Speaker 1: Our two Sean Hennity Show tolfree. It is eight hundred
Speaker 1: and ninety four one, Shawn, if you want to be.
Speaker 2: A part of the program.
Speaker 1: We have a lot of news regarding Supreme Court decisions
Speaker 1: that have come down today.
Speaker 2: Some I like, some I don't like.
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett, Fox News legal analyst and New York Times
Speaker 1: bestselling author will join us at a minute. Court allowing
Speaker 1: Trump to fire the FTC commissioner overturns major restraint on
Speaker 1: presidential power.
Speaker 2: A lot of people looking at that as a huge win.
Speaker 1: Others not happy about the Court preventing the president from
Speaker 1: firing the FED chair, Governor and justices uphold the state
Speaker 1: law allowing for late arriving mail in ballots. Not sure
Speaker 1: why people get an extension. And you know, when it
Speaker 1: comes to getting their ballots in on time, there should
Speaker 1: be a set date.
Speaker 2: That date should be election day.
Speaker 1: And if everybody's tired to have it in by that date,
Speaker 1: I don't think that is too onerous. Let's go to
Speaker 1: some analysis and we'll get to Greg. Here's John you
Speaker 1: explaining how the Supreme Court ruling in this one particular case,
Speaker 1: it's most important ruling, he declares in ninety one years.
Speaker 2: Here's what he said.
Speaker 3: The FTC case Slaughter is the culmination of a campaign
Speaker 3: by presidents going back to Ronald Reagan all the way
Speaker 3: through all the presidents, all the way through to Trump,
Speaker 3: aided by really the Roberts Court has been on this
Speaker 3: for twenty years now to try to end the practice
Speaker 3: of Congress of creating these independent powers within the executive
Speaker 3: branch which are not under the control of the president.
Speaker 3: This decision is perhaps the most important decision about the
Speaker 3: operation of the government since nineteen thirty five. As you said, Bill,
Speaker 3: that case is called Humphreys Executor. No longer will there
Speaker 3: be an FTC, SCCC, all those agencies we're designed by
Speaker 3: Congress to be outside the president's control. And the Court
Speaker 3: says clearly that is inconsistent with the vesting by the
Speaker 3: founders of the executive power only in the president. They're
Speaker 3: all going to be directly under the control of the
Speaker 3: president now, so it almost doesn't matter whether they're in
Speaker 3: the Treasury Department or in the State Department, because the
Speaker 3: President now can give them orders and fire them if
Speaker 3: they don't obey.
Speaker 1: All right, let's get Greg Jarrett's reaction to all of this.
Speaker 1: Greg I tend to agree with John Youw on this
Speaker 1: and his analysis. This is the Slaughter case where the
Speaker 1: dismissal of two Democratic Commissioners from the FTC by President
Speaker 1: Trump and finding that their removal conflicted with statutory requirements.
Speaker 2: What is your take?
Speaker 4: Well, John, you is right. Finally, after ninety one years,
Speaker 4: the president gets to regain control of the out out
Speaker 4: of control alphabet soup of federal agencies that mushroom during
Speaker 4: the twentieth century, the so called administrative state that has behaved.
Speaker 4: And you and I've talked about a sean as a
Speaker 4: fourth branch of government, unelected people totally unaccountable to anyone
Speaker 4: who wield enormous power. And today Chief Justice John Roberts
Speaker 4: said that's enough, and he restored common sense by saying, look,
Speaker 4: these agency officials who exercise executive power are accountable to
Speaker 4: the chief executive, the President, and executive power rests solely
Speaker 4: on the president and nobody else, so he can fire
Speaker 4: them at will, because removal is a necessary component of
Speaker 4: presidential control. And the Court said, by the way, Congress
Speaker 4: cannot restrict the president's control over these agency officers. So
Speaker 4: you know, in doing this, the Supreme Court reversed itself.
Speaker 4: As John you pointed out the Humphries Executor decision, horrible
Speaker 4: decision in nineteen thirty five by a different Supreme Court.
Speaker 4: Obviously that prevented presidents from firing officials at these regulatory agencies.
Speaker 4: That was a wrongheaded decision, and now finally it is
Speaker 4: dead and buried.
Speaker 1: What did you make of the Supreme Court ruling today
Speaker 1: on counting mail in ballots after election Day? Jonathan Turlie,
Speaker 1: our colleague, He described this as a significant loss for Republicans.
Speaker 2: It makes no sense to me.
Speaker 1: Maybe the exception of the military, if they need extra
Speaker 1: time because of the pace at which mail in ballots
Speaker 1: can be sent from overseas. Maybe with that exception, but
Speaker 1: he viewed this as a little bit more significant than
Speaker 1: I did.
Speaker 2: What is your take, well, I.
Speaker 4: Think this was the Supreme Court saying to the people
Speaker 4: across the street in Congress, if you really want to,
Speaker 4: you know, bring in these mail in ballots and contain
Speaker 4: them past the Save America Act, which has a provision
Speaker 4: on that. This ruling wasn't about ideology. It was a
Speaker 4: specific reading of existing federal law, and the Court said
Speaker 4: that the federal statute specifies when voters must vote, but
Speaker 4: it says nothing at all about when mail in ballots
Speaker 4: must be received. And the Court said it's up to
Speaker 4: Congress to pass a law i e. Act if it
Speaker 4: wants ballots to be received by election day, but until then,
Speaker 4: states have the power to manage ballot counting, which is
Speaker 4: what Mississippi did in this particular case. But this is
Speaker 4: consistent with the Constitution, which grants Congress the power to
Speaker 4: regulate federal elections, but it gives states the authority to
Speaker 4: administer elections, and that includes in a vote counting. However,
Speaker 4: the Court said, the Constitution does give Congress the power
Speaker 4: to override or modify those state rules such as Mississippi
Speaker 4: and California and elsewhere. But until that happens, you know,
Speaker 4: you're going to have these nightmare scenarios such as California,
Speaker 4: where you don't know the results for many days or weeks,
Speaker 4: and that only fuels distrust in the integrity of elections.
Speaker 4: I mean, I see, is the Supreme Court sort of
Speaker 4: lighting a fire under Congress that if you really want
Speaker 4: to fix elections, pass a law.
Speaker 1: You know, they often go back and pretty much advise
Speaker 1: Congress to do such without such explicit language as you're using.
Speaker 1: I think the case that is going to matter the
Speaker 1: most is the issue of birthright citizenship. Over the years,
Speaker 1: we've used the term anchor babies. People come from other countries,
Speaker 1: they give birth to a child in the US, and
Speaker 1: automatically they are a US citizen. Now you've heard oral arguments,
Speaker 1: you've heard different analysis of it.
Speaker 2: What's your take.
Speaker 4: Well, I wrote a column immediately after the President issued
Speaker 4: his executive order when he took office on birthright citizenship,
Speaker 4: and I argue that he had a valid argument because
Speaker 4: I went back to and you can read it online.
Speaker 4: Takes some time to find it, but you'll find it
Speaker 4: the debate that took place between the sponsors and the
Speaker 4: authors of that particular provision of the fourteenth Amendment, and
Speaker 4: it was abundantly clear to me from the words they
Speaker 4: spoke on the floor of the US Senate that they
Speaker 4: did not intend for this to include you know, children,
Speaker 4: or anybody who's not a legal resident. And you know,
Speaker 4: I was disappointed as I listened to the oral argument
Speaker 4: that that wasn't emphasized enough. Now that doesn't mean that
Speaker 4: the Supremes themselves aren't looking at that in context, but
Speaker 4: you know, I think the odds are that the President's
Speaker 4: going to lose on birthright citizenship. If he does, I
Speaker 4: think it's a wrong decision, and you know it would
Speaker 4: be up to con to fix it. It's astonishing to
Speaker 4: me that, you know, you hear Chuck Schumer say over
Speaker 4: and over again, Oh, it's Jim Crow two point zero.
Speaker 4: He apparently doesn't realize it was Democrats that created the
Speaker 4: Jim Crow laws, which were hideous and awful. And this
Speaker 4: has nothing to do about disenfranchising African American voters. If
Speaker 4: you look at the polling data, they're among the highest
Speaker 4: seventy eight percent or something like that want valid voter ID.
Speaker 4: And it's silly to argue in this day and age
Speaker 4: that these people don't have ID. Have to have an
Speaker 4: ID to do anything, to pick up medicine, to travel,
Speaker 4: to go anywhere, you know, even to attend Democrat rallies,
Speaker 4: you got to have an ID. So you know, I
Speaker 4: think they want to cheat, and they're creating the conditions
Speaker 4: to do so.
Speaker 1: I quick break more with our legal analysis of all
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court rulings that have come down today. More
Speaker 1: with Greg Jarrett on the other side, Mark Halper will
Speaker 1: analyze a lot of how the Democratic Party has now
Speaker 1: shifted so solidly left. I Final Moments where Greg Jarrett
Speaker 1: is he analyzes the Supreme Court rulings that have been
Speaker 1: released today. Overall, as you look at the decisions now
Speaker 1: that are coming down kind of fast and furious here,
Speaker 1: and whether it's the Slaughter case or Watson versus the RNC,
Speaker 1: or the Trump versus cookcase, or any of the cases
Speaker 1: that we're getting with decisions on and as we await
Speaker 1: the final decisions.
Speaker 2: What is your take on the makeup of the court.
Speaker 1: Because when people ask me, I really can't give them
Speaker 1: a straight answer.
Speaker 2: I don't have any.
Speaker 1: Clue what the judicial philosophy of Amy Coney Barrett is.
Speaker 1: At times, I don't have any clue what it might be.
Speaker 1: For you know, Chief Justice John Roberts, I don't know
Speaker 1: if you have the same questions I do, but I
Speaker 1: find some of their decisions contradictory and just odd to me.
Speaker 4: Well, Amy Coney Barrat tends to do whatever John Roberts does.
Speaker 4: You'll notice that in the opinions she mimics his point
Speaker 4: of view. But for those who say that this is
Speaker 4: a one sided court in the bag for President Trump,
Speaker 4: decisions that we saw today bely that argument. Yes, Trump
Speaker 4: has won some significant cases, but he's lost a bunch
Speaker 4: the terroriffs. For example, an important case I didn't win
Speaker 4: that one. Birthright citizenship will come out tomorrow. I don't
Speaker 4: think he's going to win that one. I may be surprised.
Speaker 4: And then, of course you point out to two cases
Speaker 4: in which Trumps slash Republicans did not win. The Lisa
Speaker 4: Cook case Federal Reserve, you know, where the President had
Speaker 4: fired her and the court said not.
Speaker 1: So well, why do you think they bifurcated that owl
Speaker 1: compared to other agencies which gave the president an enormous
Speaker 1: amount of power, And in that case, I'm talking about
Speaker 1: the Slaughter case.
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 4: So, on the other hand, in the Slaughter case, the
Speaker 4: president has brought authority to fire anyone at federal regulatory agencies.
Speaker 4: But Chief Justice Roberts created an exception for the Central Bank,
Speaker 4: the FED. Why because in creating the FED, Congress structured
Speaker 4: it to operate independently, because it recognized that monetary policy
Speaker 4: is meant to be protected from political pressure. Understand, the
Speaker 4: Court did not say the FED governor can ever be fired,
Speaker 4: only that removal has to meet the statutory requirements contained
Speaker 4: in that law. It's a nuanced ruling, which is why
Speaker 4: the Chief Justice authored both the Slaughter case and the
Speaker 4: Lease of Cook case so that he himself could draw
Speaker 4: the distinction.
Speaker 2: Net net.
Speaker 1: Would you say that this was a good day for
Speaker 1: Republicans and the President or a split decision?
Speaker 4: Oh, I'd call it a you know, a split decision.
Speaker 4: Republicans didn't win everything, but you know, the slaughtercase is
Speaker 4: a huge decision because, as John Y pointed out, you
Speaker 4: and I agree, this out of control administrative state, this
Speaker 4: fourth branch of government has been wielding too much enormous
Speaker 4: power since the Humphreys decision by the Supreme Court in
Speaker 4: nineteen thirty five, and every single president has complained about
Speaker 4: it and been angry about it. But it took President
Speaker 4: Donald Trump to actually bring the challenge and take it
Speaker 4: all the way to the US Supreme Court and get
Speaker 4: a bad decision rectified. You know, the Supreme Court has
Speaker 4: gotten a lot of decisions wrong over two hundred and
Speaker 4: fifty some odd years, and they've reversed themselves and overturned
Speaker 4: themselves more than one hundred times. And you can add
Speaker 4: today's decision to that long list.
Speaker 1: Well, it's amazing these decisions come out one after another
Speaker 1: today and Greg Jarrett actually finds the time to read
Speaker 1: them all and men help inform all of us. That's
Speaker 1: what makes you great what you do, Greg Jarrett, appreciate
Speaker 1: your time. Start thank you as always. All right, my
Speaker 1: friend eight hundred nine to four one, Shawn is on number.
Speaker 1: I just wanted to do a check in. There's a
Speaker 1: guy we're going I'm going to introduce you to in
Speaker 1: a second. His name is Brian Stern, and he's the
Speaker 1: Gray Bull Rescue chairman and founder, and we saw what happened.
Speaker 1: He's a veteran of more than eight hundred rescue evacuation
Speaker 1: missions worldwide, and Brian has helped save in the course
Speaker 1: of his life. This is his passion. This is really
Speaker 1: what he was born to do. If you ask me,
Speaker 1: he has saved more than eighty seven hundred lives and
Speaker 1: served as a first responder even during.
Speaker 2: The nine to eleven attacks.
Speaker 1: And anyway, he's bringing his expertise in terms of you know,
Speaker 1: a lot of the devastation that happened in Venezuela. There's
Speaker 1: a lot of outrage growing after a video surface appearing
Speaker 1: to show the regime's Interior minister preventing members of a
Speaker 1: US rescued delegation from actually assisting the people that desperately
Speaker 1: needed help, which makes no sense at all. Secretary of
Speaker 1: State Marker Rubio waited on this, let's play it well.
Speaker 6: Maybe already deploying a search and rescue teams from Fairfax County,
Speaker 6: virgin and Los Angeles.
Speaker 2: There'll be some others, will add.
Speaker 6: That's their most immediate need right now is search and
Speaker 6: rescue efforts. They have a much of collapsed buildings and
Speaker 6: so they'll need a lot of help in terms of
Speaker 6: digging through that. The airport there is badly damaged, so
Speaker 6: we'll have to rely on the Department of War to
Speaker 6: deploy assets there. And then we're also helping them with
Speaker 6: some overhead imagery, especially in coastal areas where they don't
Speaker 6: have full visibility over what the damage has been and
Speaker 6: what the impact has been. Those are the acute, like
Speaker 6: short term needs over the next forty eight to seventy
Speaker 6: two hours, because in search and rescue, you're trying to
Speaker 6: get to people while you can still save their lives
Speaker 6: they're buried under rubble. And other countries are responding as well.
Speaker 6: The Kataris have already offered assistance as we spoke to
Speaker 6: them earlier today as well. El Salvador has stepped up,
Speaker 6: and multiple countries around the region, including Chile and others,
Speaker 6: have reached out to us to communicate and get that happening.
Speaker 6: As we move forward with that response, with the sort
Speaker 6: of the short term phase of response recovery, the second phase,
Speaker 6: of course, will be identifying their more longer term and
Speaker 6: acute needs. What are the things over the long term
Speaker 6: they're going to need help with. We'll have a better
Speaker 6: assessment that after the next forty eight hours when we're
Speaker 6: on the ground and as the Venezuelan authorities get more
Speaker 6: visibility as to the level of damage in terms of housing,
Speaker 6: where do you put all these people that don't have
Speaker 6: anywhere to go live, what we can do to help
Speaker 6: restore or help them restore their communications, their internet, their
Speaker 6: telecom and so forth.
Speaker 1: One of the things that defines the people of this
Speaker 1: great country, and there are so many things that define
Speaker 1: its greatness, is whether it's fellow Americans in need, whether
Speaker 1: it's a tsunami, you know, somewhere around the world somewhere,
Speaker 1: whether there's any other natural disaster, the ability of the
Speaker 1: American people, the generosity of the American people to rise
Speaker 1: to the occasion and provide the food and the water
Speaker 1: and the medicine and the supplies and the you know,
Speaker 1: the equipment that are needed to help people out in
Speaker 1: their worst moments is beyond inspiring. And I think there's
Speaker 1: no better, more generous country than ours. That's why it's
Speaker 1: hard to understand why some Democrats don't take right in
Speaker 1: their country.
Speaker 2: Anyway.
Speaker 1: Here to give us an update on it is Brian Stern.
Speaker 1: He's with Great Bill Rescued. He's the chairman and founder
Speaker 1: and he is staged and ready in the Caribbean to
Speaker 1: help in these missions following these catastrophic earthquakes, and he
Speaker 1: is bringing us an update today.
Speaker 2: Brian, Thanks for being on the ground.
Speaker 1: I think it's a pretty impressive record that you've helped
Speaker 1: say more than eighty seven hundred lives in your life.
Speaker 1: But clearly that's your calling and you're great at it.
Speaker 1: How did things stand now?
Speaker 7: Thanks for having us sean things are complicated. The video
Speaker 7: that you were just referencing where you see deo style
Speaker 7: of Cabo kind of adversarial with the search and rescue
Speaker 7: team from America.
Speaker 8: It's fascinating because he's literally.
Speaker 7: That same guy, Dio Stanta Caveo is on the same
Speaker 7: exact indictment as Nicholas Maduro and the remains of Rewards
Speaker 7: for Justice bounty on his head still to this very day.
Speaker 7: So I bringing it up. I bring it up just
Speaker 7: to showcase the complexity of this whole mess. The you know,
Speaker 7: Venezuela is a complicated place. It's always been a complicated place.
Speaker 7: The largest concentration of his bola outside of Lebanon is
Speaker 7: in Venezuela. And you're seeing, you know, American search and
Speaker 7: rescue teams co located with people who have literally part
Speaker 7: of the Rewards for Justice program.
Speaker 1: And all right, but but the report is is and
Speaker 1: this video to back this up that its surfaced appearing
Speaker 1: to show that the Interior Minister preventing members of a
Speaker 1: US rescue delegation from actually assisting the people in Venezuela.
Speaker 2: What's that all about?
Speaker 7: Well, this is this is the challenge, right, Uh, you know,
Speaker 7: back the Minister of Interior, dstad of Covello, is the
Speaker 7: guy in the video. He we have a warn out
Speaker 7: for his arrest as we speak. This is not a
Speaker 7: good guy. So it is not surprising that a bad
Speaker 7: guy is getting in the way of doing good things.
Speaker 7: That's what bad guys do. So, you know, the the
Speaker 7: people are suffering. The people have been suffering for quite
Speaker 7: some time.
Speaker 8: Just because there was.
Speaker 7: A big earthquake does not mean that the bad guys
Speaker 7: found Jesus. That's not what that means. Here on the ground,
Speaker 7: a lot of things have been frustrated. The relief efforts,
Speaker 7: humanitarian aid, search and rescue teams as you see in
Speaker 7: the video, all kinds of things.
Speaker 8: Permitting for aircraft, all kinds of things.
Speaker 7: Are frustrated by the current government of Venezuela. And when
Speaker 7: he you know, you know, Dalcia Rodriguez, the current president
Speaker 7: of Venezuela. Her stepfather is Ilius Ramirez, also known as
Speaker 7: Carlos the Jackal. That's her stepdad, the godfather of international terrorism.
Speaker 1: So well, if we have an indictment for this guy,
Speaker 1: why don't we just arrest him, get him out of
Speaker 1: the way, and then the relief efforts can continue.
Speaker 7: I the guy in the American in the video looked
Speaker 7: more like a law enforcement officer than a fireman. To me,
Speaker 7: I think he maybe should have, you know, done some
Speaker 7: hebeas gravice on on Dia style of Cabello and use
Speaker 7: that to pay for humanitarian aid and search and rescue
Speaker 7: teams to come in.
Speaker 8: I don't think it's the worst to be in the
Speaker 8: world either.
Speaker 1: Let me ask you this, are you able to get
Speaker 1: to the people in need? Because time is usually of
Speaker 1: the essence after an event like this.
Speaker 8: Right now we are absolutely in recovery phase.
Speaker 7: It hasn't been called yet, but the search and rescue part,
Speaker 7: the idea of finding people who are alive is now
Speaker 7: we're talking about divine intervention in miracles. If somebody is
Speaker 7: signed alive, it's at that level. Miracles do happen, of course,
Speaker 7: but it is it would be anomalist. It's a thousand
Speaker 7: degrees outside, it's very hot. Air purity is a problem.
Speaker 7: Air of oxygen availability in a collapse and can find
Speaker 7: space is at a premium.
Speaker 8: Plus injuries plus heat plus the rest, the likelihood of
Speaker 8: finding someone alive at this moment is very very very
Speaker 8: very very very low.
Speaker 7: Therefore, this is pivoting to recovery. This is pivoting to
Speaker 7: search and recovery, and so humanitarian aids. There's lots of
Speaker 7: people in Venezuela that we're already displaced because of conflicting
Speaker 7: all the rest. This earthquake did not make that situation
Speaker 7: any better.
Speaker 2: Brian, we appreciate all you're doing.
Speaker 1: Please update us if there's anything we can do to
Speaker 1: help you, or any message we can send on to
Speaker 1: the administration. Will be glad to help anywhere we can. Godspeed,
Speaker 1: Keep up the great work. And it's phenomenal what you're doing,
Speaker 1: and I have every belief that you know that relief
Speaker 1: will get there eventually. It's too bad that you have
Speaker 1: to fight through this, you know, insanity right now.
Speaker 7: The big thing we need Sean right now, Greble Rescue
Speaker 7: dot org. We need people to go to the website
Speaker 7: and donate. We're a five to' one c three at
Speaker 7: Helicopters and boats.
Speaker 8: Do not pay for themselves. Everything costs money out here,
Speaker 8: so we need people to listen and to please try and.
Speaker 7: Help people out. That's the best way people can help
Speaker 7: right now is give money to good organizations doing good work.
Speaker 1: Well, we'll put that up on my website Hannity dot com. Brian,
Speaker 1: appreciate you being with us, Thank you, sir. All right,
Speaker 1: quick break right back to our phones. Monday, eight hundred
Speaker 1: and nine four one, Shawn. Our number if you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program, right back to
Speaker 1: our busy phones. It's toll free this Monday, eight hundred
Speaker 1: nine four one, Shawn, Joe in my free state of Florida.
Speaker 2: Joe, how are you glad? You called? Doing great?
Speaker 9: How are you Sean?
Speaker 2: I'm good, sir. What's happening?
Speaker 9: I'm actually read up the road from you on Amelia Island,
Speaker 9: the only place in nice in South Florida.
Speaker 7: There.
Speaker 9: Hey, I want to talk to you a little bit
Speaker 9: about the Democratic Socialists in regards to are they this
Speaker 9: a little bit ahead of their time? Believe me, I
Speaker 9: don't agree with their ideology on a lot of the things.
Speaker 9: But with AI and US having to go to universal
Speaker 9: basic income, where as Ala Musk would like to say
Speaker 9: a high income, I'm looking at, you know, something like
Speaker 9: three point five million tolecom jobs as call center jobs
Speaker 9: alone being replaced by AI. Now, if we go to
Speaker 9: a basic income, universal basic income, that effect not only
Speaker 9: those individuals but also on income taxes. And how do
Speaker 9: we fund that? Do we end up going to a
Speaker 9: tariff type system or how do I mean there's a
Speaker 9: lot of different things that we're looking at and when
Speaker 9: the AI takes over in regards to the jobs, and
Speaker 9: I don't know if we're overly prepared for that.
Speaker 2: Joe. First of all, I would argue AI is not
Speaker 2: the future. AI is now.
Speaker 1: This very question that you're asking me. I had an
Speaker 1: opportunity to ask elon Musk. He thinks in the end,
Speaker 1: it's going to be net net, meaning yes, there will
Speaker 1: be some job displacement, but there will be many, many
Speaker 1: other jobs that are created. I am trying to encourage
Speaker 1: everyone that listens to this program and if you have,
Speaker 1: if you have children or grandchildren, you know, make sure
Speaker 1: that they are well versed in artificial intelligence and they
Speaker 1: get they develop the knowledge, the expertise and the skills
Speaker 1: that are necessary. Because it is the future. It's not
Speaker 1: like it's it is now. There's not a day that
Speaker 1: goes by. I don't use Grock, not a single day
Speaker 1: of my life, and I look everything up on Rock, everything,
Speaker 1: and you can get information at your fingertips. You can
Speaker 1: speak into it. And you know what's interesting, there are
Speaker 1: now schools that are developing, you know, entirely new curriculums,
Speaker 1: and what they're doing is they'll go through the basics, reading, writing, math,
Speaker 1: science for like two or three hours a day based
Speaker 1: on what a student's grade level happens to be at
Speaker 1: any given moment, and then they spend the rest of
Speaker 1: the day on computers learning AI, learning all aspects of AI,
Speaker 1: also finding their individual interest within it.
Speaker 2: And I'm telling you that's going to be the next.
Speaker 1: Generation of millionaires, billionaires and very wealthy people in this country.
Speaker 1: If people put their head in the sand. And I
Speaker 1: don't care how old you are, I've always been a
Speaker 1: big believer in lifelong learning. If you think that I
Speaker 1: don't need to learn it, you do. And not only
Speaker 1: are you going to learn it, you're gonna have fun
Speaker 1: doing it. There's a lot of fun stuff you can
Speaker 1: you can experiment with, you know, and I don't I
Speaker 1: personally like rock, but get whatever one you want.
Speaker 2: It doesn't really matter.
Speaker 1: But to understand the power of this tool and the
Speaker 1: impact it's having currently and we'll have in the future.
Speaker 2: It's critical for everybody to understand this, very very important.
Speaker 5: I agree.
Speaker 2: I agree, all right, Joe, appreciate it.
Speaker 7: Man.
Speaker 2: Lance is in New Jersey. What's up? Lance? How are
Speaker 2: you glad you called sir? Happy Monday.
Speaker 5: Happy Monday to you, and thank you very much for
Speaker 5: what you do and all the all the prayers and
Speaker 5: hopes of the people and the country of Venezuela. And
Speaker 5: I do hope our rescue effort gets there with a
Speaker 5: little bit more expediency, even though things are here towards
Speaker 5: the Middle East. I don't know if you remember about
Speaker 5: this is exactly about a year ago that AI had
Speaker 5: the some people that generated the picture of the Statue
Speaker 5: of Liberty a year ago with the Berco on it.
Speaker 5: And you know, I thought it was like comical or
Speaker 5: you know, for foreboding or foreshadowing what could possibly happen.
Speaker 5: And lo and behold, now you have the mayor and
Speaker 5: Mandami is a product of generation and a half of
Speaker 5: being planted and allowing to grow and evolve. And with
Speaker 5: also with like you said, the media pushing itself and
Speaker 5: pushing that ideology. I can't wait to see a makeup
Speaker 5: of how people have lost their ability to be jingoists
Speaker 5: or jingoism.
Speaker 1: I contend that if you want to work hard, and
Speaker 1: I mean really hard, and you are dedicated to whatever
Speaker 1: whatever profession you choose, I don't think you can fail
Speaker 1: in America unless you have some type of disability that
Speaker 1: would prevent you from achieving that goal.
Speaker 2: I don't think you can fail.
Speaker 1: One of the most interesting things about the World Cup
Speaker 1: to me, and I'm not a big soccer fan, is
Speaker 1: the reaction of people from around the world and how
Speaker 1: stunned they are at how great America is, because I
Speaker 1: think they have had a false perception of us, probably
Speaker 1: generated in part by government officials that are pushing and
Speaker 1: indoctrinating them into socialism.
Speaker 2: I've got to run. Appreciate the call