WEBVTT - BI Weekend: T-Mobile Earnings, DeepSeek "Panic"

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steele and Paul Sweeney.

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 3>The real our performance has been the US corporate high yield.

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 4>Are the companies lean enough? Have they trimmed all the fats?

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:22.440
<v Speaker 3>The semiconductor business is a really cyclical.

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:26.079
<v Speaker 2>Business, breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 4>Do investors like the M and A that we've seen?

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 3>These are two big time blue chip companies.

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 4>Window between the peak and cut changing super.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Fast Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steele and Paul Sweeney.

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 5>On Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 6>On Today's Bloomberg Intelligent Show, We're going to dig inside

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 6>the big business stories impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 6>Each week we provide in depth research and data on

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 6>some of the two thousand companies and one hundred and

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 6>thirty industries our analysts cover worldwide. Today, we're going to

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 6>discuss how Chinese AI startup Deep Seek challenge Silicon Valley's

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 6>assumptions about the cost of artificial intelligence, plus why shares

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 6>of jeff Blue Airways took a hit last week. But first,

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 6>a look into corporate earnings from one of the largest

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 6>wireless carriers in the US. TEA Mobile reported fourth quarter

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 6>results that beat analyst projections, and the results were driven

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:17.759
<v Speaker 6>by growth and wireless subscriptions and home internet customers. For more,

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 6>guest host John Tucker and Paul Sweeney were joined by

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 6>t Mobile CEO Mike Sievert, and they first asked Mike

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 6>for his take on the company's most recent earnings.

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:29.919
<v Speaker 7>We're just consistently outperforming expectations, and that's what the market

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 7>looks for in a business like ours. We're taking share,

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 7>we're growing, and then across the board we beat expectations.

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 7>We just finished the strongest growth here ever in our history.

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 7>And that's saying something because we have a story to

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 7>growth history in this company and a lot of people

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 7>wonder is the big growth run behind us, and we

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 7>just demonstrated yet again, No, it's not.

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 8>It's hard for me to get really excited about my

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 8>mobile service provider. But your customers, it's like they were

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 8>in a cult. What's the secret sauce? That's my softball question.

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 7>You know, our value, our corporate values start with this

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 7>basic idea. Love our customers, you know, give them more,

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 7>ask less of them.

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 5>And they notice. That's it's just a huge part.

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 7>Of our brand, and we have this thing we do

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 7>called T Mobile Tuesdays where every week customers come to

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 7>our Tea Life app, which has fifty million users, and

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 7>they engage to find out how are we rewarding them

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 7>this week?

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 5>Do you know what this week's was?

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 7>We gave away a shack Burger like the world's best

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 7>burger for free to every single teams Reflix.

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely so, Mike, this is you're in a competitive business.

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 3>I think about the wireless business, the barriers to change

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 3>are pretty minimal. Churn is always an issue. Your competitors

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 3>are depocketed, they're good competitors. Is it just you guys

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 3>switching customers all the time just for deals. Talk to

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 3>us about the churn for your company.

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 7>Your business well churns at historic lows across the industry,

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 7>not just T Mobile. We just had our best churn

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 7>year ever, So people aren't switching a lot when they

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 7>are switching the net share takers tea Mobiles.

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 5>This is a great trend. You know.

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 7>I don't need for others to fail in order for

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 7>us to succeed in our business. This is a great neighborhood.

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 7>We just happen to be the best house in the neighborhood,

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 7>and so we're out growing everyone. But this is a healthy,

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 7>vibrant sector. Everyone's you know, growing and making money. I

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 7>think that's great. Part of it is people can't get

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 7>enough of the service that we all offer at T Mobile.

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 7>You know, we just guide it again to a big

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:30.079
<v Speaker 7>year of revenue gains per customer. And that's not because

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 7>of pricing. It's because customers are self selecting up our

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 7>rate card to our higher priced offers because they see

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 7>the superior value and they want what we have to sell.

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 7>That's a great dynamic, not just for T Mobile, but

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 7>for the industry.

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 8>The growth strategy is organic or M and A or what.

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 5>It's organic principally.

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 7>I mean, we do have a number of M and

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 7>A deals in the pipeline that we're intending to close

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 7>this year, centered around fiber, centered around you know, other

0:03:56.040 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 7>add ons. We're also in, you know, acquiring a cellular company,

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 7>US Cellular.

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 5>So but by far, the.

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 7>Growth is an organic growth story focused on taking share,

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 7>adding revenues, deepening relationships with the existing customers that now

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 7>number well past one hundred million.

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 8>I don't understand like outdoor advertising, what does that have

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 8>to do with your business.

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, we just announced the acquisition of a company called Vistar,

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 7>and you know we are in We're a billion dollar

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 7>advertising support company already, so it's a significant business for us.

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 7>We call it marketing services for marketers buy marketers. T

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 7>Mobile is a very famous marketer, and marketers want services

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 7>from us, so we provide that already. But our Tea

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:42.799
<v Speaker 7>Life app part of what it does is it asks

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 7>customers buy the millions whether they would like to opt in.

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 7>Opt in to make their digital life better and their

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 7>advertising more relevant.

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 5>And then we can use.

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 7>Data to provide marketers with an ability to put advertising

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 7>in front of customers that they will actually appreciate.

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 5>And our dream with place.

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 7>Based marketing, outdoor marketing, that's the Vistaar acquisition is to

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 7>do that for the first time ever in outdoor advertising,

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:12.799
<v Speaker 7>so that for the first time outdoor advertising, place based

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 7>advertising can become an addressable market.

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's interesting. I love the outdoor business. You can't

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 5>switch channels on that.

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 3>I took all those companies public back in the day. Apple,

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 3>Mark German Bloomberg News. Apple has been working with SpaceX.

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 5>And T Mobile on starlink. What is starlink?

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:32.799
<v Speaker 7>Okay, So this is the ability to connect your mobile

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 7>phone directly to satellite service. This is a huge breakthrough.

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 7>We announced our intention to partner with SpaceX over two

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 7>years ago, and now finally it's coming to market. With

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 7>opening of our beta a couple of weeks ago. We're

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 7>bringing on thousands of users and soon way more than that.

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 7>We're going to throw the doors open on this thing.

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 7>If you can see the sky, you're connected.

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 8>That's our visual the iPhone app.

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 5>That's correct.

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 7>These are lower th orbit satellites, easier for your phone

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.919
<v Speaker 7>to find and vice versa. But this country, you guys,

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 7>has five hundred thousand square miles uncovered by any cellular network,

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 7>and it's a massive part of our land mass, and

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 7>we're about to close that coverage.

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 8>Okay, So if I uh on my bucket list is

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 8>a trip to the South Pole, I don't need cellular

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 8>service down there. I could just use a T mobile

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 8>iPhone Starling.

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 7>Well, I'm gonna have to check on how good the

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 7>l EO coverage is. But one of the things you

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 7>point out and very quickly to follow our terrestrial coverage

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 7>across the continental US and big parts of Alaska is

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 7>the world's oceans that. That's a big piece of this

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 7>because you know now you'll be able to not right away,

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 7>but as soon as we are able to turn it on,

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 7>you'll be able to get your service across the US

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 7>and as you travel around the oceans outside the reach

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 7>of any cellular See.

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 8>It's in beta testing right now. It's just confined to messaging.

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 7>Hundreds of satellites are in the air where we have

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 7>a free beta service going on. We're starting to let

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 7>people into it. Right now it's text messaging only, but

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 7>fast to follow will be light data services and eventually voice.

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 8>So I can get rid of my satellite phone. We

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 8>don't need that anymore.

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 5>I think the time will come when that's the case.

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Top line growth four to five percent for you guys,

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 3>that's how I think about the wireless business. Is that

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 3>all pricing? If so, how do you think about the

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 3>pricing environment out there?

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 7>It's sharetaking and self selecting up our rate card, you know,

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 7>very little pricing. And so those are the big dynamics.

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 7>Postpaid service revenue growth eight percent, more than double the

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 7>rate of our peers. And so this is you know,

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 7>a dynamic that makes t mobiles so different in this

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 7>space because we're not only growing the top line, but

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 7>we're translating it into financial growth on the bottom line.

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 7>Twenty five percent year over year growth and cash flows

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 7>seventeen billion dollars are highest ever.

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 8>Now, how do you raise prices? You sort of touched

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 8>on this just briefly before, but how do you raise

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 8>prices without scaring away your cult members?

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 7>Cult members? Well, one thing is people. You know, we

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 7>have a rate card with a variety of options, and

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 7>people choose at an increasing rate the prices that are

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 7>higher up because they want what we have to sell.

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 7>Do you know that sixty percent of our new customers

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 7>coming in the front door choose one of our two

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 7>most premium plans because those are the ones that are

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 7>most packed with value. And they you know, they're here

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 7>for a reason. They want more data, they want the

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 7>experience that T Mobile can provide with the world's best

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:32.599
<v Speaker 7>five G network.

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Subscriber acquisition costs have how are they trending for you

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 3>guys these days?

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 7>They're pretty flat, and that's good. We're very comfortable with

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 7>this business model. It's a high CLV, you know, value exchange.

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 7>One of the things about this business it's reliable, it's predictable.

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 7>We do what we say, we try to exceed what

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 7>we say, and it's growing and that's one of the

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 7>things that really distinguishes us in a group of peers,

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 7>not just in the US, but around the world.

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 8>There is a fed meat today. Can you tell me

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 8>how if it all rates affect your business?

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 7>Well, we're a big debt issuer, so obviously it's relevant

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 7>in the long haul.

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 8>What's the debt right now?

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 7>With two point five leverage against debit, so it's you know,

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 7>it's very significant eve as in the thirty one, you know,

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 7>very significant debt, but it's also a stack that's you know,

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 7>investment grade, it's long term, it's you know, spread out,

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 7>so it doesn't affect us in an immediate way, but

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 7>in the long taul of course, as a debt.

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 5>It what would you like that leverage ratio to be

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 5>right where it is?

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 8>Okay?

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Market structure in the wireless business three main players? Okay,

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 3>is there room for fourth? And I think about my

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 3>old friend Charlie Oregon. I have for the last fifteen years,

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 3>I had no idea what he's doing with a spectrum,

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 3>and I don't think the market knows either.

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 7>Well, he's operating you know, a major brand and Boost Mobile.

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.560
<v Speaker 7>And the other thing is the cable companies, Charter and

0:09:56.640 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 7>Comcasts taken together, who don't overlap, kind of constant to

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 7>an additional carrier ass going well, and you know, they

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:07.199
<v Speaker 7>are really growing their mobile service at a significant pace,

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 7>not as significant as us. We're the growth leaders, but

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 7>it's you know, it shows that this is a vibrant market.

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, with a lot of competition in the smaller market.

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 8>So that's a big deal for you too, right.

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, forty percent of the country everything that's not the

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 7>top one hundred markets we call smaller markets in rural areas.

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 5>It's a huge source of our growth right.

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 6>Now, thanks to Tea Mobile CEO Mike Sivert. We move

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 6>next to the auto sector. This week General Motors gave

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 6>a better than expected outlook for profit in twenty twenty five,

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 6>but President Trump's recent tear of threats have raised uncertainty

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 6>about the automaker's business. As a result, GM shares dropped

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:42.559
<v Speaker 6>as much as ten percent on Tuesday, and for more.

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 6>We were joined by Steve Mann, Bloomberg Intelligence, Global Autos

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 6>and Industrials research analyst.

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think the you know, Scott had a nice

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:51.959
<v Speaker 9>run up last year. You know, the management team has

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 9>done a great job and actually managing and investors and

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 9>managing the challenges that's in the US market that the

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 9>other company, Ford and stilentas have been facing. I think

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 9>the expectation has actually ran up through last year, and

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 9>you know, we got some negative news, mixed news in

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 9>terms of the outlook. You know, the tone has changed.

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 9>You know, this is the first time that GM actually

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 9>is a little bit worried about the end market since COVID.

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 10>Well, what have we learned.

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 6>About GM and its actual EV units? Like, we're sales

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 6>better than expected, Like is the trough passed?

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, it sales, especially in the fourth quarter, it did

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 9>run up. Some of that may be some channel inventory

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 9>stock building anticipation of better sales than twenty twenty five,

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 9>and that's one of the key issues. I think the

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 9>investors are concerned. There's a you know, there's going to

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 9>be a mixed change. They think that EV sales increase

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 9>EV sales will offset some of the more profitable truck

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 9>sales in twenty twenty five. So, you know, based on

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 9>our estimates, like it seems like even their adjusted EBIT

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 9>margin of eight to ten percent, maybe a little bit

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 9>too high, and they may fall actually at the low

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 9>end of that range or maybe even below our.

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 6>Thanks to Steve Mann, Bloomberg Intelligence Global Autos and Industrials

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 6>Research channelist. Coming up, we're going to break down some

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 6>key corporate earnings in the aerospace industry. You're listening to

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:28.079
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in depth research and

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 6>data on two thousand companies and one hundred and thirty industries.

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:34.199
<v Speaker 6>You can access Bloomberg Intelligence through Bigo. I'm the Terminal,

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 6>I'm Alex Steele, and this is Bloomberg.

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Easter what Apple CarPlay and the

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 2>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 6>We move next to the aerospace industry. This week, Boeing

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 6>report or did a four billion dollar operating loss in

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 6>the fourth quarter. Boeing CEO Kelly Ordberg said he will

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 6>realign the company around key business lines and cleave off

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 6>fringe assets. Separately, Jet Blue shares had a record plunge

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 6>after the carrier forecasted weaker than expected revenue and higher

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 6>costs for twenty twenty five. For more, we were joined

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 6>by George Ferguson, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Aerospace, Defense and Airlines analyst.

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 6>We began by asking George about Boeing and one of

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 6>the worst was over for the company.

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 11>Look, it seems like it's always hard to say the

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 11>worst is over. It seems like the trend is definitely

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 11>going the right direction. It seems like twenty twenty five

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 11>could be the year they thought twenty twenty four was

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 11>going to be. Look, you know, I heard a lot

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 11>of positive things about the manufacturing process in the call.

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:47.599
<v Speaker 11>I think that's why Boeing pre announced. They wanted to

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 11>get some of the you know, the forward chargers out

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 11>of the way so people could focus on the message.

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 11>And I think the message was the factory, especially for

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 11>the seven thirty seven, has restarted in the new year.

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 11>It's building in the mid twenties range going to thirty eight.

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 11>It sounded like somewhere near midyear, which is probably before

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 11>where most of consensus thought it would get. I'm gonna

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 11>and the year close to forty two is what I

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 11>think I heard. I mean, management kept trying to solve

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 11>pedal it to a degree, and what I heard is

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 11>quality as spirit aerosystems improving. They're happy with it. They

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 11>don't think it's a liminar. I mean, all that's positive

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 11>for profitability and cash flow. Boeing should make this year

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 11>a lot better than last year if it all comes true.

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Where should that seven three seven build number be in

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 3>a perfect world, Georgia, I'm trying to gauge the thirty

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 3>eight number, the forty number, the forty two number, versus

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 3>where it should be, maybe versus where Airbus is with

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 3>their product.

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 11>Well, I guess I would say if you were at

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 11>the Boeing board level, would you not say it should

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 11>be in the sixties, somewhere well above Airbus. Look Boeing

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 11>ended the last decade before the pandemic sort of driving

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 11>closer to sixty builds a month. They have plenty of

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 11>back laws. I don't think it should be at sixty

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 11>a month now, but I would expect they should be

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 11>driving hard towards sixty a month as we go into

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 11>the middle of the back half of this decade. That's

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 11>a little complex, Sorry about that, but you know the

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 11>twenty seven's twenty eighths. I think that sixties ought to

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 11>be a number they'd be looking at given the backlog,

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 11>And look, where should they be right now? Maybe they

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 11>should be, you know, close to fifty. So they're I mean,

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 11>they're what, they're halfway to that level they probably should

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 11>be at right now. This is the money maker, this

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 11>is the one they want to really optimize.

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 6>And no, no, I was going to say, I mean,

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 6>it's always like at least it could be worse. I

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 6>guess right, because it has been worse, So there's something there.

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 6>I do want to switch and talk about Jet Blue

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 6>for a second, because Paul and I are just really

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 6>confused to the extent to which Jet Blue is getting

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 6>beaten down. We know the costs will higher than estimated,

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 6>but what do you make of that price action?

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so, I mean I think they're Look, the big

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 11>service carriers, I think showed slightly better results than we

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 11>had expected, right, And so I think if you were

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 11>looking at the entire airline space, you could be confused

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 11>that those better numbers would carry through to the economy carriers,

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 11>to the more basic economy carriers. And I think what

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 11>Jet Blue told us it didn't right. Jet Blue lives

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 11>in a really difficult part.

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 10>Of the market.

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 11>They are you know, they're low cost plus they have

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 11>some premium seating and I say low costs, but they're not.

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 11>Their costs are not as low as like a Frontier,

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 11>a spirit an Allegiance. And so we think at the

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 11>bottom of that market and the basic economy world, your

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 11>best advantage is to be able to deliver seat miles

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 11>as cheap as possible because you're getting customers on price,

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 11>where if you're up in the United American right delta

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 11>world you get people on loyalty programs and premium seating

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 11>and things like that. We know the back end of

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 11>this business is really competitive, and it's hard for like

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:06.880
<v Speaker 11>the Jet Blues in Southwest to survive in a world

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 11>where you've got to just deliver the really cheapest seat price.

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.199
<v Speaker 11>And they're having a hard time doing that given the upstarts.

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 11>And when they show us an eight percent increase in

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 11>cost per available seat mile in one queue, no operating

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 11>profit that gets concerning that the worst isn't behind us

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 11>on excess budget seats in the marketplace.

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Can we get some consolidation in that lower end of

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 3>the market now with this new administration, George.

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 11>Look, we could. I think the bigger ones could. I

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 11>think Jet Blue could consolidate somebody underneath them or somebody

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 11>about the same size. I don't think they'd allow Southwest

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 11>to go out and buy somebody, but I think you

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:48.919
<v Speaker 11>could at the bottom end. Plus, you have some that

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:52.120
<v Speaker 11>are hurting, right, you have Spirit airlines. Question is can

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 11>they survive. That could take some capacity out of the marketplace.

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:59.360
<v Speaker 11>The challenges the planes don't go away. They're built, they're aluminum,

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 11>they last third years. Someone gets the airplanes. Where do

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 11>those airplanes go? Do they go out of market? They

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 11>go in market. But you could get some consolidation too.

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 6>Thirty seconds RTX you cover some of the defense guys.

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 10>RTX doing well.

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, they showed some nice numbers. The guidance for next

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 11>year was nice as well. Look, they have a lower

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 11>I think view on how much original equipment deliveries they'll

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 11>make next year. That I think is probably practical, especially

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.199
<v Speaker 11>given what Boeing said. So they kind of looked for

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 11>mid single digits growth in that original equipment deliveries. I

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 11>think Boeing and Airbus alone with narrow body deliveries are

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 11>going to be twelve ish percent. It'll be interesting to

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 11>see how that plays out, because the more that original

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.360
<v Speaker 11>equipment they deliver, the more PRESSUREUS margins.

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 6>All right, thanks to George ferguson Bloomberg Intelligence and your Aerospace,

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 6>Defense and Airlines analyst. This week we focus on a

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg Big Take story titled deep Seek Challenges Silicon Valley's

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 6>assumptions about AI costs. You can find it on Bloomberg

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 6>dot Com and the Terminal. The story looks at how

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 6>Chinese AI startup called deep Seek released a new open

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 6>source AI model called r one that can mimic human reasoning,

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:13.400
<v Speaker 6>and the release sent shock waves to the US tech industry,

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 6>with tech companies analyzing how deep Seek built its chatbot

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:19.640
<v Speaker 6>and whether it did as cheaply as it claimed. For more,

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:22.679
<v Speaker 6>we were joined by Rachel Metz, Bloomberry AI reporter, and

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 6>we first asked Rachel what the feeling is in Silicon

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 6>Valley after the latest news.

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:28.640
<v Speaker 10>We're hearing a bunch of different things.

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think some people are a little alarmed,

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit surprised, but I think there's also a

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of excitement. Frankly, I mean some of it may

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:39.719
<v Speaker 1>boil down to sort of what your goals are what

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>your job is. I think you're seeing a lot of

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 1>interest and excitement, such as from companies that sell these

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>AI models to other people, like sell the usage of them,

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a company like Data Bricks or cohere. I think they're

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>really interested in seeing where this goes. Data Bricks CEO

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>told me that they have a ton of customer interest

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 1>in us Deep seeks, so that's really interesting to them

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 1>from a customer perspective. But you could also see how

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>companies that are making these models might be like wait

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a minute, yeah.

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 6>Well, and I guess the question is how soon can

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:17.120
<v Speaker 6>can Silicon Valley replicate the model that Deep Seek created.

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Well hugging face, which does a wide variety of things

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>including deploying their own models, hosting other people's models, stuff

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>like that. They're doing it right now, actually, so they

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:32.199
<v Speaker 1>were replicating it and making it available to people, and

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going along at a pretty good clip.

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>So other people could be doing that as well. And

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that's the sense that I get that they that they

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>are starting to you know.

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 3>We've obviously Nvidia and other chip names took just a

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 3>huge hit, and I guess that kind of calls into question.

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:49.439
<v Speaker 3>Investors are questioning do we need this much spending. If

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 3>somebody can come in here and do it as such

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 3>a discount, how is that argument kind of festering in

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 3>your backyard.

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I think that people rightfully were a

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit concerned, right and you saw.

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 5>The stocks really drop.

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.439
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, you're still going to be

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>needing chips for all kinds of things, including AI processes.

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 1>And it's important to keep in mind that these AI

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>models that are mimicking the ways that humans reason, they're

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>still very new. There aren't that many of them at

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>this point. They're just not very far along, so it's

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:25.640
<v Speaker 1>not clear yet how much compute. The compute in these

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>cases is often you're using a lot more of it

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the process than you would have

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>with different types of models, so it'll be interesting to see.

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>It would be. One thing that's important to keep in mind, though,

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I think, is that a number of companies have been

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to make their models more efficient for a while.

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, efficiency could be great, it could be great

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>for the environment, it could be great for these companies

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:50.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of keeping costs down. So I think that's

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>why you see a lot of people excited about this.

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 6>Well, Also, I thought it was interesting in Vidia's statement

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 6>on deep Sea it was twofold. It was like, Hey,

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 6>they totally have complied with any restrictions on chips from

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 6>the government and they still were able to accomplish it,

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 6>and we're super pumped about it. That feels like it's like,

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 6>please don't put more tearffs on chips learning from the US.

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 10>Is that in the zeitgeist at all in Silicon Valley,

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:15.439
<v Speaker 10>Not that I've heard, to be honest.

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there may be people talking about that, but

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I feel like most people are concentrating more on the

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>idea that this company has done something that appears to

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>be quite interesting, and they've made some really smart decisions

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 1>and they're a really smart team, and I think a

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 1>lot of people just find that really fascinating and they

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>want to know how they can do it too.

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 3>What do you expect to hear from some of the

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 3>big tech companies that report over the next couple of

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 3>weeks their earnings as it relates to AI and kind

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 3>of maybe how the ball field maybe changing.

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Ooh ah, that's a good question. I mean, I'm sure

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>they're thinking about this and looking at this. I mean,

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:54.880
<v Speaker 1>what it would probably make sense to hear more remarks

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>about efficiency. Frankly, I mean that seems to be what

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>this company has done in a few different areas, and

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I would be curious to see if other companies are

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:08.959
<v Speaker 1>thinking about how they can do that. I mean, I

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:10.919
<v Speaker 1>would assume investors would like that if they're being more

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 1>efficient with how they're spending money and using resources.

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 6>Thanks to Rachel Mattz, Bloomberg AI reporter, coming up in

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:19.640
<v Speaker 6>the program, a look at why HSBC will wind down

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 6>it's investment banking operations in Europe, the UK and the Americas.

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 12>If you don't have the operations, say on Wall Street

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 12>in the City of London, continental Europe, how meaningful can

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 12>you be to those types of clients in Asia and

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 12>the Middle East when they want to do stuff around

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 12>the world. You know, it's all very well obviously saying

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 12>you know, we're very big in Middle East and Asia,

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 12>will service use there. But when it comes to being

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 12>able to offer some kind of global perspective, maybe being

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 12>somewhat lacking then and I think that's going to be

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 12>the area that's going to be interesting to watch.

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 6>Here, you're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence. I'm Bloomberg Radio providing

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 6>in depth research and data on two thousand companies and

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 6>one hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 6>through b I go on the terminal. I'm Alex Steele,

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 6>and this is Bloomberg.

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 2>You were listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch the

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 2>program live weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 2>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg. Eleven thirty, we.

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 6>Moved next to the municipal bond market. It's looking like

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 6>a big year for unis in twenty twenty five, with

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 6>investors looking at high yield municipals to generate strong demand.

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 6>For more on this, we were joined by Nora Whitstruck,

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 6>chief Municipal Analytical Officer at SMP Global Ratings. We spoke

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 6>to Nora live from BAM Mutual offices in New York City.

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 13>Generally in twenty twenty five, I like to say that

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 13>the municipal sector is cautiously stable. A lot of state

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:53.159
<v Speaker 13>and local governments are coming into twenty twenty five still

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 13>sort of writing some high liquidity and reserve levels based

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 13>on the COVID relief based still oh yeah, you know,

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:02.679
<v Speaker 13>they had to commit it all by the end of

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 13>last year, but they had to they have to spend

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 13>it all by the end of twenty twenty six, so

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 13>they still have some in their coffers generally, and I

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 13>think also the economy has been pretty good and that

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 13>helps state in local governments and other entities that we

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 13>rate in terms of the demand that they see for

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 13>their services.

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 6>When it comes to something we've been talking about the

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 6>last hour and a half or so, are the impact

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 6>of natural disasters and the LA wildfires, Like how do

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:30.880
<v Speaker 6>you deal with ratings and natural disasters like that?

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 13>So we bake risk into our ratings, as you might

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 13>imagine as credit analysts.

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 6>And but that probably wasn't on anyone's BINGO card.

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 13>So we In California, the state has inverse condemnation, which

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 13>means utilities, even if they are not negligent, can be.

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 10>Liable for sparking a wildfire if any of their equipment

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:51.679
<v Speaker 10>is involved.

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 13>That's right, closet yep, absolutely so. Actually, LADWP, we lowered

0:25:57.400 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 13>from double A to double A minus a few years

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 13>ago because they choose as a decision not to de

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 13>energize their lines relative to wildfires, and that's fine for

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 13>them to do that. It's different than some of their

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 13>peers in California who do do that. But because of that,

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 13>they decide that because they're based in an urban area,

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 13>they don't want to shut off their traffic lights. They

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 13>think that the risk trade off between the wildfire and

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 13>human costs are are not equal. So we lowered their ratings,

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 13>and I think part of that is the inverse condemnation,

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 13>but also it's just the fact that utilities are particularly

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:41.640
<v Speaker 13>susceptible to infrastructure damage during a severe weather event, whether

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 13>it be a wildfire, a hurricane, flooding. So it's all

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:49.120
<v Speaker 13>been baked into our ratings. The actions that we took

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 13>on LADWP, we're partly reflecting a recalibration of that risk

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 13>as wildfires have come into more urban areas versus where

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 13>they historically have a cur and rural communities.

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 3>I guess in response to the LA fires, President Trump

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 3>I think is voiced some displeasure with FEMA and even

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:10.919
<v Speaker 3>suggesting maybe some of the disaster relief responsibilities at the

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 3>federal level FEMA be put down at the state and

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:16.199
<v Speaker 3>local level. Can states and local municipalties afford that kind

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 3>of stuff?

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 13>Well, we've historically said that FEMA is an important credit

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:26.120
<v Speaker 13>support for state and local governments. These disasters are increasing

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 13>in frequency and increasing in cost, and absent federal aid,

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 13>you know, that would be a significant pressure for them,

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 13>and absorbing all of the costs is just probably a

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 13>little unsustainable at the current reading levels. I think what

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:46.880
<v Speaker 13>we are watching for is what he actually decides to do.

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 13>Does he still decide to maintain the federal aid and

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 13>shift it to a block grant for states and then

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 13>states are responsible for allocating it, or you know, does

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 13>disaster relief go away entirely? Those are two very different

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 13>dyna that we have to monitor in terms of how

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 13>I relate.

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 10>What are the different options.

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 6>Then for those two scenarios, how would that impact How

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 6>would each impact the mini market?

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 13>So I think if even a lower level of disaster

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 13>relief for state and local governments, right now, they typically

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 13>get somewhere between seventy and ninety percent of the costs

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 13>reimbursed from the federal government. If that goes to twenty percent,

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 13>that's something that we'd have to consider. If that goes

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 13>to zero, that's a whole nother decision on our part

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:35.399
<v Speaker 13>to determine what the liquidity and reserves of state and

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 13>local governments and entities that we rate need to maintain

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 13>as a buffer against these types of disasters. Now, if

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 13>it just shifts from FEMA being the allocator and the

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 13>distributor of funds to states in terms of a block grant,

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 13>that probably could be even like a non concern.

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 3>For us, if you will, all right, as a credit

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 3>rating agency, you get paid to worry.

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 10>We get paid to work.

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 3>Aside from natural disasters, which can be an overwhelming topic,

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 3>what are more of some pedestrian things that concern you?

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 13>Well, you know, I think generally we look at long

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 13>term liabilities, right, so pensions and how is state and

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 13>local governments and other entities that we rate manage their

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 13>pension systems. Typically it's managed at the state level.

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 10>What does that mean?

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 13>We are increasingly seeing more people retire, so how do

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 13>those costs get baked into the budget? States in particular

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 13>are a safety net for Medicaid, and that's something that

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 13>President Trump has also spoken about in terms of modifying

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 13>that plan. States get a lot of money to support

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 13>people that are vulnerable and need to be in those programs.

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 13>How could that change the way states function and what

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 13>they need to allocate resources to. I think we also

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 13>watch labor productivity and labor workforce dynamics. I think, you know,

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 13>one of the things that we noted after the election

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 13>is that immigration has been good for our workforce in

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 13>the It has really lowered the cost and the tightness

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 13>of the labor market. That has turned into high increases

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 13>in salaries and personal costs for state and local governments

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 13>and entities that we rate. So a major change in

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 13>border security could tighten that labor market right back up,

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 13>and that could put additional cost pressures back onto these

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 13>entities that we rate.

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 6>I mean, on the flip side, does it actually take

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 6>away some of the state aid though?

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 13>Also so it could definitely be a bit of a boost.

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 13>Right So, New York City in particular, with asylum seekers,

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 13>had to absorb a significant billions of dollars in additional

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 13>costs to help those individuals as they come come into

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 13>the city. That could definitely be a bit of a

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 13>relief valve for them if that were to change. I

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 13>think too, you know, there could be some cost savings

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 13>relative to medicaid, relative to other social services that they

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 13>need to participate in to you know, come survive once

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 13>they get to in the US. So that definitely there

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 13>could be some offsetting improvements in cost savings relative to

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 13>credit quality.

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you can explain to me how life works in Florida. Yeah, okay, Texas,

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 3>no state taxes. How do they build schools and roads

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 3>and things like that? Because my stated my property taxes

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 3>are really high. Yeah, you know New Jersey.

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 13>I mean I own a five hundred and fifty square

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 13>foot condo and my property taxes are ten thousand dollars

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 13>in New York City.

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:29.239
<v Speaker 5>So I hear you on that.

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 13>What happens in states that don't have an income tax,

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 13>typically they securitize other forms of revenue. So they securitize

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 13>gas taxes, they securitize sales taxes, they securitize property taxes,

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 13>which is typically the way most state and local governments

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 13>secure the debt obligations that they have outstanding is through

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 13>property taxes. So, yeah, you're right, those taxes are high,

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 13>and some of it will go to paying off debt

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 13>obligations for the entities that we rate.

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 10>You don't feel good about that?

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, why do I have to pay these high taxes.

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 3>Everybody's moving to Florida to escape taxes.

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 10>It's true. No one likes paying the taxes exactly.

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 6>Yes, Well, what are some other key things that are,

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 6>uh that you guys are talking about right now, like

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 6>on the desk.

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, so I think, you know, we're definitely watching federal policy.

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 13>We're definitely watching how aspects of affordability cut across all

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 13>of our sectors.

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 10>So, you know, I was the housing.

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 13>Sector lead before I was the chief analytical officer, and

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 13>we were watching, you know, the lack of housing inventory

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 13>and how that was affecting the entities that we rate,

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 13>like state housing finance agencies and social housing providers, public

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 13>housing authorities, how they're navigating that particular aspect. But it's

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 13>playing out everywhere. So water utilities and public power utilities,

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 13>some of which operate in La County.

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 10>We've been watching how.

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 13>They're raising rates to not only pay for deferred maintenance,

0:32:57.600 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 13>but also for investment for adaptation into wildfires and other

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 13>severe weather events.

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 10>Some have been a little.

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 13>Bit lax in doing that because it's been expensive to

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 13>live in America right We've had an inflationary environment, We've

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 13>had higher costs associated with food. We've had a higher

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 13>cost associated with utilities. Insurance premiums are going up for

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 13>property and casualty insurance. So all of those things are

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 13>weighing on management teams and they're looking at how they

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 13>can dampen those costs as much as possible.

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 6>Our thanks to Norah Woodstruck, chief Municipal Analytics Officer at

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 6>SMP Global Ratings, and to BAM Mutual for hosting us

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 6>at their offices. We turn out as some news in

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 6>the banking sector. This week, we heard that HSBC will

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 6>wind down its investment banking operations in Europe, the UK,

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 6>and the Americas. The firm roll instead focus on its

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 6>operations in Asia and the Middle East.

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 10>For more.

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 6>We are dorned by Harry Wilson, Bloomberg Finance reporter, and

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 6>we asked Harry if this news was actually a surprise.

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 12>It's something that we've probably expected that could happen over

0:33:57.120 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 12>the years. The truth is that HSBC has really been

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 12>nowhere on Wall Street and in the city for some

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 12>years now. It struggled to even get into the top

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 12>ten when you look at sort of major league tables

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 12>like equity underwriting or em and A. So the idea

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 12>that they're just now kind of giving up on this thing,

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:15.879
<v Speaker 12>realizing that they can't compete with the likes of Gold

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 12>and Sacks, JP Morgan, and that actually they'll just be

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 12>better off focusing their resources on markets where they do

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 12>have some scales, such as Middle Eastern Asia. Makes a

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 12>lot of sense. So I guess short answer, timing wise, surprise.

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 12>Longer term, no, I don't think it's particularly surprising that

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:34.320
<v Speaker 12>they're taking these actions.

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 3>So, I mean this kind of goes to me, Harry

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 3>kind of a bigger question, which is these European banks,

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:43.359
<v Speaker 3>can any of them be global investment banks? I mean,

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 3>twenty years ago, I don't think we would have seen

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:46.760
<v Speaker 3>this happen.

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 12>I think it's very difficult. European banks have faced these

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 12>type of problems going decades now. Many have tried to

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 12>make some kind of impact on Wall Street, and many

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:01.800
<v Speaker 12>of them have come back having spent hundreds of millions

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:06.360
<v Speaker 12>and got really nothing for their investment. The simple fact

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 12>is that Wall Street is something of a lockout by

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 12>the US major firms. And even when you get the

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:14.879
<v Speaker 12>likes to say Barklings, which was able to buy off

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 12>the PEG the Leman operations in two thousand and eight

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 12>even they've struggled to make much of it. And I

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 12>guess the issue is that if even a bank like HSBC,

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:27.919
<v Speaker 12>the largest bank in Europe, can't really make this thing work,

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 12>then it makes a question about how anyone else, without

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:33.840
<v Speaker 12>their type of scale, without their type of profitability, could

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 12>expect to make much of an inroad.

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 6>What's the opportunity, said, if you flip it to for

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:41.760
<v Speaker 6>Asia and Middle East for HSBC.

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 12>Obviously these are fast growing regions, so you've got a

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 12>lot more economic activity, a lot of growth coming in Asia.

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:49.959
<v Speaker 12>You've got a lot of money in the Middle East.

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 12>You know, every day we see headlines about a Middle

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:56.720
<v Speaker 12>East hedge fund being involved in some deal or another.

0:35:57.040 --> 0:35:59.840
<v Speaker 12>So these are good places to be a big bank.

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:05.320
<v Speaker 12>The question really is is if you don't have the operations,

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 12>say on Wall Street in the City of London, continental Europe,

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:11.880
<v Speaker 12>how meaningful can you be to those types of clients

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:14.319
<v Speaker 12>in Asia and the Middle East when they want to

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:16.319
<v Speaker 12>do stuff around the world. You know, it's all very

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 12>well obviously saying you know, we're very big in Middle

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:21.319
<v Speaker 12>East and Asian will service you there. But when it

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 12>comes to being able to offer some kind of global

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:26.319
<v Speaker 12>perspective maybe being somewhat lacking there, and I think that's

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 12>going to be the area that's going to be interesting

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 12>to watch here is whether HSBC, if it doesn't have

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 12>the stuff around the world and is purely focused on

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:36.879
<v Speaker 12>Asian and Middle East, whether that is still a good

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 12>proposition to its clients in those regions that maybe want

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 12>a more worldwide global network offering.

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:48.279
<v Speaker 6>All right, thanks to Harry Wilson, Bloomberg Finance Reporter. That's

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:51.720
<v Speaker 6>this week's edition of Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 6>in depth research and data on two thousand companies in

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:57.320
<v Speaker 6>one hundred and thirty industries. And remember you can access

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:00.760
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg Intelligence through Bigo. I'm a terminal, I'm Alex Steel.

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 2>This is a Bloomberg Intelligence podcast available on Apple, Spotify,

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:12.280
<v Speaker 2>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:15.720
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:18.800
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:20.880
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg Terminal