WEBVTT - Surveillance: Remembering President George H.W. Bush

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane Jay Ley.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:34.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. We

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.480
<v Speaker 1>are thrilled to bring you this morning. Diana fritchgot Roth,

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>former Office of Policy Planning for George Herbert Walker Bush

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and now working with the Trump administration and Treasure You're

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>working with Secretary Minution right now, right, and it's on

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>economic policy. You have a span across Republican politics. I

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>would suggest as no one truly does. There's some that

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>did it, then, there's some that did it along the way,

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and there's some that are doing it now. But I

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>would argue in Washington, nobody's spanned it like you. What's

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a difference between Treasury financial in the process of Republican

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>politics and administration now versus under President Bush? Well. I

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.559
<v Speaker 1>started off with President Reagan in the Council of Economic Advisors,

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's been a great privilege to work under four administrations.

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>President Reagan, President George H. W. Bush, President George W. Bush,

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and now President Trump. And we're here to talk about

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>President George H. W. Bush. And he was a very

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 1>kind man, as many people have said, and he did

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>his best to cut the deficit and keep the economy going.

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>And what was really interesting is that in what we

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>were saying is that the economy was growing, but the

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>National Bureau of Economic Research didn't mark the end of

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the recession, the end of the recession being in March

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>until December. So in December nWo when President Bush said

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the economy had been growing all year, turned out he

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>was right, it had been growing out right. Well, I'm

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>not blaming what is so important here and this is

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>in great and I say this is great spirit for

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 1>the humor of the former president. We need a definition

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of voodoo economics, and you're the only one in the

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>planet can really. I mean, Jim Baker can do it,

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:33.959
<v Speaker 1>and others can do it. But Diana first got Roth,

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 1>what is voodoo economics? Just once and for all. Well,

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what voodoo economics is. But right now

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>we have cut taxes and the economy is growing very strongly.

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>We had great GDP numbers last month. The economy is

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>growing above three right now, take your point, debate about

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.359
<v Speaker 1>the vector there. But this is important and this goes

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>back to something that Michael McKee said to me. Yes

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:03.959
<v Speaker 1>and again, folks, Mike McKee will join me on radio

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>here on Bloomberg Surveillance through the morning. I've thrown with that.

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>And what's so interesting here is the lessons we learned

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>about cutting taxes to spur growth and maintain fiscal integrity.

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>That was something important to President Bush, important to President Reagan.

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>There was an experiment then, and under President Trump's leadership,

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>there's an experiment. Now. How's the experiment going? Can we

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>really grow our way out of a fiscal challenge? The

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>difference between twenty sixteen and the economy now in seventeen

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and eighteen is remarkable. People thought that the economy could

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>not grow at higher than two percent, and it's on

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>track to grow at higher than three percent this year.

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Business investment sword consumer confidence. Business confidence are up, business

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>investment increased. Okay, I'll take your point, Diana. But what

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>is so important here is to understand that idea of

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a twin deficit. My chart of the year is that

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>linkage of trade deficits something dear to President Trump, and

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>also the linkage of our fiscal deficit and the vector

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>of that is getting back to the time of when

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 1>you were very young of Reagan and Bush Senior. Do

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>we have a risk here of twin deficits into or

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>frankly beyond. It's up to Congress to put in place

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>proposals to cut spending, to cut the spending. And President

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump proposed cutting spending. President George H. W. Bush proposed

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>cutting spending, and it's up to Congress to follow and

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 1>make those spending cuts that presidents propose. Presidents propose, but

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Congress has to in the last uh, Congress is responsible

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>for how much you spent. No, this is interesting, Diana

0:04:56.120 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>first got Roth, thank you so much joining us right

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>now in Washington to begin a discussion on this is

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the right gentleman, and that as you know, since November

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>on the death of George Bush, there's been all sorts

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of worthy speak he isn't worthy in the communications of

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party. Run bun Jen has had a most interesting,

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 1>interesting career managing the message of Republicans. He's reached huge

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:38.039
<v Speaker 1>acclaim for that, frankly by Democrats as well, and we're

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:41.720
<v Speaker 1>thrilled at run bu Jeen can join us this morning, Ron,

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:46.119
<v Speaker 1>What was your biggest challenge of communication for Republicans. Well, thanks,

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>it's great to hear you know, I would say that,

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the biggest challenges are getting the message out

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in a consistent way, and that that is very challenging

0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>when you have all kinds of elected officials in republic

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Looking party who want to communicate different things, Getting them

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>unfocused on a single message to say the same things

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 1>at the same time can be very very difficult, and

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>especially in today's age. Obviously you have the President Trump

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>uh communicating via Twitter and really driving that driving that

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>message the way he wants to. And I think there's

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Republicans that are are are figuring out

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the direction of the Republican Party after after the election,

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>after the election, and the direction. Do you just assume

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that President Trump runs for a second term? Is that

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>just a given? Yes? I think he runs for a

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>second term, and I think he's going to give Democrats

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 1>a run for their money. You know, if Joe Biden runs,

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>he's really the only relatable, I think candidate at this

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>point to Americans that could really uh that could really

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:56.840
<v Speaker 1>give a good be a good sparring partner versus h

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>versus President Trump. And he's just a master of message

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 1>in terms of activating people and getting people riled up

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and getting you know, harnessing that anger that's out there.

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like there are so many Democrats right

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>now are running that they're going to dilute their own mess.

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>You were directly involved in the process and processes of

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the last election. At the Rotunda today and and yesterday

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and at the National Cathedral today there will not only

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>be the remains of the forty one president, his son,

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the President with Mrs Bush yesterday. Some of those images

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>were wonderful, but also Jeb Bush, which is maybe the

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>more modern Bush and certainly the one that run Bungen

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>has bounced off of the most in recent years. Can

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>jet Bushes still run in the Republican Party? I think

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>more along the lines of UM on the local level,

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>potentially the state level. There are still opportunities out there,

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, for for those voices UM. You know, there

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>is a polarization in politics, obviously on the left, and

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the polarization and with even the Republican experiment. I would

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>say it's you know, I I would agree with that,

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's going on in the Democratic party too.

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>You have this polarization on both sides. Um, that's that's

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>really pulling people to the left and right. There are

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>still opportunities in those moderate suburbs. Um that Republicans lost

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>um as a referendum on President Trump, UM to a

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>lack more moderate voices. I think in the future, and uh,

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that the Republican Party still remain strong.

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>We still have the White House, we still have the Senate.

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>We grew our numbers in the Senate, but as you

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier to me, you've got to take back some

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>of the losses. Where does that strategy come from? I'm

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 1>fascinated within what I think all of our listeners, whatever

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>their politics, they observe the president of the presidential tweets,

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the conferences, the gaggle around the helicopters he dashes. Forget

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>about that communication strategy. There's got to be a communication

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>strategy for Republicans to get away from his core constituency.

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Does that strategy exist or where where's the colonel that's

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>not in the lunch room at the Hey Adams Hotel.

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:14.319
<v Speaker 1>Is Well, no, it's not. I mean, it's core constituency

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>is though of voters right now? So you have to

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>figure out where can you get the other the margin,

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>where do you get the next that's your world, That's

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:27.959
<v Speaker 1>exactly that's our world, and we have to figure that out.

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that there is a number of

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>things we should be doing. We need to be appealing

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:37.319
<v Speaker 1>much more to women, to white female voters, to to frankly,

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>be much more inclusive um in in our messaging. And

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that has to happen at a consistent basis. Right now,

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>what we're doing and what the Democrats are doing is primary,

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>is driving messages. It feels like we're both both sides

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.319
<v Speaker 1>are running primary elections right now instead of the general,

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and the general election feels like it doesn't really exist,

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>meaning that we're driving messages and either side to motivate

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>our voters to the polls to try to outprimary each other. Okay,

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I love that phrase. That's a round bonding original out

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>primary each other. Guess what after that? You got elected enough,

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>for example, Ronald Reagan and I would suggest President Bush.

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they went right, but they moved to the center

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>as they moved to the general election. I'm right, those

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>days are over right, Well, we'll see. I mean, you know,

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>every election is different. I mean, you know, when um,

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>uh President Bush lost to Bill Clinton. Uh, it was

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>over the economy, um, and it was over whether or

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>not President Bush could relate to relate to uh, relate

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:41.719
<v Speaker 1>to Americans. And you started feeling out of touch. And

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the President Clinton took advantage of that, and they called

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>it it's it's what is it? It's the economy stupid?

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Was the was the line. And so I think, you know,

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and within a year or two, I mean, within a year,

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>we have to start a consistent message that is much

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 1>more appealing or else it's going to be just another

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>primary election. Well it's just another primary election and just

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>another primary process. But the process is time is different

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 1>from K Street and Ice Street and the other you know,

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the secret dark corridors out by Reagan Airport. There's offices

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>of Republicans trying to figure out the primary system inform

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>our audience. How does that that ballet start and why

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:24.319
<v Speaker 1>is it different from the last time around? What I've

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>learned as New Hampshire is not as important as it

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>used to be. I think that this that's right. I

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>think um that you know, we start out with with

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a slight advantage in Ohio and Florida because we have

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Republican governorships there. You know, we just won a very

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>divisive election in Florida. That means we have the infrastructure

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of that state party apparatus to help us with those

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:51.319
<v Speaker 1>primaries for that primary system. But the primary states are changing, Um,

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have we have states like North Carolina

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that's that feels like it's changing. Um, you know, other

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>states like Arizona for instance. That's obviously okay if if

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina discovers Connor Lamb's plural the gentleman from northwest

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>north southwest rather of Pittsburgh, those kind of Democrats. Republicans

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>have to be different, don't they. You know, I think

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of Austin Powers in that movie Behave. Republicans have to

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>behave if they're up against a more traditional Scoop Jackson Democrats.

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it really depends on each district, in each message,

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, and and the candidates themselves, um, you know,

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and what what's going on in that state and district.

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that's the thing now right now, it's

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:37.959
<v Speaker 1>a it's a referendum on President Trump, and it will

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>be a presidential election. But on the local level, they're

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.959
<v Speaker 1>going to have to continue to to um to keep

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the Trump based enthusiastic while trying to reach out to

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:53.079
<v Speaker 1>other voters. And that's a difficult needle to thread. Run Bundie,

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's leave it there. Thank you so much, greatly appreciate

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the perspective here of a gentleman in communications for the

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Republican Ron Bundin. Thank you, so thank you very much.

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:16.199
<v Speaker 1>Uh this morning I said to someone a few days ago,

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>would you just find the admiral? And of course at

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg surveillance there can be only one admiral, and that

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>is James Travidez. Of course with a Fletcher School at

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Tufts University. Admiral, we are thrilled to have you with

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>us today. UM. I was reading about Admiral the Grumming

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>torpedo bomber of World War Two and the basic aeronautics

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of what President Bush flew was It drove like a truck.

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:47.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was a little different back then, wasn't

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:51.839
<v Speaker 1>it It was? And this is all we say fly

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>by wire. I mean this is nothing electronic obviously, just

0:13:56.160 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 1>some basic hydraulics. Truck is a good example. It's like

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a truck made by the Soviet Union. I mean, this

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>thing just banged through the air. He was so proud

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of it and was such an extraordinary naval hero and

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>we all miss him so deeply. I knew him reasonably well,

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>wrote some speeches for him over the years, and Tom

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>when I was the Supreme AI Commander of NATO, he

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>was one of the biggest supporters of NATO. We're going

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to miss that, gentleman. Well, that is there. I mean,

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>we got eight ways to go now, Michael mckeena jump in.

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>But but this is so important. We saw it with

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg interview with Mr Porschenko yesterday on Ukraine John

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Mersheimer Chicago talking about maybe we overreached? Did President Bush

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>ever suggested his writings are directly to you, Admiral, that

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe we overreached too much in our expansion of NATO. Nope,

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>he was someone who was rock solid on that. Of

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>course he lived those years. Uh. And also we need

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to mention still living the Secretary of State in those days,

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>James Baker, who be featured prominently in the funeral today

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you'll see his face often. He was one of Bush

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>His closest friends. The two of them really created this

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>new world. And I think despite all the concern and

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>claim that perhaps we pushed Russia into a corner. I

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>just don't see it that way. Historically, no NATO tanks

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>tom ever went rolling into Warsaw or Bucharest to force

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>those countries to join NATO. But there were plenty of

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Soviet tanks back in the day that rolled in there.

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Those nations wanted to be in NATO were lucky they're

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>in NATO. One of the things that he is known for,

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>if you are a nerd enough looking at these things,

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>is the way he redesigned the National Security Council and

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>set up Brent Skokroft as a sort of honest broker. Uh.

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>You remember in the Nixon years, before that happened, you

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>had the big fights between the Henry kissing your faction

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and whoever was at State at the time, at George

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Schultz in the Reagan administration, UM, that really made a difference.

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>He had a George H. W. Bush came to office

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>with a specific idea of how foreign policy should be run.

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>He did and the way he did foreign policy and

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>defense policy and international diplomacy were a direct reflection of

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>his character, which focused on team building. Uh. You know,

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>as he would say, there's no eye in the word

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>team t E a M. And it was a reflection

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of his own athleticism coming and playing on great baseball teams,

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and his personality and the way he was raised. And

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>he wanted a Lieutenant General Brent scot Croft to be

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the National Security Advisor because Brent, who's still alive in

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>his nineties, marvelous gentleman. UH was the embodiment of no

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>one of us is as smart as all of us

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking together. That was the hard of the NSC under

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>President Bush the first and it was well run. Did

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 1>he leave it in as good as shape as he founded?

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:14.199
<v Speaker 1>A President Bill Clinton's first term not particularly successful from

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a foreign policy standpoint, And then you had a lot

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of the former Bush one forty one alumni end up

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:25.680
<v Speaker 1>in Bush forty three's cabinet, and people are looking at,

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the legacy of George W. Bush in the

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Middle East and wondering how did how do we go wrong?

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>From father to son. Part of it can be explained

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>by nine eleven and the extraordinary pressure that put on

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:44.159
<v Speaker 1>that administration, UH, the Bush forty three administration. Part of

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 1>it was personalities. Um I was at the time working

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>directly for Secretary of Defense Don Rumsfeld strong personality, Vice

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>President Dick Janey's strong personality, National Security Advisor Condi Rice,

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>who I think tried very much to followed the sccroft model.

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>But in those years, those were big personality. We were

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>in a war, and I think it was a very

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>different time for the nation. So if you want to

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>look for a model, it is definitely Bushart one. If

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you're just joining us. James Trevidus with us, he is,

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of course with a Fletcher School, former Admiral of the

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>United States Navy on the special day for Bloomberg Surveillance.

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Our coverage from Washington and from New York, this day

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of memory and services at the National Cathedral for George

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.199
<v Speaker 1>Herbert Walker Bush. Mike, your questions are so good and

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:38.439
<v Speaker 1>so well informed. I want you to continue with the Admiral, Michael,

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>pick it up again. Please let me as long as

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 1>we have you here and we have an admiral, let

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>me just ask you something about what's going on today.

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>The whole US China trade issue gets caught up in

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the larger U S. China relationship, and we saw and

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 1>this didn't get a lot of publicity, but during the

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>g twenty summit Argentina, the US sent a destroyer through

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the South China Sea into territory. China is claiming how

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 1>dangerous is that situation? How how much of a conflict

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>do we really have with the Chinese over this? Because

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>people are talking about, well, if if Trump fails whatever,

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>we can have a new Cold War. Is that what

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>we're facing the kind of thing we went through with

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the Soviet Union? Or is it a different kind of challenge.

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll end up ultimately being a different kind

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of challenge, Michael, but Um, we have tactical challenges with

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>China in tariffs, trade, intellectual property, cyber conflict. Those are

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>things I think we can negotiate our way through, and

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 1>I think we will. The one I worry about is

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the uber strategic challenge is in fact, the South China

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Sea enormous body of water size of the Caribbean and

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Gulf of Mexico combined, full of hydrocarbons. China claims it

0:19:56.600 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>in its entirety as territorial sea. It's a posterous claim.

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 1>The United States and our allies are pushing back on it,

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 1>not only in international courts where it's been rejected, but

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>also operationally your point, driving our ships right through these

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 1>claim territorial sees. I think that's gonna be a tough

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:18.640
<v Speaker 1>one to negotiate, but no, in the end, I think

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll find a way to avoid stumbling into a full

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>blown cold war. I've got about five more minutes of

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:26.719
<v Speaker 1>good questions on Robert Caplan's Asia Cauldron, but we'll have

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to leave it there with a good admiral at Mr Venus,

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>we are thrilled that you are with us today. Thank

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you so much. He is a tough university and there

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Fletcher School as well. Michael McKee with me. This is

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene and Washington, Michael McKee and New York on

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>this most special day for the nation morning for the

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>memory and services of George Herbert Walker Bush with us,

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>not William Hoagland. Bill Hoglan, who is truly one of

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>the nation's experts on our debt and deficit with the

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Bipartisan at Council. Bill Hoagland. Um, we go back to

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Henry Clay in eighteen fifty two, and then with the

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>finishing of the Capitol in eighteen sixty and eighteen sixty eight,

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Abraham Lincoln and Thaddya Stevens and on to President Reagan.

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>President for John McCain on August thirty one of this year,

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and now another president lying in state in the rotunda.

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>You visited the rotunda two days ago, and you had

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the privilege of visiting in the quiet early morning. What

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 1>was it like being in the rotunda? Very moving, calm. I.

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 1>Of course, it's spent many years in the Capitol, I

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>worked in the Senate, I spent many a day walking

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 1>through the rotunda. But to visit the rotunda with the

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 1>president lying in state, uh and in the quiet of

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that early morning hour, um is was brought back a

0:21:56.560 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of memories in my affection for the for the president,

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 1>overcome me peas honest John meetscham Will you eulogize today?

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Of course, his one volume is considered definitive tell Us

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Fiscal George H. W. Bush, I think it's

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:16.919
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a mystery and a bit of confusion

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 1>over what is fiscal beliefs really were? Well, I do

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 1>think that clearly uh uh. The when he came into

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 1>office to get the nomination, there was some concern that

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>this was a liberal Republican, Eastern State Republican who was

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:41.360
<v Speaker 1>not to be trusted on some of the conservative issues

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of control and not raising taxes. And so of course

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 1>his big his statement down in New Orleans and on

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the getting the nomination read my lips came back to

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:55.959
<v Speaker 1>haunt him because when we went into the we had

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a number of issues facing as we had savings and

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>loan meltdown, We had a number of problems that Congress

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 1>is being controlled by Democrats, and we negotiated a budget agreement.

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>In it was a budget agreement that did required the

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 1>negotiations and compromise, and in that compromise UH taxes were raised,

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>but it was a five billion dollar deficit reduction. He did.

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>He was concerned and his staff were concerned about the deficits.

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:25.679
<v Speaker 1>They would have preferred to have controlled it on the

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>spending side, but we were working with a Democratic Congress

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and so he had to negotiate. UM I had the

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 1>privilege and honor of attending the twenty fifth anniversary of

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the President at his library and in college station back

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>in April. Um As I was getting ready to go

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>onto the stage, the President and came up behind me

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and his wheelchair and pulled me on my UM shirt

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>TI or my coach Kai and said to me something

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>about how I was responsible for him being a one

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 1>term president, because that negociated to how much of course

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:04.439
<v Speaker 1>he was kidding he was He was wonderful and working

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 1>with the staff. And I will always remember that last

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 1>direct encounter I had with the president. It. Uh, it's

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>quaint to remember now that Uh, in fiscal nineteen ninety,

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the year that you put together this agreement of the

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>federal budget, deficit was two dollars and it's going to

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>be this year at trillion dollars, and and everybody was

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>panicked about two hundred and twenty one billion dollars. Uh.

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Things seemed to have changed. It was, I guess to

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>get back kind of at what Tom was saying. Uh.

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>When he ran for president in nineteen eighty, he derided

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the idea of tax cuts paying for themselves as voodoo economics,

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and he said, you know, read my lips, no new taxes.

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>But he agreed rather readily to revenue enhancers. As the

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.679
<v Speaker 1>statement that they put out at the time said, um,

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>what what did he really think about deficit spending and taxes?

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:13.679
<v Speaker 1>This was before the whole Republican tax pledge, and that's right. Thing. Well,

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>one thing I would say was that like that he

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>that that agreement was the beginning. Of course, yes he

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>lost his loss that his term of office at one

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>term office, but with but with Clinton coming in, there

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>was a agreement which is trictly a partisan agreement on

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic side, which and then there was a nine agreement.

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Uh and I would argue, and the agreement brought us

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>to a balanced budget, which I had on our working

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>on it. I do think that he did start at that,

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>even though it was a cost him, cost him his

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>job as a one term president, he did start the

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>process of really focusing in the subsequent to the seven agreement.

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>After we reached balanced budget, then things kind of went

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to went in the wrong direction. But I think I

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>think he was pragmatic about deficits. I think he believed

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>deficits mattered. I believe that he thought that they should

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>be controlled. I believe his focus was primarily on the

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>spending side, but overall he was pragmatic and knowing that

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:24.959
<v Speaker 1>to reach that agreement, to try to reduce those deficits,

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 1>we had to focus not just on the spending side,

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>we had to focus on revenues. To excuse me, Bill

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Bill Hogdon with us with a bipartisan Council can't say

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>enough about his abilities on the debt and the deficits bill.

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask the dumb question of the day, is

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 1>there any question? Is there any evidence we can actually

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote cut spending? UM? Well, I think there, I

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>thought one pest to say, yes, there has to be

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:59.159
<v Speaker 1>some hope here that we can look at the UH

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>four trillion dollars at the federal government spends and surely

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>we can find areas within that that we can control. UH.

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I do think we have to focus on those programs

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that are the most most difficult politically, and that are

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the entitlement programs, whether it be so SECAREDY or Medicare

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>medic it those are not politically popular UH programs to address.

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>In fact, our current president and said they were off

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the table. I don't know how we can control deficits

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>long term on the spending if we don't realize that

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 1>we have to focus on on those programs are manager

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>for the future. At the same time, I think that

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>coming back to the President George Bush, George Bush, I

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>do think that he felt that you had to have

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a compromise here in a democratic system with UH and

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>that meant that you had to focus not just on

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the spending side. We had to focus on revenues. If

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 1>you do both together, I think then you have more

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:56.359
<v Speaker 1>likelihood of getting agreement to do the spending side. Um, politicians,

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 1>if not smarter, more aware of euphemism. So the idea

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 1>of campaigning for revenue enhancement is probably off the table.

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 1>But I'm wondering. You know, you're we're gonna see if

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the deficit keeps going up. Uh, We're gonna see somebody

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:15.719
<v Speaker 1>trying to campaign on bringing down the deficit. But how

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:19.880
<v Speaker 1>do they do that? And I'm wondering in two thousand twenty, um,

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump is going to want to campaign on the

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>idea of rolling back his tax cuts. So how how

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>do you how do you make the case now because

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:33.119
<v Speaker 1>we're not seeing bond yells get out of control because

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of the deficite. Well, again, I think there are two

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>things that hapnic Leon Panetta when he was leaving office,

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and there are two ways to control the deficit. One

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>was through a crisis and the other was through leadership.

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>And unfortunately I don't see the leadership in at either.

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Into Pennsylvania Avenue. I said that with respect to vote,

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and so I'm afraid that at some point there that

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>there might be a crisis, and then that crisis comes

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>with that will force their attention to deal with this

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and a serious pamer that they're not dealing with now.

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>William Holden, thank you so much for being with us

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>today's senior Vice president the Bipartisan Policy Center in Washington.

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Were just wonderful perspective there on the reach of the

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>state of our fiscal economics from the time of President

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Bush two of the president as well. Thanks for listening

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer.

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before the podcast. You

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio.