1 00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:04,040 Speaker 1: Runt You by Bank of America Mary Lynch. With virtual reality, 2 00:00:04,320 --> 00:00:09,719 Speaker 1: virtually everything will change. Discover opportunities in a transforming world. 3 00:00:10,119 --> 00:00:14,440 Speaker 1: Be of a, mL dot Com, slash VR, Mary Lynch, 4 00:00:14,520 --> 00:00:29,240 Speaker 1: Pierced Fenner and Smith Incorporated. Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. 5 00:00:29,280 --> 00:00:32,760 Speaker 1: I'm Tom Keene with David Gura. Daily we bring you 6 00:00:32,840 --> 00:00:37,640 Speaker 1: insight from the best of economics, finance, investment, and international relations. 7 00:00:38,120 --> 00:00:43,640 Speaker 1: Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com, 8 00:00:43,640 --> 00:00:51,120 Speaker 1: and of course on the Bloomberg. We begin our job 9 00:00:51,159 --> 00:00:55,000 Speaker 1: coverage in this hour with Alan Krueger of Princeton University, 10 00:00:55,400 --> 00:00:58,840 Speaker 1: truly giant of modern economics, particularly his work on the 11 00:00:58,880 --> 00:01:00,640 Speaker 1: hourly wage. We can talk about that in a bit. 12 00:01:01,040 --> 00:01:03,160 Speaker 1: You're piling through one of my books of the summer 13 00:01:03,240 --> 00:01:06,760 Speaker 1: a couple of years ago, Leonard Oiler Mathematical Genius in 14 00:01:06,800 --> 00:01:09,640 Speaker 1: the Enlightenment, which is really heavy reading, a lot of 15 00:01:09,680 --> 00:01:13,160 Speaker 1: math in it, a lot of formulas. Fortunately, Tom, it's 16 00:01:13,200 --> 00:01:15,920 Speaker 1: the beginning of the summer. Yeah. But and it's it's 17 00:01:15,959 --> 00:01:18,680 Speaker 1: it's a tough book to get through because it's got 18 00:01:18,720 --> 00:01:21,839 Speaker 1: a lot of theory in it. It's a very significant book. 19 00:01:21,840 --> 00:01:25,640 Speaker 1: I was more interested in his life, which very little 20 00:01:25,680 --> 00:01:28,800 Speaker 1: about um. And it's tough going. I have to say, 21 00:01:28,800 --> 00:01:31,040 Speaker 1: to get through the physics and the math, well that's 22 00:01:31,040 --> 00:01:34,319 Speaker 1: where I wanted to do. It is the physics in 23 00:01:34,360 --> 00:01:37,880 Speaker 1: the math and the era. Then the mystery why is 24 00:01:37,880 --> 00:01:40,920 Speaker 1: our central banking now any different? I mean, do we 25 00:01:41,040 --> 00:01:44,360 Speaker 1: have an understanding of the physics in the math of 26 00:01:44,400 --> 00:01:48,680 Speaker 1: our central banking? Thinking you know what it's remarkable for 27 00:01:48,720 --> 00:01:52,760 Speaker 1: me and thinking about the book is humans have been 28 00:01:52,760 --> 00:01:58,120 Speaker 1: thinking about developing math for millennia and the progress was slow. 29 00:01:58,240 --> 00:02:01,600 Speaker 1: Yet in the early eighteenth century they know far more 30 00:02:02,520 --> 00:02:07,160 Speaker 1: than typical college student knows today. And when it comes 31 00:02:07,200 --> 00:02:12,359 Speaker 1: to central banking, were you know much earlier in this period, 32 00:02:12,919 --> 00:02:16,680 Speaker 1: so we're sort of pre Newton. I'd say, I want 33 00:02:16,880 --> 00:02:18,680 Speaker 1: I'll put a question you. Tom often puts to two 34 00:02:18,680 --> 00:02:21,120 Speaker 1: folks who are who are academics, that is, are how 35 00:02:21,440 --> 00:02:24,160 Speaker 1: engaged with the mathematics or students in your department today 36 00:02:24,200 --> 00:02:26,840 Speaker 1: students who are studying economics. Are they as engaged with 37 00:02:26,919 --> 00:02:29,400 Speaker 1: mathematics as they used to be? Oh? Probably more so. 38 00:02:30,200 --> 00:02:32,359 Speaker 1: I don't think, David, I'd be able to get into 39 00:02:32,400 --> 00:02:34,760 Speaker 1: graduate school with the math that I had at Cornell today. 40 00:02:35,560 --> 00:02:38,400 Speaker 1: But I would say this economics is more logic and 41 00:02:38,400 --> 00:02:41,280 Speaker 1: more analysis than math, and I think the math is 42 00:02:41,280 --> 00:02:44,799 Speaker 1: a proxy for someone who can think analytically. There used 43 00:02:44,800 --> 00:02:47,679 Speaker 1: to be on the g R E exam an analysis part, 44 00:02:48,400 --> 00:02:52,520 Speaker 1: and that was a stronger predictor of how well economists performed, 45 00:02:52,560 --> 00:02:55,280 Speaker 1: how well they fared, than the math component. Yeah. But 46 00:02:55,320 --> 00:02:57,320 Speaker 1: we had a great debate this week with Adam Posen, 47 00:02:57,360 --> 00:03:01,040 Speaker 1: who defended the orthodoxy of Phillips curvics or etcetera, and 48 00:03:01,120 --> 00:03:04,120 Speaker 1: John Riding who took him more Neil Viccellian view. It's 49 00:03:04,160 --> 00:03:07,359 Speaker 1: the markets, it's we need to improve regulation, we need 50 00:03:07,400 --> 00:03:11,920 Speaker 1: to change corporate texts, etcetera. More market based, more flow based. 51 00:03:12,240 --> 00:03:15,359 Speaker 1: Which where's the tendency right now? Are we going to 52 00:03:15,520 --> 00:03:17,920 Speaker 1: end up back to the orthodoxy of ten years ago? 53 00:03:18,280 --> 00:03:21,040 Speaker 1: In ten years I don't know. Those are so inconsistent, 54 00:03:21,080 --> 00:03:22,919 Speaker 1: to be perfectly honest, If you think about where the 55 00:03:22,919 --> 00:03:25,799 Speaker 1: Phillips curve comes from, I think of it more is 56 00:03:25,880 --> 00:03:30,480 Speaker 1: coming from my dynamic view of the economy. So I 57 00:03:30,520 --> 00:03:33,600 Speaker 1: don't see a conflict. I can tell you I uh 58 00:03:33,760 --> 00:03:37,120 Speaker 1: put some weight on historical estimates of the Phillips curve, 59 00:03:37,720 --> 00:03:39,800 Speaker 1: and I also think making sure that we've got a 60 00:03:39,840 --> 00:03:42,800 Speaker 1: proper regulatory regime for a financial system is important to 61 00:03:42,880 --> 00:03:45,680 Speaker 1: make UH the economy work for everyone. Let's get to 62 00:03:45,720 --> 00:03:47,800 Speaker 1: this job support. What are you gonna be looking for today? 63 00:03:47,800 --> 00:03:49,680 Speaker 1: What's this report going to indicate to you about the 64 00:03:49,840 --> 00:03:54,520 Speaker 1: health of the U s economy? Well, you know, the 65 00:03:54,560 --> 00:03:56,640 Speaker 1: most important number in the jobs report is the top 66 00:03:56,720 --> 00:04:02,120 Speaker 1: line UH peril growth number. But under the surface labor 67 00:04:02,160 --> 00:04:06,120 Speaker 1: force participation, what's happening with wages? It seems pretty clear 68 00:04:06,160 --> 00:04:08,400 Speaker 1: that job growth has been moderating the first six months 69 00:04:08,400 --> 00:04:11,120 Speaker 1: of this year. That's not surprising given where we are 70 00:04:11,160 --> 00:04:13,280 Speaker 1: in the business cycle, given that the unemployment rate is 71 00:04:13,320 --> 00:04:15,960 Speaker 1: below four and a half percent. So I'll be looking 72 00:04:15,960 --> 00:04:19,279 Speaker 1: closely to see if their further science of moderation, focusing 73 00:04:19,279 --> 00:04:22,400 Speaker 1: on manufacturing, which has been pretty much moving sideways, although 74 00:04:23,160 --> 00:04:25,800 Speaker 1: with the decline in auto sales, I'm concerned that could 75 00:04:25,800 --> 00:04:29,760 Speaker 1: pull down all of manufacturing. UM. So those are the 76 00:04:30,440 --> 00:04:33,320 Speaker 1: main aspects of the report. I'll look at from a 77 00:04:33,360 --> 00:04:36,520 Speaker 1: policy perspective, what what could what could improve those manufacturing numbers? 78 00:04:36,560 --> 00:04:40,719 Speaker 1: That do you think? Um, that's a good question. I 79 00:04:40,760 --> 00:04:45,200 Speaker 1: think fundamentally we need to invest more in research and development, manufacturing, 80 00:04:45,600 --> 00:04:51,479 Speaker 1: and what drove manufacturing is developing new products, products that 81 00:04:51,520 --> 00:04:56,520 Speaker 1: can do new things. Uh. Also what drove manufacturing is 82 00:04:56,560 --> 00:05:00,560 Speaker 1: productivity growth, and that's continuing. It's driving down employment. So 83 00:05:00,640 --> 00:05:02,240 Speaker 1: I think we need to think more on the product 84 00:05:02,279 --> 00:05:06,080 Speaker 1: side and how can we leverage our technology to create 85 00:05:06,640 --> 00:05:09,159 Speaker 1: products that improve people's lives and put people to work. 86 00:05:09,960 --> 00:05:12,280 Speaker 1: I think we need to rip up the script. We're 87 00:05:12,279 --> 00:05:15,760 Speaker 1: coming back and talk to Alan Krueger about everybody wants 88 00:05:15,800 --> 00:05:20,600 Speaker 1: to hear about. I'm gonna guess Professor Krueger, correct me, 89 00:05:21,120 --> 00:05:25,120 Speaker 1: Card Krueger. Krueger Card a definitive paper on the labor 90 00:05:25,200 --> 00:05:29,440 Speaker 1: economy of this nation. There is no other topic in 91 00:05:29,560 --> 00:05:34,760 Speaker 1: labor economics now about the efficacy and result of twelve, 92 00:05:34,880 --> 00:05:38,920 Speaker 1: thirteen and fifteen dollars per our minimum wage. Something everyone's 93 00:05:38,960 --> 00:05:43,159 Speaker 1: been waiting for. Alan Krueger of Princeton on the minimum wage. Okay, 94 00:05:43,200 --> 00:05:46,680 Speaker 1: here's the debate. The Washington Examine or conservative rag comes 95 00:05:46,680 --> 00:05:49,159 Speaker 1: out and says liberals hate this report. And then the 96 00:05:49,200 --> 00:05:52,440 Speaker 1: Washington Post comes out liberal rag and says, wait, the 97 00:05:52,480 --> 00:05:56,920 Speaker 1: Washington Examiner's got a point. Essentially correct me if I'm wrong. 98 00:05:56,960 --> 00:06:02,679 Speaker 1: Professor Seattle and others are finally getting the minimum wage 99 00:06:02,880 --> 00:06:08,320 Speaker 1: back up to its inflation adjusted level from another time 100 00:06:08,320 --> 00:06:11,360 Speaker 1: and place. In recent decades, a minimum wage has been 101 00:06:11,400 --> 00:06:16,240 Speaker 1: set below that inflation adjusted glide path from before, and 102 00:06:16,279 --> 00:06:19,760 Speaker 1: now at eleven fifteen dollars an hour, we're really beginning 103 00:06:19,800 --> 00:06:25,360 Speaker 1: to test what's the best minimum wage. How's the test going? Well, 104 00:06:25,400 --> 00:06:28,040 Speaker 1: I think it's very preliminary, so I will go with that. 105 00:06:28,279 --> 00:06:31,679 Speaker 1: I would reserve judgment. I've looked at the studies from Seattle. 106 00:06:31,720 --> 00:06:35,960 Speaker 1: There's more than one, and I think that the conventional 107 00:06:36,000 --> 00:06:39,440 Speaker 1: wisdom which has become that modest increases in the minimum 108 00:06:39,440 --> 00:06:43,839 Speaker 1: wage don't have a noticeable impact unemployment is still correct, 109 00:06:44,320 --> 00:06:47,520 Speaker 1: and we don't know where the turning point is. UM. 110 00:06:47,640 --> 00:06:51,120 Speaker 1: The UH evidence that we're going to start to get 111 00:06:51,240 --> 00:06:54,599 Speaker 1: from Washington State, from Los Angeles, from a few other cities, 112 00:06:55,160 --> 00:06:57,520 Speaker 1: I think might help us to determine where that turning 113 00:06:57,560 --> 00:07:01,440 Speaker 1: point is. I've been concerned that fifteen dollars and hours 114 00:07:01,440 --> 00:07:05,680 Speaker 1: beyond what we've experienced. UM. On the other hand, adjusted 115 00:07:05,720 --> 00:07:08,440 Speaker 1: for inflation, that would put us throrom eleven twelve dollars 116 00:07:08,480 --> 00:07:11,200 Speaker 1: an hour. Every business person listening to this right now 117 00:07:11,280 --> 00:07:13,640 Speaker 1: is going Professor Greg go back to Princeton. We gotta 118 00:07:13,680 --> 00:07:16,440 Speaker 1: live in the real world. We can't wait for more data, 119 00:07:16,520 --> 00:07:20,480 Speaker 1: more time, more responsible economic studies. What do you say 120 00:07:20,520 --> 00:07:23,040 Speaker 1: to the person going, wait, I gotta go from X 121 00:07:23,080 --> 00:07:25,920 Speaker 1: to fifteen or thirteen eleven, and the only way I'm 122 00:07:25,920 --> 00:07:30,720 Speaker 1: gonna do this is productivity, efficiency, robots and depreciate labor 123 00:07:30,880 --> 00:07:34,800 Speaker 1: unit count. I mean, it's just fewer people employed, right, Well, 124 00:07:34,840 --> 00:07:37,480 Speaker 1: I think it's more complicated than that. Um. I think 125 00:07:37,520 --> 00:07:41,760 Speaker 1: what many individual businesses miss is that their competitors are 126 00:07:41,800 --> 00:07:44,760 Speaker 1: also facing higher prices. So one of the things we've 127 00:07:44,800 --> 00:07:47,000 Speaker 1: seen in the past is that minimum wage increases are 128 00:07:47,040 --> 00:07:50,400 Speaker 1: often passed on in the form of higher prices. UM. 129 00:07:50,440 --> 00:07:53,240 Speaker 1: And given how low inflation is at the moment, Uh, 130 00:07:53,280 --> 00:07:55,480 Speaker 1: there might be some who actually think that it's not 131 00:07:55,480 --> 00:07:57,560 Speaker 1: not the end of the world. But I think that 132 00:07:57,640 --> 00:08:02,040 Speaker 1: the impact on an individual business is is not as 133 00:08:02,080 --> 00:08:06,200 Speaker 1: great as often as perceived because it's affecting the entire market. 134 00:08:07,000 --> 00:08:10,240 Speaker 1: Let me ask you a broader question about policy making 135 00:08:10,520 --> 00:08:12,280 Speaker 1: in the year two thousand and seventeen. Tom brings up 136 00:08:12,320 --> 00:08:14,760 Speaker 1: the minimum wage, but you see a lot of decisions 137 00:08:14,760 --> 00:08:16,320 Speaker 1: being made at the state and local level that in 138 00:08:16,360 --> 00:08:18,200 Speaker 1: the past have been made at the federal level. What 139 00:08:18,200 --> 00:08:20,240 Speaker 1: does that city about the role of the federal government 140 00:08:20,280 --> 00:08:24,280 Speaker 1: if you have UH cities and states tackling regulatory issues 141 00:08:24,360 --> 00:08:27,680 Speaker 1: minimum wage issues. So what's changed. We've seen this before 142 00:08:27,720 --> 00:08:31,240 Speaker 1: with the minimum wage in the nineteen eighties, when the 143 00:08:31,280 --> 00:08:35,160 Speaker 1: federal government didn't raise the minimum wage, the states stepped up. 144 00:08:35,640 --> 00:08:39,880 Speaker 1: That's what's been taking place since two and nine, the 145 00:08:39,960 --> 00:08:43,400 Speaker 1: last time the federal minimum wage increased. Donald Trump proposed 146 00:08:43,440 --> 00:08:45,400 Speaker 1: raising the minimum wage to ten dollars an hour when 147 00:08:45,440 --> 00:08:48,760 Speaker 1: I ran for office. That struck me as a reasonable compromise, 148 00:08:48,800 --> 00:08:51,199 Speaker 1: a reasonable level. I don't believe he's ever brought that 149 00:08:51,320 --> 00:08:55,640 Speaker 1: up again, um and I think that's something which consensus 150 00:08:55,640 --> 00:09:00,400 Speaker 1: could be formed behind and might lead to a national floor, 151 00:09:00,520 --> 00:09:05,280 Speaker 1: which is UH leading to UH more people to be 152 00:09:05,360 --> 00:09:09,599 Speaker 1: able to earn a living that they can survive. On 153 00:09:09,600 --> 00:09:11,079 Speaker 1: one other thing, I wanted to point out time we're 154 00:09:11,080 --> 00:09:14,679 Speaker 1: in a strange time now because job openings have been 155 00:09:14,679 --> 00:09:19,680 Speaker 1: growing very quickly, much faster than hiring, and it raises 156 00:09:19,720 --> 00:09:22,640 Speaker 1: the question why aren't we seeing more more wage growth? 157 00:09:22,720 --> 00:09:24,839 Speaker 1: And historically in that kind of environment, I think we 158 00:09:24,840 --> 00:09:27,520 Speaker 1: would have seen stronger wage growth. One of the reasons 159 00:09:27,520 --> 00:09:30,200 Speaker 1: why this is taking place now, I think is because 160 00:09:30,240 --> 00:09:34,679 Speaker 1: companies have imposed non compete clauses on their workers make 161 00:09:34,720 --> 00:09:37,200 Speaker 1: it harder for them to switch. Even McDonald's has a 162 00:09:37,280 --> 00:09:41,760 Speaker 1: requirement that franchisees can't hire away employees from other McDonald's 163 00:09:41,800 --> 00:09:43,760 Speaker 1: unless they've been out of work for more than six months. 164 00:09:44,080 --> 00:09:46,000 Speaker 1: So I think this is chilling the labor market and 165 00:09:46,640 --> 00:09:48,559 Speaker 1: putting a lid on wages, and it's one of the 166 00:09:48,600 --> 00:09:51,720 Speaker 1: reasons why we're not seeing wage growth, which the minimum wage. 167 00:09:52,080 --> 00:09:53,839 Speaker 1: You know, historically when we were in this type of 168 00:09:53,840 --> 00:09:55,560 Speaker 1: a labor market, we would see an increase in the 169 00:09:55,559 --> 00:09:59,440 Speaker 1: federal minimum wage. Somebody's nine and they go to eleven 170 00:09:59,440 --> 00:10:01,720 Speaker 1: dollars to any five cents in our minimum wage, whatever 171 00:10:01,720 --> 00:10:04,720 Speaker 1: the geography is, whatever the state does. Everybody else go 172 00:10:04,800 --> 00:10:07,199 Speaker 1: up a buck or two as well. There is often 173 00:10:07,240 --> 00:10:09,840 Speaker 1: a big spell over. There's a debate in the profession 174 00:10:09,840 --> 00:10:13,600 Speaker 1: now about how high that spellover goes. Um that's one 175 00:10:13,600 --> 00:10:17,560 Speaker 1: of the issues they are looking for. It does tend 176 00:10:17,640 --> 00:10:20,840 Speaker 1: to ratch it up the whole wage distribution, which makes sense. 177 00:10:20,880 --> 00:10:24,120 Speaker 1: Workers care about their relative their relative pay. That's one 178 00:10:24,120 --> 00:10:26,760 Speaker 1: of the reasons why employers resist pay increases because it's 179 00:10:26,760 --> 00:10:29,680 Speaker 1: not just the individual employee. It's the whole pace will 180 00:10:29,679 --> 00:10:32,800 Speaker 1: be effective. This is this is desperately important. You just 181 00:10:32,840 --> 00:10:36,440 Speaker 1: stated there's a lot of job openings. Why don't they 182 00:10:36,520 --> 00:10:42,600 Speaker 1: just raise the wage? Money talks. I can't get welders, 183 00:10:42,600 --> 00:10:45,960 Speaker 1: I can't get economics professors like you know, I can't 184 00:10:46,000 --> 00:10:51,440 Speaker 1: get why you yet you know, just raise the wage 185 00:10:51,440 --> 00:10:54,559 Speaker 1: and why you en right? I think employers have gotten 186 00:10:54,640 --> 00:10:57,079 Speaker 1: used to an environment which were no longer in, but 187 00:10:57,240 --> 00:10:59,800 Speaker 1: an environment where we had a surplus of labor. And 188 00:10:59,840 --> 00:11:02,520 Speaker 1: I think we're heading more towards a labor shortage economy, 189 00:11:03,000 --> 00:11:05,360 Speaker 1: partly because of our demographics, partly because of our new 190 00:11:05,400 --> 00:11:10,040 Speaker 1: immigration policy. UM and I think that employers need to 191 00:11:10,080 --> 00:11:12,320 Speaker 1: adjust to this new environment. And I think the more 192 00:11:12,440 --> 00:11:15,200 Speaker 1: enlightened ones will see it's in your interests to respond 193 00:11:15,240 --> 00:11:17,360 Speaker 1: to these market conditions. What do we need to know 194 00:11:17,360 --> 00:11:20,360 Speaker 1: about the skills gap are calling? Michael McKee was in Cambridge, 195 00:11:20,360 --> 00:11:22,880 Speaker 1: Massachusetts yesterday. He spoke with a darn a smugglof of 196 00:11:23,040 --> 00:11:25,320 Speaker 1: m I t about this very issue. It struck me 197 00:11:25,360 --> 00:11:28,680 Speaker 1: talking to Mike Boston. Cambridge in a very privileged place. 198 00:11:28,720 --> 00:11:32,480 Speaker 1: They're surrounded by great academic institutions and have their pick 199 00:11:32,520 --> 00:11:34,760 Speaker 1: of a lot of those graduates becoming tougher and deffort 200 00:11:34,800 --> 00:11:37,559 Speaker 1: to get those graduates to stick around the greater Boston area. 201 00:11:37,679 --> 00:11:39,080 Speaker 1: What do we need to know about the skills gap 202 00:11:39,080 --> 00:11:41,520 Speaker 1: and how to how to narrow that divine? Well, I 203 00:11:41,520 --> 00:11:43,280 Speaker 1: think there is a skills gap, and I think we 204 00:11:43,320 --> 00:11:47,000 Speaker 1: need to start early. I think it's a long term problem. 205 00:11:47,000 --> 00:11:48,400 Speaker 1: I think it's been a problem for a long time 206 00:11:48,400 --> 00:11:51,760 Speaker 1: for the US. But that can't explain the entire puzzle 207 00:11:51,840 --> 00:11:55,920 Speaker 1: that we're facing because the fastest growth in job openings 208 00:11:55,920 --> 00:12:01,160 Speaker 1: has been for restaurant workers, for hotel workers, retail um work, 209 00:12:01,440 --> 00:12:06,520 Speaker 1: which has relatively low credentials uh generally lower education levels. 210 00:12:06,840 --> 00:12:08,480 Speaker 1: So I don't think it's only a matter of skills. 211 00:12:08,520 --> 00:12:10,600 Speaker 1: I think it's partly a matter of employer policy and 212 00:12:10,640 --> 00:12:14,360 Speaker 1: reluctance to pay more for for both high and low skills. 213 00:12:14,400 --> 00:12:18,040 Speaker 1: Are we exporting our skilled jobs? I mean you just 214 00:12:18,240 --> 00:12:21,440 Speaker 1: mentioned three job categories or everybody's going I don't want 215 00:12:21,480 --> 00:12:23,319 Speaker 1: my kid to do that. You know they can you know, 216 00:12:23,360 --> 00:12:25,280 Speaker 1: minimum wage, fine, and go get a summer job. Great, 217 00:12:26,000 --> 00:12:31,000 Speaker 1: But are we struggling with our skilled jobs because they're 218 00:12:31,000 --> 00:12:34,560 Speaker 1: going abroad? Is that the new globalization? Well, that's a 219 00:12:34,679 --> 00:12:38,679 Speaker 1: risk I think with our new immigration policy, because, uh, 220 00:12:39,000 --> 00:12:41,280 Speaker 1: if you look at the mix of immigrants coming to 221 00:12:41,320 --> 00:12:45,000 Speaker 1: the US, it's both a highly skilled and the low skilled. 222 00:12:45,960 --> 00:12:49,959 Speaker 1: It's a barbell and also very ambitious people at all levels. 223 00:12:50,480 --> 00:12:53,560 Speaker 1: Um And to the extent we're making the US less 224 00:12:53,600 --> 00:12:57,880 Speaker 1: friendly for immigrants, that's gonna hurt employers. It's gonna hurt 225 00:12:58,040 --> 00:13:01,840 Speaker 1: employees across the spectrum be cause, uh, the jobs that 226 00:13:02,280 --> 00:13:06,120 Speaker 1: the skilled workers would help create for less skill workers 227 00:13:06,120 --> 00:13:10,559 Speaker 1: won't be here, some of them. David mentions Michael Michael mckem. 228 00:13:10,640 --> 00:13:12,319 Speaker 1: Meeting it up at m I M I T. You 229 00:13:12,360 --> 00:13:13,640 Speaker 1: may not know the l A M I T is 230 00:13:13,679 --> 00:13:16,559 Speaker 1: a school up on a river in Boston. I was 231 00:13:16,640 --> 00:13:20,480 Speaker 1: very impressive. You can both pronounce as I have Smart. 232 00:13:20,559 --> 00:13:22,520 Speaker 1: The one that I can pronounce smart. Crumpton helps you 233 00:13:22,640 --> 00:13:24,920 Speaker 1: know what people don't know. The only reason I can 234 00:13:24,960 --> 00:13:27,760 Speaker 1: pronounce these names is Crumpton is in my ear telling 235 00:13:27,760 --> 00:13:30,560 Speaker 1: me how to pronounce it. He's the best. Okay, long 236 00:13:30,679 --> 00:13:33,319 Speaker 1: term growth and his research up at m I T 237 00:13:34,080 --> 00:13:38,959 Speaker 1: is institutions, institutions, institutions. Where are we on an institutional 238 00:13:39,280 --> 00:13:43,600 Speaker 1: flexibility that gives us a better long term growth? I 239 00:13:43,640 --> 00:13:46,200 Speaker 1: think their own their own smog is an excellent work 240 00:13:46,240 --> 00:13:49,120 Speaker 1: in this area. UM. And historically, I think one of 241 00:13:49,160 --> 00:13:51,359 Speaker 1: the great strengths of the U S has been our institutions, 242 00:13:51,720 --> 00:13:56,320 Speaker 1: our institutions of free press or institutions of UH Central Banking, 243 00:13:56,440 --> 00:13:59,840 Speaker 1: Congressional Budget Office, UH checks and balances. That we have 244 00:13:59,880 --> 00:14:04,520 Speaker 1: a government and UH. Frankly, I'm worried that UH they're 245 00:14:04,559 --> 00:14:09,800 Speaker 1: they're under stress now with the new administration. UM. I 246 00:14:09,840 --> 00:14:13,520 Speaker 1: think we need to really praise our our institutions. By 247 00:14:13,559 --> 00:14:15,400 Speaker 1: the way, I was listening to your show last week 248 00:14:15,400 --> 00:14:17,720 Speaker 1: and I heard you both you listen to us. I 249 00:14:17,800 --> 00:14:19,680 Speaker 1: was driving into work and I just broke and he 250 00:14:20,560 --> 00:14:23,560 Speaker 1: heard you both mentioned the CBO executive summaries. I think 251 00:14:23,560 --> 00:14:26,560 Speaker 1: probably on the healthcare bill. UH. CBO's an institution where 252 00:14:26,560 --> 00:14:28,800 Speaker 1: you have to cherish even when I disagree with him. 253 00:14:28,800 --> 00:14:31,080 Speaker 1: I think it's an institution that I have tremendous regard for. 254 00:14:31,560 --> 00:14:34,840 Speaker 1: We're up to seven listeners in New Jersey. That's unbelievable. 255 00:14:34,840 --> 00:14:38,360 Speaker 1: Why you unreal? Alan Krueger, thank you so much. We'll 256 00:14:38,440 --> 00:14:40,280 Speaker 1: leave it there with the fact that you listen to us. 257 00:14:40,400 --> 00:14:43,400 Speaker 1: I'm Bloomberger eleven three oh in serious XM Channel one nineteen. 258 00:14:43,520 --> 00:14:46,200 Speaker 1: We said good morning one or six one FM Boston, 259 00:14:46,760 --> 00:14:50,720 Speaker 1: Good morning to all of Sloane at Massachusetts Institute. What's 260 00:14:50,720 --> 00:14:54,000 Speaker 1: the name of the schools up river? I can't I 261 00:14:54,000 --> 00:14:59,520 Speaker 1: can't remember Leslie University. Watch yourself younger. That will get 262 00:14:59,600 --> 00:15:17,520 Speaker 1: us into trouble as well. Really, really, thank Jim Glassman 263 00:15:17,600 --> 00:15:21,200 Speaker 1: for joining us today from scenic Glendale, calif waking up 264 00:15:21,240 --> 00:15:24,400 Speaker 1: early for yes, you really appreciate your early morning hours. 265 00:15:24,840 --> 00:15:29,440 Speaker 1: How important is this job's report? Dr Glassman? You know, 266 00:15:29,600 --> 00:15:33,480 Speaker 1: it's always important because it's yet another view of what's 267 00:15:33,520 --> 00:15:35,480 Speaker 1: really going on in the economy. But I think we 268 00:15:35,600 --> 00:15:37,840 Speaker 1: got to remember these things can be very volts a 269 00:15:37,840 --> 00:15:40,600 Speaker 1: month to month, and May, June July have tend to 270 00:15:40,640 --> 00:15:42,480 Speaker 1: be really volatile in the last couple of years. Remember 271 00:15:42,560 --> 00:15:44,720 Speaker 1: last year we had a really weeked May, then we 272 00:15:44,840 --> 00:15:48,120 Speaker 1: got this booming June number. Last month we've got a disappointment, 273 00:15:48,960 --> 00:15:50,640 Speaker 1: And so you know, you have to sort of lick 274 00:15:50,680 --> 00:15:52,880 Speaker 1: through the noise. And I think we got the idea 275 00:15:53,200 --> 00:15:56,280 Speaker 1: the U s economy is back on its feet. Unapployments 276 00:15:56,360 --> 00:15:58,240 Speaker 1: quite low. There may be still a few pockets of 277 00:15:58,320 --> 00:16:04,960 Speaker 1: hidden unemployment. Inkly, Uh, this report is important because it 278 00:16:04,960 --> 00:16:07,280 Speaker 1: backs up what we already know that the US economy 279 00:16:07,320 --> 00:16:10,000 Speaker 1: isn't pretty good shape. It doesn't mean we're doesn't mean 280 00:16:10,000 --> 00:16:11,880 Speaker 1: we solved all the problems, but we're pretty much there. 281 00:16:12,040 --> 00:16:14,960 Speaker 1: I agree that months a month there seems to be 282 00:16:15,120 --> 00:16:19,280 Speaker 1: a good metric, but also a new metric where is 283 00:16:19,520 --> 00:16:22,360 Speaker 1: normal non farm payroll growth? You and I used to 284 00:16:22,400 --> 00:16:26,440 Speaker 1: be one eight was terrible, two was okay, to twenty 285 00:16:26,560 --> 00:16:29,320 Speaker 1: was great. You've got a whole new mathematics now, don't you. 286 00:16:30,200 --> 00:16:34,680 Speaker 1: Exactly because of the demographics. And you know, the thing 287 00:16:34,720 --> 00:16:36,880 Speaker 1: to remember is that the population has been growing about 288 00:16:36,880 --> 00:16:39,680 Speaker 1: one percent a year since over the last ten years, 289 00:16:39,680 --> 00:16:42,280 Speaker 1: but our labor force has been growing about a half 290 00:16:42,400 --> 00:16:46,000 Speaker 1: percent past sixty a month. So this is why economists 291 00:16:46,040 --> 00:16:48,840 Speaker 1: tell you we really as long as we're getting employment 292 00:16:48,880 --> 00:16:53,920 Speaker 1: growing set you almill, say seventy five hundred thousand a month, 293 00:16:54,320 --> 00:16:57,760 Speaker 1: that's considered to be pretty normal with this slow demographics 294 00:16:57,800 --> 00:17:00,360 Speaker 1: that we have, the demographics I'm referring, who is the 295 00:17:00,360 --> 00:17:04,119 Speaker 1: baby boom generation moving to retirement. So it's a real 296 00:17:04,160 --> 00:17:06,480 Speaker 1: big deal. It's we've had to change our mind about 297 00:17:06,480 --> 00:17:08,880 Speaker 1: what kind of growth you need to get the economy 298 00:17:08,880 --> 00:17:11,200 Speaker 1: back on its feet. That's what we've been learning over 299 00:17:11,200 --> 00:17:13,560 Speaker 1: the last decade or so, and I think that's what 300 00:17:13,680 --> 00:17:15,560 Speaker 1: we're watching here, and that's why I think it's going 301 00:17:15,640 --> 00:17:18,040 Speaker 1: to be a tough story to figure out what's good 302 00:17:18,040 --> 00:17:20,000 Speaker 1: and what's not good. I think the key thing is 303 00:17:20,040 --> 00:17:23,720 Speaker 1: as long as employment is holding steady at a low level, 304 00:17:24,400 --> 00:17:26,720 Speaker 1: no matter what the job growth is, it means that 305 00:17:26,760 --> 00:17:29,800 Speaker 1: we're kind of in steady state. Jim, I know you've 306 00:17:29,800 --> 00:17:32,040 Speaker 1: been looking at layoffs. What do those numbers tell you 307 00:17:32,080 --> 00:17:34,960 Speaker 1: about the state of the labor economy? Pretty darn good, 308 00:17:35,480 --> 00:17:37,280 Speaker 1: you know. To me. To me, you're getting a lot 309 00:17:37,280 --> 00:17:39,360 Speaker 1: of news, pockets of news that are kind of squishy 310 00:17:39,359 --> 00:17:42,560 Speaker 1: and soft, and yet that's just the piece of the economy. 311 00:17:42,600 --> 00:17:45,680 Speaker 1: The layoffs are telling you something about the entire economy, 312 00:17:45,720 --> 00:17:47,320 Speaker 1: every corner of the economy that we don't see in 313 00:17:47,359 --> 00:17:49,679 Speaker 1: the numbers. A lot of it, and those trends that 314 00:17:49,760 --> 00:17:52,840 Speaker 1: that layoff pace jumping around week a week, But basically 315 00:17:52,880 --> 00:17:56,679 Speaker 1: we're floating around two fifty thousand per week, which is 316 00:17:56,720 --> 00:17:59,800 Speaker 1: a really steady. It just tells you we're holding high 317 00:18:00,000 --> 00:18:03,399 Speaker 1: and there's nothing really bad happening. Uh. If there are 318 00:18:03,400 --> 00:18:06,560 Speaker 1: pockets of weakness, there are other pockets that are offsetting it. 319 00:18:06,600 --> 00:18:08,840 Speaker 1: So it looks pretty good to me, and we've got 320 00:18:08,880 --> 00:18:10,359 Speaker 1: you know, at this time of the most summer months, 321 00:18:10,359 --> 00:18:12,600 Speaker 1: the auto industry goes through a lot of adjustments and 322 00:18:12,640 --> 00:18:15,959 Speaker 1: it could be really noisy, but frankly, these layoff trends 323 00:18:16,000 --> 00:18:19,879 Speaker 1: are pretty steady and in a really good zone. What 324 00:18:19,920 --> 00:18:22,800 Speaker 1: are you gonna learn about the confidence of employers from 325 00:18:22,840 --> 00:18:26,840 Speaker 1: from this report about the momentum in this US economy? 326 00:18:27,800 --> 00:18:30,920 Speaker 1: I'm not sure, because as the economy gets on his 327 00:18:31,040 --> 00:18:33,000 Speaker 1: feet and we get close and closer to full employment, 328 00:18:33,040 --> 00:18:35,359 Speaker 1: it's gonna be harder for people to hire folks, and 329 00:18:35,440 --> 00:18:38,080 Speaker 1: so the job growth may slow down. The way you 330 00:18:38,200 --> 00:18:41,120 Speaker 1: see the confidence is the wage trends start doing better. 331 00:18:41,520 --> 00:18:44,320 Speaker 1: People have had to pay up. The interesting thing to me, 332 00:18:45,119 --> 00:18:49,040 Speaker 1: this is music to economists ears employers everywhere complaining about 333 00:18:49,080 --> 00:18:51,119 Speaker 1: not being able to find people, not being able to 334 00:18:51,119 --> 00:18:53,919 Speaker 1: find people with the right skills. So that to me, 335 00:18:54,119 --> 00:18:58,000 Speaker 1: the fact that that companies are actually hiring and they're 336 00:18:58,040 --> 00:18:59,600 Speaker 1: having to and they had to pay up for it 337 00:18:59,640 --> 00:19:02,800 Speaker 1: means to me the businesses are pretty confident of what 338 00:19:02,880 --> 00:19:04,720 Speaker 1: lives ahead, and that's why they're doing this. That's why 339 00:19:04,720 --> 00:19:07,280 Speaker 1: they're hiring aggressively, and you see more and more signs 340 00:19:07,280 --> 00:19:11,320 Speaker 1: around of people needing help. Help on the signs the 341 00:19:11,320 --> 00:19:16,280 Speaker 1: old fashioned way. Pretty interesting. Market is not a problem. 342 00:19:16,320 --> 00:19:18,359 Speaker 1: We're just talking to Allen Krueger about this. Where's the 343 00:19:18,400 --> 00:19:23,399 Speaker 1: wage growth? It's not there yet, but I think you know, uh, 344 00:19:24,119 --> 00:19:25,879 Speaker 1: inflation is pretty low too, So you said, I had 345 00:19:25,880 --> 00:19:29,000 Speaker 1: to look at things relative to inflation and productivity. But 346 00:19:29,160 --> 00:19:31,440 Speaker 1: it's it's been a little disappointing right in the last 347 00:19:31,560 --> 00:19:33,960 Speaker 1: particularly the last several months. But all of us economists 348 00:19:33,960 --> 00:19:37,200 Speaker 1: sort of hold on to this idea that the closer 349 00:19:37,280 --> 00:19:40,080 Speaker 1: we get, the tighter labor market gets, the lower unemployment follows. 350 00:19:40,080 --> 00:19:43,840 Speaker 1: It's just a matter of time before workers start to 351 00:19:43,840 --> 00:19:46,480 Speaker 1: see better pay increases because companies are having to work harder. 352 00:19:46,840 --> 00:19:48,520 Speaker 1: So you're seeing a lot of you're seeing really good 353 00:19:48,560 --> 00:19:53,800 Speaker 1: gains in areas that are strong that the technology sectors. Uh, 354 00:19:54,160 --> 00:19:57,000 Speaker 1: we just hadn't seen a real convincing up trends. It 355 00:19:57,040 --> 00:19:59,240 Speaker 1: looked like he was moving in the right direction, moving 356 00:19:59,280 --> 00:20:00,840 Speaker 1: up from two and a half percent. Then it kind 357 00:20:00,840 --> 00:20:04,359 Speaker 1: of stalled out. But I suspect I would be really 358 00:20:04,400 --> 00:20:07,520 Speaker 1: shocked if this time next year we're not looking at 359 00:20:08,119 --> 00:20:11,840 Speaker 1: faster gains and in errors in in wage rates. And 360 00:20:12,119 --> 00:20:13,639 Speaker 1: you know, the other thing to keep in mind is 361 00:20:14,160 --> 00:20:17,480 Speaker 1: average genially learnings aren't the only part of the labor 362 00:20:17,520 --> 00:20:20,400 Speaker 1: pay story. Companies have to pay for all kinds of benefits, 363 00:20:20,800 --> 00:20:23,119 Speaker 1: health care, insurance and things like that, and so if 364 00:20:23,160 --> 00:20:25,360 Speaker 1: they have to pay more for that kind of stuff, 365 00:20:25,400 --> 00:20:27,760 Speaker 1: they can't be as generous with average gerially learnings. And 366 00:20:27,840 --> 00:20:30,440 Speaker 1: that's part of what may be going on with the 367 00:20:30,480 --> 00:20:33,800 Speaker 1: health insurance premiums moving up. I'm not underemployment. How much 368 00:20:33,800 --> 00:20:35,439 Speaker 1: attention should we pay to that figure when we get 369 00:20:35,480 --> 00:20:39,040 Speaker 1: it this morning? You know, I think the trends, you know, 370 00:20:39,119 --> 00:20:42,080 Speaker 1: it's always been worth paying attention to because there's a 371 00:20:42,080 --> 00:20:45,000 Speaker 1: lot of unemployment that is not reflected in the uneployment rate. 372 00:20:45,400 --> 00:20:47,679 Speaker 1: So we watch that trend pretty carefully. I look at 373 00:20:47,720 --> 00:20:52,360 Speaker 1: the involuntary part time guys and the young adults, and 374 00:20:52,920 --> 00:20:55,600 Speaker 1: the thing that's interesting is all those signs of undeployment 375 00:20:55,720 --> 00:20:58,480 Speaker 1: really getting better. And that's that's not visible in the 376 00:20:58,520 --> 00:21:01,200 Speaker 1: headline numbers when we you the payroll numbers, but it's 377 00:21:01,240 --> 00:21:04,399 Speaker 1: really something that's been going on in the background which 378 00:21:04,760 --> 00:21:07,359 Speaker 1: tells you. But you know, whether it's people who are 379 00:21:07,440 --> 00:21:10,600 Speaker 1: unemployed for very long periods of time, or people who 380 00:21:10,640 --> 00:21:13,720 Speaker 1: are working part time, or young adults. All of those 381 00:21:13,760 --> 00:21:17,159 Speaker 1: trends are getting better. So you know, it doesn't in 382 00:21:17,240 --> 00:21:20,600 Speaker 1: my book when you take it all into account, I 383 00:21:20,600 --> 00:21:24,200 Speaker 1: think you could argue despite the fact that the undeployment 384 00:21:24,280 --> 00:21:26,439 Speaker 1: rate is for I think you could argue that we're 385 00:21:26,440 --> 00:21:28,240 Speaker 1: still in the top of the ninth inning. We still 386 00:21:28,280 --> 00:21:31,040 Speaker 1: have a little bit more work to do because there 387 00:21:31,080 --> 00:21:35,359 Speaker 1: are these pockets of hidden unemployment and underemployment. But I 388 00:21:35,400 --> 00:21:38,880 Speaker 1: think we're doing a pretty good job getting there. Is it? 389 00:21:38,920 --> 00:21:41,919 Speaker 1: Is it okay, Dr Glassman? If I steal your spectacular 390 00:21:42,040 --> 00:21:46,600 Speaker 1: chart of non farm payrolls and claims inverted, which shows 391 00:21:46,600 --> 00:21:49,080 Speaker 1: that we are we are. We are in a tenally 392 00:21:49,280 --> 00:21:53,880 Speaker 1: unusual time. Yeah, we really are. And and I think 393 00:21:53,920 --> 00:21:55,960 Speaker 1: to think to remember about this. I mean, I love 394 00:21:55,960 --> 00:21:58,480 Speaker 1: Hayte nonfarm payrolls and job Day because you're getting a 395 00:21:58,480 --> 00:22:01,600 Speaker 1: real good picture of the economy. But we don't know 396 00:22:01,840 --> 00:22:05,920 Speaker 1: what's really going on with small businesses. It takes the BLS, 397 00:22:06,000 --> 00:22:07,800 Speaker 1: you know, a little while to figure this out. The 398 00:22:07,840 --> 00:22:10,320 Speaker 1: thing I like about jobless claims is it catches everybody, 399 00:22:10,359 --> 00:22:12,399 Speaker 1: no matter where you are. No matter who you work for, 400 00:22:13,000 --> 00:22:16,400 Speaker 1: you're in those numbers. So it's good to compare both 401 00:22:16,480 --> 00:22:21,640 Speaker 1: and and and Uh. They're both impressive trends. What's the 402 00:22:21,680 --> 00:22:28,240 Speaker 1: why the claims are as good as they've ever been, Well, 403 00:22:28,280 --> 00:22:33,280 Speaker 1: there's I think there is a like everything else, we're 404 00:22:33,320 --> 00:22:35,199 Speaker 1: surprised that the economy is doing as well as it 405 00:22:35,280 --> 00:22:38,320 Speaker 1: is with slow growth. But I think the useful thing 406 00:22:38,320 --> 00:22:40,920 Speaker 1: about claims is it doesn't care what our potential growth 407 00:22:40,960 --> 00:22:43,720 Speaker 1: is. Is Is just telling you the economy doing well, and 408 00:22:43,800 --> 00:22:45,919 Speaker 1: it's picking up pockets that we don't see in the 409 00:22:46,080 --> 00:22:49,520 Speaker 1: in the numbers day to day. And I think what 410 00:22:49,560 --> 00:22:52,520 Speaker 1: it tells you is companies are now focused on trying 411 00:22:52,520 --> 00:22:54,679 Speaker 1: to get staffing levels up so no one wants to 412 00:22:54,760 --> 00:22:57,960 Speaker 1: lay off. They may be having a harder time hiring people. 413 00:22:58,440 --> 00:23:00,399 Speaker 1: That's what you would expect as we get closer and 414 00:23:00,480 --> 00:23:04,200 Speaker 1: closer to full employment. But I think what I think 415 00:23:04,200 --> 00:23:06,399 Speaker 1: what the claims number tells you is that people are 416 00:23:06,400 --> 00:23:08,679 Speaker 1: pretty optimistic about the outlook and they're not willing to 417 00:23:08,760 --> 00:23:11,880 Speaker 1: lay off. And even when their pockets of weaknesses, companies 418 00:23:11,880 --> 00:23:14,800 Speaker 1: may be willing to ride through that because it's difficult 419 00:23:14,800 --> 00:23:17,040 Speaker 1: to find people in a tight labor markets, so you 420 00:23:17,040 --> 00:23:18,840 Speaker 1: don't want to lay off unless you really share your 421 00:23:18,840 --> 00:23:21,639 Speaker 1: business is in trouble. I'm gonna get this chart on 422 00:23:21,800 --> 00:23:25,600 Speaker 1: folks on Twitter. I'll probably feature it on television on Monday. 423 00:23:25,840 --> 00:23:29,600 Speaker 1: It's extraordinary chart from Dr Glassman about how non firm 424 00:23:29,680 --> 00:23:33,520 Speaker 1: payils are doing what they're doing, and they're hugely linked 425 00:23:33,600 --> 00:23:39,240 Speaker 1: to claims up until exactly June of two thousand and fourteen, 426 00:23:39,640 --> 00:23:42,080 Speaker 1: and then claims have a life of their own. And 427 00:23:42,119 --> 00:23:44,600 Speaker 1: it's my pleasure this morning to present the Plummest Byline 428 00:23:44,640 --> 00:23:47,760 Speaker 1: Award d Win Matthew Bosler fedwis Ri reporter here at 429 00:23:47,800 --> 00:23:51,240 Speaker 1: Bloomberg News reporting from Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts. Stanley Fisher, the 430 00:23:51,320 --> 00:23:55,080 Speaker 1: vice chairman, speaking there last night, talked a bit about uncertainty, 431 00:23:55,080 --> 00:23:58,000 Speaker 1: and he said a cautious approach to investment by US 432 00:23:58,080 --> 00:24:01,960 Speaker 1: companies may in part reflect the unser about the policy environment. 433 00:24:01,960 --> 00:24:05,000 Speaker 1: The vice here saying mitigating the dampening effect of uncertainty 434 00:24:05,000 --> 00:24:07,439 Speaker 1: by providing more clarity on the future direction of government 435 00:24:07,480 --> 00:24:11,640 Speaker 1: policy is highly desirable. Jim Glassman, how much is uncertainty 436 00:24:11,680 --> 00:24:16,159 Speaker 1: policy uncertainty weighing on employers right now? Well, you know, 437 00:24:16,400 --> 00:24:18,520 Speaker 1: I mean uncertainty is always with us, right, I mean, 438 00:24:18,560 --> 00:24:20,760 Speaker 1: I can't remember time when we were uncertain about things. 439 00:24:20,800 --> 00:24:23,119 Speaker 1: And frankly, you have to ask yourself, we had a 440 00:24:23,160 --> 00:24:25,440 Speaker 1: lot of uncertainty in the last ten years, and yet 441 00:24:25,640 --> 00:24:28,040 Speaker 1: here we are. The economy has recovered from our pretty 442 00:24:28,040 --> 00:24:32,320 Speaker 1: devastating downturn and the underwater problem is largely gone. And 443 00:24:32,400 --> 00:24:35,359 Speaker 1: so you got to say, despite all of this uncertainty, 444 00:24:35,359 --> 00:24:39,520 Speaker 1: I think businesses they run things by looking at the possibilities, 445 00:24:39,720 --> 00:24:41,760 Speaker 1: and there's a lot of a lot of opportunity out there, 446 00:24:41,760 --> 00:24:44,639 Speaker 1: and I think that's that really helps to dampen the 447 00:24:44,760 --> 00:24:48,040 Speaker 1: worries that you have about uncertainty. So uncertainty is always 448 00:24:48,080 --> 00:24:49,879 Speaker 1: a way of life, but frankly, I don't think it 449 00:24:49,920 --> 00:24:52,760 Speaker 1: gets in the way. And uh, I think the economy 450 00:24:52,760 --> 00:24:55,199 Speaker 1: has done a pretty good job despite all this. Let 451 00:24:55,280 --> 00:24:56,840 Speaker 1: me ask you just how you think that the federals 452 00:24:56,880 --> 00:24:59,040 Speaker 1: of policymakers like Mr Fisher are going to be viewing 453 00:24:59,040 --> 00:25:01,680 Speaker 1: what they see to day, we have testimony from a 454 00:25:02,040 --> 00:25:04,240 Speaker 1: yellow Capitol Hill, two days of testimony. Next week we're 455 00:25:04,240 --> 00:25:07,200 Speaker 1: gonna get a monetary policy a report as well. How's 456 00:25:07,200 --> 00:25:09,879 Speaker 1: the FED going to be processing these numbers? You know? 457 00:25:09,920 --> 00:25:13,440 Speaker 1: I think I think they're pretty uh encouraged by what's 458 00:25:13,440 --> 00:25:15,720 Speaker 1: been going on, and I think, uh, you know, even 459 00:25:15,760 --> 00:25:17,720 Speaker 1: if the numbers are whether it's a little higher or 460 00:25:17,720 --> 00:25:19,600 Speaker 1: a little low, I don't think it's going to change 461 00:25:19,600 --> 00:25:21,600 Speaker 1: their mind about what they need to do because the 462 00:25:21,840 --> 00:25:24,359 Speaker 1: basic idea is we've already got the economy close to 463 00:25:24,400 --> 00:25:28,840 Speaker 1: full employment, and they've got policy very accommodative, and they'd 464 00:25:28,840 --> 00:25:31,560 Speaker 1: like to normalize things gradually. And I think they're doing 465 00:25:31,600 --> 00:25:33,400 Speaker 1: a good job with this, and the fact that inflation 466 00:25:33,480 --> 00:25:35,879 Speaker 1: is quite low gives them lots of room to do it. 467 00:25:35,960 --> 00:25:38,560 Speaker 1: So I don't think they're going to be disputed from 468 00:25:39,119 --> 00:25:41,199 Speaker 1: the little surprises. I don't think they're gonna change their 469 00:25:41,200 --> 00:25:43,240 Speaker 1: mind about what they need to do. We saw that 470 00:25:43,320 --> 00:25:46,399 Speaker 1: last months too. They they they continue to talk about 471 00:25:46,440 --> 00:25:49,600 Speaker 1: needing to normalize the balance sheet and interest rates, even 472 00:25:49,680 --> 00:25:53,840 Speaker 1: though we had a weakish employment numbers. So, you know, 473 00:25:54,000 --> 00:25:56,760 Speaker 1: I think, particularly when you put this report together with 474 00:25:56,840 --> 00:26:00,960 Speaker 1: other things we're watching, jobless claims, trends various, Eddie, I 475 00:26:01,160 --> 00:26:05,719 Speaker 1: think if you see surprises today, you tend to you 476 00:26:05,760 --> 00:26:08,919 Speaker 1: tend to put in another box. It's not you know, 477 00:26:09,200 --> 00:26:10,960 Speaker 1: you know, things are volatile. I don't think it's going 478 00:26:11,000 --> 00:26:13,760 Speaker 1: to change their mind. Are we creating full time jobs? 479 00:26:13,840 --> 00:26:17,720 Speaker 1: Are we deluding ourselves into a set of part time 480 00:26:17,800 --> 00:26:21,040 Speaker 1: jobs to keep going. I think there's both. I mean 481 00:26:21,359 --> 00:26:24,760 Speaker 1: the fact that overall unemployments down means I mean that 482 00:26:24,800 --> 00:26:26,840 Speaker 1: there's a lot of people who like to work voluntarily 483 00:26:27,080 --> 00:26:30,000 Speaker 1: part time jobs voluntarily, there's a there's a lot who 484 00:26:30,000 --> 00:26:33,639 Speaker 1: have been forced to work part time that's disappearing pretty quickly. 485 00:26:33,760 --> 00:26:36,200 Speaker 1: So I think the jobs are pretty good, pretty good 486 00:26:36,280 --> 00:26:40,399 Speaker 1: jobs all around. And you see, uh, you see signs 487 00:26:40,400 --> 00:26:43,359 Speaker 1: of that everywhere. And you know, we haven't. You haven't 488 00:26:43,359 --> 00:26:46,880 Speaker 1: seen real confirmation yet in broad trend up in wages. 489 00:26:46,920 --> 00:26:50,359 Speaker 1: But I think when we when we see that, we 490 00:26:50,400 --> 00:26:52,320 Speaker 1: won't be shocked by it because we have a pretty 491 00:26:52,320 --> 00:26:55,040 Speaker 1: good idea that the state of the job market is 492 00:26:55,119 --> 00:26:57,960 Speaker 1: quite good. But if average all the earnings here every 493 00:26:58,040 --> 00:27:02,280 Speaker 1: year at two point six percent today, are you just 494 00:27:02,359 --> 00:27:06,600 Speaker 1: assuming with rates up, inflation goes up? How do how 495 00:27:06,600 --> 00:27:10,520 Speaker 1: does wage growth stay ahead of rising inflation? You know, 496 00:27:10,560 --> 00:27:13,400 Speaker 1: I don't. I don't think wages drive inflation. I think 497 00:27:13,600 --> 00:27:16,640 Speaker 1: in the old days, when companies have a lot of protection, 498 00:27:16,800 --> 00:27:19,719 Speaker 1: you would agree to certain deals. You figure you can 499 00:27:19,760 --> 00:27:21,520 Speaker 1: just raise your prices to cover. I don't think people 500 00:27:21,720 --> 00:27:25,040 Speaker 1: operate that way anymore. So if wages aren't doing well, 501 00:27:25,080 --> 00:27:29,280 Speaker 1: it's because productivity is slow or because they can move 502 00:27:29,440 --> 00:27:34,120 Speaker 1: operations elsewhere. So, but I think you know increasing when 503 00:27:34,119 --> 00:27:37,480 Speaker 1: you hear when you hear people complain and and wring 504 00:27:37,480 --> 00:27:40,600 Speaker 1: their hands about not finding workers, you just know what's coming. 505 00:27:40,840 --> 00:27:42,800 Speaker 1: You know that. Well. The way you solve that problem 506 00:27:42,880 --> 00:27:46,000 Speaker 1: is you offer better pay. I don't think companies are 507 00:27:46,000 --> 00:27:48,080 Speaker 1: going to be offering pay that puts them out of business, 508 00:27:48,600 --> 00:27:50,560 Speaker 1: but so when you if you so, if you see 509 00:27:50,840 --> 00:27:52,760 Speaker 1: wage trends not doing as well as you just think 510 00:27:52,800 --> 00:27:56,160 Speaker 1: you should, it might be because the underlying fundamentals aren't 511 00:27:56,160 --> 00:27:59,760 Speaker 1: there yet companies. Companies can't do things that make them 512 00:27:59,800 --> 00:28:03,360 Speaker 1: on rosket ball. But I think slowly, over time we're 513 00:28:03,359 --> 00:28:07,040 Speaker 1: going to see better trends here. And the labor side 514 00:28:07,040 --> 00:28:08,520 Speaker 1: is the job market is really the best part of 515 00:28:08,520 --> 00:28:10,840 Speaker 1: the economy so far. Jimmy last one, stay with us. 516 00:28:10,840 --> 00:28:12,680 Speaker 1: We'll have you with us as we break the numbers 517 00:28:12,720 --> 00:28:15,520 Speaker 1: and then move on to Mr Grosser's well, David Garrow, 518 00:28:15,560 --> 00:28:19,639 Speaker 1: we've gotta again pay homage to G twenty just amazing 519 00:28:19,760 --> 00:28:23,800 Speaker 1: shots earlier of world leaders gathered in a bright lit, 520 00:28:24,119 --> 00:28:28,480 Speaker 1: yellow and white room, very bright, cheerful room, a big, large, 521 00:28:28,520 --> 00:28:33,080 Speaker 1: correctable Prime Minister May over to the left, sitting to 522 00:28:33,119 --> 00:28:37,600 Speaker 1: the left, facing into the rectangle from Chancellor Miracle. President 523 00:28:37,640 --> 00:28:42,040 Speaker 1: Trump two seats away from Chancellor Miracle. When do they meet? 524 00:28:42,120 --> 00:28:46,800 Speaker 1: When does Fruiting and Trump? They've they've had their handshake. 525 00:28:47,080 --> 00:28:49,160 Speaker 1: I spoke with the German ambassador of the US yesterday, 526 00:28:49,160 --> 00:28:51,680 Speaker 1: asked him about that famous handshake between the German Chanceman 527 00:28:51,680 --> 00:28:53,280 Speaker 1: the President the White House. He said that the two 528 00:28:53,360 --> 00:28:56,040 Speaker 1: leaders have a good and productive relationship. We've made too 529 00:28:56,120 --> 00:28:58,440 Speaker 1: much of the body language. We watch what we can. 530 00:28:58,600 --> 00:29:01,160 Speaker 1: When Bill Gross visited our old headquarters here a couple 531 00:29:01,200 --> 00:29:03,920 Speaker 1: of weeks ago, we did the Russian toast thing, locked 532 00:29:03,920 --> 00:29:07,160 Speaker 1: elbows with a with a stole nia, you know, the 533 00:29:07,240 --> 00:29:18,400 Speaker 1: Russian toasting. Maybe they'll maybe they'll do that today. Brunch 534 00:29:18,480 --> 00:29:22,000 Speaker 1: you by Bank of America Mary Lynch. With virtual reality, 535 00:29:22,240 --> 00:29:27,640 Speaker 1: virtually everything will change. Discover opportunities in a transforming world. 536 00:29:28,040 --> 00:29:32,360 Speaker 1: Be of a mL dot Com, slash VR. Mary Lynch 537 00:29:32,440 --> 00:29:41,480 Speaker 1: pierced Fenner and Smith Incorporated and now joining us on 538 00:29:41,600 --> 00:29:45,240 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Radio and Bloomberg Television worldwide. We welcome William Gross 539 00:29:45,280 --> 00:29:47,840 Speaker 1: of Janice Anderson as well. Bill, I want to go 540 00:29:47,880 --> 00:29:50,360 Speaker 1: over the job market and then get right to the turmoil, 541 00:29:50,960 --> 00:29:54,320 Speaker 1: the idea that we see higher rates and lower bill 542 00:29:54,400 --> 00:29:57,920 Speaker 1: note and bond heields as well. This looks like a 543 00:29:58,040 --> 00:30:01,760 Speaker 1: yelling friendly jobs report. It looks like a jobs report 544 00:30:02,160 --> 00:30:04,680 Speaker 1: that let's have FED gives them them some room to 545 00:30:04,760 --> 00:30:07,800 Speaker 1: raise interest rates. What will be the effect when the 546 00:30:07,800 --> 00:30:11,800 Speaker 1: Fed raises interest rates? Well, they've been raising interest rates 547 00:30:11,800 --> 00:30:15,680 Speaker 1: in the effect depends, I suppose, Tom, on how much 548 00:30:15,720 --> 00:30:18,960 Speaker 1: they raise and when they raise. I still think despite 549 00:30:19,000 --> 00:30:24,120 Speaker 1: this rather strong jobs report from the standpoint of jobs 550 00:30:24,160 --> 00:30:28,600 Speaker 1: gain not necessarily from wages, which is what the Yellow launches. 551 00:30:29,040 --> 00:30:32,920 Speaker 1: UH seriously as well, um that the Fed has one 552 00:30:33,200 --> 00:30:36,400 Speaker 1: hike perhaps left in the year, and that's probably in December. 553 00:30:36,840 --> 00:30:39,600 Speaker 1: I think to a significant accent. It depends, as I've 554 00:30:39,640 --> 00:30:44,240 Speaker 1: mentioned in prior UH discussions with you, it depends significantly 555 00:30:44,240 --> 00:30:46,920 Speaker 1: on what other central banks do, and if the ECB 556 00:30:47,080 --> 00:30:48,960 Speaker 1: and the b o J and others, UH, you know, 557 00:30:49,160 --> 00:30:52,680 Speaker 1: tend to change their policies and the FED must um 558 00:30:52,720 --> 00:30:55,760 Speaker 1: not respond. But as a leader, as the central bank 559 00:30:55,800 --> 00:30:58,880 Speaker 1: global leader, you know they've got to be cognizant of 560 00:30:58,920 --> 00:31:01,920 Speaker 1: what it might do to currency levels, and so they're 561 00:31:01,960 --> 00:31:04,320 Speaker 1: all in the pot at the same time. And I 562 00:31:04,720 --> 00:31:07,600 Speaker 1: think your question about the FED is important, but it's 563 00:31:07,600 --> 00:31:10,440 Speaker 1: also important about other central banks around the world with 564 00:31:10,560 --> 00:31:13,000 Speaker 1: what we've observed in the last number of weeks, and 565 00:31:13,000 --> 00:31:14,760 Speaker 1: of course we've got rising grades and we'll get the 566 00:31:14,840 --> 00:31:18,000 Speaker 1: bonds and investment here in a moment, Mr Gross is 567 00:31:18,040 --> 00:31:21,840 Speaker 1: the idea of a FED that is coordinated and yet 568 00:31:21,840 --> 00:31:26,160 Speaker 1: at the same time constrained. How coordinated are the central banks? 569 00:31:26,440 --> 00:31:30,560 Speaker 1: And how constrained is chair yelling because she's limited by 570 00:31:30,640 --> 00:31:35,480 Speaker 1: other global activities. Yeah, I don't think they're coordinated at all. 571 00:31:36,000 --> 00:31:38,280 Speaker 1: Yet you know, obviously in the last few weeks there 572 00:31:38,280 --> 00:31:41,880 Speaker 1: have been hints from uh, the ECB and hence from 573 00:31:42,560 --> 00:31:45,200 Speaker 1: the Bank of England that they're on the move or 574 00:31:45,240 --> 00:31:48,400 Speaker 1: potentially on the move at some point six, twelve, eighteen 575 00:31:48,400 --> 00:31:50,640 Speaker 1: months down the road. But they're still you know, a 576 00:31:50,680 --> 00:31:53,400 Speaker 1: long way back from when we stopped qui in a 577 00:31:53,400 --> 00:31:55,440 Speaker 1: long way back when when we started to raise our 578 00:31:55,800 --> 00:31:59,120 Speaker 1: short term interest rates and so um, they were beginning 579 00:31:59,120 --> 00:32:02,160 Speaker 1: to be coordinated from the standpoint of philosophy, perhaps in 580 00:32:02,200 --> 00:32:05,680 Speaker 1: the direction, but certainly not in terms of timing and magnitude, 581 00:32:05,680 --> 00:32:10,840 Speaker 1: and I think ultimately that does have a significant impact 582 00:32:11,000 --> 00:32:14,480 Speaker 1: or will on currency levels, and central banks want to 583 00:32:14,560 --> 00:32:19,480 Speaker 1: keep those currency levels relatively static. Admittedly, each wants to, uh, 584 00:32:19,640 --> 00:32:22,400 Speaker 1: you know, to lower their currency a little bit so 585 00:32:22,440 --> 00:32:25,280 Speaker 1: that it gives a push to their real economy, but 586 00:32:25,840 --> 00:32:29,719 Speaker 1: they got to keep things steady. And so the future 587 00:32:29,760 --> 00:32:32,600 Speaker 1: coordination is I think it's important. It hasn't been coordinated 588 00:32:32,600 --> 00:32:34,160 Speaker 1: to this point. Bill, We're seeing a bit of a 589 00:32:34,240 --> 00:32:35,560 Speaker 1: race here up to the top of the hill to 590 00:32:35,600 --> 00:32:37,720 Speaker 1: declaring end of the bull market in bonds. I wonder 591 00:32:37,760 --> 00:32:39,760 Speaker 1: if you're vying with Ray Dolly of Bridgewater to put 592 00:32:39,760 --> 00:32:41,080 Speaker 1: a flag there at the top of the hill to 593 00:32:41,120 --> 00:32:45,920 Speaker 1: say that we're entering a bear market. What say, well, 594 00:32:45,920 --> 00:32:48,479 Speaker 1: my bear market level and now six months ago, so 595 00:32:48,680 --> 00:32:52,200 Speaker 1: that isn't really applical one anymore was up at sixty five. 596 00:32:52,280 --> 00:32:55,600 Speaker 1: You know, I've looked at the long term trend since 597 00:32:55,640 --> 00:32:59,000 Speaker 1: the early nineteen eighties, and interest rates on the tenure 598 00:32:59,000 --> 00:33:03,640 Speaker 1: have been falling by twenty basis points a year since then. Um, 599 00:33:03,680 --> 00:33:07,120 Speaker 1: you know, is that a technical mumbo jumbo Really not, 600 00:33:07,320 --> 00:33:11,240 Speaker 1: because it's an indication of what an economy needs in 601 00:33:11,320 --> 00:33:13,600 Speaker 1: terms of lower interest rates in order to keep going. 602 00:33:13,680 --> 00:33:16,360 Speaker 1: And so I think ultimately, although we're probably a two 603 00:33:16,400 --> 00:33:18,600 Speaker 1: thirty five at the moment, you know that to six 604 00:33:19,480 --> 00:33:22,720 Speaker 1: level is the critical level for interest rates going forward. 605 00:33:22,760 --> 00:33:25,120 Speaker 1: Do we get there in the next few weeks? Uh? 606 00:33:25,560 --> 00:33:28,240 Speaker 1: Probably not. You know, we've had a thirty basis point 607 00:33:28,360 --> 00:33:31,240 Speaker 1: increase or twenty basis point increase over the last few 608 00:33:31,280 --> 00:33:35,719 Speaker 1: weeks due to the bund taper so to speak. So um, 609 00:33:35,720 --> 00:33:37,960 Speaker 1: but I think we're moving higher. Creeman wants you to 610 00:33:37,960 --> 00:33:40,600 Speaker 1: come over here for Bloomberg Television. I'm gonna show this chart. 611 00:33:40,680 --> 00:33:43,040 Speaker 1: We'll show it out on radio. Go to Twitter with 612 00:33:43,160 --> 00:33:45,440 Speaker 1: that as well. Bill, for the first time in ages, 613 00:33:45,480 --> 00:33:49,120 Speaker 1: I'm showing bond price. Here's part on the Germany tenure. 614 00:33:49,480 --> 00:33:51,800 Speaker 1: Down we go, Bill, As you know, looking at your 615 00:33:51,840 --> 00:33:55,320 Speaker 1: Monro trader, we're down about three percent on full faith 616 00:33:55,360 --> 00:33:59,160 Speaker 1: and credit, higher yield. Did you know this bill? Higher yields, 617 00:33:59,560 --> 00:34:06,000 Speaker 1: lower bond prices. When does it begin to hurt? Mr? Gross, Well, 618 00:34:06,000 --> 00:34:09,239 Speaker 1: that's my old teen or todder Thomas. Obvious interest rates up, 619 00:34:09,280 --> 00:34:12,160 Speaker 1: prices down, and that's what you've talked about. Boons up 620 00:34:12,200 --> 00:34:15,439 Speaker 1: by thirty basis points with the direction of about nine. Yeah, 621 00:34:15,440 --> 00:34:18,480 Speaker 1: it's about three points. When does it begin to hurt? Um, 622 00:34:19,040 --> 00:34:22,040 Speaker 1: I think it begins to hurt at the margin here 623 00:34:22,040 --> 00:34:25,680 Speaker 1: in the United States on mortgages. Ultimately it begins to hurt. 624 00:34:25,719 --> 00:34:28,239 Speaker 1: And this is an unobserved fact. I guess by the 625 00:34:28,640 --> 00:34:32,400 Speaker 1: by the street that that interest payments as a percentage 626 00:34:32,400 --> 00:34:37,960 Speaker 1: of expenses, corporate expenses are significant, perhaps thirty and so 627 00:34:38,239 --> 00:34:43,920 Speaker 1: it begins to hurt lower yielding corporations, junk bond corporations 628 00:34:44,000 --> 00:34:45,920 Speaker 1: when they try to roll over their dead in two 629 00:34:46,000 --> 00:34:49,640 Speaker 1: thousand and seventeen late and two thousand and eighteen early. 630 00:34:49,960 --> 00:34:53,640 Speaker 1: And so as interest rates rise generally, and as interest 631 00:34:53,719 --> 00:34:57,520 Speaker 1: rates and spreads widen, you know, the hurt begins to 632 00:34:57,520 --> 00:35:01,120 Speaker 1: to affect those lower quality corporations as well as individuals. 633 00:35:01,120 --> 00:35:03,520 Speaker 1: I want to buy a home bill gross, You're unconstrained. 634 00:35:03,600 --> 00:35:07,600 Speaker 1: How do you adapt within your portfolio? Janis Anderson? How 635 00:35:07,640 --> 00:35:10,239 Speaker 1: do you adapt to a higher rate environment? Do you 636 00:35:10,239 --> 00:35:12,360 Speaker 1: get under the desk? Do you start rooting for the 637 00:35:12,400 --> 00:35:19,759 Speaker 1: New York Patriots? What's what do you do New York? Well, 638 00:35:19,840 --> 00:35:21,919 Speaker 1: of course, the way to adapt if you were sure 639 00:35:22,080 --> 00:35:23,960 Speaker 1: of higher interest rates, and if you were sure that 640 00:35:24,000 --> 00:35:26,040 Speaker 1: those rates would be higher than what we call the 641 00:35:26,080 --> 00:35:30,120 Speaker 1: forward yield curve, which isn't much um than what you 642 00:35:30,160 --> 00:35:33,800 Speaker 1: do is you go negative duration. The problem with negative duration, 643 00:35:33,840 --> 00:35:36,080 Speaker 1: and it sounds very hedgy, Tom, but the problem with 644 00:35:36,160 --> 00:35:40,719 Speaker 1: negative duration meaning's short bonds, basically is that you give 645 00:35:40,840 --> 00:35:45,040 Speaker 1: up the valued carry, the carry of a positive interest rate, 646 00:35:45,160 --> 00:35:47,960 Speaker 1: limited though it maybe, and so investors for the past 647 00:35:48,000 --> 00:35:51,040 Speaker 1: thirty or thirty five years have been reluctant to give 648 00:35:51,120 --> 00:35:53,799 Speaker 1: up carry. It's been a carry trade as interest rates 649 00:35:53,800 --> 00:35:56,720 Speaker 1: have come down and stock prices have gone up. Carry 650 00:35:56,800 --> 00:35:59,440 Speaker 1: is a function of not only interest rates, but spreads 651 00:35:59,480 --> 00:36:02,839 Speaker 1: and risk taking, and so giving up carrying going into 652 00:36:02,880 --> 00:36:05,319 Speaker 1: the negative column is a very difficult thing to do 653 00:36:05,400 --> 00:36:08,480 Speaker 1: because you need higher interest rates in order to justify 654 00:36:08,520 --> 00:36:11,160 Speaker 1: your position. But that's what you do. And the Jenison 655 00:36:11,239 --> 00:36:16,080 Speaker 1: Constraint Fund has been you know, short carry and negative 656 00:36:16,440 --> 00:36:19,560 Speaker 1: perhaps by half a year relative to its bogey. And 657 00:36:19,560 --> 00:36:21,839 Speaker 1: and the bogey, by the way, is live or three 658 00:36:21,880 --> 00:36:25,440 Speaker 1: months paper, so it's basically an effective duration of a 659 00:36:25,520 --> 00:36:28,200 Speaker 1: minus half a year at the moment. Build very quickly here, 660 00:36:28,239 --> 00:36:29,960 Speaker 1: what did you take away from the meeting in Central 661 00:36:30,040 --> 00:36:31,680 Speaker 1: last week? All these central bankers, there are a lot 662 00:36:31,719 --> 00:36:35,239 Speaker 1: of confusion surrounding what the ECB president Mario Drag had 663 00:36:35,280 --> 00:36:37,520 Speaker 1: to say, the market interpreting what he had to say differently. 664 00:36:37,560 --> 00:36:41,160 Speaker 1: What was your takeaway? Yeah, I think there's a lot 665 00:36:41,239 --> 00:36:43,360 Speaker 1: of confusion, and that's typical. There's a lot of confusion 666 00:36:43,400 --> 00:36:44,960 Speaker 1: now at the FED in terms of what they're going 667 00:36:45,080 --> 00:36:48,080 Speaker 1: to do as well in terms of UH the lack 668 00:36:48,160 --> 00:36:52,759 Speaker 1: of quantitative easy in or buying back selling treasure is 669 00:36:52,800 --> 00:36:56,560 Speaker 1: basically into the market. I think Drag is focused on 670 00:36:56,800 --> 00:37:01,160 Speaker 1: containing volatility. I think other central anchors within the e 671 00:37:01,360 --> 00:37:04,400 Speaker 1: c B and members within the ECB are focused on 672 00:37:04,560 --> 00:37:07,600 Speaker 1: the negative aspects of interest rates and what they're doing 673 00:37:07,680 --> 00:37:11,280 Speaker 1: in terms of German insurance companies. So, um, it's pluses 674 00:37:11,320 --> 00:37:13,520 Speaker 1: and minuses. It does our privilege to bring you William 675 00:37:13,560 --> 00:37:16,960 Speaker 1: Gross of Janice Henderson right now. Is he always joins 676 00:37:17,040 --> 00:37:21,000 Speaker 1: us on jobs today? We love that opportunity Bill Gross. Um. Yeah. 677 00:37:21,000 --> 00:37:23,440 Speaker 1: I look at the whole mix here, the cocktail of 678 00:37:23,560 --> 00:37:26,040 Speaker 1: you will of investment, and I guess it comes to 679 00:37:26,520 --> 00:37:28,640 Speaker 1: when do we get a bear market in bonds? Let's 680 00:37:28,680 --> 00:37:33,520 Speaker 1: begin with can you predict a bear market in bonds? Well, 681 00:37:34,080 --> 00:37:37,160 Speaker 1: predicting bear markets bonds are are used to be a 682 00:37:37,239 --> 00:37:40,840 Speaker 1: function tom of inflation and the potential for higher inflation 683 00:37:41,239 --> 00:37:46,320 Speaker 1: followed by FED tightening these days with the extraordinary provisions 684 00:37:46,360 --> 00:37:49,120 Speaker 1: on the part of central banks, quantitative e s and 685 00:37:49,200 --> 00:37:50,960 Speaker 1: so on, you know, the ECB and the b o 686 00:37:51,080 --> 00:37:54,080 Speaker 1: J and the Fed of purchase thirteen trillion dollars with 687 00:37:54,200 --> 00:37:57,640 Speaker 1: the bonds and stocks via que over the last four 688 00:37:57,719 --> 00:37:59,640 Speaker 1: or five years. And so it becomes a function of 689 00:37:59,719 --> 00:38:04,440 Speaker 1: their persuasion as much as inflation, and um, what we 690 00:38:04,560 --> 00:38:07,960 Speaker 1: know from their ideas in terms of future inflation are 691 00:38:08,040 --> 00:38:10,759 Speaker 1: there that it hasn't gone up to their targets. All 692 00:38:11,480 --> 00:38:13,960 Speaker 1: central banks are looking at a two percent target and 693 00:38:14,800 --> 00:38:17,680 Speaker 1: most are dismayed that they haven't reached those targets. So 694 00:38:18,040 --> 00:38:20,000 Speaker 1: a bear market and bonds is a function of what 695 00:38:20,200 --> 00:38:24,240 Speaker 1: central bankers believe and at the moment, because they're pumping 696 00:38:24,280 --> 00:38:26,839 Speaker 1: in so much money and because the inflationary targets haven't 697 00:38:26,880 --> 00:38:29,560 Speaker 1: been hit, Yeah, we probably don't have a bear market 698 00:38:29,640 --> 00:38:32,240 Speaker 1: and bonds until we see the whites of the central 699 00:38:32,239 --> 00:38:34,440 Speaker 1: bankers eyes. That's a nice way of putting it in 700 00:38:34,440 --> 00:38:37,160 Speaker 1: a military basis. In the attack and battle that we're in, 701 00:38:37,840 --> 00:38:41,920 Speaker 1: when does the public catch up with the new normal 702 00:38:42,280 --> 00:38:47,000 Speaker 1: of low yields. Psychologically, I haven't observed that yet. We're 703 00:38:47,040 --> 00:38:49,719 Speaker 1: still trying to get back to a decent nominal in 704 00:38:49,840 --> 00:38:53,320 Speaker 1: really yield return. And I respectfully say, Mr Gross, it 705 00:38:53,400 --> 00:38:57,719 Speaker 1: ain't there. No when I've said that for a few years. 706 00:38:57,760 --> 00:39:00,800 Speaker 1: To have that, I that I've that. I feel that 707 00:39:01,200 --> 00:39:04,800 Speaker 1: real interest rates and nominal rates, uh, you know, themselves 708 00:39:04,920 --> 00:39:07,880 Speaker 1: have to go up in order to afford the small 709 00:39:08,400 --> 00:39:11,880 Speaker 1: saver and large savers, by the way, insurance companies, pension 710 00:39:11,920 --> 00:39:15,800 Speaker 1: funds and so on, to earn satisfactory return. What is 711 00:39:15,960 --> 00:39:20,560 Speaker 1: that return? Well, you know, based upon historical historical examples, 712 00:39:20,600 --> 00:39:23,640 Speaker 1: individuals probably think that they're in a six to seven 713 00:39:23,680 --> 00:39:26,480 Speaker 1: to eight percent return world in terms of a fifty 714 00:39:26,560 --> 00:39:30,759 Speaker 1: fifty portfolio. I don't think so. Insurance companies and pension funds, 715 00:39:30,800 --> 00:39:33,200 Speaker 1: as we know with the State of Illinois and others, 716 00:39:33,560 --> 00:39:36,160 Speaker 1: you know, expect a seven to seven and a percent 717 00:39:36,280 --> 00:39:39,600 Speaker 1: return from their diversified portfolio. I don't think that's going 718 00:39:39,640 --> 00:39:41,719 Speaker 1: to happen, and that's why they're having problems. And so, 719 00:39:42,360 --> 00:39:45,680 Speaker 1: you know, ultimately, despite the fact that tightening and higher 720 00:39:45,760 --> 00:39:51,360 Speaker 1: interest rates has a negative impact historically unemployment and potentially 721 00:39:51,400 --> 00:39:54,040 Speaker 1: could produce a recession, I think we have to get 722 00:39:54,160 --> 00:39:57,560 Speaker 1: up there in order to avoid a future recession. You know, 723 00:39:57,640 --> 00:40:00,600 Speaker 1: they're one last point. They've been studies by uh, you know, 724 00:40:00,719 --> 00:40:04,080 Speaker 1: Princeton and others now in academia to point out that 725 00:40:04,640 --> 00:40:07,120 Speaker 1: once you drop below two percent in terms of the 726 00:40:07,200 --> 00:40:09,600 Speaker 1: short term rate, it really doesn't do much or hasn't 727 00:40:09,640 --> 00:40:12,200 Speaker 1: done much in terms of stimulating the economy. And so 728 00:40:12,719 --> 00:40:14,600 Speaker 1: I think ultimately we have to get back up to 729 00:40:14,680 --> 00:40:18,800 Speaker 1: a level that stimulates savings investment in the real economy 730 00:40:18,840 --> 00:40:22,799 Speaker 1: as opposed to simply channel funds into the financial economy. 731 00:40:23,040 --> 00:40:25,359 Speaker 1: We've seen the German ten year an eighteen month high. 732 00:40:25,360 --> 00:40:27,719 Speaker 1: We've seen the emerging market to sovereign dollar bonds posting 733 00:40:27,719 --> 00:40:30,160 Speaker 1: their worst weeks since since November. What are the Bill 734 00:40:30,200 --> 00:40:32,359 Speaker 1: Gross bell Weather bonds when you look around the world, 735 00:40:32,360 --> 00:40:33,839 Speaker 1: what are the ones that you look to to tell 736 00:40:33,840 --> 00:40:38,480 Speaker 1: you what's happening in the bond market overall? Well, I 737 00:40:38,840 --> 00:40:43,960 Speaker 1: follow the Bund very seriously relative to tenure treasuries. I 738 00:40:44,040 --> 00:40:47,480 Speaker 1: think there's a has been a rather dramatic correlation in 739 00:40:47,560 --> 00:40:50,200 Speaker 1: the past few months, and indeed it makes sense that 740 00:40:50,280 --> 00:40:53,839 Speaker 1: there should be a correlation period when the ten year 741 00:40:54,000 --> 00:40:58,320 Speaker 1: German Bund exceeded fifty basis points yesterday or the day before. 742 00:40:58,719 --> 00:41:00,400 Speaker 1: You know. To me, that was the say know that 743 00:41:01,080 --> 00:41:04,080 Speaker 1: you know their yields are moving higher um, and that 744 00:41:04,239 --> 00:41:07,560 Speaker 1: means that treasuries would be under pressure as well. The 745 00:41:07,600 --> 00:41:10,360 Speaker 1: Bank of Japan has this ten basis point cap on 746 00:41:10,520 --> 00:41:13,120 Speaker 1: their tenure rates, and we've gone up to the ten 747 00:41:13,200 --> 00:41:17,360 Speaker 1: basis points, and I assume they're doing some easy policies 748 00:41:17,400 --> 00:41:20,040 Speaker 1: in order to keep it there. But the ten basis 749 00:41:20,080 --> 00:41:23,040 Speaker 1: points in Japan, the fifty basis points in Germany UH, 750 00:41:23,120 --> 00:41:26,640 Speaker 1: and ultimately, as I mentioned, the two sixty level on 751 00:41:26,840 --> 00:41:29,560 Speaker 1: ten years are critical in terms of determining whether or 752 00:41:29,600 --> 00:41:32,040 Speaker 1: not bonds are in a bear market or not. It's 753 00:41:32,080 --> 00:41:33,879 Speaker 1: going back to the minutes that we got this week 754 00:41:33,920 --> 00:41:35,640 Speaker 1: from the Fed. Yes, but also from the the e 755 00:41:35,760 --> 00:41:38,319 Speaker 1: c B. There was this by any means necessary line, 756 00:41:38,400 --> 00:41:40,520 Speaker 1: or at least a version of that implicit in the 757 00:41:40,600 --> 00:41:42,640 Speaker 1: in those in the policy of the e c B 758 00:41:42,760 --> 00:41:45,480 Speaker 1: for so along. What do you make of its removal? 759 00:41:45,520 --> 00:41:47,160 Speaker 1: Do do we see a change in tack here from 760 00:41:47,160 --> 00:41:50,920 Speaker 1: the e c B? Well, I think ultimately, I know 761 00:41:51,080 --> 00:41:54,800 Speaker 1: drug is very very devilsh and doesn't want to upset markets. 762 00:41:54,920 --> 00:41:58,800 Speaker 1: It doesn't adhere to my particular philosophy that have just 763 00:41:59,320 --> 00:42:02,399 Speaker 1: discussed in terms of their negative aspects of rates UM. 764 00:42:02,760 --> 00:42:04,960 Speaker 1: I think ultimately we have to wait until two thousand 765 00:42:05,000 --> 00:42:08,040 Speaker 1: and eighteen before they begin to taper um. You know, 766 00:42:08,560 --> 00:42:12,080 Speaker 1: at what pace will that be? Probably limited? You know. 767 00:42:12,120 --> 00:42:14,560 Speaker 1: I continue to see the e c B buying and 768 00:42:14,680 --> 00:42:18,040 Speaker 1: increasing their balance sheet from perhaps four trillion to five 769 00:42:18,120 --> 00:42:21,960 Speaker 1: trillion over the next eighteen months, and that's a stimulative 770 00:42:22,160 --> 00:42:27,680 Speaker 1: type of monetary policy. So yes, taper is beginning probably 771 00:42:27,760 --> 00:42:30,080 Speaker 1: next year, but it's going to be slow and gradual, 772 00:42:30,120 --> 00:42:32,920 Speaker 1: and that's just the way Droggy does it. Within the 773 00:42:33,280 --> 00:42:37,960 Speaker 1: movement in bonds. Bill Gross remember this idea. Bill youngera 774 00:42:38,040 --> 00:42:41,440 Speaker 1: doesn't remember this. There was a point where yield actually 775 00:42:41,560 --> 00:42:45,280 Speaker 1: competed with dividends. This happened long ago and far away. 776 00:42:45,680 --> 00:42:48,920 Speaker 1: How close are we to where we return to the 777 00:42:49,080 --> 00:42:55,719 Speaker 1: day to day battle of yield competing with equity dividends? Well, 778 00:42:55,800 --> 00:42:59,239 Speaker 1: I think we have to get beyond the two particular 779 00:43:00,600 --> 00:43:07,000 Speaker 1: factors that lie underneath that historical comparison. Tom One, we 780 00:43:07,160 --> 00:43:10,040 Speaker 1: have to observe the amount of buybacks on the part 781 00:43:10,080 --> 00:43:13,600 Speaker 1: of companies, and to date, although they've been coming down, 782 00:43:13,680 --> 00:43:16,759 Speaker 1: they've been moving at a billion dollar a year pace, 783 00:43:16,880 --> 00:43:20,240 Speaker 1: and and many investors consider, and I think there's logic 784 00:43:20,320 --> 00:43:23,480 Speaker 1: to it that that five billion dollars a year is 785 00:43:23,719 --> 00:43:26,520 Speaker 1: akin to the dividend, and so you can increase the 786 00:43:26,600 --> 00:43:29,320 Speaker 1: dividend rate that we see by that amount, and that 787 00:43:29,400 --> 00:43:33,640 Speaker 1: amounts to perhaps another one to one and a half percent. Uh. Secondly, though, 788 00:43:33,840 --> 00:43:38,480 Speaker 1: I think that the corporations in terms of their dividends 789 00:43:39,120 --> 00:43:41,759 Speaker 1: ultimately are a reflection of the potential for growth and 790 00:43:41,800 --> 00:43:44,840 Speaker 1: the expectations for growth. And to the extent that growth 791 00:43:44,960 --> 00:43:47,759 Speaker 1: is now moving down and investors are beginning to look 792 00:43:47,800 --> 00:43:50,920 Speaker 1: at two as opposed to three and less fiscal stimulation 793 00:43:51,000 --> 00:43:53,320 Speaker 1: on the part of Trump and tax policies and so on, 794 00:43:53,840 --> 00:43:58,880 Speaker 1: that ultimately, uh, you know, stock yields as a reflection 795 00:43:58,960 --> 00:44:02,080 Speaker 1: of growth. Um, you know have to have to start 796 00:44:02,160 --> 00:44:05,160 Speaker 1: to increase in terms of immediate return as opposed to 797 00:44:05,239 --> 00:44:08,600 Speaker 1: a future return. How will reached it, We'll be How 798 00:44:08,600 --> 00:44:11,959 Speaker 1: worried are you about the contagion associated with this route 799 00:44:12,000 --> 00:44:13,600 Speaker 1: that this could get into that we could see this 800 00:44:13,680 --> 00:44:16,600 Speaker 1: move into other Uh, this is not a route that's 801 00:44:16,640 --> 00:44:22,680 Speaker 1: being inflammatory. Gross Gross Bill Gross remembers the day where 802 00:44:22,680 --> 00:44:26,520 Speaker 1: Alexander Hamilton wanted to coalesce all the state bonds into 803 00:44:26,600 --> 00:44:31,160 Speaker 1: a federal bond bill. Gross Seriously, this is important, folks, 804 00:44:31,200 --> 00:44:33,319 Speaker 1: for the hysteria we're all going to read about over 805 00:44:33,360 --> 00:44:36,240 Speaker 1: the weekend bill. Gross. This is not a bound route, 806 00:44:36,400 --> 00:44:41,080 Speaker 1: is it? No? Not yet? You know, thirty basis points 807 00:44:41,120 --> 00:44:44,400 Speaker 1: in Germany is not a bound route. And uh, you know, 808 00:44:44,520 --> 00:44:47,560 Speaker 1: we've come down from very low levels in terms of 809 00:44:48,000 --> 00:44:51,520 Speaker 1: term premium and in terms of compressed volatility, and the 810 00:44:52,040 --> 00:44:54,520 Speaker 1: volatility that we've seen in the last few days UM, 811 00:44:54,760 --> 00:44:58,600 Speaker 1: even as expressed in the VIX, is certainly not a route. UM. 812 00:44:58,719 --> 00:45:01,960 Speaker 1: You don't have to see volatil in double and triple 813 00:45:02,440 --> 00:45:05,399 Speaker 1: UM and and and prices declined by two or three 814 00:45:05,440 --> 00:45:08,840 Speaker 1: points a week in terms of a bond route. So no, 815 00:45:09,520 --> 00:45:15,080 Speaker 1: not yet. But ultimately, inflationary expectations and central bank policies 816 00:45:15,160 --> 00:45:21,120 Speaker 1: will try to contain volatility, will try to dampen interest rates. UM. 817 00:45:22,000 --> 00:45:25,839 Speaker 1: Whether the market agrees with him forever, I think will 818 00:45:25,880 --> 00:45:29,359 Speaker 1: be the ultimate question. Yields to my way of thinking, 819 00:45:29,440 --> 00:45:31,719 Speaker 1: should move higher? David, get one more question here. I 820 00:45:31,800 --> 00:45:34,640 Speaker 1: do want to point out Grosser's portfolio in the last 821 00:45:34,719 --> 00:45:38,799 Speaker 1: thirty days is in the percentile. So he's being very 822 00:45:38,960 --> 00:45:41,600 Speaker 1: rowdy because David's being very as I moved to the 823 00:45:41,600 --> 00:45:45,879 Speaker 1: surveillance time out share from our mispeak. There, there you go, Phil, 824 00:45:45,960 --> 00:45:48,399 Speaker 1: Let me just ask you lastly what you're going go ahead. 825 00:45:50,080 --> 00:45:51,880 Speaker 1: I was gonna say that's that's a function of being 826 00:45:51,920 --> 00:45:54,360 Speaker 1: negative on German interest rates and to the extent that 827 00:45:54,400 --> 00:45:57,040 Speaker 1: they've gone up by thirty and prices down, and then 828 00:45:57,160 --> 00:45:59,120 Speaker 1: Janice has done well, there you go. Bill. Let me 829 00:45:59,160 --> 00:46:01,080 Speaker 1: ask you lastly, here's push ahead to next week, we 830 00:46:01,120 --> 00:46:03,279 Speaker 1: get a monetary policy report, we hear from the FED chair. 831 00:46:03,280 --> 00:46:04,880 Speaker 1: What are you gonna be listening for when she speaks 832 00:46:04,920 --> 00:46:06,880 Speaker 1: on Capitol Hill two days next week? I believe on 833 00:46:06,920 --> 00:46:13,520 Speaker 1: Wednesday and Thursday, Well, the doverishness, hawkishness, uh, you know, 834 00:46:13,840 --> 00:46:18,080 Speaker 1: focus on inflation and financial conditions. I guess that's the 835 00:46:18,200 --> 00:46:21,280 Speaker 1: debate that I see. I mean, yelling suggests that financial 836 00:46:21,360 --> 00:46:26,279 Speaker 1: conditions aren't important. Others such as the you know, the 837 00:46:26,360 --> 00:46:29,440 Speaker 1: president of New York Fed, um, you know, suggest that 838 00:46:29,960 --> 00:46:33,160 Speaker 1: stock prices and financial conditions are important. So I'd like 839 00:46:33,280 --> 00:46:37,680 Speaker 1: to see answers between that those two heavyweights, uh, in 840 00:46:38,280 --> 00:46:41,480 Speaker 1: terms of whether stock prices are key or not key? 841 00:46:41,920 --> 00:46:44,480 Speaker 1: Bill Gross, thank you, so much, greatly appreciate it. Mr 842 00:46:44,560 --> 00:46:59,879 Speaker 1: Gross is with Jamie Anderson. It's been a remarkable day 843 00:47:00,160 --> 00:47:02,759 Speaker 1: and we've now got a nice move in the bond 844 00:47:02,840 --> 00:47:05,920 Speaker 1: market off the jobs report of better jobs report yields 845 00:47:06,000 --> 00:47:09,680 Speaker 1: higher I guess h two point nine and the thirty 846 00:47:09,760 --> 00:47:13,160 Speaker 1: year bond. A lot of the different American media maybe 847 00:47:13,200 --> 00:47:16,920 Speaker 1: has moved away from Hamburg and the meetings, but to 848 00:47:17,040 --> 00:47:22,040 Speaker 1: be honest, David Gura, across the Bloomberg, the headlines continue 849 00:47:22,680 --> 00:47:25,080 Speaker 1: and they're really pretty important. The President meeting with the 850 00:47:25,600 --> 00:47:30,319 Speaker 1: leadership of Mexico UH. Trump says Mexico should quote absolutely 851 00:47:30,520 --> 00:47:34,200 Speaker 1: unquote pay for border uh wall. There's headlines on China 852 00:47:34,360 --> 00:47:38,800 Speaker 1: China blast G twenty overtrade hands were shaken uh and 853 00:47:39,120 --> 00:47:41,880 Speaker 1: Hamburg is calling in a little more security. So as 854 00:47:41,920 --> 00:47:45,359 Speaker 1: we go to our next guest, David Gura, it's sort 855 00:47:45,400 --> 00:47:51,520 Speaker 1: of a stew here in Germany on this Friday. Well done, 856 00:47:52,480 --> 00:47:54,680 Speaker 1: A pleasure here to bring an ambassador, Max Bauchi's former 857 00:47:54,800 --> 00:47:56,960 Speaker 1: US Ambassador to China, former US Senator of course, from 858 00:47:56,960 --> 00:47:58,920 Speaker 1: the great state of Montana. He joins us on our 859 00:47:58,920 --> 00:48:00,960 Speaker 1: phone lines. Since let me get your respective ambassadory if 860 00:48:00,960 --> 00:48:03,560 Speaker 1: I could, from your time in Beijing. I imagine this issue, 861 00:48:03,600 --> 00:48:06,319 Speaker 1: the North three issue, loomed large while you were there. 862 00:48:06,560 --> 00:48:09,560 Speaker 1: What changed for you? Earlier this week July four, I 863 00:48:09,600 --> 00:48:12,040 Speaker 1: went North three, attested this new missile. How did the 864 00:48:12,400 --> 00:48:18,640 Speaker 1: political calculus change? Well? First, um, not much changed, because 865 00:48:19,200 --> 00:48:23,480 Speaker 1: even though we Americans, including President Obama and Secretary of 866 00:48:23,600 --> 00:48:27,840 Speaker 1: State Carry others, spoke very frequently as that I with 867 00:48:28,000 --> 00:48:31,680 Speaker 1: the Chinese leadership about North Korea. Um, the birth Koreans 868 00:48:31,719 --> 00:48:34,799 Speaker 1: with excuse me, the Chinese, but come back with platitudes, 869 00:48:34,960 --> 00:48:38,000 Speaker 1: they wouldn't say anything. Meanwhile, Kim Jong un proceeds and 870 00:48:38,520 --> 00:48:42,080 Speaker 1: develops his missiles. In a certain sense, nothing changed. What's 871 00:48:42,760 --> 00:48:47,160 Speaker 1: more imminent now though, is that how far he's developed 872 00:48:47,200 --> 00:48:50,759 Speaker 1: his missils capability and and how Also it's becoming more 873 00:48:50,880 --> 00:48:54,200 Speaker 1: clear than China is not only not willing to help 874 00:48:54,360 --> 00:48:58,160 Speaker 1: very much, but maybe even sat in with Brusha and 875 00:48:59,000 --> 00:49:02,480 Speaker 1: opposition some degree to United States ways to try to 876 00:49:02,560 --> 00:49:05,400 Speaker 1: solve this issue. So it's it's it's becoming more ominous 877 00:49:05,440 --> 00:49:08,680 Speaker 1: in my judgments, help us with with urgency and diplomacy. 878 00:49:08,760 --> 00:49:10,920 Speaker 1: We we heard from the President this week via Twitter 879 00:49:11,480 --> 00:49:13,279 Speaker 1: we had to try with China. It sounded like he 880 00:49:13,400 --> 00:49:15,680 Speaker 1: was given up on applying pressure to China on the 881 00:49:15,760 --> 00:49:20,120 Speaker 1: issue of North Korea. You've lived this, how how difficult 882 00:49:20,200 --> 00:49:24,160 Speaker 1: is it to get things to move faster diplomatically? Well, 883 00:49:24,280 --> 00:49:27,040 Speaker 1: I think it's a mistake for him to conduct foreign 884 00:49:27,120 --> 00:49:33,000 Speaker 1: policy Vida's twitter. Um, it's um, it's it one hand. 885 00:49:33,040 --> 00:49:36,719 Speaker 1: His statements are inconsistent, sometimes it's bombastic, and sometimes it 886 00:49:36,840 --> 00:49:40,880 Speaker 1: were reasonable. And foreign leaders therefore, including Kim Jong and 887 00:49:41,800 --> 00:49:44,520 Speaker 1: President she really don't know what to expect. It's it's 888 00:49:44,560 --> 00:49:48,719 Speaker 1: inconsistency rather, and a second is all public Rather, I 889 00:49:49,120 --> 00:49:52,520 Speaker 1: think it's it's such the United States to buckle down, 890 00:49:52,760 --> 00:49:55,720 Speaker 1: dig down really deep, work with other countries and figure 891 00:49:55,719 --> 00:49:59,480 Speaker 1: out much more solid planned It puts a lot more 892 00:49:59,560 --> 00:50:02,600 Speaker 1: pressure on all countries. In this case, it's not just 893 00:50:02,800 --> 00:50:05,560 Speaker 1: North Korea, but it's on China and on other allies 894 00:50:05,600 --> 00:50:08,600 Speaker 1: of ours who interned and put pressure on China and 895 00:50:08,719 --> 00:50:11,520 Speaker 1: on Russia to get a solution. Near all countries now 896 00:50:11,719 --> 00:50:15,239 Speaker 1: or involved, if can can shued an, I GBM that 897 00:50:15,560 --> 00:50:19,799 Speaker 1: threatens the world, and it says stays it's be presidential 898 00:50:19,920 --> 00:50:22,839 Speaker 1: beast dates but like and not do not conduct all 899 00:50:22,880 --> 00:50:25,880 Speaker 1: these sweets. Let me ask a senator from Montana question, 900 00:50:26,400 --> 00:50:29,160 Speaker 1: did you ever go home you know, I mean, I know, 901 00:50:29,320 --> 00:50:31,279 Speaker 1: I know Max Bock has only took five or six 902 00:50:31,400 --> 00:50:33,839 Speaker 1: days a year off. But when you did go home 903 00:50:33,920 --> 00:50:37,759 Speaker 1: to Montana, did were you ever greeted with the emotion 904 00:50:38,680 --> 00:50:42,040 Speaker 1: in anger that you see your colleagues greeted with. Now, 905 00:50:42,480 --> 00:50:44,400 Speaker 1: is this a new thing or do this used to 906 00:50:44,480 --> 00:50:49,839 Speaker 1: happen to you? Well? No, I got it um when 907 00:50:49,880 --> 00:50:53,640 Speaker 1: I took my trips home to very frequently, remember two 908 00:50:53,719 --> 00:50:57,080 Speaker 1: or three healthcare meetings, And I also found that it 909 00:50:57,239 --> 00:51:01,200 Speaker 1: worked if I just stood there. I totally respected if 910 00:51:01,239 --> 00:51:04,359 Speaker 1: people are asking the questions and respected that people are 911 00:51:04,400 --> 00:51:07,120 Speaker 1: pretty angry, kind of ticked off, and listen. You gotta 912 00:51:07,160 --> 00:51:09,200 Speaker 1: really listen. And after about an hour and an hour 913 00:51:09,239 --> 00:51:11,160 Speaker 1: and a half of meetings, but maybe if it's a 914 00:51:11,280 --> 00:51:14,319 Speaker 1: hundred people, two hundred people potend you to calm down 915 00:51:14,440 --> 00:51:16,840 Speaker 1: a lot, and I think there's a lot more mutual 916 00:51:16,880 --> 00:51:19,960 Speaker 1: self respect. Now. They may not really like the health 917 00:51:20,000 --> 00:51:22,040 Speaker 1: care ability we passed that much, but at least there 918 00:51:22,120 --> 00:51:24,600 Speaker 1: was a strong communication that we talked to a lot 919 00:51:24,760 --> 00:51:28,480 Speaker 1: of with with American with with my constituents. Second in 920 00:51:28,480 --> 00:51:30,360 Speaker 1: issue really came up a lot as a second amendment 921 00:51:30,719 --> 00:51:34,760 Speaker 1: gun control Man oh Man that's that's hot, and in Montana, 922 00:51:35,120 --> 00:51:38,120 Speaker 1: and so again I just listened to people and be 923 00:51:38,280 --> 00:51:41,200 Speaker 1: very respectful. I started meeting by saying, Hey, Okay, I 924 00:51:41,280 --> 00:51:43,399 Speaker 1: know you're upset. All I ask you give me five 925 00:51:43,440 --> 00:51:46,840 Speaker 1: minutes and let me speak uninterrupted. Then we'll let let 926 00:51:46,920 --> 00:51:50,600 Speaker 1: the roof blown off a letter riff and center backus. 927 00:51:50,680 --> 00:51:52,480 Speaker 1: We treasure when you're on with us. I'm gonna ask 928 00:51:52,520 --> 00:51:55,960 Speaker 1: you a deeply emotional question for a national audience, and 929 00:51:56,040 --> 00:51:58,759 Speaker 1: particularly our audience in New York. Can we have gun 930 00:51:58,920 --> 00:52:04,480 Speaker 1: legislation that meets the constituencies of your Montana and at 931 00:52:04,560 --> 00:52:09,000 Speaker 1: the same times meets the constituencies of our urban areas, 932 00:52:09,040 --> 00:52:13,080 Speaker 1: and particularly after this horrific I use this word folks 933 00:52:13,120 --> 00:52:17,080 Speaker 1: with immense respect for NYPD for the assassination of a 934 00:52:17,160 --> 00:52:20,680 Speaker 1: police officer in the last forty eight or seventy two hours. 935 00:52:20,960 --> 00:52:26,200 Speaker 1: Can we have two gun policies? Max pocus, I frankly 936 00:52:26,280 --> 00:52:29,719 Speaker 1: don't see it. I mean, um, if we had one 937 00:52:29,800 --> 00:52:34,320 Speaker 1: gun policy in Montana, where people are hunters outdoors respect 938 00:52:34,400 --> 00:52:37,399 Speaker 1: guns of our crime rates very low, and another gun 939 00:52:37,520 --> 00:52:41,480 Speaker 1: policy in New York where handguns aversely banned, that might 940 00:52:41,520 --> 00:52:45,120 Speaker 1: work in New York as well as uh the outline 941 00:52:45,200 --> 00:52:48,440 Speaker 1: the approach I outlined from Montana. The trouble is guns 942 00:52:48,520 --> 00:52:51,640 Speaker 1: go across the lines, and I answer your questions. I 943 00:52:51,840 --> 00:52:54,480 Speaker 1: just don't see how they can combine these two. We 944 00:52:54,640 --> 00:52:56,600 Speaker 1: have to leave it there. Too many as you always 945 00:52:56,680 --> 00:53:00,319 Speaker 1: enjoy to speak to you Inbassador Bocas. Thank you, uh something, David. 946 00:53:00,440 --> 00:53:03,480 Speaker 1: There's never enough time with Max. Bob always great to 947 00:53:03,480 --> 00:53:06,880 Speaker 1: get on healthcare, on finance, indeed on China relations as well, 948 00:53:07,160 --> 00:53:19,600 Speaker 1: China relations as well. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg 949 00:53:19,680 --> 00:53:26,000 Speaker 1: Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 950 00:53:26,360 --> 00:53:30,160 Speaker 1: or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at 951 00:53:30,239 --> 00:53:34,880 Speaker 1: Tom Keene. David Gura is at David Gura. Before the podcast, 952 00:53:35,200 --> 00:53:49,720 Speaker 1: you can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio. Brunt 953 00:53:49,800 --> 00:53:53,280 Speaker 1: You by Bank of America Mary Lynch. With virtual reality, 954 00:53:53,560 --> 00:53:58,920 Speaker 1: virtually everything will change. Discover opportunities in a transforming world. 955 00:53:59,360 --> 00:54:03,680 Speaker 1: Be of a mL dot Com, slash VR, Mary Lynch, 956 00:54:03,760 --> 00:54:06,080 Speaker 1: Pierce Fenner and Smith Incorporated,