>topics I should cover in future episodes of tech Stuff,

0:49:11.880 --> 0:49:14.440
<v Speaker 1>reach out to me. You can leave a voice message

0:49:14.440 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 1>on the I Heart radio app. Just go to tech

0:49:16.200 --> 0:49:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Stuff hit that little microphone icon or leave me a

0:49:19.239 --> 0:49:22.040
<v Speaker 1>tweet like our diad and the handle we use is

0:49:22.200 --> 0:49:26.280
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff h SWS and I'll talk to you again

0:49:27.400 --> 0:49:36.680
<v Speaker 1>really soon. Tech Stuff is an I Heart Radio production.

0:49:36.920 --> 0:49:39.759
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from I Heart Radio, visit the i

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:49:43.120 --> 0:49:44.040
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.