WEBVTT - US Inflation Broadly Slows, Erasing Bets on More Fed Rate Hikes

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey, it's Carol and Tim and we have something new

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and exciting for you.

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Everything you love about Bloomberg Radio is now in your car.

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>The new Bloomberg Business App now featuring Apple CarPlay and

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto.

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Listen to your favorite Bloomberg Radio stations anytime.

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Plus every Bloomberg podcast, the latest news, and more, all

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>at the click of a button.

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 2>It's free and simple to use. Just download the Bloomberg

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 2>Business App on your smartphone and connect your phone to

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 2>your car.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>The Bloomberg Business App now with Apple CarPlay and Android

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Auto features. Download it free in the Apple App Store

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>or on Google Play.

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Presented by our sponsor, Interactive Brokers, this.

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 3>Is Bloomberg BusinessWeek inside from the reporters and editors who

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:45.239
<v Speaker 3>bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus global business,

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 3>finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week Podcast with

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 3>Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:56.560 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>At the feeling Baby.

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:08.479
<v Speaker 2>Great quarter, great quarter, soft landing, soft landing earning season

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 2>is not over yet, That's all I'm gonna say. And listen.

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 2>More than eighty percent of S and P five hundred

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 2>companies eighty two percent of S and P five hundred

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 2>copies issued results out of toped analyst earnings expectations by

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 2>an average of stuff. I know, I know they learned.

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's talk called managing expectations.

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:26.839
<v Speaker 2>Like I said, not everybody's running to downgrade stocks to sell.

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a really good point. Did they used to

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>do that? More?

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 2>They never do that until it's like the stock is

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 2>down to nothing.

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>You're like, oh, thanks for the breaking news.

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 2>All right. Having said that, let's talk a little bit

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 2>about the soft landing that seems to be happening. Today's

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 2>CPI report showed US inflation, as we just talked about,

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 2>broadly slowing last month. And so despite some bumps in

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 2>recent months, inflation team has settled substantially from that forty

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 2>year high that was just last year, and it's led

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 2>several FED policy makers to signal that maybe they're done

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 2>raising interest rates.

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, maybe with us more on the data and the

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>impact on US yields, which today we got Bloomberg News

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>economics enter Molly Smith. She's with us in the Bloomberg

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and Active Brokers studio along with Bloomberg Intelligence Chief US

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>interest rates strategist Ira Jersey, live from BI headquarters in Princeton,

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey. Molly, I want to start with you and

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>just get into the nitty gritty here. As Carol mentioned,

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:16.919
<v Speaker 1>everything is awesome at least today.

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Great quarter, great quarter, great month. Really October is it though?

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you've been on team soft Landing for a

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>long time.

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 5>I have been. Thank you, Tim, I thank you for

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 5>reminding everybody that I have been. I still am obviously optimistic.

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:33.679
<v Speaker 5>I think today gave a lot of reasons to still

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 5>be optimistic. This was yeah, I think from the FEDS perspective,

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 5>one of the more you know goldilocks reports that you

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 5>could get, you know, it showed the one of the

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 5>biggest contributors to inflation in the past few months has

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 5>been that shelter category in rent and some of those

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 5>rent measures stepped down pretty significantly this month, so that

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 5>was very welcome to The rents of course, are still rising,

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 5>but not nearly as fast as they have been in recent.

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 2>And that's the point, still going up, but not as

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 2>much as they.

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 5>Were right, which is the same with core inflation. But

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 5>then you saw overall inflation that's the one that includes

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 5>that those food and gas court categories. That one was

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 5>unchanged on the month, and that's because gas prices fell

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 5>so much, so we were expecting that. But the read

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 5>on core inflation coming in below expectations. That's what everyone

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 5>is really cheering about right now.

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 2>I want to get to you in terms of that

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 2>two percent rate that's the FED target in a moment.

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 2>But let's bring in Ira Jersey because Ira, we saw,

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, certainly an equity rally, but on the bond side,

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 2>the treasury US treasury side, some significant moves all along

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 2>the curve talked us about the trade this morning, this

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 2>morning today specifically.

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so it's happened all day. There's been pretty decent

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 4>follow through actually, and if you look at the belly

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 4>of the curve, right the best performing part of the

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 4>treasury market right now is the five year kind of

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 4>area of the curve, and that's that's basically the market saying, Oh,

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 4>this is going to continue. The Fed's going to have

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 4>to cut interest rates. So this idea of a goldilocks

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm not quite sure that's what the market's telling you.

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 4>That's not what the rate market is telling you anyway.

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 4>What the rate market is saying is the rate market's

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 4>actually worried that the growth and inflation story is going

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 4>to be so bad next year that the Federal Reserve

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.919
<v Speaker 4>is going to be cutting interest rates. So I have

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 4>a different read on what the market's telling us. You know,

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 4>it's extrapolating out I think a little bit too much. So,

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 4>you know, I would take this with a grain of

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 4>salt because it's one day's move. But nonetheless, the market

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 4>certainly seems to think that you're going to get maybe

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 4>a string of better inflation data, but maybe significantly worse

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 4>growth data as well.

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, Ira, what's the nuance between in the trade

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 2>between the activity indicating recession versus soft landing? How do

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 2>you figure that out?

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, I think in the market, like what the

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 4>treasury market has had been pricing for a long time

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 4>was basically the Federal Reserve to do nothing with a

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 4>tail risk that they would have to ease interest rates

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 4>by the end of next year because you'd wind up

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 4>seeing a recession and slower economic activity. But today they've

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 4>just leaned into that slower economic activity, slower growth the

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 4>federers are easing. You know, we went from from pricing

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 4>in under two cuts by the end of next year

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 4>to pricing in almost four cuts, right, So that's a

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:18.919
<v Speaker 4>pretty significant move, right, fifty bases point move. I mean,

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 4>you just look at where short end futures are pricing,

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 4>and they've moved basically at least one one more cut,

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 4>if not more, throughout the course of the year. So

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:32.359
<v Speaker 4>you know, my base case is the Fed does nothing

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 4>next year. But the market seems to be much more

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 4>worried about, you know, softness in the economy.

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 2>So okay, Molly, So that two percent target that Jay

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 2>powellin companies say that's what they are shooting for, or

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 2>that the trend line is getting there, that would maybe

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 2>give them a reason to pause and just be done

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 2>with this rate hiking cycle. Are we still have a

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 2>ways to go?

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? And remember also that two percent target is based

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 5>on the other inflation metric that we're getting next week.

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 5>So that's the PCE Inflation Report. That's the one that

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 5>the Fed uses for the target. This one today was

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 5>the CPI. It's a bit more public facing. I think

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 5>some people might say this more is a truer sense

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 5>of what consumers actually pay and representative of more their

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 5>actual basket. But I mean, yeah, I think the real

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 5>thing that they've been looking for has been a mediation

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 5>more in the core metrics of inflation, so stripping out

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 5>the volatile food and energy categories, especially core services x housing,

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 5>so getting into where we've seen so much strength in

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 5>especially rents and other services inflation that has been really strong.

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 5>That did step down a bit in today's report, but

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 5>like you still are generally getting so much more relief

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:44.799
<v Speaker 5>on the good side, as you guys were just saying

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 5>with the luxury watches and other big purchases that people

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 5>are just not buying as much physical stuff. But the

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 5>services side is still where the strength in spending is.

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>That it's been like that for quite a while.

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.239
<v Speaker 5>Mollie, Yeah, and that I mean that is ultimately reflective

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 5>of what our economy is. The US economy is a

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 5>service driven economy that you know, consumers tend to spend

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 5>more of their UH except.

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>For during the pandemic when right.

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 5>It was long when there were no services to be had,

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 5>right exactly. So now we're shifting back into that kind

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 5>of normalization, and I think, yeah, it's a great point.

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 5>It is sometimes really hard to distinguish from the market

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 5>moves and also from the economic data. What is the

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 5>differentiator between recession and soft landing and that's why, you know,

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 5>to IRI's point, you can't read into one month of

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 5>this too much.

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's that's the thing. I would say, a sustained level.

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>And what I just would say, it's it's I think

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>people could push back and say, well, it's one maybe

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>one month of CPI data, but it's CPI data on

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>top of data that we got, you know, starting a

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago, with the jobs number that came

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>in kind of lighter than expected, which gave people the idea, Okay,

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>well maybe the labor market's not as hot as people

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>thought and kind of set off this rally that we've

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>seen the last two weeks.

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Ken Griffen of Citadel say that labor hoarding, maybe we're

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 2>starting to see not as much of that which we

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 2>had seen for a long time. I would come back

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 2>in here, though. The bond mark at the US treasury

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 2>market has been very vaultive this year, and so I

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 2>am always hesitant, even when we've got a steep move

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 2>on a daylight today, to buy the trend. How about you,

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:13.119
<v Speaker 2>you know and understand this market. I mean, we could

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 2>get something that's a little hot in terms of the

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 2>US economy and go in the other direction.

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think a lot of people were leaning a

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 4>little bit short. A lot of people were burned. You know,

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 4>we had when this past summer, if you recall when

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people, including myself, were calling for the

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 4>Federal Reserve to have been finished with their interest rate hikes. Usually,

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 4>when you when the Fed finishes hikes, you want to

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 4>own duration, you want to own the lung and own

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 4>market risk. And what happened this time was people got burned,

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 4>right because you wound up getting better economic data than

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 4>people thought you had. The September data was pretty strong,

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 4>right so, and surprisingly strong, and that's one of the

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 4>big reasons why people reset their expectations for the Fed,

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 4>and you wound up getting that pretty big sell off

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 4>during the months of August and September. And then you know,

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 4>so subsequently, like you mentioned, the last two weeks has

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 4>been great for the treasury market, right we hit five

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 4>percent on the tenure yeld and then we've done nothing

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 4>but rally for the last forty basis points or so.

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 4>And I think that that is, you know, shows you

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 4>how on edge the market is and how confused the

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 4>market is about the future path of the economy because

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, I have still had a lot of people

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 4>telling me. Some investors I've spoken to just today, we're

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 4>mentioning that they think that inflation next year is going

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 4>to reaccelerate. Meanwhile, you have, you know, the market pricing

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 4>for cuts. So so I think if there's any piece

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 4>of data that suggests that, hey, maybe inflation will be reaccelerating,

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 4>you can wind up just going right back the other way.

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting. Hey, Molly, come on back in here.

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 5>Did you want to frightened the thought of inflation reaccelerating?

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>You'll keep you busy.

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I guess I could see the thing. And

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 5>maybe I'm a little partial here. I'm in a somewhat

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 5>of a home buying journey myself and thinking about, Okay,

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 5>what's the reason that like housing prices could reaccelerate, and thinking, okay,

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 5>if you start to get mortgage rates coming down, which

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 5>it seems like we are at our near the peak

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 5>that at least in the New York City market. Because

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 5>you can't talk about housing really is a national market,

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 5>it doesn't exist that there does seem to be a

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 5>lot of demand here, and that when there would be

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:15.839
<v Speaker 5>more supply coming on if people start to move when

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 5>rates come down. It seems like there would be a

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 5>lot of demand to meet that extra supply, in which

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 5>case prices could come back up. So I could see

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 5>that in a housing sense, in the sense that like

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 5>inflation could accelerate more in that sector. It's tough for

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 5>me to see right now where the opportunities are for

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 5>inflation elsewhere to re accelerate. I'm not saying it's not possible,

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 5>but that's the most obvious one to meet that comes

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 5>to mind.

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 2>The house and one because it's just kind of so tight.

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting. Ken Griffin said he expects a US recession

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 2>in the second quarter of next year.

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 5>Scary. He also thinks, so that work from home is

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.199
<v Speaker 5>going to make it easier to fire people, So I mean,

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 5>maybe that'll get the rise in unemployment that the FED

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 5>is looking for.

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>We're all just saying, we're all here today.

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 2>Remember how was that? Happy Monday? Today? Ready? Great quarter

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:03.439
<v Speaker 2>month in the studio? It is. It is really really tricky.

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:05.439
<v Speaker 2>What's the next economic report on your radar? Really quick?

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 5>Retail sales tomorrow retail See how well that.

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:11.079
<v Speaker 2>Does your consumer? Yeah? Right, well, all right, always love

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 2>love love Molly Smith Economics cedit at Bloomberg News right

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 2>here in our studio, Irid Jerseyer thanks to him as well,

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Chief US Interest Rate Strategy at Bloomberg Intelligence. It's amazing

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.319
<v Speaker 2>how expectations of what the FED is doing are moving

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 2>so quickly in reaction to all of this. This is Bloomberg.

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 3>If you're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, catch

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 3>us live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern Listen

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Business app, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Cherl, think about some of these skills that you need

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to be a good poker player. Yeah, are you thinking?

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Patience, discipline, discipline.

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Ability to read people, confidence yep, understanding odds yep, or

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 2>odd people no understanding odds.

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe hot people too.

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Taking measured risk. And then I think this is a

0:11:58.640 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 2>big one. Knowing when to quit.

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so no question. I think that some of those things,

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>or maybe all of them, what you need to be

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a good poker player also translates to other areas of life,

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:09.199
<v Speaker 1>whether we're talking, you know, in the workplace or out

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>of the workplace.

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 2>I love this kind of way of thinking. Aaron Laden

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:14.079
<v Speaker 2>is on a mission to use poker to teach life

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 2>skills to women. She's the president of Poker Power. It's

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 2>an organization that provides poker workshops to businesses also individuals

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 2>to in poker Powers words quote, teach women critical leadership

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 2>skills so they can turn any situation to their next

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 2>big win. She is joining us, Aaron that is on

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 2>zoom from Chicago. Erin Welcome. Nice to have you here

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 2>with Tim and myself.

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 7>How are you, I'm great, lovely to be here.

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's lovely to have you here. Tell us a

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 2>little bit more about what you are doing and how

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 2>you can take what you've learned in terms of playing

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 2>poker and to really make it apply to women making

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 2>some really serious advancements in the workplace.

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:57.559
<v Speaker 7>Yeah. Actually, the skills that you started with are exactly

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 7>what we teach with Poker Power, and we have figured

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 7>out a way to gamify leadership skills through the game

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 7>of poker. And so it has nothing to do with

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 7>the wanting to get you into the casino or even

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 7>into that you know, basement home game where it's all

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 7>smoky and gross, But it's all about getting women how

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 7>to think like a winning poker player, and so that's

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 7>taking risk, it's allocating capital, it's strategizing and problem solving

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 7>using the skills of Texas.

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:28.079
<v Speaker 2>Hold them, Eric, take a step back your own experience

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 2>playing poker and how it kind of got you to

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 2>this point. Yeah.

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 7>So I was not a poker player when I agreed

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 7>to run this company, and that's an important part of

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 7>the story. I was surrounded by poker when I was

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 7>on Wall Street. I was at JP Morgan, and there

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 7>was always a poker game going on, and I never

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 7>had the confidence or the courage to ask if I

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 7>could learn, and I certainly was something invited. And so

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 7>my image of this game was quite negative. And that's

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 7>just what I was familiar with. Fast forward twenty years,

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 7>and what I have come to realize about Hooker is

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 7>it is the secret. Sauce and I have been talking

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 7>about equal pay for almost twenty years and trying to

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 7>inspire women to live life differently through thinking differently and

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:17.319
<v Speaker 7>strategizing different really, but I hadn't really had a solution

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 7>that could be tactical that women could employ on their

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 7>own to exhance their own careers and certainly go for

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 7>equal pay. Poker is that skill. And the reason that

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 7>I say that is when you are playing this game

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 7>you want it's communal, it's social, so it's fun and

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 7>that's a good thing that gets people to come back

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 7>to it. But two, it's a place to practice. And

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 7>I think that's what's been missing, is that in order

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 7>to negotiate well, in order to seek that promotion, you

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 7>have to practice the courage and the confidence and the

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 7>confidence and poker game after game gives you that opportunity.

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>But do you have data that show that it's actually

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>working for the groups and the individuals you work with.

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, we have tens of thousands of women over the

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 7>last three years who have gone through our programs, which

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 7>are both virtual and now in person. We love doing

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 7>in person with our cohorts. And what we know from

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 7>these different groups, and they're all ages, they're interns. All

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 7>the way to CEOs is that it's learning to think

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 7>like a winning poker player translates to asking for that raise,

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 7>asking for that promotion. And what we see is through

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 7>their testimonials is that we're hearing stories around doing just

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 7>that and people are getting outside of their comfort zone,

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 7>which may not sound like such a big deal, but

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 7>it is absolutely critical to have the courage in order

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 7>to do that. We're actually running a couple studies. So

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 7>you asked about data, and we're big on data at

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 7>Poker Power. We're actually doing a study with Northwestern and

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 7>also with Harvard, and we're going to put numbers to

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 7>exactly what I am.

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Saying, What is it about poker versus I don't know,

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, car racing or some other sport. What is

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 2>it about poker specifically that gives you the skill? And

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 2>I guess, and do you have to get to a

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 2>certain expertise in terms of playing poker or is it

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 2>just doing it over and over in order to be

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 2>able then start applying it in the workplace.

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 7>So what I like to say about poker and I

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 7>used to race cars, So I love that analogy. But

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 7>the reason it doesn't work is that to be an

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 7>amazing car racer, it's a physical skill. It's mental, certainly,

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 7>but it's a physical skill. Poker is different. And while

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 7>you need to have stamina to stay at a poker table,

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 7>what you really need is your mind. And so it's

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 7>the ultimate meritocracy, and that is incredibly empowering for women

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 7>to be able to sit down at a table and

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 7>it doesn't matter how big, tall, strong they are, how

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 7>fast they are, None of that matters. What matters is

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 7>how they play their cards. And so I think it's actually,

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 7>you know, the greatest leveler to help women take what

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 7>they can from the poker table and start to apply

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 7>it to real life and to workplace. And what we

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 7>like to say is there's some number of hands, and

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 7>so I think it's about one hundred hands of play

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 7>for you to really start to understand the rules of

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 7>the game, the position that you play in the game,

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 7>and how your stack of chips factors into the game.

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 7>Those are the key elements that you maneuver hand after hand.

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 7>After those country hands, I say, you can go play

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 7>in a charity tournament and you will not be the

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 7>first person to bust. And the reason that matters is

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 7>we need more women sitting at the table at those

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.959
<v Speaker 7>charity events because right now it's almost all men who

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 7>are playing the game, and that's where the deals are

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 7>getting done and that's where the networks are formed.

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>We have like thirty seconds left, but I want to

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>make sure we understand how the business works. How much

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>does it cost to actually get trained by you guys.

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so you can enroll in virtual classes today. We

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 7>have them starting at the beginning of every month, and

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:45.239
<v Speaker 7>it's fifty dollars for four classes. So we feel very

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 7>strongly about not having barriers to entry. If you would

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:50.679
<v Speaker 7>like to work with us as a corporate partner, you

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:52.880
<v Speaker 7>should reach out directly to me and the team and

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 7>we will create the spoke experience that is one of

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 7>a kind for your clients, for your internal employees, and

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 7>for the different way and cohorts that you'd like to

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 7>work with.

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 2>Really interesting, all right, erin thank you so much, Aaron Leiden.

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 2>She is the president of Poker Power, joining us on

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Zoom from Chicago. Interesting. So I guess there is what

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 2>you can go play poker now?

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Not not good, I'll say that. Not good at poker.

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>All it takes is one hundred hens or the roulette

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of guy. No, I don't do any of that stuff.

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you my Vegas story, the point where I

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>lost a lot of money in.

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 2>The vegab story. Always are good stories. All right, this

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg.

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 3>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 3>live weekday afternoons from three to six. Easter on Bloomberg Radio,

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg Business App, and YouTube. You can also listen

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 3>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:18:50.440 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 3>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty the.

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 8>Phone.

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, folks were taking you to the lone Star state

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 2>and you might be called. Last month, Ken Paxton, he's

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Texas's and battled Republican attorney general, threatened to bar about

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 2>eight banks from municipal bond deals in Texas simply because

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 2>of their commitment to cut greenhouse gas emissions. It's a

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 2>conflict that dates back a few years to twenty twenty one,

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 2>when the Texas Legislator legislature enacted a pair of laws

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 2>because some lawmakers saw big financial institutions as to woke

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 2>when it came to oil and guns. That's what it

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 2>really came down to.

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's go to the most recent threat, which was

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>last month, and it spurred concern on New York trading

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>desks about losing access to the state's fifty billion dollars

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a year debt market, where business is booming even as

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>high interest rates krimp deal making elsewhere. After all, as

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General, Ken Paxton signs off on almost all meauti

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>bonds issued in Texas, so his approval is key to

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure financing in the state.

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 2>All right. Amanda Albright and Danielle Morin wrote about it

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 2>for Bloomberg business Speak the story and the upcoming new

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 2>issue of the magazine. It's on newsstands later on this

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 2>week on Thursday, but it's already online at Bloomberg dot com,

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Slash BusinessWeek and of course on the Bloomberg terminal. Amanda,

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 2>by the way, his municipal bonds report for Bloomberg News.

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 2>She's with us on zoom from Kansas and also here

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 2>in our Bloomberg Interactor Broker Studio is the editor of

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg BusinessWeek. Jill Weber feels like a Texas showdown.

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 6>And it's one that's been going for a while. Only

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 6>it seems like, you know, once you're you know, in

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 6>in this kind of situation with the Attorney General of Texas, Paxson,

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 6>you know, first of all, he's been he's had some

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 6>legal issues of his own. So once he once he

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 6>got through those, you know, it turns out that he

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 6>couldn't quite turn away from this one. Yeah, and this

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 6>showdown continues, and it's all about municipal bonds which he

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:56.679
<v Speaker 6>signs off on, and that has some some tension, created

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 6>some tension with Wall Street.

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. Yeah.

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 8>No, I was just gonna say my coworkers and I

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 8>the big thing we've been saying the past month is

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 8>that we just can't believe that we're still writing about

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 8>this in such an in depth way. These laws were

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 8>enacted two years ago, so that's over two years of

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 8>kind of drama in the Texas muni world over these laws.

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 8>There's a law of targeting firearm policies, and then there's

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:25.639
<v Speaker 8>a law targeting energy policy. So the latest kind of

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 8>drama is more about energy policies. And so Paxton back

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 8>in office. A few weeks back into office, some people

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 8>were hoping maybe he kind of forgot about these laws.

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 8>He released a list of banks that he's reviewing for

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 8>their basically their climate change policies and their commitments that

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 8>they've made around greenhouse gas emissions. So we've seen a

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 8>pretty dramatic reaction among the people that we talked to

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 8>regularly for these stories. They seem pretty rattled by this,

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:56.679
<v Speaker 8>and I'm happy to talk through some of the specifics

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 8>of it.

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 1>But let's do that.

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 6>Because Ultimately, you know, Texas is known for having a

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 6>business friendly environment. This kind of puts it in a

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 6>place where it might not get to last that long.

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely, and earlier this month, Jamie Diamond made unprecedented comments

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:22.239
<v Speaker 8>in the world of SB thirteen and SB nineteen saying that,

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 8>you know, he wants Texas to remain a welcoming place

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 8>for business. Obviously, JP Morgan has invested heavily in Texas,

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 8>but the fact that he was willing to comment about

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 8>these laws and the impact that they're having, shows that

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 8>this is a really big deal to businesses, especially because

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 8>a lot of them have gone all in on Texas

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 8>and within the MUNI space. I mean, Texas is growing,

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 8>school districts are selling bonds constantly, They're doing you know,

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 8>billion dollar ballot initiatives so they can add new school

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 8>buildings and stadiums. So Texas is really where the action

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 8>is at in UNI. So that just makes all of

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.880
<v Speaker 8>this all the more painful for the muni bond desk

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 8>at say a JP Morgan where they can't well it's

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 8>called JP Morgan, but it makes it harder for them

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 8>to work on transactions.

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Hey man, I want to talk about Ken Paxton,

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>because this is a guy, an attorney general, who has

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>come under a lot of pressure over the last couple

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>of years, and there was a time not so long

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>ago that perhaps the CEOs at the biggest banks in

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the US thought they wouldn't have to be dealing with

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>him anymore. Just give us a rundown of a g.

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Ken Paxton, who, by the way, I think a lot

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of people might have heard of for the first time

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 1>if you live outside of Texas, maybe during the controversy

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>post Trump losing the twenty twenty election.

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely, so he's definitely a rising star in Texas and

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 8>everyone kind of wants to know what his next move

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:45.880
<v Speaker 8>will be, whether it's you know, running for governor running

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 8>for Senate. And so he's also a man of mystery

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 8>in the muni bond market, a man of that people

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 8>have really focused on because he has this role that

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 8>is very unusual where he can sign off on muni

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 8>bond contracts and some other types of contracts too, seems like.

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 8>And so with he actually did an interview also this

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 8>week about the laws, and he's sort of downplayed kind

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 8>of that a lot of people see him having a

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 8>very heavy hand and enacting these laws and implementing the

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 8>laws and doing these reviews of policies. A lot of

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 8>people within Texas see him having a heavy hand. But

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 8>in this interview he talked about how he's just following

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 8>the constitution, He's following the law, the legislators, the entity

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 8>that enacted this law, and so he's just sort of

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 8>doing his job, so to speak. But a lot of

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 8>the people we talked to in Texas see it as

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 8>a very kind of it fits with him being more conservative,

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 8>and they see it as kind of being a very intense,

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 8>for lack of a better word, a very intense way

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 8>of implementing the laws. Because, for example, this list of

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 8>banks that he's reviewing more recently, there's a lot of

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 8>well known American banks that are very involved immuni. He's

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 8>very involved in state and local finance, whereas the comptroller

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:59.639
<v Speaker 8>has his own list. He's also a Texas Republican. He

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 8>really a list of banks that aren't so involved in

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 8>Texas government contract work. So that list was seen as

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 8>like a little more moderate, a little less splashy. So

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 8>if that just that's kind of inside baseball. But there's

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 8>two big Texas Republicans involved in implementing the law basically

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:18.880
<v Speaker 8>and carrying out the law, and they've taken two very

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 8>different approaches.

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>And as you point out in your story, Packson was

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>suspended from office back in May as he faced impeachment

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>over allegations of bribery and corruption, and his suspension ignited

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>hopes and some quarters that interest in those laws that

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.639
<v Speaker 1>you've been referring to would quietly fade away. We should

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>note the State Senate acquitted him back in September, and

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>he quickly said he would review whether the lenders that

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>join the net zero Banking Alliance will be allowed to

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>underwrite muni deals in Texas.

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 7>Droll.

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Good good summary there, Tim th Well, I was reading

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>directly from Amanda's story, but it's like, yeah, it's all Amanda,

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it is this.

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 6>You know thing for Waltreet. I think where I mean

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:56.239
<v Speaker 6>this is a there's a significant amount of business at

0:25:56.320 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 6>risk here, Bill, Yeah, and you know, basically it comes

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 6>down to sort of a you know a little bit

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 6>of a grudge match between how Texas wants to do

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 6>its business and how Wall Street does it. Okay, Amanda,

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 6>worst case scenario here, how bad might this get for

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 6>Wall Street?

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 8>I think it could get pretty bad. We have eighteen,

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 8>or we have eight underwriters who are on the list.

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 8>I did like some quick math. I think the last

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 8>I checked, those eight banks have underwritten like fourteen billion

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 8>of the fifty three ish billion. Might be more now,

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 8>but one in five deals, if that's easier in Texas,

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 8>is essentially underwritten by one of these banks. So if

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 8>you keep knocking off banks, it makes it harder and

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 8>harder for municipalities to find a lender to work with

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 8>at an attractive price.

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 2>And what kind of.

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 6>Projects could become at risk when we start thinking about

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 6>that at scale.

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 8>I think about school districts because school districts are selling

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 8>so much in bonds lately because people are moving to Texas,

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 8>theyre moving their families there, and school districts are really

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 8>like brand from the ground up, being built through the

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 8>bond market. They're constantly hitting the market with sales. I

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:06.719
<v Speaker 8>really think school districts are the ones that are probably

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 8>most at risk because they're the most active at the moment.

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 2>Our chief curmudgeon correspondent Budge, and I'm.

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 3>Just saying this is going to cost taxpayer result.

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's that's where.

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the idea of voice you here is John

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Tucker's right.

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:22.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you on this because doesn't this lead to

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 2>amanda higher financing costs for deals.

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 8>Yes, there's been studies or there's a really prominent study

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 8>that shows that in Texas specifically.

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 2>So I mean ultimately, you do wonder are they not

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 2>going to be able to get you know, maybe they're

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 2>not going to be able to afford as many projects

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:41.359
<v Speaker 2>to do because their financing costs are going to be

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 2>more expensive.

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 6>You know what, though, it's Texas like this stuff.

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Every stick, you just turn it into, you know, some.

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 6>Kind of culture war and hope it kind of blows

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:54.199
<v Speaker 6>over along the way, you know. And Ken Paxton is

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 6>shown again and again and again that he has a

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 6>way of kind of you know, galvanizing his base around

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 6>stuff like this. So and you know, taking on Wall

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 6>Street yet another way of you know, those those guys

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 6>not in this state.

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Totally.

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:10.479
<v Speaker 8>I think the thing that interests me about it, and

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 8>this definitely to me shows the anti ESG war is

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 8>not going away. But to me, it's not a kitchen

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 8>table issue that like your grandma cares about. So I

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 8>am really curious about the politics of why this is,

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 8>you know, the issue that he's really been harping on

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 8>because to me, it doesn't necessarily seem like something every day.

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 8>Every day people don't tend to care that much about

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 8>bond issuances and who's underwriting their city's bond deal. So

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 8>it's one of those weird things where I'm still trying.

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 2>To taxes go up to pay for it, right, Yeah,

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:40.719
<v Speaker 2>Like that's when all of a sudden you sit up.

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean I live in an area where all of

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 2>a sudden, you know, the border of education good and

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 2>payers everything, and you know, they just add they can

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 2>just randomly add it to like things like that start

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 2>to get noticed.

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 6>Wall Street makes a good foil too, right, And like

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 6>the good point the whole ESG DeSantis thing, like he

0:28:57.920 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 6>showed that there was a way to weaponize this, and

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 6>you know, Paxton's saving enough to find new ways to

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 6>do this too.

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 7>You know.

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 2>The other thing I do wonder, though, Amanda is like,

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 2>doesnt Texas though have to have relationship I mean, City's

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 2>out right, Goldman's out. Don't they want to have relationship

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:14.479
<v Speaker 2>that with some of these really big Wall Street banks?

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 8>Yes? And I think you know, I think I said

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 8>this last time on your show, But if people want

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 8>to talk about this always call me. So I do

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 8>think mayors and Texas and city finance officials they if

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 8>you talk to them, maybe more privately, maybe not for

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 8>a quote in Bloomberg News, I think they would tell

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 8>you that they think this is really frustrating and they

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 8>would like to work with whatever bank is the best

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 8>to work with, the easiest, the cheapest to work with.

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 8>And they really kind of also want this to go away.

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 8>But it's difficult getting folks to talk about this. That

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 8>kind of comes away from our piece. It's been difficult

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 8>getting folks to talk about this on the record because

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 8>it is such a divisive environment and people, because he

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 8>has this power over contracts, people don't want to upset him.

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 6>So that's that's a really good point. Every single UNI

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 6>deal in the state he signs off on, right, Amanda.

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Remarkable exactly.

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. So I mean like this is you know, kind

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 6>of your nightmare where your your business, your bonds have

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 6>ended up in this place where uh, they're part of

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 6>the culture wars. Remember when we talked about the culture wars,

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 6>Like this is this is it in reality and there's

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 6>kind of no escaping any of it in the US.

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Now, And is there I mean, is there an attorney

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>general with more of a national profile at this point

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>than Ken Paxton. I don't know if there is. And

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why Amanda, you know, referred us to like, Okay,

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are looking what's his next movie

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>as well?

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 6>And he's proven to be teflon when you have sixteen

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 6>accounts and acquit it on all of them, right, So,

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 6>and you know, that was a really interesting case study

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 6>for Texas. So I think we'll be talking about this

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 6>again probably well, and I do.

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Is it just tech?

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 9>So?

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm told we live in it, right, Amanda? Are there

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 2>anything I mentioned there's an election next year? Are there

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 2>other states though facing this? Because I do feel like

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 2>the ESG pushback we see it. Is there other states

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 2>or no? Is it really just a Texas thing, especially

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 2>because of the potential the size.

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 6>Well, I actually think Texas might be leading the way

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 6>on this, Amanda, Right, And it might just be like

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 6>how does Paxton navigate this? Because if other states are

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 6>watching this, especially red states, like this could provide a

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 6>little bit of an example for how to navigate this.

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely. I mean West Virginia and Oklahoma actually enacted similar

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 8>laws deep the minutia of the laws differs among states,

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 8>but Texas really led the charge. We already saw other

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 8>Republican states follow suit. The firearms law hasn't caught on

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 8>quite as much as the energy one, but energy was

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 8>an issue, especially with concerns about Russia. It just it

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 8>got a lot of traction, especially I think last year.

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 8>So Texas really leads the way on the anti ESG war.

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 8>And there's definitely chatter that these fair access laws that's

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 8>what they're known as, that kind of are all encompassing

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 8>cultural wars, issues that use government contracts as like the weapon.

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 8>There's a lot of chatter that we will continue to

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 8>see traction on these next year as state legislators go

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 8>back into sessions. So it really seems like this isn't

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 8>going away anytime anytime soon.

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 2>I remember when just like everybody just jumped on the

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 2>ESG board, like and you know, states, cities all wanted

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 2>to be a part of it in terms of their

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 2>investment portfolio.

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's when stocks where our record has day

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 1>after day of Carrol.

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So you know, and to bring it back to

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 6>the schools part, because I think that is a really

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 6>interesting observation and you know, the fact that taxpayers are

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 6>potentially going to feel this. Like I remember, like the

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 6>story that we talked about in the Culture Wars package

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 6>as the homeschooling one. Right, like this is already playing

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 6>out and people are seeing how it's playing out, and

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 6>they're kind of taking control of their decisions and doing

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 6>things that are, you know, in some ways feel radical

0:32:57.400 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 6>compared to where the mainstream has been. But like that's

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 6>why where we go when we enter a fractured kind

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 6>of landscape.

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>But just like with that story, Joel, this feels like

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 1>another reason why someone would choose to live somewhere and

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>not somewhere else. I mean, these states are becoming their

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>own fief domes.

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 6>Well they That's also the point of America, right, Like

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 6>there are for those dates, yeah, and there are, and

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 6>the states are entitled to do something that's different than

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 6>the Yeah, exactly, so that this is America and like

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 6>we're we're living through.

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 2>It's why you end up with red states, just the.

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 6>Big dates, you know, American experiments.

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 2>This is Texas, Texas man. All right, Amanda, thank you

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 2>so much. Amita Albright Music Small Bond's reporter for Bloomberg News.

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 2>They're in Kansas, and of course the editor of Bloomberg

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Business Retel whatever here in our studio. Check it out.

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Like we said, this is going to be the upcoming

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 2>new issue of the magazine on newstands on Thursday. Find it.

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 2>They're already online at Bloomberg dot com, slash BusinessWeek and

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:58.600
<v Speaker 2>of course on the Bloomberg terminal. This is Bloomberg Radiomarco Journal.

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Can you let me drive?

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, no, no, who's going to drive? All right? Please?

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 2>Grave wait, I want to drive.

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:11.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a good question.

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:18.800
<v Speaker 3>This is the drive to the globe well.

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:23.439
<v Speaker 2>On Bloomberg Radio, all right, everybody, just about seventeen minutes

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 2>away from quite a rally on Wall Street. I haven't

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 2>seen this in some time. We've also seen, as John

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:31.799
<v Speaker 2>just broke down the numbers, quite a drop back in

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 2>US treasury yields all along the curb. But we are

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 2>pretty much just off our highs of this session, so

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 2>just backing off a little bit. But nonetheless, really we've

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 2>held onto these games really throughout the Dayti're.

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Curious what Dan Griffith, Senior vice president and director of

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Wealth Strategy at Huntington Private Bank, has to say about

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>all this. Dan is here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio.

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:52.959
<v Speaker 1>I want to get to the survey that you did

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:56.240
<v Speaker 1>in just a few minutes, Dan, but first of all,

0:34:56.680 --> 0:35:00.040
<v Speaker 1>give us an idea of where you're thinking about INFLA

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 1>going if you think the FED is done after today's print,

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Because this is kind of a monster rally that we're saying, it's.

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:09.760
<v Speaker 9>A great day, and I I'm glad.

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 2>To be unless market. It's not such a great day.

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 9>That's true, that's true there. I'm sure there's always a

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 9>few losers out there, right but I think for the

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 9>most part, this is going to be good news for

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 9>a lot of people out there, and we're glad to

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:22.279
<v Speaker 9>celebrate with the people who are going to are good

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 9>to be.

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 1>There and seeing good news.

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 9>We are a lot of good news, as we'll mention

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 9>a little bit from our clients, but we think that

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 9>inflationary trends, you know, are starting to moderate. I think

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 9>we've got some great news earlier this week that demonstrates

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 9>that that'll be the case, and a lot of the

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:37.400
<v Speaker 9>conversations we're having with real business owners and our clients

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:39.359
<v Speaker 9>demonstrate the fact that they're starting to feel a little

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 9>bit better about that. So we're thinking, we think through

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:42.760
<v Speaker 9>the end of the show.

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Feeling better about what inflationary trends. I mean, we're way

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 2>down from where we.

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 9>Were a year ago, significantly, So yeah, I think one

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 9>of the other things that we're experiencing is this phenomenon

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:54.319
<v Speaker 9>that a lot of people haven't yet experienced some of

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 9>what's the consequences of the rate hikes. If you haven't

0:35:57.520 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 9>bought a new car in the last two years, or

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:00.800
<v Speaker 9>a new house in the line two years, if you

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 9>haven't carried credit card debt in the last two years,

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 9>and really this inflationary thing is just a headline as

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 9>opposed to something that hits your pocketbook.

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Now we're starting that's say, zero zero zero one percent

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 2>of the population.

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 9>Right, You're exactly right, You're right. So I think we're

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 9>seeing now many many more people are starting to say, Hey,

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 9>I'm seeing a change because I've had to move or

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 9>buy a new car and go from there. And I

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:22.360
<v Speaker 9>think that's why we think inflation will start to decrease.

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Your business clients, are they talking recession? Ken Ken Griffin

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 2>of Citadel thinks it's a second quarter twenty twenty four thing.

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 9>We're at about fifty five percent risk of recession in

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:33.240
<v Speaker 9>twenty twenty four, I will say.

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 2>That that high are a lot for you guys.

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 9>It's actually been pretty consistent. We think it's about, you know,

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 9>fifty to fifty broadly. We were there all last year,

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 9>and I think the market was out ahead of us

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 9>and kind of came back to where we were. Part

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 9>of what we're experiencing is when we talk to our

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:50.759
<v Speaker 9>clients themselves, we say, how do you feel what does

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:52.920
<v Speaker 9>it look like? Sixty percent of our clients that we

0:36:53.000 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 9>recently surveyed said, you know, we actually feel like we're

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 9>going to have a better year next year. More than

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 9>sixty percent of them said twenty twenty three was a

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:01.479
<v Speaker 9>better year.

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Than they say a small business client, that's.

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:05.759
<v Speaker 9>Right, Yeah, small business and middle market clients, so a

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 9>lot of them are still very optimistic. Only about eight

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:10.880
<v Speaker 9>percent of them had a negative outlook on the economy,

0:37:11.080 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 9>and I think that's very telling in one of the

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:14.279
<v Speaker 9>reasons that we're in the position that we are.

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Based on the survey data that you got, do you

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:20.399
<v Speaker 1>think there's a more than typical disconnect between what we're

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing in the stock market and what you're seeing in

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the economy. With the caveat that. We know the stock

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 1>market is not the economy, but they're certainly related.

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:28.759
<v Speaker 9>Yeah. I do think that's one of those things that

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:31.840
<v Speaker 9>we're realizing more and more right, that the markets themselves

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:33.799
<v Speaker 9>can be very different than what we see. I think

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:36.360
<v Speaker 9>we see that phenomenon in small and mid caps themselves,

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:38.720
<v Speaker 9>right as we see there's a disconnect between the large

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 9>cap space and small and mid caps. But I think

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:45.319
<v Speaker 9>the nimbleness of the middle market client, the ability for

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 9>small businesses to kind of adjust to supply chain disruption,

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 9>a lot of them being able to turn around and say, hey,

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 9>we're going to go ahead and adjust and make and

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:56.800
<v Speaker 9>make evolutionary changes. It's panned out, and as a result,

0:37:56.920 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 9>I think we're going to end up with an economy

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 9>that's a lot stronger, especially in that middle market space.

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 2>All Right, Having said that, a client comes in and

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:04.880
<v Speaker 2>it's got has some money to put to work. One

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 2>of the names that you like is Exon Mobile. We

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:09.880
<v Speaker 2>know they did the mid October deal buying Pioneer Natural

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Resources shale oil play. We get it. Is that a

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:15.839
<v Speaker 2>reason why you want to buy it or is it

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 2>something else? Is it the dividend? What is it?

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:17.799
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 9>I think the dividend is one. It's an interesting phenomenon.

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 9>A lot of our clients come in and say, Hey,

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 9>we really want to talk about these higher yields and

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 9>how we can lean into fixed income a little bit more,

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 9>and then they realize, well, I'm giving up the opportunity

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 9>for some upside and I'm giving up some really potentially

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 9>beneficial dividends. And Exon's a great example of that right

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 9>where they can still catch some upside. I think because

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 9>of their myths earlier, a lot of clients kind of

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 9>feel like they're on sale a little bit, and so

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 9>they're happy to get the large dividend and happy to

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:48.400
<v Speaker 9>get potentially a little bit of something on sale, and

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 9>that's one of the things that they're excited about. They're

0:38:50.280 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 9>a leader in the premium basin. I think the consolidations

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 9>that they've done are going to be very beneficial from

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 9>a growth standpoint as well. Well.

0:38:57.120 --> 0:38:58.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say speaking of on sale, because

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that's absolutely not what's happening with Microsoft today. Another record

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 1>high for the company, up fifty four percent so far

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 1>this year. It was last week that it hit an

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>all time high as well. Carol, what are you thinking

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:12.879
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Microsoft, do you think there's still room

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:13.279
<v Speaker 1>to run?

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 9>We do, and it's kind of funny. I mean, some

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 9>of these names like Exon and Microsoft their names that

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:20.280
<v Speaker 9>people have thrown around a lot, and they've done really well.

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:22.840
<v Speaker 9>But we think, you know, again, Microsoft has done a

0:39:22.880 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 9>lot and they're still upside. The work that they've done

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 9>in the cloud computing area is one that we think

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:29.839
<v Speaker 9>there's still room to run there too, And obviously their

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:32.320
<v Speaker 9>growth in the gaming area is one that we're also following.

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:34.879
<v Speaker 9>So I know how much people at my house play

0:39:35.360 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 9>certain games like Minecraft. If they figure out a way

0:39:37.560 --> 0:39:40.239
<v Speaker 9>to monetize that, and I hope that's after you know,

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 9>my kids are gone, that could be a definite.

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 3>Up I mean.

0:39:42.840 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 1>But actually a serious question though, are your kids Do

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you think they're going to like go from Minecraft to

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Xbox games that do cost money and have all the

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:51.840
<v Speaker 1>game if I can help it?

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 9>But yes, I think for sure, Yeah, And obviously there

0:39:57.960 --> 0:39:59.840
<v Speaker 9>are ways that they can figure out how to monetize that.

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:02.240
<v Speaker 9>If it's not you know, purely fun kind of games,

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:04.360
<v Speaker 9>I'm sure that they'll be creative ways to look at that.

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 1>You're fine.

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:09.359
<v Speaker 2>Minecraft's educational John you're a Minecraft master, aren't you.

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 1>No, of course not.

0:40:10.719 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 3>Don't let your kids do video games.

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 2>That is my.

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Advice to you was that.

0:40:14.400 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 2>I was always I've.

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:16.319
<v Speaker 1>Always don't go down that pant.

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 2>I always think about like all the tech entrepreneurs and

0:40:19.600 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 2>doing panels with them like years ago, and they're like, yeah,

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:23.239
<v Speaker 2>my kid doesn't like they're not on a phone, they're

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 2>not on it.

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, I know a lot of video games. I think phones.

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 1>A lot of tech executives draw the line with phones,

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 1>but they're okay with like with gaming. Really, I think

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:33.840
<v Speaker 1>gaming is is totally acceptable.

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 7>Here's one of the weird things.

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 6>It's just like, this is big kids watching other kids play.

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 1>That is fifteen years twitch. That's psychotic, I think, and

0:40:45.239 --> 0:40:46.480
<v Speaker 1>there is you know.

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 9>YouTube has figured out how to monetize that for sure.

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:50.760
<v Speaker 9>So that's yeah, definitely a factor.

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Did you remember watching people play pong?

0:40:53.200 --> 0:40:55.720
<v Speaker 3>John, Yeah, I was a huge Pong player.

0:40:56.160 --> 0:41:01.879
<v Speaker 9>I'm still okay, No, just pop, you're still the Space Invaders.

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god. I always get some perspective. Dan Griffith,

0:41:05.000 --> 0:41:06.759
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much. Thank you. Nice to have you

0:41:06.800 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 2>in studio. Senior vice president, director of Wealth Strategy at

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Huntington Private Bank here. As we said in our Bloomberg

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Interactor Broker Studio, this is.

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:18.880
<v Speaker 3>The Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify, and

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:23.120
<v Speaker 3>anywhere else you get your podcast. Listen live weekday afternoons

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 3>from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 3>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App. You

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:32.799
<v Speaker 3>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:41:33.040 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 3>always on the Bloomberg Journey Alone