WEBVTT - 'Content Influences Everything': Kevin Mayer and Michael Kassan on Media's New Roadmap

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>M h. Welcome to Strictly Business, Varieties weekly podcast featuring

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>conversations with industry leaders about the business of media and entertainment.

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm Cynthia Littleton, co editor in chief of Variety. Today's

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Strictly Business Interview comes from the south By Southwest Conference

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in Austin, Texas on March fifteenth. I interviewed two major

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>players for a keynote session about the state of the

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>content business. Handle Media co CEO Kevin Mayer is a

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>former Disney executive who has been making waves in Hollywood

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:39.279
<v Speaker 1>as he has been out shopping with a big checkbook

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>for content assets. Media Link CEO Michael Casson is a

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>well known deal maker in the advertising business and a

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>marketing consultant to many Marquis names. His company was just

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>acquired by a United talent agency for a hundred and

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty five million dollars. The three of us had a

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>lively conversation in front of a packed house at the

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Austin Convention Center. We went deep on marketplace conditions, roth evaluations,

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>how TikTok will be monetized, when ads will come to Netflix,

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and where the new normal is headed in pay TV.

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>That's all coming up after the break. This is a

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:27.199
<v Speaker 1>really great opportunity with our two guests here, we have

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>people that just reflect all of the cross currents of

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>media right now. Kevin Mayer has had quite a tour

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>in the last twelve, twelve, sixteen months of media and

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.680
<v Speaker 1>all of its inflection points. Michael has made a career

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>out of being at the intersection of media, advertising, marketing, commerce,

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and that is that those are all of the things

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that are driving the business forward right now. So it's

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a great opportunity for us to talk about some you know,

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk about some specifics and also some big picture things.

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>So we'll talk well thought we would start by talking

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Mayer is in the midst with your partner Tom Stags,

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>who like you as a fellow Disney along longtime Disney executive.

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>You have joined forces into a company called Candle Media,

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and you have been the buzz of Hollywood because you've

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>been in town with a big checkbook talking to people

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>about buying content assets. You've been very deliberative and you

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and Tom have talked a little bit about the big

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>picture of what you're going after today, I'd like to

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>start by talking about sort of you've been at it

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:34.639
<v Speaker 1>now for probably going on about a year. Where does

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Candle Media stand in terms of your building a physical

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure around that business. Well, I think we're in pretty

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:45.799
<v Speaker 1>good shape. We actually started in earnest this summer, late

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.119
<v Speaker 1>summer when we bought Hello Sunshine. That was our first

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>purchase research. You might have heard something about that, Yeah,

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and UM and we partner with Blackstone and that that

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>was an ongoing UM search that I was the time

0:02:57.360 --> 0:02:58.919
<v Speaker 1>and I were on to see who's the right private

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>equity partner Blackstone being as one of the largest private

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>equity players and one of the companies that wants very

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>much to put some money in media right now, Well,

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>black Stone is It varies from time to time. I

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>think they're the biggest private equity firm in the world.

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>At this point, I have the biggest fund. We're part

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of a twenty six billion dollar fund, which is great.

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>They are a black Stone specifically was was a great

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>choice because they are very they're in thematic investors and

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the one of the themes they have a

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of conviction on is content growth in content spands.

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>So they're investing in private equity with Tom and myself

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and Candle Media they're investing in the real estates either

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:38.279
<v Speaker 1>they're buying studios UM they have private public equity operations

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and they're buying you know, they're making their choices among

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>public stocks in that space too. So they're high conviction

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and they've been a great partner. And we got we

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>got put into orbit really with the with the hell

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of Sunshine by and then not not long thereafter, we

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>purchased a company called Moonbug. And if you have anyone

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>out there has small kids, you'll either like me or

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>hate mate for having for Moonbug. They have cocoa melon

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>is their primary m asset and intellectual property, and they

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a blippy and they have a whole the whole bunch

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of kids I p that was born on YouTube and

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>then taken from YouTube and multi platforms into Netflix, into Amazon,

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the streaming services and also licensing and merchandizing,

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 1>and so we're pretty good shape. We do have a

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>vision for a modern UM sort of creator economy business

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>which has traditional film and television assets that are sold

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to streamers. UM. We have social media storytelling, as best

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>evidenced by Moonbug, which again starts on YouTube and then

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the stories propagate to other platforms. And then commerce. I

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>think there's a not my time at TikTok, I really

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>saw the ability for content and influencers to create audience

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 1>dynamics that are very, very conducive to making concluding commerce transactions.

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Has happened in China to a large degree, this social

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>social media commerce, and we think we have the assets

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to bring to bear to the same thing here in

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the US and parts West. So commerce can generate the

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of numbers that people in the content business are

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>accustomed to with, you know, big successful movies and big

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>successful TV shows. You see that that market is that big. Yeah,

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>it's very big. I mean, here's one example. Hella Sunshine

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>has a has a show called The Home Edit. The

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:24.919
<v Speaker 1>Home Edit for those of you haven't seen it, UM

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>is based on a company called the Home Edit. We

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>just bought. That's where I'm going. That UM that goes

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to people's homes and started office celebrities, but it goes

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to you know, anyone who hires them. They go in

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and they reorganize and edit your home, and they come

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>in with products too, so you can rearrange your garage

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and your closets and everything else. And they do a

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>great job, and they make the shows out of it,

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>an unscripted show. We bought the underlying company and that

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>is a big commerce place. So that's the and there's

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a big social media component around the Home Edit to

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>the founders of the Home Edit are very active in

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>social media. There's a huge amount of residents there. So

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>that's a great example of taking content and moving into

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>commerce and then social media storytelling. So and Mike, let

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>me ask you, Michael, you've known Kevin a long time.

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>You know he's embarking on this big adventure with again

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a nice bankroll. What what did you what? What was

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>your advice as he as he started out on this

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>journey in terms of what to look for and where

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the where the opportunities? Well? What what? What? I think

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Kevin said at the beginning identifying Blackstone as his partner

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:30.799
<v Speaker 1>because they had a focus, and Kevin had a focus.

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>We've been in conversation about the strategy well before they

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 1>implemented the first deal in the summer, and it was

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 1>about that and he was clear and Tom equally clear

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>on that focus. And I think you know hard to

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>give Kevin advice on many things that he doesn't give

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>me advice on, but I will tell the audience why

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>we played that song if you don't mind. As we

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:01.119
<v Speaker 1>were sitting in the green room, I looked at Kevin

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and I said, you know, you've got the brains, I've

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>got the looks. Let's go make lots of money. And

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I asked them to thank you for agreeing with me

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>on you know, I agree with them that there you go.

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>And we did do a quick calculation on the copyright

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>in the I p ip benefits and how much. But

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>but but truthfully, the advice I gave Kevin was advice

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>he was actually giving himself, which was be focused on

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>where they're going, what what What's interesting to me is

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>being on a stage with you. In One of the

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>earliest panel conversations I ever did was twenty two years

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>ago with Variety with Peter Bart, a name that is

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, well known by many in our industry. Great

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and this was in two thousand and The topic sentence

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of the of the panel was content meets commerce. So

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>we're not in a conversation Asian now that hasn't been

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>around for a long time. What I think we've found

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is that inflection point where content is influencing everything, but

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly commerce. As we're looking at it, and there's a

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>whole lot behind that. But just it's funny for me

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to be on a stage twenty two years later really

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about the seas, content, commerce, et cetera. UM, I mean,

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>we've moved a level beyond Watch Friends, like Rachel's Sweater

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and click now now Rachel's sweater is the show. I

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>actually asked her if she ever had a blue sweater.

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Answer was no, But everybody said, what how are you

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 1>going to buy that blue sweater? Let me ask you

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a little more specifically, Kevin, So, is the idea that

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the Candle Media is a will be a traditional kind

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of roll up where you will Candle Media will provide

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>some back end services, administration, you know, distribution, marketing. Is

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that the idea? Or are you just building a holding

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>company and you intend to house these imprints and have

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:10.319
<v Speaker 1>them run completely autonomously. It's actually neither. Um we're building.

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to replicate the sort of framework that we

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>had at Disney, where Disney is an integrated company. There's

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:19.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's no question about that. We bought UM

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>brands and franchises that plugged into that that company, and

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>they were the creative UM the creative folks and the

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>creative teams were allowed to run very autonomously. We bought Marvel.

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, Kevin Fay, he runs the Marvel studios. He

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:34.959
<v Speaker 1>decides about to make and he decides where the cinematic

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>universe is going. He does all that stuff. You would

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>never want to get in the way of that. But

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of distributing the films, monetizing them, deciding you know,

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to put them into streaming service, the windowing of all

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that um which which the characters are going to be

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>exploited for licensing, merchandizing opportunities. So all the monetization is

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>done at the Walt Disney company level, and we're that's

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:58.959
<v Speaker 1>the approach that we're taking here. Candle Media isn't fully

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>integrated operating company. It's not a holding company, nor is

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.319
<v Speaker 1>it a company that just provides back in services to

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>its component parts. Were fully operational working company UM, and

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>we're building that through acquisition, and then once we do

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>these acquisitions, there's gonna be a huge amount of organic

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>build that's going to come from that. So yeah, you know,

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>we're not pretending to be Disney or anything like that

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have that much humors. But we like

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that organizational philosophy that works so well at Disney, keeping

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the creative engines going and autonomous. Everything else is truly integrated.

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>And will you at at the Candle Media level or

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>at the Hello Sunshine level, will you be in the

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 1>business of financing your own content or do you intend

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to still partner with the major studios and platforms. Yeah,

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that's a good question. The one of the thesis that

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>with the thesis that we had one of them, the content,

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>commerce and community one, that big one we just talked about.

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>That's that's the main strategy behind the company. But if

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you look just at film and television, that component of it,

0:10:56.559 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 1>there is a real value for two. Independence at this

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.079
<v Speaker 1>point and the other the only thing that the independent

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>producers haven't had they haven't had enough scale, and they

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>haven't had access to capital. They've been capital starved and

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>they've been you know, um, just not big enough to

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>leverage the right deals with streamers. Now. On the on

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the other side, streamers have no option to go to

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the large studios anymore, by and large because those large

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 1>studios have their own streaming services at their feeding. I

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>helped our silo walls are getting builder. And that's what

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Bob iron I did my last five years of Disney

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>is that's we architected that that every single and it's

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the right strategy. I think every single piece of creative

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:35.839
<v Speaker 1>output that comes from any part of Disney, whether it

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:39.199
<v Speaker 1>be you know, something that's branded Disney, something Pixar, Marvel,

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Star Wars, that all goes in Disney. Plus if it's

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>come something out of the ABC Television studios, twenty one

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Century TV, those are basically targeted for Hulu. But everything

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>we may ultimately comes to one of our streaming services

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>permanently and exclusively. That means if you're Netflix, you can

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 1>no longer license Disney project. If you're Amazon, you can't

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 1>license Disney product. And I was running content sales in

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>order to eliminate them and get rid of content sales.

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>So independent independent producers are the last fashion of content

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that these that these streamers can go to outside of

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that they make themselves. So being independent is

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:16.199
<v Speaker 1>a very substantial benefit. Independent in the face of double

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.199
<v Speaker 1>digit growth in demand for the kind of content that

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>we make, and if you have capital and scale that

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:22.839
<v Speaker 1>when we're piecing these companies together, so you can go

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to market in a much more leveraged way, and we

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>have capital. Some projects will take all the way from

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>development through a finished product and go license that and

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>own it and to create a library like studios do.

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Some will do you know, EP type stuff, or where's

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the producer and we get paid to credit. Some will

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>be in between. But if you have scale and you

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>have capital, then you can start making those choices affirmatively

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>rather than just being at the whim of the buyer.

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 1>And do you think that if you have Riese Witherspoon

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 1>or all of the all of the heft that you

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>can bring to I P you can walk into Netflix

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>or Amazon or even Disney Plus and say no, I

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>don't want to cost plus deal, which means they give

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you the budget and they give you twenty on the

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 1>high end as the producer's fee, as opposed to the

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>old game, which was a little more like the casino

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 1>and the studio came in, had money in the game,

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and in success, everybody made a lot of money. Now,

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>in success, for the most part, producers know that your

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>upside is capside is capped at and that's a very

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>predictable game. But it's a different game. Do you think

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.319
<v Speaker 1>that Michael, I'm gonna let you stop, but I want

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to see what Kevin, as you're playing the middle of

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>building this right to give you an example, but that

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>seems to be the real. I mean, streamers want to

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>own other product and pay you and buy you out

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and and just pay you a premium. We as a

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>studio want to own the product and not more and

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>more of the product and not sell it out, and

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>so you continue to own the i P. One example

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of this Moonbug, not a hell of sometime, but a

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Moonbug example. We all the ipaid Moonbug, and Moonbug was

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>a two point seven billion valuation, something that I think

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>really which was a high valuation, but I think also

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>really opened people's eyes to the market for this kind

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of really like preschoosed on the value of the i P.

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't a high price. I wasn't not a high price.

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>It was just it wasn't thank you for saying, but

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it was a good price based on the value of

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:13.679
<v Speaker 1>the i P. People thought we were paid from Marball

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and all that stuff. We want, Tom and I know

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the value I paid. We're pretty good, We're pretty experienced

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of that. So I think we did pay a very

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>fair price. Frankly, um, But I guess time will time

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>will prove that. But here's a here's an example of

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>when you have the goods that streamers need or anyone needs,

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you have some leverage. So Cocoa Melon, that's the biggest

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I P that that Moon Bike has. It's the largest

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channel in the world, and they when they bought it,

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it was a sixty million subscribers, and that was almost

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred forty million subscribers. It's massive. And last year it

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>was the second most streamed television show on Netflix. Of

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>all shows, the only bigger one was Criminal Minds. It

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>was this much bigger. Coco Milon was almost the number

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>one show. And that Cocoa Melon show was YouTube episodes

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>strung together into episode into TV length episodes package in

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>ten episo. So sold to Netflix for a license fee,

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>non exclusively. We own it. Netflix does not own anything.

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.479
<v Speaker 1>They paid us a fee and they are benefiting tremendously

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>from it. It's a huge one for them, it's a

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>huge one for us. And it's still on YouTube with

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that huge audience, and we're getting a lot of advertising

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>revenue from YouTube. So if you have the goods and

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you have an finished product, you can get the deal

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that you want. We've already done it. Interesting, we're gonna say, Well,

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>what I was gonna say is two things. It's not

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the old days of the studio knocking on your door.

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>The producers don't have to go to the streamers. Now

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the streamers are coming to the producers. Because of Kevin's point,

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the studios are all going to have exclusive rights to

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>their product. So you do need the independence. So this

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>is a time when the independence have leverage that they

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have had traditionally. Number one, number two. You you

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>have to understand that. And I know we're going to

0:15:55.520 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>get into this, but this commerce part of this. I

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>look at the commerce part not only as the buying

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of the goods and services, but the advertising side of it,

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the monetization through advertising. We're watching that change right now.

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, as as Kevin developed Disney Plus, it was

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>clear at the beginning that there wasn't going to be

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>an a vote alternative at the beginning, but it was

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>clear if you looked at it, that there was going

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to be one ultimately. I mean, I'm throwing that question

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to him because where in the cycle was that decision

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>made to ultimately do it, and you know the the

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>other guy, uh starts with an end. I think when

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that avenue revenue per user number started to go in

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the right direction, and I saw that the AD product

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>was even more, even more incretive potential in your decision

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>process at the beginning, you must have known that that

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>was on the on the completely. I think Disney is

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>doing the right thing with that. It is if you

0:16:56.240 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>look at Hulu as an example. Hulu has an AD

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>free and an AD supported product, and that was part

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 1>of our Disney family of Directics Humor services, So I

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 1>know this pretty well. Um, the AD free was nine

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.360
<v Speaker 1>a month and the AD supported was seven nine a month.

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that was the numbers. There's a five dollar

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>difference and um, so maybe it's six, but that five

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars that you got for um AD free was actually

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>worse than the r P you got for AD supported

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>because there's an eight dollars of AD support for and

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe now it's nine. It's actually growing. You would know

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>this too, So you're three or four dollars better off

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>if that subscriber takes ads and if they take no ads.

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think that there's a massive demand for in

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, in stream over the top high quality advertising.

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.400
<v Speaker 1>That is just because there's a flight the linear television

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>is the exodus advertising from linear television is extreme, and

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 1>they're going they'd still like high quality UM video as context,

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 1>so they go over the top services like Pluto, like

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Hulu and now like Disney Plus. Michael, are your clients

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>freaking out that so much activity is going to subscriptions,

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 1>so much activity is happening, so all the buzzy shows

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 1>are happening, And you know absolutely, and you know the

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 1>the the challenge is, traditionally and historically we looked at

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 1>that inextricable link between the creation of and delivery of

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 1>content supported by marketing messages of some sort. That was

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.199
<v Speaker 1>the That was the value exchange that happened. You know.

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I always like to go back to where it started

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and people say, well, it used to be free for television,

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and I say, it never was free. The exchange you

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>made was I'm going to give you my time and

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.199
<v Speaker 1>my attention and look at those commercials and you're going

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to give me content. That break occurred and if you're

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, back to your question, Cynthia, are the clients

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the brands freaking out? Of course they are because they're

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out how do we play, how do

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>we get our message across? Is it going to be

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>back to just you know, the Coca cola can on

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>the table. I don't think so. I mean, sure there'll

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>be more of that, but they are at that point

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:07.719
<v Speaker 1>where they need to figure out They the brands need

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>to figure it out. And now with Disney making this announcement,

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>which I presumed was on the you know, on the

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>roadmap from the beginning. I heard and Spencer used to

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 1>work for Kevin back in the day at Disney. Spencer Newman,

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>who's the CFO Netflix, the other day said well, we're

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:31.640
<v Speaker 1>not religious. There was a softening at Netflix, the CFO.

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Netflix actually softened to the the Their response for ten

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 1>years has been absolutely the thought of advertising on Netflix.

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Five second pre roll in front of every Netflix video.

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>How many billions of dollars is there? It's it's it's there.

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>They don't have a choice. At some point, you're in

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>fact of a very smart variety. Senior media analysts. Gavin

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Bridge on this very stage said that Netflix, it'll be

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 1>It could be five years, it could be ten years,

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:01.199
<v Speaker 1>but Netflix will have years. Alright. I want to tell you,

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and I can't read into this more than I asked

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:04.439
<v Speaker 1>him to do it and he's going to do it.

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 1>But ted Sarandos is going to sit with me on

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 1>the stage at the can Lions this year and in

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the lions Den know it and into the lions Den

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 1>and someone said to me, how the hell did you

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.120
<v Speaker 1>get him, the guy who won't accept advertising, to sit

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 1>on a stage at a conference that celebrates advertising. I said, well,

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 1>he's got two hats because Netflix is a pretty big

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>advertiser in terms of what they spend on promoting their programming,

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:33.400
<v Speaker 1>so that is advertising. The incoming is the other. I'm

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>not suggesting that him doing that is anything other than

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>him doing something that I asked him to do. But truthfully,

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>it gives you an indication that that's softening and not

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>being religious. Will will will occur. That doesn't make it

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 1>easy for the advertisers because they still have to figure

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 1>it out. And that's part of what keeps us busy,

0:20:54.280 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, candidly is helping advertisers identify those opportunities. And

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:05.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the reasons that we reimagined media

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Link at the end of last year at u t

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:14.880
<v Speaker 1>A at United talent agency was the realization that being

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>closer to the creator economy for media Link was a

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>smart play because our brands and our clients are saying, wtf,

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, how do we get there? And we have

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to start creating more of our own content, which, by

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the way, is a part of where Candle Media has opportunity.

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>And Kevin and I have certainly talked about this. Um well,

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I've talked and Kevin's listened. He hasn't agreed yet. But

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>but truthfully, we've been doing this routine for twenty years,

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>so it's act going a little bit, a little bit.

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:49.919
<v Speaker 1>We've got we've got a get going. But but but truthfully,

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to get brands more active in the financing

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of that content is another mechanism and then it becomes

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by and just as just a um

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Michael's company. Media Link was sold in December to the

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>United Talent Agency, one of the Hollywood's largest talent agencies,

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>for a million dollars. And that is another deal that's

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:15.439
<v Speaker 1>a signpost of how all these things are converging in

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>ways that they did not. You know, new new alignments

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:22.360
<v Speaker 1>are being formed. Kevin was talking about the new sort

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of new world order Disney of all of the content

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 1>going to different streamers, and we've seen that at not

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 1>only Disney, we've seen it in a bas NBC Universal.

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>It's been inside of three years. The literally the profit centers,

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:38.679
<v Speaker 1>all of the business models have literally just been re engineered.

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>It is such a shift from literally decades of what

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we're looking in hindsight and recognizing, you know,

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>incredible profit margins, incredible momentum. But do you do you

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 1>feel like that the pay TV moment that built ESPN,

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that is that business? Is that going to be a

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>moment or are we going to see it more? Because

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we've seen a lot of these digital m

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.239
<v Speaker 1>v p d s and that that business seems to have.

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 1>The digital m v p d s to who lose

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:08.959
<v Speaker 1>the YouTube lives, they seem to have the same problems

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 1>as the traditional because there's the same product, there's delivered

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a different way. There's there they're called over the top,

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>they're just pay TV services. I mean, we when we

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>decided to launch a Hulu, we wanted to. We thought

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>there was an opportunity to do maybe do a little better,

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a little different on new devices, on connected TV, so

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the interface would be a more pleasant experience, which I

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 1>think it has been. Um, you could dynamically insert ads,

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 1>which would be great, But I will say it is

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>linear television, that the seven streaming channel is linear television

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 1>with how it was delivered on a satellite box, on

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a cable box, or on over the top on the Internet.

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 1>It is the same product, so it is experiencing the

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>same problems. We thought that it hopefully offset some of

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 1>the downward trajectory of subscribers. It really has not. I

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>think that paid that the pay TV subscriber universe is

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in free fall. Actually do you think like it doesn't settle.

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Here's what's kind of happen. My prediction is this soon

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the the only people well served by by pay TV

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>bundle or sports fans because that's where you find sports.

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Putting on your hat as chairman of the Zone, a

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>streaming service that is mostly focused in Europe and Asia,

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>but a player in the sports game, a big I think,

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big player in the sports game. If you're

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, you would know it well. And we have

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>boxing in the US and around the world. But this

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>is putting on my ESPN hat. You know, I've launched

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the ESPN Plus and as a Disney and so I

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 1>know kind of the thinking behind that, And my fear

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>is that the it will continue to decline and decline

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 1>and decline until basically you have sports fans, because it's

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>only only thing that really has to be delivered on

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a time basis is sports and news, and that's the

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>only thing. Other than that, all entertainment programming can be

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>delivered on a you know, on demand basis through streaming services.

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>There's no fundamental reason to have a linear channel experience

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>for for entertainment. In fact, people don't prefer it. There's

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>some spectacle lidents, you know, yeah, it's okay, you put

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the IS in there too, so you have the oscars

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>and you have some other live events. So the live

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:05.959
<v Speaker 1>programming is the only universe that has to be served

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>live almost by definition. So what happens then is can

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 1>continue to decline until there's just basically mostly sports fans.

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>And still let are a lot of sports fans in

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the US and around the world, but that's the value proposition.

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>In the US and pay television, you think something maybe

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>fifty even, but then you have to look if you're ESPN,

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>if you're the other providers of sports. Are you better

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 1>off wholesaling into this audience that is purely sports fans,

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:35.439
<v Speaker 1>or are you better off retailing to that audience the

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>same same calculus who went through a Disney to launch

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Disney Plus all be better off wholesaling our content Netflix

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 1>and the other streamers or being a streamer. So ESPN

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and other providers will have to go through that same calculus. Okay,

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>pay TV is small enough now that wow, why should

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 1>be be a wholesaler? Shouldn't it be a retailer can

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>make more money? And that's when you'll see ESPN and

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>others pull themselves out of the bundle, go direct to

0:25:57.359 --> 0:25:59.479
<v Speaker 1>consumers and then there is no more bundle there pay

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>TVs O And that's that's the trajectory that is. You

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:03.959
<v Speaker 1>need quite a stomach to be able to do that,

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>because you have to make that decision to cut that

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:12.639
<v Speaker 1>income stream off to make the bet. So those are

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, those are rooms you want to kind of

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>understand the dynamic of the decision to say we're not

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>going to take these billions of dollars over here because

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>we're making the bet over here, and generally speaking, in

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>corporate America at least. Those decisions are tough because the

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>short term versus the long term decision is really tough

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>to make. There's a certain tone of voice in this

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 1>and they always in the earnings calls, they always make

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the CFO deliver the news appropriately. But there's a certain

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>tone of voice that the CFO gets when they're starting,

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>when they're going to announce, okay, and in this quarter,

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 1>we're going to take this level of a hit. I mean,

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the things have been so upside down that for a

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:51.239
<v Speaker 1>while there last year the companies were announcing how much

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:53.400
<v Speaker 1>they were going to lose and the stock, the stock

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't go out. It's been do you get a sense

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 1>from you both in the market that there's been a

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>leveling off? Certainly we saw that in the Q four

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>earning cycle, there was a leveling off of Wall streets enthusiasm.

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Don't go anywhere. We'll be right back with more insights

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>from Kevin Mayer and Michael Casson after this break. Thanks

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>for helping us pay the bills. Now we're back with

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>more from the South By Southwest conference. What I was

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:21.360
<v Speaker 1>going to say about the calendar, you know, we certainly

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>all understand was a tough year for of the people

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in the world, companies and and and civilians alike. One

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>was a banner year for everybody that you can find economically.

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think the prognosis that is going to continue

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that momentum is absolutely correct the question for most and

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I look at it through the lens of marketing and advertising,

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 1>but the but the you know, that point of twenty

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>three is going to be okay, Now we're in a

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>real world. We've had this momentum, the build up from

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:59.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty all the left, all the pent up savings, all

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of that rising tide. You know, everybody's floating above the surface.

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Now what happens in twenty three, I think is going

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to really be the question from a macroeconomic perspective as

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to will that momentum continue save geopolitical you know conversations

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 1>which hard to save right now because we're right in

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:19.919
<v Speaker 1>the midst of it. But as we become it is

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>truly as we become more globally, as the business becomes

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 1>more globally connected, it's like they say, you know, a

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>butterfly flaps its wings in one country and creates as

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 1>that's that's only going to increase in the world of

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>global and you know, if you look at it through

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the lens of talent um. You know, I used to

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>get around and say, if you had a show in

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>on linear television that hit a hundred episodes, you guys

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 1>know this, well, that was the magic number for syndication

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>in the old days. And the joke used to be,

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>if you had a hundred episodes, geographically in Los Angeles,

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you could afford a house north of Sunset and and

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that would be you know, a hundred episodes entitled you

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to a house in a good neighborhood. You know that

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't exist anymore. Maybe a hundred episodes will exist, but

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the ancillary rights in the ancillary economics, So this is

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>turning a different model upside down, which is talent. Just

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:14.239
<v Speaker 1>from that perspective and now being inside the halls at

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:16.960
<v Speaker 1>U t A, I see, you know, even the impact

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>on talent that's happening because to your point, there's a

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a ceiling now and where you know, we're Kevin

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and you all are investing. I mean, I know there

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>were some snickers about Hello Sunshine being valued at nine

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>on the on the surface within the industry that felt

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>like wow, what is there? Because they don't have a

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>big library. They don't have they have incredible promise and

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>they're clearly very industrious, incredibly impressed by CEO Sarah Harden.

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>She is really an impressive person. Um. But clearly you

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>are betting on what we talked about, the social commerce

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and the ability of Reese and the footprint of her

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and like minded creators to bring audiences to them in

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that direct to consumer way. Is it really? This? Is

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it so? Should that drives all of that social is

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a big is a kind of at the center of everything,

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I think, um, And yes, I think we are counting

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>on the fact that we can, you know, drive a

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of traffic and fandom around her social media presence.

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>She has a book club, she has a lot of

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the intellectual property that she made that

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Reese makes into you know, filmed entertainment, whether the series

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>or movies, comes from that, you know, access to incredible

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 1>thinking from these her book authors, in her in her universe,

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 1>so that there's some advantage to access to ideas from

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that perspective. And I just do think that we are

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>going to build a library. We didn't buy a library,

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>but we're building one, um, because we're going to achieve

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 1>ownership and shows that we really care about achieving ownership.

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>And so we're gonna have a very a very full

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>spectrum model, if you will, from producer fees, which is great.

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, make a lot of money doing that to

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>full ownership and it's gonna end library and then between

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>him partial ownership, a lot of co co productions and

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. We've already done some hellas Sunshine. So

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that's another model. I don't own the whole thing, but

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>now we have a capital that allows us to make

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>take those bets, and we're gonna make those bets and

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 1>adds risk to the equation, but it also adds upside.

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 1>And as for a high price, I think, um, when

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>we talked about Moonbug being I think a pretty low price,

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>people snicker. I mean, honestly, if you go back to

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>our days when we bought Pixar and the bays about Marvel,

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 1>we were roundly criticized for overpaying dramatically Marvel especially. I

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 1>remember people thinking what that's worth? You name it sixty

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars and it was a good bet. Now, not every

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 1>bet turns out great. I'm not saying that every bet

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I make is always great, but I will say if

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you we were very um disciplined and careful, and we

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>have a roadmap that gets us to a value well

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in advance of above what we paid. So we'll see.

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the proof is in the pudding, but I

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 1>think we'll come out looking pretty good on that one.

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>It is I mean, if you step back and look

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>at the business as it is now, I mean, it

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is kind of fascinating the talent of the scale of reefs.

0:31:56.640 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 1>And you know something that they have this lever, these

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>levers that they can push that they never did. I imagine, Michael,

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>now with your deeper connection with U t A. As

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:09.719
<v Speaker 1>we talked about, opportunity is the theme of this this discussion.

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>The opportunity for people to move literally move people to

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the markets that they want to establish is pretty incredible.

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 1>With social well, the commerce piece of this is the

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>thing that gets really sexy because talent today understands that

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>their association with brands is more than just being a spokesperson. Yeah,

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not that and and and not everybody can

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 1>influence it, but we certainly have enough examples of people

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 1>like Ryan Reynolds, or people like Kim Kardashian, or people

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you know down the line Paris Hilton, who we were

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 1>just at a conference with and she stood up and

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 1>she was introduced as one of the you know, o

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>g of of that world, and she really is. You

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 1>know when you look at that and you say, the

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>association of brands, of celebrity and brands is no different

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 1>than product placement on steroids. Right. The idea of product

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 1>placement was to borrow celebrity. If you're holding an Apple

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>computer or working on an Apple computer in a movie,

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to be cool because you've got an Apple computer.

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 1>So you're using the celebrity of the brand along with

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the celebrity of the of the talent, if you will.

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing that commerce and celebrity come together in a

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 1>very meaningful way, and it's working. I mean, we've got

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a couple of you know, newly hatched billionaires, and Rihanna

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and Kim Kardashian and and and you know down the

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>list of people who are cashing in, but not in

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a negative way. There's never anything negative about cashing in legitimately,

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 1>but we're seeing that that cash register ring loud and clear.

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>So talent is really getting moving up the food change.

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 1>And I would imagine that there's also, like, you know,

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 1>just as just as talent, well, you don't want to

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>be in you know, you don't want to be in

0:33:56.840 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>too many movies in one year. There's a certain that

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you've got to have some boundaries, Like you know, you

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>don't want to put your name on everything. You want

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to make sure Like I would imagine that there's a

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 1>whole new discipline for talent management in how do you

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 1>determine opportunities and how do you know what's what's right

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:14.760
<v Speaker 1>with you? I would imagine that those conversations, we actually

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 1>do it scientifically. And one of the great things that

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I inherited with Media Link at U T A was

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 1>something called U T i i Q, and U T

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 1>A i Q really develops the basis for those kinds

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 1>of decisions. So it's not just random. When somebody sits

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:35.920
<v Speaker 1>down and negotiates Kevin Hart's next movie, you can actually

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>show up with data that indicates why Kevin Hart should

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 1>earn X amount of dollars for this movie. And by

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the way, you can apply that same thing to brands

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 1>in a traditional sense. And it comes back to what

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>at least at the intersection that Media Link lives out

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 1>which I've said and you said a bit ago, marketing, media, advertising,

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:59.399
<v Speaker 1>entertainment and technology. At that intersection, data is driving all

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the right to say, visioning. So data should be driving

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the same kind of decision NG that you make around content,

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 1>around the endorsement opportunities, the product opportunities. You use the

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 1>same data that brands have used forever. Well, Tommy talking

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 1>about talking about vehicles right now there is nothing. Let's

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about your TikTok and sort of

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 1>where it stands right now. UM. I saw you quoted,

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 1>i think last year saying that that TikTok you had

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 1>a brief association with them as CEO in UM. I

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:37.239
<v Speaker 1>know it was it was a combination of geopolitical situation

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that was happening at that time with the Trump administration,

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 1>but it was a short tenure for you about three months. Um.

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 1>But in the big picture about about TikTok, you've said

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that that that their algorithm, that their recommendation, their ability

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to put content in front of people, that they actually

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>do want to see the success of the algorithm. Have

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you now, now that you're on the entrepreneurial side, do

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you see a way to turn that into a growth

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 1>driver a profit generator for candle media related businesses. Well,

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, TikTok is one of several social

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:11.799
<v Speaker 1>media platforms, and I think that's really social entertainment if

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you think look at TikTok specifically, that really is about

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:17.239
<v Speaker 1>capturing people's time and attention that otherwise would probably be

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 1>spent watching a Netflix or something, because it's truly immersive

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 1>video and it's not a lot of communication that happens

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok. It is mostly you know, people create and

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>then you get your feed and you're passively watching a

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of stuff that is super interesting to you.

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Because the AI technology that that byte Dance has is

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:38.719
<v Speaker 1>second to none. It's incredible. Um and and so being

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in the social media space generally speaking with TikTok, with Instagram,

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>with YouTube, I think that's where opportunities are are going

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to lie. And I do think that you can attack

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:51.239
<v Speaker 1>it from a bunch of different angles. Again, you know,

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>getting back to Moonbug that was ip born on YouTube.

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 1>Mom and pop creates, it creates something that's fun, it

0:36:57.320 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 1>explodes virally, we buy it, I mean animal platform and

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>make a lot more to monetize a lot better than

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 1>they ever could. So it's a win win. They get

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:06.799
<v Speaker 1>they get bought out, We own it, and then we

0:37:06.840 --> 0:37:08.919
<v Speaker 1>can monetize it. And I think there's it goes both

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 1>ways though, a lot of stuff that we make can

0:37:11.080 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 1>actually end up storytelling on on social media, and I

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to be pursuing some social media storytelling

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:21.879
<v Speaker 1>assets that hopefully will being out soon that are gonna

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:24.920
<v Speaker 1>be fun um. But I do think you monetize that

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 1>and just purely through advertising on social Yeah, well, I

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 1>think when we're on social we're gonna monetize it a

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:32.959
<v Speaker 1>few ways. You can do third party advertising, for sure.

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:35.839
<v Speaker 1>You can. You can be a U, a marketer for

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 1>the right brand, have grandchildren. Thank god, there's some opportunity

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you can do that. You can create your own brands

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're if you're a celebrity with enough resonance with

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 1>with your followers, and you can authentically. The thing about

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>social media, the connection has to be utterly authentic. If

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you try, If you sell yourself and you and you

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 1>um create messages that clearly don't fit what your followers

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>expect to you know, to to present to them, you

0:38:02.600 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 1>have a real problem. You can't just force marketing. You

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:08.240
<v Speaker 1>can't fake your life to actually use it. Paris Holton

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>uses certain products so you can authentically talk about it

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and boom. Then then it works the other thing again,

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:15.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're big enough, you can create your own brands,

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's what Rihanna has done, and that's what the

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Kardashians have done. Um Paris Hulton has done that. That's

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:23.839
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the very top of the food chain.

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 1>But it is a way for celebrities since they're capped

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:28.319
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and what they can make now on

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:30.839
<v Speaker 1>film and television, it's a way for them to very

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>much capitalize on their on the degree of which people

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 1>hang on their every word on social media, some of

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 1>these people have hundred plus million followers. It's right report

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 1>last week that the Kardashian family collectively has more social

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:51.880
<v Speaker 1>media followers than Netflix has global subscribers and fix up

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to about the last time. It's quite extraordinary. And at

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the core of it, Kevin just said it, but I'll

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:04.239
<v Speaker 1>put a word on it is authenticity, because if you're

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:07.400
<v Speaker 1>not authentic in this environment, you're dead. It's not actually

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>your kitchen. Things that drive marketing today in an interesting way,

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:16.880
<v Speaker 1>One is purpose and it's not just tick the box purpose.

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:20.799
<v Speaker 1>You have to demonstrate it and authenticity because if the

0:39:20.840 --> 0:39:24.840
<v Speaker 1>brand doesn't, whether that's a celebrity or a consumer package

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 1>goods product, if if if it's not authentic, the bullshit

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 1>detectors out there are too high right now. People just

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 1>know can't work. So individual celebrities obviously you can gather.

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:39.840
<v Speaker 1>But what do you see other sort of sectors that

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:43.439
<v Speaker 1>are right for kind of DTC type disruption, like sports leagues.

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I've been hearing a lot of chatter that regional sports networks,

0:39:46.960 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 1>cable channels that are devoted to showing regional games of

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 1>local teams, that those are you know that that those

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>are very much likely to go to go into a

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:02.440
<v Speaker 1>DTC for this of the reasons, and that the hardcore

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:04.439
<v Speaker 1>fans that want to pay that four dollars a month,

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 1>here's their opportunity. I think very much. Look anything that

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you can be talking about time and entertainment here and

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:12.799
<v Speaker 1>you know we can all sorts of package goods are

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 1>directed consumer and others. Thousands of new director consumer brands,

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I will say that are out there. But with respect

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:20.759
<v Speaker 1>to what to our ecosystem, if it can be on

0:40:20.800 --> 0:40:23.359
<v Speaker 1>a TV screen, it can be delivered over the top.

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing, There is no and I can have a

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:29.280
<v Speaker 1>direct consumer business model. There's nothing that prevents that. Everything

0:40:29.320 --> 0:40:31.439
<v Speaker 1>is digital, of course, and has been for quite some time,

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's just a matter of which protocol you use

0:40:33.760 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to get it from the you know. The origination point

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:38.239
<v Speaker 1>to the viewing point is that i P is an

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Internet protocol? Is it some you know the technology that

0:40:41.239 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you know q am that that that that satellite and

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:48.959
<v Speaker 1>cable companies use. It doesn't matter, but it does matter

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is the business model. And I think that people are

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:53.880
<v Speaker 1>getting used to paying for what they want and not

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:56.359
<v Speaker 1>paying for what they don't want more and more and more,

0:40:56.520 --> 0:41:00.279
<v Speaker 1>and I think that is driving the unbundling of of

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the cable net of the cable system. It is driving

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 1>people to buy more. Precisely, regional sports networks have been

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a rip off for a long time because they're very

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 1>high priced and there then they get package with their

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 1>local cable companies. And if you buy a big local

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 1>cable package and then separately on top of that by

0:41:16.800 --> 0:41:21.319
<v Speaker 1>a local sports it's just not fair. It's not fair

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:23.799
<v Speaker 1>to those their cross subsidizing a lot of people that

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 1>aren't really sports fans and I can't go on forever,

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 1>especially at those prices. And if you think about the

0:41:29.239 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 1>impact on marketing for direct to consumer. We we coined

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:35.239
<v Speaker 1>a phrase at media Link a couple of years ago,

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and what we looked at was the traditional brand marketing

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking and what we would always call performance marketing or

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 1>what you might have known originally as direct marketing, but

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:51.960
<v Speaker 1>performance marketing. And the artificial distinction between brand marketing and

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:55.640
<v Speaker 1>performance marketing was the performance marketing go back to data,

0:41:56.080 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>required more data, and there was a return loop because

0:41:59.600 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you could see what was happening, and it was a

0:42:02.600 --> 0:42:05.920
<v Speaker 1>call to action. And I really coined it coming out

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of work with American Express, where the chief marketing officer

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:14.320
<v Speaker 1>at American Express, Elizabeth Ruttledge, challenged us to bring together

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 1>her brand marketers don't leave home without it and her

0:42:18.040 --> 0:42:20.560
<v Speaker 1>performance marketers, which is to make sure not only should

0:42:20.600 --> 0:42:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you have the card in your pocket, but you should

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 1>be using it because if you don't use it, they

0:42:24.160 --> 0:42:27.920
<v Speaker 1>don't make any money. And so that idea came together

0:42:27.960 --> 0:42:29.879
<v Speaker 1>and the light bulb went off for me and I said,

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:33.240
<v Speaker 1>so what you're really talking about is brand foremance marketing.

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:36.560
<v Speaker 1>You want to have the same data infused into your

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:39.720
<v Speaker 1>traditional brand marketing that you do in your performance marketing.

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 1>That's where I came up with the word, but where

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I really saw it play out was with Disney Plus

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and others, the other streamers. We were tasked with helping

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the marketing mentality at Disney Plus. And this is something

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:57.759
<v Speaker 1>Kevin and I worked on together because traditionally the Walt

0:42:57.760 --> 0:43:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Disney Company would market to put AUSS and seats on Friday, Saturday,

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and Sunday when they opened movies, and all of a sudden,

0:43:04.360 --> 0:43:07.239
<v Speaker 1>they had to be thinking and subscriber acquisition mode with

0:43:07.320 --> 0:43:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Disney Plus, and you want to avoid churn and all

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:11.759
<v Speaker 1>the things you needed to do. And it took an

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:14.839
<v Speaker 1>entirely different marketing muscle, and we had to not only

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 1>retrain the internal team, but we had to find the

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:21.840
<v Speaker 1>right agency partners that could that could understand that. And

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I still and I still, I think it's pretty clear

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that like I don't think any other company, only Disney

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:30.600
<v Speaker 1>with that goodwill and built in you know, Warner Brothers,

0:43:30.640 --> 0:43:33.360
<v Speaker 1>as established as it is, people don't have that feeling

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:36.279
<v Speaker 1>for that brand that they do that that the we

0:43:36.280 --> 0:43:40.040
<v Speaker 1>were tracking that the awareness of Disney Plus was shockingly.

0:43:40.600 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 1>It spread so fast that the hardcore consumer was was

0:43:44.280 --> 0:43:47.440
<v Speaker 1>aware that Disney Plus was coming. One thing we did

0:43:47.760 --> 0:43:50.360
<v Speaker 1>in an incredible way, We set out a target. Let

0:43:50.400 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 1>me did this together of coverage of people in a

0:43:54.560 --> 0:43:58.520
<v Speaker 1>monthly basis getting at least three exposures to Disney Plus

0:43:58.600 --> 0:44:03.239
<v Speaker 1>advertising at the top three. That means the average getting

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 1>something like fifty. That's just the way the math works.

0:44:05.719 --> 0:44:10.960
<v Speaker 1>We carpet bombed this country with UM Disney Plus advertising

0:44:11.120 --> 0:44:13.319
<v Speaker 1>and it worked really really well, and we got ten

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:15.360
<v Speaker 1>million stubs in the first day. Now we have built

0:44:15.360 --> 0:44:16.840
<v Speaker 1>in a brand equity, as you said, because it was

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Disney that helps for sure. I'm not Hoizon, you know.

0:44:21.120 --> 0:44:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Hans Vestberg and I did a really good deal UM

0:44:24.000 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 1>with Verizon, which broy the way, worked out really really

0:44:26.680 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 1>well better than people think. It was a four month

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:32.239
<v Speaker 1>deal both for both of us, and a lot of

0:44:32.239 --> 0:44:34.440
<v Speaker 1>those people that were getting Disney Plus for free for

0:44:34.440 --> 0:44:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a year actually did convert over to be Disney Plus debscriber.

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 1>So I was a big, big win. You're right. But

0:44:39.040 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 1>then we took that learning that we created, We created

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:44.560
<v Speaker 1>what I called to my troops a consumer frenzy. There

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 1>was a frenzy around Disney Plus, and we took that

0:44:46.840 --> 0:44:50.960
<v Speaker 1>same exact philosophy and did the same thing in Europe

0:44:51.080 --> 0:44:53.799
<v Speaker 1>before I left Europe and India. We took that same

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 1>consumer frenzy and our team executed it really well during

0:44:56.200 --> 0:44:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic. But it's all about extreme reach and frequency

0:45:00.000 --> 0:45:03.839
<v Speaker 1>of our advertising message beyond which Disney normally do. It

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:09.320
<v Speaker 1>was good Disney Plus launched November, I mean, three months

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:11.759
<v Speaker 1>before a pandemic or plus or minus, you know, three

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:16.759
<v Speaker 1>or four months, and and the story has been obviously extraordinary.

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:19.799
<v Speaker 1>But you think of the timing of it and I

0:45:19.840 --> 0:45:21.759
<v Speaker 1>think back, it's kind of special to be on this

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 1>stage because I was supposed to be on this stage

0:45:24.600 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 1>in on you know, I think literally two years ago

0:45:29.160 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 1>today and here we are, which, by the way, I

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 1>just want to give a shout out to the south

0:45:34.560 --> 0:45:38.719
<v Speaker 1>By Southwest teams because there is that special moment of

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:41.719
<v Speaker 1>being back together and being in person, and I r

0:45:41.880 --> 0:45:45.440
<v Speaker 1>L has has attraction has been so nice and Austin

0:45:45.440 --> 0:45:48.279
<v Speaker 1>couldn't be a more welcoming, just fun place to be.

0:45:48.440 --> 0:45:51.080
<v Speaker 1>It's really it's been nice. Yeah, thank you. I appreciate

0:45:51.080 --> 0:45:53.360
<v Speaker 1>you mentioning the south By Southwest people. They have worked

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:56.120
<v Speaker 1>hard and put on a very good event in in

0:45:56.239 --> 0:46:03.960
<v Speaker 1>tough circumstances working up. We're gonna open it up to

0:46:04.080 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 1>questions in our last few minutes here, but I wanted

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to ask Michael um part of media links business is

0:46:08.600 --> 0:46:10.360
<v Speaker 1>not as not as well known as the as the

0:46:10.600 --> 0:46:13.799
<v Speaker 1>as the marketing and the consultancy is that you do

0:46:13.880 --> 0:46:16.560
<v Speaker 1>some head hunting. That you do do executive search, high

0:46:16.600 --> 0:46:19.480
<v Speaker 1>level executive search for media firms. What I know, I

0:46:19.520 --> 0:46:22.399
<v Speaker 1>know you can't talk dish specifics, but can you talk

0:46:22.440 --> 0:46:25.440
<v Speaker 1>about some of the like what what are the what

0:46:25.520 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 1>are the jobs of the future, what are what are

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the skills that people are looking for? And what kind

0:46:30.560 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of placements are people looking for? The Yeah, obviously I

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:38.319
<v Speaker 1>can't be specific, but I can be generic. The Great

0:46:38.360 --> 0:46:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Resignation is real. The Great Resignation has really created a

0:46:42.440 --> 0:46:48.799
<v Speaker 1>circumstance where talent is impossible to find right now across industries.

0:46:49.200 --> 0:46:52.279
<v Speaker 1>But what we're really understanding is, and I'll take this

0:46:52.360 --> 0:46:56.600
<v Speaker 1>from a TV show, there was a period in the marketing, advertising,

0:46:56.680 --> 0:47:01.920
<v Speaker 1>media business that m mad men were the people you

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:06.800
<v Speaker 1>were looking for, and today it's math men, but math people. Today,

0:47:06.800 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for people who can actually understand the data, data, analysis,

0:47:10.600 --> 0:47:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and analysis, not just it's not just about the creative,

0:47:15.120 --> 0:47:19.680
<v Speaker 1>it's about understanding the type of creative. And look, our industries,

0:47:19.680 --> 0:47:24.760
<v Speaker 1>respectively pivot on five words right now. And it's funny

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that I just kind of landed on this and realized

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:30.759
<v Speaker 1>all the words started with the letter T. And those

0:47:30.800 --> 0:47:37.960
<v Speaker 1>words are trust, transparency, technology, transformation, and finally, to your question, talent.

0:47:38.520 --> 0:47:41.480
<v Speaker 1>And coincidentally, they all start with the letter T. And

0:47:41.520 --> 0:47:45.440
<v Speaker 1>in every aspect of our industries where we come together

0:47:45.520 --> 0:47:50.320
<v Speaker 1>again at that intersection of marketing, media, advertising, entertainment, and technology.

0:47:50.360 --> 0:47:53.359
<v Speaker 1>If you find me a conversation that doesn't pivot on

0:47:53.360 --> 0:47:57.600
<v Speaker 1>one of those five words, I would be surprised, because

0:47:57.640 --> 0:48:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that's really to your question, talent is at the core,

0:48:01.480 --> 0:48:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's really hard to find right now. The talent

0:48:05.160 --> 0:48:09.920
<v Speaker 1>representation business is undergoing so much change as expected. You know,

0:48:10.000 --> 0:48:12.200
<v Speaker 1>bear in mind now the media links at U T A.

0:48:12.320 --> 0:48:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I have to use talent with a small T and

0:48:14.400 --> 0:48:17.200
<v Speaker 1>talent with a large T. U T A is in

0:48:17.239 --> 0:48:20.279
<v Speaker 1>the business of representing talent. We're in the business of

0:48:20.320 --> 0:48:25.279
<v Speaker 1>identifying talent through right head hunting, you know, practice, it's

0:48:25.320 --> 0:48:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a little different. So we do have to use a

0:48:27.080 --> 0:48:31.560
<v Speaker 1>capital to this multi occasion um hogging the questions again? Okay,

0:48:31.840 --> 0:48:34.320
<v Speaker 1>how about this is a good one. The lines between

0:48:34.360 --> 0:48:38.480
<v Speaker 1>brand funded content and advertising continue to blur. What potential

0:48:38.560 --> 0:48:41.120
<v Speaker 1>does candle mediacy in this space? I would, I would venture,

0:48:41.120 --> 0:48:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess a whole lot would I would agree that

0:48:43.280 --> 0:48:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is it's a question that answers itself almost I think, um,

0:48:46.719 --> 0:48:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's right. And by the way, lines are blurring

0:48:48.640 --> 0:48:52.040
<v Speaker 1>all over the place between content and advertising, between performance

0:48:52.040 --> 0:48:54.520
<v Speaker 1>advertising and brand advertising, I would almost say there is

0:48:54.560 --> 0:48:58.719
<v Speaker 1>no difference here brandformance thing or every all advertisers performance

0:48:58.800 --> 0:49:01.359
<v Speaker 1>and one subset of performing this brand. Another subset might

0:49:01.400 --> 0:49:04.800
<v Speaker 1>be product placement. Another subset might be true performance digital

0:49:04.920 --> 0:49:09.160
<v Speaker 1>digital call to action advertising. So I think, um, we're

0:49:09.239 --> 0:49:11.600
<v Speaker 1>very focused on that. We think that having having an

0:49:11.640 --> 0:49:14.719
<v Speaker 1>audience and having a connected audience where you can actually

0:49:14.760 --> 0:49:16.600
<v Speaker 1>speak and have a two way conversation with your audience

0:49:16.800 --> 0:49:19.319
<v Speaker 1>opens up these types of opportunities for modernization that just

0:49:19.360 --> 0:49:21.959
<v Speaker 1>weren't there ten years ago. Do you think that we're

0:49:21.960 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously the time in media entertainment, there's a lot of

0:49:24.080 --> 0:49:26.880
<v Speaker 1>consolidation to your point of the need for a strong

0:49:26.920 --> 0:49:31.560
<v Speaker 1>independent idea factory more than ever. But do you think

0:49:31.560 --> 0:49:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that that that consolidation, that is there a danger of

0:49:34.960 --> 0:49:38.279
<v Speaker 1>the industry literally getting into you know, three or four

0:49:38.480 --> 0:49:42.920
<v Speaker 1>gigantic conglomerates that control everything. I think a lot will

0:49:42.920 --> 0:49:45.840
<v Speaker 1>be determined by what the Justice Department does with Amazon

0:49:45.880 --> 0:49:47.799
<v Speaker 1>and MGM right now. That's going to have a lot

0:49:47.840 --> 0:49:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to do with where this plays out. If the Justice

0:49:51.920 --> 0:49:54.959
<v Speaker 1>Department stops that deal, which I don't think they will,

0:49:55.120 --> 0:49:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that deal will go through. I think it's

0:49:56.719 --> 0:49:58.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot of noise, but the deal should go through.

0:49:59.200 --> 0:50:01.200
<v Speaker 1>There's no base is for it not to go through.

0:50:01.400 --> 0:50:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll put on my lawyer's heat. I don't wear it

0:50:04.080 --> 0:50:07.680
<v Speaker 1>very often, but I have it. Um. I think that

0:50:07.719 --> 0:50:10.359
<v Speaker 1>deal goes through, and if it does, I think that

0:50:10.480 --> 0:50:13.799
<v Speaker 1>bodes I don't know if you'd say this is bodes well,

0:50:13.880 --> 0:50:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it doesn't, but it bodes well for others in

0:50:17.000 --> 0:50:19.879
<v Speaker 1>the tech space to be making acquisition in the pure

0:50:19.920 --> 0:50:22.439
<v Speaker 1>content space. Do I think you end up with three

0:50:22.440 --> 0:50:26.239
<v Speaker 1>big players? No? Do I think you end up with consolidation. Yes,

0:50:26.480 --> 0:50:28.360
<v Speaker 1>you've made it clear that you're looking for you know,

0:50:28.480 --> 0:50:32.160
<v Speaker 1>very creator grouping companies. But is there you know, is

0:50:32.160 --> 0:50:33.799
<v Speaker 1>there a world where you would look at a more

0:50:33.840 --> 0:50:36.840
<v Speaker 1>traditional You know, there's some companies out there with a

0:50:36.880 --> 0:50:39.560
<v Speaker 1>few cable networks the studio. Is there any would you

0:50:39.600 --> 0:50:42.040
<v Speaker 1>play in those waters at all? I don't think so.

0:50:42.440 --> 0:50:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think. I definitely don't want to play in

0:50:43.960 --> 0:50:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the cable network waters. I just don't think that's a

0:50:46.000 --> 0:50:49.920
<v Speaker 1>viable model for UM, and we're not. We don't. I

0:50:49.920 --> 0:50:52.920
<v Speaker 1>don't like distribution brands as I like content brands, brands

0:50:52.920 --> 0:50:55.160
<v Speaker 1>that actually mean something about the content. We think Hell

0:50:55.160 --> 0:50:57.440
<v Speaker 1>of Sunshine is a great content brand. Moon Bug is

0:50:57.480 --> 0:50:59.520
<v Speaker 1>becoming a great content brand you want to get behind.

0:50:59.600 --> 0:51:02.640
<v Speaker 1>And we have a have a significant piece of Westbrook,

0:51:02.680 --> 0:51:05.719
<v Speaker 1>which Will Will Smith Company that to content brand. Will

0:51:05.760 --> 0:51:09.239
<v Speaker 1>and Jada have. Actually one of the most distinctive shows

0:51:09.280 --> 0:51:11.879
<v Speaker 1>to come out of Facebook is Jada's Written People, which

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:17.839
<v Speaker 1>is to all your point about authenticity, Yeah, I mean,

0:51:17.920 --> 0:51:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's great show. So look, we're I think the

0:51:21.200 --> 0:51:23.359
<v Speaker 1>answer to that would probably be no. We We are

0:51:23.520 --> 0:51:25.919
<v Speaker 1>focused on a couple of things. Creator driven companies where

0:51:25.960 --> 0:51:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the creator is front and center, a brand that arises

0:51:28.840 --> 0:51:31.000
<v Speaker 1>from that, because we want to transcend the individual creator

0:51:31.000 --> 0:51:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and get a brand that live beyond that that creator. Obviously,

0:51:34.200 --> 0:51:37.200
<v Speaker 1>but also that really speaks to a defined audience. Something

0:51:37.239 --> 0:51:39.600
<v Speaker 1>else to be Lord at Disney, know your audience and

0:51:39.640 --> 0:51:41.680
<v Speaker 1>speak to that audience and as a full way and

0:51:41.719 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 1>as a sort of a diverse way as you possibly can.

0:51:44.480 --> 0:51:47.360
<v Speaker 1>So we have you know, Hellos and China. It's it's

0:51:47.400 --> 0:51:51.400
<v Speaker 1>it's content um created and delivered by women for women audience.

0:51:51.680 --> 0:51:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Of course it's an inclusive audience appeals to a lot

0:51:54.239 --> 0:51:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of different people, but it's really by women for women.

0:51:56.760 --> 0:51:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Moonbug is kids um. I think, well you'll you'll can

0:52:00.000 --> 0:52:02.560
<v Speaker 1>he need to see us look at the very very

0:52:02.800 --> 0:52:05.400
<v Speaker 1>most premium content brands we can get or developed that

0:52:05.480 --> 0:52:07.640
<v Speaker 1>speech to certain audiences and then fill out the audience

0:52:07.680 --> 0:52:10.080
<v Speaker 1>map and then we'll then we think we'll be shaped

0:52:10.520 --> 0:52:12.400
<v Speaker 1>is Blackstone in for more? Do you have any of

0:52:12.400 --> 0:52:15.839
<v Speaker 1>the two billion left? I would imagine you probably that's

0:52:15.840 --> 0:52:18.600
<v Speaker 1>two billion thing I remember all came from the when

0:52:18.640 --> 0:52:21.799
<v Speaker 1>when Kevin and Tom started and started their company and

0:52:21.800 --> 0:52:24.720
<v Speaker 1>started going out there. I honestly I don't know variety

0:52:24.800 --> 0:52:26.880
<v Speaker 1>was the guilty of it. But the number two billion

0:52:26.960 --> 0:52:29.879
<v Speaker 1>that you guys had a billion dollar bankroll, well, let's

0:52:30.000 --> 0:52:32.359
<v Speaker 1>we've already deployed were setting the record straight here well,

0:52:32.680 --> 0:52:35.640
<v Speaker 1>there's been four billion dollars of assets that we pulled together.

0:52:37.160 --> 0:52:38.680
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I don't know. There's all sorts of

0:52:38.680 --> 0:52:41.480
<v Speaker 1>different you know, Blackstone from the fund, their own limited

0:52:41.480 --> 0:52:44.000
<v Speaker 1>partners in the fund can do sidecar investments. We've had

0:52:44.040 --> 0:52:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that you have some debt people. When we buy companies,

0:52:46.880 --> 0:52:49.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the things we insist on is they take

0:52:49.160 --> 0:52:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of equity in the new company as part

0:52:51.200 --> 0:52:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of their consideration for the purchase, because we want everyone

0:52:54.600 --> 0:52:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to have skin in the game for the entire company.

0:52:56.760 --> 0:53:00.640
<v Speaker 1>The best way to do that equity that crossed lateralizes

0:53:00.719 --> 0:53:03.279
<v Speaker 1>everything in the company. Everyone has commitments for them to

0:53:03.320 --> 0:53:05.839
<v Speaker 1>stay for a certain amount of time. Yeah, and then

0:53:05.920 --> 0:53:07.800
<v Speaker 1>when when you go public or get bought, probably I

0:53:07.800 --> 0:53:09.440
<v Speaker 1>think where our path is likely an I p O.

0:53:10.000 --> 0:53:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Then that equity becomes you know, has some real, real

0:53:13.640 --> 0:53:16.880
<v Speaker 1>monetize able value to it. But it's everyone rose in

0:53:16.920 --> 0:53:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the same direction. That's why equity so important. Thank you.

0:53:19.360 --> 0:53:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I would have felt bad if I hadn't asked you

0:53:20.840 --> 0:53:24.400
<v Speaker 1>about the the future I p O. Do you have

0:53:24.480 --> 0:53:26.480
<v Speaker 1>any kind of a timeline Do you think that that

0:53:27.080 --> 0:53:29.000
<v Speaker 1>for that happening and do you think is there all

0:53:29.040 --> 0:53:32.399
<v Speaker 1>their alternatives to going to an IPO route. Yeah, look,

0:53:32.400 --> 0:53:34.560
<v Speaker 1>we have We've built a company now that has the

0:53:34.600 --> 0:53:38.720
<v Speaker 1>scale and the financial um contours to actually go public

0:53:38.800 --> 0:53:40.759
<v Speaker 1>whenever we want to go public. At this point, I

0:53:40.760 --> 0:53:43.000
<v Speaker 1>would say the moon Bugs alternative to being bought by

0:53:43.080 --> 0:53:45.279
<v Speaker 1>us itself could have been a public company. And so

0:53:45.360 --> 0:53:48.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a very very the financial they're very robust. So

0:53:48.400 --> 0:53:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a matter of the markets being ready and we

0:53:51.040 --> 0:53:53.040
<v Speaker 1>us being ready as an organization to really want to

0:53:53.080 --> 0:53:56.840
<v Speaker 1>be public. Has you need some infrastructure, public company accounting

0:53:56.880 --> 0:53:59.640
<v Speaker 1>systems and you know, star box compliance and all that stuff,

0:53:59.640 --> 0:54:01.239
<v Speaker 1>and we have to get get into that mode. And

0:54:01.239 --> 0:54:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine also a couple of good hits and

0:54:04.320 --> 0:54:07.160
<v Speaker 1>not hurt. So you know, I think I don't want

0:54:07.160 --> 0:54:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to no specific timeframe, but it won't be many years

0:54:10.120 --> 0:54:12.319
<v Speaker 1>from now. It'll be sooner than that. I don't my

0:54:12.360 --> 0:54:15.759
<v Speaker 1>advices take a breather. Having gone from being public for

0:54:15.800 --> 0:54:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the last four years to being private again as of December,

0:54:18.719 --> 0:54:23.640
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of nice to be private. We have investors. Well,

0:54:23.680 --> 0:54:25.680
<v Speaker 1>you have to have some liquidity event of some sort,

0:54:25.719 --> 0:54:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's one way we can get being purchased another

0:54:29.080 --> 0:54:31.879
<v Speaker 1>possible outcome. It's not what we're angling towards. You don't

0:54:31.880 --> 0:54:34.480
<v Speaker 1>want to build a company to be to package it

0:54:34.520 --> 0:54:36.279
<v Speaker 1>to be sold. If you want to build it. We

0:54:36.280 --> 0:54:38.279
<v Speaker 1>want to build a company that can stand and live

0:54:38.320 --> 0:54:40.239
<v Speaker 1>and thrive in its own right. And you need the

0:54:40.280 --> 0:54:44.480
<v Speaker 1>fire in your belly to build. Yes, exactly there. Let

0:54:44.560 --> 0:54:46.840
<v Speaker 1>me press you again on in terms of Candle Media,

0:54:46.880 --> 0:54:49.239
<v Speaker 1>will you you you were born in a pandemic? Will

0:54:49.280 --> 0:54:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you add some you have physical office space at some point?

0:54:52.000 --> 0:54:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Will you have any kind of common infrastructure? Yeah? We will. Um.

0:54:57.840 --> 0:55:01.160
<v Speaker 1>We have you know, the Candle Media uh corporate and

0:55:01.280 --> 0:55:03.239
<v Speaker 1>we have I don't know six employees right now. We

0:55:03.280 --> 0:55:05.960
<v Speaker 1>have a little office on Sunset Boulevard is nice, which

0:55:05.960 --> 0:55:10.440
<v Speaker 1>sits geographic geographically in between the Moonbug offices in in

0:55:10.680 --> 0:55:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood and the Westwood offices of Hello Sunshine. So we

0:55:13.880 --> 0:55:16.480
<v Speaker 1>commute between the two. But look, we have big offices

0:55:16.480 --> 0:55:19.840
<v Speaker 1>in London for Moonbug. There's about the several hundred people

0:55:19.840 --> 0:55:22.800
<v Speaker 1>there we have you know, Hello Sunshine has a hundred

0:55:22.800 --> 0:55:26.279
<v Speaker 1>plus people. They're mostly in Westwood but in other parts too. Um.

0:55:26.360 --> 0:55:28.879
<v Speaker 1>So we have we have physical offices and we at

0:55:29.360 --> 0:55:32.600
<v Speaker 1>corporate if you will, um, we're pulling everything together. We

0:55:32.760 --> 0:55:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I think We have an interesting philosophy Tom Stags and I.

0:55:35.360 --> 0:55:37.440
<v Speaker 1>One is that if you buy a company that can

0:55:37.560 --> 0:55:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that has a capability that can be used across outside

0:55:40.440 --> 0:55:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of its company and to all the other brands that

0:55:42.000 --> 0:55:44.160
<v Speaker 1>we have, we're gonna use that. So here's an example.

0:55:44.719 --> 0:55:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Um Moonbike has this guy, Simon Phillips. He's the head

0:55:47.440 --> 0:55:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of licensing and merchandizing. He is probably the best executive

0:55:51.360 --> 0:55:52.640
<v Speaker 1>in the world. He was at Disney, he was at

0:55:52.640 --> 0:55:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Marvel when we be about Marvel. He was at Disney

0:55:54.640 --> 0:55:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and rand Emia for Disney when we when he was there.

0:55:57.719 --> 0:56:00.279
<v Speaker 1>When I first visited Moonbug, I saw Simon pill Ups,

0:56:00.280 --> 0:56:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't believe I didn't know who was there. So

0:56:02.239 --> 0:56:06.920
<v Speaker 1>he is the licensing merchandizing expert without parallel. And so

0:56:07.160 --> 0:56:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to the extent that we have licensing and merchandizing needs

0:56:09.760 --> 0:56:12.960
<v Speaker 1>in Hello Sunshine, and we also want the studio that

0:56:13.400 --> 0:56:17.719
<v Speaker 1>that that produces Fauda, that Netflix show, that bar Way

0:56:17.800 --> 0:56:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Road Pictures. That was a smaller person but a great one.

0:56:20.320 --> 0:56:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Those guys are awesome and they you know, to the

0:56:22.640 --> 0:56:24.839
<v Speaker 1>extent that they are less likely to have kind of

0:56:25.239 --> 0:56:28.560
<v Speaker 1>licensable characters because it's pretty gritty stuff. That they do.

0:56:28.960 --> 0:56:34.400
<v Speaker 1>But you know, but will Smith, I agree, it's incredible,

0:56:34.520 --> 0:56:37.360
<v Speaker 1>so so some insans will will be We'll be managing

0:56:37.480 --> 0:56:41.400
<v Speaker 1>all licensing and merchandising out of Moon bug Um. We

0:56:41.480 --> 0:56:43.920
<v Speaker 1>have a great distribution team at Hello Sunshine, so maybe

0:56:43.960 --> 0:56:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that will be the center of excellence for distribution for

0:56:46.200 --> 0:56:48.520
<v Speaker 1>everyone over. So it doesn't have to sit a corporate

0:56:48.560 --> 0:56:50.160
<v Speaker 1>for it to be a shared resource. I guess it

0:56:50.200 --> 0:56:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is my point. So corporate will never be massive, but

0:56:53.080 --> 0:56:55.040
<v Speaker 1>we all but we're going to tightly integrate all the

0:56:55.080 --> 0:56:59.400
<v Speaker 1>operations across businesses. Thank you everyone for sticking with us.

0:56:59.440 --> 0:57:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for all your insights, your candor. We really

0:57:01.880 --> 0:57:04.880
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Thank you Austin south By Southwest. This has

0:57:04.920 --> 0:57:15.719
<v Speaker 1>been a blast. Thanks for listening. Be sure to leave

0:57:15.800 --> 0:57:18.760
<v Speaker 1>us a review at Apple Podcast, and please go to

0:57:18.880 --> 0:57:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Variety dot com and sign up for varieties free Strictly

0:57:22.840 --> 0:57:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Business newsletter covering media earnings, financial and investment news and more.

0:57:28.600 --> 0:57:31.520
<v Speaker 1>And as always, be sure to tune in next week

0:57:31.760 --> 0:57:34.680
<v Speaker 1>for another episode of Strictly Business. Ye