WEBVTT - The ETF Story 4: The Competition

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to Trillions presents the E t F Story.

0:00:07.840 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joel Webber and I'm the editor of Bloomberg Business Week.

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>In this episode, we're going to focus on a critical

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 1>part of the e t S rise, which Eric baltun

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Iss likens to something out of early Silicon Valley. It

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>almost seems like webs and spy at this time. We're

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>like the PC or the mouse went back when Xerox

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>had it, where some people just recognize its potential, even

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of the people who actually own it at the time

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:41.959
<v Speaker 1>don't see it. This is Dave Noddi. He's the managing

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>director of e t F dot Com. The comparison to

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.160
<v Speaker 1>what happened with the pala Alto Research Center, the Park

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Labs having the the gooey for what became the mac

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>uh and that sort of that idea, whether it's stolen

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>or borrowed or whatever, it's very apt for the e

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>t F for number of reasons. It's it's apt because

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you can argue about the intellectual property and is it

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>theft or is it you know, people just recognizing greatness

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and building on it. But it's also relevant because it

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 1>was that big a phase shift in how people thought

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>about investing naught. It has been around E t F

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:18.919
<v Speaker 1>pretty much since the beginning, and he says that, yes,

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 1>the Market Break Report is largely credited as the genesis

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of the E t F, as that's where Nate Most

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and Steve Bloom got their idea for spot success has

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>a thousand fathers. So everybody tries to claim on a

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>given day that they were the father of the E

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 1>t F. It's really whatever unnamed person probably slid that

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>into the report. But I will say this that once

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that idea was planted in that you know, sec report,

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the idea was in the air. Bob Tole is president

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of his own E t F consulting company, but was

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>with Morgan Stanley in the nineteen eighties, and he says

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>nothing is right about there being something in the air

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>after the seven Market Break Report was published. He says

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>people were trying to come up with something like a

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>collective investment, but that treated like a stock. Meanwhile, Leland

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>O'Brien and Ruberstein are really trying to redeem themselves in

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 1>the financial community, and they start working on a product

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>called super shares up in Canada, the Canadian Stock Exchanges,

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:22.959
<v Speaker 1>working on a thing called tips. All of these became

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the precursors to both securities. Remember John O'Brien from episode one, who,

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>along with a team at Leland O'Brien Rubinstein, created portfolio insurance,

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>but most people in Wall Street didn't understand what that was.

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Some big asset managers did, some big focal dealers did,

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and they realized when the market went down, portfolio insurance

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>required selling stock and buying bonds. As Toll says, O'Brien

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 1>and his firm were working to redeem themselves because their

0:02:56.080 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>portfolio insurance was largely credited to stock market crash. O'Brien

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:06.079
<v Speaker 1>says that what they were working on was the first TTF. Yeah, well,

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we were the creator of the t F A.

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't called any TF back then. He says. They

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:13.839
<v Speaker 1>were communicating with folks at the am X at the time,

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and we have a handshake agreement they would not copy

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>our products and they would benefit from the trading of it.

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>O'Brien says the AMEX didn't hold up their end of

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the deal, so they undercut us, you know, maybe not

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>so intentionally, but maybe intentionally, and came out with the

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>spies exactly one month and one day after the super

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Trust began trading on November five, and when I called

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>him up, they said, well, the handshake agreement is good

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>for a month. Meanwhile, up in Canada, a spy is

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>waiting for SEC approval. A team from the Toronto Stock

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Exchange managed to get their version of a market basket

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>product approved within a year. It was called the Toronto

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Index Participation shares or tips and attract the Toronto Stock

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Exchange Index. And this was an e t F launched. Now,

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>if you go around to conferences like I do, there's

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a general view amongst the analysts that Canada came out

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>with the first TTF. However, when I talked with people

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>from that time, even from Canada, and they admitted that

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 1>what happened was the Toronto Stock Exchange had come down

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and met with AMEX and just I guess they just

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:39.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're friends, buddies. They took the spy idea

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 1>and basically red sketched it up there. And the Canadian

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>regulatory body is much more liberal than the US. We've

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>seen that time and time again. Since then, they were

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>in and out of approval process within a year. Dave

0:04:57.440 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Nodding says, he's not proving to all those details about

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>how TIPS came about, but one thing was for sure, Yeah,

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the am X was driving it. And whether or not,

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, Nate showed the idea to somebody over a

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>T s X or Toronto at that time, um, and

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>they stole the idea, launched it there. To some extent.

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.239
<v Speaker 1>It's a little bit of I don't know who really cares.

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean exposed in retrospect. You can make a good,

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, thriller movie out of it. Somebody running the

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 1>briefcase across the tracks kind of thing. We spoke with

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Peter Haynes, who began his career on the Toronto Stock

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Exchange as an intern. I came back were a full

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>time in eighty nine and Tips from launching nineties saw

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>as part of the launch team for TIPS, so I

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>do have that on my resume. TIPS Toronto Index Participation

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Units is what they were called. The symbol was t

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I P listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange on March nine,

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and probably the most interesting factoid of all is that

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 1>there was zero feet. Haynes says there was no management

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>expense ratio or mirror at the time, and that the

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>exchange ran as a way to give retail investors access

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 1>to the market with just one trading vehicle. The hundred

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and fifty million dollars that were seated at the original

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>launch of TIPS all one million institutional investors, so that

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>was a bit of a surprise in the shock. Haynes

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 1>says that yes, there were conversations with Nate Most and

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Steven Bloom at the time, but that the most significant

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>influence on their product was not the AMMYX the Philadelphia

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Exchange as they were attempting to launch something called SIPs

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>cash Index Participation securities and they struggled to get that

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>product through the sec And this was in the late

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>eighties early nineties that they were trying this, and our

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>management at the time had spent some time with the

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Philly guys and said, hey, let's try this in Canada.

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 1>And where we were lucky and I think forward thinking

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in terms of our regulators was the time from the

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 1>time the obviously was approached to the time was approved

0:06:56.440 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>was I believe less than six months. So it was really,

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, a lucky thing that

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 1>the Toronto Exchange happened to be the first market in

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 1>the world to launch an e t F. But you know,

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's better to be lucky than good. Reggie Brown

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of Cantor Fitzgerald, whose nickname Mr ETF, was working at

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the Philadelphia Stock Exchange when the Philix developed Certificate Index

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Participation Shares or SIPs, and I remember uniquely that they

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>were born from the seven Crash and some gurus at

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the Philipstocer Exchange came with an idea based on a report,

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and I do remember they traded briefly on the phile X,

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and in my role on the industry, I always recall, Hey,

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>by the way, the Philix had SIPs and unfortunately it

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>was overlooked, not well recognized, and they were designed based

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>on the report that came out from the government said

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>there needed to be a vehicle in order to help

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>offset sell in bounce orders in the marketplace, and the

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>phil X was ahead of their time, but unfortunately they

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>went away. Brown says there was a legal issue with

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>McGrath hill, who owned a license name of SP five

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>under a standard and colors and McGraw hill sued and

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>successfully got in a junction around trademark issues around SIPs

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and it stopped trading because of that. So the reality

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>is these other products did come to market before Spy.

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Here's Eric again. So to sum this up, even though

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you may hear that Canada came out with the first TTF,

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that is true, but the idea was in the US.

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's important. So it's a good footnote to

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:46.079
<v Speaker 1>the story. In the end, the fact that Spy is

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the biggest et F on the planet almost by twofold

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>says all you need to know. And the TIPS product

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>has been bought and merged and doesn't even have that

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>ticker anymore, and that kind of also matters to the story.

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>So the fact that Spy outlasted them, outlived them, outgrew them,

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and is the most trade to security four times over

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:07.319
<v Speaker 1>on the planet as to its so legacy. But some

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>have tried to take away from it by saying, well,

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>actually it wasn't first, and so I would say, well,

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>it depends on how you define it. And I don't

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>blame Toronod for doing it. It It was a heads up play.

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that just because they had to wait

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>four years, you can't really blame them for that. They

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>would have been out in one if they could. They

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>have been at if they could have, But why didn't

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>these products that were birth from similar circumstances at the

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>exact same time gained the same success well, as Bob

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Tole says, there are a few reasons. Well, first of all,

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you had the most renowned index in the United States,

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>next to the dal Jones Industrial thirty right being the

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>benchmark for it. It was a full replication, so there

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>was no question on the back of the SEC that

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody was managing this asset. And you had the publications

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that they required daily of information to provide a level

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of transparency that was nowhere available in the mutual fund industry,

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>information including the composition the assets, the holdings, and what

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the waitings were. Also, these similar products hadn't undergone the

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>same level of scrutiny with the U. S. Government as

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Spy had because Spy, remember was filed under the forty Act.

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>A move toll Fields was worth the weight. Oh absolutely, honestly,

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I do. You could have had a structured note, but

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>then you realize you're taking balance sheet risk. At that time,

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>especially after the eight seven crash, nobody wanted balance sheet risk. Okay,

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>then you say, okay, I'm gonna buy a mutual fund. Well,

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that was what everybody thought was froll to begin with.

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>So now you have to have a new structure, so

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you have your choices. Right, you can have a closed

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>end fund which has premiument discounts. Right, you could have

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:45.719
<v Speaker 1>a traditional mutual fund, or you could have this new

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>animal called at this time an index share. And the

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>index share was really I mean, it was an epiphany.

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Dave Not says, a lot of Spy success can be

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:02.199
<v Speaker 1>attributed to its no frill structure. If you actually look

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>at the structure of Spy, it was phenomenally simple. A

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of the index participation, securities models and things really

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>were almost like versions of structured notes, right. They were complex,

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>they had counterparties that people weren't used to dealing with.

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think that the genius of the Spy model

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and then later the sort of more traditional for the

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>act versions that came after it, where they took really

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>simple existing structures and they used those to create what

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>they needed to create. Um, you know, they used the

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>U I T structure to you know, embed the index

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>into the product. That I think was a really critical

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>part of getting that approved. But you know, they used

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that structure that existed already that lawyers were comfortable with

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that everybody was comfortable with, and they said, oh great,

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:51.719
<v Speaker 1>that's our investment vehicle. And then they took sort of

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a traditional prime brokerage model of moving large baskets of

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:56.839
<v Speaker 1>securities in and out, and they said, hey, we're just

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>going to take what was then the default prime brokerage

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>trading model. We're going to use that to do these

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 1>creation redemption baskets. So what they did was take all

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the pieces that already worked and changed as little as

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:15.079
<v Speaker 1>possible to make something new happen. And now spices footprint

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.079
<v Speaker 1>is enormous as the largest ETF with two dred and

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>seventy billion in assets. For a comparison, the second largest

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>et F has one billion dollars less than assets than SPY.

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>It's really stood the test of time. Here's not again.

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>But but in the end, all of these things come

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>down to execution. And I think that's actually been the

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>story of ets for twenty five years, is it's always

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>down to execution. Next time on trains presents how the

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 1>e t F really started to gain steam. It wasn't

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>until I was sitting on a trading desk and all

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, I could like hit a button and

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>get a million dollar exposure to the cues. I was

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>all in. Thanks for listening to Trillions Presents until next time.

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:10.079
<v Speaker 1>You can find us on the Bloomberg Terminal, Bloomberg dot com,

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, and where else you want to listen. Trillions

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:17.319
<v Speaker 1>Presents is produced by Jordan Bell, with production help from

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Magnus Hendrickson. Francesco Levy is the head of Bloomberg Podcasts.