WEBVTT - Concealed Carry and ICE: The Edge of the Second Amendment

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Alzoone Media. Welcome back to It could Happen Here, a

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>podcast where Robert Evans is slightly adjusting the levels on

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>his microphone because I am in New Orleans traveling and

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>with my friend and city resident and former guest of

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the pod, Carla carl.

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the show.

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for having me. Robert. It's great to be back.

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we've done a few episodes in the past

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 4>on different podcasts, and it's always I don't want to

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 4>say a treat, but it's good to work with you

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 4>because some of the topics, of course, are pretty rough.

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you and I have talked, i think primarily

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>in our previous episodes about both like digital security and

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:43.919
<v Speaker 1>then guns, Like we've talked about people getting into shooting.

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about like kind of what's responsible and irresponsible

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to training and firearms advice. And today

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of starting by talking about guns in a

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:57.959
<v Speaker 1>different context, which is the fact that specifically they are

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>often used as an excuse by a law enforcement like

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the fear of the fear or the reality of them

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in being armed, as an excuse for killing them. Right,

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about the killing of Filando Castile in

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>July of twenty sixteen, who was a black man who

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>was stopped by the police and a legal license concealed

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 1>carry holder and was shot during that traffic stop because

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the officer panicked. But the case that's right now on

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>people's minds is the case of Alex Pretty, who was

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>killed by Border patrol earlier this year. Was wearing a

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.319
<v Speaker 1>gun during a confrontation, but he was just filming. They

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:33.119
<v Speaker 1>stripped him of his weapon, and they shot and executed

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>him in a case that has actually drawn criticism from

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>gun rights organizations towards the Trump administration, which doesn't happen often.

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 1>But I think the kind of point you brought up

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.320
<v Speaker 1>when you and I started talking about this was that

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>what happened to Pretty, you know, not only can you

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>go back to other cases where law enforcement have shot

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>people legally concealed carrying, as we talked about with Castile,

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>but this is not a thing that is the result

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of the escalation of the Trump administration's use of bord

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>patrol and ice. This this is a long standing behavior

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that border patrol agents have exercised and been exercising elsewhere

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>for years. Like what happened to Preddy is novel because

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>he was a white guy in the middle of Minneapolis.

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>But it's not a novel because Border patrol shot and

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>killed somebody and then justified it by saying he had

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a gun.

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's border patrol, and really by that extension of

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 4>all law enforcement in the US, because there's so many examples,

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 4>it's almost hard to draw out just one or two.

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 4>You can go for on forever for this, but there's

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 4>some real prominent ones that make a lot of sense.

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 4>In fact, even here in New Orleans, right after Katrina,

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 4>there were a family that were crossing a bridge trying

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 4>to just recover some water and supplies, and a bunch

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.399
<v Speaker 4>of law enforcement officers jumped into unmarked vehicles, ran over

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 4>on a bridge, jumped out, and with unauthorized guns, including Ak's,

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 4>unloaded on them, and it was called the Danziger Bridge shootings.

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 4>I have a video on the channel about it. And

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 4>this is where this gets relevant. They not only shot them,

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 4>they chased them down from a moving vehicle and killed

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 4>them in their back with a shotgun while he was

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 4>running away. But they used the pretense of them being

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 4>armed even though they were not, by dropping drop guns

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 4>and calling them ham sandwiches. So again, the pretest of

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 4>there were guns, therefore were allowed to kill them is

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 4>just an example of that, right there.

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and this is really interesting because, first off, you

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>get the gun rights people, or at least a chunk

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of the conservative gun rights people, who will come out

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 1>whenever someone actually is carrying a gun. But the fact

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that this happens so much more often, where the police

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>just kill someone and say because we thought they had

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a gun, is also I mean, it's a human rights issue,

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 1>but it is a Second Amendment issue, right, You've got

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>this weird dichotomy. We're on the right the existence of

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the second because it's often said that like, oh, the

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>presence of a gun, even though you have the Second

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Amendment means the police can kill you. But the reality

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>is that the existence of guns in the country means

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that the police have the ability to justify killing and

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>border patrol has the ability to justify killing someone for no.

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 4>Reason, which it really brings up a really interesting question because,

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 4>i mean, the Second Amendment is literally the second amendment

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 4>of the Bill of Rights, which is now right enshrined

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 4>directly in the Constitution. It's the first freedom of speech,

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 4>and the second one is the right to kill and

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 4>bare arms, and so if that is a constitutional right,

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 4>even in instances where you see like Alex Pretty who

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 4>is a legally licensed CCW holder, still can be killed

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 4>with essentially no justice being delivered for their actions. Raises

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 4>a very interesting question about how is a right a

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 4>right when they can kill you for the presence of

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 4>a gun, even when it's legally possessed and not even

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 4>being used in a offensive manner, like even if it's

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 4>just on you or they think there's one there, suddenly

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 4>they can kill you and nothing comes of it. And

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 4>that's the case with so many instances. I got a

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 4>few more here if you want, Like Daniel Shaver, this

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 4>is one in Masis. It's not border patrol, but it's

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:35.919
<v Speaker 4>still law enforcement. It has the precedent of the problem.

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 4>Twenty sixteen, he was a Texas exterminator. He was traveling

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 4>through Arizona and he was up in his hotel room

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 4>and someone on the street saw him or thought they

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 4>saw him messing with a firearm. Turned out it was

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 4>like a pellet gun or something he used to shoot rats.

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 4>But they rolled up, they called him out of his

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 4>room and in a very horrific video of screaming at

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 4>him and giving very inconsistent commands, along with another gun

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 4>that was illegally modified or at least not authorized to

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 4>be modified, where they dust cover on the air fifteen

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 4>said you're fucked on it. They unloaded on him while

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 4>he was crawling on his hands and knees, begging for

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:07.039
<v Speaker 4>his life, literally begging for his life in the video,

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 4>and again really nothing came of it. In fact, the

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 4>officer that shot him ended up getting back on the

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 4>force just long enough to give him essentially a life

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 4>pension for the trauma he received for killing the man.

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 4>So the presence or the perceived presence of a firearm

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 4>justified them killing him while he was crawling on his

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 4>hands and knees.

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've talked about the warrior cop ethos and

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 1>guys like Colonel Grossman who have helped to inculcate this

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>idea in law enforcement that you are in like dire

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>threat of immediate death every second of every day, as

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>like the sworn law enforcement officer, and thus you have

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to react like this, right like, you have to react

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>immediately with lethal force the instant someone like reaches into

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a pocket or I can't tell you how many times

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:50.840
<v Speaker 1>it protests. I can remember one really clear time from

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:52.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty where.

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 2>I was with a group of people.

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>They were promising to arrest all of us, and I

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>was kind of talking to the police officer basically being like,

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>looker the mayor's most recent orders, like we are allowed

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to be out here.

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:04.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Anyway, it was a whole thing.

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>But one of the protesters, who is just kind of

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>standing behind me, very nervous, like, reached into his pocket.

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what it was to get a phone,

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and all of the officers tend stuff, and I had

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to be like, don't fucking go, like, keep your hands visible, man,

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Like we're standing in front of a bunch of and

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't have to do that, right, putting your hands

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>in your pocket shouldn't be a justification for a man

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>pulling a gun and blowing you away with the authority

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of the state behind him. But the reality of this

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>situation is that like, whenever I am talking to police officers,

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:33.679
<v Speaker 1>I keep my hands in front.

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Of me and fucking visible.

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 4>It produced a situation in which regular American citizens or

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 4>we'll get into this too. The tahona Otum Reservation members,

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 4>Indian members members of the tribe. You have to be

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 4>as a civilian trained how to interact with these very

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 4>dangerous people who have been given.

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 2>An ideology of like killology.

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 4>You mentioned Lieutenant Colonel Grossman, who actually never shot on

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 4>anyone himself, but was one of the sea crystals of

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 4>this training mentality in which he espoused don't be afraid

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 4>to shoot. Only thing that's going to happen is you

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 4>might get sued, but don't worry about getting sued. It

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 4>just gives you a little break and some time off

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 4>the force until you get it cleared. He's on video

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 4>saying this stuff, and that mentality so imbued into all

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 4>of the law enforcement agencies now presents a problem where

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 4>the legal right of having a firearm is I'd say

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 4>very questionable that it's a right when they have all

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 4>authorization to kill you for the thought or presence of

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 4>a gun. And it shouldn't be civilians, just regular people

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 4>that have to be trained how to deal with these

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 4>dangerous agents of the state, because they're the ones that

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 4>are indoctrinated into this fear mindset when we're prayed to

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 4>at this point because they can kill you and nothing

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 4>seems to come of it.

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the thing when we were chatting about this

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of behind the scenes that you brought up that

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>was really interesting to me to emphasize was the degree

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to which this is not a training problem, Right, this

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>is not a lack of training problem. You hear a

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>lot on the kind of more moderate democrat side of

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>things about how we need to be retraining these agents,

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and that like the murder of Renee Good, the murder

0:07:57.400 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of Alex Pretty is the result of like bad training

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>behalf of Border per control, and it's kind of part

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of this whole rogue agency thing you get with Border

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Patrol and ice that like because of the Trump administration

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and how they've flooded it with bad recruits and how

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>they're not getting properly trained. That's why things have been

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>so deadly. And when you look at the history of

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>how Border Patrol has worked on things like the Tahanamodo Reservation,

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>what you see is a whole bunch of cases that

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>sound a lot like what happened to Rena Good and

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Alex Petty. They're just not happening to white people in Minneapolis, right.

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 4>I think that's something that a lot of people who

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 4>haven't had the experience of living near the border, because

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 4>I also spend a lot of my life in Arizona

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:39.079
<v Speaker 4>near Tucson, and therefore the tahuna Otum reservations right there,

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 4>and therefore have some insight into the things that go

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 4>on right there near the border. And this is not new.

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 4>The thing that's new is that it's being extended across

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 4>the country and now into internal spaces. But the policies

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 4>and the way the Border Patrol and Ice have acted

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 4>is by no means a new standard. For example, not

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:58.439
<v Speaker 4>only with the firearms, but their instances at least two instances,

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.439
<v Speaker 4>if not more, in which there's verified video of Border

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 4>patrol agents intentionally swerving their vehicles to hit tribal members.

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 4>It's on footage, not only car footage, but footage of

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 4>the cell phone being struck. One instance at Leach, they

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:14.319
<v Speaker 4>were killed. Another instance they were hurt, and with that footage,

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 4>even though it very clearly the car swerved to hit them,

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 4>nothing came of it. So it's hard to not see

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 4>that there's something going on here. I don't think this

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 4>is a train anything. I don't think they're training them

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 4>to run over people. But there's some cultural maliciousness that's

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 4>imbued into some of this that's hard to ignore. Another

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 4>example of that was in twenty twenty three there was

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 4>a TOO member, Raymond Mattia, that he was called for

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 4>supposedly there was gunfire herd, and so border patrol shows

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 4>up and he's in front of his house and he

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 4>reached for his cell phone in his pocket much like

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 4>you just described. Again, Wow, there's a recurring theme here.

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 4>And he was shot nine times, thirty eight rounds fired killed.

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 4>He had no gun on him, he was just a

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 4>TOO member, and therefore it didn't really make any press.

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Again, you see, this is a qualified immunity problem, right,

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and it go back to that. And there's been some

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>talk of, like if you're going with the reforming ice

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>rather than the abolishing thing, which is you know, certainly

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>something a lot of Democrats talk about, Like I've heard

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>some discussion of like, well, maybe removing qualified immunity.

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 2>At least for border patrol and ICE.

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's so much bigger of a problem than that,

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Like I certainly will I will accept any reductions in

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 1>qualified immunity for law enforcement.

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Because that's where a lot of this starts.

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>But even without that, if these go to court, if

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:32.839
<v Speaker 1>the officer in that specific shooting had gone to court

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>for that specific shooting. I think there's a very good,

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>if not overwhelmingly likely chance that he would have just

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 1>been able to argue as in fear of my life. Right,

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>everyone knows how dangerous police officers' jobs are. Of course,

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you reach into a bocket around them,

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you're signing your own death warrant. And some of my

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:50.839
<v Speaker 1>problem with this is the degree to which Americans, and

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is starting to shift, but things are as

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>bad as they are because for a very long time,

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Americans were willing to go along with the idea that

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>police officers lie were so dangerous and their jobs were

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>so important that almost any violence they meet out is

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>justified by the danger that they exist in. And I

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>want to talk more about that with you, but first

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>here's some ads.

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 2>And we're back, Karl.

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna hand back to Mike to you if we're

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>going to continue ourtist cut.

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 4>That's the challenge that I see with all these and

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 4>these are just like again, a handful of examples of

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 4>which there are so many you can't even enumerate them all.

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 4>I mentioned the Danziger Bridge shootings, in which two men

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 4>were killed and there was really no justice came for that,

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 4>although there was long trials and almost almost someone got

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:46.839
<v Speaker 4>in trouble, but not really. They all eventually got out

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 4>with very little justice. Daniel Shaver was killed in Mesa.

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 4>That guy got pension, Borlando Castile, nothing really came of that.

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 4>Paul O Reims the guy hit by the Border patrol

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 4>sev nothing came of that. Another example, while this was

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 4>a protester to Guita in twenty twenty three, protesting cop

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 4>City was unloaded on in his tent where they said

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 4>he had a firearm. Again another similar example fourteen times

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 4>and was killed in the process. Hey everybody, Carli here

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 4>and an important update to the podcast. Once it was released,

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 4>we quickly realized that there was a mistake embedded in

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 4>it and it really kind of lies on me. We

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 4>recorded this today after Marti gram That's no excuse. We

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 4>were both a little tired. But at the same time

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 4>we had a conversation in which we discussed we just

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 4>remove this from the podcast entirely, just snip it out,

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:34.959
<v Speaker 4>and both of us came to the same conclusion that

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 4>it was too important to leave Tortuguita's story in the podcast,

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 4>because the reality is they're not talked about as much

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 4>as they should be, and what happened to Tortegito matters

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 4>very much and it should be kept in the public consciousness,

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 4>especially since the bodycam footage has not been released. But

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 4>in this I mistakenly used the pronoun he and him,

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 4>and Robert followed suit, just because we were kind of

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 4>recording together in that time and space, and this was

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 4>recorded very live and raw and real. But tortu Ghita,

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.959
<v Speaker 4>the queer indigenous activists that gave their life fighting against

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 4>Cop City, went by they them. So please accept my

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 4>apology and our apology for this mistake in the podcast.

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 4>But again we wanted to leave it in because it

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 4>was too important and too significant to tell Torteguito's story

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 4>than it.

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Was to snip it out due to this mistake.

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 4>So hopefully you'll understand and accept this disclaimer and apology

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.719
<v Speaker 4>for this mistake and realized that was of course not intentional.

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:39.199
<v Speaker 4>There was a bunch of actual bodycam footage that's never

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 4>been released to the public. But at the same time,

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:43.959
<v Speaker 4>the autopsy of him showed that his hands were up

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 4>in the position he was in when he got hit

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:48.199
<v Speaker 4>with those multiple fourteen rounds, but we don't even get

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 4>to see the bodycam footage. And there was audio where

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 4>the cops at least implied that one of the cops

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 4>shot one of the other cops and that's what instigated

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 4>the shooting.

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>It's the kind of thing that like, we don't know

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>what happened in the shoot of Tortuguhito, right We simply

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know, in part because they haven't released a lot

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of the information. And right now, the burden of proof

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 1>is on Tortighita in this case, or you know, people

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 1>who think he was unjustly killed, to prove that he

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't shoot the officer, as opposed to where I would

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>argue the burden of proof should be, which is on

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the agents of the state. He shot somebody, right, Like,

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>if you were going to say this kid pulled a

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>gun and fired on you, I want the proof and

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it's on you to give me the proof. And if

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you the police do not prove beyond a shadow of

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a doubt that you were in fear for your life

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>in being attacked when you use deadly force, my assumption

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to be that you murdered a guy.

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's.

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>How everyone should feel, right, Like that should be how

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>we treat police violence in any society, not this the

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>United States. I mean, if you're listening to this in

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the UK or Germany and you're a reasonable person, I

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>would think that your attitude should be Yes. If a

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Bobby or whatever the Germans call their police kills somebody,

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>he should should have to prove that he or she

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>should have to prove that they were an immediate fear

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of their life, which is not so different from anybody else, right,

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I can think of I can think of one police

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>shooting that I saw a video of spreading on Twitter,

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>where like a guy was literally like sprinting around in

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>traffic with a gun, like pointing it at people in

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>traffic and got shot and killed by an officer. And

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I was like, look, if I'd had a gun and

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>felt like I could take the shot, I might have

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>shot that guy too, because he was parjacking people at

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>gunpoint and pointing a firearm.

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 2>And they're like, yeah, that's the.

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Case in which maybe you have to shoot a guy

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>because like he could kill someone at any second, right,

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not going to judge a police officer for

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>shooting in that instance, but I wouldn't judge a civilian either.

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a different standard for them. If you

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>are a cop or a civilian and somebody shoots at you,

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you have the right to defend yourself, right, but you

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>also should expect to prove that they were.

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Trying to hurt you.

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 4>This is the challenge I have with all of this is,

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 4>like you said, in any instance that's a self defense shooting,

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 4>And in this and in many instances, law enforcement are

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 4>put in a situation where they're not necessarily even defending themselves,

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 4>but defending the community or others, and therefore they have justification.

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm not to say here to say that every law

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 4>enforcement shooting is not justified.

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Many of them are.

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 4>But in the instances where there are questionable circumstances, of

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 4>which many we've just enumerated here, even instances in which

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 4>they have body cams on which are supposed to be

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 4>would validate their actions, but they won't release it to

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 4>the public to see it. It draws a very significant

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 4>question of the validity of these events and what they're

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 4>doing and why there I would say no better way

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 4>to say than covering something up. In fact, going back

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 4>to Lieutenant Colonel Grossman. There's a video of him talking

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 4>about law enforcement, which of course extends to ice and

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 4>border patrol, as the samurai of the land. And you know,

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 4>that reference isn't really a good one because when you

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 4>know what the samurai are, that's a disturbing statement. But

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 4>in his mind, he's making this point that they have

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 4>these tools that are for life and death and the

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 4>right to essentially kill, and referring to them as samurai.

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 4>And I think that mindset is sadly very much permeating

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 4>the law enforcement agencies of this country.

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's the myths of the warrior cop.

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think one of my frustrats here stems from

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>just as someone like you, I carry a firearm regularly,

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think a lot about what would happen if

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>I had to use it. And I think about not

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>just the practicality of like, okay, am I trained properly

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to use this thing competently, you know, but what would

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the order of operations need to be if somebody tries

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to kill me and I successfully kill or injure them

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:21.360
<v Speaker 1>with a firearm, Well, I'm going to need to call

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the police immediately. I'm going to need to contact a

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:28.360
<v Speaker 1>lawyer immediately, I'm going to hope that there are eyewitnesses there.

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to hope and seek to provide as much

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.360
<v Speaker 1>evidence that I possibly can that I had no other

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:35.120
<v Speaker 1>choice to do what I was going to do. Right,

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 1>any civilian carrying a firearm responsibly thinks about the same

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>things about like if I am in a shooting. First off,

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>there's the question of I need to defend myself, But

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>then there's immediately the question if I need to defend

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>myself in court. And police don't have that second part,

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>not really, not in a way that matters.

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 4>And this, to me is why the Alex Pretty situation,

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 4>which was so visibly documented by multiple cameras, is such

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 4>a concern because in this instance, we see two officers

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 4>unload on the guy. One guy shoots him at least

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:05.640
<v Speaker 4>once or twice, and then another guy unloads on him again,

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 4>and we have multiple video angles. Yet the narrative from

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 4>them is that this guy was attacking them, which is

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 4>clearly not the case on the video. I mean, you

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 4>can look at it from multiple angles. Whether or not

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 4>you agree with his protest methods, he was not attacking anyone.

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 4>He was standing between them, getting pepper sprayed and being

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 4>beaten with pepper spray can and then getting unloaded on

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 4>and at the same time, we now live in this

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 4>situation where at least some parts of the firearms community

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 4>or gun community, which isn't owning a thing, isn't a community,

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 4>but we use that term gun community. Like you said,

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 4>some of these rights groups have said something, but the

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 4>response to this is still disturbing to me, because there's

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people saying, well, don't show up to

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 4>a protest with a gun, don't be in public with

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 4>a gun, you can't bring gun. In fact, we saw

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 4>parts of the Trump administration saying, don't show up with

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 4>a gun. This man had a handgun and two magazines

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 4>on him looking for trouble. Well, if he was, he

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 4>didn't have the gun out. And by the way, carrying

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:58.400
<v Speaker 4>a handgun with an extra magazine is by no means abnormal.

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 4>In fact, that's a normal procedure for most people that concealed.

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Carrie.

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 4>If you and I were hanging out on the street

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 4>and we decided that we got into a fight with

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 4>some guy, you know, Sheila Woof comes out of the

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 4>bar and starts swinging on us, and then and then

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 4>not only did we punch him and knock them to

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 4>the ground, You shoot him and then I shoot him

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 4>nine more times.

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 3>And there's video evidence of that. We're going to jail forever.

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 4>But we have footage of these guys doing this and

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 4>really nothing comes of it.

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Part of like what I really want to get across

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to people is how bog standard this behavior is. The

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>agents that shot Preddy were experienced veterans. They were not newbies.

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>They were not proud boys who just gotten inducted into

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the force, you know, and tasked with doing vigilante justice.

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>They were sworn law enforcement officers with decorated careers, and

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>they were acting the way the average cop expects people

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to act in a lot of situations, or at least

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>at least a significant chunk of the law enforcement community

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 1>expects police officers to be able to act right.

0:19:58.520 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 2>Like I don't know that.

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:01.679
<v Speaker 1>I think most police officers are going to shoot a

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>man who has been disarmed when he's in the middle

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of a pile of guys who have their hands on him.

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 1>But most police officers will defend their colleagues who do

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the same right. That's almost more of the issue. It's

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>not that the average police officer is looking for an

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 1>excuse to shoot somebody. It's that there's enough of those

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 1>guys on the force and all of their friends support

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>them when they do it right, And that doesn't exist

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>on the civilian side of things, right I think about

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>like in Portland, we had a mass shooting that was

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>stopped by a protester who was then gave himself up

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to the police and was taken into custody.

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 2>He was initially charged with murder.

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 1>And if there was the knowledge as a police officer

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that if I shoot someone, whether or not it's totally justified,

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.959
<v Speaker 1>the next few months of my life are fucked completely.

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not getting time off to chill. I am having

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to defend myself and have some of the worst stress

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of my life. Maybe we'd have fewer police shootings, right

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>if they knew it was going to be a miserable

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>situation whenever they drew their gun and fired on somebody.

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think you have to have that be the understanding.

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>And I know, like the counterpoint that at least police

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>defenders will come up with is like, well that might

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 1>make them less likely to defend themselves, and like, well,

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 1>then why are you calling them heroes? If you're not

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>expecting them to risk their lives the good of the

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>body politic. Right, We'll talk more about this, but first, ads.

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 3>What's really interesting about this?

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 4>And I would think, I mean, I'm sure you have

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 4>a really large amount of cops in the audience here,

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 4>but here's the thing. Really, everyone should be concerned about this,

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 4>even cops, even border patrol, even ice. Law enforcement in

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 4>general should be concerned about this because as this activity

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 4>becomes frankly more common and more accepted in their ranks,

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 4>that thin blue line being not one about solidarity but

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 4>one of silence and lack of justice. That puts them

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 4>a danger too, because if a person or people are

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 4>so afraid of the reality of the fact that they

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:06.400
<v Speaker 4>can be just executed in the street with no repercussions

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 4>of it, it sort of gives civilians, well, it takes

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 4>away our trust in the system. There's no due process.

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 4>You can just die for nothing, for having a cell

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 4>phone in your pocket. It'll make some people more reckless

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 4>in their actions when dealing with law enforcement, because they

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:20.640
<v Speaker 4>are like, what do I have to lose, I'm gonna

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 4>die anyway.

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>It's the same logical problem as if you're like, well,

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>armed robberies should have the same consequences as killing a guy,

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>or they should be very similar. Your life should be

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>over either way. Well, then what's the reason not to

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 1>shoot someone and kill them at a robbery. Leaving them

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>alive just increases the odds they identify you. If you're

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at the difference between thirty years in prison or

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:41.959
<v Speaker 1>fifty years in prison for robbery and murder, why not

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 1>just commit the murder right Like, it's this calculus that's

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>being forced on people. If you know, any time the

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>police take you into custody or start to move to

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 1>put hands on you, you feel like there's a very

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>good chance they're just going to murder you. Then people

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>are going to start making very different choices when they're

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>physically in contact with the police, and that makes life

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot more dangerous for everybody. And that's part of

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>why this is what we're seeing is just so fucking irresponsible.

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 4>And historically there's realities for this too, depending on what

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 4>part of the community or who you know, your demographic

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 4>if you want to go back to the past, whether

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 4>or not you agree or disagree with like the politics

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 4>or actions of for example, the Black Panthers, The reality

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 4>is because black men were just shot by cops with

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 4>no justice being delivered. Ever, they started taking on strategies

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 4>and policies that reflected that feer and concern. But now

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 4>that's being extended to people well beyond that. When we

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 4>see middle class VA nurses with a license being killed

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 4>the same way, well, this is what's been going on

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 4>in those communities for decades and decades, well before the

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 4>Civil War. Let's be realistic. And so I'm not saying

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:46.679
<v Speaker 4>that was right or wrong, but I'm saying it is

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:49.439
<v Speaker 4>a logical conclusion. When you fear that the agents of

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 4>the state can kill you and there's no justice to

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 4>ever be had, well what do you have to lose.

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>When we were talking about this early, you brought up

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>something the Attorney General of Arizona had said recently on

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:04.919
<v Speaker 1>the subject of ice agents who are not identifiable as

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement coming to your door with guns.

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 4>I don't have the direct quote, but I'm paraphrasing here,

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 4>but it was along the lines of if people are

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 4>at your doors that are unidentified with masks in Arizona,

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 4>the castle doctrine essentially provides you the right to use

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 4>force against them. And that is a very interesting statement

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 4>to be made by someone as high in power of

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 4>government of a state level at that point. But I

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 4>mean there's some truth to that, and the reality is

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:32.239
<v Speaker 4>when people aren't identifiable, it is very easy to show up.

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 4>And I mean we've already seen examples of people pretending

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:36.679
<v Speaker 4>to be ice because it's very easy to put on

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 4>some body armors, some camouflage and a mask and look

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 4>like these guys that are not identifiable. And therefore, when

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:46.160
<v Speaker 4>that is the case, how do you know what's there

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 4>and what you're facing is even law enforcement in the

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 4>first place?

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, And this is Chris Mays, Chris with a hey,

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>who's a Democrat, and the Arizona Attorney General. And as

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you said, the way that it was framed in this

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>conversation was basically, this is a disaster because if you

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>have law enforcement agents that you can't identify, people absolutely

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>have a right to just start blasting in Arizona based.

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 2>On Castle doctrine.

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, the interviewer in that brom Resnik, asked like,

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>are you giving people permission to shoot federal agents? And

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 1>May said, like, the law does, right, Like that's the issue.

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:23.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, how do you know if some guy's just

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>in a mask at your door with a gun.

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 2>How do you know?

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 1>And the fact that you're expecting Americans, a jumpy country

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 1>of paranoid conspiracy theorists with four hundred million guns to

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>see masked men at their doors and show discretion, it

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>seems like a bad bet to me.

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, this comes back to the point I was making.

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 4>I don't think the Attorney General was there. What was saying,

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 4>just go shoot federal agents. I don't think that was

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 4>the point. The point was simply what I mentioned earlier,

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 4>which is when you can't identify or you don't know

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 4>what is going on, or you're in a situation in

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 4>which these people are not acting in a reasonable manner,

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 4>you don't know what you're dealing with. It's the same

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:00.719
<v Speaker 4>thing I mentioned earlier, in which if you're that concern

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 4>or you don't believe that due process or justice is

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 4>going to be served, your decision making logic might very

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 4>well change. And like you said, in a country where

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 4>many people are armed, I think this is something that

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 4>every side of this issue should be concerned about, including

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 4>the law enforcement agents, because they are at risk too.

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 4>As this continues, the risk to them increases, which will

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 4>then be used to justify more force against civilians because

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 4>it's a vicious circle.

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's a fun note to end on. Carl.

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.199
<v Speaker 1>I want to direct people towards en Range TV. You

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that you have a video about one of the

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>shootings that we talked about, so I want to let

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you kind of plug that at the end.

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, thanks, Robert, I appreciate that a lot. So in

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 4>Range TV is my video project. It's about ten years

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 4>old now. You can just find it at range dot tv,

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 4>which is my website, or you can just google in

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 4>range TV on YouTube and you'll find it immediately. The

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 4>algorithm will give it to you, but the search engines

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 4>might and the video that I'm referencing there, and there's

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 4>a lot of them on there in regards to topics

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 4>like this historically speaking, but the specific one about danziger

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 4>Bridge is right there. So if you go to range

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 4>TV and type in danziger Bridge dam Zingr, you will

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 4>find that two thousand and five shooting, which is just

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:06.159
<v Speaker 4>an example of so many of these had happened. And

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 4>I do have some discussions on there about recent events

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 4>about Alex Pretty and such as well. So Robert, thank

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 4>you for having me back on the show. I always

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 4>appreciate it, and I appreciate our collaborations, and hopefully somehow

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 4>this stuff makes a difference.

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I hope so too.

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 1>But at least I think it gives people something to

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>like expect, right, like to look at this is kind

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of the cycle we're going to continue to see unless

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:31.640
<v Speaker 1>they pull back, unless ice and border patrols start using

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a great deal more discretion. Like, I think we've given

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>people an idea of like where the future is trending,

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I unfortunately I'm not super optimistic about

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>it right now, but you know, tomorrow's unwritten.

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 2>It could happen Here is a production of cool Zone Media.

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Coolzonemedia dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts. Wherever you listen to podcasts, you can now

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 1>find sources for it could Happen here listed directly in

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:05.719
<v Speaker 1>episode descriptions.

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening.