WEBVTT - Instant Reaction: Nvidia Sales Forecast Falls Short

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:10.399
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk in video and video shares did shed more

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 2>than two percent ahead of its earnings report that are

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 2>due in the coming minutes. The stock up more than

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and fifty percent so far this year. It

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 2>is the top performer in the S and P five

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 2>hundred and the NASDAQ one hundred. Let's go down to

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Technology co host ed Ludlow, who joins us from

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 2>our San Francisco bureau, ed the most important numbers you're

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 2>watching in just a few minutes. When these earnings cross,

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 2>what are they?

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, all of them.

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 4>It's probably the most important earnings report in my career,

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 4>which is not quite as long as both of yours.

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.319
<v Speaker 4>But you go straight to the data center business, and

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 4>not necessarily for the quarter gone. We have a good

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 4>sense of how that will go. Will probably be twenty

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 4>five billion dollars of data center revenue. You have to

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 4>go straight to the outlook or the guide for the

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 4>fiscal third quarter because that answers the only question we have,

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 4>which is what is the staying power of this AI

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 4>investment cycle?

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>And you know the thing is, I think about the expectations,

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:09.559
<v Speaker 1>how high they are ed, and we've seen the stock,

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 1>which we saw it sell off kind of like early

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>or mid June, right, and then yes, we saw an

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>equal bounce like about twenty seven percent from that low

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>over the summer. So expectations going into this are super high,

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>which makes me think, does it have to be a

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>tremendous beat as we've come to expect from this company,

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>otherwise there's going to be a little bit of disappointment

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>or some questions.

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 4>Well, let's take the third quarter fiscal third quarter guide example.

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 4>You know, the average analyst estimate is thirty one point

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.399
<v Speaker 4>nine billion dollars, but at the very top end of estimates,

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 4>you're talking thirty eight thirty nine billion dollars. There are

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 4>some on the street who have very high expectations. I've

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 4>learned from people like you at Bloomberg over the years.

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 4>One market session a market does not make. This is

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 4>a stock up one hundred and fifty percent year to date,

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 4>but almost one thousand percent from its October twenty twenty

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 4>two bear market low. It was incredibly overbought January through March,

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 4>and then again in June and July, and retail investors

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 4>continue to pile in that sets us up for some tension, I.

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Think, yeah, speaking attention, about thirty seconds away from when

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:14.239
<v Speaker 2>we are expecting those numbers.

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Doc is up one point six percent here ahead of

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the earnings. So we're just waiting for Nvidia to cross.

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>So we're seeing some trade ahead of the results, actually crossing,

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>some optimistic trading, if you will. As we said, the stock,

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>which was a little bit lower today, it's bouncing here

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>almost two percent here in the aftermarket. So I don't know,

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>seven seconds and we expect these numbers.

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm gonna let Ed Ludlow take a look at

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 2>his Bloomberg terminal, as we do expect these numbers to take.

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 2>These numbers to cross imminently right now. As a reminder

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 2>in Kiga notes, let's do this typically hits at twenty

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 2>pass all right.

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Second quarter revenue folks, thirty billion dollars estimate was twenty

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>eight point eighty six billion, So again that is a beat.

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Company approving an additional fifty billion dollars in share buyback. Again,

0:02:57.960 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the stock up about two and a quarter percent here

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>in the after market.

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the company c's third quarter revenue at thirty two

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 2>point five billion plus or minus two percent. The company

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 2>maintains its quarterly dividend at one cent per share. Second

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 2>quarter data center revenue that is a very important metric

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 2>to keep an eye on. That as the vast majority

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 2>of the company's revenue coming in at twenty six point

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 2>three billion dollars, beating estimates of twenty five point oh

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 2>eight billion dollars. So justin gross margin for the second

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 2>quarter coming in right above, just above estimates, seventy five

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 2>point seven percent, Carol estimates were for seventy five point

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 2>five percent.

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're talking with Ed Ludlow, the co host

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Technology, and you said the numbers, you're watching

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>all of them, but you did single out initially the

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>data center revenue, which we were expecting about twenty five billion.

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>That's a bee.

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a B.

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I've got the ticker for after I was

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 4>trade in front of me, and my eyes are bouncing

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:47.839
<v Speaker 4>all around, and I think the market's taking a few

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 4>seconds to make up its mind.

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 3>Let's just run through it.

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 4>Thirty two point five billion dollars plus all minus two

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 4>percent is basically, I think in line with the thirty

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 4>one point nine billion dollars that the street was looking for.

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 4>I'll do the math on the point in due course.

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 4>An impressive beat, I suppose on data center revenue in

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 4>the second court had just gone in overall revenues. Then

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 4>we asked the question, why why was it better? You know,

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 4>they telegraphed that pretty well. And my goodness, don't you

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 4>love it when there's consistency, when something that we were

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 4>talking about continues to happen. And that is shareholder friendly policy.

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 4>And I think that fifty billion dollars of edition will

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 4>share buybacks, no one would be sort of disappointed with that.

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 3>The stock up, you know, ish in after hours.

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, we had a we were talking earlier

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 2>about if things came in in line with expectations, because

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 2>expectations were so high, you might not see a huge reaction, Carol, Right,

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 2>even with a fifty billion dollars share buyback, we're barely

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:44.359
<v Speaker 2>seeing stock move in the after hours.

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, just up about one percent. Hey, dig it into

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the press release. You're going to talk with Jensen Wong,

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>founder and CEO n Vidia later on. He says hyper

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>demand remains strong and the anticipation for a blackwell is incredible.

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:59.160
<v Speaker 1>He said the company rechieve record revenues as global data

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>centers are in full throttle to modernize the entire computing

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>stack with accelerated computing and generative AI. Like, we know

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 1>this guy knows how to speak and talk about his company,

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>his market, his industry. But what are you looking for

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>as you go through this press release and what are

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.720
<v Speaker 1>you thinking about that conversation you're going to have with it?

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, my eyes went straight to the Blackwell commentary and

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 4>the anticipation being high. Excitement, anticipation are interesting words, but

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 4>they are not a granular explanation of what's happening with Blackwell.

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 4>The reporting was that due to the complexity of its design,

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 4>it has two compute dies basically think about two triangles

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 4>with a split between them, because it's so big.

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 3>It's so much bigger.

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 4>Than any other high performance GPU that's gone before it.

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 4>And the reporting was that this presented a production challenge

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 4>and so we want some specific detail on that. But

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 4>again this is classic Jensen Wang that everything is intact,

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 4>the AI investment cycle is there, and clearly he's bullish

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 4>because in video is ninety nine percent of the market

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 4>for this range of AI accelerators.

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Shares bouncing around a little bit, but they are now

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 2>lower by about two point two percent in after hours

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 2>trading AD I do wonder what the demand story is

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 2>from customers, and now that we're seeing the latest results

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 2>from in video, what's the story that you're seeing? I

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 2>should say shares continue to move lower, down about three

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 2>percent and after hours.

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 4>So this is why we go straight to the guide

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 4>or outlook for the current period or the fiscal third quarter.

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 4>Because of the timing of Nvidia's earnings today August twenty eighth,

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 4>it comes at the end of earning season where the

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 4>capital expenditures guidance from the biggest Nvidia customers has been

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 4>and gone. So if you look at the capital expenditures

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 4>guidance of a Microsoft I think Carol pointed out very

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 4>smartly that about forty five percent of Microsoft capex goes

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 4>directly to Nvidia. We knew that they were committed to spending,

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 4>but how confident is in video in that trend continuing

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 4>over a longer time horizon. You look at the stop

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.359
<v Speaker 4>after hours down now almost five percent. One has to

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 4>keep their feet on the ground and ask is that

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 4>so severe? Is it so surprising given how high a

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 4>bar this quarter was and how lofty expectations were.

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 2>One hundred and fifty percent higher so far this year

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 2>at five percent decline after earnings that beat estimates but

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 2>didn't blow estimates out of the water.

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think you go to the outlook, like you

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>keep you know, emphasizing ed this high idea and I

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>know you put it out on the on the blog

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of what came in all right, better than what the

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>average estimate was. But when you think about the high

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>numbers that some were expecting almost as much as thirty

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>eight billion dollars for that third corent revenue, like that

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to color how investors, you know, react to

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>this number. They were expecting more, a lot more.

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And like I know that this is something that

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg people always say, but you also just have to

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 4>give some sort of context of where the stock trades. Right,

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 4>it is a stock that trades at thirty eight times

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 4>forward twelve month earnings. Again, I always look at Relative

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 4>Strength Index RSI and the terminal, but one data set

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:11.119
<v Speaker 4>that I've tracked is that retail investors have absolutely piled

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 4>into this.

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 3>Stock of late.

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 4>It had all of the hallmarks of something that was

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 4>set to swing in. I have direction based on options

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.239
<v Speaker 4>market trading, and I think the point that I'm making

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 4>without telling our audience about how the sausage is made

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 4>too much. One very wise editor said on our planning

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 4>call that even if it beats expectations or street or

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 4>consensus estimates, this is a likely outcome because of where

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 4>we've positioned ourselves in the market going into the print.

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Meaning that expectations are just so high for this company.

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Correct.

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Directs, I think, Tim, that's probably the understatement of

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 4>the century.

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, you're also dealing with base effects. As

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 2>we mentioned, the comps are really tough given where this

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 2>was a year ago and where investors expected to go

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.319
<v Speaker 2>in terms of growth rate. I mean, as Abigail do

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 2>a little pointed out on our cair you know they

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 2>were seeing what north of two hundred percent growth some quarters.

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, this is something I used to think

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>about with Apple, like when it didn't live up to expectations,

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.319
<v Speaker 1>it got harder and harder to move the needle on that.

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>And yet when you look at the numbers and I

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>understand it's all relative, and you've got to give the

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>context in terms of growth and so on and so forth.

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>And video is still selling a lot of stuff, right,

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and it is the game in town if you want

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>those advanced AI chips.

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 4>Okay, guys, I'm really sorry to go on attendent. These

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 4>headlines are super important in videos saying it expects several

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars in Blackwell revenues in the fourth quarter. I

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:37.959
<v Speaker 4>King's just hit the button on the red headline. I'm

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 4>not surprised. Yeah, that this was the question that in

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 4>video makes a commitment to bring a new generation of

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 4>its AI accelerator to market annually, and there have been

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.719
<v Speaker 4>the reporting on the design challenges about Blackwell. What in

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 4>Vidia's confirming is that they will book really really significant

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 4>revenue on that product in the early stage of its ramp,

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 4>in the final three months of the calendar year or

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 4>its fiscal fourth quarter. But they do make a concession

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 4>that they had to change the Blackwell mask production step.

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 4>I have to plead ignorance on the technicalities of that.

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to run to Ian's desk and ask him,

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 4>but they are at least talking about it.

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 3>I think that this.

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 4>Commentary comes from not the earnings released necessarily, but the

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 4>CFO commentary that comes as an appendix to it.

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 3>So we'll dig into that as we go.

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Is several billion dollars not sufficient?

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Ed, what is several billion dollars?

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 4>I mean the relatively significant after hours decline is now

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 4>sort of less significant. That might give you a sense

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 4>of how investors feel about that. But I think the

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 4>idea was that, you know, this is a product that

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 4>we're not talking I've said this to you guys so

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 4>many times, and I almost don't apologize for it. When

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 4>we talk about an AI chip, we're not talking about

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 4>this little thing you can hold in your hand. The

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 4>core technology, yes, is probably about the size of a sandwich,

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 4>but it goes into a rack that goes into a server,

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 4>a big three hundreundred pounds server box in rows and

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 4>rows that fill out a data center. And that's the

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 4>scale that we're talking about. So when you produce it

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 4>at scale, it presents a challenge. And to me that

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 4>the shipment of several billion dollars seems substantive in this instance.

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's interesting. I feel like, you know, we're going

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to want a little bit more in terms of specifics

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:23.599
<v Speaker 1>about Blackwell and what those shipments in terms of the

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter what exactly means, because that's outlook fourth quarter

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>not so far away, and you do wonder if that's

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>something that moves the needle significantly. This is everything that

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you know people have been talking about.

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Ed, before we let you go, you have a

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 2>conversation with Jensen coming up a little later, a special

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 2>edition of Bloomberg Technology, an exclusive interview with Jensen Wong.

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Just the last forty five seconds we have with you,

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 2>give us how without giving away the questions, tell us

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 2>how you're thinking about this.

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:51.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that you know me. I love details.

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 4>So I'm going to ask about Blackwell, although it's Bloomberg

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 4>policy not to give questions in advance of interview, and

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure somebody from Nvidia is listening, but that's the question.

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 4>And then I heard you talking to remain boss Stick

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 4>about his surprise that revenue comes from just five players.

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 4>I thought I'd been saying that on our network every

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 4>week the last two years.

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 3>But that is the question.

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 4>When do you move beyond that, you want to sell

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 4>to smaller and medium sized enterprises, governments and other public institutions.

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 4>Do you have some evidence that that's already happening.

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 2>That's a point that Ian King brought up at the

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 2>top of our two o'clock hour right here on Bloomberg

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 2>TV in Bloomberg Radio. I'm going to tell Romaine to

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 2>listen to you more, Ed, so he's not surprised in

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 2>the future.

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Sy A lot going on, all.

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Right, Good luck, kiddo. With that, we'll be listening to

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that interview Ed La La, co host of Bloomberg Technology

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg TV and again Bloomberg Technology, we'll have that

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>half hour special at six thirty pm Wall Street Time,

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 1>highlighted by that exclusive interview that Ed will have with

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Nvidio, Jensen Wog. And right now we've

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>got Sure's of Nvidia down about five point one percent

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 1>here in the aftermarket.

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Happening quickly. The reaction has been big. It was nothing

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 2>and then it was more than it was eight percent.

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 2>It was like three percent.

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Did you go down as much as eight percent at

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:09.439
<v Speaker 1>one point. It's been bouncing around and we've seen, yeah,

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>some interesting moves here. And we are seeing as I mentioned,

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Naszak one undred many futures there down about two percent here,

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 1>So we're seeing some drag. Not coming and done completely,

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's interesting. Let's see what Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Semiconductor

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Alice kun John Sabani has to say about that, he

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 1>joins us. He's out there in our San Francisco bureau.

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.839
<v Speaker 1>All right, top of mind for you, cun John, tell

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>us about the quarter? Do they do Okay? How's the outlook?

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 1>It seems like there's a little bit of disappointment here.

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, I think they did really good as

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 5>part of our expectations. I'm sure the Nvidia obsesses and

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 5>might be disappointed given the magnitude of the beat, which

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 5>we had called out to be in the single digit range,

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 5>and especially against the lofty, unsustainable expectations that some of

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 5>the again Nvidia opssis have been forming. But fundamentally in

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 5>terms of long term, in terms of the competitive landscape,

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:08.319
<v Speaker 5>everything remains intact. We don't see any big risks out

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 5>of this earning so far.

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you see any softness when it comes to the outlook?

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Even though it did it exceeded some expectations, it didn't

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 2>exceed the loftiest expectations. Are you seeing signs of softness

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 2>with its customers?

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 5>I wouldn't call it a softness in terms of demand.

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 5>I would rather call it more of a timing. I mean,

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 5>in the given last thirty days, we have come to

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 5>know about the black Well delays, right, But as we

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 5>had called out in our preview, there's enough demand for

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 5>the Hopper series and the supply for that has come along,

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 5>so they have the ability to ship more and more

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 5>to this demand, which kept them intact and the guidance

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 5>still came to a bait. Of course, I think you know,

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 5>the DLA might actually push out the magnitude of beat

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 5>which we would have expected into twenty five calendar twenty five,

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 5>which might actually drive increased to the upside of twenty

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 5>five numbers. As we get more details on it.

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Help can textualize this for us in Video expects to

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 2>ship several billion dollars of Blackwell revenue in the fourth

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 2>quarter of the year. I feel like Carol, I'm parsing

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 2>a fed statement here.

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>It will kind of vague.

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 2>What does several mean? Kun John? Is that a lot?

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Or is that disappointing to investors?

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 5>I wouldn't call it completely disappointing. Again, given what we

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 5>came to know over the last four weeks. When we

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 5>were working on the previous two weeks ago, we thought

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 5>it will be very little volume. So the several billion

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 5>actually is good in a way and comforting that Okay,

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 5>there will be some shipment, and it's not completely delayed

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 5>until the first Q fiscal quarter, so I wouldn't call

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 5>it completely disappointing.

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>So we are watching big tech falling after Nvidia their results,

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned, the Nasdaq one under many futures in

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the aftermarket down one point six percent. Uh, it's you know,

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the q Q that also we see

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>it down about half a percent. I mean, when it

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>comes to the AI story and the build out and

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the spend, you sound really comfortable with what we've got

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>from Nvidia, that that narrative, that story, that actuality is

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>still intact. Is that a fair assessment of how you

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>see this?

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 5>It is and given we look at the fundamentals, especially

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 5>from a long term perspective, and not the magnitude of

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 5>beat and race quarter to quarter. When you look at

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 5>the disc earning season, almost all of the hyperscalers, the

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 5>big internet companies, the big cloud players actually announced a

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 5>beat to their capex and almost across the board to

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 5>their revenues. Right, So that again validates like the demand

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 5>is not slowing. Nothing has changed in the last two weeks,

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 5>just given the Nvidia results. So I agree with your

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 5>comment that we do feel comfortable around the broader dynamics

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 5>and the demand tailwinds for the AI chips.

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>So one of the things we just talked about with

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>ur Ed Ludlow too, is when you look at the

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>supply chain function on Nvidia their top customers, it's kind

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of a who's who of big megacap tech companies. Microsoft

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.360
<v Speaker 1>is their number one customer. Forty five percent of their

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>cap X goes to Nvidia Meta number two customer, forty

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>one percent of their CAPEX spend already goes to Nvidia

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Super micro Computer, which we've been talking about a lot

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>in its woes or alleged woes that one about, I

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know. A big chunk of what they spend also

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>goes to Nvidia. Alphabet is another one, almost fifty percent

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:37.679
<v Speaker 1>fifteen of their CAPEX goes to Nvideo. So you have

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:40.439
<v Speaker 1>enough confidence that those companies will continue to spend. They

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>are so important right to the Nvidia growth story. So

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>as long as you hear from them that they are spending,

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you're pretty confident.

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 5>Exactly as long as we don't see any negative feedback

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 5>from them publicly. The confidence that demains. One more point

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 5>to highlight from the CFO commentary letter. This quarter there

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 5>percentage of data center revenues from the cloud actually came

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 5>down to forty five percent. It had been running over

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.400
<v Speaker 5>fifty percent over the last year. So this is even

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.640
<v Speaker 5>though on a magnetude terms, a small victory, I still

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 5>see it as a positive direction that they're diversifying slightly

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 5>slowly but away from the big cloud customers, and the

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 5>enterprise and vertical segment is growing significantly faster.

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we got yeah. We heard from Ian King earlier

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 2>and also from Ed Ludlow earlier about diversification of revenue

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Konjohn and the idea that the company is looking to

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 2>get business from governments, smaller companies offloading work that usually

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 2>would take place in the cloud to stuff that's on

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:56.239
<v Speaker 2>prem what's that business from your view look like? Are

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 2>they making headway there?

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 5>They are, definitely. And again the one clear sign is

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 5>when you parse out the data center into sort of

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 5>three buckets. One is the cloud customers, right, one is

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 5>the enterprise, which is a much much more diverse but

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 5>smaller pockets compared to the cloud, and the other one

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 5>being the internet and vertical companies. We want to continue

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 5>seeing the combination of these Internet vertical companies combined with

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 5>enterprise continue to grow much faster than the cloud. Look,

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 5>the cloud guys have the biggest wallets, so they are

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 5>definitely going to drive a majority of the growth. But

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 5>we want that percentage that moved from fifty to forty

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 5>five to continue moving slower. At the same time, in

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 5>media revenues continue to grow as well.

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Just to reset everybody, because nvideo results they are out.

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>They've been out now for I don't know about fifteen

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 1>minutes or so. Our headline story written by Bloomberg's Ian King,

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>who we talked to at two o'clock ahead of this.

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>And Nvidia, which is really the chip maker at the

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 1>heart of the artificial intelligence boom gave a revenue forecast

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that fell short of some of the most optimistic estimates.

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Token conser learns that its explosive growth is waning. Third

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>quarter revenue will be about thirty two point five billion.

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>The company just put that out. Analysts had predicted thirty

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 1>one point nine billion on average, so that was a beat,

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>but some estimates range as high as thirty seven point

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>nine billion, so almost thirty eight billion sales in the

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>fiscal second quarter, which ran through July. They though Tim

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 1>did top analyst projection.

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at Eddian King's commentary on our live blog,

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 2>which you should all check out while you're listening to

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 2>us on Bloomberg Radio or watching us on YouTube or

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Originals. He writes that most questions will zero in

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 2>on how many billions of dollars in revenue Blackwell will

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 2>generate in the fourth quarter. Yeah, that's that's the question

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:37.439
<v Speaker 2>we've been asking.

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely right, this is what we want to know.

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:42.400
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we're talking also with Bloomberg Intelligence Senior

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Semiconductor Alice Kunjohn Sabani who is joining us, and you

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:49.199
<v Speaker 1>seem very comfortable with the report. Stock now just down

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 1>about one and a half percent, so there's been a

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of bouncing around in the aftermarket. What if you

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 1>were sitting down with the CEO as our Ed Ludlow

0:20:57.240 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to be doing at six pm Wall Street

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>time or six is it six PMOS six six thirty

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 1>pm Wall Street time? What would be some of your

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>top questions that you'd want to ask? Jensen Wang, co

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>founder and CEO of the company.

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.680
<v Speaker 5>Well, I would definitely want to get extract as much

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:16.160
<v Speaker 5>color as I can into the calendar. Twenty five outlook.

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 5>I know he might not provide that, but any more

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 5>color I can get on the volume or the dollar

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 5>outlook for the Blackwell series would be really would shun

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 5>all the concerns that we have right now and sort

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 5>of put to bed all the uncertainty.

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>All right. That really helps a lot because it does

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>feel like it all comes down to Blackwell, right. It

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>was kind of going in Kunjan, Thank you so much.

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Look forward to reading your research that'll come out a

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.199
<v Speaker 1>little bit later and into tomorrow. Bloomberg Intelligence senior semiconductor

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 1>analysts kujoh and Sabani on those Nvidia earnings