WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: May 14, 2024

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordern. Join us each day

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 2>terminal and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:38.639
<v Speaker 1>And we did get this morning, an Marie a response

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>from China yep.

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 3>The Ministry of Commerce coming out and saying they vow

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 3>to take measures to defend their rights.

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:44.639
<v Speaker 4>They say that.

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 3>They resolutely oppose what the US is doing this morning

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 3>with these tariffs. They say the decision is quote political manipulation,

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 3>and also Lisa urging the US to cancel the ector

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 3>tariffs and correct this quote wrongdoing.

0:00:57.600 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 4>Let's see whether that works.

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Joining us for the rest of the hour is former

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>National Economic Council Director Gary Cohene. Gary so much to

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 1>work through here in terms of whether it's tariffs, whether

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it's the fiscal policy or whether it's the deficit.

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 4>I want to start more broadly.

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>This question of how much are from some of the

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>fiscal policies directing investment theories right now in terms of

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>where some of the money is going and what gates

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>are being put up.

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 5>Well, Look, fiscal policy and monetary policy are directly impacting

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 5>how money is being spent, what money is available today,

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 5>and I think that's even.

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 6>A more important topic.

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 5>We have gone through a pretty vicious cycle over the

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 5>last four years where we went from a cycle of

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 5>zero interest rates, an abundance of capital capital available for

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:45.839
<v Speaker 5>almost all startups in this country and funding at various

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 5>stages of your progression from startup to early stage, to

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 5>mid stage to late stage to IPO, to a place

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 5>where we are today where there's very little investment capital

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 5>available for young companies and startup companies and the IPO

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 5>market just starting to reopen. So that is all a

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 5>function of fiscal policy monetary policy, because they're interstricably linked.

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 5>And when people were not getting a return on their

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 5>capital in the bank and there was a zero risk return,

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 5>zero risk assets out there, people bought assets that they

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 5>thought could provide an enhanced return for them, so they

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 5>were willing to take more risk. They were willing to

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 5>invest in startup companies. Today you can go out and

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 5>buy a six month treasure bill and get five point

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 5>three five point four percent on a tax preferential asset.

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:36.799
<v Speaker 5>So we have changed the whole mentality of the way

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 5>people think about holding capital, investing capital, recirculating capital. Also,

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 5>with the capital markets have that then closed for so long.

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 5>A lot of that capital that was invested in three four, five, six,

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 5>seven years ago, many of those people thought it had

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 5>a three four, five six year duration. They would get

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 5>liquified by taking those companies public, and then they would

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 5>recirculate that risk capital back into the financial markets. They

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 5>have not been liquefied because the capital market has been closed,

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:05.839
<v Speaker 5>so therefore that risk capital does not get to recirculate back.

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 6>So a little bit of.

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 5>The natural cadence of capital moving in and out of

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 5>risk assets has changed, both because of fiscal policy and

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 5>monetary policy.

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot to impact right there, are you basically

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>saying that On the monetary policy side, low rates usually

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>benefit the smaller, more leverage companies. Rates go up, that

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>benefits more some of the larger companies that are able

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 1>to be sort of turn out their debt structures in

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a more considerable way. Are you saying that fiscal policy

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>also benefits the bigger companies more because they're the ones

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that are eligible for some of these grants.

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 6>I didn't really say what you're saying.

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 5>I don't think higher rates help anyone. Okay, if you're

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 5>a large company and you're still running a large debt portfolio,

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 5>you're always you're always worried about your weighted average cost

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 5>of debt.

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 6>You're whackedy, so.

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 5>You're thinking about what that is, and the lower it is,

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 5>the better it is.

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 6>You know, ultimately, at the end.

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 5>Of the day, you sell your goods or you sell

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.839
<v Speaker 5>your services to your customers. Then you've got your expense line,

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 5>which is usually the biggest line, and the expenses is

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 5>salaries and costs. But then if you get down a

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 5>little bit down, cost of debt is a big item.

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 5>So to the extent that cost of debt goes up,

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 5>the price of your goods or service has to go up.

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 5>So companies, you know, either the profit margins contract as

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 5>interest rates go up, or they have to raise the

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 5>price of their goods.

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 6>So in a perfect.

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 5>World, no one really wants interest rates to go up,

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 5>but there is a sort of middle ground where interest

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 5>rates are a level low enough where they're not really

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 5>affecting and the economy is growing without fiscal stimulus from

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 5>the federal government. The question is really more when fiscal

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 5>stimulus from the government comes in, how does that react.

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 5>And right now we actually have one of the most

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 5>unique periods of time because we've got, on one hand,

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 5>we've got the Federal Reserve, which is trying to raise

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 5>rates to slow down economic growth to get inflation under control,

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.040
<v Speaker 5>and we've got the federal government on fiscal policy on

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 5>the other side, looking to invest capital to grow the economy.

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 5>Those two things are countervailing forces. We don't see a

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 5>lot of times in our economic history when we've got

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 5>both of those things going on at.

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 6>The same time. Usually we're in unison.

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 5>Usually the Fed's trying to grow the economy by lowing

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 5>rates and the government is trying to spend money to

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:20.599
<v Speaker 5>grow the economy.

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 6>That's normally what you see.

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 5>Is you're coming out of a very tough economic period.

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.040
<v Speaker 5>When you're in a very robust economic period, the Federal

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 5>Reserve is raising interest rates trying to slow it down,

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 5>and the federal government does not need to spend money

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 5>because you're in a very robust economic time. This time

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 5>it's very different than the historical past.

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>As an investor, who do you bet on winning the

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>FED or fiscal policy?

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 6>You know, I don't know if there's a winner or

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 6>a loser.

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:49.119
<v Speaker 5>I think you have to be realistic to what's going

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:52.799
<v Speaker 5>on and who's trying to do what. The Biden administration

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 5>has been pretty consistent on their fiscal policy agenda. They

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 5>have been trying to spend money and put money into

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 5>the economy since day one, since the first COVID relief

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:05.919
<v Speaker 5>to one point nine trillion dollars they put in early,

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 5>and they continuously find ways to put money into the economy,

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 5>as recently as relief of student loans. So they're continuously

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 5>looking at ways to fiscally stimulate the economy. The FED,

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:22.359
<v Speaker 5>on the other hand, is responding to the outcome of

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 5>that money being put in the economy.

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 6>There's a cause and.

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 5>Effect, you know, many of us think there's the effect

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 5>is so much money being put in the economy, the

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 5>money supply expanding so quickly that you've got too much

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 5>money chasing too few goods, and therefore you had an

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 5>inflationary time, inflationary pressures. So the FED is responding to

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 5>the to the effect of the cause, and they are

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:46.720
<v Speaker 5>raising rates trying to slow that down. So if I

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 5>were going to bet the Biden administration will continue with

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 5>fiscal stimulus. In fact, they have a lot of stimulus

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 5>already approved where they have not given out the money,

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 5>so that money has not fed through the economy, and

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 5>the FED will continue to monitor the financial conditions, and

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 5>most importantly, they'll continue to monitor the path of inflation

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 5>based on the data that they get, and they will

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 5>decide what great policy looks like based on that.

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 3>Gary, I want to ask you about the next fiscal fight,

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 3>which is the Trump error tax cuts. They are coming,

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 3>they're expiring next year. Do you think they should be extended?

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 6>So?

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 5>I think tariffs is one of the most interesting topics

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 5>that we dealt with when I was in the White House,

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 5>and I think the Biden administration's dealing with now.

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 6>You know, it's interesting.

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 5>Despite a lot of rhetoric, the policies are starting to

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 5>bend towards each other. It's hard to know the difference

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 5>between the two let's call them candidates policies to tariffs,

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 5>they're evaries.

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 6>I'll talk about tariffs.

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 5>So when you look at tariffs and you think about

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 5>tariffs on things that we manufacture in the United States

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 5>and we can sustain ourselves, I think it makes sense

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 5>to tariff a country that is importing things in the United.

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 6>States at a buli low cost.

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 5>So we know that China has some real economic advantages.

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 5>We know that they don't pay fair market labor. We

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 5>know that they don't have a cost of capital. We

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 5>know that they don't have environmental restrictions that US companies have,

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 5>so we know they've got a competitive vantage.

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 6>So if they're using that competitive.

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 5>Vantage to dump products in the United States that we

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 5>make and therefore they're displacing US manufacturers and US jobs,

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 5>yes we should protect our border. On the flip side,

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 5>if they are exporting and we are importing goods that

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 5>we need that we do not make in the United

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 5>States and there's no replacement for us in the United States,

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 5>and we put a terrify on it, it basically becomes a

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 5>consumption tax. You and I and all of us are

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 5>going to buy those products. We're now just paying more

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 5>for the same product.

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that we're going to see more of

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 3>these walls go up, whether or not Biden or Trump

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 3>get in the lighthouse next year, Like how high are

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 3>we talking?

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:55.839
<v Speaker 5>You know, I think there's a thought right now that

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 5>the walls should go higher. I think at some point

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 5>there is diminishing re turns. You know, we've got a

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 5>lot of historical data on putting tariffs in whether there

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 5>were old steel tariffs on their other presence. When I

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 5>was in the White House, we did a three oh

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 5>one on washing machines, and if you look at the

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 5>whole theory of what happened with washing machines, it's quite interesting. Yeah,

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 5>we put teriffs on washing machines, but the prices of

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 5>dryers went up equally with washing machines, because you know,

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 5>the manufacturers think, well, people think washers and dryers cost

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 5>the same thing, even one had even though one had

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 5>terriffts on it and one didn't, you know, very inflationary

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 5>to buy a washing machine and a dryer. Did it

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 5>bring manufacturing back to the United States?

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 6>Yes, it did.

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 5>We brought the foreign manufacturers, you know, the LG's and

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 5>the samsings that were that were importing in the United States.

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 6>Did they open manufacturing United states, Yes they did.

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 5>So we did create some jobs, but we really increased

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 5>the price of the washing machine and the dryer. So

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 5>there's a lot of historical data on what happens when

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 5>you tariff.

0:09:52.559 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Bi WTI hovering around seventy nine dollars a barrel as

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>traders await Ope's next move and inflation data. Meanwhile, on

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the other side, copper touching its highest level since twenty

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, fueled by forecasts of a global supply deficit.

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.079
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Curry of Carlisle joining US now and Jeff, that's

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>where I want to start. Traditionally people focused on oil prices.

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Right now, what we're seeing is oil steadying. For seeing

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the oil, the rest of the commodity

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>complex surging ahead, up some eight point two percent since

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the end of February.

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 4>What makes for the divergence.

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 7>Copper is the new oil. We put out a piece

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 7>back in twenty twenty one. Now making these bullish arguments,

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 7>and by the way, they haven't worked out. But I

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 7>talk to a lot of people who will say copper

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 7>is their highest conviction trade.

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.319
<v Speaker 8>I wear my copper bracelet right here. It is the

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 8>highest conviction trade I've ever seen.

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 7>If you've got decarbonization, green cap backs demand, AI, data

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 7>center demand, military demand, it takes twelve, sometimes twenty six

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 7>years to bring on new supply.

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 8>You can't come up with a better story.

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 7>But the bottom line, we've been telling this story for

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 7>three years, and maybe now it's beginning to work. I'm

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 7>confident that this time it's liftof and I think we're

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 7>going to see more momentum behind it because you have

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 7>three sources of demand this time around, meaning green cap X,

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 7>AI plus military. Back in twenty twenty one, all we

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 7>had was the green capex demand, and now it's.

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 8>In full force. Supplies not there, Inventories are tight.

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Prices have more than doubled going back to March of

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty and I'm looking right now, how far more

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>is there to rally at a time where you're still

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>wearing your copper bracelet.

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 7>I think, you know, our target was fifteen thousand dollars

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 7>a ton, when it's trading you know, just a little

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 7>bit above ten thousand as of this morning, which means

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 7>you know, it's got a long ways to go.

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:53.959
<v Speaker 8>Where do we come up with that fifteen thousand? It

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 8>was the highest real price ever reached in nineteen sixty

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 8>eight during.

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 7>That housing boom. So we don't know where demand destruction occurs.

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 7>All we do know is that bringing on new supply

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 7>is very difficult.

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 8>So we're going to learn.

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 7>Where those price levels are where you begin to kick

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 7>out demand.

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:12.199
<v Speaker 8>But I go back to the two.

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 7>Thousands and that's bullish on oil then as I am

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 7>copper today. You know, oil ended up going up from

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 7>twenty to one hundred and forty seven times, so you know,

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 7>the upside on copper think is very significant.

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 3>We're seeing a lot of supply when it comes to

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 3>countries outside of OPEC. Plus, Jeff, do you think that

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 3>potentially we're on a bearish trajectory when it comes to

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 3>the oil market for this year and next.

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely not.

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 7>You know that one of the big sources of oil

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:45.079
<v Speaker 7>supply over the last eighteen months came from sanctioned countries, you.

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 8>Know, Venezuela, Iran, Russia.

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 7>Yes, they've attacked these these sanctions and clapped down, but

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 7>they don't come into effect until after the election one

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 7>hundred and eighty days from now. So that's been one

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.040
<v Speaker 7>of the big drivers and also an energy to I

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 7>don't forget the massive surge in coal production that occurred

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 7>in China, Indonesia, and India over that same time period.

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 7>So there's a lot of energy in the system that

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 7>has backed up that needs to be eaten through. When

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 7>we think about the underlying demand, you know, it's not

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:16.439
<v Speaker 7>spectacular like it is in.

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 8>Copper, but it's rock solid.

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 7>You know, it's well above long term average growth rates.

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 8>You're going into the gasoline.

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 7>Driving season jet fuel and by the way, I remember,

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 7>global warming means your cooling season is going to create

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 7>more demand. In the past, we didn't build inventory, so

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 7>that three Q bowl story is still very much intact

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 7>driven by fundamentals, even without any geopolitical risk price team.

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 7>Also on oil, I want to note that when we

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:45.239
<v Speaker 7>look at positioning, it's down to the fourteen percentile.

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 7>This market is basically no long positioning in it right now,

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 7>and we're still sitting at eighty three eighty four dollars

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 7>a barrow, which is a testament to the underlying strength.

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 7>Putting it all together, I want to emphasize commodities are

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 7>still the best performing an asset class despite the pullback

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 7>in oil prices.

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 9>Jeff, let's talk about gold for a moment. I'm not

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 9>wearing any gold that I can hold up. But it's

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 9>a time where investors can get real yields in short

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 9>term parts of the market.

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 10>Why are gold prices still.

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 9>Going up and how much of that is activity by

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 9>the central bankers.

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think a big difference between this commodity rally

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 7>and any other commodity rally most any human being alive.

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 8>Has ever seen before is it's not accompanied.

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 7>With dollar resigning. I meaning think about the petro dollar system.

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 7>Oil prices go up, Saudi Arabia accumulates more dollars, they

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 7>plow it into US treasuries, puts downward pressure on rates.

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 7>Dollar begins to weaken, which reinforces the reflation, and it

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 7>becomes a virtuous cycle between oil prices and the dollar,

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 7>reinforcing higher commodity prices.

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 8>That's not playing out this time.

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 7>Why because many of the bricks country back in November

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 7>of last year, decided to start to trade with one

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 7>another using local currencies and then settle the differences in gold.

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 8>So what we've replaced.

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 7>Dollar recycling with is gold recycling, and that has created

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 7>this upticking gold despite a stronger dollar. Normally, you would

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 7>look at the fundamentals today and you would go, oh,

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 7>gold should be going down, real rates are higher, dollars stronger.

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 8>Those are all the dynamics that put down where pressure

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 8>on gold. Instead, gold's going up.

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 7>What's driving it is that strong demand coming out of

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 7>these emerging markets where they're now recycling into gold as

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 7>opposed to US treasuries creating that dollar recycling theme. So

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 7>this still things still has more lights to it. You know,

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 7>we see more upside in gold prices from here.

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess, Jeff, what we're trying to get at is

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>there some stories that people have been banding about all year,

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the ev transition or some of the great

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>buildout that's going to require more copper usage, whether it's

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the central banks shifting more to why do

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>they have so.

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 4>Much further to go?

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>If it's a lot being priced in and speculators coming

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>in and trying to get ahead of them and putting

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>it up even further, what gives you a sense that

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>there could be a catalyst for another leg higher in

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the near term.

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 8>Because you need to destroy demand right now. You're running

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 8>on fumes of.

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 7>Very low inventories, particularly of copper. You have no way

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 7>to bring on new to supply.

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 8>Once you're rout, when.

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 7>Prices began to spike, they got a spike high enough

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 7>to bring demand back in line with supply. That's we're

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 7>going to find out where that elasticity of demand really exists.

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 8>The only one way you.

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 7>Can ever observe is going back to the nineteen sixties,

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 7>which suggests maybe it's fifteen.

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 8>Thousand, but we really don't know. We're going to find out.

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 7>We didn't find out in the two thousands bull market

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 7>because China was never forced into a situation where it

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 7>had to consume and you had to ration demand out.

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 7>That's why we peeked out in that ten thousand dollars

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 7>ton range to where we are right now. So going forward,

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 7>no inventory, remember really strong demand from all those sources

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 7>you talked about, There's not enough to go around.

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 8>Somebody's going to have to drop.

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 7>Out, and that's where we're going to find out where

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 7>the high the high print is on this market.

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Jeff, if I could just go back to your answer

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 3>earlier on the oil market, and you see this very

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 3>bullish market happening, and you see potentially we're not even

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 3>at peak driving season. If we do see gasoline prices

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 3>in the United States go pass four dollars a gallon.

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 3>Are you expecting the US to tap the spr.

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, there's a lot of other levers that can pull

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 7>to put downward pressure on oil prices.

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 8>That's why, you know, I'm far more bullish on.

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 7>Base metals copper than I am on oil, particularly until

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:46.159
<v Speaker 7>you get after the election. Because you know, when you

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 7>look at what drives elections, what drives the populace focus,

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 7>it is the economy and inflation. So keeping oil prices

0:17:56.520 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 7>and gasoline prices under wraps over the course of the

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 7>next six months I think is going to be critical

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 7>to the administration and the government. And we've seen this

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 7>play out election after election, so I can't see why

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 7>this one would be any different. What is that limit

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 7>you know on the oil means you can get up

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 7>into the high nineties. Maybe you know, you could toppo

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 7>over one hundred or something like that in the midst

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 7>of the cooling season, but you know, would it be lasting. No,

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 7>it's not like the underlying copper story where it doesn't

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 7>really impact the underlying inflation. Now you throw in something

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 7>like a you know, some surprise problem in the Middle

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 7>East or something like that that could open up the upside.

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 7>But I think you know, you're you're going to see

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 7>governments around the world doing everything they can to fight this.

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 7>In One of the ways is you know, turning a

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 7>blind eye to you know, sanctioned oil, sanctioned.

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:48.360
<v Speaker 8>Products, you know. So there's a lot of methods.

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 7>Other than tapping the spr that can be used to

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 7>you know.

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 8>Also relaxing environmental regulations.

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 7>We've seen them use that in the past as well,

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 7>So there's lots of tools at their disposal.

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Carry of Carlisle, thank you so much. Keep wearing that,

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, copper bracelet until you hit fifty thousand or

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>bus Thank you so much. Crude slightly down, But this

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 1>is a market that really is on hold as we

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>wait for some sort of sign of a catalyst of

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>whether we're heading toward that immaculate disinflation or maybe not immaculate,

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>but at least a soft landing versus stagflation. Brian Lovett,

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>who is with us for the hour, I want to

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>ask you about the latest Bank of America fund manager survey,

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>which came out and showed investor optimism at some of

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the strongest levels that we've seen going back to twenty

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, even as investors are expecting a deterioration in

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>earnings and a deterioration in the economic growth trajectory. Is

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 1>this entirely dependent on the FED cutting.

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:56.199
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's not entirely dependent on the FED cutting. You know,

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 9>as I had said, if you look at years like

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 9>O six, you look at yours like twenty nineteen or

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 9>even now, market can do very well with the FED

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 9>on hold. So the good nominal growth environment has been supportive.

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 10>I do suspect like the Bank of America survey.

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 9>Says that things will slow you think about slow down.

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 9>We'll see if the FED feels comfortable cutting within that.

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 10>I think they would like to.

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 9>But I think what investors are looking to is over

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 9>the next few years we're going to be normalizing the

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 9>yell curve. And if you can normalize the yield curve

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 9>without a meaningful without having had a meaningful disruption and

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 9>economic activity, that should.

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 10>Be a positive. I've said over and over that.

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 9>Peak inflation, peak tightening, peak interest rates over the next

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 9>few years should be good for equities, and I continue

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 9>to stand by that, which is the reason why I'm.

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 4>This fund manager survey Amrie.

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:50.880
<v Speaker 1>We did see this optimism of several rate cuts this year,

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>even with a deterioration and backdrop. Because of this promise

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of potentially peak yields, Michael Hartnan over a Bank of

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 1>America did raise the specter of stagflash, which is something

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that Jay Powell has shrugged.

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:04.719
<v Speaker 4>Off, left off. There is no stag there is no flation.

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>This is the biggest headwind right now that.

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 4>A lot of people say to equities. A lot of

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 4>people are saying it's equities.

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 3>David Malpass, former head of the World Bank, this is

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 3>his whole thesis into what we're actually seeing in some

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 3>of the data he's looking at. But I look to

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 3>the global fund manager survey sentiment not as closed eyes

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:25.360
<v Speaker 3>and sell levels, but risk assets are vulnerable to more

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.959
<v Speaker 3>evidence of stagflation. Brian, do you see any evidence of stagflation?

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 9>I like the way Lisa put it, and I was

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:32.640
<v Speaker 9>going to say, I don't see stag and I don't.

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 4>See Flationwell, exactly, So let's.

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 10>Start with flation.

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 9>If you look in the bond market, whether it's the

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 9>three year break, even the five year break, even the

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 9>bond markets expectation for inflation, they're all very stable, very

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 9>much within the Fed's comfort zone. Now with regards to stag,

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 9>it's certainly not a stag economy.

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 10>Are things going to slow?

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 9>Well, yeah, that's ultimately what we wanted to have happen.

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 9>As things slow, inflationary pressure should moderate. You're already starting

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 9>to see it when everybody talks about the momentum of

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 9>inflation over the last few months. Hasn't been too much

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 9>on the consumer side. Very critically, it hasn't been wages.

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 9>Wages have been generally benign. It's been a lot of

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:19.120
<v Speaker 9>important inflation. And what are you starting to see already

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 9>with commodity prices, what are you starting to see.

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 10>With oil kind of moving down?

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 9>And so I think that what ends up happening when

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:29.439
<v Speaker 9>we get to these pivot points, And Lisa, you started

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 9>the show at that pivot point, People for whatever reason,

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:38.439
<v Speaker 9>think of the worst environment that they can imagine.

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 4>Right, Grafic thinking, yeah, you're watching Lisa.

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, all, well, she just said pivot She didn't say

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 9>patashrophic all of a sudden, it's going to be the

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 9>nineteen seventies again.

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 10>And yet this is a very different environment.

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 9>If you look at the misery index, which is the

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 9>unemployment rate plus inflation, it's historically quite low right.

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 10>That doesn't suggest stagflation. Now, could it move?

0:22:58.920 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.640
<v Speaker 10>But what is inflation going? I don't think it's heading

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 10>higher here.

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Part of the problem that a lot of people are

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 1>looking at, and including Philip Jefferson yesterday of the Fed

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>when he was speaking, is we just have seen this

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>persistency to inflation.

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 4>And what we've seen.

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Is an actual acceleration, a reacceleration in the first core

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 1>inflation data versus the last quarter of last year.

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 4>This could be a year over year comps.

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>But you take a look yesterday as a New York

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:27.199
<v Speaker 1>Fed consumer sentiment survey and inflation expectations.

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 4>And you could see they are creeping higher. And it's not.

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Just just broad based, but also for home prices, which

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 1>were supposed to be the most affected.

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 4>By keeping rates where they are.

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>So at a certain point you have to look at

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that and say, hold on a second. We can dismiss

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 1>this as going to be disinflation, but we expected that

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>pivot point last year.

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:45.160
<v Speaker 4>We expected that pivot point six months ago.

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.919
<v Speaker 1>If you ignore what the data is actually showing, that

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 1>will be another error.

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 10>Correct.

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 9>Although the question is when we see things ticking up

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 9>a little, they're off of low levels. Some of it's

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 9>being driven or relatively low level, some of it's being

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 9>driven by commodities, and some of it's likely being driven

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 9>If you look in the Consumer Price Index report by

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 9>some of the lagged effects of shelter housing in rents

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 9>had come down over a year ago, particularly rents.

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 10>I mean, I don't know which one.

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 9>We want to look at, but if we believe the

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 9>Zillo numbers or others, those rent numbers should be down

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 9>by now, so it's not being captured necessarily in the

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:29.439
<v Speaker 9>Consumer Price Index FEDS preferred measure of inflation below three percent,

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 9>that's the core personal consumption expenditure. As I mentioned earlier,

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 9>the tips break evens relatively benign. So I think what

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 9>the I wonder if the consumer when they're being asked,

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 9>are they thinking about the high cost of living, which

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 9>is now part of our life, or are they thinking

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 9>about the change and the change and the rate of change.

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 9>It's kind of like everything I learned I needed to

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:52.880
<v Speaker 9>know in kindergarten, everything I learned I needed to learn

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 9>in calculus class.

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 10>So ultimately this is like that.

0:24:57.240 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 9>Ultimately this is going to in my opinion, it's going

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:04.360
<v Speaker 9>to moderate. We'll look back and say, remember we were

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 9>worried that the economy was too strong, the consumer was

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 9>too strong, it was all inflationary. Then we'll be in

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 9>a slowdown and the market will do a ten percent

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 9>decline in a slowdown, and we'll be saying, gee, I

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 9>wish I really miss those strong nominal growth days.

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.199
<v Speaker 3>The thing is, though, and when Lisa brings up the

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 3>New York Fed one year inflation expectations to survey, the

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:28.640
<v Speaker 3>bank said that responders project inflation a year from now

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 3>at three point three percent. That's much higher than where

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 3>we are today. How much does that inflationary concern on

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 3>top of consumer's minds change how they're potentially going to

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 3>go out and spend the remainder of the year.

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 9>Well, we're starting to see, if you look at the

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:47.160
<v Speaker 9>Michigan survey, the consumer is starting to say that these

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 9>prices are becoming some are problematic.

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 10>And so remember the.

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 9>Recent move we've had to move in oil prices, we've

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 9>had to move in gasoline prices. Those are starting to moderate,

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 9>at least on the oil side, starting to moderate here.

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 9>And so remember we started this by saying can the

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 9>consumer hang in right? And the consumer saying things are

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 9>things are likely to slow here a bit. You saw

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 9>it in the Home Depot numbers, and so we shouldn't

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:17.640
<v Speaker 9>be you know, we shouldn't be well on this side.

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 9>The sentiment says inflation is going to keep going, but

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 9>the numbers are showing that they're moderating. Again, from our perspective,

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 9>if we look at the consumer momentum, pretty benign, wages,

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 9>pretty benign. A lot of it has been this implore

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 9>price inflation that now seems to be moderating.

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 4>You mentioned Home Depot.

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's just give you a rerun of that if you

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>are just joining us. They did report earnings, comparable sales

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>coming in light down two point eight percent versus the

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>estimate of two point two percent. You could see customer

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>transactions were down about expected about one percent. The key

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>here and why you're not seeing a bigger move really

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:54.400
<v Speaker 1>is that they still keep all of their twenty twenty.

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 4>Five year forecasts.

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 1>The comparable sales about still down at one percent, sales

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>still increasing by about one percent, earnings per share growth

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>about one percent. So this really does seem to point

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to stability.

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 4>As we heard from Brian.

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Here is also this idea that yes, there is a

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:14.880
<v Speaker 1>softness due to people maybe not moving. I've already done

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the home improvement, but there is this

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>sense that people still have money to spend. If there

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 1>is one takeaway, Brian from this earning season, what would

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you say it is It's.

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 10>A mixed picture. But I would say the biggest takeaway is.

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 9>That everybody thought we'd be in a recession by twenty

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 9>twenty three, and we're still growing earnings ten percent in

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 9>the quarter, and so it's still a good nominal growth backdrop.

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 9>And everybody's worried whether inflation's two eight to three percent

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:46.679
<v Speaker 9>three three. Remember, businesses make money in nominal terms, and

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 9>so a good nominal growth environment is supportive for corporate profitability.

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:53.679
<v Speaker 9>And what I say to you know, investors, if you

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 9>know they were so worried we'd be in a deep

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 9>economic downturn by now, the reality is things still are

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:01.360
<v Speaker 9>good and companies are still benefit. It's mixed, right, We're

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:04.199
<v Speaker 9>seeing more from tech, We're seeing more from financials than

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 9>perhaps energy or some other parts of the market, but

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:09.439
<v Speaker 9>again another good earnings period.

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, bringing you the best

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 2>in markets, economics, and geopolitics. You can watch the show

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am to

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 2>nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and, as always, on the

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business opp