WEBVTT - How New Guilty Pleas Affect Trump Case in Georgia

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Law with June Brusso from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>We had begun our jury selection process this morning, but

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I've been informed that there is a change of flea.

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:19.079
<v Speaker 2>For the second time in as many days, a lawyer

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 2>for Donald Trump took a plea on Friday in a

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 2>case accusing the former president and eighteen others of racketeering

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 2>as part of a scheme to keep Trump in power

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 2>after he lost the twenty twenty election.

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>How do you plead to count fifteen conspiracy to commit

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 1>filing false documents in indictment number two three sc one

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 1>eight eight, nine four seven guilty.

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Kenneth Chesbro's plea to one felony charge came as jury

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 2>selection was getting underway in the trial, and a day

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 2>after fellow attorney Sidney Powell entered her own guilty plea

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 2>to six misdemeanor counts. The two guilty pleas, along with

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 2>a third from a bail bondsman last month, are victories

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 2>for a Fulton County District attorney, Finie Willis. The question

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 2>is how significant you're to answer? That question? Is Michael

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 2>Moore of Moore Hall, the former US attorney for the

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Middle District of Georgia. So Michael, just how significant are

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 2>these three Please?

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, anytime that there is a plea agreement where co

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 1>defendants agree to testify against a key defendant, that's a

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>big deal. But when you look at this endictment and

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you look at the charges and specific the defendants who

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>have pled guilty, I'm not sure that this gets the

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>DA much further down the road. And really, this is

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>why the charges that Sidney Powell pled to were basically

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>dealing with a Coffee County issue and that part of

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the state, and whether or not somebody access some voting

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>machines down there to do a review and whether or

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>not that was proper, I'm not sure anybody will ever

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>be able to put that directly back on the former president.

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>When you look at the chessbro plea, he pleaded guilty

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to charges surrounding the fake electors. And remember it was

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>really his legal memos that sort of set up the

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>idea of using this alternate slate of electors. And so

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the former president would be able to say

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I've relied on his advice and he told me what

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to do, and you know, he was a lawyer, and

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you know this kind of thing and they've done it

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>in Hawaii and it is different. But I just don't

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>know how far that goes. So there is some significance,

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's always useful information. You know, if

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you think about a puzzle, you'd have to put all

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:27.519
<v Speaker 1>the pieces together to see it. This is simply a

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of pieces. But I think the DA will have

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>access to it may frankly become more useful to the

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>federal prosecution given what we know about that case, and

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>in that case it's a much more tailored type prosecution

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>with Trump as the defendant. And there may be some

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>information that Ms Powell has about individual meetings that she

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>had with the former president to give some context to

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the allegations that special counsel is making. So

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it was necessarily a game changer for

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Fulton County, but it may be useful in Washington in

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that case.

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:00.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I have a lot of questions. The first is, so,

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 2>for Bonnie Willis, was it really critical to avoid going

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 2>to trial with these two defendants and showcasing her evidence

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 2>to Trump? So was it more about that than it

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 2>was about the evidence they specifically might have?

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I think so, I mean if you look at the

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>idea of having to put a case on to preview

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the case and the complete book of evidence, if you will,

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.239
<v Speaker 1>for a more critical defendant. I don't think there was

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>any question that she didn't want to do that in

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>this case. And so to the extent that these two

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>defendants filed for some relief under the Speedy Trial Act

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in the State of Georgia, which meant their case had

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to be tried and started at least jury selected in October,

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that put the DA a little bit under

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the gun, and these were not two defendants were the

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>greatest cases that she wanted to go with first. So

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>what we saw then is a plea offer made. And

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not uncommon for people to make plea offers. That's

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of just playbook stuff for prosecutors. But we saw

0:03:56.800 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a plea offer made that really was pretty insignificant. What

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>we saw obviously will misdemeanor please for miss Powell, and

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a felony plea dealing with file and a paper and

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>preparing a paper for mister Chesbrook, both receiving probation, both

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>apparently being able to maintain their first defender of status

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and so they'll have no criminal conviction at all, both

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>could vote, and both those kinds of things that we

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>think about often following a criminal conviction, those won't be

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>in place for them. So to think about this is

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that these were the architects, or the masterminds, if you will,

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of the big election scheme and the fraud, the big life.

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>The sentence of probation was pretty meager, especially then when

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you stack that up against the sentences that we've seen

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>for some of the January the sixth defendants, who while

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>clearly that was at least it might beinion an insurrection

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>effort and an effort to go in and recav it

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>at the Capitol, but you're seeing many many of them

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 1>get jail time, which you have the people who came

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>up or who were responsible at least for the theories

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and the stories that may have been the catalyst for

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 1>that day. They're getting dis demain or promoted sentences. So

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>it seems a lot, and that tells me that it

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:09.919
<v Speaker 1>was likely that did not want this to be the

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>case that she put forward first. It also tells me

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 1>that now the judge will have another he had blocked

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>off I believe five months for the trial. This gives

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:20.600
<v Speaker 1>some ability for them to maneuver and try to put

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>if they can squeeze another group of dependents in somewhere

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:27.159
<v Speaker 1>in the first half of next year. I think you'll

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>see some effort to do that.

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Sidney Powell did have a lot of contact direct contact

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 2>with Trump, including that infamous Oval Office meeting where there

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 2>was screaming on December eighteenth of twenty twenty. So wouldn't

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 2>she be called at least to testify about her contacts

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 2>with Trump?

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I think so, And I think she would do that

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>in the chords with the terms of any type of

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>pleague group. The question will be what information does she

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>give The help will really to prove in the rest

0:05:56.560 --> 0:06:00.159
<v Speaker 1>of the prosecution's case. And so she may say was

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>at the meeting and I was given my advice, and

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>people that the grove my advice that became heated. That

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily mean it's a criminal charge. So I think

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 1>she's looking at and they're probably considering her a being

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:15.359
<v Speaker 1>a witness to again sort of give context to what

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 1>happened without necessarily being a key codefendant. Think about a

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>bank robbery case and you send your accomplice out to

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>buy the guns while you go steal the car. It's

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be the getaway car, and then you meet

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>back at a certain place, you go in rob the bank. Well,

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 1>clearly there's a great testimony to be had by one

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 1>defendant there against the other about what their role may

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>have been. I don't know, And frankly, we just don't know,

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>because there are parts of this case that we don't

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>have a complete vision to yet. But we don't know

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 1>how much information she has to directly sort of point

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 1>the finger Trump. There may be other people in the campaign.

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>There may be other people that were there at that meeting.

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>There may be other folks who she had contact with

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 1>about you know, we're going to look at these election

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>machines and that information be relevant, but it may not

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>be sort of the silver bullet that folks thought it

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>might be.

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:08.919
<v Speaker 2>Jess Brow's lawyer said his client had agreed to testify

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 2>against other co defendants, but he would be surprised if

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 2>you were called as a witness in any future case.

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 2>He didn't snitch on anyone. He simply decided it was

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 2>time for him to put this behind him and go

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 2>on with his life. I mean, he didn't snitch on anyone.

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, that can be and I mean so somebody can

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>plead to an act. They could plead to conduct and

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>say yes, I did this, and while I may not

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>have believed that was wrong, you're telling me government that

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>was wrong. I did the conduct, so you charge me

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>with doing the act. So in this case, doing the

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>paperwork or whatever for the alternati electors. So I did that.

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>If you're saying that's wrong, yes I did it, and

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>rather than go to trial, I'll let or so plea

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'll testify that in fact I did it. But

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean that that person has to have changed

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>their mind or changed their theory about why they So

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you oftentimes see the defendants say, well, the government's got me.

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I did this. In fact, I did what they're saying.

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I had my own reasons for it, but this is

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>what I did it, and I do want to put

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>this behind me. I don't know how it could be

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the I mean, he may not have snitched directly on somebody,

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>but I think his testimony could come in and be

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>problematic for defendants certainly. So he may not have said, well,

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>John Doe, and I went to the printer and printed

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>these things off. You know, that would be directly snitching

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>on John Doe, but he may talk about the calls

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that he made, the efforts that he had, the discussions

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that he had to sort of implement this alternate slate

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of electors. And at that point, and it's up to

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the Trier fact which will likely be a jury to

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>decide whether or not those other defendants be off what

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>they did, based in part, at least upon some testimony

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 1>that print may give.

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 2>I was wondering if Chesburrow's testimony would actually be more

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 2>dangerous for Johnny Spent or Rudy Giuliani, the other lawyers

0:08:58.360 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 2>in the case.

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>It could, and I thought his case was particularly unusual

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>in sense that you did have a lawyer charge of

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>criminal conduct for writing legal memoranium. And I think that

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>can be problematic and maybe a foreboding sign to other

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>lawyers who are charged in the case. You know, simply

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>because somebody has played guilty doesn't mean that they now

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>believe that the election was completely legitimate. And I think

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that's maybe what people are thinking when they think about

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the import of these particular pleas, like somehow these folks

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>have had a you know, come to Jesus moment and

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>have decided that everything they've ever done was wrong, and

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it was all off or aught, And so they're entering

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>their plea that may not in fact be the case.

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>They're required to acknowledge their criminal conduct or conduct in

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a criminal case, but they're not necessarily required to give

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>up personally held beliefs, and so it may become it

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 1>may very become a fine life or prosecutor to walk

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>on with orn. I decided to call this witness because

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>they may say something that rings true with some potential juror,

0:09:57.679 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>or they may say something that puts a cloud over

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>my allegations against another defend that you're that type of thing.

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>And so that's why I say that it's always significant

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to have co defendants flea, but it's not necessarily the

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:11.599
<v Speaker 1>end of the case by any stretch of the imagination.

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Coming up, we'll talk about the implications for the federal case.

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg attorney kennef Chesbro pleaded guilty to a

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 2>felony on Friday, just as jury selection was getting under

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 2>way and his trial on charges accusing him of participating

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:29.199
<v Speaker 2>in efforts to overturn Donald Trump's loss in the twenty

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty election in Georgia. His plea came a day after

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 2>fellow attorney Sidney Powell, who'd been scheduled to go to

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 2>trial alongside him, entered her own guilty plea to six

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 2>misdemeanor counts. I've been talking to Michael Moore of Moore Hall.

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned the Special Council's case. These two are also

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 2>co conspirators. I think it's three to five in the

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Special Council's election interference case. Do you think the defense

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 2>has been in touch with the Special Council? I mean,

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 2>do you plead in a state case when you have

0:10:57.840 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 2>exposure in a federal case.

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I would think there has had to have been some discussions.

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but I also think there have been some

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:07.679
<v Speaker 1>discussions between state prosecutors and federal prosecutors. You know that's

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>been pretty much disavowed. If they had any discussions, that

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>strikes me as strange and frankly out of the norm.

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>So I would hope and expect that there was some

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>discussion about how these defendants would move forward in the

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>face and sort of the second Acts that was hanging

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>over their head, and that'd be in the federal case,

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>so I do think. And then they may be called

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to give testimony. And one thing to remember is they

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>are on probation in their own state probation here, Well,

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>one thing you can't do while your own probation has

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>commit other crimes. And so it would be a fool's

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 1>errand for them to go out and try to give

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>perjured testimony or false testimony in another court proceeding, especially

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>one in a federal court somewhere.

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:50.439
<v Speaker 2>Do you think the Special Council will try to give

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 2>them a deal or will end up indicting them based

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:56.439
<v Speaker 2>on what they've pleaded to here.

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 1>It would not surprise me if he simply tried to

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>give them some immunity for some testimony. And I say

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that because it seems apparent to me the problems that

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>have been created by having a huge case with this

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>many defendants in Georgia into this Rico case. And I

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>think you saw Jack Smith's case, the Special Characters case

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>more narrowly tailored. And I think he recognizes, you know,

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:23.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't necessarily need to put all the menas in

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the sea if I'm just going after the big fish

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 1>in my case. And I think that's that's what we're seeing.

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>So I expect that they will use the leverage they

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 1>have over these dependents because of their probation and otherwise

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to get them into a trupal testimony. I also think

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:41.599
<v Speaker 1>you here in at some point acknowledge some type of

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>arrangement for their testimony he's made through their law game.

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 2>I've heard a lot that, you know, flipping encourages more

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 2>flipping encourages more flipping. Do you buy that that after

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 2>these three are going to see more.

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to see more. But I don't

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>know that I attribute it just because somebody flipped. I mean,

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, typically when you start flipping people on the

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>low end, there's not a lot of It's like tipping

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>over the dominoes at the end of the line. You know,

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>there's just not a lot of movement after that. But

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>when you do tip a domino over, that's you know,

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 1>near the front of the line, that can make a

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>difference proposed further down. You may see a few people plead.

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, frankly, I really think that it was

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea that you know, and if I were advising

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>these particular fits, it would have been, Look, can you

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>admit to this conduct? They're asking you to admit to it.

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>That answer is yes, you're getting a misdemeanor. You know,

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that's basically like a steam ticket at Georgia. You know,

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>they may be stacked on top of each other and

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:36.839
<v Speaker 1>you're going to get twelve months probation for each one.

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>But it's a misdemeanor. In miss Powerce case, in mister

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Chessbrow's case, you know it's a felony, but you're not

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a record because you can obey yourself with

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>certain first offendit of protection and that type of thing,

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and so you know you can get this behind you.

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>And the fines were nominal. I mean, they got to

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>write a letter of apology, you know, this kind of stuff.

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that that's that was something that I

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>feel like particularly compelling and the bi but okay, and

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>so it really was by all standards, I think a

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>good deal for these defendants to be able to basically

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 1>turn the page on this chapter. And so I don't

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>know that other defendants may get the same type of offer.

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the strategic move to file the speedy trial

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>demand played into the decision here, the fact that this

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>case is going to have to be tried. I think

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>all of this stuff was in the mix in the

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>state was willing to essentially let these two go, and

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>frankly too, because I think it was a tougher case.

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>When you have lawyers sitting as defendants, you have unique

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>legal defenses that can be raised, and those are things

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that the state may not want to deal with at

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>this point of the case, especially when they're looking at

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>other council like Eastman, Julian at that type of thing.

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 2>So then you think, bottom line, Trump doesn't have that

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 2>much more to fear because these two flipped.

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, like I said, kind of at the houseset, it's

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>never a good day or a defendant to have is

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>or her co defendants flipped and start entering guilty please.

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>And Trump has been sort of masterful in the way

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>he is controlled I think some witness and potential co defendants,

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>both by paying legal fees and you know, raising money

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>for him doing this kind of thing, And that is

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>one way I think he's trying to kind of keep

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>his timb on folks. But so I do think he

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>always has something to fear, and I think he has

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to be thinking at this point, you know, I hope

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>this is the end. I don't think these folks are

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>going to hurt me, but I still need to be

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>aware of the possibility that other people who I may

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>not have as much influence with, they may in fact decide,

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, that they're going to come forward with some

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>other you know, some of them more daming testimony. Ms

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Powell's charges were so limited in the indictment, and you know,

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>this was a very thorough indictment. And have they had

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>some additional overt acts? Have they had some additional predicate

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>acts that impacted her? I think we would have seen

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that spelled out in the DA's case. But the allegations

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that they made against Ms Powell were sort of specific

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>as it related to this incident in Coffee County, Georgia.

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>The allegations against mister Chessbro, of course dealt with a

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>very new position relating to the alternative electors. Again, both

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>somewhat removed, I think from the former president. You know,

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>there'll be a unique argument. I think that you will

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>hear and it will be a defense. I think you

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>may be seeing it somewhat now from Trump saying that

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't represented by Sidney Powell. We may have in fact,

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>now we may be seeing sort of the technical niceties

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of who is the actual client. Is that Trump is

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>an individual? Is it or is it the Trump campaign

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>which Trump is not named as an individual, or is

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it you know, another organization, And so we may start

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing those maneuverings as well. It'll will be instancy who

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Princess Mistyles says she was representing in a particular tie.

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was wondering when he said that she didn't

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 2>represent him. So where does that put his advice of

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 2>council defense? I mean, also, if all these people are pleading,

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 2>all his attorneys are pleading on him, are almost Yeah.

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a great that's a great question, and

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it is also so maybe indicative of some

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of the problems that we may see prosecutors have down

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the road or jurors have as they think about the

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>case that is in the case and ultimately a pelic

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>courts on when you charge a president who basically is

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>a person sitting in an office that's getting advice from everybody, lawyer's,

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>non lawyer's, cabinet people, chiefs of staff, you know, but

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the lawyers are coming in telling them what to do.

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Does that mean he can't readily rely on that for

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>fear that he may They didn't represent him individually, but

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>they represented something to somebody that he may have been

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>associated with, or a group he may have been associated with.

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Does that mean that he loses that defense. I don't

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>think he does, because I think sort of the executive

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>privilege umbrella is made in fact to sort of cover

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>this very situation where you have advice coming from different people.

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's a great point, and I think again it's

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>relevant because of the unique nature of this case and

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>bringing charges, especially the state charges against a former president

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>for conduct that occurred while he was a sitting president

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of the United States, enjoying in fact that privilege. So

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a question that I thank you. May find nine

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 1>folks and all a nice bench in Washington, d C.

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Making a decision about it.

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Some point sounds about right, Thanks so much, Michael. That's

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Michael Moore of Moore Hall, the former US attorney for

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 2>the Middle District of Georgia. Coming up next, Migrant numbers

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 2>are reaching new highs at the southern border. I'm June

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 2>Grosso and you're listening to Bloomberg.

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 3>From day one, this administration is made clear that a

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 3>border wall is not the answer. That remains our position,

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 3>and our position has never wavered.

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Despite that statement from Homeland Security Secretary Alejandra Majorcis about

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:43.159
<v Speaker 2>two weeks ago. The Biden administration has made the confusing

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 2>decision to build up to twenty miles of border wall

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 2>authorized during the Trump administration. President Biden is also asking

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Congress for eleven billion dollars for border security and migration

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 2>matters as part of the one hundred billion dollar request

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 2>to support Israel and Ukraine. The migration challenges facing the

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 2>US are increasing, with record numbers of migrants at the

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 2>southern border. Arrest for illegal crossings were up twenty one

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 2>percent last month to two hundred and nineteen thousand. Joining

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.719
<v Speaker 2>me is immigration law expertly on Fresco, a partner at

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Holland and Knight. There were more migrant encounters last month

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 2>than in any month last year. So whatever the Biden

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 2>administration is doing is not working.

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Is it.

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 4>No? Unfortunately, the problem is everything happens through a sort

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 4>of trial and error experimentation process, and when people saw

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 4>that at the end of the day, the legal pathways

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 4>were taking too long. And even though there are legal pathways,

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 4>and it's just to give the Bide the administration credits

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 4>for the two legal pathways they created, which number one

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 4>A parole program that allows you to apply online and

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 4>if you are from Cuba eighty Nicaragri, Venezuela, you can

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 4>potentially win one of thirty thousand monthly plots to come

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 4>in or what's called the CBP one app appointment system

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.679
<v Speaker 4>where you actually show up in an orderly fashion for

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 4>the court of Entry. Those are great new innovations, but

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 4>because each of them takes too long and is not

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 4>guarantee to actually lead to either an appointment or a plot,

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:19.919
<v Speaker 4>people have decided to take matters into their own hands,

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 4>and the consequences of doing that are insignificant because just

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 4>the fact that you're banned from asylum ten years from

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 4>now when your case finally gets the immigration court doesn't

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 4>seem to matter to people because they can still a

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 4>get something called withholding of removal, which is less than

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 4>asylum allows them to say, but me, some significant percentage

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 4>of this group isn't looking to actually show up the

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 4>immigration court at the end of the day, but it's

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 4>just looking to be in America and bide their time.

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 4>And so from that perspective, that's what we're seeing. We're

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.640
<v Speaker 4>now seeing that that trial and error period has failed,

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 4>and people realize that the unlawful route is still the route,

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 4>unfortunately that pays the best civity.

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 2>In his address last Thursday, President Biden said he'd be

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 2>requesting one hundred billion dollars in emergency aid for the

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 2>southern border and international ally facing crises. What would that

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 2>be used for? And is that just a drop in

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 2>the bucket in this problem.

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 4>The problem is that all of the money that goes

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 4>down to the southern border doesn't change the legal framework

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 4>of things. It goes toward the more expedited housing processing

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:39.679
<v Speaker 4>and transferring into the interior of the country of the

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 4>people who make a credible asylum plate. And so that's

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 4>the problem is at the end of the day, that

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 4>money is really going to make the process smoother. But

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 4>people are complaining that the point of this is not

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 4>to make the process smoother, it's to try to actually

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 4>make it so that only people with the most credible

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:05.199
<v Speaker 4>possible asylum cases actually end up entering the interior of

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 4>the United States, and that money can't go to that

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 4>because the law doesn't permit that at the moment. The

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 4>law says, if you articulate any credible fear of asylum,

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 4>you have to be let into the interior of the country.

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 4>And so all that this money does is get that

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 4>initial processing period faster and more efficiently handled for people.

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Leon you know, in the law, everything's subject to interpretation,

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 2>So could the interpretation of what is a credible fear

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 2>be changed to require more?

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 4>So what happens is that does happen to a degree,

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 4>And so you've seen over the course of I would say,

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 4>the last decade, depending on when these crises get worse

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 4>or better, they issue these memos that basically rearticulate, in

0:22:56.200 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 4>a sort of subtle manner bear Uscis asylum officer, A

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:05.959
<v Speaker 4>credible fear does not include this, it includes this, et cetera.

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 4>And the problem is that that moves the needle. And

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 4>let's say, instead of eighty percent of the claims being successful,

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 4>we now see there's actually been a reduction sixty percent

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 4>of the claims being successful. But we're talking about sixty

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 4>percent of two hundred thousand people coming into the country,

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 4>and so people won't feel that numerically because it's still

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and forty thousand people, which if you were

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 4>to do that on an annualized basis, is still nearly

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 4>two million people. And so that's the problem that they're

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 4>running up again, is they actually are dialing it up

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 4>as much as possible. But even within that comfine unless

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 4>you were to do something illegal and just start wholeheartedly

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 4>banning people saying that nobody's claim as credible. People generally

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 4>are coached who say the right words that will articulate

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:07.199
<v Speaker 4>the credible fear claim for whatever country they're from, and

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 4>so it's very hard to shut it down completely. But

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 4>you have seen it dialed up, but again you're dialing

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 4>it up from a percentage standpoint of a march larger numerator,

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 4>and so eighty percent of one hundred thousand was still

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 4>less than sixty percent of two hundred thousand.

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Let's turn to the H one B visas, which allow

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 2>employers to add foreign workers with specialized skills for up

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 2>to two to three years, with options to extend the

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 2>status further when visa holders are in the process of

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 2>applying for permanent residency. So dement on that program has

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 2>far exceeded the eighty five thousand new visas that are

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 2>available annually. Registrations for the annual lottery exceeded seven hundred

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 2>and forty thousand for twenty twenty four. Tell us about

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 2>the changes that the Department of Homelands Security is proposing.

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, the main change that they're going to implement is

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 4>that when this lottery system was established in the lottery

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 4>system has been around for quite a while, but the

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 4>lottery system used to just be a one for one

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 4>situation where one company would apply for one employee because

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.679
<v Speaker 4>it was too expensive for multiple companies to apply for

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 4>the same employee because you actually had to put in

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:33.880
<v Speaker 4>the entire visa application package and support evidence and affidavis

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 4>and everything else, and that was about a ten thousand

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 4>dollars expense for employers, so multiple employers didn't want to

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 4>do that for the same person. But the Trump administration

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 4>changed this process and said, instead of having to put

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 4>the whole application in upfront, just put your name, address, date,

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 4>pass for a number of very simple data and then

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 4>if you win, we'll ask you to come forward and

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 4>put in the entire three hundred PA each application. The

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 4>odor is process. Okay, that's great, and it found efficient,

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 4>but everything has trained out some life, and so what

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 4>happened was because it became so easy and so cheap

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 4>to put in applications, what happened was companies, not the

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 4>larger tech companies, not the Googles and Intels and ciscos

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 4>of the world, but these sort of smaller tech companies

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 4>that might have fifty one hundred employees that are these

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 4>sort of you know, family owned type tech companies decided

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 4>to basically fool their resources together and form maybe blocks

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 4>of one hundred two hundred companies where they would all

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 4>apply for the exact same list of ten thousand workers

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 4>from India, let's say. And then, however those workers ended

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 4>up getting selected from whichever companies they just transferred them

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 4>to end up getting an even number of workers for

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 4>the companies. So that was radically gaining the system, and

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:02.160
<v Speaker 4>it was creating many, many more applications that were actually

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 4>naturally desired. And so what this change does is this

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 4>change says you can only apply for a person one time,

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 4>meaning that person only has one chance to win the lottery.

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 4>They don't have sixty different chances to win the lottery.

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:23.199
<v Speaker 4>But from there then they can go to any of

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:26.360
<v Speaker 4>the employers that express an interest to them, which will

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 4>ultimately then give them more bargaining power visa v. Their

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:33.959
<v Speaker 4>ability to say, Okay, I just want a lottery slot,

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 4>so if you want to have me because I've won

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 4>a lottery slot, you can have me tack amongst the

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:42.199
<v Speaker 4>employers which one you want. So it's changed the ballad

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 4>from the employers rigging the system to now a more

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 4>employee based chance to be a free agent, so to speak.

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 2>I guess we'll have to wait and see if it

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 2>changes the gaming of the system. New York City has

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 2>struggled to deal with the arrival of more than one

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 2>hundred and twenty thousand aside islum seekers in the past year.

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 2>About sixty thousand are currently in shelters run by the city,

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 2>which is legally required to provide emergency housing to homeless people.

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Mayor Eric Adams announced in July that New York City

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 2>would start giving adult migrants sixty days notice to move

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 2>out of city shelters, and about three thousand asylum seekers

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 2>have been told their time was up in the shelters,

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 2>but about half have reapplied to stay. I've been talking

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 2>to Leon Fresco, a partner to Holland a Knight. What

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:31.120
<v Speaker 2>else can Adams do?

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:37.160
<v Speaker 4>This is where as heartbreaking as people you know don't

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 4>want to do these types of things, the actual answer

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 4>for this, as it has always been in the history

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 4>of America until six months ago for whatever reason, is

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 4>that if a person does not have a fixed address

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 4>and doesn't have a place where the governments can actually

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 4>keep track of them, those individuals have to go into

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 4>IMS or ice house, not IMS, just be colloquial for

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 4>your listeners, ice custody so that their hearings can go

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 4>quickly and they can either succeed or not succeed. But

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 4>those people shouldn't be in shelter, they shouldn't be homeless,

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 4>they shouldn't be in the middle of the street. The

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 4>only people who should be leading ice custody are people

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 4>who have a sixth address and someone who's willing to

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 4>take quote unquote ownership or custody of the person make

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 4>sure that they'll show up the court and do the

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 4>things they need to do. And really, if we're talking

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 4>about more money for the Department of Homeland Security, that's

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 4>what it should be going for. And we're not saying

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 4>that people need to be in a prison. That's nobody

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 4>needs to do that, but you have to have them

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 4>in a facility where they can't leave and where their

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 4>case can then be adjudicated quickly, so that at that

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 4>point then either they get to stay and they can

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 4>start working immediately and they're not a drain on the society.

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 4>Or if they don't have an asylum plane, they can

0:29:57.160 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 4>be repatriated back to their home country.

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 2>But that would be the federal government doing that.

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 4>Right, that is true. But Adams I have not heard

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 4>him say I take the people into custody from my shelter.

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 4>I think he knows he'd be killed politically for saying that.

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 4>But that's what he needs to say, and that's going

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 4>to be the only solution of this problem. Is is

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 4>if you don't leave this shelter, you're going into ICE custody.

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 4>So you would need two things. You need Adams to

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 4>push for this, and you would need that ICE to

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 4>agree to it. But even if Ice doesn't agree to it,

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 4>just Adam pushing for it at least solves the problem

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 4>from his perspective because he can say, this is what

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 4>needs to happen, this is what has traditionally happened. I'm

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 4>not being cruel. Everybody who has come into America for

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 4>decades has known if you don't have a fixed address

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 4>or a fixed sponsor, you can't expect to be let

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 4>out of immigration. Something in New.

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 2>York City is challenging that right to shelter and trying

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 2>to get the requirements suspended, and apparently there are negotiations

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 2>going on in court.

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 4>And from the standpoint of let's say they succeed, so

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 4>what so now that people are let out in the

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 4>shelter and they're out on the street, that doesn't so much.

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 4>And so that's why the point is ICE needs to

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 4>at the front and not release people. And that's the

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 4>conversations Adams now has to have on the back end,

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 4>which is, if you did release people and now we

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 4>can't house them, then ICE us to come back and

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 4>have a conversation with these people. Do you really, really,

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 4>really really not have someone in the United States that

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 4>can sponsor you, because if you're not, then we're going

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 4>to have to put you back at immigration custody.

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Mayor Adams also traveled to Mexico, apparently with the aim

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 2>of telling would be migrants not to come to New

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 2>York City. Do those kinds of trips and please ever work.

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 4>Here's the problem that message if don't come to America,

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm the trek is dangerous isn't working because that's not

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 4>the world we live in anymore. It's not two thousand,

0:31:56.600 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 4>it's not two thousand and five. Right now, are getting

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 4>real time information on their phone that has the exact

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 4>questions the CBP is asking which locations on any given

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 4>day are staffs less or more, which positions, which kinds

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 4>of day you should come into, where's the least way

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 4>to get into the country. And with all of that,

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 4>people understand these are the ways to safely enter the

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 4>United States, and a politician saying don't come in is

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 4>not going to have any relevance to those individuals. What

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 4>we'll have relevance are the real time reports people are receiving,

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 4>and there's no way now in twenty twenty three to

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 4>block those real time reports. So the only way to

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 4>change the infrastructure of what's happening in the border is

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 4>to actually change the manner in which people are being

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 4>processed and have that word get out that looks spending

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 4>fifty thousand dollars is not leading anywhere because you're only

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 4>sucking the tention or you're only being put out into

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 4>Mexico while you wait for your case to be decided.

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 4>The results they hear is you're allowed to answer the

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 4>United States without any conditions other than to record month

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 4>from now that's not going to.

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 2>This or anyone, and we're sure to hear more and

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 2>more about immigration issues as campaigning picks up next year.

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much, Leon. That's Leon Fresco of Hollanden Night,

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 2>and that's it for this edition of The Bloomberg Law Show.

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Remember you can always get the latest legal news on

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 2>our Bloomberg Law Podcast. You can find them on Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 2>and at www dot bloomberg dot com slash podcast Slash Law,

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 2>And remember to tune into The Bloomberg Law Show every

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 2>weeknight at ten pm Wall Street Time. I'm June Grosso

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 2>and you're listening to Bloomberg