WEBVTT - “I’ve Had Difficult Conversations” Patriots’ Head Coach Breaks Silence on Photo Controversy

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:02.759
<v Speaker 1>Heay of folks.

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 2>It is Tuesday, April twenty first, and he has finally

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:08.800
<v Speaker 2>spoken to the New England Patriots head coach Mike Rabel.

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Has just made his first.

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:16.799
<v Speaker 2>Comments since that firestorm, since that tabloid story exploded with

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.479
<v Speaker 2>pictures of him and an NFL reporter who was not

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:22.799
<v Speaker 2>his wife being with that. Welcome to this episode of

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Amy and TJ. Folks know this story by now. Robes,

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Diana Rossini is a person he was seen when pictures

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 2>with She has since resigned from the Athletic, but everybody

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.279
<v Speaker 2>was waiting to hear from him. We just heard from

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 2>him at a press conference, made comments with about three minutes.

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:40.239
<v Speaker 2>I am particular. Robes asked, you don't tell me When

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 2>I said, what did you think of what you just

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 2>heard from him? And I actually don't know your answer,

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 2>just your impression first of all, of what he said.

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 3>I just think that it is a glaring example of

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 3>a double standard where look, I understand they were in

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 3>different roles, that Diana Rossini was a porter, a journalist

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 3>working for a very reputable sports organization, the Athletic, which

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 3>is owned by the New York Times, and there are

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 3>ways of operating and she it seems at least had

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 3>the appearance of violating those standards, and so she resigned.

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 3>Mike Rabel is not being investigated. No one is looking

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 3>into any misconduct. We don't know what's going on in

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 3>his personal life. But it seemed as though all he

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 3>had to deal with was his personal stuff and that

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 3>is what he acknowledged without giving any specifics, and apologize

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 3>for any distractions and moved on and went about his

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:38.759
<v Speaker 3>business of being the head coach of the New England Patriots,

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 3>end of story. It's almost as if I saw him

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 3>just kind of go, yep, let me just acknowledge this

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 3>and then move on. And look, maybe that's fair given

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 3>each of their positions, but it doesn't seem like it is.

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't think she should have resigned, is where I'll start.

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 2>So to your point about a double standard, that's fine.

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't see it as a double standard as a

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 2>man woman and people will see it as a double

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 2>standard that I do understand. The double standard could be

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 2>argued having to do with her and how other male

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 2>journalists behave. It shouldn't be a comparison, in my opinion,

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 2>between her as a journalist compared with him as a coach.

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 2>They got guys with criminal records playing football every damn Sunday.

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Don't tell me this now. It makes them look bad.

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 2>He brought a bad reputation onto the team, which he acknowledged,

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 2>and we're gonna let you hear him. We're going to

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 2>play it for you here in a moment. But for me, Ropes,

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 2>he didn't. I never saw this as a double standard

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 2>that some talked about between him and her. The double

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 2>standard is her and every other possible journalist, which is

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 2>overwhelmingly male dominated in the sports field where she works,

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 2>don't have a direct comparison with anybody else's situation. But he, yes,

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 2>they are held to a different standard in the NFL.

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Look, and I get that, and I acknowledge that, and

0:02:58.240 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 3>I hear what you're saying.

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 4>The fairer compare would be.

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Comparing Diana Rossini with her male counterpart makes total sense.

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:09.239
<v Speaker 3>It's just it's overwhelming the difference between the two in

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 3>terms of what the professional repercussions were. And I'm sure

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 3>she knew that going into it, and he knows that

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 3>going into it. She, of all people who covers sports

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 3>and covers the NFL, understands that there is a much

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 3>different standard in play than there is for someone who

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 3>is an operating journalist. That I totally acknowledge that, but

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 3>still it just seems it just seems unfair.

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I thought it was unfair that she lost her job.

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 2>I am saying, none of this is any of our business. Now,

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 2>it's okay to speak on it now, in my opinion,

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 2>because they did both address it. They did both say something.

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 2>She put on a long letter resigning, so that brought

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 2>it up to a level where it was a different story.

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 2>But rhaps other than that, I don't know what's going on.

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Is his house in her house, with their marriages, with

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 2>their backgrounds, with their understand I don't know. I don't

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 2>look at any of this in the pictures that I

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 2>saw robes, And yes, we have some experience, if you will,

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 2>not just our personal but seeing other people's stories robes

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 2>and how they've been handling people, jumping to conclusions and

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 2>not understanding. Yes, these two could be up to know whatever.

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Good.

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 2>That's not for me to say. It's for her husband

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 2>and his wife and coach and the reporter. It's their thing.

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.359
<v Speaker 2>So now this next thing has happened in robes. The

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 2>one thing that did not come out come out of

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 2>his mouth was I'm sorry. The thing that didn't come

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 2>out of his mouth is I apologize.

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 3>And he also didn't make any acknowledgments either way. He

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 3>didn't deny any untoward relationship. He didn't deny anything improper

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 3>happening between him and Diana Rossini. He thanked reporters who

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 3>had gathered there for their patients in waiting for him

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 3>to make any sort of remarks. But I'm curious what

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 3>you think about the difference between his initial statement when

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 3>the pictures prefer revealed, where he basically said, I don't

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 3>need to make another statement, this is laughable, to where

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 3>he was today thanking journalists for their patients and acknowledging

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 3>that he's had difficult conversations with his family.

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Those two things don't obviously line up. We can jump

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 2>to any conclusion we want, but those things are laid

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 2>out and clear. If he was not involved in not

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 2>doing anything wrong, he would have said that in the

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 2>first statement. He would have said in this one, guys,

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 2>I know this looked bad, but let me tell you

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 2>what happened and what was going on and the reason

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 2>we were this, and knock yourself out. He didn't do that.

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 2>He chose not to what he has done. Now Rose

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 2>is left as in a position to where I said,

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 2>I'll almost say about it next question, for all for

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 2>all time. This is done because he said, I talked

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 2>to the people who are important to talk to, my team,

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 2>my coaches, my organization.

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 3>And look, you're somebody who knows how the sports world operates,

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 3>probably more than I do, just because you're immersed in

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 3>it in a way I haven't been.

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 4>Did he need to even say anything? Did he even

0:05:59.040 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 4>go further than.

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:01.239
<v Speaker 1>He had to? No?

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 2>He Maybe I would argue you should have gone a

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 2>little further, but I would say he did what he

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 2>needed to do, and the reason he had to do it,

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Robes is the damn NFL Draft is on Thursday. And

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 2>if folks you don't, yes you hear about the draft,

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 2>you see it's a big TV event, Robes, this is

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 2>the most important time other than the super Bowl for

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 2>the NFL.

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>It's that big of a deal.

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 2>They are forming their teams that are going to carry

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 2>them to the next super Bowl in two years, five years.

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 2>You are building your franchise. It's an event. It's a

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 2>three day event. They do it in Pittsburgh Now Robes,

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 2>it is a cute show. You cannot have this be

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 2>top of mind and everybody waiting to chase him around,

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 2>or his players around, or the owner around to ask

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:53.359
<v Speaker 2>about Rabel. So he had to say something, and he

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 2>had to do it like this. But what he's essentially

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:58.359
<v Speaker 2>done in Robes to say shut up? I said all

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm to say, and I've already what he told you,

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 2>so don't waste your time.

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 3>So that's my next question. Does this stop reporters? I

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 3>don't know what the level of decorum is among reporters. Yes,

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 3>and this head coach, this storied winning head coach, will

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 3>they respect his request?

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Wow, they want access for the entire season. They're gonna

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 2>be good, They're gonna go to the playoffs. You need

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 2>a good relationship not just with the coach, with the players,

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 2>with the organization. Don't piss them off. You're gonna lose

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 2>your access. Now sixty minutes sits down with them. All

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 2>bets are off. But in his day to day and

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 2>the folks that are in that room, I can't imagine

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 2>who's gonna take him to task for this. And as

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 2>a pr person standing by going next question, they did.

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 2>This was Azy Fudd the other day, the number one

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 2>draft pick of the Yukon. One of the reporters asked

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 2>her about her relationship with Paige Becker's The two were

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 2>dating at Yukon. Page is now working or playing for

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 2>the team that Azy just got recruited, just got drafted to.

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Asked her a question about her relationship.

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Reporter or excuse me, The PR person jumped in, no,

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 2>you have to ask that, but we're gonna shut this down.

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 2>You're not allowed. They can tell you to shut up.

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 2>We are not gonna allow you to ask our athlete,

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 2>our coach anything. This is done for him. Wow, bros,

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 2>it's done. It's over. Said what I'm gonna say Now.

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what's going on at his house, but

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 2>this is what's going on. At least this is what

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 2>he told us. So I'm gonna set this up. Robes,

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 2>you heard this as well. The part we're gonna let

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 2>you here, folks, we're gonna play. It's about a minute long.

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 2>But he talked initially just saying, hey, I addressed my

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 2>players yesterday. I talked to them. I got ahead of them.

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 2>I didn't want them to have to come out here

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 2>and answer questions blah blahlah blah, and so we pick

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 2>it up robes where you could tell he was about

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 2>to transition to the difficult stuff. So at the beginning

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 2>of this sound by you hear him take a very

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:47.079
<v Speaker 2>big sigh. So that's what you're gonna hear. But this

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 2>is coach Mike Rabol making his first comments since this

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 2>whole thing went down.

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:55.319
<v Speaker 5>Team.

0:08:55.400 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 6>With that being said, you know, I've had some differicult

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 6>conversations with people that I care about, with my family,

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 6>the organization, the coaches, the players, those have been positive

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 6>and productive. We believe in order to be successful on

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 6>and off the field, you have to make good decisions.

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 5>That includes me. That starts with me.

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 6>We never want our actions to negatively affect affect the team.

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 6>We never want to be the cause of a distraction,

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 6>you know. And what I know those are comments and

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 6>questions that I've answered for the team and with the team.

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 6>Will keep those private, and you know, to ourselves care

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 6>deeply about this football team and I'm excited to coach them.

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 5>I also know that I'm going to attack each day

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 5>with humility and focus.

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 6>And what I can promise you is that my family,

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 6>this organization the team, the staff, the coaches, everybody are

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 6>fans most importantly, will get the best version of me

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 6>going forward.

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:03.719
<v Speaker 2>You notice he said family is well going to get

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 2>the best version of me going forward.

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 4>The best version of me going forward.

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm curious by him saying that you have to be

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 3>or in order to be successful on the field, you

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 3>have to make good decisions on and off the field.

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.199
<v Speaker 3>Was that his way of acknowledging he made a bad decision.

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, you combine that with the best version of me.

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 2>That's what people say after they mess up. That's what

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 2>people say after they get caught and they say I'm sorry,

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:31.439
<v Speaker 2>and then they say, but moving forward. I mean, people

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 2>have done this in relationships when they screw up. I'm sorry,

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 2>But moving forward, you're going to get the best for pros.

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 2>That is as close as he's getting to admitting that

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 2>he did wrong.

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 4>Those without saying he's sorry.

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Out saying it. That's as close as he's going to get.

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 2>That's the best you're going to get from Mike Vabel.

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:50.959
<v Speaker 2>Everybody's moving on. I will be surprised if you hear

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 2>any leaks coming out of that locker room about this

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 2>is what he said, and this is what we thought,

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 2>and this is what the team.

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I would be surprised to even to hear that.

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 3>That was my next question to you, because again, you

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 3>know sports culture in a way I do not. You

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 3>know locker rooms in a way I do not. That

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 3>just seems unthinkable to me. I can't think of another

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 3>organization where you would have something potentially this scandalous and

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 3>you have the goods, you have the information, you know

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:16.959
<v Speaker 3>what he said, you know what he didn't say, and

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 3>you don't tell anyone because with any of these players

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:23.839
<v Speaker 3>even told their girlfriend or their wives, and they told

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:24.319
<v Speaker 3>their friend.

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 4>This is how things get out.

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:30.839
<v Speaker 2>This is not a newsroom. I would be really surprised

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.839
<v Speaker 2>if we get some big headline. Everybody's after it right now,

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 2>TMZ and the like. Everybody's trying to get some little nugget,

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 2>little detail to have some headline. I would be surprised.

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 2>But stay here with us, folks. Yes, we're finally doing

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 2>a whole episode Robes. We've done a couple of episodes

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 2>on this. This is the most we've talked about Coach

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 2>rabel in any of them. We've been talking about Diana Russini,

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 2>the reporter involved, and also another young lady who has

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 2>also now lost her job. Stay here, we'll remind you

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 2>of the other fallout in this story. All right, we

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 2>continue here on Amy and TJ Robes. I isn't it.

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 2>We've said this. We did one of these episodes and

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 2>at the end of it, I mean we did twenty

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty five minutes, and in the twenty second minute we

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 2>looked at each other and.

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Said, how we even mentioned coach raybel.

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and so I guess that's my point. When you

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 3>hear him just kind of and I don't want to

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 3>say flippantly, but it wasn't an apology tour. It didn't

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 3>seem as if he were. He didn't seem like he

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 3>was in pain or that he had any sort of remorse.

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 3>He just was matter of factly like, yep, talk to

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 3>my friends and family and my players.

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 4>We're done here, moving on, you'll get the best version

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 4>of me. Next question.

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Meantime, you have two women who've lost their jobs amidst

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 3>this scandal.

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 2>One of them voluntarily resigned, the other got fired. Chrissy

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 2>Freud I believe is her name, USA today a sports

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 2>reporter who put up what's the best uh, what's the

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:10.719
<v Speaker 2>best way to describe the the tweet she put out, right, you.

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 3>Had a girl to me, she kicked her when Diana

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Rossini was down, kind of saying, yeah, we knew this

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 3>about you all along. Don't let the door hit you

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 3>on in the ass on your way out, just basically

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 3>cheering celebrating the fact that Rassini resigned. She claimed, Oh,

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 3>you just resigned because you were about to be fired,

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 3>so just took an opportunity to take a low blow

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 3>and a mean shot at her publicly, and then she

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 3>ended up losing her job.

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 4>In doing so. Hey, Ann, that was that one was

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 4>just I don't mind her being fired at all.

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 3>That one, that one I actually do not mind at

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:43.839
<v Speaker 3>all because she didn't.

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 4>Need to jump in, she didn't need to say anything.

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 3>No good came out of what she put out in

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 3>the world. We've always said this, and we all have

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 3>to be reminded, but look it. If you aren't serving

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 3>a greater good, if you aren't whatever information you're putting out,

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 3>if it if it isn't helpful, if it isn't enlightening,

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 3>why put it out in the world. If it's just

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 3>to be mean, And that's all that was. There was

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 3>no value in what she said, that's.

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:11.959
<v Speaker 1>A tough one. I don't know.

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:14.959
<v Speaker 2>I hate to root for support somebody. I would never

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 2>support somebody being fired, if you will, But man, a

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 2>suspension would have been Okay, that was just awful.

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>That was me all right.

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Back to Rassini here, we don't know where she is

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 2>going to be. She's kind of gone quiet since that

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 2>letter ropes, that Resonation Nation letter that she put out.

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 2>I have one last question. I didn't think about it

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 2>until you said something about the double standard. What would

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 2>your thought of Rabel have been had been if same

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 2>pictures came out, but instead of it being Diana Russini,

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 2>it was a woman nobody knew. It was a Rando,

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 2>just some random woman nobody knew. And she goes about

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 2>her business, goes by, we never find out publicly who

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 2>she is, she never loses a job, goes out about

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 2>her life. Would you have felt so strongly about Rabel

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 2>needing some kind of disciplinary action for being caught in

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 2>that compromising position?

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, that's a really interesting question, and the answer

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 3>is no.

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 4>The answer is no, because.

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 3>I do believe there should be anyone who is in

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 3>a public position or and is in an influential position

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 3>still deserves to have a private life, and I still

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 3>think people are humans and they make choices that might

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 3>not bode well for their marriage or for their relationship,

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 3>but it shouldn't necessarily impact their professional life. However, I

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 3>do think in this particular instance, just as much as

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 3>she could be faulted for having some sort of access

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 3>or some sort of inappropriate relationship that could have impacted

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 3>her credibility as a journalist, which I totally get, he

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 3>too could be held to a standard where he could

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 3>be getting favorable coverage. He could be getting some sort

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 3>of benefit from having this relationship as well that at

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 3>least could be looked into. But I see your face,

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 3>and I understand, and you've pointed this out many many times,

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 3>and I get it. The things that the players on

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 3>his team and lots of other teams have been accused of,

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 3>charged with convicted of it pales in comparison to these pictures.

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 4>I get it.

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 2>I was the idea that he is benefiting professionally, that

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 2>having an affair helped him go fourteen and three and

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 2>make it to the super Bowl. There is I keep

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 2>going back to that standard, And yeah, there is a

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 2>standard for journalist behavior that she had to adhere to.

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 2>There's a standard for coach and NFL behavior that he

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 2>is supposed to adhere to. This one does not rise

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 2>to the level, at least from the NFL of something

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 2>that deserves not just doesn't deserve disciplinary action, it doesn't

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 2>even deserve an investigation.

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>They're not even looking.

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 3>They're not investigating. There's look in they said, Yep, pretty

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 3>much that I I do. I totally understand it when

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 3>you look deeper into the organizations that each person worked for,

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 3>why there was a different outcome. And again she did

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 3>choose to resign, but she wasn't fired. However, it I

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 3>think not to not to give Chrissy uh what's her

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 3>freud any sort of support. I do think it's probably

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 3>likely she was probably pointing out something that is something

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 3>many would have thought that just the pictures alone would

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 3>probably have ended with her being asked to leave just

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 3>because there was I think it's hard to argue that

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 3>that wasn't improper, that that didn't look improper, even if

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 3>it had the possibility being interpreted as improper. She he

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 3>was somebody who she was supposed to have a only

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 3>professional relationship.

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 2>Job policy, to your point, doesn't say You can't just

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 2>can't have a relationship with somebody you're covering. You have

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 2>to avoid the appearance even of a relationship or a

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 2>conflict of interests. You're supposed to avoid it. Even looking like.

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 4>That pool side in a bikini with him.

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna look like.

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 4>It's not a good look.

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>You know what that's gonna look like.

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 2>Now, if it was all good, she could have gone

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 2>in You and I will have loved an opportunity to

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 2>sit down and say, yeah, guys, this is all that's happening,

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 2>this is what it was, this is why it looks

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 2>like that, this is really what's happening. She had that opportunity, okay,

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 2>to avoid a you know what, even if she had

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 2>been in a more public place, right then you say

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 2>this was some private, kind of exclusive, romantic place. Romantic

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 2>if she had been at a Disney World resort at

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 2>a pool with him and tons of people around, I

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 2>was gone. Obviously she's not trying to sneak around.

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Correct, That would have looked different as well. Yes, And

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 3>to your point, we would have loved. We even talked

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 3>about who could sit down to do the interview with

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 3>us so that we can really just put it all

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 3>out there.

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm also just curious what you think.

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 3>You may laugh at this, but I would have, and

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:08.880
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't care what I think. And maybe he doesn't

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 3>care what a lot of people think because he just

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 3>does his job well and that's good enough. But if

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.719
<v Speaker 3>Mike Rabel had come out and said, I behaved badly,

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 3>I cheated on my wife. I feel terrible about it.

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm making amends with her. This is not something that

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 3>the public needs to dissect or have a conversation about

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 3>because I'm handling it privately. Just know that I am

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:33.439
<v Speaker 3>deeply regretful for my choices, and I'm repairing that with

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:33.959
<v Speaker 3>my wife.

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 4>With that, I would have been like, wow, damn. I

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 4>would have been impressed.

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 3>But that probably is hilarious to even imagine somebody would

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 3>be willing to do that if they didn't have to.

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Somebody has to do that if they're working in an

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 2>industry where you need the public's support for you to

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 2>continue to work in that industry. He doesn't need a

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 2>damn thing but to win football games. He just came

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 2>out of the Super Bowl. If they were three and

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 2>thirteen last year, maybe we're having a different conversation robes

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 2>they were plays away from being Super Bowl champion. So

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying to you, he doesn't have to do that.

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:17.719
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't need to do that. It doesn't help him

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 2>to do that at all. Now, if you're an actor,

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 2>if you're a musician, if you're somebody needs people to

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 2>buy tickets to your show, if you need somebody to

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 2>support you, Wow, then that's different. You come out and

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 2>say I am sorry, I need to make amends, and

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:34.400
<v Speaker 2>you want people on your side, sweetheart.

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>They're only on his side.

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 2>How big of How many big asshole coaches have you

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 2>seen that still got jobs because they win?

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and then you have Sean Moore, But that was

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 3>because he was having that relationship with someone who worked

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 3>for him and who was under him.

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:54.640
<v Speaker 2>They didn't want to fire him. They had to fire him, sweetheart.

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 2>They fired him on the day he was being he

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 2>got arrested. It was a domestic violet and there was

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 2>a woman in his office. That was a different breach

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 2>of trust. There we're talking about a different situation. And

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 2>trust me, there was a conversation had somewhere. Is there

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 2>any way we can keep this guy? And so yes,

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 2>it has to rise to a left. Think about the

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 2>successful coaches Robes who have gotten fired.

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 4>You're laughing right now.

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 5>It's come on.

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean Sharon Moore would be the only one I

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 4>can think of Robes.

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:26.479
<v Speaker 1>And you remember how crazy that situation was.

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 4>It was pretty intense.

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh it was Oh.

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 2>That they didn't have a choice. But no, and I

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 2>still stand by at Robes. This is just their business.

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:39.479
<v Speaker 1>It is.

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 2>It's their business. It's gotten out publicly. If they feel

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 2>they need to say something, knock yourselves out. He's a

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 2>football coach.

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 4>All right. So this is going to be put to bed.

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Now, it really will. And to Vrabel is something you

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 2>mentioned about. Yeah, he just looks kind of non shell.

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 2>That's his demeanor. Like he didn't look any different yesterday

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 2>than he does in most press conferences. He just has

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 2>that kind of demeanor. He's not really an animated guy.

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 1>So there it is. And look you think about his family.

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Her family, got kids involved, their communities involved, their kids

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 2>going to school and parent teacher conference in the people.

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm just saying all that stuff. These families are going

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 2>through something right now that deserves more than a lot

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:25.479
<v Speaker 2>of your comments. A lot of stuff that's coming at

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 2>them and people making jokes and whatever, and You could

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 2>say they put themselves in that position roles, but there

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 2>is there are two groups of folks, families going.

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Through right now.

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 3>There's a human price that they're paying. Even if it

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 3>isn't public. For Mike Rabel, certainly privately he is. He's

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 3>going through something, whether he shows it or not. Out

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 3>of press conference.

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 2>This has been interesting to talk this out. I'm glad

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 2>we didn't talk ahead of time because every time you

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 2>had a response, you look at me as that okay, sports,

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 2>I forgot this is sports.

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:56.959
<v Speaker 3>It's a different world and it really is a different

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 3>a different set of rules, truly, all right without everyone.

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 4>We always appreciate you listening to us. I may be

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 4>a roboch alongside t. J. Holmes. We will talk to

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 4>you soon.